TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

malignedmale Archive

View 1 post and 57 comments by malignedmale on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Question For Menmalignedmale/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 09:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

The perks of being an incel. I'm in a similar situation. That's why I kinda hope the app becomes mainstream. It fucks over more men and ​allows the blackpill to spread.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 02:24 AM
0

Yep.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 02:20 AM
–

This is unironically the healthiest advise here. Lots of guys need to understand that women are like exotic cars. You'll never be rich enough to afford a Ferrari, and you'll never be good looking enough to attract women. The faster guys understand this, the faster they can move on from chasing women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 02:54 PM
–

Wow! 40 whole hours to learn how to facepaint properly?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 02:48 PM
1

There is hate for single moms because most single mothers made terrible choices in men, and hurt their children's lives as a response. Nobody (aside from tradcons) is upset at the career woman using IVF to have​ a child when she is financially ready, we are mad at Becky who fucked around with her baby daddy, who she knew wasn't father material from the start, and ended up a single mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 02:03 PM
1

They wouldn't need to mention they had $30k saved up if they didn't think it was impressive. If I told you I had saved $4k for a home entertainment system, wouldn't you think I was broke? Probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 05:51 PM
–

Social media did not invent reproduction in the same way the car didn't invent transportation or the radio didn't invent communication, but we can both agree those technologies changed our behavior as people correct? We cannot draw reliable forecasts of modern human interaction and behavior from those who grew up prior to the widespread use of the internet and smart technologies. It is very similar to forecasting human behavior from pre-industrialized norms or even pre-agricultural norms. The in…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 05:48 PM
1

That's funny, because using your logic, when I take care of them in old age, I am paying off that debt. So in a way, they prepaid me to take care of them. This is an incredibly American way of viewing things btw. In my culture, families work together. I guess you aren't as fortunate.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 04:55 PM
1

People who were 40 in 2015 were born in 1975 and did the majority of their dating and family formation pre-social media and smartphones. The world has changed massively since then.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 12:31 AM
0

The idea that saving $30k for anything is impressive reveals a lot. I had $30k saved when I was 23 working fast food living with my parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 12:05 AM
–

Then it should be written into a contract and not be a vague "you do this and I'll maybe do this" deal. Sounds like a lot the issues you are talking about can be dodged with contractual obligations clearly delineated in writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 11:29 PM
–

You are making a case for single fatherhood via surrogacy unironically. Why should a man go though all of that when he can just pay a woman to have his kids and leave? He can then live off of savings raising his kid. It's more direct and honest than trying to argue that about deals that aren't even written down. If you want to go the contract route in the interest of preventing abuse, go all the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 11:25 PM
0

The fact that these women think 30k is a lot of money shows that they should be avoided.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 10:20 PM
1

The solution is to replace women with machines and automating reproduction. This is how the current trend of women refusing to have kids will be solved.The human female is not neccesary from an evolutionary standpoint once that technology become available. This will happen naturally as surrogacy, sexbots/AI companions, and eventually artificial wombs disrup​t the dating market. No femicide will be needed, it will be peaceful and similar to how horses where replaced as transportation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 04:32 AM
1

Why is it hard for women to just not fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 04:27 AM
1

You don't have to. Save as much as possible, consume as little as possible, and leave the gynocentric system as quickly as possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 04:22 AM
0

He understands risk enough to not get a job/career that is statistically more dangerous than average, despite his statements about relative risk going down over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 05:12 PM
3

Correct. And keep in mind that marriage is a voluntary agreement. It is not neccesary to have a productive and happy life. It's not even neccesary to have a kid, since you can do that a variety of other ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:56 PM
0

After a certain amount of years the year by year risk would considerably drop off. On top of that accounting for skill,carelessness and other factors, your flat percentage becomes something so ludicrously small that id personally take in a heartbeat. Your personal life choices show otherwise. Underwater pipeline welding pays incredibly well, much better than even a doctor in many cases. The only downside is the risk. If you have such a high risk tolerance, why aren't you doing something similar …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:53 PM
0

If there was a 3% chance of death per year over the course of your working life, would you still work or would you seek a different field of employment? This doesn't include severe dismemberment (dead bedrooms) as a consequence of employment as well btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:01 PM
1

OP, what is your occupation?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 03:53 PM
1

Yeah but don't you think sexbots (once advanced enough) along with state supported childcare/childbirth is a combo worthy of trying for men like you? I mean, women are everywhere, but women are still women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 01:16 AM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 04:16 AM
0

Yeah, I can see your point, but why would that matter in a society where all reproduction is artificial? Is talking to women really a skill a guy living in such a place needs?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 04:12 AM
0

My argument was as convincing as it needed to be. You don't believe in self determination if it poses a threat to your ideology and ego. The real reason you don't like the idea has very little to with any real concern about collective mineral rights or whatever political garbage you want to spew next. You are simply worried that such a place will grow to be such a good place to live that it will outcompete your society and thus invalidate your beliefs. You can't see blackpillers succeed because …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 04:08 AM
1

A mining town in Siberia is the opposite of self-perpetuating. An operation like that would be heavily reliant on importation for everything under the sun to function. It's likely an even worse idea than setting up on a remote island. You literally didn't think a single aspect of your plan through. You are weirdly obsessed with making this society as unpleasant as humanly possible when they can just live normally with no issues. If you are so hellbent on them being independent, then they can jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:58 AM
2

Got to make safeguards man. If anything, women trying to get in (and failing because the newest sexbots suck harder than a dyson) will prove our point right. Just got to get more money for them sexbots and artificial wombs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:31 AM
0

If you were serious about it, you'd already be dead from fighting it. See you in two weeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:27 AM
1

This is the first time I see the "blackpill" defined like that. The blackpill isn't tradcon. There is no movement, no common goals, just a bunch of disenfranchised guys realizing they have no place in this society and finding copes to deal with their situation. There is no collective movement. The blackpill can be many different things because its so vague. Separatism from women due to blackpill truths would surely fall under that term. As far as collective movements, there are none yet, but tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:24 AM
0

Why would men want there to be no women in society just because they have given up on dating? I don't think there are that many men who are being productive in the society they currently live in that would want to uproot everything just so they don't have to see women any more. It's the same guys who subscribe to MGTOW ideology. Many of them already shun women. This is just the next step, withdrawal of taxes and labor. You might not get the psychology, but I can definitely see it, especially onc…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:14 AM
1

Are you asking me if I oppose a state that refuses to admit people based on characteristics they cannot change about themselves, has conditional citizenship based on behavior, and endorses labor camps? Why the fuck wouldn't I oppose that? I'm asking you if people have the right voluntarily separate and group into their own spaces. The state aspect is irrelevant. Either you believe in self determination or you don't. And you want this godforsaken hellhole to just be given our natural resources at…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:01 AM
2

The women only communes still exist in some areas, but they aren't as common as they used to be. And they really were just communes at the end of the day. I don't really consider them separatists. If you travel down a road paved by males to your male built building where you teach radical feminism, you aren't practicing real separatism. Real separatism would be going to a undeveloped place, building all the infrastructure and related facilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 02:53 AM
0

I mean, citizenship of children born and such will be handled during the initial contract phase of any agreement with a host country. My original idea was to have the zone be autonomous in governance, but not a full fledged country. It would still be under the host nation's military umbrella for example. So we can just assume the children born will be born with the citizenship of the host nation. Embryos would be sex selected prior to gestation. No chance of daughters to avoid any messy problems…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 02:44 AM
0

Do you truly expect that your newborns will still be granted us citizenship? They'll be granted citizenship of whatever the host country is, depending on the specifics of the agreement of course. US citizenship itself is also overrated if you have money. US tax law is insane on expats. It's why lots of passport bros end up surrendering their citizenship if they have wealth. I plan on renouncing mine when I leave, after I buy my new citizenship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 02:30 AM
0

Contracted surrogates and eventually artificial wombs. Surrogates can be either in a special area within the city/zone or outside the zone.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 02:15 AM
1

What? Who decided that? NVIDIA alone employs like 30k people. The total number of miners in all of the USA is less than half of that. Some mines only have a couple of hundred people working in them. Where the fuck are you even supposed to find a mine that can employ more people than NVIDIA, let alone have enough money to buy it? NVIDIA employs that many people globally. Not in one spot. NVIDIA is also impossible without ExxonMobil, ASML, Energy Transfer, the various miners they source their sili…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 02:14 AM
0

If the guy actually believes bluepill shit, why would he stay in the first place? Why not emigrate ASAP? I assume the man is born there and not an immigrant. If he's an immigrant, it makes even less sense. The only answer would be if he is trying to spread that toxic ideology to his brothers in an attempt to make the zone just like everywhere else on Earth. It's about subversion. You can be a bluepilled feminist everywhere. Why be one here? How would the morals of the men in the country be monit…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:48 AM
1

Good points. But what kind of people would be opting to live in your male only society? Can you honestly say these are not going to be mostly people with mental problems? Mental problems is a bit fast and lose. Most of the guys will definately be neurodivergent, so they'll be mentally "off" to normies. But in a society of men similar to them, it's not that bad. Like I said to another user, the chronically ill NEETs are not the target. The target are the guys who gave up on dating but still go th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:37 AM
0

So you are against this voluntary society existing altogether? Does it threaten your way of life in some way? Let's say you had 30,000 incels from your country leave and go there. Are you for bombing them out of existence despite doing nothing to you? Or are you okay with it until their society becomes richer than yours?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:27 AM
0

Good to see you here too. Do these men have no libido or no drive to have romantic relationships or even just female companions? They wouldn't have female companions to begin with. This society will made up of leftover males who are otherwise productive but romantically unsuccessful. If women disappeared from a state for a year most men would either self delete or start fucking each other. A sizable majority of the emigres to this place have no ties to the female sex beyond their mothers and oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:22 AM
13

There are male only societies on earth called prisons, and they are hell not so much because you can't get out, but because of what a male only society is like. Are you sure it's because prisons are filled with men, or is it because prisons are filled with criminals? Are female prisons great places to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:04 AM
0

I don't think most men are interested in the fact that they are just spreading their genes, they want the sense of providing and protecting for their families, having a loving wife, see their kids grow, etc. In both environments, you are not going to get that so why would you wageslave? To be fair, the labor camps will only be for bluepilled men who severely threaten the ideological integrity of the project. Most of the time they'll just get exiled to some feminist shithole. The whole point of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 01:00 AM
2

The environment that you describe isn't "blackpill" which means giving up and embracing the suck, it is a state with clear values and goals that has expectations from its members. The members are not blackpilled, they wake up every day and have a sense of meaning and purpose. If feel like we are arguing over semantics here. Blackpill can run the gamut between self deletion to self improvement as far as praxis is concerned. The praxis here is male separatism as consequence of blackpill science. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:52 AM
1

How is it not? Is this a serious question? How can a society that you voluntarily join be dystopian? You know what an actual male-only society would look like? Monastic orders, where they work, pray, and drink beer for their entire lives. We had those for centuries. Yeah and they worked pretty well. Modern science traces some its roots back to these great places. If this was a serious want of these men to live in their own society, they could just pool their money together and buy an island or j…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:39 AM
1

Nobody is forced to live under it though. You can leave at any time. You also have to apply to join. You are treating this like it's some kind of imperialist state that coming to throw women into ovens. Its not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:18 AM
-8

Hypothetically though, if it were to exist, you wouldn't be against its existence, right? Lets say that the society actually survives and becomes very successful and wealthy, much like Singapore. You wouldn't force these men to reintegrate women into their society, would you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:14 AM
1

You can't have a functioning state with a "blackpill" ideology. Most guys will be playing video games and jerking off to porn instead of working and contributing back. I mean, why would they do that if they were raised in the environment from the beginning? Think of it from the perspective of a boy born in such a place. Would the blackpill regarding women really be that crushing, or would it be the same as you or I learning about how some ancient civilization functioned prior to modern technolog…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:10 AM
0

How is it a dystopia?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:05 AM
1

I think MGTOW should be renamed to male liberation (note; not related to men's lib) or male separatism. MGTOW seems like an outdated description of what makes up the majority of its modern adherents (male blackpillers who gave up on hetro relationships, incel or volcel). I know blackpillers aren't liked here, but it makes sense from a blackpiller/incel perspective to be a male separatist. You don't really gain by sharing a society with a group of people that hate you.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 09:40 AM
2

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 04:05 PM
2

Its not just capitalism. There is a concerted effort afoot to destroy and marginalize men's only spaces. We can speculate why those forces are doing this, but it is a fact that men's only spaces have been systematically eliminated.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 03:56 PM
3

Correct. OP and others like him are purposefully missing this point because it would reveal their true motivations.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 03:48 PM
2

Tell women to stop breaking apart men's only spaces then. Tell women to let their husbands and boyfriends hang out with single men and to stop trying to manage their man's social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 03:31 PM
2

Here's what I think: men are lonely because men don't care to meet and build healthy, supportive, platonic relationships with other men. Men wouldn't feel so isolated, so unsupported, so down on themselves if they didn't look at women as the sole providers of emotional support and understanding. Men just don't do enough work to cultivate positive relationships with other men, and I believe the reason for this is that men are too motivated by the prospect of sex as a reward for doing the emotiona…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 03:23 PM
1

It's more likely that a male separatist state or city is formed than women taking accountability or gynocentric society holding women accountable. Its also more likely than a majority of men boycotting sexual and romantic relations with women to try and change women's behavior. Thus, we have few options here. I don't see a path forward any longer where coexistence is mutually beneficial for both sexes., at least for a significant portion of one sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/25 12:37 PM
2

The problem is that it becomes society's problem eventually, whether that's reflected in the fatherless kids straining the public welfare system, or criminals filling the jails. Motherhood is a societal problem, not an individual problem, and letting women have complete control over who breeds has led to terrible results.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/25 10:12 PM
2

I say that we should go even further down that path and try to replace women altogether so the same mistakes don't get repeated. Artificial wombs for children and sexbots for sexual needs. Widespread single fatherhood and the promotion of father advocacy groups. Maybe even a male separatist state or city.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 03:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter