local_official Archive

TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
9	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man A more accurate saying would be that nobody chooses what body type they find attractive. To the point, people probably don't have a lot of choice in what anything they find attractive. Including not just body type, but income level, personality, stability, social status, whatever. People need to stop moralizing sexual attraction.	/r/MensRights	18/01/11 09:00 PM
26	Survey: 68% of men would date an unemployed woman, 80% of women would not date an unemployed man For some people, attractiveness is primarily a function of physical appearance. For others, it has more to do with status and social standing. For many, it's some combination of both.	/r/MensRights	18/01/11 08:02 PM
3	Woman's magazine on "How to Break Your Man Down" Note: may not be a real women's magazine.	/r/MensRights	11/01/11 09:27 PM
2	Title IX: Great When When Women Play Male Sports! "Being used against us" When the roles are reversed. Very difficult to make laws that are substantive without being formal. Unless there are clear rules that apply to everyone, you have a tyranny of judges who must decide what is "fair" on a case-by-case basis, and the law depends explicitly on which judge you get.	/r/MensRights	03/12/10 09:05 PM
4	Hollaback, the iPhone 'creep reporting' app That statement applies to the entirety of the internet.	/r/MensRights	11/11/10 09:51 PM
1	Effective safe male birth control is almost here. We don't understand all the (unintended) social consequences, but when it does come, then feminism is basically finished. Men who decide to become fathers will be in short supply and therefore valued. The anti-male bias will disappear overnight. This is, at most, a semantic difference hanging on the meaning of "after". Perhaps it would have been more accurate phrased as "within a ten-year span of normal condom usage" (whatever that means)... So you are correct, if the point of contention is that the failure rate of condoms does not sharply increase after a certain period of usage. But PaytonMD's point that the compound rate of likelihood vastly exceeds the incidental rate of likelihood is sound, even if ambiguously-phrased.	/r/MensRights	01/11/10 04:13 AM
1	Effective safe male birth control is almost here. We don't understand all the (unintended) social consequences, but when it does come, then feminism is basically finished. Men who decide to become fathers will be in short supply and therefore valued. The anti-male bias will disappear overnight. Each time you flip a coin, there is a 50% probability of landing heads. But if you flip a coin a hundred times, there is a much higher than 50% probability that you will see heads at least once. Math is hard.	/r/MensRights	31/10/10 07:16 AM

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter