TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

liquidfirex Archive

View 1 posts and 93 comments by liquidfirex on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

liquidfirex/r/seduction08/02/11 03:58 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Not how that works. Once the stem cells have differentiated in muscle cells they are essentially locked in for life, much like fat cells.
/r/MensRights12/05/23 10:58 PM
47

Wow, thought you must be overreacting based on the title. But nope, it's super fucked up. Edit: honestly struggling to think of any gender reversal examples.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 06:47 PM
1

I meant an actual link to the data - it's 2019 citations are all but required at this point.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:20 PM
1

Seriously, what is the source for the numbers in the article? It seems designed to be spread around in an echo chamber and sow division.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 05:09 PM
59

Was happy to hear the BBC morning news podcast actually mentioned it was today in this mornings news. Was a little taken aback to be honest.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 12:25 PM
5

Look at the comment history of the people posting in this thread, you'll find your answer. I can't help but think it's a coordinated movement to de-legitimize the concept of the mens rights movement. It's getting harder to defend the content in this sub these days IMO.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 06:03 PM
3

Someone needs to go clean their room...
/r/MensRights06/11/18 06:00 PM
0

I don't even think it's been that subtle.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 12:13 AM
3

*Pound
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:58 PM
0

Sitting in a way that considerate to others while still being comfortable? Decent percent much?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 10:16 PM
-8

There is a limit, let's not play dumb here.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 07:15 PM
1

A better one? Is that even a question? Have you been paying any attention to politics? Or even just the news?
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:01 PM
3

I'm starting to get why some people think MRA's are as bad as feminists...
/r/MensRights21/10/17 04:00 PM
1

You're as bad as people who call MRA's women haters. Your thinking is lazy, low resolution tribalism. You deride feminism for the exact problem you perpetuate - seemingly without gagging on the thick irony.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:11 PM
8

So you just use the term feminist as a blanket insult then? Your attitude is doing a disservice to the mens rights movement.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 04:40 PM
1

This isn't corporate greed that is responsible for BPA in the food supply. It's political inaction in a political machine controlled by feminists who LIKE the fact that the BPA feminizes boys. That's just a false dichotomy wrapped in paranoia. I bet "big feminism" is also against toxoplasma gondii then right? That's why males all get free cats!
/r/MensRights26/07/17 11:06 PM
2

Yeah it's the "feminists" and definitely not companies wanting to save money. I mean the sole goal of a company definitely isn't to make money...
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:50 PM
7

BPA stimulates growth of an advanced subtype of human breast cancer cells called inflammatory breast cancer How BPA may affect inflammatory breast cancer Exposure to BPA Substitute, BPS, Multiplies Breast Cancer Cells BPA Blocks Effects of Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Drugs BPA exposure impairs the structure and functions of female reproductive system in different times of life cycle and may contribute to infertility. Based on reports that BPA impacts female reproduction and has the potential to a…
/r/MensRights26/07/17 08:49 PM
2

I think one could make a pretty strong argument that it's tangentially related. If society was more willing to look at the shortcomings of being a male in modern society, I'm not so sure this law would exist. It seems pretty clear to me that this law is absurd. If you ask yourself why such a law would even exists today, there aren't many clear causes beyond the shortcoming of male support in modern society. The very support which I would argue has stagnated at least partially as a result of mode…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 10:24 PM
4

I'd actually be curious to see how many on this subreddit are trump supporters.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 02:16 AM
281

Cucks? Seriously?
/r/MensRights24/04/17 02:21 AM
2

Equality of opportunity? Great! Equality of outcome? Yeah that's discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:28 PM
4

Disagree. There is no reason they need to be. They should be able to co-exist merely a sub groups of egalitarianism. Of course it would seem feminism as of late has no interest in such a concept which is endlessly frustrating to me.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 05:03 PM
13

I'm not sure what the poster is saying exactly. It almost seems like it's saying there needs to be more men?
/r/MensRights25/11/16 11:53 PM
21

I'd love to see the gamification of education studied more. I know Elon (Musk) has said in the past that he's a huge fan of the idea as well.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 02:37 PM
1

You can get the full text of the second study (and most interesting IMO) here. A very relevant chart in that study.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 11:09 PM
1

Seems to be the best meta-analysis I can find, and speaks to it being a problem of culture: Multivariate regression results for ninety-one cities showed that while total inequality and intraracial inequality had no significant association with offending rates, interracial inequality was a strong predictor of the overall violent crime rate and the Black-on-Black crime rate. Source
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:52 PM
8

I think there is a wide array of topics that deserve far more focus in the education system than what looks to amount to gender politics. Why not teach logical thinking and literal problem solving through abstraction and decomposition by way of computer programming? Make some level of computer education in general mandatory, since the modern world is literally and figuratively run by it? How about teaching real life financial lessons based around the concepts of taxation, retirement and investme…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 08:01 PM
1

Elizabeth Holmes :( I really wanted Theranos to succeed too.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 05:22 PM
95

Specifically this delightful bit: Fire is even tied to the rise of patriarchy — by allowing men to go out hunting while women stayed behind to cook by the fire, it spawned gender norms that still exist today.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 02:43 PM
4

It's almost as if a two party system results in you having to support the less offensive politicians.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:18 PM
0

Of course it's Canada... sigh
/r/MensRights04/09/16 02:16 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHcF7iC984U&feature=youtu.be&t=1h54m24s
/r/MensRights18/08/16 10:00 PM
1

Might be related to this cringefest,
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:59 PM
57

"You make better decisions when you have a more diverse working place." Has the concept of an increased workplace diversity ever been proven to be a good thing? The concept is such a huge force today but I've never seen the justification for it beyond giving people the warm and fuzzies. At the surface of it, it seems like it would inherently reduce team cohesion by its very definition?
/r/MensRights30/07/16 01:38 PM
31

I feel like Canada is becoming the SJW capital of the world these days.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:51 AM
34

Stone cold logic... what a great person.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:45 AM
2

Seriously just bring up the idea of racial segregation and that whole tangent gets shut down hard.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 12:46 AM
9

Sure, but the real question is who are the primary victims of war?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:07 PM
18

So much of the SJW movement is shutdown by this elegant statement. "Reals > Feels".
/r/MensRights16/03/16 09:03 PM
4

The articles that were written in response to this "study" at the bottom... ugh. The sexism is so transparent and the arrogance of the titles alone is depressing.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 04:35 PM
3

I believe it was only single males that were turned away. Men could come with their families. Not that it's much better than way.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 03:35 AM
1

What you are saying, and the fact that it is common opinion, is likely the very reason it hasn't really been studied. Even male on male rape has had very little study.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 12:58 AM
13

Follow up: http://malebreastcancercoalition.org/Survivor%20Stories/raymond-johnson/ Shit like this makes me wish that MRA's were more savvy in terms of activism.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 05:57 PM
-5

To be fair their website http://equalitycanada.com/ doesn't have a single female issue mentioned on it... I want to like these guys as I'm an egalitarian first, but from what I've seen they're being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 11:55 PM
5

I thought you were being hyperbolic... my god the horror... the horror.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 09:54 PM
16

Some people never progress past the school yard it seems.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 06:14 PM
1

Was worth sticking around for the finals statements!
/r/MensRights07/06/15 02:30 PM
12

It doesn't make it anything, it's macro-level generalized BS that does nothing but pander to people who don't like women in general. Use facts, data and logic, not emotional words and sweeping stereotypes if you want any respect from me.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:23 PM
46

This is nothing but woman hating cringe bait. It just talks in pure absolutes and uses emotional language like "whiny", "brats", "spoiled". We're better than this guys...
/r/MensRights31/05/15 05:39 PM
1

It's hard to think of anything more traumatizing than what that mother went through. I really hope she can somehow find the strength to manage it.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:03 PM
4

I'd pitch in for a crowd-funding operation to get her tickets to the less oppressive Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 09:02 PM
15

So egalitarianism isn't a thing? Don't conflate the two, they are very different by their very definitions. "egalitarian. asserting, resulting from, or characterized by belief in the equality of all people, especially in political, economic, or social life." http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/egalitarian Where as feminism: "Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve equal political, economic, cultural, personal, and social…
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:36 PM
2

I honestly don't understand how something like this gets enough traction that Tom Hanks needs to feel the need to defend himself. I'm becoming a huge proponent of the Bill Burr manner of thinking - don't apologize unless you honestly believe what you said or did, was wrong in the context in which it took place. It seems that one of the negatives of the internet is the ability to make trivial issues seem so much more than they are. Instead of an idea going through multiple people and being vetted…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:31 PM
1

So it's not because of some sort of unfairness or perceived injustice, but rather because we think it's a safe well paying career? Why just push women into it then?
/r/MensRights06/10/14 12:23 AM
4

I never really understood the whole idea of "we need to get more X in the X field". With the exception of maybe education, I don't see the need for more women/men/minorities in any field. It seems like an indirect way of saying the right person wasn't picked for the job because they were discriminated against. Ok. Make that the issue then, not "we need more X in this field". Saying you need more x in a field results in inequalities more than it equalizes them in my opinion. Also why is IT such a…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:46 PM
2

They don't "belong in IT" because of their gender?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 09:39 PM
8

There is a difference between someone stating what they believe to be a fact, backed with logical evidence (thus open to peer review), and someone giving a general opinion backed by, more opinion. What would your parent argument even be? "It's OK to attempt sexual relations with a female in a relationship because she will inevitably find it somewhere else". If that's it, then no, there is no way to prove she will do that. Your comment on a "Utopian argument" actually furthers me second point and…
/r/seduction13/04/14 02:52 PM
13

If she doesn't get what she wants from you, you can be damn sure she'll find it elsewhere, and elsewhere could be a lot worse. For all you know, physical, verbal, or emotional abuse could easily be a component to her seeking affection from another man. Don't ever assume a healthy relationship dynamic, chances are you're very wrong. That sort of thinking seems to fuel a lot of morally unjustifiable actions. At the end of the day it's about respect, specifically respecting yourself. I hold myself …
/r/seduction13/04/14 02:34 PM
-6

I couldn't help but cringe at Tyler. The whole close talking, and holding him in place "alpha" moves, just made him come across as trying too hard, and disrespectful (albeit subversively).
/r/seduction01/02/14 12:11 AM
2

I honestly view "beauty" as a character flaw. Tthere is the odd exception of course, but generally that person never had to develop a strong affable personality.
/r/seduction01/08/13 04:45 PM
2

I honestly don't care about genders at all here, this is perversion of common sense and justice in every sense I can muster.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 09:18 PM
2

I honestly just want someone to attempt to logically point out why they disagree with these posters.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:55 AM
1

"Interacting with a Woman Can Leave Men "Cognitively Impaired"" http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-interacting-with-woman-leave-man-cognitively-impaired
/r/seduction09/05/13 09:53 PM
3

Is that not considered a hate group? Does reddit allow stuff like that?
/r/MensRights06/04/13 08:23 PM
3

And people wonder why this sub reddit gets a bad rap?
/r/seduction11/02/13 05:13 PM
1

If your friend was a recovering alcoholic would you offer him a drink? No, and why not? Respect.
/r/seduction13/12/12 05:57 PM
3

Jamie Eason?
/r/seduction10/10/12 02:05 AM
6

One of the biggest things that separates the men from the boys in my opinion, is principals. I like seddit for its emphasis on self improvement, but without a set of solid principals as a base, it becomes a dark thing. A lack of principals is what I see as reason for a lot of the negative opinions of this community.
/r/seduction13/08/12 04:51 PM
1

Lack of principals and "morals", is why I'm torn. A month or so ago there was a highly ranked topic on how those in seddit need to stop judging other about continuing the chase after you know a female has a boyfriend. Honestly, I like the ideas behind seddit and the logic and social dynamics as a study, but if you don't have principals you don't get my respect.
/r/seduction01/08/12 11:24 PM
1

I never got the whole concept of the question "are you happy?", or having the goal of "being happy". Happiness is a state, not a destination, it's not something you achieve and then pat yourself on the back - rather it is something you will never stop working for, or towards for the entirety of your life.
/r/seduction19/07/12 12:56 AM
2

No there is nothing wrong with someone (male or female) who loves sex. However there is a good number of reasons to view someone who has sex with another person without a proper vetting process as less than ideal. *without/with
/r/seduction25/10/11 04:18 PM
1

Get your testosterone levels checked, sounds like you might be hypogonadal.
/r/seduction29/09/11 11:52 AM
5

Really never understood that. I mean I could in theory care more but still act on principal and not take any sh*t could I not? The amount you care about someone is independent of the "power" they have. Well unless you are run entirely on emotion that is.
/r/seduction11/05/11 11:35 PM
6

I like the message... but I can't help but dislike this guy.
/r/seduction02/04/11 01:37 PM
9

Agreed, since when is Seddit without basic principals? Is Man code/law not applicable any more? Think we're above it? PUA's have enough trouble dealing with the stigma of being narcissistic douches, and with stuff like this it's not hard to see why. Technically sure, you did a lot of things right, but I personally would feel like a bad person plain and simple. Also I get that kissing is a two party activity, and she could have "stopped it at any time", but my issue started when OP continued the …
/r/seduction24/03/11 12:27 PM
1

Sounds more like DURING the research for the game, he mentions Style in the second video.
/r/seduction09/03/11 02:43 AM
9

Studies show this isn't true, in fact some to contrary show that masturbating increases testosterone levels. Abstaining after a WEEK shows a rise in levels, but I believed they dropped off after that.
/r/seduction10/02/11 12:36 PM
3

That is actually rather succinct, well done.
/r/seduction23/01/11 04:14 PM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU7NzbG58Ik I definitely went a different route than everyone else!
/r/seduction23/01/11 12:00 AM
1

I can see in most circumstances this would make total sense, but I think in this instance it's totally awesome. I really only think that based on how I would react to the situation, I've been "that guy" and I would have loved it if someone took a little effort to help me out. I'd definitely buy OP a beer, there's nothing worse than being out in public and feeling invisible.
/r/seduction22/01/11 06:37 PM
5

I'm curious as to why you think that, I genuinely thought that was an awesome thing to do and made me like the OP.
/r/seduction22/01/11 04:41 PM
2

Anyone else cringe when he mentioned his MMA coach "that you can see on PPV all the time"? I don't know if it's just because I'm aware of DHV or what, but it made me cringe.
/r/seduction13/01/11 05:34 PM
1

You are arguing the edge cases of PUA which I acknowledge are there but are being argued just for the sake of being argued it seems. Obviously, I have to agree with this. But when there are many attractive women, what makes one stand out more than another... or more approachable than another? Also, a lot of guys here think that women don't take initial attraction into account... and well, we do more often than you would think. No one is going to say looks don't matter, but they aren't enough, wh…
/r/seduction09/01/11 05:59 AM
1

I suppose it's a good thing no one here is saying such things; I agree completely.
/r/seduction09/01/11 04:13 AM
1

I don't believe I made myself clear enough then I suppose despite my bolded text. At no point have I, or will I ever tell girls to "just look pretty". Attraction, for males is based greatly on physical appearance, if you do not agree with that please let me know and I can back that up. But it bears mentioning that I am not saying attraction is based entirely on appearance, the more enlightened of us will take into accord other attributes. But those are only taken into consideration AFTER initial…
/r/seduction09/01/11 04:12 AM
0

Am I honestly the only one bothered by this post? I think my issue is you come across as though you accomplished something that took a lot of effort, when in reality I have no reason to think it did given what I just read. It's like when an average looking or even below average looking guy manages to catch the interest of a "out of his league" female, and manages to get her to chase him down instead of the other way around, that deserves a pat on the back and a level of reverence. One would not …
/r/seduction09/01/11 01:08 AM
2

"start it off by announcing that I am getting laid tonight" Is where my second paragraph came from.
/r/seduction08/01/11 09:54 PM
2

Anyone have a link to that study that had an attractive male asking random females if they would sleep with him Vs a female doing the same? Something like 0% of females would, and 75% of guys, that is why I don't view female "game" as legit. I say that in the sense that the logistics are so lop sided that 80% of female game is just looking good, after that it's as easy as asking a guy if he want to go to bed with them. My overall point I suppose is OP would have had just as much success just wal…
/r/seduction08/01/11 06:12 PM
2

That and your friends sister (where the principals part came in for me, also the root of my "I get that you're only human" remark). A lot of it is almost intangible, it might just boil down to your word choice as well. Look, I'm just calling it like I see it with very limited information, I'm not trying to be a dick just to be a dick. All I can say for sure is if I did what you did, I'd feel like a huge douche and would do some soul searching, but hey that's just my path through life.
/r/seduction05/01/11 04:42 AM
3

You honestly sounds like the stereotype of a douchebag, you are the exact opposite of what I hope to accomplish. I get that you're "only human", but you pretty much broke every guy-code rule known to man and seem to lack basic principals. Who knows, maybe you're a great person, but from what I just read I would argue otherwise.
/r/seduction05/01/11 01:36 AM
3

http://blog.ted.com/2010/04/22/build_a_tower_b/
/r/seduction03/01/11 03:49 AM
9

I upvoted this so hard my finger slipped off the mouse. I'm not saying OP necessarily IS one of those girls who have a twisted sense of entitlement who demand to be entertained will doing nothing to promote the conversation, but I hate people like that. Conversations are a two party interaction. There is nothing worse then one party who will simply respond or never try to drive the conversation when they feel it's lacking; same goes for action in the bedroom. The only sound reasoning behind that…
/r/seduction02/01/11 03:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter