TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lorddeathhh Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by lorddeathhh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

What if a guy called you "smart" after only talking to you for 5 minutes? Would you be marginally livid that he doesn't know you enough to compliment you on your ostensible intelligence?
/r/seduction23/06/14 05:59 PM
9

I understand that, but what if she (a 7/10 or lower) badgers or begs you (~10/10 alpha) for more sex and you wish to break it off with her so you can fuck hotter chicks? Might she endeavor to get back at you by reporting your initial sexual escapade? I conjecture that no one is truly safe from surreptitious, Machiavellian women.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 01:32 AM
4

"Nobody is offended if you say "mailman"; It's about the power to control our language." and "They're not concerned about rape, they're concerned about power." Great post, but can't you be concerned about both (even if they are most likely more concerned with power)?
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 01:13 AM
12

I don't follow your logic that alphas are safe from the same accusations from jealous women. Can you elaborate?
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 01:04 AM
6

What if a guy called you a "good woman" instead?
/r/seduction22/06/14 11:21 PM
4

Why? Are you naughty?
/r/seduction22/06/14 07:09 AM
5

And you've been hit on by too many fugly people because you aren't very alluring. ;)
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 11:51 PM
19

So true. Either that or they are so unappealing that when they do get accosted and hit on it is by men in their own repulsive leagues yet believe they are entitled to higher market value men because of their sanctimonious, fallacious philosophies and eccentric, abrasive personalities so they spout their inane voices by signing the petition to disallow the lower market men from hitting on them. I'm certain they will still make exceptions when a guy way out of their league attempts to talk to them…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 11:47 PM
6

I'm definitely not a white knight. I despise feminazis way more than narcissistic pick up artists. I am a grey knight.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 05:51 PM
4

You have to approach every woman (that you want to be intimate with) with varied objectives and plans of action because they are rarely the same type of woman. Some like to have men take control of the situation, some don't, and some are somewhere in the middle. You have to be really good at reading body language, what the woman means when she utters her responses (not necessarily the literal meanings of the words) and tone of voice to know what plan of action you should be taking.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 05:35 PM
2

"no reason" What a risible and ludicrous assertion. He will scare away potential subscribers because the first thread they see on this subreddit might be his inane, mendacious dreck, ergo he is hypothetically ruining people's lives and I find it extraordinarily disconcerting. Have ye no moral compass?
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 06:20 AM
0

I just want to mention by directly controlling yourself and your actions, you are "indirectly" controlling your surroundings and the people located in those surroundings. You are being incredibly myopic, child; you are also employing fallacious logic; case in point: "You can’t control a woman," Yes, you unmitigatedly can. Just because you are neither charismatic, charming, nor good looking enough to do so doesn't mean they are incontrovertibly uncontrollable. Perchance when you graduate from hig…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 01:00 AM
7

"I never claimed he did." Yes, you did, child of ignorance. You should work on your atrocious reading comprehension before further besmirching your already dastardly, languished name and ego. "That seems like a hasty generalization, OP. You talk to one (possibly hypothetical) person, of seven billion, and find she is a little selfish in this one way, therefore all men are victims or potential victims of this because you think she's somehow representative of some significant number of women?". "Y…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 08:58 AM
10

"Just as I wouldn't want to be lumped in with that group" The hypocrite doth protest too much, methinks. You are lumping and pigeonholing OP in with the minority of zealous, misogynistic bigots. He never claimed that every single woman was the same way; here's an example to elucidate my contention: if over 2 billion purple aliens come to visit earth and every single one of them is a murderous, impertinent, creature, and a 2,000,000,001st purple alien comes to earth, should we treat it with respe…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 12:29 AM
3

On baseless and bona fide ad hominems: when an ad hominem argument is made against a statement, it is important to draw a distinction whether the statement in question was an argument or a statement of fact (testimony). In the latter case the issues of the credibility of the person making the statement may be crucial. So I inquire of you, is a mendacious, fallacious, disparaging retort the best your half-witted mind can muster?
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 04:30 PM
5

Are you still in high school?
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 04:51 PM
3

A couple things to mention: 1. I don't think you know the definition of the word "selfish" and 2. instead of communicating less you should try reflective listening (repeating the salient parts of their story back to them using different words). Remember children, women are not exact replicants of each other so saying something like "the right answer is: agree and amplify. “Uhh. Let’s see. I’m feeling hungry. And horny. Definitely horny. But mostly hungry. If you’d worn a shorter skirt, maybe we …
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 01:13 AM
5

"kid" "adorbs" The irony is earnestly palpable; you may not technically be a child but you certainly have the mind of one. I feel especially sorry for your parents and friends (if you even have any that aren't as autistic and gormless as yourself).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 03:14 PM
1

My contention keeps getting reproven. Yet, just because you claim that I am livid does not make it true. Make sure to practice your most important line, "Would you like fries with that?".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/14 11:17 AM

^ Attention whore. Do you not acquire enough attention in real life so you come on reddit to slake your desperation? Depending on what definition of "affected" you are employing, you may be correct in that assessment. If you are brandishing the definition I am ruminating, literally everyone who responds to or reads anything is relatively affected in some way; each post you fabricate further expounds my theory that you are afflicted with autism and retardation.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 04:44 PM
0

No, it makes me a realist. Contrarily, it makes you incredibly sad to gainsay my contentions while living a life of fantasy. I can descry the illuminated fact that you are still in high school (mentally at least).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/14 06:58 AM
6

I'm not saying that he was correct to use language so errant from "proper" rhetoric, but his usage was still technically grammatically sound.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 08:30 PM
0

"I think women are just as logical as men in general." If only you weren't so ignorant, myopic, and quixotic you would realize how erroneous that statement is. There have been scientific studies expounding the theory that women are more emotional and less logical than man. I'm truly sorry you are too delusional and imbecilic to look for the truth. Furthermore, most of the contentions you just conjectured are false: "I think hypergamy, shit testing, and beta bux are all bullshit," "I love sluts (…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/14 02:19 PM
6

Just to edify you, every time you hear or read a common phrase the phrase does not necessary have to be inferred as either literal or figurative simply because the masses usually infer it that way; language is amorphous, you inerudite dolt. The author obviously meant "begs the question" in the literal sense, not the figurative, logical fallacy one. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/beg: In this specific example, "begs" means "asks."
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 01:54 PM
2

"This guy doesn't exist, because anyone who does that will be getting laid." It is wrong to talk in absolutes like this. I'm sure there are mentally retarded, horribly disfigured, or severely handicapped people who are involuntary celibates. Also, because of the deterministic society one grows up in which produces said individual, it may be technically considered involuntary for even an average autistic male to be an incel: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/involuntary. Finally, you can …
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 02:26 PM
18

"It's a fucking post on POSTURE... Wow, we sure are the devil." Don't you think it's a strawman argument to say that theredpill haters shouldn't think we are the devil based upon the assumption that they are talking about this one post? You are excluding literally every other post besides this one; in my opinion you are being a bit myopic.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 12:25 PM
-3

"Hey :) reject that groupthink!" Oh, so when you and the information you gleaned from ignorant authors write a lengthy rigmarole on how to better your life and how others should live it's okay, but when a larger number of people understand that a word is loaded with connotations ergo live their lives according to the semantics of the word it turns bad? you just sound like an ignorant child who doesn't want to accept reality
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 02:27 AM
3

"Treat triumph and disaster just the same." "Eschew failure, think about success." I feel like this was written by a freshman in high school. These logical inconsistencies are laden in this edification. "you may lack VALUES, boundaries, and ambitions. Take time to reflect on these subjects" "Become entitled" seriously... this is embarrassing to read "Seek action not for the result but for the intrinsic merit of accomplishment." "were you better off before or after they came into your life?" so j…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 02:18 AM
43

or you know, it was just a dog being a dog...
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 07:09 AM
4

silence yourself, child
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 06:29 AM
25

"rediculus" maybe after you teach her all those amazing talents she can teach you how to read and write properly. also, saying "3) Hey guys my name is Ashley. I like to touch a guy's dick and then run away." is probably one of the most beta, passive aggressive things ive ever read. so no, you aren't a real alpha male. you are a retarded beta male
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 11:28 AM
2

Your reading comprehension needs work. Both men and women CAN be unintelligent and manipulated but that doesn't mean all of them are on that same level of susceptibility. But to assume that all women are intelligent, responsible creatures is just an ill-conceived notion.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 02:21 PM
0

"The Red Pill gives women the benefit of the doubt. The Red Pill believes in a woman’s ability to make responsible decisions for herself." Giving women the benefit of the doubt is not altruistic and pro-women as OP implies. It ignores real world variables and truths, which he then utilizes (his naive axiom) to postulate that he is somehow doing women a favor by condoning this point of view. He then goes on to strawman the opponents of RedPillers by stating that they don't take the feelings of wo…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 12:52 AM
2

preach it brother! hey, are you single and gay like me? we should meet up
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 03:50 PM
-2

Not only are you a loser, but you sound mentally retarded too. Most of the things you are spouting are not even close to being correct. Maybe you should pick up some books while improving your body?
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 09:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter