TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mandrewradams Archive

View 4 posts and 67 comments by mandrewradams on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They're just saying that they desperately want to hit people they hate.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:48 PM
2

I ascertain that they were well ahead of their time.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 02:38 PM
1

Congratulations! You're somebody now!
/r/MensRights29/07/15 07:06 PM
27

What the fuck do they have against the Korean cars?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:56 PM
2

How else are they supposed to vote brigade?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:51 PM
3

It wasn't her intent. But, she's still culpable for the result. Saying "I didn't mean to cause this result" is not an excuse for doing something stupid. For example, if someone fired a gun into the air and one of the bullets hit and killed another person, that person is responsible for their death. Doing stupid things deserves punishment whether or not it was intended to cause harm. My point was that we don't punish criminals to undo their crimes. We punish them for their cost to society.
/r/PussyPass29/12/14 03:32 AM
5

Civil Engineer here. The safe following distance is far shorter than the distance it takes a vehicle to come to a stop. A rule of thumb is 2-3 seconds behind the car in front. This allows for the drivers reaction time and some extra to slow down enough to avoid a collision with another car that has slammed on their brakes. Since the driver in front of the motorcyle ducked out of the way and narrowly avoided the parked car, we can assumed that it was blocking the motorcyclists view. According to …
/r/PussyPass20/12/14 06:44 AM
6

punishing Czornobaj would not bring back the father and daughter killed just like punishing rapists won't unrape someone...
/r/PussyPass20/12/14 06:13 AM
1

Facts (that don't support their agenda) don't real. Only feelz.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:58 PM
4

Personally, I'm sick of theft culture. I should be able to leave my possessions unguarded on my front lawn all day and expect all of them to be there when I come home. Teach thieves not to steal.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 08:56 PM
63

Every hour a cop wastes on a false accusation case is an hour that could be spent preventing/working on an actual case. Thanks feminism.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 03:51 PM
3

Her rabbit probably makes her feel special.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 02:46 AM
1

So, "you support/oppose something I oppose/support, therefore let me assume everything I need to assume about you in order to hate you." How is this not on par with all other prejudices and racism?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:31 PM
0

So, feminism will change the wording on the UN treaty to not specifically include actions by government officials?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:43 PM
2

How do they make the leap that a politician saying that domestic violence doesn't fall within the boundaries of torture to "Australia condones torture?" Can someone explain that to me please?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:25 AM
1

I believe you mean "being catcalled;" which is totes sexual assault and the only cure for unwanted male attention is getting maximum whiteknight attention on twitter.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 01:42 PM
1

The infuriating thing is that the "study" characterizes the reported/no files charged and the charged/prosecuted/, but not guilty as "assailants walking free." Meaning that an accusation = guilt. Who comes up with this shit?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 01:39 PM
1

Ya. Then, it extends to "well, society shouldn't be this way. So, we'll just ignore boundaries" because "boundaries are opression." Which is good for major stuff. But, when your SIL brings your 2 year old nephew to his grandpa's birthday party in a dress and whore-amounts of makeup, then, you've missed the fucking point and I am going to tell you that you're a fucking bad mother... or is that just me?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 12:39 AM
3

I should be able to able to leave all of my possessions on my front lawn all the time without giving a second thought that anyone would ever take them just like any woman should be able to bend over naked in the middle of the night in a shady part of town and be perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:48 AM
3

We fuck retards now?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:46 AM
26

any communication is usually used to, at a minimum, be snarky and put you in your menz place and, at worse, start a fight so they can scream oppression.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:35 AM
40

It's not even that. They want the right to not be presented with a counter-argument or any dissenting thought or evidence that contradicts the hivemind. EDIT: words.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:32 AM
28

TIL: Men can't be raped. We can only refuse sex.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 06:27 PM
7

Ya. There are about three times as many thumbs up for feminism as there are of MRA. The definition of feminism paints feminists as heroes and MRAs as pedantic, whiny bitches. Personally, the person that cares about what ud.com has to say deserves whatever misinformation they get.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:59 AM
5

"Bitches be crazy" - Abraham Lincoln.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:27 PM
2

Supposedly, Mark Mothersbaugh was pissed that Weird Al was better at sounding like Devo than he was.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:54 PM
12

They're so effective because they're used, usually, when you're not thinking very rationally. I'm almost certain my ex-wife wrote this as an instruction manual for other women and it was later used as an expose.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 05:06 AM
1

It wasn't presented that way. It was presented in the style of whiny.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:00 PM
2

I was in a similar situation (although, obviously, not that extreme) where, once she determined that she was unhappy, instead of simply moving out, she went bat shit crazy until I had a nervous breakdown. She went through mental and emotional gymnastics to make me angry just so I could be her scapegoat and tell everyone that it wasn't her fault. But, that I was the one to blame.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:28 PM
4

I have to downvote you because your statement, even though I agree with you, is based entirely on supposition.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:23 PM
0

If anything, it would be someone else's problem. Maybe not the most ideal scenario. It might also cut down on the trolls here.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:43 PM
1

Fair point. Faux paz not withstanding, there does seem to be a lot of posts that are nothing other than a woman doing something stupid followed by a bunch of supposition and rabble rousing not related to rights. In my opinion, that's nonsense. I'm not saying that women don't get preferential treatment. But, as is stated on the sub-reddit page, discussions should center around rights. Having a subreddit specifically dedicated to people who simply want to whine about women behaving badly, would im…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:17 AM
1

Well, since I took the time to research the subject and phrase my thought in the form of a question, I hoped to get a more productive response.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:44 AM
-1

Maybe I made the mistake of thinking that The Men's Rights subreddit is a place for those who wish to discuss men's rights and the ways said rights are infringed upon and not a place to whine about behavior that someone doesn't like.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:40 AM
1

Hahahaha... no.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:36 AM
2

Amanda, that is exactly my point. MensRights should support and advocate for rights. Womenbehavingbadly would be a receptacle for stories about women who are being assholes and the misogynistic whining that sometimes ensues. Neither of which has anything at all to do with the rights of anyone. The hope is that having an outlet for those posts would prevent them from winding up here.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:31 AM
1

Huh. I'm sorry for thinking my opinion mattered and was shared by someone else. I can't, for the life of me, figure out why someone having an opinion that you do not agree with has made you so angry or how that makes me arrogant. Cheers.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:45 AM
1

I'm suggesting that one man's trash be taken to a different trash heap at which others can find their treasure.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:32 PM
1

Not at all. If anything, the "Bitches Be Crazy" posts are among the funniest things I read all day, but they do not lead to constructive discussion.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:19 PM
2

Haha. Thanks!
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:00 PM
1

Those are not the type of posts I am complaining about. But, women saying attrocious things does not constitute a rights violation.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:40 PM
-2

"Bitches be crazy" posts rarely lead to anything that resembles intelligent discussion ; whereas many of the posts you mentioned do. That's the difference.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:37 PM
2

I would gladly post a picture of my beard for proof... she's really cute.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:35 PM
1

That's just prejudiced speculation isn't it?
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:26 PM
3

This is a WomenBehavingBadly issue. I just posted a request to start that sub. I hope it gains traction.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 10:25 PM
1

Personally, I find the presentation of articles as "if this were the other way around, this would be a huge deal" just as lazy as our feminist counterparts and comments insulting to women (pampered like sheltered schoolchildren) counter-productive to the cause of equality. So, have some class. Otherwise, we are only proving the feminists claims that we are childish.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:51 AM
3

This article completely avoids genetics. He argues that the male contribution is proportionate to the ratio of the mass of the sperm to the mass of the fetus. The male parent contributes heavily to genetics. I think the dangerous part of this article is that it suggests that the male is so insignificant that it makes no difference from what partner sperm is "secured." Selectivity in breeding is what propels the human race forward. Except the parents of half the babies I see seem to have disregar…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:32 AM
2

Which is why she is an equalist it would seem. The feminist movement started out as an equalist movement, but something, somewhere, got fucked... figuratively.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:23 PM
2

ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS. ONLY MEN ARE RAPISTS! [sarcasm]
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:00 PM
2

I hope people make it to this comment. It's a gem.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 06:58 PM
10

Wow. I've had most of these epithets hurled at me... by the same woman. I didn't put two and two together that there was any strategy behind it.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 01:43 AM
47

Clearly, she requested a certain action. Yet, they say that a "pervert" was pranked.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:32 AM
5

It's infinitely more likely that there will be an in-flight emergency than a molestation. In that case, wouldn't it be better to have your child next to a guy?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:26 AM
8

Nailed it!
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:32 PM
4

Hahahaha.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:31 PM
-1

You're SUPPOSING she held him under. There is no way of knowing because there were no adults present; which is the real story here. saying that she drown him makes it sound intentional. That's all I'm saying. Someone already reposted this with a title that makes sense anyway.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 03:19 AM
0

Your gender plays no role in the reason your post makes no sense. This toddler panicked and he drown trying to save her. That is not the same as she drown him.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 02:21 AM
0

You are imagining that a 3 year old girl wouldn't help out a boy as a means to justify this as a men's rights issue. That is purely hypothetical and assumes that girls don't have a capacity to help other people. I don't understand your logic here.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 02:10 AM
10

If you think more women should be scientists and engineers, why don't you become one? If you are an engineering type, why do you think more women don't choose technical fields?
/r/MensRights08/08/12 05:35 AM
1

touche
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:56 AM
1

Hey. Love your channel and your comments. Thanks for the education.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 05:49 AM
2

IT'S SATIRE FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST!
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:23 AM
1

I was using satire to draw a parallel between the proponents of feminism and religious fundamentalists as, in many ways, their actions are similar. Case in point: neither understands satire or can let an imagined offence slide.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:23 AM
1

exchange "get all up in your shit when they don't like something you say" with whatever it is you're upset with and I will be quite correct.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:14 AM
2

Clearly, the "kill" is figurative. As in, your response kills me.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:34 AM
15

I think of feminism as more of a religious fundamentalists. Either you vehemently and blindly agree... or they condemn you or try to kill you.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:21 AM
11

I think of feminism as more of a religious fundamentalists. Either you vehemently and blindly agree... or they condemn you or try to kill you.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 01:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter