TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

liuetenantwaffleiron Archive

View 3 posts and 40 comments by liuetenantwaffleiron on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Ha! Exactly. I can only imagine what this lady may have gone through in Libya, but I doubt the town she was relocated to had much to do with her continuing problems.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:08 AM
14

Indeed; Considering that Boulder, Colorado is one of the strongest bastions of super-left liberalism in the state (often referred to as the Republik of Boulder,) I suspect that it being "white and rich" had very little to do with her inability to assimilate. [edit: to express a word of non-contradiction with you]
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:10 PM
1

We call this "hitting the wall. Hard."
/r/MensRights27/07/15 04:09 PM
2

Agreed. If the parties involved are honest, open, and ultimately, satisfied, open marriages can work. ("Futuristic" is a great way to describe the feeling of transcending traditional relationships) This fellow, however, seems desperate to rationalize an asymmetrical situation which he seems to have been bullied into. He could have rationalized it differently; Of all the explanations he could have given to himself, Feminism is the one of the least-convincing he could have chosen.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:53 PM
1

I (haven't read paper but) wonder if this has something to do with the ability to smell pheromones, and for the body to respond accordingly. We know (sorry, no citations on hand) that a huge part of attraction is subconscious pheromonal communication. (to wit: two 'bodies' know if they're attracted to each other before they even consciously meet.) If those pheromones aren't being received olfactorally, then that line of communication with a woman is basically severed- No signals in, so no signal…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 06:48 PM
4

I think I see your problem, now- You're missing the implicit statement of the headline, which isn't that Amy Schumer raped a guy; rather that by the standards I mentioned above, feminists and campus policy (in a growing number of US Univerities) should consider this rape, but they don't. I think this reading is obvious to most American-born readers, and you (as I presume someone who speaks English as a second language) should be forgiven for missing it. It was a sarcastic headline.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:20 PM
6

It doesn't matter if she continued or not- The standard for rape championed by feminists and college campuses is that he was presumably unable to consent due to his inebriation. The fact that few care about this double-standard is what's troubling to many here.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 04:58 AM
1

Thank you for your insights. I'd like to hear your opinion of the film once seen. I think one of my problems with MM:FR was that I was being pulled in two directions- On one hand, I was to accept the absurd excess of the massive vehicles and structures; On the other, I was to feel for the suffering of the escaped women as analogous to, and illustrative of, real-world events. It's this latter point that I feel was handled too gently. If I could have felt their suffering more tangibly, or if their…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:39 PM
1

Yes, very good point. When I said that I may have been channeling things I read before I watched the movie, so thank you for calling me on that. I actually was surprised at the point in the movie where we realize the Many Mothers had dwindled. It sounds like you feel the ending was quite ambiguous, then.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:24 PM
1

That guy was ALL IN
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:22 PM
0

Gotcha. I'm going to take a step back and drink in that absurdity the next time I watch it!
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:17 PM
2

Sorry, which topic?
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:15 PM
4

PLEASE do. I'm grieved that I had such a hard time seeing the film as the film I wanted to see. I love the Mad Max franchise, and I'm hoping this discussion can help save the movie for me. It really is an excellent piece of filmmaking.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:15 PM
3

Yes, this! I agree. All my observations could have been made to varying degrees about many, many other movies and tv shows. I think all this talk about "feminism in Mad Max" primed me to see these subtle, implicit examples of what you describe. Ironically, what I imagine Ensler's contribution was was almost invisible, and I wish they'd examined the situation of sex slaves in more detail; I walked out not even caring about the rescued women, which I think is a disservice to the millions of real w…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:13 PM
0

No, you're right, it's small potatoes for sure, especially considering the unlikelihood of what can/should be done about it. I simply see it as another another reflection of many of the issues we describe here, including misandry, gynocentrism and male disposability that are all-but-invisible to most viewers.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:09 PM
1

While I can't claim that I don't care about these topics, I'm certainly not beating a drum or calling us all to action. I happen to love movies, and I love discussing them. I think we all agree that this is the one of the few spaces that discussing this aspect of this movie will be tolerated, and I think my analysis of the film is germane to this sub.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 03:06 PM
0

Indeed, but you forgot to add, "...all men are evil, problems are caused by men, matriarchy is unquestionably the solution, etc," which I argue are the most pervasive themes in the film. Yes, obviously sexual slavery is wrong, and people shouldn't be treated like objects. It's the perniciously implicit malignment of masculinity in every aspect of the film that bothers me.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 02:55 PM
2

Considering that it's a bit of a cultural phenomenon that concerns the portrayal of men to that culture, I feel the discussion is pertinent. And I wouldn't say I was "bitching" about anything- merely discussing what could be validly described as Feminist themes in the movie.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:13 PM
1

I'm afraid so. I wish I could have gotten away to watch it sooner.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:09 PM
5

I was wondering if that was the case as well. It absolutely occurred to me that many of us here felt this was a trap they'd rather not step into.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:04 PM
2

Indeed, good point. I was defending the man, but his statement being used in the article at all is more than telling.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 06:07 AM
-1

I'm afraid I disagree that MM:FR wasn't about "men are abusive." Mad Max is portrayed as a good person, yes, after he was 'tamed' by Furiosa. He was an animal until he met her and his sympathy for her civilized him. The War Boy who became their ally was also a bloodthirsty piece of the machine until he met one of the freed women. There was not a single villain in the movie who was not female. The enemy was exclusively white men, and often (and I admit, I might be reading too much into this) lite…
/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:26 AM
7

In his defense, he seemed simply to be considering all options, and cited this 'solution' as an absurdity; an example of how unlikely this phenomenon is to change. I don't think he was seriously suggesting it.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:35 PM
-1

This is absolutely poorly titled, but implicit in the post is the reminder to imagine the woman as a man, and the reaction his psychotic actions would have provoked from experts and the public. That said, I can cite no cases in which a male in her position has been subject to such a double-standard, so the relevance of the article might, indeed, be shaky.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:18 PM
5

Indeed, Islam isn't a race, but it's treated like a race; the accusation of racism is a favorite response to criticism of Islam, especially in context to terrorism. I think OP makes an accurate comparison, here.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:44 PM
3

Agreed. "Red Pill" as a metaphor is larger than the subreddit of the same name, and is a very useful way to describe any piercing of that gynocentric narrative inculcated in us from birth. I do what I can to reclaim it for broader use.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:34 PM
3

See, shit like this threatens to taint my love for doing Random Acts of Kindness- The next time I'm nice to a stranger, or pick up some trash, or [your niceishness here], I'll remember that there's an active campaign, by people who don't know me, who have already determined that I don't do enough. In essence, my own motivations for performing altruistic deeds are corrupted by being made self-conscious about actually doing them. Am I closing my neighbor's gate just because some PSA guilted me int…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 04:37 AM
3

It's deeply saddening that the woman in the first article gives her husband so little benefit of the doubt- a man she's been with nine years and whom she loved trusted enough to have a baby with- that her opinion of him changes completely after she sees him trolling. Instead of her opinion of trolling changing- perhaps concluding that if her own loving husband is an "internet troll" maybe trolling isn't as bad as she thought- it's easier for her opinion of him to change. This is the danger of id…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 09:35 PM
1

It's interesting then that women dressing to "to make themselves feel good" is almost indistinguishable from women dressing in order to attract men. Indeed, one could be forgiven for concluding that it's being attractive that is exactly what's making these women feel good by dressing that way.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:58 PM
1

My entire response to a friend having shared this: "Dresses provocatively; provokes." Instantly unfriended.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 11:49 PM
2

He had time to ditch his expensive bike and helmet securely, change into running shoes, and somehow find her again, and then- not say a thing to her. I think it's more than likely that it was a completely different guy just out for a run. Making the assumption that this was the same guy she saw on the bike, i can understand her apprehension. However, remove the assumption that this was the same guy and I think the situation gets a whole lot less creepy.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 04:04 PM
2

The book, "Sex at Dawn" makes a very convincing case for orgiastic sexuality being the norm in pre-civilized human societies. The female sexual response seems to be well-adapted to sex with multiple partners in succession, an observation I think many of us have made about our own women. I'd recommend the book to any one here.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 04:09 PM
1

The term, "Alpha lays, Beta pays," is a clearer and more harmonious way to describe the dynamic, though it hasn't been widely adopted.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 06:13 PM
7

Please expand on this. An example would help.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 07:22 AM
5

I saw that strip a couple of days ago on FB and I criticized it, not having any idea what a hornet's nest of vengeful wrath would descend upon me. Otherwise inclusive and open-minded people would bridge the gap between "Nice Guy" and "institutional rape" in a single stride, without batting an eye. It's horrifying to me that so few can interpret the actions of a 'Nice Guy' as simply what a person does when he cares about another person. Oh, and that strip really WAS a bit of tripe- The author str…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 11:23 PM
37

"When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all." -God, to Bender
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 04:14 PM
18

I don't see how Marissa could have spared herself from condemnation here- If she won't put out for x-number-of dates, she's criticized for not being realistic about men's needs. (Not an unfair criticism.) But if she DOES have sex on the first date, she's be exposing herself to criticism of riding the Carousel so close to the Wall. (Again, that wouldn't be an unfair criticism.) It seems to me that she knows what she wants, i.e. a LTR, and she acting on the understanding that having sex 'too early…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 08:08 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:52 AM
3

Does anyone have a link to a recording of his speech?
/r/MensRights16/12/13 08:46 PM
15

To the folks advocating violence: Have you heard of the real world? Beating a guy up is called assault, and it will get you arrested, charged, and thrown in jail. It is a bad, bad idea, and no solution at all to u/TheLoudThoughts's situation. That said, appearing like you COULD beat this guy up CAN be part of the solution, and is most definitely fundamental to TRP ethic. What comes with muscle mass and fighting skills is confidence, and the unspoken message that you can defend your property and …
/r/TheRedPill23/11/13 12:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter