TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lol_maneee Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by lol_maneee on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lol like there are any sane governments in the first place. and they care so much that they would turn a blind eye to single parenthood which only decreases the odds that the child will be taken care of financially, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/23 09:36 AM
1

When I said “why they are loved” I was trying to convey that a man is not loved for who he is at his core, but instead, for what he is externally, and for what value he delivers(value can be anything outside of monetary, including qualities such as humor, sexual pleasure). I think this goes both ways in the overwhelming majority of cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/23 04:38 AM
1

First of all, I am not saying that choosing the genetics of next generation is “the reason that women get abortions”. You are still twisting things probably just to get the last word in, meanwhile my main argument you have finally agreed to(that which I wrote in all caps). I am saying that women having this choice in effect allows them to choose which male genetics ultimately pass on to the next generation. And in response to a previous post, despite women not having this choice throughout histo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/23 12:43 PM
1

That’s really a reaching, and convenient way to “disqualify” an argument. It’s amazing that you can speak for men and say that it is not true, and that men do not think/plan/prepare for parenthood at relatively equal rates. You are not entirely correct because not all men are able to get erect for their entire lives. There are also men who have varicoceles and face fertility problems way before they even hit 40 years old. I am really surprised that you will claim that most, let alone all women, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 10:07 PM
1

Just because you think I am wrong does not mean that you are correct in your thinking. You simply do not understand “just fine”, because while a male can also pick who’s genes are good enough, that does not guarantee that those genes will make it to the next generation. IT IS STILL THE FEMALE CHOICE AFTER CONCEPTION WHETHER TO TAKE THE BABY TO FULL TERM AND BIRTH THE NEXT GENERATION. My god how is that so difficult to understand? The way you responded to my assertion that you are conflating sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 09:42 PM
1

Yeah half a dozen times my ass. Just because you don’t understand my arguments does not mean they are faulty or unable to convince others who actually have the ability to critically think. “And second of all, in a very similar manner(excluding rape), every feature that our genes have evolved is still only taking place when the male approves the female to proceed as well.” WRONG. You are still conflating sexual gatekeeping and reproductive gatekeeping. This is why you are wrong. The undeniable fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 03:20 PM
1

The only way I see this being regulated is by enforcing a limit on how many wives one can have. This does not impact how women sexually select in all their years before marriage(it also does not impact the selection process in hypergamous affairs), and many men are becoming aware to this and that is why they are so often discussing it online. I do agree the current dynamic is not healthy and will lead to problems down the line.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 09:09 PM
1

You are trying sooooo hard to discredit my points but you are failing so hard. Just because you say it is “absolutely incorrect” does not make it so. “Choosing who to fuck and who not to fuck is gatekeeping” again, there is a difference between this gatekeeping and the gatekeeping that only women have control over which is the choice of bringing a baby to full term and birthing the next generation. “Women do not pass on genes to the next generation unless a man fucks them”. Great job in pointing…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 08:40 PM
1

I said I would stop because I am going to but I cannot help but defend this post. Lol, nice try. I did not ignore what you wrote, unless you go back and edit like a cheater, I know what you said. You did clearly write that “women don’t have to prove they’ll be good mothers because there are greater societal consequences for women, who must carry the baby to term, to abandon the baby”. I’m sorry I did not realize that what you went on to write after that was your “reasoning” as to why women don’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 04:48 AM
1

Some people on Reddit reallllllly either cannot critically think or they just simply write whatever they can to make it appear like they have won the argument/ discredited my argument. For example, you create a strawman when you quote my statement “women do determine which male genes pass on to the next generation” by saying that “so men don’t choose who they’ll fuck? Try having a little accountability man?”. Like wow. First of all, the sneaky ad hominem does not add any value to your case. Seco…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 04:33 AM
1

Just because women control access to sex and are the gatekeepers of reproduction, does not mean that they automatically have the best genes for reproduction (therefore they are not more worthy by default).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 12:22 AM
1

Cmon now. This is the last time I am posting on Reddit. So many poorly constructed, weak arguments I am wasting my time. Women can adopt a baby out, she doesn’t just have to “abandon” the baby like throwing the baby in a trash can etc. And besides that, just because there are greater societal consequences as you say, does NOT mean that women do not have to prove they will be good mothers. I can say the same thing that men are reminded of their reproductive potential every time they ejaculate. Do…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/23 12:19 AM
1

I agree with the commenter that you responded to, because the human male and female biological imperatives that drive reproduction are different (I explain this in another comment I made in a thread under the parent post but I will rewrite it if you want me to). This results in exactly what the commenter is saying about “Dwayne the rock Johnson” and the lesser female reproducing while the lesser male never has a chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 10:11 PM
1

These points do not negate any of my points. I will again contend that it is still an individual thing, despite any propensity created by nature. Some males may think they like when the female was very aggressive(those with a lack of options/little experience). Some men may pass on a woman for reasons other than bad health or dissatisfaction. I think that both genders like to have someone who invests at first to show interest. I think both genders can experience insecurity in the dating world. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 09:15 PM
1

You are still missing the original point. Women DO determine which male genes pass on to the next generation. The female biological imperative is said to be “pick the best to increase the probability the offspring survives” while the male biological imperative is to “impregnate as many as you can to increase the probability that our species survives”. That is a big difference and is the reason why I am pointing out that women will heavily vet men (and they still are not always selecting the best…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 08:23 PM
1

It is not that simple. I agree to an extent that men like to win and women like to be won. Women also like to win, etc, is it more of an individual thing instead of a gendered thing. Just because it is nature does not mean it is ideal or most efficient/effective of furthermore unable to be overcome(claiming that nature cannot be overcome can be an excuse for continuing a dynamic that benefits one gender). I do not have any trouble swallowing a pill of truth. I do not understand why you think tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 08:08 PM
1

Two strawmans in one post, lol. “only men have to prove they will be a good father in order to reproduce, in the dating arena.” is NOT because “men don’t seem to care enough to reject women for being bad mother material”. Maybe I should rephrase that as “only men have to prove they will be a good parent in order to reproduce”. The point still stands even if it is true that men do not always filter out bad mother material. This ethos I am talking about makes things worse when it comes to vetting …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 03:21 PM
1

For both genders!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 03:05 PM
1

This got me thinking. So I do agree that pregnancy and child rearing makes reproduction a greater task for women. But I cannot help but think about the cost involved in a different sense, which is arguably the most important consideration in modern times, and effects both parties. The effort and resources required to start a family/raise a child makes reproduction a huge decision to make, and that is another reason why I think it is wrong that there exists this ethos that only men need to prove …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 08:28 AM
1

When I said “enter the dating game” in my first comment and then later said “reproduction”, I thought it was clear that I am talking about people looking for serious relationships, not casual sex, sorry about that. So my point still stands. And in my experience women do have high sex drives, I think it is more of an individual thing instead of a gender thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 06:30 AM
1

No that is not exactly what I said. I am talking about the fact that only men have to prove they will be a good father in order to reproduce, in the dating arena. You are missing the point I made. I have already highlighted the bias is exactly what I just wrote. That one gender has to prove and the other does not. Women select which male genes pass on to the next generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 06:00 AM
–

Can you please explain what custody battles have to do with my last comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 05:50 AM
–

I agree with all points made by others so far regarding my comment. I just want to say that the idea that “eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap”, or that “it is nature” are not solid enough reasons to justify this dynamic in modern times. Also, there are definitely other reasons that I believe contribute more to this dynamic than natural instincts, such as culture and the women are wonderful effect. Another way I could word my first comment is to say that, the nature of this dynamic assumes that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 05:24 AM
–

Women enter the dating game with this air as if they are by default worthy of reproduction, but men have to be vetted.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/23 03:22 AM
2

You can call it whatever you want, but so many women nowadays are obviously not dating for romance, no matter how much they say they are not looking for sex (just to deter undesirables). And it is human sexuality(lust) that leads to love/attachment/reproduction. It is a marketplace where we bargain our chips and coalesce genetic information.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 01:17 PM
1

Okay I am using the word dating in the sense of : The process of playing the numbers game to vet and sift through potential prospects. (The dating game) Relationship would be when you are actually committed to each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/23 07:26 AM
1

I am not changing any story. If anyone is changing anything, you are changing the fact that you said “who cares” instead of “who cares how they’ll respond”. This really doesn’t matter in the context of what we are disputing. Maybe you just have a super ego and cannot admit when you are wrong. Have you ever heard of the Dunning Kruger effect? “What matters is that it should be done”. So dogmatic, so genius. You have solved a great problem plaguing humanity. “The best way to take stress away from …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:24 PM
1

Wow. The mental gymnastics are something else. It is entirely baseless to say that I am copying you, and at the same time my accusations about your ridiculous idea are far from baseless. You may have responded to every post, but you did not address every point in the posts I made. Full stop. And you STILL, are obviously ignoring one of my points, when you say “let women take it on”, because in a previous post I asked you how women would respond to working their lives away, alluding to the fact t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:04 PM
1

You are literally just copying what I say, probably because you cannot think of anything better to say, and out of spite. Re-reading the thread only confirms my point that you do not fully address everything I have said. You ignored so many critical points I made (unless you go back to edit like a cheater). Okay and your main point is still a stupid point to make, because if your noble goal really is to eliminate stress for men, removing them from the workforce would only increase their stress a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 09:42 PM
1

Obviously you are making things up now(because you have not even once, let alone fully addressed any of the points that I have made… besides calling them strawmans or saying they are just being made because I “don’t like your points” lol), just like someone who would perform any type of mental gymnastics to make themselves seem or appear to be the one who has won the argument. Like you cannot support your main point, do not refute any of my points relating to your main point, and then you resort…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 09:16 PM
1

Really just stop trying. You already lost and either don’t realize it, or are trying to cope, or are afraid/ unwilling to concede. I never inadvertently admitted to my points being strawmans. You have not addressed everything I said in full, nice try. “yet you did this” LOL andddd my point still stands that I did not even think it was worth responding to some parts of your last post. The fact remains that I only responded to some of your post, which further proves my point that commenters on Red…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 09:08 PM
1

Go back and reread my last post, try your best to comprehend it, instead of cherry-picking things that you think support your case. You are entirely wrong to think they were strawmans, and just by quoting the definition of a strawman does not prove that my points are strawmans, nice try. Some of what you say in that last post is just not even worth responding to, LOL. And yes humanity had a great run, men in control got us through the hardest times of human history (pre technological, primitive …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 08:18 PM
1

Yeah it is quite fitting because I can drive cocksure people like you bananas. I am responding because commenters on Reddit will say anything to get the last word in just to create the appearance that they have won the argument. “Not all of them. Just enough to justify allowing men to swap out with women so they can be free”. First of all, men will NOT be “free” (or even free from stress if that is what you were trying to say) if they relinquish their position in the workforce. My points were no…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 08:10 PM
1

Nutty. It is almost like projection that you think I am the one not making any concrete points. The fact that it is irrelevant is not just because “I don’t like it” (which you are assuming), lol I conceded that point to you, and never in any way said anything that would indicate I didn’t like it. I never voiced that I “didn’t like yours” … instead I was pointing out what is wrong with your points, that is an important distinction to make. Funny you try to frame me as the confused one (as if I am…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:52 PM
1

No it is not “back at me”. My points are still standing. You have not made a single point that has negated any of my positions, besides this point about assuming implications, which is still irrelevant to what is important in this discussion. If you are not implying any of what I said before, then it makes this proposition even more laughable. So you are saying the ONLY (or at least the greatest) reason women should take over the workforce is because alllll men suffer/stress from labor. Let me a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:25 PM
1

Just to be clear, when someone says “speaking as if”… it means that you are insinuating/implying something. So to be clear, yes you are implying the things I have brought up by what you are posting. Letting women take over the workforce is still a ridiculous, extremist idea to propose. I’m sure alll men would gladly take up that offer, and give women all the financial power, and all their stress will disappear because women are to the rescue, about to solve every problem known to humankind. The …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:09 PM
1

Only in your own mind, what you contend is realistic. You speak as if women are immune to the age old adage “power corrupts”. You are speaking in sweeping generalizations and absolutes, and you are oversimplifying the problems that humanity faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 06:53 PM
–

You are in your own world with that one. Like the old saying goes, dumb people do not realize their ideas are dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 06:48 PM
–

What is ridiculous about it is that you contend that women will alleviate all that is burdening men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 06:39 PM
–

Yes I understood your point and it is ridiculous. Thank you for confirming that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 06:32 PM
–

Please stop speaking as if women will solve all the world problems, as if things will be better for men if onlyyyy women took the reigns. Everywhere that women have already “taken over” the workforce, corruption is still rampant, very real financial problems still exist for the majority of workers and families.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 06:28 PM
–

Based on the comments you can tell that OP is correct. The women are wonderful effect has a stranglehold on so many minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 06:20 PM
1

No I would not be mad… depending on what type of bodies they were (LTR/monogamous, poly, cuckhold, etc.), I would take that into consideration when assessing whether she is in all likelihood going to be a strong force conducive to the continuity of the unit, especially if marriage/kids are the talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 05:50 PM
5

No buddy, get your facts right. I said contemporary dating, not contemporary relationships. Big difference. And by the way, I was not complaining, I was simply pointing out that modern dating drives some men to adapt. Again, another important distinction. You may not see civilization as advanced when you are only narrowly focusing on sexual dynamics, lol. I never said anything about shying away from monogamy/commitment. You have no idea about how I structure my relationships. Yes the west is dec…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:27 AM
4

Yes you are defending not only your argument in favor of Christian values, but also Christianity because you speak as if Christian values will solve this, as if Christian values are the ONLY way to solve this complex issue. As an apostate, I know that you will only see science that supports your religious ways, so at a fundamental level you are not wrong, the biological purpose of sex is reproduction, but that is only trivializing natures greatest act, like you do not speak of the health benefit…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 10:05 AM
8

The real problem is that you are not viewing these interactions through a scientific lens. Instead you are white knighting AND defending an ancient belief system that any critically thinking human being understands to be fantastical. Obviously my point went over your head. Again, the same ideals regarding dating/reproduction can be concluded without religious enforcement, but unfortunately not all people can understand that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 09:38 AM
8

First of all, an organized sexual marketplace has nothing to do with Christian values, lol. It absolutely can exist independent from that. There are many other reasons, beyond what you have stated, that have created this sexual marketplace/ dating game. Including factors coming from women. I am not pretending to be a victim just because I am hinting at the chaos, and inefficiency of the dating scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 09:18 AM
17

Of course men do. Until some men begin to realize all that is stacked against their pipe dream of having a lifelong relationship (love and marriage🎶). Until some men realize what love is from a biological perspective and the merciless nature of sexual selection. Until some men realize why they are loved. Until some men get burned or watch other men get burned. Men like this are just forced to adapt to the undesirable conditions of contemporary dating. Thinking that men do not want love is almost…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:44 AM
-2

I just used an extreme example to make a point, just like many others are doing. So I see on the CDC website that men aged 25-49 average just about 2 more lifetime partners over women of the same age range. This statistic alone obviously does not paint the whole picture. It is known that women are more selective when it comes to choosing a partner. So they can have a lower number of average lifetime partners but still have had way more opportunities over that span of time. That is only part of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 07:07 AM
4

From what I am reading, it seems that so many commenters here are completely skipping over the gray, and just jumping right to the extreme- chastity. It’s not necessarily chastity that all men who think like this are looking for from a woman in their age range/dating pool(and many of them do not know how to articulate why they don’t like promiscuity), but a promiscuous dating history does say a lot about a womans’ sexual behavior, and despite what these very women conveniently claim, promiscuity…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/23 06:26 AM
1

You are just trying to delude yourself into believing that looks do not massively impact the probability of a male attracting a mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 09:04 PM
2

The point is that women can receive pleasure from a guy who does not have a big dick, women (in most cases) are just lying when they speak as if they can’t (yeah I know it’s pretty scummy).
/r/MensRights08/07/23 09:01 PM
1

Is it really that stupid when anyone can easily reference that study that proves women find 80% of men unattractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 08:56 PM
1

Of course you ignore the data of atrocities that other races committed. That does not fit your narrative. (The discussion is not only about white people specifically, nice try). And yeah I could already tell what you are crusading for (politically) the moment you started using all these left wing buzzwords. Lol you go on to throw an ad-hominem by trying to sneak diss my understanding of history and speaking as if I have insecurities. At least I can throw in ad-hominem and still construct real ar…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 07:55 PM
1

So it’s really just anecdotal instead of an (observable) “fact” like you said
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/23 07:42 PM
1

People can obviously say whatever they want on Reddit to appear like they have won the debate. That’s really reaching to think that this sort of taboo would be “compelling” to a white man, when it is literally biologically pathetic to allow another male to pleasure your wife(and even worse creampie/impregnate her… or better yet while you are watching/filming and pleasuring yourself to that). I never said it means whites are victims first of all. You are the one imposing that narrative. Just beca…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 06:05 AM
11

Also wanna add that this post is flagged under discrimination, and you go on to speak as if alll white men are lacking. You obviously believe that stereotype for some reason or you just writing whatever on reddit.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 02:47 AM
8

It’s something you can only learn from experience I guess.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 01:47 AM
37

Brotha, dickshaming is just a cheap shot way that women use to put down men. Besides, they can still orgasm from the clitoris, which does not even require a dick.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 01:33 AM
1

Do you really think white men would turn a fear into a fetish? I am also surprised you think that someone who is capable of such atrocities would even have a guilty conscience. You do realize that men in general, regardless of race, have a fear of their woman being stolen from them(let alone by someone who could pleasure their woman better)? And I am not at all surprised you would find a way to tie this to white male supremacy, as we are on Reddit. I will agree that cuck porn has to do with slav…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 01:08 AM
1

Nobody talks about the fact that the porn industry and many have perpetuated the black/white cuck narrative. Cuckoldry is never depicted with any other races.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 05:28 AM
2

I do know one chad who does put a lot of effort into meeting women, which further increases his chances of success, but I will say that he pursues/“cold approaches” women because he knows they are receptive to his advances. He wouldn’t be doing it so often if it wasn’t working for him. So that is to say that it is not exactly the fact that he is cold approaching more often that makes him more successful with women, it is, his level of attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:19 AM
1

Women will cancel a guy over anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/23 05:12 AM
1

I just can’t help but wonder about all the unattractive men that can be seen having intercourse with attractive women in pornography(including escorts). They will do it for money but not for the health of others. Like can’t women use lube to prevent the bleeding that comes from having intercourse with an unattractive male? Besides there is more to sex than just penetration and virtually all of these unattractive men are starved sick. So many women justify selectivity by saying it is an evolution…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/23 06:41 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter