TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

majestic_tapir Archive

View 2 posts and 413 comments by majestic_tapir on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
174

Discriminationmajestic_tapir/r/MensRights25/05/22 07:25 PM
21

Generalmajestic_tapir/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:08 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

There was nothing in the answer I responded to which talked about direct/indirect causes. I have no idea what you're even trying to convey when you say direct/indirect causes. I am responding to this: This question makes bad assumptions. Women's "hormonal" behavior comes from their regular hormone spikes and crashes which literally define their lives and is completely outside the experience of a normal healthy man. A man's libido is not related to hormones the way a woman's emotions can be. Base…
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:15 PM
5

I read your other replies, and I don't believe you've adequately answered why it's besides the point. I assume you're thinking because it's cyclical that it's incomparable, but mens hormone levels fluctuate daily, which is...still cyclical. It affects your day-to-day life. There's also a very key takeaway that you've either ignored or not read from the article I posted: There is more research needed. Unfortunately, according to many experts in the field. People aren’t studying and taking the “ma…
/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:08 PM
10

Would you mind clarifying why you consider it besides the point, and what about it is cringe?
/r/MensRights03/01/23 11:58 AM
5

https://ltmensclinic.com/mans-time-month/
/r/MensRights03/01/23 11:51 AM
-2

Tbh, seeing this actual post and the disgusting comments in it inspired me to finally give up on this subreddit entirely. I was of the belief that I could add a voice of reason to the absolute hatred that permeates the entire subreddit, but people like you are not worth my time. I'll use my last moment to point out how much of a tool you are. you're anti mgtow, so it doesn't surprise me a simp like you would be pro men's rights when convenient until it upsets feminists in any way whatsoever. I'm…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:31 PM
0

You and people like you are the reason men's rights are looked on poorly.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:14 AM
1

Respectfully, I understand that you can disagree with what I say, but you haven't lived the life of a man. In the same way that I won't deny the views of a woman and her own experiences, there must be some level of give for men as well. I agree with you that the options i've provided are both bullying and abusive behaviour, but they also count as coercion, which counts as rape. The issue i'm also stating isn't that the relationship will end if it doesn't happen, which is primarily the counters y…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 09:19 AM
1

I definitely have a block on the consent aspect for males, unless tied up on some way. Mainly because women will actively participate in some sexual actions for fear of violence or not actively fight against men for fear of violence. Alright, so this is a great point to make, and hopefully i'll be able to reframe it a bit in your mind. I completely understand that in the vast majority of cases, men will be able to overpower a woman and will therefore not feel forced into it by fear of violence. …
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:10 AM
1

I'll address this hopefully in a slightly less aggressive manner than some of the other posters. Legally, in most places, a man cannot be raped unless a woman uses an object to penetrate him. Even then, it will likely be considered to be sexual assault, not rape. However, from an actual standpoint of biology, the penis is primarily just a tool that reacts to stimuli. If you rub it long enough, it'll get hard in the vast majority of cases. Mental stimulus isn't always prevented either, if you aro…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 08:51 AM
4

She's right, legally he wasn't raped, he was sexually assaulted. Which fucking sucks. UK law is rather backwards here.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 04:53 PM
1

Relationships based on love or other emotions......are a First World problem. This isn't the gotcha you think it is, because I certainly live in the first world. I won't deny that people in third world countries have other priorities, because they do. First world relationships have first world problems. We don't need to think about survival and protection because those are covered by the fact that we are living in a first world country, therefore the focus of a relationship is on the emotional c…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 08:00 AM
0

Okay, so let's see your evidence supporting your disagreement. Where are your articles? Where is your science? Where is your supporting research? Here's one example, which is a review of different studies of why people form partnerships: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399251/ The study linked above covers a variety of quite a lot of different studies, and goes into partnerships at different ages, and review of partnerships from a variety of different methodologies (it also include…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:03 PM
1

No, I'm arguing for the sake of pointing out that you're talking bollocks.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 08:02 PM
1

None of what you've said has any basis in science.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 07:53 PM
1

...I can't tell if you're being obtuse on purpose. I'm referring to the part about men's sole purpose in a relationship being to protect and reproduce. That may have been the case tens of thousands of years ago, it may even have been the case as much as a thousand years ago. It is not the case now. We actually have been evolving this whole time, making the assertion that men are just reproductive and protective machines is a backwards concept.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 07:03 PM
1

I never claimed for there to be. If you're claiming that it's a scientific view, back it up with scientific studies. Or can you not, because your viewpoint is using outdated concepts like alpha, beta and sigma male?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:23 PM
1

There is no science in your blog post whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:13 PM
1

I was always in that position, you were just blinded by emotion.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:08 PM
1

He is claiming to speak on behalf of all. So yes, he is speaking for you if you're supporting him. I have plenty of sympathy for the issues of other people, again as I said, as long as it is not spewing hatred, like this poster is. I'm certainly sympathetic if my theory is right, but I'm also not going to tolerate hatred.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:01 PM
1

Pointing out that someone is approaching a topic from a bitter and jaded position is not a bad thing. It can highlight both to those reading, and to the person writing, that there are issues that need to be dealt with on an individual level, not at a societal level.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:57 PM
2

I'm incredibly understanding of people's issues. I will not stand for hatred under the guise of "well I went through some stuff". Hatred is not an acceptable response mechanism. Anger certainly is, and anger can be directed and managed. Hatred and vitriol cannot. I am in fact attempting to make people's lives better even with these points, but you're so focused on an emotional response that you can't see that.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:45 PM
2

I will pick on someone's arguments if they are claiming they are speaking for all men whilst spewing vitriol. OP has done exactly that, he's claimed to be speaking about scientific aspects that have no real basis in fact, and is giving all men a bad name by doing so. I am well within my rights to criticise that, and I have exercised that right. As for you, I'm very glad that you're dealing with it, as so far you've not been able to get your point across without use of caps lock and insults, whic…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:43 PM
1

And then some people get surprised when other areas of Reddit have the opinion that the MRM is oppressive and backwards. No shit when posts like this actually receive upvotes.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:11 PM
2

It seems like you have some issues that you need to deal with. I am perfectly able to criticise someone who has gone down the wrong path, it is not my duty to fix him, that is up to him. The best I can do is point out a couple of things: 1 - This is not representative of men's rights. It is representative of a toxic view about men and women. 2 - This person has issues that they need to deal with. It is up to this person to deal with them.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:03 PM
3

Read some of the other blog posts. It's pretty bad. Take this any way you want, my theory however having read the blog posts, and having seen the gap between the posts: He was married, got divorced, went into a depression, and came out of it a few years later by blaming women for everything and taking zero accountability, and his blog posts about men (which started 2022, everything before that was recipes and music) very clearly show a bitter person who needs therapy. Again, all this is conjectu…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 12:08 PM
3

https://thethousandeyes.blogspot.com/2022/06/i-dont-beta-male-very-well.html Look at this dudes other blog post. "I'm a sigma male". THis shit reads as if it's satire, if he's being serious i'm genuinely disappointed.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 12:02 PM
18

Simply put, MensLib attacks male issues, as men, from the viewpoint of feminism. MensRights attacks male issues, as men, from the viewpoint of egalitarianism (primarily). That's the main difference realistically. MensRights is less likely to ban you for a contrarian view, MensLib is quite ban-happy.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 10:02 AM
3

That is an....interesting comment history you got there my dude.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:53 AM
1

Would you mind explaining what you believe needs to be talked about regarding male virginity?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:51 AM
8

I just read that blog post. I am not surprised you got backlash, the blog post is dogshit. You go off as if you're speaking for all men, and you're not. I'm not in a relationship to keep my partner alive, or to reproduce. I'm in a relationship to make myself happy, and to make my partner happy. This is the most backwards-arse shit blog post i've seen in a while on this subreddit, and it's immensely disappointing to see all these people agreeing with you. Fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:42 AM
48

She didn't donate it, she pledged it. She only donated about £350k
/r/MensRights06/06/22 01:15 PM
1

I did say that I got disenfranchised recently, you'd need to go back further than 11 days as I simply stopped commenting on things for some time, or even checking the subreddit, for the sake of my mental health. Example 1: someone calling all women liars (there's a fair few comments on there, just linked the first one in history I came across): https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ubdor8/my_first_child_is_going_to_be_born_in_a_couple/i65xuqs/?context=10000 Example 2: Getting pissed at a …
/r/MensRights05/06/22 10:15 PM
1

Go back further. I got disenfranchised recently with this subreddit and stopped posting for a while, figured I'd trawl around some other spaces.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:36 PM
1

Why would it make you happy to irritate women? You should be happy because it's potentially a turning point for male victims, not because of pissing women off.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:22 PM
3

All of those points are accurate, but they aren't a counter-point to mens rights. 1: Yup. Men have had a bit more freedom in job options for some time, but that's also because for a very long time a lot of the jobs that were up were manual labour, which was quite intense, and with a lack of automated tools women mostly weren't able to keep up. There was no excuse for not having female judges and such, that was mostly down to keeping women out of higher education - something which has now been re…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:19 PM
2

Not really, I was a prick when I was younger, then I got into a long term relationship and improved. Someone may say i'm nice now, but it literally just means i'm nice, because i'm off the market anyway.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 09:09 PM
-5

There's an absolute fuckload. And no, I won't go find it, if you're that curious just look through my comment history, I tend to call it out when I see it.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 08:54 PM
2

Concept is good, execution is poor. The core ideas are perfectly valid, and there are female equivalents (with different names), and there are psychological equivalents of equally different names. Love yourself, be comfortable with yourself, you do not need others to be fulfilled. The execution left a bit to be desired. Any time I got curious about what was going on in that subreddit, i'd take a look and I'd primarily see woman-hating, instead of self-elevation. Somewhat similar to what has happ…
/r/MensRights05/06/22 08:52 PM
18

a bit of non-functional foreskin. Except that it does actually have a function. Multiple functions, in fact. It is however a contested point, dependent on who you are paying attention to, so i'll give this a slight pass. I didn't consent to all of the vaccines I was given or medications I was given when I was a baby either, and those helped me survive? Yes, because you can't wash away polio. There isn't a preventative measure for whooping cough other than a vaccine or isolation. The vaccines are…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:35 PM
19

Yes, and if you chop off someone's foot when they're born, it means they won't ever develop athlete's foot. How about instead of lopping off a piece of a body, you simply teach kids how to clean their dicks? Millions, if not billions of men across the world are capable of cleaning their penises without needing to cut any of it off, that excuse is piss poor. Correct hygiene covers the washing and UTI issues, and wearing a condom, or vetting the people you're sleeping with is the most efficient wa…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 10:01 PM
15

It doesn't need to be the same for the fact that it is wrong to mutilate a child without any medical reason to do so, when they cannot consent. You do not need to compare them in the sense of FGM and MGM are as severe as each other, it is sufficient to simply say that mutilating a baby for no medical reason is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 09:52 PM
1

I understand, as I currently am heading up 5 different projects in my company. However, I have multiple additional people fulfilling my role, and notes on various project wikis, and weekly calls to update my entire team as to where we are. I'm more saying that if you're going to pick a hill to die on relating to gender differences, this is perhaps the wrong one to pick.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 09:25 PM
2

I mean I understand where you're coming from, but I also completely disagree. And I say that because I've struggled with it my entire career, as I'd believed for a long time that my missing work would mean things would fail. In reality, things get done regardless, because adults aren't children and most of them will just do the job. And in cases where a manager is sick, depending on the job there should be another manager who can pick up the slack and get things done for a short amount of time. …
/r/MensRights03/06/22 09:00 PM
3

Let's not make sick pay a feminine issue. You should not be proud that you only took 2 periods of sick leave in 15 years, the only reason that's a flex at all is because your country is exploiting you. If women are pushing the US to have better sick pay options, that isn't something to fight, it's something to encourage.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 08:38 PM
0

Wish more people were like you.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 08:09 PM
7

Men and women rate attractiveness differently. Women have some inherit benefits just for existing, and men will highly rate women who are objectively not majorly attractive, even if it's for a bad reason (e.g., easy to sleep with). So women actually sit on a scale more between 4-10. Men rate mens attractiveness incredibly low, so a man is either an adonis, or "meh". As a result, men sit on a scale of 1-8 being ugly, and 9-10 being the thing to aim for.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 12:22 PM
8

Why wouldn't it be? It's the internet.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 12:21 PM
23

Men are disposable, therefore are not victims. Women and children are victims. That's the logic.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 12:18 PM
3

The difference I imagine is that men on this subreddit will call out blatantly poor behaviour compared to some of the other subs. Not perfect, but yeah, a rule is sort of difficult to manage considering some people just need/want to vent.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 12:08 PM
10

Im so confused as to why this is transphobia? It's a dystopian novel about eradicating anyone male whatsoever. So men are gone, but men aren't protesting because...it's a fucking fiction novel. Who gives a fuck? I also don't get how people are saying it's misogynistic, when it's a female author writing about a utopia where men don't exist, and in fact die in horribly violent ways en masse. Where the fuck is it misogynistic?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 08:32 PM
8

And when men are younger, they want the super fit fuck girl. As people mature, they tend to go for what will give them the best long term relationship, not the short term.
/r/MensRights28/05/22 05:50 PM
1

Mental health for men is woefully misunderstood in the same way that many aspects of life are misunderstood for women (a lot of healthcare is based around men, not women). Mental health is dominated by female therapists and psychiatrists who lack an understanding of how to treat men. This leads into more men not receiving the help they need.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:29 AM
1

I'm not suggesting that girls don't have it hard, they experience a completely different set of problems that boys see, and a lot of them are sexual in nature, which is horrific. Statistically in their lives, women are incredibly likely to be sexually assaulted by someone (not a stranger) in their lives. I'm glad people are now empowering women and aknowledging women are the future That's a lovely sentiment, but women are not the future, humankind is the future. Pushing the concept that one part…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:19 AM
1

You're actually sick in the head. That was not a child, that's an Abled bodied grown MAN who CHOSE to load a gun and go out and kill a bunch of innocent children. The thing is, an 18 yr old is genuinely a child. Particularly in the USA, where the coming of age period is closer to 21. The fact that he can buy a gun at 18 in the first place is an astounding problem in the country that needs to be dealed with. Frankly, anyone under 25 is still developing mentally, and the cut-off for truly being an…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 08:16 AM
2

You're right that it is a USA concept only. So evidently it isn't just a man thing, there must be other contributing factors confounded by US society, not just "men is evil". The exact point I was aiming to make.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:41 AM
2

You are refusing to listen to any point which is not your own, I assume because you haven't seen this first hand. Here's a timeline, assuming you're in the USA You're born. There's a high chance your genitals are mutilated because of aesthetics. You have an increased chance between now and the age of 10 to be sexually assaulted by a family member (compared to girls) You live a normal life until you're capable of thought, so around primary school Now you're in society, and you're taught that men …
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:30 AM
2

If you're considering an 18 yr old still attending school a man, that's a mistake. This person was a boy, a child who did not have the ability to help themselves, because they do not have the life experience or capacity to help themselves.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:21 AM
3

A lot of people are raised by single mothers and don't go on to be violent aggressors. However, when you look at school shooters and see that pretty much every single one of them is a male brought up by a single mother, there should be some questioning. It may be a combination of lack of male figure at all, with a poor education system, a lack of support system, the current social climate that demonises any form of masculinity. Our first thought should not be "fucking violent men are at it again…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:19 AM
6

You completely didn't understand the point I was making. Demonising boys and men without looking at the common causes that would make them snap isn't healthy. It's frankly neglectful and troubling when this happens, and when the gut response by women online is to go as far as to say they're either having a girl or an abortion, that's even worse. I was able to name one common cause almost instantly, which is that the vast majority of male school shooters come from single mother households. That d…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:14 AM
3

Nothing I could find, but please do say so if you find anything because I'm very curious of this myself.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:08 AM
2

I'm not blaming single women. I'm making the point that demonising men and ignoring any other factors is an unhealthy behaviour that will never resolve the issues. Boys are living in a world where they are often told, within education, that they are second-class. Boys are allowed to be bullied because it's "part of growing up". Boys are living in a world where any sense of masculinity is considered to be toxic and something to avoid, and this is a boy who grew up without any male role model to a…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:07 AM
10

I think abuse is the wrong word, but every single school shooter certainly seems to come from a troubled household
/r/MensRights26/05/22 12:40 AM
9

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/trans-womans-photo-used-spread-baseless-online-theory-texas-shooter-rcna30511 There are a variety of other sources, but this one is fairly reputable as well.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:33 PM
12

Why would it be trans issues? If you believe the shooter was trans, that was debunked.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:06 PM
5

You made zero points here. I actually am advocating for nuance, I'm advocating for looking into causes instead of being outraged and gut-instinct demonizing all men. I'm not looking for any form of confirmation, I'm saying that watching a large amount of women instantly demonise men (to the point of advocating to abort if they're having a boy) is a terrifying concept, and looking into reasonings is a good thing to do. Edit: wow, already deleted. The troll was obvious with this one I guess
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:08 PM
15

I mean I'm British, so I do actually believe in gun control, but that is a completely separate conversation
/r/MensRights25/05/22 07:45 PM
-2

Based on what evidence? There are people with chronic pain issues who have the ability to take time off, that doesn't mean they do. Sure, there will be some rotten eggs, that won't mean everyone does it, not everyone is trying to skive off work all the time. You use this argument for any kind of pre-conditions? I suffer from migraines, I basically have carte blanche at work to call out when I have a migraine, as I won't be able to work, and it's no big deal. I get migraines pretty much twice a m…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 02:36 PM
1

Nah this subreddit has gotten worse and worse. I rarely find a conversation that's engaging and actually trying to advance mens rights, more often than not it appears to be salty people who have come from a banned MGTOW subreddit to post their newest complaint about women, without any context whatsoever. Could be getting older too tbh, I know I am
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:18 PM
4

ITT: No one who actually read the article, or who has lived in Spain. Thanks for posting common sense.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:16 PM
1

If you're reading the Daily Mail article, it's not accurate. If you're reading the Spanish article, it doesn't have any details about how it would be used, it states it's a proposal that is going to vote, as to whether they can properly vote for it (so it hasn't even got past stage 1), it's bundled with some other aspects relating to feminine hygiene products and tax (this bit will probably pass, as it should). Basically, no, it's not saying you don't need a doctor's note. It's not saying you do…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:14 PM
1

why don't they just get a doctor's note saying they need their period off work? You can't get a doctors note for a period in Spain Also, I have heavy periods and three days wouldn't be enough. This is just baseline 3 days for people who suffer extreme discomfort on their period, not baseline for people who do not. If this goes through, I suspect there will be some legislation requirements where you suddenly do need to get some form of medical note that specifies you suffer from intense effects d…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:09 PM
2

The article is vague, and doesn't even quote the Spanish article correctly. And the Spanish article is also vague. And it also doesn't say it's likely to be approved, just that they'll approve a vote for it. And it says its only for cases of strong discomfort (diaorhhea, fever, headaches), not just because you're bleeding a bit.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:05 PM
1

Are you the same person who keeps posting this everywhere? Spain tends to have a 5-6 day work week, not a 4 day. Just because they may have trialled it in some companies, in some areas, doesn't mean suddenly they're Finland.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:02 PM
-2

Implying there won't be checks and balances in place for this is absurd. You think a company won't notice when every single woman takes 3 days off for sickness every single month, and it's never on a weekend? Come on now.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:02 PM
-5

They aren't getting 36 extra sick days, because the concept of sick days is an americanism. You don't run out of sick days and now suddenly you're not allowed to be sick in most european countries. If you're sick, you're sick. It's only if it's clearly on purpose that there's an issue. So if you're mysteriously off every Monday, that's a big fucking problem.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:00 PM
2

Spain doesn't have sick days that you deduct for, the same as most civilised countries. If you're sick, you're sick. Hell, I need to have dozens of unexplained sickness before it even becomes an issue. You can absolutely guarantee that if I have severe headaches, a fever or diarrhoea, I'm taking time off myself, and no one is going to question it or use it against me.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:59 AM
3

It's a proposal, not a law. It's not set to be approved, it's set to be approved to be put to a vote, and it's likely it'll fail in part, but the part about non-taxed feminine hygiene products will probably pass The proposal is specifically aimed at people who suffer from period pains, not just "I'm on my period, laters", it's meant to be for people with serious medical issues associated to being on a period, which does not affect every woman This is what happens when you listen to the Daily Mai…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:56 AM
0

Yes, I would, if I trusted them. If I did not trust them, I would ask for a paternity test. And I would not marry them. Because I do not trust them in this scenario. In the scenario that the OP is describing, he has stated that he trusts his wife. That he loves his wife. I really don't understand how you're not grasping that it's a literal conflict to both state that you trust your wife, and also that you want a paternity test. In a single sentence you're saying "I trust you, but I also don't tr…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 11:36 PM
1

Talking to you is like talking to a broken record. His behaviour is very clearly different from his words. A paternity test is literally only needed if you suspect infidelity. You cannot both trust someone and suspect them of infidelity at the same time, they are opposing concepts.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:45 PM
1

I trust my fiancee. Everything else that you've said isn't relevant, as none of that has occurred in mine, nor from the looks of it OPs case. But if all of that had occurred, I imagine I would not trust her. And I therefore would not be seeking advice on a paternity test online and stating that I trust her, because I would not. Which again, makes the point moot.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:41 PM
1

I literally do not have a problem with paternity tests. I have a problem with someone saying they trust their partner, but still want one. He could just admit he doesn't trust her, but lying about it is irritating.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 06:36 PM
0

I have no reason to suspect that she may have cheated on me Because of this part of OP's post. With all that in mind, AND keeping in mind that I love my wife. And because of this part of OP's post. So, you trust her (as she's given you no reason to suspect), and you love her....so why do you need a paternity test? That's literally a conflict.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 04:09 PM
2

Yup, that's the point I'm making. OPs post is inherently contradictory, because trusting your partner means a paternity test is irrelevant
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:08 PM
-8

I'm not suggesting that men shouldn't know the paternity. I'm suggesting that OPs phrasing is contradictory. If you trust your partner, you don't need a paternity test. If you don't trust your partner, you need a paternity test. If he's simultaneously stating that he trusts her and he wants a paternity test, then he's lying about something, if not consciously then subconsciously.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 03:08 PM
-16

I have no reason to suspect that she may have cheated on me So why are you wanting one then? If you have no trust issues in your relationship then it's a non-issue. If you actually want one, then you have trust issues, and in that case you should probably reconsider your marriage.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 08:04 AM
1

1 - Fair enough. But in the sense that no one really should be using violence, threats or intimidation against anyone, outside of an actual war. 2 - Hope they aren't counting OnlyFans, because that's been touted as empowering women, and allowing them to become incredibly self-sustaining from an economic standpoint without needing to do a 9-5. 3 - Complete misunderstanding of BDSM. The sub is the person with all the power, and there are about equal male doms as there are female doms. 4 - Fine, as…
/r/MensRights25/04/22 07:45 AM
1

No, it's on you. The burden of being clear is on the speakers, so as to not open up your words to interpretation.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 07:22 AM
1

The fact that you said they don't have the education is a pretty big giveaway. You could make the point that you're stating education about a specific issue, but your comment doesn't read that way with context.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 07:46 AM
13

Wow, I was actually expecting this to be kinda horrible, but this is a surprisingly nice post. Kudos, OP.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 04:08 PM
5

You're splitting hairs here. Within the context of the post I replied to, it was used in a disparaging way.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 10:16 AM
0

It's a fucking lesbian event you donkey. The messaging isn't gathering resentment, they're organising an event for lesbians.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:17 AM
1

I go to a club to dance, as a man. I don't give a shit about pulling and haven't for years (mostly because i'm in a relationship), but i'll still go to an EDM club and get off my nut. I want good music and good vibes, and fuck the rest. You're speaking for yourself.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:15 AM
3

Watch this just turn into another LGBTQIA+ venue and disappear into obscurity It is an LGBTQIA venue. Look at the host name, it's "Lick". They're a known event planner for lesbian events, and the event displayed here is one that's occurred multiple times.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:14 AM
-1

Have you just never gone out with women before? They buy plenty of booze.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:12 AM
-4

It's a queer event arranged by a company that has seen massive profits from having an almost permanent venue in the middle of London. They're not losing money on this at all.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:12 AM
0

Why wouldn't the event go ahead? Women-only nights are nothing new, you're just seeing something closer to you. Not to mention, this is literally being arranged by a lesbian event organiser, it's nothing to do with men at all, or anything along those lines. https://www.vice.com/en/article/neapm7/lick-events-launch-opening-queer-women-club It's really not that big of a deal to essentially have a female-only gay bar. They're not your market, it's utterly irrelevant. Their selling point is still th…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:11 AM
-1

Stop it, you came up with a middle-ground answer. Lately, those aren't welcome here.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:06 AM
14

Dude, just because they work in a nightclub they aren't un-educated. I worked as a waiter whilst I was going through university. If my boss put on something questionable, I would still be there, because I need the money to pay for my education and for my rent. Why are you insulting people who are trying to live?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 08:05 AM
5

beta men Fuck off with this nonsense.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 03:44 PM
2

Not sure how you took that from what I said. Every subreddit that deals with gendered issues is going to have sexism in it. It's rampant across feminism, twoxchromosomes, FDS (this one's obviously disgusting), and was equally prevalent in men-focused ones, not just MensRights but also MensLib. In some cases people need to vent. There's usually some support, there's usually some agreement, there's usually some reminding that things will improve. Venting is a normal part of life, and you'll see th…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 02:51 PM
1

That's kind of the point though. You saw a bigoted post most likely, and those kind of posts and comments don't tend to last long in MensRights, because you and others call them out. I've done that myself a fair few times. There will always be people posting shit, it happens in every subreddit. As long as the other members are calling it out, and downvoting it, it's not really that big of an issue as it clearly doesn't represent the majority.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 02:45 PM
1

Or you could use the reddit analysis tool to determine what subreddits they post on. For example, your top commented subreddits are: MensRights: 495 comments Misanthropy: 149 comments Southpark: 146 comments Depression: 40 comments LifeProTips: 39 comments Significantly easier than trying to find things.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:27 PM
3

Certainly. As long as you're prepared to admit that women have it easier in other cases.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:28 AM
0

Nah, there's a line between courage and idiocy on the internet, and generally using your real name on Reddit is more on the line of idiocy than courage.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:26 AM
7

What are you linking to? That's a deleted comment
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:22 AM
4

I do agree with the idea, as I've attempted to police that a bit myself. However, I've now acknowledged that sometimes people just need to vent, and other female-based subreddits do exactly the same. The main thing I'm happy about here is that there really isn't a ban-happy mod team. If you're a feminist and you open a discussion, you won't be banned unless you're trolling really hard. You won't be banned for belonging to certain subreddits. Keep things on topic, and you're welcome here, unlike …
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:05 AM
6

Happily engaged to my partner, been with her for 9 years, love her to bits. Most people here are the same boat, they don't hate women, they just want men's issues to actually be acknowledged and fought for.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 08:02 AM
11

Toxic masculinity as a term is simply an excuse to blame things on men, when life is far more nuanced than this. Bad thing that a man does? Toxic masculinity Bad thing that a woman does? Internalised toxic masculinity It's literally a catch-all. People don't want to admit that people are horrible, and so they blame it on something outside of themselves. And the upper-class/mega rich perpetuate the issue, and push the media to perpetuate it, because it pushes men and women against each other. Men…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 11:31 PM
1

I don't have a defence for her, because she does not need a defence. His actions are his own, they are for him to defend, they are for him to be judged against. Her speaking out is a bonus, not a requirement. There are only a couple of people who need to be heard from: Representatives of the Oscar, condemning his actions and banning him from future events Will Smith himself, providing a public apology for what he did Chris Rock (optional), providing insight as to why he has decided not to press …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:29 PM
2

No. But I'm also not happy he hit a man and everyone played it off. It's a disgusting insight into the rich. The man committed assault on TV, sat down, then accepted an award. He should've been escorted out, and the award revoked. No matter who he hit. Anyone defending Will Smith right now is being pretty fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 12:17 PM
2

You were very eager to speculate on Will's mental stability That's not speculation, no mentally stable person slaps another one on live TV for making a joke. You address it after. You were happy to speculate on Jada's mental health She has stated in the past that she's struggled with her mental health, and has had suicidal thoughts You were happy to speculate on the Smiths' current marriage situation Yep, that's fair, that was just speculation. Based on what has been presented by the media, but …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 10:31 AM
1

I'm not really here to speculate on what she may have done if he'd have hit a woman. It may be a different situation, I genuinely don't know. It's also possible it just wouldn't have happened.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:55 AM
2

What did you want her to do? Dive on him as he approached the stage? She can also be a victim of her own mental state, which also appears to be fucked, in a word. Ultimately, he is responsible for his own actions. She would ideally come out with a statement condemning violence as the right way forward, but she's under no obligation to do so, it wasn't her actions.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 09:23 AM
26

Will proclaiming he was defending his family is BS. He hit a man because of his wife’s fragile ego. He hit a man because he's mentally unstable. Let's not go ahead and immediately blame his outburst on his wife. I personally believe it certainly has affected him, and he does appear to be in an emotionally abusive relationship, but taking his agency away from it is incorrect. He can be both a victim and a culprit in the same sentence, and that's what it seems like we're looking at right now.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:12 PM
1

I'm with you on this. The degradation of this subreddit has been horrible since MGTOW got shut down, it's like this subreddit inherited them all, and every other post is just a bitter man posting about how they're bitter, instead of doing what usually happens in this subreddit, which is to try and improve things.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:51 AM
3

I understand this is one that's a bit of a fucker, but honestly, you can't put the blame on this solely on women. There's a poor history, and people learn from history. There were a series of events in a row that pushed the narrative, and people now feel safer not giving hard no's. Whatever. If you're a guy, and you don't get a hard yes, just assume it's a no and move forward. As someone else has mentioned, ghosting seems to be the new "no". If you get ghosted, take it as a no. If you get a mayb…
/r/MensRights18/03/22 01:45 PM
4

I mean it is absolutely incorrect. MGTOW is generally considered to be hateful, and it's considered to be hateful for a good reason. WGTOW is not considered to be anything, because it's so miniscule that it doesn't even have a wikipedia entry yet, and isn't a common terminology. So making a comparison of "Wow look, Google is sexist" by comparing these two things is completely irrelevant, and ultimately a bit of a bad faith argument. As to why we can't have this discussion here, I didn't say we c…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:38 PM
6

That's kind of irrelevant, because it's outside the scope of this post. This post is trying to imply that MGTOW is eschewed, whilst WGTOW is celebrated, which is inherently incorrect. The fact that MGTOW existed for a while (2000s, depending on which source you believe) is an entirely different discussion.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:32 PM
3

Or it just tells you that WGTOW is a new concept, and MGTOW is an established one.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:25 PM
7

Every time I see a post like OP's on this subreddit it makes me cringe. It genuinely shows how much this is women vs men for so many people, and it's just embarrassing.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:20 PM
-2

It's based on how many times it's been searched. MGTOW is a much more common term than WGTOW, which is why it has a definition at the top. WGTOW doesn't even appear to have a recognised definition, so google cannot display it. This was the exact same argument with people comparing searches of "Misogyny" vs "Misandry". It shows a complete inability to understand how search engines work. This isn't google oppressing you, it's a search engine. Edit: Also, I like how you cropped out the urban dictio…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:16 PM
-1

My dude, could you write with paragraphs? It's difficult to read your answers! Anyway, I've actually been looking at this myself, as it's an area that interests me, and I try to keep an open mind wherever possible. Men more so often in cases of divorce are heavily negatively impacted and increasingly so when it comes to custody battles. I looked at this in particular. From what I could find, the courts find that in custody battles, it is almost always awarded to whoever is the primary caregiver.…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:14 PM
0

You're coming across as rather bitter, and it looks like you're pushing something that has either happened to you, or you've perceived as happening to you, down to all men. It's also possibly a social/cultural thing, but I have seen no real evidence which supports that women are valuing mens money over their personality, and much more evidence that women are actually just setting the bar as unachievable, meaning they're more likely to subsequently "settle", even though they're not really settlin…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:48 PM
6

Nowadays I stopped questioning why guys leave 61% of divorces are initiated by women. It's not really questioning why the men leave, it's questioning what went wrong with the marriage end of story.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:04 PM
3

No issue at all, very happy to celebrate the accomplishments of women.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 10:55 PM
5

Depends on which Bible. Genesis is standard westboro stuff. New testament is a bit more understanding
/r/MensRights03/03/22 02:41 PM
21

I already countered this exact point. Make a different point or expand on it.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 07:20 PM
2

Fair enough, I feel like I may have got the defensive wrong side of the stick here, so I apologise for my somewhat aggressive stance
/r/MensRights02/03/22 07:00 PM
13

Honestly that's the thing. They're complaining as if they're the affected ones, when the affected ones don't give a fuck, and are just getting through their days. Conscripting is a horrible act and is worth talking about right here, right now. Gendered language is one of the lowest priorities imaginable.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 06:42 PM
10

Yes. Trained people under rigorous fitness training are capable of carrying heavy weights for a longer period without suffering. Women in the military are not able to pass the same tests at all, they are subjected to less strenuous testing, as otherwise the pass rate would be so appallingly low that there's basically be no women in the military. A lot of men fail out as well, but if those men were subjected to the tests that women are, they would pass at substantially higher rates. You may quest…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 06:41 PM
13

Do you have any experience in modern combat to support this? For infantry, which is predominantly what people are being conscripted for, you still have to carry a heavy rifle for prolonged periods, hold it up and shoot it. That still requires strength. That's without accounting for any additional equipment you may need to carry, or for carrying/dragging your comrades out of the line of fire if hit. I think people underestimate just how much strength is needed simply to carry and fire a weapon. A…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 06:21 PM
16

Or you could just not want conscription at all?
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:31 PM
28

Men should have the choice to do what they want to do. If it were me, and I had a wife and child, I would want to get out of the country with both of them, and seek asylum. A country is just a place, my family is where I belong. And if that means I have to seek asylum, and start my career completely fresh as if I had no history, I'd rather do that than risk my child growing up without a dad, or my wife not having her husband. And that's my personal choice, which should be respected. I don't want…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:24 PM
34

Of course some women are volunteering to stay behind. Some men volunteered to stay behind. The problem is that men are being forced to stay behind. As for incel vibes, it really doesn't. Men are biologically stronger and faster than women. They are naturally more adept at fighting because of it; this isn't a debate, it's a reality. In a worst-case scenario, the strongest are sent to fight, the weakest are sent to survive/protect/gather. And that is exactly what has happened in Ukraine. And it fu…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:22 PM
248

Take a look at the feminism sub. They've started posting about how women are the real victims of war again. And apparently now is the time to talk about "patriarchal language", because saying that Zelensky has balls of steel to stay himself and fight is a terribly gendered thing to do. Also posting images that Putin wants banned from the internet (Putin with boobs, Putin as a homosexual) is sexist. Not that it's being done to hurt and humiliate a homophobe/sexist, but that the act of actually po…
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:18 PM
3

Are you stating that you're pro-life? Because that isn't a sentiment held by all MRA's, this is a singular topic, that actually doesn't really apply.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:23 PM
1

I mean, you're replying to the wrong person in this case. My female therapists have been good. The only one that wasn't was the 2nd, and that wasn't due to any training I could see, just a personality clash (also she was blonde, which I didn't know, and I had an unconscious bias against blonde women).
/r/MensRights01/03/22 09:36 AM
90

It's a common statement that in a situation where lives are at risk, women revert back to "I'm such a delicate flower, I need to be protected".
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:40 PM
2

Yikes. I've never been in that kind of situation before. I can't imagine a therapy session being interrupted for anything. The worst that i've had is internet drop out due to sessions being online for a while. Although, one of my therapists did do something incredibly clever, which was that mid-conversation, he just stood up and walked out of the room. Then came back in, stood by the window for a moment, then came over and sat back down and carried on. Took me a minute to ask why he left, and hi…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:12 PM
3

I can't comment for New Zealand, but I can see that I discussed being an MRA in my own therapy in the UK, and found my female therapist to be very accepting, and encouraging, particularly when I suggested that I wanted to be able to make some changes, possibly within politics. There are therapists out there who will be accepting, because they understand that people come from all walks of life. It's the state ones that are going to be bad, the private ones are often solid.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 06:25 PM
2

Warning: Wall of text No offense taken. I'm happy to be open about my experiences. I went to the therapist because my emotions fully shut down, which caused a major amount of concern to me. Throughout my childhood, and into my early 20s, I was not a very emotional person at all. And i'm not saying compared to women, but compared to other men. I was incapable of understanding what emotion I was having, but I could usually ascertain what emotions others were feeling. Then an event occurred which c…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 04:53 PM
2

Ban it, unless it's required for a medical need.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 01:03 PM
7

I enjoy watching it. "If he won't do it, I will". I'd love just one boyfriend to pop up and go "Ok, you gonna deal with all her bullshit, or just this one?" It's like they don't understand that a relationship is work. My fiancee has days where she has to put up with me being a dick, because i'm just in a shit mood and I want to be left alone. I try to keep that in, sometimes i'm just in a shit mood. But thankfully, that goes both ways, so sometimes I put up with her shitty moods. Most of the tim…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 01:00 PM
8

I'm sorry to hear that you've struggled so much with this. Is it particularly bad in Aus? I've been in therapy about 4 years now for a variety of issues (undiagnosed light autism, plus my mother not being fantastic), and have had great success with it. Admittedly, I had to shop around a bit. 1st: Female therapist, overall decent, big emphasis on my mother. I wasn't prepared for therapy at this point, and I went in feeling forced due to my partner. Ultimately failed 2nd: Female therapist, just di…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:57 PM
0

I feel like this case is going to go nowhere. This was literally their USP, they make it incredibly clear when you sign up that this is the case. If you don't want it, don't use it. Frankly, I felt when I used Bumble some years back, that it was actually better, it meant I wasn't wasting my time messaging people who wouldn't message me back.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:50 PM
7

I've had one boy punch me in balls when I was a kid. I've had several women knee me in the balls as an adult, because they've seen it as acceptable on TV, and don't recognise how bad it is. One of my ex's did it whilst I was at university, and made me collapse into a heap and immediately vomit. She was subsequently dumped, and hopefully learned the lesson of how painful it is.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:46 PM
1

Because no one cares. Frankly, men don't care. We aren't trying to feed a narrative. If you applied the exact same basis for the 97% figure (which wasn't even 97% in the study) to all men, you'd get a similar figure, as it involved things like being stared at. The thing is, men don't care (mostly) about giving this a number, we just recognise it's shit and would like it to stop, or we recognise that if you stare at us, it has no effect. What I find slightly more problematic is more anecdotal inf…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 12:44 PM
3

I got banned for pointing this out. I think. The mod decided not to elaborate and just basically called me uneducated.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 10:52 PM
3

Interesting that this post was linked. A few weeks back I subbed to Feminism, thinking I'd give their subreddit a shot. I spend a good amount of time on MensRights, maybe i've got the wrong half of the stick. I lurked for a couple of weeks, then commented on a couple of posts. Maybe 6-7 posts total, with the last one being on this thread. About a day after posting on this thread, I was then banned from Feminism for the following rule: nformativity rule: all ideological considerations must show a…
/r/MensRights26/02/22 10:44 PM
31

I would argue it is in fact the correct time to discuss it. Men are being drafted against their will. Those who are willing to fight are already fighting, this is pulling men out of cars when they are trying to escape, for whatever reason it may be, and pointing untrained men at an army that vastly outnumbers them. There are thousands and thousands of men who are voluntarily signing up. There are women who are signing up as well. But those who do not wish to fight, should not have to fight, and …
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:09 AM
21

So what you're saying is you're happy for 18-60 yr old men to be drafted in the name of security, regardless of mens issues. But just so happens that you wouldn't be one of them? Ok then.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 12:05 AM
8

They did. Working class men had to fight for the ability to vote, as prior to this it was only people who had land who had a voice
/r/MensRights24/02/22 06:27 PM
1

There's a very good reason for the anti-incel mob though. Incel has become almost synonymous with MRA in the wider world, and they are a subset that is not representative of men overall. It's like saying you're happy for TERFs to represent feminism, when most TERFs are just a subset of feminism. Or that you're happy for FDS Subreddit people to represent feminism. It's innaccurate and damaging. Incels require some assistance, mostly with their own self-esteem, but it's not an incorrect statement …
/r/MensRights23/02/22 02:23 PM
1

Used to work as a waiter. Have been groped multiple times by women, generally drunk and in bacholerette parties. At no point was I ever displaying that I was interested in any other thing than providing a good service at the time. If I bring this up, it tends to just be thrown aside as a comment of "Ah yeah, it happened to you there, but it happens to women every day". I was also somewhat harrassed at my office job by a recent divorcee, who insisted on coming up to me constantly for a chat, and …
/r/MensRights23/02/22 02:00 PM
1

I don't need any, because i'm not speaking in absolutes. I've stated categorically that I am speaking in possibilities. I have clearly said that it MAY have had an impact. It COULD have resulted in him not being guilty. I have even placed the majority blame on the prosecution, not the woman who acused. Even if she hadn’t said that, there was the physical evidence and the guy would have been convicted on that. These are your words. "There was physical evidence and he would have been convicted on …
/r/MensRights22/02/22 11:08 PM
1

I have no empirical evidence. I've made that point clear many many times, when i've stated "it MAY have had an impact on the result". I've said that in basically every response i've had, at no point have I ever asserted that her lack of testimony would have automatically made him not be convicted. Fact is, eyewitness accounts are a big part of trials even today, and back when this trial occurred, even moreso as ability to gather evidence was lessened compared to right now. For the timeline, I ag…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 09:39 PM
1

Even if she hadn’t said that, there was the physical evidence and the guy would have been convicted on that. You have absolutely zero idea if that would be the case. You have no empirical evidence whatsoever. There are many cases across history that have been made or broken based on eyewitness testimony. Particularly if the defense has any ability to point at flaws in the evidence. Your statement here is just based on a fallacy that you know what would happen, when you don't. And she didn’t make…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 09:01 PM
1

No, there isn't. She picked a different man out of the line up, could not actually ID this man at all, then stated that it was this man who raped her, whilst in a court, in front of a jury who can be easily swayed by a tearful eyewitness testimony. She did not have any memory of how the man actually looked, and yet she positively IDd him at the worst possible time she could have. Why are you so eager to take away any role she had in this at all? I'm not disagreeing that the justice system is fuc…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 07:32 PM
1

You'd think it would be reliable, but it's possible it's not. There's a very big difference in saying "I was raped by a black man in a dark alley, I never saw him so I really don't know what he looks like" to "That man right there is the one who raped me"
/r/MensRights22/02/22 07:23 PM
1

I agree that the defense should have picked it up. I simply disagree with the idea that she has no agency at all, and that her pointing at someone in the court who she has no actual memory of and saying that this is the person who raped her, is something that she should be excused for. She should not be excused for it.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 07:18 PM
1

Yes I do. I believe that people should not obscure the truth when they hold someone's life in their hands. I believe that whether they be male or female, and I believe that regardless of how old they are, if they are legally an adult. There are facts to a case, it is the job ultimately of the court and the justice system to hold people accountable for untruths, which is why I say it's only partially this person's fault. Regardless of what happened with evidence, this person lied.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 07:11 PM
1

Memory doesn't improve with time unless you're repressing a memory. If she could not pick him out of a line up, she should not be pointing at him in a court and saying that he was the one who did it.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 07:01 PM
2

Yes, and even cases where the forensic evidence is clear are sometimes thrown out by a jury if the eyewitness statements aren't clear. Otherwise there would be no jury, as the evidence would just immediately mean guilty. Note that at no point have I ever said it would've made a difference, just that it MAY have had an impact. Which means that she is still culpable, to a degree, as she lied.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 05:24 PM
8

The forensic evidence was seemingly incorrect. Eye witness statements still hold a lot of weight, so if someone is incapable of recalling who committed a crime against them, the sole reliance is on the evidence. Lawyers aren't generally stupid, they know how important eyewitness statements are. I can't guarantee they'd throw out the result, but it may have had an impact.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 03:57 PM
5

Partial blame for not simply admitting during the court hearings that she had no real memory of how he looked, and instead lied that she remembered him. Most blame towards incompetent police work imo.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 03:53 PM
20

Which she shouldn't do. The correct statement is "I am unable to say with certainty if this man is the perpetrator based on my own recollection of the events". Stating that you remember someone clearly, when you do not, is perjury, as far as i'm aware. If there is physical evidence, that will be presented separately, there is no need to lie when you have physical evidence. If she hadn't stated that this was the man, then perhaps a jury may have found reasonable doubt and not put someone in priso…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 03:48 PM
0

That's a shit question, sorry.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 11:16 AM
1

Are you not picking up the difference between documentaries and fiction here? I can think at least of Prison Break not subscribing to this. I can think of a couple of characters in OITNB who aren't given a backstory at all, but are shown to be pretty vile people.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 10:58 AM
1

I am indeed saying the company failed because of leader incompetence. I didn't mention pay at any point, because that would be a dumb metric, on the simple basis of capitalism. If they don't pay market rates, they'd get no employees, male or female. I'm aware this comment chain contains reference to pay, but I was specifically responding to the person talking about a company failing due to infighting, but that company was not paying women less because they were women, they paid market rates.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 04:14 PM
8

If someone throws out the word "Incel" at you, take a step back, you've already won. If you engage further, or go into insults, you're just giving them ammo. Refer to Bill Burr, he actually does have some solid advice in this area: https://youtu.be/uQOyXlsoS04?t=104
/r/MensRights17/02/22 03:59 PM
1

Just checking, wasn't sure if you were making a witty comment about incompetence in some way that I was missing, it's been a long day already. In terms of what would be stopping them, very little, but it's highly dependent on the country and the type of work being completed. It is very much a grey area legally, and mostly won't apply to men for sure, outside of things like religious reasons. There are some precedents set for hiring only women outside of religious/modelling reasons, in cases wher…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 03:23 PM
1

What strategy exactly, employing only women?
/r/MensRights17/02/22 03:12 PM
2

Stop thinking of yourself as a straight male This was pretty big for me, although i'm bisexual. I started hating the concept of labels a while back, because they've got so granular that it feels like you're actively cutting people out. I started considering that everything is just on a scale, and calling yourself by an absolute is damaging in my opinion.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 09:59 AM
17

That was nothing to do with women, it was 100% to do with a CEO who was literally incompetent. I used to use that as an example, but when you really read into it, the woman clearly had no idea how to manage a piss-up in a brewery.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 08:35 PM
-7

The comments in this thread have really got me down. This isn't even about mens rights at this point, it's just a load of bitter men shitting on women. Come on people, do a bit better.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 04:32 PM
5

I also don't understand how successful relationships works nowadays Lots and lots of hard work. It's the hidden truth that no one will tell you about, relationships are not easy. The main thing is if your relationship is difficult in the first 3-6 months, you're not compatible, because it shouldn't be hard during the honeymoon period. After that, everything has to be worked on constantly. Maybe people just don't understand themselves and their soul mate Soul mates aren't a thing, just get that o…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 04:30 PM
5

Bit of a wrong take. You're looking at the relationship subs, which are honestly primarily populated by a combination of literal children (12-19), and bitter divorced people (40+). You're missing a whole subsection of the population that just are not represented whatsoever. There are reddit metrics that go over subreddit population using AI, and the relationship threads are basically a cesspool.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 04:27 PM
-2

Petition for a change then. It's got absolutely nothing to do with Mens Rights though, unless the discussion gets routed back to the fact that women can abort without the say of the male parent.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:16 PM
1

I stated "within reason", for the very case of extreme health reasons. If the choice is between mother or child, or major health concerns for the mother is proceeding. I'm not at all okay with murdering kids, but until a child is born they have no rights, they are not a person, and therefore the desires of the parents trump anything else.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:05 PM
1

That is one of the funniest replies I think I've ever received to any comment I've posted.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 10:04 AM
-6

100% pro choice. Even to the point of delivery, within reason.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 09:28 AM
2

That isn't a PUA. That's just a chat, a conversation between two people. PUA is about manipulation, using what you see against people. It's a completely different concept, and you're muddling them up a bit.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 09:27 AM
0

That argument falls apart under the most basic of scrutiny. It really isn't the gotcha you think it is.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 09:25 AM
3

Did you perhaps respond to the wrong comment here?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 09:23 AM
28

X FACTOR host Dermot O’Leary got a rude awakening at the new round of auditions after a cheeky fan managed to grab a handful of his bum. What a curious way of spelling "sex offender". I've never seen it spelled like that
/r/MensRights13/02/22 03:17 PM
2

I've had a couple of DMs personally, but usually I get people disregarding my opinion on any topic (regardless of if it's about men/women) on the simple basis that I belong to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 03:30 PM
2

Why do people post videos from 9 years ago as if they're relevant? Yeah, dude's a fucking idiot. It was 9 years ago. Move on to something relevant.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:25 AM
3

Weirdly enough, the Quora article on google for some reason has information that is utterly irrelevant. When you click on the article itself, the pinned response is: This behavior is NOT normal. She has control issues. This is also emotional abuse. This may be her past catching up with her. How does her mom talk to her dad? Is she bossy with everyone? Does she put you down with belittling you? All this is abusive. You need help, but she needs it more. If this has just started or been going on fo…
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:20 AM
1

What country was this? I can't imagine anyone in the UK being told this.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:10 AM
1

I was quite taken aback by this. I looked at this expecting it to just be a bit of a bait title, or a bit sensationalist, but it genuinely looks just like sexism. His phrasing was wrong regardless, you can't say: "I would like assurance that steps are being taken to reduce that." What you can say is: "I would like assurance that steps are being taken to increase male representation in this area" Either way, getting canned for this statement is horrendous. I'd like to understand what code of cond…
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:08 AM
2

I like people who are able to take their bias out of it. Good on you, we need more of that attitude around here.
/r/MensRights11/02/22 11:06 AM
19

On the bright side, all the top comments on that thread are people rightfully advising him to seek out a diagnosis for ADHD, as it's most likely this which is making him feel the way he does. However, that thread is horrible. Look at how it starts: If you hang out in feminist circles, you’ll probably find the concept of the ‘mediocre white men’ - the incompetent man who finds himself getting promotions and rewards that others deserve simply due to the privilege of being born under a white suprem…
/r/MensRights11/02/22 10:14 AM
1

Yup. 1 of them does in fact redirect to misogyny. 1 result, from the front page. And i've explained why it would do that in another comment.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 09:32 AM
1

You are once more showing a complete lack of understanding of how tech works. Search engine results do not have all that much human intervention in them. There's a huge amount of optimisation you can do to appear on the front page of google, but if you've not particularly done that, then it's based on things like keyword frequency. So having results for "Misogyny" when searching for "Misandry" is entirely normal, simply because there are less individual topics related to misandry than there are …
/r/MensRights08/02/22 09:31 AM
-1

Could you get another couple so we don't have to read any more of your vitriol?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:18 AM
9

In your own words, would you care to explain white privilege to me? Noting that I am white, from England, yet grew up from age 6 in Spain, with Spanish people. Could you explain how my white male privilege allowed me to thrive?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:14 AM
1

The amount of people in this thread who have no idea how search engine optimisations work is fucking absurd. You're making a mountain out of a molehill, based on your search engine results? If you wonder why other subreddits sometimes take the piss out of us, look no further than this thread.
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:12 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights08/02/22 12:07 AM
29

"Misandry UK" gives the following: Hate Crime (Misandry and Misogyny) Bill - Parliamentary Bills Misandry meaning: Correct term for 'hatred of men' explained ... The fact that we're considering making misandry a hate crime ... Misandry - Wikipedia Misandry: Stop Saying “Kill All Men” - Home Misandry | Etsy UK What is misogyny? Meaning, is it a hate crime in UK law Why misandry and misogyny should be treated differently ... Misunderstandings behind the idea of making misandry a hate ... Feminist …
/r/MensRights07/02/22 09:59 AM
1

You're probably right.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 08:17 PM
1

I called my local place first and asked about DBT and even they sounded surprised it was only offered to women and recommended I call them to confirm. So I called this place and asked. They dismissed me and said I wasn't welcome unless I was assessed and accepted by them. I didn't read too much into "Dismissed", and instead took a look at "Assessed and accepted by them", which suggests that they would be open to assessing if he is referred via the correct means. That being said, he has also said…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 06:14 PM
1

There's a UK Law that states when a whale or sturgeon becomes beached, it must be offered up to the reigning monarch. It's never been removed, because it's irrelevant. The same way a policy may have been originally written incorrectly, and fully needs updating. Maybe it's not enforced, and the person answering the phone is an idiot. Maybe the actual case is that they only accept referrals, and the person who wrote that one page assumed it was for women. Yes, as of right now, it is their policy. …
/r/MensRights04/02/22 06:01 PM
3

unless I was assessed and accepted by them. That sounds moderately positive to a degree, in that they'll consider you if you are assessed. Unless it was a bit more of a "get you off the phone" technique?
/r/MensRights04/02/22 05:48 PM
3

It does, yes. But official documentation is written by fallible people, and approved by fallible people. I'm not saying it to absolve them of sins, just that it's an option. It may be an outdated page that needs a re-write.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 05:14 PM
-1

Wow your ignorance is unreal. Really? About what? Im done being civil with you. You weren't really civil at all. Just fuck off you ignorant slime. No You literally just repeated exactly what i said but reworded with synonymous terminology or phrases. No, I didn't. I actually went against a fair amount of what you said, do you want some reading comprehension assistance? Like... Come up with your own argument you dipfuck. I did. Do you also need some anger management assistance?
/r/MensRights04/02/22 05:10 PM
2

Would you mind clarifying about your first point? The only source I have is Wikipedia, which states that it is only illegal to rape your wife if she's under the age of 18. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape_laws_by_country
/r/MensRights04/02/22 04:27 PM
-1

Yeah... smashing a soft dick on the outside of the pussy... feels fucking amazing let me tell you. Well, the fact that you posted this certainly made me go down that route. Because you seem to think that after a man has cum, his only option to continue to please a woman must be to smash a dick against her. He couldn't just....go down on her and finish her off that way? Use his fingers, kiss her thighs, make it a bit about her after you've had your fill? Sexually educated people call the use of y…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 04:17 PM
1

Generally I hated being ‘different’ in the locker room and the ‘giggles’ I would get from girls. That's a symptom of the problem of circumcision, not a catalyst for circumcision. Your logic is a little bit circular. In terms of realities: You have to clean better: You have to pull your foreskin back and clean the overall area. It takes approximately 20 seconds per shower, on a long day. Education resolves this. there is more risk of glandular cancer: I'm afraid i'm uneducated about this particul…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 04:08 PM
3

Serious query, as it's just not done in my country at all: What makes you think that willingly cutting off a piece of an infants body that serves a purpose, and doesn't cause problems, is acceptable for aesthetics/religious reasons? I understand needing to snip it under certain medical conditions, but that's not why it's primarily done in the US from what I can see. It's literally cutting off a piece of someones body without their consent, and without a valid medical reason. If I looked at my ba…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 04:03 PM
3

I don't hate women. That seems to be an unpopular opinion recently since places like MGTOW have closed down.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:57 PM
-4

I get where you're coming from, but I feel you've also slightly misunderstood where the posted is coming from. You don't just have to smash your dick into her, you can use hands, fingers, mouth...toes probably if you're feeling it. The build-up and journey is as important as the ending, and it generally takes a learning period with any partner to figure out how to make it excel. For men, it's easy and women never have to figure anything out. You stroke it, it's good. It's literally that simple. …
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:53 PM
-1

The link you have provided has nothing to do with what you've stated. It provides a review of divorce rates for couples who have had 1, 2-3, 4-6 and 7+ partners. It does not reference men or women specifically, just people in a partnership who have individually had sexual partners. So if I'd had 1, and my partner had 7, we would not qualify for this study. If I'd had 4, and my partner had 6, we would qualify. It also compares college educated to non-college educated, and shows that college educa…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:46 PM
1

I've noticed a trend in people feeling they can hit "upwards from oppression", with no repercussions, recently. By which I mean, women targetting men for being men, black people targetting white people for being white, etc. I've had the exact same thing as OP within Reddit, where I had the audacity to comment a disagreement that was nothing to do with gender, and was called a piece of shit for being on MensRights. Which is great, considering most of what I post on MensRights is subtle adjustment…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:31 PM
5

Out of curiosity, how did you even find this place? I understand that they are for women only, but they then also specify their waiting list is months long, and you need to be referred by a GP. Did your GP refer you to a place that would never accept you? Or did you decide you want DBT yourself? I'm not judging, i'm just genuinely curious about mental health things, as i've been attending therapy myself for several years now. In terms of preventing men, I guess this is because of the outdated co…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:23 PM
1

Not every woman is like this but every woman can be like this. "Not every man is a rapist, but every man can be a rapist" See how that looks? Not so good right? Now, let me go ahead and quote again what it was you posted: The vast majority of college women have been run through 100+ Ds. They irreversibly lost their pair bonding ability. They are hook up material at best, watch out for STDs and baby trapping with them. So, you've gone from "Vast majority" to "Not every woman". What exactly is it …
/r/MensRights25/01/22 01:44 PM
1

Real people share their stories to educate men. In the video a young guy, early 20ties, describes the female college reality as he and his mates can see it in RL with their own eyes. Yep. One person, in one university, in one country, is sharing his own experiences. These do not correlate to an overall systemic problem across every university, and every person. Denial and wearing rose tinted glasses is not going to help men. Men need to see female nature, divorce and family court biased laws for…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 01:27 PM
14

Yes, it is. It is in fact an infinitely bigger risk than not eating a cake. It is a low chance, but why take it if you can avoid it Except in this analogy, cakes are men. So you're saying that it's better to never be in a relationship, or date a woman? Physical overpower is worse. Because emotional overpower is included in physical overpower. Never said that physical is less than emotional. All I did was to state a simple fact that there is an obvious distinction between when someone grabs your …
/r/MensRights25/01/22 12:50 PM
24

Why would you? A chance of 0.03% to eat a cake seems like a high price. Because statistically, to eat a poisoned cake, I'd have to eat 333,333 cakes. That's how that maths works. You really gonna say that 1 in 333,333 is a big risk? I think the issue here isn't denying that some men should be avoided. When I walk down a dark alley at night and I see a strange man, I feel more threatened than if I see a strange woman. I don't think there is anything controversial in this statement. I agree. I'm m…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 12:10 PM
1

Ever been to a gay bar?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:58 AM
1

Why do I have fear that they’re going to use it against me in the future, even though they’re supportive of me now? Interestingly, this is something i've noticed before. If I confide in a male friend about something major, it only comes out if i've subsequently brought it up myself. And it won't be mocked, until I mock myself (I give my best friend a pass, as he knows me pretty well). However, I have noticed that things that are somewhat major, which I then divulge to women, is often used agains…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:50 AM
1

The vast majority of college women have been run through 100+ Ds. They irreversibly lost their pair bonding ability. They are hook up material at best, watch out for STDs and baby trapping with them. This is some of the most absurd shit i've ever read on this subreddit. Do you have any source for that whatsoever? I had some lovely relationships when I was at university, and never did I think I was one of 100 D's, nor did I fear STDs or being baby trapped (I used this thing called a condom, and t…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:41 AM
4

How did you get to that conclusion, when the title specifically states that both people are 18+?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:36 AM
51

"if you're given 3 cakes, but 1 cake is poisonous, you wouldn't eat any Yeah, the comeback to this is: "If you're given access to a cake factory, and told that 0.03% of the cakes manufactured at this cake factory contain poison, would you eat any cakes?" Because I know I would. And that's the more realistic percentage of men who are rotten, to put it bluntly. The problem is, there are a lot of people in the world. If you asked every single 16 yr old girl if they'd been sexually assaulted, a good…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:32 AM
3

Toss up between physics, maths and languages (french, in my case)
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:25 AM
-13

Why do you seem to think that this is their goal?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:22 AM
1

No, typical privileged behaviour.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:40 PM
3

No, typical privileged behaviour.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 11:40 PM
9

...did you genuinely not understand her position from reading through even the 4 images posted by OP, never mind the full article posted by someone else?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:28 PM
28

This is fantastic for multiple reasons. Prominent right-winger backing essentially the banning of circumcision for babies, that's incredible. Of course, the downside of this is why she came to this conclusion. Because she was pregnant, and looked into what's best for her. And opted to deviate from the stance that a lot of Americans had, because it directly impacted her. It's a shame it takes personal impact of something for these politicians to acknowledge that something is bad. Maybe if the US …
/r/MensRights24/01/22 05:27 PM
4

Women ARE inferior Nah mate, you lost me here. You then immediately stepped into woman hating regions, the same thing that we, as a subreddit, chastise a lot of women for.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 10:42 AM
1

How about we let my upvotes do all the talking How about your fake internet score is irrelevant, and spewing hatred is a bad thing? just because you like defending women who are feminists and lesbians tryna bring men down here on our own page No, I defend Mens Rights. This is not about Mens Rights, this is about hatred. You are not pushing anything about uplifting men in any way, you're talking about how it's unfair that women are celebrated and men aren't. How about propose a solution, or do so…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:50 PM
-1

From the looks of it, i've been here much longer than you. I was here before all of the MGTOW and RedPill people got redirected to this subreddit because the cesspools that they inhabited got banned or quarantined. It's got so much worse lately with people not trying to elevate men, but trying to bring women down as well. And yes, I will bash a real person, because you have the fucking nerve to post this nonsense: I'm not non-binary , and have a straight mind as a man I'm getting real sick of th…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:32 PM
-4

one is February 14th which is Valentine's Day and the other March 8th which is International Women's Day Valentine's day is about couples/romance. Yes, there's often a focus on women, with men doing the planning. Personally in my relationship, we don't even bother with valentines day as it's just a capitalism day, and i've noticed many people around me doing the same thing. Thankfully mothers day has an male option, with is fathers day. Admittedly, fathers day is much less celebrated than mother…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:29 PM
1

I'm not non-binary , and have a straight mind as a man Fucking what mate? It's people like you bringing this sub down with woman hating. It's not about woman hating, or people hating, it's about elevating men. Fuck off with your hate.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:19 PM
4

You telling me you don't get an affection erection? It's not necessarily a turn on, but there is some physiological response sometimes.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 09:22 AM
30

Having any form of self-confidence, based on the responses I can see in this thread so far. I understand that people feel bitter, but damn.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:32 AM
4

Pretty sure this is dependent on where you live. I do this in England and I think the only time i've not heard a thank you tends to be from senile old women
/r/MensRights11/01/22 10:30 AM
2

I assume this is on the thread of the woman who posted she's a millionaire at 26 after letting men shit on her, eating shit, sleeping with 14 yr old boys, etc? Unfortunately, this person is correct, but in the worst possible way. She doesn't fit the definition of paedophilia, as it requires sexual attraction to children, whereas she accepted money to do something illegal. There is no age of consent in Saudi Arabia, however it is illegal for her to have sex with someone she isn't married to. Saud…
/r/MensRights10/01/22 10:16 AM
8

You can report it for sexual assault, if you have evidence. IF you have no evidence, you're pretty much shit out of luck. This is obviously dependent on country, some will offer less support than others.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 03:03 PM
1

I'm at work at the moment, so don't have enough time to go through. If you go into my profile and check my recent comments on MensRights, I believe the past 5-6 are all attempting to pull people over to a less...dangerous viewpoint.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 02:25 PM
1

What is the stupidest thing a PERSON has ever said to you while you were pregnant I had this argument a while back when someone posted a thread of "What are the signs a man hasn't matured?", and it was just a load of women taking the piss out of men for doing the exact same things that make women immature. Just take a look at the first comments: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/rskw51/what_are_signs_a_guy_hasnt_matured/ If he doesn't listen to who he is talking to: I've dated this wom…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:13 PM
2

There are obviously lots of counter arguments to this Not really, the trick is in the name "Conservatives". They want to conserve the status quo, not improve it. Does anyone actually debate the fact that conservatives do less for mens rights than liberals, seriously?
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:07 PM
3

AITA, the clear bias there for women is astoundingly hilarious when you come across examples of double standard posts where things that men do are denied but women are seen as empowering. This one is the one that came to mind for me. Two recent examples actually: Example 1: Woman is breadwinner, supported man pursuing his dream job of becoming a freelance photographer. After 2 years of doing this, with the man not making it (note, he started then 3 months into it a global pandemic hit, reducing …
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:06 PM
4

Ah, you also get those? You disagree with someone, and their comeback is "Wow, you're a regular in the MensRights cesspool, makes sense". Alrighty then. Never mind that i've been in a committed relationship for 9 years, never mind that I care for both men and women, never mind that most of my comments on MensRights are urging men to not stray towards the idea of hating women, and to actually improve mens lives. Nope, I go to MensRights, which means I hate women.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 12:00 PM
1

I find myself getting into more arguments than any other thing. If i'm outside of MensRights, i'm usually arguing with people who tar anyone who visits MensRights with the title of woman-hater. If i'm inside MensRights, i'm usually arguing with someone who has strayed the opposite way and actually become a woman-hater. The amount of conversations that are level-headed are minimal, because the things that attract views and clicks are things which are controversial. If there's just a few people ha…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:58 AM
7

Really? Because Merriam Webster states: : belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests Which is not the same as what you've stated at all.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:02 AM
7

if there wasn't a problem with men getting hired over equally or more qualified women If you think this is specifically a female problem, you're blind. It's a person bias, no matter what. You're less likely to be hired by a woman, if you're a man. That is an actual accurate fact. You're equally likely to be hired by a man, if you're a woman however. In some cases, moreso for things like secretary work, where some men think they live in the 60s and can slap an arse on their way to a meeting. Howe…
/r/MensRights07/01/22 10:01 AM
3

Do you have a link to this? I've seen none of it publicised, as I live outside of the UK, and I would appreciate some non-biased reporting, but I don't really know which US publications to trust.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 04:01 PM
2

Report it and move on
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:30 PM
4

I cant hit a girl lol Yes you can in MMA. They will teach you how to adapt your hits to be strong or weak, and one of the first things you'll learn is how to moderate your hits. men and women had tournaments agaisnt each other In mma You may have the occasional friendly sparring session at a gym, but it's immensely doubtful. And men are tought to respect women so they cant lay a finger on them Men are taught to respect everyone. If you're in an MMA class, you're there to learn. The women are als…
/r/MensRights04/01/22 11:41 AM
2

And how does that have anything to do with MMA or Mens Rights in the slightest?
/r/MensRights04/01/22 11:34 AM
3

That's good, but that's not representative of overall life. If you're that worried, just ask in any gym you're aiming to go into about it. Not to mention, for training it's just not that big of a deal. I've done MMA for years, it really doesn't come up much, and actual matches between sexes just doesn't really happen. It feels a bit like you may be projecting societal/religious issues of yourself as a mens rights issue, and this honestly has nothing to do with mens rights at all.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 11:31 AM
7

I'm rather stumped about this post. Are you suggesting doing something which is already done? There are no professional matches in MMA that haev men vs women. In training you'll often mix, but mostly only if you're training certain moves and techniques, not for actual sparring. For actual sparring in MMA, men and women are usually separated to get a good sparring session. If you're attending a place that doesn't do this, it's probably a bad gym.
/r/MensRights04/01/22 11:25 AM
1

It's worth noting that many latin countries appear to be hyper religious, but in reality its just social constructs, not belief in a god. You don't have a Catholic wedding because you're Catholic (in many cases), you do it because that's what your parents, grandparents and great grandparents did.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 01:42 PM
6

My view is any sub that would permaban you without a discussion, for participating in MensRights, is not a sub you want to go to anyway.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 11:53 AM
5

Oh yeah, it's not gonna get you a good service, that's for damn sure. Absolutely right, the best option is to report for discrimination.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 01:55 PM
0

I suspect that some of what you're seeing is societal differences. I live in the UK, which is seemingly quite different to North America in terms of pragmatism. Women here above the age of 18 are rarely seeking the chiselled 6 pack 6'3 man with a 6 figure salary and a 12 inch dick. They want someone who understands them, and who will be a companion. Men, as well, are looking for someone who wants to be with them, they're not looking for the latest instagram model. Again, some of this is generali…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 01:21 PM
0

No you didn't. What are you considering objective metrics? Is it possible you have a bloated sense of who you are as a person? By any objective metric I should be a top tier catch No objective metrics stated I did all the right things, and bring a lot to the table, but it means nothing. Vague, no real information here. This is fully subjective I met my dream girl, and we were perfect for each other; only difference being she was more privileged and attractive than myself so of course she rejecte…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 01:12 PM
2

The OP just vented and never asked how it was on the woman's side of things. Yeah, he definitely didn't make wild assumptions of "Just for an easy dating life". He definitely didn't say "A woman can always find sex and companionship so she can hold out while the rigged system pressures men to settle". He definitely didn't say "Being a woman would at least guarantee me that I'd never ever ever ever be lonely again or in want of companionship of the opposite gender; or physical desire if I choose"…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 12:20 PM
6

Damn that's rough. There have been attempts with that in the UK, with some shelters proclaiming to be "Women only", whereas legally that's not allowed, so you can just go ahead and walk in, and if they try to stop you, point out that it's illegal.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 12:07 PM
4

Are gender-specific services legal in Aus? That's kinda shitty.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:36 AM
3

Never said women have it worse, I said women have a different set of problems, and wishing you are one gender to avoid your current problems is setting yourself up to fail. People should be striving to improve their current lives, and improve things for everyone, not wishing they had a different set of problems. Not sure why people get so defensive when prompted with an argument that isn't "LUL WOMEN SUCK" on this subreddit, jesus christ.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:32 AM
1

So, I replied to the top level post, but I saw this and now i'm feeling a bit disgusted. Your life is not living proof of anything. All we can see is your side, with no pictures, no demonstration of who you are, how you flirt, what you do for a living, what your hobbies are, how you treat people, etc. You're claiming you're a top tier catch. Why? You claim that if you were a woman, you'd love to date you. Why? I am by no means a top tier man. I'm not incredibly attractive, i'm decently smart, an…
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:04 AM
3

Alright, so I agree with the principle of what you're stating. However, have you actually seen what women go through whilst dating? I'm not saying this as an excuse for some women treating you like a living ATM, but honestly if I had to deal with some of the shit they deal with, I'd be pretty fucking jaded too. My fiancee is an attractive woman. She is not on the market, as she is engaged. However, she still gets unsolicited random messages from creepy fucks who seem to think she'll be into it, …
/r/MensRights21/12/21 10:01 AM
5

Current definition: the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. That's not egalitarianism, it's womens rights. This isn't even difficult, that's literally the fucking definition. Whatever it was originally branded as, it is not that at this point, so it's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 09:54 AM
1

So, men are motivated to improve their bodies to attract someone. Not take it to bodybuilder level, but to try and be fit. To get the full ripped look is actually dangerous, as it generally requires dehydration. So, it's a good motivator, bad if taken to extreme. Women are motivated to lose weight, to the degree that is probably unhealthy. And also to get weight on, but only around the boobs and arse. And then to buy a small fortune in makeup, shave every hair off your body other than the hair o…
/r/MensRights17/12/21 09:47 PM
1

We've been together for 9 years, so the 7 year itch isn't a thing for us at least. I live in the UK, if that helps, and grew up in Spain. In terms of options, yes I of course have a lot of options, but I'm extremely happy in my relationship, and I don't even consider the other options. For my height, I'm 6'1, so yes over 6 foot.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 06:02 PM
1

And thankfully, the women who are going for that are not the ones you need to be interested in. And long-term, don't matter all that much, as casual sex is pretty overrated. When I was younger, it mattered to me. Then I got older, and found someone I actually love, and who loves me back. I have no need to spend hours in the gym, or hours grooming. She loves me for who I am, and I love her for who she is.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 04:55 PM
0

And the only thing that's going to happen with women going for top 20% of men is that the 80% of women who aren't accepted by the 20% of men will actually end up with the 80% of men who aren't top. Unless we're expecting the top 20% of men to somehow date/marry/maintain relationships with 100% of women, despite the fact that women out-number men.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 04:19 PM
4

You know what the funniest part of that story is? "Independent" studies (not independent, funded by insurance companies) found that women were safer drivers overall, something like they make up 48% of accidents and men make up 52%, hence higher premiums for men. So yeah, safer...except for when you look at the data, men drive a factor of 10 higher than women. To put this in basic data, as I like basic data: Man drives 1000 miles, makes up 52% of total accidents Woman drives 100 miles, makes up 4…
/r/MensRights17/12/21 01:21 PM
1

Was that Drive like a Girl or something? I got insured by them a couple of years ago as a man, as it ended up being a fair bit cheaper. Swapped back to Admiral this year as they beat the rates, but it was hilarious to be a man with an insurance of drive like a girl.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 01:13 PM
5

My dude, one of the biggest things you can do is to care about what matters to you, not how people around you perceive you. Focus on yourself, focus on self-improvement. Work out if you want it for confidence, but that's not all life is about. Self improvement comes about in a thousand small different ways, but I can go ahead and tell you right now that very few committed relationships have continued because both the man and the woman are gorgeous. Beauty standards are massively unattainable for…
/r/MensRights17/12/21 12:54 PM
6

I have no idea why the OP came to that conclusion, considering that the first statement is entirely contradictory to all the evidence previously provided. If you get a woman and a man, stick them in separate cars (same model, make, everything), and get them to drive, they're equally likely to crash.
/r/MensRights17/12/21 12:49 PM
0

I'm not sure I understand what you meant, who has joked about smashing people with their boots? In terms of what wrathful has said, I'm not inclined to agree. Who exactly has pretended to care?
/r/MensRights15/12/21 04:09 PM
3

Feels like it's more problematic the more time you spend online tbh. I rarely see anyone in my real life ever espousing nonsense about the fact that men are not stronger than women (in general). But it's kind of everywhere online, possibly because of how US-Centric places like reddit often are, whereas if you live elsewhere, it's a lot less visible. I'm thankful that the people i'm around are actually always up for a non-heated discussion about it, as opposed to just shouting at each other, even…
/r/MensRights15/12/21 01:38 PM
2

Birds has fallen out of favour a bit. It's generally not used to refer to a person directly, and more man-to-man. "Mate, that bird is well fit" (friend, that woman is very attractive) You don't really call someone a bird to their face, this isn't IASIP. Duck is more of an affectionate term that is specific to places like Yorkshire. All the terms I stated are non-gender specific, but it is more likely that a man will use them over a woman. No real negative connotations.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 12:04 PM
1

I'm not so sure it is a double standard. It doesn't feel like one in the UK at least, although we use different words. "Darling", "Love" and "Duck", none of which are gender specific really, so a woman could use those on a man, and a man use them on a woman. They are however regional, you won't be called all of those by one person. "Darling" being more London, "Duck" being more Yorkshire, and "Love" being more overall (but mainly up north)
/r/MensRights15/12/21 10:10 AM
1

Personally, no I am not afraid of marriage. I'm currently engaged, and looking forward to being a married man. I've been with my partner for 8 years, we communicate well, and it simply doesn't worry me at all.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 09:46 AM
4

Men are of course allowed to deny sex. If your partner dumps you and finds someone else because you denied sex, then they were the wrong person for you. A relationship is work, but it isn't compromising yourself. I'll give an example: I make the bed before my partner gets in it every single evening. It makes her happy, I like seeing her happy. She can do it herself if she wants, but it brings me joy to make her happy. This is fine. My partner has on a couple of occasions been too rough with my g…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 02:00 PM
1

Yes, I will call things devolved, if they have devolved. I will also call things hateful, if they are hateful, regardless of the gender stating them. My experience with speaking out about things has not resulted in any case of anyone being fired. It is incredibly illegal, in my country, to fire someone so blatantly, and therefore it's less of a concern. The practices that I have set up continue to this day, and it may not be a major impact to mankind, but it's an impact to the people in those co…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 12:25 PM
2

I've implemented working groups within the companies i've been employed with, that encourage men to speak out about their issues. I've highlighted the need for increased resources to be provided to men for mental health, which have been provided to our female colleagues in the past. I've also educated women within these companies as to the issues that impact men, in non-confrontational settings, and opened up discussion points between both genders. I can't claim that I've done loads, I'm not an …
/r/MensRights14/12/21 11:49 AM
3

It's gotten worse recently, that's why. There was a period ~4 years ago where it was mostly just memeing about feminism. Then 2-3 years ago started getting really good, loads of resources to help men, pointing out areas that need to be resolved, etc. Then this past year, it's devolved again into memeing about feminism quite a lot, with much less focus on providing men with resources then need.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 11:36 AM
0

Every time I try and point out something similar, or have the voice of reason, I get massively downvoted. It got worse when they banned MGTOW, fairly sure this sub inherited a good chunk of their users, and the misogyny increased. In one post, you'll have people saying "Wow, here's another post by TrollXChromosomes where they clearly say they hate men", and then the comments within that post are all incredibly hateful towards women. Like...practice what you preach ffs.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:44 AM
1

I'd be willing to if we could nail down some of the details ahead of time
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:37 AM
3

I don't understand what point you're trying to make here. MensRights: Discussion about inequalities than men face, and ways to better ourselves AntiFeminists: Screenshots of women being bad, and men "owning" them PussyPassDenied: See above TheRedPill: Basically just men go their own way, moderately more extreme than others. Also a quarantined subreddit, so that's fun. Comparing MensRights to the other 3 subreddits is simply incorrect, they serve different purposes.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:35 AM
2

Unfortunately MensLibs at least is simply not a good subreddit. Can't speak for LWMA as i've never been on there, but MensLib tends to be virtue signalling at best.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:33 AM
0

Because men are desperate for whatever sexual crumbs a woman might offer, as they are usually in deficit over the amount of sex they want So, I read your whole message, but I felt I should pick this one up in particular. What is your solution to this? You think women should be forced to have sex against their will? Do you think men should be able to seek sex outside of their relationship? Genuine questions there, I want to know your views on this.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:31 AM
1

Assuming that this person is a member of the subreddit, that would make them a member of the movement, and if they want to define it as that, then that's fine. I personally am in a similar position, I don't want to pit men and women against each other, I don't want to take rights away from women - I want to level the playing field. Any rights a woman has over and above a man, a man should have (e.g., the right to choose), but also anything extended to a woman should be extended to a man, in the …
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:29 AM
1

If some altercation between a male and a female occur in public space, there will a male crowd who will come to support the female without knowing the matter and presume the male to be guilty and in worse case beat him up too. Yep, this is a problem. It's a very slow-changing problem, and the solution begins in education. Teach people to not hit, don't just teach boys not to hit. Unfortunately, there's been no push for men to be involved in primary education, where a lot of the behaviour is ceme…
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:26 AM
1

I'm real confused about this. I'm probably confused because i've never encountered this myself, but what kind of friend is it exactly that you have who would respond in that way? Have you ever insinuated that you would rape someone? Has she ever been raped? THe whole thing sounds kinda horrible, and it's rough getting over cases where someone is that biased, but I feel like there's a pretty big gap here in what has happened.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:12 AM
5

All 3 of those are not quite like MensRights. There's a difference being anti feminism and wanting to watch women get "owned", versus trying to elevate mens rights, and work for improving mens lives.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 10:10 AM
1

Oh hey, you must be that CEO of Harassment guy who followed me. Nice to see you being hateful again.
/r/MensRights14/12/21 06:49 AM
1

I'm not equating you with OP at all, I equate you to the crap that I would scrape off of my shoes, as a cursory glance at your comment history suggests that you hate women, that you view abortion as a sin, that you view abstinence as the best way forward, and that your entire purpose on this website is to create conflict and argue as opposed to attempt to reach any form of consensus. I do not conflate societal concerns with misogny, I simply am capable of determining when something is hatred, an…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 05:13 PM
0

Alright, let's deal with this bit by bit. OP said NOTHING about removal of rights. Correct, OP did not say anything about removal of rights, I stated that as a re-inforcement for the things that I constantly see on this site. For example, the fact that women recently fought against the draft is seen as a bad thing, when it is in fact a good thing. No one should be forced to be drafted. The next step would be to remove the draft for men in the US, as it's an absurdly out-dated concept. It's been …
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:54 PM
1

What are you on about? What lies exactly am I perpetuating? I'm literally active on this subreddit in an aim to improve mens rights, and I push back against people who perpetuate hatred or the concept of equality by removal of rights. This particular type of post, stating that women are trying to essentially effeminise men to the point where men there will no longer be strong people capable of doing construction work is both a strawman, and damaging to the cause of mens rights. It's bordering on…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 04:36 PM
2

Men outnumber women and children for homelessness everywhere. And yeah, I know in the US it's kinda screwed, but I wasn't sure if this person was US or UK, or somewhere else. All the laws you have over in the US appear to be created to screw over the poor and working class, it's pretty sad.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 02:56 PM
1

I'm not sure about US laws, however in the UK even if a shelter is named "For women", that is illegal and you can still enter and seek shelter as a man.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 09:34 AM
-13

Feminism has nothing to do with removing the ability for people to complete jobs that require strength.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 09:31 AM
4

Stop generalising the individual. There isn't really a problem with individual women, there is a problem with an inequality between sexes for certain things. None of which should prevent you from having a nice meaningful relationship. There are areas where you need to be wary, when it comes to relationships as well, things like marriage and having children can still be pitfalls to men, depending on the individual, but if you find the right person (which is doable) then it is not a problem. Don't…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 09:30 AM
2

It's been banned, also it's not that big of a deal, it's a fetish. There's huge amounts of fetishes about degrading women, and there are multiple subreddits covering degrading men and women.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 09:26 AM
2

It kind of is in a win, in the sense that no person should be required to be signed for the draft. If they can now take the fact that adding women didn't work, and also do the same for men, that would be a double win.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 09:16 AM
1

From a previous comment i've made addressing this: Improvements to education for boys Focus on mental health for men, with support Increase in homeless shelters for men (ideally for all, but there are quite a lot of female-only shelters across the world) Levelling the playing field for family court (parental rights, alimony, for example) Ceasing the concept of circumcision outside of medical needs Providing the right to financially abort a child. This one probably needs an explanation. The decis…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 04:48 PM
24

Improvements to education for boys Focus on mental health for men, with support Increase in homeless shelters for men (ideally for all, but there are quite a lot of female-only shelters across the world) Levelling the playing field for family court (parental rights, alimony, for example) Ceasing the concept of circumcision outside of medical needs Providing the right to financially abort a child. This one probably needs an explanation. The decision to have a child at the moment is entirely in th…
/r/MensRights01/12/21 09:38 AM
6

It's categorised as a "long-sleeve crop top". I assume that means therefore that her midriff was fully exposed. That is absolutely not ok at a company function unfortunately. I can't turn up in a wifebeater/vest, or shorts. You cannot turn up as if you're going clubbing, it is a work event.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 10:22 AM
3

Best way is to state that the points you're making are not to detract from the issues that women face, but to shed light on the issuse that men face. You're not here to say "Women shouldn't get homeless shelters because more men are homeless", you're here to say "There should be more homeless shelters for men as well". You're not here to say "Women shouldn't get as much help with their mental health", you're here to say "Men need more help with mental health". If they bring out the patriarchy ma…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 11:49 AM
3

I was so confused reading through that post, and realising that the poster was lauding the behaviour of their niece. Who literally stabbed a guy in the face for saying words. At a school. Dark alleyway, alone, and a guy says that? No problem, I'll give someone the benefit of the doubt for stabbing them in the eye. A group of girls, where 1 guy (14 yr old, so still learning) walks up and says "I wanna fuck you in the arse"...there's no threat there. If it's a big deal, you bring it up with your t…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:39 AM
1

Yeah, but no. I intend to marry my partner. I'm not a moron for doing so, i've been with her for nearly 10 years.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:21 AM
1

I mostly like him. I despise his fan base
/r/MensRights15/11/21 10:41 AM
-4

It's fine expressing your emotions, as long as your emotions are not inherently destructive.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 06:19 PM
1

My dude, women are hurting in different ways than men. Men are, in my opinion, doing worse. We suffer in many many horrendous ways, and we do not get any real support for our problems. The difference is that whilst many women are also suffering, for different issues, they have a much better support system than men do. You cannot simply make the statement "Women are not hurting", which is based on literally nothing. Women are absolutely hurting. Everyone is hurting. It's not a case of saying "Wel…
/r/MensRights12/11/21 04:53 PM
25

Dude, I cry watching most sad movies, I cried when my family members have died, I cried watching an advert to donate for cancer towards kids, i've cried in front of my mum, my dad, my brother, my fiancee, my sister in law, friends, family, it doesn't matter. Showing your emotion is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, and if people call you out on it, call them out on their bullshit, and continue being you.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 04:40 PM
2

Ah, unfortunately the comment is now deleted, but thank you for the link regardless.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 04:46 PM
2

All the top comments are people supporting the OP. What did you do, sort by controversial?
/r/MensRights11/11/21 12:39 PM
1

Beats me. Was genuinely curious what people consider to be a solely gendered issue, and not something which affects both people. I've seen some people citing family court, which isn't a gender issue, it's a family court issue. Yes, one side gets beat out more, but it isn't an issue that only men have. Something like prostate cancer may be, for sure, but I can't think of many non-health related ones, so I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 03:37 PM
3

That's the algorithm. You're watching these videos, possibly commenting, possibly going back to it multiple times because you're enraged at them. So TikTok believes you want that, and shows your more of the same. My TikTok rarely shows me anything like this, but I do have quite a lot of MRA stuff on mine.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 11:11 AM
2

I guess that works. Didn't occur to me as I'm not American.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 10:12 AM
2

I think you've kinda nailed it on the head as to why that didn't occur to me, which is that I would also view that as a parental thing, not a man/woman thing.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 10:12 AM
1

This is a symptom of a bad leader, not the reason that women-dominated companies don't succeed. There are multiple occasions throughout that article that make it clear this person is a terrible boss. Here are some examples: But I didn't challenge the decision not to hire her because I had a policy of picking my battles carefully This is in regards to her second in command hiring a woman based on her looks, and made it clear this is why. She didn't step in and shut it down, so she fomented the at…
/r/MensRights09/11/21 03:51 PM
3

Because it's bullshit. The Patriarchy is a "thing", but it's a thing that benefits the top 0.1%. It's not a gender issue, it's a rich vs poor issue. So, you'll get a load of women saying "Ha, patriarchy", then a load of men going "What patriarchy? I work 3 jobs, the fuck you on about?", not realising that the women are referring to the very top of the pyramid. This link says it best: https://www.wokefather.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/apex-fallacy.png
/r/MensRights09/11/21 03:35 PM
1

I mean, she made it real damn difficult to find out what venue she went to. Fuck knows why, it's not that hard to just name drop a venue so that the venue knows something is wrong.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 03:31 PM
-1

Would you be able to explain a gender-specific issue relating to either men or women? I personally don't see it.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 03:23 PM
-2

I find it real hard to imagine a 12 year old looking like a 16-20 year old. That is astounding. Absolutely horrible for the bloke if he was genuinely deceived, which it sounds like he was, but jesus christ.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 10:02 AM
1

Not sure where you're seeing this, unless you're looking just at social media / TV? I don't think i've ever seen a heartbreak go in either of those ways, and i've seen a fair few of my friends hearts been broken.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 01:04 PM
2

MGTOW is a tad controversial. At it's roots, the ideologies are pretty good, things like "Love yourself" being one of the key parts. Unfortunately, MGTOW also breeds a certain type of people who now also reside in MensRights, who are actually hateful towards women, and whose whole advice is to avoid women, or use women, as opposed to wanting to fight the inequalities that make dating difficult for some people (equal rights in family court, righto to deny parenthood, divorce rights, etc).
/r/MensRights13/09/21 08:17 AM
1

Welcome to the party.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 08:11 AM
1

Sorry, but i'm certainly not going to support the continuation of circumcision. It's literally mutilation of a body part due to religion.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:39 PM
-1

You have literally zero information, you have no idea what I have achieved for MRM, because nothing I do is for you as an individual, it's for equality. Equality and MGTOW do not correlate in any way. And yes, false rape accusation posts don't generally belong here. You want to read up on a biased view of someone who you don't know? You have no idea if that story is accurate, they could be posting for any reason at all. It has nothing to do with mens rights, if you want to talk about false accus…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 10:38 PM
-11

Acknowledging many men accused of rape may be innocent isn’t bashing women, it’s simply acknowledging that those accused aren’t necessarily guilty. I agree. Read those posts though, they add nothing, they're simply stating a biased (the OPs) point of view, where we have no actual information, and have to believe what is being told to us. Exactly the same thing that I see people saying on here when we "have" to believe what women say about rape. Informing people, with statistics, about how this i…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 05:00 PM
-2

If you truly believe that, push for change. Don't push for hatred of women, and avoidance of any kind of companionship, that is simply not an achievable goal for humanity.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:56 PM
-3

It's honestly so disappointing seeing people be this way. I had poor communication skills over a long-term (as in, I can communicate short term, but it gets worse over time with a single person). I didn't swear off all women because my relationships were terrible, I went to therapy and got some help. I've never been happier than being in a relationship with my amazing partner, and I cannot wait to get married and have kids. And not have kids because socially i'm meant to, but have kids because I…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 04:17 PM
2

It's worse now that MGTOW closed down, a chunk of them ended up coming here, as that's what's left, and you can tell with the recent posts that have been up. There's literally MGTOW comments all throughout this post, and it's a bit sad. At it's core, the idea is solid, as it is with many things. Work on yourself, love yourself, be happy with yourself. But humans aren't solitary beings, it's missing the step of "Find someone to share yourself with". It's the same with women having rights. Too oft…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:25 PM
-3

Or even better, don't tell people what to do. I will be getting married. I accept the risk that this brings with it. I'm also not getting married on a whim, I proposed to my partner of 8 years, who is my best friend, who I've lived with for multiple years. Divorces are as high as they are because people rush them, and do them before they actually are ready to commit, because that's what society tells them to do. Instead of following a formula, just do it when it seems correct, and you'll actuall…
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:17 PM
1

I think it's entirely dependent on who you interact with in real life, and also where you live. Personally, I've found that the higher educated, the more likely they are to be willing to have an open discussion. I also live in the UK, which is slightly less radical than the USA, where a lot of these issues crop up more. The problem is, many cases are less vocal, and simply parts of society, such as issues around mens health, mens reproductive rights, family court, etc. And attempts at improving …
/r/MensRights23/08/21 10:43 AM
6

You're going to have to forgive this, but I recently commented on a post on TikTok. The post was from a therapist, showing the dynamics of a relationship whereby one was the woman, who was complaining that the man did not help out enough. The other side was the man saying that all that happened was he got nagged. Now, i'm not dumb enough to agree with the man straight up, because the point of view was kinda bad tbh. The woman states something along the lines of "I get up, feed the kids, get them…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 10:28 AM
1

Honestly, i'm kinda with you. I earn 4 times what my partner earns. When I got a promotion, she invited me out for dinner, paid for by her.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 02:53 PM
5

Some of it's absurdly internalised too. And it's not just emotions. It's built into me that I'm not getting help for things. Thankfully I attend therapy for some of my emotional needs, but simple things like work. You'll see some women go down the route of saying that they need help. You ask a man who's overworked, and the response is "I'll get it sorted". Because...no one is coming to your aid. There are no white knights, there's no light at the end of the tunnel, there's no magical fix for thi…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 06:13 PM
1

So, generalising in this sense is just that, a generalisation. Fact is, most people need some form of help, because growing up in current society is difficult as fuck. If you grow up without a strong father figure, there are normally issues that present later on in life. Common example is that pretty much every mass school shooter in the past 30 years has come from a single-mother household. If you grow up without a mother figure, you'll have a whole set of other issues that will present. It's i…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 11:43 AM
21

I can't speak for psychologists, however I've been receiving therapy for my mental health over the past 4 years. My experience broken down: Female, blamed everything on my mother. I went against this, but later realised she had a point. Didn't see them for long, wasn't really ready for therapy Male, talked about background, talked about familial relationship. Best therapist i've had to date Male, relational therapist style (tries to connect by sharing their own stories). Appalling experience, re…
/r/MensRights01/06/21 11:41 AM
6

What are you on about? How have you taken any of that away from my comment?
/r/MensRights27/05/21 09:25 PM
2

Hilarious. I post far more commonly on a multitude of other subreddits. And without any context, it means nothing either. Like, how much percentage of my comments on MensRights makes up my total? Cause I have 54 comments in MensRights, but 236 in AskReddit, another 233 in 1 gaming sub, 102 in aother, 176 in AITA, 15 in another gaming, than 4 across a variety of small subs. And if you expand it out, there's several comments in Feminism, which would surely matter to somenoe
/r/MensRights27/05/21 05:31 PM
0

Now i'm curious....what does mine say?
/r/MensRights27/05/21 05:13 PM
25

The sad part is that all it does is form an echochamber, where there's no debate. It's like if you go onto the conservative subreddit, where you must be conservative, and if you ever disagree with a conservative view your comment gets deleted, it's hilarious. At that point, why even bother talking about things? Just to stroke your own ego? Even on MensRights, there's sometimes conflicting views, but i've never seen someone be banned or even had a comment deleted outside of them being inflammator…
/r/MensRights27/05/21 05:10 PM
29

I will join you. I'd fucking love to be a stay at home dad, but I earn more money than my partner by a good chunk :(
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:09 AM
3

For me, stay at home dad. I love kids and I've wanted them for ages. I know that I'll never be able to be a stay at home dad, I earn 4 times more than my partner.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:59 PM
1

No, that's a myth. Feminism's founding document stated that 'men where oppressing women', which even back then was blatantly not true. Fair point, I take what I said back. Just took a little dig at it, and the original statement is to even the playing field for women. The statement about it being equal rights for both sexes is a later point. However, even the definition doesn't appear to state equality for both sexes, so that seems interesting. No, a vocal minority of people are feminists, but t…
/r/MensRights13/05/21 07:35 PM
10

The counter to that is exactly the same though. When a woman demands equal pay in sports, they're generally told the same thing - you get paid based on what people want to see.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 12:32 PM
1

Feminism is a hate movement because it has more sexists (by far) than the general population. The men's rights movement is not a hate movement because it has fewer sexists than the general population. Would love to see a source for this, as it sounds like absolute bollocks.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:50 AM
2

men already have more rights than women Source please someone getting paid substantially less than their men counterparts Source please not even getting the job they are more qualified for Source please
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:48 AM
1

So, this is an annoying concept. In theory, everyone should be a feminist, because the idea behind original feminism was around equaling the playing field. Make it so women can vote, can do the same kind of jobs as men, etc. So at its core, absolutely everyone should be a feminist (although I'd argue egalitarian is much much better as a word). Unfortunately, modern feminism suffers from the same thing that many groups do, which is that they're tainted by the vocal minority (hopefully it's a mino…
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:38 AM
2

Wrong subreddit my dude. This is not a hate subreddit for whining about women, it's about talking about mens rights.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:33 AM
28

That's just supply & demand. This isn't an equality issue, and it's key to ensure that every single part of life isn't broken down into being a gender issue.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:30 AM
11

I have never encountered a post or comment that is hateful towards women, let alone condones violence. There are a fair few. The difference is they get downvoted into oblivion pretty damn quickly, and never garner any kind of actual discussion. If you sort by new you might come across one or two. Other subs are perhaps less nice. And unfortunately Mens Rights tends to get lumped in with redpill and MGTOW for some reason. I imagine there are some people that straddle a few of the dodgier subreddi…
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:25 AM
13

Yeah I found it mildly amusing when this happened to me as well. Apparently talking about Mens Rights is a hate crime. Genuinely gave me a giggle, as it just means that I can fully ignore that subreddit based solely on the fact that the mods are biased.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:24 AM
11

I think this has been getting in for a while. It's why in many places they now don't call it rape culture, it's sexual assault culture. Then a whole host of things can be rolled into one, getting to that hilarious 97% statistic that is simply wholey false.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 12:52 PM
1

Generalizations within studies are basically only ever used correctly within medical studies, where they have tight restrictions on what they can allow and what they cannot allow. A non-medical study should never output a generalisation, it should output a summary of information from which you can make your own assumptions.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:46 PM
1

Exception that proves the point? :)
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:45 PM
1

I've mentioned multiple times that you have added no qualifiers, which you've glossed over. Perhaps you only respond well to a direct question: What are the other reasons that you refuse to work for a female manager?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 02:44 PM
1

Dear lord you're an irritating person to try and have a discussion with. I never said there weren't qualifiers. I'm saying that in the context of this post, the only qualifier provided was gender, which is not an accurate qualifier when left on it's own, it's a bias. You've then doubled down and stated "the vast majority of female managers aren't experienced or qualifed", yada yada. This is actually a completely incorrect statement, there are no studies I can find that would suggest a woman is i…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:58 PM
1

Well there's a lot to respond to here, which is amusing. Yes, i'm office based. This isn't really a surprising thing, a huge amount of jobs are office based, including (based on interpretation and OPs history) his job in question. If it were manual work, it would be a different kettle of fish, as there are substantially less women in those areas. Studies do not generalise, this is misunderstanding how studies work, exactly the same way that most people misunderstand how statistics work. Actual s…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 09:35 AM
0

I work in IT. I'm a Process Consultant. I also never said studies were bad, I said generalisations were bad. Generalisations means you're inferring something based on personal or anecdotal experience, not that you're applying a study to something. Example of a generalisation: "I dated 2 women and they were both insane, therefore all women are insane" Example of a study: "Studies show that women are 10% more emotional than men" (obviously fake stat, to show difference". In one case, you're applyi…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:50 AM
3

May I ask what about the OP's post would suggest that they're pathetic? It seems like a fairly standard story, if you swapped the genders you'd get uproar. The whole point of this subreddit is to try and push forward male rights, alongside female rights, because there's a tendency to suggest that because one side has it worse, we have to ignore the other side.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:37 AM
0

I've had 3 female managers, 2 male managers. There was no discernible difference between them from a managerial point of view. I got promotions and pay rises under both scenarios. Generalisations pretty much always do harm
/r/MensRights29/04/21 08:28 AM
12

Bear in mind that men can get breast cancer, whereas women cannot get prostate cancer, therefore there are some men mixed in within that 43k as well. There's also a stigma associated with breast cancer in men, just to top it off.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:26 PM
1

That would be because it is one..
/r/MensRights24/11/20 07:47 AM
2

Just stop trying. The guys a lost cause.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 06:48 PM
2

You're being pedantic now, and you know it. Rather than refute the point of my argument; that working more hours = more pay Actually i've refuted that multiple times. I did it in fact in my very first post, where I provided multiple examples of how extra output results in additional pay, generally in the form of a promotion. Companies which fail to provide additional remuneration for increased output inevitably lose their biggest talent to a company that is willing to pay more for them. You're b…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:33 PM
1

For the love of god, stop using theoretical P->Q and X is Y and just talk in normal plain english. There is zero reason for you reference the exact same set of information 5-6 comments in a row. Would you like to actually pull out from my comments the time's I have actually used Argumentum Ad Hominem? I'm really curious about how you're viewing this, because I cannot make it any simpler than stating that I did not use your character as any form of insult - I debated your scenario with actual fac…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:16 PM
1

Well, this started off as amusing, and is rapidly turning into boring. Here's the wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem You can see the example of how Ad hominem looks in the first paragraph. "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong". "ComprehensiveMGTOW claims that women are poor workers, however they belong to MGTOW subreddit, which is an unwelcome property, and hence they're wrong about women be…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 03:06 PM
1

You really do need to read up on the definition of Argumentum Ad Hominem, as it appears you just use it as a way to get out of being wrong. Here is an example of Argumentum Ad Hominem: OP claims that women are shitty workers compared to men However OP belongs to MGTOW which is quarantined for toxic behaviour Therefore OP is chatting shit I have in fact your argued against your argument, not your character. I've mentioned your character in passing, certainly, but my argument is against your logic…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:50 PM
1

Thanks for the recommendation in reading, I did actually study logic when I was a physics student quite some years back. Interestingly, I haven't actually used Argumentum Ad Hominem, as my points stand without attacking you, and don't rely at all on the character of anyone i've referenced. I've made a very simple logical conclusion: You have offered to pay someone to build 1 car in 1 day. They have completed work on 1 car in 1 day, they have therefore concluded their part of the deal. The fact t…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 02:16 PM
1

I've followed it just fine thanks. Original comment was " If someone gets their daily work done in 4 hours they should get paid the same as someone who gets that same work done in 8 hours". If they've completed their daily work, then this means that they've completed what they were contracted to do. In the scenario you subsequently come up with, you make it about cars, where you explicitly state "I pay you to build a car in one day, you build it in half a day and then leave for the day". Now, yo…
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:59 PM
1

I didnt misunderstand the scenario at all. Go back and read your post. You explicitly state that you're paying an employee to make you a car in a day. You don't mention the hours for this scenario until afterwards. In conclusion, you're trying too hard to appear smart.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 01:22 PM
1

I agree with the person who said you're not as smart as you think you are, based on one single argument you made: You pay me to make 1 car in 1 day. I make it in half a day and leave, and you get sad. Which is your problem. Otherwise you'd contract me to make 2 cars in 1 day, not 1.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 11:34 AM
4

Yes. The correct day to ask about mens day is on mens day. If you try and make women's day about you, then you're part of the problem
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:22 PM
2

This post right here is why a lot of people won't take Mens Rights seriously. Because you're essentially taking the side of someone who, in this case, is legitimately victim blaming. If you want women to hold people who say shitty things accountable, you need to do the same for men.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:28 AM
2

"Your nails are sexy like you". That right there. I compliment people at work by saying "Hey, those shoes look great". I don't say "Damn girl, yo ass is fiiiiine"
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:25 AM
1

Why you bringing young people into this, exactly?
/r/MensRights30/01/20 06:29 PM
5

Dudes a troll, or a legitimately broken human being. Check his comment history...
/r/MensRights06/12/19 02:04 PM
2

Looking into it I think I got some lines crossed, I was thinking about Operation Yewtree, the one that took down the likes of Jimmy Saville, whereas this one appears to be a separate thing entirely that I was woefully uninformed about
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:41 AM
1

Non-existent? Providing this is the same paedo ring that took down quite a lot of famous people in the UK, i'm not so sure you can make the claim that it's non-existent.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:24 AM
1

I read all of them. They all cite that using boiling water is an issue that is associated to women who perform domestic abuse. It does not say that they are sat around boiling water waiting for their partner to arrive so they can dump it on their head. It also doesn't confirm that they dont do that, it's a very basic "There are multiple cases where women use boiling water on men".
/r/MensRights27/11/19 07:55 AM
1

Absolutely none of the links you provided are a counter I'm afraid. They're good information, regardless, but none of these links confirm a process whereby a woman is boiling some water with the sole intent of pouring it over a person's head (I actually couldn't verify the third link, download wasnt working). The first link even states that she went to make a cup of tea, then opted to pour water over his head. It doesnt say that going to make a tea was a lie, it could have been, or it could have…
/r/MensRights26/11/19 11:26 AM
1

The entire page is 1 occasion. So, ideally you could have done with reading the search results. And whatever you google, it will always come up with the sensationalised options, simply because that gets more hits. You think that out of 7 billion+people on the planet, the scenario I stated has never happened? I can all but guarantee that it has, mathematically. I'm also not at all contesting your statement that abuse by women is generally more planned than abuse by men, that's a very common fact,…
/r/MensRights25/11/19 02:24 PM
9

Gotta be honest, its sounding a bit anecdotal. I gave a very legitimate scenario as to when you could use boiling water in self defense, as you couldn't see that as an option, and you've instead gone off on a tangent
/r/MensRights25/11/19 12:23 PM
3

Source?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 12:20 PM
10

You throw it at them. I'm not certain what you're trying to achieve here?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 12:17 PM
14

In the middle of cooking, someone comes at you with a knife.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 12:11 PM
2

Man, this guy posts constantly on TRP, and all his comments are the exact same shit. I'm guessing his girlfriend cheated on him and he's going on a tirade tbh
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:58 AM
2

Consider how much you ramble in all of your answers, talking to you is a chore that I don't wish on anyone else. And other people have now started to notice that you are either trolling, or majorly full of hate, either which way - i'm pretty sure you're not that welcome here.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:57 AM
2

I haven't stated any personal attacks at all, barring a statement that I believe you're trolling. You, in your original posts, referenced the sort of videos that can be easily located on any porn site, which are staged. I have stuck to the discussion perfectly, you've provided 2 sources, from the exact same website, which shows a clear bias. It's not even a reputable website. If you want to state 90% of women cheat, you need to provide actual peer-reviewed studies, not 2 posts from a single webs…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:47 AM
2

I checked your source. It was bullshit. Literally every statement you've made is based on your own bias, and what you perceive, without referencing a single actual non-biased source. Not every bacholorette party has sex, kissing, blowjob or groping. It's not a vast majority, it's the slim minority that you're actively looking for on porn websites, and then parading your bias on this subreddit. Even your original message shows that you dislike women. And then you've pulled another thing out of yo…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:22 AM
2

These are some seriously biased sources, and the statistics are entirely made up. You may not hate women, but you have a very warped view of life. I've seen bachelorette nights, they are wild but don't always result in sex. I've also seen bachelor nights that end with prostitutes. My evidence is as good as yours, it's entirely bullshit. I've seen one thing, you've seen another, yet you've jumped to 90% because of...dancing bear staged porn videos?
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:11 AM
39

Fucking hell the comments in that post are appalling.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:24 PM
2

No it isn't. 30 women, 2 men - the expectation is youd get full years of women. 50/50 employed would be an entirely different story
/r/MensRights09/08/19 07:03 AM
1

only the most secure men who can be MGTOW I'm not putting any words into your mouth, you used an absolute. "Only" the most secure men. Suggesting that any man who dares to have a relationship, clearly isn't secure? Then you look at most people who are MGTOW, and realistically it's mainly incel, not people who are putting their careers first. Unless of course you mean a scale: Most secure: MGTOW Secure: Decent relationships Insecure: Frivolous relationships / sucked into marriage In which case fa…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 02:00 PM
-4

Sorry, no. Wanting to be in a relationship and share your life has nothing to do with insecurity. I am immensely secure in my life, I have a very successful career, and I have a loving girlfriend who I've gone out with for 6 years, and who I've lived with for 2. This type of chat is what makes people say that MRA is bullshit, you're sprouting absolute nonsense on the thought that MGTOW is a good thing, because women are inherently evil. You've even used terms like "sucked into marriage". You rea…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 11:48 AM
3

Moving, not mowing
/r/MensRights28/06/19 11:33 AM
1

Which makes it 4 times worse...
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:53 PM
1

The thing is, there is NO difference. Both scenarios where the man hides it vs the woman lying are horrible things to do. Not only that, you're bringing up that she didn't bring it up, in his post he clearly states that in all cases he either lied by omission, or straight up lied when directly asked. Going down the route of "Well women do this so of course men lie" is the absolute worst way of going about it. This isn't mgtow or red pill, we should act the way we expect others to act - lying abo…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 03:45 PM
0

It was a 2 year relationship where he didn't disclose that he could not have kids. It's either an immensely superficial relationship, or he outright lied, or he lied by omission. Other than option A, hes an arsehole. Where are you taking the information of "the topic just never came up"?
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:22 PM
2

I absolutely consider that a massive twat move. The relationship where his girlfriend got pregnant - that was a 2 year relationship. That is already long term. She fucked him about in it clearly, but going 2 years without stating "yo I actually cant have kids" is absolute insanity
/r/MensRights25/06/19 02:20 PM
1

What does that have to do with literally anything? I am 100% for mens rights, but this sub has a weird tendency to seemingly insist that arsehole behaviour is not because a man does it, and normal behaviour is shitty because a woman does it. If I were dating a woman and she failed to tell me up front that children are medically not in her future at all - she would absolutely be an arsehole. Dont fuck legitimate mens rights issues by watering the sub down with utter bullshit like this.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:36 PM
-19

He's still an arsehole. Vasectomies aren't always reversible. You can stop taking the pill whenever. Not disclosing this to long term partners is a massive twat move
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:38 AM
4

First season of Love Island had one. He was the best person in there. This is a non-issue to get wound up over.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 05:58 PM
4

I love this story so much. Thanks for reminding me of it
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:45 PM
1

Hey that's a positive I hadn't considered right there, but wanting to show your dirty side
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:08 AM
6

I'm kinda hoping this is just a step towards full genderless bathrooms tbh. Check it out with men, then roll it out to women once it's been refined. I was at a gay club a couple of years back that had a gender less bathroom. Walked in, there were men and women everywhere, then a little sectioned off bit for urinals. No weird shit going on, was quite pleasant. My only concern is that overall, women are disgusting in public toilets, so I imagine toilets would need more janitors
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:19 AM
3

Really excellent argument that deserves to be seen
/r/MensRights03/04/19 06:42 AM
13

Request your GDPR Snapchat information. They should hold all your information, despite it appearing deleted on your side.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 11:24 PM
1

Do you have sources on that, out of curiosity?
/r/MensRights08/03/19 12:27 PM
0

It's worth noting that career doesn't have to mean CEO, Nurse, etc. It could mean anything. Right now, I live with my girlfriend. I earn triple her salary, and with some minor modifications to lifestyle or a raise, could quite happily pay all bills with her doing whatever she wanted (she would like to bake cakes, for example), right now she just works in a supermarket, aged 22. Now, let's say I do that, we get married, we're together for 15 years, then we divorce for whatever reason. She's now 3…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:15 PM
5

That last statement is a dangerous one for the position it puts people in. If someone legitimately gave up their career because their partner supported them for years, a lack of alimony as a concept would result in the earner of the relationship having a huge power dynamic over the other. "I'm going to cheat on you in front of you, and you can do nothing because if you leave me, you have no money and no marketable skills ". The amount of alimony could certainly be capped, but the concept of enti…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:46 PM
1

6'1 with a tiny bit of podge checking in. 83 kilos. I'm above average size, so put a fit man of average height between 70-75 kilod
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/18 10:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter