TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lmaogetbodied32 Archive

View 7 posts and 197 comments by lmaogetbodied32 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You didn't need to be cut in the first place
/r/MensRights13/05/23 04:32 AM
3

How is it incorrect? You are disfiguring the penis, ridding it of mucous membranes, and leaving scar tissue in place of healthy and functional tissue. Or is this just you being defensive about your own injury?
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:02 PM
2

You are a dumbass. Stop trying to justify cutting genitals
/r/MensRights29/07/22 04:03 AM
1

No you don't. Does your skin go over the glans when you're hard? Does it go up and down in intercourse? You are most likely loosely cut, that's why you confuse it with actual skin mobility
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:33 PM
1

You don't have the gliding mechanism
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:14 PM
16

Your dick is scarred and you're defensive about it. That's the whole reason why you are so mad
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:22 AM
13

Scarred, dry, and immobile sticks are not "super good looking"
/r/MensRights15/07/22 04:21 AM
1

Also females are known to bath more than child boys And that means we should mutilate boys? You are a psychopath. Anything will get infected if you don't wash yourself for 4 years, your body would fucking rot all over. This isn't a case for MGM like you think it is. People in history didn't behave like cockroaches, they washed and bathed. Fucking Ancient Rome of all places banned circumcision. This isn't even an argument. You are just furthering your own narrative.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:36 AM
2

1) Read the 2012 cosigned joint paper I mentioned. Even if the pseudoscientific myth somehow held up, the penile cancer rate is rarer than almost all cancers. It would be like suggesting cutting off breast tissue off girls to prevent breast cancer; pseudoscience. 2) Phimosis is normal in infants and toddlers as a part of penile development, the rate of it beyond adulthood is near under 1%, and even then procedures such as z-plasty or preputioplasty exist, which do not cut any tissue. 3) Good to …
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:57 PM
2

Penile cancer isn't pseudoscience, the myth that you have less of a chance by being cut is pseudoscience AAP has been shat on by European medical institutions in 2012 with a cosigned joint paper indicating that none of their claims hold clinical basis, they no longer have a statement on the issue because they were wrong. Their last statement expired in 2017. Again, pseudoscientific drivel. There are problems with it. The foreskin is the primary erogenous zone and includes the 5 most innervated a…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:47 PM
3

Lmao No, the STD myth is pseudoscience, has been bashed on by European and Canadian medical institutions for ages. Penile cancer reduction myth is also a myth. Even the American Cancer Society in 1996 said it's pseudoscience LMAO
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:31 PM
3

Bodily autonomy and integrity are human rights And it is not more hygienic. Stop pulling shit out of your ass
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:25 PM
2

It is by definition mutilation, you are ablating functional tissue and mechanisms, including the gliding mechanism. Regardless of how you perceive it. Histologically it is the most erogenous zone on the penis. And preventative? That is absolute bullshit, and largely pseudoscience as indicated by all European medical institutions. The foreskin isn't hazardous, and removal of it does not benefit anything How do you feel about FGM Type 1A or Type 4? Let's see if you're a hypocrite on top of being u…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:18 PM
1

That's not how anything works. An open-wound is far more prone to infection than a body-part designed to protect. According to that logic, women were cut too back in the olden days
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:16 PM
2

I didn't say you did, it was just a manner of speech
/r/MensRights05/07/22 11:11 PM
5

I have, I have been in counselling due to my trauma of genital cutting for 2 years now. Rape and genital mutilation are comparable in every capacity. Loss of control to your own body, being taken advantage of, harmed without resistance. And it's not "just a bit of skin" either. The fact that you minimise it to this degree tells me that you are cut yourself and in denial of the damage this thing causes. You are cutting children, repeat that in your head and see if alarm bells start to ring.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:34 PM
0

I don't care if the clitoral hood is bound to pleasure. It's clearly not the sole creator of it, since women without it can still find pleasure. There is no major dysfunction caused by circumcision. For that reason, circumcision is not a major issue. Maybe that will put things into perspective for you. And this. The foreskin is a necessary body part and its excision is a detriment. Be it the keratinisation and dryness caused by its absence, the removal of stretch receptors, the removal of the gl…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:30 PM
2

Now you've ignored all of my points, and the bulbocavernosus reflex is bound to pleasure, mind you. And now you pretend that the bare minimum is absolutely fine despite the loss of functional mechanisms, reflexes, and fine-touch stimulus/nerves. The percentage doesn't matter in any case, the frenulum is still removed in some capacity in all cases. A woman that has gone through FGM Type 1A can also experience pleasure and can experience orgasms, the harm is still done and it isn't insignificant i…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:15 PM
2

The bulbocavernosus reflex has been found to be delayed or absent at a higher rate than the general population in diabetic men with complaints of erectile impotence, and men whose penises have been circumcised or have permanent retraction of the foreskin behind the glans penis. Read the article you cite first. The bulbocavernosus reflex is absent in 92% of circumcised men. Stop trying to bullshit your way out of this you illiterate spoon
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:08 PM
5

Nice wall-of-text of a coping mechanism. The moment someone in denial of the damage of MGM is told that the foreskin is neither useless, vestigial, nor a hazardous waste, they go absolute apeshit like you. The prepuce is the primary erogenous zone in primates, this includes humans. 70% of the world does not cut genitals, and nor do they see the foreskin as something hazardous. You are delusional. The origin of MGM isn't hygiene, it is group control. It was first performed on Egyptian slaves as t…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 10:02 PM
1

It is. The gliding mechanism sticks onto the vaginal walls and retains the lubrication in intercourse, acting as a bearing (Çengel et al,. 2019 pp-162,164). This is why cut men resort to lubrication and friction because that mechanism is absent. The penis is a mechanical system where friction is undesirable And that is not what I implied. The ejaculation reflex retains because it is almost not possible for the frenulum to be completely removed in circumcision unless the doctor personally carves …
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:55 PM
5

You do, explain to me how a reflex bound to an organ still exists when it is removed entirely. You are clueless. 92% of cut men do not have the bulbocavernosus reflex. You didn't even know these terms in the first place before I brought them up, but keep telling me your retarded takes on it please. These reflexes are bound to stretch receptors found in those structures. And your "scientific poll" is absolute horeshit that is neither related to histology, anatomy, nor anthropology. It is released…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:45 PM
4

It is harmful. The glans is an internal mucous structure not meant to be exposed, it becomes skin like and dry after the mutilation. The foreskin includes most of the nerve endings on the penis and regulates the ejaculation reflex and the bulbocavernous reflex ("mini orgasms"). Some people cannot ejaculate because their frenular delta was "cut too much". And many rely on their glans to orgasm and think of it as a "release". They think friction equals stimulus since their gliding mechanism is moo…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:39 PM
5

70% of the world does not mutilate genitals. No one has problems due to having their entire organ
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:36 PM
1

Get raped so I can tell you to get over it. See how you react
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:35 PM
3

It's safer to be cut as an adult because they actually administer anesthesia, there is more surface area and they can actually choose which parts to keep. They do it to babies because they are defenseless and cannot resist. After they cut it, they cannot predict if it will be too tight, loose, high or low, because the penis is not developed. Babies also go into nervous shock due to the trauma and develop cognitive disorders usually.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:34 PM
5

It's not a choice parents should be allowed to. It's mutilation
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:31 PM
8

Lmao imagine thinking an open wound 10 thousand years ago is better in a non-hygienic environment than a functional body part designed to protect On the contrary, you might have brain rot.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:29 PM
14

Death grip is a symptom of circumcision because all fine-touch tissue is deprived off you, it's not the cause.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:27 PM
7

LMAO You can, and people do. The frenulum and ridged band are responsible for the ejaculation reflex and the bulbocavernosus reflex. Are you going to tell us that the frenulum and ridged band aren't erogenous? Let alone the entire inner foreskin? Read the papers by Taylor et al. The foreskin is the primary erogenous zone in all primates, including humans. I can tell you solely rely on your glans for stimulation because you have nothing else left. Hilarious and pitiful
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:24 PM
8

We'll stop talking about it once Male Genital Mutilation is banned for good
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:18 PM
5

You are clueless about this issue. I can tell that you are cut just from the way you hand wave this as "insignificant". The justifications people use to normalise Male Genital Mutilation is amazing
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:17 PM
9

Look how proud you are to have abused and irreversibly harmed your sons. It's so sickening and ironic, it's hilarious. Why do you think you had to have gone through it in the first place? 70% of the world doesn't mutilate and neither are they mutilated. No one ponders if they want to cut an essential part of their sexual organ at one point.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 02:28 AM
2

Middle East and Africa mutilates genitals. By 70% of the world, I mean Europe, Australia, East Asia, South America. "Medicine" is not mutilating genitals. Consult the doctors in South East Asia if you want to model your healthcare on a basis of butchering organs, they routinely circumcise females there as well for "medical reasons"
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:54 AM
0

I hope you still clean your dick you swamp ass. Yet another cope to think that it's "harder" to take care of an intact organ. Also, no, I am not projecting here. These are all anatomical facts. It obviously won't change how those that live in denial acknowledge it. You literally are missing several erogenous structures, your maimed penis does not function the same as a normal one. And I'm cut too. Yet I'm not that pathetic to ignore anatomy.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:19 PM
0

Fully functioning? LOL. Your dickhead is dry and keratinised (feels like "skin" even though it's mucosal tissue), your penis is immobile and relies on friction, artificial lube or either tugging for stimulus. The gliding mechanism is completely gone. You are missing chunks of your frenular delta. You are missing mucous membranes, you are missing your ridged band. You lack reflexological tissue, you are missing the bulbocavernous reflex. Etc. This is universal for all mutilated men by the way. Yo…
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:12 PM
0

You've thrown every bullshit coping mechanism known to man to justify why you have scarred and partial genitals
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:08 PM
2

It doesn't. 70% of the world doesn't mutilate genitals. You genuinely think they "deal" with it like this? It's mucosal tissue, not any different than a vulva or the inside of your mouth. Also lol at citing MayoClinic, quack.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 08:05 PM
2

Circumcision does remove feeling. The foreskin includes the most sensitive structures on the penis, you lose all of that when it is maimed and cut off. Do you genuinely believe it's some unfeeling sheet of "skin"? How dumb are you? I'm cut by the way. And yes, some people become impotent either through early ED, keratinisation, or tight cuts.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:59 PM
0

Cope more
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:54 PM
8

That FGM and MGM aren't the same and cannot be compared
/r/MensRights14/06/22 11:14 PM
2

lmao he fucking shat on your entire pseud argument and that's how you respond? holy shit dude learn how to lose arguments
/r/MensRights13/06/22 05:45 AM
2

Imposing what? You aren't imposing anything, you are imposing the lack of imposing. You are delusional
/r/MensRights13/06/22 05:42 AM
5

Why are you glad to have partial and keratinised genitals?
/r/MensRights13/06/22 05:38 AM
6

You're ignoring the links other people provided you. Keep digging your head under the sand, I know that I can't convince people in denial, they have to convince themselves. I'm just here to laugh at your ignorance. And a circumcised woman can still get pregnant, pee, and orgasm. But I assume you'll disregard this as you wrongly think FGM is cutting off everything pleasurable. They still don't function as normal. You are pretending the bare minimum is everything and it's so pitiful. I bet you thi…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:15 PM
6

You were linked it in this very thread, that same source has more passages if you still rather be in denial. Which I know you will be, you will dismiss it for your own interpretation so you can keep pretending genital mutilation is a part of Christianity, when no Christian other than Americans cut themselves Again, your penis is mutilated and scarred. It doesn't and will never function as normal. It's like skinning your hand and saying it still picks up things LMAO
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:07 PM
3

He hasn't. You are not a Jew, and you are cut off from salvation. As stated in the bible, in the documents from the first Christians 2000 years ago, in the Catholic documents 600 years ago. You are coping with your loss, damage, and scarring by pretending it was the will of God. So pitiful. The reason why this became a thing in America is so far from faith it's hilarious. They just wanted to harm your sexuality. Ever wonder why no other Christian is circumcised?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:04 PM
6

LMAO no it doesn't Your penis head is dry and keratinised. You are missing stretch receptors. You are missing the bulbocavernosus reflex. Your penis has no bearing and hence is immobile. It relies on pressure and friction for stimulation because everything else was lost The foreskin is 15 square inches on average, that's half of the penis, not "tiny" at all, and is double layered. It is the primary erogenous zone on humans and primates. It consists of almost half of the nerve endings on the peni…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:59 PM
6

That's for the Jewish faith. You are supposedly a Christian, where circumcision is not a thing Why do you want to harm children so badly?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:54 PM
12

Freedom of religion states that you are free to practice your religion, not practice your religion on others. That's not freedom, that's taking away someone else's freedom
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:52 PM
4

There was a previous counsel regarding this 2000 years ago with the same conclusion, right after the first Christians were trying to separate themselves from the Jewish faith, but this is a bit more modern. From the document, "Cantate Domino" (A.D. 1442), signed by Pope Eugene IV, from the 11th session of the Council of Florence (A.D. 1439, a continuation of the Council of Basle, A.D. 1431, and the Council of Ferrara, A.D. 1438) The Catholic Church] "firmly believes, professes and teaches that t…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:42 PM
7

LMAO No, circumcision is only done to children and infants because they cannot resist, they are weak. Taking advantage of this weakness is abuse and subsequently a human rights violation. The only narcissistic psychopath here is you. I am not imposing any will, I am imposing the lack of it. You are delusional and an absolute moron if you think you've found some sort of loophole to bypass ethics and human rights. This group mentality also reflects on to FGM btw. 85% of women in Egypt are glad the…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:37 PM
11

They should. Bodily autonomy and integrity are human rights You are a moron
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:38 PM
10

Christians forbid circumcision 2000 years ago. You aren't a Christian, just someone acting as one. No "Christian" outside of America mutilates their genitals
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:37 PM
4

Genital mutilation does not help the child. You're stumbling across medical ethics without knowing a lick of it. When things are not medically necessary, bodily autonomy holds for all. This is also disregarding the human right of bodily integrity, but that's besides the point.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:48 PM
5

Have you not heard of human rights?
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:11 PM
2

it's not a good thing. a third of the nerves are in the foreskin, the glans becomes keratinised and dry due to permanent exposure, and the penis becomes immobile due to no bearing. It leaves a disfiguring scar. And no, it hasn't been done for centuries, at least not in America. It's only a century old there. 70% of the world does not mutilate genitals. What problems do you think warrant genital mutilation? The problems you overemphasize to justify this retroactively?
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:09 PM
2

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Motherfucker, you don't even know the tiniest tidbit about preputial anatomy. It being "safe" doesn't matter when the act of removal itself is fucking mutilation. Stop living in denial, your penis is scarred and maimed. And that's my line, you're averting your eyes to the truth about this practice so desperately it's hilarious
/r/MensRights06/06/22 06:10 AM
2

you really fucking believe no guy cut as a baby has issues? HAHAHAHAHHAHA most botched cuts are neonatal solely due to the variation in penile development. they can't tell whether a cut will be tight or loose until they actually go through puberty, not to mention the skin bridges and keratinisation that occurs due to the smaller surface area to butcher with. You are the one that drank the koolaid too hard, so much so, that you went out of your way to find the single most shit and junk study to d…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 01:14 PM
7

It's not "excess" you anatomically blind moron. It's the most sensitive part of the penis and makes up over half of the nerve endings. It works as a mechanical bearing in intercourse and protects the mucous membranes from exposure and debris You don't know what you are talking about. And no, it is only "recommended" in the shithole known as America. 70% of the world does not cut genitals. And it's hilarious how you cite American for-profit healthcare organizations to further your pseudoscience
/r/MensRights05/06/22 01:08 PM
6

I like how all of you assume those that are mad about this are intact You are so fucking delusional it's hilarious. Most anti-circ advocates are cut men themselves, don't kid yourself with this "us and them" narrative, moron. I am not speaking on behalf of you, I am speaking for myself Fuck off from this sub if you don't support men's right to bodily integrity and autonomy
/r/MensRights05/06/22 01:06 PM
41

Ohio is one of the states where it's sickeningly pushed upon, I wouldn't even trust a pediatrician there lest they do forced retractions.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 03:43 AM
27

Lmao what? Why is having normal and intact genitals a "medical concern" for home care? Aren't you the old fart that defends circumcision because you mutilated your sons?
/r/MensRights05/06/22 03:41 AM
1

Sure, carve your sexual preference into your child, pedophile.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 12:31 AM
1

Dude, I think you've been indoctrinated by American media to hate your natural body. Trying to cut yourself at 11?? Why?? Did your parents indulge you into it? Were you forcefully retracted as a child (hence the short frenulum)? Look into symptoms of Body Integrity Identity Disorder, what you describe sounds a lot like it. And believe me, you will regret it if you cut yourself. Try to find solutions (which DO exist) that don't harm yourself. Also, that's not how keratinisation works. They aren't…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:29 PM
1

Dude, do not indulge in your fetish. There are surgical stretching methods to cure phimosis, such as z-plasty. You do not need to scar yourself to get over this hurdle. You'll be getting rid of the "off-switch" when you scar yourself and leave it exposed. You will feel uncomfortable 24/7 as it rubs on fabric. Like some static CRT TV turned on, ringing in your ear, and you cannot find the remote. What made you hate your penis? Are you American? Because this fetish for circumcision largely comes f…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 10:05 PM
1

?? You circumcised yourself, it's pinned at your page
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:49 PM
1

That's not how anything works. That "scooping out semen" myth has been proven to be false since the fucking 90s. The mere existence of the gliding mechanism itself proves this wrong. It's not my preference, it's the natural order of things. You like maimed genitals, not me. Like holy shit, you even maimed your own genitals for your own fucked up fetish, you either have BIID or were subject to extreme trauma. You seem to fetishise keratinisation when it is a physiologically wrong process. No inta…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:35 PM
1

Mucous membranes aren't meant to keratinise, this is a biological fact. Boys that have sex do not have their glans keratinise, and neither do men that have healthy sex lives. You are delusional. KERATINISATION SHOULD NEVER OCCUR ON HEALTHY MUCOUS STRUCTURES SUCH AS THE GLANS, and it does not. Do you think all of those intact men with functional mucous membranes are keratinised? Intactivism is a movement for bodily integrity and autonomy. It is a movement that is against bodily harm. Denial of th…
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:04 PM
1

You're a pedophillic fetishist freak. There is no beauty or "sculpting masculinity" about scarring genitals. Glans being exposed is a sign of arousal, not a sign of masculinity. Fucking hell. The foreskin is also a sexual part of the penis. I've seen your post history and no doubt you are mentally ill. You keep posting about how glans should be "keratinised" to be masculine MUCOUS STRUCTURES SHOULD NEVER EVER KERATINISE. TAKE A BIOLOGY COURSE, HOLY FUCK
/r/MensRights23/05/22 04:30 AM
17

My reproductive rights were violated when I had a clamp crush my genitals when I was an infant. The fact that people proclaim "men have reproductive rights" is hilarious to me because of this. I wish.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 05:10 PM
1

Çocuk senin kölen mi amk ucubesi? Oyuncak bebek gibi paramparça etmeyi ebeveyne yakışan bir şey olarak mı görüyorsun? Çocuğa sahip değilsin, velisisin. Korumak için bir görevin var, her boku uğratmaya değil. Herkesin bedeni kendine sahiptir. Eğer cidden bu istismarı çocuğuna uğratmayı hoş görüyorsan yazıklar olsun. Benimkine de senin aynı kafaya sahip olanlar kestiler, hiç bir şey diyemedim. Onun seçenek hakkını yeme.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 05:01 PM
1

It's on me that my genitals were mutilated? I hope your son bleeds out when they crush his frenular arteries with the clamp, at least would spare him the long term effects
/r/MensRights19/05/22 06:13 PM
5

You seem absolutely deranged and seem to suffer from BIID. Maiming intact genitals, let alone having a fetish for it is utterly insane
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:54 AM
3

Yes, that's how it typically is in primates. The foreskin is double layered, the outer layer "the skin" is what protects the glans, the inner layer "mucosa, smooth muscle, frenar junctions" is the primary erogenous zone. I recommend reading "The prepuce" by Cold & Taylor et al before showing more of your ignorance Also, good thing that you pointed out that the foreskin is reflexological. The ridged band and the frenulum regulate the bulbocavernous reflex, also known as "mini orgasm reflex" infor…
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:46 AM
3

Lmao no, intactivism has been a thing since the Ancient Greeks when mutilated Jews tried to "restore" their foreskins with weights and blend in their baths and in the Olympic games. I was a muslim, I was mutilated under Islam, you are brainwashed to think cutting genitals is normal
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:43 AM
3

It encompasses half of your penis. It's not tiny and nor is it just skin
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:34 AM
1

You are cruel and have no idea of the damage of circumcision. I genuinely believe that anyone that cuts an innocent child is a sociopath. And I am one of those cut men unhappy about it, we exist. To think that not one person would be mad about their human rights and sexual function be violated is absurd
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:29 AM
1

There are more types of FGM, most of which is less severe The foreskin isn't a "flap of skin", it is mostly made of mucosa and smooth muscle. The skin is only the outer layer, stop trying to minimise MGM
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:27 AM
1

Amk salağı O kesilen deri "kirli" falan değil, insan anatomisini öğren çocuğuna zarar vermeden önce Ve sünnet kuranda geçmiyor, zorunluda değil. İlla kendine olan şeyi çocuğuna yaptırmak için bahane bulma
/r/MensRights19/05/22 05:23 AM
0

I'm unfortunately cut, but do go off. Your coping mechanism isn't healthy
/r/MensRights19/05/22 01:32 AM
8

MRM talking about men's issues? No way!!
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:37 AM
8

None of this is true, and you know it. An overwhelming majority of the world doesn't cut genitals
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:35 AM
5

By your logic, nothing is erogenous and it depends on the person. It's like saying the clitoris isn't erogenous. Thank god that's not how anatomy works. The foreskin isn't just skin, stop trying to minimise your loss. It is mostly smooth muscle and mucosa, the skin is only the outer layer. And they don't know any better because they never had a normal penis
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:08 AM
2

The foreskin isn't vestigial, nor is it unnecessary. It isn't small either. It's more than half of the nerves in the penis
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:05 AM
3

I wish it was "to each their own". Sadly, my choice was taken away from me.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:26 PM
3

I wish it were that easy. Sadly my sexuality was damaged, since I had to resort to these methods to be able to orgasm. If I "fuck a hole" or "stroke my penis" (which I assume you just mean stroke my exposed glans and etc.), I don't feel anything. The only way I feel anything is through what's left of my frenulum and inner skin, and my non-keratinised coronal ridge.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 10:21 PM
3

r/Foregen is an exception to this reality
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:27 PM
2

r/Foregen Cut penises are by definition, "cut", mutilated. Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering isn't mutilation, it is on the contrary a healing factor.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:26 PM
5

It doesn't become senseless, but it is true that it keratinises and as a result desensitises to some varying degree. For me, my glans might as well not be there.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:24 PM
5

The head dries out and callouses. It is a mucous structure, suggesting otherwise is going against basic biology. Your tongue doesn't feel nothing right now, but if you stuck your tongue out for 40 years it would become dried out and numb, just as the glans of cut men.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:23 PM
5

No, if the monster that cut me got rid of my frenulum and the remaining stretch receptors as well (like many unfortunate men), I couldn't orgasm. I am not saying this as a hypothetical, I know this because I experimented. Even if stimulating other parts such as the coronal ridge gets me close, I can never reach it without the satisfying "stretching" feeling of my underside. I don't even touch my glans because it is numb. And I genuinely believe that anyone that can orgasm from just touching the …
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:18 PM
1

This is an alt account I use to discuss and spread awareness around this topic. I also use it to vent about my trauma. I have a main account which I obviously won't share around here for the "life" shit you're talking about. Really telling of your position to stalk someone's account to that degree though.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:34 PM
3

Frenulum and ridged band orgasms are actually a thing. You don't know what you are talking about I couldn't even orgasm if i wasn't spared my (partial) frenulum
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:30 PM
5

Those cut men don't know any better, they never experienced anything else. Also, speak for yourself. As a cut man, it is absurd to think that removal of erogenous tissue doesn't affect pleasure or sensitivity.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:28 PM
14

This is what I am talking about. You don't know shit about what MGM even entails, or even FGM for the matter. The most common variant of FGM is the excision of the female prepuce, the foreskin equivalent on females. The practice of this is "justified" by doctors in South East Asia due to the practice of MGM in America. You do know the difference between male circumcision and female circumcision, right? Apparently you don't. Lol. Female circumcision prevents the person from reaching orgasm, entir…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 08:49 AM
2

If your dorsal slit didn’t cut off anything, you aren’t missing much other than the ridged band, which has been cut down the middle. The ridged band has stretch receptors that are pleasurable when the foreskin is pulled back, without that tension, it probably doesn’t feel like much. Not to mention the scar tissue from the slit
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:48 AM
5

Yes, I do. And it has been done before. Despite this overwhelming positive outlook on FGM, Egypt abolished the practice along with some other African countries. UK and Australia used to have a cutting rate of 50%-60% back in the 1940s, which has now been lowered to a mere 5%. Canada has been making efforts to lower the rates as well since the 1970s. 70% to 25% in 50 years. I was indoctrinated the same as you. I was cut as an infant in Turkey, I thought it was normal. I’ve witnessed friends and r…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:35 AM
2

It’s indoctrination. Cutting cultures normalise partial genitals by making intact genitals seem “extra” and unappealing. This is also the case in FGM cultures, according to a statistic 6 years ago, 85% of Egyptian women like having circumcised clitorises. But since we’re outside of that culture and its influence, we are able to see how fucked up that is. Same case here. Also, if it’s a dorsal slit, you can heal it through surgery. I’ve been told it leaves scar tissue though. As long as the parts…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:22 AM
14

HAHAHAHAHA imagine mentioning MensLib as a “men’s right sub” when it censors most men’s issues to somehow make it about women. Fucking discussion about MGM is banned there because of the correlation with FGM. Such a joke That whole sub is about gaslighting men by making their issues seem as if it’s their own fault.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:15 AM
45

Not surprising seeing as MGM is still accepted and perpetuated
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/22 05:44 AM
9

Yes. I’ve had this on my mind ever since I informed myself, I just didn’t have the words to say it.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 01:11 AM
0

Mutilation is the alteration or damage of an organ or body part. It fits the definition 100%. FGM’s most common variant is the cutting off the female prepuce (female foreskin equivalent). It is entirely comparable, you have no fucking idea what you are talking about and it’s hilarious. FGM has variants by the way, since you as an absolute idiot think it’s just cutting off the clitoris, which is one of the most extreme variants. Pin-pricking and circumcision are far more common in FGM. See r/Circ…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 11:33 PM
0

How hard is it to understand that strapping down infants and butchering their genitals is an issue? Also, the foreskin does serve purpose. It’s not just “some skin”. It is literally the most innervated part of the penis. It’s not just skin either, majority of it is consisting of mucosa. www.cirp.org/pages/anat What’s your stance on FGM?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 03:07 PM
1

Genital mutilation is more of an issue than all of those. Bodily integrity is a human right
/r/MensRights15/03/22 03:26 AM
2

The parent is a guardian, not an owner, you fucking freak. It’s none of my business? Then neither is it yours. Stop harming infants.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 06:42 AM
3

Oh no, people in men’s rights are talking about men’s rights. The horror! Fuck off if you aren’t an advocate of boys’ human rights
/r/MensRights06/03/22 06:40 AM
2

Mutilation is the alteration and/or removal of healthy body parts, causing damage. Genital cutting fits all criteria. Circumcision is genital mutilation I think you’re just trying too hard to deny reality
/r/MensRights03/03/22 03:51 PM
3

Robert Van Howe
/r/MensRights17/02/22 12:07 AM
11

Absolute joke of an article with no constructive arguments other than insulting the many doctors, bioethicists, and organisations trying to spread awareness and ultimately fix this human rights issue.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 09:36 PM
25

except r/menslib censors majority of men’s issues such as MGM. When I mailed the mods about it they simply handwaved it away, saying “I’m better at moderating”. Such a joke. r/leftwingmaleadvocates is a far suitable sub
/r/MensRights11/02/22 05:05 AM
3

That’s not the reason it’s not being talked about. The reason it’s not talked about is because of pseudoscience, the hypocritical stance of the WHO and religion. The studies he’s shown have insignificant data, i.e. no benefits Many forms of FGM are less harmful than the typical MGM. Saying removing the female prepuce is more harmful than removing the male prepuce is nonsense
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:46 PM
4

There is no conflicting evidence. You either believe in actual scientific histological mapping or pure pseudoscience saying otherwise. The foreskin has the same nerve endings as the clitoris, especially the ridged band and frenulum. This is not disputed. What is disputed is polls of cut men saying “they are still sensitive”, which is pure nonsense as they cannot tell what they are missing. Saying FGM is worse when even pin-pricking is considered mutilation is hypocrisy. The only difference betwe…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 07:38 PM
4

Garcia-Mesa et al. (the discussion section of that paper is really wonky), Sorrells et al., Cold & Taylor et al. all have histological and pressure mapping of preputial anatomy and they all indicate the same thing: The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. I assume you’re a woman, and don’t understand how crucial the frenulum is for pleasure; there are vibrators designated to it and it’s referred to as the “f-spot” in Europe. The fringe studies saying otherwise are from junk publishe…
/r/MensRights07/02/22 04:28 PM
5

MGM removes the 5 most innervated structures of the penis; frenulum, frenular delta, ridged band, inner mucous junctions, and outer prepuce. These are innervated with the same Meissner corpuscles found in the clitoris. It absolutely reduces pleasure and sensitivity. It leaves the penis to be immobile and keratinised. Many cut men experience chafing and other complications from it. You have no right to dismiss their trauma. And typically, in Muslim countries, toddlers and older are strapped down …
/r/MensRights07/02/22 03:05 PM
38

It’s ignored due to the pseudoscience spread by American health organisations from the 1950’s, as well as the religious doctrines that deem MGM to be necessary. When banning FGM in America, feminists gave leeway to MGM. The authorities knew it was a battle they couldn’t win, so they banned FGM and doubled down on MGM. This dilemma got reinforced by anti-FGM activists deeming that both types of genital mutilation “aren’t comparable” by pretending the most gruesome forms of FGM is the norm. While …
/r/MensRights06/02/22 06:16 PM
2

And you call yourself a man? Maybe get a spine first, your first duty as a father was to protect your children.
/r/MensRights06/02/22 08:19 AM
3

Jesus Christ, this attempt at somehow linking your misogyny and homophobia to men’s rights is pitiful and hilarious. No, nothing was all bright and happy in your day. Lesbians still existed, “masculine” women still existed, rebellion still existed (as usual with being a teenager). You just were blind to it, a period when internet and information wasn’t widespread.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 09:03 PM
3

Yep. This practice is a relic from puritan cultures, and these medical “benefits” are mere justifications in a sex-positive world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 06:32 AM
10

“Lesbianism” isn’t a choice
/r/MensRights05/02/22 05:49 AM
1

Is that the same statement they let expire in 2017 because of the joint statement published by actual medical institutions? LOL
/r/MensRights04/02/22 11:12 PM
1

Their current statement quite literally says otherwise. They have stated that it would take a 100 circumcisions to prevent a single UTI. There are no health benefits. A joint statement from the European medical institutions made sure of that, now they only cling onto “religious benefits” and “social benefits”. Those lunatics are doctors. They are the ones that spread this procedure in America. I know the truth hurts. But those studies you are talking about also do not have clinical or statistica…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:34 PM
1

And that’s not how science works, at all. Bad papers that get released by junk publishers are criticised due to their false data and methodology. Ignoring that is just conceding your already non-existent argument for genital cutting
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:25 PM
1

I never stated that it originated from America. Reading comprehension and nuance. I said the “procedure” did. • ⁠In cases of masturbation we must, I believe, break the habit by inducing such a condition of the parts as will cause too much local suffering to allow of the practice being continued. For this purpose, if the prepuce is long, we may circumcise the male patient with present and probably with future advantage; the operation, too, should not be performed under chloroform, so that the pai…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:19 PM
1

The clitoral hood is the prepuce of female genitalia. It is removed in certain cultures for hygiene and aesthetics. Namely South East Asia. It is claimed to be a safe procedure. Sound familiar? The foreskin is also fused in infants. A clamp and probing is required. It is not as “easy” and clean as you mistakenly believe. The male prepuce is as removable as the female prepuce No meta analyses support your position other than a single paper by Brian Morris, which itself was criticised by Brian Ear…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 09:42 PM
1

Type 1A of FGM is literally the same as male circumcision. You are delusional. Explain to me how cutting off a prepuce is “different” than cutting off a prepuce. And all those studies have been debunked, many people have provided you a multitude of sources, and have provided you criticisms of the statistical significance of those STD studies. Parroting the same two excuses doesn’t justify anything. It isn’t a safe procedure. Its complication rate is a 100% as it removes erogenous tissue in all c…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 09:08 PM
1

The benefits never existed in the first place. The reason they do it to babies isn’t for “benefits”, it’s because they cannot resist and are defenseless. As an adult, if you want to get cut, you can consult your doctor on what parts you want to keep, how much skin is to be cut, and you get general anaesthesia, while babies only get sugar water. It’s not anymore complicated, it’s even safer. You were bullied in a cutting culture and that’s why you are emphasising on the “risks” of having a normal…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 07:44 PM
0

You block out all scientific evidence like a frustrated toddler. Want to elaborate why cutting genitals is good? What other arbitrary reason will you use to justify your mutilation? Your whole comment history in this subreddit is complaining about people advocating against an issue
/r/MensRights04/02/22 07:40 PM
8

Owning up to the reality of what happened to you isn’t “victimisation”. You people are so far into denial that you fail to see the wrong about cutting infant penises. Do you not have common sense? Or did they circumcise your brain too?
/r/MensRights02/02/22 06:38 PM
3

If your God needs a blood ritual for a covenant, you didn’t make it through God, you made it with the devil.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 06:22 PM
2

This is the reason. You’re mentally ill
/r/MensRights31/01/22 06:20 PM
2

I don’t want to associate with you. You delegitimise the movement
/r/MensRights31/01/22 06:04 PM
20

It is genital mutilation. Those saying otherwise are men too deep into denial about what happened to them, and those parents that subjected that injury to their sons.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 05:53 PM
5

Are you referencing the Bossio study you falsely interpreted and people corrected you on? Jesus, this is what I mean, it’s like you don’t retain new information. Absolute dotard. We aren’t ignoring large studies, we are looking at the data within the studies and looking at the meta analyses of those studies and the criticisms of it by medical institutions and bioethicists. We’ve given you the same information so many times but you’re a broken record. You are also still arguing on the basis of tr…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 12:29 PM
4

I’m insulting you because there is no point arguing with you. We’ve shown you discernible evidence and meta analyses debunking your misinformation posts and yet you still share the same two studies because otherwise you cannot accept the facts. It’s so pitiful and pathetic, I’ve argued with several thick headed illeterate men before, but you take the cake, you deny basic information. You’re like those flat earth luddites that would call mathematics fake because of arbitrary anecdotes. The fact t…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:41 AM
7

Bud, there are plenty of polls that have different conclusions, you just ignore them because it doesn’t fit into your narrative. Histology absolutely does matter, saying “there are nerves all over the skin!” shows how scientifically illiterate you are regarding nerve innervation. You said the frenulum isn’t sensitive. The frenulum I don’t know if you’re middle aged and just too old to take in new information. But the fact is the studies you provided have no conclusive data to disregard anything …
/r/MensRights30/01/22 11:12 AM
7

Histology absolutely does have clinical value, are you scientifically illiterate? The ridged band and frenulum are innervated with the same nerve endings as the female clitoris. If you lose that you will not get the same stimuli. Many adult men who get cut as adults notice difference, you’ve just cherrypicked the polls that support your claim because it’s hard to own up to the truth. That’s another funny part, you disregard any other study that aren’t polls because it disagrees with your narrati…
/r/MensRights30/01/22 10:51 AM
9

Finding healthy coping mechanisms to deal with loss might be challenging, I hope you get through the denial stage. Your evidence is all polls. You ignore actual histology and anatomical studies in favour of cut men saying they are sensitive. It’s hilarious Didn’t you try to say the frenulum isn’t sensitive a while ago? Why are you even on this sub? Intactivism is a core part of this community, leave if you don’t want to advocate against a critical men’s right issue.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 10:33 AM
14

Don’t cut your dick, your dick is normal. Consider yourself lucky as most people around you have scars on their dicks and don’t feel the same things as you do.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 08:51 AM
1

Authors: Brian J Morris Inflated data, don’t bother.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 04:16 AM
4

80% of women are fine with having no clitorises in Egypt. Jesus Christ, I’ve argued with several dumbfucks before but this is the first time someone argued that the frenulum is not sensitive. Would you care to share these supposed studies that have conclusive data? Because all histological studies of the prepuce show its sensitive innervation
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:46 PM
4

I wonder why Europe never has these HIV problems you describe. 80% of women also are fine with having no clitorises in Egypt Again, I pity you. You will never feel the most sensitive parts of your penis. And the fact that you are arguing they aren’t sensitive at all is deeply concerning lmao Facts are facts
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:30 PM
6

I pity the men who never experienced having their frenulum stretch. Your denial is understandable
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:01 PM
5

This is the reason why South East Asia still does FGM btw. They see the US perpetuating MGM and use that to justify it.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 05:21 AM
1

A scar looks hideous, I’d rather have had the complete package
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:40 AM
10

Wish we had more discussions and activism about this than other topics. This seems like an anvil compared to the other “sanish” issues about men’s rights. This is institutionalised sexual assault, why aren’t we taking more of a stance on it?
/r/MensRights15/01/22 02:04 PM
2

I don't condone ear piercings either, I wouldn't do anything cosmetic to my children without their consent. But genital mutilation is irreversible, damaging, and affects anatomy on a larger scale. It can be compared on consent, but not on bodily integrity.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:26 PM
2

Ear piercings aren't irreversible. And they don't alter anatomy.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 07:20 PM
2

Comparing ear piercings to genital mutilation is a non-sequitur
/r/MensRights06/01/22 06:20 PM
2

So I can cut their clitoris because I don’t like them having extra lumps of flesh?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 03:43 PM
2

Really? So it’s okay if I cut my daughter because I feel it looks better?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 03:37 PM
2

Parents that carve their beliefs into children aren’t parents, they are pedophiles.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 01:02 PM
2

And then I provided further studies and bioethicist meta analyses criticising your statements about phimosis. And added the fact that circumcision for paraphimosis is redundant. But do go off on how Z-Y plasty is ineffective or something, wouldn’t be the first time some nutjob tried to handwave actual medical procedures away.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:38 PM
2

That is pointing out the percentage of circumcised males in the world. I don’t understand what that is supposed to point out specifically but do go off. MENA, SEA, and NA are the proponents of circumcision, that adds up to 30%~ of the world population. NA is the only region to circumcise for “health” reasons (if you look back on its origin, it’s entirely due to the culture surrounding puritan America), SEA and MENA circumcise for culture and religion. I said the NIH documented the physiological …
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:35 PM
1

Thank you for respecting his bodily autonomy
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:25 PM
2

Why? It's for culture. If it was for hygiene every nation on Earth would've made it a routine procedure and not outright oppose it. Maybe open up a history book on America's puritan past. Even looking at the statistics of UTIs by the Canadian Pediatric Society or even the AAP would make you nudge your head. And even then, if your daughter had a UTI, what would be your first reaction? Amputation? or simple fucking antibiotics? I guess it's different once it's a boy. Male and female circumcision w…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:13 PM
2

Ignoring? Ironic coming from you, since you've been ignoring every fucking source while crying about the phimosis boogeyman. I don't even understand how someone as narrow minded as you comments under here. The fact is circumcision is redundant when it comes to paraphimosis, better conservative methods exist to treat it. Those arbitrary hygiene reasons, especially the UTI statistics have been debunked, especially by the Canadian Pediatric Society. which points out a 1-3% difference. I hope I don'…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:09 PM
2

You can deny everything I throw at you. It will not change the facts. I fucking love how you still insist this is a hygienic procedure after all the data you’ve been shown. Amazing.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:52 PM
2

The possibility of phimosis (tight or non-retractable foreskin) does not warrant circumcision. Pathologic phimosis is rare. It can be cured by stretching the foreskin gently at regular intervals. For faster results, topical steroids can also be used. In the unlikely event that theses methods don’t work, surgery like Y-V plasty, Z-plasty, and preputioplasty can be done as a last resort. None of these treatments result in the loss of tissue. Moreover, some doctors misdiagnose phimosis in young chi…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:47 PM
2

Paraphimosis cannot be fixed by circumcision, it is redundant. To cut the skin you have to have coverage, to have coverage you must be able to move the skin, if you can move the skin forward you no longer have paraphimosis. And yes, physiological phimosis is a normal part of penile development and the median age of foreskin retraction is 10.5. This is also documented in the NIH. I don’t see how your background is relevant when you are spewing absolute bullshit. The moment your views got threaten…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:00 PM
2

Phimosis is the result of a tight ridged band and can be fixed via surgical stretching or z-plasty, not amputation. Arguing against bumfuck retards like you that link mayoclinic as a source never fails to amuse me. And, believe it or not, phimosis is a normal part of penile development, I guess your anatomy classes failed to teach you that. Physiological phimosis is apparent in all children until the median retraction age of 10.5. Every, and I mean, every medical institution in Europe, Canada, A…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:51 PM
2

Brainwashed and indoctrinated enough to see the cutting of genitalia as something normal, you Americans disgust me. It is not hygienic nor does it have any of those “health benefits” you flaunder. You aren’t for men’s rights, you are against them. You’ve failed as a parent twice. You simply aren’t aware of what you lost, so you wallow in your denial. Mine wasn’t “botched” either, so do kindly fuck off.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:29 PM
3

I am not worried about my dick, I am worried about the bodily integrity and autonomy of male infants in America whose medical and legal system has failed them. Genital mutilation is the biggest men’s issue right now, bigger than any of those legal issues surrounding custody. I am sorry that you are so well into denial that seeing a literal scar on your dick doesn’t ring alarm bells.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:41 AM
3

False. Circumcision is pseudoscience
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:32 AM
3

Circumcision is not a “small issue”. You are deranged and do not belong here
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:31 AM
3

Circumcision is never medical.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:28 AM
7

Rite of passage I’d prefer not having another subset of MGM, thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/21 10:12 PM
5

You’re dumb as a rock.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:03 AM
5

Male Genital Mutilation
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/21 10:01 PM
10

I got muted from there for asking why they didn’t allow comparison or discussion of MGM. Clown subreddit
/r/MensRights22/12/21 05:07 AM
10

Even if they were Jewish, it’s not justified. Religious freedom is subsidiary to bodily autonomy
/r/MensRights20/12/21 01:03 PM
36

MensLib is a joke, they don't allow discussion of most men's issues there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/21 08:28 AM
2

It should be fine, he’s a mod there
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/21 07:51 AM
1

Yes. See; Hyenas
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/21 12:35 AM
3

What show? What?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/21 09:35 PM
4

It’s because it’s a lock and key dynamic. A lock is praised for not letting anything through, a key is praised for how many it opens; otherwise they are dysfunctional. I don’t know why you are brainstorming so much about this, it’s really simple
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/21 06:52 PM
2

it’s very not nice. r/intactivism
/r/MensRights12/12/21 09:43 PM
9

You're right. FGM, MGM, and IGM all need to be outlawed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/21 08:35 PM
2

Yep.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 08:32 PM
5

The "modern use" of a foreskin is that it is the most sensitive part of the penis. 75% of the world population is not cut for this exact reason. The foreskin is a double-layered mucous tissue and membrane that protects against pathogens due to its Langerhans cells. The AIDS studies made by VMMC has been criticized by every European medical institution for being a violation of human rights as well as effectively being pseudoscience in preventing HIV and AIDS. Bioethicists such as Robert Van Howe …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/21 08:23 PM
3

"quantitative somatosensory testing results at the glans penis." They are not even talking about the foreskin. LMAOOOO
/r/MensRights29/11/21 02:03 AM
3

That is testing the glans penis for temperature, which is literally the function of the glans. That will not change because it is not amputated. Try harder please. This is getting boring. All of these articles have been criticised already by previous meta analyses.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 02:01 AM
3

There are, read the articles. Cold, Taylor et al. disagree with your article. Meissner corpuscles are also found in the vagina. Fine-touch hence correlates to sensitivity (Sorrells, 2007). You are again citing a pedophile that is laughed at in the scientific community. That dude pays junk publishers to publish his papers because none go through actual peer reviewing.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:52 AM
3

Brian J Morris (self-identified "circumsexual" pedophile) junk publisher (paid to publish, i.e. no peer review) Nice "science" bro. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8800902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joa.13481
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:47 AM
3

You are sending search queries. Send the actual articles, and not the ones by Brian Morris of all people (for christ's sake)
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:44 AM
3

They are, r/CircumcisionGrief and r/foreskin_restoration are prime communities for this Also, you are citing search queries again, give me an actual article. You are ignoring scientific literature so you can keep in your denial bubble. The foreskin has 5 specialised structures innervated by Meissner's corpuscles that give fine-touch sensation and tactile nervous feedback. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ It is the most sensitive part of the penis
/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:29 AM
4

Facts are facts, but you aren’t providing facts. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis www.cirp.org/library/anatomy All circumcisions cause harm due to the fact that they always amputate erogenous tissue. Aren’t you the one that cites search queries and that paedophilic clown Brian Morris? You have no horse in this race. I pity your culturally conditioned mind, and hope regenerative medicine advances by the time your children realise what they lost
/r/MensRights29/11/21 12:16 AM
4

Circumcisions always result in complications. Complications are the reason it’s done in the first place. If you do not define complications as loss of sensitivity, or the ablation of multiple reflexes, then it’s easy to throw around the fact that it doesn’t result in complications. Brian Morris has been relentlessly criticised by the scientific community due to his false interpretation of data and false methodology. He also pays junk publishers that have no real peer review process to shit out t…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 11:28 PM
2

Lol get out of here already Karen Go flock and promote more harm
/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:22 PM
2

Yeah, you aren’t for men’s rights anyway. You’re no better than a feminist that thinks it’s okay to harm boys. I pity you
/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:18 PM
2

Sorry bud, you’re the Karen here. Only a Karen would forcefully mutilate their child because of culture. Female circumcision is also normalised in other cultures. I bet you’d harm your girls the same way if you lived there. Also, no, I’m not a vegan. I’m also pro-vax and pro-choice. I’m just against all genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:13 PM
2

www.cirp.org/library/anatomy You have permanently exposed his head (an internal mucosal structure not meant to be exposed), which leads to keratinisation and possible harm later on throughout life. You have given him a permanent scar that he will never be able to get rid of. And due to neuroma (because of how scar tissue forms), it will be more prone to pain and other uncomfortable sensations. You have removed his ridged band and most of his frenulum, which are the most sensitive parts of the pe…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:09 PM
2

You harmed your son because of nonsensical reasons. Congratulations, you failed as a father.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:52 PM
3

Ablates several penile reflexes, amputates or damages the 5 most innervated structures on the penis (frenulum, ridged band, frenular delta, inner mucosa, outer foreskin). It also removes the Langerhans cells responsible for resistance against infections and pathogens. It is quite literally genital mutilation
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:51 PM
4

You mutilated your sons. It has no health benefits. Every pediatric society in Europe and Canada opposes the practice and has bashed on the AAP for their misleading stance on the supposed “health benefits” multiple times. 75% of the world population isn’t circumcised because it is harmful. If it was like a vaccine it would be global, but it’s not, because it’s not medical. 80%+ of women around the world are also not circumcised. But 93% are in places like Egypt, Malaysia, and other African/South…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:48 PM
6

There isn't any study saying circumcised penises are more sensitive. Not a single one.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:21 AM
8

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/27/Sorrells.gif Pressure map diagram for fine-touch tissue (i.e. pleasure) made in 2007
/r/MensRights15/11/21 06:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter