TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

macsenscam Archive

View 1 posts and 246 comments by macsenscam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

macsenscam/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:09 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Probably God is going to punish this nation for what it has been doing to men and their kids, soon I am guessing.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:29 AM
1

Don't ask why, just be happy for these lucky dudes!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 02:28 AM
-1

Medical "research" is the biggest scam of all time.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:57 PM
8

Social justice is literally s dogwhiste for anti-White male now. It's very saddening.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:35 PM
1

They are in power, in the counties they came from after mooching off the US medical schools and taking up slots that minorities would have filled. But no, we gotta get rid of the White men right?
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:33 PM
2

Would she wear this outfit to the bar at night?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 04:44 AM
0

I am curious if men are actually the initiators of romantic interactions. Maybe women actually do the initiating, but they are just more subtle about it and like men to think we are the ones doing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/18 03:02 AM
2

I don't really like super aggressive flirting that much tbh. It's not really necessary, any interest will be construed as a possible opportunity for a horny male.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/18 03:54 AM
1

Sure, you can believe whatever you want. Unless you are on a just, then there has to be evidence. It's also worth mentioning that false accusations will become more likely as society downgrades its standards of proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/17 03:59 AM
2

Or maybe are less truthful on surveys
/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:27 PM
0

I explained the relevance, if you were trying to say something different you failed and should retract your statement.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 04:38 PM
0

I know, you were defending her sick mindset that let's perpetrators of sexual assault get off with nothing. It's disgusting in the extreme and encourages impunity for rapists, inevitably leading to more victims.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 04:36 PM
2

So if teenage boys stripped, held down and taped a 11 year old girl and then posted the video online you wouldn't want charges? Are you really suggesting thus behavior should be legal under the penal code?
/r/MensRights10/05/17 04:33 PM
3

That's what plea bargains are for. You can't let perps go scot-free or else you promote the idea that assault won't be punished which will lead to more children being victimized.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:13 AM
2

There's just no excuse even if they do offer a generous plea in regard for their youth and stuupidity. The evidence is there on film, it is sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:09 AM
2

The only possible takeaway is that it's ok to abuse little boys if you're a teenage girl. There's no way they didn't have enough evidence to prosecute, they are just letting abused children down in such a blatant way.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:33 AM
1

Sorry you're getting downvoted by the way. I find your views reprehensible in the extreme as someone who has known many victims of rape and assault, but they do need to be heard if only for the sake of refuting them.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:28 AM
0

Wtf? All rapists and sex offenders should be prosecuted, especially if they have video evidence! It's obvious that had the genders been reversed the DA would have brought charges, no matter what the victim's mom wanted, and indeed they should. If the evidence can only be obtained by the victim's cooperation and they are not cooperative then you don't press charges, but otherwise they should always decide based on the strength of the case, not what the mother wants. This is even more true when th…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:26 AM
2

It's more about protecting future victims by providing a legal deterrent.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:07 AM
2

She is endangering future victims of sexual assault by allowing the quilty to go free and thereby decreasing the deterrence factor of the law. If you don't punish abusers what is to stop the behavior from continuing? This is even more the case when you are perpetuating the immunity of a privileged group in society who already feel they can act with impunity.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:05 AM
1

No they don't. They are allowed to report the truth.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:48 AM
1

I wonder how long it will take for instant, global communication to homogenize language? It has been on a trajectory of eliminating smaller dialects for quite some time, but I think that soon the trend will be over. Advanced translation devices will make it homogenization pointless pretty soon.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 04:29 PM
1

This is going to be so good for the EU's economy...
/r/MensRights30/07/16 11:23 PM
6

It definitely took courage to publish that freaky sex tape of her reliving her alleged rape, so gross.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 10:25 AM
23

None of these things prove that rape occurred though. If we aren't going to require a standard of proof beyond what a person says then we can kiss any hope of having a rational justice system goodbye.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 06:03 AM
9

Doesn't matter what makes more sense, what matters is what you can prove in court. Well, that's supposed to be what matter anyway...
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:59 AM
2

I have an idea, let's argue about the definition of the word "feminism" some more. It's not like there aren't entire libraries devoted to that eternal debate in women's studies...
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 07:00 AM
2

Sex is different in different cultures, for example, some places prostitution is pretty normal. Some cultures expect you to marry and reproduce or something is wrong with you. Even in the States I have been in lot's of places where sex wasn't easy to get and others where it was not so hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 03:10 AM
2

Depends where you live.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/16 02:43 AM
1

I don't necessarily agree with all of her opinions. It's too tiresome to try and parse sll the varieties of feminism so I just go with the old school before the debate about the meaning of feminism became so complex.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 08:50 AM
1

Yea she is fine by me. I don't know how "modern" she really is; there are so many gradients of feminism that it's not worth keeping up with them all.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:19 AM
1

I think I've seen some of her videos actually.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 04:45 AM
1

Never heard of her.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 04:15 AM
1

Just chicks from around my town.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 03:16 AM
1

Equality means women don't have to wear a shirt right? We should support them in their courageous fight against oppressive puritan shirts! I know many cool modern feminists who understand men's issues and are down with helping us too. I think the problem is with the media that loves drama and so ends up giving all this attention to the most radical feminists. Then you also have a much larger proportion of girls going to college than there used to be so colleges want to cash in on seeming more pr…
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:40 PM
1

Like abortion and medical freedom, just the typical 1970s stuff.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:14 PM
2

I don't know, probably. There are plenty of pictures.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 02:55 PM
1

You know, equality under law, voting rights and that shit.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 02:53 PM
1

I'm not an anti-feminist, I'm an old-school feminist. But yea, I guess the only pleasure I would get out of it would be to violate her and then she would put me in jail so...
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:52 AM
1

No, I would feel dirty and violated afterwards I think.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:43 AM
4

Why do they call her a "survivor," wasn't her story proven to be false?
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:55 AM
2

Dumb Blue-Haired Asian College Slut Gets Fucked Hard On Mattress The title they came up with works much better than hers I would say.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:52 AM
3

Yea, she even gave us entertainment by carrying that stupid matress around lol.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:46 AM
2

She's not afraid to play the race card either after a more reasonable feminist pointed-out that what she was doing was pathological. Honestly, this girl cracks me up and I find it amusing that she will probably never be able to have sex again unless it is recorded as an "art project," giving the man some legal protection.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:45 AM
1

This hypocritical bitch seems to have both a hatred for white women and a fetish for white men.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 07:20 PM
7

To top it off, her acceptance speech says that "getting over it" would be some sort of vile victory for the patriarchy. Odd seeing as how she was "over it" the very next day judging from her behavior and text messages she sent to the guy she had sex with. What a fucking nut-case. I guess she is going to make a living out of this though.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:46 AM
9

Anyone who isn't white.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:43 AM
4

She will never move on lol. Just let that one bad experience define you, right?
/r/MensRights27/06/16 05:42 AM
3

Yet I go on r/all and it is 50% post crapping on sjws.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/16 05:54 PM
3

I've had female friends experience both reactions from police, but if we just give up on reporting rape then the fucking rapists have won dammit!
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:50 AM
0

Wouldn't it just put you to sleep though.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 12:11 AM
0

Who the hell can't sleep to the sound of a waterfall? Jeeez...
/r/MensRights23/04/16 05:09 PM
1

She may have given you the cold shoulder because you didn't come on a little more aggressively.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 02:33 AM
1

I have to ask here, how many raped people have you heard describe their experience in depth? You sound like someone with little personal experience of the subject. I don't know the number, but it is large. It is precisely my experiences (of victims consistently not resisting, not calling the police and letting rapists go free) that makes me vocal on a topic that I'm not "supposed" to have an opinion on. Training for physical resistance will avoid a small minority of rapes. In many cases the vict…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:45 AM
1

They don't need you to tell them that police exist and can investigate rapes, nor that getting a conviction may well prevent more rapes, nor that having an investigation may prompt the offender to rethink his behaviour, nor that having a record of a complaint that did not result in prosecution on the accused's file may result in more careful attention being paid to future or past complaints about him. Apparently they do since they are against encouraging the reporting of rapes. Women have heard …
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:34 PM
1

I respect that it is up to the victim to make the decision, but if we don't encourage them to report rapes then we are just helping rapists get away with it. People also should learn some basic self-defense (even just vocal tactics, to prevent "freezing-up"), if the victim fights back and leaves signs of a struggle then it will be easier to get convictions. I think this is just common-sense, but apparently it makes me a woman-hater.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 04:36 PM
9

I guess they "shouldn't have to."
/r/MensRights18/04/16 12:42 AM
30

Yea, I was called a closet rapist for saying women should report their rapes to the police.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:26 PM
4

Ten "no"s and one "yes" is still a "yes." It's the last statement made that counts. Same thing as if a person is saying "yes" at first, but then changes their mind and says "no," you have to then stop or it would be rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 08:47 PM
1

Sure it is, just not exclusively. The sexes are oppressed in different ways.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 08:01 PM
9

These are good points, but it's also non-controversial that most societies oppress women in some ways. They also oppress men in some ways, it's part of trying to ensure that gender based division of labor works.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 04:36 PM
2

probably most men that want them don't need them
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/16 03:17 AM
0

I'm not saying they're stronger, but in my high school practically all the black guys looked like they worked out even if they didn't.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 03:45 AM
-9

It's not all that unrealistic, except htat they aren't black. For some reason black dudes have nice pecks.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 11:44 PM
3

Seeing as you get banned for debating on TRP or feminism subs, this is much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/16 03:55 PM
1

Are they taking the cup of their won free volition and drinking from it? To me that would imply that they want it. The video is really just pointing-out the more obvious situations and it seems like the analogy can only be taken so far into the more subtle aspects of consent. There we probably need better analogies or something.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:34 AM
2

And all I'm saying is that I used to agree with you, but then spending a night downtown made me realize that some people are next-level good at rationalization. In fact, from the more "extreme" side of the misogyny spectrum there are not necessarily sadistic: they represent the Alpha and so are a blessing to women (bitches, as they say).
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:12 AM
2

LOL. You are kidding, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are rapists in jail who don't quite get it. Remember, the human capacity for rationalization is very well developed. Also, there are places where "rape culture" is a reality; they just aren't mainstream and many of us will never come into contact with them or will be disgusted if we do. Spending a night in downtown Syracuse lockup made me realize this.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:26 AM
1

There's already History.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/16 04:48 AM
1

14 yr olds can give consent, it just depends what country you live in.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 09:59 PM
1

No, they were paid by having a roof over their heads, food on the table and, in the modern world, any number of luxuries provided by the husband. True, otherwise the institution of the family would not be so popular! However, the tricky issue with women nowadays is the fact that housewives don't get any cash even though they may work as hard or harder than the man.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 02:52 PM
1

Women did it to themselves It's hard to determine cause and effect in a society. Almost anything can be attributed to the patriarchy if you try hard enough.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 07:23 AM
3

I think that in a certain sense there is a wage gap: women don't work the longer hours in the right professions to earn the same that men do. Is this a result of women making free decisions about what hours they want to work and what jobs they want to take? Is it a result of residual sexism in the culture that influences their career decisions? My guess is that it is a little bit of both. However, women are graduating college at much higher rates than men anyways so I don't see what the big deal…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:57 PM
2

Computer algorithms will match us up, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/16 08:13 PM
1

In a lot of these situations the state gets a cut, it's one reason child support is so popular even if the father only had the kid and hour or two less a week.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 08:34 AM
2

Alcohol has a different effect on women than it does on men, must we ignore the facts of life in order to be PC?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/16 08:09 AM
6

Part of the problem is that feminism has become an academic subject and so is needlessly complex. Look it up on wikipedia and it is amazing how many different forms there are. This makes it hard to dismiss the crazy "feminists" that hate men by calling them out on what feminism should actually mean: equality of the sexes. But that is the way things go once they become part of the academic system that needs to invent artificial "hurdles" so that people can be tested and what-not.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:43 AM
1

It's true that people naturally for groups and animosities, but it also true that political forces like to take advantage of this fact and sometimes encourage it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 10:23 PM
1

The use of "wedge-issues" is pretty well known in American politics. The classic example is the closet homosexual Republican that loves to harp on gay marriage, but I don't see why it wouldn't extend to the other side of the isle too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 10:23 PM
3

She could have killed him! Community service!?
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:43 AM
7

Ecstasy isn't much of a rape drug. You're just as likely to be very interested in talking all night as having sex.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 01:09 PM
6

You can't do anything about it: those types of people thrive on victimization. Just do everything as you normally would and call them out on their bs when it is obvious enough that they can't claim to be victims.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 09:41 PM
1

Not gonna happen. You can get rid of the extremists (hopefully), but women are going to be relatively equal in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 04:59 PM
1

The university doesn't have to prove a case so they are generally assumed to be more supportive of the accuser than the accused.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 04:56 PM
1

You're never going to win that war, better strategy is to ally with the rational feminists as much as possible and isolate the lunatics.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 10:07 AM
1

Rape victims don't want to deal with a trial, so they would rather just report to the school who will punish the person with no trial and keep it on the down-low. Rape trials can be pretty shitty, especially if there is no real physical evidence that the sex wasn't mutual. It's a good defense strategy to smear the victim.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 10:05 AM
2

You mean presumption of innocence? What a radical position!
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:25 PM
-1

MMA is not legal in every state.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 02:33 AM
2

Boxing has certain rules, if you try and have fights with different rules you have to get all sorts of permission from the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 02:22 AM
2

Depends on the state in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 02:03 AM
1

WHAT OTHER WAYS!? Being an infantry soldier on the front lines is about your physicality. No it's not, there are also mental/emotional aspects. What in the fuck are you going on about? Conservative Muslim society.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:59 AM
1

it's factually proven, as well as proven in every life example we have, that women are physically inferior to men and less fit in every single category you can come up with. No one is arguing about the physical issues. As for the other areas they are "less fit," I'm not sure what you mean. They may be better in some ways too, how can we know if we haven't tried. Why the fuck are women needed for front-line soldiers doing house sweeps in Muslim countries? What the fuck are you talking about? If m…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:30 AM
1

What do you mean until we try it? We have had women in combat roles. Mixed with men, which is a terrible idea. And I don't give a shit how your moral is, if you're not physically fit you're not physically fit, that's that. Don't we need both in a volunteer force? We KNOW women are inferior to men strength wise, endurance wise etc. This is just insane speculation from some random person who's never been outside in his life. I'm not speculating, I'm saying we don't know. Not having women in Muslim…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:01 AM
1

There's PLENTY of evidence against why a male would be a better soldier than a woman, all of them due to physical superiority in every way across the board. Physically superior, but is that all there is to it? Can't know until we try it. Besides, it doesn't matter if they are better or worse on average: moral and willingness to serve is a big factor.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:42 AM
2

Even with separate divisions, they cant be on the front line because if they get trapped or captured, its going to mean throw every man in the line of fire to save the women as the OP said. The Taliban, Al Q and ISIS will rape the woman soldier and then probably kill her much faster than the male soldier. This is a problem, but I think at higher levels of command it can be negated if there is the will.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:41 AM
2

I never said we shouldn't have women in the military, or put them at risk. The advantage you have stated above is definitely an important step in winning hearts and minds and I'd fully support women being part of 'support' units that deal with that kind of thing. I just think the potential for issues would be less if they had their own units. It can be hard to define the frontline anyways. Force-protection isn't the point of war. This is why we lose...
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:12 PM
0

That's hard to say, but I can't rule out any potential advantages without any evidence either way. But as long as your female unit isn't your worst unit (and i don't see why it would be: all the females are going to be pretty elite and motivated) then fuck it. The one thing they definitely have going for them is the ability to be alone with Muslim women without the community automatically assuming they have been "compromised."
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:40 PM
-3

Did you ever wonder if it might have a good effect on moral? Really get the bloodlust going?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:22 PM
-5

The problem is when you mix them in with men, in separate divisions it makes more sense. I mean, if all the really hardcore women got together they could be pretty effective.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:21 PM
-3

Some will be better, some will be worse. In war you can't just use the best of the best all the time, that is too optimistic and also leads to a lack of good trainers in wartime. This means they stop being soldiers and become liabilities and liabilities get people killed. That's why we need all female divisions. As far as how an all female division would compare to an all male division: who knows? There are advantages and disadvantages. As far as we know the advantage lies with men most of the t…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:19 PM
-5

Women not being able to fight is one of the most common misconceptions.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:36 PM
2

Female units would great. They would indeed be killed and maybe tortured, this is what equality means. The reason women haven't been on the front line historically is because we haven't had gunpowder fro very long and because of sexism. Even Plato was smart enough to advocate for female units separate from men and this idea has been implemented in other cultures. Of course, if the all-female unit sucks then they might have to be assigned to less important roles.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:31 PM
4

This debate is stupid. Just give them their own units, like Amazon bitches.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 07:16 PM
1

There are plenty of feminists who think prostitution should be legal as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:10 AM
1

If all it takes is a couple of beers and then any sex afterwards is considered rape, then I guess everyone except Mormons have a "rape culture."
/r/MensRights09/01/16 01:05 AM
-2

Is a hand guiding your cock to the hole a "yes?"
/r/MensRights04/01/16 10:05 PM
9

All drunk sex is rape lol.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 10:51 PM
1

Is it a law that you have to have sex with a girl you find attractive? I'm talking about human created laws, not laws of nature or science.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:10 PM
3

if rossie o donald did the same thing i would have a problem with that and i would call the police on her (as its not welcome). You can't base the law on subjective values like your example, it has to be applied equally to all. Either it's illegal to send someone an obscene note or it isn't.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 08:54 PM
5

Wow, they really expect a guy to not even try to get laid with his own girl? That is just encouraging extremely unhealthy relationship trends.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 08:46 PM
2

Have some fucking accountability for your actions woman!
/r/MensRights30/12/15 08:44 PM
1

I'm a white male feminist, but I define feminism as being for equality of the sexes. I know plenty of decent feminists, they just don't get the attention of the professional whiners. I think it is useless to try and destroy feminism, they welcome that approach as it plays intot he victim narrative. Rather, the best way to solve this is to infiltrate feminism from within and combine it with the MRM.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 08:56 PM
1

I feel bad for women, but they can always just buy men's products.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 02:08 AM
2

That is the weirdest wikipedia page I think I have ever read. No doubt it will be "corrected" by the feminists soon.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 11:45 AM
2

Percentages are not all the same. Say they have 100% win rate, that means every case they lose matters a lot. If the percentage of losses goes up then each consecutive loss will matter less as far as percent goes.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 11:38 AM
4

Feminists are obviously running low on things to complain about.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 02:45 PM
1

Classic paranoia, almost like we're back in the 1800s when a man couldn't be alone with a woman.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 02:34 AM
1

I'm not trying to rebut it. Fighting isn't the only way to attract a mate, I never meant that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 05:29 PM
1

It's just one thing, not the be all end all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/15 12:20 AM
1

Dudes fight each other, prove their masculinity and then get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 11:46 PM
2

Well, that's why I said "ostensibly." I'm sure it depends on where you were raised, as someone from a liberal background I was indoctrinated to believe that sexual aggression was a bad thing. Obviously certain masculine traits, like muscles, are still acceptable though. The main problem for me was that I was always taught not to fight (and indeed, you can go to jail for fighting in school or at the bar now), but violence has always been a sure way to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 11:35 PM
5

Yea, although I think feminism was an inevitable response to women being taken advantage of for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 11:01 PM
10

I think you are missing the point to some degree. TRP tells men that they have to do all these things to get laid, but all their lives men have been told NOT to do those things (ostensibly because of feminism). Most of the stuff you mention as being positive messages of TRP is stuff that was just taken for granted back in the day when gender roles were more rigid. So right there they come-up against some of societies myths that are perpetuated by feminist ideology: be a nice guy, love yourself a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 10:26 PM
3

some people are fundamentally repellent to others. Yes, a very small minority of people. if you are one of these people, there is very little you will be able to do to become less repellant. This is not true except for an even smaller minority of people. The trick is to "lower standards" or to find out what types of women you may be successful with. If you can't find a girl/relationship when you're college-aged, you're not going to be attractive when you're 30 or 40. I don't know where you got t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 08:42 PM
3

I don't think you can seriously disparage the transgendered by mocking their own internal struggles with gender identity unless you've been afflicted by the same thing. Just so you know, it would piss the SJWs off to hear being trans an affliction. Still, semantics aside, I question whether it is all genetic and if the rates of "abnormalities" have remained constant over the centuries. A change in the environment might have the same effect: such things have been observed with animals in the lab.…
/r/MensRights19/12/15 05:55 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:08 PM
1

They are liberal to a degree, but in reality they support the corporate status-quo.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:19 PM
1

They do some good news segments (other than the hourly, which is basically the same as any station), but they only last for a very short time to make room for more identity politics.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:17 PM
20

It wouldn't even have to be more "conservative," just more focused on actual news and events that matter and less identity politics and hours and hours of boring novelists talking about their personal struggles with depression and such crapola.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:15 PM
1

Women have an easier time being conformists so I guess they make better journalists by today's standards.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 09:14 PM
6

Actually women do rape men all the time depending on your definition of rape. If you consider all drunk sex to be without consent then women rape men more than men rape women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 06:52 PM
1

One vood thing that might come of having a coed military is that political xorrectness will necessitate loading our troops less and finding better ways to hhaul all that crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/15 09:18 PM
1

That's certainly a new definition of justice!
/r/MensRights06/12/15 05:02 AM
1

This woman's idiocy is a crime against real rape victims.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 06:20 PM
1

Maybe some of the time, but I thought the movie-maker was actually sympathetic. I guess I'll just have to see the movie to find out.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 06:31 PM
2

I'm talking about that Mens Rights Movement documentary called "The Red Pill". I know, I just think it's silly to name a MRM doc that. Otherwise, they'd find both groups are viciously opposed to one another. Which groups do you mean?
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:08 AM
2

I can't understand why TRP gets lumped in with MR, they don't care about a social movement they just want to get laid.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:31 AM
1

I feel bad because I basically cucked myself by including sections regarding feminism, I really would've liked to have just discussed every way men are slighted in our society, but I had to please the "900 pound gorilla" in the room. Don't feel bad, you did good fro the cause by including some traditional feminism (I would call MR non-traditional feminism).
/r/MensRights26/11/15 12:28 AM
3

It's hard to know if someone is lying about rape or not, often there is just no evidence either way other than heresay. If women were encouraged to fight back physically instead of being coddled we would not have this problem.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:32 PM
8

"Don't go to the police, they won't believe you anyways." I always thought that was the line of the abuser not the feminist...
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:30 PM
2

Shoulda called the cops rather than trying to force the issue with no witnesses.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:19 PM
8

Sounds like a troll, at least I hope it's a troll.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:29 AM
23

The one guy she actually got to "make consent a part of foreplay" she describes as cute. Does anyone here have any good experiences of being considered "cute" by a woman? It seems to be the kiss of death as far as being respected by them is concerned.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:20 PM
6

What is wrong with these people? This fucking bitch is so clueless about kids she thinks that a 7 and a half yr-old can't tell the difference between diet and regular soda. Crazy that they would let someone so stupid work with kids.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 02:03 PM
0

So the guard happened to be male? Seems essentially coincidental since any gender could have done it.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 11:32 PM
-4

Not sure what this has to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:53 PM
0

Or maybe statutory rape crimes are just punished too severely in general?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 09:54 PM
0

Ok, lemme just run out at blow 600 bucks on an HPV shot right now lol...
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:32 PM
0

Exactly.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 12:31 PM
-10

"Related to" genital warts? What does that even mean? Does the vaccine even cover the strains that are "related" to cancer and warts? This link says nothing about it.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:22 AM
-16

The virus is harmless to boys anyways so it's pointless to vaccinate them.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:04 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:06 PM
-1

I think that it's important to empathize with the oppression of both men and women in developing countries. Just because men have it bad in some way in Saudia Arabia doesn't mean we shouldn't support women's rights to drive and whatnot.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:09 AM
-1

I have to question the assertion that women didn't help defend the kids with spears back in the cave-dwelling times. Wouldn't it make sense for both parents to help in such a life-or-death scenario?
/r/MensRights30/08/15 06:06 AM
0

It's a terrible rule of thumb, all people try to explain their malicious actions through carelessness, et. al.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:08 AM
3

If they do die at work it's more likely that they died of murder than men. Basically, they work safer jobs than men so when they do die it's a real freakish event.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:05 AM
1

Out of the percentage of deaths women have a higher percentage of murders than other deaths as opposed to men, as we can see by the first graph. However, it only shows percentages so if we look at solid numbers we see that men dies a lot more in all ways.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:59 PM
3

It exists, it's called making six figure and being a feminist while posting on dating sites. Actually approaching women in real life could be considered creepy and/or rapey.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 11:42 PM
0

The chicken or the egg? It's always hard to tell which comes first. That said, I have women problems and I've always been a feminist. I think there is probably some balance that works best depending on one's personality. I know that very alpha guys can get away with sexism that I cannot, nor would I want to. Do they necessarily get laid more than me? That depends on a lot of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 11:39 PM
5

Men hold most of the very very powerful positions, but the average guy doesn't have much more power than the average woman (in the West).
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:56 AM
1

I wouldn't say they are censored necessarily, they just don't always participate in twitter. Look at Ursula LeGuin. She never gets any attention in social media, yet her books have sold millions and are super influential. Another point to be mentioned is that (aside from the extreme fringe of so-called feminists who openly hate men) even bad feminists will have to admit that the philosophy is about gender equality if you debate them. That is because they are hypocrites, and that is their weaknes…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 02:15 AM
1

Because the "good feminists" would have to do that, and they aren't doing that. The "good feminists" didn't question the wage gap until non-feminists did, the "good feminists" didn't talk about conscription until the MRM did. They are passive and invisible. So you are saying that in order for good feminists to see the light they have to be led by MRAs? Isn't that my whole point? Where are the popular feminists who are censored? I'd like to find them and then sort this whole thing out. Most femin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 10:57 PM
1

Left in a huff? A mod messaged me and said I was banned for a month, I don't know if that leaves a trail or not but it is exactly what happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 03:26 PM
1

Similarly, feminists judge the men's right's movement by it's lowest common denominator. The "mainstream media" is always going to give more attention to controversial assholes rather than sober-minded normal people, as we can see by the treatment of the MRM. Yet most feminists will say that feminism is about equality. It's all just very petty ans stupid if you ask me, most feminists are on our side when we aren't shitting all over them. Instead of trying to destroy feminism (which is never goin…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 03:19 PM
1

I was only banned for a month, that was enough for me to unsubscribe.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 07:55 AM
1

I'm not lying, I was defending feminism in the sense of a philosophy that believes in equality not the toxic crap that is spewn around tumblr and such. I was banned for a month, go check it out. I would link the conversation for you but I don't know how.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 07:41 AM
1

Wise people, I wish I could go over there and chat with them but they banned me for being a feminist (in the sense of believing in equality, not one of the bad ones).
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 01:04 AM
1

Really? Is that a mod decision?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 11:01 PM
1

The things I find arousing in porn don't have much to do with anything in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:52 PM
2

They would ban TRP if it started getting on the front page too consistently like FPH did.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 01:46 AM
1

Hey, that's your opinion. I like to have discussions about things and I don't subscribe to subs that restrict that. They are only hurting themselves honestly. I mean, how are they supposed to progress if they won't even allow feminist discussions?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 10:27 PM
0

I don't understand the beef here, both subs want their discussion to be focused on the red pill or feminism respectively and delete posts which take away from the subject. That's really not the issue at all. I don't know about r/feminism, but r/trp bans people for disagreeing with the philosophy even if it is related to trp. Similarly, your question is totally related to feminism even if it isn't toeing the line of the orthodoxy. If r/feminism refuses to allow criticism of feminism it is because…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 06:07 PM
2

I think you should be able to, but TRP is not a site that cares about discussions at all. That is why I unsubscribed after being banned temporarily for defending feminists in comments. I would hope that r/feminism is on a higher level of discourse than TRP, but maybe I am wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 05:23 PM
2

This discussion is clearly related to feminism. Just because there is a sub that is more relevant to the specific post doesn't mean that that post is not relevant to another sub as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 05:06 PM
2

I really don't consider people who are against the rights of men to even be feminists at all. Feminism should advocate equality of the genders and advocate for the removal of injustice no matter whi9ch genders it impacts. Unfortunately, the are some vocal so-called "feminists" who don't see it that way and want to take away men's privileges instead of expanding those privileges to include women as well. I don't believe it is the majority of the movement, though the nature of controversy is to ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 04:55 PM
1

This man is looking for a hot woman to screw who will also commit. At some point it seems pretty normal to want a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 04:51 PM
-1

I would assume it was a used watch if it was older than 20 yrs.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 04:05 AM
0

So what do you call the doctrine of equality of the sexes then? Are you going to make up a new word for us now?
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 03:21 AM
-3

It's still a double standard, just one you feel is justified.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 10:50 PM
-9

I'm sure she's hiding plenty of embarrassing things as most people are. She probably isn't giving him threesomes because she's not into that anymore, besides who needs another dick?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 10:07 PM
-3

I don't plan on telling my future wife about all of my sexual exploits so I can't really criticize her.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 09:42 PM
1

I guess people figure that a girl who was willing to have threesomes is more likely to cheat. I imagine it depends on the individual though, I would be more concerned if she had actually cheated in the past. I don't see anything morally wrong with threesomes either, but if the hubby really can't take it then it's his perogative.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 09:27 PM
-9

My guess is that he no longer is attracted to her since she really didn't do anything that disgusting or freaky.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 09:21 PM
-10

Why would you divorce your wife just because she had threesomes over a decade ago?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 09:17 PM
-1

So your argument is that feminism isn't feminism, ergo feminism is a noble ally of men because your friends say so. Who defines feminism if not the feminists? The vast majority of them agree with my formulation as my experience shows as well as the literature. You are just trying to redefine the word based on a radical fringe that associates with feminism and is anti-man. I don't know what this has to do with scotsmen... Therefore all arguments levied against you based on facts, statistics, and …
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 08:44 PM
0

There will never be complete equality because nature benefits males in some ways and women in others. Obviously, however that doesn't mean we shouldn't strive for equal rights and treatment. Splitting hairs is kind of besides the point. Now why do you think feminism will empower men? I am defining feminism, and indeed the majority of feminists define feminism, as a philosophy that men and women should enjoy equal rights and privileges. Thus the philosophy has to empower men where they are being …
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 07:27 PM
0

you want egalitarianism or humanism not feminism. Feminism refers to the specific issue of gender equality, egalitarianism is more broad. For example, I may want all humans to be equal under the law regardless of their sex, but that doesn't mean I want them to be equal in all ways like in a communist society. The reason we have words is to convey precise meanings, it's not that hard to understand if you think about it. Feminism is a toxic label and has evolved in that way, what it had to accompl…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 06:49 PM
-1

If a person punches you in the face while telling everyone they only want hugs, then they're full of shit and trying to appease their critics. What you are describing is hypocrisy, the very thing I am saying we should call the feminazis out on. They are indeed full of shit, but not all feminists are full of shit. Most of them are pretty cool and supportive of men's liberation, in my experience. Invoking the No True Scotsman and the old Motte & Bailey is not an argument, nor will it get you far a…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 06:43 PM
1

The time that I spend working towards equality is time that I don't spend pursuing other values, such as getting my dick sucked. I would argue that you can do both at the same time pretty effectively. But of course you are free to spend your time as you want, I just think that a lot of RP men would appreciate some equality based on their constant bitching about how the deck is stacked in favor of women all the time. You go and work on that. I'll work on getting my dick sucked. That way, I get al…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 06:22 PM
0

Feminism was needed last century today it's just annoying. Feminism is needed to make men and women equal, if not by raising up women then by raising up men. I think there are a lot of shitty things about being a man in the society I live in and I would like feminism to address those issues. This is happening more and more, but it really holds us back when the men's rights people and TRP shit on feminism. You get women refusing to do house chores or learning to cook because it's oppressive when …
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 06:13 PM
-1

You make the unsupported assumption that feminism is a movement devoted to equality. I'm not making any assumptions, this is what all the feminists I know have been telling me for years. The reason they spend more time trying to help women than men is because women have gotten the shaft in very obvious ways historically. Now feminists are starting to realize that men haven't had it so great either, but the full implications of male-oppression aren't going to make themselves clear overnight. Have…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 06:03 PM
-1

Ideological groups can also be divided from within. For example, I may be a proponent of eugenics, that doesn't mean I believe in genocide. Unfortunately, eugenics is commonly associated with the Nazis and other mass-murderers; but it is an objective fact that George Bernard Shaw is as much of a eugenicist as Adolf Hitler, although he is certainly not a Nazi. To take an example a little closer to home, I have rarely if ever gone to the comments of a RP post without reading something negative and…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 05:39 PM
0

How is equality in contrast to the the goals of the trp? Third wave feminism didn't start gender inequality (which is really what trp is about), it has been around pretty much forever. Now we are in a time period where men are waking up to the fact that we are oppressed by society as well as women and women are starting to get it too more and more. Why hamstring our efforts with divisive petty bickering over the debunked theories of some bitter academic bitches? Don't you realize that we are suc…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 05:24 PM
0

I accept that there are hypocritical assholes who call themselves feminists, I'm just saying we should call those specific people out on their bullshit while making the natural alliance with those feminists who share our goals of equality for men, i.e., real feminists.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 05:09 PM
0

If you believe in equality you should act accordingly. If you claim to be about equality and do not act in a fair way then you are a hypocrite. Hypocrites can have correct beliefs, but they just don't act on them. In this case feminism is the correct belief and fake feminists are hypocrites. I don't see how this fairly obvious point is a "bold, controversial statement" at all.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 05:04 PM
0

I hope you are correct, at least in the US. One can be against 3rd or 4th wave feminism and still be a feminist though.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 04:49 PM
-1

Are you kidding? This sub if full of posts and comments bitching about the bad deal men get from society while women get it easy. You really can't imagine how a movement devoted to equality could help with that? Even as far as getting laid goes feminism is helpful since it encourages women and men to be free and not ashamed of their sexuality, this in turn leads to more/better sex lives for everyone. Feminism is also about breaking-up negative stereotypes, which is directly related to gaining "p…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/15 04:47 PM
-3

you're the one playing into the ("fake") feminists' game by legitimizing their attempt to be viewed as the true No, I'm actually calling them out on their bullshit and hypocrisy. I can understand that egalitarians have a false idea about what feminism is, but the solution isn't to take a good philosophy and allow it to be degraded into an absurdity.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 08:06 PM
-7

I do. I also think our objectives as a group would be better served in alliance with feminism rather than opposed to a fake version that has seen a lot of media-play recently.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 07:22 PM
-2

If you don't believe in the equality of the sexes, you are not a real feminist. Plenty of women I know agree with that statement, they are not in hiding. The reason you don't here more about real feminists is because people like to play drama games, and this sub usually plays right along (sad to say).
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 07:21 PM
-2

Sure and male feminists are more concerned with male issues, what do you expect? The point I'm trying to make is that we have ideological common-ground that is forgotten because of misdirected rage against douche-bag fake feminists that hate men. In reality it plays right into their game, so why do it?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 07:19 PM
-16

I would say you are "anti-fake feminist," since real feminists are pro-men as well as pro-women. If this sub just shifted a bit semantically we could avoid being seen as bigots quite a bit.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 06:03 PM
2

The most bigoted? Have these people not seen r/fatpeoplehate?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 05:17 PM
1

I wonder if some of this can be explained by mass-killing of males during war and letting the women live to breed them.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 09:09 PM
0

You shoulda signed his thing and became the real king of the feminists. With all the beta energy around to make you look good they would most likely have ate it right up!
/r/TheRedPill13/12/14 08:27 PM
1

People who are drunk cannot give legal consent. I don't think this is true. It depends on how drunk you are and the jury and stuff, I'm sure.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 06:31 PM
15

That chick in the "Honest Deception" video is such a slut lol. I don't even understand who would make such a bad video and why.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 06:23 PM
2

Isn't there also something about not screwing drunk girls in there? I can't imagine how many dudes in Cali are going to have their lives ruined for this crap...
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 05:53 PM
1

Just have to point out that some men rely on their looks in early life just as some women develop their brains as they grow older. The advice is good advice no matter what your gender happens to be.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/14 09:58 PM
-4

That's not even feminism anymore; feminism is the philosophy that women should be able to make their own decisions in life, among other things.
/r/RedPillWomen16/09/14 08:16 PM
23

They want rough sex, not rape.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 07:45 PM
1

I have found that sometimes women desire sex more when you show them how much you desire them. For me it's the opposite, I get turned off by a too aggressive woman.
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/14 04:07 AM
1

I don't see why RP men can't have the goal of a stable monogamous relationship if that is what he really wants. Likewise, if a woman wants to have a few men on speed-dial she can still embrace other aspects of traditional womanhood (or whatever it is that women on this sub are into, I'm new here). I think it's just happenstance that TRP posters tend to think women are insane sociopaths and as the men's liberation movement progresses there will be less resentment towards women and perhaps more in…
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/14 04:04 AM
1

Feminist are always arguing about what the word means, so I just take the approach of picking what seems to be the most rational version and telling the so-called "feminists" who hate men that they are doing it wrong. I suspect that the purveyors of mass-culture are using divide and conquer tactics, but maybe I'm just paranoid. In any case, what is good for the geese is good for the gander, and vice-versa, so I don't see any need to argue about it. I support man's liberation, therefore I conside…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 09:55 PM
1

Seems like a pretty well-expressed post, in my view. He brings up some of the flaws of this sub, basically dudes coming off like dicks. If you take anything too far you may get into trouble, I believe, including the good advice here. Of course his ideas about relationship power dynamics are pretty laughable. Sure, we all want to just have an idyllic no drama love life (or most of us I suppose) and we should work towards healthy relationships, but there are power games going on regardless. In its…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 09:06 PM
-5

[Sigh] another great TRP post tainted with mindless paranoia about women, specifically how they "control most communication channels." These are the exact same type of blanket statements that the feminazis make, of course.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 11:11 AM
1

It was just a suggestion so that you don't sound as if you are unfairly generalizing. Of course, maybe you are...
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 12:13 AM
1

I think the perspective she is coming from is that sex should be about more than just purely physical traits. By "should" I mean it's a better experience overall.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 11:03 PM
6

lol so true
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 10:20 PM
0

Instead of arguing about exactly how many woman fit your description (and pissing off the ones that do not), why not just qualify your atatement with: "those stuck-up bitches we all know..." This seems much less offensive to me than just pulling a meaningless statistic out of your ass.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 10:18 PM
-10

This type of woman you describe can be quite annoying, but I don't think all woman are like that.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 10:16 PM
0

Menfolk have been the targets of economic and political repression to a degree where society is indeed collapsing, but I don't think feminism is the cause. If you want to destroy a community you go after the men (historically, this may be changing), but it's not an ideological decision. If that was true then we would have to say the Romans were feminists because they made their men fight all those wars while the women got to stay at home.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 04:06 AM
1

I'm not sure I get your point. I agree that there is "baggage" to sexual advances (even if it isn't always a rational fear, but who knows?), but what does that mean? Is it wrong to get laid because you tried real hard and she just didn't feel like resisting with equal force?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 04:03 AM
2

It's not that the division of labor by the sexes is such a totally bad thing throughout all history; but in the modern world money is paramount and women need it too. Back in the day women were able to get the things they wanted by harvesting the natural materials and making them by hand. This is not possible for most households now, so obviously the division of labor has to change. Ironically, the beginning of modern style of jobs in America was textile mills that only employed women, yet we th…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 03:58 AM
1

If they are telling women not to have kids (or not to raise them) they aren't feminists, rather they are idiots.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 03:50 AM
1

I wonder why she drank so much in the first place? Could it have been to relieve those inhibitions and gain the freedom to make "bad" decisions?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 03:49 AM
0

I agree with this, except I would have said "feminists" with the quotation marks. Real feminism (or what it should be) is just the idea that the sexes should be treated roughly equally, given the biological differences. It is no more pro-woman than it is pro-man, it just happens to be prefixed with "fem" for essentially arbitrary historical reasons.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 03:44 AM
11

I can imagine choosing to live after losing all my stuff and gf, lol!
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 01:26 AM
3

So true. As a "nice guy" I hear the same thing from chicks all the time. Usually the problem is that the guy they should be with doesn't have enough balls to "take it to the mat," as they say.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 04:10 AM
1

The problem is that biology has already been biased by the notoriously sexist male-dominated academic institutions. Hopefully these feminists aren't replacing it with more bias, but I do think that there have been scientific errors made because of sexism in the past (and possibly continuing).
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 07:49 PM
0

This is true, but I will add the caveat that if you can mentally not give a shit people will sense that and it can help you get respect. Think of the word "cool," it essentially means not giving a shit. So there is a balance to walk here.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 11:20 PM
-1

That's fucked up man, I hope you go to hell and have to fuck fat black chicks for all eternity!
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 11:16 PM
1

Not following your logic, also I think that there are plenty of seemingly non-physical elements to attraction. For me when a friend says "what a hottie" I usually think "ewww, robot woman!" I mean, I'm sure they're hot underneath all the make-up and crap but I just don't see it. Throw some dreadlocks and dirt in there and I'm all over it.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 11:12 PM
2

Cyborgs will solve this problems huh? Or will we just all be fat and ugly fucking in virtual reality? I guess it's the same difference...
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 11:09 PM
3

If she is texting you now that probably means you had a shot back then.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 02:30 PM
1

Fair enough. It just proves my thesis (to me anyways) that women should have their own military; that way they will learn firsthand how tough the man's job is and get in shape or quit. Women hate to be told that they can't do the same jobs men can and will go to extreme lengths to prove themselves worthy (at least the kind of women we would want in the armed forces anyhow).
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 08:45 PM
2

How is a 250 lb guy going to be any better at moving a 10,000 lb pallet than a small woman? You would obviously need a forklift anyway.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:54 AM
2

Sometimes you have to make pragmatic choices that go against principles you know to be true, for instance if you are fighting a war. While I'm sure women would be fine for soldiers, the fact is that there is an uncontrollable rape problem int he military and to draft thousands more women into it would just make the situation untenable in the extreme. Now you could probably organize female units and solve the problem, but that takes time and we're at war in this metaphor. What TRP doesn't seem to…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:52 AM
2

I think you just proved her point that through dialogue with feminists men can gain greater knowledge about their own situation, at least I feel enlightened by this thread so far. I hope she realizes that it goes both ways, maybe she thought that was assumed or was not relevant to her point?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 04:04 AM
5

I think he's assuming that minds are brains and brains are computers so we should be able to study them with mathematics just like computer programers do. It's not very explicit, but those are the usual tacit assumptions that neurology fanboys make; at least I hope the actual field researchers are more circumspect in their conclusions based on the limited capacity of our instruments to probe the complexity of the brain. Consciousness itself may not even be "falsifiable" by consciousness. Not tha…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:48 AM
2

Indeed!
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:58 AM
2

Why is that nonsense? Both study matter, one just has a more narrow focus.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:57 AM
2

Problem is, most of neurology is irrelevant to the questions that philosophy tries to answer, such as ethical ones. The correlation/causation problem has not been solved by science either, in fact they are still using the antiquated method of Bacon. Offer any critique to that system and you don't get a rational defense of it (there apparently is none), but rather a bunch of examples of how science ahs accomplished so much more than anything else so who are you to question it? News flash: scienti…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 01:56 AM
1

men do the same thing
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 06:16 AM
0

dude, she's the one. either that or you are.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 06:14 AM
2

and kids also like to have fun with men! wtf is the problem with society? it's like parents have become so overprotective that they are stunting their children's development.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter