TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

madonnamanpower Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by madonnamanpower on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I live in the PNW, here it's extremely difficult to develop friendships because it's basically just your platonic marriage. So I don't really know why people have difficulty making a relationship work- cause that's a societal problem here that we adapted to and dosent translate well elsewhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/22 03:16 PM
5

I don't quite understand but okay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/22 03:13 PM
5

But did you love them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/22 02:10 PM
18

This might sound like shit but I've seen it pan out repeatively. Maybe working on cultivating platonic love in your friendships will help- people can tell generally speaking if you're not available to receive love if you were never given love as a child. Like you may not "hear" it when people attempt to direct love and care towards you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/22 11:48 AM
1

the standard assumption has to be monogamy. It's the least harmful assumption you can make. I disagree. It's harmful to assume because you're not actually regarding that person for themselves. Your regarding an artificial pile of assumptions. And not many people are good at reading people well enough to make quality extrapolations. Also when we assume at 100% we make it difficult to make room for people who aren't fitting the assumption. And that just disenfranchises people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 07:26 PM
1

It's the default BECAUSE it's the socialized norm. That's what I'm saying. Not the natural norm. Sorry for not being more precise. What kind of fucked up logic is that? It's one of the secret rules of society. Respectability and being discreet. Have you ever wondered why conservative politicians are so extremely hypocritical? Technically the aren't because they are following the societal rules. I'd someone is in a position of respect or authority, you're not allowed to take anything you know the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 06:01 PM
1

I'm not pushing polygamy as the new norm I actually think polygamy is morally and ethically wrong. I haven't seen any real examples of group marriages, I forget what they are called off the top of my head, with multiple wives and multiple husbands, I'd find it interesting to see a society with that structure. What I am pushing is communication and consent as the new norm. So don't care what those say- because monogamy will still be extremely common probably most people will be monogamous. The on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 04:37 PM
1

But monogamy isn't the default. It's the socialized norm. is it more ethical for people who aren't monogamous to just play along with the monogamous narritive? After all it's not cheating if you didn't love them-stayed with your partner-no one found out. "Discrete" ("We don't speak of such things" dose indeed mean everyone is pretending events aren't what they are if saving social face is important) If you want monogamy to be the default then this article is true, that women don't cheat and all …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 12:50 PM
1

The default is the lack of explicit consent. Which is unethical. One assumption doesn't have to be default. It's not that hard to have this conversation. You need similar conversation to get into a relationship anyways. I personally prefer this cause I think anything less shows a lack of respect. But those are my values.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 06:05 AM
2

Interesting enough, a incredibly high number of perfectly happy families have a child from outside of wed lock. It's just a thing that happens. The question is do we continue with the old social tradition that if unspoken nothing of the sort is happeneing. Or do we just have conversations about normal behavior and discuss the limits of monogamy and non monogamy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 02:04 AM
0

-roll eyes- fine one of the most
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 12:41 AM
1

58% of men and 33% of women had fantasized about this before. https://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/a33338854/kinks-fetish-list/ Here's something. It's the first thing Google spat out. So I won't say I heavily researched the topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/22 12:30 AM
1

expecting Expecting is not consent. most men who respect themselves will leave you on the spot if you have the nerve to actually suggest this idea to them face to face. Under patriarchy all sex is rape. -feminist screeching- In all seriousness, your point is how you feel personally, not really what people generally think. If you're full blown monogamous that's cool. Be up front about it so non-monogamous people know you're not compatible. nerve to keep telling regular people that the way they're…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 11:32 PM
2

Let me be a bit blunt. If you don't have an open conversation about whether you want the relationship to be monogamous or not. You are not in a fully consensual relationship. Hense why it's more performative for society than what the individuals genuinely want. Assuming monogamy is not consenting to monogamy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 10:48 PM
-6

... when is society going to figure out that monogamy dosent have to be the norm? Seriously the most common fetish is being cucked. Society over prescribes monogamy to the point that non monogamy has a kink term. I didn't disagree that some people are monogamous. I'm saying that it should be a discussion in every relationship so you know if the person is actually monogamous or just performing the expectation. (Note people who are monogamous are not performing the societal expectation) Edited to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 05:03 PM
-16

Seriously when is society going to figure out that discussing non-monogamy isn't caused by a lack of love? Trust and discussing things is completely different from being "faithful" because that's not a commitment to your partner it's a commitment to society. Sure some people do want to be monogamous but you have to ask them. Not just assume societal prescriptions apply to them, otherwise your not having a relationship to the person, you're having a performance for society. Edited to follow rules
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/22 02:12 PM
3

Agreed. This kind of tagline is directed at men as a hierarchy. Men as an individuals trait. But that is compelled obscured in modern language.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/22 02:13 AM
1

India is quite a bit different. they still have acid attacks disfiguring women when they say no to a STRANGER coming up to them on the street and asking to marry them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/22 03:50 PM
-1

So what's the difference between a heterosexual woman doing that vs a gay man doing the exact same thing? Why is it not fucked when a gay man gets their kicks from a gay bar?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/22 06:11 PM
0

I dont quite understand why people are so agenst this idea. My best guess is that I'm being too idealistic about human behavior. And neglecting the fact that people do often abuse their ability to be allowed in spaces because some people don't abuse the privilege.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/22 03:20 PM
0

Don't eveyone goes to a bar to get their kicks? Isn't that the point of the patronage of a bar? Maybe im just disregarding elements of social order I don't realize are much more important. Considering most people are describing it as "fucked" or "shitty" which are very very subjective terms. And are being applied to just shifts of energetic presence being applied to the space.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/22 03:19 PM
-18

I personally believe in a multi purpose spaces. It really rubs me the wrong way to state that anything is for x and only x. I just reject that kind of theory of form. I do understand the need for safe spaces but those need to be an exclusive invention only spaces.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 05:52 PM
-19

One thing I will disagree with is "our space is not your shield" I get the sentiment but I just don't think baring heterosexual women from our spaces make a lot of sense. Especially if we want them to be spaces of culture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 03:55 PM
5

I think people who say shit like that aren't masculine at all. It's my opinion that they have an inhuman caricature of behavior they call masculine. That interferes deeply with the natural development of masculinity. Ironically my father is from the middle east and he is more masculine than most people over the age of 30 here. Yet a lot of his behavior would be mocked as feminine in school yards of ages ago. I don't think school yards are as bad as such anymore. It seems like the zoomers are mor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/22 01:59 AM
4

In regards to the original punishment. Its extremely obtuse that they weren't discrete with the guy. If they are going to make it that public they should have suspended the girl as well. (After all it sounded like she was the one making child pornography)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/22 12:02 PM
7

Agreed that should be slander. But I imagine that highschool gossip, while is slander would be difficult to press legal charges agenst to a court of law. Slander is a pretty difficult ruling to get in general. And may be hard to get a judge to take highschool gossip seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/22 11:48 AM
47

Pretty messed up story. Should mothers hop to treating their boys like fathers treat their daughters? Might help balance things out. And the school really should have expelled the girl that made the confirmed false accusation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/22 04:33 AM
3

That's what I figured. It's nice to know that there is real information about viral vectors being faster within communities than intercommunities. The worse part about the HIV epidemic is that it's pretty much solved anywhere in America they decided to do something and still a huge problem in places that decided not to (largely because they want it to spread among certain populations)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/22 05:35 PM
5

So I'm confused. Why is monkey pox effecting men who have sex with men at a higher rate? I was under the impression that it just spread because there was more travel due to gay pride parades. Completely coincidental.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/22 02:09 PM
-1

I always thought that the logical conclusion of feminism would have to incorporate men's rights. The word feminist itself demands it, as men should be liberated from restrictive gender roles that create an artificial masculinity and place feminate behavior as inferior. Calling genuine masculine behavior as feminine and inferior. Patriarchy mutilates masculinity into an unnatural anti-human visage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/22 05:06 PM
1

I agree. I'm just being descriptive about current linguistic trends. It's just not something that can be put back into Pandora's box.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/22 10:16 AM
1

Sorry let me clarify. The right argues effectively that it's nothing and shouldn't be delt with (cause they liked it) and the left responded with non literal language to use an action baised term to get around the social norms that emotions are dismissable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/22 02:39 AM
1

Agreed... And disagreed. I think the issue is that if you didn't call it violence then it's nothing and shouldn't be delt with. Which is why the language use is shifting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/22 02:22 AM
4

Facinating. That's what I thought. Emotional effect. It's interesting that the left is moving to a more non literal use of language.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/22 01:27 PM
6

Can someone clarify something for me. Has the word violence officially expanded it's definition to beyond physical assaults?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/22 06:26 AM
5

It would be pretty funny if they started advocating for titty parties for any man who vous to refuse to do vaginal intercourse until the ban is lifted. Basically men who don't agree get no sex. men who do agree get a bunch of group sex activities. And no man could say "you're taking it out on us" cause they have a clear other forcing them. "Sorry I would love to but I can't, the government won't allow it."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/22 05:22 PM
1

I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 03:39 PM
2

That's possibly true. It might be easier to talk about if we discussed the issue more directly: artificial gender roles. I get the concept of patriarchy but pointing at a emergent property of our socialization not a legal system of power as the word is borrowed from. Yes it's difficult to name new concepts but the naming scheme is confusing to a lot of people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 03:33 PM
-8

This conversation has always perplexed me. Because the logical conclusion of feminism is to liberate men from the patriarchy as well. after all the patriarchy is just the name for societal brain washing of telling men that they have to be x to be a man. And often that violates natural masculinity. I'm not entirely sure why feminists lost this thread. I'm not sure how to put it hope that makes some sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/06/22 10:36 AM
3

Seems like a no brainer. Violence breeds violence. So minimizing violence agenst men would minimize violence all around.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/22 04:07 PM
3

I don't understand how brain structure leads to gender essentialism. The only thing that the brain structure effects is how much more we process certain things. It doesn't effect who should do what in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/22 03:14 PM
0

Oh that "we know it's not about me" is extremely dangerous advice and will turn into a nuclear fight. Ive seen this Ive tried it. It's extremely dangerous game to play. Rationalizing is impossible. The limbic system screams to loud to be reasoned with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 03:28 PM
1

This is an extremely harmful take. Yes shes hurt and her response is to use abuse tactics. Unknowingly. Most abusers do not know they are abusers. DO NOT ENGAGE. He dose not have consent to what his own feelings and intentions are in these moments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 03:25 PM
1

Oh ya, I had that on a every interaction basis. So it's probably manageable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 03:21 PM
1

I'm speaking from a more exreme situation so it won't fit perfectly. If her accusations don't bother you too much just ignore them. Don't even try to find the enjoyment of any sort of jokes at your expense. (My experience) It can be stressful. But if it's not taking a lot from you then just don't engage just say "okay". Hopefully she won't resort to trying to get a response from you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 03:15 PM
2

I know, I beat my head against that wall for years myself. Tried to apply rational logic, but one thing to keep in mind is that emotional logic is significantly different than rational logic and often they don't translate well at all. Your only option is to not engage. Grey stone- don't feed into it. Encourage her better interactions don't engage with her negative behavior. Essentially you don't have any consent to what reality exists. No matter what your intention is her belief of your intentio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 02:44 PM
2

Oh ya, sounds like some emotional disregularion. The rational doesn't matter cause the emotion can't be managed. She probably isn't telling you the reason why because she knows it sounds batshit insane and probably kinda is. Just let her process the emotions and don't try to reason with her. It's extremely difficult to reason with emotions, cause the limbic system ha a different method of logic that we just don't understand very well. So cognitive rationalizing just doesn't translate well at all…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/22 02:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter