TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

logggggggggg Archive

View 4 posts and 28 comments by logggggggggg on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I am, however, completely egalitarian Why not simply call yourself egalitarian and easily avoid sharing a label with groups you condemn?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 06:50 AM
3

Yes they are. your opponents haven't pledged to stand you no matter what
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 02:18 AM
1

Wasn't there a meta flair?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 01:04 AM
23

However TRP is defined, you can disagree with concrete examples of flawed logic by its followers
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/14 12:19 PM
2

Interesting, what will become moot after becoming transhuman? How do you imagine that future?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/14 07:40 PM
2

That's the question. It's easier to say that age isn't the best way to do it (all choices after age X are legitimate no matter the circumstances) than point at the best way. One thing is that if we're going to be more concerned with maximizing freedom than minimizing misery, why not hold children accountable for their choices too? Everyone, for any kind of choice. And if we're going to place a line, why not make it more complex (less arbitrary) than age X.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 04:57 PM
2

That's what I asked before reading that she co-ran his business.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 03:45 PM
2

This better not sound like looking to argue. Isn't age alone an arbitrary line for when the choices you make become legitimate. What's the difference between an 8 year old girl, or boy, deciding to take daily beatings and love them, and an 18 year old. what if the 18 year old has grown up in a cult beaten since he was 2, taught it's the only right way to live and to never question. At 16 he leaves the cult and at 18 chooses to become an older man's punch-bag. Are all choices equal? If the 8 year…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/14 03:27 PM
3

It appears Cesar Millan's ex-wife was very involved in his business even though it was in his name
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 04:45 AM
1

So... why is it not set up as a percentage of the earnings instead? That sounds borderline unbelievable to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 02:09 AM
2

Not related, but wow, didn't know the situation with divorce was that bad. What is the rationale behind making the divorced pay for a very luxurious lifestyle? What happens if he stops being able to afford giving away 25000 a month?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/14 02:01 AM
0

Another explanation is that to women not only how you behave matter, but why you behave the way you behave. If you have had to learn the behaviors specifically to attract women, it means you haven't acquired those behaviors in order to, or as a result of, something else that matters to the woman. That makes them broken indicators.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/14 12:08 PM
8

Overall you strike me as a very weak person. This... here... weak persons exist, who the hell thinks that makes it good to take advantage of them? She assumed that she felt negatively and was to weak to do ANYTHING about it. How does she account for the flirting afterwards? What if she hamstered it out that she was attracted to him so that she wouldn't feel so bad about it? Mind you, I'm only replying to this comment, not the whole story.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/14 11:46 AM
1

Yeah, but I recalled some justifications in the red pill saying they use them left and right because there's no harm in that. Might be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/14 03:31 PM
3

How can we know for sure what part of which differences are a result of nature rather than nurture? I doubt anyone here is even an expert on the matter that is up to speed with the latest best supported theories. When you ask someone to tell you differences that are definitely innate, aren't you inviting either the most obvious answers or best guesses?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/14 10:17 PM
3

but using the term "damaging" as a way of saying "should not be used" I asked specifically whether you thought they were damaging. Wasn't obvious to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/14 09:56 PM
1

That's more the equivalent of calling a woman, womyn, if countries were a group of self aware entities
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/14 12:56 PM
8

Don't kill and steal when you can get away with it is one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/13 11:20 PM
3

"violating common moral standards" works. I took it from the OP and meant extreme delusion and irrationality as well as violating basic moral codes. You're right that it's not a good word.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/13 11:16 PM
6

Not going to refute it, but just because content removal can be used in a bad way doesn't mean it can't be used in a good way. As you very well know, since you are removing the content which you think aims to insult some users. It's a form of control, of course. Moderating is always a form of control, that's the point of it. Anyway, it's going to be interesting seeing the development of TRP and successors on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/13 06:33 PM
9

I went with your argument, even though I don't think any moderation is a slippery slope. Look, you introduced the slippery slope argument as a response to the idea of making an " extremism-wary" clone of TRP. The opposite of extremism is not necessary " outside "political correctness""
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/13 05:35 PM
8

And the number of users saying they were banned for saying potentially (but not objectively) looking-like-they-might-develop-into-offensive things, are they all dirty liars? It can be a slippery slope if you and the rest of the mods are nowhere near perfect arbiters of the line between an insult, potential insult and genuine commentary, as well as what " on topic" means. As the sub grows new mods will be added with their own ideas of what is offensive... = slippery slope.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/13 05:26 PM
11

You already are on the slippery slope... you're regularly banning and deleting, so you're already taking that risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/13 05:07 PM
7

That's why he was asking users other than you, although it'd be curious if the same guys who ran TRP made its extremism-wary clone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/13 04:57 PM
6

Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/13 09:10 PM
7

The woman who conforms to Martin's values is respectable. To Martin...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/13 10:58 PM
5

I think I've seen a number of examples on the occasions I've lurked, but am not going to search for concrete examples to prove my point, sorry to ruin that opportunity. Without any proof, an example would be a man having casual sex with young women while believing years down the road they will weep over their stupidity to whore up their youth. Another example, seeing women who cheat on their partners even though you believe this is detrimental to both of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 04:42 PM
3

(OP here, F if i remember the password. ) So I was referencing the attitude that doing things with a woman (person) which things you believe are detrimental to her wellbeing, which you think she will probably regret in the future and pay the price, is not immoral at all since she consented to everything. How does that jive with denouncing women taking advantage of alimony as immoral? After all the men consented to marriage. danabanana9 answers that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/13 04:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter