TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

macaroniinapan Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by macaroniinapan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I agree, this is the way to go.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 03:48 PM
1

I think a good way to start would be, not a dime of child support is paid before a paternity test confirms who the father is. No option to opt out by anyone. If a man finds out a child is not biologically his and still wants to provide support, that's up to him, but the government isn't going to get involved. That would be difficult to get out into law but not as difficult as universal testing at birth would be. And maybe it would work well enough as a deterrent that the ROI for universal mandat…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 03:35 PM
1

Thank you, I think so too. He was very wise in a lot of ways and I will be forever grateful.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 05:29 PM
2

Thank you, I agree. And I am eternally grateful for him.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 05:28 PM
1

Morally I agree but supporting vigilante justice is a very slippery slope.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 02:04 AM
7

I was just thinking about this song too. Especially with that last verse that is sometimes left off. I don't think the man commits domestic violence in that one, though, I think he just cheats, which is of course terrible, but not worth the death penalty.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 02:03 AM
15

Songs involving women being indifferent to violence against men (at least not in time to do anything about it) have been around for a long time. Examples: Springtime in Alaska Long Black Veil El Paso And as funny as it is, Salute to a Switchblade. I remember as a little girl listening to these songs and talking with my dad about them. He told me that men are very quick to defend the honor of women, almost by instinct. So women should respect men by always acting honorably. I've done my best to l…
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:40 PM
4

Exactly!
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:53 PM
6

I'm a woman who just turned 50, and I remember Tom Leykis too! He wasn't the first one who caught my attention and he wasn't the biggest influence, but he did play a significant part.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:48 PM
3

Interesting little fact to add to that. Up until the 26th amendment was passed in 1971, the voting age was 21. The reason that is interesting is that men between the ages of 18 and 20 had to register and could be drafted, even though they couldn't vote. The slogan "old enough to fight, old enough to vote" became popular and the voting age fell to 18...for both men and women. I of course don't think it was wrong to drop the age for women also, but I wish we didn't get the vote for free as a resul…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:09 PM
3

We are all uncultured when we are taking the first few steps of a journey. There is a lot of good information out there that you'll come to learn in time and improve your own life a lot!
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:36 PM
7

Wow, of course, I should have guessed! People like that are terrible.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:34 PM
40

Many don't think boys even can be molested. They think that situation is every boy's dream and they should be grateful. Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:33 PM
3

Right back at you.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:31 PM
4

No problem! I'm glad to be able to do something even if it's little. It's just such a huge issue it seems like emptying the ocean with an eyedropper.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:30 PM
3

Credit where it's due. Second wave feminism achieved something great for both male and female college students by working to get rid of in loco parentis.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:28 PM
6

My point is, we have no idea what OP would do in that situation. And it doesn't matter. That's not what this post is about. And don't YOU ALL take issues with "whataboutism?"
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:27 PM
6

So is it okay for a man to have issue with a woman who only cares about women's activism and wouldn't stand up for a man?
/r/MensRights27/03/26 09:42 PM
9

I think you're missing the point.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 09:22 PM
15

I'm a woman and maybe not an MRA but I do what I can. Somehow I ran across people like John the Other and Chapin's inferno back in the day and it really shook me out of my apathy. I had fallen into the trap of thinking that if you want equal opportunities for women that makes you a feminist. But I came to realize that wasn't true, and feminists can say that's what it means until they are blue in the face, but that doesn't make it true. And I am very glad to have had this learning experience.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 09:16 PM
13

GirlWritesWhat was another early contributor. I don't know if she's still active or not, but she was a big influence on me back in the day.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 09:08 PM
2

That works too, thank you. I do think the difference between the two questions is important though. At least when it comes to navigating the law.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:53 AM
1

I am saying I am not a lawyer. I have heard different things about different geographical areas but they might have changed since I last checked. I don't want to throw out something too specific and end up in the weeds with people telling me I'm wrong now about that specific situation which might have changed. My overall point was to draw a distinction between the question "can a man be legally raped?" and "can a man be legally raped by a woman?" because those are two different questions and the…
/r/MensRights24/03/26 02:11 AM
9

That might depend on which sex is doing the raping. In some cases at least, I believe, the exact wording of the law means a man can be raped by a man, but not by a woman. Of course it's all absolutely wrong from a moral perspective, I'm just talking about the wording of laws. And at least for the USA, the laws will vary by state, so that just adds to the confusion.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 10:15 PM
11

To add to that, until the 26th amendment was passed, young men aged 18 - 20 had to register and could be drafted, but they were not allowed to vote yet. That's a legal problem that has been fixed but there are too many people who don't realize the significance of that amendment. Or the fact that the voting age for women dropped to 18 automatically even though the biggest reason 18 year old men were given that right was exactly because they were subject to the draft, but women were not. Not sayin…
/r/MensRights19/03/26 10:46 PM
11

Same here and also because the opinion that hating an entire gender is gross is as controversial as it is.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 03:20 AM
2

The only time I have ever heard of males doing that to each other is the few that challenge each other to see who can withstand the hardest kick. And the vast majority of men would consider that to be as dumb and immature as trying to win a laxative brownie eating contest.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 01:19 AM
2

I've always had the impression that "leave each other's nuts alone" was the literal translation of "no hitting below the belt," meaning the concept has been around for a very long time. Which makes sense, of course.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 02:02 PM
2

To add to that, there is also the issue of proxy violence from women. They get another man worked up enough to commit crime against a man they don't like. And yes, the man who commits the violence is responsible for his own actions but a woman lying to him has responsibility too but it isn't technically considered a crime.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 01:42 PM
4

"The Rifleman" is also an excellent example of this, though of course it's older.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 02:49 PM
5

I suggest addressing it with the actual pastor first, privately. Be diplomatic at first, feel out the situation. You'll soon get a better idea of how to proceed, based on that person's reaction.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:08 PM
5

Don't know, but thank you very much!
/r/MensRights07/02/25 06:01 PM
18

I think for now it's a pick your battles thing. At this particular time not a lot can be done about such subreddits because from what I hear, the people that are in charge of Reddit as a whole are not responsive to reports of even the most blatant rule violations in such groups, and will even threaten to ban you from all of Reddit if you report "too much." Hopefully that will not be for much longer. In the meantime it might be best to focus on strengthening groups like this, share the actual fac…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 05:43 PM
3

Let's not forget the good things women are allowed to do but men are not. Lost little kid, crying alone in the grocery store? A woman is allowed to comfort the child and help find the parents. A man's safest option is to run away fast - even he wants to help.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 04:44 PM
2

I came to make a similar comment. Lost kid crying in the grocery store? A woman is allowed to comfort the child and help find the parents. The only truly safe option for a man is run away fast.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 04:40 PM
1

Somewhere I read, and I have no idea how they measured this, that it starts in the womb. Boys are more likely to be miscarried than girls. Then premature boy babies are less likely to survive than premature girl babies.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 04:43 AM
2

My BIL didn't get anything special for afterwards but he was given Valium to take about an hour beforehand. Yes he was a bit loopy in the car on the way there (Sis was driving of course). We tease him about it but it's all in good fun. We've all of us in the family made it clear to him that we appreciate his courage and consideration for Sis - we helped make sure he had all his favorite foods, for example. And other men in the family who had already been through it spoke privately to him about i…
/r/MensRights19/09/24 04:32 AM
4

How do you handle uncontrolled variables though? So many things can be different besides gender from case to case. Not saying that can't be useful data for some studies. But how does your example pertain to not being taken seriously due to being female (assuming you meant it as that and not just as a random example, of course.)?
/r/MensRights19/09/24 04:05 AM
18

What I want to know is, assuming you CAN get access to such records...how are they going to help you? To be more concrete, what terms are you going to type in the search engine? I'm just not understanding how you are going to get any meaningful data at all beyond "patient reported not being taken seriously due to being female." You can't even verify she was objectively correct, even down to the question of, maybe it's true she wasn't taken seriously but it was for a different reason. I could go …
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:48 AM
5

I work on a college campus and every October, all the pink comes out. Fundraisers everywhere. Frat guys wear shirts that say "save the boobs." Which is all well and good. But does anything happen in November? Do the sorority girls reciprocate? Of course not. It's just so ungrateful and so disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:40 AM
6

Isn't that still ultimately self report though? What could be found objectively in the records, that's not basically a complaint, "patient reported she wasn't taken seriously due to being a woman"? (And to what extent is that verified?) I know, particularly in older records, there might be notes from providers that say "all in this hysterical woman's head" but I doubt there are many of those.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:15 AM
4

That's a really great point. Women have more complicated reproductive systems and thus more potential to need medical attention. And it would make sense that diagnosing abdominal pain would take longer - just simply because there are more things it could be. And of course as sad as that is, it isn't men's fault, and direct comparisons are disingenuous at best.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:07 AM
13

Is there a way to do that research that's not based just on self report, though? The "volunteer problem" is real.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 03:00 AM
34

Wait...she had an injury to her vagina and people want to compare how a man would have been treated differently? There is literally no way to meaningfully make a comparison here. I'm not saying she should or shouldn't have gotten different painkillers. Not a medical professional of ANY kind and I have NO CLUE. But if you're going to make these comparisons... wouldn't it make more sense to talk about a broken arm or something? (And of course compare apples to apples in other ways too.)
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:33 AM
1

That's true. The issue is bigger than just male versus female. Strong painkillers are both over prescribed and under prescribed and it needs to be looked into more carefully.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:27 AM
9

Same here. Something that really strikes me about health care in particular is my privilege to insist on a doctor of my own sex or at the very least a chaperone of my own sex, if I so choose, and nobody will think less of me, even if I have no trauma or good reason, and if it just makes me more comfortable. But if a man did that, he'd be written off as a sexist pig, for being uncomfortable with a doctor of the opposite sex and no option of a male chaperone, at best another female.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:25 AM
1

I see. I'm so sorry to hear that happened. I do not have that experience personally, but I can see how having an automatic level of trust for someone based on their sex would be quite helpful to medical treatment. Trust in your doctor is so foundational to making it all work.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:15 AM
6

Maybe. As a female with multiple chronic illnesses my opinion is, women having women doctors is overrated. Some doctors are frankly just shitty. And some are excellent. I can say that I personally have never benefited from a doctor being one gender or the other, but YMMV. I will say though I fully acknowledge my privilege in being able to insist on a doctor of my own sex if I want to, and to have a chaperone of my own sex if I wish to have that if the doctor is the opposite sex, and people will …
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:08 AM
9

Same here...kind of. I'm a female with multiple chronic illnesses and no, I haven't always been taken seriously and treated well by health care professionals. But I have never gotten the impression it is in any way due to being female. Some of these so called professionals are just chicken shit when it comes to a complicated health care situation like mine - which isn't really inherently wrong except for how they are too proud to admit it and to refer me to someone else. I think it would be the …
/r/MensRights19/09/24 02:00 AM
6

In some ways that might be true. But is it really more so for women than men? I've known several men who got treated like shit by female doctors, under the delusion that men always exaggerate when they have flu like symptoms, or men have a lower pain tolerance than women (which men of course must be punished for even assuming it's true? Which it isn't) and all that.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:24 AM
20

I suppose in individual cases it might sometimes be true but what I've seen more often is when the men in my family go to a female doctor and get treated like crap due to being male.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:15 AM
8

In my experience, so are men. I don't know numbers for who has it worse technically but I do know some doctors are just shitty.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:12 AM
17

Maybe they can identify as urigender - their gender shifts from male to female only while they are peeing. Okay, I just made that up, but that means they can make something up on the spot too.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:21 AM
1

Great point. Anything to insult him and intimidate him into paying. Back into his place, by any means necessary.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/19 07:15 PM
3

I always get confused when they use this as an insult. I thought it was okay to be gay, not a source of shame. But for fear everybody will think he's gay, he should give into the blackmail attempt. It would be so funny if more guys, even though straight, just said, "yes, I'm gay. I just wanted a free meal from you" or something similar. Because even if he says it, those who matter won't mind and those who mind won't matter.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/19 07:09 PM
5

She'll also not talk about other dudes. In her eyes, you will be the man of the hour ... Or however long you paid for.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/19 07:01 PM
3

Even 2: percent would mean too many innocent men were suffering. I hate how some people say that it's JUST 2 percent, no big deal. Anything over zero percent is a serious problem needing to be addressed.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:57 AM
3

And even 2 to 4 percent is still way too many.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:53 AM
7

Even if it were only 2 to 8 percent, that would still be way too many innocent men suffering.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:51 AM
18

And if there is a heaven, I hope the uncle has a special place there.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 02:46 AM
1

A big-ass people toilet, you say?
/r/MensRights30/06/18 12:22 AM
2

If she'll victimize her own child, she'll victimize anyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/18 12:11 PM
3

Jodi Arias is another good example of this. Why even have it if you're not going to give it to her? She fit all the criteria for it perfectly.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/18 07:22 PM
1

It's pretty awful in this case, true.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/18 07:18 PM
19

I wonder if that means that men who were born women don't get automatically invited, and have to sit outside if they come.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 11:25 AM
4

I wonder what green eyes have to do with anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/18 11:19 PM
6

As much as I agree with you, I do hope that somebody in the background of this is prepared for some backlash. No need to spoil the amazing breakthrough that this is and the celebration that should result for most, but I hope there is some security already on call somewhere that can be brought to deal with any protests. It involves CAFE, though, so I'm sure they have it covered!
/r/MensRights06/01/18 09:15 PM
0

Okay, let's be real. If somebody could invent a "pants app" that could digitally remove a guy's clothes and show how big his dick really is, lots of women would be calling it THE BEST APP EVER!!! So yeah. Hypocrites as usual.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/17 01:15 AM
1

That's a great typo. Very appropriate for this situation.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 07:54 PM
4

To add to that, I bet they wouldn't have sued him if he hadn't gotten the monetary award.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:18 PM
6

Even though that's true, the women doing the suing might believe otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:16 PM
2

Where did I speculate about anything? I just said that somebody else has been found guilty, which is true. And given that this person obviously didn't put any of the blame on the first guy, this is actual proof he's innocent in this case. Though I don't disagree with you that "not guilty" isn't a synonym for "innocent," of course.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 06:15 PM
8

The real rapist was found and convicted, though. I'd say that's proof of actual innocence.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 05:25 PM
3

Relevant
/r/PussyPassDenied06/11/17 12:34 PM
1

Possibly, acrylic nails.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 10:15 PM
2

I'm thinking she had long acrylic finger nails.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 10:13 PM
3

r/dontdeadopeninside
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/17 09:49 PM
2

I think, if you have to say out loud that you are relaxed...you're probably not actually relaxed.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/17 04:17 AM
2

I thought it was Quinn from "Daria" myself, but maybe it was Lisa after all.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/17 04:16 AM
6

Her voice reminds me of Quinn from the show "Daria."
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/17 04:12 AM
1

Stefan Molyneux has some good you tube videos about movies like this, including Maleficent, Frozen, and the new Beauty and the Beast.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 08:53 PM
5

Encyclopedia Dramatica has an article about her. https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Jenny_McDermott But yes, you're pretty much right about her. Not worth bothering.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 06:24 PM
5

Maybe she should get one "freebie". The first time she is asked, she only has to say one man's name. If that man turns out not to be the father after a DNA test, then she has to state the other names.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:09 PM
16

True. But she should be. It's just disgusting how many of them are trying to hold the non-bio dads accountable for the harm that they themselves are doing to the children.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:01 PM
56

It would harm women in the same way laws against fraud harm con artists. Which makes what the women are doing to the children even worse. If the children are harmed by not getting child support paid by the biological father, because the mother won't or can't say who it is, then all that harm to the children is caused by her and her alone, and she should be held accountable for it.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:15 PM
1

That's the key word, isn't it? "Respect". If everybody truly respected each other, we could find a way to make shared bathrooms work even if we all hated them. And honestly I think that men in that type of space would show much more respect to the women in that space than vice versa, as a rule. But if we just all tried to respect each other and assume we are being given respect unless there is direct evidence to the contrary, the whole world (not just bathrooms) would be a better place.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 02:38 PM
1

True, I'm sure. I don't hang out in men's restrooms so I can't directly compare.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 06:52 PM
1

Thanks! :)
/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:47 PM
1

Interesting! Some particular reason for the water on the counter and floor?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:59 PM
2

I didn't think I was belittling any issue. I cannot speak directly on how it would feel to be a boy who was being sexually humiliated. Beyond saying that it is reprehensible and should under no circumstances be allowed and that yes, the situation described in the OP would allow for it and that would be horrific, I really don't think I have the right to speak on that matter. It is not my place. (Though if you notice in my original reply to this post, I mentioned that males could be groped by fema…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:25 PM
2

Sorry, I think there's been a misunderstanding. What I meant was that if such a thing were possible without using lots more money and lots more space, which very few places have besides the BBC HQ, then it would solve the problem. With my second and third sentences I tried to communicate my actual disbelief that it was a practical way to solve the problem, so sorry, my bad.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:06 PM
2

No problem, I will, thanks! Just having a Dad and a brother and uncles and brothers in law and nephews would be enough to motivate me to want to help with all this, but the more I read on places on the internet like this, the more fired up I get even beyond that.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:39 PM
4

Good point about what happens during puberty. Having to share a restroom at that stage of life would be very, very awkward in a very different way. And true, I might have been seeing it through my female eyes when I said it would be considered "rude". Women tend to take things to extremes that way. "Annoying" is probably a better word overall. And I really wish those words weren't true, but thanks. I just feel so helpless watching all this go down, though it seems like I should be one of those i…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 01:16 PM
3

Thanks, but there's always something to add if you want to. :) Another thought I had after I made that first comment early this morning is that women's restrooms have a very different social atmosphere than men's restrooms - at least from what I can gather from conversations with male friends and relatives. From what I understand, men never talk in a restroom, for example. Even if two men were in an active conversation before entering the restroom (such as while waiting in a line) they stop talk…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:14 PM
1

I have noticed pee on women's toilet seats, and occasionally blood, but never shit, that is true, but I think that's splitting hairs at this point. Those other things are equally gross. And I have seen shit smeared on the wall - though, again, thankfully, not very often. I don't know how often that last thing happens in a men's bathroom though I assume it does occasionally.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:04 PM
1

Well, that would solve the problem all right - thanks for the clarification. But that's going to be awfully expensive and take up a lot of space. Where are those things going to come from?
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:02 PM
21

I have wondered for a while now about what the effects could be to boys who are forced to share that space with girls, in terms of the possible sexual harassment claims. The tiniest little thing a boy does, if he accidentally bumps into a girl or even makes eye contact, could be seen as sexual harassment or violence and he might get reported and in trouble for that, or worse, physically beaten up by the girl or multiple girls, or more likely, some white knights who are responding to some girl cr…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter