| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Double standardsIt's like you're wanting to prove you're a moron. Describing FGM as a pin prick is one of the most retarded things I've read. And then you refer to how male circumcision is performed in the states, presumably neglecting to wonder why female circumcision is illegal in the states. Of course I wouldn't expect that one can generally be performed in a hospital by medical professionals while the other can't to influence your view on which is worse; that the health implications are self-evidently worse… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/22 12:01 PM |
| 0 | Double standardsSure. Sure. The average survivor of MGM is significantly more damaged in physical objective terms than the average survivor of FGM. Where did this come from then? In fact, don't bother pretending it's from anything resembling a reliable source. It can just stand as a testament to your ignorance and stupidity. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/22 11:43 AM |
| 0 | Double standardsYeah, there's a beautiful irony in you telling me I'm making shit up... | /r/MensRights | 18/05/22 07:31 AM |
| -4 | Double standardsBoth are bad, don't play the "girls have it worse therefore bad argument" shit to dismiss the legitimate concerns of both It's like you didn't read the first sentence of my comment. It's foolish to assume who I have and haven't spoken to. You're welcome to comment emotive nonsense, but if you think the health implications of male and female circumcision are equally severe, you're at best ignorant and at worst an idiot. And yes, the implications being significantly worse for females mean that the… | /r/MensRights | 17/05/22 06:39 PM |
| -5 | Double standardsYou could just try googling 'health implications of male and female circumcision'. Once you've done that, you're welcome to still say I'm making shit up; you'll be wrong, but you'll be welcome to say it. | /r/MensRights | 17/05/22 06:29 PM |
| -11 | Double standardsI think it's wrong to circumcise boys; it's genital mutilation and the intention is irrelevant given there is no consent. That being said, this is false equivalency; female 'circumcision' is far more damaging to girls than removing the foreskin is for boys. | /r/MensRights | 16/05/22 11:08 PM |
| 82 | Has the world gone mad?That's really unfair. Being a student doesn't entail they have, or will ever obtain, a degree. | /r/MensRights | 26/12/21 01:33 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter