TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

m1_hammer Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by m1_hammer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

That quote does not refer to an accusation, but rather to prohibit abortions after rapes without reporting the rape to the police. This is not about criminal prosecution, this is not about public accusations, this is about the private act between a possible victim and her doctor. And the term "legitimate rape" has a very bad connotation.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 09:18 AM
–

He also said that gays should fight for gay marriage and then ... don't marry.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 11:54 PM
2

Does a boutique discriminate based on gender if they sell only women's clothing? And you probably could open a doughnut shop like that, but it would not be a wise business decision. Discrimination by businesses is a very hot iron, since a business can decide what specific product to offer a person and whether to offer a person service or not, but this is not unlimited. I am not claiming to have a definitive answer or solution here, but I do think that this is more in the realm of business issues…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 10:17 PM
0

It is a business or political decision. And it is not about the actual safety, but rather the feeling of safety (at least I am not aware of any studies proving an increased safety).
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:56 PM
2

Oh dammit, that ruined my night </sarcasm>
/r/MensRights08/11/14 12:55 AM
1

Then lucky you. Still does not invalidate the point for NYC.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:42 PM
1

Saying "good morning" is not harassing someone, but definitely not normal behaviour. Larger cities have a certain anonymity for their inhabitants and not greeting unknown people on the street is part of that. New York is especially known as a city where people show very rude behaviour, thus increasing this.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:02 PM
1

I found the whole thing very interesting. In my everyday experience I seldom see catcalling in action, certainly not at me, but also not at women on the street, but I heard of it. Although mostly in the context of a club or, disturbingly, the office. It is a fact, that the video mostly shows black or latino men catcalling the woman. The defence, that saying "good morning" is not harassment, must come from people not living in a large city. To spell it out: People in large cities do to greet each…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:09 PM
9

I have no idea how an idea can be more racist, sexist, totalitarian, misogynist, misandrist, ableist, anti-humanist, paternalistic ... I am running out of words here.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 08:35 PM
–

We are talking about Munich, one of the safest cities in Europe. If you turn over a stone, there is a copper under it. But during the Oktoberfest, the city goes nuts, and every year there are a couple of rapes (literally "a couple", the city's report lists 4-5 for every year, around 400 cases of assault, around 100 dangerous injuries by aggravated assault). There are also a lot traffic injuries and of course alcohol issues. Why the outrage?
/r/MensRights28/09/14 11:11 PM
2

I like the werewolf part. Running around at night howling at the sun and occasionally at a Porsche driver is good fun, nothing wrong with it.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:10 PM
–

(Disclaimer: this is a sarcastic answer to the article) (1) Yeah okay. If I won't be a part of it, why should I care? Or is there some entitlement there? (2) I heard that before from some consultants, and the majority settled in some dumb job at some customer of theirs or had a burnout. (3) Okay, good for you. But then don't complain if you do not find the perfect man in the window between 37 and 39. Secondly, just because it is possible to get pregnant in the late thirties does not make it the …
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:57 PM
1

A fetish is something tightly connected to sexual arousal and not necessarily something that the person actually likes. Often the side effects of any acting on the fetish are so damaging, that you (or anyone else) will never fulfil this sexual phantasy and it might eat you from the inside.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:47 AM
-1

Look at the numbers. The question was only attractiveness without age information, so everything that follows might be wrong, but I will still provide some hypotheses, since in real life people do not have their age tucked to their forehead either. The women between 20 and 23 prefer men 2 to 3 years older. This does match with the measurable difference in development during the teens. Until they get 30, the man should still be one year older. That the line switches sides after 31 is interesting,…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:11 AM
6

When we look back in history, a man's life (aka a male life) never had real value, unless that man was king or emperor. A society can survive with a very low number of men, but is doomed to extinction with only a few females. The more people a society had, the worse it treated both sexes, but always kept that ratio of "caring" intact, and so do we. We hold human life as a value of its own and in order to keep that ratio up, society treats women as more precious and thus the outcry is always more…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:25 PM
13

Maddox at his best
/r/MensRights04/09/14 11:33 PM
2

The video is pretty good
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:01 PM
1

Yeah, 9min is not too long, but still. For the summary: either my browser is hiding stuff from me or you mean the teaser that ends with "if she were a white man"
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:27 PM
–

I won't listen to the podcast, not because of the content but the format. On a site with the headline TL;DR the internet shorter and then no summary? No ...
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:11 PM
0

According to the cliché all gay men are basically ripped. There seems to be a group called "bears", but maybe I misheard.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 07:09 PM
–

At first I just wanted to ignore it, but then obscure stuff surfaced, so here we go. The whole article does not provide one bit of "how to make it a men's" problem. The author avoids certain words in the headline, because people "tune out" and pay no attention to it. Maybe people just do not want to read or hear about the same stuff over and over. The image that men sit at a table and a woman cannot pull a chair up. This topic is not about "women's rights", but opportunities. The author has no i…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 07:39 AM
1

According to the book "Undercover" by Rob Evans and Paul Lewis (paperback, page 45f), which deals with this particular under cover unit, the cops were phased out just like everybody else. They told the activists that they needed to lay low for a while, went abroad and contact decreased until they were gone. Although some people seem to use this way to end a relationship, this had nothing to do with their relationships but their undercover work. It is general douchebaggery by the cops and this un…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:52 AM
–

The whole existence of the undercover unit is a open "Fuck you" to a free society, but Britain was always special in this way. Supporting and committing crimes in order to watch eco activists and animal rights activist as if these people would kill other people by the hundreds is fucked up Some of the police officers fathered children with activists they had sex with and just disappeared on the mother and their children They literally cheated on command, since every undercover in that unit has a…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 07:10 PM
1

I first wrote a long answer, but that was overkill. Short version. Many people takes sides way too often way too quickly and want to lynch someone. Due to her early release of her side of the story, she is dominating the sphere, while he disappeared and the linked "alternative" unverified story does not help at all. Not only does it portray him as the escalating factor, too, it increases the aversion against him due to the events described. There is weirdly much detail in it given that everyone …
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:44 PM
1

I have a couple of things that disturb me here (included part 1 of the article): Why are sting operations legal anyway? How can it be legal and defendable to lure, persuade or seduce someone to commit a crime? Because we are not talking about a specific person, who was under surveillance for months, and now we need proper evidence to build a case, so we allow a crime to happen and watch or trick him/her into committing one. I find even that repulsive! But, hey, police officers are also allowed t…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 06:01 PM
2

(a) Men (just as women) are regulated. The ingenious invention is called: laws! (b) 90% of dead babies are caused by women (shake the baby). Regulate women. Secondly, given the high murder rate in the US, the US clearly has other issues, unless countries in Europe are populated by women only (especially Iceland. But they also disprove the gun/murder causation, just BTW) (c) Committing crimes is actually not socially punished in all cases. Especially non-lethal violence and economic crimes seem s…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 09:59 PM
1

(1) It is very dangerous to compare the behavior of rats to the behavior of humans (which is, by the way, also true for the comparison of the behavior of college students and the rest of humanity). (2) This only indicates that isolated rats prefer drugs to no drugs and go for an alternative, when they have one. If one would transport this to human behavior, it tells us that isolation and loneliness may make a drug habit worse. Given that men are often expected to deal with their problems, this w…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 09:40 PM
164

Ah, western hypocrisy. You do have rights, but if you use those rights to stand up against an institution, you are a querulous person.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:03 PM
2

In general I believe that campus sex life is a mine field for both sexes, especially when fraternities are involved. Both parts are pressured into a certain behavior, but only part is victimized. I would like to know, what impact the pressure to have sex without emotional attachment and may not even proper attraction does to young men. But that only on the side. It is probably true, that college is more dangerous for women in these terms. The Pareto principle works here as well, so 20% of the me…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:59 PM
1

This is a more and more common notion in any debate. Arguments are not accepted as arguments, but rather as an expression of personal opinion and agenda. If you enter a debate and properly announce, that you argue for another point of view, which is not your own, people will still use that for ad hominem attacks. For some reason this became acceptable. Attacking people for arguments they make and, even worse, putting someone in some category of people, that they think would use the argument to a…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:40 PM
1

Not everybody speaks English. Especially not in rural areas in eastern Europe or Asia. This case does involve a justifiable amount of victim-blaming. Yes, one should know that a contract one cannot read is probably not valid (who to ask to verify?) and by now it should even be common knowledge in these areas that western companies do not recruit their employees by an obscure agent, who lives down the street in some small village. On the other side, this seems still to happen, so it cannot be tha…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:19 PM
1

She can try. To illustrate the situation: she is in a foreign country, She can certainly try. To illustrate the situation: she is in a foreign country, most likely not speaking the language, without knowledge about local customs and institutions (e.g. that it is virtually impossible for her "employer" to bribe the police). So she has to "break out" of the building she is in (which might be difficult enough), find a way to the police, make a statement. The last element is probably the easiest, if…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:34 PM
2

I am glad that we could sort that out :) It is true that trafficking in western Europe is easier due to missing border controls. It is also more difficult to prove actual trafficking. One scheme is to offer a woman from a poor, rural part of Romania or Bulgaria a job as a waitress and have her sign a contract in German (Prostitution legal in Germany and Switzerland, very liberal in Austria) or Dutch (Prostitution is also legal in the Netherlands). According to the contract she has to work off th…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:12 PM
1

It is a reasonable and justifiable defense, but this argument actually appeared in the discussion in Germany during the liberalization of prostitution. Since prostitution is legally a proper occupation in Germany, foreign prostitutes need a work permit. Legal scholars pointed out that courts would have to order the deportation of these women under the then publicized version of the law. The law was amended afterwards to add additional protection for victims of human trafficking. Courts cannot ac…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:30 PM
2

I lack the necessary insight into Canadian conservative politics to make a proper judgement here. I also do not understand what the goverment has to do with that? If a person or group (in this case feminists) has a certain opinion (in this case "hating prostitution"), not all other persons or groups (in this case Barbara Kay, who I don't know but can deduce as not being a feminist) with the same opinion belong to the original group (or person, but then it does not make sense any more). I was not…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 03:05 PM
1

Nice idea, but fails to appreciate the agility of market participants. This idea needs existing penalties for the supply side and a somewhat effective realization of those penalties. If the risk of getting caught is already low to non-existent, then lowering the penalties has no effect. The risk is already very low. For the demand side this is also true: the penalty must be high and effectively enforced. But if the risk was high, one might indeed expect a spike in supply when removing penalties.…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:52 PM
4

Just because one group hates something does not mean that everyone who agrees is part of that group
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:36 PM
-2

To understand this model, you'll have to understand the underlying ideas for this model and how the legal system works. If one wants to ban prostitution, the only argument that does not fall apart quickly comes from a moral point of view. From any other view, such as safety for the involved persons, public health or criminal side effects, any ban does not make much sense and in fact worsens the situation for the women the ban is supposed to protect. Only if one states that prostitution is fundam…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:34 PM
3

Alright, lets start. (pre-PS: Some parts turned out to be ironic or sarcastic, but I left those in.) Paragraph 1: (1) Claim without any "because". (2) The term "friend zoned" is particular to the US and influenced other anglo-saxon areas without a wider influence on other countries. (3) The terms "giving up sex" and "men getting pussy" project more power on the women than on men. Men have to work to make a woman "giving up sex" or "getting pussy", she decides whether this happens or not. (4) It …
/r/MensRights30/05/14 10:48 AM
2

True, I still have the separation between an indecent assault (by means of incapacitation or coercion) and rape (by violence or threat of violence) in my head. It is rather interesting to look at the actual legislation around the world. If one trusts the English Wikipedia page on this topic, several Western countries would not classify this as rape for various reasons. Some countries require an act of penetration by the offender, which is not applicable in this context and in some cases even the…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:02 PM
3

The problem with the perspective is often caused by ignorance and thus many of these women cannot be blamed for their view of the world. They cannot imagine, that we as men also have role models forced upon usas well, but rather feel and think as if the behavior is natural. When women look at men, they often project the image they had since they were little girls onto all other men (and I am not saying that women are crazy because of this,but rather all humans categorize other people according t…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:29 PM
–

Alright: If the situation is that he cannot properly defend himself against any outside move, then I would consider this situation an indecent assault (in its legal sense). And he is not cheating. It is missing the violent part for rape. The point in this case is, that he did not actively choose to enter any sexual activity (which would make this cheating) but rather the girl uses a situation in which the boy (a) has an impaired judgment and (b) has no longer the physical ability to defend himse…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 09:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter