TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

littleelf Archive

View 4 posts and 169 comments by littleelf on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

This reflects one of my biggest pet peeves with feminist whining. They complain about "unrealistic" body images in films, and point to Scarlett Johannson and Jennifer Lawrence, who are just fit. Not even super fit, but like "I exercise moderately, and watch what I eat" fit. Chris Evans, Chris Hemsworth, and Hugh Jackman all took steroids.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 01:48 PM
2

That statistic is warped by serial divorcees. A more accurate representation of reality would include only the number of first marriages which end in divorce. Don't ever marry a woman who has been divorced.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:30 PM
0

Really? You're unsubscribing for the comments of a paranoid loonie who is one hundred points in the negative?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:15 PM
48

Do this, but keep everything identical so it is hard to tell which is real, and put a poster above saying "all of these are bigoted, but only one is real".
/r/MensRights23/04/13 01:20 PM
5

I hate it when people say feminism began in the nineteenth century, because while the word existed, no one that I can confirm was saying it in regards to suffragettes or actual women's rights activists. As far as I can tell it wasn't until the 60's/70's that the term entered prominence, and it was then applied backwards to lend credence to itself. Put another way, if I started a movement tomorrow dedicated to racial equality (here meaning a thinly veiled excuse at bigotry toward pale people), ta…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 12:15 PM
2

She's not any kind of Canadian. She's an Australian living in Canada, who will be deported after release.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:41 PM
1

But remember, black people do not live as long, so there's less cost associated with old age.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:17 AM
-3

From what I saw of the article, there was no evidence that they were threatened, coerced, or drugged, and she wasn't in a position of authority over them. Without information from the boys about their state of mind and level of agreement we cannot determine if there was a crime.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:28 AM
1

Did you read the title? A: Yeah, you're correct. She brought it on herself, and internet trolling is not an example of sexism, and she was utterly wrong to generalize men from that. B: Yeah, again, correct. C: He's married, and in the process of having his first kid. He's not a white knight, he's just kind of an idiot.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:36 PM
1

I actually followed through the numbers on a feminist poster saying "X percent of rapists never see jail time" and if you accept their conclusion as true, there are more rapists than there are adults in the US.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:31 PM
0

I think it's most that your comment is poorly constructed and hard to understand.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:39 PM
5

/r/suicidewatch We're here for you. I don't know what specifically you need, but I find that hobbies help. Non-reddit related hobbies.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:29 PM
26

This was in Canada. Your point is still valid, but Canada.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 09:39 PM
2

It wasn't that it was morally repugnant, or even a bad idea, but the commerce clause does not grant the federal government the authority to make someone sell goods or services to someone else under any circumstances, even if their reasoning for refusing service is itself morally repugnant. (In this case, being racist.) The commerce clause simply means that the federal government has the right to some degree to regulate trade, both international and interstate but, and this is a really big BUT, n…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:32 PM
2

Can, and have the right to are different things. Heart of Atlanta V US (which doesn't apply in Canada where this occurred, but odds are there is something similar) says that the civil rights act (which was unconstitutional to begin with) also applies to private business with no more connection to the government than that they pay taxes. So legally, no business can deny service to someone based on the color of their skin. They can require that people satisfy some other requirement, which requires…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:02 PM
57

I think both sexes need to be taught not to start shit ever.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:11 AM
8

Doesn't make it wrong. And this happened in Cleveland, so I think the American point of view is the relevant one here.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:33 PM
9

Yes you do. I have the right to bring a gun to knife fight if my life is being threatened. When someone assaults me, I have every right to use all necessary and reasonable force to ensure that they do not do so again. Further, Hughes did not escalate. There was nothing unreasonable about what Artis Hughes did. He didn't kick her while she was down. He didn't use a weapon on her. He popped her in the face after she had already hit him. Now my inclination is that one should attempt non-violence, b…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:25 PM
7

Not how it works. Women have more accidents, men have more severe accidents.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 07:17 PM
3

Right, I was thinking "That guy's not Boehner, he isn't orange".
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:34 PM
1

I feel like nine-hour long interrogations are fruitless. I have never in my life read a single story about nine-hour interrogation that ended with the subject being proven guilty without the confession.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 01:30 PM
2

What was said and by whom?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:04 AM
3

I'm so used to his style of speaking that I actually started hearing that in his voice. Weird.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 02:03 AM
5

Now if I repeatedly say, 1 in 4 women are raped in college every year. It doesn't matter if it's a big old whopper of a lie, that'll bring in the money by the boatload. It bothers me to no end that people believe that. I attend a university with 18000 women. We had less than a dozen reports of sexual assault last academic year. Let's assume 1% of all women sexually assaulted report. (A tenth of what even feminist propaganda says is the number). That's 1200/18000, or 6.7% of all students. Now kee…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:14 AM
6

I especially like how her conclusions do not at all follow from her premise. If policymakers and people who care about children want to reduce the number of abandoned kids, they need to address the systemic issues: poverty, maternity leave, access to resources, and health care. With the possible exception of poverty, none of these have anything to do with the actual issue of whether or not the child is wanted, merely how many people besides the parents have to work to the benefit of the child. E…
/r/MensRights21/09/12 02:01 PM
7

I am of the opinion that if the child can declare a preference and justify it, he/she is old enough to choose.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 11:22 PM
0

4.8% is that that says.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:41 AM
4

Are they? Isn't 1 in 20 including female perpetrated, but not including prison rape?
/r/MensRights19/09/12 11:29 PM
-1

It's sexist against women because women are just as capable of physically overpowering you as men despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. /s
/r/MensRights17/09/12 12:55 PM
2

I weigh 48.5 kilos. Hire me.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 12:53 PM
3

So why report that number as 'homeless'? Why report homeless and living in a shelter as separate numbers for clarity?
/r/MensRights17/09/12 12:45 PM
76

White communities in peril as white are jailed in record numbers. Still nowhere near parity with blacks, but that's okay.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 12:36 PM
20

Atheism+ is for people who don't feel morally superior enough just by being atheists.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 09:32 PM
1

The US intervened after they got attacked. Switzerland very likely would have done the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 10:59 PM
7

How about "don't go behind people's backs at all"? If I want someone's number, birthday, etc. I will ask them.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 02:59 AM
15

I find it kind of funny, and kind of sad, that one of the few unanimous opinions the SCOTUS has had in recent years was deciding that it was not unconstitutional to force people to pay to further political agendas they disagree with.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:23 PM
2

I don't want in to either. I don't play golf. Too elitist for my tastes.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:55 PM
17

When I saw it, I imagine he was thinking something like this: "Woman, I am trying to remember where I left my keys."
/r/MensRights22/08/12 02:50 PM
2

It took less than half the nation to elect him, and it wasn't that great of a thing anyway.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:42 PM
7

That's cool. You can also steal the description.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:57 AM
8

It's like the r/gaming and r/atheism circlejerks had a circlejerk baby, and that baby is now fourteen and thinks it understands politics.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:24 AM
-3

Yeah, I'm with you. It's an interesting read, but it's in the wrong place.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:24 PM
1

You're looking at it the wrong way. It's not women, it's non-workers. The fact that a majority of non-workers are women is no more to the point than that more black men are non-workers than white men.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:05 AM
3

Age of consent in KY is 16. It would have been legal if she was not his teacher.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 08:54 PM
-4

Probably not, but keep in mind where you're standing. Being an MRA is the social equivalent of outing yourself as a Klansman to some people, so you don't become an MRA unless you have been hurt by misandry to the point where you couldn't ignore it anymore. People who haven't been hurt by misandry have no reason to come here.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 02:24 AM
4

I believe you misunderstood him/her. His "why anyone should care" probably referred to the bad reasoning of misandrists, not the misandry.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 10:15 AM
0

You honestly think that with teargas flooding the room and panicked bystanders running among, that anyone who isn't a murder would fire wildly into the darkness? Is there a word that can properly describe how completely fucking stupid that is?
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:17 AM
3

The wiki-article includes how she blamed her father at her parole hearing.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:54 AM
0

Wrong. Entirely wrong. If he planning on people having guns and wore armor, he would learn pretty quickly how not effective armor is when you're outnumbered three to one. Adding guns in a situation that isn't violent is escalation, but adding guns to a situation like Aurora, in which death was already going to happen is not.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 12:53 AM
12

Every officer involved should be fired and brought up on charges for reckless endangerment and inciting vigilantism.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 11:11 PM
4

As long as religious or cultural reasons exist or complete misunderstanding of the facts persists, doctors still make money doing it it will continue to happen. FTFY.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:46 AM
3

I don't know how I feel about nine months in jail for filing a false police report. It should be two separate offenses. A criminal offense for filing a false police report, and a civil offense for falsely calling someone a criminal (in this case, a rapist). Conviction of the former should be permissible as evidence in the latter.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 12:25 AM
4

Not nearly. Humans killing each other is pretty normal. It's only recently (in terms of our evolutionary history) that murdering transgressors became socially unacceptable. That's not to say that it's not better to go about murdering people to solve your problems (quite the contrary, societies which frown upon that sort of thing seem to do better in net), just that it's pretty normal to want to kill someone whom you perceive as being a unfair threat to you.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 01:26 AM
4

That I have, my friend. That I have. It also made me viciously angry about how impotent we are to stop child porn production.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 09:20 PM
47

It would cost him 20000 to hire a reasonably competent hitman to kill her. The courts should not make it such that killing your ex-non-wife is your best option.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 05:26 PM
5

Women lawyers. FTFY
/r/MensRights01/07/12 05:24 PM
1

I was actually just thinking about this, because I was working on a Prince of Persia costume, and it occurred to me that it wasn't actually physically possible to have a chest like the Prince's (in the games, not the movie), since his muscles aren't modeled after a typical human being's.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 12:40 AM
1

Are we also including human error for OCP's? Like forgetting to take them? Further, making them all the same price is completely economically moronic. If everything's the same price, there's no incentive to economize at all, which drives up costs. more women on birth control, the fewer pregnancies. And that means fewer abortions, and fewer babies to poor mothers who end up needing WIC and welfare. Your premise does not lead to your conclusion. Fewer unwanted pregnancies is a good thing, but none…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:12 PM
1

Preventative care for women includes preventing pregnancy If paying for OCP's had an appreciable effect on unwanted pregnancy, insurance would already pay for it. Women who are responsible enough to use OCP's but whose insurance does not pay for it use condoms. It's just a fact of life that women are, medically, more complex than men, and thus require more preventative care. I disagree with this assumption. It makes more sense that we just know more about how to prevent disease in women given th…
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:02 PM
1

I'm well aware of that, but I don't think that women who don't get OCP's free will stop using protection entirely, when condoms are cheap and available everywhere.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:55 PM
1

Well yes, just as my countrymen are all my people, but I am not especially responsible for one group over another, even if I am better equipped to help one. And compelling people to help one group over another is hardly an appropriate stance for the government to take, even if you believe that it is the responsibility of government to provide healthcare, it can't be the responsibility of the government to provide more healthcare for one group at the expense of another.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:52 AM
1

They're our women. No they aren't. They're their own people. We can get all libertarian on the topic, but our ideals aside, that's more or less what's going on here, and you can still disagree with it, but on those grounds you're disagreeing with it more for socioeconomic reasons than social I disagree with these policies in general because they are generally bad policies. I disagree with this one in particular because it is bad and sexist.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 04:00 AM
1

Rule number one of doing anything: Intentions are not results. The things listed here are good things, I'll give you that. and things that end up saving the payers (among them, we, the men) money It only saves the people paying money, but it seems absurd and sexist to have a tax funded healthcare system benefit women disproportionately when men pay the majority of taxes already.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:45 AM
1

Check the amount of federal funding (just the federal funding, private donors can be as sexist as they want) for breast cancer research and compare that to the amount for prostate cancer research. They have similar mortality rates, but breast cancer receives ten times the funding. edit: According to this article, it's only twice as much.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:39 AM
1

Paying for preventative procedures for women and not for men on the grounds that the ones that only apply to men are "less effective" is absolutely a bad idea, given that the only reason male-specific screening methods are less effective is misandry in how research funding is appropriated.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:31 AM
2

I realize full well that this is geared entirely for the benefit of women, but I'm saying that it's not just them that ends up profiting from this. Wait, what? Also, if the reason is that prostate exams are less effective than mammograms, than there should be appropriations to research better screening methods, not refraining from using the ones we have.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:15 AM
1

Actually, IIRC, vasectomies are much less risky and invasive, as well as being cheaper, which are all huge arguments in favor of covering them over tubal ligation. Once you dispose of all the petty illogical rationalizations, the only reason left is misandry. women need more preventative care than men Citation needed.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 02:05 AM
6

Show evidence that women who do not have OCP's paid for get abortions instead of condoms. Having mammograms is a good idea. So is having prostate exams. The bill mandates one be universally available and copay free. Care to guess which?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:06 PM
1

Men are the majority payers of taxes. Anything that is financed or subsidized through taxes is at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:03 PM
14

Women may need pap smears and mammograms, but they don't need to have everyone pay for them.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:01 PM
-14

If it took 30 years to come up with something as wholly abominable as Obamacare, we are long since doomed anyway.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 06:01 AM
0

I don't know. I think that possession of CP should certainly merit investigation, and mandatory therapy. I don't think prison time is the most effective means of fixing these people, but doing nothing isn't much better.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 03:56 AM
1

IIRC, Planned Parenthood gives out BC of all kinds. I think that people who believe strongly that BC should be readily available for all people would make much more of a difference by donating to Planned Parenthood, than by asking politicians for help.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 03:51 AM
2

It usually isn't, but there's an extreme dearth of responsibility when police officers arrest people (even moreso for men), so if a women gets leered at in a bar, and she calls the cops who arrest him, they can hold him for up to 72 hours (depending on the area) with no evidence and no crime being committed, and there is no personal liability on the part of the police officers.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 03:43 AM
6

The assumption being that I wouldn't suggest a mental hospital for a man who was nuts.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 01:57 AM
20

The woman needs an institution, because she's clearly nuts.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 04:03 PM
15

Police abusing their power? I am completely surprised. /s
/r/MensRights11/06/12 10:34 PM
15

5'4". Maybe that's why I can't find a job.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:00 PM
32

I'm sure feminists will find some way to make sure only men can be convicted of this.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 08:38 PM
7

The two are in conflict how? The argument is that a women's right to have her choices go completely unexamined is somehow important?
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:08 AM
4

Brian Banks was a lot a victim of his lawyer, who should have been disbarred for what she did. She was probably a feminist wanting to fry an athlete for rape (because rape culture makes all athletes think they are entitled to rape people obviously), and didn't care that her client was completely and obviously innocent.
/r/MensRights03/06/12 03:23 PM
6

I find it odd that they list impotency, but not infertility or frigidity.
/r/MensRights02/06/12 04:15 PM
5

I was wondering why someone whose sole interesting quality is that they don't swallow feminist bullshit would do an AMA.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 03:40 PM
5

And where would that fear come from? There is absolutely no reason not to report a rape, given that falsely reporting rape is almost never punished. And where do you get that 15% number?
/r/MensRights30/05/12 10:32 PM
22

I've always seen Rebecca Watson as being this: "I'm an atheist, but I have no qualifications aside from that, so I'm going to play up my ovaries for all their worth (because seeking fame through one's gender isn't at all anti-feminist), and then maybe people will pay attention to me."
/r/MensRights26/05/12 03:59 PM
-2

Well it's more than that. It's that they aren't a government body, and we have no expectation of egalitarianism from them.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 03:11 PM
22

I don't know anyone I would let be jailed for six years for monetary gain.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 02:02 AM
2

Hardly his point.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 12:34 AM
20

"I've been thinking of a way to explain to straight white men how life works for them." As if he/she is some kind of expert? Moreso than white men?
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:40 AM
13

We NEVER advocate for violence here. NEVER.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:12 PM
0

"300+ boys wrestling programs". If it was as easy as you say, it wouldn't have happened.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:32 PM
1

They don't have to win for the lawsuit to be incredibly damaging, and I think you underestimate their chances. "Your point that a girls' wrestling team with 2 players must get as much money as a 40-member boy's' team remains grossly wrong." I don't think they should. But the legislation allows for lawsuits, and their chances are not nearly as bad as they should be.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 04:15 PM
-3

Wrestling is a contact sport. Even if the girls are okay with being grappled and thrown around, the parents might not be. If you have boys and girls wrestling together, it's only a matter of time before something happens that some parent doesn't like and sues over. "may consider the failure to provide necessary funds for teams for one sex in assessing equality of opportunity for members of each sex." Consider that.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:57 PM
1

True, but how many of those men were twelve when they first got the shot?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:49 PM
0

It's a no-win situation for schools. If you let girls join the boy's team, you get a sexual harassment suit a week. You don't let girls wrestle, you get a title IX suit. If you let girls wrestle only if there's interest, you still get a title IX suit because you should fund the girl's wrestling team (which has two members) with as much money as you fund the 40 member boy's team.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:42 PM
19

Isn't sabotaging your significant other's relationships with friends and family the first sign of an abusive relationship?
/r/MensRights06/05/12 06:18 AM
12

It doesn't even use consistent grammar. It refers to men as being both "You" and "They". Confusing for a moment.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 12:50 PM
14

Women receive generally lighter sentences and more sympathy from the media. Society excuses violence from women and condemns it from men.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 05:07 AM
3

One of the problems here (There are many), is that people see this and say, "Failure of capitalism, the socialists were right along", and yet socialism itself has had nothing but failures. So anyone who has studied economics treats them as being full of shit, and ignores the very real problem of the prison industrial complex.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:52 PM
15

5: TedxWomen exists, and it's terrible most of the time.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:44 PM
17

What about offering men's only classes? Since men can be intimidated by the female dominated classrooms.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 07:57 AM
2

I think that one was child porn, since nude pictures exchanged hands, but we could be talking about two different things.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 04:31 AM
2

If you have reason to believe it to be true, you can drop the allegedly. You aren't naming names.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:45 AM
2

There we are! Yeah, totally. "many don't report, far [more don't report] than women who don't report being sexually assaulted" Fixed.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 03:43 AM
1

The rest of your points are, as far as I can tell, completely valid. I just think that that particular aside doesn't make sense, and it's not relevant to your conclusion, so if we can't reach agreement in the next two comments, let's agree to drop it. What makes you think that children don't under-report at the same or higher rates as adults? Children in general know they aren't taken seriously.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:44 AM
7

If this guy was actually rapist, I would still be opposed to him getting kidnapped and beaten. We have a justice system for a reason, and it hasn't exactly shown reluctance to punish rapists.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:34 AM
1

far fewer than women who don't report being sexually assaulted I'm skeptical. It seems to me that since the existence of support systems for adult women are thrown in the face of everyone attending school in a western nation, there is social pressure to report (don't report and he might rape someone else), and almost no consequences for false reports, that women would very seldom not report.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:30 AM
4

Or maybe she was six years older. I don't know. The article is unclear.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:15 AM
20

From what I understand, she's only three years older. Yeah, if their gender roles were reversed the guy would never see the light of day again, but I'm inclined to restraint here. I think she probably thought it was normal too, and that she just needed to encourage him to participate. That at least seems more likely to me than a thirteen-year-old methodical rapist.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 01:12 AM
98

Calling her ugly was low blow. Valid, but a low blow.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 05:08 AM
2

Awww crap. I've got friends in Italy.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:46 AM
3

She donated the egg.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:43 AM
3

Here's what the did. At the bottom the paper, before any research had begun, they wrote, "And therefore, 1 in 4 women will be raped". Then they made up the rest. Even if that wildly inaccurate claim were true, they would still be wrong to have made it, because they began by making the claim and searched for evidence to support it, rather than exploring reality to find the truth.
/r/MensRights23/04/12 12:27 AM
1

Franklin V Gwinnet was BS. No one should be allowed to get money off of title IX lawsuits.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 06:45 PM
3

Didn't happen at the school, happened at her home. All three of the boys were of the age of consent. No evidence that she coerced or threatened them. Hell, she wasn't even their teacher, she was a secretary, so there isn't a grading conflict of interest. She should be fired, to be sure, but put in jail? Well, I wouldn't want to see a man arrested in this situation, I see no reason why a woman should be arrested.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:59 AM
9

My god! They're slightly more anatomically correct than the regular legos! We're doomed!
/r/MensRights22/04/12 01:40 AM
6

I'm pretty sure male POW's get raped as frequently and as violently as female POW's. We just expect men to suck it up.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 01:18 PM
10

Normal people don't do holocausts either. Over time the Nazis had desensitized the German people to the idea that Jews had rights and freedoms that deserved respect. The same thing his happening to men in America, only it's easier because humans already favor women. Godwin me if you must, but my point stands.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 04:21 AM
2

No one is talking about charging her with murder. This girl is more in need of our sympathy than our scorn.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:19 AM
9

More than forty percent of men in South Africa have been sexually abused themselves. It's rape central over there. http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=ad3524cc-6076-4bc2-a015-23860553bd04
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:20 AM
3

I'm outraged for a number of reasons. The child didn't just die spontaneously, it died as a result of her negligence. But there are a lot more reasons than her sex that she isn't in prison now.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:18 AM
4

Most divorces are initiated by women. When I quit my job, I don't get severance. When I'm fired, I don't get severance indefinitely.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 12:34 PM
-15

Says the ChildSnatcher.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 10:35 PM
0

I go to the gym frequently, and I'm a member of Fitocracy. Every freakin' day I get my ass handed to me by women who have been working out longer and are much stronger.
/r/MensRights15/04/12 03:53 AM
2

Punishing people for 'defiance' is unamerican.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 02:22 AM
3

1/2 your age plus seven. All I'm going to say.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 02:12 AM
5

I could drive a truck.... scratch that.... I could drive a fucking armored convoy with hummers, tanks and APC's through the holes in her logic with room to spare.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 01:53 AM
-1

I was on your side, right up to the point where you attacked capitalism.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:52 PM
4

Don't talk to just one lawyer. Talk to every lawyer. Have dinner, a meeting, a business lunch, with every half-competent lawyer in the state. Make sure no one can represent her without it being a conflict of interest.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 04:27 PM
2

She already said she didn't go the police, which was the right decision.
/r/MensRights28/01/12 05:33 AM
1

The heated argument happened because if she had pursued legal action he could have been expelled summarily just for being accused, even if she made up the story.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 03:15 AM
3

What?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:20 PM
7

Yes, a thorough, inquisitive discussion was totally necessary in that situation. That didn't happen. What happened was rampant downvoting and senseless comments adding nothing. If someone says "my relative died in this way, and technically it was criminal homicide", you can point out that it being criminal is ridiculous without being a dick. The way to get people to see reason is not to tell them not to empathize with alleged victims, but to get them to identify and empathize with the accused. I…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:19 PM
1

I know. But college debate classes are like that for reasons. And fighting for hearts and minds does require a lot of emotion, but if someone already thinks you are wrong, hitting them in the face with the contradictory evidence will not get your point across.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 06:07 AM
2

Excuse me, but what? I'm responding to all legitimate arguments against my behavior, and ignoring the trolls. Tell me, what am I doing hypocritically?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:45 AM
5

It is bizarrely interesting to see this thread develop into a microcosm of our problems as a whole. On one side you have the very conservative MRA's, who think that being right gives them unlimited license to be an absolute dick to others, and anyone who disagrees is a concern troll. On another you have the rational, but complacent MRA's who are saying logical and meaningful things, but not devising a course of action for the future. Then there's me and mine. I'll let you form your own judgement…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:37 AM
3

It might have been unfair of me to generalize, given that are close to 30,000 people subscribed to this subreddit, and only a handful of trolls, but those trolls were getting upvotes, and legitimate contrary opinions were getting downvotes. This is the kind of BS we call SRS out on daily. We cannot simply sit by while it's done on our behalf, or we are no better than they are.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 03:29 AM
1

Wrong. I began attacking your argument rationally, raised the point that your adherence to certain methods will not lead you to your goals, and from that questioned how much you actually want those goals. Because if you want them at all, you want them less than you want to feel good about yourself.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:41 AM
3

I only meet the definition if the definition is weak. I'm not some well-meaning fool who wants to fix your opinions. I'm a rationalist who agrees with your ideas, but is pointing out that your methods aren't going to get you your goals. Which makes me wonder, are you actually an MRA, or a troll trying to get the movement even more bad press than we already get?
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:35 AM
2

It is. I just have bizarre syntax sometimes.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:29 AM
1

Happens all the time bro. English is a tricky language. Glad you asked for clarification instead of just downvoting.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:26 AM
5

Have you read the things that were said to her? Have you read the things she said? This may come as something of a shock to you, but this is what people think of when they hear about the men's rights movement. There was a right way to handle that kind of discussion. Mass-trolling the people who disagree with you was not it, unless you want MRA's to be the same as SRS. It is not being a "concern troll" to point out that mass trolling someone is not helping our case. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:25 AM
0

You and I have different ideas of what the word "necessarily" means. To me necessarily means that I don't by nature of what I'm saying agree, not that I disagree.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:18 AM
1

I don't have any opinion on what you did because I don't know what you did.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 02:09 AM
2

I don't know what you did, so I'm in no position to judge your actions, but I felt it necessary to point out that that guy is fucking crazy.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:58 AM
4

I don't necessarily agree with what you did, but Qwestioneverypost is a foaming at the mouth lunatic.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 01:38 AM
3

You can't fix them. They've decided that all the discrimination in the world is designed to oppress women. All discrimination against men is benevolent sexism toward women. It is completely impossible for their broken minds to make such a radical shift, just because they have been proven wrong.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 09:00 PM
3

A former teacher of mine and a respected friend posted one of these shirts to his wall. All I did was point out that his wife has a father who might not have approved of their relationship (He's black, she's white).
/r/MensRights23/01/12 02:08 AM
3

Even if Anglin is a completely mediocre student, that doesn't mean the school system isn't systematically failing boys. They're outnumbered 2:1 on the honor roll.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 03:02 AM
8

He was my favorite ranger when I was a kid. No idea he was gay though.
/r/MensRights22/01/12 01:53 AM
-10

I'll take five.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 07:50 PM
1

Every time I hear about the 'true cause' behind someone's violent behavior I'm reminded of a quote from Battle Royale. Kawada was talking about a pair of killers, one who was raped repeatedly by her stepfather, and one who was in a car accident that made him a sociopath. Kawada said "You're right. They weren't born monsters. But they are certainly monsters now."
/r/MensRights17/01/12 04:58 PM
22

We need to start our own ad campaign, "When my friend was falsely accused of rape, I didn't immediately assume he was guilty. My brain is not for stupid."
/r/MensRights17/01/12 02:26 PM
2

This is the most condescending piece of shit article I've seen in almost a full twenty minutes. The assumption that women do not deserve an equal share in war is insulting.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 05:44 AM
1

Not at all. Are you saying r/guns is crazy?
/r/MensRights11/01/12 02:12 AM
1

May I introdcue you to r/guns?
/r/MensRights10/01/12 09:24 PM
8

Which you mean is: Sometimes the police actually do their jobs.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 06:48 PM
4

I don't care what your gender is, or how old you are. If you can't walk, I will fucking carry you. I don't care if it's my super muscular 200 pound RA. (I'm 112, so it would be more dragging than carrying, but that idea is the same.) Because it's the right fucking thing to do.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 04:02 PM
9

A better title for this article would be "The many failings of a small amount of men (that are perpetrated just as often by women) that we will fallaciously use to de-legitimize claims of discrimination against men." Edit: I accidentally a letter
/r/MensRights31/12/11 05:01 PM
2

I quite agree.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:26 AM
3

From what it says in the article, it appears the police arrested someone based on an accusation of a another person who did not so much as provide identification. This is a travesty of justice and a failing of procedure no matter the nature of the crime, or the genders of the persons involved.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 12:37 AM
1

I think it's invalid for one solid reason. The man who has just gotten into a car accident in which he has become critically injured does not get to deny that I have a broken wrist, and his injuries, even if they are more severe, do not negate my need for treatment. If there's a doctor nearby who can set a wrist, but can correct his internal bleeding, he doesn't get to say that my wrist should remain broken until he gets treatment.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 12:11 AM
0

Stop calling illegitimate actions by the police arrests. It's kidnapping and confinement.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 05:24 AM
3

Most violent crimes are committed by black people. Should we abandon the idea of racial equality? The notion that a meaningful equality is unachievable is false. The notion that either gender is expendable is false.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 11:24 PM
1

Why waste a good action scene on a stupid romance movie?
/r/MensRights09/12/11 03:15 PM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 04:20 AM
2

SRS?
/r/MensRights09/12/11 04:09 AM
3

People ignoring solid evidence and data when it disagrees with personal bias? Nah, that'll never happen.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 09:42 PM
1

Who are all these woman that are sexually assaulting children?
/r/MensRights08/12/11 03:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter