~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionI’m just disgusted anti-feminists wrote this law to begin with back in 1929. How are a group of guys going to sit around and write a law saying “we can’t get raped, we can only rape”. And obviously it was anti-feminists who wrote that law because it’s not like women were in power back in 1929. And if women were in power you know those guys would be anti-feminists (historical context). I’m not saying feminists fixed the law in 2012, but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn just that. | /r/AntiFeminists | 11/05/22 01:25 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionYou haven’t linked any article. Was this prior to 2012? | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/22 04:57 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionWhy are you talking about vandalism? We were discussing rape. | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/22 04:41 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionProbably outdated then. This might have been a concern pre-2012 when the gendered language was removed. Good news though! This is a major win for men! | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/22 03:53 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionAccording to the definition, if a woman blackmails a man into intercourse, that’s sexual assault, not rape. Since the words “woman” and “man” aren’t in the legal definition, you’re just making this up. Also this is blackmail, not rape. And the only other time I’ve seen a case where the woman was charged, it was for using a knife to threaten the man and she was charged with damaging his car. Good news that you aren’t omnipotent - things which you cannot see are still things which happen. Also, yo… | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/22 03:46 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionAnd male on female is excluded from the definition as well. All gendered language has been removed. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/920 So, no need for concern. | /r/AntiFeminists | 09/05/22 04:36 AM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionThe good news is, what is written into the law is basically a test: Did something or someone enter you (with some object or with an appendage or organ, in any orface). Did not consent to this act? Or, were you under the influence of substances which means you cannot give your consent? If both are yes, it's rape. (I am glossing over some additional cases but with genders removed, the most literal interpretation of the law would protect men). This is great news.. and disturbing that it was only fi… | /r/AntiFeminists | 08/05/22 11:28 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionI see absolutely zero reference to the outdated language in current law: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/920 | /r/AntiFeminists | 08/05/22 04:40 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionSource? | /r/AntiFeminists | 08/05/22 04:37 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionThe new definition is: “The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” For the first time ever, the new definition includes any gender of victim and perpetrator, not just women being raped by men. It also recognizes that rape with an object can be as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape. (From the link I gave you) Looks like it isn't. Edit: The antiquated common law d… | /r/AntiFeminists | 08/05/22 04:34 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionDo you have a source for that claim? I am not seeing anything regarding that about Duluth. You seem to be suggesting that men cannot be victims of rape, which isn't law. Edit: it appears the current definition doesn't not use gender or sex. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/blog/updated-definition-rape#:~:text=The%20new%20definition%20is%3A,the%20consent%20of%20the%20victim.%E2%80%9D | /r/AntiFeminists | 08/05/22 04:31 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionI can give you some re-assuring news then. Absolutely no women are getting abortions for their convenience. Every abortion weighs on a person's conscious. Every miscarriage weighs on a person's conscious. It's super invasive. The pill is brutal, the proceedure scrapes the inside of their womb.. condoms, birth control are all methods women use out of convenience. Abortions are anything but. I've never heard of the duluth model.. seems outdated but I only skimmed, ill look into the studies later a… | /r/AntiFeminists | 08/05/22 06:03 AM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionYou know, that's a really good answer. Seriously. It passes the "no true scotsman" fallacy "test", it's probably one of the best faith answers I have seen on reddit lately. Seriously. I kid around a lot but I want to give credit where credit is due, and that is legit good faith. I also think your answer works with the question you asked me (changing misogyny to misandry and antifeminism to feminism). I might even be able to explain why people behave this way (men and women, respectively): in a l… | /r/AntiFeminists | 07/05/22 06:55 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionSo, as I was asking.. Is there any misogyny in antifeminism? | /r/AntiFeminists | 07/05/22 02:09 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionWhich is why I gave you my personal opinion. | /r/AntiFeminists | 07/05/22 12:03 AM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionAre you asking me to speak on behalf of all feminists? There are bad takes within every group. You do realize the point of logical fallacies isn't to walk your opponent into them, right? I know what you're trying to get me to sayn but because I try not to speak in falsehoods and fallacies, the best I can tell you is that the majority of feminists, feminist theory, literature, blog posts, placards, etc... are intersectional and NOT misandrist. An anecdote: I've been to the women's march. There we… | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 10:55 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionHave you heard of the no true scotsman fallacy? Jesus. What I said is that feminists don't support genital mutilation. I said right now feminists are concerned about legislation to remove their right to life. Have you heard of the bill of rights? Life is one of those rights that mothers have. Edit: here is my best attempt at answering your question.. OP is a feminist and I am a feminist, but within every movement you have differences in opinion, especially if those differences are in the strateg… | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 04:04 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionYes which is why i didn't say op wasn't a real feminist. | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 04:01 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionThat post isn't a good representation of what feminists believe. Are you sure you want to try to win an argument against what is essentially a strawman? Feminists do not support genital mutilation. Right now, women are maybe being forced to give birth or simply die if they can't get a life saving abortion. Do you expect every feminist to always be concerned about ONLY mens issues when a huge right of theirs is being taken away? Of course I can't listen if you don't speak. Speak! | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 02:49 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionOh ok sure. I am willing to listen. I will point out lies though. And there was no attacking of your character, just your honor (as you have yet to prove yourself trustworthy, having made up stats about forced birth in the other thread). But sure.. feminists fight for mens rights more than the majority of MRAs (with exception to one: the "father" of the MRA movement who is largely a gender abolitionist and says the MRA movement has been co-opted by the far right). Want to start there? Or... what… | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 02:40 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionAlso I want to be clear. I am a feminist who along with other feminists fight against genital mutation for men and women. I am also a guy who is circumcised. Are you sure you are anti-me? Anti-anti-genital mutilation? Pro genital mutilation? Feminists do not support genital mutilation never have, never will. | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 02:33 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionInteresting how you can't back up your claims in the other thread. I am still waiting to hear you tell one truth. | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 02:26 PM |
| 1 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionSo you just want power over women then with your forced birth views. Got it. Yep, zero hypocrisy here. Rights for men but not for women huh | /r/AntiFeminists | 06/05/22 02:21 PM |
| -2 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionYou are pro mutation, which is why you suggested mutilating a baby girls genitals. That's disgusting. | /r/AntiFeminists | 05/05/22 03:41 PM |
| -2 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionSo you hate men? | /r/AntiFeminists | 05/05/22 03:37 PM |
| -3 | had this argument with a feminst about genital mutila- uh I mean circumcisionYou are vile. Feminists are against genital mutations. | /r/AntiFeminists | 05/05/22 03:17 PM |
| 1 | My wife is leaving.Ahh yes, you are saving the world. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/21 06:45 AM |
| 1 | My wife is leaving.Damn dude you are still going | /r/MensRights | 27/11/21 04:49 PM |
| -1 | My wife is leaving.You still going huh | /r/MensRights | 27/11/21 04:49 PM |
| 1 | My wife is leaving.Some people like to listen to themselves lecture. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/21 04:48 PM |
| 1 | While we all support self defense, planning to kill someone isn't self defense. Kyle is a 2A leader, Chad's ex-wife is a Texas Judge, they hid Chads son during Chads scheduled visitation pickup time, trying to anger the Father, then kill him. It was premeditated murder.And this has nothing to do with mens rights. Its just a bunch of idiots talking about shit they don't know. Come to think of it maybe this is the best use of guys time. Carry on gents. America - it's dumber here (tm) | /r/MensRights | 27/11/21 04:20 PM |
| 1 | My wife is leaving.Sure, you always have the option to not learn and grow. Its a stupid fucking option to take but it suits you very well. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/21 03:44 PM |
| 0 | My wife is leaving.I dont need to work for your validation. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/21 07:47 AM |
| -1 | My wife is leaving.sure, here’s a whole thread of dudes trying to blame the problem on the woman, encouraging the guy to not communicate, lawyer up, projecting their own hatred onto the issue, and downvoting opposition to this into oblivion. way more than your requested 2 examples here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/r2lp8p/my_wife_is_leaving/ but most importantly, I didn’t limit my advice to this thread, you nitwit. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/21 01:49 AM |
| -9 | My wife is leaving.i guess you’ve never left a relationship. one day you will understand. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/21 07:22 PM |
| -9 | My wife is leaving.good. people should be happy and free. your wife is no exception. if you love someone let them go, if they come back to you then you”lol know. ignore the advice of men telling you to try to control her, you will only lose. | /r/MensRights | 26/11/21 05:12 PM |
| 0 | Feminists hysteria is causing problems for both gendersWhat are some legal rights that men don't have but women do? | /r/MensRights | 10/07/21 04:31 PM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?No problem. For what its worth I cisgender hetero man in his late 30s, and I have chosen to be a feminist my entire life. I still fight for mens rights, but not the entire platform that all MRAs believe - some goes against true equality and some is just hate. Of course, i am not even remotely popular. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 02:04 PM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Body autonomy. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 12:06 PM |
| 2 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Yes. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 05:42 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0751842/characters/nm0001329 | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 05:41 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Rebecca Watson on why men have the right to not be fathers. https://youtu.be/26X6iUSbLNc | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 04:25 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Sure, that doesn't surprise me. But they exist, regardless of if you have met them or not. Feminists oppose conscription, genital mutation (circumcision), the lack of male abuse shelters, and even the right of men not to be fathers. Feminists come in every gender too. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 04:20 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?That's a damn shame because the most vocal people on real mens rights issues are feminists. But yeah, if you can't understand that children are not born out of masturbation I can't help you understand much of anything, really. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 03:26 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Next you'll be whining that 'muh taxes' will have to pay for child support when men dont... 🤣🤣🤣 https://youtu.be/pSm8F8tBz8w Dalrock’s Law of Feminism: Feminism is the assertion that men are evil and naturally want to harm women, followed by demands to men to solve all of women’s problems. Citation Needed Inside most feminists is a misandrist totalitarian screaming to get out. They don't like having another point of view in the room and they try to squash it by character assassination and name c… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 02:32 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?“Take it like a sperm donor”? No, thanks? I assume you mean “look at the example of women going to sperm donors”. I’m glad you brought this up. When a woman goes to a “sperm donor” they don’t go to some guy’s house, they go to a fertility clinic. In this example, men would masturbate in rooms into a vial. That vial would be kept frozen until a woman would like to be impregnated with it. At which point, a doctor will perform a medical procedure to insert the sperm into the woman. Later on, the wo… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:34 AM |
| 2 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Yeah.. you’ve got the strawman fallacy somewhat understood, but asking for clarification on what you wrote is not a logical fallacy, nor is it a strawman argument. It’s literally a question. What exactly is your problem with copy/paste? See? You do understand how to strawman; you’re doing it right here! I pointed out that I was asking for clarification because you copy and pasted something irrelevant. You simplified that to “What is your problem with copy/paste?” Copy and pasting is just fine as… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 01:06 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?HOW are you planning on doing that? How do you not consent to fatherhood? Explain as if I have a date in an hour and I want to fuck but not consent to fatherhood and really don’t ever want to be liable to pay for child support even if it’s proven that I am the biological father of the child? | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 12:40 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?I’ll let you discover the fact that excercise isn’t a good way to lose weight on your own. And don’t forget to answer my most important question: How are you planning on getting out of child support if you put your sperm inside a person and they became pregnant? Your answer of “not consenting to fatherhood” doesn’t get you out of child support. What do you do, go out on the street and declare “I do not consent to fatherhood!” as loud as you can? Edit: formatting | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 12:35 AM |
| 2 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Neat copypasta but what the hell does that have to do with anything? Strawman: an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument. Yeah.. you’ve got the strawman fallacy somewhat understood, but asking for clarification on what you wrote is not a logical fallacy, nor is it a strawman argument. It’s literally a question. How about the argument of bodily autonomy? Should we have bodily autonomy? I say yes. Women's bodily auton… | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 12:31 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Neat copypasta but what the hell does that have to do with anything? I see you found a woman to agree with you, which is cool and fits your argument. How about the argument of bodily autonomy? Should we have bodily autonomy? I say yes. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/21 12:07 AM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?How exactly do you eat lots of food and not get fat? How are you planning on getting out of child support if you put your sperm inside a person and they became pregnant? | /r/MensRights | 30/06/21 11:54 PM |
| -1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?That’s ok. You can eat but not consent to getting fat. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/21 11:48 PM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Women make the babies. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/21 11:46 PM |
| 1 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Cause -> effect. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/21 11:46 PM |
| -5 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?Did you know that sex leads to pregnancy? | /r/MensRights | 30/06/21 11:45 PM |
| -6 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?we shouldnt force men to pay for the child he didnt want. As that sentence is written, I cannot agree. That could mean men who have sex that results in pregnancy but don't want to pay child support don't have to, which isn't right. If someone gets pregnant from your sperm, you pay child support unless the mother chooses to have an abortion. Don't want a kid? Be careful who you fuck. We shouldnt ridicule men for grieving what would have been their child. Here, I'll shorten this for you: we should… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/21 09:45 PM |
| 2 | Why does pro choice go right out the window when it revolves around men or children?The birth of the child is up to the person birthing the child from their body, period. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/21 04:13 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter