TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lostbut302 Archive

View 1 post and 82 comments by lostbut302 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
51

lostbut302/r/MensRights09/03/11 04:48 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I do contend that many men would find being a woman offensive, though Yes, of course there would. And I'm sure there would be many women who would feel the same about becoming a man. My response was in reply to the implication that all such choices would be weighted as zero-sum. this coming from the fact that society actively demeans men for doing stereotypically "female" things (sewing, dancing, even wearing pink) A man that switches their gender to a woman would no longer be ruled by their pre…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:10 AM
3

MRAs ... still tend to demonize women fighting for their rights. What are some examples of MRAs demonizing women for fighting for rights that they deserve but are unduly being denied? If you can acknowledge that you wouldn't want to be a woman When given a singular choice of binary options, to choose one thing over another is not the same as saying that one would specifically not want the other. If one chooses chocolate over vanilla, that does not mean that one dislikes vanilla or finds it offen…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:06 AM
12

I would upvote the serious reform or replacement of the alimony system, but not altogether ending the safety net for people losing their "employment" as homemaker.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:54 PM
2

Do you think that Men have less political power than Women? Why? Do you think that Men have less religious power than Women? Why? Do you think that Men have less social power than Women? Why? Do you think Men have less economic power than Women? Why? These questions are too loaded with potential nuance to answer comfortably. For example, what do you believe to be "political power"? Does it reside with our politicians? Voters? And which metrics do you use to balance the two to decide which has pr…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 10:42 PM
19

Every time we talk about SRS(/AMR/etc.) a troll gets its tusks. We aren't going to change any of their minds by yelling across the subreddit divide and giving them more of the material they covet. The classier we stay and the less we acknowledge their existence the better off our discourse will be.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 09:53 PM
1

As opposed to people who get married in jeans? Happens in my area sometimes. I heard of a groom that wore Carhartts to his wedding.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:59 AM
37

So men are finding that there's no reward or incentive in rushing to get married, have kids, and are postponing adulthood because well, they can. These things are a possible aspect of adulthood, but they aren't requisite to attain 'adult' status. I am both an adult and unmarried/without children.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 10:19 PM
4

Yes, please. This sets the tone that we're here to accomplish something positive, not just tell other groups of people how wrong they are.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 10:01 PM
2

Agreed. I don't like the use of the terms 'white knight' or 'mangina'. We don't appreciate shaming terms thrown at us, and they're merely cards that are played to end rational discussion like 'patriarchy!' and 'privilege!'. We're supposed to be above the lowly tactics used against us. How about, "... and the misguidedly chivalrous since ..." or something along those lines.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 08:25 PM
7

a practice that is not part of a dominant culture in a place is not necessarily going to get the same deference in practice. Problem solved: Jews are only 1.7% of the United States population. The practice was adopted as a cultural norm in the US due to misguided notions of cleanliness and suppression of male sexuality and had nothing to do with the Jewish religion. Our culture is non-Jewish, circumcision is mostly performed for non-Jewish reasons, so by your logic deference to the Jewish religi…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 05:41 AM
8

Since circumcision is a central milestone in Jewish life with an important religious meaning as Jews practice their religion today and for thousands of years, for all intents and purposes it would be a ban on Jewish life and on Judaism. FGM is also central to cultural practices of tribes in Africa, yet our society does not allow these practices to be carried out on our soil. Do you believe that African immigrants are oppressed by not being allowed to practice their traditions? That there may be …
/r/MensRights04/10/11 03:49 AM
12

Any ban on circumcision is a ban on Judaism. False. It's a ban on a specific tenet of Judaism. Deuteronomy 21:18-21 specifies that parents have the right to demand that unruly sons be stoned by all the men in their city. Are you for this religious right as well? If not, why do you get to pick and choose which religious tenets are exempt from law and which aren't? All parenting is full of encroachments on children's rights, for which their consent is irrelevant. Parents do not have the right to i…
/r/MensRights04/10/11 02:37 AM
15

The first amendment protects your right to exercise your religion as you see fit as long as said exercise doesn't encroach on the rights of others. In the same way the same amendment doesn't protect you from the legal ramifications of yelling fire! in a crowded theater, it shouldn't protect parents performing circumcisions on non-consenting children.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 09:26 PM
1

As for your final question, the answer is simply the accident of nature. I believe the technological ability to do something means it should necessarily be done. Perhaps this is the point where we agree to disagree. I can see where you're arguing for the right to abortion with regard to biology (#1 from this table), but I'm just not able to discern from your comments where the argument has been made for women having the right to opt-out of parenthood while men do not. (#2 from this table, and fu…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 01:53 AM
1

Although it is reasonable that a woman mustn't be compelled to abort, if the opportunity for a man to resign their obligations a potential avenue of coercion would exist. The overwhelming reason that a man would attempt to coerce a woman in to abortion would be that he doesn't wish to be a parent. That reason would be nullified if he had the option to opt out of parenthood as we are discussing. I would expect attempts at coercion by men to drop if legal equality was put in place. I'm not convinc…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 01:11 AM
2

Does a mother have the right to give up their child for adoption without the consent of the father? My understanding is that a mother (In the US) can unilaterally give a child up for adoption as long as the father is absent (Whether he is aware of the child's existence or not), or she makes allegations of some form of abuse. Ex: Preventing Your Infant from Being Adopted Without Your Consent In terms of the status of abortion as giving up one's parental rights without requiring the consent of the…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 12:10 AM
2

The peculiar nature of procreation creates a natural inequality in the process. Women have a right to abortion for biological health reasons, as they should, but they also have the right to abortion in the case when they simply don't have a desire to be a parent. They have an opt-out of parenthood that does not carry the consequence of the deprivation of property (In the form of money), nor liberty (In the form of imprisonment for failure to yield property due to choice or circumstance such as u…
/r/MensRights02/10/11 11:16 PM
2

The rights of women to not endure an abortion, particularly in light of legitimate reasonable and moral objections, and carry child are placed above the man's right to refuse his natural duty. In what way is a woman in this case not also refusing her "natural duty"? In either case, to simply demand parity through this legal option because of the medical option to combat such cases seems to be swiping a broad brush across a finely detailed tapestry. I agree that there are nuances involved, but we…
/r/MensRights02/10/11 09:40 PM
3

With advancement in medicine and womens' rights, carrying a child to term is no longer an inevitability for a pregnant woman, it's a choice. The default is to see a pregnancy through to birth, but the woman can choose to take the other path, even if the reason for that choice is simply because she doesn't wish to be a mother. A man on the other hand has no rights in the matter, whether he wants to be a father or not. If he wants to keep a child that a woman wants to abort, he has no say. If he i…
/r/MensRights02/10/11 08:58 PM
4

I recall that Connery was referring to slapping a woman that was running at the mouth, which should never be a solution regardless of the participants' genders, but I believe LAMFF here is referring to a man exercising his right to physically defend himself when necessary. (Perhaps with a poor analogy) Surely you don't believe--from a purely rights perspective--that a man should continue to hold back when he's put in a corner with violence from a woman?
/r/MensRights02/10/11 08:11 PM
4

From the comments on the video: Women when I want 'em and none with the name of Hogan. [His character's last name]
/r/MensRights27/09/11 12:43 AM
16

nearly 45 per cent agree that “to be a man you need to be tough.” A much larger percentage hold views that men should retain traditional roles. Note for others: OP appears to be a /MR troll account.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:35 AM
3

Jesus is totally bummed that you questioned his intelligence like that. He was born in the first century, cut him some slack.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:51 PM
6

Perhaps I was just being too picky, but it's hard to ignore a major character like God when you're drawing your metaphor with stories from the Bible. I believe you're just trying to say that your perception of "leftism" leads to the idea that we require equality of outcome and not simply equality of opportunity? Those that think in that manner likely have more friends on the left side than the right, yes.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:12 PM
6

When Adam and Eve left the garden, Adam became the head of household not because he deserved to be, and was the natural leader, but because he beat Eve into submission. That's completely false. God imposed their respective gender roles, not Adam: Genesis 3 16 To the woman he said, "I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you." 17 To Adam he said, "Because you listened to yo…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 10:17 PM
2

I didn't make any comments on whether I thought economic abuse was a real issue, I commented on what I thought was an error in your comparison between child support and the general notion of economic abuse. Do you recognize the error, or do you have specific reasons for believing parallels exist between state-enforced transfer of money vs. general economic abuse solely between one partner and another?
/r/MensRights22/09/11 04:15 AM
6

Child support is enforced by the state. A woman economically abused by a man will not have her wages garnished or be sent to jail if she doesn't comply with his wishes.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 02:26 AM
2

It looks like Kita ran to AMR for a good circlejerk to relieve herself of rising to the challenge.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 08:36 PM
28

Note that he says he was exactly like the people he criticized. So what happens at the end of the article to make him change? He gets a girlfriend(at 28). He only got out of this state once he found someone, he didn't have an epiphany or something where he learned how to be a better human being. He was unhappy, then became happy. Sounds like he has a hole in himself that instead of fixing, he merely filled with a girlfriend. And now he speaks like some sort of expert? Fuck that. I have a hole in…
/r/MensRights17/09/11 02:02 AM
5

If she doesn't actually know he removed the condom it could have just been a failure. (Including a tear as Electrocutee mentioned) Condoms aren't 100% effective; at best they're 98% effective.
/r/MensRights16/09/11 10:53 PM
14

in fact i always wonder if men take that to court and win. Once sperm leaves a man's body he is liable for pretty much anything that happens with it regardless of his consent. There are cases where women retain a man's semen in a condom or after oral sex and use it to impregnate themselves without the man's knowledge, then they sue the man for child support after giving birth and win. Or cases where where women rape men, including statutory rape of boys, become pregnant, and again are awarded ch…
/r/MensRights16/09/11 08:38 PM
20

It's not rape, no. If he was knowingly passing on a STD then she would have a case. If he got her pregnant, I don't believe there would be a case. If there is, women who stop taking birth control would have the same liability. (Assuming equal application of the law)
/r/MensRights16/09/11 08:16 PM
0

Agreed.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 12:24 AM
2

Was there a MR thread about her original thread? I searched for the link and no 'seen it' came up. Why does MR need to apologize as a whole if we never discussed it in the first place? I hadn't even seen this until now. MR members acting on their own does not equal the MR community.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 11:25 PM
1

I think ... that increased awareness of misandry is not necessarily going to have the effects we desire. I agree with your cautious conclusion, but I'm skeptical of some of the objective claims you made about innate human behavior. Any links or Google-able subjects you could reference to back some of them up?
/r/MensRights03/09/11 02:45 AM
6

In your opinion what justifies $96k/year going to his ex-wife for child support?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:02 PM
20

... your ex-wife abused your child Note that the article just says that one of her children was hurt in her home. It doesn't mention abuse specifically. Noting that child support was her only significant source of income, Sarah claimed she would lose her house and car and be unable to pay other bills without that money. Doesn't that describe most low income/unemployed men faced with alimony and child support payments? And not only do they lose everything, they get put in jail for not making enou…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 09:27 PM
3

However, I would be curious to know what you mean by "the fruits" of those organizations. The most recent grievance would probably be the lowering of standards of how colleges handle sexual assault charges. Coupled with the social and legal bias against men when sexual charges are made it effectively gives college women the power to end a young man's educational career without physical evidence, risk of consequence, or even having to face their accused. All this while the delta between men and w…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 09:34 AM
5

I don't know what you mean by "tear down" exactly. I can't speak for all of /MR, but since you replied to me, I don't think I discount feminists' ideas and policies with a vengeful or mean spirit, just armed with my understanding of reality.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 11:30 PM
6

I'm sorry you have such a biased view of modern feminism. My "bias" is only created from my observation of the current balance between the genders. I support the ideas of equality that many every-day feminists such as yourself espouse, but I do not support the fruits of the higher-level feminist organizations that seem to disregard the other half of the species when influencing policy, society and education. It's a case of focusing on what feminists say vs. what they do. Secondly, any true femin…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 11:14 PM
66

When I think of modern feminism I tend to think of an episode of The Simpsons where Lisa thinks she's going to stick it to the man by signing up for football (Dialog from IMDB): Lisa Simpson: What position have you got for me? [the kids gasp] Lisa Simpson: That's right. A girl who wants to play football. How about that? Ned Flanders: Well, thats super-duper, Lisa. We've already got four girls on the team. Lisa Simpson: You do? Ned Flanders: Uh huh. But we'd love to have you on board! Lisa Simpso…
/r/MensRights31/08/11 04:52 AM
8

I still don't get how that applies to the MRM. As far as I'm aware we're not trying to control the sex lives of others. A sticking point is something that causes an impasse. Perhaps the OP believes the term means the opposite and is contrasting that with other movements such as feminism.
/r/MensRights29/08/11 10:12 AM
3

Over the years, Vicky has accused him of five different episodes of abuse, claiming that even after he was cleared of one count, he went back and harmed his daughter again. After every complaint, his access to his daughter was restricted. He once, he says, went more than 100 days without seeing the little girl. ‘I am a loving father. I would not hurt a hair on her head. To be denied access to your child like that, is devastating.’ In November last year, however, the authorities took the extraord…
/r/MensRights28/08/11 12:02 AM
4

This is the worst case of male privilege I have ever seen! http://imgur.com/IWbZ2 Contextless charts are meaningless. If you wanted to have a discussion about what the root cause of the "problem" you're presenting might be, I'm sure the community would be up for it. But per your one and only comment it looks like you're just trolling: I love that mensrights is some sort of primitive tribe ... Edit: wording.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:11 PM
3

First paragraph My goal was to falsify your statement that "Stern believes false allegations are extremely rare" by pointing out that it wasn't Stern that made the statements you were quoting. My opinion of the actual rate of false accusations isn't educated enough to weigh in, so I haven't given any position either way. Second paragraph I cut off the last quote in my reply for context assuming you had looked at the OP's link, but I'll finish it since it answers your misunderstanding of what I w…
/r/MensRights13/08/11 01:35 AM
3

The "extremely rare" statement is a quote from a lawyer, not the author of the study. Further, the quoted individuals are describing the prosecution of false rape allegations, not the phenomenon of false allegations. They are extremely rare. I have been prosecuting for 20 years, and have prosecuted for a false allegation once. The judges we talked to said these cases occur very infrequently. An experienced police officer had come across two such cases in 15 years. I don't have vetted statistics …
/r/MensRights13/08/11 12:48 AM
5

The word skank was unnecessary. "40-yr old woman" would correctly describe the situation.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 03:54 AM
6

I'm curious if this comes up for female-to-male trans folks. Are they denied because they identify as male? Or are they accepted because they were born as female?
/r/MensRights05/08/11 05:09 PM
2

It's my understanding that women are still prohibited from being on front-line combat. The death rates between men and women as a whole wouldn't be a fair comparison. Although I wouldn't be surprised if men are still at higher risk than women when direct comparisons are made.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 09:16 PM
5

Looking at the issue from the perspective of race instead of gender, is there a substantive difference between a "ladies' night" and a "white peoples' night"? If so, what is it? Personally I don't see it if there is one.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:16 AM
3

But would you say that woman is 'privileged' with something like maternity leave? (Spoken from my perspective in the United States) From a legal standpoint men and women have the same right to child leave as one another. Sadly this isn't the case in all countries though. (See the chart on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_leave) From a social standpoint men are not encouraged to the same degree as women to take child leave and this definitely needs to be rectified. Or perhaps a better insur…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:57 PM
3

As for female privilege/male discrimination and male privilege/female discrimination, they are one and the same. It is just a way of looking at it from a different point of view. Less of the "you're doing this to men/women on purpose" and more of the "look what is handed to you and you don't even realize it or it's power." Perhaps this discussion comes down to our own semantics, but to me privilege is something for royalty. If every man that gets a given job receives $10/hour, and the first woma…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 07:54 PM
5

I read through that PDF and it appears that nearly every point raised is discrimination against women, not male privilege. The problem with framing it as male privilege is that it gives women an enemy to be angry with and feel a victim of, and unnecessarily puts men in the crossfire. For example, a reverse parallel to #3 would be, "I am far less likely to die or be injured at work than my male co-workers are." Women are not privileged to work in safe jobs, and women are not the enemy of men that…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 07:36 PM
5

This'll probably be downvoted to oblivion, but... The downvote reverse psychology trick isn't necessary. If your content is good it will get upvoted. Women being raped is a problem. Men being raped is a problem too. Agreed. False accusation of violent and sexual acts are also a problem which at this point in time is one that rests almost exclusively with men. There is such a thing as male privilege. There is also such a thing as female privilege. I really don't understand the eagerness to use th…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 07:02 PM
7

Could you give a bit more context and background as to why you're asking and how the answers from MRAs are of particular interest?
/r/MensRights17/06/11 12:52 AM
1

The blurb article includes a link to the study itself. Did you actually review the study? If so, which specific points in it seem dubious to you?
/r/MensRights07/06/11 03:05 AM
3

They types of me who stay single I think the first phrase is supposed to be, "The types of men".
/r/MensRights22/05/11 11:38 PM
12

Planned Parenthood offers more than just reproductive health services for women, they also offer the same class of health services to men, and services that apply to expecting parents such as counseling, family planning, etc. (See: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/index.htm) Even if the larger percentage of PP's dollars goes to single women (Assuming it's based on demand, not discrimination; there is no male pill, men cannot have abortions, etc.), isn't the benefit to society a pos…
/r/MensRights13/05/11 04:08 AM
1

I need to check the weather in Hell, 'cause I just agreed with the commentary in a Feministing article.
/r/MensRights10/04/11 01:27 AM
1

Gays do not want traditional monogamous marriage, only the version debased by divorce. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights03/04/11 09:07 AM
9

At school a teacher is a teacher. They wouldn't be brining their other career with them in to the classroom, and they don't somehow emit porno radiation that infects the students. I'm sure there's teachers out there that engage in all sorts of depraved extra curricular activities, but no parent or student ever learns of them. As long as they do their job properly it shouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 03:32 AM
9

Why would it matter if a teacher is, or was at one time, a porn star?
/r/MensRights01/04/11 02:46 AM
1

As long as it's morally repugnant, I'm not going to campaign for it just to "get equal" with women, and I'm pretty disgusted with those who do - they hurt men more than they help them. Okay, I understand your position now. The comment I originally responded to lambasted the idea of men having/exercising the same sort of legal abortive rights women have; it didn't say in neutral terms that the rights in general are a bad idea. That was the root of the lack of understanding on my part. And said th…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 11:00 AM
2

You're addressing the wisdom of walking away from parenthood, but you're ignoring the legal reality. You started your comment by citing sources that say "financial abortion" is a horrible idea (And said that only activists "worthy of the name" agree with this position, a fallacy of presupposition), but which of the sources simultaneously support the current legal reality which gives women options to abort their parental obligations? You need to address the legal double standard. If a woman post-…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 10:02 AM
1

So the situation is that she wants to give the child up for adoption, but the father wants to have custody of the child, so she signs away her parental rights and he is granted sole custody? And the question is whether she would then have to pay child support? My understanding is that child support is determined by a judge. Looking through the lens of an MRA I would assume that a judge would be lenient on a mother, but I can't recall any situations that match this one, so it's just a biased gues…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:19 AM
0

The "financial abortion" thing is something rejected by many men's right activists, and all parent/children's rights activists worthy of the name. Just because that's the case doesn't make their positions logical. To grow up knowing you were rejected by your biological father is afwul - you can bet a good part of the next generation of cluster-d types are being created that way. But it's somehow acceptable to grow up knowing your mother put you up for adoption or legally abandoned you at a safe …
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:03 AM
1

So you would do away with mothers' current options of abortion, adoption and safe haven abandonment? Or make them require the consent of both parents? Or..? Those options could not continue to exist at the mothers' discretion and simultaneously make what you're saying more equitable for fathers.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:54 AM
2

Given that you had an abortion ten years ago due to your life situation, I'll assume that you understand his point of view when he says he's not at a place in his life where he wants to be a new parent. He is stating his desire to exercise the same sort of rights you exercised when you walked away from becoming a mother ten years ago. I agree that it's really shitty that he's supposedly doing this only after changing his mind about the pregnancy seven months in to the process. But, from a rights…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 08:38 AM
5

Do you really think that just because I'm a woman I would walk right by? That is the most common reaction, yes. The reactions to female-on-male violence range from indifference to, "He must have deserved it," to, "You go girl!" Even from a male cop. Your willingness to assist a man from being attacked by a woman puts you in the extreme minority.
/r/MensRights26/03/11 07:15 PM
1

Anecdotally, at the last company I worked for the HR department set the pay scale for positions. Managers could provide input, but it was the final call of HR. Quote Wikipedia's Human Resources article: Key functions ... Compensation and employee benefit management
/r/MensRights14/03/11 04:58 AM
19

Given that companies are willing to hire illegal aliens and ship jobs overseas to improve the bottom line, if they could really hire a fully capable female workforce for 75 cents on the male dollar, they would have a competitive advantage for doing so. Why aren't all companies completely dominated with this cheap labor force? And isn't the HR field predominantly female? HR sets pay, ensures fairness, etc. If women were really being under paid, women themselves would be their own oppressors.
/r/MensRights13/03/11 04:36 PM
30

She refused to accept that was the case and insisted that I was compensating for something in my life e.g. a lack of achievement! Not the case grr! ... 2 paragraphs later ... I think my GD originates from the fact that my mum died when I was a child and I feel like I have missed out on that mother-daughter relationship. Really?
/r/MensRights13/03/11 04:09 PM
3

Equal rights, responsibilities and treatment; both under the law and within society. The MRM is a response to the demonstrable imbalances between men and women in these areas. With frustration comes belligerence in some. This is just human nature. What someone says when they are venting in a friendly forum is not necessarily what they will say in a formal conversation or debate. I would err on the side of not attempting to police this behavior as long as informal rants do not bleed in to the mov…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 10:45 PM
2

I recommend watching this video if you think you're going to have more run-ins with the cops: Don't Talk to Police
/r/MensRights10/03/11 08:43 PM
1

See the DarkKnightBob thread where I address overreaction and my intention. Edit: linkified thread.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:46 PM
8

I'm not creating an issue. This is not a call to action. I'm simply pointing to an instance of what I perceive to be as a double standard in our society. That video is interesting. I feel there's difference between the setup and delivery of the 'punchline' so to speak, but I don't have the experience to describe the comedic and situational nuances. I will relent that this is an instance similar to what I have posted that doesn't appear to have raised any of the ire that I would have suspected it…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 07:22 PM
6

No. If that's really a serious question, see my first comment's thread for explanation. I meant to have the text of my first comment be this post's text, but it apparently disappeared when I failed the first captcha.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 06:59 PM
9

No, I'm not overreacting. The point here is that while society has no qualms with making light of female-to-male violence, depicting the reverse would be considered an affront to our sensibilities. Having this double standard sets up the mentality that gendered abuse toward men is not something to be taken seriously. (See real-life example: http://youtu.be/LGZIQaCaW0I) I'm for equal opportunity comedic combat: nut shots and falcon punches for all. Edit: added ABC Female-on-Male violence video.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 06:53 PM
21

I'm guessing that Smart Water would never recover from the PR fallout if the clip instead showed a male actor fending off an adoring female fan with a vicious physical blow.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 04:50 PM
5

Society needs to unlink giving birth with allowances with becoming the primary caregiver at home. They're two separate things; the former is automatically women by biology and should be covered by normal medical leave for the birth itself and recuperation, but the latter can be either or both parents. The option exists for men to be the ones that trade time spent on their career to stay at home to raise the children, but neither society nor the workplace are as accepting of this as it is with wo…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 04:15 AM
2

My question is, if I AM pregnant and not having a miscarriage, would I be out of line to ask him to help pay for an abortion, IF that is what we both agree on? Putting myself in his shoes, no. As long as "I" am an equal in shaping the outcome, I'll do what's necessary to make it happen. (And I would be breathing a huge sigh of relief that you're being mature enough to not abuse the power position you're now in.)
/r/MensRights02/03/11 11:59 AM
6

A proposition for you: We'll enter in to a business contract. At any point in time I can back out of this contract, without fault or penalty to me, and take more than half of our combined assets as I go, regardless of the effort I put in to our endeavor relative to you. You also have the option of backing out, but the law is skewed such that I will still come out with the favorable result. The national failure rate for these contracts is around 50%. Breaking down the demographics, the demographi…
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter