TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lmoalmao Archive

View 0 posts and 15 comments by lmoalmao on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't see how it is promoting anything? It's just looking into the roots of monogamy and how it's mostly all socially constructed for humans and not in innate hardwired trait as it is for other truly monogamous species.
/r/RedPillWomen04/09/21 03:33 AM
0

https://youtu.be/DCGyLjBjuGI Vox is very hit or miss but this is a super interesting evolutionary examiner on humans and monogamy
/r/RedPillWomen04/09/21 03:16 AM
-5

Interesting that humans are not a monogamous animal then huh?
/r/RedPillWomen03/09/21 11:29 PM
2

Okay but she always says that's literally the only non skin to skin contact she would be worried about.... Aka you cannot get herpes from sharing a drink
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 08:58 PM
3

I just can't see winning that case at all. Due to how widespread it is it seems almost impossible to prove the person gave you it unless they said/emailed/texted you that they gave it to you on purpose.
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 06:10 PM
1

Yea I'm not sure why that myth is so widespread and posted on many websites when it is not actually true. Here is a thread from 2 days ago with a lot of sources https://www.reddit.com/r/Herpes/comments/o4umfw/question_about_drinks?sort=confidence
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 05:57 PM
2

You can get genital hsv1 making it effectively the same as hsv2. You can get oral hsv2 though much rarer. They hVe the exact same symptoms. Also you can't get herpes from sharing drinks and such even though many websites incorrectly state this. It is purely skin to skin. Most of us get jt from relatives before the age of 5. You can technically spread your hsv1 to someone by going down on them even if you don't have symptoms and definitely if you do have a cold sore. There is no moral or legal di…
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 11:54 AM
8

Sure is. Gonna cost you a lot of money too though and you could easily lose it all so unless he's fucking rolling in it likely not worth it.
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 01:45 AM
3

Again as I said there are no criminal charges for transmitting herpes. That just has never happened in any state. People can bring lawsuits against anyone for anything. If some super wealthy person gave you herpes you can prob get a decent settlement. Most people aren't multimillionaires so the fact that that has happened doesn't particularly matter. Hsv1 + 2 are both quite well understood and both can increase risks for other certain conditions but that doesn't really matter much in the grand s…
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 01:29 AM
4

They are effectively the exact same thing. You can get genital hsv1 from oral sex. It's actually quite common if you browse /r/herpes lots of post about it. The distinction is meaningless because either virus can cause genital herpes which is what we are talking about here so my statistics are very relevant. No way people are winning large settlements unless they somehow are suing someone crazy rich who doesn't wanna deal with court or there is a pattern of them purposely infecting people. Just …
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 01:12 AM
-5

Yes 50-80% of adults in the US are estimated to have hsv1 and 20-35% hsv2. The distinction is pretty meaningless because either can be genital or oral and transmitted anywhere.
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 01:01 AM
8

Anyone can file a lawsuit for anything. According to the article you linked me CA law states transmitting a disease with "significant public health implications". Obviously herpes does not meet this criteria since it has no negative impact on your health and more people have it then don't so any such lawsuit would be dead. That law is basically exclusively for hiv/hepatitis.
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 12:59 AM
6

What about my statistics are wrong? https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/herpes-hsv1-and-hsv2/oral-herpes Here is John Hopkins they say 50-80% have hsv1. That is the range I see mentioned almost everywhere. The tests are widely known to be very inaccurate which is why they are not used in a standard std screening. https://www.modernhealthcare.com/providers/lack-knowledge-unreliable-testing-feed-stigma-herpes HSV-2 isn’t included in the standard panel of tests for sexual…
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 12:56 AM
11

What am I wrong about? I didn't actually mean to say literally you have it but on average someone reading this is more likely to have it then not. Hsv 1 and 2 are different but both can infect anywhere on the body. Neither are totally preventable at all unless you don't have sex. The tests are known to be pretty inaccurate due to how the infection lives in your cells. That is why no one gets tested for it when they get tested for stds unless they specifically request it. Most providers are not s…
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 12:39 AM
-2

Transmitting herpes is definitely not illegal in any states lol. 50-70 % of the population have it. You could have it but don't get symptoms. If you have ever had a cold sore at any point in your life you carry herpes. Hsv1 and hsv2 can both be spread anywhere on the body.
/r/RedPillWomen23/06/21 12:18 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter