TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

luxury_banana Archive

View 13 posts and 1,976 comments by luxury_banana on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
44

luxury_banana/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:13 PM
20

luxury_banana/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:23 PM
16

luxury_banana/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:18 PM
12

False Accusationsluxury_banana/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:43 AM
11

luxury_banana/r/MensRights03/11/14 06:27 PM
9

luxury_banana/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:58 PM
7

luxury_banana/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:07 AM
7

Red Pill Theoryluxury_banana/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 12:01 AM
7

luxury_banana/r/askTRP03/08/13 03:26 PM
6

luxury_banana/r/MensRights01/08/13 10:02 PM
2

Red Pill Theoryluxury_banana/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 07:26 PM
2

luxury_banana/r/MensRights16/10/13 02:31 PM
1

luxury_banana/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:40 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,976 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

You're an SRS poster. You never had anything "to do with it." At least use a sockpuppet account like the rest of your friends before you try to concern troll in a way that lacks irony and self-awareness as you didn't address the actual point being made here: A feminist who claims she'd love to put men in concentration camps.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:57 AM
1

They gave Homolka a plea before they found out her full involvement, yes, and by the time they found out she was just as bad as Bernardo she already had the deal. That wasn't as bad of misconduct as in this case where going into trial everything was known and it was literally an open and shut case that even in the highly bureaucratic Canadian court system should have been over in just a few court dates. Should have been easy to fully show a jury her guilt with the weight of the evidence they had…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 11:33 PM
1

I guess an evolutionary idea might be that he's seen seen as displaying and using his power to "protect" women, which enhances his standing and can potentially lead to some kind of social or sexual rewards down the line.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 02:53 PM
3

You would think this would be obvious but I think you'd actually be surprised at how many are ignorant know-nothings who push their cultural values and what they've "heard." The reality is of course that cutting dicks provides, if anything, less than a 1% reduction in chance in contracting this disease. Almost nothing. If you were gambling based on those kinds of odds, you wouldn't think it worth it if you were at all sane and knew even the basics of probability. And it doesn't do anything at al…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 03:57 PM
27

Not specifically MRAs but I remember when I was a kid people were saying this in regards to this highly politicized rape issue. That people need to say no when they don't want to have sex. There are good reasons for this involving the fact that rape is not like a lot of other crimes --a completely consensual act can be transmogrified into an accusation of "he raped me" via these kinds of regret cases we see like with for example the mattress girl having sex with a guy she found attractive and hi…
/r/MensRights17/06/15 01:56 PM
2

Those recent inventions existing don't somehow magically make millions of years of evolved animal instinct and aversion to promiscuous women go away. Also, the legal system as well as our standard procedures haven't exactly caught up to the reality of what DNA testing technology entails and what it can prove and how this should change law in this arena for the better. There are actually some countries like France that have put in place laws that essentially prevent men from seeking the informati…
/r/MensRights15/06/15 01:48 PM
9

That's the funny thing about this: Most of these super racist social justice women openly admit they still find white men extremely sexually attractive. It's like an anti-gay preacher or family values politician that secretly likes to suck dick.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:55 PM
4

It's an ignorant statement on her part. I doubt you can find a single culture where it happens to girls but doesn't also happen to boys.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 07:19 PM
11

You know, we have the same problem in Canada with the CBC being entirely politically biased. This is government funded media that should be neutral and impartial, but it's not.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:54 PM
1

Well she's not exactly white, more hispanic, but yes you can make the case that women, especially pretty women, don't get the death penalty or really usually much time in prison if at all for their crimes.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:29 AM
0

Yes because these kinds of things never happen in real life and the stories are all made up by MRAs (and redpillers, even cases from before either of them existed of course) along with all of the highly televised rape hoaxes and so on. UVA thing recently? MRAs were clearly behind that, if not redpillers. You are an intelligent and reasonable person.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 07:20 AM
6

See also: Professor KC Johnson who covered the Duke case extensively having a presentation about this, with the usual SJCult types heckling him.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:45 AM
43

Anita Sarkeesian is a con artist who is using boilerplate feminist belief systems which are eerily similar to dogmatic religious belief systems along with the least possible effort she can put in to make as much money as possible for herself.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:55 AM
6

Always test, no exceptions.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 04:47 PM
6

So in other words your feminist coworker thinks men can read minds.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:12 PM
1

I don't think it's largely so, but probably is in some way so. The "prison gay" phenomenon is a pretty convincing piece of evidence for this.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 06:02 PM
14

What a ridiculous way to try to game the system. That aside, they look nothing alike except for being white women with long blonde hair.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:08 PM
1

That was the joke.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:25 AM
5

When you see the kind of views she was shouting accepted as normal in those parts of academia, I have to agree. I can't just buy it that she's "ill." This seems to be bog standard humanities belief systems with a bit of alcohol behind it.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:35 AM
3

I'm really surprised this is a sociology professor.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:33 AM
6

Easy: It's not science, it's sociology.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:33 AM
5

It absolutely supports the OP of this comment chain's claim. Women are extremely biased towards women, while men are almost as biased towards women as women are. In the real world this translates to men (including powerful men) doing all they can to make sure women get this and that, while men who aren't in good positions in life are left to rot. And since women care even less than that for men who aren't useful or physically attractive to them, well, things would undoubtedly be even worse for t…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:29 AM
19

A lot of people agree but the entire point is the legal double standard. Men have the book thrown at them in cases like this.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:46 AM
5

It is absolutely appropriate to call it mutilation as it removes function and sensation permanently, but if you're a consenting adult and you choose to have it done then it's your life. Unfortunately it seems very few get that choice. I sure as hell didn't.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:22 AM
11

So you were taken out of your place of work, thrown in a cage for at least a few hours, then interrogated. Based on nothing but an accusation with zero evidence to back it up. It's kind of weird that this is standard operating procedure and that those who create these policies see nothing wrong with this, don't you think?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:58 PM
3

Well as we all know thanks to decades of being told so, only white males do bad things in this world. The campaign video is just reflecting this. And of course because the actual act of rape is pretty rare in Canada they need to shore up those numbers by jamming as many things as possible under the sexual assault umbrella term and then through language games trying to conflate the myriad of things that no normal person would agree is rape with rape itself. It also brings back this urban myth of …
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:57 AM
4

Well it is a rather expensive piece of propaganda. Over CAD$40 million of taxpayer money.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:43 AM
16

Maybe she hasn't considered that in 1983 women like her already had it better than everyone else, still do really. She was able to make hundreds of millions of dollars making shitty pop music, mostly using sex appeal when she was younger. How many guys do you think can trade on sex appeal? Not very many, though shockingly enough in her profession some can--see the boyband phenomenon as a good example. If she were a man her career would have been over a long time ago, maybe never even would have …
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:25 AM
2

Pretty simple here: It's not worth taking a gigantic gamble with your life where you have a good chance of it being completely fucked up by the family law system. Also with what we know today, passing your last name on is less important than, say, confirming you've actually passed on your genes at all. In the times when passing on your family name was important there was no way to actually confirm this for a man, so the custom made a lot more sense. This has changed.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 02:57 AM
2

So what you're saying is that you read Futrelle and other propaganda and took it at face value until you actually looked into what real people talking about these issues are saying. I guess Edward Bernays was right.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 12:10 AM
3

How many people even use that term properly anymore and how much social weight does it carry.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 08:17 PM
7

Good news: The same "study" says you're also sexist if you don't.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 07:34 PM
1

You don't even need to go that far. Just ask yourself why he has such a large audience of girls in the first place.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:14 AM
1

The whole story of Zyzz's resonates with a lot of guys because we've had the exact same kind of experience. We were young, relatively ignored and sexually invisible until we started getting into really good shape. He took it to extremes by using steroids but the point still stands.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:01 PM
2

I get the idea that most of those competitive bodybuilder guys are just doing that for the competition's sake. It still destroys their bodies all the same but for the most part, they aren't doing it for some body image issue. It's that the entire "sport" is fucked up to the point where the winners are those who can best abuse their bodies with all of these drugs while exercising far more than they should be and probably not eating as healthy as they should to achieve that space gorilla look that…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 05:19 PM
2

I think Zyzz was a better and more realistic example.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 12:35 PM
1

Who could have predicted this kind of outcome given current law practices related to marriage that have been ongoing for the entire lifetime of that demographic totally screwing over men. It's almost like you don't need a crystal ball to see that future.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 01:05 AM
15

It's amazing to me that we'd like to think we're in a highly civilized country (this really applies in all first world countries) when all it takes to send an innocent man to prison is a little bit of theatrics and tugging on the jury's heartstrings with a bunch of emotional appeal rather than hard facts and evidence.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:46 PM
10

It wasn't her political views. It was her actions.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:44 AM
9

You know what's funny is that according to the propaganda of local feminists in her own country, somehow the men in her own country are just as bad too. Well, there's no actual evidence showing that of course but that's about the level of proof she's going on when condemning some guy from India.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:43 AM
11

No no, it gets worse. She wrote a book talking about how she finds underaged boys sexy and thinks that grown-ass old women like her should be able to fuck them.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:04 PM
7

Earlier generations tried.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 06:04 PM
0

How does she know he wouldn't take no for an answer? According to what we know from the article, it seems that the word no was never uttered. As such, a lot of assumptions are being made here, mostly by you. Your rhetoric mirrors that of feminists when it comes to this issue. They say that a woman can't just say no because of assumptions of fear because all men are clearly violent and will react violently if rejected. This is where their insane "enthusiastic consent" arguments and other such dri…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:47 PM
0

A gun being pointed at you is a clear, unambiguous and imminent threat. Being near a man is not.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:32 PM
0

I think someone pointing a gun at you even it isn't loaded and you can't know that is a completely different scenario to the "he's a man and he's stronger than me therefore I'm scared just because" feminist modes of thought. Your argument is very disingenuous.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:27 PM
0

You are clearly an irrational person and I feel like I'm conversing with an animal here, honestly. Good day.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:25 PM
0

Your normal is to give the woman's word more value than the man's in what is a he-said, she-said scenario with no clear and convincing evidence either way, when neither should be given more weight. You lack even the pretense of any impartiality. At the very least, you would be willing to throw someone in prison based on a sort of 50/50 chance that they may have done it. A coin toss for someone's life. Which is kind of what the kangaroo courts in colleges are now doing to handle claims of sexual …
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:20 PM
0

None of that is clear and convincing evidence. Lying to her and then bragging about what very well may have been consensual sex to a friend via text is not very convincing evidence. One might say that he's a bit shady for lying it much in the way a guy lying about being rich or having connections or whatnot is, but it's not very good evidence of any wrongdoing. The texts are so ambiguous that they are also not clear and convincing evidence of any wrongdoing. So for all we know, he may not have d…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:12 PM
0

There's no clear and convincing evidence that this guy is a predator, either. Lying in order to try to get into a girl's pants is not evidence that someone is a violent rapist. Your bias is showing.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 10:03 PM
0

Is this real life? Is this real life. People tend to say "took virginity" all of the time often even when they aren't rapists, men and women alike. It's how that figure of speech works. You're really reaching here. The "gross" aspect given the girl being a virgin can also likely be referring to blood from the torn hymen. That is something that happens normally even when there's no rape going on. There is nothing convincing in the texts. Also, a guilty plea doesn't necessarily mean he did it. Did…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:58 PM
0

You are an emotion-junkie who's all-to-ready to accept the claim and read into it only what you want to hear. Let me quote this for you, from the article, emphasis mine: "I honestly have zero recollection of calling you ... Was a sick night – took a chick's virginity." His friend replied: "bahahahaha nice popping does cherries ..." Lazarus replied: "... it's a prety gross story tell ya later". Now you can take "gross" to mean he raped her but that is a very large leap in logic given the first te…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:54 PM
0

No, his texts afterwards come across like a bro-like stereotype of bragging about getting laid. There is nothing in those text messages which lend any credence to a claim of rape. You have no sense of what makes modern civilized countries work or even justice whatsoever it seems. If you lived in a third world country like India I'm sure you'd be the type who'd engage in the lynch mobs that have been happening recently.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:49 PM
0

We don't tend to base law on something as subjective as someone's personal point of view. According to a whole lot of feminists it's completely reasonable to treat all men as potential rapists and be afraid of them in a way similar to how some racists say it is to think of blacks or whatever other group they don't like. Is that a legitimate train of thought, too? If not, why not. You seem to be supporting a similar mode of thought, here.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:43 PM
0

No, it's not evidence of any such thing at all. You could say it's slimy because he's being dishonest but there's no real link to rape there. Like I said, you're only a few steps removed from the most extreme feminists. Pretty chilling stuff in this sub recently.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:40 PM
1

Him lying is not evidence of him committing a rape any more than a Palestinian man lying about being Jewish is. See: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/jul/21/arab-guilty-rape-consensual-sex-jew Feminists are actually trying to pervert the law in this way,
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:34 PM
0

First of all, people lie in real relationships not involving rape quite often. If you're one of those people who think that we should be imprisoning men because they misrepresent themselves as rich or as a certain religion or whatever, then you're a lost cause and I shouldn't even be wasting my time here. Secondly someone asking you for your wallet is quite far removed this scenario which involved sex and very well could have been consensual. Things are a lot more ambiguous when it comes to matt…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:22 PM
-3

I don't buy it. Being "fearful of what he may do" when no explicit threat was present isn't evidence. There's a reason why at the very least saying no in these situations is important. If I were on that jury I would not convict on this alone. I'd need something more convincing.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 08:52 PM
4

An insane Swedish feminist is somehow lamenting that people shaving their pubic hair is cutting down on cases of crab lice, a parasite.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 05:15 PM
16

It is improper to call someone a victim before facts have been established, but as we all know in their world accusation is as good as established guilt.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 02:18 PM
5

This sub has plenty of voting brigades constantly shitting in it so I wouldn't pay attention to votes for the most part, but it doesn't matter if you hold yourself to the same standard on this one because women and men find different things attractive. Men tend to instinctively find such such women less attractive because of obvious biological reasons related to reproduction. Women on the other hand for the most part don't seem to mind a guy who can get laid a ton unless it's really over the top…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 09:15 AM
3

Comments AND ratings disabled. Taking a note from the Anita Sarkeesian playbook there.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:38 PM
0

What does "conservative" or "right wing" even mean in this context. With politics like this I get the idea that it means slightly further right than an opposition of a sort of completely insane crypto-communist true believer party which conveniently forgets much of 20th century in Europe's history while it claims that communism like just hasn't been tried right yet, maaaan.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 08:22 PM
7

Paternity testing (which isn't as widely and easily available as you may think, especially if you live in a shithole like France that has it outlawed outside of a court order) and contraceptives or whatever new invention that someone imagines will be able to dispense with what we refer to as traditional sexual mores aren't some kind of magic that is going to somehow override millions of years of evolved instinct, even if that instinct isn't always 100% rational. Even if the laws weren't so stack…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:20 PM
2

Apparently he didn't even have sex with her but even if he did, 18 and 15 isn't a huge difference and wouldn't make him a pedophile. The legal system is a fucking joke when it comes to handling things like this, but only when boys and young men are caught in its machinery. There was an example a year or two ago of a girl being charged for being 18 and having sex with a 14 year old and of course most of the same people who are calling this guy a pedophile were all about dropping the charges for h…
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:13 PM
33

Is anyone at all surprised at this doublespeak? These quotas are just a clamor for free goodies for whatever designated "victim" in-groups are under the umbrella of the Orwellian-named "progressive" parties that push them. It's kind of like when men in the US started to use Title IX and we'd see people involved in the legal process or high places university saying extremely stupid but telling things like "it was never meant for men to use this!"
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:57 PM
1

Openly? No one's going to because at this point in time the chokehold on the mainstream media propaganda machine is still too tight. It's still political and/or career suicide to go against the sacred cows of the very dominant narrative.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:51 PM
2

I haven't seen conclusive proof that a society with lots of single men who can't find a sexual partner is worse off but this argument has been made before. See the middle-east. Polygamy and the application of the "72 virgins" propaganda in the local religion, how those work together. The whole thing goes a long way to help create young men who will be much more likely to be able to be recruited by the likes of what we call terrorist organizations.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:34 PM
24

The primary motivator isn't even diseases. It's that a woman who sleeps around or has slept around (past behavior is the best predictor of future peformance) is a poor choice for anything serious due to very real and serious instinctual paternity concerns. Men don't want a woman they invest into--and are expected to take care of, often forced to under our legal systems--having sex with other men for good reasons. Your male ancestors didn't pass their genes on leading up to you by investing into …
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:28 PM
19

Incidents like this tend to put the lie to all of this propaganda we hear about countries like India being some "bad patriarchal country"--it's really just a third world country where you can be sure a lot of highly uncivilized things like this are probably going to take place. It does show that white knighting and the "protect the women" mentality is an ingrained instinctual universal that is often taken advantage of in some really horrifying ways.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:20 PM
2

He's also some weird spineless cuckold who airs his sex life out on twitter and then wonders why people made fun of him.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:32 AM
3

More exposure for the average person to the hypocritical, tribalistic and Orwellian "social justice" milieu which will result in more researching it and coming to similar conclusions about it.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:39 AM
15

If they didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:34 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartier_v_Chartier This is where the precedent was set.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 07:59 AM
5

Or Scott Peterson, or Ted Bundy, or that idiot with the face and neck tattoos last year who was in for armed robbery or something but was showing up on all of those news sites because they thought he was like soooo hot.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:06 PM
14

Plenty of people have observed the fact that most men are sexually invisible. Just not the kinds of people who peddle feminist myths.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:04 PM
7

Well no shit. You only tend to see guys say those kinds of things when the woman is herself being offensive in rejecting, but of course only the guy is made out to be bad in those cases for responding in kind.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:03 PM
2

Yes, the system can and will compel as many men to pay as a woman and her lawyer(s) will be able to game the system for.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:54 PM
5

You're describing what neoreactionaries -- see /r/darkenlightenment -- call "The Cathedral."
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:43 PM
12

That's true but this scenario itself isn't specifically about paternity if you'd read the post above mine. A woman with a child can enter into a relationship with a man and after X amount of time has passed can then abuse the system to make that man pay child support. In Canada she can do this multiple times to multiple men and collect more money.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:34 PM
13

The only reason it would "stir shit up" is if the man found out he's not the father. Then he would have good cause to visit a court of law and sort it out, where he'll have to take another DNA test because only those that follow a strict chain of evidence are admissible in court. If he was the father, then he'd have peace of mind and there'd be no need to "stir shit up." Look, let's be real here. Brass tacks. You know as well as I do who's in the position of power when it comes to this entire sc…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:45 PM
18

Why should you need to go through the court to acquire such information when the information itself holds no legal weight without taking any legal action? This is some serious Orwellian doublespeak here. You seem to think it's ok that the system it setup in such a way as to lower the chances of defrauded men being able to make informed decisions about their life without using some kind of nuclear option.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:27 PM
20

Taking the test by itself isn't something that has any legal weight. You have to take the results of that test to a court of law and settle it there if it turns out the man isn't the father. Preventing a man from gaining this information with which to base a decision on to begin with is shady as fuck.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:18 PM
15

You don't have to date a single mother for that scenario to happen. All you have to do is be duped by a woman into thinking a child she gives birth to is yours.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:14 PM
14

The scenario you outline is already the case in Canada and there is no limit to the number of payors a woman can rack up. That is, she can have multiple guys on the hook if she's that much of a scum fuck to take advantage of the system intentionally.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:12 PM
1

It was cooked up by people who are part of such a pampered class that this is one of the worst things they experience in their day-to-day lives. The best part being that most of them probably take up seats with their bags, making them gigantic hypocrites.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:41 AM
14

No, underaged you probably would have thought she was weird as fuck and declined. That's what I thought when I was in this kind of situation when I was that age. You're probably just forgetting what it was like to be that age, your frame of mind and what you thought of women much older than you back then. You were probably interested in girls around your own age but not some 30-something year old woman.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:51 PM
19

Pierce have you watched this video? In 10 hours, that is all she could find. A few guys saying hi, a few complimenting her. One guy apparently followed her for 5 mins after his approach but no idea whether he was just headed that way or what. Given that she never TALKS to any of them or says anything. One hit on her and went full self-deprecation about being ugly. That was it. 10 hours and that was all she could find. 10 HOURS. And yet we're supposed to believe this is some massive problem causi…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:21 PM
3

There is a much longer book in which the author (Roy Baumeister) covers these topics more in-depth. Is There Anything Good About Men?: How Cultures Flourish by Exploiting Men Other good reads which are related include The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature by Matt Ridley, and Richard Dawkins' The Selfish Gene.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:51 PM
2

So men have completely become the new Kulak under feminist/"progressive" ideology, I see.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 03:39 PM
1

You are aware your non-argument here is full of the exact same things anti-abortionists said just with the sexes flipped, yes? "Oh she knew what the risks were when he had sex. Why should abortion be legal?" You do seem aware of this contradiction and are making nonsensical special pleading arguments to try to square away that cognitive dissonance it must be causing.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:44 PM
1

Well that's the popular belief, isn't it? DNA testing is showing an alarming number of cases where that isn't so. Women have the more valuable resource and are more picky, especially when it comes to sex that they are not getting any kind of longterm resource commitment from a man for. Anyone who spent much of their youth in bars, clubs or whatever will attest to this and seeing certain guys get "lucky" more often than not for obviously discernible reasons. It's the difference between what peopl…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:14 PM
11

Interesting analysis there that seems to lack any empathy whatsoever for the male experience. There is a good chance that a guy approaching you in that way does find you attractive, even if he is playing the numbers game. You see if you are a man and you are not a Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Johnny Depp, Ryan Gosling etc. kind of guy, it's not as simple as just waiting around and picking the best of the offers you find like a woman does. As an ordinary, mere-mortal man, you will be rejected and y…
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:30 PM
15

Something you should find interesting is that the very same people saying this shit are the ones who claim to be "against gender roles." What you're really witnessing is manipulation with the end goal of attaining power.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 06:31 AM
1

How did the Church of Scientology get any traction. How do other unfalsifiable and faith-based beliefs get any traction? How did other bullshit delusions like the repressed memories molestation crap from what, the 80s? get any traction. You seem to be suggesting that just because a lot of people believe something is true that it somehow must be, in the absence of any kind of actual evidence supporting that belief and in the case of feminist rape culture, myriad of evidence which shows it to be a…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:16 AM
3

So people who don't like what he has to say can "hit the close tab button" but the likes of Anita Sarkeesian somehow cannot.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 03:36 AM
2

It's real, there are people who hate women... but just about every time you see the term invoked it's complete bullshit. Such as in your example. Real examples? Fucked up killers like Ted Bundy or Elliot Rodger, though the latter seemed to hate just about everyone.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:01 PM
1

They don't but when it comes what is colloquially termed "the sexual marketplace" they are the buyers in a buyers market.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:45 AM
1

They definitely do. That's just a function of money.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:43 AM
7

The video reply feature was canned some time ago. Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 02:07 AM
1

FYI male attractiveness is also huge in being hired, especially given how much of the hiring process is in women's hands.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 01:06 AM
2

People who don't have problems aren't likely to post there so you're probably far more likely to see nightmare scenarios like this one.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 12:02 PM
2

That's right. We don't actually know the exact rate. The 25-33% on very large sample sizes is on tests taken for a variety of reasons: court ordered, man wanting to know, woman wanting to know, immigration-related. It could be lower. Could be higher. It's the only real empirical data that exists, however, and a lot of "estimates" are based around it. I'd accept somewhere between 10 and 16% as being representative of the entire population, though. This is generally what experts who have no ideolo…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 12:31 AM
2

You see this kind of thing every time a woman who isn't fat does something like this. That "fitness mom" from a while back made the same whales even more mad. That aside, even if she were really thin that's still kind of odd. Is she really short and/or her 4 year old really big for her age? 4 year olds are typically what, between 3-4 feet tall at most?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 06:30 PM
1

Excommunicating those heretics, I see.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:03 PM
1

The irony here being of course that the guy who runs the blog they're commenting on is even more unattractive than Dean Esmay is, and yet they're not claiming that means anything.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 08:13 AM
13

So now the feminist definition of rape has been expanded to include sex with "beta" men they aren't attracted to but are deceptively sponging off of. Nice.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 01:26 AM
3

This is a 4chan troll but if you google "fucking while feminist" you can find the words of a whale who echoes the same sentiment.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 04:31 PM
-1

You are shifting the goalposts now because you have no argument left. Go away.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:55 AM
-1

A past of promiscuity means high number of past sexual partners. This in turn means a higher risk factor for very bad things. Divorce risk, baby not being yours, so on. It's a pretty rational choice to be averse to committing to someone with such a past.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 07:31 AM
0

It's a definitely significant risk factor. Nice emotional kneejerk, though.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 06:53 AM
0

Actual "slut shaming" is mostly done by women as a way to make them seem like they're the better choice. It's a form of intra-sexual competition. For a man, a promiscuous women is rightly seen as seen as less or not worthy as commitment for good reason. It's called human biology and the mechanics of reproduction. Those men who did not take care when it came to these matters tended to have their genes die out. No amount of new agey religions or cries of "slut shaming" will change any of this.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:30 AM
21

We followed this over in SRSsucks. Luckily, he got out before any serious damage was done to his life.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:26 PM
3

It's not been "culturally accepted" for anyone to play video games, especially not competitively or professionally. They used to be thought of, until quite recently, as "gay shit for nerds" or "children's toys." Pro gaming was, and still is, a pipe dream. Only the big winners make off with any kind of actual money. "eSports" are not like real sports where all of the "athletes" can make a living off of it. No one is "encouraged" to do it. Opening up the male tournament to all but keeping a female…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 10:28 AM
3

Well how are you going to steal money from a man that way?
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:27 AM
3

You seem to not be familiar at all with the Hitman series. There have been plenty of missions they've made in these games that have been dark and gritty in setting like that, and yes, some of them have been seedy nightclubs or otherwise bizarre places with a sexual theme. It's not designed for small children. Another one I can think of (from the 3rd game I believe) had some deranged butcher who killed some missing girl you were sent to find (and other people) and guys in gimp suits in an attache…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:22 AM
14

You'll notice this in a lot of these news articles. The liar is referred to as "victim." Not false accuser, not even ALLEGED victim.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:58 PM
6

This hoax was repackaged again? This time with FIFA soccer then. Google "superbowl domestic violence hoax" and see it isn't new at all. Another spin on this is the sex trafficking hoax, again associated with sports events like the superbowl. Again you can easily google that as well.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:09 AM
15

Sounds like Futrelle just doesn't want yet more videos like from every other event continuing to show a clear pattern that reality is the opposite of what he claims. I'm sure it'll happen anyway, though.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:44 AM
5

In most places, female circumcision is done to deter the female in engaging in sexual relations, because it hurts a lot, this doesn't happen with males. The Jewish philosopher Maimonides said otherwise about 800 years ago. So did 18-19th century quack doctors like John Harvey Kellogg. Cool cultural imperialism and kneejerk reaction, though.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:09 AM
7

Also because for practical reasons it was done for the same reason that quack 18th-19th century doctors pushed it. The Jewish philosopher Maimonides even said so about 800 years ago: Similarly with regard to circumcision, one of the reasons for it is, in my opinion, the wish to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible. It has been thought that circumcision perfects w…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 12:05 AM
6

The sex trafficking thing was exposed as a hoax, much like the superbowl domestic violence hoax.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:26 AM
1

What logical fallacy may there be here. I'm not sure. I'm just stating facts. You can improve but there's only so much a guy that looks like, say, George from Seinfeld can improve. He's not a genetic lottery winner and he's never going to be in that top, most desired percentage no matter what he does. I never said you shouldn't improve. I'm just saying be realistic.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 08:50 PM
1

The whole genetic lottery angle is way underplayed in this sub. That's the way male psychology is, though. We see something broken or not working, we want to fix it, be able to fix it, or at least believe we can fix it. We want to think it's all a meritocracy even when it's clear for this specifically that it is not. You could call it a form of rationalizing because, well, that's what it is. For a whole lot of men though there is no "breaking into" that small demographic. No amount of working ou…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 11:24 AM
15

Why on earth do you think that would be important? When I began commenting and blogging, I made it clear to everyone that I'm a woman, but no one knew what I looked like. They still (most of them, can't speak for all) respected my opinions and arguments. I'm not dating my subscribers, so why would they care what I look like? What a dismal view to take of men that you'd believe men in a movement about equality and fairness, no less would care more about how a woman looks than the words coming out…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:05 PM
5

There's only an elevated risk for a UTI in what, the first 2 years of your life? And even if you get one it can be treated with antibiotics like any other.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 01:32 PM
4

You could game the system by pretending to be bisexual.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 02:19 PM
0

Negative exposure from the kinds of people who looked for the tiniest scrap to propagandize against the meekest seeming guys like Warren Farrell in the first place, sure.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:31 AM
1

That's fine and all, but it didn't solve the problem he still obviously cares a lot about.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 01:45 AM
2

Again the problem is for this guy he's just rationalizing his lack of success away. You don't have to want to be the "1950s TV dad" caricature to realize what works and doesn't work when it comes to getting sex, a pretty basic human desire. It has fuck all to do with "traditional masculinity." This guy wanted it so bad but never looked at what women did rather than what they said, which would have led him to spend some time in the gym losing weight rather than cry about his sparkling personality…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:13 PM
1

Maybe you should read his article also where he described in detail how awful he felt and if you can read between the lines obviously still does about it. He's rationalizing this hard. This guy is just playing for brownie points and to make himself feel better about things.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 07:04 PM
-2

Here's the problem: The guy in the article doesn't look like he "works on improving himself." He looks like he just gave up and is post-facto rationlizing all of this. He has no chin.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:53 AM
22

http://oecdbetterlifeindex.com It seems that on virtually every measurable metric on quality of life, in almost every country indexed, you are wrong. You can makeup weird doublethink attempts to rationalize it like "it's really misogyny!" or "toxic masculinity!" but it doesn't mesh with the facts.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:22 PM
5

When women say they want these qualities in a man, what they mean is that they want those qualities in a man they are already attracted to. In other words they are tertiary, and unfortunately a lot of them are contradictory as well, or are contextual mind-reading type shit.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 10:39 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pGLNeov2VM - Original Estrogen Based Parasites video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqPL9B_nc8I - First criticism. First section of this to 25 mins in is more "criticism": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUeVmM37TwI (It's a caller, a woman not making any arguments and talking about how Stefan made her feel by saying things) Bonus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2P3qknUN4k Here's a show where a woman who cheated on the guy she's supposed to be marrying with a g…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 02:49 PM
2

"The Patriarchy" sure seems to do a lot of conflicting and contradictory things, doesn't it? That's because it's an amorphous bogeyman, a conspiracy theory of sorts.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:52 AM
3

So he has a bowlcut, his face looks like one of those stereotypical "gray" aliens and he looks like he weighs 90 pounds. Suddenly the rationalizations in the article make sense. Is this real life?
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 05:01 PM
4

No he didn't even post it on a PUA forum. It was on a forum that thinks all PUA shit is utterly bogus. Do you see how tenuous the link they're trying to create is now?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 07:46 PM
1

A better question is are they really that different. It seems like a very delusional, an almost religious belief to think we don't play by much the same rules as animals.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:03 PM
5

That pill wasn't safe, from what I know. But you're right that feminists did protest it. RISUG or Vasalgel which are shots in your vas deferens that are fully reversible and last years may be on the horizon, though.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 07:14 PM
3

Tom Leykis definitely did talk about putting hot sauce in condoms on his radio show. Whether this story as a result of one of his listeners is true, who knows. Crazier stuff has happened as a result of his show. He had have some woman who murdered her child's father call in and confess to it, which was legit. Unfortunately she didn't go to prison for it. She got away with it.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 07:03 PM
3

How does he know he was actually fucking with her head rather than just playing a Darwinian game with a stone cold slut? At the end of the story, he mentions she got back together with the guy she cheated on him with initially. How does he know she didn't just come back to him with crocodile tears trying to sucker him into providing for her, going to the lengths of doing some minor favors for him to reel him in--maybe because he's much better off than the other guy she was caught fucking is. A c…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 04:14 AM
6

Also, even if it were true (and it's not since there's zero evidence for it) that men were "taught" this -- who is teaching them this? Who is raising them, who is most with them in their formative years teaching them all of these things feminists claim via evidence by assertion that men are "taught" to do? You're absolutely right though that those who get a lot of it thrown at them feel entitled to it. Women as a rule tend to get a lot thrown at them for obvious reasons related to evolutionary b…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 10:19 PM
65

They're looking desperately for some way, any way to ad hom their political opponents. Real life feminists are doing the same shit. Look at Rebecca Watson, Anita Sarkeesian and the long list of these feminists claiming all sorts of death and rape threats yet failing to produce much in the way of evidence.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 05:38 PM
1

I'm not saying the guy is a male model or anything but relative to the OP, probably much better looking. Probably much better than his girlfriend has been able to get. This is the most unfortunate fact that some don't like to talk about because it's anathema to male psychology. That the genetic lottery is a huge thing. That it's not a complete meritocracy. If we see something that isn't working or working as well as it could, we want to fix it. But sometimes, you can't, or at least you can't in …
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 05:02 AM
2

See this is the problem: You are not omniscient. This guy was with her for 5 years. LTRs and marriages in this day and age are for the birds.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 04:40 AM
28

But unfortunately they won't. This is someone who made up a rape claim that sent an innocent man to prison for years, scammed over a million dollars, and won't be going to prison.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 02:17 PM
30

You can't get blood out of a stone.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 01:35 PM
3

See also: Alain Soral on feminism.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:14 AM
15

The inculcated feelings test at play there. Someone said it, someone else said it. Seems to be a popular opinion, and those are never wrong... right? They feel it must be true, so it must be true.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 11:57 PM
0

At the very least, Mike Nifong should have spent a long time in prison.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 10:33 PM
1

I disagree but the law should at least be applied equally or not at all.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 09:03 PM
4

Seems to be innate enough that it's existed without any encouragement or attempts by the likes of feminist lesbians to get sex out of otherwise heterosexual women, and even exists where it's harshly punished--see what happened to Alan Turing for example.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:19 AM
11

It seems more like unscrupulous lesbians trying to score sex. You don't really choose what you're sexually attracted to.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:14 AM
8

The real reason is because of the imbalance of legal power and the moral hazard it creates. If a woman is pregnant and doesn't want it, it's legal for her to abort. The other way around? You're screwed. That's why you have a vested interest in making sure you're wearing a condom.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 04:59 PM
11

Neil Lyndon is no stranger to feminist censors and bullying. He wrote a book about feminists over 20 years ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Lyndon#Early_writings_on_feminism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Lyndon#No_More_Sex_War
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:02 PM
2

No, you fail to see that the word "curvy" has been distorted and in these days is often referring to obese and morbidly obese women. It doesn't mean what you actually think it does, that is what used to be referred to as curvy is now often claimed to be "skinny" and "unattainable." What I'm saying is that the common use of these words "skinny" and "curvy" when used to describe women's bodies have been distorted. Also these same fat acceptance feminists tend to mock guys who don't meet a physical…
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:47 PM
3

Just call it the "Zimmerman effect." They're classified white men when they do something bad, but hispanic men otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 04:40 PM
5

The OP of that thread seems to grasp dual sexual strategy pretty well. Not in-depth and technically but for someone who's probably not even acquainted with any of the science, he knocks it out of the park.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 11:17 PM
4

Some really bitter guys who get no sex at all use it as an interchangable word that essentially means the same thing.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 11:13 PM
4

He's really not, though. The OP has been running a website since the 1990s. He's an old timer around these issues. What is currently thought of as an "MRM" is only maybe 5 years old, but there were people with interest in these issues for decades who simply weren't able to get the message out by being overly nice about it and hoping those who have power would simply go along with it no matter how good the arguments were, how solid the data was. The feminists of the time were definitely shitting …
/r/MensRights09/05/14 05:47 PM
2

Probably because whites are and men are an easy acceptable target to pile hate on in today's first world countries, while women and blacks are not. It's to illustrate a point to the brainwashed majority who have been conditioned by certain political special interests to, for example, see "racism" as something only whites do, and "sexism" as something only men do. See: Language Games
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:36 PM
4

What you need to understand is all of this bleating about porn being "misogynist" and "rape training" is just flinging poo and hoping some will stick. There is no cogent argument in there. The overwhelming majority of porn isn't that Max Hardcore shit where they slap and spit on the women--and even then some of them seem to enjoy that kind of thing, if you take the massive success of "50 shades of gray" into account. Most porn seems to be 100% consensual, where they seem to be enjoying themselve…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:42 AM
2

It can work if you're not attracted to them and they don't try to impose on you by trying to get you to go way further for them by asking you to do all sorts of things than an actual friend would.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 11:54 AM
8

What Myers is engaging in is what is commonly called "liberal creationism." This idea that evolution is real but somehow magically doesn't affect humans or if it does it stops at the neck up. Myers is a believer in the well debunked blank slate, largely for political reasons. He also runs one of the biggest hugboxes on the internet.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 07:51 AM
2

You mean classical liberals, maybe? Certainly not the "progressive" totalitarians of today that would have us live under a sort of Soviet style communism if they could.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 01:15 AM
4

There are no good arguments against it that don't also apply to women's reproductive rights. This is just a case of wanting to retain the kind of power that creates moral hazard and gives the upper hand to the group with reproductive rights to the group without.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 01:10 AM
6

One could easily make the argument that the extra hours a man works and the added risk the average man takes on working in more dangerous conditions (which is why over 90% of work related deaths are male) as well as the fact that your life is irrevocably changed by added responsibilities for something that isn't your choice (cutting off your options in life) constitutes loss of bodily autonomy, as well.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 01:09 AM
9

Vasalgel/RISUG will be game changers if they're ever ok'd for use in first world countries.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 01:06 AM
10

Polygamy is actually really bad for most men. What happens in reality is that you have some men (the most physically attractive and ones with most resources) with several wives and many, many more who have no chance of doing what the vast majority of us instinctually want to do i.e. their reproductive fitness has been significantly lowered to a point where violence is almost inevitable. For better or worse evolution in many species has selected for the use of violence in such situations where a …
/r/MensRights02/05/14 11:31 AM
3

The actual definition had to do with who was the head of a family in the past for various reasons related to survival in a much harsher world, the costs of marriage and taking care of a woman and children, the paternal uncertainty and just general lopsided deal that traditional marriage was before recent laws made it completely untenable. The feminist version is a nebulous, faith-based conspiracy theory that also doubles as a way to try to explain its own inconsistencies by saying "patriarchy hu…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 08:05 AM
1

So you're saying this person has went through the indoctrination camp recently. Big surprise.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 09:00 PM
0

The fact is that you'd never know unless it turned out that it wasn't his child, then there would be problems. Everything isn't about you. The main reason I recommend it done this way is because of the exact kinds of emotional manipulation you're displaying.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 08:58 PM
3

It's quite a rarity because of id bracelets and footprinting. You see, hospitals actually take measures to make sure a woman leaves with her own baby.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:29 PM
19

This is why you don't ask. You just do. Privately. Without telling anyone else. Women are granted by biology a certainty about whether a child is theirs. Men are not. This fact alone creates sex-based behavioral differences and puts us at odds. And even if the child isn't yours, you can bet dollars to donuts that it'll summon some self-righteous fury by asking. Again, it's none of her business if you want this knowledge and the only way it will have any negative effects on her if you get a priva…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:39 AM
2

It may not fix the problems but at least you won't see any more of these real life horror stories of a man being taken for all he's got by a cheating wife.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 01:47 AM
7

The actual women (it's much smaller than a 50% share) who play big budget AAA titles like Dark Souls tend to not give a shit about idealized physically attractive characters or try to inject SJW politics into games, because they actually like video games and playing them. See comment below by /u/GizDrak
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:43 PM
4

I am sure we wouldn't see a massive increase in "where have all of the good men gone" were men to do this.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:30 AM
5

A lot of people tend to be horrible at it despite having had a lot of it--ever heard the expression "lays there like a dead fish"? This all seems funny to me that they cry about being thought a slut but also shun certain men for a perception of them not being sexually successful enough. The lack of self-awareness to do this then complain about supposed "slut/stud double standards" is amazing.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:57 PM
0

Feminists are as a rule staunchly against paternity testing to the point where several countries have laws that effectively make it harder or illegal for a man to seek one and will make arguments loaded with sophistry when presented with cases of paternity fraud, and were the ones to push for "no fault" (his fault) divorce in the first place. Don't count on that.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:52 PM
2

The only thing that even remotely makes any sense there is the preselection angle.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:47 PM
4

The guy you're responding to seems to have this idea that women don't have standards for men.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:54 PM
6

This isn't science. By what criteria do they determine this? Let me guess: just-so stories. There's literally no way to know someone will be a shitty lay or call you a slut.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:52 PM
1

Given divorce risk vs. number of prior sexual partners and how family court still allows an unfaithful woman to "take him for all he's got," and laws in too many jurisdictions refusing to catch up with the technological reality that we can now prove whether a man is a father or not, the answer is yes.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:38 PM
4

There have always been some female gamers who don't try to use the fact that they have a vagina to get special treatment from mostly sex-starved guys. Unfortunately in recent years it seems to be a smaller percentage. No one has a problem with anything but the attention whores and recently the non-gamer feminists who shriek about idealized physically attractive characters (only the female ones, of course)
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:56 AM
2

It's just a re-iteration of male sexual invisibility noted by others, really.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 12:14 AM
1

What can he even do if he's that ugly, though, other than stop orbiting and accept that bitter reality.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 12:56 AM
4

I'm more skeptical due to the timing. It was right after feminists tried and failed to suppress a men's issues group at that university. There's no motive for the attack and yet there is motive to create a hoax.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 12:15 AM
5

Pierce, I think you know these people who refuse to engage are simply flinging poo and hoping some will stick. They know they are in the wrong so won't engage, but it's all about power, political capital. So dishonest media mouthpieces sligned with such people politically play the propaganda game. They don't care about ethics, the law or even civilized behavior. I think your work is important, really. Handing it over to AVFM won't change anything. If anything it will simply add yet another lame …
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:26 PM
10

What would be far more amusing on a large scale is the kind of blood typing assignments kids used to get in some schools (their types and parents types) which were stopped because of what they were revealing.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 04:55 PM
1

I don't know how anyone can say capitalism isn't human nature as plenty of other animals display such behavior in their ways of living. I guess since scientific understanding was far more primitive at the time it's understandable that such poor conclusions were made, but believing marxist ideology today is insane. We live in a world of limited resources and scarcity and as such, conflict is inevitable. We compete for those resources, whatever they may be--financial, sexual, whatever. The tyrants…
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:59 AM
1

If you think our level of technology can be maintained and any progress can be made under a such a model, you are kidding yourself. Also, conflict resolution with other "tribes" can and will be messy, as with pre-history.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 04:02 PM
1

The problem is that all of the nice things we have today are not compatible with that way of life.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:51 PM
2

Karl Marx never worked a day in his life and the following of his ivory tower philosophy resulted in some of the worst atrocities in recorded history.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:42 PM
1

What you are describing is tribalism, the sort of environment we evolved in.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 01:39 PM
8

Exactly. It's human nature and competition for limited resources. Any system that requires a good-faith assumption that others won't do things that will completely break the system is doomed to fail. There will always be a Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot or others who will ruin it.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 12:24 AM
6

They aren't much worse than most other papers, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 09:39 PM
13

You seem to be one of "those" people who think communism just "hasn't been tried properly," and like free market true believers who forget the horrors of what happened during industrialization, you willfully ignore the communist regimes of the 20th century. Here's a clue: that shit is incompatible with human nature.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 09:24 PM
2

This doesn't have much to do with mens rights per se, but it is interesting how she gives up the game wrt dating in general with the "1 out of 1000" quote.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:01 AM
17

Only in Canada is there any significant challenge to feminist orthodoxy. That is why.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:58 AM
4

That is because it's a cult with no real factual basis. The underlying observation is that many young heterosexual men have issues finding sex partners and they make a leap to assume porn is at fault rather than young women providing harems to a small percentage of unusually attractive men, which will perforce cause a large percentage of young men to have no other option but porn. Plenty of cultural data supports this idea; whines about "good men" by middle-aged women looking for husbands who ca…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 12:21 AM
9

Yes unfortunately there are too many livelihoods of the priests, their acolytes, and the acolytes of the acolytes selling bullshit all with mouths to feed, as well as vested interests in the divorce industrial complex, family courts, the related court-appointed psychologists and a range of other financial interests that will simply not budge on this without being literally forced to by being exposed for exactly what they are on a large scale which will force action to correct the problems. The c…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:49 PM
7

I'm not an MRA, but... I've followed these issues. You could say that the current one is the "2nd wave." Before you had a complete failure that resulted from appeasement and trying to work with the feminists under the misguided notion that feminism is for/helps men too. It was the previous era in which books like Warren Farrell's "The Myth of Male Power" and his other books about men were written, among others. He was called a "sellout" for writing these by angry feminists despite having reporte…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 09:38 PM
0

No it's a real disadvantage--a huge one even--but because so many guys are out of shape with gross guts and love handles and so on, getting in shape will still work for them and they will still be able to get laid regularly. Not as much or as easily as a guy of above average height who has the same kinds of characteristics otherwise but well enough that there won't be any complaints. If a larger percentage of guys were to get into shape then of course it would become harder for them. I just don'…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 07:30 PM
6

It's like cause and effect elude these people. There's a serious lack of incentives for the common man. Their prospects for the future are mostly miserable. An uphill battle vs. stacked decks in the eductional system and then in the hiring process, and a broken legal system which makes the basic human desire of finding a mate--and in the context of what should be a high trust advanced civilization starting a family--a metaphorical minefield. If they're "addicted to Xbox" or drugs or alcohol a st…
/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:53 AM
0

She's a pretty airheaded indoctrinee who gets views by dolling herself up and showing off her body. This is a pretty successful youtube model for a lot of female youtubers, even the few who have much interesting to say. In fact there's a few male youtubers who are like that too. They're the Justin Biebers of youtube. Shitty opinions and boring content but sex appeal.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:44 AM
1

If you know the history of the dude he's some sort of weird submissive who likes things in his butthole because he has a tiny dick or something, so it's not likely. Google "amazing atheist banana". He recovered from that like a champ though and has more subscribers than ever-- some politicians like Anthony Weiner could learn from him. None of that invalidate his arguments here, which stand on their own merit.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 01:37 AM
1

I was under the impression that lifting made your face look better as well, as you move closer to ideal body fat percentage. Anyways thats what I noticed in myself. It can if you're significantly out of shape, sure. You may drop fat off of your face which will show the bone structure better. It still won't change that bone structure if it's not attractive.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 07:19 PM
17

It certainly meets the buzzword quota.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 05:53 PM
15

The thread is amusing because it's full of women manipulating him into accepting this when their own scriptures say he does not have to and shouldn't. Christians are such a joke these days with their fair-weather buffet table style approach to following their own rules.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 04:52 PM
6

All of what the article is talking about applies to straight guys too. There is a large pressure to be not just in shape, but in really good shape. Some gay men I'm guessing like muscular bodies as much as women do.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 08:02 PM
2

Well no shit it's important, but even here you're giving up the central point of it all: When it comes to "fuck buddy" arrangements, you really only want to fuck a small percentage of unusually attractive men. Nobody is telling these guys how, or even if, it's possible to work their way into that field of vision to be one of those men. That's a big part of why the OP was entirely useless. It doesn't tell a guy who's struggling what he actually needs to do, if anything or possible, to get there, …
/r/seduction03/04/14 01:40 PM
1

Yes. In all provinces except Quebec, this is law.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 10:55 PM
24

There will never be enough "choice" for you for relationships and hookups. Only a very small percentage of guys will fit that ideal of you being physically attracted to want to fuck them with no ulterior motives and who are also not lacking in all of these other attributes. A lot of the "advice" here quite frankly looks like a setup for the guys you don't want to fuck to be available whenever you want some commitment or someone who can be useful to you in some way. And the newbies around here or…
/r/seduction02/04/14 08:47 PM
99

This is why the entire post is shit. It's from a woman's perspective. Getting dick for an average or better looking woman is supremely easy. She has dated 0 women and doesn't know what it's like on the other end. For her it's just something she can go to a social gathering and pick out whatever guy she deems best and go from there. "It just happens." Such a guy rarely has problems getting laid anyway, so wouldn't even be asking for advice in the first place. The rest of the guys who would ask su…
/r/seduction02/04/14 07:48 PM
9

And down the road you can expect more stopgap measures in the form of "common law marriage" to keep the wealth transfers going when enough men have said no to marriage. Already happened in most of Canada.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 01:26 PM
16

I thought child support already worked similar to this and really fucked with the statistics on poverty. Seems they're doing it with yet another category to mask what it might show. Things must be getting economically worse for most men.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 01:23 PM
1

No, I think the default is more indifference to men who are not useful or sexually attractive to a woman. This level of actual hate requires indoctrination that only modern western colleges and universities have been disseminating for decades now.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 12:45 PM
1

It was funny that one time 4chan trolled Oprah.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:52 AM
16

"Men's studies" (Michael Kimmel brand Orwellian feminist bullshit) or male studies, the real article? This is a very important distinction.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:44 AM
1

He doesn't really seem to get straight men at all. He's talking about a bunch of inconsequential minor social bullshit in that video that has nothing to do with the meat and potatoes of how heterosexual relationships actually work.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 01:52 AM
2

Better to be seen as "vain and self-absorbed" than as a sexless eunuch.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 01:14 AM
1

The thing about that is that it's unknowable knowledge. No one knows how prevalent that underreporting actually is.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 12:10 PM
7

The reason most guys can't believe this or are shocked by it is because most guys numbers are much lower. Example: Most guys at around age 20 may have a number of 1-3. While the women have for the most part, double digits. How is this possible? Because a small percentage of men have absurdly high numbers due to the Pareto distribution going on.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 12:09 PM
1

No, Pierce has also called out nebulous and vague standards as well as expanded definitions for rape against women as well. I don't think you really know about his blog or the work he's been doing with it for years. I get that rape ideologues on the feminist end are doing all of those things and that this piece of research is essentially using feminist standards and applying them to men. The problem is that these standards are shit and are not just.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:48 AM
27

No, it's unfortunately very real. Richard Dawkins made fun of both of those people before in a presentation.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:22 AM
7

You have to keep in mind that the system is what this guy has been raised under. A system full of hypergamous women that provide harems to a small percentage of highly attractive men for the first 25+ years of this dude's life. He is a product of that system and the kind of thirsty motherfuckers it creates. This is why I don't mock guys like this. It's easy to see how they ended up like that. I think they should grow a spine, sure, but it's easy to see how they ended up like that. Even if you've…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 01:31 AM
36

Women couldn't get away with this kind of behavior. There was no threatpoint. If they wanted to do this kind of thing in the past, there wasn't anything stopping her husband from leaving her with nothing. They had to play nicer for the most part. Now the legal system will ensure she can do this kind of thing and he will be punished for it if he finds it unacceptable and leaves her. Incentives and consequences. Moral: Don't get married in today's age.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 01:19 AM
8

If this shocks you, you are sheltered.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 01:17 AM
-1

I tend to like him when he talks about anything else other than "the free market." I get that this is what he makes his living doing and all but I find the libertarian belief in the free market to be as faith-based as those who believe communism "just hasn't been tried properly yet." We have historical evidence that neither work. For communism we have the 20th century disasters and for absolute unregulated free market we have the kinds of historical horror stories that make up most of the indust…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:41 PM
2

I haven't posted here much since the early days the sub was founded but when I did I had some posts about how "alpha" and "beta" are just shortform for how sexually attractive women find men. What you're describing here (behavioral traits) is bullshit used to sell DVDs, books, seminars and bootcamps to desperate men.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 09:37 PM
2

But if they're not your genetic material very few will actually care about it. That is the reason most people have children. It is the reason why you have an instinctual drive to mate guard and repulsion to raising children not related to you.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 03:02 PM
4

I saw a documentary on this a few years back. It followed a teenage boy (American-Indian I think?) who went through with the procedure which involved breaking his legs like that for, at most, a couple inches of gain. He said it hurt constantly and it took the better part of a year during which he was unable to do things for himself. Pretty fucked up stuff.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 03:41 AM
4

It is when you have them trying to change law to that end.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:41 AM
3

This is literally the "Jew Physics" of today's age. It's wrong because... because white male.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 01:10 AM
1

Women are, though, biologically speaking. Dual sexual strategy entails using one man for resources while a man deemed to have "better genes" is on the side. Now we can quibble over what "better genes" may be in the eyes of a woman but I think we have enough data, contemporary and otherwise make that call. The best examples of this are the celebrities, the rich the famous. Women aren't chomping at the bit to fuck a Bill Gates or a Danny DeVito, no. It's more a Brad Pitt, a Ryan Gosling or that ki…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 11:36 PM
5

Or she or her friend read some Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 11:30 PM
6

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:35 PM
2

Logically if we're dealing with universals this would be the case but as we all know no woman has ever been charged with anything related to any of this and won't be. "Oops" pregnancies are super common. There are women who write articles about doing this shit and are published in very big papers.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 11:22 PM
8

I'm sure if the guy had got a vasectomy, confirmed a 0 sperm count and she mysteriously showed up pregnant anyway those in /r/relationships would still support the woman.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 11:20 PM
2

The reason war is becoming less and less popular is more due to mutually assured destruction rather than any kind of revolution in morality.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 09:05 PM
4

Does the kind of man who would be forced into a role of cannon fodder under pain of prison or execution really have the right to tell government what to do, when it comes down to it. Does the common man really have any kind of representation in government these days.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 08:48 PM
3

I think when John the Other recorded a "debate" with them (which they later whined about him doing) it showed they were incredibly immature 16-20 year olds who said the word "faggot" a lot and have some hilarious caricature view of "masculinity" that seems to be some amalgam of non-ideas ripped straight out of Hollywood movies.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 08:11 PM
7

Except it's not true. Warren Farrell once again confirmed these were the research findings and not his personal opinion in his AMA on reddit when someone who was as pathetic as you are shit on that thread. Grasp at those straws some more though. SPLC hate group amirite?
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:45 PM
5

They also left out the fact that Warren did an AMA on reddit where he clarified once again that this was his research findings on the subject (yes he was being paid to research this, crazy times) from back then and not his personal opinions. The best part is how they're still still clinging to this like they're still clinging to the SPLC "hate group" thing which was of course actually denied by the SPLC, not that the SPLC is any kind of authority on anything, especially these days when they're t…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:42 PM
3

It was a decent book for its time in that she had the guts to talk about that kind of thing back then. The book predates a lot of today's understanding of evolutionary biology, psychology that explain base motivations in far better detail and far more compellingly. If you want a better understanding of things and as a rule why they are the way they are then read books like "Sociobiology" by E.O. Wilson, "The Red Queen" by Matt Ridley, "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins, and a bunch of other m…
/r/MensRights22/03/14 06:17 PM
2

Later, my husband confided that the therapist told him I was a pathological liar and manipulator. Seems the therapist did tell her husband that.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 08:09 AM
1

Probably a lot less.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 09:34 PM
-1

Lifting and otherwise having the attributes that women actually respond to is all you can do. Lifting helps with one of the attributes that women respond most to, especially when it comes to casual sex: Your looks. You still have to approach but you know as well as I do that your approaches success has more to do with having these attributes than any notion of "game." Two guys doing the exact same approach can yield completely different results based entirely on these attributes. The whole "sedu…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 09:25 PM
1

It's a confidence scam.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 12:24 PM
1

You can just refer them to the specific version of the page which has the ridiculous shit on it.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 03:27 PM
3

Not that I have any kind of personal experience here with experimenting with living with my parents and not then comparing success rates, but I'm sure it doesn't matter much at all. If they're that into you they'll fuck you in a public washroom. A public washroom.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 12:10 PM
5

See: Cognitive bias, The Halo Effect
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 10:57 PM
10

Not if you see the women he has to fuck to make that paper. He talked a big game but he was too scared to go run any on that trashy tattoo'd girl on the beach he thought had a nice ass.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 10:47 PM
9

I don't think anyone who's been around this sub for long has forgotten the massive amount of vandalism that happened with men's rights related pages a couple years back and the admins who were part of a "feminism wikigroup" who not only allowed it to happen but were part of it. Wikipedia is a complete shitshow when it comes to anything even remotely political.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:37 PM
2

If you live in a first world country, your own government's statistics on who the victims of violence are will back up what he's saying.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:45 AM
1

No, "TRP" as it were is akin to skeptics in atheism. It's not necessarily tied to self-improvement. It's about rejecting the aphoristic garbage that most people "know" about relationships between the sexes unless there is clear and convincing evidence. It's about slaughtering the sacred cows of conventional "wisdom" related to these subjects. What you do with the knowledge is entirely up to you. If what you want out of life is to succeed in the sexual marketplace, then yes, self-improvement is p…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 03:02 PM
2

It's been like that for a long time. You just noticed?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:44 PM
25

She's "only" getting over 2.5x+ the median household income for doing nothing at all. How can she possibly live on that?
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 02:34 PM
3

Some not-so-subtle spin in trying to paint guys who desire monogamy as some sort of backwards, boring types. The reality is that the costs of committed relationships, especially marriages, are still primarily borne by men. Do you think it's just a coincidence that the Europeans who essentially led the founding of the modern world not only insisted on marriage and monogamy but also outlawed polygamy? There is a reason for this. It is a bad deal to have such a relationship for a man. If you are no…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 01:50 PM
0

Pretty good success story. Guy needs to start lifting though, really. He's still really doughy and weak looking. He seems to have the right mindset now though and is shaking those doormat behavioral patterns.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 01:29 PM
4

A vasectomy is not contraception. It is sterilization and there is no guarantee you can reverse it. RISUG/Vasalgel will be amazing if it works, is safe, and becomes available, though.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:39 PM
2

Socratic method. Tell them you are one as part of it. They probably won't like you anymore due to the mass of cognitive dissonance you're causing.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 06:37 AM
1

The thing about real science, not pseudoscience, is that it's true whether you believe in it or not. Such as the computer device you are using right now.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 10:53 PM
4

Well he'd have a point if he pointed out that Jezebel and other feminist media shithouses would not similarly criticize a woman for doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 08:31 PM
2

Smart guy. He turned a rotten situation around by going with the nuclear option of disappearing and leaving that bloodsucker, who he said in much nicer terms, wanted to ditch him to fuck other guys while living off his money, with nothing.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:56 PM
4

Guarantee you the law will not be applied equally, especially in Canada, but it'll be amusing to see any cases go to court and the attempts to justify the double standard by the judiciary.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:22 PM
5

The behavior is similar in all but severity. Look at people like Neil Lyndon and Larry Summers who've had their lives severely affected by either speaking out against the dogma or merely just presenting evidence-based alternative explanations rather than shrieking "patriarchy" at the top of their lungs and insisting discrimination is the cause with no evidence because differences exist.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:05 AM
9

Still as applicable. Both hold faith-based beliefs, beliefs that do not have evidence supporting them.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:22 PM
2

First I've seen of it and I agree but at the same time he's completely right about how the system operates in Canada. I may not like that he's essentially some extreme internet shock jock posting shocking gore shit, but I can't disagree with him on how the system is operating.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:16 PM
3

I think the only kind of man who would have any kind of opinion that is anywhere near as divorced from reality as what the women the OP is describing have is some sort of born-rich, top ~5% genetic lottery winner who's never really faced rejection.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 03:09 PM
2

Note also that most of their ridiculous arguments are based on this same line of thinking i.e. the idea that because most politicians are white men (voted in by a majority female electorate, by the way) that somehow, the other 99.9% of white males benefit from this or are somehow represented in any way by them no matter who the actual policies and law changes and programs launched and so on are geared towards while these guys are in office.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 05:34 AM
7

If rape weren't about sex then the demographics targeted by it wouldn't be those in their generally most physically attractive age group. You'd think you'd see a more even spread, or you'd see more older people targeted in the countries with aging population. That is neither here nor there though really. She's a rape liar and feminists love to defend the shit out of them with disingenuous arguments.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 05:09 AM
3

The rate of circumcision in Canada used to be very high until maybe a couple decades ago at most. Happened to me. My brother too. Back then it was just something "that was done" and my parents being pretty simple working class people bought into the authority of the doctor on it.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:19 PM
9

One has hard evidence, the other does not. Who to believe should be a no brainer here.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 04:30 PM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjeV2_hKLao#t=2h17m15s should work for other browsers, probably.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 01:43 AM
0

The feminists of the time were on board with it while blatantly avoiding any such responsibilities for themselves, while of course demanding the vote.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 12:34 AM
8

It's mostly women calling each other sluts anyway. Not men.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 12:33 AM
7

It's /u/RobotAnna who is about as mentally ill as Cathy Brennan.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 09:29 PM
5

Seems enough did get shamed off to their death to comprise a pretty impressive body count.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:35 PM
10

Well she did get fired during the Watergate scandal for lying and unethical behavior. I'm sure she'd like people to forget that, though.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:51 AM
12

For someone who isn't taking it seriously she sure whines about it a lot and has no actual counter arguments.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 11:53 PM
4

Why not just work out if you're going to invest that much time.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 11:10 PM
1

It's about half/half. So not all of them are deluded and/or pathetic.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 11:06 PM
10

Also has a cat. How many women like cats? Truly unique.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 08:30 PM
12

The fact that someone leaked it doesn't make it permissible to play thought police, as immature as they may be. It's kind of like when a guy was fired last year because some uber-feminist who fancied herself a "modern day Joan of Arc" eavesdropped on a dongle dick joke and whined about it. Luckily there was justice there because she got fired too for causing bad PR for the company she worked with when PR was part of her job
/r/MensRights02/03/14 11:01 AM
1

I'm sure the "good comrades" in the Soviet Union thought they were great people too.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 04:19 AM
23

This was a private conversation on facebook, which is not in the workplace. Wasn't at or on the school grounds, either. This totalitarian impulse you're displaying in this thread is kind of fucked up.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 03:52 AM
5

This article should read: "Snooty Daddy's girl would rather claim they were raped than admit to getting too drunk and making a tit of themself". Firstly, you wrongly incriminate innocent men - even the accusation of a sex offence comes with a great social stigma. Secondly, this makes people take people less seriously who have actually been sexually assaulted or raped. rekt This really is a new low though, she's trying to go on the offensive and claim a rape occurred using this platform, after th…
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 01:42 AM
5

It is depressing but entirely true. This is why the most often repeated advice here is to work out to improve the way you look, which will usually improve your chances barring having had a really unfortunate roll of the genetic lottery dice, like a guy that looks like George from Seinfeld. The better you look, the less bullshit you have to deal with, the less you have to invest to get with a woman and the more options you have which changes the entire power dynamic.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 01:15 AM
4

Two guys can act the exact same way and get different results based entirely on what they look like. See: cognitive bias, The Halo Effect.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 12:55 AM
17

George from Seinfeld is a fictional character and the fact he sometimes actually got laid despite saying he's unemployed and lives with his parents while being short and bald was part of the joke. Men who look like George from Seinfeld however are not fictional and their outcomes in this arena are near universally bleak unless they happen to be financially well off.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 10:52 PM
1

Feminist legislation. Including no fault divorce.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 09:57 PM
3

Looks like she was hoisted by her own pedohysteria petard.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 09:57 PM
8

Some dudes just look like George from Seinfeld and that's enough to irreparably doom them, to be fair.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 09:44 PM
8

I've been using the internet for about 17 years. You can see the same shit on dating websites. You can see the same shit on just about any internet forum that such issues are openly discussed. You can see the same thing in real life at bars/clubs if you pay attention. Anywhere guys talk about it you'll see the same thing: Most of them have trouble getting anything, while women only complain that they can't find really high value guys. There is a pareto distribution of sex, at least among those o…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 09:39 PM
1

Yes.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 08:22 AM
1

This is a non-sequitur when due process and the presumption of innocence are strictly adhered to.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:47 AM
1

In 1841 Scottish journalist Charles Mackay published a history of popular folly called Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, a rather sensationalistic overview of the irrationality that occasionally seizes an entire society or nation. Most famous are his economic examples, like the 1840s “Railway Mania,” as well as the notorious South Sea Bubble (1711-20) and the Dutch “tulip mania” of the early 17th century. I think a better classical read and reference for this phenomenon …
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:43 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjMk0fK0_zU
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 07:22 AM
5

If he has text message evidence of it he has a slam dunk of a case, that is if the laws are applied equally.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:31 PM
5

Yeah, I don't get it. Those guys must be about as desperate as those women. One of them looks like (actually, is!) an aging junkie and the other like some sex and the city reject.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:26 PM
1

That's not RP vocab. That's just how women conduct themselves in this arena. It's also why they sometimes complain when guys aren't "getting their signals" -- because as many guys know these "signals" mean fuck all as every guy who's approached many women has seen a woman or many women doing these kinds of things has been rejected at some time or another.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 05:38 PM
1

TRP really needs to come up with a relationship- problem solving technique besides "dread game". You can't do anything besides this. The legal system necessitates it.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 02:07 PM
12

Two words: Plausible deniability.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 02:03 PM
3

Relax bro. It's a trilby.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 01:48 PM
5

The takeaway lesson here is that "nerd girls" still want to fuck the same guys as every other girl. See also: elevatorgate. This is something the guy should have learned in high school if he paid attention but there's a lot of guys who just don't pick up on this stuff for whatever reason.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 01:42 PM
2

I remember thinking similar when I was 9 years old. Most of the teachers when I was in public elementary and high school were there putting in a very little amount of effort just to get paid. It was the few who gave a shit and actually enjoyed their job that made a difference to me.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 11:53 AM
1

It was almost entirely 4chan.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 11:14 PM
5

IIRC it was that femitheist bundle of crazy. Actual feminists who don't outright dodge the issue engage in sophistry and appeal to emotion.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 01:11 PM
6

"I have to admit these are real issues but I don't want you talking about them because it ruins my narrative and may end the gravy train of do-nothing propaganda jobs with massive funding."
/r/MensRights27/02/14 06:43 AM
2

It's enforced by the simple fact that offspring of a pair-bonding species rarely survive to adulthood if the father doesn't stick around. A male animal that leads behind dead babies is not successfully breeding. Right but with humans specifically we are neither absolutely r or K selection type. A man who invests nothing but a little sex isn't exactly losing a whole lot by doing so, even if the potential resultant child has a reduced or low chance of survival. Humans have typically mix and matche…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 02:29 PM
0

Therefore a promiscuous male animal's sexual instincts are to preserve his sperm for 1) higher ranking 2) less mated females. If you assume he has that kind of opportunity on a regular basis, sure. I'm willing to bet even the top 5% of men do not have that kind of opportunity on the regular, so opportunity cost comes into play here. There's also the fact that in our primate species cousin and not-so-distant past, that there was not a whole lot lost by just giving it up to any woman who passed wh…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 02:03 AM
3

No, it was the F4J guy (and his landlord) that got bit by some weirdo.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:03 AM
3

Anyone who debunks common feminist dogma using actual empirical evidence such as Farrell is slandered as "misogynist woman hater" as you're doing here in this thread. It doesn't matter how they present it. They can be the most unthreatening dude with a super soft sounding voice like Warren Farrell and still be accused of it, baselessly. It's fine if you just don't like that people are speaking up about these issues, but at least be honest about it.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:21 AM
4

Watch out, they may link you to a handful of parody articles that make it abundantly clear that they're parody articles inside the article itself.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:14 AM
1

Why am I not surprised she has a hyphenated name.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 04:21 PM
1

Here is yet another case of that. Not unique.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 03:37 PM
7

Canada used to be 14 and no one really made a big deal about it unless someone much older was trying to get with a 14-15 year old. But as you can see, age of consent laws being raised are typically being used to prosecute males and only males whenever someone offends.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:39 PM
15

Of course it does. It's a third world country. But if you ask the mainstream media in the west, it's only women who suffer in those countries.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:37 PM
7

Context: People in India have consensual sex under the condition that they will get married soon. In this case, if EITHER party absconds, the court will either i) Order them to get married ii) if BOTH of them are unwilling to get married, the case will be dropped or iii) If one wishes to get married and the other doesn't, action will be taken against the other. This doesn't seem to be the case these days. That seems to be the kind of view we'd call "traditional conservative." India seems to be i…
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:07 PM
23

Despite news story after news story showing men getting the raw deal in India from the legal system itself, I'm sure we'll see some idiot telling us how India is some "awful patriarchy," even though they do not actually live there. This is not an "only in India" thing though, this kind of thing happens in our western, first world countries. In practice, the law is never applied equally.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:04 PM
2

It's funny how she's acting like a child with a toy she didn't want to play with but didn't want anyone else to play with either.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 10:32 AM
6

Probably not fake. Most women who try to set up relationships like this don't want the chump boyfriend to actually be getting any of their own. If he didn't, I can almost assure you she'd have fucked someone during the trip and not felt bad about it.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 08:28 AM
1

It's not uncommon for women to have double that in our society and yet there's still plenty of guys who rarely or never get any. I have to wonder how the guys who aren't being selected for sex are kept on the treadmill.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 04:05 PM
2

More accurately it's traditionalism with no female obligations and the male obligations double down.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 05:34 AM
2

Yes, they want to reverse Blackstone's formulation and have us live in an environment much like that of the witch hunts.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 04:27 AM
1

The user you're replying to is literally asking everyone to take the word of someone who's gotten, at best, second-hand information over someone who lives there like yourself.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 04:26 AM
21

She removed them because they were calling her out on the hypocrisy, but they're still on twitter if you favorited/retweeted/have the URL. Here's my favorite one
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:31 AM
6

It seems to just be something she unironically tweeted.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:08 AM
2

Unbelievable that he got fired when all of the facts that this girl made up the persona and set this all up to ruin him were out there in the open. Almost as unbelievable as the propaganda in that newspaper trying to paint her as a victim and a small child and the fact that the police know all of the details and yet still jailed him.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:49 AM
9

It was most likely a glorified name for someone who does easy paper pushing, running food and other things to save programmers time that could go towards their work.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 01:40 AM
3

First wave feminism included things like the tender years doctrine and the white feather campaign from hypocrites who did not want to go to war themselves, not to mention the domestic terrorism. It was still special pleading even back then, sorry.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:17 PM
5

That is how the legal system has come to work in so-called "civilized" first world countries. Men are second class citizens and when it's a he-said, she-said case, then guilt is assumed.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 11:43 PM
2

How does that work? Be a woman in Canada. It gets worse. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hHq3NnvA0Y
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:48 AM
1

Yet another case of bullying via bluelisting by professional victims who think they have a right to not be offended (by someone who merely disagrees with their nonsense) and that anyone who disagrees with their insane politics should have their lives ruined. This time by the biggest feminist organization there is. This is what mainstream feminism is all about. Need more evidence? How about some from just this past week. Here's the kind of product that Harvard's women's studies program churns out…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:44 AM
1

I think most of that is just pointing out the double standard as well as the obvious observable truth that feminists and almost all of today's women say one thing but in reality do or believe the exact opposite.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 02:27 PM
4

"Confidence" isn't a magic pill. It usually comes from past success, and in the context of what he's talking about here is usually a positive feedback loop i.e. guy is good looking, "gets lucky" often as a result, has more "confidence."
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 08:09 AM
1

That's not exactly fat either, that's an acceptable body shape. The sad potato shaped "fat acceptance" types are more of what's being referenced here.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 05:40 AM
7

That's entirely possible but not that likely. MGTOW forums used to have people that scoured relationships/marriage forums for these kinds of stories to post in the "Anecdotals" section and unless they were running some kind of longhaul troll, these several year old stories they dug up were probably not made up. You're likely just suffering from a case of just world fallacy here. You don't want to believe this shit happens as often as it does.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 05:14 AM
3

Not actually true: See other post above. They're targeting exclusively men, including heterosexuals.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:47 PM
4

The thing that bothers me about Chris Hansen and copycats is that they go exclusively after male offenders and they do so using cases where the bait is barely below the age of consent. They're not going after actual child fuckers who are looking for small prepubescent children. There's a new dimension of shit being added here in that they're also going after gay men and they're beating people up instead of reporting them to the proper authorities, though.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:46 PM
5

Like "sexual harassment in the workplace" policies, this is one of those things that is one-sided in practice. If you complain about it, you can probably expect nothing to be done at best and retaliation at worst. You have to ask yourself if you value that job and can easily replace it if you're going to go that route.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:17 PM
6

Did you even read the same thing I did. Nobody was celebrating it. He was wondering who the (probably male) web designers and maintainers of the sites' infrastructure are, and why anyone would bother DDoSing them in the first place. The reality is probably just freelance work.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:56 PM
1

The way the guy talks represents where he grew up. Black neighborhood, poor. Doesn't really detract much from what he's saying unless you're the style over substance kind of person.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:52 PM
5

They are the same types of people who bought into the "War on women" rhetoric because the church, in a country with separation of church and state, would not subsidize someone's birth control. They are the same types of people who flip out at any kind of religious politician trying to say, talk about putting time limits on how far into a pregnancy a woman can have an abortion. Yet, they think men having any ability to say "I don't want to be responsible for this baby just because I had sex. I wa…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:49 PM
1

It probably has to do with the kinds of dangerous work done by men and pretty much exclusively men.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:45 PM
0

I don't know, why don't you run this disingenuous argument past Aerik and your other pals in /r/againstmensrights to try to determine how you can try to apply it to men who didn't actually want to be fathers in the first place without looking really dumb.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:42 PM
11

It's because thebluepill is a sub almost entirely full of SRS users and feminists who talk out of one side of their mouth about "equality" while they do their damnedest to fight against it. I hope I've solved the mystery for you.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 05:39 PM
1

You're talking about expatriating here. Doesn't specifically have anything to do with MGTOW.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 03:37 PM
2

How does this work regarding non-straight people? Looks like: More attractive/in demand individual gets the kind of sexual power women have in heterosexual relations. Just because you don't like the concept of a sexual marketplace existing and people having values in it, doesn't mean it's not true.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 12:42 AM
1

Right, and Vietnam was the war that was being referred to here. Canada and other countries that saw this massive male suicide spike did not participate in it. They do all however have that no fault divorce on the books.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 10:20 PM
8

I think it's reasonable as well. In a reasonable society, being gay would be neither promoted nor discouraged.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 05:59 AM
3

Doesn't explain it for other first world countries such as Canada where the same thing happened. Know what might though? No fault divorce (read: his fault no matter what).
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:42 AM
10

This is ridiculous. She found someone else and stabbed him to death while he was sleeping to get rid of him. Look at the sentencing for men who do that kind of shit. They get death row or some kind of enormous sentence.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:40 AM
3

I don't know what he's bringing it up but I tend to bring it up when someone shits out the conventional "wisdom" on this topic which says that men are the shallow ones.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:45 PM
18

What women instinctively want is for 99% of the men they run into to leave them alone, buzz off, drop dead—while the one to whom they feel attracted makes all their dreams come true. One of the keys to deciphering female speech is that the term “men” signifies for them only the very restricted number of men they find sexually attractive. All the dirty articles in Cosmo about “giving him the sex he craves” and “driving him wild in bed” concerns this man of her dreams, who by some amazing coincide…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 03:51 PM
2

That's not what he's saying. He's saying that the discussion of issues as well as the propagation of ideas as well as the questioning of feminist politics are all happening. Just a few years ago you would not see many people commenting on mainstream news sites when something that stinks was happening, and this alone is huge. The handful of mens rights and related blogs have grown to thousands, whereas maybe in 2009-2010 you would rarely find places talking about any of this and there just weren'…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 03:37 PM
1

Basically they're shitting on unattractive men with bad fashion sense, but fail to realize most of these guys are brainwashed or cowed into agreeing with or at the very least not speaking out against their bullshit. Meanwhile the heterosexuals among them fuck the guys they claim to hate the most.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 02:07 AM
2

Girls in my high school openly talked about how "hot" they found certain young-ish male teachers, and most girls that age are already sexually active. It's just the pussy pass at play here. This woman had like what, 6-7 less counts than Jerry Sandusky and that stupid motherfucker isn't getting out for decades.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 01:34 AM
5

Not talking about muslims here, but with each year that goes by with each piece of horrifying legislation that passes, it really is getting harder to say that the ancient philosophers were wrong on this subject.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 01:19 AM
2

Even if where you live doesn't have this kind of precedent set, there's still bullshit like the "common law marriage" scam (it's a stopgap measure, let's be real) that's been going on for quite some time now in many countries.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 01:15 AM
2

Aren't you the guy who made this? Didn't you also make another one. I'm not sure which one it was (this or the other one) but an issue had a story of some Christian guy who got destroyed by a cheating wife. Brutal stuff. I remember reading it when I was newer to all of this. You also had a youtube channel with some really good content, I believe.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 04:24 PM
1

The problem is that the law doesn't allow it. If you marry a woman, she has you by the balls.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 02:55 PM
8

Do you not understand that marriage itself is that regardless of your actions? Even if she fucks around on you, you catch her in the act, and she laughs in your face while you capture it on a cellphone video for proof. Even if it turns out "your" children aren't even yours. It's still half or more of your shit. That is the state of the law.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 02:54 PM
5

Textbook dual sexual strategy.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 02:00 PM
10

"Triggers" have become a social justice warrior weasel term used to shut down any opposition or discussion of topics they don't like.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 01:32 AM
6

I can guarantee you it's still better than 99% of the shitty "art" these days which is just really bad politics being injected where it doesn't belong.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 12:14 AM
13

No, it's not going to be downvoted. You have no obligation to be a sponge to absorb violence done to others. As long as you're not a perpetrator of the crimes themselves, it's not your problem. The gall to demand men take bullets for women after a half century of demonizing men and writing all sorts of fucked up anti-male legislation is jarring, though.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:07 AM
243

"Free speech" to these people means "free speech only for those I agree with." It's a common and unfortunate thread you see with the "progressive" milieu.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 01:08 AM
1

So your non-argument here is throwing up your hands and saying "that's the law! gotta follow the law!" rather than analyzing the hows and whys and determining whether the law is just or not. I imagine if you lived under, say, Jim Crow in the United States, that you'd have no problem because hey, it's just the way the law is. Can't argue with that, right?
/r/MensRights05/02/14 01:06 AM
3

This is a lot of mental gymnastics to justify an obvious double standard under the law and ignore the enormous elephant in the room that the man wouldn't have even done what he did if he had equivalent legal rights to opt out. Your last sentence really drives the point that you know it's a double standard home by telling men to keep it in their pants while you would not dare impose the same standard on a woman.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 10:24 AM
1

Even in the modern age you can see it in events like the Rwanda genocide or Sbrenica massacre.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 09:51 PM
4

It happened with the last thing at the University of Toronto, yes.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 10:00 PM
17

It's interesting how it's still relevant today because of the vested political interests, isn't it?
/r/MensRights31/01/14 07:55 PM
1

The problem with really thirsty dudes like your friend is that the saying that "Some men are a blowjob away..." (that originated from some early manosphere--Paul Elam uses it a lot but I know he didn't make it up) from abandoning their stated values is 100% correct. It's hard to put all of the blame on them when you realize how Darwinian the entire sexual marketplace is these days, though, and just how many guys go so long without any sex. Some of these guys go years without any sex, and since t…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 07:18 PM
1

It means you're an SRS poster who is playing coy while you circlejerk in another sub with your pal Aerik.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 11:43 PM
2

Yeah, he's probably fucking this girl given his purported behavior. The funny thing is when you flip the sexes on a situation like this, the man who's rightly suspicious is told he's "controlling" or "jealous" and is somehow wrong for it. And of course given current divorce practices it just makes it a bad idea to get married if you are a man, as after all you're always in the wrong, even when you're not.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:02 PM
7

Pierce, how are the grievance industry "charities" supposed to seek rent and fill their coffers if they tell 100% factual, non-conjectured data such as how college campuses generally see 0-3 reports of sexual misconduct a year?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:55 PM
6

I don't know man. Maybe my sentence structure on that comment I spent 10 seconds on wasn't the greatest.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 05:58 AM
5

It's the old game of "let's you and him fight" (I'll pick the winner.) The sex stuff is really fucked up though. Have your limits on that. If they want to be seriously choked or hit anywhere other than maybe their asscheeks that's when I nope the fuck out.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 03:31 AM
2

Why did you ever agree to those requests? That could work against you in court, by the way, if the kid turns out to not be yours.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:15 AM
1

Two cotton swabs: one inside your cheek to scrape some cell samples and one inside the your putative daughter's cheek to scraps some cells. Pretty easy to collect samples. Make sure you follow the instructions properly to avoid contamination for the most accurate results. It's not very difficult and really every man should confirm it in this day and age especially.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:03 AM
3

How does one get to the age of 31 without realizing that physical appearance has massive amounts of influence in every social sphere? Well, the solipsism of never observing the kinds of treatment others get and regular doses of fake positive reinforcement that women tend to get in the form of thirsty dudes who would fuck the fat version of her, or "fat acceptance" and so on. If you're a man in the same situation as she was, you'd would have no such delusions. You get the hard knocks. Even if you…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 02:05 AM
3

Every single one of them has a thyroid condition. Trust me on this. It's self-diagnosed.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 01:50 AM
1

To be honest I think we'll probably have an energy crisis causing a collapse of the modern way of life before any kind of serious automation happens. We don't really have any kind of replacement energy source to keep, say, supermarkets stocked with food for example. That's gonna be a problem. When most people are focused on surviving like our ancestors were, there won't be much in the way of new inventions or innovation. In fact life would probably be a lot like it was back then. Most transhuman…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 12:46 AM
1

Joshua Peterman, Wyatt's attorney, argued a time-stamped receipt shows Wyatt filed visitation and custody petitions on Feb. 18 — five days before the Zarembinskis initiated an adoption proceeding in Utah. Wyatt also never received proper notice of Fahland's intention to proceed with an adoption, Peterman said. The state facilitated this and is weaseling out on a technicality. If you seriously have to ask how this is "oppression" you might need your head checked.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:41 PM
1

Thank you for the man bad, woman good narrative but you're still not showing anyone how there is any semblance of equal or equivalent rights at play here. You're parroting the status quo of special pleading for women. Also, some US states have allowed just that. Example: http://m.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/52218807-78/wyatt-adoption-utah-court.html.csp
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:18 PM
5

A lot of women try to turn casual sexual relationships into something more. They put out readily for guys that get them wet and then try to turn that into something serious. It rarely works because usually they're shooting above their league.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 05:15 PM
1

Abortion alone has nothing to do with the fact that women have outs even after a child is born. The fact that she carries a baby for 9 months also has zero bearing on what happens after it's born i.e. you stubborn insistence that men but not women must have some kind of forced responsibility there.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 04:40 PM
1

So it's not okay to force women to have and/or raise children they never wanted, but it is okay to force men to labor under pain of prison to pay for children they never wanted--that is a form of control over someone's body, by the way. That is your argument. That's really special.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 04:10 PM
1

So for men: "Keep it in your pants." Interesting how when Roe v. Wade happened, "keep your legs shut" did not seem to cut it. Do you see your obvious double standards here? Your argument is literally the inverted anti-abortionist argument. A note for you: Child support is not biologically mandated. It is a social and legal construct. This is about the rights to self-determine when you become a parent. Women have it. Men don't. I don't see what's so difficult for you to understand here, but I'm g…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 03:21 PM
3

You are essentially saying whatever the woman wants goes and that should be the legal status quo, full stop. Your disingenuous use of children as human shields to justify this but willingness to flip the script and claim "just a clump of cells" when convenient for you is very telling. No, one doesn't "have" to be "chosen over the other" in such a conflict. This is a special pleading argument. The only way for you to be consistent with forcing men to pay is to be anti-abortionist, and yet you're …
/r/MensRights26/01/14 10:49 AM
3

So here we are with yet another bout of special pleading. The child deserves the income, but only when convenient for the mother. Otherwise it's just a lump of cells you can kill. Men also have the right to disallow an embryo from developing into a child. No, we don't. It's a woman body and 100% her choice under the law where abortion is legal and a man has no say in this. The current system is not only a system of unequal or unequivalent rights, but one of moral hazard. This have your cake and …
/r/MensRights26/01/14 08:01 AM
3

It's not even a "male value system." They don't seem to get the concept of choice--which men have none of in this arena. If you are a man, you have to work to earn money/resources or chances are you will be homeless and you will probably never have anyone interested in you. That solipsism I guess.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:54 AM
6

It's only to be seen as an "attempt to coerce an abortion" if you believe women are entitled to men's income and you admit your feminist ideology that women are "strong and independent and don't need no man" is 100% bullshit. Any way you cut it, the current status quo is special treatment under the law as women have plenty of legal rights men do not. Men could opt out and incur the same benefit of having a biological offspring with no investment other than having sex. This is a hugely abusable s…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:20 AM
2

Yes I think we're all familiar at this point with the term of "rape" being used as an umbrella term for all sorts of things that definitely don't fit any reasonable legal definition of rape, but it's hard to determine in this case because they don't supply any data of their standards for classifying a report as a rape.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:22 AM
17

What you need to understand is that the bottom line is that the state wants some man, any man to pay. It's 21st century tyranny--there is no concern for justice here. We don't have a justice system. We have a legal system that is all too often immersed in political special interests. The old common law on that made sense when you could not prove one way or the other that a man was a father. Then we got blood testing which could exclude a man if the child was not possibly his due to ABO blood typ…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:12 AM
4

I have to wonder also if those are just reports and not proven cases.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 04:14 AM
2

People will still flip their shit in real life when you use the Socratic method to prove them wrong. Just FYI.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 04:10 AM
3

No, actually it doesn't provide any such framework. You know how I know? Everywhere that abortion is legal and in no danger of becoming not so, you still have the usual suspects screeching about how "unfair" it would be if men were allowed an out while they themselves have several outs. A good example of such a place is Canada, where I live.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:58 AM
8

Of course we know why the government does it. It's all about the money. That's not the point. The government however must know how common it is to be banning it is the point.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 05:29 PM
5

I think this has been discussed multiple times. It's about how some women like to have these shit test conversations with their boyfriends where they try to make him agree that if they ever met these celebrities it would be totally ok for her to have sex with them and it "wouldn't count." It's not a new conversation.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 05:05 PM
30

France bans DNA paternity testing. Think on that.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 04:54 PM
152

This is honestly a must-watch if you care about philosophy at all. You'll see how intellectually bankrupt and cult-like gender studies professors are. A comedian just asking them questions and for evidence supporting their claims makes complete fools of them.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 01:44 PM
13

Textbook examples of Briffault's Law and hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 12:29 AM
6

Exactly. When women say they want these qualities in a man, what they mean is that at the very least they want those qualities in a man they are already attracted to.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 09:28 AM
2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3-pFBYc_3I
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 09:19 AM
4

They actually screen for physical traits too. Sperm banks are a sort of eugenics project.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 04:00 AM
1

Ok so the guy has all of the traits that we acknowledge work. Height, body build, natural good looks. There's no controversy surrounding that. You should notice the most common piece of advice no matter where you sit on these issues is: Work out (get aesthetics) -- there's a reason for that. Let's try a thought experiment here though: Do you think Patrice would have been seen to have had as much "game" without his money or fame? In other words, without those traits we know also work, would a man…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/14 01:26 AM
1

Yeah I don't believe that happened the way he describes without proof, either. Never seen a verdict approaching anything just from that kind of scenario.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 11:42 PM
2

He's acting exactly like a post-wall woman.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 11:35 PM
2

The gay version of "where have all of the good men gone?" it seems. Just as delusional.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 11:29 PM
25

You ever notice how the term "gender roles" from the feminist lexicon only ever appears when women aren't getting the better side of the deal? It doesn't matter if what they're saying is wholly inconsistent with their fair-weather philosophy, what you need to realize is that it's all about special treatment. They want the best of both worlds, to have the cake and eat it too.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 11:07 PM
1

Telling the idiot you responded to this is useless. They think anyone who doesn't toe their line is "some bible-thumping right winger."
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 10:52 PM
4

If this guy doesn't "have game," please post a video of someone who you think does proving it. This guy has posted many, many videos of him successfully picking up girls who aren't crazy landwhales.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 10:42 PM
2

This is true. Which is why you try to get what you're looking for straight up. Else you wind up wasting your time. It's opportunity cost.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 07:58 PM
2

Consider the alternative: A highly violent social structure where men spend enormous amounts of time and effort in the mating. It's what displayed in the whole primate hierarchy with its challenges to the alpha male. Only in this kind of scenario with humans the alpha male does not really have a massive advantage in strength. Even a much weaker man could put a spear through you, shoot you with a gun or whatever. If you think that the institution of monogamy was solely down to giving the less att…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 04:44 PM
2

Surviving hunter-gatherers like the Yanomano seem actually less worse than today's society in terms of this stuff, actually. They have a smaller rate of paternity fraud as well. Likely because of the small community aspect as well as the harshness of survival in a state of nature. Some men get access to more than 1 woman but this is mostly only because of male deaths in gathering resources/testing the environment, but I am sure that the highest status guys get the "best" ones as well as the exce…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 04:20 PM
4

No value to be derived under current legal system.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 04:00 PM
2

The bottom line is that men set what they find attractive in women, while women set what they find attractive in men. It just so happens that most women find a man who has "gotten around" a better option. Men on the other hand have an instinctual aversion to this for obvious reasons related to biology and reproduction, with very few of us wanting a woman with a high partner count. Even 5 past partners is enough to create a massive divorce risk. Something to keep in mind. We didn't make the rules…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/14 03:57 PM
1

We hear a lot about how much worse women have it in this arena but honestly if you're not at least the average height with some real muscle definition as a man then things are gonna be bad for you in all kinds of social situations. Not just with women. The amount of effort that constitutes the difference in a socially acceptable shape for a man's body is quite honestly massive compared to the standards for women.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 03:34 PM
2

I've had this kind of thing happen to me several times. Women do not handle rejection very well when they have to approach, and when they approach it tends to be in the most inept way that makes even the clumsiest teenage boy look smooth. To be fair that type of approach does actually work for women, if the guy is into them. Look into those experiments about men and women walking up to members of the opposite sex and asking them if they'd like to have sex. Doesn't work for men but has a fair cha…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:56 AM
-1

That is exactly why.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:36 AM
0

Not unless it's part of a parody piece made abundantly clear in the article itself. They also tend to have rules to keep the commenting civil recently, as far as I know.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:35 AM
1

It's a propaganda-filled hit piece by someone who does not want it to happen. You can check out http://www.newmalestudies.com if you'd like to see the kinds of material that would be discussed.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:33 AM
-1

At this point there are far too many vested interests to simply get rid of "gender studies" (women's studies) from colleges and universities. One of the best ways to combat the indoctrination is the offer opposing viewpoints that have an actual scientific basis to them.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:33 AM
8

Michael Flood is an Australian feminist ideologue that, like Michael Kimmel in the US has tried to claim (with no evidence of course) that fathers rights groups are some diabolical thing that isn't what they say they are. In lieu of actual evidence to support his argument (he knows he doesn't have one as well as anyone else,) Michael Flood spammed members of the Australian parliament with abusive and offensive emails by gaining access to the Australian father's rights group F4E's services. He wa…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:31 AM
10

http://www.f4e.com.au/blog/2011/11/17/michael-flood-when-equality-becomes-the-new-enemy-of-feminism/
/r/MensRights13/01/14 03:20 PM
17

Of course Michael Flood would be on the defensive. Look at the kinds of unethical shit this guy does
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:29 PM
4

That was an agricultural civilization. These are hunter-gatherers we're talking about here.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 06:14 PM
1

Some of the oldest tales from history are rife with infanticide. Humans are in no way like bonbos in our sexual habits. We have roots very similar to that of tournament species like chimpanzees. Infidelity is not a "silly" idea at all. Sex leads to children and you will not be able to convince unrelated men to bear that burden in any significant capacity. The reason that it is the norm is because of this. This is also the reason it is for the most part a norm in just about every surviving primit…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:09 PM
3

It's relevant to the course material at hand and as unprofessional as you think it is, it's some real talk and nowhere near as bad as what other professors do and get away with all of the time.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 06:01 PM
3

No, you would need to claim that you've divined that 90% of paternity frauds are undiscovered (see: underreporting!) and you just this because you feel it, in order to be on par with the rape hysteria train of reasoning.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:00 PM
3

Narcissism. She just wanted people to see what she's done and paid facebook money to get people to look at her pictures. She wasn't promoting any kind of product or service. Facebook has been a huge pile of shit in this regard ever since the feminist commissars got control of it and started censoring content that offends them or disagrees with them in any way under the guise of "hate speech."
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 03:55 PM
1

So in addition to the whole-sample applicable arguments being very shaky as I outlined before, we have in addition red herrings such as identical twins, guests of the Maury Povich, Jerry Springer and Jeremy Kyle shows who need to go through dozens of tests to find a father and still not find one. None of this refutes what I'm saying and the author is even more or less saying what I was at the end! As stated earlier, these statistics were not designed for this purpose, and statistics typically ha…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:50 PM
1

The sample size is hundreds of thousands of samples and you're not providing any kind of compelling or even cogent argument as to how it's possibly skewed, poorly-sampled, or flawed in any major way.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:17 PM
8

Good question. The tests were for a variety of reasons including immigration, suspicion, court-ordered, and medical. If you ran with the argument that it could be skewed due to suspicion, you have to keep in mind that is an unquantifiable variable that has an inverse unquantifiable variable in men who are duped but never suspect. I would say that yes, given the sample sizes being in the hundreds of thousands that this is pretty representative of the population. See my post elsewhere in this comm…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 02:53 PM
5

In what way. The tests are taken for a variety of reasons including suspicion or anxiety (from either gender of parent/putative parent,) court-order, immigration-related, so it's not even just "the suspicious people may not be representative of the population and may increase the negatives in sample." Even if you ran with that unquantifiable argument then you also have to account for the fact that there is another unquantifiable variable that is those who never suspect but nonetheless are also n…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 02:49 PM
14

Highly unlikely. Ancient weaponry that our distant ancestors used was typically things like spears which were thrown or thrust from a distance, typically to hunt animals that were more resilient (thicker skin or whatnot) than we are. Things like body armor made out of hard enough materials to protect from such an attack are a relatively recent development. Add to that the fact that primitive tribesmen in surviving tribes don't look very built. They either look somewhat chubby or even a little em…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 01:36 PM
11

Tools used to hunt which can also be used to kill other humans have been used pretty much throughout all of human history, whether it be guns, swords, or spears made of carved wood and bone
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 12:28 PM
11

This is what sociobiology or evolutionary psychology is largely about. About taking the proven observations from real sciences and applying them to animal behavior, including humans. Feminists of course hated it and decried it. Which is not surprising.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 12:24 PM
8

It was a relevant anecdote to the teaching material, at the very least. Unlike all of these shitty professors who bring their race and gender politics into completely unrelated courses.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 12:24 PM
1

Sexual morality as you know it was largely about ensuring that most everyone got a fair shake at the whole fulfilling of the biological imperative thing. Women could not reasonably expect men to labor and provide resources for them and their children with no reasonable guarantee that they are getting something out of the deal. It was a compromise. That a man would concentrate his efforts on one woman and give up his optimal sexual strategy of trying to impregnate as many women as possible. That …
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:04 PM
-1

The bonobo female freely shares sex as a protective strategy against the infanticide which is common in many other species as to confuse the many males they have sex with about paternity. I think you will find that most other apes do not do this because they are more tournament species. At the same time, none of these species really have much in the way of male investment in offspring. Which of course brings us to the next point, that this like, free love, man thing is not compatible with our ad…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 11:44 AM
1

No, it won't stop these false reports, especially not ones made for this specific reason of trying to hide infidelity. Women push men for commitment and in this day and age it isn't because they think that's the only legitimate way to have sex. We don't live in the 1950s or any age before that which had real ramifications for those who didn't play by those rules. Let's be real here. If you want to talk about instinct, almost no man is going to want to commit to them if they're sleeping around. I…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 11:27 AM
14

Yes, the American Association of Blood Banks and the accredited labs that report data to the organization produced empirical data that showed year after year that the rates of negative paternity tests was ranging from between 24 and 34%. You would be an absolute fool not to confirm.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 11:04 AM
17

It's not standard in any country and in fact it's banned in a few, like France. As it stands, men have to find out on their own and get the testing done themselves or in most jurisdictions they are stuck with the child support after some arbitrary cutoff date after the child is born. It's like somehow the fraud is ok if it goes undetected long enough. The worst part is that the knowledge of all of this and how common it is, is well, not common. No one teaches young men about this problem.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:52 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXZIXYM6Q-Y
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:11 PM
4

Everyone knows it's bullshit and they won't produce any kind of data on how those numbers were reached as the jig would be up. That's not the issue. The issue is how insane they're getting with things that they're literally asking people to believe 50% of women are going to be raped in Canada, a country with less than a 2 per 100000 rate of rape.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 11:03 PM
5

1 in 2 as per the rape whistle commercial
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:23 PM
3

It's a 0day old troll account you're replying to.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:18 PM
3

When do you see this situation changing when the entire family law apparatus is about profiting from it. When there are bogus "victim advocacy groups" organizations whose very livelihoods depend on keeping the lies going. When there are other interests like court-appointed psychologists and bullshit "sensitivity training" and other courses where livelihoods are again at stake and this is all linked together in a chain of perverse incentives. It's a lot like what's happening right now with Americ…
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:05 AM
9

"Strike" infers that this is temporary or going away, that it can be waited out. It's not. Not unless the laws change and I don't see that happening with all of the vested interests there.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:17 AM
1

This isn't even really a problem with TRP, which is about accepting things as they are rather than the wishful thinking new-agey bullshit of things like "Fat Acceptance." The problem came from with pushers of "Game." Does game work? Well yes and no. If you don't have a fairly strong physical pull for whatever woman you're trying to "game" though, what it comes across as to them like a lot of things a guy they're not into trying to get with them does -- the guy being seen as a "tryhard," a "creep…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 06:25 AM
2

They don't have to be. The threatpoint assures that she has power over you and that you had better do whatever she says or else.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 01:16 AM
3

Why would you care what a bunch of circlejerkers with too much time who can't put forth any substantive arguments think.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 01:03 AM
4

It's not "The US" it's a wealthy part of the US. These women can afford plastic surgery, the best in skin treatments, the best in help getting fit. They still don't look as good as a woman half their age that takes care of herself but maybe better than some that don't. Even then they're still not gonna get the same kinds of guys they could 20 years ago, because why would such a guy bother with them when he can do better unless he has a fetish. What they're gonna get if they go for younger guys i…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 01:02 AM
24

The attempt to stretch the term rape to a ridiculous level and pass that on to actual law and policy is a very real issue. See what's going on with US colleges right now due to the "Dear Colleague" letter.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 12:34 AM
7

Hard work ain't gonna make you taller, change the shape of your face unless you're really fat, or cure male pattern baldness. Epigenetics isn't some magic pill. It's far more subtle than that. Someone with a family history for crazies and sociopaths for example may not end up as one if they grow up in a specific type of environment. Whether it has any effect on intelligence in any meaningful capacity is really up in the air.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 11:38 PM
94

Microrape. MICRORAPE. This is actually a thing that social justice warriors believe in. The word rape has been so diluted that it's almost meaningless anymore.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 11:17 PM
9

Not every guy can. Let's be real here. Genetics are obviously a huge thing. Height below around 5'10" is a massive dealbreaker for any woman who isn't in wall panic phase of her life i.e. young women who would be worth a shot at serious commitment with. As is male pattern baldness, and of course your facial structure and I'm sure if women could easily assess things like penis size without an unrealistic amount of effort leading to opportunity cost, they would also be factored in. Now as for thin…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 09:50 PM
28

What those people fail to mention of course is that it's women who push for marriage. If it's so awful for them, then why are they the ones who insist on it. What's happened here is that she got the X year itch/new cock urge and divorced only to find that she didn't have the kinds of options she did when she married him in her 20s. Post-divorce, she probably screwed a few guys that were willing to have sex with a woman in her mid 40s and decided her ex-husband was a better option than what she c…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 06:43 PM
4

Yes, she was someone involved in the shitshows in Toronto which also involved and overlapped with some of the "anarchist" kiddies from the G20 incident. What a big surprise.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:54 AM
11

He's essentially arguing one of two things. 1) That women are somehow brainwashed puppets who are unable to make their own decisions and so even when they do, things like consent to sex are somehow not valid. 2) That women often make "trade-off" type decisions in who they have sex with, such as for financial reasons in his dumb, meandering rant about marxism and a warped definition of rape. The implication is that this is also not valid consent because they would otherwise not have sex with thes…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 05:38 PM
3

Don't worry, Sir Knight. I think they're doing just fine by your code over there.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 04:54 PM
11

Your idea of justice--your "social justice"--is abominable. Throwing someone in prison for a he-said, she-said shitshow farce of a trial based on nothing more than appealing to emotion and taking the word of the accuser as more credible than that of the accused is against everything that modern, civilized justice systems were built upon. You may as well just go back to vigilantism and hanging accused from a tree.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 04:00 PM
38

How is Jezebel any different from feministing.com or any different from the implicitly and explicitly feminist prop posted in almost every mainstream rag save maybe the Wall Street Journal. It's not like Jezebel is uniquely awful. It in fact sprung up well after a lot of the established mouthpieces of the Cathedral. It's just a symptom of a greater problem with what feminism is and has been since well before I was born. Even as a small boy I knew something was severely fucked up with the way the…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 03:51 PM
2

What exactly do you think this nonsense about "common law marriage" is about? A stopgap measure to try to keep the wealth transfers going. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see attempts to transfer even more wealth away from men.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 11:58 AM
2

Most of the larger, more populated cities in Canada are like Toronto, although not all are quite as bad as Toronto itself. This is why you see such a disproportionate amount of men's rights/MGTOW/redpill/pua people being from Canada. Yeah, it's pretty bad here. You should avoid it if you can.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 11:52 AM
6

Tumblr is almost entirely idiot teenagers, actually. It's pedestrian. You get horrible shit like Jezebel.com or feministing from the post-wall specimen.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 09:18 PM
3

The funniest part being that she says "the other side" is no better yet provides zero examples evidencing that claim.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 01:31 PM
10

Hasn't this been the norm for years? There's been constant brigades and new account simps who fancy themselves master trolls.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 12:54 AM
10

To put it more clearly, the amount of available sex hasn't really changed much. What has changed is the distribution of it. As a rule, women now provide harems to a smaller percentage of highly attractive men.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:35 PM
13

You've wasted your effort. Do you honestly expect the average young heterosexual woman who has (or can) gorged herself on a literal smorgasbord of easy casual sex with men way out of her league to "get it"? Even the most sexually successful guys will have more empathy for these guys than she will. Her entire article is basically shitting on low status men she would not consider having sex with in a million years until she becomes an over the hill, used-up woman looking for some guy, any guy to p…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 11:37 AM
1

Honestly physical appearance is like 90% of genuine sexual attraction. The difference in how women treated me from when I was a thin 115-120lb teenager to when I put on some muscle was jarring and eye-opening. It's why I don't value women's opinions on individual men. It seems to be by and large rationalizations based on their sexual attraction or lack of. It shocks me how guys grow up and don't see this even if it's just in watching what women do and what guys they tend to put out the most for.…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 10:23 AM
1

There has however been abuse of youtube reporting to fuck up the accounts of people posting such materials (and even their own original materials) by false flagging over something as trivial as using an image or a 3 second video clip which should be covered by fair use, or by claiming that the material in question violates some kind of rule when it doesn't. So the auto-moderation software removes the video and takes action against the account holder and appeals take forever. The problem I guess …
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 10:21 AM
3

Hate speech laws and codes are and always have been a way for those who have power to expediently silence any opposition from those who do not. There is no chance in hell of them being applied objectively and equally.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 01:35 AM
26

This isn't just in Canada. The problem is that too many prosecutors are far more concerned with boosting their careers by securing convictions rather than determining what actually happened and doing what's just.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:30 PM
4

Well there was that one dump of data that OKCupid posted where women rated a stunning 80% of men as below average.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:25 PM
3

So Ally Fogg is now getting the same kind of treatment that the other useful idiots like Tom Matlack got as soon as they stopped toeing the line. History repeats itself. Hopefully he'll learn something.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 09:20 PM
5

It also contradicts various feminist aphorisms such as that "rape is about power, not sex" and that the United States and other first world countries are "rape cultures" when in fact by their own attempted reasoning they're using to posit these things it is the exact opposite. As well as showing that once again they're repackaging old tired 2nd wave feminist crap about all men being rapists--er, potential rapists and dressing it up in a bunch of sophistry to see how well it works this time aroun…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 10:21 PM
2

The first step is to not care about what they think about you and learn to not fear rejection by trying over and over until you really don't care and don't become too attached to any one girl. There is no way to 100% successfully "close" and so you must take chances. You are going to see some awkward situations. For all of the crowing about "equality," women will not initiate and will not take these kinds of risks, and they love having situations where they maintain plausibile deniability. That'…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/14 09:00 PM
4

That is true but it seems they'll do anything inflammatory for cash.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:05 PM
11

The comments are amazing. A bunch of weak attempts to shame him from single mothers.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 12:22 AM
9

It's still all the same in the bar/club/party and other meat market scene. The difference between the guy who gets a lot of play and the guy who goes home with only his right hand for company or if he's lucky a girl who's still there at closing is almost entirely aesthetics.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 12:02 AM
5

They really don't. Some just don't mind that the guy isn't above-average as long as that guy is still taller than they are. I'd bet more guys have a fetish for fat girls than girls have a fetish for actually short guys.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 06:43 PM
3

It's almost as if the whole equal pay for equal work issue as well as questions of being actually qualified for the job are being talked about here. Crazy stuff.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:07 AM
2

As long as the laws are as they are today, yes.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:35 AM
2

Well, it's yet another example of blame the nearest man.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:26 AM
3

"Objectification" in terms of finding certain people physically attractive or not is a loaded term and bullshit and all, but not as much as thinking it's somehow bad when men do it but then not applying that equally to women.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 02:24 AM
3

I think it goes without saying that if there are "common law marriage" laws which the government has enacted as stopgap measures in your country, yes, don't live with anyone.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 02:58 PM
6

Secular circumcision in North America started as a result of quack doctors like John Harvey Kellogg a long time ago as a way to "stop boys from maturbating so much". The guy had a ton of loony ideas, such as that spicy food somehow caused a man to become more sexually excited--being why he made his cereal, Corn Flakes, bland.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 03:41 AM
10

Well the official herstory peddled by some victim advocacy groups is now up to 1 in 2 women under the rape-as-umbrella-term to go along with that charming rape whistle commercial, so why wouldn't they believe that kind of insanity.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 03:25 AM
13

It's actually best to not marry at all under this legal regime, if you are a man. That is the bottom line.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 02:22 AM
3

There have been plenty of articles of late talking about these concepts, either from the men's issues angle or in relation to the constant whines about things like "Where have all of the good men gone?" I think the most telling recent coverage was of the "Men on Strike" book by Helen Smith.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 02:13 AM
3

He has a body that your average guy can achieve in about a year or so of regular workouts, but that's still in much better shape better than most guys in a first world country. Have you seen what the average guy's body looks like? Slightly flabby, love handles. Not much muscle definition. He's no pro bodybuilder but he's still much better off than like 70-80% of guys in that regard.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 11:45 PM
2

We're talking about heterosexual sex here. His point is you aren't finding women (who make up apparently 1/4 to 1/3 of all internet porn viewers) liking porn with guys that have small dicks, are short, or overweight, or old. You will simply not find the kind of widespread acceptance and sexual attraction for just about every type of male body in women that you will find in men for women's bodies. It doesn't exist. The only thing you'll find in women's heterosexual porn preferences is a like for …
/r/MensRights26/12/13 11:28 PM
2

Big enough that the ideas are now infecting the mainstream. Keep pushing.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 11:00 PM
2

This is exactly what it is. It's essentially "do whatever you want to meet your own needs, fuck expectations." It's a form of rational hedonism based on the realities of today's social climate and legal system.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 10:58 PM
1

The real problem is that /r/mensrights has a lot of alt account shitheads who are actually feminists/newbies that try to smear /r/theredpill. A lot of the genuine guys who are just figuring out how fucked up things are would really benefit from reading this sub and taking in the useful information. What real MRAs like those at A Voice for Men are doing is somewhat worthwhile and I applaud them for it but I don't envy them. It's a lot of work for something that most likely will fail as they are f…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 10:44 PM
5

"Cock carousel" is a descriptive term that's probably been around almost a decade now. "Red Pill" if you're referring to /r/theredpill is maybe a year old now. A lot of the lexicon they use is just already established terms. The reason it's bad is a variety of reasons. Heightened divorce risk (not worth marrying such a woman with that kind of history), heightened infidelity risk and all of that possible downfalls that come from that (not your child, diseases, etc), the entire chemical bonding pr…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 09:01 PM
4

Well, no. Feminists love to say how they're somehow still relevant because women have it so bad in the third world countries and as if the often-exaggerated treatment of women in third world countries somehow justifies their ongoing western pogroms. The bottom line is that all but the insulated wealthy and powerful have it really bad in third world countries. This includes those "subhumans" we call males. The really unfortunate thing is that so many people uncritically believe what they are told…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:46 PM
1

You're replying to an SRS/againstmensrights poster making intentionally disingenuous arguments. If it seems like their arguments make no sense and are complete bullshit, you now know why.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 07:13 PM
1

But if they do they'll just jerk with yet another disingenuous "misters love to hit women" thread.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 07:08 PM
16

He is. It'll be interesting to see however that no one will make excuses for him as they did for the likes of Andrea Yates and the many other women who kill their children.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 10:51 PM
0

Yes, depending on your genetics (some guys get results much easier,) 30min-1hr a day 4-5 days a week of just the workouts themselves. Sure. Fair enough. Then there is the nutritional planning and followthrough. More time on top of that. If the guy is really that busy then he won't be able to keep it consistent enough to get the kinds of results he'd need. Not to mention that women generally report they find guys around ~25 to be the most physically attractive. Youth somewhat matters. Just not as…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 05:18 AM
1

Such a woman will always be mercenary. Treat the relationship with them for what it is--a casual thing that never gets serious enough for any kind of legal entanglements.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 05:09 AM
3

Lose weight/get in shape if you aren't in decent shape. If you've ever seen the before/after pictures of some guys who went from flabby to fit, there can and often is transformation potential there. Use moisturizer and exfoliating scrub. Get a good hair cut that frames your face well, but if you're unfortunate enough to have visibly thinning to the point where nothing would look good framing your face anymore then shave it all off. The "in denial" look so many balding guys sport is not good--it …
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 05:00 AM
49

Many women marry men they aren't actually sexually attracted to for resource-related reasons. The great mystery is solved.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 04:06 AM
2

That's not surprising. In the US I'm fairly sure white male suicides outnumber or close to outnumber every other demographic put together.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 03:11 AM
6

It would be just as pathetic and disingenuous as this show which is trying to present first world prostitution as "sex slavery." Let's be real here. Nearly all prostitutes in a first world nation are simply making a rational cost/benefit analysis and would rather get paid exponentially more per hour than they would work an equally soul-crushing shit job. It's the same reason strippers do what they do rather than work at Wal-Mart or some other terrible job that pays peanuts.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:20 AM
5

Not that I think you can do anything about all of this, but... Do women have a harder time when it comes to body shaming? Sure, Are you sure about this? The double standards in this would be comical if they weren't so pervasive. You see it all of the time in "meat market" settings. It's a major taboo to even talk about a lack of desire to fuck fat women and how you're shallow and a shitty person for it, but women can and do talk about how repulsive they find short guys, bald guys, guys with smal…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:07 AM
2

I have this problem when I talk to true believers in the free market as well. They imagine that we've never had a "truly free market" in the same way true believers of communism imagine that communism totally works, it's just never been tried properly. They seem to think their world of ought-to-be will actually work because they ignore the "human nature" (or applicable game theory) that prevents them from working.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:51 PM
2

The best part about Naomi Wolf I think is how she flipped her script about porn as soon as men stopped paying attention to her. She hit the wall late, in her 40s, and as soon as she did suddenly she says porn was not bad because of some attempt to associate it with rape like she used to, but because it creates a sort of competition and makes it harder for her to get attention. She then went on to write a book about her vagina not getting the kind of attention it used to.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/13 09:00 PM
1

It's because that's an SRS sub now.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:28 AM
2

I'm not so sure if this isn't just because they don't have the options they did when they were younger.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 01:02 AM
9

It's a no-win situation. If he wins he's an asshole who beat up a girl, and if she wins he's a pathetic weakling.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 12:02 AM
6

Search this subreddit for "O2" "Symantec" "Shermer" "Skeptic" "Facebookr" Google search for "Elevatorgate" and "Donglegate." Google search for "atheism+." You will find more than enough hits.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:46 AM
12

It's because the harassing of employers over political bullshit to get them fired ("bluelisting") is wholly ineffective when it comes to truly skilled work-- even if they do get fired as a result. The guy that got fired in the donglegate scandal was easily able to find new work for example. The thinly veiled threats of Lysistrata are also not very effective on a certain breed of tech nerd kind of guy, either.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:12 AM
7

I have to wonder whether cases of proxy violence like this or hired hitmen are included in official statistics i.e. number of male/female killed by intimate partners. I'm willing to bet no.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 04:32 AM
3

Pretty much exactly as those like Alain Soral said it would play out, where most of the militant feminists are in fact upper class women and their politics do not help lower class women who are stuck working bad jobs which include ones like taking care of the upper class feminist's children.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:14 PM
2

Does that matter? She's still showing these guys off for the titillation of her mostly heterosexual female audience.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 06:39 AM
2

Ellen Degeneres is a talk show host. Jay Leno is a talk show host. There is your context for these glaring double standards.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 04:52 AM
1

Consider that if you live in the UK, America or Canada or most first world nations, a massive percentage of the population is fat and out of shape to the point where even their facial aesthetics are affected. The chances of you being in good shape while taking care of the whole grooming with minimal effort in clothing/fashion and not being able to get laid are pretty slim. I'm not saying you're gonna bang supermodels or anything unless you have really good genetics on top of it all, but the chan…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 02:46 AM
10

She's making a red herring argument that somehow the exceptions disprove the rule i.e. she's disingenuously trying to argue that because unattractive women can't approach guys way, way out of their league and always expect to get easy sex--that some guys have minimal standards--that somehow as a general rule women having access to sex whenever they want within reason somehow isn't true. Even she doesn't believe what she's trying to argue, though. She knows as well as everyone else does that the …
/r/MensRights14/12/13 10:52 PM
3

The guy is either a troll or a hopeless cuckold in an abusive relationship trying to rationalize it so it doesn't seem as bad as it is. Way too much effort either way.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 04:50 AM
15

How easy? Well let me show you how easy. About a year ago, a woman was let free for unsuccessfully hiring a hitman (it was an undercover RCMP officer) to kill her husband. She claimed abuse at trial and the husband was not allowed to address her accusations in court. There was also hidden camera footage of her trying to hire the undercover RCMP officer where he explicitly asked if her she was abused, and she said no. She admitted on camera to the RCMP officer that no such abuse took place, and s…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 02:11 AM
13

I don't think that anyone in this subreddit seriously believes in love as it's sold to us in modern times. It's essentially a chemical cocktail in your brain as a result to certain stimuli that has been exalted and raised to the status of some sort of inexplicable supernatural or even religious belief, sort of like the belief in the "human soul." While you may have an actually equitable relationship with your boyfriend where you get all the stimuli required to be in "love" with him or maybe even…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 07:07 AM
1

It's everything when it comes to sexual desire for you, otherwise you end up like this guy who gets tepid sex from his wife who only married him for stability and yet had this sex tape floating around of doing things with random guys in a group sex setting that she wouldn't do with her husband of 7 years.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 01:32 AM
3

It's because the real world Canada is nothing like the image sold, as anyone who lives here and pays attention will tell you. You have people like this insane professor who are somehow respected for opinions like this.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:50 AM
19

It's only worth bringing up in response to men being called shallow to show that the empress has no clothes.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:42 AM
6

Most of what you describe as "alpha" behavior seems like you superimposing this caricature onto guys that you're jealous of the sexual success of. "Alpha" males in human culture is basically shorthand for the guys that are the most sexually successful. I'm not going to say the attitude you see all bullshit because it's not 100% bullshit, but most of these guys get this way through conditioning the same way a lot of women get the attitudes they do. They never really have to work for it. Due to th…
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 07:51 AM
2

Essentially it's an exercise in a form of cognitive bias called the Halo Effect. Being physically attractive is the difference between being seen as cocky, cool and charming or being seen as a weird tryhard loser/creep. This applies to far more than just trying to get laid. It applies to hiring--even pay--and a host of social situations.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 07:33 AM
7

He's got status working for him now. Same reason so many highly televised killers end up with women wanting them. Look at how Charles Manson is doing now in that regard. Old as fuck, still has that swastika tattoo on his forehead but has some women probably young enough to be his granddaughters wanting him.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 07:03 AM
60

No. I think the point was showing the obvious double standard. Actually, this is even worse than that because while you can change weight and women also don't tend to be into fat guys (or even just non-muscular guys,) a short guy can't do anything about his height. Being a heterosexual man today is a pretty brutal Darwinian affair all and all, so it comes as no surprise to me that the porn industry has seen such insane growth. There's nothing you can really do about it, though. All you can do is…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:47 AM
2

This is rich coming from you but no, the OP is using the actual definition. Not the made-up definitions you tend to use such as for racism when you post your diatribes about how horrible white people-especially males are--despite you supposedly being engaged to one, and how you're totally not racist because it's somehow impossible to be racist against whites.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 03:08 PM
9

The white feather campaign is a major piece of evidence for this. While the suffragettes engaged in domestic terrorism and demanded the vote they go with no corresponding responsibilities as men had as a precondition to their recently-gained vote, they also shamed boys and men to dying in World War I while at the same time not clamoring to go do that themselves.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/13 03:15 AM
2

No, it really doesn't contradict it at all. It argues that women are opportunistic and pragmatic. Rather than just blindly promiscuous, which no one was really arguing at all anyway. The article begins with an anecdote about a female throwing herself an at alpha male, a common sight at just about any meat market to be honest. It's all a build up to an appeal to nature, trying to argue that because it's natural it must be good. And because it benefits women's reproductive fitness via beta bucks (…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/13 02:42 AM
3

Feminists see false rape claims that end with a man's life in ruins as acceptable collateral damage at the very least. It is only when their own flesh and blood are subject to their obviously unjust law and policy that they will speak up about it.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 11:01 PM
22

Feminists often claim that MRAs are arguing against strawmen when in reality an abundance of actual physical evidence is present to support those arguments in the form of shameful events like this, or writings from their most cherished authors.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 10:47 PM
3

Aside from the fact that the obnoxious "fat acceptance" crowd seems to not understand physical attraction and how it works, this is the second biggest problem I have with them. It's pretty much entirely a bunch of fat women and "feminist allies" who whine about "men being shallow" but the same people then go on to shit all over guys who aren't the physical apex (not even necessarily fat, often just short and/or bald guys who can't even do anything about that, or thin non-muscular guys) with no s…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 07:30 PM
1

Having a texting history that shows she was up for the sex has prevented more than a few men from being thrown in prison due to false accusations. Similarly CCTV footage and other recordings have.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 05:05 AM
3

The "flip the sexes" test only works when you have an initial reaction based on a real thing to work with i.e. female sex offenders and their slap on the wrist sentences vs. male sex offenders having the book thrown at them. Here they skipped that, probably because they know that the results of such a comparison wouldn't fit their narrative.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 02:54 AM
1

/r/mensrights is full of newbies and feminist false flag alt accounts. The vast majority of verifiable regulars over there either don't really care one way or another about this sub or see the value in it.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/13 08:12 AM
-1

Correct. Sheryl Sandberg is the same woman who said: “When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, want…
/r/MensRights17/11/13 09:47 PM
5

It's because the man in these relationships is without fail providing all sorts of things that he shouldn't be, and that a man doesn't benefit from being in a relationship with a woman who sleeps around even from a purely biological standpoint. The "advice" here is to simply dump the bitch, yet you're trying to spin it as some sort of conservatism.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/13 09:30 PM
7

This is the number one problem I have with "game" as it's sold in general. It largely just seems to be a bad observation that is really just the Halo Effect at work, and the most useful bits of information seem to be related to pushing for sex and how to escalate when you're already in to get past any inhibitions and/or token resistance, and of course the unrelated but useful advice about how and why committed relationships in this day and age are a bad deal. If you're not meeting whatever their…
/r/TheRedPill13/11/13 09:05 AM
2

Professional victims who think they have a right to not be offended want to make this harmless but tasteless stuff "hate crime"? Really?
/r/MensRights12/11/13 10:33 PM
1

If there were arguing to release those in prison on bullshit minor drug offenses, that would be one thing. Here they are trying to release murderers using the abuse excuse with no actual evidence to support it.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:45 PM
4

Well, no. Why do you think the sexual mores of every major thriving civilization and culture in the world developed similarly? Muslims even have stories in their scriptures about the importance of women not sleeping around as "no one would know who the father is." The Arabic world was once upon a time was more a advanced civilization at the forefront of scientific thought, from what I understand. They knew how reproduction worked, though they likely only made educated guesses on it. Women are wo…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/13 04:06 AM
2

Don't let this guy dissuade you, all of the totally believable speculation about her being "demisexual" and such offered up in r/relationships is far more plausible than a textbook expression of dual sexual strategy where the OP is the male being used for what he can provide.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/13 01:02 AM
5

If the demand wasn't there nobody would be spending lots of money trying making this kind of thing to market it. Ask yourself why birth rates and marriage rates and so on are on the decline-- the juice isn't worth the squeeze. This is just a symptom of the problem.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 10:51 PM
2

That's a good question as to how women score on these metrics but the most important question is in how what metrics they used to declare this, and what kind of questions they asked to arrive at these statistics. I'm willing to bet they were very leading and nebulous and had to do with things like alcohol consumption.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:35 PM
45

It's 1.7 per 100000 here in Canada last I checked, and yet they want us to believe "1 in 3" now.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:32 PM
1

The question is does that pay the cost of living. The traditional way out of poverty used to be things like factory jobs which have all but disappeared in countries like America. More people doesn't necessarily mean better economy and better quality of life. China and India are great examples. Especially modern-day China which is becoming quite capitalist, and yet has enormous amounts of problems.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:13 PM
1

They're "progressive," that most Orwellian of political terms.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:10 PM
1

How much does an abortion cost vs. 18+ years of whatever it'll take to raise a child. Are adopting and abandonment not a thing? You don't seem to get that women have options, and men don't. That is his whole point.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 07:08 PM
8

If he was even the father. Those kids don't even look much alike in the most recent picture used.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 06:56 PM
5

Apparently she's never been to a gym before.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 11:07 AM
3

Strong gender differences in reproductive success variance, and the times to the most recent common ancestors tests this with various models and simulations. Spoilers: When the population is heterogeneous (alphas/betas, like in the real world) and things like promiscuity/infidelity (also exists in the real world) are accounted for, it turns out to be true.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 02:07 AM
1

Apparently everything does judging by people calling "troll" on everything posted in this sub. Bad case of just world theory. Fucked up shit happens in the real world. At the very least you should treat unverifiable internet stories as hypothetical situations.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 01:55 AM
2

Theoretically it could but if you've seen how most so-called "open" relationships work out in reality, well... Lets just say the male "partner" probably isn't getting many extra partners.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/13 11:28 PM
5

And most of that single motherhood isn't even possible without massive wealth redistribution, to boot. The ones that are rely on using lower class women as low paid childcare workers. Not sustainable. Behavior is driven by incentives and consequences. This all sounds great if you're a woman but if you're a man it's an obviously rotten deal.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/13 11:18 PM
11

What you have to ask to figure out how this is bullshit is, how it would translate to human behavior, and how it would actually look and what kind of casual effects it would have. You also have to look at the social hierarchy of the animal in question, how they live their lives -- this is very important for animals like the Bonobo which feminists love and think we should totally emulate because they have no idea how civilization and human societies work i.e. how things are made, how they get to …
/r/TheRedPill10/11/13 11:01 PM
4

Or maybe he did and he just doesn't have any actual employment opportunities that don't involve being a low rent Dr. Phil.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/13 01:17 AM
1

It's basically true that no one cares about it if you're a man. You have to work out and eat better. I just like pointing out the hypocrisy of these "body acceptance" types myself.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 03:45 PM
1

The vast majority of those arrangements are de facto cuckold arrangements and don't in any way benefit a man even if they aren't.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/13 12:50 PM
0

I was more talking about Christian sexual mores than anything else. It should be obvious in the context. Those don't apply and haven't for generations now.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 08:38 PM
4

Unless the OP is trying to fuck her, it's really not. The whole purpose of this subreddit is to remove the veil of bullshit that we're indoctrinated to believe about relations between the sexes. Helping this guy out would possibly be doing just that.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 08:00 PM
2

Of course they don't really care about it, but if they're attracted to you or want something from you (see the religious dupe described by the OP where she pretends to be a good virgin christian girl) they will pretend to be what you want or what you present as wanting. That is the whole premise of this thread. It's like when women pretend to be interested in whatever a guy is interested in. That whole "social chameleon" effect where a woman assimilates a guy's interests when she seemed to not b…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 07:57 PM
2

This isn't true at all. Some women won't like it, but some will. Some will see you as a "principled man" and if they're attracted to you to begin with, will posture themselves to make themselves look better in comparison. Now they may or may not actually be in reality better than the other woman as you can never really know another person, but that's besides the point. Part of female intrasex competition is to make themselves look better than the competition and this includes so-called "slut sha…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 07:36 PM
-2

I would tell the guy on the basis that he's a supremely naive religious dupe who's been indoctrinated to believe things that just aren't true.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 07:30 PM
9

He also knows where his bread is buttered, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:26 PM
21

And also didn't pick him up off the floor, either.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:42 PM
5

"Mansplaining" and the feminist "critique" of science as shit by mostly white males therefore wrong are essentially the "Jew Physics" of the modern age.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 11:25 AM
0

I was thinking that before I even checked the comments. It's a nice shirt.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 11:12 AM
1

I doubt anything significant would have really changed. The "sexual revolution" that caused this happened in the 60s.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 11:08 AM
1

It's almost entirely propaganda from very mainstream-thinking feminists who have this idea that men are "privileged oppressors" and therefore deserve any and all ill-treatment, or that somehow all men are part of the elite top 1% of CEOs, bankers, politicians and the like and can't have problems. Try bringing up the issues and see the kind of responses you get. For example bring up that genital mutilation against girls is illegal but not genital mutilation against boys. Bring up paternity fraud …
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:43 AM
1

The attitude of most women in today's world at least in most first world nations I've been to is that men are perverts and predatory and creeps and should keep away--unless they're not--and strangely enough that usually has to do with social status and whether or not he's extremely physically attractive, which there's no way for a man to know beforehand. And if she doesn't find him attractive seems it's become acceptable to treat him like subhuman garbage. The only way to deal with it and keep y…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:35 AM
3

If feminists were to actually examine if there were any evidence for what they define as "patriarchy" I think they'd find that there's no way it can actually exist as they define it. Men as a group score lower on just about every quality of life index there is in any country that keeps track of that-- life expectancy, homelessness, imprisonment, you name it. If we really lived in a culture as they claim where things are run for the benefit of men at the expense of women, or privileged men over w…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 12:56 AM
5

The tiny minority of men with power (who are, by the way, voted in by a majority female electorate) don't use it to help other men. Given spending, government programs that are women only this and that, well, it seems to be that they use it to help women far more.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:55 PM
1

Boiling them down to suicide attacks alone is of course yet another strawman, as polygynous societies like much of the Islamic middle-east have problems that run much deeper than that as a result of that issue. We knew you were disingenuous, though. Note also that the North American polygynous Mormons have their own problem which arises from polygyny. Blonde hair does darken with age, but it darkens slower from age in women than in men so it doesn't follow necessarily that darkening of the hair …
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 08:42 PM
6

Nice. You got off to a quality start by strawmanning an out-of-context, incomplete sentence you didn't quote the entirety of as a tautology. You're a real pro at this. The other key ingredient is the promise of 72 virgins waiting in heaven for any martyr in Islam. The prospect of exclusive access to virgins may not be so appealing to anyone who has even one mate on earth, which strict monogamy virtually guarantees. However, the prospect is quite appealing to anyone who faces the bleak reality on…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 07:08 AM
5

We get it, you're a humanities major and you don't like it because your worldview based in identity politics is threatened by it. You still aren't making a cogent argument against it. Evolutionary psychology is perhaps the only branch of psychology which at least has any real basis in actual sciences, and isn't just a series of just-so stories which are parroted with a zealous appeal to authority. To quote someone: Much work in evolutionary psychology offers explanations of phenomena that best e…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/13 04:10 AM
6

This is what the oft-quotemined-out-of-context Warren Farrell bit is about, women's romance novels and their content vs. the odd feminist attempt to redefine rape.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:19 AM
3

Not so. See: Dual sexual strategy. This kid definitely should learn to not be such a doormat and not offer up so much when he's getting nothing in return, though. It's like any kind of deal: You to be ready to walk away if the terms aren't acceptable to you, and in the case of relations between the sexes, no reciprocation/no commensurate compensation means you should look elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 10:10 PM
16

They were covering their asses from the shitstorm created by "social justice" bullies who were pissed off that anybody would even dare research such a subject.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 10:00 PM
6

It was removed from PT. From Wikipedia on the issue: In May 2011, he published an article in Psychology Today that explored why black women had been rated less attractive than those of other races in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Subsequent critical independent analysis of the results showed that the difference in assessed attractiveness held for three of the four data sets in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and that there was only a statistically sig…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 08:41 PM
12

It's not even necessarily that they believe that shit about 72 virgins. It's that they live in a culture which permits high status men to have four wives which leaves many men with no hope of fulfilling their biological imperative within the rules of the society and can drive them to do some crazy shit such as join extremist organizations. Their choices are essentially join extremist organizations and use violence to attempt to get resources/status/whatever or try the "sneaky fucker" strategy in…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 07:41 PM
22

Satoshi Kanazawa is a pretty legit evolutionary psychologist who's posted a lot of such things, it's too bad that he got removed from psychologytoday for ruffling feathers by exploring what demographics are seen as the least sexually attractive, as most of the content on PT is a wasteland of just-so assertions backed by little to no evidence or even basic logic.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 07:40 PM
13

It's a total strawman about something that isn't even in the dialogue from people who can't form a cogent argument against what MRAs actually say. Nobody seriously discusses the "friendzone" here. There are discussions about the misuse of the word "creep." This however is not the same thing. Essentially this whole thing is a weak shaming attempt in implying that, somehow, the only reason we're talking about these issues is that we can't get laid--while also of course being rapist virgins and oth…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:13 PM
1

I said this recently but the dictionary definition of feminism is about as descriptive of feminism in practice as the name "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea" is of North Korea.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:02 PM
2

Yes much like all of those other people who've also been professional victim social justice warriors who've made it on a combination of their looks, moderate acting talent and dumb luck but can't help putting their foot in their mouth when it comes to religious-like political opinions. It's Tom Cruise scientology level crazy but you don't want to see it because you buy into this brand of bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 04:23 PM
7

It seems like a generic question that she's blowing out of proportion because she's a professional victim. The article is literally SRS and is chock full of dumb social justice warrior shibboleths and just-so assertions.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 03:44 PM
7

The disparity between male and female sentencing was found to be about six times greater than even the racial disparity.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:13 PM
3

The term essentially means "not transgender" in the way they use it. And they use it as if it's a bad thing. The same with "white" and "heterosexual." These people are of course completely insane but that is besides the point.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:20 AM
4

When pseudo-intellectuals saw that brown people were the majority of the believers and declared it somehow racist to criticize certain religions.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:18 AM
1

This is also a great argument against abortion rights unless in your world women have no agency.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/13 05:07 AM
5

I remember this kind of thing growing up, too. Worst part was that they were handing out ritalin pills like candy and I can guarantee there were few to no legitimate diagnoses behind that. The office in my elementary school had a huge fucking jar full.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 11:05 PM
5

Or rather to turn their argument around, if you want a man to help support your child then have a child with a man who actually wants one with you.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/13 10:29 PM
6

Evolutionary biologists and psychologists don't quite agree about female end of the textbook you're reading, when it comes to sexual strategy.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 12:22 PM
1

It's like whoever wrote that had a "Buffet Table" approach to sexual selection theories where they pick all of the potentially bad things about the male end and exaggerate them to the extreme but leave out entirely what they say about the female proclivities-- the mercenary behavior, the dual sexual strategy.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:55 AM
2

It's kind of like when he was saying only domestic violence done by men matters just because men are bigger and stronger and threw a temper tantrum over that. Still haven't forgotten about that.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:52 AM
1

Over the hill feminist true believers who contradict themselves by claiming 18 Feel grateful that you don’t have to live with the same kind of fears that she does. Despite actual crime statistics showing otherwise, and also 21 Imagine what it would be like if your body were regarded as an unavoidable catalyst to bad things happening that you must now prevent. While they went on and on about how she fears you (because you're a rapist, I mean uhh potential rapist and men are scary) I could do this…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 11:29 PM
4

She basically flung herself at him judging by the thread. If it wasn't him it would be some other guy. His problem was with his trashy girlfriend who openly disrespected him and sucked this other guy's dick and probably fucked him, and he made the right choice by getting rid of her.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 10:52 PM
3

Exactly, which is why absent any kind of real consequences for this action you should never have a committed relationship.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 10:42 PM
4

What, he deserves to have his ass kicked because he partook of some easy pussy that was freely offered to him? Fuck that. The OP of that thread made the right move, removing her from his life.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/13 10:22 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_son_hypothesis
/r/TheRedPill24/10/13 05:10 PM
1

Quality of life metrics in first world countries such as homelessness, imprisonment rates, life expectancy, and so overwhelmingly show men worse off.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 04:07 PM
9

The stripper was at least a cool guy for showing him what a bad idea it would be to marry her.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/13 12:20 AM
2

Well yes, and no. Some of that shit mentioned is petty and maybe shouldn't have made it past editors but also you'll notice that a lot of the great content linked was also from AVFM. I think Paul has stated repeatedly that he just doesn't agree 100% with everything he allows on his site and that his goal isn't some kind of ideological purity or any similar thing. His goal as far as I know is in the site's name itself. To allow people to share their thoughts about these things and the issues. I t…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 03:43 AM
14

A lot of guys in France for example just mail out of country. Definitely worth the risk. Don't let unjust laws prevent you from finding out the truth.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/13 01:23 AM
17

Don't ask. Do. Privately. For your own peace of mind.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/13 12:34 AM
17

Absolutely. The problem is that DNA technology is relatively new (~30 yrs,) paternity testing is not very widely known about and there's a ton of attempts to shame men who would use them. Communities like this are one of the only places a man can learn about these things. Add to that the fact that the legal establishment, curiously, only seems to be lagging behind the technology on this one issue. There's no filibustering behind using DNA to catch murderers, thieves or any other sorts of crimina…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/13 12:30 AM
1

The major factor is what the guy looks like. A guy that looks like Danny DeVito and has the attitude of Danny DeVito but not the money or fame is going to be a "stupid creepy asshole." A guy with the same attitude but looking like a male model is going to get more ass than a toilet seat.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/13 03:39 PM
1

It really isn't. Acknowledging that the straight-up removal of the sexual mores that made civilization go is going to lead to bad things isn't the same as being for Sharia law.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:19 PM
1

I think fat women are the perfect example of being delusional about SMV, honestly. Some guys are so thirsty they'll still fuck it or even like it (see the existence of "BBW" porn having a market) so a fat woman whining about "no man wanting them" is really just not wanting to take men around their own value.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 10:00 PM
-1

That's largely what /r/theredpill is about except the scope is more limited.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 03:20 AM
-1

I can't fully agree. Everyone knows that not "all men are created equal." The truth is somewhere in the middle. Sure, no woman wants to fuck a total doormat but at the same time you aren't going to take some 5'5" bald guy acting the exact same way as a 6ft+ classically good looking dude and expect the same results. It just won't happen.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 01:28 AM
16

No joke. They'll fuck you in some public washroom if they're that into you.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 01:22 AM
18

They would rather spend 4 hours writing a whiny article to publish on jezebel or huffington post about how it's way too much time investment.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 02:19 AM
16

Also, resorting to insulting his appearance? She fucked him and wanted a relationship so at that point it's sour grapes.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 10:50 PM
33

"Clingy nice guy™"
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 10:48 PM
2

I remember that Paul Elam was talking about this interview quite some time ago. It's amazing it took this long for them to shit out a biased hit piece a month and a half later.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 09:44 PM
7

The reason you don't get married isn't because "it's forever," it's because it's a criminal contract and you legally become her bitch. She can do whatever the fuck she wants and you will still lose out in a divorce if you want out or she gets bored or whatever. There's no real reason to get married. If you live in a state without any "common law marriage" nonsense then live together and if people want to stay together, they'll keep coming back each day. You don't need the government creating a p…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 09:27 PM
1

Could be, but unless dawn of the dawn has been running a long haul troll about his divorce for like a year+ now I don't think this is fake.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 09:21 PM
6

A lot of people like to think they can "sniff out crazy." It's like how a lot of guys still get married thinking "Not my cupcake" despite knowing that it's a criminal contract and yet still find themselves in a horrible divorce however many years down the line.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 09:18 PM
3

Huffington Post is a mega feminist online rag that runs articles that constantly blame anything and everything on men. It's "man bad, woman good" writ large. I have no idea why this has been posted here.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 09:15 PM
10

I was going to post this. It's the most hilarious thing about "fat acceptance." It's a bunch of fat women who think that male model looking guys should be into them.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 05:03 PM
1

I'm not saying she's wrong to suspect the guy just got drunk and fucked another girl and is making excuses, women do it often too. This kind of thing happens all of the time and people love to try to blame the alcohol or whatever they can when they're caught out. What you're describing though is known as the passive voice which is something women often use in an attempt to dodge responsibility for their own actions. There are so many stories about women saying "it just happened" that some of the…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:18 AM
3

People who dream up absurd laws and policies like to imagine that they won't apply to them and theirs. It's the same reason that a feminist was so aghast recently that her own son was being railroaded on a false rape accusation. It's more of a "not in my backyard!" kind of thing to them.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:14 AM
0

The most defining reason in why the Duke and Hofstra guys (first set behing white, the others not) didn't get railroaded into prison was because they had evidence to prove their innocence. Rape accusations in the last few decades have largely become guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 02:47 AM
3

Too many people use the word "confidence" as if it's some kind of magic potion when it comes to trying to get laid. It's not. At best it's probably tertiary. What is probably a more attractive personality trait is sexual aggressiveness (i.e. taking the lead) which doesn't necessarily have anything to do with notions of confidence.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 01:12 AM
10

It's purely cognitive bias. A large reason why common advice is to work out and get into better shape is because the same behaviors seen from a more physically attractive man are received better. It's more likely to be perceived as "he's cool and cocky" rather than "he's a tryhard asshole." The gold digger prank on the frontpage of TRP right now is another good example. She thinks he's just some average guy asking for her phone number. He hops in an expensive car and suddenly she's interested be…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 11:12 PM
-6

No you see, wanting to get laid (having completely normal sexual desires) when you aren't stunningly attractive = creepy. Glad to have cracked the code for you.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 10:55 PM
1

These were taken for a variety of reasons including court-ordered, parents (of both sexes) wanting to know, immigration, medical-related and so on. So it's about as random as it can get without someone doing a very expensive large-scale collection of data which some would say is "unethical." The laboratories themselves are held to high standards to assure the accuracy of the tests.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 01:43 AM
1

https://www.aabb.org/sa/facilities/Pages/relationshipreports.aspx Interesting to note that they stopped making them available for free to the public because of these reports consistently showing the high rates every single year and people taking notice of this and drawing the obvious conclusion that this is a massive problem in our "civilized" society. This seems to be politically motivated as some of the more recent reports even try to downplay these results rather than just presenting the data…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/13 08:22 AM
6

If I'm not mistaken, Mary Koss is also responsible for this CDC fiasco because she doesn't "feel it's appropriate" to categorize the exact same thing as rape when it's a man it happens to.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:38 PM
3

Around 10% is the estimated average. 1.9% assumes high confidence and likely very high socioeconomic standing. Keep in mind these are all just reductive estimates based on actual tests taken from accredited labs which are showing an alarming 25-33% rate pretty much every year.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 11:51 AM
12

It's not really a rights issue. It is one of those social issues though where a double standard becomes apparent: Men are apparently monsters if they express a preference for anything in-shape whereas women don't catch any shit if they expect a guy to look better than the statue of Adonis.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:48 PM
6

(let me say this is not uncommon behavior between me and men I consider close friends. I have a close relationship with a lot of my former EdgeCase coworkers) By a guy she found physically unattractive by the sounds of it.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/13 08:10 PM
3

There are no consequences because the legal system makes sure of it. The only thing the guy can do is go nuclear with the threat of mutually assured destruction and actually mean it, or just not get married.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/13 06:45 PM
2

As long as you don't live in a state with the "common law marriage" nonsense, anyway. If you do you can't live together.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/13 06:41 PM
98

It's an amusing prop piece since they're quoting people who are saying that it's the men's rights people who were starting problems at the University of Toronto for example. The video evidence both of Warren Farrell's talk as well as the protesters outside paint a very different picture, as do the videos of other events there. These classic propaganda tactics of controlling the discourse and straight up lying about what happened don't quite work in this day and age because many, many very averag…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:15 PM
1

You have people who've definitely had some sense of the issues and problems that are talked about but you'd never expect to actually talk about them start talking about them recently. For example, Joe Rogan talks about this kind of shit on his podcast now sometimes. The obvious best way to combat the system and vested interests is to start removing any of your own support for it, sure. You can speed this up by spreading the message to as many people as possible. That's largely where we are right…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 05:57 PM
9

This is an old hat non-argument that has been discussed over and over. barbarossaa discussed this in May of last year, in fact. Point to some specific examples, please.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:56 PM
16

Yes, you're right. What one guy does will be seen as "charming, cocky, etc." while another guy will be seen as some stupid asshole with the only difference between them being the way they look. A lot of people need to learn what the term cognitive bias is and how it applies to this situation. Some people will disagree with you here because they have a bad case of a just world fallacy brewing in their head and like to believe that it's all a meritocracy, and acknowledging that it's not will destr…
/r/TheRedPill11/10/13 03:37 PM
1

The man is not a father. The ancient common law on this existed to keep the peace because hundreds of years ago you could not prove it. Then came blood testing which could exclude but not conclude whether a man was a father based on whether the child's blood type was even possible based on their parents' types, which excluded the man as the father if it was not. Then came DNA testing. What we have is the law refusing to catch up the technology for political reasons related to a half century of f…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 09:32 AM
12

Unfortunately, "being yourself" only works if you're one of the top maybe 5% of male genetic lottery winners who women swoon over no matter what you do save maybe becoming ultra-out-of-shape. For every other guy who wants to have sex more than a handful of times in his life, he has to actually do things and make changes.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 08:42 AM
2

For the last time, the man is not a father. He split with the mother when the children were five years old and decided, probably on his lawyer's advice to see if they were even his when the cheating whore of an ex-wife tried to squeeze even more money out of him to unjustly enrich herself. Family bonds my ass. Your entire argument is a stack of appeal to emotion using children as human shields to enforce a slavery model on unrelated men who've already been duped. There is no justice in this kind…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:39 AM
1

Also known as the "social chameleon" effect.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 08:35 AM
9

I was gonna point that out. It's amusing because this is the same advice that out-of-shape guys, that guys who buy into the "just be yourself" advice and so on get.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 08:26 AM
2

It shouldn't mean that at all because it was under fraudulent pretenses. You are overtly supporting fraud and slavery by making this statement. I don't see what there is to disagree with here. The man in this story and common scenario is not only innocent of any crime, he is in fact the victim of the crime. And yet he is being punished by the system. This is also extremely unjust. You have a very repugnant ends-justify-the-means worldview where slavery of an out-group or a socially or legally sa…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 07:52 AM
1

Then you would be doing so at the expense of an innocent man's liberty as well as likely stripping him of the chance to have his own children as his resources he would need to do so are being unjustly stolen from him via state violence.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 03:03 AM
2

The system is supposed to produce just outcomes. If it does not, then there is no reason for anyone to follow the laws or have any faith in the system.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:50 AM
1

Apparently you think children are human shields to be used to evade consequences for crimes.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:26 AM
1

I don't think this behavior should be rewarded at all. It creates moral hazard. In a sane world, paternity fraud would carry a stiff sentence for the woman and the children become a ward of the state.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:22 AM
1

It's simply not the man's problem, and attempting to make it his as the court has is a form of slavery. You don't prioritize the well-being of certain unrelated innocents over others by making one wronged party pay. What's really going on here is that the state wants any convenient wallet, some man--any man, to pay.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 01:23 AM
1

If the man had legally adopted the children with full knowledge they weren't his, I wouldn't have a problem here. He did not, however. He was duped and is now literally enslaved under pain of prison by the state to pay for children that are not his and he did not consent to raise under any kind of circumstances that would pass muster for fraud of any other kind.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:59 AM
3

Shallow claim. Feminism gets blamed for where it is demonstrably at fault, such as in the creation of black letter law and policy that discriminates against men.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:20 AM
1

Just FYI: The man's attempt to recoup resources was also shut down by the court. It's a very cake and eat it too injustice and you seem to be fine with the status quo of forcing unrelated men to pay for children that aren't theirs and they never would have cared for if they weren't defrauded in the first place. Again, you think it's fine that a non-father be forced into peonage to support children that aren't his own. Why not the judge in this specific case if she's such a philanthropist? She's …
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:12 AM
1

Yes I would be ok with that because they are not his children and he never would have taken care of them had he known the truth up-front. It is fraud and you are attempting to say it's somehow legitimate based on weak emotional arguments. The choice as to whether he has any involvement after discovering the fraud should be his and his alone. If he wants to, great. If he doesn't, the state should not be able to compel him to. It is a form of debt bondage or indentured servitude to do so-- forms o…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:58 PM
1

Now you're arguing semantics to uphold injustice. This is classy.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:12 PM
2

I'll take disingenuous arguments for 100, Alex.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:00 PM
1

In this case he separated from the mother in 1998 when the children were five years old and was milked for child support for over a decade for children that are not even his.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:21 PM
1

Also the fact that she's a total hypocrite who doesn't practice what she preaches, as evidenced by her recent whine about men being able to filter out dumpy, bitter aging shrews like herself on OKCupid.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 01:20 AM
3

It's basically about women who engage in sex tourism. And then try to claim they're totally not doing the same thing as men who do it.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 11:55 PM
58

Why do you think there's such a huge MRA presence in Canada? It's not just a coincidence.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:13 PM
2

Another case of: It's only sexist when men do it.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:11 PM
3

I'm willing to bet the only kinds of guys who approach her are way below the unreal standards set in her mind by the many guys who pumped and dumped her a couple decades ago that she thinks she deserves but in are in reality way out of her league. She's the female equivalent of a "neckbeard" -- an unattractive, dumpy middle-aged shrew.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 10:29 PM
3

She has to be really awful for him to prefer video games.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 07:40 AM
2

Briffault's law.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 12:09 AM
16

That's a very just world theory way of looking at things, but really what's happening is that most of the women are "sharing" a small number of guys. Straight from the horse's mouth. Jayne Dallas, a senior studying advertising who was seated across the table, grumbled that the population of male undergraduates was even smaller when you looked at it as a dating pool. “Out of that 40 percent, there are maybe 20 percent that we would consider, and out of those 20, 10 have girlfriends, so all the gi…
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:45 PM
23

When feminists talk about how good "men" have it, you can decode this by knowing they're really only referring to the top maybe 20 percent of men at most, if we're being generous. It's what called the apex or frontman fallacy. Everyone else knows most college aged guys have nothing but their right hand for company most of the time. So what's really happening is that college-aged women are offering up harems to a small percentage of unusually attractive men and then complaining about the obvious …
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:16 PM
2

That doesn't really sound odd when you consider marriage a contract wherein men sell wealth to women in exchange for rights to her womb/children. In the absence of such a contract, men don't really have "their" children but women do. See barbarossaa's recent video on surrogacy for more on this. Swedish feminists were among the first to fight against men using surrogacy to sidestep obligations to women.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 07:57 AM
3

The summary is that women care far more about male physical appearance and sex than our society indoctrinates us to believe.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/13 03:30 AM
1

If there are "Romeo and Julet" laws where you live, you'll be fine. Usually those allow a 3 year difference to be legal. Those laws had to be created in the first place due to situations like yours ending in ruined lives over nothing. I don't think the girl in the story should be going to prison but it's an obvious case of double standards in the law practice and the legal system and that is what gets people worked up. It's bullshit that if she were a male she'd be in prison and no news media wo…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:33 AM
1

What twitter trolls seem to have done was take the anti-white racism they already knew was there in feminist and other related discourse and use it to troll them into being very overt about it.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:22 AM
2

Twitter trolls seem to dislike social justice warriors a whole lot more than even I do.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:19 AM
3

It could be like a guy who hides his income to avoid gold diggers, maybe.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 02:04 AM
1

As long as it's self-reporting, people will lie and put up "myspace angle"/older pictures and sometimes setup awkward meet-ups as a result. It's only as useful as people are honest.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 04:47 PM
4

It's the origin of the "where have all of the good men gone" whining, really, once they get to a certain age and are cast off by guys that won't--can't really--commit to all of the women who desire them. "Good" isn't a comparative word; the word they should be using is better but that seems really shallow, doesn't it? So they don't use that word.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 12:47 AM
2

It really does work if you're in decent shape and post pictures showing it off. Online dating is the club scene on a macro scale, staring into the abyss of animal behavior we're raised to think we're all above but very few people seem to actually be.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 12:41 AM
2

Trust me, they know when a guy is into them. They aren't oblivious. Male "friends" or orbiters as they're also called are excellent ways to get free shit--help moving, attention, gifts, favors, etc.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/13 01:24 AM
1

The double standards in shit like this are obvious but most women have enough social intelligence to not vocalize their dislike for short guys because they know most guys who aren't even short won't be impressed and it'll hurt their chances of getting anything but pump and dumped. Any guy who is short or has a short friend or male relative knows all about this.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 12:35 AM
3

Private prisons often use the inmates for forced labor to produce all of this "made in the USA!" shit where they try to pretend it's "morally better" than sweatshops in Asia on top of all of the other ills of the system.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/13 11:53 PM
22

Yes, it's for real. Here's something you might find interesting.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 01:27 PM
1

I don't think any of this really applies here since he's only 7 years older than her and probably met her when she was 15-16 i.e. didn't raise her.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:55 AM
3

You're thinking of /r/seduction and the commercial PUA stuff. Hint: almost all of the stuff that sounds like total bullshit that doesn't work is exactly what it seems like--bullshit--and it's sold to really desperate, lonely and sexually frustrated guys. Most of the stuff people suggest in /r/theredpill is common self-improvement stuff like being in shape, not being a doormat and so on. Some of it is telling you to act in ways women find attractive... the "dominant" kind of personality traits, b…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 03:59 AM
1

A personal history of the men's rights movement video by factory, an older MRA. Video from 2009.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:47 PM
9

That's the thing. There is no point in circumcision at all. Urinary tract infections are incredibly rare in all men over the age of about 2 and they're treated the same as they are with women. It's not like an uncircumcized man generates 5 metric tons of smegma a day or anything, either--it takes under 10 seconds to clean up there.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:40 PM
9

It increased the risk in uneducated African populations because the westerners performing the circumcision sold them on it as if it's some kind of vaccine or cure. I've never seen any credible research stating that mutilating genitals gives any kind of reasonably good mitigation of infection rates. Maybe 1% per sex act, at most. So you'd need to perform around 101 circumcisions to prevent just 1 infection from over 100 individual sex acts. That is not worth it. Teaching people to use condoms is …
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:25 PM
2

I think anyone who's observed the world will know that the "bro code" doesn't really exist and very few men will adhere to that kind of thinking if they're being offered easy pussy. Even real biological brothers.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:08 PM
10

The textbook clearly works from a faulty set of assumptions such as that male sexuality is inherently predatory while female sexuality is not. It's sort of like how some guys are called "perverts" for having completely normal sexual desires.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 12:13 PM
3

It's just naked special pleading. Of course there won't be any proof or justification for the statement.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 12:11 PM
6

Not that I think the political "right" is any better but "leftists" in North America tend to call and label people they don't like as racist/sexist/homophobe etc with no actual substantiation as an attempt to smear someone's character, intimidate them and shut down discussion. It's a type of intellectual thuggery and it's only effective if you let it be and don't stand up to them.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 02:33 PM
19

So they teach largely uneducated people that cutting a part off their dicks makes them bulletproof and afterwards these men then go out and recklessly have unprotected sex where they may or may not have a miniscule, unproven, and at best maybe 1% lesser chance per sex act of being infected. Is anyone really surprised when this is the result? Anyone could have it seen it coming--but hey, I bet some people made a lot of money on this mass mutilation of cocks. Certainly weren't going to make as muc…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 11:16 AM
6

Forced marriages, and false dowry claims, often as part of divorce strategy.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:06 AM
2

I have no idea where the actual hate for /r/theredpill came from honestly. It seems to be mostly SRS/feminist-driven shallow claims of "misogyny." You made a fair point here.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:03 PM
4

They're trashy and the people on them are also trashy and mostly on them to get their 15 minutes of fame, but the issue covered is still is very serious and very real.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 07:54 PM
3

I can almost guarantee you that after the whole "atheism+" (feminism) bullshit invading the atheist/skeptic community that he's done a lot of reading on these kinds of issues and come to a lot of the same conclusions that almsot all men who do that kind of research do.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/13 07:11 AM
8

Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: why do women like women more than men like men? “Women are wonderful” effect
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:24 AM
3

I think you're an early 20-something college student know-it-all idiot by the way you write, honestly.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:00 PM
1

Not necessarily. I believe that Richard Dawkins said in "The Selfish Gene" that you have about as much of a chance to inherit that from your father's genes as from your mother's. It's possible that her father had a small penis.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 09:06 PM
13

The one where the author acknowledges that some MRAs deserve the criticisms that the whole movement receives. It's very important that we get a handle on some of the less "tactful" voices out there. Completely disagree. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window The movement will never go truly mainstream until we get advocates who can be moderates, or if our current advocates can moderate their language, and be a little more tactful. I really look forward to the day that we get coverages with …
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:32 PM
22

I highly suggest you read Warren Farrell's recent article about how in Canada, these people and their cohorts have essentially unilaterally and with no discussion banned men's rights issues groups from campuses. The bottom line is these people have a lot of actual power and exposing them for what they are will go a long way.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:17 PM
2

/r/SRSsucks
/r/MensRights25/09/13 05:10 PM
20

"social justice."
/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:41 AM
2

I'm reminded of the manufactured outrage over Resident Evil 5 when that was in development when no one heard so much as a peep about the previous game.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 12:43 AM
7

Then the government should not force anyone to pay child support under pain of prison in the first place if they cannot or will not ascertain that it is the correct person.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:12 AM
2

"Social justice" is to justice what alternative medicine is to medicine.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:10 AM
7

The government is already in the business of legally forcing people to care for children, is that too much government for you? If not, why not. As such, the least the government can do is make sure it has the right person on the hook.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:03 AM
7

Something to keep in mind is that even the earliest looks into paternity using blood typing back in the "good ol' days" didn't bear this idea we keep seeing as a meme here out.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/13 01:43 AM
2

And why not? I mean they've been beating on that Marc Lepine drum here in Canada for decades to demonize literally all men in the country.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 12:11 AM
14

She's essentially trying to shame and guilt men into giving women even more freebies and artificial legs up in competition for high-paying cushy jobs. Any man who does is a fool because not only will his own quality of life drop but there is the obvious elephant in the room that you don't see her or many other women at all for that matter really mating down. so the very clear effects on a man's sexual marketplace value are apparent.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/13 01:43 PM
7

She came from a country where being not fat and having a vagina was a golden ticket, and went to a country where men would rather jerk off to porn or immerse themselves in hobbies than deal with a plain jane with an attitude problem like herself. The best part I think is where she shits all over the appearance and interests of guys who are in all likelihood in her league or even better than her. To put her own analogy to work, she thinks she's "Barbie" when in reality she's the gross-looking gir…
/r/TheRedPill22/09/13 02:15 AM
3

/r/SRSsucks
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:54 AM
17

When you read these articles you need to know that by "men" they mean "men we are sexually attracted to" i.e. the small percentage of guys being provided harems.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/13 12:24 AM
2

Added to the rules for this sub recently: No crosslinking anything from reddit at all. Not in submissions. Not in comments. If you want to post a conversation or post between members on reddit you must take a screenshot, and edit it for the following requirements: No URL in picture or post, Subreddit name must not be present in the picture or in the post, Must be self-post with analysis. No low-hanging "look this guy is a moron" posts. Constructive posts only. Everything else will be deleted wit…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 10:02 PM
2

Doing it regardless is a good idea but the ones who can do it and get results are largely the most attractive men who again have an actual abundance of options rather than just the mentality of abundance. A lot of white knight types are the way they are likely because they think this is the only way they can get laid, and for some of them they may even be right that all they can get is a lukewarm pityfuck on rare occasion by doing that.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/13 11:22 PM
4

Only the most attractive men who have an abundance of actual options as opposed to merely an abundance mentality can do this. Unfortunately too many "beta" herbs exist that will not do this and are one blowjob away from doing whatever she asks so you end up with the kind of women we have today. I think this is unfortunately largely biological and that most men will do whatever it takes to get sex with the hand they are dealt.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/13 11:02 PM
1

A class issue is being framed as a sex issue, and the elephant in the room they keep dancing around even as they keep saying that poor black women aren't experiencing this is the PC dogma of "white privilege" that has shaped policy that has led to less social security nets for poor whites than poor people of other racial groups. Being a poor white man in countries like this is of course even worse.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/13 10:55 PM
43

A feminist that said they've been following this sub for years despite this sub not even being a year old, no less.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/13 04:37 PM
12

Well this sub has become popular enough that reddit admins are playing favorites and disallowing all outside links while their darlings in SRS can still link anything, vote brigade anything and shit all over the place with impunity.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/13 04:34 PM
9

/r/foreveralone but it's really sad and you shouldn't read it.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/13 12:13 AM
16

You shouldn't let this bother you, really. Just lie about it.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/13 09:34 PM
1

Easy enough to avoid by never using any but his own which she has no physical access to.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/13 06:51 PM
2

If he's only in it for the sex, it doesn't really matter if she's a gold digger. She's trying to exploit him but has to open herself up to giving him exactly what he wants in order to even try. But he knows her game so he's still the clear winner in this shitty game she's playing.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/13 05:10 PM
1

This is essentially the "Tom Leykis method." It's what he recommends doing. Letting them get a whiff of the money but never letting them have any access to it. I think you're really naive if you'd marry under this legal regime at all but if you're set on it you should probably present yourself as if you have no money at all to speak of.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/13 05:06 PM
-6

You've gotta be pretty old if the girls weren't like that when you were in high school.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 02:02 PM
3

I haven't read the second one but the first was full of the author imagining that DNA testing would somehow rid us of the instinctual sexual jealousy and aversion to tolerating to infidelity. It won't. Especially not when men still take on the primary costs of committed relationships. It was essentially female imperative propaganda. Very few men will ever accept women who sleep around for anything serious, no matter the laws.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/13 12:22 AM
2

That's because the SPLC hires complete dunces who hold to their hardline dogma of men as "privileged oppressors" to write their garbage hit pieces.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 02:22 AM
7

That entire article is hilariously slanted, with that Montana thing that feminists are losing their shit over being propagandized as a rape when it was just the same kind of thing female teachers are being caught doing all of the time with them only really caring because it's a man who got a slap on the wrist like almost all of the women in the same scenario tend to.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 03:19 PM
8

Only a fool believes that a man's looks count for nothing and it is easily observable in any kind of "meat market" as to which kinds of guys end up leaving with women regularly. Some guys delude themselves into believing this because they want to think that they have complete control over something, that whether they succeed or fail in any given thing is entirely some kind of meritocracy of their actions rather than there being things that are either completely out of their control or require a …
/r/MensRights11/09/13 05:10 AM
5

Put it this way: How many guys are legitimately creepy. Like grab a girl's hair and inhale creepy. Actual behavior. Not this man's doesn't spend at least 6 hours a week working out (while I myself am chubby) "creepy" which is what most of these complaints are. A guy looking for sex and being upfront about it on an internet dating site is not "creepy." It's what most people use the things for. The real difference you're seeing here is that men have far lower standards to have sex with someone, an…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 04:05 AM
3

Are you somehow surprised that SRS users like the ones who run that sub are duplicitous and self-serving as well as in dire need of a creative writing class when they make up most of the shit posted there?
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:35 AM
3

As far as I know, evolutionary biology says that larger testicle size (and penis size, due to amount of sperm ejaculated and ability to place it farther in increase the chances of a man's swimmers winning in the whole sperm competition bit) are related to female promiscuity in a species. The theory being that larger testicles are able to produce more sperm and has little to do with parental investment. I guess a guy with larger testicles may theoretically be able to impregnate a larger number of…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 12:15 AM
8

For assault in general it's very easy to quantify this, but for this kind of thing men don't tend to actually file crime reports for it and police probably wouldn't take them seriously if they did. In any case you seem to be attempting to justify gender-based shaming and a sort of gender apartheid. Really classy, Grapeban. Imagine an /r/niggers poster trying to justify a similar argument using concrete statistics about crime rates. Somehow I don't think you'd find that palatable when aimed at a …
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:04 PM
2

That is all essentially correlation and unproven theories. Given the disastrous risks that a man takes getting married and the massive divorce rate, it is simply not worth it to get married in the first place. I can't imagine it's good for your mental health to be tolerating infidelity, either.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 10:04 PM
1

For example, it's pretty clear that men in particular get important health benefits from being married. Such as? This is questionable, by the way. It could just as easily be that there is a health risk if part of your marriage involves you working long, hard hours in a stressful job to provide. Men die an average of five years earlier than women, a gap which as far as I know did not exist one hundred years ago. If you're comfortable with someone but that person cheats on you without health conse…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 09:17 PM
5

These are the same people who say "gender is a social construct" and "gender roles are bad" and yet are resorting to gender-based shaming. They'll say whatever benefits them most at any particular time, no matter how contradictory -- a little something to think about.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:08 PM
7

Except the crime stats say that men are at a higher risk. Interesting, that.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:08 PM
2

Most of these arrangements as well as the hippie commune experiments that predated them are AFBB to the max.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 07:05 PM
3

It still doesn't make much sense to break up because of infidelity Of course it does, if you are a man. As you've said, it's all about reproduction. If she's not satisfied with what you're giving her there and is willing to step out then chances are you are going to end up raising someone else's child if you stick with her.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 07:03 PM
4

Well, no. Women have always spent men's money and continue to do so. It just increased the number of taxable workers and also drove down wages due to the influx and surplus of available labor.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 04:42 PM
4

Not everyone who works a shitty job is an inarticulate drooling retard. Pretty sure /u/girlwriteswhat had recently worked as a waitress, for example.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 11:12 AM
4

Freedom of speech means you can say what you want to say but if you're saying shit like she was you can expect to have the reputation of someone like David Duke and you'd deserve it.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 11:49 PM
4

Seems unlikely. They may understand what they were doing but the bad habits have already formed.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 06:39 PM
3

In the case you're talking of it sounds like she wasn't all that physically attracted to you and saw you in more of the "beta provider" way. A healthy relationship has some kind of reciprocal, commensurate compensation for effort put in and it doesn't sound like that's what you were getting.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 04:22 PM
14

They post all sorts of hilariously awful social justice warrior shit, too. Why would you even read cracked.com.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 04:17 PM
11

It's really not many /r/mensrights subscribers that are that socially retarded but you can do whatever you want, honestly.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 04:14 PM
1

If the company is having problems with employee's sneaking into the women's washrooms, maybe they should terminate these people and possibly call the police? Last I checked, we are supposed to be responsible adults at work. They aren't having this problem. The entire thing is a result of decades of fomenting hate about all men being rapists "potential rapists." That is how pervasive this shit has become. Where lots and lots of buildings have these keycard-required/code-required locks on women's …
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:18 AM
5

Also there are no feminist organizations trying to get the judge in this case fired because they only care about that Montana case due to the sexes involved and it being a male teacher getting a slap on the wrist rather than the usual female teacher.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:15 AM
10

Are you attempting to justify extrajudicial murder based merely on an accusation that had not yet been adjudicated? How did I know a savage like you would have SRS posting history
/r/MensRights07/09/13 06:08 AM
8

Human behavior is heavily determined by incentives and consequences. There are no consequences to infidelity anymore (unless you are a male politician,) and there are plenty of incentives (in the legal system and otherwise) for a woman to be as mercenary as possible.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 05:19 AM
5

They're among the very easiest to fuck, with very low self esteem girls beating them out.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 05:15 AM
1

Even in a college town you probably have thousands of girls that aren't like that that you can approach. You shouldn't tolerate that in any case.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 04:51 AM
3

Then drop her and find a girl who would be fine with that arrangement. If you live in a large city, the thing is that there are literally tens of thousands of other girls and many of them won't make you jump through hoops because they are insecure and will do what you want for attention/validation, because they just want to fuck, whatever the reason may be. Don't put up with that bullshit
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 03:57 AM
8

How so. The gist of the article is to "Be as mercenary towards women as they are towards men." Until the laws at the very least change I can't really disagree with him, pragmatically.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 03:27 AM
2

Hate speech laws and codes are invariably used by those who have power to silence the dissent of those who do not. Where have these restrictions on free speech ever played out well?
/r/MensRights06/09/13 04:01 AM
1

Fatman of the Social Justice League. His superpower is ineffectively parroting the poster's contents the party's line.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 02:12 AM
7

It totally could not be because of the much higher infidelity, cuckoldry and relationship instability risks at all. Biology isn't equal here bro. One sex takes a much larger risk by taking a chance on someone with that kind of sexual history, and that sex is the male sex.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 06:31 PM
7

or worse having a baby will ruin your life. Or ruin a naive guy like the OP"s life with a baby that isn't even his because there's no way his girlfriend that hasn't had sex with him outside the home for over two years now would be packing a condom hidden a glasses case to fuck another guy or anything.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 04:41 PM
5

Not that it ever really existed, but that's not what the so-called "bro code" ever was about. Men simply don't have in-group bias preference.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 03:43 PM
8

Brutal but 100% true. Probably a reason I have upvoted 22 of your comments/posts.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 12:33 PM
13

This is honestly why I think in the winning strategy for men in the "gender wars" will simply be to not play ball. Despite decades of the facts being out there (see for example Warren Farrell's Myth of Male Power) the MRA angle has only recently broken out into the mainstream due to certain elements like A Voice for Men being very loud and aggressive.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 12:13 PM
4

They're usually a lot older than some late teen-early 30s single mother largely described here and not anywhere near as common. Seems like a red herring to me to edit the post to mention this.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 12:01 PM
0

He's probably right if she suddenly drastically changed her behavior around you and nothing about you changed.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/13 11:43 AM
6

I'm pretty sure there's nothing intelligent or sane about PZ Myers trying to claim women should be paid more for the same work because of some weak biological reasoning that by his own admission means he thinks women are not as capable of workers as men (meaning "equal pay for equal work" has gone out the window and this is just naked special pleading) -- and he calls us the "misogynists," by the way. Outside of his own field of specialty, every time this guy opens his mouth he puts his foot int…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:38 AM
5

It's PZ Myers doing that. The guy is completely insane and this is just the latest episode.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 05:19 AM
1

Poor Serena is probably still trying to get over losing to that guy that was ranked about 100! 203 and set to drop into the 300s.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:05 AM
1

It's in almost every paper you can think of, actually. They just keep getting printed.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 10:06 PM
12

Looks like the OP found out what tends to happen on "girls night out." I'd be getting a paternity test if I were him.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 03:09 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:24 PM
8

CreepyPMs is an SRS sub, so yes you would be best off posting this to /r/SRSsucks.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:07 PM
2

As true as that all is naturally and evolutionarily speaking, the thing is that civilization and all of the nice things we have don't continue to work without these artificial constraints. Civilization is an artificial construct where we agree to put aside that kind of mate competition and all it entails. Men will not continue to labor, will not continue to be used, will not continue to produce what we need to keep it all going on sustainably when you allow women to do whatever is natural in a c…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 06:26 PM
2

The constant barrage of shitty articles in mainstream publications seem to suggest they do.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 04:06 PM
2

Traditional sexual mores existed for reasons and we are finding out that they were for very good reasons. The ship has sailed however and I for one think there is probably no going back and our civilization is headed for collapse due to a number of issues, this being a major one. Short of major social upheavel and likely a new dark age of sorts I don't see those old sexual mores coming back. I live a lot like you but for a different reason than you.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 03:03 PM
5

Most women reward the behavior with more sex, so you can do it but it's not going to have the same effect. The bottom line is that women set their standards for what they want in men, while men set theirs for what they want in women. Seems women just love guys who get around. Love that preselection. He must be awesome if all of those other women wanted to fuck him, right? I've seen this happen on occasion even with guys who were otherwise not conventionally (physically or monied) attractive. The…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 02:57 PM
7

Or maybe he's just describing an easily observable phenomena and you're an SRS retard on your 80th alt account trying to play the shame game with someone you don't even know, while, curiously, complaining about supposed shaming.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/13 02:42 PM
5

This isn't even the first article of its kind. Now that the ideas and things like government statistics on quality of life metrics are piercing through the veil of propaganda and narrative these people have created for the past four+ decades they're trying desperately to play damage control.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:38 AM
2

Consider how many marriages end in divorce. Consider how much higher the rate gets from there when the woman earns more than the man. Consider who is initiating the overwhelming majority of all divorces. Sure, you can attempt to frame it as the man's self-worth but what evidence is there to support that assertion? On the other hand it's pretty obvious from actual data that it's a big risk factor for failing relationships and that they'd be right to worry about it.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 07:25 AM
6

But how else can you then take loaded and leading questions like this and extrapolate your own doctored "1 in 4 raped" statistics?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:19 AM
0

Or he has a small dick and she makes him fuck her with it instead of his dick. Either way, feminism isn't gonna fix those feelings for him.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 06:56 PM
1

The problem is that most of what actually attracts women in terms of them wanting to have sex with you (not gold diggers for the few who have ridiculous sums of money) is a have or have not kind of thing. It's mostly physical characteristics, congenital at that and the guys who don't have the ones that fit preference can only really improve on one of those: what shape they're in (i.e. musculature) which may not be enough. It's worth a try for the fat guys who find themselves unable to get laid, …
/r/MensRights30/08/13 12:39 AM
1

Back when I used these kinds of transportation often, I had plenty sit next to me wearing black jeans and a plain t-shirts, usually brown or ash colored. I was in really good shape and clean, smelled good and always clean shaven though.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 10:31 PM
1

That is not something that is realistic now and may not be during his entire lifetime.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 07:21 PM
2

It's not going to help guys at the bottom of the pile. There's really no good solution to the OP's problem other than maybe legal prostitution like in Amsterdam.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:35 AM
23

You'll notice how they want birth control for free but then say men "can buy" condoms. It's a dishonest rhetorical sleight of hand. They can buy pills and/oror condoms and insist these things get used but instead what you have here is a cry for more free shit in a special pleading manner, and at someone else's expense.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:29 AM
1

Make sure you have an original recording of the exchange because most "journalists" these days are nothing but propagandists.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 09:52 PM
1

This is the kind of thing that happens when women take trips without their husbands or boyfriends, or on "girls night out." You have to be really naive to think otherwise, especially if you've spent time at bars and clubs and have ended up being the other guy. When he said she was going and partying with her slutty single friends while there, there was no doubt what she was up to.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/13 02:13 AM
2

Eivind Berge is a bit weird and has strange ideas that come from a strictly evolutionary/game theory standpoint.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 10:04 PM
1

It should definitely be a very serious criminal offense.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/13 06:36 PM
6

Anyway, in this case, I may have done more harm than good. I'm doubting whether she is able at this stage of life (mid-40s, still believes a lot of the feminist crap about attractiveness being a cultural construct) to absorb the real message I was trying to send. Maybe it will end up working for me as dread game, but she's pretty fiercely independent and her hamster is strong. She actually seems to believe - maybe bluffing, but I don't know - that she could still go out and fairly easily land a …
/r/TheRedPill23/08/13 05:22 PM
9

It's because this situation is unfortunately not at all uncommon.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/13 11:52 AM
7

This guy isn't "blue pill" but he's a bit uninformed as to his options. He needs to talk to a lawyer and learn whether or not simply being married and/or signing the birth cert will cement him in as indentured servant if the child isn't his. Then he needs to do a private test and find out shortly after it's born. He's right to be suspicious that she's going on vacations with her slutty friends and getting smashed around the time of conception. ~90% of women's comments in that thread are emotiona…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/13 11:48 AM
1

Human Tissue Act 2004 (if you don't have the woman's consent, good luck)
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:23 PM
5

It's essentially outlawed in the UK, France, and Germany, and every attempt at making testing mandatory such as this one has been met with feminist screeching.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:30 PM
3

A lot of ifs here but basically if I am not attracted to them/don't want to fuck them but they're also decent enough company, share interests, and they are not looking for the kind of one-sided "friendship" where they're constantly trying to get for non-reciprocrated favors (i.e. the treatment that "orbiter" guys get), and aren't into me or if they are at least won't play stupid social dominance games like shit testing, then sure they can be "like one of the guys." Again a lot of ifs there.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/13 12:57 AM
3

It's mostly the protein you need to get good results.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 09:27 AM
1

What's interesting is that Lisak's info seems to suggest that a similar percentage of rapists exists in direct proportion to what is generally accepted as the population of sociopaths in the general population, around ~4%. I'm still not convinced as to the legitimacy of his research in terms of actual percentages of rapists, though. Sociopaths tend to display the kinds of personality traits that would make them actually do better with women in a consensual context, and that aside the issue of ra…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 12:31 PM
3

The same kind of world where people believed the world was flat or that you must be mentally ill if you don't agree with the state so we're going to put you into this gulag. There really is nothing new under the sun when large amounts of people can be duped into believing utterly insane notions like "rape culture" are a thing outside of male prisons and places like the Congo. (where it's literally everyone being raped)
/r/MensRights15/08/13 12:20 PM
2

That website looked and ran almost exactly like that before they took a single donation. Most of it is probably bandwidth costs as it's gotten to be a fairly popular site. If he really thinks he can do so much better I am sure Paul would even let him put his articles on that website.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 05:11 AM
3

What Elam is doing is not an elected position or even any kind of position that is limited by number or has any barriers to entry. If you're so sure you can write better material than him, why not?
/r/MensRights12/08/13 02:48 AM
31

"What's yours is ours, what's mine is mine."
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:37 AM
2

Stop being nothing more than a keyboard warrior and put your money where your mouth is if you think you can do it so much better, that's what he's saying.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 12:30 AM
3

The thing is you can't really tell whether a guy would be "hard up" or not by approaching a stranger, getting to know them a tiny bit and then trying to fuck them which is the whole casual sex setup. So essentially what's happening there is a value judgement based on a cognitive bias which stems from the guy is exceptionally good looking or not.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:48 PM
2

Is it really? If your success rate would be ... "much lower" than you're really going for maybe 10, 20% of the male population if you're being generous. It's not like those guys in the video were hideous.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 11:05 PM
2

It would be interesting to hear what the show was about and why he thinks he didn't really make any progress with the message he was putting out there.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:52 PM
3

So it's literally a hypergamy sub to try to figure out how to pickup male models? Seems you've confirmed the whole evolutionary psychology / pareto distrubution thing a lot of guys get called misogynists for pointing out.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:35 PM
-1

Ask me what I like and what I don't, and I'll do the same for you. Never in a porno have I ever heard someone genuinely ask "does this feel good? What do you like? Are you comfortable?" So how many women actually like this either, for real? Most of them expect the guy to mind read them or rather play it by ear by paying attention to what they respond positively to rather than ask questions. Asking questions like this is seen as unsexy, the same as the whole feminist "enthusiastic consent" garbag…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/13 07:49 PM
3

Another generic unfunny feminist blogger relying on heaps of sarcasm that can't deal with the empirical data s howing that she's wrong?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:35 AM
3

Absolutely because creepypms is an SRS sub.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:31 AM
1

That was when I was a 14 year old virgin and someone I didn't even know even the name of was being very sexually forward with me. If I had gotten to know her a couple hours, it would have been different. How is that a contradiction.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 10:18 AM
7

I think you're now playing a card similar to what feminists do by screeching "misogyny" and "rape apologist" as if there's some kind of hidden agenda when someone disagrees with them, and I think you're a massive retard on top of that. Good day.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 07:15 AM
4

Yes, 17 year olds are routinely waived into adult court for very heinous crimes like murder and forcible rape. Honestly I think you're just one of the people who've been caught up in the pedophilia hysteria I was talking about. She wasn't babysitting this kid because most ~12 year olds don't need a babysitter so I don't even buy the authority angle either. This isn't exactly as black and white as you'd like to think it is.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 06:59 AM
-2

It's usually a 3 or 4 year difference in the law, and she was still a minor when this happened too. I think the overzealous prosecution and eagerness to label young people pedophiles and still them on a sex offender's registry list, lumping them together with, say, 40 year olds with a taste for 5-13 year olds is a problem in our society today and a result of the pedohysteria in the last few decades. I can understand and get behind the fact that 15-18 year old boys are almost entirely the ones ha…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 06:43 AM
2

We have laws called "Romeo and Juliet laws" to prevent locking people up for stuff like this because it's pretty normal. The law isn't always applied equally and fairly but the intent behind it is to not treat slightly to somewhat older minors or barely-adults as pedophiles and throw them into prison, ruining their lives over what is almost always victimless crime. A 5 year age gap is a bit on the big side here in this story but I can't say that if I was a 12-13 year old kid that I would have ha…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 06:02 AM
4

A lot people have shitty political opinions because they don't give much thought to them. They go with whatever "feels" right. This guy is rich, famous and definitely part of you can call a leisure class so he is probably one of those people. He still innately understands and rejects marriage for what it is today, though. A lot of women get really angry when a guy they really want makes it clear there will never be any way to have a serious relationship where they have any kind of real power ove…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 05:35 AM
11

The whole idea that men are financially better off after a divorce was a piece of shoddy advocacy research by the same people who brought us advocacy research that said that girls were still doing worse in schools in the 90s. The reality was the exact opposite of the claims.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 05:28 AM
40

/u/intortus is definitely an SRS shill who refuses to apply the rules equally when it comes to SRS violating them.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:17 AM
4

It couldn't even go to trial from what I understand.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 02:11 AM
3

The real problem with this is that the crowd that cries about "fat shaming" and "body shaming" thinks they're totally in the same boat as what this commercial is doing. When in reality what's happening is that a photo of an already good looking woman is only having small imperfections photoshopped out. The magazine industry is not making a 250 pound whale look like she's 120 pounds here. They're taking a photo of a woman no man would "body shame" and making the photo look even better.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 01:51 AM
96

So is this because they're saying this sub is somehow vote brigading? If so, that's funny because they don't seem to be doing anything about SRS vote brigading which their own screenshot bot documents the proof of.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 12:19 AM
9

It happened, she killed him and she admitted it live on the Tom Leykis show. She was using a friend's cell phone to make the call and her friend turned her in when the police investigated. Unfortunately due to some kind of technicality she is not in prison.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 12:16 AM
3

She got away with it.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 12:05 AM
4

Video about the whole consent debate and how unreasonable the feminist "enthusiastic yes" consent standard is. Any guy who has gotten laid more than a few times already knows that the process leading up to the sex act doesn't work like feminists claim should be the standard for legal sexual consent.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 12:02 AM
6

Here, let me decode this story for you: Feminist "atheist" Ashley Paramore was probably flirting and with this guy and at the last moment got cold feet and changed her mind about having sex with him (after asking him to take her back to her room). The guy was clearly turning her on in some way or she wouldn't have asked him to take her back to her room after the whole attempt to make a move. Which is fine. She can change her mind. It makes her a cocktease but no one was raped here. Unfortunately…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/13 10:24 PM
1

Evolution has endowed men and women and women with different sets of priorities and motivations. Evolution has endowed men and women with sexual dimorphism and the things attached to this. There's every reason to believe that this could also apply to eyesight, and things like hand-eye coordination are all but proven when women cannot compete with men in pursuits related solely to both intellect and this trait (i.e. the whole professional gaming thing in various genres such as first person shoote…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 09:30 AM
1

Yes the survey results had this to say: What women want: Women showed some preference for thin, muscular men. But they also disagreed over the hotness factor of many men, with some women giving a guy high attractiveness ratings while others scored the same guy as not attractive at all. Which suggests that they merely disagreed in which men -already meeting- those generalized criteria were the "best." This is consistent with /r/ladyboners where there isn't much agreement but the guys all meet tho…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 08:29 AM
9

Change to blue pill example for sure. This guy thinks that if internet dating were around when he was young then he'd have been successful, which means he doesn't know any young men who are in the exact same boat as he was when he was that age while actually using internet dating sites. If anything, things are more confusing for sexually frustrated teenager and early 20s guys because there is a whole slew of new shitty conflicting messages being fed to them. It's at a fever pitch.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/13 11:23 PM
1

Nobody has a right to not be offended, and in the case of people who are chronically offended simply because you're saying something they don't like the content of rather than the tone of (see feminists) it's utterly meaningless to care about offending people and you should instead use as evocative of language as possible to have maximum impact on those who are receptive to your message.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/13 10:49 PM
3

That still doesn't make it a "power fantasy" unless you mean "sexual power fantasy" which isn't quite the same thing. Just about everyone wants to be sexually attractive.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 10:30 PM
1

If they're rich lesbians, they don't need child support. Sperm banks are essentially a eugenics project that screen for intelligence and physical appearance related traits in donors.
/r/TheRedPill04/08/13 08:12 PM
43

Not only that but you'll notice that most of the real world fighters have the bulky look and you don't see any six pack abs on them. This is also consistent with the romance novel books and their front cover illustrations when a man is depicted. They are not bald, and they are leaner than the real world champion fighters. Look at /r/ladyboners as well. You'll notice the guys posted there don't look like champion fighters either.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:00 PM
15

This is textbook woman-hitting-the-wall provider seeking. So transparent. Only it gets worse because she's added a layer of entitlement on top of it and is demanding they make themselves look better for someone who's only going to continue looking worse. The kinds of guys that make that money she's looking for could whip themselves into shape and dress better, but then why would they want to be with her when she's clearly talking about the kind of guy she wouldn't have given the time of day ten …
/r/TheRedPill04/08/13 07:32 PM
2

Bullshit was such a good show. They took no conventional wisdom or orthodoxy at face value. It's often comedians who tend to make the most profound observations as questioning anything is not taboo to them.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 07:01 PM
1

Yes, what he's saying is true. What tends to happen is that the foreskin itself which ends up being a fairly large section of skin with a lot of nerve endings and fine touch receptors is removed (see, sexual pleasure) and the protection and lubrication it proves on the glans is done away with. Guys with circumsized penises also tend to end up having leathery looking, much stiffer-feeling glans that lose most or all sensitivity to touch. Google image search should show you the difference in what …
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:12 PM
1

I'm not angry at my parents for having done it because my parents are essentially good-natured, working class people who decided to defer to the authority of a doctor. At the time I was born, circumcision in Canada was at an around 80% rate and (thankfully) since then has dropped in incidence, even though I myself am one of the mutilated. I am angry at the luddites who call the shots in the medical community and establishment at having accepted the shit arguments of quacks like Kellogg and then …
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:45 PM
12

This idea that women being thin is "unrealistic" and men are "shallow" for wanting a woman who is not clinically overweight to obese is as mainstream as it gets. It's been in papers and it's been spouted from the feminist pulpit for the last two to three decades. It's only recently that men have started to point out that media depictions of men and the female preference displayed are far more so and are actually unrealistic as it gets. Do you have any idea what getting into the kind of shape tha…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:47 PM
5

I don't even understand why this is controversial. It's true. Most men do too unless they're well monied. The only reason some men who aren't monied can keep competing is because we live in a culture where most men aren't hypercompetitive about mate seeking and so a guy who maintains a chiseled body into his 40s and 50s yet has an average income is still far more attractive than a 30 year old guy with an average income who lets his body go flabby.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:17 PM
1

TRP can't decide if it's a forum on male-female sexual dynamics, This is what it was supposed to be about and most of the content and posts were about for a long time. I can't say I'm thrilled about the ban-happy stuff.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:14 PM
9

women tend to have a more varied taste. Are you sure about that? Something to note is that there are entire porn genres for men who have a taste for, say, fat women. I saw a television show called "chubby chasers" while channel surfing a couple months ago -- this is common enough that it's profitable to pander to it. Despite women making up around 1/4 to 1/3 of the consumers of porn according to internet traffic, you will never find anything similarly profitable in women's tastes. There just are…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:07 PM
21

An SRS poster let the point sail over their head, probably on purpose in order to call people in this sub misogynists? Amazing. In case you missed it, here is a timeline of events: Feminists claim video games with stereotypically attractive women that would appeal to heterosexual men and lesbian wearing almost nothing "objectify women." Non-feminists show that games are full of depictions of stereotypically attractive men wearing almost nothing that appeal to heterosexual women and gay men. Femi…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 01:56 PM
3

He doesn't seem to realize that the whole men's rights dialogue needs to reach a critical mass of consciousness before any real power to change will crystallize with popular support, and that is what she is helping do by presenting factual information and persuasive arguments in a cogent, distilled manner. She's even admitted that even though she's got a huge subscriber base compared to most others, that there are guys presenting far more in-depth, substantive arguments and bleeding edge comment…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:08 AM
1

Why have you avoided the meat and potatoes of the post to repost this exact same special pleading non-argument favoring women again? Biology isn't a legitimate argument for anything else in law, and furthermore why when men don't even have the same legal agency under law would you hold them to a higher standard of responsibility? It makes absolutely no sense.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:59 AM
7

Yeah, this is completely insane that someone would be fired for doing this. That judge who fired her has no actual interest in justice and needs to be removed immediately.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 10:25 PM
0

Yes that would be a good way to test the waters to see if she's into you. If she's sending you shitty amateur erotic stories then there's a chance she might want to fuck you, but remember that women love plausible deniability and ambiguity so she may not be. Give it a try and if she's not responding positively it's safe to stop contacting her.
/r/askTRP03/08/13 03:10 PM
2

It's essentially testing your boundaries to see what kinds of various shit she can get away with. It's a stupid dominance game type thing that most of us could do without but are stuck with.
/r/askTRP03/08/13 02:58 PM
9

These kinds of guys tend to get used for emotional support, validation, and ask for favors with no reciprocal value of any kind provided. They "like" them like you'd like someone who gives you free shit but you otherwise couldn't care less about.
/r/askTRP03/08/13 02:56 PM
2

a guy who was orbiting her So were you. And you were in an 8 hour timezone distance, and 8 years younger than her. Also keep in mind she chose this guy over you to the point where some guy you think is an orbiter means more to her than you coming over and banging her. To keep this in perspective. There's also the possibility she's married and just got cold feet about cheating on her husband with you by having you stay with her for some time. Married women who are looking for some strange often l…
/r/askTRP03/08/13 02:51 PM
2

Meth is one hell of a drug.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 02:42 PM
1

I can show you a straw man. That's good enough for you, yes? How is it a strawman? Your naked appeal to nature or biology met its obvious conclusion: Nature does not mandate child support. A man would be wise to stick around if he wished the child to have a greater chance of survival and reach adulthood to pass on its genes, but if the man does not wish to have the child at all there is no natural force compelling him to stay. Interesting. No special stipulations are placed on man as to the spec…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:19 PM
3

I would agree if it wouldn't be hidden from view in approximately 10 minutes because you can't ask the hard questions without demmian banning you or censoring you. This seems to be a far more appropriate place given that this subreddit is not known for totalitarian policies.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:44 PM
2

Is this even your biological child? Have you confirmed this? I think it's obviously highly inappropriate as well and honestly this is a horrible situation somy condolences.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:33 PM
1

Mental illness? Bipolar, apparently. It explains a lot.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:24 PM
7

Can't disagree with the attempts to co-OP. Look at /r/mensrights and how so many of them have been duped into thinking A Voice for Men is somehow bad when they're one of the only organizations causing ripples and getting the issues heard. They're one of the largest driving forces for getting content that sat around the nebulous "manosphere" for literally a decade out into the public to where you can now actually see and hear terms and rhetoric being repeated by people who aren't part of it. Men'…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 09:09 AM
2

The bottom line is that men determine their standards for women, and women determine their standards for men. It just so happens that a lot of those images are whining about physical appearance when women have the same preferences except even stricter when you control for physical fitness (body shape, where anything but muscular is seen as undesirable in men), and congenital traits like height, and baldness or lack of. They want to not be judged for sleeping around but that's only because they d…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 08:50 AM
1

Depends by what criteria you're judging him by. Sure he has enough money to literally buy almost anything he could ever want. He's a winner by that criteria. But look at the guy. He has never and will never know what it's like to have women really just desire to fuck him, no strings attached. Another guy who was in the same industry however, Steve Jobs, probably did when he was young. How about that criteria? How many women talk about how much they want Bill Gates to fuck her? Women don't exactl…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 08:37 AM
1

The important part about this article is that the guy is breaking taboo to even ask this question. That's pretty ballsy of him. Of course, they don't respect him for having this little bit of his ballsack intact because as they've said: They're not physically attracted to him at all and 3/4 of them admit they decide within seconds of meeting whether they will have sex with a man or not, based on that.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 08:07 AM
10

The problem is that unless MRAs are successful in change, the way you'll have to live your life to avoid becoming a victim will eventually become even more difficult than it already is. Things like refusing to marry (MGTOW) are coping strategies in a broken system.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 08:02 AM
2

What it boils down to is that this woman has an entitlement complex and thinks she or other women should be able to irresponsibly spawn children that she herself cannot support without other people's money, even if no man is actually interested in having one with her.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:36 AM
2

Stating the facts of biology is not tautology. Stating the facts of biology is not special pleading. Please show me a biology textbook that shows mandated child support being part of biology. You can't? Well it seems that 90% of your post has no validity now, because under natural law, a man can easily walk away at any time and there's not a thing you could do about it. If he considered his risk of fatherhood too great for his comfort he should not having freely and willingly agreed to take that…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:29 AM
1

The ERA will only be palatable if the Hayden Rider is removed, which if you didn't know preserves special treatment in favor of women.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:15 AM
3

No, her (Mary Claire Walker, the accuser's) father is a professor at Vassar and 3 members of the school faculty were playing judge of the kangaroo court. Xialou "Peter" Yu, the accused, is a Chinese citizen as is his family. Did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 05:07 AM
3

It sounds like the author doesn't really get it. Men don't "want" to be sexually aggressive. We have to be. There are exceptions to the rule of course such as the most ridiculously physically attractive genetic lottery winners, extremely wealthy men, rock stars and so on that have women practically throw themselves at them, but for the other 95%+ of us we have to approach or we don't get sex. Period. You can say women should approach more all you want until you're blue in the face. They won't in…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/13 03:40 AM
5

He was exposed as a huge hypocrite because he just recently wrote a series of shitty articles in mainstream publications about how older men who go after women in their 20s are somehow creepy/dirty old men. Fact is that there's nothing wrong with that. Everyone in those situations is an adult who knows what they're getting into. Nobody's making a big deal about women who are doing the same thing, either.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:36 PM
5

Your post is full of tautologies and special pleading. Women are responsible for the choice to gestate or abort the fetus. As a consequence of their choice they will gestate or abort a fetus. Men have no responsibility to gestate or abort the fetus, which is why men have no claim to choose whether to gestate or abort the fetus. This is an obvious tautology and circular reasoning that has nothing to do with any kind of justice. You complain that a man is responsible for his offspring on the basis…
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:54 PM
7

It happens to be a factor for being an easily offended baby who holds contradictory, often hypocritical opinions.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:44 PM
-2

Nice tautologies but where's the substance?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:35 AM
2

It isn't even used in a huge amount of video games, and when it is, it's usually used as a story element. There are also male characters in the same situations, often as a source of mockery.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:29 AM
9

You also happen to post in SRS? Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:26 AM
0

No, it's just infested with SRS posters.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:08 AM
2

The whole dogwhistle thing is SRS speak, FYI.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:08 AM
10

She got anonymous tough guy internet trolled like everyone else on a video she curiously left the comments ON for while she has them turned OFF and ratings OFF for every single other video she made. You are the most disingenuous, intellectually dishonest fraud if you try to claim this wasn't a money grab done by, ironically, damseling herself. Point out the actual sexism in video games. Do it. Objective examples please. Arguments like: Many of the female characters are attractive (nevermind the …
/r/MensRights02/08/13 07:05 AM
23

The Duke rape liar was a black woman and everyone sure seemed ready to believe her and the media sure seemed ready to cover her story with her side and only her side to the point where the school's faculty were with the mob on campus carrying banners that read "CASTRATE" before a single piece of evidence turned up. Sure seems to put a hole in that theory.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:54 AM
15

And by very few you mean literally hundreds. Which actual female gamers had no problem with. You know, the ones who actually play games, not just steal other people's youtube clips and look for depictions of attractive women or a woman being involved in some kind of violence or another (devoid of context, all of the while while hundreds of male characters are killed off and conveniently ignored, of course) and then scream "SEXISM" at the top of their lungs.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:47 AM
16

Second, it's correcting the already well-known income gap between men and women. Why does this need to be "corrected" when it's caused by women's own choices such as the choice to work fewer hours? Now the men who work for this shitty company have to put in longer hours for the same pay. Calling this "equal pay" is ridiculous. You're the unreasonable one if you think is a good idea. This is an actual wage gap being created.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 02:27 AM
9

As long as you didn't invest much into her and were banging her anyway I wouldn't say you really got made a beta by her. She played the old hypergamy game and traded up but it's not like you really lost anything since she was clearly a low value woman to begin with. Seems your friend took it hard though. You should probably hook him up with some info. He sounds kind of chumpy.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/13 11:57 PM
4

Reddit is a glorified link aggregator. Sites like A Voice for Men as much as some people who don't really post here often on their alt accounts will tell you are "horrible" have people who are actually doing things.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 06:38 PM
2

The Queen is on more money in Canada than any man.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/13 03:54 PM
6

No, there really are guys like this. My father married by mother after knowing her for less than 2 months. Of course this was in the early to mid 70s where there was far less slutting around to be seen as these were children of the 50s, so he had a much better chance of finding a woman who wasn't trash. If a guy like my father were to marry just 10 or 20 years later he'd have been up shit creek without a paddle.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 06:41 PM
1

Once hormonal birth control is available for men, is this something we'll have to worry about, too? No because men don't ovulate and don't have dual sexual strategy. The whole point of this post is that the pills disrupt their normal cycle so while on the pill they're more attracted to the "safe, stable" guy but when they come off they're suddenly craving the cock of someone else who is the complete opposite of that.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 11:40 AM
5

You mean the taxpayer does. You can't squeeze blood from a rock.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 11:20 AM
8

Most of them answered things about how the guy looks. The guy himself is short and pudgy. To be honest they were being fairly honest, 3 out of 4 of them even answered that they decide within seconds of meeting a guy whether they'd fuck him or not.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 10:18 PM
2

Note also that those who claim false accusations are rare only use the percentage that can be proven false. They then play a nice little shell game with statistics and use the low rate of proven rape claims and say all other claims not proven false must be true and then divine a large number of unreported rapes that must be happening because no one is reporting them with surveys with misleading and loaded questions where the "researchers" if you can call them that categorize women as raped even …
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 09:56 PM
7

Oh, I know. It's just insane that these people hide this information from a a man and try to pass this off of as good ethical behavior.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 06:54 PM
1

It would probably weird me the fuck out to have some guy watching and probably commenting and jerking off while I'm doing that but if you can handle it then whatever floats your boat, dude.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 06:30 PM
3

He's right. Outside very recent civilizational history up until about 50-60 years ago, your male ancestors wouldn't have reproduced if they weren't like that. We've regressed to a very Darwinian primal mating model and unfortunately this is what you get.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 06:18 PM
5

To be fair he actually thinks she does cheat on her and is taking the paternity testing suggestion seriously. Backwards day in /r/relationships.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 06:14 PM
9

There's the so-called ethics of the medical community for you.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 06:07 PM
10

I read the OP of the link before checking comments here and noticed this as well. That was the first thing I was going to post about. Glad I'm not the only one who caught this. Holy shit. Her boss would have to be making millions of dollars for $5k purchase to be a drop in the hat for him, and even then he probably still wouldn't buy it for her unless he was fucking her.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 03:02 PM
13

Female sex tourists are the same kinds of hypocrites. They think they're totally not doing the same thing. Except they are.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 01:08 PM
1

Given the fact that the majority of men do not get tests done, my guess is that the majority of men also do not believe it to be a problem that affects them. Shocker, isn't it? How do you know this isn't just because it's a relatively new technology and has become taboo in our society for a number of scummy confidence scam-like reasons?.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:57 AM
1

Your dishonest framing belies the fact that most men do care about this and would prefer to have this protection in place.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 08:11 AM
1

Don't let that stop the tinfoilers from coming up with absurd scenarios.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 07:58 AM
2

Blood is already taken from children to run a battery of tests which you seem to have no objection to. You are attempting to grasp at straws for an argument against this, when blood doesn't even need to be taken (you can just swab the cheek for some cells and test those). It's really sad on your part.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 07:57 AM
2

Polls say otherwise. Almost all men do care about this.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 07:55 AM
6

It's a dishonest framing of the fact that due process is a thing and when it's not you have people like Amanda Marcotte thinking it's totally cool to hold banners that read "CASTRATE" outside of their dorm rooms before a single scrap of evidence is admitted in a trial, like she did during the Duke lacrosse scandal.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 12:29 PM
15

Every first world country is this bad because every first world country has these kinds of shitty laws, policies, and educational systems that create it. Some are worse than America in this respect. Canada and Sweden are for sure.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 01:57 AM
1

They might, but probably not in our lifetime.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 01:55 AM
1

I'm having a hard time imagining how much more unfair to the accused that it could even get.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 07:33 PM
8

Later on he'd asked her to go with him on a road trip over a weekend - to which she accepted. I assume you know what probably happened during this trip if she went? So why didn't you dump her then. You must have been a real doormat at the time.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 05:48 PM
2

Bet you anything they seem to think what they critique is a 100% meritocracy and isn't subject to trends and the whims of the politics of shithead critics like themselves who can't or won't be impartial, therefore totally not the same as the genetic lottery and make-up work and physical exercise and all of the other things that make up physical beauty.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 04:30 PM
1

I cannot name a single first world country where it isn't the case.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 04:15 PM
5

Except we're not "stooping" to anyone's level. Your outmoded, inculcated values of what makes "a man" do not apply in 2013 and didn't even apply over 30 years ago in 1980. We do not live under a just regime. Reminder: The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men. Sexual strategy is amoral.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 07:41 AM
14

Biologists do. Dan Savage is just a dilettante who seems to think the scenario linked by the OP is totally harmless because he's a gay man and doesn't understand how things work for heterosexuals.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 07:22 AM
5

In a perfect world with a fair legal system that isn't biased towards one sex, what you're saying might make sense. We do not live in that world.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 06:52 AM
11

Male primates don't provide anything but protection and mostly only to hoard reproductive resources. The "alphas" there are the winners of fights between themselves and other males, nothing more. Good try though with this alt account.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 06:51 AM
12

I wasn't aware this concept of autonomy of your body included an entitlement to someone else's resources. Do explain.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 06:47 AM
1

Sex is where babies come from and unless you're the latest in the line of idiots who imagine that some new technology or pill will magically allow us to dispense with sexual monogamy, a preference for which has evolved things like sexually jealousy for very good reason (i.e. only a woman knew for sure they've passed on their genes until very recently with DNA technology which still isn't widespread for paternity testing) then you should easily understand why. Add to this the shittiness of the mo…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 12:50 PM
3

It's a loaded question based on the idea that just talking about these kinds of things makes you "bitter."
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 12:36 PM
3

It helps the man who is as of now a de facto slave.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:49 AM
3

Yes but that was only because you couldn't prove it. Now you can. And guess who's blocking reform now that we have the technology to prove it?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:47 AM
4

Issues that affect you specifically because you are a man including things that specifically effect gay men because they are men and not specifically because they are gay are of course under this umbrella. For example some African countries will execute homosexual men but not women. That would qualify. This is an issues based thing. Not an identity politics platform. That aside there are plenty of gay guys already out there talking about these issues. Pretty sure the owner of The Spearhead, WF P…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:44 AM
2

She can just abort it. Reproductive rights are a very "heads I win, tails you lose" kind of thing in women's favor.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 03:57 AM
1

You will find no male equivalent to the screaming boy band fan masses.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 08:18 PM
1

Well it's not surprising, seeing as men must know more about politics because politics adversely affect men the most.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 11:09 PM
2

Also, not stretching the definition to impossible limits.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 09:25 PM
0

If they do it is because their real goal is power, not the "equality" used as a smokescreen.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:31 PM
1

Feminists like this have been saying that like 60-90%+ of rapes have been going unreported for decades now without being able to qualify that statement at all, despite the environment for reporting them being more welcoming than ever and a cultural bias that believes a man did it on the mere accusation of it and actual numbers of provable rapes going down down and down. In the US for example, rape has fallen over 80% since the 1970s as shown by prominent psychologist Steven Pinker. I somehow dou…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:31 PM
4

Feminism is an ideology that mental midgets like yourself buy into voluntarily and then dishonestly conflate "feminist" with "women" while you scramble to defend it.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 11:33 PM
2

Are you saying it's not just an act he put on for the show?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 10:36 PM
2

Maybe if it weren't so politicized and we didn't have a witch hunt atmosphere surrounding the crime where too many people wanted to invert the principles our justice system is supposed to stand for. We don't live in that perfect world, though.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:59 PM
12

Yes but women already de facto have this option.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:51 AM
2

She probably makes more than he does if she's as famous as he's hinting but it's still a bad idea to commit to that.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:07 AM
3

I think he meant to say "dismiss" as that's what they attempt to do since they can't argue against it at all.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 12:21 AM
1

You know what I love about the opponents of evopsych? Their worldview is constructed entirely of just-so ideology, unsupported by any actual research, and they can't argue against it without constructing the most hilarious strawman arguments. For example in this article, the author is using the naturalistic fallacy to try to imply that those who've done research to show how rape is natural are somehow saying we should totally do it bro, it's totally moral and normal..
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 12:19 AM
7

Tom Leykis is a radio show host who's been talking about some of the issues discussed here for decades.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:27 PM
3

She's a hypocrite because she's talking as if the other girls are only noticing him because of that--but she's not the same as them, oh no.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 07:12 PM
2

Except there's a world of difference in men's standards of "Don't be fat" and the female standards of "Must be really fit" before you get anywhere near the amount of attention as the average woman. If the amount of time and effort expended in the two were in any way near equal I'd agree that it's "insecure bitterness" but it's not.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 03:36 PM
18

He was getting in shape before he met her, and she probably wouldn't have given him the time of day when he was fat. She's exactly like one of the women she's complaining about hitting on him. She only noticed him once he started to get ripped. Biggest hypocrite but the salient point is if you are good looking, you will have options and that is a power thing in most women's minds and makes them insecure when they're looking for someone to lock down into commitment. Note that she was this guy's v…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 01:04 PM
11

Real talk.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 12:56 PM
1

The only real subjectivity if you can call it that comes in reasoning, debating and arguing it to make sure it is sound. Richard Dawkins explained what he thought on this pretty well. I tended to agree with this before I even saw this clip. It's why I don't like social justice warriors. Their morality is no different from the shitty absolute moralities of the religious.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 02:12 AM
1

Tell me what divining method you use to determine how one woman who acts exactly like the other will do this or not.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 01:40 AM
3

Most ~20 year old girls have had sex with at least 4 or 5 guys, to put things into perspective on how big that partner count usually is.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 09:30 PM
4

So he may have lucked out. The laws are shit so a man essentially makes a leap of faith and most guys going in think their wife would never divorce-fuck them or they wouldn't walk in on their wife fucking some other guy or think that those children are actually theirs until they find out they aren't.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 07:33 PM
2

Except he didn't even mention the pitfalls of marriage and the power imbalance and moral hazard it creates.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 07:16 PM
30

The trial by media and public opinion is exactly what he says it is where the word "rape" never enters when a woman does it. The outcomes of court trials are just as lopsided with the women getting slaps on the wrist almost every time, and judges often being brazen enough to admit that a man would not get the same sentence in their court.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 07:03 PM
11

So it's like Mike Nifong all over again but with an even softer slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 06:57 PM
2

The toxicology reports confirm this, but this was mostly a last decade phenomenon when this myth was popular. I haven't really heard it much in years. Mostly what's happening is these women go out drinking and have sex with some guy and then regret it for a number of reasons (guy wasn't as good looking the next morning, woman is married/has a boyfriend and needs excuse, etc.) but the drugging claims haven't been common in false rape claims lately at all.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 03:31 PM
2

steer clear of cohabitation, Especially important in some areas as "common law marriage," a slimy stopgap measure used to continue the wealth redistribution scam in a day and age of rapidly falling marriage rates by making it as legally binding as an actual marriage which you have to voluntarily enter into.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 03:20 PM
3

And of course the sad part is that most of them are in for bullshit non-violent offenses like marijuana possession because of the US "war on drugs." It goes without saying that they're probably all men.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:50 AM
4

Yes, Paul has been around the men's rights community longer than most. He knows what he's doing and he's learned from the previous generations that failed to launch as to why they failed; Counting on the empathy of others where it doesn't exist has not worked. Since those people control the public narrative with a monopoly on the discourse, this is the only real way to get the message out there. How many of these issues were even seriously being discussed even five years ago? Come on.
/r/MensRights15/07/13 02:21 AM
38

This author thinks curvy means obese. To them it's a better metaphor than "rotund" or just straight up calling it what it is: Fat.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 01:40 AM
9

I can't really relate to the guys who'd do that. Even when I was a thirsty as fuck skinny teenage kid I wouldn't have dropped my standards anywhere near that far. The post is probably a troll because it's so over the top, but I have seen some guys actually go for bad but not as bad as this post and I wonder why.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 11:51 PM
1

Yeah that's pretty solid. Not the best tasting food that you'd feel like eating consistently though. It can be done with less than $300 a month worth of food and eating pretty well, though.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 10:29 PM
12

It was Mary Koss, the same feminist who used misleading questions, umbrella terms and many other really shady practices to create the 1 in 4 rape myth.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:02 PM
10

... While they fuck a narrow slice of the male population, the best looking ones. And then expect the better earners, many of which don't overlap with that group, to stay in a holding pattern and be totally up to marrying a promiscuous woman when she's "had her fun."
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 09:42 PM
5

You have to define what you actually mean by sexual free market. You seem to think the coercive measures in place that allow women to act as they do today is a free market. It isn't. If men didn't have to pay child support, alimony and we didn't have a massive amount of wealth transfer going on through State actions then they would not be acting in such a way. They would have to provide a man value to get any return. Value being things like sexual fidelity and bringing more than their pussy to a…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 09:17 PM
1

"As humans were hunter-gatherers there was no sexual equality. The alphas had their harems and the beta didnt get any pussy. Let's be real. Even in hunter gatherer tribes (which warred one another!) that didn't happen to a large extent. There may have been some guys who had more than 1 mate but a large harem, I doubt it. Numbers make might and you can't maintain large numbers and a fighting force by monopolizing reproductive resources. You won't have enough men to win. The de facto matriarchy we…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 09:07 PM
10

For the average guy, getting sex without paying for it has never been harder. I think what's really happening is bad economy and these guys just choosing to jerk off to free porn rather than pay high prices with money they really don't have.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 01:59 PM
7

It's not a lifestyle. It's acknowledging things as they are at this current moment. It's how the world is rather than ideas of how the world ought to be. Non-committally fucking sluts is a hedonist/nihilist lifestyle.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 01:31 PM
7

Shaming doesn't work. The only one they won't open their legs for is the specific guy who's doing it. They'll still do it with other guys because the shaming currency has no backing of any kind. No real clout. It used to when women who were caught in bed with another man would be out on the streets with none of the husband's stuff, when men demanded women with low to no partner count before they'd commit. Not now. The trick here is to just not commit to such women. They made their own decisions …
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 01:28 PM
2

You just explained why they complain about their N count and think it shouldn't matter and why they lie about that number.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 01:27 PM
2

Women don't need to be attracted to have sex, just lubrication. While true they generally won't have sex with someone they aren't attracted to unless there is an ulterior motive at play. Dual sexual strategy outlines this very well. The OP's plan will only work if he wants to fuck a much older woman who is likely very out of shape, and if he is fairly good looking himself. Men who do this kind of thing are rare. My older brother actually did this when he was young before he let himself go and go…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 01:16 PM
3

Of course it's not but the frame here is of pure hypergamy. There's plenty of men who would make good husbands but women like Venker want men who are better than them. They don't want just any decent man. It's the career woman paradox, and it's made worse for them by things they largely demand like women-only short lists, quotas, affirmative action, etc. which all but guarantee there will be less men of higher socioeconomic standing than them. They then go on to complain that men who are of high…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 12:35 PM
3

It's like this: Men are dropping out and refusing to participate in the capacity that someone like her wants and in large enough numbers to alarm someone like Venker, because she sees the writing on the wall and knows our current trajectory is going to end up somewhere really bad. To Venker, the greatest tragedy in this all is... the lack of good husband material. She realizes that men's second class citizen status is what's causing this but her motivations are less than noble.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 12:16 PM
2

Look at the whole "fat acceptance" thing for example. Who is driving that? Well it's all feminist women, and if you look closer it's feminist women who, strangely enough seem to think that being fat should be no hindrance to them being with classically handsome, in-shape guys because those guys should just accept that fat is beautiful (if you're a woman). You will not see fat guys included in this. Hugo Schwyzer, one of the biggest hypocritical white knights ever who's admitted to doing things l…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 11:20 AM
1

Not marrying seems to be the tool of the everyman because you can never actually know where you stand. Plenty of guys you'd think this kind of thing would never happen to have had it happen to them because a bigger better deal in this respect came along. The legal system is in that kind of state, sorry to tell you. That is why those "married game" people are playing a dangerous game of chicken.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 11:12 AM
1

Youtube MRAs/MGTOWs/redpillers tend to actually address what their opponents say is why they do that. They don't make claims they can't back up, like that feminist you're talking about who disables ratings and comments because she her house of cards blows apart at the slightest criticism.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 05:35 AM
4

They do, though. But they have materialistic concerns as well. That is why cuckolding is a thing. They can't find a "total package" man so they settle for resources and get the kind of strange on the side that wouldn't commit to them. This isn't even a controversial claim.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 05:33 AM
3

Lot of downvotes because too many people want to believe it's a 100% meritocracy when it just isn't. You just outlined dual sexual strategy for them in a less eloquent way and of course they don't want to hear it. OP, the only thing you can possibly do is work out to make your body look as good as it possibly can. If you're in better shape than ~80+% of the population you will likely have some success. Good luck.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 05:29 AM
1

but damn are my jimmies rustled watching them Why?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 05:24 AM
2

I read on the Southern Poverty Law site that men's rights activists are considered a hate group because a guy who was a mra went to a university and shot some female engineering students, but shouldn't feminists be considered a hate group too? Link, please. If the SPLC is really trying to say Marc Lepine is an MRA when MRAs were not even a thing in the 80s when this happened then they've taken the propaganda to a whole new level. On the other hand, feminists supported Valerie Solanas and still w…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 05:18 AM
9

She's not likely coming from a traditionalist standpoint, she is coming from one. If you read her previous materials on this subject she's basically Phyllis Schlaffy Jr. Siding with her is a lesser of two evils approach since what she really wants is ultimately for men to return to the disposable provider/producer model. If done by eliminating the shitty laws then men would still be in a better position than today, sure, but I'm just telling you she's looking at this from the perspective of men-…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:40 AM
2

There is probably enough of it in ~20% of men but the fact of the matter is that any kind of society as we understand it is fucking impossible when almost all of the men are violently competing for mating rights or otherwise simply spending most of their time on trying to get them.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 04:21 AM
2

One thing you also have to consider is that unlike most animals, human males will band together to do things for mutual benefit, in this case killing a man hogging all of the reproductive resources. I highly doubt the proverbial cavemen had large harems. In fact I highly doubt that until the most recent years that anyone other than kings, sultans, emperors and other very, very high status men really had harems to speak of at all. The human world was a much more dangerous place and women were not…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 04:10 AM
2

I think earlier societies had no idea about genetics beyond a simple understand of "man having sex with woman produces that man's child and therefore if multiple men have sex with the same woman you cannot be sure who's child it is" but that understanding is entirely correct and they likely through observation created laws and customs to stop violent mate competition and be more productive than other tribes, bigger numbers won fights after all and you're not going to be able to produce those big…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 04:04 AM
1

The most effective forms of mate guarding were woven into the legal system (fault based divorce) and culture (things like the scarlet letter). A woman knew if she fucked around and got caught, she was out on her ass on her man's discretion and she wasn't getting anything from him. Now that is inverted. Now they can fuck around and get everything handed to them by the legal system. The only way to retain a balance of power is to not commit. And if you do commit, men have to be prepared to go all …
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 02:02 AM
4

We are omnivores. You can get certain nutrients you need easier from meat. Why not eat it? I'm not going to make a value judgement on whether it's "masculine" or not because that's stupid. Bottom line is if we're going to go into the moral quagmire about animals being living beings, get this: Plant life is still life, you're still consuming other life so that you might continue to live. The cognitive dissonance of the vegans who think eating meat is "morally wrong" because you kill another livin…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 01:54 AM
7

And of course there is the elephant in the room they don't want to acknowledge that they sexually choose men who have these supposed "bad" traits over men who do not. Really mixed messages. "Don't do these things! They're awful! But if you do them anyway I'll reward you by fucking you."
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 01:46 AM
5

Preference for younger women, preference for women who are not overweight. Basically stuff they give women a pass on because you don't see them saying fuck all about commercials like this andwhat they represent and you certainly do see them shitting all over fat guys by calling them fat neckbeards and stereotyping anyone who disagrees with them as a fat guy with a tiny penis.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:23 AM
4

Don't do anything that will let a woman have a metaphorical loaded gun the form of the legal system pointed to your head. No marriage, no cohabitation if there's "common law marriage" where you live. None of it. Everything that won't have you legally entangled is fine. As long as you hold the power over your own life you cannot be fucked with. It's the essence of MGTOW philosophy.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 10:21 PM
6

"Everybody I've dated I've been sexually attracted to immediately. Sparks don't grow- your vagina doesn't become more inclined to wanting someone just because you're around them." Straight from the horse's mouth. The essence of dual sexual strategy.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 11:02 PM
5

This is solid advice for your own mental health but only because the most effective forms of mate guarding are either now gone or outlawed. That said though committed relationships aren't worth it for that reason.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 10:31 PM
10

It makes me wonder why Asian men don't fall into this mindset. Everyone casually(!) slanders them with penis jokes, yet they don't seem to turn to mental illness. Have asian men been demonized and denigrated for the past 40+ years in their own cultures merely for being born asian and male? Could be your answer there.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 09:58 PM
3

Exactly-- Yet these people would have us believe that there is no such thing as a false accuser. They want us to believe that every report is 100% genuine. The logical conclusion of that is a witch hunt environment where accusations are weaponized to throw someone in prison with no need to investigate.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:22 PM
7

It's because rape has become a politicized bludgeon for the people who talk most about it. For example. In one of the articles about what's going on in the recent postering, one Karen Smith, the executive director of the Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton said: “It just doesn’t happen.” “Nobody would report sexual assault needlessly because it is a gruelling process to go through.” (about false rape accusations). This a supposed "moderate feminist." Except in MZZZZZ Smith's own city, Edmonton, th…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 06:52 AM
5

Probably because most women in the late teens and early 20s can find someone without resorting to using an internet dating website, and are unlikely to need to send any messages out even if they do use one. As they age however... Also do note that even on the internet, most women won't initiate. There's also probably the fact that very few guys that age make that kind of money.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:21 PM
6

The average household income in the united states is under $50,000 a year.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:19 PM
4

Internet dating is really terrible and all but you should be aware that women don't really approach, even on the internet they won't make the first move so most of this really doesn't even mean anything. Mostly if you're just trying to get laid, you doing the initiating if you look decent will do the trick with enough casts of the line so to speak.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 04:16 PM
3

Even if she was the effects on his life were still the same. Even after the prosecution knew the case was bullshit and that she was a liar, DSK still had to have bodyguards escort him to events he would be speaking at. That is how profoundly this has affected his life. Sure, he's still better off than a working class guy would be because he has money, but the guy had a real shot in politics that was quite literally destroyed by a baseless accusation.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 06:09 AM
25

Pretty common knowledge and a big part of why you don't commit under current laws. There's no deterrent and YOU will be punished for her misconduct.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 02:40 AM
2

You should dump her, regardless. These are the kinds of things most men aren't told: "Breaks" or "seperations" or language like "I need to find myself" "I'm bored" and so on are code for "wants a new cock, has probably already found one and is possibly already fucking it."
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 12:02 AM
1

Fucking you on the first date doesn't necessarily mean anything other than she's physically attracted to you, which is a good thing. The men that get used the most tend to get strung along for quite some time before they get any sex at all and the frequency of it is not very often. The other things are awful though, especially the company she keeps--most notably the cheating female friends and family. She probably is cheating on you so you should probably not have anything serious with her.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 11:58 PM
2

Abortion being legal is a mitigating factor at best in the number of men who are forced to become ATMs against their will. It's not legal rights for men.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 11:51 PM
2

Why would you have ever taken her back when it was obvious she took a "break" to bang other guys.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 11:48 PM
1

James Taranto is very much someone who knows what's up, that's why.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 11:35 PM
1

Canada's rape rate per capita was like 1.7 per 100000 last I saw (compared to ~27 per 100000 in the US), so any raise or drop would have to be somewhat large to be statistically significant. If it went from 1.7 to 1.9 one year but then was 1.5 the next what you're really seeing is people playing with numbers in a propagandized manner. The short of it is that yes, this campaign of "don't be that guy" (and teach men not to rape, and all of that those others) do nothing but shit on men by repacking…
/r/MensRights10/07/13 11:22 PM
3

Another thing you will be absolutely floored to learn is that in France, DNA paternity testing is illegal outside of court orders. Feminists have seen to it using the most slimy emotional heartstrings tugging reasoning about "keeping family peace" as if a family built on that kind of lie is worth preserving.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 10:49 PM
18

he has a kid, I hope he confirmed this, especially given her behavior.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 05:47 PM
3

A large part of the premise of what we talk about here is that traditionalism only worked because of shaming, which is not effective anymore, and that if non-nihilists want men to get a fair shake there needs to be a new male-only dependent way of forcing that kind of outcome. Sluts won't stop slutting it up because you shame them. The specific slut may just not fuck you if you hurt their fee-fees too much.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 05:07 PM
1

??? He's a reasonably intelligent guy, but his views are unnecessarily hateful IMO and he does a poor job of presenting his arguments in a convincing manner. -- you, top of this comment thread.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 03:42 PM
1

Look for actually hateful people, not just loud opinionated people like TheAmazingAtheist. How many viewers do they have?
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:51 PM
1

It's not a video link so the mods wouldn't ask for any kind of description, and the OP is probably just linking it because it's a yet another affirmation of what we talk about.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 06:20 AM
1

Also except for the fact that he didn't scam $150k+ out of the public and then not produce any content, and also that he actually has interesting things to say even if I don't agree with all of it. So not really like Sarkeesian at all. The typical shitty popular youtube account is someone who is young or young-ish, attractive, has nothing interesting to say and banks on getting a lot of clicks because a lot of people find them attractive. Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOVV39DwhCc -- ho…
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:53 AM
1

Go make a youtube channel and see how successful you are at it then. Bonus points if you're as physically unattractive as he is and can actually get some modicum of success.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:49 AM
3

So he's still miles better than the people who tend to vehemently disagree with what he says? TotalBiscuit completely destroyed the social justice warriors who recently had their feathers ruffled over something he said.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:47 AM
7

unconstrained hypergamy means it's pointless to offer commitment. Exactly.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 02:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter