TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

magnora7 Archive

View 1 posts and 167 comments by magnora7 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
74

About 25 years ago, if we look at divorce court outcomes, and look at which gender is mostly imprisoned
/r/PussyPassDenied30/11/20 04:25 AM
1

Because the American justice system is a complete joke
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 08:56 PM
2

Abusers always try to flip the blame. Always.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 08:55 PM
19

There are those that truly want equality. Yeah they're called egalitarians, not feminists
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 08:54 PM
4

The scary thing is that in many people's minds, those two are the same thing...
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 08:54 PM
1

Lol this guy could have any woman, and he chose this woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/20 08:53 PM
10

Turns out displacing water and reducing rust is also good for lubrication, especially if your gears are old and rusty
/r/PussyPassDenied20/12/19 09:09 PM
4

I agree. The difference between "few" and "none" is very important though
/r/MensRights14/10/19 09:50 PM
6

We listen. No, almost no one listens or cares. That's the reason why men don't open up.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:11 PM
1

The person you replied to cares. I care. Stop painting with too broad a brush
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:11 PM
-1

So we shouldn't verify facts if they happen to fit our narrative? That's not very wise. Verified facts make for much more reliable arguments.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 07:10 PM
8

If feminism were egalitarianism, they'd just call themselves egalitarians.
/r/MensRights23/07/19 11:59 AM
1

But it adds even more unnecessary work, just to make things equal. I think that's the worst solution :P Unless you have a cat that drinks it or something
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/19 01:17 AM
1

That's just a "now it sucks for everyone" system, imo
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/19 01:11 AM
2

That just makes more work for everyone! Putting the cover down is overkill. Putting the seat down means the man does all the effort
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/19 12:28 AM
24

Yes it is gross, so why should only men have to touch it? :P I see the train of thought though.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/19 11:32 PM
75

I think the real reason is because they literally never use the toilet with the seat up, so it's something they just don't want to ever think about. Guys are used to flipping it up and down because we use toilets both ways
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/19 10:43 PM
4

And if the same person uses the toilet twice in a row, they just did unnecessary work
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/19 10:43 PM
1

I vote for non-deepstate people regardless of party. But unfortunately Democrat non-deepstate politicans are about as nonexistent as Republican non-deepstate politicians. Ron Paul comes to mind as one of the few examples
/r/MensRights17/03/19 08:16 PM
1

That's definitely true.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 04:06 PM
3

Do you know what sarcasm is?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 08:00 AM
29

Sarcasm does not come across well through text. Especially when there are celebs who basically believe those exact things, for real. Poe's law in action.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:55 AM
7

It would be funny if in a few decades the way men are treated now was looked at like how women were treated in the 1950s
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:54 AM
36

Both parties are corporate whores who pretend to give a shit about social issues to get votes
/r/MensRights12/03/19 06:52 AM
2

Nearly 90% taking SSRIs as well...
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:09 PM
1

I am. I also don't go around pretending Pamela Anderson is some bastion of morality.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 08:46 AM
1

Because she's a sex video slut who has made a living doing exactly that?
/r/MensRights21/10/18 07:03 AM
0

Pamela Anderson is very morally guided? Lol now I've heard everything
/r/MensRights20/10/18 08:58 AM
1

There is an alternative at saidit.net
/r/MensRights13/09/18 01:16 AM
4

saidit.net
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/18 09:50 PM
6

It just LOOKS like majority because of how the media holds it up in high prominence
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:46 PM
1

Nobody in the army is arresting a drunk girl at 2am trying to punch them in the face. I think you have no idea what being in the army is like.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 06:20 PM
1

Yes I'm just saying it's bizarre that the bulk of the army has more restrictive combat rules than the domestic police do.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 06:00 PM
1

Because they have special legal authorization to do so. It's not general policy, unlike your policy.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 05:51 PM
1

Funny how the military has equal level of engagement that meets the level of threat, but they get by just fine. In fact if you engage before the enemy does, you can be court marshaled. I don't know why the military has more strict rules towards enemy combatants than the police does towards the citizens that are supposed to be protected by them. Doesn't seem right.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 05:46 PM
-6

You're supposed to meet the level of the threat, not exceed it, I always thought... that way you avoid escalating the situation. https://agingcapriciously.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/force-continuum.png
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 04:54 AM
1

Here you go: http://www.wweek.com/news/2017/12/26/what-its-like-to-betray-antifa-to-the-cops-and-get-caught/ They didn't trick people, but they are paying them to do this.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/02/18 04:01 AM
1

Wake up, child: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/31/cop-autistic-teen-pot_n_4178746.html
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 11:13 PM
0

That is not mutually exclusive with what I said, they could be both those things at the same time
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 12:30 AM
1

I'm not sure if you're being deliberately dense, but I'm implying that the people being paid are being paid by an organization they don't realize is the police undercover
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 12:22 AM
-1

If they're paid by the police, they're working for the police, regardless of if they're aware of that fact or not
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:50 PM
1

They don't have to be cops to be hired by police to be agent provocateurs. In fact it's probably easier if they aren't. A craigslist ad is all they need
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:32 PM
-1

They don't have to be actual police officers to be hired by the police. They can just be randos paid to dress in black and cause trouble at a protest. They might not even know they're working for the police, they might just think they found some random contracting gig for protest work
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 11:07 PM
2

Well they can be both. They're not mutually exclusive
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 09:42 PM
6

They could also just be "useful idiots" who don't realize fully what they're doing, but are instead blindly following some manufactured ideology that ends up having the same effect
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 09:39 PM
-2

Some possibilities are more likely than others, and some are actually relevant to the situation at hand.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 09:29 PM
-5

That's a possibility too, but what I said is also a possibility.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 09:08 PM
-10

Clearly the chick randomly pepper spraying people completely unprovoked
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:13 PM
-12

Provoke violence to give the police a reason to break up the protest. They likely work for police
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:07 PM
-24

The police are dressing up as protesters and trying to start violence in order to give them a reason to break up the protests. It's called an agent provocateur
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:06 PM
18

That's their point. That's why soros pays to help them grow. Now any legit protest will get messed up because of these asshats, and democracy dies a little more
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:05 PM
11

antifa is far left's response to the neo-nazi of the right. Both are trying to turn everyone in to extremists. The thing they have in common is they both hate gray area
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:04 PM
6

by agent provocateurs
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 08:00 PM
-5

It's called being an agent provocateur. They very likely work for the police. They start trouble, then call the police in, in order to break up the protest. It's an incredibly common tactic, and it's the reason they're dressed so no one can tell who they are.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 07:59 PM
11

Some people's idea of "being an adult" about it means to never mention it ever and to just suck it up. Which is bad, and why our labor situation is so messed up here in this country. I agree though there is a difference between endless childish whining, and doing things like organizing unions to counter bad workplace policies.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/18 05:06 PM
11

Attitudes like this are why America has some of the least labor-friendly laws in the developed world
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/18 04:47 PM
6

Don't worry, the government is already on that
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/18 12:29 AM
1

Listen and learn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJJClhqGq_M
/r/MensRights10/12/17 07:02 AM
14

"military-industrial complex" So Eisenhower and JFK were cringe, since they used this phrase in their speeches? Get real.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:09 PM
0

You saying you can know what ALL women are like is the height of hubris. Now only if you can explain men so easily, you will have explained all of humanity.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 07:54 AM
1

:/ you have a lot of hate
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 07:43 AM
0

Yeah, not all women are like that. Women are diverse, believe it or not. Not every one of them drinks the kool-aid of modern culture. I know that's not popular to say on this sub, but it's true.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 07:41 AM
1

93% on first time marriage Source?
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 07:38 AM
1

But it is not 100% divorce rate, or even close. Which is what the OP is saying. Stats.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 07:17 AM
0

I understand don't care. You however seem to care quite a lot. I agree things are stacked against men. That doesn't mean that good women don't exist at all...
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 07:04 AM
0

God forbid anyone get in the way of your blind hatred...
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 06:52 AM
0

only women talk like that. Hey look, you're wrong. But you would never admit that to yourself, you're too busy being "correct"
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 06:41 AM
0

I'm not, though. See you just are making even more assumptions to justify hatred. MGTOW is supposed to be a place of healing, not just blind hatred? Or am I wrong
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 06:34 AM
1

Well... most people who run government are men, for starters. I agree that this happens, but your "stats" that you're using to justify hatred of the other sex don't really exist, let's be real
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 06:32 AM
-3

and they obviously wasted it pursuing Chad and riding the CC Why does everyone keep saying that? We know nothing about these women...
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 06:06 AM
-1

I wouldn't say "All" relationships. That kind of broad-brush thinking isn't healthy, and is also inaccurate.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 05:41 AM
1

Advertisers pay for views
/r/MensRights01/11/17 07:08 AM
11

Are you kidding, that's all her jokes. All she does is make fun of what an idiot she is
/r/PussyPassDenied22/09/17 10:44 PM
1

It externalizes their own internal emotional problems, so it has a point, just not a good one
/r/MGTOW07/09/17 07:42 PM
1

Who cares about hating on women? I've got more important things to think about
/r/MGTOW07/09/17 07:38 PM
4

Too much hating on women, not enough building up men
/r/MGTOW07/09/17 07:38 PM
1

When you let fear control your life
/r/MGTOW07/09/17 07:33 PM
17

Women are legal children, who often cannot make decisions for themselves. Also, women are super powerful and independent and don't need men for anything. Yes, somehow both those things are thought to be simultaneously true.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 11:17 PM
9

And then more and more politicians become women. And then people think they've actually fixed the underlying problems, but instead there's just a new face. Same reason HR is mostly women
/r/MensRights20/08/17 03:48 PM
8

Or let's charge the rich people in the state with all the kids, and say the people of America deserve all the payments. Bam, unconditional basic income overnight
/r/MensRights19/08/17 07:19 PM
13

What!? That makes no sense. Why does the gov't arbitrarily get a cut of that?
/r/MensRights19/08/17 07:16 PM
1

This image of who owns the most servers in the world, laughs at your statement: https://thumbnails-visually.netdna-ssl.com/who-owns-the-most-servers-in-the-world_502915f2e6ddb_w1500.jpg
/r/MensRights09/08/17 11:30 PM
3

Almost like when a person is abandoned for a long time they turn to food to fill their emotional needs, or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 08:05 PM
2

I guess I was using it as a euphemism for "attention grabbing while not necessarily being truthful" but I didn't want to be too wordy
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 02:25 AM
1

You're right. I guess it's more "watch the whole video" bait
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 01:45 AM
2

Clickbait warning, more like
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 01:20 AM
3

It's clickbait
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 01:20 AM
1

Don't devolve to this level. Focus on real issues.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 01:03 AM
1

I DID vote again and again, it fixed nothing. "Politics is the entertainment branch of the military-industrial complex" Just keep thinking voting will fix this, so you won't try anything else
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:09 AM
1

When none of the options presented represent us, voting doesn't matter
/r/MensRights21/03/17 04:37 AM
50

When both candidates of our 2-party system are so out of touch with the public, can we really call it a representative republic anymore?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:29 PM
2

"All I need is my gold mansion and my rocket car" https://tstotopix.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/tumblr_lfx7b11y2b1qztjn5o1_1280.jpg
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:25 PM
2

Where is this, new zealand?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:22 PM
1

No I understood, I was agreeing with you.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:36 AM
1

Yeah exactly, she's talking about the places people specifically go to hook up as if that's how people act 24/7. Lots of people don't even go to those places
/r/MensRights22/01/17 10:22 PM
11

Most popular... among a certain segment of society
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:43 AM
1

Lol at the comments vs the votes on the OP. Also, how does something 50% upvoted still have 3100 net upvotes? That means like hundreds of thousands of people voted? Doesn't even make sense... I have a feeling this is being upvoted against the wishes of the subreddit
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:31 AM
1

Or we could just ignore him entirely. That would probably hurt him the most
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:30 AM
17

Bars, clubs, and music festivals are not "all of society"
/r/MensRights22/01/17 08:29 AM
1

The two party system is a control mechanism, it's why all former british colonies excluding NZ and AUS use first past the past.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:46 PM
56

Both parties are completely corrupted and engaged in gender-based divide and rule, and until that is fixed, voting for a different party is just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:57 AM
2

by the same companies that are claiming STEM worker shortages in the US (at the bad prices they're willing to pay...)
/r/TheRedPill03/01/17 01:18 AM
1

Karma just means the consequences of past actions. Unless you think cause-and-effect doesn't exist, then I'd say you have to believe Karma exists
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/17 11:46 PM
2

I don't think some feminists realize that men are also abused by the powerful owners of this country, just as much as women.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 02:08 PM
2

Women are twice as likely to be hired to engineering jobs according to studies, all other things equal.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 02:07 PM
0

Divide and rule
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:55 PM
16

Is this really even "liberal"? This seems pretty against liberalism, to me. Seems very old-fashioned, victim-blaming puritan-esque social shaming. But I guess since women are doing it, it's "liberal"? Seems odd, I feel like the word has lost nearly all meaning
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:53 PM
6

Well that's a George Soros front to destabilize american society, so that doesn't really count
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:51 PM
1

It's only a useful word if you're talking about things like the petrodollar hegemony or the american military hegemony
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:34 AM
2

This. This is the real problem. The deliberate ignorance, to protect emotional biases
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:32 AM
4

You cannot reason someone out of something they didn't reason themselves in to
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:31 AM
5

I think those might be different groups of people saying those two different things.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:27 AM
4

I think that's what religion used to be until the state institutionalized and corrupted it like a thousand years ago
/r/MensRights16/10/16 01:25 AM
2

Virtue signalling. "I'm a good person, you can't talk to me that way!"
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/16 05:02 AM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/5523qt/censorship_theres_an_ama_in_rscience_right_now/ This thread documents it quite well
/r/MensRights30/09/16 12:49 AM
7

I think that's because she's a Clinton, not because she's a woman. Bush Family got away with a lot of that crap too, I blame our 2-tier justice system.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/16 10:00 PM
5

Well it's about equality in the sense of dragging everyone down to the level of the lowest person
/r/MensRights11/09/16 08:48 PM
1

It's our puritan religious roots, we're way too religious for our own good as well. We need to mature like Europe, but we probably won't until we suffer for our shortsightedness
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/16 08:23 PM
16

They want you to feel as uncomfortable in your own existence as they do
/r/MensRights11/09/16 08:16 PM
14

Yeah, I think we should stop calling everyone pervs for finding the opposite sex attractive... I think that's the real problem here. Denying human nature.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/16 07:55 PM
-6

they would like you to be rounded up and exterminated. That's some ridiculously divisive hyperbole, but your overall point is well-made
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/16 07:53 PM
87

Because men are bad and women are good, get with the program
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/16 07:52 PM
4

It's right there in the name.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 10:52 PM
2

Romyn empire
/r/MensRights30/07/16 10:52 PM
1

Good observation. That is pretty strange.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 08:41 AM
2

Can't they just like put a baggie around the guys dick until he pees
/r/MensRights12/07/16 12:08 AM
7

Good question... I did a little looking, and I think the reason they do the catheters, is to get around the recent restrictions made on drawing blood for DUI. http://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/sd-courts-making-dui-blood-draws-more-difficult-for-officers/article_176ced8c-f338-5184-8a8d-dc57bdcd8369.html And also, why don't they just hold the people until they pee? Why the rushing of the forced catheterization? It almost seems like they deliberately want to torture people, especially if the n…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 10:04 PM
20

Well, it's legit. We have a huge problem. Alternate links about this story, since the original post link is apparently dead now: http://www.argusleader.com/story/news/crime/2016/07/01/police-use-catheters-force-collect-urine-samples/86577942/ http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/10/police-use-catheters-force-to-collect-urine-sample/ http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/south_dakota_cops_collect_urine_samples_through_forced_catheterization_is_i Also, it's apparently done with no anesthe…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:31 PM
3

Yeah, warrant should be the bare minimum to do something like this. Ideally, it wouldn't happen at all except in extremely rare cases. I wonder if other countries in Europe ever force-catheterize people to obtain urine for evidence?
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:28 PM
1

He still has no voting record, which is my point. All he is proven is that he can use other people to make himself rich.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:07 AM
2

Running the country is nothing like running a company
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:01 AM
1

No, hillary is absolutely fucked and is a guaranteed war or two because she is owned by the military-industrial complex. I'm all for taking a step in to the unknown, but trump isn't unknown, he's a greedy billionaire. He doesn't give a flying fuck about the middle class. Both are extremely poor choices, imo
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:27 AM
2

It's not, it's more that we literally have no idea what he will do once elected because he's never held any sort of political office in the past, ever, so we have no voting record to go off of.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:19 AM
2

What Ron Paul? He still has a website and posts updates regularly
/r/MensRights11/07/16 01:25 AM
2

I'd like to note that Trump has never been in office, and lies a lot, so nobody knows what the fuck he is going to do once elected or who he will sell out to.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 01:25 AM
4

It's like they lay out attacks, waiting for you to counter-attack so they can claim to be the victim again. So you have to sidestep all the ad hominem stuff or else it's just lose-lose. That's why they love the inflammatory language, because it puts the ball in their court if you react to it.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 08:04 PM
2

Yeah I guess the plot got lost somewhere in the 70s and 80s. I just picked 100 years ago because no one would disagree it was important and necessary 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 12:04 AM
11

I wouldn't say "never", it was pretty legit about 100 years ago, its just that it's morphed as they've won rights.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 06:30 PM
1

That isn't a guarantee, half the reason it's so taboo is because everyone is so afraid to do it
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:53 AM
17

I'd rather she get punched back in the moment then have her life ruined later, seems a bit disproportionate tbh
/r/MensRights21/01/16 07:30 PM
10

The thing is there is a disagreement as to what is in their favor, having more actual rights and freedoms or having the state protect them excessively so they don't have to think for themselves. Women are pretty split over what direction feminism should take because it's already progressed so far.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:30 AM
6

Every time the right has gained absolute power what has happened? The problem is absolute power and authoritarians, not "the right" or "the left".
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 06:13 AM
2

Exactly. In the end if you think about it, it's not right vs left, but authoritarians vs anti-authoritarians. Right vs left is just a way to divide the anti-authoritarians so they don't gain too much power.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 05:11 AM
2

Most of the left are not authoritarian left
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 04:49 AM
6

Women oppressing women
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/15 10:20 PM
22

The authoritarian left, who have gone so far left they're not even liberals anymore
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/15 10:18 PM
2

Neither is yours. My point is that these corrections for gender imbalances need to be tit-for-tat, if they're going to be done
/r/MensRights20/04/15 01:06 AM
-1

And maybe terrible at planning when emotional
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:14 AM
9

Couldn't the idea that females aren't as good as directing and management explain why there are so few female CEOs and on average why they earn less?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:12 AM
-4

Men oppressing men, the same way it's always been
/r/MensRights20/04/15 12:11 AM
0

Yeah, I know. You're unable to see the subtler point at hand and it is very frustrating to me.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:29 AM
0

I feel the same way talking to you.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:18 AM
0

Discriminating against white males is not the only way how to achieve that. When your team is already composed of mostly white males, yes it is. By definition.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:14 AM
0

The article says: And she has passed on hiring candidates who don’t embrace her priority of building a gender-balanced and multiracial team. “We ask people what they think about diversity, and we did weed people out because of that,” she said. Quit splitting hairs. It's obvious what her intent is.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 11:02 AM
1

How can they hire diversity unless they specifically choose not to hire white males?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:36 AM
1

It's implied by her defined priority, is it not? And the fact that she's removing salary negotiations is just a corporate money-grab.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:27 AM
1

Oh yeah, she just wants to build a gender-balanced and multi-racial team out of one that isn't... which means that there's too many white guys, and she wants less of them. And she said so. That's discriminatory. I don't think diversity is stupid, I like diversity. I think white guys getting the shaft, for the benefit of corporate profits, under the name of diversity, is stupid.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 10:07 AM
2

That's what Ellen Pao says! What a sexist. Toward both men and women.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:41 AM
2

It means "I want to take advantage of employees, for profit" but hidden in the ideals of feminism, using the ideology of feminism as a shield to hide misdeeds.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:41 AM
1

Forced diversity isn't actual diversity. Diversity is an acceptance that people and ideas may differ from how you imagine them to be, and being ok with that. Not forcing your company to fit some mold of perfectly distributed racial attributes.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:40 AM
2

She's there to maximize profits, and use her feminism as an excuse to fuck everyone else over. For profit.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:38 AM
2

Begins? Hahaha that is so delightfully naive. We're at least 2 years in to the decline. Even a cursory glance of /r/undelete or /r/conspiracy (which are both banned from /r/all) will show you how messed up this site actually is.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:37 AM
3

See also: No Child Left Behind
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:36 AM
6

She's perfectly fit for the job. She's a corporate whore. She doesn't give two shits about actual feminism, it just serves her corporate and profit interests. She uses feminism like a shield, to hide her greedy misdeeds. Which is why she is reddit CEO.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:35 AM
1

"I want people who aren't men and aren't white in my workforce" is pretty discriminatory against white men.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:33 AM
1

You should've put it in quotes and started it with a ">" and then put "-Ellen Pao" at the end, and you would've gotten upvoted instead of downvoted because your sarcasm would've been more obvious
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:33 AM
6

It's almost like having power and not having power is a bigger divide then gender, or something.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 04:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter