TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

likeinformation2000 Archive

View 0 posts and 104 comments by likeinformation2000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Actually no, women are more likely to have depression, anxiety, or other internalized disorders. Men are more likely to have ADHD or antisocial personality disorders.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:15 PM
0

I don't think its immoral. Culture always has effect on controlling people's hormones to some degree.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:10 PM
1

Probably true.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:09 PM
1

Exactly, it proves testosterone can decrease or increase based on environmental feedback. So it IS possible to change the way men think or behave...its not biologically determinist.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:05 PM
-2

Women in power were lone wolves in a male dominated hierarchy. They played by male rules. Come back to me when there is all female dominated government, because here never has been one.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:02 PM
-1

Female criminals are more likely to have mental illness such as depression, PTSD, bipolar, borderline personality disorder, or have drug addiction problems. Female criminals are also more likely to have children (and be mothers) than male criminals.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 10:00 PM
1

No, cultural feedback has effect on hormones including testosterone. It means our testosterone goes up or down depending on reward feedback in relation to the environment (culture, family, social structure).
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:57 PM
0

Wars have everything to do with resources and territory. Look at Hitler trying to take over Europe.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:55 PM
-5

Nope. Toxic behavior mostly involves men. I already gave lots of examples. Why don't you go watch documentaries on gang culture, school shooters, terrorists, or drug cartels. Maybe you can learn something about male criminality.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:54 PM
1

We evolved from a common ancestor with chimps. Wars have everything to do with resources and territory. Its tribalism.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:47 PM
1

Yes you can control testosterone. Chronic endurance exercise — such as cycling or running for hours — has been shown to decrease testosterone,” says Dr. Jadick. “High-endurance athletes tend to have higher levels of cortisol, which has the opposite effect of testosterone. https://www.piedmont.org/living-better/the-best-exercises-to-increase-testosterone#:~:text=Exercise%20that%20lowers%20testosterone,the%20opposite%20effect%20of%20testosterone.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:46 PM
-6

Yeah i'm a man. The only people that would stab me are likely to be other men.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:41 PM
0

Yeah high level of testosterone is bad. Testosterone is good when its at an optimal level.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:39 PM
-3

It's an article based on evolutionary psychology. It explains the biological impulses on why men go to war. Intertribal conflict and competition for resources (food, women, territory)
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:38 PM
-12

Nope. Try to understand my point of view. When I grew up, getting laid and getting p**** is something guys bragged about. I also saw lots of guys get beat up by other guys. The military has a lot of rape where male soldiers raped female soldiers. War also has rape involving men raping female civilians. Most crimes are committed by men. Hitler, Stalin, Musoolini, Mao Zedon, and Polt pot were men. Jock culture in college is disgusting. Hollywood is full of pedophillia and sexual harassment. You al…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:36 PM
0

Its called toxic masculinity is because they are the characteristics of men. Actually, we are a mix of biology, social factors, and personal factors. No stoicism is NOT biological lol. Do you have any scholarly link that suggests so?
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:33 PM
0

Wow an Instagram post..
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:30 PM
-1

Aren't masculine men more egotistic? Look at Dan Bilzerian.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:29 PM
-8

Women didn't really do anything bad in the past compared to men. Did you forget that Hitler was a man? Slavery, war. and dominating is a male issue. Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_warrior_hypothesis#:~:text=The%20male%20warrior%20hypothesis%20(MWH,between%2Dgroup%20competition%20and%20conflict.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:16 PM
-10

Men suppress emotions because it is "unmasculine" to express them. Sexual entitlement refers to a view that men have strong, and often uncontrollable, sexual needs that must be fulfilled and that women must serve that purpose Men commit majority of rape against women whether in society or in war. Nope. All those things women do not do. You know what you have? Fragile masculinity. Instead of trying to understand opposite views you shut them down and write off red herrings. And for the war part, r…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:09 PM
-8

Yeah..sexual violence happens to men...by other men.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:01 PM
-4

Because masculinity is the factor in all these things ( brag about sex, rape, shoot-up schools, join gangs, join terrorist groups, and commit more violent crimes )
/r/MensRights24/09/20 09:00 PM
-4

It's because the male demographic are more likely to brag about sex, rape, shoot-up schools, join gangs, join terrorist groups, and commit more violent crimes etc. Toxic masculinity is main factor in all these things.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 08:56 PM
-8

Being stoic leads to suppression of emotion. Emotions are meant to be expressed or else they bottle up inside. Men committed many bad things in the past as a result of toxic masculinity. The need to dominate other nations, enslave its population, rape during war et etc. Sexual entitlement is a toxic masculine trait NOT masculine one. Toxic masculinity =/= masculinity. Masculinity is about being a good man, having responsibilities, being a provider, and being caring. Toxic masculinity is about do…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 08:44 PM
-9

Being stoic leads to suppression of emotion. Emotions are meant to be expressed or else they bottle up inside. Don't bring up the past, men committed many bad things in the past as a result of toxic masculinity. The need to dominate other nations, enslave its population, rape during war et etc. Sexual entitlement is a toxic masculine trait NOT masculine one. Toxic masculinity =/= masculinity. Masculinity is about being a good man, having responsibilities, being a provider, and being caring. Toxi…
/r/MensRights24/09/20 08:41 PM
1

Women's crimes may cause lower physical damage than male crimes. Female criminals are also more likely to have mental illness such as depression, borderline personality, trauma, or have drug problems. Women criminals are also more likely to be mothers and have children. These are some of the factors that the judge would look at before giving punishments.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 08:30 PM
-2

Toxic masculinity - ego, dominance, sexist, misogynistic ,entitled, treating women like objects, stoic, hostility Healthy masculinity - fatherhood, paternal instincts, bravery, altruism, independence, caring
/r/MensRights24/09/20 06:40 PM
1

I was responding to the OP.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 06:20 PM
1

Oh I think I was responding to someone else.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 06:19 PM
1

No I'm saying men should accept the realities of the dating market and settle for what they can get.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 06:06 PM
1

At this point you're just trolling.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 06:05 PM
0

XDD LMAOO Its not oppression if high quality women do not choose you. It's just their choices. If you want to control people's choice just to fit your desires, then that is oppression right there.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 06:02 PM
0

Mate choice is not oppressive.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:57 PM
0

Be realistic. Just accept hypergamy and be grateful for what you got.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:55 PM
1

Why is hypergamy such a big deal? Yeah sure women date up, why can't men just date down? If men don't want to date fat women then why would they be entitled to date hot beautiful women?
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:54 PM
0

No I'm serious., be realistic and just date someone in your own league. Hypergamy is a social behavior driven by biological impulses, yu can't control that.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:51 PM
0

What does racial segregation have to do with hypergamy? Either way, hypergamy is NOT part of the men's rights. Date someone in your league instead of blaming hypergamy.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:47 PM
1

No one sees this a problem except for narcissistic entitled males such as yourself. If hypergamy is reality then it is simply best to accept it. Why don't men date fat chicks? Are fat chicks oppressed because no one wants to marry them?
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:43 PM
1

If women want to date up, then let them date up. It's their choice.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:35 PM
1

The future men and women will be more similar due to monogamy. Just look at birds.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:30 PM
0

Stop complaining just because you can't get laid. There are winners and losers, its part of life.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:28 PM
10

There is a difference between healthy masculinity and toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 05:21 PM
1

Where do you find laws from 1600?
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:55 AM
1

You don't have any further arguments that's why you keep cussing like a moron. Women were never given opportunities to work in male dominated jobs. That's that.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:54 AM
1

Why Women Shouldn’t be Doctors (According to Victorian medical men) https://victorianclinic.wordpress.com/2015/06/28/why-women-shouldnt-be-doctors-according-to-victorian-medical-men/
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:52 AM
1

There are women in STEM fields in biology, chemistry, and medicine but low in engineering, tech, and physics. Yes women do want to work. They want money like everyone else want money; to lead a quality life. So now you are comparing nazis to women's rights. You're stupid as fuck.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:50 AM
1

More to read: http://www.indianhills.edu/_myhills/courses/WST101/documents/lu01_timeline.pdf
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:46 AM
1

Social norms, culture, and discrimination prevented women from entering male dominated jobs. No historian denies that. There were laws that barred women from being for example doctors.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:42 AM
1

There are far more male scientists than female scientists. Maybe search up Marie Curie and how sexism was a barrier in her career.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:39 AM
1

Control your anger issues. Most women want a career as well as kids.
/r/MensRights24/09/20 12:36 AM
1

HAHAHA nice joke. Its about free choice. The same opportunities weren't given to women who wanted to be something other than a mother. There are social factors as well for example how historically society had pressured women to have babies. Fuck off to you as well.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 11:40 PM
0

DISCRIMINATION IS OPPRESSION. Oppression by definition means unjust treatment. Men don't feel oppressed working in construction. Have you even been in a construction site? Do they look oppressed? They are doing what they like to do. Physical labor is something men have been doing for thousands of years. Its not a form of oppression but a form of occupation. As for conscription to war, who is it that is making men go to war? OTHER MEN. The whole war business is male competition at tribal level.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 10:35 PM
1

How many madam curies were there? ONE. Majority in her profession were still male. They were discriminated against from entering male dominated fields. I don't have link to a particular law but you can find documents or links which tells us that there were discrimination.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 10:21 PM
0

https://bestlifeonline.com/womens-rights-restrictions/?nab=1&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
/r/MensRights23/09/20 09:54 PM
1

There is no justification for why property was held by the husband. It is WRONG. Yes working IS a privilege. That's how you earn money so you can buy what you want. No women generally were not allowed to work in male dominated jobs. https://www.history.com/news/great-depression-married-women-employment
/r/MensRights23/09/20 09:52 PM
1

You resort to personal attacks because you know you are wrong.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 09:49 PM
0

Patriarchy is a social hierarchy dominated by men. Women in Classical Athens had no legal personhood and were assumed to be part of the oikos headed by the male kyrios. Until marriage, women were under the guardianship of their father or other male relative. Once married, the husband became a woman's kyrios. As women were barred from conducting legal proceedings, the kyrios would do so on their behalf. Blundell, Sue (1995). Women in ancient Greece, Volume 1995, Part 2. Harvard University Press. …
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:53 PM
1

Patriarchy is a social hierarchy dominated by men. Women in Classical Athens had no legal personhood and were assumed to be part of the oikos headed by the male kyrios. Until marriage, women were under the guardianship of their father or other male relative. Once married, the husband became a woman's kyrios. As women were barred from conducting legal proceedings, the kyrios would do so on their behalf. Blundell, Sue (1995). Women in ancient Greece, Volume 1995, Part 2. Harvard University Press. …
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:50 PM
1

Some as in women of different classes. Guess what? All the money she made remained in the property of her husband. The responsibilities placed on women were not fair. I suggest you read this wikipedia page and its sourced references to learn more about this subject (women's rights in past western societies) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_rights Its not something taught in a MRA subreddit.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:42 PM
1

The Subjection of Women is an essay by English philosopher, political economist and civil servant John Stuart Mill published in 1869. It was obviously for the English world NOT india.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:39 PM
1

I said SOME of them had jobs you moron. No that link you posted, the OP give poor sources. For instance, one of the source was from international men's journal. The sources are bad sources and is not even close to being as accurate as a referenced wikipedia page.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:37 PM
1

I could quote you many philosophers from that era that talked about women's oppression. ex. John Stuart Mill, Mary Wollstonecraft, Simone De Beauvoir.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:28 PM
1

If women weren't allowed to pursue education, get a job, own property, then that does mean they were oppressed. Being restrained and restricted from those things is the very definition of being oppressed.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:26 PM
1

Men could also become doctors.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:23 PM
1

In the 1800s, women usually stayed at home. They cleaned the house and cooked and sewed. They didn’t often go out to work and many girls didn’t go to school. http://www.scholastic.ca/education/magazines/elt_pdfs/little-women-factfile-616443.pdf
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:21 PM
1

No...some women worked. Majority didn't and were housewives. No, men had the opportunity to pursue other forms of jobs whether Merchant. Miller. StoneMason. BlackSmith. Armorer. Falconer. Tailor. Carpenter. Plowman.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:19 PM
1

Here is another link: http://www.scholastic.ca/education/magazines/elt_pdfs/little-women-factfile-616443.pdf
/r/MensRights23/09/20 07:25 PM
1

In 16th century England women were not allowed in the professions (such as doctors, lawyers and teachers). However, women were allowed to join some of the guilds (organizations of tradespeople and skilled workers). http://www.localhistories.org/women.html In the 17th century SOME women had jobs. Some of them worked spinning cloth. Women were milliners, dyers and embroiderers. There were also washerwomen. Some women worked in food preparation such as brewers, bakers or confectioners. Women also s…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 07:17 PM
1

Actually that link is wrong. It was looking at women leaders in history as opposed to women leaders today. It also mischaracterized some women leaders as being war mongering when they were not. For example, Maragaret Thatcher went to war with Argentina because Argentina invaded Falksland. Indira Gandhi sent troops to Bangladesh to defend against invasion of Pakistan. Pakistan was also committing atrocities against Bangaldeshi people. So no, these two leaders weren't bad or oppressive. Also women…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:03 PM
1

Its a patriarchy because the social hierarchy was dominated by men. Women in power didn't oppress anybody.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:45 PM
1

Who sent men to war? Other men. Patriarchy hurts both gender.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 04:17 PM
1

Women in Classical Athens had no legal personhood and were assumed to be part of the oikos headed by the male kyrios. Until marriage, women were under the guardianship of their father or other male relative. Once married, the husband became a woman's kyrios. As women were barred from conducting legal proceedings, the kyrios would do so on their behalf. Blundell, Sue (1995). Women in ancient Greece, Volume 1995, Part 2. Harvard University Press. The central core of the Roman society was the pater…
/r/MensRights23/09/20 03:09 AM
1

Everything else besides the rule of thumb is correct.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 02:57 AM
1

Can you link me the sources for this information. I have to verify it.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 11:21 PM
1

1)Actually no. Women got the vote in 1920 whereas non property owning white males got their vote in 1828. After 1919 men could vote from the age of 24 while women only gained the right to vote from the age of 30. 2)No. Some women worked, but most in general didn't work. But they took care of children. 3)Women couldn't get jobs except helping their husbands. 4) Forget the physical strength, it's not based on output. It's based on the fact that for the same jobs women would get unfairly lower in w…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 08:51 PM
1

Women in general didn't have right to vote, to hold public office, to enter into legal contracts, to have equal rights in family law, to work, to fair wages or equal pay, to have reproductive rights, to own property, and to education. These are relatively new as they are only 100 years old. Nobody denies women were oppressed except some mens rights activists such as yourself.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 07:54 PM
1

I could quote your historical sources that state patriarchy DID exist. The Middle Ages is often labeled as a patriarchal society because of the rigid roles that assigned men to the public sphere, and women to the private. Males dominated feudal society, which was defined by the three orders of society (those who pray, fight, and work). https://thescholarship.ecu.edu/handle/10342/1701#:~:text=The%20Middle%20Ages%20is%20often,%2C%20fight%2C%20and%20work). In 16th century England women were not all…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 07:45 PM
1

Common man had rights to property, opportunities for jobs, that common woman didn't have.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:57 PM
1

I don't think you understand what patriarchy means. I quote " Patriarchy is a social system in which men hold primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property" Patriarchy is based on masculine social hierarchy therefore men will dominate other men as well as women. Patriarchy still exists in many third world countries.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:31 PM
1

If women weren't oppressed then why did philosopher John Stuart Mill write "The Subjection of Women"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Subjection_of_Women
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:24 PM
1

"In the time of the renaissance women were considered to legally belong to their husbands. Women were supposed to be typical 'housewives. ' Though women were inferior to men, women in different classes had different roles" http://www2.cedarcrest.edu/academic/eng/lfletcher/shrew/acloud.htm#:~:text=In%20the%20time%20of%20the,different%20classes%20had%20different%20roles.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 06:21 PM
1

8 Ways Soldiers Were Recruited in Medieval England: Royal household Feudal Obligation. Mounted knight at the Tewkesbury Medieval Festival. ... Distraint. ... Volunteers. ... Paid Service. ... Contracts. ... Royal Commissioners. ... Mercenaries. https://www.warhistoryonline.com/medieval/8-ways-soldiers-recruited-medieval-england.html
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:35 PM
1

Yeah, but it was men who recruited other men for war. War is an expression of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:31 PM
1

I cited them in my previous post. Scroll up.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:24 PM
1

I go for what majority of historical sites states. Majority stated that women were treated unfairly and were restricted to certain roles. That's what is meant by oppression.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:20 PM
1

Its not false history. Its true history if you research the history of legal rights between men and women, you will find many laws that are unfair to women.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:21 PM
1

Rich women had fewer rights than rich men. Poor women had fewer rights than poor men. Women were not considered equal to men, rather as lesser. You can't deny this gender imbalance and unfairness, which had restricted women from playing a greater role in society. Most historians will say women were oppressed by men and you can find out this information from many websites on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:19 PM
0

That's because women in general were not given opportunities for jobs before 1900s.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 03:35 PM
1

But those legal responsibilities were not oppressive.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 03:24 PM
2

Nope. Quotes from some of the things I have found: WOMEN'S WORK IN THE 16TH CENTURY In 16th century England women were not allowed in the professions (such as doctors, lawyers and teachers). However, women were allowed to join some of the guilds (organizations of tradespeople and skilled workers). http://www.localhistories.org/women.html ​ Women of 16th Century Venice It is not surprising that men exclusively dictated the societal expectations of women. Six of the most significant traits prescri…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 03:16 PM
1

Men can pay taxes because they had jobs.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 12:38 PM
2

From the articles I have read, they all said women were oppressed by men in history.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 12:32 PM
3

Legal responsibilities means more rights.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 12:31 PM
2

OP is not entirely correct. There were many situations where laws and customs were unfair to women.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 01:35 AM
1

Quotes from some of the things I have found: WOMEN'S WORK IN THE 16TH CENTURY In 16th century England women were not allowed in the professions (such as doctors, lawyers and teachers). However, women were allowed to join some of the guilds (organizations of tradespeople and skilled workers). http://www.localhistories.org/women.html ​ Women of 16th Century Venice It is not surprising that men exclusively dictated the societal expectations of women. Six of the most significant traits prescribed by…
/r/MensRights22/09/20 01:27 AM
11

Women in the 17th century: "In the 17th century some women had jobs. Some of them worked spinning cloth. Women were milliners, dyers and embroiderers. ... Other women were midwives and apothecaries. However most women were housewives and they were kept very busy" http://www.localhistories.org/17thcenturywomen.html#:~:text=In%20the%2017th%20century%20some,were%20milliners%2C%20dyers%20and%20embroiderers.&text=Other%20women%20were%20midwives%20and,they%20were%20kept%20very%20busy.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 01:15 AM
-20

Average poor men still had more legal rights than average poor women.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 01:12 AM
3

Women did work in domestic jobs like farming or helping her husband run a business. But their most important jobs were taking care of kids, because otherwise who would?
/r/MensRights22/09/20 01:11 AM
4

Most women didn't own property, some did.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 11:40 PM
3

I don't think women in general worked, but there are always exceptions like you mentioned. A minority of women worked whereas most women who restricted to domestic chores.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 11:35 PM
45

Women worked in the farms. But their more important duties were nurturing & taking care of the children and babies.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 10:05 PM
-15

That sounds a lot like what feminists are saying. Gender roles hurt both men and women.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:55 PM
-4

Non property owning white Males in America got the right to vote in 1828, while women got the right to vote 1920.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:45 PM
-5

Non property owning white Males in America got the right to vote in 1828, while women got the right to vote 1920.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 09:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter