litteplayerz Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Going to a speed dating event ruined my mental health even more Thats not all, infact i'd say thats a small amount of women. Just don't date those types of women if you are not interested in their lifestyle bro. Theres plenty of women who AREN'T like that.	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 10:11 PM
1	Going to a speed dating event ruined my mental health even more Nah I just think it’s funny that “all ___” is okay but only if you fill the blank in with women…	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 05:08 PM
1	Going to a speed dating event ruined my mental health even more I only say this from experience bro. At some point the bad, especially if it has to do with untreated trauma, weighs down on the other person. I really just hope you work on yourself before you delve into a relationship. For both of your sakes 🧸☕️🧋🩹	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 05:07 PM
2	A woman who makes her husband “earn” sex is not a wife. She’s a prostitute. I agree. That logic to not sleep angry does not work for every fight (especially really extreme ones). However, the point is that each partner doesn’t hold resentment against each other for a prolonged period of time. I don’t think it should be about forcing your partner to agree with you.	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 05:03 PM
3	A woman who makes her husband “earn” sex is not a wife. She’s a prostitute. So basically you didn’t read a thing that I said… okay! You pinpoint on the specific words I used but not on the core message. Let me reiterate: if someone is pressured, coerced, or pushed towards sex because of a demand or because only one partner wants it, then it’s wrong. Both parties involved should want sex every time it happens. No semblance of duty involved. Yeah, sex IS a privilege, and it’s a good thing. That doesn’t mean that it should involve pressure on either side or some sort of ob…	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 04:58 PM
2	A woman who makes her husband “earn” sex is not a wife. She’s a prostitute. What? You do realize there is a such thing as martial rape, right? I only used the word “partner” because it’s interchangeable between male and female and also multiple relationship dynamics. Regardless of your gender or dynamic, sex should be something you WANT every time it occurs. Pressure, obligation, etc. should not apply. No one should feel like they HAVE to have sex with another person, regardless of who that person is in their life. In fact, a good spouse should understand that and NOT p…	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 04:45 PM
1	A woman who makes her husband “earn” sex is not a wife. She’s a prostitute. Why is sex a responsibility then? By definition, it means you are duty bound and accountable, which doesn’t sound like appropriate words to describe sex. You should WANT to have it, every time. There should be absolutely no pressure. If there is pressure or some sort of obligation involved in sex, then it is wrong. Also, equating sex to “well men have to do things that they don’t want to do” implies that in this scenario, sex is a chore and it is not a want. If you are expected to have sex when …	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 04:41 PM
-26	A woman who makes her husband “earn” sex is not a wife. She’s a prostitute. To expect sex from someone solely because they are your partner and YOU want it is so unhealthy and quite toxic. Of course, a typical, average marriage includes sex but it shouldn’t be without explicit consent and want… if one person doesn’t want it, it’s insane to demand it from them. In a way, it makes me wonder how much affection you must have towards your partner if you value their body more than their needs, want, and consent…	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 11:30 AM
-16	A woman who makes her husband “earn” sex is not a wife. She’s a prostitute. Well good for you I guess? But that doesn’t sound healthy for most people. Your partner shouldn’t be obligated to give up their body to you especially if they are upset with you over something. If they WANT to do it, like it maybe sounds in your case idk, then that’s different. However, that’s definitely not the norm. I totally agree with the idea that a couple shouldn’t go to sleep angry with one another. I don’t encourage fighting and pent up rage. However, to say that it is normal to have sex…	/r/MensRights	20/02/26 11:25 AM
0	Going to a speed dating event ruined my mental health even more not all!!11!	/r/MensRights	18/02/26 09:39 PM
-1	Going to a speed dating event ruined my mental health even more It sounds like you want a relationship because you think it will solve your problems or make you feel better, but its not that easy. Its not healthy. It won't help you and it would likely push your partner away in the long run. Take it easy, focus on yourself and what you can control. If someone you like comes along, then thats great, but chasing someone just to make you feel better won't fix your problems and it doesn't work. 🧸☕🩹	/r/MensRights	18/02/26 09:38 PM
-2	Going to a speed dating event ruined my mental health even more This!!	/r/MensRights	18/02/26 09:35 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Weird how your thought process thinks thats equivalent but okay. First of all, saying "a disabled man is still a man" is wildly different from saying "diddy is still a black man". A disabled man could be anyone, a good person or a bad person. Diddy is a very specific person who IS bad, and with your logic, you are specifying Diddy is a "black man" rather than saying he is a man. Although I don't even agree with your thought process anyways, the only equivalent would be saying "A black man is sti…	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 06:00 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart … can you point out which ones? I could say many people thing Epstein, Trump, or any other abusive monster was “not that bad” (because unfortunately, some people actually do idolize or look up to him, sometimes in a contrarian way or a “they didn’t do anything wrong” way) but that would be an over generalization. It’s only the extremists who think that.	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 02:23 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Weaponized it how? Damn, maybe people who believe in women’s rights would also support disabled people’s rights? Who would have thought?!! Supporting disabled people does include the provisions that you mentioned above. However, believing that ableism exists is a different thing. Do you believe disabled people are discriminated against? If yes, then you believe ableism exists. If not, then I question why you wouldn’t.	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 02:20 PM
1	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Then that sounds more like a legal oversight. That doesn’t make it okay, but it might explain why.	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 02:16 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart I agree. I’m not saying he is a pedo. Again, my main argument is about allowing the women in these messages to speak out and tell their abuse stories. Stephen Hawking may or may not be a bad guy according to the files, it really depends. They need to research more and that’s all I could say at this moment.	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 02:14 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Because disabled men ARE still men. They are capable of doing anything men are. Did she say all men harass women? No. She just said disabled men are still men. The worst things that able bodied men could do, a disabled man could do too. You see the word “men” and you automatically get defensive as if she is speaking about all men when that is not necessarily true.	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 02:12 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart I notice you’ve made no comment about that at all. Because my argument is not based on whether or not Hawkings is in the files or not??? He is in the files, but we don't know if he abused anyone yet. He was at the island before and there were some emails of Jeffery trying to disprove a victim's claim that Hawkings participated in a "underage orgy". Personally, I think it needs to be investigated regardless, but I think anyone in the files needs to be investigated anyways. He cheated on his wife …	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 06:09 AM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart So do you not believe in ableism either or...? 😐😑😐	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 05:54 AM
2	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Each of these replies are in reference to Stephen Hawkings being in the files and the original person expressing disbelief. The replies itself don't mention Hawkings, they speak about their own experiences and explain that just because some is disabled that doesn't mean they cannot harass and abuse others. Also, the first one literally is shaming abusers not regular men? She said she was harassed countless times by men who couldn't even clean after themselves. Thats not man hating....	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 05:53 AM
-2	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart This is based on the assumption that they are lying. For example, Mark Pearson's accuser did lie, so she is not a victim. We have proof that she lied. Even if there wasn't video evidence, there would have been other evidence (they brushed past eachother and that was their only contact, and there was no evidence of other contact). THAT specific case doesn't speak for everyone. We can't assume all of these cases are untrue because of one bad example. That logic would let so many abusers walk free …	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 05:44 AM
-1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart What do they have to do with this at all? First of all, women tried to speak about those monsters for years. Only after the law got involved did any action take place. Those women simply speaking their stories did not send them to jail. Their testimony was only the first step. Also, they were free for many decades before they were convicted. Maxwell and Epstein were abusing women for decades and STILL got sweetheart deals. Weinstein abused women for over 30 years until he was arrested. They quit…	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 05:30 AM
2	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart When did I mention Jeffery Epstein? The essence of this post is not centered on Epstein and it barely is about Hawkings either. The only one that directly touches on either of those two men is the last screenshot. None of those girls were "kicking" Hawkings nor did they insinuate that they had anything to do with Epstein. I don't know where you even get that idea from LOL	/r/MensRights	17/02/26 05:22 AM
-3	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart I would much rather see genuine victims receive justice through the legal process - and there are a lot of issues in the legal system - rather than a string of unquantifiable vague accusations. Agreed, although even through the legal process, only a small percentage of cases lead to jail time. Do the victims ever truly get justice? And whilst there are no criminal convictions in the “court of social media”, there is ample opportunity to commit libel. Again, there are no names or information abou…	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 10:05 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart This is legitimately feminism's entire modus operandi. Misandry and bigotry shielded by women's rights. Not only is it not relagated to the fringes of society, but it has been elevated to the point of gaining an incomprehensible degree of power and influence. Probably because there are extremist in quite literally every group? They do not speak for us all. I assume the genuine misogynists in the men's rights movement don't speak for everyone, do you think that the misandrists in feminism speak f…	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 09:59 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Again, you must not understand the meaning of what an incel is. From google: "a member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active." From wikipedia: "An incel (/ˈɪnsɛl/ ⓘ-Flame,_not_lame-Incel.wav) IN-sel; a portmanteau of "involuntary celibate"\1])) is a member of an online subculture of mostly male and heterosexual\2]) people who define themselves as u…	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 09:49 PM
0	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart “Stories” - a word you yourself use to describe the allegations made in the comments. That’s the rub - without any evidence, they are just stories. Not truth, not facts, stories. Stories can be true or false. Why not adopt a more nuanced few of provisional belief? I'm not assuming that every single aspect and detail is a legally proven fact, but I'm not denying that the abuse ever occured. For most things, yes, innocent until proven guilty. However, specifically with sexual abuse and harassment,…	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 09:39 PM
-4	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Because nobody actually gets convicted in the "court of social media" regardless. Abusers still walk free unless they are are arrested in real life. Victims are silenced in either outcome. I would much rather give victims a voice instead of giving the "benefit of the doubt" to a potential abuser. Again, this is too common of a thought process I see in this sub. If a major men's rights claim is that men are silenced and told not to come forward with their abuse stories, why are you okay with the …	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 07:44 PM
1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Are you like.... dense? Virgin shaming, really? Not only is that overly defensive and sensitive, but you do realize theres a difference from a virgin and an incel, right? Although, maybe you wouldn't know that as you sound like you fall in the latter catergory...	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 07:39 PM
-5	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Yeah, so create your own incel and misogyny spaces far away from society. Just saying, if you are using this thought process and shielding behind men's rights, you are only hurting your cause. There are real men who are victims out there and deserve recognition, but too many people use men's rights spaces for their own "i hate women!!!" agenda.	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 07:38 PM
-2	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart What are you talking about "deliberately ignoring facts". Most of these stories are about personal experiences and their own anecdotes, except the last screenshot where they're talking about Stephen Hawkings. You are completely ignoring the core of this post to hone in on that specific one BYEEE	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 07:36 PM
-1	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Again, your argument is based off of the first assumption that they are lying. The men's right movement specifically usually tries to fight for people, mostly men, who society believes must be lying or overexaggerating the serverity of their harassment and assault. Yet, when you see these women, you assume they are lying at first glance? Insane. How about we believe victim's and their abuse stories instead of assuming that it must be untrue without evidence?	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 07:33 PM
-23	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Huh. Interesting. When women speak out about abuse and harassment, your first assumption is that they’re lied to fit in with a certain crowd. You can’t even fathom that these experiences could actually occur…? Somehow, the thought that harassment was a trendy topic made more sense in your mind?	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 07:34 AM
0	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Again, you’re saying ALL of them are lying? You literally don’t have any proof to prove that they are. You don’t even have proof that ONE of them are lying. You would rather discredit potential victims of harassment and assault rather than admit that some men are simply bad people? If your first assumption when a dozen women come out and talk about their experiences with harassment and SA is “they are incentivized to lie for social media clout!!11!” and you use that reasoning to discredit their …	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 07:27 AM
-9	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart I don't have any reason to take their word for it. Why are you so antoganist towards them? Why do you believe that ALL of them are lying for no reason? You don't have any evidence that the men involved are innocent either, yet you are quick to defend them without proof. Is it so hard for you to believe that even one of them could be describing a real personal experience? What I pointed out is their attempt to make it seem as if non-disabled women were treated worse while disabled men are, accord…	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 04:54 AM
-2	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart maybe real life sexual harassment shouldn't be parodied 😐	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 03:43 AM
-13	Look at how virtue signalling falls apart Its like you are purposely ignoring their stories. How disingenous AND disgusting. Literally all of these stories are women describing terrible men who have harassed or assaulted women and/or children and yet you are ignoring that. The whole point is that regardless of disability, men ARE capable of harming others still. Thats not ableism, infact, its quite the opposite. Ableism can be assuming that someone is incapable or unable to do something because of their disability, but this proves other…	/r/MensRights	16/02/26 03:39 AM
1	She brought her "bestie" and other girlfriends with her to her chemo appointments, not her husband. Why female friendships matter The only issue is the hospital not allowing men in that area for some reason. Also, it’s a little strange why Taylor’s husband didn’t want her best friend to be there. Not sure why “bestie” is in quotations though. Other than that, this is a beautiful story about why friendships matter 🧸☕️🧋	/r/MensRights	15/02/26 06:46 AM
-1	How do single guys 5ft6 and shorter deal with the fact that society lacks empathy for them This. This SO hard.	/r/MensRights	15/02/26 06:39 AM
20	Circumcison of infants is sexual assault There’s something about circumcision and piercing a baby girl’s ears that I’ve always found a bit off. They only make that choice for children because they have the authority to do so. Children deserve choice too.	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 07:32 PM
0	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Huh? I only brought up women not being able to vote because it shows that even back then during war times, women weren’t allowed to participate in the military BECAUSE they were barred from it. I’m not equating selective service draft to women voting.	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 07:17 PM
-1	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Nope. Cause I acknowledge it happened, I think it needs to be corrected, but it is NOT devastating you as you believe it is. You are no less of a human being in the eyes of the law simply because they tell you to sign up for something that LIKELY will never affect you afterwards. However, I DO acknowledge that you shouldn’t be forced into signing up. I never said I don’t care about it, I’m just stating that your WHOLE argument is hinged on men being oppressed or discriminated against because of …	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 07:15 PM
-1	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere I already said I hope they do things to change this and make it more fair (which they are…) and you bring up a personal anecdote that even you admit was a unique scenario. I’m not too familiar with how the IRS call taker’s position you describe works, however from what you detailed, had you still had this card in the mail, you wouldn’t have had an issue (not saying it’s your fault, but it’s very important to keep track of your personal information and paperwork). It also doesn’t seem like a disc…	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 05:52 PM
0	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere I already said I hope they do things to change this and make it more fair (which they are…) and you bring up a personal anecdote that even you admit was a unique scenario. I’m not too familiar with how the IRS call taker’s position you describe works, however from what you detailed, had you still had this card in the mail, you wouldn’t have had an issue (not saying it’s your fault, but it’s very important to keep track of your personal information and paperwork). It also doesn’t seem like a disc…	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 05:50 PM
2	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Can you state which act banned this? I’m trying to research but I’m not very familiar with Australian laws or politics. I was previously operating from the viewpoint of American law. I don’t know too much about the geography in Australia and state law, however this article seems to state that the age of consent was raised to 16 in the late 1800s-1900s. Still too low in my American opinion, however compared to British law that seems to be their standard.	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 04:43 PM
1	Woman act like they are the most exploited beings in existence.women Multiple things can be true at once? Palestinians definitely are exploited and have been in history. You can state that without downplaying any other group’s exploitation.	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 04:34 PM
-2	Woman act like they are the most exploited beings in existence.women Exactly! Apartheid ended only 35 years ago in South Africa. We still have civil rights activists alive today, and there’s people who grew up in segregation who are still here. The CROWN act, a law to prevent job discrimination based on hairstyles (specifically natural black hairstyles), was only first passed in 2019. Only about 20 or so states have enacted this law as it’s not an amendment to the Civil Rights Act but a state level law. We have the president who passed the “Restoring Truth and Sa…	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 04:33 PM
8	Woman act like they are the most exploited beings in existence.women Well two things can be true at the same time. And what about black women…? In the modern era, racism and sexism still exist unfortunately. Not so much in the legal system (although there are still some instances) but socially. Black people aren’t being whipped on plantations and women aren’t barred from their rights, however there’s still definitely areas on improvement we can address to make things more accessible to all and fair.	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 04:01 PM
0	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Do I think that is particularly fair? No, not really. However, like I said, we haven't had a draft in 50+ years. You're telling me that signing up for selective service when you likely will NEVER have to fight in combat is somehow infringing on your rights? Not to mention, the original point said men's rights are being "increasingly" taken away, while this is something thats been in place for decades if not maybe centuries. It is also something that multiple bills have been proposed to end. Also…	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 01:54 AM
-5	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Well thats a sick thing that she did. No offense, but she should be in imprisoned for that. I don't want to minimize that action because its disgusting. My main question is how did she get away with that? Were charges pressed against her? Is this a family secret or does the law know? Unfortunately, 98% of rapists get away with their crimes, which ABSOLUTELY needs to be addressed. Rapist, both men and women, are apart of that 98% statistic, so it is less of a gender debate but more of a debate on…	/r/MensRights	14/02/26 01:41 AM
0	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Curious what points i'm wrong about...?	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 08:39 PM
2	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere ghost pinging and then blocking is so... childish. And just plain weird lol. I genuinely misspelled a word and somehow i'm bitter 😭 BYE LOLLL	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 08:36 PM
-1	"Feminist" and other activist and "Socially-Conservative" groups, claim that "AI girlfriend generator websites" and Pornography encourage boys to perpetrate sexual violence against girls in Ireland, despite offering faulty evidence to back up such claims. I dont need to explain, you can simply read some feminist literature and see it, like how early feminists thought the best way to “ get more rights” (meaning establish women as superior to men in feminist lingo) was to reduce male population to %30. Majority of the early feminist like Beauvour and Foucault were also raging pedos. So basically, you think feminism is a monolilth from what it sounds like. Not all people who identify as feminists are good people, sure. But saying that feminism the m…	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 07:57 PM
-3	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere You are literally seaaaaarching for reasons to complain about. Good grief. How nice that you give me permission to do that If thats what you took from the word "choose", then oml 💀.. not only is that just nitpicky semantics, but you already sound so insufferable its kind of sad. How about I reword it and say "You have the legal right under the US constituition to not to be in a relationship". Better? I could claim the inverse as well. But honestly you're being disingenuous. Have you not read thi…	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 07:25 PM
-2	"Feminist" and other activist and "Socially-Conservative" groups, claim that "AI girlfriend generator websites" and Pornography encourage boys to perpetrate sexual violence against girls in Ireland, despite offering faulty evidence to back up such claims. Explain what makes feminism a hate idealogy? Assuming thats true, does that mean that the paralell to feminism, men's rights, is also a hate ideology?	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 07:01 PM
-14	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere ...Seriously? Your entire argument hinges on this? And you refuse to give any other points then that?.... First of all, women weren't allowed in the military besides nursing roles up until the early 1900s (atleast in America.) Mind you, women couldn't even vote up until around this time either. Theres been women who wanted to join the military for centuries. The vast majority? No, because war is brutal and even many men involved in combat were there mainly because of the draft or conscription (6…	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:59 PM
-4	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Yes, thank you for pointing that out 😭	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:39 PM
-13	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Huh...??? In what society are culture do you think men have "increasingly less rights?" Rights to what exactly? If you are refering to human rights then you have absolutely lost your mind. Even then, I don't even know what rights in this world that a woman has that a man does not have (besides maybe biological intrinsic differences, for example a biological man cannot give birth while a woman can).	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:31 PM
-4	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Yes, in some places. I could defintely agree to that. Though the question of what those places are, how severe they are disadvantaged, and the topic of what makes men disadvantaged in those areas are debatable. If he is claiming "hostile environment" means society, then I would disagree heavily.	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:29 PM
1	Is this true? So, throwing out a claim and asking to see if it were valid. Ergo, an accusation. ^^^ You're deliberately ignoring the first 3 words which is the whole point, because it doesn't fit your narrative. Again, being nitpicky. I originally said: Someone made a question based post accusing women of a certain behavior, yet when someone does the same to men, they are seen as wrong... I acknowledged he is asking a question already. Then, you pick at my use of the word "accusation". Now, you are saying tha…	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:26 PM
1	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere One thing I do want to note though however is we need to encourage healthy masculinity. The Andrew Tate redpill "man need to take control" sphere is predatory to young and struggling men. The role models they have are not good representations of men at all. Then you have the incels who promote misogynist rhetoric, isolating themselves further from women and connections. I can go on, but basically, there needs to be examples of healthy masculinity that young men follow. We need fathers who don't …	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 05:45 PM
0	Is this true? You are acting obtuse on purpose 💀 Some have claimed that younger generations of women often treat social occasions as dating scenes, where they talk to different guys and if not found interesting, they snub them thereafter. If true, it makes human interactions pretty meaningless. Note the bold words. Here is the meaning of "accuse" directing blame or responsibility toward someone or something Directing responsibility towards younger generations of women who do this. Heres another note about acc…	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 05:28 PM
-22	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere Are you equating men to second class citizens in a hostile environment?... We gotta be realistic here. C'mon.	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 05:16 PM
3	My female perspective on men’s right and the manosphere You can absolutely just choose not to be in a relationship, but lets not act obtuse. Alot of people are scornful because they had one or a few bad experiences with women, leading them down a path of loneliness. Not all, but too many.	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 05:13 PM
2	Is this true? "What is that accomplishing" is a valid question. It establishes an argument or a debate. That's how they work. Some people like partaking, some dont. Dgmw, i love debating. Its one of my favorite pastimes. However, this isn't even a debate on something sustaintial. I just pointed out how this tit for tat isn't accomplishing anything. If you wanted to debate on the validity of whether men project their behavior or not, then that is different. Thats a genuine debate, otherwise we would be talking…	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 08:12 AM
0	Dutch article ( male loneliness ) This is really thought provoking and well written. 🧸☕	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 07:36 AM
1	Is this true? Fighting "retaliation with retaliation", as you put it, proves that there are two sides, at best. I agree. I don't believe OP's claim about women nor the claim about men. However, the difference is one point was made in retalition, leading to multiple people to retaliate back. In the end, what is that accomplishing? You started with a point towards "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" and ended up at "an eye for an eye means that one guy was right." Because ironically, you played into…	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 07:31 AM
0	Is this true? Yeah? Which again, proves the point. Now whats happening? A cycle of "no, you!!" that keeps repeating. One person makes a point about women. The next person makes a point about men. In response, the next next person makes a point about women. So basically, fighting retalition with retalition, therefore proving the thought that "men project their own behavior onto women".	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:55 AM
0	People on Twitter (X) making jokes about a man who was stabbed to death by his girlfriend. Not like internet points matter, but a "downvote or two" is quite disingenous lol. I don't really have any positive upvote comments at all, minus maybe a handful and this thread. Some of that is simply because it doesn't have any traction or interaction. The ones where I do conversate with others or it gets multiple replies, they are in negative numbers because most people don't agree with me. I don't measure myself or my opinions based on upvotes or downvotes tho, so it doesn't personally affec…	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:48 AM
1	Is this true? Thats true, which is why i said the few people that do that behavior can be men or women. Its not a gendered issue like how OP implied, but more of an individual one.	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:33 AM
1	Is this true? Funnily enough, you kinda just proved their point. Although, I think its clear shes pointing out that theres a double standard here. Someone made a question based post accusing women of a certain behavior, yet when someone does the same to men, they are seen as wrong...	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:32 AM
-1	"Feminist" and other activist and "Socially-Conservative" groups, claim that "AI girlfriend generator websites" and Pornography encourage boys to perpetrate sexual violence against girls in Ireland, despite offering faulty evidence to back up such claims. Both feminists and egalitarians support womens rights and advocacy though...	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 06:28 AM
7	Is this true? Not really the case for most people. The small few where it may be true for aren't good people. And it is also not a gendered issue, there are definitely men who are also one track minded at social events.	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 02:21 AM
1	"Feminist" and other activist and "Socially-Conservative" groups, claim that "AI girlfriend generator websites" and Pornography encourage boys to perpetrate sexual violence against girls in Ireland, despite offering faulty evidence to back up such claims. I consider myself someone who 100% supports women's rights and advocacy, however I def disagree with the portrayed notion here. I don't necessarily think AI chatbots will increase violence, but it definitely will increase loneliness. Its not healthy at all, and I think its quite strange to be in a relationship with something that doesn't even exist. Sane people should steer clear of chatbots for relationships 100%. It won't end well.	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 02:19 AM
-17	Do most women find male genital mutilation to be funny or justified depending on the situation? Well said.	/r/MensRights	13/02/26 02:14 AM
0	People on Twitter (X) making jokes about a man who was stabbed to death by his girlfriend. Literally every comment I make here gets mass downvoted. What are you talking about? This is absolutely and echo chamber LOLLLL Oh, and calling it a “feminist” s-hole kinda proves your own echo chamber. I never called men’s rights that at all. I never said men’s rights is invalid or somehow wrong, I’m just pointing out that a lot of you guys hate women for some reason… oh, but saying that is somehow wrong, why? Cause it opposes your rigid view points, ergo, an ECHO CHAMBERRRR	/r/MensRights	12/02/26 02:06 PM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Which is fair from your perspective, but I guess we just disagree. Sexual abuse and harassment is a crime which notoriously doesn't lead to much imprisonment. I supposed maybe we have different views on what constitutes as punishment as well.	/r/MensRights	12/02/26 03:31 AM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens So then we agree? Society must have some sort of aversion to non-masculine figures. Ergo... women too..........	/r/MensRights	12/02/26 03:28 AM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens Being a female is a secondary attribute because it is not a causal factor. Even in your example, the perception of vulnerability is the larger factor than gender. Broad strokes categorisation of femicide actively disregards other determining factors; this in turn hinders progress towards resolution. As I explained, its because the perception of vulnerability is tied to femininity. Its a societal idea held by alot of the monsters who attempt to attack women. Why do you think so many serial killer…	/r/MensRights	12/02/26 03:27 AM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens If we are using per captia, women are more 5-6x more likely to be murdered by an intimate partner than men. Even with raw numbers, there is roughly a gap of ~600 more female victims. That is still a 68:95 ratio. Of course, all murder is wrong, but what is insane to me is why are women more vulnerable when it comes to people that they should be able to trust? Why are specifically women in so much danger when in comparison, intimate partner murder is a minority in men? Look at it in this perspecti…	/r/MensRights	12/02/26 02:05 AM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens I literally said that you can. The difference is men being killed for being men doesn’t to the extent of how women are killed for being women. There are men who are killed for being elderly, disabled, gay, etc, but what men are targeted specifically because they are male or because of an aspect or norm associated with being male? However, there are women who are killed for being women or because of an aspect or norm associated with being female.	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 11:38 PM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens I literally said that you can. The difference is men being killed for being men doesn’t to the extent of how women are killed for being women. There are men who are killed for being elderly, disabled, gay, etc, but what men are targeted specifically because they are male or because of an aspect or norm associated with being male? However, there are women who are killed for being women or because of an aspect or norm associated with being female.	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 11:37 PM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens I didn't mention men who are killed for being with other men because that is a completely different scenario. They are killed for being gay, which unfortunately in common around the world. They are not killed for being men, they are killed because of their attraction to other men. Ergo, being male is NOT the determining factor for why there were killed, but their sexuality was. I hope we can abolish killings like this in general, but to say that these men are killed for being male is false. They…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 06:30 PM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens How can that be proven? It can be proven through context clues and common sense lol. If the murder is investigated, through evidence. Probably not the best use of English. It indicates there is a level that is acceptable. Well, you got my point, right? And of course no femicide is okay, I only say that’s it’s “far too common” because it is. The ideal number of femicides is 0. Insert proof and also female against male ratio to indicate how out of balance it is. Combine that with most people are k…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 05:03 PM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens It can be prove through context clues and common sense lol. If the murder is investigated, through evidence. Well, you got my point, right? And of course no femicide is okay, I only say that’s it’s “far too common” because it is. The ideal number of femicides is 0. Roughly 5-6% of male homicide is committed by their partner vs about 40% of women’s homicide. Very disproportionate. Men have an 80% chance of being killed by a stranger. Also, something to note while researching this, it says that so…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 04:58 PM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens ...No? Its not like femicide never happens. Women all around the world quite literally ARE killed just because of they are female, or because of a unique aspect related to femininity. What system or social stigma kills men specifically because they are male, or because of an aspect of manhood? Women are likelier to be victims of pre-meditated crime by someone she knows. Men are more likely to be killed by strangers or as casualities. Pre-meditated and planned murder obviously has very different …	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 08:56 AM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens Read the rest of the paragraph and I explain it lol. I literally said not all women that die by murder are victims of femicide. You use the words in the parenthesses as some sort of "gotcha" because you are completely removing the context. I said a femicide is a woman being murdered because the context explains that she was murdered as a consequence of her womanhood. Meaning, she was killed because she was a woman. If you wanted me to be extra descriptive, i could have written "a woman who is mu…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 08:50 AM
0	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens The reasons for androcide and femicide are usually verrrrry different. Women are more likely to be killed in the home by their partners or family. Men are more likely to be victims of conflicts or killed by strangers. Of course, all murder is bad, however, what makes a murder an androcide or a femicide is because of larger reasons. If you are walking in the park and you get shot by a random criminal, its likely not because you are male. I can't speak for all criminals of course, but their manife…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 07:16 AM
0	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens Oh absolutely!! Finally someone understands!!! I don't get why there is such a big fear when it comes to women and programs that benefit them. History proved why woman advocated for better conditions. Even now, there are so many women who are abused and mistreated who still deserve advocacy. That doesn't take away from men's issues. Infact, I think it strenghtens the importance of why advocacy is important. There are systems and social norms in place that disadvantage women just as some disadvan…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 07:06 AM
-2	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens Ohhh!!! that makes sense!! Even then, I still don't see why everyone else is making this such a huge deal, yk? Even then, I think teaching teenagers these things is a great addition to a school. Especially for young girls who are growing up, they deserve access to care!!! (and they aren't segregating boys, so actually whats the big deal???)	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 06:46 AM
1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens thank you! 🧸☕	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 06:40 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash The reason I brought up such an extreme example is because men facing life altering repercussions would be such an extreme outcome. Realistically, is a man's life over if he violates someone in the workplace? If we are looking at the most minor outcomes, the victim might feel uncomfortable and the abuser might get a warning. This is assuming the abuser in the situation is legitimately guilty. Thats still a huge slap on the wrist at the expense of someone's wellbeing. So, how would this affect in…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 06:39 AM
-1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens My main point is that gendered schools are a non issue. In the US, there is over a thousand single sex schools. None of them are "mandatory" in the sense that parents HAVE to put their kids in single sex schools. Its a CHOICE to put your kids in a school like that, so why is it an issue? Like I said, theres all boys schools too, so its not like they are just making schools for girls and ignoring boys. This school specifically provides care SPECFICIALLY for teenage girls and their needs. Why not …	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 06:24 AM
-1	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens For example, if a serial killer sees a woman walking down the street and kills her, and he mainly targets women, then those murders were femicides. Why? Because if he saw a man walking down the street, would he have done those crimes? What about honor killings? If a man's sister is caught in a compromising position with a man, and he kills his sister for her "ruined honor", that is also a femicide. If a man's brother was caught in the same way, would he have been killed? You can use the excuse t…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 06:15 AM
-6	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens You can use this logic with genuinely any murder. Unless theres a detailed manifesto, by this logic, femicide doesn't exist. By this logic, that also means androcide, senicide, infantcide, racial based murders, etc. can't exist, because who can prove that the person murdered was killed specifically for that reason. This is why context matters. The act of femicide (a woman being murdered) is far too common. An estimate of 40% of femicides being committed by a romantic partner. You can say that th…	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 05:14 AM
-4	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens So make a boys private school? You do realize there are plenty of boys acadmies worldwide, right?	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 05:02 AM
-11	The first Feminiteca in Mexico opens Bro, seriously. This is the biggest non issue to ever exist. You do realize gendered schools have existed forever, right? Theres boys academies and girls academies that are gender specific worldwide. These are usually private schools too, so its not some mandatory education program that gives girls fancy and new materials. Also, reading into this, I think this is great. Its goal is to promote equality, give gender specific care to young, growing girls (such as menstrual health), and it seems to …	/r/MensRights	11/02/26 05:00 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash A lost reputation is worth more than being abused??? Thats crazy to me. I mean, we can acknowledge that if someone unfairly is ostracized, then thats wrong. Saying that is equal or worse than being abused or harassed is insane though. Victims who genuinely are harmed can potentially have long term trauma. Imagine you are trying to do your job and you are harassed or abused by your coworker or boss. The crazy thing is that sexual harassment in the workplace is a civl violation, so theres no inher…	/r/MensRights	10/02/26 08:56 PM
2	Is Epstein Being Used to Replace Even More Men With Women? Thats why I put "witch hunt" in quotes. What you may describe as a witch hunt, I believe constitutes for punishing abusers and serving justice. Many people in the files ARE abusers and have nefarious ties to Epstein. Not every single person, sure, but a large chunk. Even then, if someone has suspicious ties to one of the most heinous sex traffickers of the modern era, I think they absolutely should be investigated. Regardless how big or small it seems.	/r/MensRights	10/02/26 08:38 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash In that same light, as much as that might damage his reputation, how do you think a woman who was genuinely harassed feels? Surely protecting people from harassment or abuse is more important than reputation, no? Not to mention, how often are men given that reputation unfairly? Especially ratioed against the men who absolutely deserved that title?	/r/MensRights	10/02/26 08:34 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash I think you are confused. I never said that I liked any of these democrats you mention (except Barack, I’m confused what he has to do with this? I’ve never seen him implicated anywhere). Also, please don’t say that Ms. Virginia “slept” with those monsters. She was raped. She was 16 when she met Epstein and 17 when she met Prince Andrew. She was a child who was taken advantage of by disgusting monsters. Also, you do realize the men that she was raped by were associates of Epstein, right? Epstein …	/r/MensRights	10/02/26 07:31 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash The thing is, what is regarded as appropriate and inappropriate should be taught from childhood. For example, as a child you learn about personal space and boundaries. If you don’t learn that young, you’ll be an adult in the workplace who is uncomfortably close to others and it’s inappropriate. You might bear hug your friends outside of work, but sometimes it’s completely inappropriate to hug your coworkers like that on the clock. I get what you mean though about what is considered appropriate i…	/r/MensRights	10/02/26 07:11 AM
3	Is Epstein Being Used to Replace Even More Men With Women? Okay sorry but this is insane. Are you insinuating that the Epstein files are specifically meant to bring down men? The people in the files are sick men who harmed young women and children. They absolutely deserve to be brought down if found that they have been doing crimes. That doesn’t mean it’s a “witch hunt” against ALL men or innocent men. Anyone who is related to Epstein should absolutely be investigated, and then punished if they’ve done something sick. They absolutely should be a “witch …	/r/MensRights	10/02/26 06:59 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Okay, what do you mean by that? There are definitely scenarios where intent and age contexts matter. And something like simply walking past someone or mentioning something about work isn’t going to get you in trouble. Maybe if you go farther, say overly compliment someone when they aren’t receptive to it, you could potentially get in trouble. Isn’t that why sexual harassment training is taught in many workplaces? If you know how to appropriately speak to your coworkers, and more importantly focu…	/r/MensRights	10/02/26 03:47 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Idk man, I think women speaking about their trauma is more important than this theoretical “backlash”. Being honest, alot of what I’ve seen on this sub is women doing horrible things and getting hatred for it (rightfully so). However, why is it when women come forward about their trauma, there is defensiveness? What about the innocent men? Well, are you asking about the innocent women who were literally raped and abused by the most powerful people in the world???	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 03:28 PM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Care to show evidence it is not a small chance? Every statistic like ever shows that only a small chance of rape is a false accusation. And like I said, why is it that you care more for the unlikely chance of a false conviction rather than the majority of cases where the men ACTUALLY were sexually abusive monsters? That’s like saying that a criminal shouldn’t be arrested or held on the chance that they may not have done the crime. In the case of rape or other violent crimes, that is a very dange…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 03:22 PM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash I think that’s honestly still the man’s fault in that scenario. One, why is he sleeping with someone he can’t guarantee is an adult? Two, if they are specifically going after someone younger, why would they go so young that they potentially might be under 18? The girls who lie about their age are wrong of course, no doubt. However, it’s not like he’s the victim 100%. If you’re 19 and you sleep with someone who’s 17, that’s not wrong. If you’re 30 and you sleep with someone who’s 17, prison!!! Ev…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 02:57 PM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash I can’t find any evidence that he did, but if there is any, I would be disgusted.	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 02:52 PM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash This is an interesting claim. I looked into it and it says that this rumor is inconclusive and/or misinterpreted. There’s a few accusers that Hillary called names (like calling one a failed cabaret star) and she said something rude about Monica Lewinsky. There was also something about her wanting the information about her husband’s rumored affairs to be hidden during the election. That’s kinda weird. The accusation that she keeps “dirt files” on people is something I’ve never heard before though…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 05:37 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Oh, if I wasn’t clear before, Bill Clinton sucks. I’ve literally been saying that this whole time. Getting offended over my verbiage somehow not being strong enough is crazy. Although, I’m soooooo proud of you for acknowledging that there’s some valid reasoning to call Trump a pedophile. Good for you. Bill is gross, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s a rapist (I mean, he took advantage of Monica and there was a major power imbalance). I just think it’s funny you only have negative things to say…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 05:19 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Again, you are focusing too much on the small chance that the accusation is false compared to the victim who was abused. Even if we are going with that logic, a false accusation isn’t comparable to real abuse. Even then, that is why it’s important to investigate these cases in the first place. If a man is falsely accused, it will be disproven in court. If he is rightfully accused, then he should go to jail like he deserves. We would never know if women were silent about their abuse.	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 05:00 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Bill is a weirdo for that. I'm not disagreeing with you there. Once again though, you completely brushed over all the other accusations against people you (probably) like more. Trump has had dozens allegations spanning for decades, with multiple of those being confirmed in the Epstein files. But nooooooo. Bill Clinton!!!! Also, idk how I feel about Hillary. Shes pretty off too, but I mainly don't like how she stuck with Bill. She kind of couldn't leave him because she wanted her own political ca…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 03:52 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Sorry, but do you care more about the social impact of a rumor or the effects of actually being abused? For the men that do have false rumors propagated against them that they raped someone, I feel so much sympathy for them. Its tragic. However, to quiet the voices of genuine victims because of the potential that a false rumor would start is stupid. For example, there are many people falsely imprisoned for murder. That sticks on their record and its horrible. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't …	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 03:42 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash I love how you brush over the republicans that are involved with Epstein just to point out Bill Clinton lol. Well, first of all, he sucks too. He is a sucks and he cheats on his wife a lot. I didn’t like him before the Epstein files released, and I definitely don’t like him now. Weinstein used democrat politics as a cover, just as Epstein did. You think any of those losers were fighting for women’s rights or equality while they were actively abusing women? Still, that doesn’t speak for the democ…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 03:04 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash I’m here because I care about men’s rights and women’s rights. All rights. There’s middle ground within every conversation. I literally asked why you brought up that Weinstein was “liberal” and explained why that doesn’t even matter. I don’t expect you to like feminism, however it’s kind of crazy that you think that #Metoo was bad specifically because it “resulted” from feminism. Well, without the #Metoo movement and feminism, there would be so many victims whose stories would not be heard, both…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 02:54 AM
0	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Well. the laws must have not worked. Not only did Jeffery Epstein abuse young girls for decades, but later on he got a sweetheart deal for it. He really didn't get any just punishment. If anything, the #MeToo movement, which encouraged women to confront their abusers, was a good thing, no? If everyone stayed silent, who knows if Jeffery would have ever been caught? Hundreds if not thousands of girls have already been taken advantage of by Epstein and his friends, where was the law to protect the…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 02:13 AM
0	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Care to delve deeper into the negative aspects of #metoo? From what I was assuming, I thought the negative outcomes implied by the post would be laws or some sort of unfair persecution against men. What you describe in the last sentence seems to be more of a "believe all women" approach. Of course, some women lie about their abuse, but the vast majority do not. Ntm, not only women experience abuse either, so it would also be a "believe all victims" argument more than just women. I absolutely agr…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 02:07 AM
0	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash So what are you suggesting? Forgo laws to protect women? I hope there can be fairness for both men and women, truly. This situation though requires legal and civil protections for women so that they are not taken advantage of again like they were by people like Epstein.	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 01:32 AM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Except his best friends and supporters are still around. Abusers just like him still walk free…	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 01:12 AM
-1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Like i said, he specifically trafficked young girls. He did not traffick young boys from what reports are saying. The report you are referencing was a workplace incident which is absolutely sick. He didn't deserve it, and I'm not claiming he did. However (and this doesn't excuse it, and I'm not comparing trauma), he was not trafficked, which is what I was referencing in my previous comment.	/r/MensRights	09/02/26 12:07 AM
1	Fatherhood and how it is downplayed What are you trying to prove? You don't think women also need to do those jobs either? Whos protecting the kids while dad is at work? Whos fixing things and driving children to their appointments? Infact, you kinda proved my point more. Those are additional tasks that mothers do thats unpaid. If you are trying to say that men do all of these tasks when they are home, then sure. They get their paycheck at home and they fix issues in their house and protect their family. The mother in this scenari…	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 11:52 PM
1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Its so sick that children are abused. That practice specifically was so heinous as well...	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 11:47 PM
-1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Well, I specifically didn't mention young boys because epstein specifically trafficked young girls. Thats not erasing male suffering at all... kind of weird to assume that.	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 11:45 PM
4	People on Twitter (X) making jokes about a man who was stabbed to death by his girlfriend. lol, btw blocking me because you are scared that my views oppose your echo chamber is so childish. Women are the emotional ones right?	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 11:40 PM
1	People on Twitter (X) making jokes about a man who was stabbed to death by his girlfriend. Mind you, a good portion of this sub is about how men should stay away from women or ignore them solely because of a couple bad women. So whats your point?	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 11:16 PM
1	Disturbing Facebook comments This logic is like someone being happy that a heinous criminal is imprisoned for life. Yeah, if you do something sick, you should be punished. Justice being served should be something to be happy about, no?	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 07:01 PM
1	Fatherhood and how it is downplayed If you think any aspect of motherhood is easy, then you must be extremely wealthy or off your rockers lol. Just as men in a traditional household work long hours, women have to as well… imagine having a babysitter, chef, maid, chauffeur, manager, etc for your child and believing that it’s easy work. Unless you’re rich enough to purchase all of those services, the stay at home parent (in this scenario, the mother) has to do all of that work. Unpaid. On call 24 hours a day.	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 06:57 PM
1	My diary entry on hating being a man lately Hey bro, I just wanna show some support for you. Don’t fall into the trap of hating yourself for the actions of others. You don’t sound cruel or primal at all in your writing, you sound very strong and emotionally intelligent for being able to describe your thoughts constructively. Your feelings sound like they are based on the stereotypes placed against you, which is totally unfair. You should be allowed to explore your interests regardless if they are perceived as “feminine” or not. Don’t list…	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 06:48 PM
0	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash I hope women feel safe against predators like Epstein.	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 06:43 PM
-1	Could the Epstein files trigger a new #MeToo style backlash Yeah exactly. I don’t know what OP’s point even is atp. Epstein was a monster who hurt young women, girls, and children. This is NOT the time for gender wars	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 06:42 PM
2	People on Twitter (X) making jokes about a man who was stabbed to death by his girlfriend. This murder is absolutely sick, no doubt about it. I’m just confused why people are taking the comments seriously. The comments are referencing a “role reversal” scenario. They are saying these things because those are actual sentences people say when women are murdered. For example, the “let’s not ruin her bright future” quote, or the “he led her on” one.	/r/MensRights	08/02/26 06:31 PM
2	Victims of False Accusations Bold of you to use the hard "er" in reference to a 15 year old black girl	/r/MensRights	07/09/22 10:14 PM
1	Victims of False Accusations I agreed with you until I found out she was 15 and he was 37. Both of them are terrible people	/r/MensRights	07/09/22 10:12 PM