TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

locks_are_paranoid Archive

View 23 posts and 1,401 comments by locks_are_paranoid on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
625

Generallocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights19/06/21 04:43 AM
345

Legal Rightslocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights02/09/19 05:02 AM
205

Discriminationlocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:00 AM
131

Feminismlocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:45 AM
115

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:55 AM
111

Generallocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights17/04/21 03:34 PM
81

Discriminationlocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights27/10/18 08:08 PM
54

Generallocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights13/04/16 02:34 AM
24

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights02/01/16 06:00 PM
19

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:58 PM
17

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights11/03/16 10:57 PM
17

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights25/03/17 05:22 AM
17

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights09/08/16 02:26 AM
11

Progresslocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights25/03/21 03:13 PM
10

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:18 AM
9

Marriage/Childrenlocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights09/09/21 06:14 AM
8

Edu./Occu.locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights28/04/17 10:48 PM
6

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights15/01/16 04:16 AM
6

Marriage/Divorcelocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights28/04/17 10:47 PM
3

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights14/05/16 04:31 AM
3

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights07/02/17 09:10 PM
1

Feminismlocks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:43 AM
1

locks_are_paranoid/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:19 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,401 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If a person said the same thing about black people, they would be called racist. You're being sexist against men, it's no different then any other stereotype.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 03:58 PM
2

Thanks
/r/MensRights28/02/22 06:59 PM
-1

No, the discriminatory part is that only women can message first.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 05:08 PM
2

A non-discriminatory solution would be to only allow one message at a time. This way either person can message first, but they can't send a second message until the other person responds.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 05:07 PM
0

Yeah, and that's illegal discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 05:46 AM
2

The fact the company settled this case means they thought they could lose. Plus all the men get money for being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 05:06 AM
7

I really don't want to watch the video, it would just make me too sad.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 10:34 PM
14

The times are in blue because YouTube confuses them with sections of the video. If you were to view the actual comment and click on the time, it would attempt to take you to that section of the video.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 07:23 AM
7

It's amazing how republican can say all this, but somehow still support the requirement that men register with the Selective Service. However this is a moot point, since there hasn't been a draft since 1973 and there's no chance of a draft happening in the future.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 08:45 AM
3

The father was arrested for asking a question? I'm genuinely stunned at this blatant violation of his freedom of speech. Yes, I know Australia has much weaker free speech protections then the US, but at the very least they shouldn't be arresting people for asking questions.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 10:09 PM
3

There's a website cuddlecomfort.com where you can pay women to cuddle.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 07:59 PM
8

Kids bullied me all the time in middle school, but everyone who I mentioned it to just told me to ignore it. There were days when I was literally crying, but no one did anything to help.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 07:16 PM
1

No, and I've never heard of anyone of either gender doing that in real life.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 08:06 PM
2

I'm a guy and when I was in middle school and high school kids bullied me too.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 07:03 PM
1

I'm a guy and kids bullied me too.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 07:00 PM
9

I feel so bad for that kid.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 02:37 AM
21

It's genuinely hilarious that they believe they should get paid for thinking.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:07 PM
19

No, they're not.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:06 PM
1

I agree with most of what you said, but I disagree about cops. A quick scroll through r/bad_cop_no_donut will show that cops do far more harm then good.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 01:46 AM
1

The draft is so unpopular that it would never be implemented in the US.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 08:00 AM
1

US troops have never been used to defend the US, they've always been used to invade foreign countries.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 06:29 AM
1

The US will never have another draft, almost everyone is against it and any politician who tries to reinstate the draft will be voted out of office almost immediately. Any reinstatement of the draft would have to go through congress, and not even the most unhinged republicans are even suggesting a draft.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 05:20 AM
1

There is a reason they don't simply get rid of selective service That reason is because of inertia, there's just not enough political will to change it. There will never be another draft in the United States, and the Selective Service is just a relic of a bygone era.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 05:17 AM
2

The Selective Service System needs to be abolished.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 05:14 AM
9

If you want to feel better, stop using social media. If you go out and talk to people in the world you'll see that most of them are good.
/r/MensRights29/11/21 09:05 PM
1

Shows like SWAT are pro police propaganda, also known as copaganda. All cop shows portray the police as the good guys, and even when they show a bad cop, it's always portrayed as "a few bad apples." Yes, many cops are good, but there's rarely accountability for bad cops.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 12:07 AM
-14

There were protests against the draft for the entirety of US history.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 04:18 AM
1

If it was 1800, and you asked me who the priveleged sex were, I'd say women. Is this a typo?
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:01 PM
1

Her logic about a STEM degree being hard seems counterintuitive.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 05:16 AM
50

It's amazing how To Kill a Mockingbird is required reading in most high schools, but everyone focuses on the racism instead of the false rape accusation.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:30 PM
14

I don't want to watch the video, can someone summarize it?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:29 PM
5

There should not be a military draft, if a war is truly justified people will voluntarily sign up.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:01 AM
1

People conscripted into the US military were always paid. I'm against conscription but to claim that they weren't paid is blatantly false.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:01 AM
6

Conscripted soldiers in the US were always paid. I'm against conscription, but even so this is a bad faith argument. Also let's keep in perspective that the US hasn't had military conscription since the Vietnam War.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:58 AM
3

Yes
/r/MensRights08/11/21 07:55 PM
8

It's amazing that Hillary actually said that women are the primary victims of war.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 06:50 AM
3

These organizations will be going downhill fast.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 06:49 AM
1

The Vietnam War is just one example. The US wasn't in any danger whatsoever, but we decided to invade a foreign country. I guess technically they were defending South Vietnam, but what I meant what the vast majority of wars are not defending the countries which the soldiers came from.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 06:44 PM
1

Except the vast majority of wars are not defensive.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 06:39 PM
1

Yes, how dare I say that forcing someone to fight against their will is barbaric.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 05:31 PM
1

Conscription is wrong, and it's shameful that some countries still practice it. It's also sexist since they only conscript men. Even countries which conscript both genders have a shorter service for women. But the most critical factor is that conscription makes people slaves to the military. Yes, conscripts are slaves in everything but name. Any country which still practices conscription is barbaric.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:33 AM
-2

I got that from a post on r/bad_cop_no_donut.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 07:19 AM
-9

Please cite an actual example of that happening within the last few years.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 04:43 AM
-7

Even "being vigilant" is just media paranoia. There's a zero percent chance of a kid being abducted by a stranger.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 03:19 AM
6

Except we have body cam video of cops shooting people who are literally begging for their life. This is the body cam video of when Daniel Shaver was killed my police. It's extremely graphic, and even though the cop was initially fired, he was rehired by he department so that he could retire and collect a pension.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 03:14 AM
-15

If you have 12 bad cops, and 1300 good cops who stay silent, you have 1312 bad cops. Every time a cop shoots someone in cold blood, there's always a ton of misconduct and brutality complaints which were ignored. Bad cops are never removed from the force, which means that there are bad cops in all ranks of law enforcement. Even when a good cop does the right thing and reports bad cops, the entire department retaliates against the good cop. Adrian Schoolcraft is just one of many examples. His capt…
/r/MensRights07/11/21 01:07 AM
20

The fact that he says "there's creeps and danger in the world" shows that he's fallen for media fear mongering. There is no justification for this, and paranoia isn't an excuse.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 12:47 AM
2

I'm glad that was blurred, I wouldn't want anyone seeing that.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 01:37 AM
4

Awhile ago I was watching an episode of Scrubs, and JD said that growing up is "a choice you have to make."
/r/MensRights03/11/21 08:44 AM
6

incel terrorism I don't even know how to respond to this.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 07:28 PM
85

That's why a guy who has sex with a girl who he met in a club shouldn't be punished, since it's presumed that she's at least the minimum age to enter the club.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 11:31 AM
707

The fact that the girl was even let into the club shows that she looks older then 15.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 05:12 AM
91

She's a cop and a woman, meaning she has both a pussy pass and the cops protecting her.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 02:46 AM
5

When I read the title, I though it was going to be able women teaching their daughters to use the men's bathroom.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 03:16 PM
-2

In the animated Netflix show Paradise PD the main character's father uses testosterone patches, and I genuinely assumed they really existed.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 03:07 PM
9

The episode which I hated most was the episode where Dr. Charles got his daughter committed to a mental institution. Granted, she was hearing rats which weren't actually there, but he literally stole her keys and went into her apartment when she was in the hospital for a voluntary psychiatric evaluation. Her apartment had tin foil on the windows and a ton of other stereotypical stuff indicating "this person is crazy." Dr. Charles then prevented her from leaving and had her committed even though …
/r/MensRights28/10/21 03:44 PM
2

r/antipsychiatry
/r/MensRights27/10/21 11:11 PM
1

Where exactly would he be able to get his own test?
/r/MensRights26/10/21 11:16 PM
1

If they retest him right away, they'll know if the first test was a false positive.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 10:59 PM
1

The first test could've been a false positive.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 05:37 PM
1

A simple test like that would take a few minutes at most, especially because it seems obvious that this person wants to be tested again.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 11:03 PM
4

The fact that they're not retesting him immediately shows that they just want to punish him and don't actually care about the truth.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 03:26 AM
3

Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens falsely arrested her under the pretence of having breached COVID-19 regulations and drove her to near Dover where he raped and strangled her, before burning her body and disposing of her remains in a nearby pond. This was a cop, so if she had fought back she would've been arrested for assaulting' an officer. Cops have far too much power in almost every country, and the fact that he used COVID-19 regulations as an excuse to arrest her shows that governmen…
/r/MensRights24/10/21 03:19 PM
34

Women are paranoid because of the media, not because there's actual danger. A woman can walk home at night perfectly fine. Even in a truly dangerous area, they're just as susceptible to violent crime as men.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 03:46 AM
8

Given how much contraversy there is around Catholic priests molesting boys, male victims are still taken seriously in some situations.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 06:49 PM
1

She was wearing a very short skirt which was clearly too small to have pockets. I remember it because she was using her hands to hold her skirt to cover herself.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 04:05 PM
1

She was trying to steal from him She wasn't carrying a bag, and she was wearing a skirt without any pockets. She trying to steal anything. She was having a mental health breakdown Mentally ill people still have rights, and you can't kidnap someone just because they're mentally ill. The only exception is a mental instution, and a college dorm room certainly wouldn't qualify. Also, there was nothing to indicate that she was having a mental health breakdown, other then possibly the strange was she …
/r/MensRights21/10/21 02:19 PM
1

Except in this case it was a college student dragging another college student into a room against her will. The woman clearly said "no, I don't want to go." It has absolutely no relation to the case which you linked to. Please name any explanation for why this guy would be justified in dragging her into a room against her will.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 11:52 AM
1

The police were fully informed of where it was, and the other people in the hallway were still there.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 11:49 AM
0

When I was in college, I was on the fourth floor of the dorm at 2am. I was walking down the hall, and I saw a woman walking in the opposite direction. As we walked passed each other, I noticed that she was crying. She was also shuffling her feet along the floor so that her feet were barely lifting off the ground. A few seconds after I walked passed her, a guy came out of a room, charged up to her, and started pulling her back towards the room. She was struggling to get away and said in a very we…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 08:49 PM
2

Thanks
/r/MensRights20/10/21 07:28 AM
4

Do you have a link to the actual website?
/r/MensRights20/10/21 07:05 AM
20

At first it just made the woman look racist. I genuinely thought it was some kind of anti-racism commercial at first.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:35 PM
1

This is the first time I've seen a video with no views.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 08:36 PM
159

Plenty of female writers have used male pseudonyms.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 06:35 PM
34

I genuinely thought Bloody Mary with a fictional character.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 05:55 PM
1

Exactly, she claims the cashier called it a "rewards card," and she acts like that's some kind of excuse. However a credit card application would ask for your social security number, which makes it obvious that it's for a credit card.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 05:08 PM
1

The fact that the show made her go dumpster diving is just terrible. There's nothing wrong with her kids eating food which was delivered, and I genuinely don't see the issue. To be clear, her kids were not eating food from a dumpster, they were eating food which was delivered from a restaurant. The dumpster diving was just for the show.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 02:54 PM
-1

There have been numerous instances of cops shooting people on the ground with their hands up. You can Google it and find a ton of results.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:33 PM
-2

They shoot people who are on their knees with their hands in the air, so I could totally see a cop shooting someone for saying "I'm going to kill you."
/r/MensRights12/10/21 03:49 PM
6

Even during the height of the pandemic, no one was trapped inside. I went to the McDonald's drive through in April 2020 and there was a line of cars. The same with every other month in 2020. The drive through at Taco Bell had a huge line.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 12:49 PM
-9

The girl feared for her life, and had a right to respond with violence. If you told a cop "I'm going to kill you," you'd almost certainly be arrested or shot.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 12:45 PM
-11

A kid at school is just as capable of raping someone as anywhere else.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 03:11 AM
-1

Some bullies deserve to be punched. I'm a man, and when I was in middle school kids would poke me all the time. They would jab their fingers as hard as they could, and it really hurt. But the worst part was that I couldn't do anything in response without getting in trouble. I would have to hold in my anger every day to avoid fighting back, and it caused really bad anxiety. It genuinely got to the point where I couldn't relax because I would always be worried about kids poking me. Even when I was…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 03:09 AM
6

Only biological women can have periods and give birth. Anyone who says otherwise is either an idiot or being intentionally wrong.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:16 PM
3

Except there is no wage gap, and trying to justify the wage gap is just terrible.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:29 AM
60

I know the college court system is just as bad.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:28 AM
168

The reason why the juvenile justice system is so extremely corrupt is because everything is allowed to be done in secret and there are no juries.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:11 AM
2

Yes they do, that's the whole point.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:38 PM
1

This is about his older cousin, not his mom.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 09:57 PM
18

Except that insanity defense rarely works for men.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 02:59 PM
5

Because military conscription is morally wrong and the vast majority of Americans are against conscription.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 10:25 PM
57

The Selective Service needs to be abolished.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 06:46 PM
48

Bill Burr did it.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 05:45 PM
1

I'm in America and I've never seen that.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 01:39 PM
1

Please explain how the Vietnam War "led to my freedom?"
/r/MensRights08/10/21 03:25 AM
30

They also claimed that long bathroom lines are sexist.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 06:44 PM
1

The US hasn't had a justified war since WWII.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 05:23 PM
0

If it wasn't for conscription, the Vietnam War would've ended much sooner. There simply wouldn't have been enough troops to keep it going.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 01:41 PM
0

The US mainland has never been directly attacked by a foreign country, every war had nothing to do with defending the US.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 12:37 PM
1

Are you saying that you want permanent conscription? That's literally authoritarian.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 12:34 PM
2

A fair, free, and democratic society shouldn't have conscription. You appear to really like the military, but other people really hate the military. Do you really want slavery back in America? Conscription is slavery in everything but name.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 03:16 AM
2

We shouldn't be conscripting people at all. If a war is truly justified, people will voluntarily sign up.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 02:44 AM
3

Except very few wars are actually justified, the Vietnam War being a perfect example.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 01:31 AM
11

Conscription is morally wrong, no one should ever be forced to kill another human being. A person shouldn't have to risk their life for their government. Even in cases where the war is defending their country from an attack, no one should be conscripted. If a war is truly justified, people will voluntarily sign up.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:07 PM
7

They claim it's just "a few bad apples," the exact same excuse which cops use when they beat up people, murder people, and rape people.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 03:07 AM
3

This is actually talked about as evidenced by all of the altar boy jokes.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:59 AM
3

An elected office can still have minimum qualifications. For example, the president of the United States has to be a natural born citizen.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:48 PM
12

In many states family court judges are elected, but there's literally no information about the candidates.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:56 PM
3

With every political party there's some stuff which you'll disagree with, that's the problem with political parties.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 11:35 PM
4

Finally there's a scientific paper on this.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 06:45 AM
7

There was a Law & Order: SVU episode with a similar premise.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 03:47 PM
13

The Selective Service needs to be eliminated, it's a relic of a bygone era
/r/MensRights01/10/21 06:09 PM
1

I assume this video has already been demonitized.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 10:55 PM
1

Yes, I'm so desperate for love that as long as we got along I would marry them.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 08:15 PM
1

This is the first time I've heard of this poem.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 09:50 PM
2

The Selective Service needs to be abolished. A lot of people don't realize that it was abolished after the Vietnam War, but reinstated in 1980 due to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:37 AM
1

One time there was a post on r/legaladvice about a restaurant where all the female wait staff were forbidden from walking to their car by themselves at night because the parking lot was somewhat far away from the restaurant. The post was written by a woman who was complaining about how sexist it was, but most of the comments were saying "maybe something happened," and "the boss is just trying to protect you." It was the soft bigotry's of low expectations. However some of the comments were really…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 10:54 PM
3

I'll have a rape kit with a side of molestation fries and assault cookies. Also, could I get some rape yellow mustered on the side?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 04:19 AM
9

The sexist part was where he said that the only problem would all be the lonely uneducated would be dangerous. That's true, but even more dangerous would be all the bitter, lonely women that would be left in charge. Lonely people are not dangerous, and it's prejudiced to say they're somehow a threat to society. I'm a single man, and I'm not dangerous.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 03:40 AM
10

Also conman
/r/MensRights25/09/21 07:53 PM
38

X-People
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:03 PM
16

I used to be against security cameras because I didn't want Big Brother watching me, but I've come to realize that mass surveillance has its positives.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 03:21 AM
4

I'm a man, and one night I was walking doing the street and a black man started walking the same direction as me. It was obvious that he just happened to be walking the same direction, but I was scared. I started walking a bit faster, but he was walking at a normal pace, so the distance between us was getting further apart. Since it was dark, I couldn't see the person's face, but I imagined him looking really scary. I kept walking faster, and eventually I got to an intersection where I had to cr…
/r/MensRights24/09/21 06:35 AM
6

It's amazing how everyone reads To Kill a Mockingbird in school, a book about a black man falsely accused of rape, yet they don't do anything when a person in real life is falsely accused of rape.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 02:51 PM
3

Rich dudes don’t give a shit about screwing over a trophy wife’s ex husband. But that's exactly that happened. The rich dude screwed over his trophy wife’s ex husband. The person in this story is the ex husband.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 03:09 AM
4

Yeah, reddit bans every sub which is considered too right wing.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:46 AM
0

I got banned from a ton of subs for posting in r/nonewnormal.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 07:25 AM
1

Fair point, but a ton of people on this thread are assuming he's guilty.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 09:02 PM
4

There's a lot of reasonable doubt here.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 05:18 PM
4

So the UN is against taxes now?
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:44 AM
0

You claim that cops care about public opinion, and I'm pointing out that cops do whatever they want regardless of what the public thinks.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 11:40 PM
0

What about when Derek Chauvin put his knee on George Floyd's neck for eight minutes?
/r/MensRights11/09/21 11:14 PM
0

They just follow the law and the legal system Given the number of people killed by police, this doesn't appear to be true.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:28 PM
-1

The number of people killed by police seems to imply they don't care about public opinion.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 10:26 PM
2

Although feminism has the most responsibility for this, the cops are the main problem. They forced this man to leave a bar despite not committing a crime.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 06:24 PM
5

The Big Bang Theory played this concept for laughs.
/r/MensRights11/09/21 12:55 AM
25

This happens because of race too. In 1992, presidential candidate Ross Perot was giving a speech to the NAACP, and he was talking about how unemployment was increasing. He said "I don't need to tell you who gets hurt first when this sort of thing happens, do I? You people do." He later found out that everyone was calling him racist because he used the phrase "you people," however there's nothing inherently racist about that phrase. He was speaking to a group of black people, so when referring to…
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:04 AM
1

You're right, the way you phrased it sounds better.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 10:20 PM
5

You could try saying something like: I noticed there aren't any females on the list. Can you explain why that is? However they respond, just say: That makes sense.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 08:39 AM
2

When used in legal terms, the phrase "United States" refers to the Federal Government. Thus, the agency hasn't defaulted the "United States" since they haven't defrauded the Federal Government.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:24 AM
3

London used to be the epitome to high society, but now it's just trash. Sadly I've never visited London, and now it's too late.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:03 PM
5

Exactly. I used to work in Brooklyn, and most of the homeless people who I saw on my commute were men. The really sad part is that I started getting used to seeing homeless people to the point where I didn't even notice them anymore.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 08:00 PM
3

It was a standard amount of blood for a nosebleed, but it was happening every day. If you start getting nosebleeds again, you should see an ENT, which is an Ear, Nose, and Throat doctor.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:46 PM
3

My primary care doctor is a woman, and she's honestly really good. It was just that one specific female doctor in college who didn't take me seriously. Most likely it's because the college just didn't pay enough to get good doctors.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 03:44 PM
60

I've been told to "calm down" a countless number of times. One time a female doctor wasn't taking my problem seriously, and she called a nurse into the room when I started yelling at her. For context, I'd been getting nosebleeds everyday for a few weeks in a row, and I was concerned about the frequency of the nosebleeds, however she just wasn't taking me seriously and kept saying that it was from the dry air. Eventually I finally went to a good doctor and he correctly diagnosed it as being from …
/r/MensRights02/09/21 02:25 AM
14

The Netflix show Space Force had a direct parody of her in the episode "Edison Jaymes." She's played by Kaitlin Olson and she claims to have invented a new type of rocket fuel called Skinny Fuel.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 03:41 PM
4

During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980’s the United States through a CIA covert operation based in Pakistan supplied billions of dollars to support insurgent militia forces called the mujahideen (soldiers of God). Following the Soviets’ withdrawal in 1989, factions of the mujahideen fell into a civil war and in 1994, the Taliban emerged as a dominant force. The Taliban was literally created by the United States government.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 03:26 PM
7

When I was a kid other kids bullied me but no one did anything about it.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 06:03 AM
0

There's no draft in the US, registering for Selective Service just ads your name to a database in case a draft ever happens. Also, there's no chance of a draft happening so it's a moot point.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:49 PM
1

You are making the claim that people have been denied the right to vote, thus the burden of proof is on you.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:36 PM
-1

Literally no one has been denied their right to vote because they didn't register with Selective Service.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 11:00 PM
-2

Please cite one example of a person being denied their right to vote because of the information in your post.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 10:23 PM
-2

I do not believe any State has ever tied voter registration of eligibility to selective service registration. A direct quote from the page you linked to.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 06:46 PM
6

Yeah, it was like a riddle.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:17 PM
16

His wife's aunt came in, his wife's grandmother took the kid, then she gave the kid to her husband, the wife's grandfather. The OP is still married to his wife, and his wife supports his story. There are five people in the house: The OP - The one who originally had the kid The OP's wife - She wasn't involved in the altercation The wife's aunt - The one who caused the kid to start crying The wife's grandmother - The one who took the kid The wife's grandfather - The one who the grandmother gave th…
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:04 PM
5

The OP had the absolute right to take his son from a man who did not have custody over him.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 05:00 PM
-4

He's wrong. You are not barred from voting if you don't register for Selective Service, This comes up a lot on this sub, yet no one has been able to find any proof of it.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 04:56 PM
-2

You are not barred from voting if you don't register with Selective Service. Please find any proof that this is true.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 04:56 PM
2

Except this involved civilians being killed.
/r/MensRights31/08/21 04:54 PM
7

Except if the woman consented to him continuing to have sex, no one would consider it to be rape.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:35 AM
32

This is both racist and sexist. Just replace white with black and it's literally like something the KKK would say.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 08:28 PM
2

The inferior gender will have been sexually enhanced so that they have a higher chance of giving birth and have had pleasure with.... Females are the only ones to give birth.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 05:59 AM
1

You legally have to register with Selecive Service, and there hasn't been a draft since 1973.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 01:36 AM
1

People in mental hospitals generally still have the ability to fill out a form.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 01:35 AM
18

Your tax dollars at work.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 09:27 PM
8

The fact that it's even called kidnapping is a slap in the face to actual kidnapping victims.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:09 PM
4

DO NOT TALK TO POLICE! Be polite, But your only words should be "No Comment" This video goes into more detail on that.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 11:41 AM
1

he's right to think that the suspect's calm behaviour is very unusual for an innocent person This is so wrong that I don't even know how to respond to it.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:33 AM
3

Replace the word "men" with "black people" are see how offensive it is.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:31 AM
5

Elliot Rogers There's no "s" at the end of his last name.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:45 PM
7

I first learned about that from American Horror Story: Cult. They had a really ugly woman play Valerie Solanas.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 01:42 PM
1

I was once called racist for saying that poor black people live in Harlem.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 02:15 AM
11

I genuinely thought the title was a joke at first since Karen is a common term for a very specific type of woman.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 10:49 AM
12

Can you explain what that article is referring to? What country is it in?
/r/MensRights18/08/21 10:04 AM
25

Did you appeal the grade with the department?
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:56 AM
1

I get the point, but police are one of the few professions which desperately need a reduction in force.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:17 PM
2

I remember that story being the old man tossing the star fish into the water and the little girl asking him what he's doing.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 03:07 AM
-4

Cops are not a protected class. There's no such thing as blue lives.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 03:05 AM
6

Wow, that's just blatant prejudice, it's the exact same thing which racists say whenever black people are unjustly suspected of a crime. There have been numerous cases of black people being pulled over and arrested under suspicion of stealing car, because the car looked "too nice" for a black person to own. There have also been cases of black people being suspected of kidnapping just because they happened to be with a white kid. In this case, it appears to be a white man and a white kid, but it …
/r/MensRights03/08/21 03:03 AM
5

You should post this to r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut/, it's a subreddit which deals with police abusing their power.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 02:57 AM
10

I thought you were referring to this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fruit_machine_(homosexuality_test)
/r/MensRights02/08/21 12:30 PM
2

This just isn't true. I've been looking for a girlfriend for a long time, but I haven't found one. I don't use Only Fans, but I understand the appeal.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 12:26 PM
17

Is "Fruit Machine" some code I'm not getting?
/r/MensRights02/08/21 12:24 PM
8

In the US, this is a violation of the Fair Housing Act.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 05:40 AM
34

In complete fairness, I once read a post on the legal advice subreddit where a woman took her teenage daughter to a psychiatrist, and the psychiatrist refused to believe that she was suicidal, he told her that she was just being a dramatic teenage girl. The mother was in the room, so she heard all of this. Later that night, the teenage girl killed herself.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 07:53 AM
1

Ok
/r/MensRights27/07/21 04:20 PM
4

This would have been the case if marriage had been anything but a really good deal for them. You mean that it wouldn't have been the case if marriage had been anything but a really good deal for them.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 12:34 AM
20

A simple way to prove that women weren't viewed a property is to watch sitcoms from that time period. A perfect example is The Honeymoons, which aired in 1955. Ralph is always asking his wife for stuff and she says no. There was one one episode where he asked her for money to buy a Halloween consume and she said no. Numerous episodes involve him doing something which his wife told him not to do and trying to hide the evidence so she won't find out.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 08:36 PM
30

I'm a man and I know not to get in the car of anyone I don't know, regardless of gender. This is just basic common sense, and isn't gender specific.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 06:51 AM
1

No one's been drafted since the 1970s, this is essentially an academic debate. The process of registering for Selective Service is filling out a one page form which takes less then five minutes.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 11:55 PM
1

The law is used against people who fail to register with Selective Service. It's so simple to comply with the law, and it's not sexist to require men to fill out a form. The US Census takes longer fill out then a Selective Service registration form.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:53 PM
0

Except in the vast majority of states felons regain their right to vote after they complete their sentence. Also, no one's been prosecuted for failure to register with Selective Service since the 1980s.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:50 PM
0

No one has been prosecuted for failure to register with Selective Service since the 1980s.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:49 PM
-1

No one has been prosecuted for failure to register for Selective Service since the 1980s. Also, even if a person was convicted of a felony, the vast majority of states only restrict a felon's right to vote while they're in prison, they get they're right back once they're released from prison.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:49 PM
0

Except I'm not lying. The right to vote is enshrined in the constitution, no state has ever denied a person's right to vote because they didn't register with the Selective Service System.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:44 PM
1

No one has been prosecuted for failure to register for Selective Service since the 1980s .
/r/MensRights25/07/21 08:38 PM
-1

Please cite any proof of this.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 05:45 PM
-2

You do not lose your right to vote if you refuse to register with the Selective Service System.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 05:43 PM
-3

You do not lose your right to vote of you refuse to register with the Selective Service System.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 05:42 PM
1

Same, especially in states like California where the age of consent is 18. It's simply a travesty that a person can be convicted of statutory rape for having sex with a 17 year old, even if they lied about their age.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 10:08 AM
-38

Military conscription hasn't existed since the 1970s, and it would take an Act of Congress for military conscription to ever happen again. The Selective Service System just maintains a database of men between the ages of 18 and 25 in case Congress reinstates military conscription.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 10:01 AM
27

To Kill a Mockingbird is an entire book about a false rape accusation.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:03 PM
1

The Selective Service System really needs to be eliminated.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:40 AM
1

India has so many bad laws.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 08:32 AM
21

Her eyes are really creepy.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 07:42 AM
3

I figured it was created in the 1960s during the Vietnam War. Churches like that existed in the US at that time, they were known as peace churches.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 02:31 AM
1

I figured it was created in the 1960s to help people avoid bring drafted during the Vietnam War. There really were churches created for that purpose, they were known as peace churches.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 02:30 AM
26

The best solution would be to eliminate Selective Service registration.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 08:26 AM
11

This is like something from Black Mirror.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 07:57 AM
1

In your title did you mean to write "hooting" instead of "tooting?"
/r/MensRights22/07/21 10:01 AM
6

Hot flashes have nothing to do with this.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 05:57 AM
2

Since a draft was happening, people didn't volunteer. However without a draft people would've volunteered.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 05:19 AM
3

Enough volunteers would've joined even without conscription.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 04:09 AM
4

Military conscription is morally wrong and needs to be eliminated.
/r/MensRights21/07/21 02:58 AM
5

That's not him being an asshole, that's him caving to peer pressure.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 10:02 PM
3

Exactly. The age of consent in Germany is 14. This tends to offend pearl clutching Americans, but it's still illegal to force someone have sex regardless of the age of consent.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 01:28 AM
1

Exactly. There's a huge difference between a girl who looks like an adult and a girl who looks like a kid.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 01:25 AM
29

Do not talk to the cops. Anything you say can be used against you.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 08:02 AM
3

You're justifying vigilantly justice.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 09:06 PM
20

Murder is wrong. Your entire post is a justification for murder.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 07:45 AM
6

This is why I'm glad Hillary Clinton never became president. She actually said: Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:35 PM
6

This is why multiple choice tests are the best. There's an objectively right answer and those tests are often graded by a machine and not an actual person.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 09:23 PM
9

I took a political science course with a female professor and I got a C-. I took an equivalent course at a different college with a male professor and I got an A. Since the course at the other college had a C-, it wasn't accepted as a transfer credit.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 09:21 PM
8

Another major problems is that women have a ton of high level positions in education, and they don't understand men's issues. For example, kids bullied me all the time in middle school, but I was always told to ignore it. The kids would poke me, and it was impossible for me to ignore. But no matter how many times I mentioned this I was just told to ignore it. The problem is that the women who were in charge seemed to assume that boys would respond the same as girls. Though I've heard stories of …
/r/MensRights06/07/21 09:16 PM
2

This is some new age hippie bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 05:27 PM
21

I almost downvoted this post even though you were just the one who posted the screenshot.
/r/MensRights23/06/21 06:30 AM
0

I think you mean innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 08:32 PM
1

The defense lawyer is legally required to make any argument which might help his client. Like how the defense lawyer for Derek Chauvin claimed that George Floyd died of a drug overdose.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:13 PM
1

There was a case in the UK where a woman's two children died of unknown causes. She was arrested and convicted of murder. She had a third child while in prison, and that child was immediately taken away ftom her. That child died while in foster care, and at that point the case was reopened and it was revealed that the prosecution hid the fact that one of the children had died of an infection. The woman was released, and she killed herself a few months later. A person is meant to be innocent unti…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:11 PM
3

I had a college professor who was a former cop, and he said the hardest part of his job was taking kids away from parents. He mentioned one time when he took kids away from their single mother on Christmas eve. He said the social services made "the right call" since there was no food in the house. Thinking about it now, a far better solution would've been for social services to provide food.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:06 PM
3

Bill Cosby popularized that phrase.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:02 PM
3

Did....did you just reply to your own post?
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:01 PM
1

ACAB
/r/MensRights22/06/21 05:00 PM
2

Because prosecutors needed to get their conviction rate up.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 04:59 PM
0

Except accidently dropping them can cause the same injuries.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 04:58 PM
0

Except the bones are so fragile that accidently dropping a baby can cause the same injuries as shaking them.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 04:57 PM
1

Then there have been cases where a parent accidently drops a baby but a doctor testifies that the injuries are "consistent with shaken baby syndrome." Innocent people have been sent to prison for this. There also a case where medical tests showed that a child died of anti-freeze poosioning, so the mother was arrested and sent to prison. But it was later revealed that the child died from a rare generic disorder which mimicked anti-freeze poisoning. There was another case where a woman's two child…
/r/MensRights22/06/21 04:54 PM
3

It's like when Derek Chauvin's lawyers claimed that George Floyd died of a drug overdose and that it was just a coincidence that the cop happened to have his knee on Floyd's neck at that time.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 04:42 PM
3

Charges were also dropped which means the dude decided that it wasn't worth his kid being born in jail. The victim does not choose if charges get dropped, that's up to the DA.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 05:24 PM
2

intent was not to cause physical harm to that degree That's not how the law works. If you punch someone and they die, you can still be convicted of murder even if you're only intent was to injure them.
/r/MensRights21/06/21 05:23 PM
32

I've only ever heard a shooter described as either a gunman or an active shooter. I've never heard the news say "a gun woman has opened fire."
/r/MensRights19/06/21 04:47 AM
12

This program is open to heterosexual couples married a minimum of two years, So...gay couples are excluded? I guess gay right don't really exist in India.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 07:39 AM
2

Even Scrubs said that people aren't adults just because they're 18. The narration by the main character was "I always thought becoming an adult happened naturally as you got older, but it's a conscious choice you have to make."
/r/MensRights15/06/21 09:16 PM
11

The fact that it says "suspected" suicide attempts is a major red flag that the numbers aren't accurate. If a woman cuts herself, is that considered a "suspected" suicide attempt? What if a woman takes pills which she knows aren't strong enough to kill her? There are a ton of other ways that "suspected" suicide attempts aren't real suicide attempts.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 05:36 PM
9

When I was in high school, we were reading a memoir and a classmate said "the main character dies at the end." I was mad at him for spoiling the ending, but then I realized that since it was a memoir it was written by the main character, and so he couldn't have died at the end.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 05:33 PM
2

Why does the article start out by calling the guy "highly intelligent?" It just sounds like he's bragging.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 11:52 PM
3

This is insane. Society shouldn't have to bend over backwards for religious zealots.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 08:04 AM
2

Please cite any proof of this.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 08:19 PM
1

No one is hiding a cancer cure from the public. Just imagine the massive amount of people who would need to be involved in the conspiracy. Also, if a cure existed, rich and powerful people wouldn't be dying of cancer. Plus, another scientist could independently discover the same cure.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 07:03 PM
7

Yes, because clearly no one lies on those surveys.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 07:12 AM
-1

Technically passing on a case isn't adjudicating it. [I'm not the person you replied to.]
/r/MensRights25/05/21 07:10 AM
2

A very sad example is the Satanic Panic, where innocent people were accused of raping children in a satanic ritual.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 07:08 AM
7

-Medical field (hospitals) would be out of business if medicine progresses Even if we develop remarkably advanced medical care, hospitals would still be needed to administer that care.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 07:08 AM
3

It's the internet, you can say rape.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 05:45 AM
2

You spelled rape wrong.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 05:41 AM
5

In practice, mandatory military service has not been implemented since 1949 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscription_in_China
/r/MensRights22/05/21 05:44 AM
1

What should he be in jail for? What crime has he committed?
/r/MensRights18/05/21 04:54 PM
2

The therapist never actually said it was a dick pic, just that he sent "pics" to a 7 year old.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 04:48 PM
2

This kid doesn't even sound mentally ill, he just has a different world view then the therapist.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 04:45 PM
12

"You didn't save my life, you ruined my death."
/r/MensRights15/05/21 11:19 PM
2

I'm not the OP.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:02 PM
3

You're literally criticizing a person for being nice.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 07:38 PM
2

He's literally just carrying extra stuff in case she forgets to bring her own.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 06:59 PM
3

In a truly free society, no one should be forced to work against their will, it's just slavery with extra steps.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 09:01 AM
8

Even if it was applied to everyone, conscription is still morally wrong.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 02:05 AM
15

Conscription needs to be abolished. If a war is truly justified, people will voluntarily enlist.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 11:46 PM
5

You're literally comparing children to dogs. Also, you shouldn't hit dogs either, or any other animal for that matter.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 05:11 PM
3

Hitting children is never justified.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 04:35 PM
5

What part of the video has the woman laughing?
/r/MensRights10/05/21 10:00 PM
25

When I was in college my best friend was a lesbian. There was no chance of a romantic relationship, so we just hung out. She defended me when other girls were mean to me, and she was always there when I needed her.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 09:58 PM
8

Bill Burr has a great bit about this.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 09:49 PM
17

Conscription needs to be abolished in all countries. If a war is truly justified, people will voluntarily enlist. If there's no war, there's no reason for people to enlist at all.
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:52 PM
2

Modern Family has a gay couple with an adopted child as two of the main characters. Shameless has Ian as a gay main character.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 06:48 AM
8

Do not talk to the police. The same goes for the FBI, DFCS, or any other government agency. This very long video explains why you should never talk to the police. There are so many ways that talking to the police could backfire. Even if you just tell the truth, you would be admitting to possession of the pictures. If you accidently say that she deleted the pictures, then realize your mistake and say that you deleted the pictures, the police can view that as changing your story. Right now, there'…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 03:04 PM
0

Alright, I might watch it.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 04:00 AM
0

I've been looking for a new movie to watch. EDIT: That movie is copaganda, so I'm not going to watch it.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 03:25 AM
10

That article is incorrect. It has a quote which they claim is from his attorney, but the original article states that the quote is from a defense attorney unaffiliated with the case.
/r/MensRights04/04/21 12:48 AM
1

Most school bus drivers are also men.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 12:23 AM
1

In order for this to happen, there should be a very clear distinction between an honest mistake and deliberate fraud.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 09:23 PM
3

It didn't mention what he actually did, just that he was charged with 3rd degree rape.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 09:17 PM
4

He lied to avoid the draft. Thus, he avoided the draft.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 10:23 PM
15

If all men stopped working society would grind to a halt.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 04:38 PM
4

Honestly, schools always punish the victim for fighting back, but they never punish the bully. This applies to guys bullying other guys as well. When I was in middle school this kid would always poke me as hard as he could. It always made me freak out, and everyone just told me to ignore it. Finally one day I threw the lock from my locker at his head, and he told a teacher. I got one day of lunch detention, and I had to write an apology letter to him. He then preceded to make fun of me for writi…
/r/MensRights30/03/21 03:07 PM
6

Right, and the OP is 100% correct.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 03:02 PM
3

What does that have to do with anything? Military conscription is morally wrong, and a person is fully justified in doing anything they can to get out of it.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:58 PM
1

I disagree with requiring people to retire. If a person wants to work, let them work.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:57 PM
1

I still don't see why they dropped out. The party can't require them to drop out, so they should've stayed in the election.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:56 PM
1

Trump actually cares about Men's Rights. He appointed Betsy Devos as Secretary of Education, and she revoked Obama's Dear Colleague Letter. More information about the Dear Colleague Letter.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:50 PM
3

Requiring anyone to serve in the military is morally wrong, regardless of the justification.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:47 PM
1

Military service should never be a requirement for a person to be president. If anything, military service makes a politician more likely to send troops to war. Just look at John McCain.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:46 PM
5

Even if a foreign country literally invades the US, a draft is still morally wrong. If a war is truly justified, people will voluntarily enlist.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:43 PM
1

The president is the commander-in-chief of the military. He could order all troops to instantly come home, and simply not send them to fight anyone for any reason. My favorite politician of all time is Ron Paul. He's been anti-war for his entire career, and he said that if he becomes president, he'll bring the troops home "quickly as the ships could get there."
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:36 PM
0

Yeah, Hillary is just insane.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:33 PM
6

In the 1970s, the US military would literally send people to prison if they found out they were gay. They were charged with lying on their enlistment forms, so the charge technically wasn't because they were gay, even though in reality that was the reason. To be clear, I've never served in the military, got this information from the movie Biloxi Blues.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:30 PM
2

Because far too few young people vote.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:25 PM
4

Agreed. The same with people criticizing Trump for avoiding the draft. No one should be criticized for avoiding literal slavery. I know it's controversial to say this, but military conscription completely fits the defination of slavery.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 02:24 PM
9

Don't fucking say that you were assualted at 4 years old we all know you're lying. This just isn't true.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 02:30 AM
1

Present evidence in 240 characters or less.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 06:50 AM
1

I'm not reading all of that.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 06:32 AM
5

and also 68% of rape cases arent reported They have zero evidence for this.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 03:35 AM
8

There's no actual evidence that rape is unreported. Feminists literally use a lack of evidence as evidence.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 08:55 PM
2

The legal definition of discrimination doesn't exclude men. Most lawyers would be happy to represent q man in a discrimination lawsuit if there was clear evidence of the discrimination.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:42 AM
2

Yet again cops get away with stuff which would land a normal person in jail.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 12:00 AM
1

I say age 18 is when you become a man. That's when you get most legal rights except for the right to purchase alcohol if your in the US.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 04:57 AM
1

Report them to the agency which owns the metro. It might not do anything, but it'll at least create a paper trail if they do it again. I'm almost certain this would violate some metro policy. Plus the trains might have security cameras. I don't know what city your in, but this advice should apply to all public transit systems.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 04:15 AM
1

Next on Shark Tank
/r/MensRights15/03/21 04:13 AM
3

Sexism is a single event. If a black person is refused service, that's racism even though it's only a single event.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:17 AM
7

You're missing my point. Even if a woman is truly afraid, it's still discrimination to deny someone service and it's wrong. Imagine if they turned away a black person because they were afraid of all black people.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:15 AM
2

That's not even a boomer thing, that's just a general thing to do. One time I was buying something over the phone, and when I gave them my credit card it was declined. Then they just hung up the phone. I realized that it was because my bank used an abbreviated version of my address. They used the letter W instead of the word West. This caused it to be declined since I gave them the non-abbreviated version over the phone, and it didn't match the one on file with the bank. I called the company bac…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 01:09 AM
10

Now apply this to race and see how it's completely racist. This is sexist and even if a woman is truly afraid, that's not an excuse for discrimination. Imagine if a business refused to serve a Muslim because they were afraid. Discrimination is never justified, no matter what a person is afraid of.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:41 AM
9

The law makes it illegal to discriminate based on sex. Both men and women are protected from discrimination.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:34 AM
10

The fear is completely irrational and has no basis in reality. One man murdering one women is not a justification for all women being afraid. If a black person murdered a white person, that wouldn't be a justification for white people to be afraid of black people.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:27 AM
5

Never shop at that bakery ever again.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 12:06 AM
-2

Investing money to help one group doesn't automatically create discrimination against another group. If a company donated money to the American Cancer Society, no one would say that it was discrimination against the World Wildlife Fund.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:28 PM
-1

What does this have to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 10:18 PM
4

A military draft is wrong regardless of the justification. If a war is truly justified, people will voluntarily enlist.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:34 PM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIcUgyLxNBA
/r/MensRights10/03/21 04:23 AM
8

This is amazing.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:32 PM
3

If she wasn't being blocked from leaving, then there's no self defense claim.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 08:28 PM
21

All phones can be used to contact the police, including deactivated cell phones. Unless this woman was physically blocked from leaving the house, she was not justified in killing him.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 05:55 PM
9

I mean, it could be a troll.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 02:27 AM
13

The TikTok videos of dancing nurses are a prime example of this.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 05:26 AM
7

All laws can be abused, I never thought DMCA would be used to remove a suicide note.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 03:05 AM
14

I'm saying that it's unfair to blame men when women have other options.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 06:57 PM
4

Also, if a woman truly wants kids she can adopt or use a sperm donor, they don't need to be in a relationship to do it.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 05:43 PM
7

Except actual school shooter drills are gender neutral.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 07:25 PM
23

From the Titanic to present day.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 04:57 PM
6

It's the same with Adam Ruins Everything, his videos only seem correct if you don't know anything about a topic. But if you know about the topic, you'll know that he's either making stuff up or using biased sources.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 04:52 PM
2

I actually do have an issue with the Payday Loan video. Most of the video was correct, but the hypocritical part is when he was making fun of the company Kwik Kash because they spelled the words Quick and Cash incorrectly. I get the joke, but by his own logic he should also be making fun of Citibank for spelling City incorrectly. Yet he never made fun of Citibank, and whenever I post about this people say "Citibank isn't a payday lender," but their missing my point. In both cases, the company ma…
/r/MensRights18/01/21 04:49 PM
4

There was a video on the shows YouTube channel called Retractions, and I genuinely thought that he would be retracting stuff which was incorrect, but instead he was just making a bunch of jokes.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 04:42 PM
1

Britta wanted to gave sex with him that night at the theater, but he drove her home because he felt bad for her.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 04:02 PM
26

If you look at media from that time, it shows women being the assertive ones in a relationship. Even shows from the 1950s had women being the boss in a relationship. The Honeymooners is a prefect example of this. The vast majority of the episodes have the main character's wife being the one in charge of everything. There was even an episode where the main character asked his wife for money and she said no. In the 1960s there was a Twilight Zone episode where a man's domineering wife was screamin…
/r/MensRights18/01/21 09:55 AM
65

The HBO show Last Week Tonight with John Oliver had an episode talking about bias in medicine, and he showed a video from the 1930s as proof that women were discriminated against.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 09:48 AM
8

Yeah, I figured you were being sarcastic with your physical description of her.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 03:11 AM
6

She was middle-aged and ugly.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 03:04 AM
12

I used to work at Staples, and the assistant manager was a woman. She would always micromanage everything I did. One time she called me away from the register, then got mad at me for leaving the register unattended. She kept saying that I didn't like her because I have a problem with women, and she refused to consider the fact that I didn't like her because she was a bitch.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 11:45 PM
2

This is so tragic.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 09:15 PM
2

I tried on my phone but I can't zoom in. It looks like it's already at it's maximum resolution.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 06:04 AM
1

Yes, but the fact that she was a judge doesn't make her ruling on this show have any legal weight.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 01:15 AM
1

The last bullet point refers to "her" as a woman.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 06:55 AM
2

Yeah, John Oliver said it was like a report card from a Montessori school.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 10:53 PM
8

I remember a spokeswoman saying that he has greater "emotional intelligence" then his father. It was so bad that even John Oliver was making fun of it.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 06:09 PM
16

It's amazing how many government programs just ignore single men.
/r/MensRights24/12/20 06:07 PM
5

It's amazing how close Hillary came to the presidency even though she said "Women are the primary victims of war. They lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat."
/r/MensRights19/12/20 02:58 PM
16

Are we talking about assumptions or actual definition? The actual definition is irrelevant. For example, the Nazis claimed to be socialist, even though their policies were right-wing. Antifa claims to be anti-fascist, even though their policies are fascist. I could name a ton of more examples.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 02:50 PM
20

Feminists have protested to keep MRAs from speaking at college campuses. There was one time where they literally pulled a fire alarm to get a speech canceled.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 02:47 PM
106

She clearly lied under oath. Every article about this case says that she was the judge. If all of these articles are wrong, then who was the judge?
/r/MensRights18/12/20 10:52 PM
72

Let's all remember that Judge Judy isn't an actual judge, and that her rulings don't set legal precedent. In order to be on her show, both parties agree to binding arbitration, meaning that she's acting as an arbiter, not a judge. However the arbitration agreement makes them bound by her decision, so the ruling are "real" in that sense.
/r/MensRights11/12/20 08:10 AM
103

Interesting fact: The Devil's Advocate used to be a real position in the Catholic Church. If someone was being considered for sainthood, they would argue why that person shouldn't a saint.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 09:35 AM
32

The first time I heard about the SCUM Manifesto was on an episode of American Horror Story, and I was certain that they just made it up for the show. I was shocked to find out that it really existed.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 09:32 AM
11

There were school shootings in the 1800s, it's not a new phenomenon.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 06:14 AM
18

Except it's not true. A quick Google search shows many school shootings which were committed before the one with the female shooter.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 04:47 AM
1

The Amazing Atheist had a better response to this video.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 12:29 PM
6

If you can afford it, have a lawyer take her to court over this.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 12:07 PM
6

She did not save her husband. He was not in any danger. The part about "putting her husband first" meant that she allowed him to light the fire and didn't try to stop him.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 08:49 PM
7

She didn't save anyone. The part about "putting her husband first" just meant that she allowed him to light the fire, which is why she was convicted.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 08:47 PM
4

The article says it.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 08:45 PM
-13

I've never heard any use the term "female journalist," "female comedian," or "female doctor." She's angry at a problem which doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 05:45 PM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights17/11/20 05:03 PM
6

Are you honestly advocating that people commit fraud?
/r/MensRights17/11/20 04:55 PM
2

I didn't know, but think how many kids and adults are just walking through a mall. All of those adult have "access" to kids.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 01:09 PM
10

This punishment still seem insanely light.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 01:05 PM
14

Then there's the really insidious fact that if two people under the age of consent have sex with each other, they can both be arrested for statuary rape. Also, the age of consent varies by state, so while two 16 year old's can have sex perfectly legally in one state, it becomes statuary rape if it's in another state. Then there's people under 18 getting arrested for taking naked selfies. Their literally be charged as an adult for something which is only a crime because they're a minor. An adult …
/r/MensRights11/11/20 12:48 PM
5

I'm going to need some proof of this. There's no way that any of this is true.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 03:07 PM
6

This reminds me of when Hillary said that woman were the primary victims of war.
/r/MensRights24/10/20 08:18 AM
3

The term aggravated means the crime is more serious then non-aggravated crimes. Also, just to be perfectly clear, the victim did not "egg her on" and I have no idea why you even thought that was a possibility.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 05:36 AM
36

The alleged pedophile is also said to have told a neighbor what she had done. This is the most accurate news reporting I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 05:35 AM
0

The title says: Man 'raped and killed by parents' after daughter 'joked he molested her'
/r/MensRights30/09/20 04:23 AM
-1

That's literally what the title says. If the title is incorrect, then this is literally fake news.
/r/MensRights30/09/20 01:59 AM
-11

Yes, it is.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:50 PM
-12

That's literally in the headline.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 07:39 PM
1

I don't want to watch a 26 minute long video. What actually happened? What is a Jodi? What was the person actually charged with?
/r/MensRights23/09/20 05:54 PM
3

This is some next level hate. Imagine if a man said the same thing about small boobs.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 09:50 PM
3

Cops have literally beaten people up and gotten away with it. This guy punched someone who was hitting him. Schools have way too much power over their students.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 08:03 PM
13

The meaning of flashing your lights most likely varies by country.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 09:06 PM
1

Feminists: "Teach Babies Not To Rape!"
/r/MensRights10/08/20 02:31 AM
0

What about Daniel Shaver? The cop gave him conflicting commands, then shot him when he obeyed one command which conflicted with another command.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 06:03 PM
-2

I'm not trolling.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:26 PM
0

The huge difference is the cops who murder people never get convicted, while civilians who murder people will almost certainly be convicted.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:12 PM
-2

The entire protest happened because of George Floyd.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:11 PM
-17

Yes, but Democrats are the only ones who actually want to stop police shootings.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 04:36 PM
-67

I'm not joking. This sub is filled with examples of men being arrested because they called the cops, and men being arrested because they were falsely accused of rape. The vast majority of people shot by cops are men, and plenty of woman have been shot also. This sub should understand how terrible cops are, and be marching in the streets chanting "defund the police."
/r/MensRights09/08/20 04:08 PM
4

DEFUND THE POLICE
/r/MensRights09/08/20 04:04 PM
-13

We need to align ourselves with BLM and defund the police.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 04:03 PM
-109

This is just one aspect of how terrible cops are. We need to align ourselves with BLM and defund the police.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 04:02 PM
22

There was an episode of American Horror Story about this.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 03:32 AM
-1

This guy justifies every police shooting. Cops are murdering people and this guy is defending the cops.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 03:30 AM
14

This reminds me of the episode of It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia where Charlie tells Dee about all the work he has to do, but it's all stuff that he chooses to do. When Dee shows Charlie what she does, it's also a bunch of optional stuff which no one cares about but her.
/r/MensRights05/08/20 03:57 PM
2

If they don't represent feminism, then who does?
/r/MensRights02/08/20 04:56 AM
1

Modern feminism has nothing to do with equality.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 04:09 AM
3

My point is that she claimed it wasn't hypothetical when it clearly was hypothetical.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 02:51 AM
3

I was not being obtuse. All I did was point out that the question was hypothetical, and she freaked out.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 02:15 AM
2

They yelled at me about race first, then they asked the hypothetical question about rape and screamed at me when I said it was hypothetical. EDIT: Thanks for agreeing with me. It was surreal being in that situation.
/r/MensRights02/08/20 02:13 AM
41

When I was in college, I was talking to a woman in her dorm room, and this is the conversation which took place: Her: If you were walking down the street with your cousin, and someone tried to rape her, what would you do? Me: That's a really specific hypothetical situation. Her: It's not hypothetical because it could happen. Me: But it's not happening, so it's hypothetical. Her: IT COULD BE HAPPENING TO SOMEONE RIGHT NOW!!! Me: But it's not happening to my cousin, so it's hypothetical. Her: THER…
/r/MensRights01/08/20 07:08 PM
37

I agree with you 100%.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 08:52 PM
14

There are several situations where hitting someone is justified. When I was in middle school, kids would bully me every day, but everytime I reported it to the school administration, they just kept telling me to ignore the bullying. I developed a lot of depression and anxiety from never standing up for myself. Schools should allow students to hit a bully as long as they're not the one who started it.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 08:51 PM
7

Also, if woman really wanted clothes with pockets, companies would be making them.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 02:45 PM
4

I'm 100% on the side of the dad. His ex wife started the argument, so she's responsible for him shouting.
/r/MensRights19/07/20 10:04 AM
33

girls are much more observant and intuitive children than boys. This is just a terrible line of thinking.
/r/MensRights19/07/20 10:01 AM
5

In complete fairness, requiring military service is antithetical to a free society.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 04:36 AM
3

I know that other states do this, but it just seems insane that the punishment is different depending on a person's relationship to the victim. If we want there to be true equality under the law, then the sentence should be the same regardless of a person's relationship to the victim.
/r/MensRights18/07/20 03:40 AM
8

It seems really strange that there would be specific law if it's a family member. What's the punishment if it's not a family member?
/r/MensRights18/07/20 03:17 AM
32

I used to work retail, and my female manager wasn't agreeable at all. That already destroys one their points.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 06:50 PM
3

Just to be clear, if an able-bodied person refuses military service and refuses civil service, is the only penalty a 3% tax?
/r/MensRights09/07/20 05:34 PM
5

I suppose you could leave it blank, but I'm not sure what that would accomplish.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 03:01 PM
70

I still remember Hillary Clinton saying that woman are the primary victims of war. It's scary how close she came to becoming president.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 01:40 PM
23

Is it really volunteering if they're forced to do it?
/r/MensRights09/07/20 01:31 PM
7

I don't see how "or on the author's person" includes "made to penetrate."
/r/MensRights03/07/20 10:48 PM
1

What country are you in?
/r/MensRights29/06/20 03:16 PM
1

When I was in college, I was required to take a literature course and we read the play "A Doll's House." The main character was a woman, and she forged her father's signature in order to get a loan. However, the bank manager found out and started blackmailing her. The entire class felt bad for the woman because she was being blackmailed, but completely brushed over the fact that she forged her father's signature, which is a crime. The play took place in Norway in the 1800s, and a woman couldn't …
/r/MensRights26/06/20 09:21 PM
3

Daniel Tosh did something similar, he made up words and asked people if they were racist.
/r/MensRights23/06/20 06:28 PM
1

My rebuttal is, if they can leave, they don't have any justification for killing anyone.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 04:27 AM
2

I'm the person who said that the person could just walk out.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 02:12 AM
3

Killing is wrong unless it's in self defense. If a person has the physical ability to remove themselves from the situation, then the killing isn't justified.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 02:05 AM
2

There's no evidence that this woman was joking.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 07:45 PM
5

If a person is truly in danger, they can simply walk out the door. You cannot kill someone no matter what they did to you.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 07:42 PM
6

Many women have no place to go if they left. So they do have the physical ability to leave. You do not have the right to kill someone no matter what they did to you.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 07:41 PM
2

Unless they're physically barricaded in the house, they can simply walk out the door.
/r/MensRights13/06/20 07:39 PM
34

He didn't say anything threatening. He criticized her decision, which is fully protected under the first amendment.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 06:04 PM
-3

The only way to stop false accusations is to revoke the law enforcement authority of all police departments everywhere. Just to be clear, I want to live in a world with zero cops.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 04:35 AM
7

Cops need to have for less power then they currently have. We need actual police accountability where anytime a cop attacks someone they're automatically fired and banned from working in any position of authority ever again.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 04:34 AM
13

Just another way for cops to keep their arrest numbers up.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 04:32 AM
144

Its amazing how judges can just ignore the law.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 03:03 PM
4

https://time.com/3222543/wage-pay-gap-myth-feminism/
/r/MensRights28/05/20 02:19 PM
4

I still remember when Michell Obama had that Bring Back Our Girls campaign, despite more boys being kidnapped then girls.
/r/MensRights17/05/20 04:11 PM
8

All wars fought today are for oil, they have nothing to do with defending anyone.
/r/MensRights14/05/20 02:35 AM
6

I wonder how long it'll be before SJWs consider the black and white chess pieces to be racist.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:37 AM
107

The only way to win is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?
/r/MensRights28/04/20 09:02 PM
6

LPT: It can be negotiated down to two strips.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 10:31 PM
10

The doctor's simulated daughter dies.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 08:27 PM
5

Do you want me to tell you how it ends?
/r/MensRights26/04/20 08:09 PM
29

There's an episode of Star Trek Voyager where the holographic doctor creates a simulated family, and he invites a few of the crew members over for dinner. The crew members say that his simulated family is too perfect, so the doctor lets them modify the simulation. When he walks into the simulation after the modifications are complete, the family is chaotic with the kids screaming and his exasperated wife giving him a list of things to do.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:51 PM
11

They were only giving it to woman, so the men had to steal food in order to survive.
/r/MensRights25/04/20 03:27 AM
1

The Amazing Atheist has a great video making fun of this.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 10:38 PM
5

TikTok is a really annoying app.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:01 AM
-1

63% + 5% Google calculator says that the answer is 0.68, which translates to 68%.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:53 AM
0

Their high in the sense that its a lower percentage then they're saying.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:53 PM
3

One time I was talking to a girl and she claimed that half of all woman have been raped. It was such a ludicrous statement that I didn't even know how to respond.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:36 AM
-2

Those numbers are absurdly high, and I'd like to see actual data before regarding them as true.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:34 AM
2

When I was in elementary school, we were taught the phrase "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me." Are you saying that this is incorrect?
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:32 AM
24

She also stole his property, which is objectively illegal.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 10:21 AM
7

Exactly. Most kids are happy that schools are closed.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:21 AM
1

WTF is in her face.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 06:15 PM
2

Woman have always been the primary victims of war. Woman lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Former Senator, and thankfully not president, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 04:39 PM
1

Barbasol
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:50 AM
1

The notion that "everyone knows someone" in a specific situation is just untrue, and it happens with everything. I've heard people say "everyone knows someone affected by the opioid epidemic" despite the fact that many people don't know anyone who was affected. The same is true with every other crime.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 09:18 PM
4

How would it violate anti-trust laws? If I buy a CD and give it away to someone for free, I still have to pay for the CD. Thus, when Apple Music gives away Taylor Swift's songs for free, they still have to pay Taylor Swift.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 10:54 PM
8

I say don't jingle your keys and just let the person be paranoid.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 06:22 AM
8

A person is innocent until proven guilty, and a random hotel employee shouldn't be interrogating guests.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 06:16 AM
1

Imagine if instead of saying "men" it said "black people." It is incredibly prejudiced to judge someone based on the demographic which they belong to.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 08:08 PM
5

That's largely because of their work culture.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:09 PM
6

I disagree with this. There are many woman who work full time jobs and it seems offensive to say that they "can't function without safety nets."
/r/MensRights19/02/20 02:06 PM
18

The UK pardoned people convicted of homosexuality back when that was illegal.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:42 AM
15

Yeah, and they also have cash benefits which can be spent on anything, including Tampons.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 11:38 PM
1

There was an episode of the TV show Corporate about this
/r/MensRights07/02/20 08:03 PM
2

Don't Buy Into The Gender Pay Gap Myth
/r/MensRights07/02/20 03:33 AM
2

There is no pay gap. This should be obvious.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 11:14 PM
0

It's not illegal when the US govt does it as they absolutely have repeatedly over the last few years. Can you give some examples? They've been banning people from flying on planes Give an example causing disruption to university educations, adoptions Examples? the US has deported people to their deaths last year Can you name an example?
/r/MensRights06/02/20 01:10 AM
2

No one is banned from flying on an airplane because of their race or religion. There is certainly discrimination, but it's blatantly illegal to outright ban someone because of their race or religion. Also, housing and employment discrimination is blatantly illegal.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 05:06 PM
10

Imagine if they stopped people of a certain race from adopting a child. Imagine your exact post with the word "men" replaced with the name of a specific race.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 03:53 PM
2

Or just use a Barbasol razor.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 11:24 AM
23

Remember the scene in Shawshank Redemption where Andy wrote a letter to the government every day in order to get more books for the prison library?
/r/MensRights26/01/20 10:04 PM
0

emotional terrorism I tried googling that phrase, but all I found were a bunch of random books are articles talking about it. It's not in any dictionary and has no legal significance.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 11:09 PM
3

People who do that are terrable, but domestic violence doesn't meet the definition of terrorism.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 03:00 PM
6

Remember when Hillary Clinton said that women were the primary victims of war? If not, here's proof that she said it.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:09 AM
2

You can't just change the definition of words to support your argument.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:07 AM
10

I laughed out loud at that. Once the government has your data, they'll never give it back.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 05:41 AM
3

Do you really want the government to have your DNA on file? Imagine what the government could do with a database of everyone's DNA.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 02:11 PM
3

I am in ts, boots, What is ts and boots?
/r/MensRights22/10/19 04:36 AM
1

What country did this happen in?
/r/MensRights08/10/19 02:37 AM
2

When I was in elementary school, a kid in my class actually got in trouble for crying. I felt so bad for him.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 02:36 AM
14

That reminds me of this scene from The Office.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:28 AM
38

Its like car salesman pressuring you into signing a contract. Its not rape.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:27 AM
1

New York is the same way.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 07:35 PM
3

This reminds me of the Seinfeld episode where Uncle Leo was accusing everyone of being an antisemite.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:45 AM
5

not paying taxes because they're "tips" Tips are taxed as regular income, if she really didn't pay taxes on it, than we can add tax fraud to the list of charges.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:58 AM
13

Legal Studies
/r/MensRights13/07/19 07:19 AM
13

Do you have any actual proof of that, or are you just believing what a random person said?
/r/MensRights07/07/19 12:00 AM
9

You are 100% making that up.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:59 PM
39

While it's true that men can be raped, it's incorrect to say that "most male first sexual encounters are from them being sexually assaulted." It's just as invalid as the infamous "1 in 4 women are raped at college" statistic. Please don't take what I'm saying the wrong way, it's a tragedy when anyone, regardless of gender, is sexually assaulted, but to claim that "most men are sexually assaulted" is false. It's literally claiming that over 50% of men, meaning over 1/2 are sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 06:19 PM
159

This is almost certainly illegal.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 01:14 AM
2

That’s 100% illegal. You should file a complaint against them for sex discrimination with Attorney General of your state.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 12:00 AM
3

This is blatant discrimination. I don't know much about South African law, but this would certainly be illegal in the United States.
/r/MensRights26/04/19 05:36 PM
3

We have tragically shaped society already by putting an enormous quantity of women on hormonal birth control No one forces women to take birth control.
/r/MensRights26/03/19 06:58 AM
2

Please cite the law in your region which requires all parties to show ID.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 09:00 PM
2

Those signs only apply to the person purchasing the alcohol. The age of everyone else is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:31 PM
-2

They were either lying, or you misunderstood what they said.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:29 PM
-1

The law only requires ID from the purchaser. They do not need the ID from anyone else.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:29 PM
-2

They only ID the person purchasing the alcohol. They are not required to ID anyone else.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:28 PM
-7

This sub needs to stop criticizing circumcision. It just makes everyone look bad.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 08:16 AM
3

A person is meant to be innocent until proven guilty. The fact that this innocent person was treated like a criminal just shows how terribly unfair our justice system is.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:18 AM
1

The Amazing Atheist has a really funny video making fun of these idiots.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 08:23 PM
3

Can you link to this treaty?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:44 PM
18

forced labor in case of emergencies What does this refer to?
/r/MensRights21/01/19 08:49 PM
39

You might be able to report them to the state for gender discrimination. Also, make sure to file a complaint with corporate.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 12:53 AM
5

This sketch is funnier.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 08:47 PM
1

I've never been accused of sexually harassing a co-worker, but one time I interrupted a co-worker's conversation and she reported me to my supervisor.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 08:46 PM
1

I supported her from the beginning, since she always supported the rights of the accused.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 07:14 AM
9

This is yet another reason why all officers should wear body cams.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 11:01 PM
33

I also agree. I would get to safety and call 911. I'm not putting myself in danger, and I will not be shamed into doing so.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 12:19 AM
7

Exactly. Its a massive double standard.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 12:14 AM
2

Treating someone differently because if their sex is sexism. In this case, men are charged more than woman, which is sexism.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 10:27 PM
4

Its still sexism, which is a problem.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 03:50 AM
1

Private schools are better. I went to public school and it was terrible.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:29 PM
6

Did you really just suggest that he should be suspended for writing a love letter? In reality, there should be no punishment for this because he did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:24 PM
6

Did you even read the note? Its the most innocent thing I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 07:22 PM
4

While there is something to childbirth making women smarter, or rather wiser That is false.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:59 PM
19

Agreed 100%.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 09:07 PM
2

ROTC is for college students, so most of the members are already 18. They wouldn't have to get rid of ROTC, they would just have to change the age requirement to 18.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:43 PM
1

What does the ROTC have to do with this?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:40 PM
2

Its a reference to woman typically getting sole custody in a divorce.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:38 PM
2

The average person reading that headline would assume that she killed the baby.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 02:55 PM
0

True, but it nonetheless proves that there was no infanticide.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:19 AM
-1

It was revealed that her infant son had died before or during birth. https://www.narcity.com/news/a-25-year-old-ontario-woman-who-abandoned-her-babys-body-in-a-dumpster-just-had-her-sentence-suspended
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:14 AM
2

That headline is extremely misleading. The baby was dead at the time of delivery. She did not kill the baby.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:59 AM
-1

Did you read the article? The baby was dead at the time of delivery. She did not kill the baby.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:57 AM
52

They would have to compete on an equal playing field. If feminism was truly about equality, they would support this.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 03:15 PM
3

Is it possible for a company to change it's state of incorporation? If so, a bunch of business are about to leave California.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 05:58 PM
1

Xanax just reduces anxiety.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:49 PM
13

Yeah, my grandmother takes it for anxiety, and she’s not the type to go to parties.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:48 PM
9

The OP said that he hopes she’ll have to register, it’s unclear if she actually will.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:46 PM
8

The problem is there’s no way to track spending to ensure the money actually is being spent on the children.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:14 PM
8

Married couples get a reduced tax rate.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 10:59 PM
3

Also, many countries still have conscription.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 12:34 AM
2

womankind There's a clip of the Prime Minister of Canada saying that "peoplekind" is the correct term. This man runs an entire country. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItsGW1Nlm3c
/r/MensRights15/07/18 09:41 PM
5

Laws vary by state, and many states define rape in a gender neutral way.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 03:55 PM
1

Far too many people use the term "verbal abuse" as a way to shut down an argument.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 04:04 AM
-2

almost all of the limited photos and videos being released show exclusively boys Did you just assume their gender. /s
/r/MensRights25/06/18 04:11 AM
2

That reminds me of this video where a student at the University of Cape Town, South Africa, claims that science is "a product of western modernity."
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:38 AM
3

What about wizards?
/r/MensRights31/05/18 07:16 PM
4

Betsy DeVos is truly a great Secretary of Education.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 05:05 AM
-4

Why are their infants on a college campus?
/r/MensRights17/05/18 04:27 AM
1

At this point, females’ starting points not as good as men This is false. When a person enrolls in a college class, everyone has an equal starting point.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 05:48 AM
1

Because its not treating them equally.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:39 AM
2

If he's in his professors private office, the professor would have a reasonable expectation of privacy. The laws vary by state.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:10 AM
12

If you're in a one-party consent state, and you're university policy allows you to record conversations, go to the professor's office hours and ask "why did you give women extra points?" When the professor responds with a justification, you've got even more proof.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:26 AM
2

Is that a Johnny Cash reference?
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:12 PM
10

The main issue is that prosecutors legitimately believe that everyone is guilty. I knew a girl in high school who wanted to become a prosecutor. I asked her if she would ever convict an innocent person, and she said "they're always guilty."
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:10 PM
11

I read that story freshman year of college, I never expected it to become reality.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 11:22 PM
2

legally yes
/r/MensRights30/04/18 04:56 AM
2

That's not discrimination since political affiliation is not a protected class.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 04:07 AM
1

Could an insurance company get away with charging people differently based on race? I assume the answer is no.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 02:49 AM
1

Discrimination based on sex is illegal discrimination.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 02:44 AM
1

There are certain protected classes which are illegal to discriminate against. These include race, religion, national origin, sex, and many others. You not wanting a junkie roommate is not discrimination since being a junkie is not a protected class.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 02:39 AM
4

What if insurance companies used race as a factor? That would clearly be discrimination.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 12:37 AM
5

The law says that a person cannot be discriminated against due to sex. It does not specify that it only applies to one gender.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:59 PM
-14

Sex is a protected class.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 11:30 PM
-16

Neither of those are a protected class.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 10:42 PM
-23

Discrimination is always wrong.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 09:21 PM
1

Replace the word male with any other demographic and the bigotry is obvious.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:39 PM
-9

I kid. /s is far better.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 01:16 AM
114

The Big Bang Theory
/r/MensRights13/04/18 10:47 PM
1

The main point of the movement is to stop people from making fun of fat people.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 09:43 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:34 PM
6

A person is innocent until proven guilty, and that includes Bill Cosby.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:33 PM
3

Or do you think that everyone are lying? That Bill Cosby didn't drug and rape anyone? I think that woman accusing him of rape are lying. Bill Cosby never drugged and never raped anyone. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and this includes Bill Cosby. People lie, its just a fact of life.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:31 PM
3

All it took was a bunch of women on TV accusing him of rape.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:29 PM
-1

Agreed. Bill Cosby is 100% innocent, and its insane how many people think he's guilty.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:29 PM
20

Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law by an impartial jury of your peers. This is how our justice system works. Bill Cosby is 100% innocent until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:27 PM
3

I have always maintained that Bill Cosby is innocent. Everyone who know says that he's guilty.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:25 PM
25

I remember in elementry school, I would often get angry. I would never do anything bad, but sometimes I would clench my fists and shake them. It was not in threatening way, it was just me trying to hold in my anger. But sometimes a female teacher would tell me to stop doing that. She actually expected me to be perfectly still and quiet despite being angry. I should clarify that when I say "shaking my fists," I just mean that my hands were trembling while they were clenched. I was not swinging th…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:21 PM
3

Yes, and it's clearly biased, since it was written by her.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 04:12 PM
83

One time I read about a case where a woman in California murdered her husband by setting his bed on fire while he was sleeping in it. At the trial, she claimed that her husband abused her. The jury felt bad for her, and found her not guilty. Its just another example of female privilege in this country.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 04:53 AM
7

Women already have equal rights in the US. Modern day feminism is simply trying to give women more power than men.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:39 PM
3

In a truly equal society, no one would even notice race. The people talking about how certain groups are "privileged" are the real racists. This person wants to teach his son the concept of race, which is completely antithetical to Martin Luther King's dream of a society in which people "are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." The very fact that the black kid is in the same school as white kids proves they will have the same opportunities as him.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:36 PM
8

She committed a crime, and needs to be punished for that. False accusers need to face harsh punishments to discourage others from doing this.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:29 PM
13

A man accused of rape will get arrested and, if convicted, sent to prison. A false accuser should get this same punishment.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:26 PM
13

Her mother wasn’t involved in this.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 08:59 PM
1

Exactly. This one line sums up the hypocrisy perfectly.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 05:08 PM
76

Equal treatment – which we fully endorse – does not mean identical treatment The hypocrisy is palpable.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:04 AM
2

Its a way to shut down debate. It makes it so that, no matter what the topic is, they simply have to say "check your privilege" and not have to debate the issue.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 01:51 AM
1

Yeah, but its extremely unlikely to happen.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:26 AM
1

Hate speech is protected by the fiorst amendment A more detailed analisis of the case
/r/MensRights10/03/18 04:05 AM
1

Freedom of speech is still a right in the US. Please cite one case of a person being arrested in the US for hate speech.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 02:10 AM
3

People in your country are arrested because of offensive social media posts. That would never happen in the US.
/r/MensRights09/03/18 09:17 PM
9

Department of Transportation
/r/MensRights04/03/18 07:04 PM
6

You're clearly a troll. Your account was created the day you made this post.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 04:16 AM
7

The funny thing is, the retirement age in the UK is 65, so women working in their 50s are still below the retirement age.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:56 AM
8

Its not available in the Google Play store anymore because of their reaction to the memo.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:54 AM
7

This 100%. A bully will keep provoking someone for years on end until they finally snap.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:49 AM
9

Agreed 100%. I always held in my anger and never fought back because I didn’t want to get suspended. If kids were allowed to fight back, mass shootings would decrease dramatically. Another way to decrease mass shootings would be if schools actually punished bullies rather than doing nothing and telling students to ignore it.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 01:18 AM
46

Switzerland is just one example of a heavily armed country with less mass shootings than America. The problem is that children feel ignored since no one listens to them and no one takes their problems seriously. I remember when I was a kid, whenever I told people that other kids were bullying me, everyone told me to ignore it. Back when I was in elementary school, I actually saw a teacher reprimand a student for crying.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:00 PM
14

I had to read that sentance a few times before I realized they were talking about penis bulges. It was literally too bizarre of a statement to process right away,.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:27 PM
1

There's a stronger argument that having to invest in tampons, pads, or long-acting reversible contraception is itself a tax. No, because taxes go to the government, while the actual purchase price of tampons goes to the store you bought it from, and the company which made it. If we had universal healthcare in this country, I would agree that it should be covered, but currently healthcare in the US is private, and that includes tampons.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 12:07 AM
3

Sure, I agree that the tax should be eliminated, but its unfair to call it a tampon tax. Its simply the general sales tax which is applied to everything except for items which have been specifically exempt.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:58 PM
5

A West African society saying women can't cross a river during their periods without angering the river gods is obviously ridiculous, but taxing tampons has the same underlying assumptions. The entire tampon tax debate needs to stop. Condoms are taxed, toothpaste is taxed, toilet paper is taxed, soap is taxed, shaving cream is taxed, deodorant is taxed, diapers are taxed, and a bunch of other things are taxed as well. In most states, sales tax is around 8% and is a minimal cost to everyone invol…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:37 PM
6

Are you being sarcastic, or do you actually believe this? Your statement is pure sexism.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 10:00 PM
4

This one of the most BS arguments I've ever heard.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:59 PM
3

Please explain to me why there are government programs specifically for women. This means that men only get what's in general health programs, but women get what's in women's health programs in addition to general health programs.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:58 PM
6

what use is there in extending men's lives? You realize that old people are humans who want to live, right?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:55 PM
12

We focus on everyone's health Than why are there government program specifically focused on women's health?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:51 PM
6

The point is that there are government programs which exclusively help women, but no government programs which exclusively help men. Why should men be forced to "take care of themselves" while women have government programs to fall back on?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:50 PM
10

I once had a women tell me that "there are twice as many women in the world as men." I attempted to google statistics to prove her wrong, but she wouldn't accept them.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:47 PM
2

Exactly. The fact that it said "some form of sexual abuse" means that they must be including a ton of minor things in that definition. It also includes all people "before they turn 18." This means that its including people all the way from age 0 to 17. It also doesn't specify that the abuse is coming from an adult. Since so much information is unspecified, and there's no source showing where they got this information, I have to assume that its fake.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 07:51 PM
5

Speaking of voices in general, I once knew a kid in elementary school who constantly got in trouble for "talking mean" but it was just his natural speaking voice. Its not PC to criticize a woman's voice, but its perfectly ok to criticize a man's voice.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 03:13 AM
160

His lawyers will push him to settle. I hope he doesn't. Far too many great lawsuits end in a settlement. I truly hope he doesn't settle.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:29 PM
1

I actually know a few college students who have kids.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:39 PM
3

By your logic, should a disabled employee be paid more than an able-bodied employee?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:23 PM
0

Imagine if college GPAs were distributed this way. Imagine if having a kid automatically made a person's GPA go up by 20%. Would you agree with that?
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:22 PM
9

Its amazing how its even legal for there to be more women's shelters than men's shelters. A good lawsuit is needed because I'm fairly certain this actually violates the law.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 02:42 AM
3

A human life is infinitely more valuable than the life of an animal.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 02:30 AM
-1

That clip isn't from a real talk show, its from a scripted TV show called The Larry Sanders Show, which is about a guy named Larry Sanders who has a talk show. That bit and all the conversations were 100% scripted in advance.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 02:22 AM
39

So much for freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 09:33 PM
-27

Please cite a source for that.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 11:11 PM
-21

Policing words is literally what the Nazis did.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 11:01 PM
11

When people tell you you're wrong it's probably not because you're a man If a person says "stop mansplaining" it clearly refers to men. Imagine if a man told a woman to "stop womansplaning."
/r/MensRights22/12/17 09:57 PM
-23

So any negative opinion of you is "toxic?"
/r/MensRights22/12/17 09:56 PM
0

This seems to be the fault of the water park, not the parents. I agree that since the parents were found guilty, they should both get the same sentance, but in this case the drowning seems to be because the water park didn't have any lifeguards.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:27 PM
36

How about informing the family, but not making it available to the general public.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:14 PM
3

What if this man was actually the victim of something? He deserves to get help just like everyone else.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:58 PM
1

Zero tolerance is simply an excuse to not do any real work.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:45 AM
4

They could've easily looked up the court records, but they chose not to.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 02:09 AM
9

If this is actually the logic they used, we're truly living in an Orwellian nightmare.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:59 AM
6

However, something might be up with dad too This is exactly the kind of speculation which causes these problems.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:57 AM
13

You're being downvoted because innocent people are being sent to prison.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:23 AM
2

This is in Canada, not the US.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:20 AM
1

No, but there has to be some kind of middle ground here.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:29 PM
2

But the problem is that an accusation can destroy someone's life.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:13 PM
19

Exactly. A perfect example is Bill Cosby. A ton of women accusing him does not make him guilty. Sure, he might be guilty, but he also might be innocent, and in the US a person is innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:26 AM
5

A while ago I read that a woman who accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault tried to sue him for saying the accusation was false, but it was thrown out of court.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:21 AM
25

You can still blame her for pandering in general.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:10 PM
11

If children are involved, than child support should be paid into a special account, where every purchase from it is tracked by the court. This way it prevents women from spending child support money on themselves.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 08:47 PM
5

Now if a woman gives up her career to raise a family, is out of the workforce for 20 years, then they divorce the man has to, and should, pay alimony because she is unemployable. It should be for a year at most, and the amount should only be enough for basic living expenses.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 08:23 PM
47

Exacty. Lifetime payments are simply insane.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 08:16 PM
8

Individuals make mistakes at a very high rate. This is exactly why the government should be calculating people's taxes for them. That's how it works in the UK and most other countries. The IRS already has your information, so there's no reason why they can't give you a 1040 form with at least half the information already filled out. This video explains it very well.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:36 AM
11

I meant that the tax preparation industry lobbied to force you to either fill out the forms yourself, or hire someone to do it for you. They don;t want teh IRS calculating people's taxes for them and sending them a bill, since it would put companies like H&R Block out of business.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:28 PM
6

The sad thing is, many European countries have "duty to rescue" laws which would've required you to help. Thankfully the US is the land of the free which has no such requirement.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:52 PM
10

Yes, but the media could spin it as "man leaves bruises on women" without even mentioning CPR.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:50 PM
5

The IRS already knows your income, and thus can simply send you a bill for the amount that you owe. That's how it works in the UK and almost all other countries.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:46 PM
36

Its because the tax preparation industry lobbied congress to stop the IRS from simply calculating a persons taxes themselves and sending them a bill. Mainly H&R Block and other major companies. EDIT: I changed the wording for clarity.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:52 PM
25

Only the names would secret. In many cases, the name of the victim isn't revealed to the media, the same should true with the defendant.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 12:35 AM
2

How else do you expect them to measure the effects on an infant's brain without using an MRI?
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:53 AM
3

My point is that the first MRI did not show any trauma.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:03 AM
1

I agree that circumcision is wrong, and that it should never be done on anyone, but your story is anecdotal. There are plenty of calm and rational people who were circumcised.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:46 PM
4

Your mother might have incorrect information. Was your mother in the room with you? Did she actually see you get anesthesia? Its possible that she simply asked the doctor, "will he get anesthesia?" and a busy doctor who wasn't really paying attention said "yes."
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:40 PM
5

there's nothing to say that the trauma wasn't caused by being restrained, being out in a noisy, claustrophobic MRI machine, The infant was given an MRI prior to the surgery. This was the baseline. If the trauma had in fact been caused by being in the MRI machine, it would have shown up on that MRI as well.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:36 PM
4

The fact that the doctors were forced to destroy their research is troubling. The proof was in that research.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:34 PM
3

The infant was given an MRI scan before the surgery which showed no trauma. It was only the scan after the surgery which showed trauma.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:33 PM
1

The infant was given an MRI scan before the surgery which showed no trauma. It was only the scan after the surgery which showed trauma.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:30 PM
5

They did two MRI scans of the infant. One before the surgery and one after. While the scan before the surgery showed no trauma, the one after the surgery showed massive trauma.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:28 PM
2

I agree completely.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:15 PM
1

The doctors were performing study, and the parents consented.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:14 PM
1

Read the above post, the parents consented.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:11 PM
1

The text in the image says "the doctor who performed the surgery." However you are correct that they had the full consent of the parents.
/r/MensRights06/11/17 11:10 PM
29

In high school I knew a girl who said she wanted to be a prosecutor. I asked her if she would ever prosecute an innocent person, and she said "they're always guilty."
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:07 PM
1

A simple test would be to see if a kid can sit quietly in a room for five minutes. If they can, there at least mature enough to be in the mature class.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 05:07 PM
2

I'm a guy and I was always the one who actually wanted to learn. When I was in elementry school and middle school, I never disrupted class and actually cared about my grade. By high school, I stopped caring because I couldn't stand being in classes with immature idiots. If schools grouped people based on maturity level rather than by age, I would've most likely stayed motivated to learn. I'm not talking about separating students by gender, I'm talking about maturity level.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 12:33 AM
6

The rate for males is 280% higher than females, and its increasing as well.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:33 PM
6

6,000 sounds like a lot, but not when you realize that there's 300,000,000 people in the US.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 11:14 PM
11

Because the numbers are still incredibly small.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 10:45 PM
7

The problem is the media never reports that the rate for males is 280% higher than the rate for females. If the media published an article which mentioned both facts, and identified them both as problems, I would be fine with it.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 07:34 PM
21

I agree that any increase is terrible, but the headline makes it seem much more dramatic than it really is. It literally went from 0.003% to 0.005%.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 07:30 PM
24

move to Canada I wonder how she's enjoying her new life in Canada. /s
/r/MensRights17/09/17 05:24 AM
2

The intent of these laws was to prosecute adults, and to protect children. These laws are being deliberately misapplied to put children in prison, which is the exact opposite of protecting them.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:46 AM
1

Don't you see how absurd it is to prosecute a child for taking an explicit image of themselves? These laws were clearly meant to only apply to adults, and to protect children from predators. Its incredibly ironic that a law which was designed to protect children is instead putting them in prison.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:44 AM
5

Simply rewrite the law to say: "It is a criminal offence for an adult to take an explicit picture of a minor, and for an adult to coerce a minor into taking an explicit picture of themselves. No one under 18 may be prosecuted under this statute." If a rewrite like this is passed, it will prevent minors from being prosecuted, but it will still prosecute adults who coerce minors into taking explicit images.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:34 AM
3

This is in the UK, so thankfully US tax dollars aren't funding this.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:27 AM
18

Source: One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
/r/MensRights10/09/17 07:41 PM
5

I got a message from the a few weeks ago saying that I was banned for posting in "controversial subs."
/r/MensRights28/08/17 12:20 AM
4

You misread that statistic. Its causes a 1% increase in the rate of deaths.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 05:13 AM
1

This heavily varies by college. Not all colleges are like the ones which you hear about on this sub.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 07:13 PM
1

Because they took a full day off.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:57 PM
3

The public library in my area locks the bathrooms for both genders, but the keys are right next to the doors. They're single person restrooms, and each restroom has it own key. This is to prevent people from accidentally walking in on someone who forgot to lock the door, since it automatically locks. It can always be opened from the inside, but to open it from the outside you need the key.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 07:38 PM
7

I actually applied to that college, but I didn't get in. I guess that was a good thing.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:02 PM
1

That has nothing to do with your statement that no one at Google does mediocre work. But that's not even the problem. You claim that even though these women took an entire day off, they would still end up working 40 hours that week. That's what you have no facts to back up.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 10:51 PM
3

This reminds me of when I was in high school. Some teachers were being laid off due to budget cuts, and one student tried to organize a walkout to protest it. It was obvious that he didn't really care about the layoffs, and was just looking for an excuse to get of of school early. However, he was the only student to actually walk out, so he got in trouble for leaving school in the middle of the day.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:44 PM
21

Google claimed that a pay gap existed, he simply offered a counterpoint. If an employer is allowed to bring up politics, so should an employee.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:39 PM
1

Otherkin in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:37 PM
15

You have literally no facts to back this up.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:33 PM
15

The OP needs to get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 08:31 PM
1

Lock them up for one day, then release them and tell them that if they don't show up to their next court date, they'll be locked up for a week.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 02:47 AM
1

Send the police to arrest people who don't show up.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 02:40 AM
5

I know how default judgements work, but its still wrong. Imagine if criminal law worked like this, where a person could be charged with a crime, but if you don't turn yourself in within 30 days you're automatically found guilty. Also, he said that he never received any notice from the court about anything.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 01:08 AM
2

That's actually how all default judgements work. Its a major flaw in our legal system.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 01:05 AM
0

This is a major problem with the legal system and it needs to be changed.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 01:01 AM
2

Its irrelevant whether or not the people even had sex, or know each other at all. A women could literally name any random person as the father, and unless they contest it, they'd be forced to pay child support. This applies even if the person named as the father has never even met the women making the claim.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:58 AM
2

The sad thing is, this is how all civil lawsuits work. If you sue someone, but they don't show up to court, you win by default. These laws need to be changed.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 12:54 AM
2

Because 2nd wave feminism was fighting actual discrimination, 3rd wave feminism is fighting things which don't exist.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:16 AM
6

Women already have full equality of opportunity in America. They claim it's oppression that the average man makes more than the average women, but its not oppression since women choose to major in things like Gender Studies rather than in high paying majors like Computer Science.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:48 PM
3

And if you're keeping your nose clean such that you never have to see the inside of a courtroom Innocent people get arrested and charged with crimes they didn't commit. According to the Innocence Project, 5% of people in prison are innocent of the crime they were charged with.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 04:33 AM
10

Because far too many act like women are the only victims of these attacks.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:50 AM
2

It would still be giving this women special treatment.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 04:47 AM
5

Let's say a 17 year old guy is dating a 17 year old girl, and they each decide to take sexy pictures of each other. Under the law, they've produced child pornography. The same with sexting. If a 17 year old guy takes a naked selfie and sends it to his 17 year old girlfriend, he's guilty of prodiction and distribution of child pornogrphy, even though it was a picture of himself. If you get into the age of consent, things somehow get even more insane. In California, if a 15 year old and a 17 year …
/r/MensRights12/07/17 07:24 PM
1

I had to take psychology and sociology. It wasn't as bad as I thought.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 11:26 PM
10

God help the people of Sweden.
/r/MensRights09/07/17 10:53 PM
5

I'm a guy, and when I was in middle school and high school, kids bullied me all the time. I was miserable for a long time because if it. But every time I told a teacher, they just told me to ignore it. Bullying is a huge problem, and for some people it can affect grades, but its simply insulting how this article focuses on girls. All bullying is wrong, and it should be stopped regardless of whether or not it affects grades.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 05:21 PM
3

Three is not an epidemic. There were obviously others, and those others were obviously male.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:28 AM
0

You do realize that all the land in both Canada and the United States once belonged to the indigenous people. The same with Australia and many other countries. Its not that Canada gave them reservations, they simply didn't take that land from the in the first place.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:46 PM
8

They mention an "epidemic" of suicides, yet only talk about three female victims. They even mention one girl who died in a suicide pact, yet don't mention any other people in the pact besides her. Its quite obvious that the other victims were male, otherwise they would've been mentioned.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 11:43 PM
3

Yet another place added to my boycott list.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 08:36 PM
1

US Airways was bought by American Airlines, make sure to never fly with them over this blatantly sexist behavior.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:29 PM
3

"Women have always been the primary victims of war" -Hillary Clinton
/r/MensRights23/06/17 08:26 PM
3

My college doesn't use Pearson's Mylab.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 08:50 PM
6

This is so untrue I don't even know where to begin.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 04:00 PM
1

This is why I prefer classes with multipal choice tests, so every answer is objectively right or wrong.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:59 PM
7

I once took Intro to Political Science at a college in Upstate NY, but I ended up getting a C- in the class because the professor marked every little thing wrong. For example, if a question on a test asked me to define a specific term, and I wrote an accurate definition, she would mark it wrong if it wasn't the exact wording of the definition from the textbook. Then I went to a much better college in Downstate NY. I had to retake that political science class because the C- was too low a grade to…
/r/MensRights17/06/17 03:55 PM
2

If you tell somebody to steal a car and they do are you guilty? Many states have laws making it illegal to encourage someone to commit a crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/17 08:16 PM
45

What happened in 1975?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 12:28 AM
1

The justification for implementing it was that they didn't want students guessing if they had no idea what the answer was. But it caused students to not choose an answer unless they were sure it was right. Back when I took the SAT in 2010, there were several questions where I was around 70% sure that an answer the right, but I left it blank to avoid the risk of getting it wrong and losing 0.25%.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 02:45 AM
1

Literally since 1954. EDIT: It was eliminated in March 2016, I was incorrect when I said that it was eliminated in 2012.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 01:37 AM
1

I know I can be overly thorough.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 01:35 AM
4

When I said guessed, I meant put an incorrect answer. If you don't answer a question, you simply don't get any points for that question, but if you pick the wrong answer, points are subtracted in addition to not getting points for that question. This is how the SAT's used to work up until March 2016. Now if you get a question wrong, you simply don't get points for that question. For the sake of an example, let's say it was a one question test. Of course, the SAT has a ton of questions, but for t…
/r/MensRights12/06/17 01:20 AM
2

The SAT's used to penalize you for guessing a wrong answer, as opposed to leaving it blank. If you left a question blank, you simply didn't get points for that question, but if you guessed the wrong answer, it would actually subtract points in addition to you not getting points for that question. For example, if one section had 30 questions, and you guessed the right answer for 20 questions and left the other 10 questions blank, you would get 20/30. But if you guessed the wrong answer on the 10 …
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:31 PM
2

I think this is why they removed all the analogy questions. I'm really good at those types of questions, but by the time I took the SAT, all those types of questions were removed.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:25 PM
2

I'm not comparing it to centuries of racism, I'm comparing one instance against one instance.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:41 PM
1

You admit that you wouldn't make the same argument, yet the rest of your statement is doing exactly that.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 10:25 PM
1

I was never going to see it anyway.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:58 PM
1

If a theater was Whites Only, would you make the same argument? Discrimination is wrong, no matter what.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:57 PM
1

Women can choose to run for a political office, but very few actually do. Its not the fault of the system if very few women run.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:56 PM
1

as long as men only events are permitted too If a theater had White Only screenings and Black Only screenings, would you be making the same argument? Discrimination is wrong no matter what.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:55 PM
1

If a theater was Whites Only, would you make the same argument? Discrimination is wrong, no matter what.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:51 PM
1

If a theater was Whites Only, would you make the same argument? Discrimination is wrong, no matter what.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:51 PM
1

Yes, but its equally ridiculous to try to change society to conform to your way of thinking.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:50 AM
3

Claiming that "societal pressure" is the problem is simply not true. Its personal choice.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:27 AM
3

The simple solution is to file Title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 02:17 AM
3

What's wrong with my post? If a man and a women both commit the same crime, they should get the exact same sentance.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:47 AM
3

Yes, but its would simply be an inequality to treat women different from men.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 04:34 AM
2

But she claims that prison is "designed for men." The very fact that women's prisons exist prove this false.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 03:59 AM
6

Women are already equal, so modern feminism simply tries to give women a more privileged status than men.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 09:36 PM
6

The context talks about how women have "children to look after," and how they "grew up poor and uneducated." I guarantee you, this applies to most men in prison as well.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 08:47 PM
0

There is no draft, registering for Selective Service is NOT registering for the draft. It simply puts your name in a database which would be used in the event of a draft, but since no draft is occurring than it has nothing to do with this.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:06 AM
-4

Yes, but the government hasn't bothered to convict people for not registering since 1986. Also, registering takes less than a minute, and that's it. Despite how you feel about a law, you should still comply with it. I registered with Selective Service the day I turned 18. I also registered to vote the same day.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:45 PM
-3

No, the right to vote has nothing to do with Selective Service registration. Look on any voter registration form, and nothing is mentioned about Selective Service registration. Look on the official Selective Service website about the penalties for not registering, nothing is mentioned about losing the right to vote. Call your local board of elections and ask them if Selective Service registration is required to vote, I guarantee you they'll either have no idea what you're talking about or tell y…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:12 PM
10

Any examination of the women who are in U.S. prisons reveals that the majority are nonviolent offenders with poor education, little employment experience and multiple histories of abuse from childhood through adulthood. This applies to most men in prison as well.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 02:45 AM
1

no purpose except to screw men over I don't understand why people keep bringing up the consequences of not registering. As long as you register, that's literally it.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:43 AM
-3

The thing is, its just a simple form which a person fills out. It takes less than a minute. MRAs make it seem like a much bigger deal than it actually is. The most obvious example of this is when they mention the penalties for not registering, despite the fact that an obvious way to avoid the penalties is to simply register.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:59 AM
1

You seem to think it's just a piece of paper, sign it and done? But that's literally it.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:43 AM
1

Because I follow the law.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:41 AM
2

Are you aware of what a man losses if he doesn't sign? What is withheld from him until he does? Yes, which is why I registered the moment I turned 18.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:05 AM
2

Lots of things have penalties for not doing them. Paying taxes and jury duty are just two examples off the top of my head.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 11:09 PM
-33

Than register.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 11:08 PM
1

The form to register for Selective Service is shorter than the Voter Registration Form. Also, I'm fairly certain that voting rights aren't affected by that.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 11:06 PM
-6

its the state forcing me to do something Its a form which takes less than one minute to fill out.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:31 PM
-3

It exists so that all the relevant information is in one place. A draft will never happen.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:19 PM
-11

I honestly don't understand why people make such a big deal about this. Its literally just giving the government information which they already have.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:17 PM
-7

Its not a draft, its just a database. A draft is when people are actually conscripted into the military. This is why I hate when people refer to registering for Selective Service as registering for the draft. Your name simply goes in a database, that's it.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:15 PM
-5

Its literally just basic information about you which the government already has in a bunch of other databases.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:12 PM
-1

Even if the Selective Service System didn't exist, those steps could still happen. I guarantee you the government has many different databases with everyone's information. Eliminating the Selective Service System wouldn't increase or decrease the risk of a draft.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:09 PM
-10

Right now it's a legal privilege that women have over men. It literally doesn't affect the lives of modern day men at all. If the Selective Service System was eliminated, nothing would change whatsoever.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:06 PM
-29

There's no draft in the modern United States, the last draft ended over 40 years ago.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:04 PM
-63

hurting men How exactly are modern day men hurt by this?
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:02 PM
-5

In order for a draft to happen, both houses of Congress would have to pass a law allowing it, and the President would have to sign it into law. Even with the existence of the Selective Service, a draft can't happen without these steps.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:00 PM
-58

The US will never have another draft. Registering for Selective Service is as simple as filling out a form online. In some states, your even registered automatically.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 09:01 PM
3

This video shows that.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:01 AM
6

By that logic, all laws made by women should cease to apply to men.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 02:35 AM
17

Most bullying and problems like that come about because of men/women relations. I have to disagree with you on this. Kids bullied me in middle school and high school because I was weird. It had nothing to do with women.
/r/MensRights04/05/17 06:34 PM
1

Thank you for agreeing with me.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:30 AM
2

This is the smart move.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:29 AM
1

I don't think it would violate any anti-discrimination laws, but I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:29 AM
1

What if there was a requirement that each jury have exactly six men and six women, so its a 50/50 split? I know this isn't the best idea, but I figured I'd at least suggest something.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:17 AM
1

So it'll either have the same outcomes which we have now, or it'll have better outcomes. I highly doubt the outcomes could be any worse, so this idea is still good.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:03 AM
1

Since juries are composed of 12 random people, it still has the potential to be better.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 11:20 PM
-1

Let me rephrase that. Men pee more often than they poop. If its 50/50 men and women, the seat will be up 50% of the time and down 50% of the time.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:47 AM
4

We all need to write to Trump and urge him to veto this bill.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 07:19 AM
3

Yes, and a women might lift the seat up to puke. Assuming people pee far more often than they poop or puke, than my solution works best.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 06:37 AM
-1

There are many parts of it which I disagree with, but its insane that feminists are trying to ban the documentary about it.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:16 AM
12

If there's 50/50 men and women using the same bathroom, it's more likely the seat will have to be down. No, because people pee more often than they poop.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:13 AM
1

Does anyone know how that's possible unless a dude is aiming at the floor? The toilet could have a leak.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:08 AM
2

This is such a minor issue, its not a big deal for women to check to see if the seat's down.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:06 AM
6

Even in the middle of the night, there's no excuse.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 05:04 AM
-4

I drink a lot, so I'm not going to judge anyone that has an accident. If you have to pee so bad that you're running to the bathroom, you're drinking too much.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:53 AM
4

Why should I have to do two touches for my one pee when I can have someone else do one touch for my pee? This actually makes sense. This way men only touch the seat once to lift it up, and women only touch the seat once to put it down. Its honestly the most equal solution. If men moved the seat both up and down it would mean that women would never have to touch it with their hand. The most equal solution is for each gender to touch it once.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:51 AM
3

Just because a person is found guilty doesn't mean they actually did it. False convictions happen.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 01:57 AM
3

To be fair, when Title IX was introduced, people had no idea that it would be used to establish these tribunals.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 08:10 PM
6

You mean cuntribution.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 04:27 AM
9

This was on United Airlines. Yet another reason to never fly United.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 11:11 PM
6

This reminds me of when they tried to ban the word bossy.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 06:49 AM
2

Most students wouldn't even notice the camera.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 11:58 PM
3

Most people aren't mad at people for protesting, they're mad at people for blocking streets, which is illegal.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 11:16 PM
3

They have a right to protest the legitimacy of someone's existence? Americans have the right to protest anything as long as its non-violent.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 11:04 PM
2

They have a right to protest.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:33 PM
30

One way to fix this would be to have security cameras in every classroom.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:26 PM
7

This reminds me of when a british news site wanted to take the vote away from old people. Democrats just want to disenfranchise people who vote republican.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 06:13 PM
608

Change the word "men" to literally any other demographic and it would be clearly seen as monstrous.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 04:13 AM
1

and the parents with her What if her parents had no idea what she was doing? Charging the parents for the actions of their child is literally what North Korea does.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:28 AM
10

This guy needs to save that text.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 04:06 AM
3

Your 100% correct.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:52 PM
11

Women have to take maternity leave to take care of children Women can choose not to have children.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 07:51 PM
2

I'm Jewish, but I don't run a bank.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:13 AM
42

This is a Title IX violation.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 04:02 AM
1

There's still hope. Hillary lost.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:06 PM
2

This could cause fatal accidents.
/r/MensRights28/03/17 08:04 PM
54

This is 100% illegal and discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:32 AM
2

A reasonable person who is not knowledgeable about guns A truly reasonable person wouldn't make assumptions based on a topic which they have know knowledge of.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:58 PM
2

To be fair, the kid could've phrased it better. Though I agree that it should've been removed from his record the moment it was relaixed that it was an accident.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:57 PM
5

At least it shows that this type of insanity isn't anything new.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:56 PM
6

That reminds me of this skit.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:51 PM
16

This might actually be discrimination based on a political belief. I can see the parents winning a lawsuit over this.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:47 PM
4

Moss and ther German
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:10 PM
1

Black is clearly listed under race on all forms. Hispanic is at best a subclass of race.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 10:38 PM
1

Hispanic is not a race. If you look on any form, it clearly lists Hispanic as separate from race.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 10:19 PM
2

If it can't be proven false true then it's true false in the eyes of the law. FTFY
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:33 PM
2

So much for the right to face your accuser.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:28 PM
2

Its most definitely not a race. A white Jewish person is white, a black Jewish person is black, etc.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 09:25 PM
4

Its still not a race.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 05:10 PM
2

This might have some merit, but it sounds too much like what an SJW would say in reference to slavery.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 04:21 PM
10

I'm so glad she lost. Her comment about women being the primary victims of war was simply insulting.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 04:19 PM
4

Italians The native population of Italy is white.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 04:16 PM
3

Judaism is a religion, not a race.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 04:15 PM
1

In the US, the word College is synonymous with the word University. What you call University, people in the US refer to as both College and University.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 12:47 AM
12

Many colleges require all students to take a sociology course.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:22 PM
0

You're a fucking bigot. How so?
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:15 PM
0

She's a murderer By no definition would this be considered murder.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:15 PM
1

conspired to cover up a murder She wasn't reckless or negligent, therefore it wasn't manslaughter. There was no intent to kill, so it wasn't murder.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 08:55 PM
-8

If she wasn't driving because her license wasn't suspended, this kid would probably still be alive today. The probably would've been hit by a different car.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:49 PM
0

If she had been a law abiding citizen this accident would have never happened. He most likely would've been hit by a different car. Running across a highway at night makes it 100% his fault.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:48 PM
-3

The pedestrian ran across a highway at night, it was 100% his fault. You basically want this women to be punished because someone else was an idiot.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:03 PM
-5

She was following all traffic laws which a licensed driver would follow. Leaving the scene doesn't make teh accident worse.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:54 PM
-4

Whether or not she fled the scene doesn't change the fact that the accident happened, and the fact that it wasn't her fault.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 06:08 PM
0

The accident was 100% the victims fault. He was wearing all black and ran across a highway at night without looking for cars or giving any indication that he was going to run across the road. He also jumped over a barrier, and was crossing at a place where it was illegal to cross. The driver was completely sober and was only driving 5 mph over the speed limit. The only thing which she did wrong was fail to report the accident.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 05:52 PM
1

If a man got more for same crime The judge said "I'm not sending a lady to prison for this." Thsi implies that had a man committed teh same crime and gone in front of the same judge, they would've been sent to prison or jail.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:34 PM
23

A man would've gotten jail time.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:31 PM
22

The judge specifically said she didn't get jail time because she was a women. This implies that a man would've gotten jail time.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:30 PM
23

Even if only 1% of homeless people were women, it would still be technically correct to say its under 40%.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:30 AM
1

Exactly. I've changed my view numerous times on several topics.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 08:40 PM
1

Social pressure doesn't equal choice. A person can chose to go into a different field. Its incredibly simple for someone to change their maior.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 08:02 PM
1

What "social pressure" are you referring to?
/r/MensRights09/03/17 06:25 PM
5

women in China have that drive and, surprise surprise, dominate universities Its still personal choice. A person can choose to work toward success, or they could choose not to.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:57 AM
14

Furthermore, the "muh choices" argument fails to realize WHY women make those choices. This is irrelevant. A human being has the ability to make whatever choices they want. If a woman decides to become an elementry school teacher, its 100% her choice. Even if society "expects her to care for children," she still chose that profession. Its the most obvious in colleges. Anyone, at any time, can chose to change their major to STEM, yet most women remain in the social sciences.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:55 AM
21

A paper is meant to be objective. By telling her to only use feminist sources, it makes the paper biased in favor of one side. Also, equating reality with patriarchy is simply untrue. Women choose to major in less desirable fields. At my college, you can change your major by filling out a form with the registrar. Yet my STEM classes have very few women in them. But when I take a psychology class, its mostly women. If a person has a decent GPA, there almost guaranteed to be accepted into a STEM m…
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:45 AM
18

make the assumption the choices women make exist in a vacuum Its still their choice. Any women can chose to go into any profession.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:43 AM
17

I don't think you guys know how dangerous places like the slums of Nairobi are. I agree that International Toilet Day is a good holiday, but why is it on the same day as International Men's Day? Why not choose literally any other day?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:04 PM
6

Juries are unpredictable.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:45 AM
12

Its good that men and women are both being treated equally in this regard, but it would still be better if they didn't have conscription at all.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:09 AM
326

She was only sentenced to 13 years. The other gang members got similar sentences. Its only 78 years if you add up each of the sentences for each of the members.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 02:42 AM
1

He should file an anonymous complaint with the New York State Department of Labor.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 03:21 AM
44

Consulting with a doctor before a medical procedure makes sense.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 06:28 PM
0

doctors have been convicted of this I highly doubt any doctors were convicted of sexual assault for performing a circumcision.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:07 AM
0

The two are completely different things.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:02 AM
-4

A commonly performed medical procedure is not sexual assault.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:59 AM
-1

Its common for children to get testicular exams, is that rape? Its obviously not because its a medical procedure.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:50 AM
-1

Using hyperbole is the problem.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:45 AM
-3

Remember the episode of Family Guy where Peter got a prostate exam and thought that he was raped? Its quite obvious that a medical procedure is not sexual assault. Its common for males of all ages in all countries to get testicular exams, would you consider that sexual assault? You can object to circumcision all you like, but don't call it sexual assault.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:44 AM
4

I don't know what's going on in that last picture, but I can assure that does not happen in the United States.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:41 AM
31

Alimony should only be granted in rare cases for a low and reasonable amount of money for a limited amount of time.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 10:14 PM
13

Why should a person be entitled to money simply for existing?
/r/MensRights12/02/17 06:02 AM
6

What about scholership which are based on test scores? In that case, it should be 100% based on merit.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 10:38 PM
2

The Department of Education has almost nothing to do with actual education policy, most of that is determined at the state level. Basically, all the Department of Education does is give grants to colleges and college students.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:08 AM
1

Its still a step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:39 AM
3

I know what you mean. Nothing which I can say will make you feel better, but you'll eventually start to feel better. Know that you're not alone.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:13 AM
4

if you don't fight back to go unpunished I once read about a case where a student was attacked, and security camera footage showed that the victim never fought back. But both the bully and the victim were suspended for the same amount of time.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:47 PM
1

When I was in middle school, kids would bully me at recess. When I told a teacher aide, she would send both me and the kid who was bullying me to the office. I was being punished for telling the teacher aide that I was being bullied.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:46 PM
1

Yes, and the comments on r/news are sickening.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:43 PM
2

I know I should have used an archive link, but I have to give credit to USA Today for reporting on it.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 10:42 PM
56

When I was in middle school and high school, kids picked on me all the time. I had to use every ounce of my willpower to stop myself from fighting back. My school had a policy where all students involved in a fight would be suspended, and I cared about school far too much to risk being suspended. Everyone who I talked to told me to ignore it. Holding in my anger led to a lot of anxiety and depression. I was suicidal in 8th grade, when I was 14. Even after I graduated high school, and the bullyin…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 01:35 AM
25

In most states, toilet paper is taxed as well. That's clearly an essential item, and so are many other things which are taxed.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:24 PM
-4

Or even mental health. A website for mental health already exists.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:22 AM
1

I'm not the OP, but this chart seems helpful.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:57 PM
1

I'm American, and I was truly shocked to learn that conscription still existed in other countries. I thought it was a relic of a bygone era. Are there at least some campaigns in your country against it?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:53 PM
2

Male illegal immigrants are also required to register with Selective Service.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 11:40 PM
3

She served her time. She got too short a sentence. This should have been charged as 1st degree murder and she should have gotten life with no possibility of parole.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:16 PM
7

"Just following orders" hasn't been an excuse since Nuremberg.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:11 PM
7

WiC For those who don't know. WIC stands for Women, Infants, Children.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 10:01 PM
1

r/pussypassdenied
/r/MensRights19/01/17 09:06 PM
9

The problem is that its impossible to tell someone's true age. Let's say you meet a girl who's working as a bartender in a state where bartenders are required to be 21. You ask her for ID and she shows you ID stating that she's 21. You ask her employer and he confirms that she's 21. You ask one of her relatives and he also confirms she's 21. You ask for a birth certificate and the birth year is far enough back that it shows she's 21. Than you have sex with her and get arrested for statutory rape…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:49 PM
6

Indian courts care more about justice than American courts.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 09:51 PM
5

These people need to be investigated by CPS.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:02 PM
2

Make sure to stay in contact with her.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 04:39 PM
1

Did you at the very least get the contact information of the female witnesses?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 05:28 AM
1

Why else would she risk 25 years by not taking the deal? She assumed it would be a sympathetic jury?
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:45 PM
1

Many states have Stand Your Ground laws, which legally allow a victim to stay where they are and attack the aggressor with reasonable force. Though other states have Duty to Retreat laws which obligate a victim to leave the situation if they can.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:44 PM
3

Two people who were not freaking out was a mother and daughter who saw her strike me the 5 times Find these people and get them to file a police report as witnesses to her assaulting you.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:38 PM
8

All he did was defend himself. He used much less force on her than she used on him, and it was simply to neutralize an imminent attack. If he'd called 911, he would be in jail since cops are trained to arrest the man in these situations.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:34 PM
3

Raising taxes on small businesses is a terrible policy.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:29 PM
5

No legal entity is trying to charge someone for rape when the other person consented. The problem is that, even if a woman consents at the time, she can later say that her consent was invalid since she was drunk. If a person gets drunk and voluntarily has sex, they consented.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 06:16 PM
5

Legally, you can pretty much use any bathroom you damn well please Can you cite a source for that?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 12:30 AM
3

First micro-aggression, and now micro-cheating. Soon looking at a women will be micro-rape.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:16 PM
2

Radical feminists actually think they can read minds.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:15 PM
4

Man: Honey, please wash the dishes. Women: No. Man: This is why we always argue. Women calls the cops. Man arrested for "coercive control."
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:14 PM
1

This could apply to an argument with anyone about anything.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:12 PM
7

So its a perfectly rational law, since only actual rapists are punished.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:20 PM
4

The Montana rape statues currently require use of force as an element. What's the problem with this?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:07 PM
1

He's going to be much worse president for men than Clinton would have been How did you come to that conclusion?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:37 AM
8

Exactly. The fact that this kid went to school on his own means that he values education.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:10 AM
2

Exactly. They were only four years apart.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 06:53 PM
29

So unfortunately he does belong in a category of having committed a statutory rape The problem is that a person who commits statutory rape is on the same list as someone who commits a violent sexual assault.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 06:51 PM
29

Every one of those women should be arrested for federal mail fraud.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 06:18 AM
10

The only reason why it's good from a PR standpoint is because the public cares more about "equality" than merit.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 09:42 PM
0

he's going to pander to his demographic Trump seems like the kind of person who does what he wants, no matter how many people tell him its a bad idea. Just look at how many people told him to drop out of the race. I think Trump will help improve men's rights, or at the very least not make it any worse.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 09:40 PM
3

Your username makes you a double-minority. /s
/r/MensRights10/12/16 09:38 PM
7

There should be mandatory minimum sentences for murder.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:18 PM
2

I'm a guy and I always raise my hand if I know the answer.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:08 PM
3

Please cite a source.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 05:15 AM
1

Men have no private bathroom. Also, what if a guy as to poop? It would literally require the exact same conditions.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 08:00 PM
1

women needing a more sanitary space to pee They already have a private bathroom, yet men do not. This is literally institutionalized discrimination.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 07:29 PM
4

Its his job, if he walks away he doesn't get paid. Also, she would most likely follow him, or attack him while his back was turned.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 08:01 PM
2

Public
/r/MensRights27/11/16 03:02 AM
6

The problem is that men have no private restroom in this scenario while women do. We need to stop this trend before it takes over.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 12:44 AM
8

Here's how both genders pee. Men walk into a restroom, unzip, and pee. Women walk into a restroom, pull down their pants, sit down, pee, then wipe. With both genders, it should take less than two minutes. Its not men's fault that women take a long time.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 12:43 AM
10

I'm a college student, and my college is normal.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 12:38 AM
1

Do they not know how a seat works? Women have collectively failed potty training.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 12:36 AM
1

He had to immobilize the threat, and this was the quickest and safest way avaliable.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/16 05:44 PM
3

He had to neutralize the threat somehow. I agree that he could have used less force, but he still used a reasonable amount.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/16 05:43 PM
2

He used a minimal level of force.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/16 05:41 PM
12

The guy was acting in self defence.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/16 05:39 PM
8

It was reasonably minimal.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/16 05:39 PM
2

What are you basing that assumption on?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/16 05:36 PM
2

I still can't tell if it was real or fake.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/16 05:35 PM
13

I think in this case people will be harmed No one is being harmed. Its quite literally fake, and thus harmless.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 04:18 PM
4

Fighting in a war is much different than going to a theme park. A soldier fighting in a war knows that he might die, and sees real people being injured or killed. But a person going to a theme park knows that everything is fake and that they have no change of being killed.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 04:16 PM
10

I knew a woman who said that the world was 80% women. No matter how many statistics I showed her to prove her wrong, she still insisted she was right.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:25 PM
2

This is a but off topic, but I looked at the entire cast list for Doc Martin and she isn't listed. I've also watched the show and I never saw her in it.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 11:55 PM
5

My college must be the exception.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 07:03 PM
21

valuable life lessons Like how the government views them as disposable.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 03:25 AM
0

Everything is right with the world again.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 03:17 AM
17

I've never encountered that in real life either.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/16 08:26 PM
16

MSNBC said that most of the people voting for Trump were "uneducated white men." The left just ignores reality.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:19 PM
1

They're basically holding his farther hostage until he consents to the divorce.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:07 PM
2

I remember I was taking a law class in college and the professor mentioned Israel as an example of a country which uses religious law. At first, I thought she was simply mistaken, but after looking into it I realized that she was right.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:06 PM
11

If it can happen to Bill Cosby, it can happen to anyone.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 03:02 AM
6

Schools never do anything about bullying. In middle school and high school, I was bullied every day, but no one ever did anything about it, even though I told every adult I could find. I cried every day in middle school, but nothing was ever done. I was suicidal in eighth grade, but still nothing was ever done. I'm in college now, and thankfully no one bullies me since college students are actually decent human beings.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 08:16 PM
1

It's time to accept that the way your ancestors lived is not a good one.. I'm a white guy.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 07:21 PM
2

This is almost as dumb as when Republicans talked about "a thousand years of darkness."
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:15 AM
3

This reminds of the Free Hat episode of South Park, where they were trying to set a serial child murderer free because it was "self defence.'
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:13 AM
3

It's a huge waste of tax dollars. These people could be alive somewhere. Are you seriosuly condemning them to death because you don't want to spend money to find them?
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:11 AM
4

they just want to keep being kids No, they want their culture back.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:09 AM
5

You realize the Canadian government literally took native children away their their parents and put them in residential schools where they were forbidden from speaking their native language or practicing their native culture in any way. Those schools were also rife with abuse. Seriously, one thing which the US, Canada, and Australia have in common, is how horribly they treated the native population of their respective countries.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:08 AM
3

I used to be on an antidepressant. I gained a ton of weight, had high blood sugar, and my cholesterol was so high that my regular doctor put me on medication for it. I finally went off the medication after my doctor said that I was at risk for diabetes. I'm rather be depressed than have diabetes.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:05 AM
4

Hacks are serious, cyberbullying isn't.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:33 PM
24

because cyber attacks are still attacks To be fair, cyber attacks can actually destroy a country.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 05:57 PM
8

Same, but either option is better than what we have now.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 05:56 PM
6

The world is Double Plus Fucked.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 12:08 AM
2

What if the women lies? What if she knew the guy but claimed she didn't?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:27 PM
1

a man raped a complete stranger How do you know it was a complete stranger? Maybe they knew each other. These facts cannot be known unless the alleged victim's name is made available to the defendant.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:03 PM
4

The right to face you accuser directly has been a cornerstone of all civilized justice systems.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:03 PM
38

there are numerous police reports filed against her husband You can file a police report about anything, it doesn't make it true.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:17 PM
3

Can this organization be prosecuted for obstruction of justice?
/r/MensRights23/10/16 10:52 PM
40

Where is the assembly where they tell ALL the students to just fucking be respectful of eachother and nobody to hit nobody? My high school actually had an assembly like that. My high school had a lot of problems, but at least they treated men and women equally.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:32 PM
1

I had just eaten at a restaurant, and was driving home when I noticed that a piece of food was stuck to my finger. I tried to flick it off, but that caused me to crash. I was NOT eating while driving.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 06:56 PM
2

To be fair, outside the US, its mostly Jews who do it.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 06:55 PM
8

I'm Jewish, and I really want to support Israel, but stuff like this makes it very hard to do so.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 05:00 PM
3

She could have been about to text something when it happened.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 04:51 PM
8

I can understand a person being distracted by something beyond their control, but in this case the person chose to pick up her phone and start texting. One time I got distracted by a piece of food on my finger and ended up rear-ending someone, but the difference is that I had no control of that piece of food being on my finger, while this person chose to pick up her phone. EDIT: I had a piece of food stuck on my finger from eating at a restaurant earlier that day, I was NOT eating while driving.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 04:50 PM
1

At least now we all know to boycott this pharmacy.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:26 PM
2

This just like the whole Bill Cosby thing. He's innocent, but everyone acts like he's guilty.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:25 PM
0

It seems incredibly suspicious that these women waited decades to come foward.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:39 AM
0

People are innocent until proven guilty, yet everyone acts like someone guilty just because they've been accused of a crime.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:01 AM
0

As said by House, everybody lies.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:51 PM
3

I don't think they are all lying in this case. Yes, they are.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:51 PM
1

i find it impossible to believe that every single woman involved is lying Why? Its entirely possible they're all lying to get attention.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:51 PM
3

Cosby is innocent.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:49 PM
3

These women waited decades to come forward, and many of their stories have been proven false. There's no physical evidence whatsoever, and people are meant to be innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:49 PM
1

And I don't see the Cosby case as a men's rights issue. He's being falsely accused of raping women, despite no physical evidence whatsoever.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:47 PM
10

I hope he sues the school for all their worth.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:43 PM
2

I kept waiting for the part about men's rights, but it never came.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:41 PM
29

This is a dangerous level of stupidity.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:02 AM
2

Random question, how did she get to be CEO anyway?
/r/MensRights15/10/16 02:40 AM
13

Because anything other than that is unfair.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:48 PM
27

I can see female scholarships still being relevant for a STEM degree. Scholarships should only be based on merit and financial need.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 06:43 PM
1

CUNY is run by the City of New York.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:13 PM
3

Asking for a high five is much different than grabbing a hot dog out of someone's hand. If he actually gropped her, I could see your point.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 08:16 PM
6

I would prefer no one go to jail in this scenario.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 01:29 AM
4

Remember when the NAACP called the term Black Hole racist?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:51 PM
16

Its sad when reporting a crime can get you arrested.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:42 PM
1

TRIGGER WARNING: This video contains Oprah Winfrey. Avoid at all costs.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 08:41 PM
1

Is this how real small claims court works?
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:21 PM
1

Can I show you this [document/photo] evidence? In one case which I saw, she asked for the defendant's bank statement, and because he didn't have it on him, she ruled against him.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:10 PM
1

when she doesn't understand an explanation, even if it's reasonable to at least myself, she doesn't even attempt to see it from their view. A perfect example of this is a case involving Bitcoin. She admitted she didn't understand it at all, but ruled in favor of the plaintiff anyway.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 07:00 PM
5

Just because you repeat a lie over and over and over again does NOT make it true. A lie told often enough becomes the truth. -Vladimir Lenin
/r/MensRights08/10/16 03:21 AM
23

At least one constitutional law class should be required for all students at every high school and college.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:46 PM
3

This is the biggest waste of money I've seen today.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:45 PM
0

Do you realize how hard it is to find a new job in this economy?
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:41 PM
2

CEOs get paid major bonuses even if they do a terrible job. This person should not be in power.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:40 PM
1

Most female executives are normal people, but the only ones talked about on this sub are nutcases.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:38 PM
1

She should have never been investigated for that shit in the first place. It was clear to anyone with half a brain and a law degree that there weren't going to be charges filed. She copied classified documents and kept them on a private server in her home. How is that any different than what this private contractor did?
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:10 PM
14

griping about how sexist it is for the NFL to assume men are their primary audience So all facts are just out the window now? Most NFL fans are men.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:54 PM
1

I probably should have read the OP better.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:07 PM
1

Please sue them for sex discrimination. This is a clear violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection clause.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:15 PM
1

Good job, but a random staff member probably can't do much.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:14 PM
1

I once heard someone in real life say, "girls don't lie."
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:13 PM
2

If you're not white, this could have also been because of your race.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:11 PM
1

Its truly sad that in America a victim can get in trouble for called 911.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:06 PM
3

Can someone please sue these hotlines for gender discrimination?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:04 PM
2

Please tell me he sued and won.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:04 PM
-1

I can understand why she was the way she was. This is the problem. Injustice, no matter how minor, has no excuse.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:03 PM
0

if I was an administrator I'm not sure I'd have believed me either This is the problem. Since feminists talk about internalized misogyny, we should talk about internalized misandry.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 03:01 PM
1

Remember when the UN had a whole panel dedicated to the depiction of women in video games? Remember when Emma Watson spoke at the UN? The UN is both good and bad when it comes to men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 02:52 AM
2

This reminds me way too much of that South Park episode where a girl quitting Twitter was a major event.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 02:48 AM
1

One problem with any survey is response bias. If every college student in the US was emailed a link to a sexual assault survey, 99% of people would delete the email and not respond to the survey. The people most likely to take the survey would be people who've experienced sexual assault.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:54 PM
2

Its 2.1% on average. That's 2.1 out of 100.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:52 PM
1

I always thought Dawkins was a rational person, I guess I was proven wrong today.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:51 PM
1

Is there any way this can be challenged in federal court on constitutional grounds? This law doesn't seem like a constitutional violation, but I hope there's some way to get this overturned.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:33 PM
1

You can't get more un-american than banning words.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 11:52 PM
5

She'll say that the presence of such posters on campus are a form of violence Do these people even know the definition of words?
/r/MensRights02/10/16 11:50 PM
1

You have a point, but this still seems wrong. Perhaps a restriction saying they cannot fly with passengers, but don't take away what they love completely.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:17 PM
7

As someone who used be depressed, I cannot express in words my hatred for this comment. I personally have no interest in flying planes, but my hobbies were the only thing which got me through my depression. If a person loves to fly small planes, denying them that will only push them further into depression.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:04 PM
2

Those choices are affected by the gender stereotypes Its still ultimately their choice. There are a ton of scholarships for women in STEM, yet very few women actually apply for them. A person can't blame society if they choose a bad option.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:38 AM
5

I'm a college student. When I took a computer forensics class, 90% of the students in the class were male. This class had no prerequisites, and anyone in the college could take it. When I took a psychology class, 90% of the students were women. Its simply personal choice, not gender roles. If a person is given a choice between two options, they can't blame society if they pick the one which leads to a less lucrative career.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 05:36 AM
8

Exactly. Women have no excuse for not going into a high paying field. Its the choices of women which determine the job they go into.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:48 PM
7

His opinion was simply wrong.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:27 PM
2

Of course it's bad because there's no way to ensure it's accurate and the relevant metrics are relevant in the eye of the beholder. What about men paying more for car insurance? That's statistical discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:22 PM
1

But I don't think we're there yet. Yes, we are. Women are free to choose any profession they wish.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:19 PM
10

they would be free to choose their professions and roles without internal or external pressure and expectations due to having a certain sex. Men have this problem too. Male nurses and child care workers are often looked down upon. People need to make their own decisions and not blame society when they make a bad choice.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:16 PM
4

women more than men take time off to raise children and stay at home when the children are sick These are choices which women make. No one is forcing women to have children, they choose to have them.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:13 PM
7

reward individuals who labored long hours and worked particular hours Its amazing how feminists are against rewarding hard work.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:12 PM
11

He's being downvoted because he gives no proof for his positions. He's simply saying "that's too much to explain."
/r/MensRights27/09/16 10:07 PM
5

I believe false accusations also come up in an episode of Voyager. Yeah, that's where Seven of Nine lost a few hours of her memory due to a power surge. The Doctor attempts to help her remember what happened, and he convinces her that they guy she was with extracted nanoprobes from her. Basically the Borg version of rape. In the end, the guy was revealed to be innocent, the memories were inadvertently planted in Seven of Nine's mind by The Doctor.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:05 PM
1

We already have equal pay for equal work.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 04:58 PM
2

No one said the gap doesnt exist Saying it without context implies that its because of sexism. Hillary knows that her base thinks its because if sexism, and she's not correcting them.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 04:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter