TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

literallyallah Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by literallyallah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-3

And that's ridiculous too, but irrelevant
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 08:38 PM
-2

No I'm saying not to call someone a thief because they like things If I accused you of stealing some foo, I couldn't say 'you buy foo regularly, so you probably did steal it'
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 08:36 PM
-5

OK, the term may be accurate, though crude, but that's not the problem. The problem is false accusations. OP added 'slut' to the title for no good reason
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 07:41 PM
-6

But there's nothing wrong with being a slut. OP adding it to the title implies there is
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 07:40 PM
-4

She's a bag of shit for ruining someone's life - putting them in prison based on a lie. Indeed The implication that women enjoying sex is a bad thing has no place outside of /r/theredpill
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 07:40 PM
-7

Thank you for your contribution to discussion
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 07:38 PM
-20

I don't want to be 'that guy', but the use of 'slut' in the title is completely unnecessary and maybe legitimately misogynistic. Without this false accusation, it's none of your business if she likes sex This girl is a horrible human being, but I don't care about her sexual preferences
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 03:10 PM

Sixty-year-old white men Regardless of whether you agree with him or not, this quote pisses me off. What the fuck should race have to do with sentencing (unfortunately, it has quite a lot in America)?
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:28 PM
2

I expected better of the Guardian, but apparently this particular writer is known for this kind of sexism
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:56 PM

Many people have criticised and defended Torvald's style of discussion, both males and females, so I don't think you can link it to gender Seriously, saying 'women are only good for emotion, men are all tough but logical' is sexist to both genders and sounds like a quote from a 19th century anti-suffrage pamphlet
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:35 PM

Usually when Torvalds is criticised it's for being pretty overtly insulting. While some say his insults get stuff done quicker than nice words (both Gates and Jobs are similar), you can't deny that it must be pretty bad to be on the receiving end of his wrath, even if it's because you were stupid/naïve/broke userspace
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:07 PM
1

I've seen this linked many times, but does anyone have a similar resource for UK citizens (though all the police officers I've talked to seemed nice and didn't appear to be out to get me)
/r/MensRights17/04/13 09:54 PM
2

For once, I agree with the Daily Fail
/r/MensRights21/02/13 08:05 AM
1

im back im 12 feet tall and im a genderqueer cyborg in a beautiful woman's body Please tell me this is sarcasm. According to /r/tumblrinaction some people genuinely believe they are 12 foot cyborgs in human bodies etc. (otherkin)
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:02 PM
2

BTW, Dropbox probably isn't the best image hosting site IIRC, if a public file gets too many requests, it may be taken down (source: Downloaded lots of Android ROMs)
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:46 PM
13

I try to support feminism, yet I hate this contradiction feminism includes mens' rights you tried to bring up mens' issues in /r/feminism/s? This is a womens' space about womens' issues! Fuck off back to /r/mr
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:53 PM

The couple should confirm that first, and come up with a 'safe word', to be taken seriously
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:54 PM

So, you'd just walk up to a girl in a club and start fingering her, because she didn't say no?
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:09 PM

I agree, and it would comes under the legal definition of a blatant, overt display of consent, so the man probably would be acquitted
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:09 PM

Affirmative Consent: In the past, a man could reasonably infer that a woman was consenting to intercourse based on her behavior. Now, the woman must give affirmative permission through “words or overt actions” – although there is a lack of consensus regarding which specific overt actions constitute consent. While I agree there can be confusion, I think it's good that you have to verbally (or blatantly using sign language etc.) give obvious consent. You can't claim someone consented based on beha…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:04 PM
1

As long as it's in compliance the school uniform policy (apparently it is), why can't he grow his own hair!? If he hadn't said it was for movember he'd probably be allowed
/r/MensRights16/11/12 08:18 AM
3

It's a shame that Lifehacker is gawker. It's a good site, but I don't want revenue going to gawker
/r/MensRights17/10/12 07:32 AM

I haven't read far into the article, but I would say, assuming her story is true, that her killing her husband was justified. He beat her many times, and implied he was about to kill her, making it self defence Even if he wasn't about to kill her, I still think it's justified, if legal justice had failed
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:47 PM
3

It's not just us, it seems everyone hates /r/lgbt (especially robotanna), that's why everyone migrated to /r/ainbow Also, I can't be the only one who gets irrationally pissed off by 'don't real'. It's similar to how I get pissed off when facebookers use memes wrong and think they're so cool. Keep your in-jokes to yourself, SRS, otherwise it's called a forced meme
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:07 PM
5

This comment sums up my feelings From a strictly biological perspective yes, men do play a limited role in reproduction but life and raising children is far more than just the physical aspects of reproduction. To suggest that men are irrelevant to the lives of their offspring because of their limited involvement in the procreation process is absurd. [I cut out the slightly homophobic section] Hampikian reduces a serious and complex subject to a very limited and strictly biological position to ma…
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:30 PM
68

They're defense is moot anyway. Even if someone really accidently damages your property, they're still liable to pay you back AFAIK
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:28 PM
3

The Equality and Human Rights Commission is taking a look at the facility’s case, and will decide whether it’s subject to England’s Equality Act. “The Equality Act does allow for some services to be just for women or men-only,” says a spokesperson for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, “but this is the exception not the norm and must pass a strict test to be justifiable. We will look into why Kids Go Wild is a women-only service.” I'm expecting them to lose the case (and have to open to m…
/r/MensRights11/08/12 12:59 PM
5

I guess dictionary definitions don't real? Yep, he's definitely an SRS member
/r/MensRights09/08/12 02:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter