lonefaust Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
8	touching the toilet seat is flippin' gross. There's a big leap from not wanting aerosoled piss and shit everywhere, and being a germaphobe	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/07/19 05:39 AM
1	touching the toilet seat is flippin' gross. As a former janitor, I disagree. The seat is still open, some asshole will spider shit or piss like they're having a seizure midstream. Toilet seats always up just means less mess makes it to the top, but it's open, it'll still get there.	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/07/19 05:36 AM
1	touching the toilet seat is flippin' gross. Not an office solution, but at home we have a cat and dog that both like to drink or splash in any water. Top lid always goes down. Plus, you don't have an open basin of water to accidentally fumble something into if you're in the bathroom but not using the can. Drop your phone/blow drier/towel/brush/comb? Not going into brown water with the lid down. Plus everyone has to do it. If an office shares a men and women's room, it's probably a regular toilet with a lid and not some industrial open bow…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/07/19 05:34 AM
1	Did you notice that in the Time poll that pulled the word feminism from the list of words to ban also includes the word "bossy"? ;) Did you also notice your winky face didn't add to the post whatsoever?	/r/MensRights	18/11/14 09:35 PM
1	I just found out I have a 4 and a half year old son . WTF Listen, hubbyofhoarder. You're arguing nothing worthwhile here. I'm not a lawyer, and OP needs to discuss his matters with a lawyer from his locale, not with armchair lawyers and argumentive assholes. Instead, you're debating minute semantics that really have absolutely no point. Really. I didn't even say he is liable, I said he MIGHT be, meaning that in some situations (such as the one you detailed), someone might be liable for backpay on childsupport. Which, whuduyaknow, you just supported my …	/r/MensRights	02/10/14 08:40 AM
1	I just found out I have a 4 and a half year old son . WTF It's happened before. There are news stories of it occurring all the time in this subreddit. Should they be liable for back payments? No, I don't think so. But judges sometimes do require it and it's crippling. I don't really see the point of arguing with me on that here, as my point (made weeks ago) was to talk to a lawyer, and seeing as neither you nor I ARE lawyers, I think that's the only advice either of us can give.	/r/MensRights	01/10/14 03:24 PM
25	I just found out I have a 4 and a half year old son . WTF I am not a lawyer, but this is why you need one. You could be liable for 4 years of backpay for child support.	/r/MensRights	17/09/14 05:22 PM
1	Why Great Husbands Are Being Abandoned I'm calling baloney; read the introduction. It also stated that 99% of the people convicted of and imprisoned in response to rape accusations were male Problematic convictions or not, to the general public, that means 99% of rapists are confirmed to be men.	/r/MensRights	17/08/14 09:07 PM
-3	Why Great Husbands Are Being Abandoned So you do agree with women being afraid of being raped while walking through public? Cancer and people are entirely different. Cancer is chaotic and will always kill if present and untreated, where as all people don't react the same. By what you're arguing, we may as well assume that black people are criminals because the majority of Prisoners in the US are black, which is bunk.	/r/MensRights	16/08/14 10:21 PM
0	Why Great Husbands Are Being Abandoned The foolish notion is confusing assumptions as facts.	/r/MensRights	16/08/14 10:12 PM
2	Why Great Husbands Are Being Abandoned Women initiating divorce is not the same as assuming all women don't know what they want. Stick to the facts, because if it's safe to assume women don't know what they want because they initiate divorce, then it's safe for women to assume men are rapists because most rapists are men.	/r/MensRights	16/08/14 10:11 PM
-1	Why Great Husbands Are Being Abandoned I feel like that's the sort of assumption that puts MRA in a bad light as that's a sweeping generalization that applies to many people and not women more particularly than men. Just because someone's limited sample size exhibits certain behaviors doesn't mean it's relevant to everyone.	/r/MensRights	16/08/14 08:48 PM
5	There is not a monopoly on victimhood. No no no. He felt HE deserved sex from women. He felt other men were getting something that specifically he was entitled to. The guy was delusional and thought the world revolved around him, and anyone better off than him, or contributing to someone being better off, or having the potential to be better off in the future, were deserving of death.	/r/MensRights	31/05/14 11:08 AM
2	There is not a monopoly on victimhood. The problem lies with media and feminists using the term to imply he only hated women and that was his sole motivation, and that is why he killed people. It's not necessarily untrue, but just saying he's a misogynist ignores that he hated everyone that didn't give tribute or surpassed him in life. TL;DR - He hated more people than women. Calling him a misogynist ignores the other people he hated too.	/r/MensRights	31/05/14 11:00 AM
3	My journey so far.... The reason that didn't go so well is because she had a boyfriend already. She obviously just needed sex. Just sayin.	/r/seduction	05/07/11 09:52 AM