TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lookhooturnt Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by lookhooturnt on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Idk if this is misandry, this is just pathetic simp behavior
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 08:12 PM
-1

They’re all still results of the patriarchy and things women in real life will 100% cling on to yourself included
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 05:02 PM
4

What a cool life
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 02:53 PM
1

I was just responding to the person who referred to black men as “blacks” idk why you’re telling me this
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:12 AM

I’m just so tired of hearing every excuse from women being “misogyny” or “patriarchy” it has really gotten old. Many of these women have blind spots around their own contradictions because they are narcissists, leading to cognitive dissonance and a tendency toward self victimization by blaming men or misogyny instead of ever taking accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:36 PM

Have you tried talking about this with a therapist?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 09:11 PM

I mean not person I was responding to, but credit for not applying a double standard
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:54 PM

Well there’s no other aspect you’ve assigned him other than being a virgin, so I’m not sure what you mean. Anyway….how many partners a man has had does matter? Do you see how it’s confusing?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:46 PM

…you’re saying you wouldn’t in the past have dated (or as you put it, “fucked”) a man because he’s had no sexual partners. Is that correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:36 PM

You, hun. Saying you wouldn’t date a virgin. Which is a totally normal take btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:31 PM

Do women care about how many partners a man has had before? Yes, I wouldn’t date a virgin
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:28 PM

So the answer is yes lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:26 PM

Is it gross and off putting when it applies to women too? edit: lmao the downvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:25 PM
3

On the off chance you’re not lying to me or yourself, most women would make a value based judgment based on that. I think you know that too which is why you initially dodged the question and say you wouldn’t ask.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:36 PM
6

Lol ok what if he told you? You would apply any value judgment whatsoever?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 05:01 PM
6

Really? Women don’t care if a grown man is a virgin? They don’t take that as a red flag?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:58 PM
3

Point is it’s easy for women to slut out. Not that most want to. Do you think the same applies to men? There are different standards for a reason
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:53 PM
3

Only men perpetuate the idea that having sex is important to their value. Ironically the same men perpetuate the idea that a woman having sex decreases her value. Something about a lock and key…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:48 PM
7

NotAllWomen 🤓
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 04:13 PM
1

I thought it was supposed to be us evil women that’s hurting men No, that’s just your victim mentality coming out. My point was that despite a lot of white knights believe otherwise, women are indifferent to whether or not a man is a feminist when it comes to sex or attraction. He’s sweet though so you’ll buy him a pint and be his friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:41 PM
1

You’re making my point lol
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 02:08 PM
-4

That’s not what I said
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 01:32 PM
-5

Black men (or “blacks” as you call them) still have it worse than white women and they complain a lot less
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 12:48 PM
-3

White women and getting defensive over others saying black men having it worse. Name a more iconic duo, I’ll wait
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 12:45 PM
11

Ladies, SonBabu is defending your rights. Can we get him some pussy? No? Don’t want to ruin the friendship?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 12:41 PM
3

I agree that both of those issues are real issues. Again, if feminism was about actual equality, these would be at the forefront rather than playing victim, demonizing men. If you look at those two issues in a vacuum, of course white women don’t have better lives than white men. Even then, they don’t necessarily affect the “lives” of women. Still not good and a result of the fascist administration that liberals and feminists have helped put in power by placing identity politics over actual polic…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 05:01 PM
4

…that’s my point. Feminism is mostly white people victimizing themselves, not all that dissimilar to what right wingers do
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 04:50 PM
7

Well a majority of feminists in the West are white women, most of which who have lives on par with or better than most white men. You don’t think the majority of feminists victimize themselves to an insulting degree? Even non-white feminists, the reason they are in worse situations isn’t because they’re women, it’s because they are minorities in a white supremacist region.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 04:27 PM
7

Even beyond man hating, the majority of modern feminists are white women who love to victimize themselves while at the same time having more social and economic power than black men. Being a white woman in western society is on the same level as being a white man in western society, and in some ways it’s even better.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 04:16 PM
6

This statement is objectively true
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:59 PM
7

…is that what you think happened here?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:22 PM
20

Why on earth would these women be interested in these types of men? And vice versa. Lol what a dumb post.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 07:14 PM
6

Well of course, that’s why they’re not absolutes
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 04:47 AM
9

You don’t think there are any patterns or general truths between men and women when dating? You think it’s all random?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 04:29 AM
4

That doesnt mean those women aren’t attracted to confidence
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 04:21 AM
7

There are no absolutes but couple things that get pretty close are things like women are attracted to confidence, they’re influenced by how others see a man especially other women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 04:18 AM
5

I mean for some things it gets pretty close to absolutes. But even if they are just probabilities, that would mean dating is based on more than timing/luck/emotion which is what I believe you’re suggesting
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 03:42 AM
13

Every person is different obviously but after you’ve been through it for a while and have met so many different people, you do start to notice patterns
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 03:31 AM
3

Women under 30 are more likely to cheat than men under 30. Then it goes the opposite direction as men/women get older. Men in their 30s oftentimes become more desired than they were in their 20s, while the opposite happens to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 03:55 AM
6

I am saying there is a difference between someone who doesn't quite know or recognize what they are doing is inherently wrong or abusive Do you see how you’re now contradicting your original point? At first you said many men underestimate their behavior and don’t realize they’re being abusive because they rationalize it or think they’re well meaning. In other words, they don’t recognize their behavior as abuse. But now you’re arguing there’s a meaningful difference between someone who doesn’t re…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:39 AM
7

I've dated plenty of abusive women to know and understand how they can be. And also to know the difference between an abusive woman and a woman with untreated trauma. Are men who have untreated trauma not capable of being abusive either? Or does this only apply to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:21 AM
6

You’re automatically assuming that any abusive behavior women show must be a reaction to being provoked. Much of the time that’s just a self serving justification to cast themselves as the victim and avoid accountability/rationalize their own abusive behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:15 AM
11

Yes, this is exactly the kind of narcissistic reasoning I was referring to
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:11 AM
19

A lot of women don’t even attempt to estimate their own abusive behavior. Many assume something is not abuse because they can’t be an abuser by default or because it’s framed as a trauma response or “reasonably reacting” to something their partner did when it’s really just narcissism. Controlling, manipulative or degrading behavior applies to many, many women as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 01:01 AM
11

Totally forgot about that lol and great point
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 01:09 PM
-8

Wait why couldn’t you vote for AOC?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 10:54 AM
3

Not many. Thus to my point of many women settle earlier in order to have kids
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 08:28 PM
1

You sound young
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 04:43 PM
2

Right. Women don’t have to settle. Many do in order to have kids. Even if they freeze their eggs, how many men want to have kids with a 50 year old woman? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 04:39 PM
2

I don’t think that’s what I said. Parts of life begin at 40 much of the time like newfound stability, raising kids, more confidence, etc
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 04:38 PM
3

Of course it doesn’t. In many ways, it’s still beginning. Not sure what your point is though
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 04:27 PM
3

Nothing wrong with that at all, I agree. Women don’t have to settle. Many do in order to get married/have kids. They are free to not do that and live life by themselves. Men are free to do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:39 PM
8

Yeah and those women are free to live life by themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:25 PM
6

Of course they don’t have to settle. But many do in order to get married/have kids when they’re in their 30s and reality hits
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 03:21 PM

Now hold on a minute… /s
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 01:58 PM
1

Oh I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:20 PM
-2

Women are more sexualized but many also take part sexualizing themselves. Or when a woman twerks on the floor with her ass out, is that society just sexualizing her?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:12 PM

Oh no! Women wouldn’t like their psycho deception to be exposed? So sad 😢
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 08:55 PM

If the divorce rate increases as a result of less men living a lie as a result of women’s deception, so be it
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 08:50 PM

My point was that intent can be easy to prove if the couple is married. As in it could be inferred that if she knew there was a reasonable possibility the husband wasn’t the father and intentionally withheld that information while allowing him to rely on the assumption of that he is the father. Thus if this happens and she is married, 9/10 that will lead to a reasonable inference of intent
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 07:14 PM

I mean lawyer here, intent can be inferred from knowing concealment of a material fact. This is the case much of the time acrually. If the wife knows there’s a reasonable possibility the husband is not the father and intentionally withholds that information while allowing him to assume paternity, that’s fraud by omission or fraudulent concealment. So yeah marriage alone obviously doesn’t prove intent assuming the husband knows he was cheated on within the time frame of her getting pregnant, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 06:16 PM

Being a married woman, cheating on your husband, getting pregnant from cheating on your husband, and not mentioning the possibility of it not behind his when you have the baby is easily intent. For unmarried women the standard would obviously be higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 04:29 PM

Proving intent is easy. Were they married? That’s it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 02:40 PM

Intent needs to be proven for what OP is proposing to make any sense. Which is easily proven if the couple is married before getting pregnant. With that said, why not require DNA tests at birth? Why wait until divorce? Do you understand how crushing it would be if a man found out their child wasn’t actually their child?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter