TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lidsville76 Archive

View 1 posts and 124 comments by lidsville76 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

lidsville76/r/MensRights24/02/16 06:02 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-38

Still not a justification for turning over your DNA to the whomever.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 12:47 AM
3

No. Those are examples and you just don't want to accept that.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 10:16 PM
3

Smoking cigarettes. I smoke pot, but not cigs. Collecting unicorns and making that all about their personality. Switch out anything with unicorn and any gender, and it's the same. Slow walking and minimal blinking, staring at people without looking away. Commenting on someone's feet when you get introduced. Or mentioning penises (or vaginas) in a conversation when you just met them. Talking about all the women or men you've slept with and the various positions you've done it in. Purposefully bra…
/r/MensRights28/02/26 09:58 PM
4

I don't think that's the case most of the time, though. There are some habits that women, and men as well, do that rub off on their personality that I don't find appealing. That doesn't make them a bad person, just irritating to me. Everybody's threshold for irritation is different.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 09:46 PM
2

If only the DoJ had fully complied with the law and redacted only the victims names, then we would be able to have context for everyone in these files. It is horrible if these dudes are fully innocent of any wrong doing other than guilt by association, but as long as there are redactions of the criminal names, this will keep on happening. Maybe this will force the DoJ to finally release all the unredacted files, but I doubt that very much.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:07 PM
8

It is a two-way self-fulfilling prophecy.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 04:43 PM
11

Yeah, now that I see that he used the Judges name and likeness, coupled with the current political climate we are in, and it's no wonder you got arrested.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 03:14 PM
-2

Or IQ, or physical appearance. The "right" fling nothing but insults at people, not just women but men too. I would have preferred if she didn't insult that peice of shits height and rather attacked that peice of shits racist rhetoric and support of racists policies, but she is only taking a cue from the Presidnet and following his example.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 01:45 PM
1

I agree. I also think that was more of a thought experiment than an actual belief system.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:45 PM
1

I don't think anyone did. It read as more of a thought experiment to get a conversation going as opposed to actual solid belief system. But that is just basing it on the comments and the general tone of the post.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 10:43 PM
8

The submarine incident was self-inflicted stupidity that entangled an innocent kid, not intentional sought out "justice" or mental illness masquerading as a cause. All three are bad. We can find some type of karma in all of them, but they are not easily comparable.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 12:17 AM
13

You should talk to your professor first in their office and ask for their advice, but tell them that you feel like it should be elevated to the Dean of Students. That, however, may be the tricky part. Most DoS's are women, at least in my limited experience. But I work at a college, so that's my experience. That makes it known you are serious about it. But you have to be willing to die on that hill.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 03:54 AM
8

In Nazi occupied France, women's families were often targeted by Nazi officers to have their version of comfort women. Forced and coerced compliance. Then, after the war, the women were often punshed by their fellow Frenchman for having those babies and relationships.
/r/MensRights03/09/24 01:57 PM
0

Oddly enough, I would counter sue for full custody on the grounds that sue is unfit to be a mother. Only agree to drop the suit would be a binding contract to not ask for child support. I mean, if you are going to be forced to pay for a child, you might as well be the one guiding their morals and principles instead of someone willing to be duplicitous enough to ruin a life to have a kid. They have already proven themselves to be a bad parent from the start, so fuck them. If you are going to spen…
/r/MensRights19/10/23 01:51 AM
14

My old neighbors wife used to work in the hotel industry. Every hotel has a history of human trafficking. They have manuals and procedures on how to spot human trafficking, sexual or otherwise, and some of the larger chains even have classes and seminars on it. Because they don't want the liability the other way, not doing anything.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 10:59 AM
1

He did, he had a ton of trauma inflicted on him and he wanted to spare his offspring of that. Maybe he thought that was the only way to raise kids, or was worried about him falling into the same parenting style not realizing there are other options. But, he did gaslight her into that marriage (of a sorts) by lying to her "I can't have children". That literally means he is unable to but wants to have them. "I won't have children" means he does not want them but can. Words have very strict meaning…
/r/MensRights02/06/23 05:54 PM
3

He had the affair and she left him after recovering. Newt left his wife on/near her death bed.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 03:50 AM
16

Like Newt Gingrich did?
/r/MensRights21/04/23 06:52 PM
1

dude, best blow job I ever got was from an "unattactive" girl. Best date I ever had, as far as enjoyment goes, was with a bigger girl, and not sex, just conversation. It didn't work out because of life and things, but I really try to mostly look at a persons personality first, to see what they are before I see who they are.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 07:50 PM
4

On top of that, the attraction bit goes both ways. I don't see many "incel" men going after women of "lesser beauty". They ignore what they are not attracted to, some of them spitefully so in the same way that women are to them.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 04:35 PM
46

How many in Russia/Europe will cover this? good question, and I have no clue. I fully expect it to get zero attention here in the states, as well it should seeing as this is the other side of the world.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 10:35 PM
9

I think it is as simple as it makes it real for her and the consequences of her actions. If she is able to whisk it away and give the baby to a good family, it would become a passing memory. But if she tells the boyfriend, that creates a whole world where she has to answer questions that could quit possibly physically hurt her (if her father is that type of person). Its a fucked up situation for all around, especially the guy not knowing that he is a father.
/r/MensRights31/10/22 02:49 PM
1

One guess I would have is breast-feeding babies. My tits might be on the big side, but I cannot produce milk no matter how much Stewie sucks on them. In a lot of poorer areas, the drinking water is highly suspect, which means it is for men as well, but as a few have pointed out, women will often get and carry the water, use the water to make formula (and if it is toxic water then the babies gets it too), or just drink the water and pass it on during breast-feeding. This is just a guess as to why…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:12 PM
15

Only if Cristina Richie plays Morticia. Actually, I would watch the hell out of JD doing a Gomez.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 05:37 PM
41

if it's anything like JD, they get a new slew of movies and get to erase his persona from the film he was most famous for.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 05:25 PM
1

Isn't that just rape but with extra steps?
/r/MensRights18/08/20 03:18 PM
39

In some states and cities, yes they can. In fact, IIRC, New York City allows women to go around topless. Not many do, as they would probably be subject to a lot of cat calling. Most men probably don't do that in New York either as they would suffer the same fate, just less so. And seeing as how, IMO, women tend to be more aggressive in their cat calling/fondling, the amount of women leering would be less, but the type of leer would be worse.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 05:32 PM
1

I have known a Sam or two in my life.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 07:57 PM
3

Sit Ubu sit, good dog.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 02:12 AM
4

As long as she can still he criminally prosecuted within the statue of limitations, then go for it. If it is past that point, then well, shit.
/r/MensRights28/03/19 09:27 PM
0

I don't think grocery store clerks get offer letters. If what he says is true, that he has trained the people he works with, he has been there longer, and they have been promoted or given raises over him, then I would wager that his attitude has a lot to do with it.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 03:09 PM
3

You mean the guy that lied under oath to congress at least 3 times over 20 plus years?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:23 PM
5

Oh yeah. There is a marked difference to telling an inaccurate account of something and intentionally telling an inaccurate story. The problem comes from intent, and having to prove it was malicious. The worry I have is not that men or women won't come forward because prosecution of false allegations, but that a not-guilty verdict will mean the person is a liar and will be prosecuted. What we need is to have the whole situation be as anonymous as possible to avoid these pitfalls.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:19 PM
49

In this case it would be assault, but typically harassment it repeated and unwanted contact, at least as far as my mandatory sexual harassment power point training says.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:45 PM
3

Is it a political move by her in doing this delay tactic, yes it is. But we probably wouldn't be here if McConnell hadn't denied Obama a SCOTUS seat when Garland was nominated.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:43 PM
2

Not going to lie, it is a slippery slope, but this is not a Court of Law where he may or may not go to jail. This is a job application and interview. It just happens to be for a lifetime appointment and in a very public manner.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 11:39 PM
5

True, mostly. But in this case, he isn't on trial. He is applying for a job. So there can be no guilty or not guilty verdict. All that is being asked is to have an investigation into the allegations, which is the job of the government anyways. This would have all been over with last week if they would have had the FBI look into the allegations. Waiting 3 or 5 days to find the truth is not a bad thing. The GOP are fully responsible for this.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:24 PM
3

And the accused has no proof either, just his word. And, it looks like he has lied before Congress before. That alone ruins any credibility he had.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:20 PM
9

That doesn't make this untrue though. And honestly, I do not blame the Democrats for this. The way the GOP acted with Gsrland and the entirety of the Obama administration, I do not fault them for doing what they think is needed. If she is lying, she goes to jail for Lying to Congress, and when she gets out, he is still a SC Justice. If she is honest and true, then he is still a Circut Judge for the time being. Justice Thomas went through something similar, although not as scrutinized, and he is …
/r/MensRights27/09/18 08:16 PM
1

Because you are worth it
/r/MensRights12/02/18 03:45 PM
43

It definitely makes out for shitty work environments when you work with a feminist extremist
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:02 PM
1

Similar to what her ex said about Emma Stone.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:41 AM
0

You're right, I just cashed my check from the pink haired fem club for disagreeing with your opinions.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:43 PM
-2

That's fine and fair, but I still think he is a piece of shit. I do not agree with some of his points, or how he goes about expressing or exposing them. He may have said the right things regarding the young adult sex, but I do not believe his apology.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 08:42 PM
-9

No, because he advocates, in a manner of speaking, child sex. I understand but do not agree with his reasoning in why it was ok for him, and a few others, to have those relationships, but he is essentially condoning adult/young adult (I will not call a teenager a child) relationships.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 07:13 PM
-11

Thank you. That dude is a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 03:57 PM
2

Amen
/r/MensRights04/05/17 06:59 PM
1

I've read the comic for a long time (but not lately as I do not read the paper anymore) but doing things different from what the parents want, and in a smarmy almost calvin like way, does not mean he doesn't do anything right, just different.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 02:21 PM
6

It is called "Parental Alienation". It is a very real and serious issue, some people even go so far as to call it child abuse. As I type this right now, I legit am in a conference talking about just this. I run the media for a community college, and they are having a conference on this specific type of child abuse. There is a speaker talking about what his wife did with his child. It's pretty fucking tragic. She killed her son and herself so the husband wouldn't get any time with him.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 04:57 PM
4

Because he is a voice that literally millions of people, young and old, male and female, watch. The old show with Jon Stewart, the young adults who watched it used it as a main source of news, and I would bet that that trend is continuing. Because he has a soap box to stand and shout from, and because CC can be sued for the content of their programming, they do have a sort of responsibility to their audience. The same argument is, and should be, said of all the networks. Yes, peddle your ideolog…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:28 PM
0

lets be honest here, in the '50s the women would not have been welcomed to complain. It was the bra burners of the'70s that gave women their voice, and it is the pink haired horn rimmed ones that are drowning out all of their hard work.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 06:21 PM
5

Yes, yes, 10000 times yes.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 08:43 PM
5

I can see that as a viable claim. Stupid men, like stupid women, will think they are protected from themselves when they are on birth control, and go around without using protection. But, it is ultimately up to both parties to use protection, no matter who has birth control.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 08:20 PM
8

Yuppers.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 12:03 AM
69

On an individual level, sure. But in an institutional level, this is the mindset for a lot of school districts across the country, and it will get worse as we move forward.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:43 PM
109

It infuriates me that this is the mindset.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:09 PM
7

He is the best.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:07 PM
4

30 year sex offender list is not short walk for a 42 year old. All that said, the bitch should be in jail.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 03:27 AM
0

You are right on. OJ is not a murderer, but he is a burglar.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 07:37 PM
1

I don't want that, so I am trying to change it by adding the good genes in. Idiocracy maybe inevitable, but I will go down swinging.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:50 PM
-1

If women were particularly concerned about having a female Presidential candidate to represent and express their interests, they could have voted for one, as females have been permitted to vote in the U.S. since 1920. I want you to know that I do agree with you, but that part of your argument is a little flawed. Yes, woman can vote, and even run for office, but you assume that us men that were in charge in the '20s - '80s would have allowed a woman to even run on their platform. That isn't to sa…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 09:12 PM
1

To each their own.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:34 PM
1

process of appeals going on forever is rediculous. And to make sure a person is put to death who deserves it, that is a cost I will happily make. I live in texas, where we love to kill people, and I want to make damn certain that somebody is the right somebody. If that means they can appeal to the cows come home, fine by me.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 03:18 PM
2

While I agree that the attractiveness level of one person does diminish when they are rapists, that still doesn't mean this one isn't hot.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 03:14 PM
5

Even better. I like that idea. You want more liberties, they cost more.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 04:16 PM
4

And that is part of the problem. Most feminist refuse to see the other side of the coin, forcing people to perscribe to their views. And to be fair, some of us here do the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:58 PM
9

Despite what my comment was before, i have debated with my wife this very subject ad nasuem. I dont think there shiuld be any special group only hours, but if you cater to one, then you force yourself to cater to others. That being said, if that situation were to arise, let them know they lost your business. Hopefully they will see the loss of revenue as a sign to change their ways.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:38 PM
1

To me, that means there is a women's side and a men's side without commingling. This is just a time set aside each day for either sex not to be bothered by the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:01 PM
4

If the6 have a noodle dangling between their legs, guy only hour (even if it needs tucking in). If they have a sideways smile, woman's hour. Don't care how they mentaly think of themselves, it is how they are biologically that matters.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:54 PM
44

I am fine with a woman's only hour if they have a men's only hour. Goose and gander type thing.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:26 PM
1

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-stops-use-of-key-part-of-voting-rights-act/2013/06/25/26888528-dda5-11e2-b197-f248b21f94c4_story.html Just one of many articles all about it.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:57 PM
1

Isn't it a similar argument to the voter rights that the SC turned around not so long ago? That hasn't gone so well.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 05:24 PM
1

Just a hanj, maybe eye contact.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 03:32 PM
0

My aunt is a lawyern and one of the earliest to be a lawyer in texas. She graduated from UT and then Baylor Law. Not one God dammed thing was ever handed to her.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 12:50 AM
6

Shit, I'd swallow the shaft and balls for half that a month.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:57 PM
8

And powerful in Hollywood circles. If she is smart, which I don't think she is, she should argue that Depp has so much influence with studios and execs that it will be neigh imposible to get a job acting. It won't hold up in court.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:56 PM
1

My brain just threw up a little in its mouth.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 02:55 PM
2

And so is smoking weed. Not trying to defend her at all, but just because something is illegal doesn't make it wrong.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:11 PM
0

That is correct, they were, based on the article, at the same school. Is the relationship still improper? undoubtedly.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:48 PM
-1

We won't, but your comment makes you sound giddy as a school girl. Also, in the article, they did say specifically that she wasn't his teacher.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:20 PM
2

It can be very daunting seeing this uphill battle before our eyes, but our resolve is needed to keep all persons safe from violence, and to maintain awareness of men's needs.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:34 PM
2

I work for a community college here in Texas, and we routinely do these online workplace awareness classes. It is annoying, and I usually pay the barest minimum attention to this. That is until I stumbles onto these series of slides. I was a bit surprised and taken aback by just the simple admission that these things happen to men, and that my school at least attempts to look like they care (which I think will lead to awareness and actually caring.) Regardless of what the numbers say, who can or…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 06:06 PM
9

In print its called libel. thanks J.J.J.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 09:01 PM
5

Holy fuck tits, those NOW bastards are off their rockers. Di they not see that the "victim" is doing more harm to the issue of rape than the Dean who is filling the suit?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 08:57 PM
-1

I will be perfectly honest. If I was the 11 year old, with my pecker just starting out on its journey, I would not be upset at having sex. I, as a child, would not see this as rape, but I, as an adult, see this as nothing less than child molestation and rape.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 10:29 PM
17

But being unwed and in Utah, means the woman, by default, has control over the welfare of the child.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 11:35 PM
34

Which is how it should be.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 11:32 PM
12

They may prosecute on an equal rate, but let's be honest here, they get less in the way of punishment.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:20 AM
1

They are smart, they just made a decision to cart the wrong horse.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:17 AM
4

I am old fashioned or a feminist, but only when it benifts me
/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:28 PM
1

Just for the sake of being curious, but what was the impression that you got from the radio?
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:13 AM
1

There are some good looking guys, and gals, that are rapists. His version of rape would be in the form of sexual power. This is just a dime store psychology, but he needs to weld power over someone, not who he can or can't have.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:08 PM
3

That also means getting off reddit. Regardless of what you may think of this site, it is social media. It connects people with others of the same mind. We share things not unlike Facebook and instagram, we soapbox like Facebook, and we troll like tumblr. This is a newer form of social media. And while I completely agree with the article, he is asking for us to dump one freedom for another, speech. This is a tough thing to balance. Does Cosby's right to due process and a fair trial supercede the …
/r/MensRights08/08/15 06:06 PM
7

They say it is a woman's rights issue, and in some ways it is. But there are more children (boys and girls) that are used in the sex slave industry than just women. What about their rights? With the sex scandal thing going on in England, and the "rumors" of Hollywood elite also being involved in this, or having their own little ring, I'd say they don't support this for more nefarious reasons.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:21 AM
2

There is a keypad for the downstairs women's restroom at work. I always wondered why that was. One day the night cleaning crew was there and the door wide open. The pad was for all the cleaning supplies. They used the downstairs restroom as a supply closet/bathroom.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:55 AM
4

Couldn't have said it better myself.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 10:08 AM
7

That kind of crap is the exact same thing feminist use to lasso women to their cause.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 10:05 AM
10

Sarcastic, but still very true.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 02:33 PM
-1

There are some states in the US where that is true. I want to say Michigan and Florida, but i am on my phone so i can't post a source. I will when i am on a computer. EDIT: I was wrong about the states, but correct about the law. Although this is more for phone calls, and not video recording in public. I didn't find anything regarding that, and if it is in a public place, I can't see why it would be illegal. So, you were right about that.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 04:59 PM
1

Fair enough that we disagree. I didn't say health insurance, I said health care. There is a big difference. I also do not want to be forced to have insurance, and have the cost of a cancer patient put on my bill, which as you said is distribution. I do think that the taxes levied against the people should be used for such things as health care, education amongst other things. By reducing what the government spends on, mostly defence, that can be paid for 10x over (a hyperbole I know but the sent…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:52 PM
1

I'm not talking about, nor did I ever say anything about, the redistribution of wealth. I am not jeolous of the wealthy. Maybe envious. What I am talking about is equal access to basic needs, or what I think should be basic needs. Healthcare and education. Those with wealth and power of no desire to share what they have, and I don't blame them per se. However, they are blinded by the fact that those things will benifit then as well. They get better educated workers, healthier workers, and that c…
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:22 PM
3

We can't control when and where and to what family we are born into, that is true. However, those being born into the richer families do not have to take loans or do much of anything when it comes to cost. They EARN it by being born. Others EARN it the old fashioned way. And giving every one access to advandced degrees, benifits those at the top as much as those at the bottom. It gives people that have skills sets that companies need, who wouldn't be able to go to college, get the education they…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 09:31 PM
15

I was there, we had an assembly and they brought in yo-yo playing clowns on uni-cycles and sparklers to teach the boys about how to rape and the girls on what to wear to encourage rape. All the girls had this awesome look of anticipation on them, just waiting to be raped. They feed us spaghetti.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 10:12 PM
2

I actually work for the school in the media department (the guy who walks into class and fixes the computer and projector), so take this as you will. The course is a bit skewed towards woman, but not fully biased. I had to do a similar thing from the HR department, so it may be a bit different than his.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:33 AM
2

We should turn towards rehabilitation over incarceration, but there is still a much larger issue at hand. And that is socio-economics. Poorer people tend to commit more crime, and often more violent crime, due mainly to lack of access. Access of jobs, education, health care, and affordable life style. It is expensive to be poor. All your money goes into the day to day aspects of life with no plan for the future. How to change that, I personally do not know, and that will be argued over til we ar…
/r/MensRights01/02/15 03:09 AM
3

There were a lot of obstacles in your way and you blew past them. We are all proud of you. You have done justice to your sons by showing them the way a real father acts, fighting through adversity. Best of luck to you sir.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:22 PM
4

I had an argument with my wife about this issue. She said women typically are raised effeminate and boys masculine, which gives boys an advantage in the military. So I said women she be drafted, to which she said not yet. Women haven't been introduced en masse to a masculine way of thinking and are not prepared for the choice of the draft. To which I said i have no choice to sign up, and if women didn't either you would probably see the shift in girls being more masculine.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 03:31 AM
5

I have no clue. On the surface it seems like a good idea, but I have a feeling deep down this bill will do more harm than good.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:08 AM
2

You know what, ya son of a bitch...you're right. I agree that police shouldn't always be involved in each and every situation, but we shouldn't make light of the issue of domestic violence, regardless of who is doing it. not that what you are saying is making light of it.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:55 PM
3

Minor or Major is not the point. It is not even close to the point. The point of this is the hypocrisy of the whole fucking domestic violence issue we have going on. If a woman did the exact same thing with her man doing this, there would be a lot of people up in arms. Violence, any violence in a domestic capacity, is wrong. No mater how major or minor. But she is a bit more than "kinda psychotic".
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:18 PM
2

The current standards have been in place for a while, back when women didn't work because, well for several reasons that I have no desire to talk about. It served a purpose once, to allow women to provide for herself and children. Often times women could not get jobs, as being a divorcee was a social stigma. Now, these standards need to be changed to reflect society today. Women often leave their husbands for other men, are a majority bread winner, and don't keep the kids. This is why these need…
/r/MensRights16/08/14 02:26 AM
4

Couldn't the male student also fole charges of "sexual misconduct" due to his drunkenness?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:28 AM
3

I agree with most of the posts here about mandatory minimum sentencing, it is a bad idea, all you need to do is look at drug offenders filling our prisons to know its not a good idea. Your unintended consequence of this is that once found not guilty, the rape victim would go to jail, and potentially for life. But being found not guilty does not mean it didn't happen, just that the evidence was not enough to get a conviction. I think with this type of sentence you are suggesting would make actual…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:21 PM
2

Sadly, there don't seem to be enough rational comments like this.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 11:00 PM
8

I don't see how Abby said that. She said don't make stupid and hasty decisions, get some help and if signing over is best, do that. The lady STILL has her child in her belly and is currently pumped full of some really fucked up hormones, which may or may not be playing a massive factor. Your right that the best thing is to acknowledge her potential behavior, which she has done, and is hopefully taking the necessary steps to get help.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 10:59 PM
3

That sucks about the abuse and internet hugs for it. You seem to be stronger now, inspite of it. I see your point that you are attempting to make. He could have hit walls, cussed frustratedly and done all manor of other things that was not directed at her, but she remembered it all the same. So she never saw it as a direct or implied threat, so she never told the police about it. But, I do see her story as being bullshit.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 02:58 AM
3

I'm with you on this one. Was it a lady judge? I feel I must ask this.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 10:46 AM
1

No dude, you don't get it. I provide for my child as best I as I am able. You see fault and anger where there is none. Its simple and basic math. My daughter is taken care of, her needs are met beyond the basic. That is the whole point of child support, and where that money comes from is not at issue with me. Wheter it is my 250, her 250, the bf 250, or a 250 scratch off winner, its all going to support my child. And, this may piss you off more, but I also buy my daughter...more clothes. Some ev…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:44 PM
1

Yeah dude, I am real and have been living in the real world long enough to have the curtesy to not cuss, which you didn't, so thank you. Like I said, the money goes into the collective income. My daughter is taken care of and provided for with my contribution to their household income in addition to her and her boyfriends contribution. I used a poor example with the video game, but the point is basically the same. They have x in expenses and y in income. Whatever is left over is their money to d…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:05 AM
1

First off, don't cuss at me. Second, she has majority custody, which I don't like, but for now its the way it is. I know she doesn't go out and spend the money on herself all the time. Mostly it is spent on food, light bill, rent and maybe car payment or insurance. The money, as I said, is added to a collective pool that is spent on living. As she is raising my child, just about everything that she would or could use the money for is spent around the home. I'm not going to babysit het wallet and…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:17 AM
0

I have one kid with my ex and pay 250 a month. I won't say what I take home but it isn't enough. Now I am lucky that me and my ex have a decent relationship and communicate fairly well. She gets her money on a card rhat is uploaded once a month. Even though the money is on a card and separate from her other income, I see it as a pool of money and as long as 75% or more go to the kid I am fine if she spends some on herself or elsewhere.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:30 AM
3

Agreed. That comment was more hateful than helpful.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:31 AM
3

The title is a bit misleading. It says the journo justified it, but in reality, he/she was just writing that she was a single mother with cash flow issues, most likely sourced from the dominatrix. That doesn't mean what the lady did was acceptable.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:53 PM
2

Some states won't give you retroactive child support if the other party did not attempt to collect or contact the partner. Some states, maybe all of them I am not sure, you can waive your right to raise your children this effectively gets you out of future payments, however it makes it almost impossible to see his child or have a relationship with them
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter