TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

lynn Archive

View 1 post and 86 comments by lynn on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

lynn/r/MensRights08/10/08 03:23 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That’s possible. But I, at least, don’t measure men by how many women he has collected — that’s actually usually a sign that he’s not my type. Now, hearing other women (and men, but especially women) speak highly of him? Sure. So that would be why I misread that.
/r/seduction04/08/21 04:13 PM
2

As an example, when I was in middle school we watched a video that was supposedly to demonstrate the different muscle groups. It showed a super-muscled bodybuilder -- like really extreme -- flexing the various muscles as the (male) voiceover talked about them. As we were leaving that class to go to our next one, I heard one of my popular classmates tell her boyfriend that he'd better not ever get like that because she'd be grossed out. I've seen that sentiment over and over again from all kinds …
/r/seduction04/08/21 08:28 AM
5

You need to listen to more women talking about what they like in men.
/r/seduction01/08/21 01:18 AM
3

I wonder what that woman would think of my bisexual self married to a man? I'm a traitor, I'm sure.
/r/MensRights21/08/09 03:58 PM
3

No, because then they can keep questioning you. Say "Lawyer." They can't keep questioning you after that without a lawyer.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 05:14 PM
1

Not only that, but if you marry a gold-digger (and if she doesn't want your number until she sees your car, that's exactly what she is) and then decide you want a divorce, prepare to be fucked royally by the courts.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 12:58 AM
12

Long as you only use these women for practice (hey, they're using you) and don't try to get into a long-term relationship with them -- and definitely don't marry one. The woman you marry should be one who doesn't even see the car (or any other status symbols) for the first few weeks she dates you.
/r/MensRights17/08/09 07:26 PM
2

I think his (his?) point is that the words have those connotations BECAUSE of whether it's easy or hard. Take out the connotations -- replace the words with "a man/woman who has sex with a lot of women/men" and the point is more clear: To be a man who has sex with a lot of women you have to be witty, charming, well-dressed, have nice shoes and a fake job. To be a woman who has sex with a lot of men you just have to be there. There are fat-ugly women who have sex with a lot of men out there; ther…
/r/MensRights17/08/09 07:23 PM
-2

When you say "nice guys", do you mean nice guys or Nice Guys?
/r/MensRights31/07/09 11:31 PM
1

I love that woman! And I fully expect a few visits from DCFS when I send my kid(s) out for eggs or something from the store a mile away. When I was 18 I was mentally about 12 because I never got to do things for myself, and I swear my kids are not going to have the same experience.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 03:17 PM
1

Sounds good -- I think pretty much all of that stuff I do plan to do (I don't have kids yet, but I'm gathering information on parenting for when I do). We definitely will not circumcise our son(s) -- we both feel very strongly about it -- and I don't read women's magazines, we don't have a TV though my husband watches shows on Hulu... I and my brother were raised without much gender-specific anything, except for what we asked for or got as gifts. I'm not sure how much gender..izing? I want to do…
/r/MensRights07/07/09 01:23 PM
1

Being a woman, I have a question. What can a mother do to let her son break away? Besides the obvious (letting him do just about everything for himself, starting as soon as he can)?
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:17 PM
3

If you are afraid that your girlfriend might cry rape when it wasn't, maybe she's not the right one for you.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 05:15 AM
6

News flash: people suck.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 04:08 AM
6

Damn, it's too bad I'll be homeschooling my kids. I'd love to send my kids (with their permission, of course) to school wearing shirts like those -- the girls with "Boys are great -- every girl should own one" and the boys with "Girls are great -- every boy should own one". That would be a fight for the ages: "Oh, you don't like my son's shirt? What about my daughter's?" Edit: my husband points out that we might need a savings account for the express purpose of paying for fights...
/r/MensRights28/06/09 06:12 PM
2

Interesting point. How does that work in lesbian relationships?
/r/MensRights28/06/09 05:38 PM
12

All of them except for that pesky sex card.
/r/MensRights28/06/09 04:48 AM
4

I'm only at the bottom of the first page, but I had to comment when I read this: Cherlin believes the reason for this paradox is that Americans hold two values at once: a culture of marriage and a culture of individualism. Or is it an American spirit of optimism wedded, if you will, to a Tocquevillian spirit of restlessness... Well yes, it is a combination, but of three things: individualism, entitlement, and fantasy. Americans believe that each individual is entitled to the fantasy of passionat…
/r/MensRights19/06/09 08:10 AM
1

Fair enough, but there should be a paternity test involved if it's really for medical reasons. I like the sealed certificate idea. But those things can easily be rearranged a while later (example: a seatbelt law in Illinois that was never going to be a reason to be pulled over is now, 10 years later, a reason you can be pulled over for), so I'm not sure I agree completely. I don't think there's a way to ensure that the biological father doesn't get screwed. But we're assuming a more ideal world …
/r/MensRights02/06/09 04:58 AM
10

Ok, this is just sexism. There's nothing here talking about "these kinds of women" or "women who have these characteristics" -- it's just "women", in general, with no qualifications. Nothing has been said here that can't be said with genders reversed. How does this advance men's rights?
/r/MensRights27/05/09 05:03 PM
2

"Girls, if you don't want to be a single mom with no support, and you don't like the idea of an abortion, then don't hook up with random skeevy dudes." More like "don't hook up with anybody you haven't talked over the possibility of pregnancy with and aren't absolutely certain you can trust." The problem with that is that it takes experience to recognize trustworthiness and mental health in people (and some people just want sex and can't be bothered with the consequences). I am damned lucky that…
/r/MensRights27/05/09 02:27 PM
2

Yes, we are leaving this burden with the female. It is entirely her choice to keep the child. If she gets a choice, then so does he. The reality is very much that there is a steep financial burden to raising a child. If the biological father does not wish to have a child, he should not be required to provide the financial support. Of course, when he decides not to provide financial support, he would also give up any rights to be the father as well -- he would not be listed on the birth certifica…
/r/MensRights27/05/09 05:29 AM
3

She looks like she might be an older-looking 40-year-old in that picture, if you ignore her shoulder and chest (above her boobs). The lines around her mouth and the wrinkles under her eyes give away her age, and that's not even looking at the skin on her shoulder and upper chest. Just out of curiosity, how old are you?
/r/MensRights27/05/09 05:16 AM
3

You think being a single mom (or a married mom for that matter) isn't giving up anything? It's her choice, though, when she discovers that she's pregnant. Or maybe you think having an abortion is an easy, free and pain free process? Spending thousands of dollars on a child you hardly get to see for 18 years is also not easy, fun, or pain free. Men's rights != uterus control. That's the gist of it right there, isn't it? You're saying that men don't have the right to tell a woman to get an abortio…
/r/MensRights27/05/09 05:08 AM
2

Yes, the Puritans were so hardy that their women could pop out kids in about four or five months. There were a remarkable number of Puritan marriages where the first child was born about that long afterward. Granted, that data is probably not used by the CDC. I don't remember where I heard it, either, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 04:52 AM
1

...Do you regularly drink a quart of milk in one sitting? I mean, I'm not trying to be snarky...
/r/MensRights12/05/09 03:17 PM
1

I'm not sure I could eat two pounds of any one thing.
/r/MensRights11/05/09 08:12 PM
6

A late night snack of two motherfucking pounds of bacon?
/r/MensRights11/05/09 03:56 PM
2

Am I the only person on reddit who passes over stuff she doesn't want to see in favor of stuff she does?
/r/MensRights30/04/09 03:56 AM
0

Clearly, I was serious in my previous comment.
/r/MensRights25/04/09 03:42 AM
-1

Why should we be permitted charitable deductions for charities we select? Let the state decide "fairly" which charities get our money. We do that already; it's called welfare.
/r/MensRights24/04/09 08:36 PM
2

Fractal wrongness, right there.
/r/MensRights24/04/09 08:35 PM
0

And prenups are unfair! All of them! Edit: oh, I'm sorry -- MOST of them. Yeah.
/r/MensRights24/04/09 08:32 PM
1

Or you could be rigorous in your testing of their morals and leave if they're not up to standard....
/r/MensRights24/04/09 08:32 PM
6

Add to that: Eventually every organization (or ideology) for victim's rights becomes obsolete when the victims are no longer powerless. Then the organization/ideology's purpose becomes its own survival, which means insisting that the former victims are still victims. Soon that becomes the only purpose.
/r/MensRights24/04/09 06:24 PM
3

You haven't worked in retail, have you?
/r/MensRights23/04/09 05:15 PM
1

Ok, I got off track in that comment. My primary point is that if she was trying to advocate actually stopping violence against women, it's immoral and unproductive to call out men who do not do violence against women. It is not their responsibility. It's the responsibility of the people involved (and having a relationship of any kind more than an acquaintanceship is being involved, though that's beside the point). But her entire point, even if you take out all the shock tactics and emotion, is t…
/r/MensRights09/04/09 08:28 PM
1

How can you possibly not have met people who think they aren't responsible for things that happen to them? She was simply calling out men for the violence done against women by OTHER MEN. But it's not anybody's responsibility or right to look after another adult or to prevent another adult from doing something. If she actually gave a shit about women, she wouldn't completely ignore their own role in the violence done against them. There are very, VERY few victims who could not have avoided the s…
/r/MensRights09/04/09 03:28 AM
8

I wonder how long it'll be till she sues her mother for something equally stupid?
/r/MensRights09/04/09 02:55 AM
1

With all due respect, you're still applying a stereotype to me. I'm female, yes, but that doesn't mean I'm a feminist. Edit: Okay, I'm a female who argues about gender, so I guess your application of the feminist label isn't terribly unwarranted. But now you know, just because a woman argues about gender doesn't mean she's a feminist. :)
/r/MensRights09/04/09 02:50 AM
1

Where in the article does she mention anything relating to women's responsibility to avoid violence against them? To remove themselves from bad situations? No, it is not women's (as a group) job to clean up after men (as a group). Nor is it any particular woman's job to clean up after any particular man or group thereof. But -- and this is the part that feminists, fighting a war that's already been won, completely ignore -- it is every woman's responsibility, just like it's every man's responsib…
/r/MensRights09/04/09 02:47 AM
1

I wouldn't have a problem with that, except for your application of your stereotype to me, the individual. I think I wrote enough to indicate that I don't (at least, not necessarily) fit into the stereotype you hold. I don't have a problem with stereotypes in general -- they exist for a reason, and I definitely agree with this one -- but there is a problem when you apply a stereotype to an individual, especially when you have evidence to contradict it in that individual's specific case. Edit: al…
/r/MensRights09/04/09 02:24 AM
7

Women not having the vote and getting shit for trying to work outside the home -- those things were cultural also. Racism is cultural, as is its real-world application (discrimination and/or violence based on race). I agree that I don't have the right to not have people question the size or existence of my engagement ring, and I may not have read the article very closely, but I am not and I think the author was not advocating making such things illegal. But there's nothing wrong with arguing on …
/r/MensRights08/04/09 03:38 AM
4

You're saying that because it's natural for a man to ask a woman (a statement I'm not sure I agree with) it should be expected? And I don't understand how the symbolism makes it inconsequential. There's a reason a lot of women don't have their fathers walk them down the aisle. My very Christian cousin was walked down the aisle, but by both of her parents, and when the pastor asked "who gives this woman" the response from her father was "her mother and I do." I'm not sure yet exactly how my fianc…
/r/MensRights08/04/09 03:19 AM
3

Do you think they are congruent with equality? I am, of course, wearing my engagement ring as I type this. I'm just curious how you see it.
/r/MensRights08/04/09 01:23 AM
8

I'm sorry your sexual experience has been shitty :(
/r/MensRights02/04/09 09:43 PM
2

Between the two options (divorce now without cheating and divorce later after she finds out you cheated), I'd take the one where I look better to the court.
/r/MensRights02/04/09 09:41 PM
3

She's absolutely right. Generally speaking, both sexes have to work for sex -- men to convince their women that they want to, women to get their sexual interest closer to the level of their men. When we do that, we have more sex and therefore better relationships. There's a reason it's called a 'wifely duty' and not a 'wifely longing'.
/r/MensRights02/04/09 09:41 PM
3

Yeah, I don't have any problem with cutting skin off helpless, screaming male babies who then go into shock and pass out. If it were female babies, then yeah I'd be pissed. Joking and sarcasm aside, I didn't think about it much until after I met my fiance a few years ago. His father wasn't very concerned about it, but his mother made damn sure her son didn't get cut and after talking with her and watching Penn and Teller's Bullshit! on the subject, I'm pretty militant about it. I still find it i…
/r/MensRights27/03/09 03:25 AM
12

RESALE VALUE??? What the fuck? I had no idea foreskins were sold off! No wonder people are calling for more circumcision! Ugh. I feel dirty now.
/r/MensRights26/03/09 09:25 PM
2

Wow. That says so much while saying so little...
/r/MensRights09/03/09 09:21 PM
6

No, sweetie. Women are victims, they can never be responsible for crimes against them (and the crimes are always against women -- crimes against men pretty much never happen so who cares?). Men are perpetrators, because men have all the power and women are helpless little babies, unable to so much as make a decision. </sarcasm> This is how feminism fucks itself. If women are victims then we have no power to change our situations. We are children at the mercy of men, who are the adults. So why do…
/r/MensRights09/03/09 05:48 PM
0

Why did you capitalize "woman"? Edit: WTF downmod, it's an honest question!
/r/MensRights05/03/09 06:18 PM
3

This doesn't even make sense. Females' greater control over their reproduction gives men greater control over it? How exactly does a woman's control over whether or not she takes a pill give a man control over her? This just blows my fucking mind: A man, he's saying, can spread his seed...without worrying about raising some other man's child. Bullshit! If she quits taking the pill, doesn't tell you, gets pregnant, and refuses to have an abortion, congratulations on the kid you didn't want. Guess…
/r/MensRights27/02/09 09:24 PM
1

Makes sense to me. thanks :)
/r/MensRights27/02/09 05:19 PM
1

What is WBB? And for that matter, VAM? Are there any others I'm missing?
/r/MensRights27/02/09 05:46 AM
1

Um... Okay, his wife being pissed off because the family and house didn't fall apart in her absence? Not quite crazy-bitch behavior, but certainly irrational. But I'd like to hear her side before I take his word that she was "furious." But this doesn't work for me: She could hardly have been blamed for imagining that her return would be greeted with piles of unwashed plates and clothes, a pair of unwashed children and a frantic wide-eyed (and probably also unwashed) husband to boot. After all, t…
/r/MensRights02/02/09 08:06 PM
1

If the reason for killing her daughter was the boyfriends threat to leave...if that ever in fact took place...then they should have entered a plea of "not guilty due to insanity". As I understand it, insanity defenses generally do not work. I could be wrong, though. Look, the boyfriend issuing her an ultimatum is a relevant fact. It's not anti-male to include it, any more than it's anti-female to post the story in the first place. If the genders were reversed, would you be claiming anti-female b…
/r/MensRights02/02/09 07:25 PM
1

Wait, so when some crazy bitch threatens a guy with leaving him and he does something fucked up, it's her fault? Or are you just saying that it's the boyfriend's fault in this situation because he's male and you don't see enough actual discrimination against males so you have to go searching for it? Sure, he gave her a reason in a sense, but she killed her daughter. He's not being charged with so much as accessory. How would you prefer they get across that she killed her daughter because she was…
/r/MensRights01/02/09 06:44 AM
1

We're not. She tried to do it because she wanted to keep him from leaving. It's all her.
/r/MensRights01/02/09 01:18 AM
2

Maybe he's not named as an accessory because...it's not his fault?
/r/MensRights30/01/09 09:55 PM
18

There are plenty of women here who don't downvote you for saying that. Edit: forgot to mention that there are probably even men who would downvote you for it.
/r/MensRights21/01/09 07:29 PM
2

Wow. What a powerful piece.
/r/MensRights20/01/09 08:13 PM
6

It's not really a man's fault. and Men use denial all the time, it's perfectly natural. Uh...huh. BTW, it's not society that makes the poor man want to go sow his wild oats and makes the evil, manipulative, trapping woman want to mate for life. It's biology. Doesn't make it right (or wrong), it just is. Also, I'm really glad that I got what this author might call a defective man.
/r/MensRights15/01/09 12:49 AM
15

I was glad to find out that the quoted part was about a completely different couple than the rest of the article was.
/r/MensRights12/01/09 10:37 PM
1

You could go into social work, counseling, stuff like that, but the only way to make a decent living in women-focused work is to go into academia. And then, yes, pretty much the only thing you're doing is encouraging other women to do the same.
/r/MensRights03/01/09 05:54 PM
1

A male coworker of mine with no family works his ass off for this company. At the company Christmas party he opened his gift and sat there stunned at the amount of his Christmas bonus. (No, I don't know how much it was, but it must have been good!) I try and put in more than 40 hours in a week. Most of the time, I don't. There are other things I want to do with my time and I don't have the energy that my coworker does. I know that I can make the same amount if I work hard, but I just don't value…
/r/MensRights02/01/09 05:46 PM
-3

You know it's time to get off of Reddit when you get the urge to make a comment like this: AAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
/r/MensRights01/01/09 12:20 AM
2

I find it interesting that you consider it a moral failing to get into such relationship but not to be the emotional abuser. I was focused on the person not doing the abusing, so I can see why you might have thought I intended to imply that emotionally abusing somebody is not morally wrong, but I didn't. (Edit: If I'd considered the abuser I would have assumed it was obvious.) Also, I didn't say or imply that I thought it was a moral failing to get into an emotionally abusive relationship -- I s…
/r/MensRights12/12/08 05:29 AM
2

I wouldn't go so far as to apply morality to any of this, except maybe to say that it's morally right to make sure you don't get into a relationship with an emotionally abusive fuckup in the first place. And it might be said to be morally right to consider intensity of sex drive when choosing a partner, among other things like shared values and ambitions and similar senses of humor. If you choose somebody who has a higher or lower sex drive than you, you'd better be willing to compromise and mak…
/r/MensRights11/12/08 08:35 PM
0

before any judge currently on the bench. This makes it sound like you're arguing that a married person does have a right to sex with their spouse. (Emphasis on "right")
/r/MensRights11/12/08 07:52 PM
1

What I don't understand is the suggestion that sexual arousal encourages sexual assault. It isn't sexual arousal that encourages sexual assault. It's a woman acting for all the world like she wants sex. How exactly is a guy supposed to know that a woman showing off her body doesn't actually want sex? If you dangle a piece of food in front of a hungry person, do you expect them not to go for it?
/r/MensRights03/12/08 01:36 AM
6

I'm ashamed of my sex sometimes.
/r/MensRights24/11/08 06:12 AM
5

...and didn't get anywhere near the same punishment that a man would have.
/r/MensRights21/11/08 09:07 PM
1

That's barbaric.
/r/MensRights07/10/08 03:42 PM
0

So...businesses that have nothing to do with the state can't discriminate against people based on a laundry list of characteristics, some chosen and some not...but this guy's lawsuit had to try and make some connection to the state?
/r/MensRights30/09/08 03:59 PM
1

Full disclosure: My fiance actually noticed it, but he rarely gets around to commenting >_>
/r/MensRights25/08/08 06:01 PM
3

"Alleged accuser"? What the fuck?
/r/MensRights25/08/08 05:05 AM
9

Could somebody please explain to me that guy's response? because it doesn't seem to have anything to do with the condescension in those commercials. Course I don't know why anybody's complaining about them, everybody knows men are so weak that it's practically olympic for one to master his own hormones long enough to keep his eyes on his wife who he's obviously not attracted to. Because everyone knows men don't marry women they're attracted to, they marry women who will do housework for them! be…
/r/MensRights24/08/08 05:39 AM
10

More to the point, it tells that group's social opposites that they are oppressors by nature and are guilty regardless of the lack of evidence against them or the evidence for their innocence.
/r/MensRights10/08/08 08:55 PM
4

Yes, and freedom and responsibility go hand in hand.
/r/MensRights10/08/08 08:52 PM
15

This is one of several issues that make it blatantly obvious that men's rights and women's rights are pretty much the same thing. A system that blames men for everything tells women we are no better than children.
/r/MensRights10/08/08 06:18 PM
1

I've filled out a lot of job applications for retail positions and temp agencies. They always ask if you've been convicted of a felony and tell you that it won't necessarily bar you from employment. I assume they have to say that, because nobody would actually tell an applicant that without being required to. But maybe it's perfectly legal to discriminate against those convicted of misdemeanors? It wouldn't be the first or the last time the law did a stupid (the subject of this thread notwithsta…
/r/MensRights07/08/08 11:34 PM
2

I'll keep that in mind just in case some asshole does decide my fiance is trying to hurt me: plead not guilty. But isn't it illegal for an employer to discriminate on that basis? Something else I noticed in that article, which is rather offtopic from your comment, was the bit about "arresting the larger party" which is probably assumed to be the man. I'm about 25 pounds heavier than my fiance (he's not tall) so I'd probably demand they arrest me instead.
/r/MensRights07/08/08 09:10 PM
7

This kind of thing always scares the hell out of me. My fiance and I both practice aikido, and we'll be out someplace tickling or poking at each other in play when he pulls out the kotegaesh and I find my top half suddenly parallel to the ground (he never takes it all the way to the throw unless we're actually on the mat). We sit there for a second and then he lets me go, but all we need is for somebody to see the wrong moment and make a phone call and he's completely screwed. And we both could …
/r/MensRights07/08/08 05:24 PM
4

Plenty of women have women issues.
/r/MensRights25/07/08 04:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter