TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

linearThinker Archive

View 17 posts and 160 comments by linearThinker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
75

linearThinker/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:38 AM
45

linearThinker/r/MensRights06/07/13 12:29 PM
44

linearThinker/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:49 AM
32

linearThinker/r/MensRights05/07/12 05:19 PM
29

linearThinker/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:04 PM
26

linearThinker/r/MGTOW20/09/18 05:44 PM
21

linearThinker/r/MensRights05/12/11 05:26 PM
21

linearThinker/r/MensRights19/01/12 05:37 PM
18

Raising AwarenesslinearThinker/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:27 PM
18

linearThinker/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:37 AM
17

linearThinker/r/MensRights27/12/15 08:53 AM
11

linearThinker/r/MensRights26/01/12 06:56 PM
6

VideolinearThinker/r/MGTOW23/02/16 06:39 AM
4

linearThinker/r/MensRights04/08/11 01:23 PM
3

linearThinker/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:19 PM
1

linearThinker/r/MGTOW04/09/18 04:01 PM
1

linearThinker/r/MGTOW11/10/18 03:07 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

See here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rsrkk3/male_suicide_is_not_caused_by_toxic_masculinity/
/r/MensRights09/03/25 02:28 PM
1

The men who make those comments are solely interested in how the woman looks. Or, at least, they are trying their damndest to come off that way. Men have the right to be interested in women only for their looks, just like women have the right to be interested in men only for their money. And who's creating by far the majority of the demand for pornography, smart alec? LMAO you tradcons will never hold women responsible for their actions if your life depended on it. Women can choose not to respon…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 06:40 AM
3

You clearly have never seen "Hey cutie" comments under pictures of fully clothed women doing everyday things. That's not objectification. Also, human trafficking is rampant in the porn industry. It's women who are doing most of the trafficking.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 11:03 PM
1

men who don't want to provide for their ex-wives had the option of not marrying them in the first place; And women who don't want to be objectified by men have the option of not working in the porn industry in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:35 PM
1

eggs-plaining.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:36 PM
-1

/r/LateStageMatriarchy/
/r/MGTOW212/01/20 08:09 AM
9

According to actual statistics, suicide deaths by firearms account for only 2.3% of suicide deaths for men (in the UK). http://lostallhope.com/suicide-statistics/england-wales-methods-suicide
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/19 07:06 AM
2

Do you have a source for the figures or the name of the study?
/r/MGTOW26/02/19 04:13 PM
3

Exactly what I meant. The title does not mean to contradict that.
/r/MGTOW20/09/18 07:02 PM
1

r/latestagematriarchy
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:11 PM
4

Found the communist.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/17 07:02 PM
1

Men can go on strike as well: Police go on strike in Brazil.
/r/MGTOW08/02/17 07:10 AM
2

I agree with this post. It's a shame so many MGTOWs are in favour of social isolation. Individual MGTOWs will thrive if they are in like-minded company, and will attract (and thus save) many other men who would only get married out of fear of being alone.
/r/MGTOW09/08/16 07:22 AM
1

Female infanticide = Female disposability = No necessity to male disposability
/r/MGTOW05/08/16 05:46 AM
1

No, because if it were biological it would be universal and it's not. (See here for instance)
/r/MGTOW05/08/16 04:30 AM
2

Actually, when men get paid the same for sperm donation as women for egg, women still sue.
/r/MGTOW01/04/16 04:08 AM
2

Giving into women's demands is weak. Not giving into women's demands is strong. Feminism is a strength test that western society failed: they gave into women's demands. So, all women have to do is demand that men save them and they will? If men are not protecting women, then either women are not demanding it or men are not giving into women's demands that men should protect them.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:58 AM
1

Save this article for when feminists try to use the dictionary definition of 'feminism' to tell us what it stands for.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:05 AM
1

Do you remember the subverse it was discussed on?
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:46 PM
2

Good. Society has no obligation to provide women with stud services.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 09:11 AM
1

The fact that Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are funding feminist campaigns Can you give a source for this?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:28 AM
3

It's called the Appeal to novelty fallacy. A typical "argument" from left-wing liberals.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 08:47 AM
3

Avoid citing anything thats cts based, they can just point to the limitations and cts based arguments are out of date by more than a few years now . (it doesn't tell who is acting in self defense or the gender break down in repetitive controlling abuse). That's really a feminist myth, see here.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:31 AM
1

And yet women are allowed to enter men's locker rooms so they can have equal access to do interviews, etc.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:32 AM
2

But.. but.. feminists tell us that what men need is not people who will advocate on behalf of men (MRAs, that is) but to support feminism which will solve men's problems!
/r/MensRights23/06/15 12:17 PM
1

Great example of how we can have a man in charge without men benefiting. Feminists don't seem to get this very simple concept. They could've fooled me. They've had no problem telling us that girls in school suffered massive discrimination from and neglect by teachers, the majority of which happen to be women.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:13 AM
4

That's just femsplaining.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:40 AM
2

Here's a refutation of the above.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 08:50 AM
1

It's the same reason employers are seeking to destroy unions. They need their slave class to be powerless to stop their exploitative and greedy agenda.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 09:02 AM
1

how do Mens Rights activists reconcile the idea that men are losing their rights with the fact of their overwhelming representation in government? The same way feminists reconcile the idea that girls in school are being discriminated against, ignored and silenced with the fact of the overwhelming representation of their gender among school teachers.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:48 AM
2

Where are the truths?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:42 PM
10

Remember, guys: these are the same people who tell us that men aren't entitled to have the same choice as women to avoid parenthood after conception because men don't get pregnant (biology), and men should "take it up with mother nature". So, to recap, according to feminism: When biology poses obstacles for women, women must be compensated by "society" (euphemism for men) for their biological shortcomings (for instance, women shouldn't be expected to do heavy lifting if a certain job requires it…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 07:59 AM
1

The reason (some or many) women, as well as feminists, hate male only spaces is the same reason greedy employers hate worker only spaces (i.e., unions) - they represent the combining strength of a group, and as such impart power to those they seek to exploit, and as such a pose a threat to them. They want men/employees to have as little power as possible so they'll be at the mercy of women/employers, who will be in position of power over them and able to reap maximum benefits while contributing …
/r/MensRights27/08/13 07:56 AM
2

If the AAP has been swayed by the research done, it must have at least some merit. Not really. More on that Also, male circumcision is recommended and done with anesthetic, Not really. EDIT: The study also wasn't looking for psychological effects, so just because they didn't find them doesn't mean they don't exist. Doesn't mean they do exist.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 03:17 PM
2

Feel free to continue downvoting me for posting facts though. You didn't post facts. You posted a pamphlet published by a political organization.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:48 PM
2

They didn't find anything because they didn't comduct a study looking for it, as the article stated. Read it again: "The study findings did not reveal any clear immediate or long-term physical or psychological complications of FC for girls or women." And your own WHO source did not conduct a study (or reviewed any studies, for that matter) but simply made a bunch of unsubstantiated claims. Read the paragraph that comes after: Let's read it together: "however, direct observation of procedures sho…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:44 PM
2

Okay, so the "in conclusion" sentence meant that they have not yet gathered the evidence to claim anything. No, it means they found no evidence in the medical literature to conclude there are physical or psychological complications. also love how your ellipses replaced this part: "This evidence, and the fact that it is done without the consent of the girl and without clear health benefits or religious mandate is enough to ix classify this act as a violation of human rights, specifically children…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:54 PM
5

Argument from authority? We can do that, too: "The study findings did not reveal any clear immediate or long-term physical or psychological complications of FC for girls or women. ... In conclusion, our literature review could not lead to a clear indication that FC practices in Indonesia violate women’s and girl-child’s human rights. " Source: Female Circumcision in Indonesia Extent, Implications and Possible Interventions to Uphold Women’s Health Rights. Population Council; Jakarta, Sep 2003; U…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:30 AM
8

"Best interests of the child" is merely a euphemism for "best interests of women".
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:20 PM
10

Tragic. This is what happens to men who base their ego on their ability to get (sexual) attention from women.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:24 PM
3

Poe's law?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:43 AM
1

Or maybe women only marry men who tend to spend.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:41 AM
2

Patriarchy don't real.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:58 AM
1

As someone who was once a scrawny 18 year old boy with a gym membership, I call bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 08:07 AM
3

Look friend, women as a vast majority are incapable of being qualified to be soldiers I say if scrawny 18 y/o boys can make acceptable soldiers, so can the majority of females.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 09:12 AM
5

From the study From the first table, "Gender Gap in Time Use": Adults with children younger than 18 at home Total work time: Men=54.9 Women=53 (Actually 52.9 when you add up the numbers) So the total workload for men is 2 hours a week more than for women.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 08:09 AM
60

Feminists campaigned for the right to vote while simultaneously campaigning for the conscription of men. By giving women the right to vote without the civil burden of being subjected to conscription, feminism has brought on wars, killing, concentration camps, starvations and endless cruelties, all made possible by a privileged class (women) who have the power to control the government without consequence to themselves.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:03 PM
0

This may contain some useful information.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 07:02 AM
1

Kimmel’s (2002) finding that “men who are assaulted by intimates are actually more likely to call the police, more likely to press charges and less likely to drop them” (p. 1345) needs examination. The claim, which is contradicted by large surveys, is based on three studies. One of these, Rouse , Breen and Howell (1988) was based on a small sample of 260 college students of whom males were slightly more likely to call police (4% vs. 0%) but also more likely to require medical help (5% vs. 2%). T…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 07:04 AM
1

The central problem is that of paternal uncertainty; women are always 100% sure that the child they are carrying is their own, whilst for men there is always some degree of uncertainty. So I take it that women are biologically/evolutionarily programmed to be promiscuous or unfaithful? Otherwise there would be no need for men to be unsure of their paternity.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 06:04 PM
-1

David Duke: "I guessed correctly. The bombings were not carried out by white people."
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:41 PM
3

Because feminism is a female-supremacist ideology, not a gender-equality one.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:15 AM
4

You can be a liberal and an MRA, but you can't be an establishment liberal and an MRA, because modern establishment liberalism is the bulwark of female-supremacy, promoting women's interests the same way extreme capitalism is promoting greedy tycoons' interests.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:46 AM
1

Just make a new diagram and replace the left one with "the falsely accused victim" and the right one with "the false accuser".
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:17 AM
1

But there is no patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:16 AM
1

So if in a society men use women for their womb and cheap household labour, that's a fair, just and equal society?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:13 AM
1

Would this bill allow a boy who was statutorily raped by a woman to remove the mother's rights while still making her liable for child support?
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:25 PM
6

"Equality is not enough" -- Germaine Greer, a feminist
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:56 AM
1

It always helps to document and observe our progress.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 08:16 AM
2

It's funny because it's true.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:00 PM
2

Using the same logic, banning abortion is not discrimination or a 'war on women'. When abortion is banned, the laws treat men and women the same. Any person, regardless of gender, is not allowed to remove unwanted tissue from their own body. If a man ever has an unwanted fetus in his body he would be treated no differently from a woman. Using your logic, abortion is neither a feminist nor a women's issue.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:08 AM
3

"McLanahan and a colleague found that boys raised in a single-parent household were more than twice as likely to be incarcerated, compared with boys raised in an intact, married home, even after controlling for differences in parental income, education, race, and ethnicity. "
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:12 AM
2

If you come across a topic on /r/mensrights that doesn't interest you, just ignore it and move on. Others, however, may be interested.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:27 AM
3

What about post-partum depression/psychosis in women? Supposedly this is a woman-specific condition caused by hormones (that is, biological) that predisposes women to anything from neglect to outright homicidal aggression towards infants. Since it is biological, according to your logic, it justifies discrimination against women. So, for the sake of infants' safety, we should automatically give custody of infants to fathers. Oh wait. Post-partum depression is actually considered a get-out-of-jail…
/r/MensRights26/12/12 05:35 AM
4

Notice that they're changing the criteria. Before, women only spaces were justified on the grounds that "everywhere else" is men only spaces. They just throw out whatever justification they can come up with to promote an ideology that is deeply entrenched in their psyches: "what's men's is also women's, but what's women's is only women's"
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:18 AM
1

This article is just a collection of claims and statements without a shred of evidence to back them up.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 08:18 AM
1

Because they are the primary purveyors of it.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 10:03 AM
1

They're not.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 06:01 AM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:22 AM
-1

Why else are girls doing so much better than boys when it comes to high school and college? There is no institutional discrimination against boys. ... Females are just better able to adapt to being under authority. When the testosterone starts flowing, boys naturally want to exhibit their masculine self-sufficiency... girls are performing better than boys simply because they're better equipped... Oh, there is very much institutional discrimination against boys. It comes from teachers such as you…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 07:00 AM
6

"If we had more women in the Senate, would we be debating about birth control?" "If we had more billionaires in the Senate, would we be debating about tax-breaks for the rich?" Same logic. Her underlying assumption is that everything women want or demand is automatically legitimate, no debate required.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 06:16 AM
1

I'm not concerned about the glass ceiling because so few boys are succeeding in school.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:37 AM
2

Obama on marriage: ‘Do whatever she tells you’
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:35 PM
1

How about a dictionary?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:13 AM
2

This seems to be saying that homophobia is caused by the sexual harrasment of boys by gay men. Really? And if the fear of men by women is justified, then by the same logic, the fear of gay men by straight men is justified as well, right? What about homophobia among women? Is it caused by the fear of women treating women the way women treat men?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 04:46 AM
1

Ignoratio elenchi
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:58 AM
1

Here's another example: Woman has a one night stand. Gets pregnant. Has baby. She earns about $1500 a month. Situation 1: She wants financial support. The father is obligated to pay because it is in the best interest of the child. So the child lives on her salary ($1500) plus whatever child support she's awarded. Situation 2: She would like financial support, but she wants to be the only parent in the child's life, so she doesn't pursue child support so the father won't know about his child and …
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:31 AM
1

For the "but the Jews cannot be criticized!" crowd: NYC Health Commissioner Condemns Metzitzah B’peh Also relevant: Obama distances himself from an anti-white rhetoric
/r/MensRights20/07/12 07:50 AM
1

Pointing out one case of child abuse perpetrated by a women isn't a counterargument to that though. Sure it is. Onc case is enough to disprove a negative. And considering the weakness of the original argument, which is merely an unsupported statement, anecdotal evidence is sufficient.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 07:49 AM
2

Feminists claim that joint custody is that path to domestic violence and is unsafe for children, trying to make people believe that sole custody to the "primary caregiver" somehow protects children from violence (because only men, or only non-primary care givers are violent)
/r/MensRights07/07/12 02:14 PM
8

Yes, women have been and are vocal about issues and very active especially since the suffrage movement. However, even by the their own admission the reality is that they are not in the majority to enact laws to perpetuate these issues. Men are. Men have enacted the laws. Really? I have never seen or heard a feminist crediting MEN with all the legislation that has supposedly 'emancipated' women and eliminiated the 'oppression' of women. With men exclusively responsible for creating laws, shouldn'…
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:10 AM
1

Critique of the CTS feminist/Kimmel critiques
/r/MensRights16/06/12 07:10 AM
1

Bateman's principle (and critique)
/r/MensRights11/06/12 06:57 AM
3

Don't like custody discrimination? Become a stay-at-home dad, and encourage others to do the same. How about: don't like employment discrimination against women? Go work for a woman-owned business, and encourage other women to do the same. Oh, wait... women are entitled to "equal opportunities" to get a job. Where are the laws the ensure equal opportunities for men to become stay-at-home dads?
/r/MensRights03/06/12 01:17 PM
5

Yay!
/r/MensRights02/06/12 08:04 AM
3

If they're so sure that they're winning the battle, why do they need to convince the "misogynists" of it as well?
/r/MensRights16/04/12 07:14 AM
3

"MRAs are a lunatic fringe with absolutely no intellectual basis other than hatred for feminism. " "Intellectual" basis? Feminists are the ones who tell us simultaneously that: Our society is a "patriarchy" and "male dominated" and is really all about men, their rights and privileges. In other words, society itself is essentially a men's rights movement. Hell, society is a men's privilege movement, according to feminist criteria. MRAs are a lunatic fringe. So people who advocate for men are a "l…
/r/MensRights12/04/12 05:30 AM
1

Isn't that Nancy Pelosi in the picture?
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:26 PM
1

I think "coward" is similar.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 09:41 AM
1

but Men don't run the risk of being pregnant for 9 months and incurring the huge cost of that care So men are entitled to a higher coverage for heart disease, because women don't face the same risk and incur the huge cost of that care? Or is this another case of "biology is destiny" for men only?
/r/MensRights04/03/12 07:43 AM
7

I've been arguing with some feminists That was your first mistake. You'll never convince most feminists of anything, since most are rigid, ideological zealots. The only point of arguing with feminists is when you're not surrounded by the feminist choir (who will never listen to you anyway) but when you're surrounded by more open-minded people, which will allow you to expose their cult-like mentality and logical fallacies. As for the "derailment arguments" -- from your description it sounds that …
/r/MensRights01/03/12 07:57 PM
3

Good article.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:17 PM
1

As far as feminism is concerened, it means nothing. It's a weasel phrase, an ambiguous and flexible term that changes its meaning according to whatever benefits women over men in any given issue.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:03 PM
2

Only the last one is 'unfavourable' The last what? That, and for some reason people now use the term 'Feminist' as a shaming tactic to shut up women. Well, people could similarly be using the term 'MRA' as a shaming tactic to shut men up, and to shame other men into shunning a movement that they might well indeed be interested in.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:31 PM
1

Forty-three percent of women in the United States say they have an unfavorable impression of feminists -- compared to 29 percent in 1989 The survey points towards an increase of unfavourable opinion of feminists overtime.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:27 PM
6

WASHINGTON, June 21 (AFP) - A large majority of American women don't consider themselves feminists, according to a Time/CNN poll released Sunday. The poll showed that 65 percent of American women don't see themselves as feminists, compared to 58 percent in a 1989 study. Forty-three percent of women in the United States say they have an unfavorable impression of feminists -- compared to 29 percent in 1989... What do you think is the reason for women's unfavorable impression of feminists?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:51 AM
4

Here are findings from other studies, perhaps more objective than those by Ms. Kirkwood: From "Paternal Filicide" Can J Psychiatry, Vol 44, February 1999 Data from Rodenburg showed that 60% of the fathers successfully committed suicide after their offence (15). In Canada, from 1974 to 1983, 42% of the men who killed 1 of their children committed suicide at the scene of the homicide. The suicide rate for mothers in this situation is 4 times lower than the suicide rate for fathers (13). Adelson (5…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:36 AM
0

Your statistics? Meaningless with out context. Pseudo-science babble. Your evidence? Circumstantial and unsupported by peer reviewed studies. "Circumstantial evidence" is a legal concept, unrelated to social-science theories. You logic? Failed circumnavigation into an appeal from emotion. More pseudo-science babble. >male disposability- via male suicide statistics You can show statistics, you can say more men are at risk than women, and all that will show is correlation, between suicides between…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 06:55 AM
1

In the article, your response that women's housework has value is to the statement “That bitch got MY house. It was MY property because I paid for it while SHE stayed home,” seems to suggest that because of the housework she's entitled to get the entire house for herself, and that the man's contributions to it (by working to pay for it) are worthless, which is why he deserved to lose his house.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:33 AM
1

What debt?
/r/MensRights25/01/12 06:55 AM
2

One domestic violence "risk assessor" used by the courts recommended a dad for domestic violence treatment largely because of his "indifference" to his wife's "feelings and needs." Remember that when feminists tell us that women are the primary victims of domestic violence because men are physically stronger and can cause more injuries.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 05:51 AM
-1

Its not about sudden depopulation, its about hundreds of thousands of yers of evolution which states that the life of the future generation and birth givers as more important than the current generation. If evolution cared about prioritizing the survival of human birth givers it would have made sure that they did not routinely die in child birth without having to wait for the appearance of modern medicine to do the job instead.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 02:16 PM
10

If the idea is to prioritize the survival of children, men should be the ones to accompany them as they could provide children far better protection (due to their physical strength and stamina) than women could.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:51 PM
6

To be fair to MRAs, women pushing for equality are rarely complaining about chivalry.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:47 PM
1

But black men are more likely to rape both black and white women than white men. Women of any race are at a greater risk of being raped by black men than white men.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:30 AM
5

Dunno, you tell me who rapes both sexes more, who are these people typically? What gender? Why just focus on gender? Why not include which race rapes other races more?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 08:36 AM
5

I'm a gay man so I find it rather amusing when you goons accuse me of misandry. Well, Camille Paglia is a lesbian and is routinely accused by feminists of 'misogyny'.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 08:24 AM
1

Why are feminists not fighting it? Because it's a valid assumption; child rearing is still the mother's primary responsibility. Think about your childhood, and be honest with yourself. Who was feeding you, getting you dressed, cleaning up your messes and taking you clothing shopping? My father is a wonderful, great dad but if I think back to who did more of the hands-on parenting in my earlier years it was my mother and most of us here would agree. So is it a valid assumption that stay-at-home m…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:06 AM
1

"Today, Medicaid pays for more than four in ten births nationwide, and in several states, covers more than half of total births". So what? How is that proof of your claim? How does pregnancy-related issues justify twice as much spending on women? But, as it turns out, men go to the doctor less frequently so this likely also accounts for the spending discrepancy. Table 1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE RESEARCH DOLLARS FOR VARIOUS CANCERS FY 1992 - FY 2000 (in millions) Breast Cancer 407.5 Prostate Ca…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 08:59 AM
7

Gabby Santos, a program coordinator with the Oregon Attorney General’s Sexual Assault Task Force, said fabricated rape reports are few and far between. But media attention on such cases may make it seem like false rape reports are more common than they are, Santos said. The real lesson here is about feminist intellectual dishonesty (or abject stupidity). Feminist commonly trot out the fact that the constant media stories about violence against women (or other female tribulations) are proof of ho…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 04:22 PM
0

Despite my longer life expectancy, the majority of public health money (around 66%) will be spent on me. Because of pregnancy and its related issues, [CITATION NEEDED]
/r/MensRights04/01/12 12:22 PM
13

Probably for the same reason "it's his body" doesn't apply to military conscription - a culture where women's bodies are significantly more valued.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 02:51 PM
7

I should note that, contrary to feminist claims, equal perpetration rates of men and women have been replicated by many studies, not just the CTS. Don't fall for the feminist tripe.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:31 AM
2

Thank you MRM You're welcome. :)
/r/MensRights27/12/11 07:58 PM
1

Tell her you're perfectly willing to bog her down in legal bills and red tape till the child turns eighteen. I'm not sure this is a good idea: she could use this to claim that he's just interested in making her life miserable and doesn't care about the child when they have it out in family court. Might as well not tell her anything that comes across as a threat or has the potential to make him look bad.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 07:17 AM
-1

Not being born at all is better than being forced to be raised by a shitty or abusive single mother.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 07:00 AM
15

(continued) Menshed Movement Gains Widespread Approval and Government Money The Australian government announced it will appropriate $3 million dollars in funding for the exclusive purpose of funding the Menshed Association. Warren Snowdon, Australia’s Minister for Indigenous Heath, made the announcement at the fourth annual Menshed conference in Brisbane. “Men’s sheds’ demonstrated success in reaching marginalized and isolated males and contributing to improvements in male health and well being.…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 08:39 AM
2

True, but blaming men's problems on men (which is easy if people accept that men control everything) allows them to justify the demand that society should focus exclusively on women's issues. Of course, this rationale is merely a pretext, as they have no problem demanding society should fix problems of women that are caused by women (the alleged silencing of girls by teachers, female circumcision, lack of women running for office, etc.)
/r/MensRights22/12/11 10:52 AM
2

Sure, gay men have a problem in that regard and need surrogates to have children, but that's hardly the lesbians' fault. Well, it's not men's fault women can't manufacture sperm. Sperm donation can be regulated just like egg donation, surrogacy, blood donation, organ donation, etc.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 05:06 PM
5

It's interesting that we are told that foreskins are a breeding ground for germs and are highly prone to infections yet the medical community will gladly use them on burn victims.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 04:49 PM
2

men do not face nearly as much discrimination as women bam cycle of logic fixed This is what is called a "non sequitur".
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:10 AM
1

If the argument is that men don't face remotely as much discrimination as women, The argument may well be false. Only by quantifying the amount of discrimination experienced by men vs women can that argument be validated. the response can really only be "men face as much or more discrimination than women because here are statistics that show my case". And the feminist response is the same: Discrimination against men doesn't count because it isn't a part of systemic oppression/it's caused by the …
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:04 AM
2

You are incorrect because the illustration shows there's no opportunity to present more than one blue ball: as soon as one is presented it is rejected by using the conclusion as a premise for the rejection (that's the circular logic). You could replace the one blue ball with multiple blue balls and the feminist response would be the same: dismissing them all on account of "teh patriarchy!"
/r/MensRights20/12/11 05:27 PM
5

Where are all those humor-concerned people who defend jokes about violence against men and boys because "it's just a joke"? They claim to be equal-opportunity defenders of all jokes against anyone, but seem to conveniently disappear when women are the target of the joke.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 08:50 PM
0

Please educate yourself about the history of logic and reason.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:29 PM
1

Women in developing countries are often second class citizens, lacking education and the ability to support themselves or their children without a man. Excuse me, why does women's inability to support themselves or their children without a man make them "second class citizens"? No one is preventing women from supporting themselves like men are supporting themselves. Unless women are legally prohibited from working or creating businesses, they are not "second class citizens".
/r/MensRights17/12/11 03:42 PM
1

The Women In Entertainment Power 100 list shows that 45% of Hollywood studios are now run by women, and that four of the top six US TV networks - CBS, Fox, ABC and UPN - also have women in charge.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 05:29 AM
1

Well, if the quality of the relationship is more important than the quantity, that pretty much discredits the "primary caregiver" model that claims children have a closer relationship with mothers because they spend more time with them, and would then do better if mothers got primary custody.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 05:08 AM
1

This subreddit has never approved of rape jokes. This subreddit has always supported freedom of speech, especially offensive speech. Except, lately, apparently, when it comes to jokes about cutting guys' balls. Oh, come off it. No one here is calling for making these jokes a crime. If criticizing someone is against freedom of speech, then you are just as guilty as the rest of us. >>Rape jokes were never "fine" around here. Oh really? There was more than one MRA defending rape jokes in this threa…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 06:47 AM
0

Oh, get off your high horse. I have no patience for arrogant morons like you who think that they get to dictate to everyone else what to think and what not to think. You are one person. You are nothing. Insignificant. Your preferences are not important. Just because you like something doesn't mean shit. So get over yourself and stop telling everyone what they can say or what they're entitled to criticize and protest. You are not the only person in the universe. There are other people, which unli…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 05:01 PM
1

Yeah, a youtube video with 1500 views. That's mainstream culture right there!
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:59 PM
-2

And now, the next time feminiists rage at a rape joke, we'd better be right there raging with them, as all humor that doesn't please us must be hate speech. This subreddit has never approved of rape jokes. Sadly, since we usually, as a movement, aren't on the "humor is bad" bandwagon, Black & White thinking. Opposing a small subset of jokes is not equivalent to "humour is bad". we're going to come off as the guy who loves all racist and ethnic humor... until someone tells a joke about his ethnic…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:30 PM
7

Hello, a woman here. Firstly, this is not a troll, I am trying to understand what is going on here. I am just having a tough time understanding why it is some of you seem to think women having more political, social, economic power means that takes away from men's power? We believe women already have more political, social and economic power than men. Women are the majority of the electorate, which is the top of the political hierarchy - all politicians and policy makers are subordinate to the e…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 01:22 PM
2

When has feminism protested jokes about sexual mutilation of women? Oh, that's right. It never needed to because there aren't any.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 07:48 AM
1

Hana Rosen, like many feminists, is a pathological liar who will say anything and its opposite depending on what will help to promote the feminist agenda at any given moment. For instance, during a conference to promote boys' issues (which would threaten the unfair advantage girls have over boys in state schools), she completely reversed her tune of "women are taking over" and stated "Why are we concerned with boys education when they represent the majority of CEO's, policy makers, etc.". Of cou…
/r/MensRights04/12/11 04:16 PM
1

It's not really obscene if most people are not offended by it.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 04:10 PM
1

Well, that's a nice change of pace from last September's "We don't have equal pay now any more than we did in 1970"
/r/MensRights24/11/11 08:52 AM
7

Be careful when you discuss questions like these with feminists. Feminists cheat - they implicitly change definitions of such concepts to suit their agenda. When talking about 'equal rights' for women, the concept is very broad and includes rights to enforce equal opportunities, etc. But when discussing men, 'equal rights' is restricted to whether or not the law explicitly gives advantages to women, so, for instance, they can deny men don't have equality in custody matters or education.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 04:02 PM
8

Appeal to Ridicule
/r/MensRights18/11/11 03:05 PM
4

Using the same logic: Have sex: possible responsibility for a pregnancy. A woman has full control over her life.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:19 AM
2

Do you also think that a man should be forced to marry the woman if she doesn't want to keep the pregnancy unless he's willing to marry her in order for her not to be pressured into abortion by his decision about their relationship? Perhaps you also think that any employer should be forced to hire any pregnant woman who applies to a job when her own income plays a role in her decision about the pregnancy, so as to make sure she's not being pressured into abortion by the lack of her desired emplo…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:25 AM
2

Firstly, I would like to clarify that according to the US Census, in 2007 there were 7.8 million female-owned business, and 13.9 male-owned business That is a ratio of 1:2, or about 33% of all businesses in the US being owned by women. While that is not a majority, it is not a vast minority by any standard use of the term. From the same website: In the SBO, businesses are defined by gender as either: All firms classifiable by gender in which companies could be: Women-owned. Women own 51 percent …
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:29 PM
3

"Benevolent sexism" is really just an ad hoc explanation. It exists to address the anomly of favourtism and privileges of women, which shouldn't exist at a significant level in a patriarchal society. Its purpose is to prevent evidence against a patriarchy from being considered a contradiction to the patriarchy theory, so as to allow the notion of a patriarchy to continue to exist, irrespective of how far women have actually come.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 07:01 AM
1

And the idea that men can create jobs while women can't is utter bullcrap in this day and age. Strawman. Women can create jobs, but not at the same quantity or quality as men. Either that or they're unwilling to take the risks and make the sacrifices men make. Which is why the vast majority of business owners (and employers) were and still are men. If women could create an female equivalent of the male created economy, they would never have been financially dependent on men or husbands in the fi…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 05:12 AM
1

Well it would open up a lot of job opportunities for women, mostly the jobs of disposing of dead bodies and what not, but still, lots of glass ceilings being broken! /s No, it wouldn't. Jobs (and the businesses that provide them) are created by people, they do not grow on trees. And the vast majority of people creating jobs are men, which is why they are the majority of employers, which is why for equal opportunities for women to exist men must be forced through "anti-discrimination laws" to hir…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 04:20 PM
3

"Men can stop rape" "Blacks can stop crime" I fail to see the difference.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 07:48 AM
2

Study finds women learn less in college Findings are based on results of achivement tests given to 19,000 students at 56 four-year colleges and universities across the country. By MARY CHALLENDER Register Staff Writer 10/31/2001 Women may attend college in greater numbers than men, but they apparently learn one-third less, according to a recent study conducted by researchers at the universities of Iowa, Missouri and Florida. The reasons for the disparity still need to be determined, said co-auth…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 07:44 AM
0

"Official figures are only based on the earnings of men and women who have worked full-time for a full year prior to the survey. Rose and Hartmann looked at how much income men and women actually bring to the table in their peak earning years regardless of whether they worked full or part-time or left the workforce or raise children or care for sick family members. Over the 15 years they studied, women earned $273,592 while the average working man earned $722,693, a gap of 62%, three times as hi…
/r/MensRights02/10/11 07:59 AM
1

Black people didn't need impose the CRA on a society that was overwhelmingly pro-racism, as much of society by then had rejected the racist values that the CRA came to address. Widespread racism by then was mostly concentrated in smaller geographical areas in the US, too politically small to have the power to stop the CRA. And let's not forget that the CRA included women, a politically much larger group, and, combined with racial minorities, made up an electorate majority (=power). It's debatabl…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 12:42 PM
1

Also, it is opinions like mine that prove that circumcision isn't as harmful as the posters of this subreddit make it out to be. Really? So is it an opinion like Fuambai Ahmadu's that proves that female circumcision isn't as harmful as Americans/Westerns make it out to be? Also, just because the fox thinks that the grapes he can't have are sour, doesn't mean they really are.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 08:19 AM
1

They were also disadvantaged during the apartheid, but didn't get assistance.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 02:18 PM
3

Regarding your first point, he was saying that they come from a disadvantaged position, and that preferential treatment balances this out. They do not come from a 'disadvantaged position' - that's the justification/rationalization/pretext. It comes from a position of POWER, because power is what makes you able to force a government to act on your behalf, not the act of labeling yourself 'disadvantaged', 'oppressed', 'victim', etc.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 01:44 PM
1

Nope, no affirmative action for blacks until the demise of the apartheid government.
/r/MensRights08/09/11 01:37 PM
1

It's not that women are a minority, it is that they are disadvantaged. Take a look at S. Africa under apartheid. Were blacks the oppressed minority? No, they were the oppressed majority. Same deal with women, folks. Could you point out all the policies and legislative actions South African countries had implemented to compensate blacks under the apartheid for their oppression?
/r/MensRights08/09/11 06:45 AM
2

From what you wrote here, I think you're going to make a great mod for this subreddit.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 08:06 AM
1

Maybe having separate charges for domestic vs. non-domestic assaults allows them to set different standards for domestic violence: lower burden of proof, different punishment, etc. which helps promote a particular ideological agenda.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 09:11 AM
1

Maybe for stuff like this?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 07:20 AM
3

Compared to non-resident fathers, twice as many non-resident mothers failed to maintain contact. Schaefer M P. Children’s Adjustment In Contested Mother Custody, Father Custody Homes. Paper presented at the 66th annual meeting of the American Orthopsychiatric Association, 3 April 1989. McMurray A, Blackmore A M. Influences On Parent-Child Relationships On Non-Custodial Fathers. 14(3) Australian Journal of Marriage and Family (1992) pp 151-159 at p153
/r/MensRights25/08/11 09:23 AM
1

I'm not arguing that it isn't a problem, just that it's being caused by male culture itself. There's no evidence that it's caused exclusively, or even mostly, by male culture itself. Screening programs for prostate and testicular cancer have been quite successful. Some even say they're too successful. And women are being offered programs even when their 'female culture' encourages them to neglect their health issues, or causes those health issues in the first place (anorexia and self-cutting are…
/r/MensRights03/08/11 07:10 AM
6

Actually, my impression is that this is a fairly common belief in the MRA community. Although it's not just feminists who are opposed to pornography due to its effect on women's sexual power - religious conservatives share similar views.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 08:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter