TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

manihatebuckeyes Archive

View 0 posts and 127 comments by manihatebuckeyes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

Yes, I'm sure women are the problem and has nothing to do with your shitty, toxic views like "women should be focused on the kitchen and starting a nuclear family". Good lord, a little self reflection would go a long way
/r/MensRights12/07/25 06:20 PM
-2

Oh no, someone who doesn't feed into the echo chamber!
/r/MensRights11/07/25 12:36 PM
-4

It is perfectly acceptable to not let someone in your car and give them a ride because they make you uncomfortable for any reason. Its no different than when I worked at a gun counter back in college. I was able to stop a sale anytime I didn't feel comfortable. No different here. Does it make them a shitty Uber driver? Probably. Does it make them wrong? No.
/r/MensRights11/07/25 02:07 AM
-4

I think there are some leaps in logic here that don't add up. Yes, rejection hurts. But it's a part of growing up and being human. Not everyone is going to like everyone. Its something everyone has to deal with. Being rejected by someone you are romantically interested in doesnt automatically lead to self isolation. Likewise, being a virgin, or being someone who can't get laid isn't a stigmatization...unless you allow it to be that, or you make your sex life, or lack thereof, your entire identit…
/r/MensRights11/07/25 01:13 AM
2

Bro, every one of your posts relies on chatgpt. You're the epitome of why AI will actually doom humanity versus what's in the movies
/r/MensRights10/07/25 07:39 PM
1

Its really not. Its literally AI chat or trash
/r/MensRights10/07/25 07:38 PM
1

Wow, you really don't know how to use tools like chatGPT. Your title says you're asking about date rape laws, yet your prompt is asking about something completely different. Also, let me as a human answer the question in the title. Date rape laws protect (to the extent that any law can) everyone. Men and women.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 07:35 PM
1

Wow. And people wonder why this sub is labelled as misogynistic.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 10:53 PM
-28

That should include yardwork and home and auto maintenance too then, right Sure? But it's funny that you bring up that. Maybe it's anecdotal, but the majority of men I know don't know the first thing about fixing anything on a car, and most take cars to a shop to get fixed. Likewise, my partner know extensively about home repair and has taught me a lot. Idk why this has to be an either or thing. Healthy relationships are about growing together and learning together. Apparently we aren't seeing a…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 03:52 PM
1

The majority of women are in the workforce and are also working 8+ hours a day. Bet your grandma didn't do that
/r/MensRights04/07/25 03:34 PM
-27

Also more women in the workforce. The majority of households both partners work, which would require a more even distribution of home chores
/r/MensRights04/07/25 03:33 PM
-43

Do you think the majority of women aren't working and have to deal with commuting and an 8-10 hour day? The majority of households now both partners are working. Maybe that is what led to the rise in housework by men
/r/MensRights04/07/25 03:14 PM
0

That you're an extremely insecure individual.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 09:15 PM
-1

I feel like they're watching the first season of breaking bad, looked at tweaker Jesse, and went...yeah, that's how I'll convince people I'm cool
/r/MensRights01/07/25 09:12 PM
-2

Everything you wrote comes off as just absolutely the most insecure person imaginable. Like, every bit of your language comes off as someone trying to act cool while just coming off as a loser. You are trying to make people jealous and envious of you by using words like "cheddar" when in reality it makes you sound and look like Jesse Pinkman from breaking bad haha. All while using terms like "chad" and admitting you yourself don't think you're attractive. Somehow I don't think it's your looks th…
/r/MensRights01/07/25 09:06 PM
-6

Hahaha Someone is overcompensating. And before you try to come at me and say something idiotic like Im just jealous....I'm a software developer too
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:14 PM
1

I'm pretty sure there's a sizable group that would rather resolve the disparity by banning abortion. Yep, which is a problem. We've seen how banning abortions kills women. Its very well documented.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 04:12 AM
4

Its all over this subreddit. People screeching about wanting a "paper abortion" while simultaneously saying that boys need a father figure in their lives and implying that single mothers are single moms because they're sleeping around. Its contradictory and hypocritical. You can't have it both ways
/r/MensRights30/06/25 06:55 PM
-3

Jesus we get it, people here want the right to be a deadbeat parent and abandon their children without repercussions. I'm willing to bet the same people will bitch and throw statistics out about single moms and how it leads to men not being able to get ahead.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 05:33 PM
1

I'm going to assume you have citations you can post for all of these claims?
/r/MensRights30/06/25 01:03 PM
0

Oh my God shut the fuck up. There are people in the world who are actually still slaves. The selective service hasn't been used since the 70s. Its not going to be used anytime soon. I can probably guess you haven't been drafted or are at risk of being drafted.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 03:48 AM
0

Sounds like someone is a coward and running away from their views being challenged
/r/MensRights30/06/25 03:45 AM
1

And? That's not what give you the right to vote, that's being criminally responsible (whether you agree with it or not) for something that would take away your right to vote. If being registered for the selective service was what gives a person the right to vote, then how the fuck did anyone vote prior to 1917 when the selective service was implemented?
/r/MensRights29/06/25 07:39 PM
0

Who the fuck said you have to gain something when others achieve rights? That's like asking what did white people gain when black people were allowed to vote, or asking how legalizing gay marriage benefits straight people. Like for fucks sake, maybe it's not always about you.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:53 PM
1

You don't fucking earn the right to vote because of the fucking selective service, Jesus fucking christ.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:23 PM
1

I would like an answer
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:21 PM
-1

group A to vote what group B will he subjected too What a braindead take. Before women were given the right to vote they were the ones subjected to the other group as they had no say. Now both men and women have a say.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:10 PM
-2

Ok, well look at it from their perspective. They don't want to sit next do someone who is obviously sick. It has nothing to do with you being a guy and everything to do with you being fucking sick
/r/MensRights28/06/25 07:49 PM
-1

I've had to miss a race I was training a long time for because a coworker came in sick and got me sick. I was pissed
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:38 AM
-4

I know what you meant, but they did potentially. If the dermatology appointment is just a check up or can be pushed back a week or so, there is no reason to show up sick, possibly getting others around in the office needlessly sick. There's no indication that the people were acting the way they did because "men bad!!!". But I would hazard a guess their reaction is because OP was obviously sick, and no one wants to sit next to someone sick if they can avoid it.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:21 AM
1

But the point still stands. You don't know if someone you're next to immunocompromised or anything like that. A "really runny nose" is very noticable and I wouldn't want to be sitting near someone like that either. Its not sexism...its not wanting to get sick
/r/MensRights28/06/25 12:12 AM
1

You did nothing They showed up to a dermatology appointment coughing and hacking. Its not a PCP appointment, ER, or urgent care. In that case, I wouldn't want to sit near them either. You don't know if the people asking to sit somewhere else are immuno compromised or anything about them. But they know OP is sick and coughing.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 11:50 PM
0

Could you send a screenshot of them? Cause at this point I'm kinda hesitant to believe it. You are pretty quick to jump to sexism in your OP, despite no actual evidence of it. If you're receiving dm's about it, then that should be something brought up
/r/MensRights27/06/25 11:45 PM
1

Did it ever occur to you that maybe they don't want to get sick? 9 times out of t 10 a dermatologist appointment isn't critical, and it's not a PCP visit. I wouldn't want to sit next to someone hacking and coughing either.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 11:33 PM
-8

That has to be one of the dumbest terms I've heard in a long time
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:13 PM
1

I'm sure she's devestated
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:58 PM
-10

Who the hell uses the term "sexual market value"
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:56 PM
1

Nope, English is the only language I speak. This is the same shit everyone always bitches about on this subreddit where "X happens to man, women most affected".
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:54 PM
-1

Woman cyber bullied and commits suicide, men most affected. Sound familiar on this sub?
/r/MensRights26/06/25 05:12 AM
-5

Because chances are, it’s not your kid. What an idiotic take
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:59 PM
0

I don't know whether to laugh my ass off at this comment or what, but God damn you are deranged.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 09:50 PM
-4

So what you are saying is you don't know the meaning of the word abstinence.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 10:50 AM
-4

I...what?
/r/MensRights24/06/25 02:07 AM
-8

So he should be able to force her to go through the pregnancy?
/r/MensRights24/06/25 02:05 AM
1

Its not hard to believe at all. It's just hard to believe anyone on this subreddit of all people do
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:01 PM
0

On that we agree. The fact that healthcare is tied to employment is beyond fucked up
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:00 PM
-2

Nah I'm good
/r/MensRights23/06/25 08:01 PM
0

Right?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:59 PM
1

Offensive? No. It's just not believable
/r/MensRights23/06/25 05:13 PM
-10

How is it off topic? OP is bringing up abortions and that's what I'm talking about. I'm free to be here as much as anyone
/r/MensRights23/06/25 05:10 PM
-34

Women who financially neglect their children are absolutely shamed by society. You are arguing about 2 entirely different things
/r/MensRights23/06/25 03:13 PM
-43

Pregnancy comes with risk of health up to and including dying. Men don't have that risk. Thats why they should have the choice. The amount of people around here advocating for being a deadbeat will never cease to amaze me
/r/MensRights23/06/25 02:59 PM
4

Either troll post or someone never took a history lesson of the 1900s. Also, if the Republicans back then are the same as the Republicans of today, then why are they so adamant about keeping Confederate statues in place and overwhelmingly fly the Confederate flag?
/r/MensRights21/06/25 03:16 PM
2

Lol which is why you will never be take seriously in life
/r/MensRights21/06/25 12:36 AM
1

I'll call a spade a spade. The evidence is overwhelming that the police and investigators were involved or tampered with evidence. Anyone who thinks this woman should be in jail is a fucking dumbass
/r/MensRights21/06/25 12:15 AM
1

And anyone who agrees with him
/r/MensRights20/06/25 03:02 PM
2

Why yes, that's what they apparently are implying. Disgusting fucks
/r/MensRights20/06/25 02:56 PM
-3

Ask them what exactly?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 02:14 PM
1

What the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights20/06/25 02:12 PM
1

The 150+ sexual partners I've had Imagine thinking anyone would believe this
/r/MensRights20/06/25 02:11 PM
3

Jesus Christ what a dumbass. You obviously haven't read a single thing about this story other than the headlines if you think she belongs in jail
/r/MensRights20/06/25 12:53 PM
3

What does any of your comments have to do with this case? You seem to be seeking out making men the victim no matter what, when in this case all the evidence points to her being the victim of abused by the system
/r/MensRights19/06/25 11:03 PM
1

Such as?
/r/MensRights19/06/25 10:26 PM
1

They do. And again, if you actually paid attention to what happened in this case, you'd recognize there's a lot of fucked up shit that went on. You know who doesn't seem to be getting prosecuted or investigated? The cops who seem to have been involved. Guess what, they're men. It's fine to recognize injustices, but to be mad because this woman was found not guilty is just asinine and looks like you are just seeking out being mad for the sake of being mad
/r/MensRights19/06/25 10:16 PM
0

What the fuck does any of that have to do with this case?
/r/MensRights19/06/25 10:06 PM
1

He says with absolutely no evidence
/r/MensRights19/06/25 09:39 PM
7

Have you actually followed this story at all or are you just hell bent on claiming all women are bad?
/r/MensRights19/06/25 05:12 PM
-6

That doesn't even make sense. Your OP screams of chronically on tik Tok or social media specifically seeking out the worst of the worst people who spout dumb bullshit like kill all men to validate your views here. It's not actually indicative of what "society" actually believes.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 05:17 PM
-10

Some of you really need to get off the Internet and actually interact with people.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 12:59 PM
-5

If you read the study, it says growth reduction is temporary, minimal, and more often than not reversed after withdrawal. The study then goes on to say that it's also not fully conclusive due to not following up with final height after growth stoppage. I'm rejecting your experience because you are drawing conclusions that aren't there. its as simple as that. feminine modes of learning — stillness, emotional compliance, verbal absorption What makes you say these are feminine modes of learning? Yo…
/r/MensRights04/06/25 04:10 PM
-10

It’s because my body was denied the nutrition and growth other boys had. That's not because of the medicine. They've done peer reviewed research on this. It taking medicine actually decreased the risk of unintentional injuries. Your argument that it is the reason you get injured is unfounded. I’m also not complaining about learning math You are though. You are lamenting the fact that it's being taught instead of boxing. I’m pointing out the difference between how education is structured for the …
/r/MensRights04/06/25 02:15 PM
-3

I think you are wildly equating some things happening to ADHD medicine. You claim that it's the reason you get injured so often...while playing full contact sports. Injuries happen. Especially in full contact sports. I'm also confused about you complaining about learning math? Math is pretty important. If you want to compare today to ancient civilizations, maybe take a look at the life expectancy back then vs now. Science and innovation is a big reason for that....backed by math. This is coming …
/r/MensRights04/06/25 01:16 PM
0

Well that blog post is just an absolute load of trash. Good lord.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 08:53 PM
1

So a woman mocking a man in the workplace should be fine then right? They should be able to make genitalia jokes to men without repercussions right?
/r/MensRights26/05/25 01:21 AM
1

Actually no. He's a colleague
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:40 PM
-16

Oh fuck right off with that. Everyone should have the right to work without degrading comments made about them. This sub would go apeshit if a woman made that joke and she wasn't fired.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:36 PM
-24

That's absolutely not true. Guys go to HR all the time over things like this. There is a guy I know who got fired because he made a Deez nuts joke to a guy whose last name is Deez.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 04:19 PM
-27

Is this supposed to be profound or something? There's plenty of times I want to tell someone they're an idiot, but I don't. That's self censoring
/r/MensRights25/05/25 03:06 PM
1

getting off Scott free as ALLWAYS This hasn't happened. You are literally making things up to be mad about.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 02:21 PM
-1

She was arrested and is going to court. How did she get away with it? Your statement doesn't even make sense
/r/MensRights10/05/25 02:19 PM
0

What does that have anything to do with the statement I made?
/r/MensRights07/05/25 02:14 AM
-3

What a weird title. You could post countless stories of murders and say "Another man committing murder.. nothing to see here.."
/r/MensRights06/05/25 03:01 PM
1

Disagreeing with you isn't supporting infidelity. It's disagreeing it should be criminalized. Because it's a stupid fucking idea
/r/MensRights24/04/25 07:29 PM
3

You literally said that because we have domestic violence laws that we live in a hellscape. Why the fuck would that make anysense Well your whole premise doesn't make sense so there's that.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 02:12 PM
2

Wait wait wait. You think that because people get prosecuted for domestic violence, that we live in a hellscape? What the actual fuck is wrong with you? .most people agree with me when its not a post most will see No, they don't. Because this is a braindead take. You think domestic violence should be acceptable which is insane. I'm just hated becuase everyone wants to get social points you are all booing becuase im telling the truth Its actually because you think abusing a partner is ok
/r/MensRights24/04/25 02:03 PM
2

Because its a stupid idea that will only lead to people abusing it or intentionally causing harm to others. You have such a binary vision of what "cheating" is. Ok well, what if someone was abused by their partner and they're going through a divorce and they sleep with someone. They're still married, so that's technically cheating. So according to you they should get a minimum 3 year prison sentence? What about people in a non monogamous relationship? It's consenting adults, should they be sente…
/r/MensRights24/04/25 12:44 PM
1

and I'm a liar The chances of this occuring in real life are slim to none. It sounds exactly like the caricature of a feminist that someone sexist would come up with. Prove me wrong How does one prove something didn't happen. I can make up random bullshit online, and tell anyone to prove it didn't happen. Luckily, I don't have to. Maybe it did and I'm wrong. But somehow I doubt it.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 11:25 PM
-7

I'll take things that didn't happen for $1000
/r/MensRights21/04/25 11:51 AM
1

In many cases it does seem like a lot of blogs and stuff devolve into just complaining about the other gender and personal greivence as much if not more and in fact likely more than feminism... It's called the red pill rage. Red pill rage? Jesus Christ get off the Internet and go touch grass. Maybe interact with real people. Lots of men get angry when they find out that society and women have been lying to them their whole lives. Their mothers, sisters, and teachers lied about women's nature So …
/r/MensRights11/04/25 07:38 PM
-4

I have neither stated he is guilty nor if he is innocent. YOU however have already declared the evidence to either not be there or incredible. Despite the fact you don't know the facts of the case, nor the evidence the prosecution has. So what you are ACTUALLY doing is declaring the person who was allegedly assaulted both a liar and a criminal(it would be perjury) . Again, without proof. So no, you don't believe in innocent until proven guilty. You made this post. You have declared it a witch hu…
/r/MensRights09/04/25 08:06 PM
-6

This is just idiotic. Like, really dumb.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 07:31 PM
-5

So why do you assume there is no evidence? You made this thread, you keep using language that you think it's unfair he's being prosecuted, but at the end of the day you don't know what evidence has or has not been presented. You know he's been charged. That's it. But despite this, you insist the evidence provided is "questionable". Why do you think it's questionable? Why do you think the prosecutors haven't weighed the evidence especially given the time that has passed? Men just happen to be the…
/r/MensRights09/04/25 06:58 PM
-7

Lol right? Fucking Y2K was a major concern because of computers. I was in elementary school before 1999 and they were using digital cameras back then. For the love of God, Google existed in 1999. But apparently this person seems to think you had to sit in front of a camera for 10 minutes to take a picture at that time.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 06:50 PM
-16

Think for a second That's what I'm doing. I don't know what evidence has been provided to prosecutors. And neither do you. So for you to call it a false accusation jumping the gun without knowing anything. What tech, existing in 1999, would provide proof of a sexual encounter? Polaroids Are you serious? Do you think video cameras, normal cameras, computers, and anything digital didn't exist in 1999? Likewise, there's the possibility of DNA evidence. People are being convicted and exonerated of c…
/r/MensRights09/04/25 06:26 PM
-28

How do you know there's no proof? Edit: for those downvoting, feel free to engage in the discussion
/r/MensRights09/04/25 05:51 PM
-2

Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that majority of online sting operations are geared towards targeting male's? That's your take away? You know there's this really easy way to not get caught up in those. Don't download CP. It's pretty easy to do.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 02:09 PM
-10

Oh I call complete and utter bullshit on this.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 07:09 PM
1

Meh, I don't care honestly. This sub doesn't like ever hearing that their perception of some of this stuff has to do with living in an echo chamber, and then seeking out content online to reinforce the echo chamber. Which is sad because occasionally there are things that warrant serious discussions, but it gets drowned out with all the anti women bullshit
/r/MensRights09/03/25 06:07 PM
-1

Meh, I knew I would. This sub tends to downvote anything that isn't "women bad!"
/r/MensRights08/03/25 09:20 PM
2

Well let's see here. TV is covering women's issues everyday in news and documentaries. We've already covered this. Their healthcare is actively being legislated against in the US...so that makes sense it's being talked about. Talk shows for women (women's issues, women's subjects) There are men centric talk shows also. chivalry (practiced even by non-feminist men) Chivalry anymore just means being courteous. That's it. men defending women against men Men defend other men against men all the time…
/r/MensRights08/03/25 09:17 PM
-9

And yet, you are no better than the woman you're bitching about. You are wanting to denigrate an entire sex simply because of one idiot on the internet. I also noticed you failed to address any other point.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 08:48 PM
-14

Women's International Day is proof that the world is gynocentric. Having a vagina is an achievement that it makes millions of women around the world celebrate the day You could say the exact same thing about having a penis and celebrating mens day. All I can say, damn TV is covering women's issues too much Because a lot of women's rights are being attacked legislatively...at least in America. Women have everything that men no longer have, all-female spaces Nothing is stopping anyone from creatin…
/r/MensRights08/03/25 07:39 PM
1

You're experience is not typical. And it's not hard to imagine...there are states with laws on the books requiring exactly this for tubal litigation surgery
/r/MensRights07/03/25 06:01 PM
1

Where are you going on the internet? I'm pretty sure that's something you have to actively seek out.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:20 PM
3

What witch hunt mentality? I'm being objective. So let's look at the facts. Man was removed because he was making her uncomfortable. Several news outlets HAVE reported an incident with him being at her hotel and giving her a letter of some sort. Two articles you posted don't mention that. And we don't know why. Your responses are immediately blaming the woman for overreacting when you admit you don't know what happened. So again, you are out here screeching hysterically about a woman over reacti…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:26 AM
2

So reading your edit it's as simple as you have no fucking clue what the details are. You just want to vilify the woman in question. Often times there are details in cases that are not made immediately public. But you don't care about that as long as WOMAN BAD!!!!! Also, not mentioning the letter doesn't mean it didn't happen. Those sources may not be able to independently verify that aspect
/r/MensRights20/02/25 05:15 AM
2

Did it ever occur to you that maybe, just maybe, YOU don't know all the facts or evidence? Her claims that he was "fixated" is not a fact, she cannot read his mind. If he's following her around for multiple days then it seems pretty obvious. If someone is stalking me, I don't need to read their mind, I need to do what I can to ensure my safety
/r/MensRights20/02/25 04:53 AM
1

What biases in marriage are you talking about?
/r/MensRights19/02/25 06:00 AM
1

How do you figure that one?
/r/MensRights19/02/25 02:57 AM
0

What a stupid comment. Good God I hope you're an edgy 12 year old or just trolling. Let me lay it out for you FAFO. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences. One of these in your list isn't like the others. Yes, if you defend Hitler and the actions of Nazis you should be punished. Maybe not by the government, but by society. If you were to be doxxed and someone sent your comments defending Nazis to your employer, I agree with and defend their ability to fire you without question…
/r/MensRights18/02/25 11:53 PM
-3

This subreddit does nothing to help with issues men face. 95% of the posts here do literally nothing but bitch about women. That's it. And I'm glad you bring up the broad brush, because again, that's all this subreddit does when it comes to women. Look at the person's comment here. Saying that if you get married to anyone...it's going to be to the spawn of Satan. The OP's whole post is painting with a broad stroke
/r/MensRights18/02/25 09:38 PM
0

Um, saying words can absolutely make you a bad person. Praising Hitler, using racial slurs, etc all make one a bad person
/r/MensRights18/02/25 09:35 PM
-1

I'm saving this comment for the next time someone claims this sub isn't sexist
/r/MensRights18/02/25 09:13 PM
-3

Good lord, and y'all wonder why you are called misogynistic and aren't taken seriously.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 03:07 PM
-11

Lol how dare you come into this space and immediately give women the benefit of the doubt. Don't you know this is subreddit is dedicated to hating women?
/r/MensRights10/02/25 02:22 AM
-1

Ok defending planned parenthood sucks and all, but at that point it's just regular private Healthcare. That's losing a benefit, not a right. But I do disagree with it. And what men's health? The only men's health i know of is private clinics. You defund planned parenthood and you significantly affect women's reproductive health, especially in lower income areas. Infant mortality and maternal deaths are significantly higher where there isn't easy access to women's clinics. The jumping through hoo…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:07 PM
-1

Sure I can do that. Republicans regularly defund things like planned parenthood, which provide reproductive health services to women, especially in low income areas. I've never heard of Republicans banning mens health clinics. Many states, if a woman wants to get sterilized, she has to jump through hoops, all while being brought up that they are at child bearing age and being second guessed. Likewise, a lot of states try to require their significant others approval before doing the procedure. Fe…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 06:12 PM
4

Or hear me out. It's a performative piece of legislation mean to raise awareness that politicians shouldnt be dictating medical practices. Edit: Also men don't have to masturbate if they don't want to. It's not a requirement for living Edit 2: it was introduced by a man. At least read the fucking article OP
/r/MensRights23/01/25 05:17 PM
-6

I will deny it. You're lying and spreading ragebait bullshit. You are not "on the ground" seeing anything of the sort. Edit: call me a feminist plant all you want. Your rhetoric is why no one will ever take any sort of mens issues seriously. You spout bullshit and when called out in it you scream feminism.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 06:06 PM
-8

No the fuck you havent.
/r/MensRights15/01/25 03:58 PM
1

Yes people in general will complain, that's pretty human however feminists only complain if the guy higher up is a man that's where the problem arises. And how often is there the trope that a woman has slept her way to the top? You can bitch and complain about feminism all you want, but it doesn't hold up to scrutiny at all. Same way when they protest/scream that women need to be represented in jobs more they are still only talking about higher up jobs/careers looked upon more favourably which a…
/r/MensRights10/01/25 03:21 PM
1

my point was feminists will complain about men being in high positions or respectable jobs because that's what they want. People in general will complain about higher ups. And I don't know anyone ever who complains about someone having a respectable job. They don't want any of the dirty jobs just the high paying/powerful positions Yeah, that's pretty standard across the board. This has nothing to do with women or men. Everyone wants high paying jobs and no one wants to do the dirty jobs.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:47 PM
1

I've seen women in every single one of these jobs in multiple places I've lived.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 10:05 PM
1

I'm not mad, just merely calling out bullshit where I see it
/r/MensRights20/08/24 05:03 PM
1

Mmhmm. That's a lot of blaming things on your phone.
/r/MensRights16/08/24 01:23 AM
2

Yeah see, your response here makes it even more obvious. 'Ive always given birth to a son!'. What is this the middle ages?
/r/MensRights15/08/24 09:36 PM
2

You preface that you're a woman so often I actually don't believe you
/r/MensRights15/08/24 08:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter