TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lupercus64 Archive

View 1 post and 76 comments by lupercus64 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

That's just unbelievable, talk about cultivating a sense of carelessness and lack of self-awareness. From the white supermodel that uses her body to make money. I've known far too many white women who move through the world unaware of their privilege, and I've been traumatized by many of my experiences with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/20 11:36 PM
18

I think once you remove the specific terms, that pretty much lays out the operational dogma of most social justice organizations today. I remember the first week of college, attending an event for a school program for latinos and minorities in STEM. The keynote speech was about how as minorities, we are disadvantaged no matter what our experience is. That professors, other students, future employers are judging us by the color of our skin. That wherever we were, whatever we were studying was bec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/20 09:59 PM
3

I understand the pain you feel, you feel you did everything you could and you still lost. Try not be bitter about it. If that's what she did, that doesn't necessarily mean that's what's women do. Everybody has baggage, everybody is gambling when they date, don't let the hurt she put you through be what defines your perspective. It'll help you more to let it go than it will help anybody else, because the world just isn't that black and white.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/20 03:27 PM
15

As a gay man, I fail to see how any of the current LGBT+ movement helps men, even gay men. Growing up, I always observed the worst, and most persistent homophobia came from women, not men and the idea that they're SJW doesn't change a thing. Look at Stonewall, a huge issue for gay men and lesbian women; it erupted because that community didn't want police or the mafia involved in their bars/scene, it put gay men in particular at a high risk of being arrested and abused. This past year on the ann…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/20 02:23 PM
4

Pretty sure they didn't say "always and only," they described a general group behavior. Also didn't say that women never self depreciate, just that men tend to self-depcreciate due to that trend. The idea that women self-deprecate "usually for male validation" doesn't make male deprecation any less bitter or less real. And if it were fact that they're doing it for "male validation," does that make it the fault of the men they are trying to get validation from? His point was that men and women ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/20 07:10 PM
6

I completely agree. In addition, I don't think we need a better term than just "masculinity," the big problem surrounding that word is defining it and recently it has only been defined by bad qualities. The only time it is defined in a good light is if it is a benefit to society, regardless of the individuals. Mainstream discussion surrounding femininity focuses on the benefit to the individual and by extension society, whereas masculinity is discussed in terms of utility or cost to society, it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/20 10:18 PM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you asserted that women only go for powerful men because they're socially conditioned to, while MMDT pointed out that a lot of animals display this same kind of behavior in some form, and we are animals as well. That it is partly based in instinct. Your only rebuttle was that society changes super fast. MMDT's point was pretty clear, as was yours, but you don't offer any support for your point, only that gender roles are bad and they will fade. Not saying you're wron…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/20 03:39 PM
6

I really appreciate my dad. Growing up, he spent a lot of time working, and constantly stressed. I was going through my own problems growing up, and we often clashed. I always thought about how I wanted to leave and never visit, how I would be free not having to live under him. It wasn't until about a year or so after I left for college that I realized my dad is my best friend. All that time growing up, that it felt like he didn't want to spend time with us, or he was pissed around us, it was be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/20 05:39 PM
7

I'm struggling to find it right now, but an article linked on r/philosphy discussed how philanthropy is fundamentally flawed, because the causes the ultra-wealthy throw minute fractions of their wealth at are fighting the conditions that made their mass accumulation of wealth possible. They are donating money into the system, but they continuously pull 10-fold from the system. In addition, these foundations rarely target the core issue e.g. treating wealth inequality as a purely gendered issue
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 05:09 AM
20

It's not even that men are excluded because they are less likely to need it, it's that men exhibit anxiety different than women. Look at the crazy stressful and dangerous jobs men have worked over history, plenty of them have had anxiety, but it looked different. Men typically present with anger, alcoholism, depression, and irritability under anxiety. In men, anxiety isn't addressed, because these symptoms are treated as symptoms of being a man. It doesn't make those behaviors acceptable, but th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/20 04:54 AM
3

I've talked about it in this sub before, but growing up as a gay guy, it was always girls ridicule I feared, not boys. There were boys who made fun of me for my sexuality, a supposedly close friend even publicly declared "I wish they[gays] were all dead." But the boys were harmless, if we didn't agree, we didn't interact. It girls who were relentless, and persistent with their insults and public humiliation. The same happened to girls who might have identified as lesbians. I feel like a lot of p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/20 11:57 PM
13

What do you think about identity politics involvement with this sort of phenomenon? There is a lot of demonizing of men by mainstream feminism, but more broadly among the democratic party and the left, identity politics and insectonality have been their MO. In that framework, men are a non-entity, a lot either find some way to conform to that or find a group that support their self-interest rather than treating it as the problem. I feel attitude is all too well summed up by Marge Simpson: "Nelso…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/20 11:21 PM
13

Personally, I'd look at them more as companies. The causes they support, the fandoms they associate with, the brands they wear, all play into their PR and their success. Not that all celebrities are complete shills or that they can't do anything meaningful, certainly the further up you look the more you'll find, but so much of what they do in the public eye are career moves, not necessarily representative of their character. They're actors after all. Especially with social media now, their perso…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/20 10:56 PM
1

Huh, I hadn't considered that, there is a lot more variability among males across many different metrics. I'm curious what the gender gap is like among the lowest scores, I'd like to see what that is. It's an incomplete picture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 06:55 PM
2

I believe it is critical that we acknowledge the influence women have in society, we still act like women do not have the right to vote, but they've had the right to vote for a while now and hold responsibility alongside men for a lot of things happening in the world. Even before the right to vote, women still had social influence and they still hold that social influence today, if not greater. I don't believe women having influence is a bad thing, what I think is bad is the gas lighting that go…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 02:39 PM
6

Aren't you then taking discussion off the table by saying that? There could be discussion, you could post facts, you could ask OP specifically about his views and discuss the discrepancies between his and yours. The only thing you've done here is state that YOU are not willing to participate in discussion, especially since you were the first comment on this thread.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/20 02:01 PM
1

I agree, I think this sub has a lot of potential, but we need some organization with regards to what sort of post go up, and we need have so more constructive discussion regarding the issues we face. A lot of male oriented subs get categorized as right-wing, but we get some unique hate because we are not right-wing, but the idea of supporting male issues, or criticizing feminism, seems pretty foreign to the left. I understand the emotion behind some of those rage posts, but that sort of behavior…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/20 12:40 AM
2

No, the article states that within the SAT there are sections that favor men, and some that favor women. Favor in this instance isn't to mean that these questions are intentionally set up to be easier for men or women, just that men or women may disproportionately score higher than the opposite sex on certain types of questions or subjects in general, based on the testing data collected by the SAT. What this article does is accuse the writers of the SAT of intentionally create a test that favors…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 06:30 PM
6

It's hard to quantify the sort of experience it induces, depending on the conditions it is done in, the type of procedure, and the skill of the person doing it. The main difference is one is way more widely practiced across the world, while the other is practiced in a geographic areas that overlaps with the most heavily affected of the opposite gender. FGM is most prevalent among the equatorial African states, the middle east, and island nations in the south China sea. Among many of these same n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/20 02:48 PM
6

What do you think determined those policies that affected women? Gender norms, society is a much more complex web of interactions than 'men control everything, men hold the entirety of the blame.' This sub's main goal is to facilitate the discussion of rights of men in our current society. Like every sub there is a range of the personalities that participate from extreme pro to extreme con. Your arguments and language are nearly identical to the behavior of the people you claim make this sub "ca…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 10:31 PM
13

Wow. Great discussion skills. I believe they are talking about gender norms rather than laws. Gender norms have always dictated what type of work each gender does. Women tend to have lower-risk jobs, due to their role in childbirth. Whereas men typically take responsibility for high-risk jobs, jobs that are outside of the home, jobs that focused on threats to the communities survival. This post is a little ill conceived to state "allowed" but they didn't say legally, they are referring to the sy…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 09:35 PM
7

I can't say I agree with your title, the article does seem to suggest that lay off's during a crisis should take race into account to keep demographics the same. They argue that it is unfair to use job function/positions to determine lay offs because women and other minorities are more represented in industries at high risk of lay offs, mainly service industries and manufacturing. They don't really make the case that any given manager or organization is laying off more women and minorities than …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 05:22 AM
2

Look at breast cancer awareness, it's not bad that people support it by any means, but every year businesses release and sell products they changed pink and they rake in a ton of money. Some of that is going to charity, but thousands of businesses pad their annual profits during breast cancer awareness, they're just able to encourage looser spending when it's "for a good cause." That seems completely benign, and for the most part it is, but it's important to note that kind of nationwide effort i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/20 01:16 PM
2

It's never been about equality with men, it's equality with the to 10%. I completely agree, there is so much literature out there written to suggest that that men are all controlling, misogynistic, and lazy, while women are slaves without any voice. They discuss problems that could easily, and should, be addressed on a personal level, and instead make them a societal problem. I wouldn't quite call it a conspiracy, but I full-heartedly believe feminism as a mainstream movement is intentionally be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/20 03:04 PM
7

I'd recommend skimming through it. I have a huge issue with how psycology and sociology studies are published, they always put the conclusions and reasoning into the abstract, but rarely justification for methods, lucky if they even mention the methods. That is behind a paywall, once you get past the paywall, the bias, and potential for bias, becomes apparent. In addition, the original study only looks at childcare. I've been ranting a lot because I've spent a lot of time reading this article, b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/20 07:03 PM
8

The only radical thing feminism has changed is the significance of a man's words, and the accountability of a woman for her own.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/20 07:03 PM
9

Right? Here's what they classified as housework: Routine activities included cooking; washing dishes; cleaning house; family shopping; laundry, ironing and mending clothes; financial management; and driving (others). Nonroutine activities included outdoor maintenance and automotive repair. The division of labor literature has focused on both routine and nonroutine tasks because they capture gender differences in flexible (nonroutine) and nonflexible (routine) work And it's important to note, the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/20 06:58 PM
24

It's funny, I almost posted this article yesterday, but deleted it because it feels like a moot point anymore. The article is that it is entirely an opinion piece that cites specific figures to paint the picture that women are the most affected by the pandemic both on the employed and unemployed side of things, despite men being infected and dying at much higher rates. My biggest problem is that every argument they list hinges on the statement: Past research using time diaries has consistently s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/20 04:27 PM
3

You would think... but there's plenty of them that I'm sure hear that as less men taking up space. It's not all of them, just the one's that saw Mad Men and asked "Why not Me Too?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/20 06:47 PM
1

Not sure you understood the point of the reply
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/20 04:50 AM
3

The goal will always change. Feminism tries to paint itself like a movement by individuals; it is not a corporation, it's not an institution, it's by individuals so you can trust it. But those individuals, decades ago, built institutions, and those institutions created careers, and those careers create fields of education and training, and those fields create more jobs. It is not a movement, it has become an industry, with people whose jobs depend on inequality existing. No matter how well-meani…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/20 10:35 PM
3

I'm sure I'm not the only one who grew up with biology teachers in high school and college preaching that evolution proved men weren't necessary and evolution was going to eliminate men as if it were an evidence-based fact
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 07:02 PM
1

Feminism isn't a philosophy or even a movement, it has become an ideology
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/20 02:11 PM
3

You'd expect them to calm down their propaganda during a global health crisis, butt they see everything as a highlighter for women's issues. Look at HPV, there has been so much effort to vaccinate girls over because it can cause cervical cancer, but low and behold it can also cause cancer in the penis, the anus, and most prevalent it causes oropharyngeal cancer, which men are disproportionately affected by. I understand this was done to counter the spread because it is an STD, and help prevent c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/20 01:28 PM
7

And they'll use it as evidence of why men are evil and "violence against women" is such a pressing issue
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/20 12:07 AM
3

Agreed. By the wording, "16% more likely than men to get hired after applying to a job" They mean that they are comparing the rate of hire for a woman in response to applications vs the rate of hire for men in response to applications. In other words, that "16%" is the difference of two independent numbers. It could very well be that men take more of a shotgun approach, applying to a broader range of jobs, facing more rejection as the branch further out vs women who wait to takes their shot, but…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/20 05:10 AM
11

Feminism never would have succeeded if society truly hated women the way, or to the extent, they claim. Women are a part of society, it's pretty insane to think so many things in our society, especially in the social sphere, are oppressive to women when women are at least half of society. Not to mention women in most western civilizations have more social influence than men. Feminism doesn't "empower" women, it removes agency from women and empowers those who removed it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 11:54 PM
8

And I feel like that is a level that public discussion has not gotten to and I feel that is also enforced by the idea that men aren't allowed to be victims. If both of their allegations of abuse are true, they are both offenders and both victims, then aren't these legal battles moot? They were in a toxic, and admittedly volatile, relationship. I'm not trying to say Depp wasn't/couldn't have been abusive, or that Heard couldn't have been a victim because she was clearly an offender too. But then …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/20 01:34 AM
9

I think all they are referring to is the fact that men are predisposed to a lot of disorders like autism. Not really my field, but what I took from it was they would like to further investigate this area to better understand the mechanisms that lead to such variability as they believe that those mechanism may also play a role in vulnerability to developmental disorders or later in life mental disease, possibly even from a genetic level. It's important to note that their main conclusion is that t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/20 07:42 PM
2

I wouldn't say "man-bashing" but it does seem to belittle the idea that a man can want to stay a man. My main problem with the article is that they dismiss the concern of growing boobs as the only concern, when the actual concern is much worse and they don't address it. It is a health article written from the perspective of gender identity i.e. useless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/20 09:34 PM
5

Basically: both plants and animals have hormones, which are used by the body to signal responses/stimulate biological mechanisms. Soy contains something known as phytoestrogen, it is analogous to human estrogen, but it structurally a little different just because of different biology. This phytoestrogen does not behave exactly like estrogen in the body, it may be restricted to certain organs, but that's not too well understood. What we do know is that phytoestrogen is a human estrogen receptor a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/20 09:12 PM
1

Doesn't change the fact that it has an affect on the the body's regulatory system, it poses a health concern regardless of if you are concerned about the environment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/20 09:03 PM
1

I suppose you're right, there is a lot of focus to get women to advance ahead of men, especially in schools so boys are falling through the cracks, their issues are ignored. The school system shift in pushing girls to succeed has also increased the drugging of boys. As schools receive less and less funding, programs that benefit boys' development, maybe not deliberately for that cause, but that's where the consequences lie. There is also the issue of boys maturing slower than girls, so they are …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/20 02:54 PM
3

Very true, I just feel like the movement takes advantage of the vulnerable state of when they have been a victim. A victim is way more vulnerable to being victimized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/20 01:20 AM
3

I completely agree, I feel feminism is more detrimental to women than helpful because it cultivates fearfulness and only encourages you if you are a victim, regardless of anybody's actual intention. They know there is strength in numbers, and you keep numbers through dependence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/20 12:43 AM
6

Exactly, I've had straight friends who act way gayer than me, but only when there weren't women around. And they're fine expressing feeling to each other or talking about hard things, but not around women, because that's where they get teased and it can no longer be a serious relationship between men, now it's a "bromance" and it's subject to everybody's opinion. I know it's anecdotal, but honestly I've seen way more reinforcement of gender roles from women than men, and way more conflicts comin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/20 12:40 AM
6

I think by ideologically blinded, he means are they taught to be scared of men, or to feel they can't learn around men because they systematically disadvantaged. I will refer to my experience in minority-oriented STEM programs in college; a large part of introductions to these programs emphasize how you as an individual are so disadvantaged that no matter how smart you are, or how hard you work, you will fall behind in the real world because the majority is actively working against you. They cul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/20 12:22 AM
16

Personally, I think there is a huge feedback loop. There is a lot of focus on boys holding girls back in school, not because boys are dumber, but because school systems have changed to benefit the way girls learn over boys, classifying the as "disruptive" or "on the spectrum", but when 70% of the male population is "on the spectrum" that sounds more like a trait that has been classified as a medical disorder. In addition our society is completely okay misandry, look at representations of men in …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/20 11:56 PM
7

As a gay man, I can just say that seeing friends in relationship with women, their relationships seem very one-sided. They're nice women, smart, but there's so much more walking on egg shells for the guys. Men are expected to only confide in their partner, but it's expected that women have a support network. That's just anecdotal though. I feel i have it much better because the emotional burden of the relationship is spread more equally, and there aren't expectations to disappoint around every c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/20 02:14 AM
1

That is definitely a possibility, however you just as often form echo chambers online, Reddit is better about it, but that's the whole idea around having unique subs that cater to whatever you like. You're trying to define globally what emerges locally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/20 03:40 PM
1

I don't believe that's something anybody actually learns from reddit. What masculinity is grows from communities, from the people you interact with, from the men you observe, and learn from. That is why different cultures have different concepts of masculinity, as well as concepts of female/male gender roles. I'm not shitting on discussion, discussion is how you understand that concept of masculinity, but I think that becomes incredibly irrelevant when it's done from behind a computer screen, be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/20 05:31 AM
3

I really like how you put that. I don't think "masculinity" is a defined concept or idea, it's the journey. It's not something you have or don't have, it's the experience and how you assemble your virtues. Trying to define it as "all inclusive" just lowers the bar across the board and eliminates that personal liberty to choose what kind of man you are, to learn from your experiences. I believe the problem is less that it doesn't have a good definition, and more that when it is defined it is base…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/20 01:48 AM
2

I think the whole problem is with trying to define it, then deconstruct it. Nobody has the same definition of masculinity, because it isn't a definite concept. It's something that is taught, and experienced, and compiled. It doesn't need to be homogeneous or discrete. The things pointed out as toxic masculinity aren't bad male traits, they're traits, and extreme examples, of bad human behavior. We don't need some unified idea to tell us how to behave, everybody just needs to work on being less o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/20 01:25 AM
1

Had to scroll too far for this comment
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/20 11:20 PM
11

Right? In theory it is a good idea, but they use their words as weapons. Language, especially legal language, is a powerful tool. Equality requires that explicit protections for one group entitle the other to the same protections as well, and there is literally no downside to equality by creating the same protections for everybody. Feminist doctrine time and time again works against that. Bills like this are not about equality, they're about quenching a vindictive thirst and codifying inequality…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/20 08:07 PM
10

You can hardly call it a blind spot when they try to ignore it and actively dismiss male issues as sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/20 07:59 PM
12

Men and boys in recent years are falling behind in the workforce and in school. Fuck them. They lack the skills and education to work "modern" jobs. What a bunch of assholes. Now where are women supposed to find a suitable husband. How inconsiderate of men. Don't you love it that in a "man's man's man's world" the majority of the impoverished and left behind are men... and that's entirely their fault. It's not a matter of equality, it's a matter of equality with the top 10%.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/19 02:12 PM
13

The government had a plan in place with a timetable, then reevaluated it and moved it up. People affected by that change should be entitled to some sort of planning assistance because they had planned to not be working by 2020, but as of 2018 still have to work. But what is the injustice if they have to continue working like men, earning money and contributing to their pension? The argument that all women paid in so all women should get a payout is invalid. They will still get their money, just …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/19 04:36 PM
1

I feel that low effort posts tend to be more inflammatory ones, I'd favor taking those down. Seems like they're posted out of anger than rather than reasoning and real justification. You need to explain what you saw rather than linking to a provocative article.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/19 12:11 AM
3

Definitely a flawed strategy, but as certain politicians have shown over the last few years, even a flawed strategy works in a race to the top if you have an audience willing to ignore facts. When a women complains about being held back or restricted by the "patriarchy," but if a man tries to explain how being male isn't all rose-tinted, or how other men shit on men, then it either doesn't exist or "we asked for this. I think it is hilarious how similar feminism is to Trump's administration, not…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/19 11:41 PM
5

Literally anybody, you do it, I do it, groups do it, individuals do. Let me break it down for you. People use words Words have meaning Many words have the same meaning, with different connotations You choose specific words for specific connotations Many groups, from activists to marketing departments, are aware of this They use words and double-standards to convey their message over that of their competitor/general antagonist Some claims may be true, some may be false, or everywhere in between, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/19 09:27 PM
10

Dude, take it easy. You're simplifying things down to "better/worse off." All this thread is illustrating is that groups choose their language to reflect the best of them, and when they're against another group, they will reflect the worst of the other group. You're making some leaps.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/19 08:44 PM
7

I agree, it's the way "mansplaining" was a hot topic for a while. It's just being condescending, it isn't specific to men, it's condescension and women can do it too. Language is a powerful thing, the words you use and hear greatly influence the way you think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/19 08:36 PM
1

Both sides in a deal usually have some sort of input, negotiations are like poker and both sides are trying to run off with the pot. Plenty of psychological science has shown women to take the safer bet, while men will make bigger risks for bigger rewards. I'd believe it if both men and women thought they chose the better deal until they heard the other. Still one side isn't suing over making less.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 12:53 AM
1

I like what Aaod says in reply to another comment; A lot of enlightenment think came from male thinkers, much of which benefited women and laid the ground work for feminism, women's rights, and human rights in general. I don't think men are responsible for women's rights, but the feminist movement acts like all men currently, and always have, made a coordinated effort to stifle women. It is not a gender issue, it is a corruption issue. Equality is about equality with all 100%, not just with the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 12:38 AM
1

What I'm confused about though is... say I and another person are starting equivalent positions at a company, both going into separate salary negotiations. If I were to just take their first offer, whereas the other person negotiated a higher pay rate or some additional benefits, I'd be a chump, but that'd be on me right? So if both teams went into separate private negotiation and accepted different offers, what is the legal basis for suing over that? Is that even how those deals work? Either wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 12:25 AM
5

I think the problem is that you are looking at the problem from the start as men only produce bad and women only produce good. If you want to assume that men are responsible for the shape of society, then that includes the good and the bad. That's a conflict. If you take the other, that men are responsible for bad, and women for good, that conflicts with the narrative that women have been oppressed and powerless for nearly all of history. In truth, there have been good men with influence and bad…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/19 05:26 PM
1

Can somebody explain why there is a lawsuit if the pay structures are a result of separate collective bargaining agreements? Shouldn't that an issue among the players themselves/bargaining representatives rather than a legal dispute?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/19 02:52 PM
4

I think it's wrong to call shame an epidemic, but the whole "woke" online shame is definitely an issue. Shame can be a useful tool in a culture, but when you're not interacting face to face, or you're doing it as some competition, you can't gain anything but a self-absorbed sense of satisfaction. Shame is a huge part of Catholicism, but publicly deriding and humiliating a person is not. At least when it's in person you feel the shame to tell the person privately or be constructive, rather than a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/19 01:19 AM
12

I love: " We can think of no motivation for you to touch the victim other than sexual. " That is some gross logic. Can I sue for every time a girls touched me to show interest and made me uncomfortable? Can I assume that I had I not pulled away, they would have grabbed my crotch? No, because that's not the kind of system we live in. Feminist propaganda hurts men and makes women weak. It treats innocent boys as if they were truly monstrous men, simply because both have a dick. Then women are taug…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/19 11:24 PM
3

Look at the schools. Boys have consistently been falling behind girls in school, mostly do to changes that were implemented to help "level the playing field," studies have shown that it has helped girls in school, but they still fall behind in real world work. The trend views boys confidence as the issue here. The issue isn't the fact that girls and boys are different and learn in different ways, it isn't that girls aren't taught that same confidence growing up. Hell, it isn't even an issue of s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 08:27 PM
2

More upvotes to this. If there was any want for real equality, there would be femininity and masculinity, not just feminism and toxic masculinity. Can you imagine the outcry if any male group exclaimed the same reassurances feminist do. There would be riots if men started "embracing their inner god" but as long as what's inside you isn't male you can say anything you want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 08:12 PM
0

I found loophole, men! Get a boyfriend instead, I did and relationships are actually enjoyable! But in all seriousness, straight relationships are terribly one side. There's a lot of talk about how relationships are not transactions and expectations are what ruins a relationship, but I feel that generally the side that tends to argue that, also tends to benefit. Men and women, are just very different in general. On an individual basis we may share a lot, we're all still human, but those differen…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 07:13 PM
1

It's a teams thing. They want to act like they've transcended competition and sides, but their whole platform is very "us vs them." I used to argue that it feminism was a great example of sexism, because why would a movement that cares so much about equality, go by a gendered term, but I would just be called mysoginistic for saying anything. Feminism is about advocating for women in every space, I'm not saying anybody can't, but you can't be feminist and claim you only care about equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/19 04:24 PM
3

I agree with it for the most part, but I feel like the second half is saying, lets change the norm meaning for words so we define what we want by words that state the status quo. (I don't thinks that's necessarily what she means, but there's a vagueness) But I get what you mean. Feminist should not just be a glorifilying title. Another commentor said social justice types are often just bigots on the "right" side of history, and I entirely agree. I feel like they have taken the same course with t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/19 04:02 PM
8

I was afraid that's what this article was going to say, because why would gender equality laws apply to women too?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/19 07:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter