TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

livingdead191 Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by livingdead191 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Australia had good laws and it happened there.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:52 AM
1

What the actual
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:50 AM
1

Shocking!!!! (It isn't)
/r/MensRights16/11/17 10:45 PM
1

Wow
/r/MensRights08/10/17 11:38 PM
8

Haha yet here you are, arguing with several people over the Internet.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 07:59 PM
13

The audience here finds it relevant, you don't get to decide what is and isn't appropriate. If you don't think it should be here you can downvote, report & move on. It seems like you're more troubled about the fact that it's a negative article about women. And moreover there is a male issue here in the sense that the dad wasn't involved, maybe some of us want to know why? It also goes to show that despite popular opinion, much abuse does happen at the hands of mothers, and it's not because they …
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:36 PM
3

That was the statement from Human Services, not OP.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:33 PM
15

How could you do that to a kid :( I'm not typically for mob justice, but I hope those cunts get beat just as severely and for just as long as that poor kid. Prison isn't enough.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 04:28 PM
1

72 days later. Blocked.
/r/MensRights20/09/17 04:00 PM
-1

Be very wary of that advice. You'll see it all the time here.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 10:55 PM
1

You're purposely being obtuse. You know why the term offends but you're acting as if that's absurd when you know it isn't. Why are you doing this?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 10:09 PM
17

That could just as easily be called toxic femininity, because women judge men as being lesser than other men when they show emotions like sadness.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 10:03 PM
10

Only because feminism attacks men for talking about it amongst themselves and claims feminism is the answer, then does fuck all about it. So it's not "whataboutism", it's calling serious issues to attention.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 10:00 PM
7

You haven't explained anything at all.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 09:58 PM
14

Remember people don't feed trolls
/r/MensRights03/09/17 09:41 PM
9

REEEEEE
/r/MensRights20/08/17 10:54 PM
0

Hahahahahaha 1) You need medical attention. 2) Clearly you have issues with conceptualization and visualization. 3) You would not notice sperm in a toilet unless you were specifically looking for it. 4) This discussion is over.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 08:50 PM
0

When you walk into the bathroom you don't stick your head in the bowl and look for cum on the bottom of it. Bye. And LOL "between porcelain white (white) and grey-white (white)" ... you're ridiculous.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:56 PM
0

Obviously you don't or you need medical attention if your sperm is easily visible in water sitting at the bottom of a white bowl. Anyways not going to feed you any more, bye troll.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 06:34 PM
0

Dude no you wouldn't lmao, you'd have to look very hard and probably move the water around. Go bust one in the toilet then wait 5 mins and see for yourself instead of having this extremely stupid argument.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:32 PM
1

What? My point is that you'd never see it anyways
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:19 PM
0

My point is that you wouldn't see it so I'm not getting how looking in the toilet first would help in any case.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:17 PM
1

Sperm would sink to the bottom of the White toilet and is a white/clear colour... It would be very easy not to notice sperm in a toilet.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 02:39 PM
2

Whatever mgtow is it sounds like a bunch of sad men who have given up and hate women.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 11:46 AM
1

That's one chick but I guess so.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 09:07 PM
1

You did misuse it as you were and are not correct.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 11:28 PM
1

Calm down, they were not comparable. Calling it "slavery" is a misnomer when referring to the british and when in the context of racism within the the UK today.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:11 PM
1

British "slavery" was not US slavery.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:11 PM
1

I agree with the second part of your comment.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:43 PM
1

That's such a stupid term to use when I'm right and you're wrong.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:15 PM
-1

Give up already and stop trying to paint the British treatment of blacks as anywhere near the length, scale or brutality that the US did.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 08:14 PM
1

"tex" as in Canada. You're silly.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:09 PM
-1

You don't know what you're talking about LMAO. Why don't you understand that black slavery was practically non existant in Britain and that which did exist was no more brutal than what white servants endured. You're just being ridiculous and looking to make blacks vicitms.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:38 PM
1

Stop being ridiculous. You are embarassing yourself.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 06:37 PM
1

The UKs "black slavery" was nothing compared to the US black slavery, no more harsh toward black servants than white. Also your hyperboles are so cliche that I don't have any intention of assuming they're true. One neighbourhood in a one major city in the US does not speak for the rest of the country.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 04:22 PM
-1

Ok this was for a short period and they were on the same level as other servants, not lesser than. So there is a reason there is far less racism towards blacks in the UK than there is in the US. They're not even remotely comparable.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 04:14 PM
-2

NO where near the scale or brutality as seen in America. Don't event try to compare. From your article: By the mid 18th century, London had the largest Black population in Britain, made up of free and enslaved people, as well as many runaways. The total number may have been about 10,000.[28]
/r/MensRights09/07/17 04:12 PM
-5

Dude no. You have race issues that are pretty bad. I notice it visiting from Canada. And the UK never had black slavery.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:26 AM
-1

SEXIST!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:24 PM
1

Nothing better than a guy bragging about unverifiable stuff online. Maybe you should start copy pasting that Navy Seal copypasta, it'll be just as believable, but it'll but a bit funny at the same time. You watch Naruto. Enough said. Once again, Canadian - the "Navy Seal copypasta" (whatever that is supposed to translate to in adult words) wouldn't be applicable to me. One day, when you grow up, you'll understand that the vast majority of people don't fit the narrow world view you pick up at T_D…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:16 PM
1

Exactly. I don't have a problem with either men or women sitting how they want, I am pointing out that women tend to do the behaviour they complain men do, more than men. Whether you like this or not or think it's sexist is irrelevant to me. Also, there is a legitimate reason men sit with their legs wider apart, we have exterior genitals and our hips are angled differently than most women. But anyways that's a pointless rabbit hole to go down.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 02:03 PM
1

Look, bucko. I have a real job, a wife and a daughter. Don't pull your neckbearded projections out on me. Furthermore, I am Canadian. Further still, my post history is 6 years long. Do you lie in real life like you do online? One day when you grow up, you'll understand the nuances of these debates. Perhaps one day you'll speak to a woman in person. St that point, after interacting with woemn, I'll take you seriously. But you're an MRA regular poster... And have the audacity to say that I'm the o…
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:51 PM
1

It's wildly important to be able to categorize and generalize, accurately. Now, as women tend to carry large, expensive bags everywhere they go, it stands to reason that they'd use additional seats on public transportation for these bags. They do it for two reasons: 1) to keep others from sitting near them and 2) because they think their bags are too nice for the floor.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:48 PM
1

Hahahahahaha oh my god. So because you are a shut-in with no real social interaction besides Reddit.... your experiences must be the same as everyone else, right? We aren't all depraved neckbeards, bud. Maybe if you had more than MRAs in your life you'd have more interactions with women.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:14 PM
2

Irony doesn't make something incorrect.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 01:12 PM
7

Which is what women do to men all the time. It's not a "few" either. It's the majority.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 10:43 AM
12

Honestly she's pretty good damn based from what I've seen. She doesn't fall for bullshit and doesn't seem to have many biases - being on TV and constantly scrutinized would probably keep your legal decisions authentic.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:28 PM
1

This was posted elsewhere and the sicko feminists were saying how "the problem isn't that the girls weren't punished, it's that boys are too severely punished" bla bla bla, but never a fucking word about how boys and men are routinely punished more severely than females for the same crimes and given similar past criminal histories. The ONLY time feminists consider reducing penalties for boys is when there will be a direct benefit to women as well.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 04:34 PM
1

Yes and so does assertiveness before it becomes aggression lol.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:08 AM
2

Yeah but you're acting like a child screaming when you don't get your way
/r/MensRights20/04/17 01:07 AM
2

I don't take public transportation because I have a car. But also because assholes like you are always there.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:01 PM
2

I drive a car to avoid it all. Pretty simple. Taking up an extra seat is no excuse for shouting in someone's face.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:41 PM
-4

You're the reason why most of us don't take public transportation. Just so you're aware.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:00 PM
26

Who lets you out of the house :S
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:16 PM
1

GET HER OUT OF HERE!
/r/MensRights25/01/17 12:55 AM
0

Wow you're thick. All I said was the US is litigious in nature. You're part of that if you're excited about the prospect of suing hour employer. Get it?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 11:56 PM
1

No, son. What I am is a successful man with a happy family and the ability to reasonably foresee outcomes to situations such as the above. That's neither here nor there. Here are the facts, since you seem to have an issue wrapping your head around them: All I commented on was the fact that you greedy Americans like to sue people, and that you'd be excited to purposely throw your job away at the prospect of a lawsuit and windfall is pretty disgusting. The rest of your idiotic comment has no basis…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 10:01 PM
0

Wrong about what? That the US people are litigious in nature? That was my only point and it is a fact. So, unfortunately you are wrong on all counts, bro. The "litigious system" (whatever you think that means) reflects the litigious nature of the people who created that system. Don't be so obtuse, it's annoying.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:37 PM
1

I'm not angry, I'm right. I know that may make you angry, but try not to project your feelings so obviously.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:36 PM
1

bahurrdurr!! Nope I've never had a jerrrb I live in mommies basement eating tendies!!!! Hurrrrr No, I just walk in and people give me shit. It's called being talented. But seriously, did you have an actual point or are you just typing shit out you think seems edgy? You have obviously never given an interview. That is how it will go. Period.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:24 PM
-7

No. I am referring to your litigious nature. You don't get to tell me what I am referring to. Don't be stupid, men like you make the rest of us look bad. Smarten up.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:13 PM
2

You aren't making any sense. How do you plan on getting "another job" that will be equal to a job you think you're about to sue for millions? You're going to go from being a real estate broker to a McDonald's server? "What happened with your last employer" "Can't talk about that, I'm currently suing the fuck out of them hehehe" "We'll call you."
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:12 PM
-5

I'm referring to your litigious nature. You guys cant wait to sue people.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:04 PM
-1

No, I was referring to your litigious nature. You have more lawsuit millionaires than anywhere else in the world. I know you have horrible social law too with respect to time off and workers rights, but not what I was referring to. No one I know would expect to get so much out of a lawsuit that they'd risk their job and livelihood over it. What are you going to do for money while the courts are reviewing your case?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:03 PM
-14

Americans...🙄
/r/MensRights15/01/17 08:39 PM
4

Sounds high
/r/MensRights29/10/16 06:50 PM
5

He doesn't have a history of those problems but she certainly does.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 08:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter