TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lethatis Archive

View 18 posts and 301 comments by lethatis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
288

Discriminationlethatis/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:30 AM
67

Intactivismlethatis/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:00 AM
51

lethatis/r/PussyPass16/01/15 05:15 PM
41

lethatis/r/PussyPass16/12/14 07:40 PM
25

Edu./Occu.lethatis/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:31 AM
21

Discriminationlethatis/r/MensRights20/09/15 02:03 AM
21

Blogs/Videolethatis/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:20 PM
11

Opinionlethatis/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:01 AM
5

lethatis/r/MensRights09/12/14 03:34 PM
4

Questionlethatis/r/MensRights31/12/14 11:31 PM
4

Feminismlethatis/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:36 AM
4

lethatis/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:04 PM
4

Newslethatis/r/MensRights05/01/15 09:51 PM
2

lethatis/r/PussyPass01/10/15 01:22 AM
2

lethatis/r/MensRights19/12/14 05:15 AM
1

lethatis/r/MensRights09/12/14 01:36 PM
1

lethatis/r/MensRights26/09/15 07:58 AM
0

lethatis/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/15 09:24 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Different feminist. They all have said or done something monstrous like this if you look hard enough.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 02:44 PM
6

Stress has negative health consequences. After what this kid has been through, I'm not surprised about this.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:04 AM
3

Next time, record everything on you smartphone.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:13 AM
1

archive.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 09:21 PM
5

It's Jessica Roy! That stench!
/r/MensRights23/10/15 06:03 PM
7

It comes two days after Marc Lepine Day, which is essentially a feminist bonanza where they work one another into a smug, self-congratulating, victim status mongering tizzy over how evil and violent men are. The sobering (and actually real) fact you presented could be a great opportunity to dilute and coopt that nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:49 AM
2

There are plenty of other cafes in TO to support, such as "I Deal Coffee", which has been attacked by SJWs. Publicize the name of this place and don't go there any day of the week.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:07 PM
15

Walk in and order. When they say it's woman and trans only, tell them that it's not their place to decide what gender you are, and that they will not be seeing inside your pants. walk away, then sue the living shit out of them. FTFY
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:00 PM
2

Five minutes of my life I will never get back.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:54 AM
1

that's what they claim.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:48 AM
8

Hope he doesn't settle.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:11 PM
2

Trudeau has said half of his cabinet ministers will be women. This is the headline here. Quotas are being implemented. Let's hope this doesn't lead to more gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 10:44 PM
2

Congrats! Now let's see if they follow through.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 01:38 AM
2

She knows what she's doing. She knows that her writing is inflammatory and that comments increase page views. And on some level, she knows that what she is saying is a lie.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 12:01 AM
1

The real question is will she be charged?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/10/15 10:53 AM
1

On twitter she says that her personal video diaries are going to be a big part of the film, where she makes use of the "red pill" terminology
/r/MensRights17/10/15 04:41 PM
3

People can mature and gain knowledge over time.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 05:49 AM
1

lots of astroturfing (cf. Ann Gus, /pol/ pranks, Joshua Goldberg, etc.) keep challenging their narrative, they are bound to react (evidence this is already happening: the "ironic misandry" meme) frame ourselves as the vanguard, the feminists as the backlash (especially when they try to shut us down) There's more, let me think about it. Another thought: as a social scientist, you can also add questions in your studies pertaining to men's issues, which could potentially be interpreted by others in…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 07:53 PM
1

Academics do maintain a modicum of autonomy ;) In the Humanities, at least, they seem to take a certain pride in opposing the mainstream. Maybe all it will take is to convince them of that. Also it needs to become obvious that feminism has jumped the shark culturally. Encourage the Jezebelification of popular-feminism, and reinforce the association between the underlying feelings that produce it and its negative features.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:55 PM
7

Is it addressed to women?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:13 PM
1

Right now, counter-feminist opinions are dismissed in the elite mainstream with the implicit assumption that feminist opinions are morally correct. This is why argumentation and the dissemination of information is so important. Do you have any suggestions for obtaining some better kind of toehold in academia, OP? One suggestion I can offer is to provide moral support and whatever other help one can to those scholars who are already dissenting against the narrative. What else?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:02 PM
39

Be sure to document every instance of this harassment. This could lead to administrative consequences for the feminist group and its members (what they're doing is probably against the CoC), could lead to de-listing or expulsion. If they're made to understand this, that threat could act as a deterrent. Step 2 down the road is convincing the administration to pay all security costs, if they decide to incur them, but that's another story. Good luck!
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:13 PM
3

Nice try, Clem. I say, who cares? All it does is expose their bigotry (despite their protestations). Don't give them any views. Edit: I listened to a bit of it. The only interesting part is where one of them admits that they are lying when they claim that feminism helps men (and uses the term "lie"). Aside from that, my only observation is that these women categorically lack any charm or wit whatsoever, so it's no wonder they're so bitter.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 02:37 PM
1

Some transparency regarding why funds are needed ATM would be useful. She seems to have completed many other projects in the interim. Not sure what the big hold up with this one is.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 04:37 AM
2

I don't like the idea behind paying for something like this. I feel it compromises journalistic integrity. It's also kindof like blackmail in a way (want one potentially accurate representation of your movement? ok, maybe, but pay us $100k first!).
/r/MensRights12/10/15 09:12 PM
2

MGM. personal pet issues on /r/mensrights?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:10 PM
2

The DV stat is certainly false. Ask for references. Ask them if it would be ok to have an ad featuring only natives/ black or whatever, if the crime stats reflected that.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:07 PM
-2

You think genital mutilation is unimportant?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:05 PM
5

We now know that Phillips decided to take matters into his own hands when a family member was sexually assaulted. He wrongly identified Andreas' home outside Truro as the address where the man who had carried out the assault lived. White knighting and violence in the service of women. Who'd have guessed?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 10:16 AM
2

Sounds cool, but from that post, I have no idea what you're working on and why it will be significant.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 07:36 AM
0

Can't tell from the pic if he's cut or intact.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 06:42 AM
9

If what it takes to overturn these laws is having them be applied to feminist bigots too, than so be it. It's a bad law, but it's worse if it only targets one group.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 06:48 AM
3

Wow, the math in that headline is a doozy. Outrageous
/r/MensRights07/10/15 11:31 PM
1

Genius. This is the way forward.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 08:54 AM
10

That's so ridiculous, when in fact, the actual stats show the reverse by a WIDE margin.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 06:12 AM
2

both
/r/MensRights07/10/15 04:33 AM
9

He's also pro-MGM. Nails it on some sociological issues, and is terribly entertaining, though. Oh well, nobody's perfect
/r/MensRights06/10/15 03:05 PM
2

Ooh, feminist infighting. Yay!
/r/MensRights06/10/15 02:19 PM
6

To add to existing replies: Gynocentrism: women's concerns matter most Girls must be protected, boys are disposable. Some women claim to prefer their sex partners cut. So they cut their baby sons, despite presumably not intending to have their son as a sex partner. Mothers are ignorant about penile anatomy. Fathers don't want to admit that they were harmed Social conformity & inertia. Has been around for a long time (FGM never caught on) and is a profitable industry. Fathers feel an (unconscious…
/r/MensRights06/10/15 01:58 PM
1

Also why male feminists are usually the ugliest bottom feeding greasy scrubs. They want to cut down the competition to size
/r/MensRights06/10/15 11:52 AM
1

and of course, it would never occur to her to ask how to raise a happy confident boy
/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:39 AM
3

http://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2015/09/30/feminist-backlash-against-the-censors-shows-tide-turning-in
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:09 AM
1

We should be doing everything possible to stir this pot.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 04:08 AM
2

The irony that is escaping these harridans is that many clinics already require the wife's permission for a man to get a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 03:22 PM
2

No special section --- underrepresentation, suppression Special section --- a 'ghetto'
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:45 PM
2

if you controlled for IQ women would actually be the ones that are overrepresented. Unquestionably true. Everyone knows this on some level, and, as a consequence, it would be taboo to actually conduct such a study.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 12:49 AM
1

Use archive next time
/r/MensRights03/10/15 08:58 PM
1

Record and document everything. Perhaps you can make this the basis for a title 9 complaint
/r/MensRights03/10/15 09:09 AM
-4

That's way too general to be interesting. I'm gonna assume the article is like that too.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 09:06 AM
2

tl;dr?
/r/MensRights03/10/15 08:43 AM
5

Pretty rude response considering it's coming from a supposed etiquette expert.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 12:50 PM
1

It played into it as a factor, IMO
/r/PussyPass01/10/15 09:34 PM
3

Could you explain why you think this, please? I would think that population growth is limited by the female population, since a limited number of males can still "get around".
/r/MensRights29/09/15 08:58 AM
2

Female circumcision is illegal, and far less prevalent across the world. It's a gender issue.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 04:56 AM
1

sauce?
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:16 PM
2

It is the point. If your gov't is censoring the internet, you have a duty to fight that, instead of just lying down and taking it.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:08 PM
1

you can use google to get the original link from the archive url
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:43 PM
8

Some incisive political analysis you got there, vice.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:23 AM
1

The 'performance' part means she dropped the case. She didn't pay. Still PP
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/15 10:09 AM
7

liquify your assets and just leave the country.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 01:19 PM
4

Gynocentrism in action
/r/MensRights23/09/15 01:17 PM
1

So the tl;dr is Elam is making AVFM a pay site? I find the whole thing with that latest video to be really distasteful, offputting, and counterproductive. He seems to want to be the dictator of the MRM, but has shown himself to have really bad judgement. He also lacks the ability to move off of a gaffe, and is just making things a million times worse. The whole MGTOW war and other recent drama is also inexplicable and in extremely poor form. It's like feminist cointel agents are trying to create…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 02:38 PM
12

He should have demanded to be moved to first class
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:32 AM
2

Correct, this bias is why I archived it. OTH, putting this spin on it might be the only way to get the info past the censors.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 04:37 AM
1

I created it (so someone hostile won't squat on the name), but I hope someone else will want to take over the main modding responsibilities.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 09:35 AM
2

Good info about the feeling of intact vs restored. Don't agree with the conspiracy stuff he was hinting at, though
/r/MensRights19/09/15 03:32 AM
4

"men" is not a rate of representation.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:24 PM
3

Under-represented compared to what?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:09 PM
2

Don't call ANYBODY!! *catwalk strut*
/r/MensRights18/09/15 01:32 AM
1

"Helping dang dirty MALES" is wrong.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:45 PM
0

The judge thanked jurors for their "careful consideration" of the case and said it would present a "difficult sentencing exercise". IOW, "how can I implement the /r/pussypass legally?"
/r/MensRights16/09/15 12:59 AM
9

How the fuck is this such a big story? Also she got the details wrong, the post was from several months ago. It was only recently that some snowflake make a stink about it.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:32 AM
3

Vibrators, et al. are technically sex robots
/r/MensRights15/09/15 07:41 AM
1

Yet another example of abuse which contradicts the feminist narrative.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:30 AM
1

This is a replay of the USU situation with Anita Sarkeesian (recall there was a false flag threat posted, and she cancelled her talk there, even though she was informed that the alleged threat was not credible).
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:06 AM
-1

Maximum cuckface
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:07 AM
1

Did you miss all the crude sex insults? Just for the sake of argument, Valenti had recently published an article lamenting that she no longer received male attention, so that topic was on the table as a public conversation. I think it was a bit of a crude mode of discussion, however. My personal response to that proposition would be merely an "as if!".
/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:02 AM
12

It's upsetting that they just credulously repeat the accusation in order to smear MRAs
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:31 AM
2

There are people who have set up bots like that. Get in touch with one of them on other subs (like /r/kotakuinaction)
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:55 AM
4

Thanks, keep up the good work!
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:13 AM
8

I want to harangue and abuse an innocent man by lying about my case! You call me out on this? Waaahhhhh!
/r/MensRights13/09/15 06:21 AM
-1

I'll take that as a "no".
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:04 AM
1

It doesn't say in the article, but it's obvious if you read the threat. Almost identical to the USU threat against Anita Sarkeesian last year
/r/MensRights12/09/15 10:46 PM
-1

Do you know what "irony" means? lol.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 09:16 PM
5

It appears I am now reading The Guard-feed. A fitting change.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 09:07 AM
1

"dude", and it sure sounds like a fake.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:18 AM
1

all over reddit atm, look for it yourself
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:03 AM
180

The Nicole Doucet Ryan case is a bit old, but it is demonstrative of the way the legal system in Canada values men vs. women. They had her dead to rights (open and shut case), but prosecution stopped because they believed that she had "been through enough".
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:42 AM
2

Here is the posting in question. https://web.archive.org/web/20150905225050/http://www.blogto.com/city/2015/09/what_university_campuses_used_to_look_like_in_toronto/ The only thing missing from that is talking about how the threatener is sexually frustrated, and can't handle all those beautiful, strong, independent wymyn who wont take him. Why do institutions fall for this nonsense?
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:33 AM
7

My wife wants me to do a pyscho-sexual evaluation to prove I didn't do it. I've asked what happens when it comes back that I'm normal and she can't comprehend that it would come back normal because our 3 year old couldn't have possibly made it up. The point about the evaluation shows she's already turned against you. Not worth pining over somebody that disloyal. But she does seem right about the idea not just popping into the child's head ex nihilo. If it's a 3 year old saying it, she must have …
/r/MensRights11/09/15 01:45 PM
3

Quite right, my apologies.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:39 AM
19

WTF. What does FPSF stand for?
/r/MensRights10/09/15 09:02 PM
4

BTFO (but ever so politely)
/r/MensRights10/09/15 04:23 PM
2

Direct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPy3YVgIZrM
/r/MensRights10/09/15 04:21 PM
2

Holy shit that fat Maatz woman making faces and rustling papers.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:49 PM
6

It shouldn’t be a surprise that I’m not fond of comments sections. I think you’d be hard-pressed to find many female writers who are. How dare these uppity males disagree with me! The nerve. Only my feelings matter!
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:04 PM
2

The data I've seen shows that the difference in mean intelligence is insignificant. It is well demonstrated, however that the standard deviation is higher for men across widely different populations. Meaning, given a population with intelligence above a threshold that's above the mean, you will get a larger proportion of men, and the higher the threshold, the higher the proportion.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:53 PM
3

How was she able to get a career spouting that kind of nonsense? I like how she's obsessed with MRAs. All publicity is good publicity.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:57 AM
4

There's always somebody. It boggles my mind.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:53 AM
5

Wikipedia is a failed experiment That's not quite right, there is a tremendous amount of value in Wikipedia, it just has systematic (and perhaps fundamental) problems in the way it's organized and run.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:40 AM
2

Yeah, this seems like just a really shitty joke. Men are considered disposable and expendable, and they don't typically get consideration for their well-being, so that always needs to be kept in mind. However, if that were not the case, this would not be a big deal.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:01 AM
0

if the topic of circumcision arises, I find out they prefer it cut to uncut You think women don't lie. They just tell you what they think you want to hear.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:23 AM
1

Oh, man, lawsuit time!
/r/MensRights10/09/15 01:14 AM
11

Fair enough, but don't perpetuate the practice
/r/MensRights09/09/15 04:53 AM
1

There's an older submission with the original link, give that a click too. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3k2ckg/why_does_speaking_out_about_the_issues_men_face/
/r/MensRights08/09/15 05:27 PM
2

Good on the judge Uh, no, she was covering her ass. Then she went right out and said "sorry you're offended". Another slap in the face.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 06:01 AM
2

Well, perhaps you can use this as the basis for an appeal if you lose the case. The posters were clearly biasing and prejudicing the court, and the opinions offered by that judge show that she her opinions are biased as well.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 05:59 AM
2

wut
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:35 PM
2

Ok, so what should they de doing instead, smart guy?
/r/MensRights06/09/15 09:15 AM
8

I wouldn't have done it that way, but I see their point, and it is a good one.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 04:35 AM
17

They tried to frame the other child for a murder they committed. They are a danger to the surviving child.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 04:16 AM
7

Disagree. This is a topic that is too easily ignored. I do think that some of the things they said were over the top and overly hectoring, but people respond to emotions more than arguments. Don't forget that circumcision is perpetuated due to emotions. Also, the point is not necessarily to convince the circumcisers. Similar to how we don't debate feminists without an audience.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:58 AM
2

Would something similar apply to Vaslagel?
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:15 AM
3

She's NPD. She really doesn't care beyond her own feelings.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:13 AM
2

Why did they publish that? What a horrible woman. Everything's all about her. No wonder he killed himself.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:11 AM
3

The Guardian has a high prestige level for some reason.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:41 AM
2

There's room for all different kinds of activism. There's no one true way.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:38 AM
3

The bail part is fine decision aside, the crime is still horrific. And all too common. This should be prosecuted as a hate crime.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:10 AM
5

That comment is definitely way off, IMO. I think circumcision is a form of child sexual abuse, so 'pedophile' is pretty close to the truth.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:08 AM
2

Does anyone know of any sexual assault accusation cases from that school?
/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:57 PM
2

Instead of looking at the negatives and going with the circlejerk, why don't you look at the positives? Jerking is now way harder? hm
/r/MensRights05/09/15 06:19 AM
2

Spoiler: no.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 12:00 AM
2

This is the kind of case the ACLU should be taking on, instead of bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 09:31 PM
2

Frankly, you have no idea what you're talking about. Wikipedia info on circ is widely controlled by pro circumcisionists. The clitoris extends far into the body, and women with even the worst forms of FGM can often still have orgasms. And circ'd men have far less sensitivity, less satisfying orgasms, and the mechanics of sex are changed to make things less natural and enjoyable for both partners. Sorry dude, but sex wise, you'll never know what you're missing. It's like night and day.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 09:29 PM
2

You're missing the point. It's really the same practice in essence, even though the two sexes have different genitalia.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:57 PM
1

They are done for the same "reasons". Every culture that practices FGM also practices MGM. Food for thought.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 08:46 PM
43

And "feminazi" is an extreme exaggeration?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 04:24 PM
7

You're both missing the bigger picture. The more medicalized it becomes, the more entrenched it will be as a practice. Whether it's done by a doctor or some religious nut, it still causes great harm, so it's not any better.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 03:26 PM
-1

This is a step backwards. Better to have a cleric do it than to try to legitimize it as a medical procedure.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 11:24 AM
5

The standards are the same as they have always been, and she is fully qualified under them--- her parents are loaded.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 11:18 AM
1

don't call it "reverse sexism" that plays into their ideology, and is a strawman characterization. There's no such thing as the "reverse" of sexism. "sexism against men", or "anti-male bias/ discrimination/ bigotry", "misandry", etc. are preferable.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 07:48 AM
6

https://archive.is/R3WLy Use archive for shit like this. Funny how now there's such a push to deny men any reproductive control whatsoever all of a sudden. Curious indeed.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 07:09 AM
2

It's almost like this issue has nothing to do with gender.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 06:26 PM
3

People like Dunham don't like the mirror. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:56 PM
3

How about STFU and just pay us more?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 03:15 AM
1

sickening
/r/MensRights01/09/15 03:48 PM
1

This is the most delicious kind of poetic justice. Interesting what they said about South Korea (banning sex screening, and other draconian measures). South Korea also has an extremely high male circumcision rate. It's almost as if the US is exporting its misandry there.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 01:47 AM
0

They got the definition of "SJW" wrong. Furthermore, their choice of words to include is, shall we say, questionable, and overly confined to one area of internet discourse. Most of these words will prove to have been ephemeral.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 06:44 AM
1

This is some of the stupidest nonsense I've ever read.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:47 AM
1

https://archive.is/m0SME
/r/MensRights22/08/15 06:52 PM
0

Good. Divide and conquer. This should be encouraged as much as possible. Same with other feminist controversies such as sex negative/positive, or the TERF war.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 06:47 AM
0

How dare you mansplain to that wonderful, strong independent womyn who don't need no man! Go flagellate in the corner until you've learned your lesson.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 06:45 AM
5

Working link to original article https://archive.is/olrpQ
/r/MensRights20/08/15 04:09 AM
3

The legal system was biased in favor of the female perpetrator, and against the male victims. Also, gynocentrism and the current misandrist media environment makes it easier to conceive of this type of atrocity. Furthermore, we already mutilate our boys as a matter of course, so killing them is only a small step further.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:38 PM
2

If they would have gotten in without the quota, than there is no need for a quota.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 10:17 PM
1

Archive everything, but post the original links to pro-male articles.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:23 AM
19

Don't support him, support his rights.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 07:16 PM
5

It could literally be attempted murder. The freaks celebrating over Roosh's assault by a mob of SJWs have many times suggested igniting the alcohol. Mens rea is satisfied, regardless of the flammability of the specific fluid. Furthermore, if someone throws it at you, you have no way of knowing what liquid it is, and would be fully justified in defending yourself. Conclusion: do not throw drinks at anyone, regardless of the TV cliche. It's serious stuff.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:50 AM
4

Another disgusting example of feminists lying, attempting to censor, and levelling false accusations. They are now falsely accusing him of sending threats and posting revenge porn. If you care about men or free speech, you should be supporting him.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:29 AM
1

This is really insightful stuff. We can learn a lot from this guy.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:08 PM
8

Neither of them comes off well from that. If she had had a good lawyer, she would have taken him to the cleaners, though.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:59 PM
1

Generally, you can apply, and if rejected you can sue and likely get a few k out of it.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:47 PM
1

Mensrights contributors should get an invite chain going.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:30 PM
5

There's some optimistic thinking for ya!
/r/MensRights05/08/15 03:49 PM
10

She has the gall to pout like that. Wtf.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:36 PM
1

Well, I disagree with that, but really it's better to address the arguments, and not the person. Nobody is 100% right on every single issue.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:47 AM
4

Milo is so dashing.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 11:45 AM
32

Reverse genders, and it is considered rape most everywhere. Each of -intoxication -coercion -deception -absence of affirmative consent has been proposed as a sufficient reason for rape to occur, and this has them all.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:15 PM
2

Because misandry is still socially acceptable. Our society sees no problem with the denigration and hatred of men. In the same way that people in the American South more than 60 years ago saw no moral problem with printing anti-black racism, and the 1930s era German public approved of anti-semitism, people now just don't consider men as a class worthy of equal consideration as human beings. As for the prevalence of such rhetoric, there are a lot of factors that contribute in addition to lack of …
/r/MensRights12/04/15 01:56 AM
1

I don't get it.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:41 AM
2

On the bright side, now more people know what feminists mean when they say "victim-blaming".
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:38 AM
2

A question: You use the term "aggrieved entitlement" to refer to the attitude that MRAs hold with regard to pursuing rights for all men. Could not the same description be applied to any other historical "social justice movement" such as the civil rights movement of the 1960's, worker's rights movement, and even women's rights? If not, what's the distinction? Furthermore, there is the insinuation in the use of this phrase that both the grievances and the demand for rights are somehow illegitimate…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:56 PM
3

Wow, BTFO after by Senator Anne Cools. What a bigoted interviewer. Then they cut her off and played music rather than let her get her last point in. This should be noted and spread around From /r/kotakuinaction 's experience, we should realize that if we want anything to happen based on this, we need to complain to the CRTC on the basis of factual inaccuracy, and that there is a time limit for doing this. Here's a thread for reference. www.np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2ygp13/wu_hoo_th…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:07 PM
3

This article proves why this campaign is so necessary.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:09 PM
3

That's a completely inept response. If anyone cared about discrimination against men, they'd be in serious shit right now.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 11:31 PM
6

How many times can one author contradict herself in a single article?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:48 PM
8

On the contrary, IMO she is the raw id of feminism laid bare. She just lacks the same power of dissimulation that most women seem to have. She is a great example of how feminists can really be like when their guard has been lowered. There are many equally awful feminist writers such as marcotte and valenti, but they are not as articulate, and do not express their awfulness quite as succinctly or clearly.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:46 PM
9

I think it is important to include MRA voices and allow MRA oversight in such an endeavor, to guard against misandry, feminist ideological creep, bullying, indoctrination, and other abuses.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:53 AM
4

Bodily autonomy for me, but not for thee.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 11:32 PM
12

Not sure I trust the mod at the moment, it might be a good idea to have a different subverse from a verified long-time user on reddit.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 04:01 PM
3

It's a shame what happened to him, but parents have too much power over their children's medical care as it is. From kooky religious practices (faith healing, refusing treatment for various superstitions, etc.), to weird fads like anti-vaxxing, and of course, the prime offender: circumcision, these are all horrendous practices enabled by giving parents too much power over their children.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:02 AM
1

report it to archive.today, and maybe it will start working
/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:51 AM
5

Salon loads the second part of the page using javascript when you scroll down, maybe the archive team will fix it if it gets reported. Here's the rest. Not worth reading IMO, just the usual blather. And so on and so forth. While interpretations of the ad as misandrist and unfunny have neither been the only nor most dominant responses, they highlight a pretty common misconception of how sexism tends to work — one common enough that we’ve talked about it in its different and very grave iterations …
/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:33 AM
1

How can I be this smart?
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:32 AM
1

m!
/r/MensRights01/02/15 07:30 AM
1

The feminist agenda puts promoting a belief in "rape culture" above promoting misandry in priority.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 10:45 AM
1

Not nearly as funny as the huge boost they've given to sales. It was in the top 20 feminist theory books for quite a while following the campaign (and various other top 20s too). It seems to have been removed from that category. Feminists need their hugbox, I guess.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:11 AM
4

I don't understand this story, sorry.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:25 AM
1

Absolutely terrible article. 100% libel.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:57 AM
6

Trans men face a lot of the same issues that adult males do, certainly, if they 'pass' successfully. Read "Self Made Man" by Norah Vincent for one example of this. However, it must be borne in mind that they still have benefited in many ways from being female, for instance having the right to genital integrity, and having favorable treatment as children, in addition to the healthcare benefits stemming from being female. The MRM is probably the most demographically diverse social movements in his…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 12:55 AM
1

Well, at the end of the day, the decision is down to the mother.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:38 PM
0

? Circumcised or not?
/r/MensRights24/01/15 07:21 PM
2

Cut or uncut?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:36 PM
3

Well, good for you, but that has 0 relevance to the topic.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 10:19 PM
1

The male experience is typically reduced and reshaped in most mainstream media. This breaks that mould, apparently.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:36 PM
2

Haven't seen it, but you must be on to something, as feminists have been complaining it's not about a girl instead.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 03:34 PM
2

Medical professionals do not encounter a random sample of patients with penis problems. The overwhelming majority of boys do not have these problems, so you never see them.
/r/MensRights19/01/15 09:49 AM
12

Elizabeth Sheehy, vice-dean of research at the University of Ottawa and an expert on women and the law In fact, she is a radical feminist who advocates for the right of a woman to kill a man without facing any penalty (really!)
/r/MensRights19/01/15 08:53 AM
3

The comparison to Rosa Parks is an apt one, ironically. In fact, I propose MRAs get together to organize a "spread-in", but kinda make it a joke.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:46 AM
1

Did it say what the database would be of specifically? Is this for making accusations against specific people?
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:43 AM
1

That's the student council's opinion, macleans would not actually say that, but arguably they're trying to insinuate it in a weaselly way
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:41 AM
1

what do you mean by "members"? How would you respond to claims from the media that they're a hate group? What claims?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 01:37 AM
0

Wow, dat rationalization.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 11:56 PM
1

correct. OP needs to rewrite the petition. There are about 10,000 other reasons to drop her first before needing to resort to the 'slag' thing, so why even mention it?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 02:13 AM
7

It will only get worse with time.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:19 PM
2

Well, that's yet another reason to meet that call
/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:16 PM
2

Documents like that usually have gender neutral phrasing these days.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:47 PM
0

/s, of course
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:35 PM
0

Read the FAQ
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:12 PM
10

his client will start counselling at a women’s shelter soon. What a disgusting injustice. What about the rights of the victim, the man she falsely accused?
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:19 PM
0

Yeah, I'll bet that's exactly what they intended when they wrote it. Surely.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:16 PM
0

If you haven't already read his book, you should. It's a gem.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:34 AM
1

It means they dun goofed. You lost?
/r/MensRights08/01/15 03:38 AM
2

While I don't think private conversations will remain private (that ship sailed long ago), they must remain protected legally. I agree, but this is unlikely to happen in Canada, whose constitution explicitly omits freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 01:22 AM
61

you should first verify that they take calls from males seriously.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 08:40 PM
1

JB = just based
/r/MensRights05/01/15 07:37 PM
3

"i don't like him, therefore he doesn't deserve any rights" This is exactly what we are trying to fight against. All accused deserve the presumption of innocence in public opinion as well as legally. Hopefully his response will change the way that these charges are flung around willy-nilly. Not to mention that he is almost certainly innocent, but I'm sure you don't care about that.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 07:05 PM
11

They essentially had a gang of feminists, supported by the government to go after them. This does not look like justice to me.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 05:40 AM
3

Exactly. The MRM has a few things to learn from GG. Boycotts and email campaigns are a very effective tactic.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 05:37 AM
-6

Hope to see you at the picket line for the next MRA protest..... oh, right.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 11:46 PM
14

What she doesn’t focus on is Lee. She isn’t truly trying to achieve justice for Lee and her family. The feminist definition of "justice" is doing anything which hurts a man or men as a whole. Real justice means due process for the accused, and avoiding false convictions, above all else.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:01 PM
2

That's actually supporting what I said.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:44 AM
3

I mean I looked up foreplay vs sex for lesbians. Making the distinction is BS.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 07:30 AM
4

Stupid article could at least have a picture of the painting.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:12 AM
3

Looked it up, was as I thought: nobody really has a good answer, AKA: it's a bullshit concept.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 05:10 AM
5

define "full blown sex" vs. foreplay for 2 women.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 02:06 AM
1

we wound up having full blown sex. uh... wut
/r/MensRights01/01/15 11:20 PM
2

She's not intended to be a mouthpiece (?)
/r/MensRights01/01/15 09:47 PM
7

His bravery brings the upboats and m'ladies to the yard.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 04:39 AM
1

That should be a question of the child's rights. Reread my comment.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 03:13 AM
9

Watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc Then retain a lawyer.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 12:01 AM
3

"Pro-life" as applied to the abortion debate is an unfortunate red herring that prevents honest discussion of men's rights. A lot of this stuff just gives ammunition to feminists in order to give them more excuses to trample on men's rights. Also life/choice is a false dichotomy, with the former being a thinly veiled religious doctrine, and the latter being a gynocentric grab for ownership over the bodies of children. The real debate should be over the rights of the children who are born. Their …
/r/MensRights31/12/14 11:42 PM
2

(Spoilers: ) Concepts like IRL blocking, surveillance implants, outlawing PUA, widespread cuckolding, lack of due process for men in conflicts with women, women's outsize entitlement, etc. are all very interesting. It seems like we are not far off. I think we need a bill of privacy/ information civil rights to prevent such things from becoming reality (and really, we're not far off as it is).
/r/MensRights31/12/14 11:35 PM
1

They use Jezebel and thedailydot as sources, kinda undermines their credibility....
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:36 PM
2

She needs to escalate this up higher on twitter. Maybe she should look into getting verified.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 03:07 AM
1

I see.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:34 AM
2

Hold your celebration for when someone with influence says it.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:09 AM
7

They avoid seeing by turning a blind eye. On the bright side, their rhetoric is starting to acknowledge the problem, which is a small concession at least. This is why we need to keep up the pressure.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:47 AM
1

wut
/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:44 AM
2

My major concern would be if there was a bias What if there was a bias in the other direction?
/r/MensRights28/12/14 09:01 PM
5

Interestingly, her Patreon is now in direct violation of thier community guidelines (particularly, her stance and history with doxing). Maybe "MRA"s should start reporting her.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:47 PM
6

A significant portion of the intactivist movement (which is technically separate from the MRM, although you can't really be a good MRA without supporting it) is led by Jews, often framing arguments within that specific cultural context. Presumably, they are not being anti-semitic or self-hating. It is strictly an issue of human rights being a point of conflict with tradition (the rights of the child supersede the rites of the parents*). Also it should be noted that it does not single out Jews, a…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 11:51 PM
3

Only argue with feminists if there is an audience.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 07:17 PM
28

Do not bang. Also, I don't believe the "pity" comment, it's just an attempt to sound superior without any good argument.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 05:40 AM
5

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-group_homogeneity
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:51 AM
6

It's called outgroup homogeneity.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 12:47 AM
11

two "0"s good video
/r/MensRights25/12/14 08:40 PM
34

https://archive.today/WZfHN The desperation is showing. We must be doing something right.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 08:17 PM
1

Those videos are terrible. On an equal platform, they will lose. Although more MRA growth and youtube channels will always be a welcome addition.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 02:46 PM
1

Maybe someone should report it to local police.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 04:29 PM
11

TW: Marcotte archive that shit. I find it funny how the whole "due process for rape accused" = "conspiracy theory" is not sticking in any way whatsoever, yet she keeps trying with it. Salty feminist tears are the best.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:50 PM
1

Potential sampling problems, but seems plausible nonetheless. Very interesting.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:18 AM
5

Who says feminists can't take a joke?
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:19 AM
2

It's funny because they think MRAs are just like feminists (who brought us "womyn" and "herstory" and "ovular", and.... decades ago)
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:48 PM
2

Written by disgraced feminist Charles Clymer. He got destroyed in a debate with Paul Elam last year, it was pretty funny.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 01:57 AM
1

Yeah but what if ... and how do you even know for sure that you haven't?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:56 AM
1

I'm not sure, obstruction of justice, "mischief", defamation, vexatious something or other.... There has to be something. Are you saying that any random person can get some nonsense tagged to your name forever, just by telling a tall tale to the police?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:50 AM
1

Is there any way to get the accuser charged? What if police write a report, but there is no arrest?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:42 AM
1

Can you sue for legal costs afterwards? would it appear in a criminal records database/ “non-conviction” record? If so, how to get it expunged?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:37 AM
1

revoke -> *invoke? Then what?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:33 AM
1

What is the best course of action for someone who has been falsely accused?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:30 AM
68

She speaks as though children are the property of their mothers
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:51 PM
18

Gay men are the new straight men, haven't you been reading Tumblr lately?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:27 PM
1

Be sure to make it clear in comment sections, that we have called for action on this very problem before, but our cries were not heard, merely because of gender prejudice.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:15 AM
6

The headline, and tone of article is another pussy pass. And a significant one, considering the critical reading skills of the general public.
/r/PussyPass17/12/14 02:13 PM
3

At least some feminists are acknowledging some of the glaring inconsistencies in the narrative here. However, there is still too much hair splitting and hedging to really merit approval. (same with the past two episodes of "The Newsroom", and most of the commentary on the UVA rape hoax this week).
/r/MensRights17/12/14 12:11 PM
2

That friend's name? Albert Einstein.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 05:34 PM
3

The same tired old feminist lies and cliches. Reading this article is watching cognitive dissonance in action.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:06 AM
6

What they will find is a clear look into the molten core of a certain mind-set, a place where conspiracies are legion, victims are portrayed as perpetrators and so-called news is a fig leaf on a far darker art. Massive irony fail
/r/MensRights15/12/14 12:24 PM
15

Archive: https://archive.today/OMfrw Watson is absolutelydisgusting.jpg I wonder if she has a reddit account? If so, needs to get reported.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 04:26 AM
2

Did he actually say that he wasn't going through with the court case?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:05 AM
1

It does, thanks. Glad these clowns are getting BTFO. I wonder if that will have any effect on the final report, though.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:58 AM
9

This is only the first shot of the first battle. There have been some heartening signs in the media, yes, but there is still so much more to do. We must be relentless.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:04 AM
1

disgusting
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:29 AM
6

This sounds trivial, however, it is crucially important to push back against these people whenever they say things like this. They need to know they can't smear others with impunity. Every time a story like this gets spread, hopefully one of these harridans will think twice before ragingly exercising her female privilege to hurt someone out of mere spite.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 02:27 AM
13

So privileged, your voice gets ignored automatically.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:43 PM
7

He needs to sue. If he settles it will be no victory for the falsely accused.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 09:13 PM
3

Just raise her to be a decent human being, but also make her aware of gynocentrism and misandry. Also teach her that boys have feelings, too, and deserve the same respect as girls.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 08:04 AM
3

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 07:06 AM
2

link?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:59 AM
7

What about the safety of the falsely accused?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 06:32 AM
1

No they're not. As long as they have good shows to carry their audience, they can afford to keep shows like Girls, which garner approval from the right people.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 03:28 AM
1

Well, maybe this can be tested in court somehow.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 02:44 AM
1

Literally who?
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:36 AM
1

But I find it hard to look past the real issue, a woman was raped. You're basing this claim on what, exactly?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 11:04 PM
6

The silver lining in this sad debacle is that she may finally have to pay for her mistake.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:17 PM
22

Seriously? It's in the news. Why?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:18 PM
98

Here's the archive https://archive.today/G7gKN As indicated in the beginning of the book, I made the choice to keep certain identities private, changing names and some descriptive details. To be very clear, “Barry” is a pseudonym, not the name of the man who assaulted me, and any resemblance to a person with this name is an unfortunate and surreal coincidence. I am sorry about all he has experienced. That's about the most laughable nopology I have ever encountered. Bitch needs to get sued into o…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 12:12 PM
2

Unnecessarily punitive and spiteful. The biggest loser here is the public.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 09:08 PM
3

Insane. They had a solid case against her, and they're getting pushback against the very idea that they should use the evidence. Moreover, she was pushing for a false conviction. This is your brain on gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:11 PM
1

I wonder if this helps or hurts his case. It would be a good idea for his lawyer to say whether he intends to reject their offer.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 03:08 AM
5

I believe that the affected fraternity probably has a good case to make against Erdely/Coakley for what they have done. I hope they at least obtain justice in the courts.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:49 AM
3

What's the story behind these Huffpo purges?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:39 AM
1

Does this mean feminism has officially jumped the shark?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 12:43 AM
1

Why is this guy relevant?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 04:16 AM
1

what podcast? lol.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 01:17 AM
1

Some of the most vicious people I've come across were women (ironically feminists too) Why ironically? In my experience, the more hateful, vindictive and self absorbed a woman is, the more likely she is to be a feminist.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:24 PM
5

use archive.today instead
/r/MensRights02/12/14 11:35 AM
9

could you give a tl;dr of that?
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:07 AM
2

Yikes. At least he admits: The fuck-ups are my own He just doesn't realize the full extent of it.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 12:46 AM
3

Does curves operate in the uk?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:08 PM
8

I wonder what sort of checks against this sort of corruption are possible?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:10 AM
73

Compare this to the treatment received by marina abramovic. As far as I am aware, no one went all the way with her, nor has she received this kind of blame for the audience's actions. Yes, from an artistic point of view, what he did was derivative and frivolous, however, this does not excuse the sort of victim blaming that has subsequently occurred
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:50 AM
3

This happens in literally every case where the man is the victim, yet, if you reverse the genders, it's headline news.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:58 AM
1

No. Those are shibboleths for a very particular way of thinking. Someone who comes from a liberal/humanist perspective is not going to be able to achieve very much common ground with people like that.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:42 AM
3

What a poorly written POS
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:26 PM
1

Why should we watch this?
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:15 PM
6

men and masculinities issues around vulnerability the aggressive expectations for sex craft a healthy narrative Sounds like toe-lining feminist/SJW rhetoric, if I ever heard it.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:49 AM
2

It will lower women's relative SMV (especially average to ugly ones), and further demotivate men. Feminists will also try to ban them claiming that they make their knees soggy
/r/MensRights24/11/14 06:28 AM
2

check the faq
/r/MensRights23/11/14 08:20 AM
1

There are about a million things out there to protest. What part of the world are you in?
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter