TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

macromastseeker Archive

View 0 posts and 200 comments by macromastseeker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I was asking someone else if THEY are internally consistent, your comment adds nothing towards answering that, but Im sure the sisterhood thanks you for your zeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 04:59 AM
1

You have no counter argument just shaming language. Boring NPC content.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 03:30 AM
1

The word "special" is triggering you. No one deserves to have someone fall in love with them because they are "special", people need to do for each other in relationships. Everyone is special...duh, we are all unique. Basic adults know that. Only one gender is groomed to think that they deserve anything romantically for just existing. And it isnt the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 03:27 AM
-1

You would also need a crystal ball to know how someone acts after years of marriage. There's no such thing as vetting, especially with highly emotional creatures like women. She can change her feelings and cash out at any time regardless of what you do, fucking obviously. You're a living breathing "women are wonderful" fallacy where if women are shit it is men's fault for not predicting the future. No. Some women are just shitty people that take advantage of good men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 03:16 AM
-2

Who knew men couldnt be assaulted by women, you can just walk away. This is extremely misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:33 AM
2

"Divorce rape isnt real....source: trust me bro!" Prenups get thrown out all the time and are up to the whims of the feminist judges. You reeeeaally want lots of simps providing resources to low quality women-there's no need for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:20 AM
-4

Not if that threat comes from a woman and you're a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:15 AM
-6

So you dont say bullshit needing a crystal ball to men, like "you should've vetted better" when they get treated like trash in the marriage and get screwed in divorce. You criticize the woman for her shit behavior...right?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:13 AM
–

If they were not lying about feeling safer with the bears they wouldnt be so promiscuous sleeping with strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:11 AM
1

Those are certainly all words
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 07:00 PM
1

No I assumed you cant cook or clean because that's an easy layup to get men interested: its stupid to not lead with that because the worthless modern women dont either, its a free way to set yourself apart from them. The very first woman I met who could ever cook better than me was the only one I had a baby with, so I practice what I preach. And yes, you should be submissive. Because you ask for better than you. Men dont.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 06:45 PM
1

I dont really give a crap about this sub, I am talking about the table question and men and women in general, I dont know which sub I am replying to half of the time. I am sorry that you encounter some of that stuff but I very much assure you there are a LOT of men who would be extremely happy with a loyal, sweet, average looking girl who could cook well...we're waiting for you to offer that at the table question instead of being in lockstep with the sisterhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 06:43 PM
0

No its your opportunity to bring to the table THINGS MEN CARE ABOUT. It isnt the opportunity to say you are hot; you are being extremely dishonest. Someone asking a woman what she brings to the table has already seen her, we are explicitly asking for what you bring OTHER than looks. This shouldnt be a hard question for women, but because they know they cant cook, cant clean, arent easy to get along with, arent loyal etc....they stumble all over themselves and suddenly they ARE a piece of furnitu…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 06:18 PM
2

One of the first results for "MGTOW hate group" is an article calling it a male supremacist movement, Im sorry you cant google or read. None of the articles challenge the claim its a hate group at all and it isnt like our googles are going to be radically different. You have a "creative relationship with the truth" hope thats better for the mods.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 04:27 AM
–

You're a liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 03:32 AM
2

If only there were a thing like, I dont fucking know, google.com where one could search "mgtow hate group" and read all sorts of thinkpieces that call it male supremacist group and all sorts of other dumb shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 03:01 AM
1

I mean, lying is certainly a posting strategy too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 02:59 AM
2

What I realized recently is why "what do you bring to the table" is so offensive to them. They know that the world's elite beauties dont have to bring anything, so for starters to answer the question she'd have to admit she isnt a 10, which is against girlcode right there. For two: part of the disney princess brainwashing is that women are "special" in some undefined way, and she watched nothing but romcoms with simps pursuing some girl who is "special" for no particular reason and all she has t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 11:50 PM
0

Im sorry but not, BP says MGTOW is a hate group because we refuse to be the retirement plan for women who dont like us and couldnt tie down Chad and Tyrone. Literally they say not simping is misogyny. That most definitely is NOT what BP and RP agree on
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 11:42 PM
1

Not the same. Women who arent attracted to MOST MEN are the equivelent of women riding the bus and refusing to buy a honda civic because they got a ride in a rich guy's Lamborghini Urus a couple times. They are awash in PERFECTLY FINE VEHICLES. The fact that they dont "want" those vehicles which are good, decent vehicles, is more akin to a personality problem. When men are walking on foot and desperate for a car, any car, to get out of the baking sun. The analogy that men would have to date othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 11:40 PM
2

"What is it that you think I’m doing? " Encouraging men that it's a good idea to get married and absolutely wrecked emotionally and financially because "just walk away!" as if it's easy and harmless (You're probably projecting how easy it is and such a come-up it is for women). You're a danger to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 08:59 PM
2

...You're literally doing it right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:37 PM
1

Most married men are settled for betabux simps so no, my fear isn't "unwarranted"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 09:36 PM
0

The thread is predicated on men turning into women and I asked a question on if I still have my brain. I'm a man, sorry if that triggers you, that makes it a man's brain. Just like if I had your brain I'd be an obnoxious feminist calling people problematic for engaging with a hypothetical
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 01:27 AM
0

The betabux simps are being lied to by women and society at large, and Id go so far to say as, the largest reason dor the backlash about the redpill is it will inevitably lead to less simps as retirement plan for 304s to settle for and parasitize and divorce grape.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 01:21 AM
1

A chaos agent asking why stability matters for....stability
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 06:13 PM
7

Yeah women who solo travel in relationships are all 304s.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 06:11 PM
3

Do I have my man brain? The one that can distinguish the difference between how something LOOKS and it's aesthetics and how it IS, it's substance?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 06:10 PM
0

Im a male and a solid 5 so I dont think I can speak for the ugly, but as someone who has banged pther 5s all the way up to some 9's and 10s, I can tell you banging insanely beautiful women sometimes is more difficult because their beauty takes on somewhat of an ethereal quality-you spend a lot of time in the act thinking, "I cant beleive Im getting to fuck her!" Which is actually distracting from getting the job done. Girls who are more normal pretty/cute are just asier to be comfortable around …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 03:44 AM
1

Keep it up, I encourage that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 01:26 PM
1

Im one of the men that takes advantage of modern women being the easiest lays and most promiscuous ever, since the stopped minting wives since before my age cohort. Shrug
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 01:26 PM
1

"Who cares about the options" Men do. But you dont care about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:01 AM
-1

A vast majority of women who would describe themselves as single as not celibate. Single celibate women are rare. And those rare women are awash in options. Pointing out reality triggers women constantly for reasons that escape me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 05:52 AM
0

A woman who is not in a committed relationship still has tons of orbiters in her phone and real life that would sleep with her and probably pay for her stuff at a moment's notice globally now. That is as opposed to most men who are invisible to most women and they have to go to great efforts to prove themselves worthy of womens' attention. Not really the same paradigm of singleness.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 04:30 AM
5

But women are almost never "single" in the way single men are single.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 02:05 AM
1

Ah, the "Every man who sees female BS for what it is must be an incel!" Gambit. When actually its the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:47 PM
1

I do think that "Random online comments" are too high a price to pay for women...actually destroying society lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:34 PM
1

And I fully agree with you, women are looking for the alpha simp ceo thug poet who feels their feelings with them constantly, which definitely is not a traditional man, nor one who actually exists
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:33 PM
1

Like I said, all women are picking and choosing which parts of tradition they like. You're not addressing what was actually said. Again, men have compared notes and the deal is no longer valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:32 PM
6

Because if there aren't any gender expectations explicitly, women will manipulate and surreptitiously control which is unenforceable. Just like they have been doing in the collapse of gender roles for thee and none for me. Men are simply waking up to the hypocrisy of the double standards of modern women and traditional men. You can either get treated equally...TRULY equally, which includes the parts you dont like and wont measure up well in, or you can be a feminine woman. You dont get to pick a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:52 AM
2

Height has very little to do with fighting prowess, in fact I'd wager that most men above 6ft have been in fewer fights than men of average and short height. Mike Tyson is 5'10". Also, I'm 5'8", if I beat up a 6 footer in front of a girl that won't make her more attracted to me. Height attraction has nothing to do with fighting prowess for women, otherwise shorter trained fighters would be more attractive to them than 6'2" guys with no training, but we know that is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 11:12 PM
2

What good is your man being taller than other men?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 11:04 PM
2

A higher bar for relationships than they do for fucking? Absolutely true, what the hell?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 05:06 PM
–

And again with the projection and shaming language onto men-I have my child and have had many relationships and still like any DECENT MAN find it disturbing how attracted to criminals women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 07:01 PM
–

How is it not a moral issue that criminals have more children than non criminals? That's entirely a moral issue if I've ever heard of one.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 07:00 PM
–

Honestly, data says you should be job hopping every 2-3 years to maximize wages anyway. So making friends with a girl and vetting her and asking her out romantically as you're leaving could be a good move Youre basically giving women a loaded gun by starting a relationship with them when they have HR and endless white knights around where you pay your bills. I dont trust anyone like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 06:52 PM
1

"Women do it to attract men, not for enjoyment." Shrodinger's feminist, primping and makeup and dressing slutty are for themselves, or men, depending on whatever will win them the current argument. If you have a BF your tiddies on display will be "for yourself" and he's "insecure" if he has a problem with it. It's tiring hearing this BS, don't you ever tire yourself saying the BS?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:34 AM
1

Yuh THINK? *golf clap*
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:32 AM
1

Yeah just like it's gay to wear makeup even if it works if you're a Korean guy. You don't need to do that to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 05:31 AM
–

If you have a shit job sure, if you have a career you care about dating at work isnt worth the risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 03:18 AM
-2

LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 03:17 AM
–

No, that word salad is from women. My advice is only to avoid at work, because I dont want any man's money being played with.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 03:17 AM
0

I don't know what this means and have never heard of it if it is a phrase. Do you actually think men preach this and think this? A lot of feminist nonsense is because you just believe in fables about men as long as they paint women as victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 10:39 PM
18

I really REALLY recommend men NOT approach women at work in 2025. Those days of meeting someone are over, unless you REALLY don't care about your job because it's a shit mcjob anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 08:58 PM
1

" Imagine how much more quickly men might actually move on from users or bad matches if their friends warned them the girl was bad news. " We're talking about situations where the men and women don't know each other, thus my friends couldn't know if a girl I was talking to was bad news or not, and vice-versa. You don't know the first thing about my friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:21 PM
0

"You see it happen all the time." Perhaps this is too technical a conversation to be having. You do NOT see encouragement to do this, anywhere. No men tell other men to keep trying after a no-I've only EVER heard "Plenty of fish in the sea, keep it pushing" messaging, not once, ever have I heard encouragement to keep being aggressive with women who say no. And since you aren't a man you wouldn't even encounter this anyway...so why are you lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:20 PM
1

This is probably just another male/female communication difference. It reminds me so much of the "I just want to RANT to you about my easily-solvable problem I don't want you to fix it!" thing that women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:35 PM
-1

There's a difference between "some men do something" and "There is a narrative that you should do something". I.E., rape existing does not mean we have a RAPE CULTURE, that is bizarre feminist framing. I've never ONCE heard encouragement to keep pushing women after they say no. Not once. In school in sex ed etc, Many, MANY times all the boys were told no means no, and active consent etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:23 PM
1

You're not a man and were never a boy. I'm almost 40, we were told explicitly all throughout school that "no means no", you're out of your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:21 PM
1

So redpill men who are divorced are lying incels, that is quite a conspiracy theory you're nursing there
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:19 PM
1

A man wouldn't talk to a woman, describe 10 characteristics exactly matching her, and be shocked when she asks him out, we'd only do that if we were trying to show interest in her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:14 PM
-1

"I hate the narrative that men receive growing up to keep trying if she’s not interested. That women love to be chased and a “no” is playing hard to get." That hasn't been a thing in many decades.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 11:58 PM
1

I've been married and had relationships, but nice try with the incel shaming language.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 11:36 PM
-5

Do you not see how you can't make up that everyone in the redpill is simultaneously a frustrated virgin making up stories when many of them are disgruntled men who are comparing notes on RELATIONSHIPS THEYVE HAD WITH WOMEN?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 11:34 PM
4

I have an ex who had two identical hitachi wands for if one lost power mid-fap. It was funny at first until it wasn't and after the initial new-relationship energy died she'd rather use her wands than have actual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 11:33 PM
-4

If they weren't aimless idiots, they wouldn't take out their frustrations on betabux guy. They would enjoy their time with Chad and keep it pushin' rather than get alpha widowed and bitter.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 09:43 PM
-4

Because women use getting banged and ditched by a higher value guy as their barometer for relationships, punishing the betabux provider simp for not being the Chad she couldn't get commitment from.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 07:44 PM
3

What is the "type" you fall into? I think it's always a coin toss, some women are repulsed by being a guy's "type" and others are like you and require it. I will say that a LOT of western women are extremely insecure if a man has had a relationship with asian women before.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:47 PM
3

I'm mixed myself but I find that I like, for lack of a better word, "extreme" body types, like I can like BBWs or Petite women or women with huge boobs or ass or hips or thighs, etc, but I need something to perv on...the worst body type for my attraction is the "average" body type. I don't know if this makes me weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:45 PM
1

Men "being visual" means we're visually stimulated, not that we want to sit around like women primping ourselves up and checking angles, that is for women and (some) gay men's enjoyment. Straight men do not like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:42 PM
3

I've never had someone explain it so well. That's EXACTLY the way I felt my whole life. It is totally self-reenforcing and I realize that, but I've made my peace with looking awkward and shitty in photos decades ago. It makes being in a relationship with someone who cares way too much about "cute pics" for social media maddening. I'm trying to ENJOY THE NIGHT not stop the fun to pose a million times for some picture where I will look like shit anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:40 PM
1

Do you understand the difference between how something is marketed, and how it IS? Or do you not see the difference between image and substance? How you are, in person, is who you ARE, why do women want men to fake how they look online when they will be the same person in person? You're ASKING to be lied to, and it's bizarre. I get that a lot of guys need to actually take better care of themselves in person to improve their looks, but we're talking about jpegs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:37 PM
1

And also, sidebar but I think all men need to stop online dating as it is inherently simping and all of you 5's would have to drop back down to earth where you belong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:35 PM
1

"It isn’t difficult to know if you look handsome in a photo and to get someone to help you take a couple of flattering photos." No, that isn't hard for YOU to do, because you're a girl. We'd have to have someone to do that for us, and also get over how gay it is to act like a girl and ask someone to do that for us.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:34 PM
1

I'm talking generally for the benefit of male-female modern relationships, I personally don't GAF about relationships anymore at this point. Semi MGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:31 PM
1

I guess I can see your point about "marketing" if a man is an actual, literal incel, but if you're a man who can get his occasional needs met from the poor selection of western women I don't see the purpose of primping yourself digitally. For what? You're not going to pose your way with fake "candid" shots at flattering angles to get a traditional quality wife or anything. You will get the chance to pay for some ran through woman's meal. Yay.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:29 PM
2

I can't overcome the ick of the narcissism to take selfies and "pose" like a woman. Also, I couldn't care less what women think, in general. "Market" myself, for what? For the non-existent traditional wives? Or so that I could get married and lose my kids and all my stuff? Nah I'm good.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 06:25 PM
9

I've always wondered why the type dynamic thing is what it is. I've had multiple women who were turned off by finding out that I don't have a type, I have dated the rainbow and all body shapes. I certainly like certain things but I like so many different "types" that it seems like I have no type. I think women find this untrustworthy or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 10:23 PM
34

There was a great video where a guy explained the phenomena of a girl complaining about men (to the guy they're talking to) and basically describe what they want, a caring nice guy who listens blah blah, and that guy thinks "Hey, that sounds like me!" and is utterly confused why he can't get with this girl. The thing men need to know, is that it is SO obvious to women that it doesn't need to be said: You must ALWAYS append or prepend "Men that I am attracted to physically" to EVERYTHING they say…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 10:21 PM
3

Never once has one of my boys butted in and scared me off from a girl, because he didn't like her or was jealous of the attention she was giving me. The amount of women I wasn't even talking to who've sabotaged her girl who was previously feeling me, is more than 1.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 10:17 PM
16

It's me, I'm that guy. As I posted above, as a heterosexual male it's bizarre how women think we curate photos and IGs the same way they do to look artificially cute online. Me and the boys never are taking candid photos of each other. Multiple women have remarked on how much better I look in person, never ONCE have I met a girl who looked better in person than her faked contrived photos...I don't know what they don't get about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 10:10 PM
5

I've had multiple people meet me from dating sites who were shocked that I was visibly much BETTER looking in person, I truly am pug-fuggly in pictures because I feel awkward as hell and I hate forcing smiles. I'm still average looking at best IRL, it's just my photos are ugly AF
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 10:09 PM
7

I think it's a mix of a few things: -As you said men aren't constantly taking selfies like women are (I mean I hope not) so there's going to be less practice at angles and lighting to be flattering etc -I'm a heterosexual man, it's...not normal for men who hang out together to take pictures unless there's something else involved (Fish etc). I have VERY few photos of myself for this reason. -Women nitpick whatever tf men do anyways. Can't take a picture with a fish, can't take a picture with a TI…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 10:09 PM
2

If you disagree with something that would help men and level the playing field to equality, you are not for equality, you are not neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 09:22 PM
2

Feminists are ANTI-EQUALITY when you ask them about men's issues. So, stop the lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:17 PM
0

Saying you're about "equality" is a lie because it implies you will objectively call balls and strikes. For example, the NAACP is the National Association FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE. ITS IN THE NAME. They, unlike feminists, make their goals clear, to advance civil rights for colored people. No problem. Feminists, ITS IN THE NAME, advocate for rights ONLY FOR WOMEN, but unlike the NAACP they lie about being for "equality" and say that men who arent feminists are misogynists. But what i…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:28 PM
2

1) Curious how old you are, 2) In redpill spaces it is an amazingly common story, and even in non redpill spaces why are marriages overwhelmingly low sex? Women use sex to attract men and get commitment with NO intention of keeping men sexually satisfied while in a marriage (Im not Christian but this makes sense why this is a marriage duty)- any man with experience knows that "new girlfriend" is the best you will ever get out of a woman and "wife" is the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 05:23 PM
0

Women don't have to become mothers to be lying chameleons, most lying chameleons aren't. Somehow the ring or even moving in can be enough commitment for them to show their whole ass. They aren't joking; you can find videos of women saying they "knew they would get divorced" before the marriage and making light of "starter husbands" now.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 08:13 AM
–

That's horrible. But you're also judging 95% of men by what 5% of scumbags are up to? That's definitely the "logic" that causes women to choose the bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:50 AM
–

One of the reasons I married a woman was because she said she would NEVER tolerate a dead bedroom marriage...guess what she enacted unilaterally almost immediately after marriage LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:48 AM
3

"but either partner who pretends to be enthusiastic sexually for the sake of locking down a partner is guilty of a bait n switch." Honestly you might be the only woman I have met who has admitted this is foul behavior and I appreciate that. "Within reason, absolutely. Aging and the addition of children, illness, or changes in workload obviously affect frequency and quality for both" I think all reasonable people, including men who are redpilled know that real life puts a hamper on sex lives some…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:47 AM
0

I'm speaking in general and trying to share a common experience men have, that a woman fraudulently chameleons a whole persona and then turns into a nightmare. When men share this, women and shitty male white-knights blame the victims of the liars by saying they "ignored red flags", "should've picked better", or "Must've gone only for looks", as if someone should've KNOWN someone who appeared to be a good person for an extended period of time must've been horrible. I don't know why women can see…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:39 AM
1

My example's purpose was to agree with you how shitty the behavior you're complaining about is and saying as a man I've also been on the receiving end of it, it's terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:36 AM
1

"While all gender equality is feminism, not all feminism is about gender equality." Can you give some examples in the last 10 years where feminists have tried to benefit men specifically in the areas that they are not equal to women? You would think if they were about equality it'd even happen on accident every once in a blue moon, but I guess if you think women are the oppressed victims in the west that that is a good excuse for why it never happens? If all gender equality is feminism than when…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:27 AM
–

My child's mom is in constant competition for the baby with me, asking me directly stuff like "Why can I (blah blah blah)" towards our child and not her...and the answer is, because he's a freaking baby and you're an adult, you weirdo? She's a good mom and a horrible, horrible partner. She makes everything a competition as a parent and it's incredibly toxic. I would never "punish" her or resent her attention given to the baby...that's so freaking weird and gross to be in competition for a child …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:19 AM
0

Do you agree to maintain sexual attraction and performance throughout the marriage as you showed him when dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:16 AM
–

It's weird because whenever men say that their wives change for the worst and chameleoned their entire personality, we're told "pick better" but you're claiming that all the men who are slobs pretended to be neat freaks before they got commitment? Nah.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 07:10 AM
0

What "amount" is that, percentage wise?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/25 06:37 AM
1

Probably a 3; I dont think most people can tell and I'm very good at talking to women, I am just too logical for normies and I suffer in relationships long term because LTRs with women involve constantly being forced to lie rather than state the uncomfortable truth, and lying makes me extremely uncomfortable. I also couldnt give less of a shit about meaningless, fickle, fleeting emotions that are 10/10 important today supposedly but will be gone tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 07:50 PM
0

Now, I am a fairly masculine male, I would have no problems being friends with a feminine male, so long as he kept to his word, and didn't violate "man codes", I wouldn't be friends with a feminine male who like most women had no sense of logic and thought his feelings were more important than facts, and constantly contradicted himself and never admitted to being wrong. The only reason men put up with that in women is for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 11:48 PM
0

By projecting I simply mean that you are not a male, so you are making assumptions about how male friendships work. I'm just a man who disagrees with you, and I do think my viewpoint carries more weight than yours, and that's ok. I've never noticed a corelation between masculinity and friendships among men, which is what would be true if men were all trying to be friends with more masculine "countenanced" men, it's like you're projecting hypergamy to male friendship where there is none.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 11:46 PM
1

In other words, guys who like hunting, hunt together, guys who like cars, work on cars together, but it's not "HEY YOU'RE A FELLOW MASCULINE MALE LETS GATHER AND BE MASCULINE TOGETHER"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 11:29 PM
0

I would love to see a poll on how many men think "masculine countenance" is a factor in their friendships, I think you are projecting. Male friendships are usually based around common interests which are tertiary to masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 11:28 PM
1

The question was "If you were a man, what would you do to be able to be selected by a woman for a LTR and be a good partner ?" What does masculine countenance that other men admire have to do with attracting women? (Also I'm not sure I even agree that men "admire" masculine countenance but I wanted to take the premise as a given because I was just very curious why you said that). If you meant "Separately from picking up chicks, to make friends I would do this?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 11:01 PM
1

"have a masculine countenance that other men admire" I'm curious what makes you say this?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 10:54 PM
1

Yes, OF girls perform on camera. Pornstars JUST perform on camera, they're not trying to get you to be their paypig because you're lonely and unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 10:51 PM
2

I have zero problem getting women as an autistic man, it's wanting to stay around for their emotional bullshit that is the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 08:31 PM
3

I'm probably autistic (never diagnosed, score high on online tests, work in technical field etc etc)- The "miss social cues" thing is BS to me, it's the neurotypical people have a much easier time being completely illogical and lying and forcing other people to deal with constantly crazy emotions. I don't need to deal with female crazy emotions, those are HER emotions, SHE needs to deal with them as no one else can manage another adult's emotions. If everything is chill and serene and good when …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 08:29 PM
2

Oh I believe there are women who can respect their men as men just as much if they make more money, they're just a tiny minority. And the vast majority of women are OPENLY HONEST about this but you're pretending they don't exist because it's a bad look for women who claim they want equality. You wouldn't tell a son to not worry about making money because women equally respect men who make very little and they enjoy being providers for men-they don't. As an adult I can handle generalities and exc…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:43 PM
2

Is it weird when women's "preference" is that men make more money than them? Because that's 90%+ of women. Weird, WEIRD!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:23 PM
2

So what happened to me, in my marriage, is delusional. All us men sharing notes online are making stuff up, our lived experiences are not reality, your female feelings about it are reality. That makes a lot of sense! I hope a lot of younger guys who are on the fence about how to deal with women read this thread and decide for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:21 PM
1

The girl you're talking about was a fresh college graduate and I had been working for a few years already so I made slightly more. Sometime during our marriage she got a better job an instantly started treating me with disrespect. So again you are projecting "Low income" I never said low income, I said made less than me. It's actually bizarre how you pretend you know me or my situation from a few sentences where you fill in the details with your own delusional fantasies. But please, keep telling…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:20 PM
1

Yes, I left that person, of course. But you spreading bluepill garbage like it doesn't matter what a woman makes might ruin the lives of some men, they need to know they will statistically get treated like dirt.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:15 PM
1

"If every woman you have is bad, " You really enjoy projecting and making up running narratives in your head don't you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:12 PM
1

No, that isn't what I said, try re-reading until you stop making crap up and beating up on strawmen.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:09 PM
1

"Dominant party" You don't get to choose whether you're treated with respect or not, that is up to her and how she feels about you after she has a new income
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:09 PM
1

". No woman does this" Yet, that is exactly what happened to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 05:08 PM
6

"REAL men tolerate disrespect from women because they make slightly less!" This guy lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:22 AM
2

You're projecting things I didn't say and telling me what a "real man" is which is very feminine shaming language. In the scenario I gave, I wasn't the one whose feelings changed, I was responding to different treatment like a light switch the MINUTE a woman started making $1/hr more. This is perfectly normal and explained by hypergamy. You can go get bitched out and disrespected by a woman for making a tiny bit less if you'd like, that's all you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:21 AM
–

Expecting to be taken seriously when they operate entirely on feelings, never admit they're wrong, and take zero responsibility for anything. They want all the BEST parts of every encounter with the responsibility of a toddler and the prestige of a CEO. It's systemic selfishness and hypocrisy is unreal.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:19 AM
–

Trust me, women don't want to be judged for the content of their character if we took beauty away. You couldn't handle the smoke.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:15 AM
–

They can't even attempt to make a sensible point. They are so comfortable moving goalposts it's pointless to talk to them, just a running "We have always been at war with East Asia" bot.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:13 AM
8

And WTF is up with your shaming language of "insecurity" and "intimidated" BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:04 AM
4

"And most of it very obviously comes down to insecurity." I wouldn't say that is obvious unless they said that, which they didn't. I wouldn't date a woman who made more than me, nothing to do with insecurity. It's a preference which men are also allowed to have. edit: Let me say, I miiiight date a woman who makes more than me but it would REALLY depend on the woman. It only takes one time to have a woman go from making less than you to making more and having that change her attitude towards you,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 12:01 AM
4

" Who convey in private that they'd "never date" a woman with a higher income than them." Choosing not to date someone <> You find someone intimidating.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 09:29 PM
1

I find it suspicious that you think that women have to be forced to have decent values, it is kinda baked into your assumptions that if women are of higher moral character and are more family oriented it's because they're enslaved to do so. The tie-breaker middleground between your opinion and mine is that women are susceptible to whatever society tells them to do, therefore we should tell them to be moral and family oriented and not narcissistic thots.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 05:12 PM
1

The differences between non-hot women and non-hot men are so vast as to be silly to even compare.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 11:07 PM
0

Bastards can come about from one sexual liason. Girls nowadays are on Tinder, there is no comparison and I think you know that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 10:06 PM
4

OF models prey on weak men because they inculcate shitty parasocial relationships that prey on their loneliness. Pornstars are just performing on camera. That's the cause of the repulsion for me. And also I don't think Porn stars pretend that it's "just a job" and that all men should accept them like OF do.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 09:58 PM
2

So you have no evidence about your claim of studies showing "past generations were MORE promiscuous."? You were just guessing and going off of feelings? I wasn't interested in conjecture and the brief data I found contradicts your claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 09:55 PM
1

Possibly, but I don't think that it really matters since the women back then didn't have time traveling machines to twenty-twenty-thot
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 09:52 PM
0

This is what AI says to the query: "are there studies showing women were more or less promiscuous in past decades?" "The Kinsey Reports (1948 and 1953): Alfred Kinsey's studies found that women's reported number of sexual partners increased over time, but these findings were influenced by changing social attitudes. The General Social Survey (GSS) conducted by the National Opinion Research Center: Analyzing GSS data from 1988 to 2018, researchers found that the number of reported sexual partners …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:53 AM
1

I was wondering that. I like BBWs too but this girl (while nice) is super, extremely unhealthy big and shaped like a bowling ball. It was just...shocking. He has a good job too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:49 AM
-1

There's absolutely positively zero chance women in the past were this promiscuous, for starters.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 01:48 AM
2

Maybe I am the exception but I find women who are non-gender conforming absolutely repulsive as far as partners go. They can be cool people though, but it's visceral for me seeing women with short hair or butch clothes or unladylike mannerisms. I realize I'm in the minority because most guys' thirst means they will overlook mannish behavior to get a crumb of the P.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:16 PM
-1

I had an ex wife and one of the reasons I realized the writing was on the wall was because she wanted me to act like a childish cartoon character with her 24/7, my crime was often being a serious adult with ambitions and goals and wanting a deeper relationship than "goofs" all the time. Many women are shallow and because they're so shallow they don't KNOW that they are shallow. There's a certain extreme boringness in the banality of 24/7 light heartedness that if you're that shallow you will nev…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:14 PM
5

The opposite of this affect, which is part of the same thing, is women can know NOTHING about you but find you more attractive if you are pre-selected by other women i.e., with a girlfriend or talking to a group of girls. So basically it's a circular fallacy of sheepleish groupthink of the sisterhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:05 PM
–

I've noticed women using A.I. in conversations to "settle" ambiguous questions as if algorithmic next-word-guessers can tell us a single thing about the human condition authoritively. They can't. But they make a lot of money convincing you they they're an authority on anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 07:02 PM
1

Many guys who end up getting financially screwed, their kids taken from them, emotionally devastated etc (there are a million drawbacks) by divorce, had very good sex at the beginning of the relationship where they felt their future wife was very attracted to them. Some of these women even meant it, some percentage of women were faking it to chameleon their way into a financial jackpot by a betabucks provider simp. Some of them even are planning the divorce in the dating phase because there's a …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 10:37 PM
6

A co-worker who was female and very very obese, showed me a picture of the guy she had gone on a few dates with, who was a tall, somewhat handsome dude. She wasn't super into him either, when in my mind she should've been pulling out all the stops to tie him down. It was startling but kind of revealed the entire problem with modern dating, that a super obese woman has access to men who are way above her looks-match, so much so that they think it's super normal and NBD. Am I annoyed? Not for that…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 08:48 PM
3

"A guy not being approached means he isn't attractive to whatever women he is around." You *ALMOST* get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 07:11 PM
1

Won't happen because women are way more terrified of rejection than men are. Also they're way more toxic when they get rejected no matter what feminists would have you think. The few times in life I've had to reject a woman they were absolutely vicious about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 07:08 PM
4

No worries. I've been called an incel while scrolling on my phone and literally holding my baby in my arms, women LOVE "creepy" "incel" etc slurs whenever a man disagrees with them or points out an uncomfortable truth to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:53 PM
6

Also I really dislike that you genuinely asked for what to do and were shut down. I don't respect men that complain and offer no solutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:03 PM
3

Thanks for considering it!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:03 PM
2

Youre an outlier then because married men get the least sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 07:06 AM
5

Wtf no you arent that's comical.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:36 AM
6

Guys looks peaking in 20s only matters for guys who can attract women on looks which is a small % of guys. In other words, 5's and below guys will have a much easier time in their 30s and 40s, and the vast majority of men are in that category to women (men and women rate the population very differently)- most men are completely invisible to women lookswise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:35 AM
28

The next time you witness girls call a guy creepy for being inexperienced or a virgin, speak up and tell them you think there's nothing wrong with him. Women NEVER correct each other, and especially not to go against the sisterhood to defend men/a man
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:29 AM
0

You really project and just talk about feelings instead of the logical statements made, and you use femimine shaming language instead of counter arguments of any kind. If its all the same to you I wont waste my time responding to you anymore because your feelings arent important to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:23 AM
1

Are you talking about sex workers or modern women in marriages, I genuinely cant tell
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:24 AM
1

Figuring all this out like you has killed my interest in sex. Its the most overrated thing ever and Ive been with some beautiful women who were very freaky and had a great time, I can confidently say better than most men will ever experience...was it worth the chase my whole life when I shouldve been stacking my money and focusing on a career? Nope. Those girls arent around anymore, I just have fun memories, divorces, and a shockingly light bank account
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:23 AM
4

Their husbands would be the judge of that, not the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:21 AM
2

Its a really really bad idea to have men pursuing the puppydog phase that chemically cannot last as the purpose of relationships. That feeling youre describing NEVER lasts and then youre stuck in a marriage that will be extremely painful to leave, emotionally and financially. I dont know a single man EVER who is sexually satisfied and excited for the same sex with the wife years in. When you get great sex with a new girl you're hoping it can last...it wont.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:20 AM
0

I dont know a single man who is stoked about his marriage and pro-marriage. Which makes sense since they stopped making wives many decades ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:17 AM
13

All the guys who got divorce graped thought they had mutually wanted sexual experiences at first, too. Thats an addiction that causes men, especially younger ones, to make horrible choices. I'd be a millionaire a few times over right now if I had gotten over my addiction to women at 20 instead of my late 30s. This isnt theoretical either.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 02:16 AM
1

JFC, if you care about your safety you pick random man and not a bear. This is just absurd to the point of parody now...Im shaming for NOT placing safey over their feelings if anything. How is that not obvious?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 08:36 AM
1

I've been called a red flag because I *DONT* have a type and have dated the rainbow/body type spectrum. I swear women are never satisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 11:20 PM
1

She could snoop digitally and become obsessed with your attractive ex and then blame the relationship issues that come up due to that insecurity on you not being over your ex. Projection and insecurity are a MFer and relationship killer
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 11:18 PM
1

Are you a man or a woman, how many men do you know that live like this? Its fantasy, not real. Because that isnt how women work in the real world, they are repulsed by men they see as not their equal or better in provision.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 06:46 PM
1

That it wasnt saying much is true. Which means women go out of their way to paint men to extreme negative lights recreationally. But when men say not to get married because divorce mauling happens to dozens of men we know personally, that's misogyny 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 06:44 PM
1

If "black man" is racist, then "man" is misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:29 AM
1

These same guys in jail with face tatts get picked up by their girlfriends because they dont have their own car and need to sponge off of women lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:27 AM
–

Your fetish for losers is your god given right but dominant men are men who have self control. Losers are in prison because they have no self control, usually from lashing out emotionally because they were raised by single women. Aggressive criminals are not dominant, theyre no stronger physically than regular men, they have poor impulse control because they are feminine and grew up with no male role models. The strength and aggression of men and the over emotionality of women does not make for …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:24 AM
1

I didnt try to convince you of anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:18 AM
-2

Biker guys and hood guys are losers, that that is your stand in for dominant men, criminals, is hilarious but very modern woman of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:09 AM
-1

Dominant men can get what they want, and men who can get what they want are disgusted by disagreeable women sorry to ruin your fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:08 AM
9

Women dont want men to take the lead, they want men to take THE RESPONSIBILITY. Big difference
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:04 AM
2

I can believe somewhat that women can enjoy the control, what I cant believe at all is that they would happily spend money on the guy who is a mooch. Thats the biggest impossibility of the scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:03 AM
-2

Dominant women are repulsive to dominent men. IMO. Its like watching a phony parade around as the real thing. Dominant women dont exist in nature, theyre a construct of modern society that coddles women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 09:01 AM
2

If someone would rather encounter a bear than a black man because theyve had bad experiences with black men, what would you call that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 08:55 AM
1

I made it about me in response to the accusation that I was offended. Then I used that logic to demonstrate that even if it was DIRECTLY ABOUT ME (which it isnt) I still wouldnt be offended. For someone demonstrating the women were 4-Dimensionally lying about picking the bear because men are more dangerous than women you struggle to follow along basic trails of thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 08:53 AM
0

I was asking if it was smarter for WOMEN to choose male feminists (who have a history of being abusive creeps) or a bear. What do you think? If youre more dangerous to women than bears you should turn yourself in.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 08:50 AM
1

That isnt what an allegory is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 08:49 AM
0

Oh I understand the nuance. Claiming youd pick the bear as revenge against men when you wouldnt, is a lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 08:48 AM
1

"So women chose the bear as a way to sarcastically highlight the harm discrepancy between males and females." That's called lying
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:28 AM
2

Would it be smarter to choose the bear or a random pool of male feminists like yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:27 AM
2

I find this very very hard to believe. A guy with a great face on a dumpy body or short body is not attractive to women. I had a male-model friend who was 5'0" in high school, he got NO play and was fit and attractive, just tiny. SO many times in my life I have seen women swoon over a doofy looking guy because he's 6'4" and makes them feel tiny. Height is clearly the king for women, #2 is probably the emotional content you give them i.e., game, #3, and very distant, is money and status. #3 is wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:22 AM
2

I'm "offended" by man vs bear the way I am by all illogical things human people do, the same way morons don't use seat belts because "they know someone who died because they couldn't get out of the car because of the seatbelt buckle". If some woman wants to choose a bear over me I'd find it funny and not care at her stupid choice because she's a strong independent woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:10 AM
1

I find it hilarious that you're fed up with misogyny yet you're white knighting for misandry on man v. bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:08 AM
2

They choose the bear because they dislike men or don't have common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:07 AM
1

So they lied and made up an alternate scenario than the one asked, how does that make sense to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:06 AM
1

I guess to be specific is that I did not know what women like to talk about or how to do it, I just knew how to talk about my own interests (which are very niche and not common for women to give a crap about). I'm not a handsome guy (I think I'm a 5) but I have been with some very gorgeous women including my kids' mom, mostly due to me improving my skills at talking to women. A lot of it is confidence which stems from experience w/ women and not caring about being rejected whatsoever, and also b…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 02:05 AM
0

In your lifetime youve met tens of thousands of men and had some bad experiences with a few. A much higher % of bears will do much worse to you than random men. Your abuse is causing you to have distorted thinking, that is trauma.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:18 AM
-2

Your stepdad is one man, math says picking a man is safer than picking a bear. That your perception is severely distorted so bad that you are thinking a bear is safer than a randomly selected man means you're operating delusionally....so we agree then
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:13 AM
1

No man would take an issue with a woman prefering to encounter a random woman than a man (that is reasonable). They say bear because they are misandrists. I dont believe a single one of them would actually press the bear button.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:11 AM
1

With crimes like that too, a small % of men are multi-repeat offenders. Meaning you can't divide # of SAs divided by men to find the "average" because the "average man" has committed zero SAs. In other words the average and the median are two extremely different things. This is why, say, the man vs bear thing is so stupid and offensive to men, it makes zero sense to choose a Bear encounter over a man encounter.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 07:41 PM
1

I guess what I am saying is that my being fat (and not egregiously fat, just a chubby guy) and not having the best social skills at the time kept me from what I wanted, which was a girlfriend. Now that I am no longer fat (I would like to lose 20lbs but by American standards that is NBD and I also have decent musculature now), and have good social skills and have had plenty of relationships, those barriers to what I wanted weren't there anymore. I have other barriers to my different goals now, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 07:34 PM
1

Men are generally stronger than women. Reasonable people: Yep. You: I know this one woman who is stronger than this weak guy I know! FALSE GENERALITY *smug*
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 10:10 PM
1

Generalities are by definition "false" if there's a single exception to them, THATS WHY THEY'RE GENERALITIES and everyone who is either honest or of reasonable intelligence UNDERSTANDS THAT. Which are you not?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 10:10 PM
1

Right, at 3am we're going to need you to go check that sound downstairs, while your man stays upstairs near the phone and locks the door. You for sure will find him extremely attractive after this, we believe you
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 08:09 AM
4

God I don't know why in the last ten years literal adults struggle so hard with "generalities" and "statistics", "ALL WOMEN" do you shut down EVERY discussion ever since NOTHING applies to 100% of any large group ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:26 AM
4

You might wake up and realize what agency and control you've had over your life this whole time, and you will feel regret that you wasted time ever calling yourself a loser... you could start now, or you could not. Trust me bro I was a fat nerd in high school, if I can do it anyone can.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:15 AM
–

I am a guy, I could've written this post. As with all things, when you see behind the curtain, how men and particularly, women, work, you will get the worst pushback from Women because the truth rarely makes them FEEL better, and they cannot separate their feelings about what is, from what SHOULD be, and usually that leads with lashing out at you for simple observation and logical thinking. So, you have my condolences on this one. You will be called an incel despite you actually being more confi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 07:13 AM
5

They want the "equality" of being Don Draper from Mad Men, not equality of handymen or garbagemen or anything uncomfortable or physically difficult.
/r/MensRights17/02/25 09:05 AM
12

I asked a feminist Ex of mine if it was possible for me to be emotionally intelligent and disagree with her. She refused to answer. Because "emotionally intelligent" is thinly-veiled codeword for "agreeing with women".
/r/MensRights17/02/25 09:03 AM
2

This is easy work: Feminism is about female empowerment, and one "lever" of female "power" is the power to always be the victim in any situation. If you promote the ability of men to be the victims in situations you clearly are, that removes some of the "lever" of female victimhood (notice women are either always boss babes or empowered victims as a false binary).
/r/MensRights17/02/25 09:00 AM
1

Good on you. There was this tragic story where this African immigrant who was known for his generosity in the community, died in a snow storm because some single mom called and begged him for something she should've had herself. So this married man, crashed his car and froze to death in the snow, leaving behind a wife and at least one children trying to white-knight for some single mom. I get his heart was big but that was the wrong move.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 10:07 AM
1

I defended two young girls from an aggressive stranger at a bus stop in Chicago and that aggressive stranger threatened my life before walking off. Neither girl even made eye contact with me, much less bothered with a "thank you". I learned from 18 years old never to be a crash dummy for a woman who isn't important to me, they won't even acknowledge your existence if you get hurt.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 10:02 AM
1

I think a better version of your question is something I saw someone say online: Why didn't any WOMEN in Afghanistan defend the girls' schools from the Taliban? So men can defend the rights of women to attend schools, why can't the women?
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter