| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | This is currently on Buzzfeed's "explore" section on Snapchat. Lets joke about cutting up men's penises and feeding them to people! So funny!Is baby foreskin the key to youthful skin? Harvesting and selling human body parts for commercial purposes basically - no problem! | /r/MensRights | 21/02/16 09:14 PM |
| 9 | This is currently on Buzzfeed's "explore" section on Snapchat. Lets joke about cutting up men's penises and feeding them to people! So funny!FYI babies' forcilby removed foreskins are used to make face creams for older women so while this is a silly joke, there is something very similar happening IRL with very few people questioning the ethics behind it. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/16 08:59 PM |
| 0 | New Danish research shows circumcised boys are about 50% more likely to develop Autism.The cultural/ethnic background parameter is addressed in the study. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/15 03:04 AM |
| 4 | Shaming MRA's For Disagreeing Is Not Okay, and the Issue of Male CircumcisionDo you need to "prove" harm? I wonder why these babies are screaming their lungs out, maybe they're enjoying themselves? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oCFrw5N-44 I'm sorry to reiterate this but ALL forms of genital cutting on female minors are banned, even nicking the clitoris without removing any living tissue. It has no long term consequences, but it's still a human rights violation regardless of any argument one may want to put forward to defend it. Generally speaking, handling someone's ge… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/15 07:00 AM |
| 5 | Shaming MRA's For Disagreeing Is Not Okay, and the Issue of Male CircumcisionNo, they didn't find more harm than good, it's banned on Human Rights grounds as NGOs have put pressure and succeeded to get it outlawed.These particular human rights are easier to conceive for girls because they can be more easily seen as a victim of sexual abuse, which genital mutilation is. The taboo around male circumcision being criticized for what it is is all about religion and the power it wields in politics, there is no need to add "female" before genital mutilation to make it a bad thi… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/15 06:38 AM |
| 3 | Shaming MRA's For Disagreeing Is Not Okay, and the Issue of Male CircumcisionAS someone who was mutilated by a mohel for religious beliefs that I do not share at all, coercive circumcision of children goes against freedom of religion, which is an individual right, not a free pass to harm or brand others with your ideas, even if they are your kids. It's child abuse, and that's the way it's viewed for female circumcision. Same standards should apply once again, just because a religion is held in higher regards in the West, doesn't mean its followers should get a free pass … | /r/MensRights | 07/01/15 06:29 AM |
| 1 | Shaming MRA's For Disagreeing Is Not Okay, and the Issue of Male CircumcisionThat's not what I'm saying, women can get labiaplasties, clitoral reduction, clitoroplexy, vaginoplasty, etc...when they are 18 and over and I have no problem with that whatsoever. these things would be called FGM if they were done in other contexts. The same standards should apply for male circumcision/MGM, adults can do it if that's their wish, but don't do it to children just because you're in a position to overpower them. The practice would die out very quickly if coercion was not involved. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/15 06:14 AM |
| 2 | Shaming MRA's For Disagreeing Is Not Okay, and the Issue of Male CircumcisionThe only reason circumcision (full excision of the foreskin) is even a thing is because it's mentioned in the Bible. It's an extremely invasive treatment for what rare problems people say it cures (himosis mostly, but there's a huge cultural component involved, in Denmark only 1 in 16 000 men get surgery on their foreskin for "medical reasons"), and most people who get it done were perfectly fine before so it has no justification in this regard anyway. What you are saying here about investigatin… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/15 05:45 AM |
| 14 | Another Baby Gets Herpes From Dangerous Haredi Circumcision PracticeIt's interesting that "freedom of religion" is considered absolute when it's a boy and used to defend this practice, which happens with the knowledge and benediction of the city and state ( see here), but it can't be used at all to defend even the least invasive form of FGM. Where do you draw the line? Is freedom of religion dependant on gender? Is cocksucking blood from a newborn too much? There would be a 20 year prison sentence attached to this practice if these sick pervs didn't hide under t… | /r/MensRights | 25/12/14 08:20 AM |
| 2 | What's the Deal With Circumcision?Oh I was not asking for cheap digs, is that really all you've got? I assume you take offense at the idea of a ban based on "religious freedom", except that religious freedom is taken away from the child who undergoes genital mutilation for religious reasons which have no meaning for him at this point. That would be valid regardless of religion or gender. So is religion a good excuse for coercive genital mutilation of children, yes or no? | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 05:25 PM |
| 3 | What's the Deal With Circumcision?What exactly is "antisemtic" about wanting children from jewish parents to have the same protection under the law as other kids ( that is what it is in Europe where people are circumcised only for religious reasons).? As someone who was mutilated by a mohel I take offense at such statements, freedom of religion is an individual right, if your belief is that you should have a part of your cock cut off to please your God then by all means do it, but a 8 day old child does not hold these beliefs an… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 05:14 PM |
| 1 | What's the Deal With Circumcision?i guess you mean ear | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 03:28 PM |
| 6 | What's the Deal With Circumcision?Most circumcised women have no issue with it either, there are even protests AGAINST banning female genital mutilation organized by cut women. http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/?articleID=2000123627&story_title=Kenya:%20over-500-maasai-women-protest-fgm-ban https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu1gmUuDniU That does not make it OK, you need to wrap your head around the fact that it's a children's rights issue, how you feel about it does not matter, at all. Just don't force it on someone else, that's all … | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 03:14 PM |
| 5 | What's the Deal With Circumcision?I'd probably still make the decision to be circumcised personally. Very unlinkely like I said, what you are saying here is very influenced by your current status. Why would you consider that part of your body abnorma if you had grown up with itl? Are you religious? It's a children's rights issue, nobody gives a fuck if an adult man wants to get circumcised if he's been properly informed. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 03:00 PM |
| 3 | What's the Deal With Circumcision?You probably think it looks better because you are already cut and you want to think of it in a positive way, plus it's all you've ever known. The problem with it is that it's forced, when there is no coercion involved, less than 1% of adults choose to have a part of their dick cut off. Now you don't remember having t so you wouldn't consider it a part of your dick, but it was at some point, and if you still had it you probably wouldn't feel the need to chop it off. Some circumcisions do more da… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 02:51 PM |
| 6 | Expecting father with questions about my son-to-beThe USA is the only country that routinely practices circumcision at birth in hospitals for non religious reasons, whatever argument they put forward now, keep in mind that it first popped up there to make masturbation more difficult and sex less enjoyable. Most circumcised men are not conscious of it and they do fap, but that was the intent originally. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Masturbation_concerns http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 Chart It's a childre… | /r/MensRights | 11/11/14 11:20 AM |
| 20 | U.S. Will Spend $24.5M to Circumcise Men in SwazilandConfirmed Circumcised men abandoning condoms after circumcision campaigns in Africa and Circumcised men less likely to use condoms (not just in Africa) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23514832 | /r/MensRights | 01/11/14 07:23 PM |
| 14 | What is your opinion on male circumcision?It's rape with a knife and the rapist takes away a piece of you so you can never enjoy sex like you would have if you had it still. Unless it's consensual in which case it may be called plastic surgery. I know many guys say they are circumcised and fine, many circumcised women say the same - the fact is adults are not queuing to get it done so it only keeps happening on such a wide scale because it's done to babies. "He won't remember", that's the same argument used for date rape drugs. The scar… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/14 10:33 PM |
| 0 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Men have the right to be bare chested in most cities whereas women don't and can be arrested because their body is sexualized, even though the same body parts were being exposed...hmmm It's more of an institutional discrimination anyway, all structures of power tend to be male-dominated because of nepotism and misogyny among rich white men, things are changing very slowly. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 11:52 AM |
| -7 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.The problem with patriarchal concepts of gender roles is tthe fact that they tend to be coercive and toxic, surreptitiously. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 09:58 AM |
| -2 | Man vs Man: Thunderf00t exposes Stefan MolyneuxI said he was creepy because of his videos on Sarkeesian which were borderline harassment, I don't know how many he produced but the last one made me unsubscribe. I must have liked this guy at some point, probably for his atheist views but I think he went too far on this particular case. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 09:14 AM |
| -5 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Another person called you out on this logical fallacy in the thread about patriarchy, you could say the same about colonialism and slavery . Justifying shitty stuff a posteriori by saying there was no way around it is pointless and doesn't bring your argument any further. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 08:16 AM |
| -3 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Strictly speaking, yes. ? No you don't. Making stuff up again. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 07:58 AM |
| -1 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.If you have not seen it yet, it's safe to say that there is no hope for you. It's the major problem of this sub, it's very unfortunate because you guys are fighting for some legitimate stuff sometimes but it's too often overshadowed by misogyny and whining about feminism. You should ban this rhetoric altogether, it's counterproductive. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 07:55 AM |
| 0 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Your sorry ass wouldn't be alive today without patriarchal societies Do you have proof that I would not be alive today without a patriarchal society or are you talking out of YOUR SORRY ASS? Unless you have managed to live in an alternate universe you have no clue what you are talking about, it's like praising white people for the development in colonized countries without realizing the damage they have caused and how they have blocked endogenous development and ideas, also ignoring the centurie… | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 07:32 AM |
| -1 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Patriarchy is bad either way, abrahamic religions which are patriarchal in the biblical sense are a crock of shit My ass is not sorry and is not up for gambling. You don't know what the world would be now if women had not been oppressed for such a long time, maybe we'd have better technology and an Iphone 27 already. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 07:31 AM |
| -2 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.The standards and norms it has set still exist even if the power structures have changed a little. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 06:59 AM |
| -2 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Patriarchy pre-dates feminism look at the other comments on this topic. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 06:41 AM |
| -2 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.That's cold :( | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 06:20 AM |
| 0 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Well to be fair what do you guys do to benefit women? Thank you for taking the time to address her points though. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/14 06:20 AM |
| -8 | Man vs Man: Thunderf00t exposes Stefan MolyneuxYeah I'll even say he should get a haircut, how about that? | /r/MensRights | 03/10/14 10:56 PM |
| -13 | Man vs Man: Thunderf00t exposes Stefan MolyneuxThunderf00t is creepy with his obsessive videos on Anita Sarkeesian, and Molyneux - who does make sense sometimes -talks out of his ass quite often and seems to have a grudge against women as a whole. Overall I shall not watch this video, unsubscribed from both channels a while ago and it's better for my sanity. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/14 10:44 PM |
| -2 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.She wants to address men's issues through the fight against patriarchy and views men's rights as a hate group (there are definitely a few misogynistic people among your ranks, I see it when visiting this sub from time to time) , but the same could be said about some branches of feminism. I re-posted this video to focus on the content of what she says, not on her tone. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/14 07:24 PM |
| -1 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Well I'm not saying that contemporary feminism as a whole is awesome but if you think that it's a good idea to frame debates in terms of Feminists VS MRAs, go on, I don't think it's going to yield many positive results, and that's not a good angle at all to tackle problems IMO. It has earnt you a very bad reputation outside of this sub, maybe stop blaming everything on women and look at who set these rules in place and how you can address them. A good example of that is genital mutilation, it's … | /r/MensRights | 03/10/14 07:07 PM |
| -3 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Your hate towards Big Red is blinding you. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/14 06:52 PM |
| -3 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Because in the feminist sense the way it hurts women is emphasized, I think it hurts both and that's what I'm trying to bring attention to. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/14 06:46 PM |
| -3 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.This sums it up pretty well http://i.imgur.com/zFwAcdB.jpg | /r/MensRights | 03/10/14 06:21 PM |
| -4 | Unpopular opinion: I think that when you put all the rudeness aside, the Lady Red is right, what you guys need to fight is patriarchy for the most part.Patriarchy was not invented by feminists, the term has been used for a very long time in history and anthropology to describe societies where men have most of the power and set standards accordingly. As society evolves and demands for equal rights grow, you get to see that the concept of patriarchy assigns a certain role to males that can be harmful and oppressive for both men and women. I don't necessarily use it in a feminist sense, abrahamic religions for instance are described as patriarchal… | /r/MensRights | 03/10/14 06:18 PM |
| 8 | Question from a woman about circumcisionPro-female circumcision activists actually use the fact that infant male genital mutilation is allowed in the West, as all forms of FGM, even the ones that are less invasive than a male circumcision, are banned they say it is banned on grounds of racism/ethnocentrism or if you prefer, the fact that some cultures are assumed to be more valid than others and get free passes for it. http://www.fuambaisiaahmadu.com/ And they are right, because even this is allowed to happen with the support of US po… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/14 11:47 AM |
| 1 | Male Circumcision IS comparable and equitable to female circumcision.What do you mean by "trying to legalize"? I don't think they have tried anything legally (going to court) They'd only have grounds to do it because MGM is legal in the West, completely overlooking child abuse laws, medical standards ( most circumcisers practice surgery illegally in Europe) and medical ethics too. That's not because it affects boys but because it's practiced in a religion that's established and respected when the ones that practice FGM can easily be dismissed as barbaric with no … | /r/MensRights | 28/09/14 02:46 AM |
| 1 | Male Circumcision IS comparable and equitable to female circumcision.I don't identify as an MRA and I do have issues with some of the things that have been written here but the problem I have is that you say drawing parallels means "equating" when we are talking strictly on a Human Rights playing field where the two practices are perfectly comparable. For me it's neither a feminist nor a MRA issue, I examine these stuff through the prism of Children's Rights. I think people compare coercive FGM in the West (illegal, barbaric) with coercive MGM in the West,(encour… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/14 01:58 AM |
| 2 | Male Circumcision IS comparable and equitable to female circumcision.That reasoning makes no sense because every single culture that practices FGM does MGM as well and if they don't do one in the hospital they won't bother going there for the other one either. See the pile of 888 dead bodies here from a single province in South Africa (where they only practice MGM), and then you can click on complications to see the outcome for those who survived, keeping in mind that all the ones who had gangrene had to have it completely chopped off afterwards. http://ulwaluko.… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/14 12:59 AM |
| 0 | Male Circumcision IS comparable and equitable to female circumcision.As of now it's not banned, neither in Sweden nor in Denmark nor anywhere in the world, it's nice to use google but maybe click on the search results to see the details. They are part of the EU I don't think they'll manage that but I hope they do. Having a doctor present while the mohel mutilates the baby in no way means that it's banned. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/14 09:45 PM |
| 1 | Male Circumcision IS comparable and equitable to female circumcision.Non medical circumcision is not banned anywhere AFAIK because jews always rise up to say it's "antisemitic" to not allow them to mutilate their children ( how horrible and discriminatory is it to wish that all children have the same rights regardless of their ethnicity or parents' religion...).Which country would that be? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/14 09:19 PM |
| 4 | Male Circumcision IS comparable and equitable to female circumcision.You should watch this debate that was broadcasted on Australian TV, several circumcised women and gynecologists were invited (you can assume these people are qualified to talk on the subject), it gives an interesting insight on the practice. You are misinformed on a few points. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cu1gmUuDniU Also I don't think you'd be OK with FGM being practiced in hospitals on minors ( which already happens) even if it "prevented infections" (which we don't know because thankfully… | /r/MensRights | 27/09/14 08:21 PM |
| 58 | Male Circumcision IS comparable and equitable to female circumcision.I'd just like to point out that male circumcision keeps happening not because of feminists but mostly because of circumcised men (father's circumcision status is one of the biggest influences in the parental "decision"). In cultures that mutilate girls too, the practice keeps going because of women ( the Western narrative that men are forcing their wives to do it is mostly false) I agree with most of your post otherwise, but it doesn't need to be framed from the angle that feminism is the proble… | /r/MensRights | 27/09/14 05:37 PM |
| -9 | Oregon woman used box cutter and pliers to circumcise son at homeShe was only doing it for the good of her kid! I say let her go, those Bible stories are so inspiring - if a 99yo man is agile enough to cut his own cock, his son's and his slaves' I can't see why this godly woman wouldn't be able to do the same in the comfort of her own home. It's her child after all. Now at least the kid is cleaner, he won't have to shower or use condoms and he won't be made fun of in the locker room :) | /r/MensRights | 22/09/14 06:48 AM |
| 3 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.I don't quite understand why people who think it's a non-issue even bother clicking on articles about it. You are pro - forced genital mutilation as you stated above, you don't find a lot of validation for your choices here so you say it "derails" and makes the sub unpopular...It's rather preposterous really. There are many other subs who discuss this issue as well and align with these positions, they just don't take it from the angle of systemic oppression. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/14 12:23 AM |
| 2 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.the majority of prozac to treat premature ejaculation (as opposed to depression) is prescribed to uncircumcised males Now I'd like to see a source for that , mine was Pfizer's annual report, it did not correlate with circumcision status, just the country... It would be very weird if they gathered such data. It's not more painful as an adult than as a baby (besides the fact that less than 1% of adults choose to get circumcised so why do you assume he would?), babies feel pain more than adults do … | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 11:51 PM |
| 6 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.Medical professionals are supposed to treat diseases/illnesses/malformations. Performing a non-therapeutic surgery on a healthy baby with no problems is indeed mutilation, or you can call it "plastic surgery" (although there's not much improvement http://i.imgur.com/J7rhb.jpg) if a person freely chooses to do it to herself. Plastic surgery on children is banned AFAIK, dentists don't extract normal teeth, the appendix is not removed at birth. Moot comparisons. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 11:48 PM |
| 0 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.I am circumcised actually and if you don't see a scar or callusing you are simply ignorant on these matters. If there as no callusing you could not stand the chaffing against your underwear, and of course there is a scar, surgery leaves scars. http://i.imgur.com/J7rhb.jpg (nsfw) See the difference? Another study on circumcision and how it affects women in a culture where it's not as fetishized. http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/06/13/ije.dyr104.abstract On the lasting longer (disp… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 11:36 PM |
| 2 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.The negative outcome is that you lose your foreskin 100% of the time (that's not counting the numerous complications involved) and the sexual organs get externalized and callused, and it does harm the child as he comes out of it with an injury a scar and a missing body part, the most sensitive one of his genitalia. Would you consider cutting an extra part of the current penis you have now for preventative measures ? Which one? You can always tighten up a circumcision you know. Less tissue= less … | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 11:18 PM |
| 1 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.If you had not been circumcised, you would certainly not consider it a "reasonable precaution to take", besides it is pointless to be circumcised if you wear condoms and those African RCT studies are extremely dubious anyway. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/221818829_Sub-Saharan_African_randomised_clinical_trials_into_male_circumcision_and_HIV_transmission_methodological_ethical_and_legal_concerns/links/0046352b8cd860586a000000 I know it's common in America, I also know why it became pop… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 11:03 PM |
| 7 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.Penile cancer occurs somewhere between 1 n 100 000 to 1 in 250 000 men depending on the country, Finland having a lower rate than the US for instance despite the fact that they don't mutilate their children. So there goes your "carcinogenic" argument. If you live your life in fear of penile cancer you can get vaccinated against the strains of HPV that cause it - the vaccine is called Gardasil Langherans cells ( from this dubious study that pathologized the foreskin as the culprit for HIV transmi… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 10:39 PM |
| 6 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.Australia's rate of circumcision has been drastically reduced in the past few decades, the prevalence was 12% in 2003 despite their infamous homegrown whackjob Brian Morris who thinks it should become mandatory for newborns. It's no longer provided in public hospitals in this country. In South Africa circumcision is practiced mostly by the Xhosa people as a ritual of initiation that makes you become a "man", it causes quite a few problems. Botched circumcisions claimed 496 lives and there were 2… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 10:00 PM |
| 4 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.You can remove parts of the clitoral glans (external part) but removing the clitoris which is mostly an internal organ sure doesn't happen anywhere, the person would die instantly. See It's horrendous nevertheless, but saying "removal of the whole clitoris" is incorrect | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 09:28 PM |
| 3 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.You had hypospadias it seems...? Yes like I said some rare conditions can require cutting a very tiny portion of it but full excision of the foreskin, which is about 50% of the penis' surface is never medically required and therefore I don't consider this operation ever "medically necessary" when there are always less invasive/destructive options available. Plus the hypospadias surgery has a rather high rate of complications, you got lucky if you didn't have one, this guy for instance had to und… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 06:58 PM |
| 4 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.There is not a single condition that I'm aware of that requires full excision of the foreskin, it's just a religious ritual that has crept its way into "medicine". In Finland 1 in 16 667 men have to undergo surgery on their foreskin over the course of their life. So that "medical purpose" is very much a matter of culture, namely the fact that this body part is considered optional/pathological in places where most people don't have it. Phimosis/tight foreskin, the excuse most commonly used (even … | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 06:32 PM |
| 10 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.How can you go unharmed when your cock is missing a part and you're bleeding in your diapers? There is an injury, a scar, and a piece of you in the trash can - that's a pretty good sign of harm . | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 04:38 PM |
| 6 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.I didn't, perhaps he was still training on me though... I hope he read you this cute text | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 04:36 PM |
| 23 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.Penile cancer occurs somewhere between 1 in 100 000 to 1 in 250 000 men. depending on the country ( Finland has lower rates than the US and they don't cut anyone) It can be prevented (although it's really not needed considering this stat) using the same vaccine we have against the types of HPV that cause cervical cancer, Gardasil... Urinary tract infections are 4x more common in girls than they are in boys because their urethra is shorter. What do we do when they get one? We give them antibiotic… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 03:57 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone have any articles on the ethics of neonatal circumcision?Thanks for the gold! I've found one of Kira Antinuk's articles in full text, she won a nursing ethics prize for it, see here | /r/MensRights | 04/09/14 09:17 AM |
| 6 | Does anyone have any articles on the ethics of neonatal circumcision?George Denniston, MD, wrote " Circumcision and the Code of Ethics" where he argues that it violates medical ethics on several levels, including the Hippocratic Oath which includes "primo non nocere" (first do no harm) http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/denniston/ http://www.circumcision.org/ethics.htm You can find books/articles by Marilyn Milos (RN), Kira Antinuk is another registered nurse who writes on the subject but most of her articles are behind a paywall. Sami Aldeeb's book (Law professo… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/14 08:44 AM |
| 2 | Guardian: What kind of men support FGM? An illustrated guide. — Filthy man-hating article blaming men for FGM. And it's the "nothing like male circumcision" lie told again.The similarity of the cultural rationales for child genital cutting is why ending nontherapeutic forced male infant genital cutting in the first world is the strongest action that can be taken against female child genital cutting in the third world. Very well said, female circumcision activists actually use this double standard when they demand "equal treatment" and in the current situation, having equal rights would mean allowing girls to be mutilated when they are still children, which obvious… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/14 09:44 PM |
| 15 | Guardian: What kind of men support FGM? An illustrated guide. — Filthy man-hating article blaming men for FGM. And it's the "nothing like male circumcision" lie told again.Hmmm OK The Guardian likes to run pieces about FGM while keeping MGM in high regards because it's a jewish tradition that they don't have the balls to criticize. The fact is, FGM victims defend it the same way cut men do, and it's not true either that all societies that practice FGM are patriarchal (see the Sande society in Sierra Leone for instance), and yes this practice is run by women mostly. Why do you feel the right to police these cultures while you protect the jewish one? Either you have… | /r/MensRights | 01/08/14 11:41 AM |
| 5 | All-in-one penile circumcision and suturing device. Makes an ideal birthday or christmas present. Available in 5 sizes.You'd also have to look into HOW they market it, people who wouldn't want to do it had an "health intervention" here where they were told about the "benefits" but not any risk apparently, I don't think the inherent destructive nature of the operation was explained either, they don't mention these anywhere in the full text... I think the participants of this study were not properly explained what a circumcision was, nor were they given the data on the diseases it is supposed to prevent, because I… | /r/MensRights | 20/07/14 09:23 PM |
| 3 | All-in-one penile circumcision and suturing device. Makes an ideal birthday or christmas present. Available in 5 sizes.I don't really understand this study...? How can "reduced risk of penile cancer" be an argument when you know it affects somewhere between 1 in 100 000 to 1 in 250 000 men ? o_O Have they told them that, or shown or explained what a circumcision is ? It's certainly not common knowledge in China. Also the research seems very biased For those who classified as refusing MC, a health education intervention, including the explanation of the benefits of MC and knowledge of circumcision was carried out… | /r/MensRights | 20/07/14 06:00 PM |
| 3 | Doing a paper on the moral and ethical issues of male circumcision - need your help!Brian Earp - The Ethics of infant male circumcision https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeV8DfRdW1s This video explains the role of the foreskin in Human anatomy from a neurological and cellular point of view https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DD2yW7AaZFw#t=32 George Denniston, MD, made a paper on how routine circumcision goes against medical ethics http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/denniston/ Sami Aldeeb's book is very complete from a legal and cultural point of view, he's a Palestinian Christian Law… | /r/MensRights | 08/07/14 03:47 PM |
| 2 | Israeli Rabbi calls for the genital mutilation of hundreds of Palestinian men as an act of revenge. Male "circumcision" now a weapon of war.I think they intend to mutilate them post mortem and bring the penis parts as trophies...It's a bit sordid. | /r/MensRights | 03/07/14 06:21 PM |
| 0 | Uganda: Gulu Wives Reject Circumcised MenSurely the people who design this ad campaign know this, seems like they are purposefully misleading people. perhaps so that they can obtain data later on that their circumcision campaign "worked to prevent HIV transmission", when the man hasn't been exposed to the virus at all... There were hints in this direction already in their clinical trials , more married men in the circumcised group than in the control one. This is the shittiest health campaign I have ever come across, made even worse by… | /r/MensRights | 28/06/14 01:29 AM |
| 7 | Uganda: Gulu Wives Reject Circumcised MenSo there is an important question that needs to be asked here This is an ad/poster that's on display in men's urinals in that lovely land of Uganda. My question is as follows. Her husband got cut so that they would both have "less chances of getting HIV". Where is HIV supposed to come from if you are a seronegative married couple? Does she expect him to screw around with HIV+ sex workers in his free time? Or is that her hobby? Because that's the only way he or she are going to get infected, HIV … | /r/MensRights | 27/06/14 08:04 PM |
| 11 | 100 peer-reviewed scientific studies have found male circumcision painful, traumatic, or psychologically harmful to men and boysA circumcision may qualify as "medical" when there is a problem to treat in the first place. Routine circumcision is not medical per se, you can say it's a destructive cosmetic surgery if you want, but cutting a healthy child open when he has no disease or malformation to begin with is not proper medicine, it doesn't treat anything. And even if there is a problem with the foreskin ( which is extremely rare, 0.6% of boys have been affected by phimosis by age 15), there are other ways to cure it w… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 02:59 PM |
| 8 | 100 peer-reviewed scientific studies have found male circumcision painful, traumatic, or psychologically harmful to men and boysI knew at 5 yo that there was something wrong with my penis. WHen I was told I was circumcised I was about 7yo,I felt very violated already and knew it was wrong. My grandfather had a photo album of this that he wanted to show me, I got very angry and asked why they did this to me .I went back to his room, took the photo album to burn it as in my view (now) it's people keeping some kind of BDSM child porn about me. It was not medical, it was not a doctor, there was no anesthesia, and no reason t… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 02:23 PM |
| 9 | 100 peer-reviewed scientific studies have found male circumcision painful, traumatic, or psychologically harmful to men and boysThe skin was scaly and the scar is just very bad and uneven with a neuroma, which was recently confirmed by a urologist ( my foreskin was torn apart with fingernails, jewish ritual). I just knew that normal dicks were pointy through swimsuits and I had...that, which on top of being a circumcised dick which I never wanted, is a botched circumcised dick. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 02:08 PM |
| 10 | 100 peer-reviewed scientific studies have found male circumcision painful, traumatic, or psychologically harmful to men and boysI started having negative thoughts about it when I was 5, I thought my penis looked dead or diseased because of the very bad scarring. AT that point I didn't even know I had been circumcised, I couldn't read and I only got access to those studies 15 years later. I also found out that when I started having sex that my penis was not sensitive at all, as in blowjobs either don't do anything for me or they are painful, because too much tissue was removed during the circumcision. This is VERY difficu… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 01:58 PM |
| 6 | 100 peer-reviewed scientific studies have found male circumcision painful, traumatic, or psychologically harmful to men and boysWell we can work on promoting such an approach, it's the one that's used for girls already...It makes sense, the effort is not to push a ban on circumcision, but an age restriction at 18 if the child wants to have it done by his own free will. The current approach of religious freedom I have heard , last time it was debated in Europe was rabbis saying "banning infant circumcision would be the worst thing that happened to jews since the Holocaust". It's a bit of a stretch, and how obscene is that… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 11:18 AM |
| 13 | 100 peer-reviewed scientific studies have found male circumcision painful, traumatic, or psychologically harmful to men and boysIt's not religious freedom as long as you consider it an individual right, not something you can inflict on someone else's body with a knife, even if it's your child. I'm all for religious freedom as long as it's not used to harm other people. I can say that as I was cut by a rabbi, and I'm an atheist now, my bodily integrity and my religious freedom were not respected, i never wanted to live with that mark or with the awful consequences it has had on me. Voices like mine get drown out by more v… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/14 11:09 AM |
| 27 | Circumcision Disasters - This is what happens when circumcision goes wrong. Male Genital Mutilation MUST stop!Phimosis (tight foreskin) occurs in 0.6% of boys and can be cured without surgery in 96% of cases. IN the extremely rare cases where someone would "need" an operation on his foreskin, a preputioplasty is more indicated as it fixes the problematic area ( the opening, actual "tip" of the penis) without removing half the penis' surface, or more like most circumcisions do. There is no medical reason to get a full circumcision (considering everything that's destroyed with a Gomco clamp, the most comm… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/14 06:07 AM |
| 26 | Circumcision Disasters - This is what happens when circumcision goes wrong. Male Genital Mutilation MUST stop!I hope this can somehow get attention on a main subreddit... These poor babies were healthy when they came in :( | /r/MensRights | 19/06/14 05:39 AM |
| 13 | If parents can circumcise men, why can't they give their boys a tattoo?Slicing off healthy body parts from your child is objectively called child abuse. Irreversibly harming a child physically is not a "parental decision". Unless he has a penis because some religions consider that all baby boys are born with a deformity that needs to be "fixed" despite the fact that all mammals, male and female, are born with a foreskin. As for the medical excuses for it, unless you are treating a disease/malformation you are out of the boundaries of the Hippocractic Oath and there… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 05:38 PM |
| 13 | If parents can circumcise men, why can't they give their boys a tattoo?Religious freedom is not a right that you can inflict on others by chopping off parts of their bodies. It is an individual right. Parents do not "own" their children's bodies, they are only custodians after birth. Precisely it goes against religious freedom to do this to children, you are putting a mark on them that they can never remove, and they will have to live with the consequences of these superstitions for the rest of their lives ( most are blissfully unaware of them of course). It's a bi… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/14 04:25 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision is a trans-issueDo you know how men's rights activists are perceived outside of this sub? Trans rights activism is not necessarily "sjw", some people do it wrong, some people have a measured discourse and do it right (see Andrea James, Laverne Cox or Calpernia Addams). Seems like you are discrediting this issue the same way your movement is unfortunately regarded as unimportant by most people, and you don't realize it :/ | /r/MensRights | 14/06/14 12:26 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision is a trans-issueYou do know that intactivists are perceived as SJW by most people, yes ? It's just a pan of people that are concerned by this issue, that you wouldn't necessarily think about to start with. Nobody said it ONLY mattered because it adversely impacts vaginoplasty, but , it's another reason why it does, and it might also help people understand the amount of damage a male circ does in strict terms of tissue removal. I don't think you have the right attitude on this, and saying that OP "undermines" in… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/14 12:13 AM |
| 4 | Circumcision is a trans-issueThis is unfortunately true, trans women who have had a circumcision at birth often have to go through vaginoplasty that uses a part of their intestines due to lack of genital tissue :/ http://www.peyroniecenter.it/Transsexualism-male-to-female-rectosigma-vaginoplasty Intact males who become trans women do not have these issues as their genitalia is enough to build a vagina ( by inverting the tissues, turning it outside in ). It is therefore, of course, a lot more sensitive and erogenous than if … | /r/MensRights | 13/06/14 07:44 PM |
| 3 | Sydney University professor of medicine says circumcision is "equivalent to childhood vaccination"More on this man, as you've pointed out he's not even a doctor, it's very strange that he's so vocal and obsessed with this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdGbXdEo93U | /r/MensRights | 07/06/14 01:19 PM |
| 5 | Infant dies during circumcisionWhich is legal everywhere in the world, that's how most jewish and muslim boys end up being circumcised. It happened to me, first idiot they pick from the street who has read a few books about religion and magic thinks he's a surgeon. I'm in Europe, from a legal standpoint this is sexual abuse, grievous bodily harm and illegal practice of medicine. Anyway, for circumcision to be considered medical(within the bounds of the Hippocratic Oath), you need to have a disease/malformation in the first pl… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/14 02:47 PM |
| 8 | Infant dies during circumcisionThey are very difficult to get because circumcision will very often not be cited as the cause since it's considered normal, if not mandatory in the US. You will get "infection", "hemorrhage", "didn't survive anesthesia" or stuff like that, which are complications that only happened because an unnecessary surgery that broke the Hipppocratic oath was performed against the patient's will in the first place. For the US we have this, the estimation is about 117 newborn deaths a year (link posted abov… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/14 10:17 AM |
| 32 | Infant dies during circumcisionThis happened in Sri Lanka, but in the US, I think more children die each year from circumcision than from school shootings http://www.examiner.com/article/new-study-estimates-neonatal-circumcision-death-rate-higher-than-suffocation-and-auto-accidents | /r/MensRights | 06/06/14 01:25 AM |
| 11 | FGM and circumcision: confronting the double standardActually most male circumcisions also remove the inner foreskin (which is not skin but a very specialized mucosa underneath the glans, that contains the penis' most sensitive parts). The Gomco clamp is very specifically designed to suppress it, jewish circumcisions also remove it since they added a second ritual in 160 AD ( the initial one was bris milah, then they added bris periah which involves the rabbi tearing the inner foreskin apart with his nails). So its female equivalent would remove m… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 06:33 AM |
| 11 | FGM and circumcision: confronting the double standardYou know there's an article embedded in this post, maybe you should read it before commenting since you don't seem to be very informed on the topic. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/14 11:30 PM |
| -1 | Wow, just wow. This blew my mind the other day when I went to the strip clubTBH I think the majority of people on this sub is pretty dense and looking for anything to validate what they already think (women are evil, feminism bad, poor men,...), without ever questioning it. I'm sorry to say it because I thought the concept of "men's rights" would be a pretty good idea in theory ( I think the fight between genders is very sterile though), but good lord the execution is not up to very high standards. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 01:09 PM |
| 1 | Wow, just wow. This blew my mind the other day when I went to the strip clubNope. Troll, hopefully. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 12:57 PM |
| -1 | I saw this product in a shop today and was shocked..imagine one that said "woman" on it..Do you know what impact seeing this product has on me? Right, I don't. How has seeing this random picture on the internet traumatized you? Let me know. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 12:12 PM |
| 2 | I saw this product in a shop today and was shocked..imagine one that said "woman" on it..For fucks's sake, do you guys need a lecture on how you come across to the outside world when you're "offended" by stupid crap like this? STOP!! Argue about real issues, stop whining and acting as if women/feminism were the root of all evil. You seem to get inspiration from the dumbest people on the "other side" and mimicking their behavior. You should have higher standards of argument since your movement isn't even properly recognized, not stoop to the lowest level and come across as dumb and w… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 10:31 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision because of CleanlinessSee, even that is weird . Who wants to be mutilated? How is that even an option? This thing only keeps happening because it's done to children, and once it's done, victims set it as the norm and want to inflict it to others too. The fact that virtually no sane adult decides to do it on his own should give a pretty good clue as to how desirable it is. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 09:24 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision because of CleanlinessHuh...Yes, because he's a child and can't have a say in it. If you were to impose a circumcision on an adult the same way people do it to children, you'd end up in jail with aggravated sexual assault and grievous bodily harm charges, and you'd be on the sex offenders list. So it IS a children's rights issue. There is no question for adults, intactivists do not care what they do with their genitalia, we oppose FORCED circumcision which is a form of sexual violence that is completely overlooked in… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 08:59 AM |
| 3 | Circumcision because of CleanlinessI think a lot of feminists also don't realize that circumcision is a part of patriarchy .It's meant to remove what's perceived as feminine in the male genitalia, and tell the child that his body does not belong to himself, but to the greater father ("god" or whatever, and the father is the one insisting on removing it most of the time). I think the wound inflicted by this procedure has detrimental consequences later in life. From a purely sexual point of view, you have to use hard long thrusts t… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/14 01:23 PM |
| 4 | Remember all the feminists complaining that GMs new CEO made less than the man she replaced? Surprise, surprise, they're wrong. She's making 60% more.I think this subreddit would be much better if you stopped mentioning "feminism" in half the messages. It turns into cheap digs, gives you a bad rep and doesn't really serve your purpose at the end of the day. Try to work a way around that. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/14 01:26 PM |
| 2 | This is ridiculous , reverse the roles and there would be outrage.Is it aimed at girls though? The name has the same structure as GrindR ( gay dating app) | /r/MensRights | 16/09/13 01:14 PM |
| 2 | A brief history of women in video gamesCan somebody explain " the cake is a lie"? Don't see the reference. I'm familiar with at least 3 girs who are into gaming but the difference with the stuff we see these days is that they weren't particularly into "girl" videogames. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/13 09:54 AM |
| -1 | Why don't more men aspire to adopt and raise a child with full custody?Why would anyone wwant a child though? Animal shelters are crowded. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/13 08:05 PM |
| 0 | Baffled by teen boys, experts keep trying to turn them into girls. Surprise — it’s not working.This subreddit is a circlejerk especially when it comes to lambasting women and/or "feminism". It gets obnoxious even for people like me who are concerned by the fact that human rights should also encompass men's rights. But clientelism, and fishing for upvotes...That's very strong here, even more so than in /r/fatpeoplestories | /r/MensRights | 27/08/13 09:45 AM |
| 0 | Baffled by teen boys, experts keep trying to turn them into girls. Surprise — it’s not working.This is one of the most vapid articles I've ever read in my life. It could have been called " Random person wants to rant about something". NEXT | /r/MensRights | 27/08/13 09:32 AM |
| 9 | Popularity Of Circumcision Falls In U.S., Especially Out WestBeing sexually assaulted with a knife is rape. Except this time the abuser confiscates the body part he has abused, forever. ANd the " you won't remember" argument doesn't hold because it does leave psychological and physical scars, and you would disagree anyway ( well I hope so ) that it's OK to rape someone - especially a minor- if he/she won't remember it. The only reason this practice still exists is because it's done before the victim gets a chance to have a say in it, and of course before … | /r/MensRights | 22/08/13 11:23 PM |
| 0 | Real men have curves!Can you imagine that I've been downvoted for that correction?? I should have been given REDDIT GOLD. It's not too late to do the right thing, people! | /r/MensRights | 13/08/13 04:06 PM |
| 1 | Real men have curves!You are (You're) =/= Your | /r/MensRights | 13/08/13 03:06 PM |
| 2 | Thought this was an interesting lack of consistency in my online sociology course.It is | /r/MensRights | 03/08/13 12:21 PM |
| 4 | Paris for Beginners: How French Men are Vain and NeedyI was wondering if this text was intended to be funny and failed, or if it was just a plain dishonest rant from a delusional person with a persecution complex. She can't possibly think that french children casually eat foie gras all year long o_O It's not even a credible caricature. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/13 11:26 PM |
| 2 | Paris for Beginners: How French Men are Vain and NeedyMMMhhh...Okay , but if you are less than 50 meters away from a taxi station hailing a taxi, I think it's clear that you were not looking for a taxi, but for a way to avoid the queue ;) It seems to me that she is bitching for the sake of it...She seems to be that kind of person. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/13 10:07 PM |
| 2 | Paris for Beginners: How French Men are Vain and NeedyTHe only places where there are taxi stands to queue at are the 2 airports and the 4 biggest train stations where there are literally millions of people flocking daily, and it would be a huge mess if it was just a crowd randomly trying to grab a taxi passing by. If this is what she was referring to, she should have just said I don't like waiting in a queue instead of making up this "it's illegal to hail a taxi" . You can hail a taxi anywhere else in Paris and it will stop, there is even a lighti… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/13 09:29 PM |
| 4 | Paris for Beginners: How French Men are Vain and NeedyI think that story about her ordering a burger might have some grounds in reality though...LOL I can only fancy her going to some Michelin starred $80 a meal restaurant, asking " I wanna burger" ( without saying hello to the waitress first, as she sees fit ) even though it's not even on the menu, and eating it with her bare hands with the sauce dripping all over like she's at McDonald's (of which there are thousands in France, so eating with your bare hands isn't an issue at all)...But somehow I… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/13 08:49 PM |
| 21 | Paris for Beginners: How French Men are Vain and NeedyThe French are different from you and me. To start with, they have better manners. “It’s acceptable to order a hamburger,” my friend Sarah explained. “But you must always eat it with a knife and fork. French people believe that touching your food is disgusting.” o_O ??? No, not the case. “Never hail a taxi in the street,” she instructed. “It’s illegal.”To obtain a taxi, one must find a taxi stand. But even if one does, the driver may not always find it convenient to accept your business. Not the… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/13 05:18 PM |
| 7 | Why should I not have my son circumcised?Well you can actually cite a study... It's not one in 20, and it's not an "accessory"', it's an inherent part of the penis and it's no coincidence that the most sensitive part of circumcised men's penis who have some sensitivity left (not the case for everyone, sadly) is the circumcision scar. This is the area where the fine touch nerve endings are located, and that's precisely what circumcision aims to remove. Fine touche Pressure thresholds in the adult penis - British Journal of Urology Inter… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/13 01:12 AM |
| 5 | A cute girl rated me 5 stars on OKCupid! Oh wait....never mind.I think you don't understand why she wants to avoid redditors from mensrights...Let me try to give you an outside perspective : It's not because she thinks men shouldn't have rights - more about the constant nagging and the fact that a lot of people here only see reality (and even fiction) through the prism of MRA issues, which turns into a festival of butthurt comments so intense it make a fisting party look like a walk in the park... To sum it up: the same reason why you avoid feminists!! | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 11:43 PM |
| -6 | A cute girl rated me 5 stars on OKCupid! Oh wait....never mind.It's perfectly understandable. There are SOME good people on Mensrights, but also a lot of nagging butthurt individuals who complain because somebody made a joke on a Facebook meme, or they think the last musical they saw (a fiction that took place a century ago) is "male bashing" and worth bitching about. In a nutshell: everything a professionnally offended loud mouth feminist is, applied to the opposite sex. It must be exhausting to witness this in real life, she probably just has a low tolera… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 11:07 PM |
| -1 | Went to see a shockingly misogynistic musical theater showLighten up, it's art. THEY HAD IT COMING!! You should care about real CURRENT AND NON-FICTIONAL issues instead of being so butthurt. Don't forget to review the complete Library of Congress to make sure there is neither abuse towards men or women... Sad. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/13 09:06 AM |
| -2 | Assumptions about Men- are there any figures?semen is a "happy drug" that is left inside the woman :| That's disgusting. Thank God for condoms. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/13 05:23 PM |
| 6 | Do white men rule the world?Well. Beyoncé disagrees. But that could be a cover op for the Illuminati... | /r/MensRights | 15/06/13 10:32 PM |
| -4 | Oral-B doing a commercial right and (hopefully) starting a trend on twitter. #powerofdadA lot of people on Reddit seem to have dads!! I sure as fuck don't. That's a worrying trend, those posts make me a bit uncomfortable. | /r/MensRights | 15/06/13 12:13 AM |
| 12 | Woman bashes Kink.com, thinks its viewers should kill themselves, and compares it to slavery.www.DIVINEBITCHES.com is part of Kink.com where men get mistreated and humiliated REALLY bad, they enjoy it and also get paid for it( yet I'm sure they would also do it for free :p) She needs to mind her own business. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/13 01:08 PM |
| -1 | Are we fanatics?My point is : I wanted to take this "men's rights" thing seriously, but was thrown off by a lot of comments when I started digging a little deeper. This subreddit could be called, at times /r/Ihatefeminists, or /r/Imthequeenofcomplaining ( neither of them exist but I would chuck you into the latter WITH feminists). You guys should think about the way you are perceived by other groups, seems like you get in your head a little too much and it becomes tedious and ridiculous. This is why I say that,… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/13 05:30 PM |
| 1 | Are we fanatics?I think some interesting and valid issues are defended in this subreddit (genital mutilation, child custody,..), but I see many people are "butthurt" over the littlest bullshit (like facebook memes or really random empty conversations), and seem to try to make a fuss about nothing. I think that discredits what you guys are supposedly standing for. So I would say yes, a lot of people here seem to be fanatics. They may have had good intentions when it started, but went completely overboard and bec… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/13 02:42 PM |
| -7 | Even in 2013 I guess men are obligated to put themselves in danger to protect women. Tell me...what are women obligated to do for men in this modern age?Jeez I was really hoping this story would not end up in this subreddit... Nobody is "obligated" to do anything, you can just keep on being a coward like most people in this subway station. Happy? | /r/MensRights | 12/06/13 02:27 PM |
| 8 | How do you guys feel about circumcision?What infections are we talking about? A lot of infections on intact men are caused by people not knowing how to handle it and being too invasive: trying to forcibly retract the foreskin before puberty causes infections that wouldn't have been there otherwise. This is the reason btw, for american doctors' claims that intact men have higher UTIs. They get UTIs because they are badly handled by the parents/doctors due to complete absence of information on how to talke care of an intact child (leave… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/13 07:52 PM |
| -5 | Massive double standards in Hollywood - Female on Male rape in the Film 40 Days and 40 NightsSleepy guy who willingly handcuffed himself to the bed and left the front door open with a raging hard on... Nah, not rape. Next time: close the door, don't handcuff yourself and don't bust your nut!! | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 11:14 PM |
| 2 | Our existence... ACKNOWLEDGED!What's a "ta..." ? I don't understand | /r/MensRights | 09/06/13 12:42 PM |
| -5 | Double standard? Seattle Times runs front-page opinion article featuring male bashing. The complaint? Men don't hit on her enough so they are bad.It's a silly little vapid article but "male bashing"...? You are WAY too sensitive. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 11:14 PM |
| 1 | LiveLeak.com - New York City Mayoral Candidate Criticised for wanting to end Jewish ritual of "oral-genital suction" on babiesThe genital integrity debate is complicated because people have terrible double standards about it and have swallowed the propaganda that it's healthy, for the greater good, that the baby will look like his dad, that it will protect him from HIV ( he will get it real soon if he believes that btw!) when the first intent, since immemorial times, is to punish/reduce sexual enjoyment. But this is direct sexual contact, there are no tools involved, it is a B L O W J O B. I saw a report that some babi… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 04:13 PM |
| 9 | Saw this on Facebook today.Boring | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 04:00 PM |
| 8 | LiveLeak.com - New York City Mayoral Candidate Criticised for wanting to end Jewish ritual of "oral-genital suction" on babiesWhy aren't these people being prosecuted? This is paedophilia, no amount of fairy tale bullshit can cover up that fact. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 12:36 PM |
| 2 | Circumcision: "Sometimes it seems like every boy is born with a coupon for $300 on the end of his penis..."What are you even talking about? | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 11:45 AM |
| 1 | Circumcision: "Sometimes it seems like every boy is born with a coupon for $300 on the end of his penis..."Define "cultural" VS " religious"..? Especially in ethnic groups that function via oral tradition ( that can go back to hundreds of years) It's the same thing, really. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 11:43 AM |
| -2 | The "men can stop rape" poster is submitted to r/WTF: the comments section is full of posts defending the generalization of men as rapistsExplain how you can be "forced to penetrate someone" if you don't want to do it, you don't have an erection. Unless you've injected caverject or something like this (even viagra requires arousal). Speaking strictly about adults here. (PS: Don't go ballistic on me, I'm new to this subreddit ) PPS: This infographic is a response to the instructions women get in order to not be raped (like dressing conservatively, don't go out at night alone, and stuff like this) - so you should take it with a grai… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 11:14 AM |
| 1 | Social experiment: 3 actors try to steal a bike in a park (a white man, a black man, and a pretty girl.) Watch how onlookers react.It's amazing that they help the girl even when she admits she's stealing it. I guess these people are really desperate! | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 09:48 AM |
| 0 | Feminist group wants obscure rapper thrown out of Australia over his lyrics. Guess Facebook isn't enough, they need the Department of Immigration as well!Free debate and direct calls to violence against a specific group are different things. You know those rappers (and their fans) aren't so subtle and tend to act upon what they say, makes them feel like a "big man". I agree, revoke his visa. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/13 08:08 AM |
| 1 | Mother eventually informs herself about circumcision, decides not to cut her next baby boy (after having it done to the previous ones ) and makes awesome video on the topic. THIS type of testimony can really help bringing the issue mainstream.Actually you can start to have an idea of what it would feel like to have your glans covered(making the remaining nerves more sensitive, and decallousing the skin) by applying the methods used for "foreskin restoration" ( T-tape, etc...). You will never be able to regrow the thousands never endings you lost but this is a step. I did this, and in 2 weeks I started to experience new sensations, and getting an erection actually gave me a spontaneous smile, because it FELT good for the first time in… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/13 11:02 PM |
| 1 | Circumcision: "Sometimes it seems like every boy is born with a coupon for $300 on the end of his penis..."IT's worth way more than $300, it's sold once for the operation($300-$800), a second time to the labs that buy it ($534 as of today apparently), and a thrid time to the woman that buys anti-wrinkle face cream made of harvested body parts. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/13 05:30 PM |
| 2 | Mother eventually informs herself about circumcision, decides not to cut her next baby boy (after having it done to the previous ones ) and makes awesome video on the topic. THIS type of testimony can really help bringing the issue mainstream.Sorry I'm new here :) I understand you are putting yourself in the average (or dumber than average) man's shoes when you state this but these sentiments are so wrong, they made me fuse hehe. But what you are saying must be a big part of the problem. How do you communicate on this issue without having this "you're attacking my manhood" reaction (I think the parallel with FGM really works in that respect but then again some people are gonna scream "how dare you compare the two!?"etc..), and avoidi… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/13 02:40 PM |
| 5 | Mother eventually informs herself about circumcision, decides not to cut her next baby boy (after having it done to the previous ones ) and makes awesome video on the topic. THIS type of testimony can really help bringing the issue mainstream.I don't understand your reasoning...? She said things in a very respectful way, I would assume that chopping off 30-50% of your penis surface against your will, removing your most sensitive body part in the process, is a greater attack on one's "manhood". And there is no attack involved, the issue is about helpless children who get their body parts chopped off due to misinformation( It's not even really treated as a surgical procedure, meaning I really doubt the doctors warn mothers of the conse… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/13 01:10 PM |
| 1 | Woman eventually researches circumcision after cutting 4 of her boys, decides against it for the 5th one and makes an awesome video on the topic.CONTEXT : She didn't question it for her first children as her husband said "I'm cut, my sons will get cut too" , felt awkward about it but still had the procedure done. When she eventually got the proper information, she decided to let the 5th child intact and this happened. Please be respectful in your comments, I know it's terrible that her previous children were cut but I think that this is really the type of person that could help further the children's/men's rights cause. She is realatable… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/13 10:25 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter