~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "What Will We Concede To Feminism": UPDATEIf you read my comment, I said that I do not agree with their position for many of the reasons you stated. I wouldn't say it's anything like the majority of feminists who hold this position, but we were talking about the more extreme intellectual leaders of third-wave feminism. I don't know what their counter-argument would be (like I said, I only encountered these ideas in a gender studies course), but I would say that the whole dominance/hierarchy = masculine to many gender theorists would not… | /r/MensRights | 04/07/13 04:47 PM |
| 3 | "What Will We Concede To Feminism": UPDATEI never made the claim that Obama was 'weak' (read my major caveats on even labeling a president weak/strong in another set of comments). But on the other hand, the Affordable Care Act is a larger, more ambitious piece of legislation than anything Bush or Clinton ever passed, even with its issues. Clinton's main agenda was even to pass a very similar health care bill, and he didn't. Energy and Immigration are huge issues that presidents have been trying to tackle without efficacy for the past 2-… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 09:24 PM |
| 6 | "What Will We Concede To Feminism": UPDATENo, I still think you perception is just based on impressions that are largely divorced from political realities. It's essentially impossible for us to know how effective a President is behind the scenes, and what we most often get are media characterizations/caricatures. But if you're going to bring it down to the level of passing law against fierce congressional opposition, the fact that Obama passed health care legislation much like Clinton's failed plan (a bill which would have been the most… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 07:51 PM |
| 2 | "What Will We Concede To Feminism": UPDATEI'm not an expert, but I did take a bunch of gender studies classes, so I'll do my best: Essentially, there are two parts. The first holds that the way science has been conducted since the European Enlightenment--that is, by men--has in various ways marginalized women and non-European cultures, which were largely seen as 'objects' within science, and not subjects themselves. Note that they more often mean the social sciences than, say, physics, notably anthropology/psychology/sociology. It's kin… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 07:41 PM |
| 9 | "What Will We Concede To Feminism": UPDATEBush had full command? One of the strongest narratives of his Presidency was that Cheney was really holding the reigns. That could have totally been an illusion, but my guess is that your perception is just as based on illusions as those who subscribed to that narrative--because those kind of judgements go through so many abstractions before they reach the public. And Clinton powerful? His health care plan got blasted to smithereens and, though he still won reelection, Gingrich and his 'Contract… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 07:09 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter