TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mankindglobalmedia Archive

View 654 posts and 521 comments by mankindglobalmedia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2138

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/09/15 06:29 PM
1894

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/03/16 08:27 AM
932

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:51 AM
259

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:44 AM
246

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:54 AM
243

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:46 PM
228

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:26 AM
193

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/10/15 12:53 PM
188

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/01/16 06:17 AM
171

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:58 PM
167

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/10/15 11:27 AM
163

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/07/15 09:50 AM
163

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:04 PM
154

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:10 AM
152

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/03/16 10:23 PM
146

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/02/16 09:00 AM
143

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/05/15 03:42 AM
142

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/05/16 12:22 PM
141

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:59 PM
134

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:31 AM
119

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:14 AM
116

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:12 PM
110

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/03/16 04:36 AM
107

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:52 AM
104

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:14 PM
97

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:37 AM
95

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/06/15 10:08 AM
95

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:46 PM
95

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:21 PM
94

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/05/15 09:00 PM
91

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:20 PM
90

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:17 AM
86

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/05/15 01:55 AM
86

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/11/15 08:55 PM
85

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:59 AM
84

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:20 PM
84

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/12/15 11:38 AM
83

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:22 PM
81

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:27 AM
80

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:11 AM
76

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:11 AM
75

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/06/15 09:32 AM
75

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/03/16 10:36 AM
75

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:56 AM
73

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:40 AM
73

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:05 AM
72

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/05/15 08:07 AM
71

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:32 AM
68

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:06 PM
68

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:32 AM
67

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/05/16 11:34 AM
67

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:22 PM
65

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:27 PM
64

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:01 AM
61

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/10/15 01:20 PM
61

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:46 AM
61

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:07 AM
60

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/03/16 11:43 AM
59

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:08 AM
58

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:01 PM
58

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/09/15 04:11 PM
58

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:43 AM
58

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:36 AM
57

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:40 AM
57

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/05/15 05:51 AM
56

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:52 AM
55

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:47 AM
54

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:02 PM
54

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:10 AM
54

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/05/15 09:31 AM
54

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/07/15 05:09 AM
54

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/01/16 11:38 AM
54

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:11 AM
53

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:41 PM
53

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/09/15 09:59 AM
52

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:43 PM
51

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/10/15 05:40 AM
51

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:24 PM
51

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/01/16 04:13 AM
51

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/06/15 07:04 AM
51

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:03 AM
51

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:05 PM
50

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/11/15 05:40 AM
50

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:59 PM
49

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:40 AM
48

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:19 AM
48

Discussionmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/01/15 07:57 AM
47

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:10 AM
47

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/07/15 03:44 AM
45

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/08/15 03:12 AM
45

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:11 AM
44

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/12/15 11:38 PM
43

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/10/15 09:23 AM
43

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/06/15 06:33 AM
43

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:07 AM
42

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:50 AM
41

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:45 AM
41

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:30 PM
40

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:19 AM
40

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/10/15 07:08 PM
40

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:58 AM
40

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/05/15 01:33 AM
40

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:37 PM
40

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/12/15 08:00 AM
40

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/02/16 06:54 AM
40

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:56 PM
39

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/11/15 02:13 AM
39

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:52 AM
39

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:49 AM
39

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:58 AM
38

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:26 PM
38

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:43 AM
38

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/05/16 08:11 PM
38

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:47 AM
38

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:10 PM
38

mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/12/15 06:43 AM
37

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/11/15 03:39 AM
37

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:11 AM
37

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/11/15 07:31 PM
36

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:22 PM
36

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:33 AM
35

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:47 AM
35

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/12/15 06:03 AM
35

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:13 PM
35

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:43 PM
35

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:10 AM
34

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:57 AM
34

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:46 AM
34

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:06 PM
34

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:00 PM
34

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/09/15 02:15 AM
34

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:50 AM
34

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:39 PM
33

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:45 AM
32

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:25 AM
32

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/09/15 11:43 PM
32

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:26 AM
32

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:18 AM
32

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:11 AM
32

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/12/15 10:48 PM
32

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:39 AM
32

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/06/15 02:51 AM
31

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/01/16 06:08 AM
31

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:41 AM
31

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/07/15 08:04 PM
30

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/01/16 08:15 AM
30

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/08/15 08:11 PM
30

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/09/15 05:19 AM
29

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/06/15 05:40 AM
29

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:44 PM
29

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/07/15 02:32 AM
28

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/03/16 06:05 AM
28

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/05/16 05:38 AM
28

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:44 AM
28

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:06 AM
28

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/03/16 07:11 PM
27

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/05/16 06:34 AM
27

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/07/15 01:30 AM
27

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/01/16 09:42 AM
27

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/11/15 04:52 PM
27

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:12 AM
26

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/05/15 04:00 AM
26

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:50 PM
26

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:30 AM
26

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/05/15 09:43 AM
26

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:11 AM
25

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/02/16 09:00 PM
25

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:45 AM
25

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/02/16 04:45 AM
25

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/12/15 08:02 AM
25

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:25 AM
25

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:22 AM
25

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/09/15 07:58 PM
25

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/11/15 04:10 PM
25

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:24 PM
25

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/07/15 09:11 PM
25

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/07/15 04:24 AM
24

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:52 AM
24

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:07 PM
24

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:35 PM
24

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/07/15 11:37 AM
24

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:24 PM
24

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/01/16 09:19 PM
24

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:46 PM
24

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:30 PM
24

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/10/15 10:30 AM
23

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/11/15 08:23 PM
23

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:48 PM
23

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/01/16 05:05 AM
23

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/09/15 12:02 PM
23

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:36 PM
22

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:54 AM
22

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/12/15 11:28 PM
22

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/05/15 06:30 PM
22

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/03/16 12:15 PM
22

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/04/16 12:38 AM
21

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/04/16 12:27 AM
21

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/11/15 12:21 AM
21

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/07/15 07:33 PM
21

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/12/15 09:16 AM
20

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/01/16 04:40 AM
20

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/10/15 08:05 AM
20

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:49 AM
20

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/09/15 06:55 PM
20

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:22 AM
20

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:22 AM
20

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/12/15 01:57 AM
20

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:16 AM
20

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:26 PM
20

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:44 PM
20

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:31 AM
20

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:13 PM
19

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/09/15 09:46 PM
19

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/03/16 10:57 PM
19

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/10/15 09:06 AM
19

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/05/16 10:38 AM
19

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:11 PM
19

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/12/15 12:43 PM
19

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:20 PM
19

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:58 PM
18

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:20 PM
18

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:19 AM
18

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/05/16 08:08 PM
18

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:40 PM
18

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/10/15 09:14 AM
18

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:59 AM
18

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:23 PM
18

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/12/15 07:54 AM
18

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:38 AM
18

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:23 AM
18

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:05 PM
18

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/01/16 11:24 PM
18

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/12/15 12:48 AM
18

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:08 PM
17

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:37 AM
17

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:45 AM
17

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:56 PM
17

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:54 PM
17

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/01/16 05:49 AM
17

Newsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:27 PM
17

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:00 AM
17

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/08/15 03:53 AM
17

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:32 AM
17

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/01/16 12:32 AM
17

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:41 AM
17

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/12/15 11:34 PM
17

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:13 PM
17

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/12/15 12:09 AM
17

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/12/15 12:07 AM
17

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:21 AM
17

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:48 PM
17

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/01/16 11:10 AM
17

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:47 AM
16

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:02 PM
16

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:52 AM
16

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/09/15 04:13 AM
16

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:22 AM
16

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:57 AM
16

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:05 AM
16

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:25 PM
16

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:57 AM
16

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/05/15 02:45 AM
15

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:00 PM
15

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:17 PM
15

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:03 AM
15

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/02/16 10:44 PM
15

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/09/15 10:02 AM
15

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:53 AM
15

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/10/15 10:32 PM
15

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/03/16 04:12 AM
15

mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/12/15 06:52 AM
15

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/09/15 03:37 AM
15

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/04/16 11:03 AM
15

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:06 AM
15

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:16 PM
15

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/01/16 03:08 PM
14

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:26 PM
14

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:48 AM
14

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/10/15 10:20 PM
14

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/07/15 01:01 PM
14

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:52 PM
14

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:54 AM
14

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:43 AM
14

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/02/16 07:35 PM
14

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:58 PM
14

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:41 PM
14

mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:10 AM
13

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:38 AM
13

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/03/16 08:58 PM
13

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/04/16 05:35 AM
13

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/11/15 05:43 AM
13

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/11/15 11:51 PM
13

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/09/15 08:56 PM
13

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:01 AM
13

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:10 PM
13

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:38 PM
13

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/01/16 01:08 PM
13

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:27 AM
13

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:27 AM
13

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:38 AM
13

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/05/15 01:25 AM
13

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/04/16 07:09 PM
13

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:08 PM
13

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:16 AM
13

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:57 PM
13

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/05/16 02:33 PM
13

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/10/15 11:31 PM
13

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:01 AM
13

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:51 AM
13

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/04/16 05:35 AM
12

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/06/15 03:50 PM
12

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:41 PM
12

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:48 AM
12

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/01/16 11:49 AM
12

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:39 PM
12

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:22 PM
12

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:18 PM
12

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/10/15 11:25 PM
12

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/01/16 12:33 AM
12

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:17 AM
12

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:45 AM
12

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/09/15 02:06 PM
12

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:53 AM
12

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/08/15 06:49 AM
12

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/07/15 04:25 AM
12

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/09/15 10:35 PM
12

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:37 AM
12

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/01/16 05:35 PM
12

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:51 AM
12

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:01 PM
11

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/12/15 09:04 AM
11

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:08 AM
11

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/03/16 08:03 AM
11

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/09/15 06:31 PM
11

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:10 AM
11

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/05/15 02:35 AM
11

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:44 AM
11

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/09/15 03:18 AM
11

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:42 AM
11

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/07/15 08:10 PM
11

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:58 AM
11

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:28 AM
11

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/07/15 09:46 AM
11

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/01/16 05:10 AM
11

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:31 PM
11

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:16 PM
11

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/10/15 03:55 AM
11

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/10/15 06:06 PM
11

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:29 PM
10

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/12/15 10:01 PM
10

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:41 AM
10

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/05/16 05:39 PM
10

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/11/15 03:22 AM
10

Discussionmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:23 PM
10

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:00 PM
10

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/09/15 08:33 PM
10

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:41 AM
10

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/01/16 01:36 PM
10

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/10/15 03:16 AM
10

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:06 AM
10

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:37 PM
10

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:26 AM
10

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:40 AM
10

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:54 PM
10

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/05/16 08:53 PM
9

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/10/15 11:09 PM
9

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:03 AM
9

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:07 PM
9

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:34 PM
9

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/04/16 06:00 AM
9

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/05/15 05:14 AM
9

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/05/15 04:03 AM
9

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:13 PM
9

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/12/15 05:30 AM
9

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/01/16 12:46 AM
9

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:06 AM
9

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:58 PM
9

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:31 PM
9

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:09 AM
9

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/11/15 02:25 PM
9

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/03/16 11:02 PM
9

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/01/16 10:04 AM
9

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:58 AM
9

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/07/15 06:41 AM
9

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/01/16 04:51 AM
9

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:57 PM
9

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/02/16 09:27 AM
9

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/11/15 04:45 AM
9

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:30 PM
9

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/05/15 01:33 AM
9

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:46 AM
8

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:57 PM
8

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:26 PM
8

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:08 AM
8

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:21 PM
8

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:12 AM
8

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/06/15 06:08 AM
8

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:43 AM
8

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/10/15 03:53 AM
8

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/05/15 01:51 AM
8

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:49 PM
8

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:24 AM
8

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:19 AM
8

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:54 AM
8

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:07 AM
8

mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:13 PM
8

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/04/16 12:51 AM
8

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/12/15 11:18 PM
8

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/09/15 03:42 AM
8

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/12/15 12:39 PM
8

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/04/16 09:25 AM
8

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:45 AM
8

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/05/15 04:12 AM
8

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/04/16 08:38 PM
8

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/01/16 12:10 PM
8

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/02/16 01:18 AM
8

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:43 AM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:28 AM
7

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/10/15 02:49 AM
7

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:10 AM
7

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/12/15 11:11 AM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:43 PM
7

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:12 PM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:27 AM
7

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:26 PM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:42 PM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:16 PM
7

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:06 PM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/08/15 07:40 PM
7

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/08/15 06:06 AM
7

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:21 PM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/01/16 09:57 AM
7

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:22 AM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/12/15 07:55 PM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:54 AM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:09 PM
7

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:45 PM
7

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/10/15 09:21 PM
7

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:40 PM
7

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:31 PM
7

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:13 AM
7

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/06/15 03:41 PM
7

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/01/16 12:43 PM
7

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/10/15 09:55 PM
7

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:16 AM
7

Intactivismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/02/16 03:04 AM
7

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:59 PM
6

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:28 PM
6

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:46 AM
6

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/05/16 11:13 PM
6

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/01/16 06:12 AM
6

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/10/15 03:49 AM
6

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:22 PM
6

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/02/16 06:12 AM
6

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:29 AM
6

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/02/16 03:58 AM
6

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/01/16 11:37 AM
6

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:19 AM
6

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:40 PM
6

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/08/15 03:48 AM
6

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:05 AM
6

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:45 AM
6

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:27 AM
6

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/01/16 10:21 PM
6

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:53 AM
6

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/05/15 09:22 PM
6

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:49 PM
6

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:20 PM
6

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:17 AM
6

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/03/16 11:07 AM
6

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/11/15 10:55 AM
6

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/12/15 11:45 AM
6

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/07/15 08:33 PM
6

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/05/15 11:43 AM
6

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:52 PM
6

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:30 AM
6

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:28 AM
6

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:05 AM
6

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:23 PM
6

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/09/15 04:50 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/11/15 10:50 PM
5

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/08/15 08:28 PM
5

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/04/16 09:31 PM
5

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/10/15 07:39 PM
5

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/05/15 09:26 AM
5

Questionsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:30 AM
5

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:11 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/05/16 06:18 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:22 AM
5

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/02/16 04:33 AM
5

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:06 AM
5

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/01/16 08:32 PM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/10/15 09:47 PM
5

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/08/15 03:56 AM
5

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:01 AM
5

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/08/15 03:46 AM
5

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:10 PM
5

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/04/16 09:36 AM
5

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:24 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/10/15 02:21 AM
5

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:09 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:45 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/01/16 10:01 PM
5

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:12 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:40 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:00 AM
5

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:52 AM
5

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/01/16 03:42 AM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/08/15 07:36 AM
5

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:58 PM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/09/15 10:06 AM
5

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:42 PM
5

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:02 AM
5

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:37 PM
5

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/01/16 05:08 AM
4

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:39 AM
4

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:57 AM
4

Discriminationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/09/15 07:48 PM
4

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:26 AM
4

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/02/16 02:07 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/09/15 05:29 PM
4

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/01/16 11:46 AM
4

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/06/15 06:01 PM
4

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/05/15 10:07 AM
4

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:27 AM
4

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:29 PM
4

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:42 PM
4

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:51 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/10/15 07:13 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:41 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:46 AM
4

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/08/15 07:33 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:06 AM
4

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:45 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:43 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/06/15 09:21 AM
4

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/08/15 10:28 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:40 AM
4

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/08/15 10:31 AM
4

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:13 PM
4

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/03/16 11:57 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:40 PM
4

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/04/16 10:37 PM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:09 AM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:25 AM
4

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/03/16 11:55 AM
4

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:56 AM
3

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/06/15 05:04 PM
3

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:41 PM
3

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/12/15 10:27 AM
3

Discussionmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/01/15 02:07 PM
3

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/05/16 05:50 PM
3

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/02/16 07:49 AM
3

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/03/16 12:49 AM
3

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:40 PM
3

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:52 PM
3

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/09/15 06:54 PM
3

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/07/15 10:00 AM
3

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights28/05/16 09:24 PM
3

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:56 AM
3

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/04/16 09:32 AM
3

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:21 AM
3

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/05/16 09:08 AM
3

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:26 AM
3

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/05/15 10:50 PM
3

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:51 AM
3

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:59 AM
3

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/05/15 08:31 PM
3

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/01/16 05:15 AM
3

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:21 AM
3

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/04/16 09:14 AM
3

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/04/16 04:42 PM
2

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:40 AM
2

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:46 PM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:44 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/07/15 05:47 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/02/16 11:25 AM
2

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/05/15 06:40 PM
2

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/05/15 08:08 PM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/04/16 10:11 PM
2

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:56 PM
2

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:57 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:46 PM
2

Legal Rightsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/07/15 04:06 AM
2

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:06 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/05/16 06:20 PM
2

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/09/15 04:02 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/05/16 10:33 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/09/15 03:38 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/15 10:14 PM
2

Fathers/Custodymankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:05 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/04/16 12:29 PM
2

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:25 AM
2

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:33 AM
2

Storymankindglobalmedia/r/PussyPass01/04/16 12:27 AM
2

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/09/15 10:43 AM
2

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:03 AM
2

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:35 PM
1

Newsmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:52 PM
1

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:43 AM
1

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:46 AM
1

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/02/16 06:22 PM
1

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:40 AM
1

Discussionmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:24 AM
1

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:30 PM
1

Discussionmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:25 PM
1

Marriage/Divorcemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:09 PM
1

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:39 AM
1

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/03/16 01:14 AM
1

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:34 AM
1

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:37 AM
1

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/10/15 10:49 PM
1

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:26 AM
1

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/09/15 07:37 PM
1

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights06/10/15 08:23 PM
1

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights02/10/15 06:15 AM
1

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights11/08/15 07:57 AM
1

mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:36 AM
1

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:30 PM
1

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/05/16 07:32 AM
1

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:42 AM
1

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:37 AM
0

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/06/15 09:22 AM
0

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:50 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:02 AM
0

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights18/01/16 10:47 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:17 AM
0

mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:45 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:19 AM
0

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:53 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights09/02/16 08:26 PM
0

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights17/07/15 03:54 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:18 PM
0

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:15 AM
0

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights04/01/16 12:15 PM
0

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:29 AM
0

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/01/16 12:44 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:22 PM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:10 PM
0

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:06 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:08 AM
0

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights30/03/16 02:06 AM
0

Feminismmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/01/16 09:15 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:52 PM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:48 AM
0

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights13/05/15 06:47 AM
0

Edu./Occu.mankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/05/15 12:59 AM
0

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights27/04/15 06:46 PM
0

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:02 AM
0

Social Issuesmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:05 PM
0

Eastern Culturemankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:26 AM
0

Activism/Supportmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights24/05/15 04:01 AM
0

Generalmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights19/01/16 12:35 PM
0

False Accusationmankindglobalmedia/r/MensRights05/01/16 08:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

someone on the other side is eventually going to turn it back on us by demonstrating that Chomsky still aligns himself with the feminist movement Feminists so balk at healthy criticism of their movement, that they just about can't sit through it without crying that you're abusing the poor darlings. I suspect that proper use of Chomsky in context will go a long way, here.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:58 AM
1

What a cluster fuck. If the American pick Trump, politics in North America will officially have merged with reality television. The World have gone mad. Indeed.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 02:53 AM
1

Nobody is claiming he's "one of our supporters." LOL You're grossly underestimating his criticism in the videos provided, though.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 04:17 AM
1

Just curious: Aren't you glad Harper is gone? :]
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:11 AM
1

If you asserted to his face that anything he says in this video applies directly to feminism, he'd probably tell you you were wrong. Maybe. Maybe not: https://youtu.be/OzrHwDOlTt8
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:09 AM
1

I see you didn't listen to the accompanying videos.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:07 PM
1

Nope, it's the Austrians & Neoliberals that are. behind a lot of the social and cultural trouble we see today.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 03:36 AM
2

Thanks for the help~!
/r/MensRights09/06/16 04:46 PM
2

Thanks. Do you have any news stories you can link me to on that?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:57 PM
3

But just for shits and giggles, how did the DNA tests definitively prove that they didn't do what they said they did? I thought you said you looked into the case? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_jogger_case#Convictions_vacated Subsequently, Reyes declared in 2002 that he had assaulted and raped the jogger that night, when he was 17. He said that he had acted alone.[56][57] At the time of the attack, he was working at an East Harlem bodega on Third Avenue and 102nd Street, and living i…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 04:45 PM
4

You didn't really look into the case did you? The Innocence Project did, and the exoneration was based on DNA matches. Not based on the scenario that you pulled out of your ass. And your cute little convo you concocted there only serves to show you know nothing about the extent cops will go to in order to fabricate evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kern_County_child_abuse_cases http://documentarystorm.com/witch-hunt
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:14 AM
1

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/donald-trump-central-park-settlement-disgrace-article-1.1838467 He made it clear who he was referring to in an op-ed he penned, with the ad shown right next to it.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:11 AM
1

Those alleged to have committed the crime were not named, nor did he suggest suspension of due process. Dead wrong: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/donald-trump-central-park-settlement-disgrace-article-1.1838467 He made it clear who he was referring to in an op-ed he penned, with the ad shown right next to it.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 07:04 AM
1

All that means is that you would rather reward bigotry when it's made a spectacle of, which is to say that you'll encourage more of it.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 07:56 PM
1

Sorry, I cannot keep up on all the supposed MRA-Blacklisted sites and actually I have no interest in doing so.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 07:54 PM
1

You have to be being willfully obtuse not to see that he's at least as bad. If any one - Obama, Sanders, Clinton - whomever - called men "rapists" and felt it was ok because they were of an ethnic group, you'd be all over it saying it shows how terrible they are. But you're probably not aware that there's more to Trump than what the video discusses: http://flavorwire.com/578741/what-the-central-park-five-teaches-us-about-a-trump-administration The problem with Trump’s condemnation of the five yo…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 05:45 PM
2

They're voting for him for what it represents. They're voting for him because he doesn't bow to the PC bullshit Yeah, and that's what the video is disagreeing with.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 10:35 AM
0

Your brains are shit.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:19 PM
2

my movement LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!! You are nowhere near of the credentials and track record to tell me to get out of anything, let alone call the MRM "your" movement. ;-)
/r/MensRights27/05/16 07:24 PM
2

but that rate of failure would make Bill Gates blush This is the dumbest, most inconsequential statement I've heard in defense of Trump yet. He's a god of bankruptcy who loves the spotlight FIFY And the whole "Billionaire = POTUS Material" is the laziest thinking I think I've seen in years as far as politics go.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 07:22 PM
2

you can vote Independent. There is not only 2 choices there is at least 3 Indeed.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 02:24 AM
3

I'm amazed at the mental hoops people are jumping through to justify this orangutan shithead with a toupee excuse for a candidate. "Satire" LOL. If you say so.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:13 AM
1

But not in all of us does it reach a level of psychosis.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 01:11 AM
1

IOW you can't believe anything Trump says. Got it.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 09:27 PM
0

And if Clinton had said that?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:06 PM
2

And if Clinton had said that?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:06 PM
1

Do you think MGTOW is somehow immune to the category thinking endemic to humanity, or something? No, but I think some groups are more prone to tribalism than others.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:06 PM
0

And if Clinton had said that?
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:05 PM
1

Hello??? MGTOW insists they are not an "organization." Hell, they eschew the term "movement."
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:19 PM
1

Meaning duh, American schools expect you to show up. Just like a job.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:16 PM
3

It's still visible on the NY chapter of NOW's website: http://www.nownys.org/archives/leg_memos/oppose_a00330.html
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:10 AM
1

This seems to be conflating trigger warnings and giving people the option to leave the room with not having to take the exam Probably not, since it's a critique based on the American system.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:04 AM
12

You know PC bullcrap is bad when even TYT is reporting against it.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 08:13 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 08:12 PM
1

Is there a difference?
/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:28 PM
1

You have no clue who your enemies are. Social Justice isn't exporting jobs overseas or failing to pay taxes while being wealthy.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:39 AM
1

Ah, but this is not justice, it is defense of your property. Justice calls for a sanction against their past behavior. Social equity is a position I can support. Social justice is not. But the analogy was being used to how if the wealthy are getting out of their lawful tax obligations, then they're going to have to be made to pay up. It's not just a sanction on past behaviour, but future behaviour as well. In the example of the orchard, a kid who's playing softball and loses the ball behind my b…
/r/MensRights24/05/16 02:37 AM
1

This is exactly the guilt by association that is so fundamentally erroneous: They aren't all guilty, but hang em all anyway! Let's say I have an apple orchard, and I discover neighborhood kids have been stealing from it. The response I would take is to put electric barbed wire, cameras & a couple of rottweilers. That may be irrespective of how "all" kids behave, but it's still 100% wise, necessary & fair. The ones who aren't stealing do not need to worry. At the same time, I cannot be incognizan…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:00 PM
1

A Demographic most certainly can be culpable. The Panama Papers are more than evidence of this. And even if the behaviour doesn't describe "all" Billionaires, there's still the issue that all of them enjoyed that privilege. Changing the laws to take the loopholes away or counteract them will be more than fair. There are privileges that women enjoy by the fact of being women, and the MRM is always highlighting those. More so if you're MGTOW. The dynamic of always being believed because you have a…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 08:49 PM
1

"I am not a crook" -Richard Millhouse Nixon
/r/MensRights23/05/16 08:32 PM
1

Thomas Woods? LOL I can't take you seriously after that :D
/r/MensRights23/05/16 08:31 PM
1

So... put your objections to him and see what he says :) Believe me, he has even had his posts cited on Mises before.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 08:29 PM
1

Wow, Mises. I guess if Mises doesn't put it under that category, it must be so FIFY ;-)
/r/MensRights23/05/16 08:04 PM
1

Besides, I already refuted your nonsense in my first post about neoliberalism being libertarian in any way. No you didn't. You posted a link by Mises ;-) The only "deregulation" that could account for the 2008 crash is Glass-Steagall. However, that cannot be blamed on the crash. Dead wrong: http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/2009/11/financial-deregulation-and-origin-of.html And check the comments, more are listed.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 08:02 PM
1

Oh, but they are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism#Austrian_School
/r/MensRights23/05/16 07:55 PM
1

Whatever you say, Torquemada.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 01:06 PM
1

Cultural Marxism? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School#Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:58 PM
1

You are an idiot if you think libertarians advocate neoliberalism Excuse me? Hayek and Friedman are the granddaddies of Libertarianism and of Neo-Liberalism: Neoliberalism (or sometimes neo-liberalism)[1] is a term which has been used since the 1950s,[2] but became more prevalent in its current meaning in the 1970s and 80s by scholars in a wide variety of social sciences[3] and critics[4] primarily in reference to the resurgence of 19th century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic libera…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:55 PM
1

I doubt very much you even know what Marxism is, or the difference between it and Socialism, or what socialism is, either: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production,[7] as well as the political ideologies, theories, and movements that aim at their establishment.[8] Social ownership may refer to public ownership, cooperative ownership, citizen ownership of equity, …
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:36 PM
1

Just out of curiosity, why did you post this anon on my blog?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:35 PM
1

It's not your enemy. Neoliberalism is.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:34 PM
1

I don't believe Shoeonhead has described herself as libertarian http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/author/shoe0nhead
/r/MensRights22/05/16 10:33 PM
1

Did you not understand the bit about not wasting any more of my time? Then don't reply #DERP
/r/MensRights21/05/16 11:40 AM
1

Your bit about doctors makes no sense, it looks like the kind of thing a crazy person would say. Not half as crazy as someone who's never studied medicine thinking they know enough to critique doctors. Mentioning prejudice is not political correctness, if it is then this sub is politically correct and so are all the right wingers who claim Facebook is prejudiced towards them Oh well, it starts when people have objections to things like what Mrs. Carter said and then it's all "you're pc!" "You're…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:44 AM
1

You are truly a moron. If only doctors are allowed to criticize doctors, there are a lot of doctors going to be getting away with malpractice. Nope. The reason we can criticize doctors is because of doctors and scientists that have put their time in and done their homework and who are willing to put their reputation on the line to have an opinion about the professionalism of others. Really, grow a brain http://votersopinion.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Extreme-Irony-300x183.gif As for Reagan, …
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:06 AM
1

Even Some Men's Rights Activists Are Worried About a Trump Presidency That's actually a better title than the 1st one, which implied we had a "complicated" relationship with Trump.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 03:21 AM
0

Before you say anything else, know that I agree with you that Hillary is about the farthest thing from a good candidate anyone concerned for men should be backing.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 03:04 AM
0

It's official, folks, Warren Farrell has gone senile. You want immature, you traitor, look at men who need the approval of powerful women so badly that they will support even a rabid female supremacist like HC. That's the problem with not shaving, i guess, you don't look at yourself often enough. And you've done what for the well-being of Men & Boys, that gives you the place to criticize? and his mere presence in the White House will help to change the current American mindset when it comes to p…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:56 AM
1

I just got the joke lol #DERP ;-)
/r/MensRights18/05/16 04:31 AM
1

This has what to do with the price of eggs in China?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 07:14 PM
1

A fair amount of the pundits in the MRM are Libertarian. Few Libertarians can stand McCain.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:42 PM
1

The one thing that is consistent is that for the most part, women seem to have made an innovation on something. There's very few that seem to have really made something out of whole materials that was in and of itself a real invention. If you want, we can grant kevlar as an exception. That still doesn't eliminate the dodginess of the bulk of the claims that appear to be ppl standing on their heads to try to make women into inventors. I mean... If it bothers women that they lag behind in inventio…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:39 PM
1

Seems like mine got moderated before it was published.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 01:09 PM
1

I mean - What do you think anyone should do? Go and ask DE. He'd say "Yes, it's true." So you choose then whether to believe him or not. The other alternative is to email GMP directly. To my understanding, they are run by Ms. Magazine. So how likely are they to give you an unbiased answer?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:33 PM
1

Looks good & thanks! Headed for bed... lol I spent some time looking up that Pol Pot thing. Fascinating.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:07 PM
1

There was no reason to ask because: 1) I know Dean Esmay well enough to verify his integrity and that he's not about playing fast & loose with the facts. 2) The pattern fits David Futrelle if you have any at all knowledge of his m.o. 3) What we were being asked to do was in no way immoral or illgal or even questionable. He just asked us to like the article & share it, simple as that. Fyi, his Reddit name is u/desmay so you might have better luck there, or through AVfM.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:05 PM
1

If this is so important to you, why don't you go and ask him yourself?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:13 AM
1

who is better Not either of the presumptive nominees. we once put our faith in John McCain Who's "we?"
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:13 AM
1

That being the case, we'd never see it because the tendency appears to ignore any MRM bips on the screen as much as possible. Meantime, lots of working-class men attend his rallies. It's his choice as whether to listen or not.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:44 AM
1

Excellent work. Perhaps you could put all of this on a blog? I'd share it around!
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:35 AM
1

Come out strong in support of him, he will adopt our issues Nope. He needs to do his own homework and adopt them before deserving support. There's already men in his corner, so what's stopping him?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 02:28 AM
1

The author contacted my Facebook group and said this is what's going on. For proof, I suspect you'd have to ask GMP.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 01:13 AM
1

He came into my Facebook group and mentioned it. Given Futrelle's modus operandi, I think it's within the realm of plausibility.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:38 PM
1

I don't think there is one Keep telling yourself that :) I'm really of the mind that OP is talking out their ass http://rs169.pbsrc.com/albums/u214/JRLloydIII/WebStuff/insults/ExtremeIrony_zps577d0dcf.gif~c200
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:14 AM
1

I would suggest contacting the author.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:36 AM
1

If that's what you're going to respond with, find the answer yourself :-|
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:35 AM
1

Maybe a drunk driver who kills someone should try the 'I didn't consent to driving' defense Shhhh...They'll sue the car manufacturer next ;)
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:33 AM
1

What's a paryer? :)
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:07 AM
2

His analogy shows why it shouldn't be called rape.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 06:51 PM
1

Check this out: https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresident/comments/4ig9fb/some_of_the_real_heroines_in_our_country_today/d2xzx23 Once in awhile someone agrees! LOL
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:55 AM
1

Don't blame you. I's still rather deal with them then with Hillary's supporters.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 03:00 AM
1

But it's not the handbook where the conflicts happen, it's in school discipline.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 08:18 PM
1

Read the title.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 02:39 AM
1

it's putting our population in danger https://overpopulationisamyth.com https://www.pop.org/content/debunking-myth-overpopulation http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/14/opinion/overpopulation-is-not-the-problem.html http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/10/25/overpopulation-a-fact-or-myth http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22292-debunking-the-overpopulation-myth https://youtu.be/WT_CxJfFgh0 https://youtu.be/eA5BM7CE5-8 http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/2014/02/bill-gates-r…
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:20 AM
2

Fascist.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 12:30 AM
1

Anyways I've said already and I fucking meant it - I'm through with you. You're too proud and too threatened by someone who's argument you cannot even begin to address to quit, Little Boy. At least I think you're a boy :))
/r/MensRights03/04/16 10:06 PM
1

You are making a moral argument, based on YOUR OWN MORALS and your own prejudice against a person Pretty certain I'm hardly alone, or Hillary's opposition wouldn't have tried to make an issue of it. If you had any dick or spine at all you'd be angry at the people who supposedly destroyed evidence They aren't running for office.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 10:03 PM
1

your morals do not apply to the rest of the world I think the voting public will have a different viewpoint.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 10:02 PM
1

Innocent until proven guilty you dumb fuck And you are so flustered and angry you can't even tell the difference between what I'm saying, and the concept of presumption of innocence, which you are trying to clutch your pears with, as a means of moving the goalposts. Seems to me you're trying to cover up the people who destroyed evidence Hee hee #FAIL... I could care less about them. But you sure are passionate to defend a likely child molester :]
/r/MensRights03/04/16 10:01 PM
1

According to someone WITH morals :D
/r/MensRights03/04/16 09:58 PM
0

You don't have one other than "I hate her, and she defended someone (I.E. Her job) You might actually be able to argue against my argument if you'd stop strawmanning it ;-) she has NO OBLIGATION Only as an amoral person. As a moral person, she does have an obligation to refuse. You're a narcissist Keep swingin' & missin'! XD you have no evidence or backing claim)that she should have refused is some sort of binding moral code Sure I do. The fact that she thought he probably was guilty, yet didn't…
/r/MensRights03/04/16 01:33 PM
0

She did her job That's what the SS soldiers claimed: "I was only following orders" :) But a moral person would object and resign. you've got nothing on her for this Delude yourself all you want to.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 01:29 PM
1

You're a hypocrite, and an imbecile. I'm finished with you, you may limp back into whatever sad existence you live. Funny, didn't you say you were finished once befiore? :)) But thanks for the ad-homs and trying to strong-arm me into agreeing with you. It's the most satisfying indication of defeat on your part.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 01:27 PM
1

No Sherlock, Shit ;-)
/r/MensRights02/04/16 09:13 PM
0

"He shouldn't have a good lawyer, or a layer of his choosing" Nope. Not even close. Her INTEGRITY was what allowed her to take a case few others would be willing to take. No, that is her lack of moral integrity. You have no other argument Don't need one. You ain't put a dent in mine, yet.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:56 PM
1

You're a piece of shit, Ad homs are the most satisfying admission of defeat. What about Duke Lacrosse Apples and Oranges Here's the definition of integrity you dumb fuck: " Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code." Glad you got something right. you do not get to dictate what is or is not moral You telling me I have to agree with you and Hillary is you dictating what is or isn't the right thing to do. Oops! She acted well within her rights And eschewed integrity. None of that is deb…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:54 PM
0

The right thing to do would be give him the best defense possible Nope. The law necessitates that, but the individual still has the right to objection based on conscience.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:47 PM
1

And those who refuse to take his case FORCE him to use an attorney of lower quality. Those people are undermining justice, they're letting their biases (or lack of desire to lose a case) prevent someone from getting good representation, in the process of doing so they FORCE someone else to do it LMAO! That's truly funny. Did you stay up all night trying to pull that one out ya backside? They force no one to do anything, sorry. And even if they did, so what? Let a person of lower integrity take t…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:58 AM
1

Somebody HAS to represent them. If she didn't someone would be forced too, representation is guaranteed. Would you hate the person the state chose to represent him as well? Possibly. It depends on how things went. She was doing her job, her job was to defend him, she EXPOSED the evidence tampering as part of her job. snicker She didn't expose anything. Someone f'ed up. So? Donald Duck coulda fielded that one. She believed he was guilty 2) She was his attorney 3) He is not in prison because she g…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:53 AM
1

I will admit she did one thing right, when you show me that she did something right. In this instance, the one right thing would have been to not take the case.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:40 AM
1

She has the RIGHT to turn it down And if she had intergity, she would.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:39 AM
1

If you're that shallow, you probably wouldn't understand the video anyway.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:12 AM
1

1) You hate her because she defended someone - fulfilling their legal right to be defended. Again, irrelevant. Attorneys turn down cases all the time #DERP 2) She - in accordance with typical legal practices - defended her client by analyzing the veracity of all evidence, including bringing in professionals. She could have resigned once she knew there was inadvertent evidence tampering. 3) She fulfilled her role without letting her personal biases influence her professional duties. You can see i…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:11 AM
1

Apparently she feels everybody has the right to representation. So did Charles Manson. But not everyone will take his case. So did OJ. But only an unscrupulous attorney would (and did) defend him. If you want to be salty I'll be salty at whom I choose, tyvm. Just because YOU don't think someone deserves their - LEGAL RIGHT - to a defense doesn't mean everyone agrees with you Goalpost moving. This has nothing to do with his legal rights and you know it, Dumb Ass.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:05 AM
1

Sure thing. Hillary all the way in November, Dude. ;-)
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:02 AM
1

Yeah I'm sorry you didn't like my response to your criticism but that's life. Your criticism of my opening credits using a Feminist term like "Cringe-worthy" for a benign opener of 15 seconds doesn't make me change my opinion that you have the mental level of a Millennial. Sorry Dude.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 12:00 AM
1

You seem pretty much on the same page.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:42 PM
1

It's hard not to notice you avoided the fact that she didn't have to take the case.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:41 PM
1

Thanks for the non-relevant response ;-)
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:40 PM
1

No argument, there. I still say he's more reasonable than her.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:38 PM
1

So do a lot of Repubs.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:38 PM
3

You should check Fiorina's response sometime. She basically avoided addressing Boy's Issues and started ranting about Feminism.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:34 AM
1

Fair enough. The trick may be to get to him in order to present the case. I'm betting Warren Farrell could do it, if he could get an audience.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:25 AM
2

If I had to pick between who's more reasonable between Sanders, Clinton & Obama, Bernie seems to be the obvious choice.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:23 AM
8

But most in politics today are gynocentric to the nth degree. I expect a socialist to be more reasonable. Fyi, it might help you to learn your terminology: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:40 AM
9

He also said Campus Sexual Assault cases should be handled by LE, instead of by school officials.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:14 AM
1

It's still an overstatement, and at best a way of talking about these issues that's a bit out-of-date. Something Sanders would have to tighten up on should he become the nominee.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:12 AM
1

And one can define wealth as anything that exceeds meeting your needs. Sure they can, if you want to move the goalposts and talk about wealth in a different sense than you originally brought up. But for the record, by that definition, people with vows of poverty are not wealthy. They've been going on what they need ONLY. As I've pointed out to you time & again. And in the strictest sense, "meeting your needs" is mere survival, on the brink of starvation with absolutely no surplus of resources an…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:48 PM
0

Was it too long for a millennial to sit through?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:38 PM
1

Ferrari Do you just look at everything through the lens of worshipping the almighty dollar or what? :)) Men who aren't as wealthy as Lennon absolutely do have the option of taking a breather from the workforce. They can join one of the communities of goods we've been talking about. There's also the option of MGTOW, which I brought up earlier, and it's hard not to notice you avoided the topic altogether. You can't dismiss those just because they don't fit in with your "more-is-more-get-all-you-ca…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:31 PM
1

You quoted me saying "To say that it's some kind of social construct is ridiculous. " To which you responded: "No, there is nothing that makes wealth "objectively" a positive trait Mmmmyep. The example of starvation level poverty serves only one single purpose and that is to demonstrate that everyone has a minimum threshold beneath which they are wanting for more wealth. That is all I need to show in order to demonstrate that wealth is objectively a positive trait Except that it doesn't. All it …
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:59 PM
1

Not for men who can't afford to retire. Which happens to be most of them. But it doesn't matter, since many of them don't take that option regardless. So you've entered the discussion about most men - whether you say so now or not. And I've not moved anywhere from that discussion. That is what you have done. Not me. LOL Keep telling yourself that, Bucko! ;-) From my very first comment I was explicitly referring to "most men" and included the assertion that they cannot afford to retire when they …
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:11 PM
1

The existence of vows of poverty or communities of goods does not prove that wealth isn't a positive trait. It is in fact, proof that not everyone holds to the same values that you do. The missing premise is that people always take vows that match their wants. Thank-you for proving my point. The vows they took are proof that they don't want or need that much to get by. Besides, shared resources doesn't negate their value. It just unifies people into one economic entity. Irrelevant. My original c…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:05 PM
1

One more time: He uses John Lennon as an example for how men don't have to be dependent on earning money to earn love. But John Lennon was already rich and famous when he “discovered“ this alternative path. That's why it's a terrible example to hold up. One more time: Regardless of the station in life that each man is at financially, they still do not avail themselves of such options. Therefore, Lennon is an excellent example to hold up. pointing out that even rich guys who have the option of no…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:24 PM
1

The point is what options they have. And pointing out that a rich and famous man has the option of retiring from his career, simply doesn't work for the vast majority of men. Even with those options, many husbands and fathers STILL do not take the options of being stay at home fathers. You still aren't getting it.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 09:06 PM
1

I'd like to see some solid evidence that they genuinely prefer men with fewer resources. I'd like to see them watching their children go hungry and not wanting to get more food Which of course, has zero to do with the concept of vows of poverty or communities of goods, both of which have existed for centuries. Also, you are making a correlation of lack of wealth/consumerism = with starvation level poverty. There is none. Everyone has a threshold beneath which resources are too few. Place them be…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 09:05 PM
1

Well what is his response to this? Why don't you try listening to some Yt videos of his? "Most men" can't afford to quit their jobs. Irrelevant, since I pointed out that even in Lennon's situation, not everyone is going to take the same options. I'm not concerned for the tiny minority of men who have world wide fame and great fortune Because it doesn't fit your narrative?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 09:33 PM
1

Are they self-sufficient societies or are they dependent on external resources? And how is "poverty" defined by them? What must they lack in order to call themselves "poor"? Why is any of this relevant? Do some googling on monastic lifestyles with vows of poverty if you are so curious. You seem to want to go to great lengths to justify your unfounded assumption that everyone wants to be wealthy full stop, and that just simply has no basis in fact.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 09:31 PM
1

But don't you think it would be doing young men and boys a disservice to try and encourage them down a path that isn't really available to them or, at best, will make their lives very difficult Why? Men are going MGTOW all the time.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:19 PM
1

But he's wrong in several important things. Firstly the pressure on men to be in high-status jobs isn't something that can just be undone. It's a function of women's preferences You haven't been listening to Farrell very much at all if you don't understand that he deals with this at length in most of his writings and talks given. his example of John Lennon is a terrible example for most men No it isn't. It's exactly at this point in the career of most men that decompressing and changing gears is…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:16 PM
1

Needless to say, I'm not convinced Ditto.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:08 PM
1

What, you're going to start moving the goalposts because you don't like the answer? ;-) For the record, certain monastic groups even take vows of poverty. There goes your "declaration that certain goods should not be acquired" objection. Actually, I would surmise that most of our worship of wealth and personal gain is a byproduct of the Industrial Revolution. Prior to that, I doubt men were looking for more than just a woman that would be good around the farm, if utilitarian purposes factored in…
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:07 PM
1

Ummm... A married man in India commits suicide every 9 minutes: http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-one-married-man-commits-suicide-every-9-minutes-1350968
/r/MensRights28/03/16 10:10 AM
1

They do .... but They don't. No buts about it. So here we have an actual example of social pressure affecting mate selection. That and the fact that women often look down on a lower income male. I think you're assuming a correlation that doesn't exist. The truth of my statement doesn't really validate yours.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:32 AM
1

The Amish. Monastic lifestyles. Hutterite Farm Communities. Things like that.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 12:28 AM
1

Now you might ask why men don't want a woman with a high income. They do. Actually no they don't. Not one with a higher income than themselves. And if they do, it would be something like him having a talent or a trade that he could make even more money for both of them, but she's investing in his "career," so to speak. Most social systems are designed around it being a shame for a man to not be able to "take care of the woman."
/r/MensRights26/03/16 11:09 PM
1

To say that it's some kind of social construct is ridiculou No, there is nothing that makes wealth "objectively" a positive trait, other than the fact that people are in agreement that it's a plus. There are societies designed around the notion that having more is actually a sin. Whether that's right or wrong isn't the point.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 11:05 PM
1

she did all she could to point out flaws in the evidence [citation needed]
/r/MensRights24/03/16 07:57 AM
2

Oh, bullshit. She could have refused the case & you know it. Try looking at the facts of the case: But the defense prevailed, Clinton told Reed, when she realized that the crime lab had woefully mishandled the girl’s bloody underwear—a key piece of evidence. “The crime lab took the pair of underpants, neatly cut out the part that they were gonna test, tested it, came back with the result of what kind of blood it was what was mixed in with it—then sent the pants back with the hole in it to eviden…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:11 PM
2

??? She admitted that she knew he was guilty. I don't think your example works here.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:24 PM
1

All of our jobs are going to be replaced by automation regardless. Sex bots basically change nothing about "jobs" Good job missing the point.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:28 AM
1

The MGTOWS, Libertarians & Atheists all cheer this kind of thing on. "Technology!" "Loose the old moralistic restrictions~!" Then watch their faces as their jobs are being replaced by automation.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:45 PM
1

Okay but you are being down voted into oblivion (again!) And besides being muted, you aren't addressing video content. Maybe get your own blog and start writing? Just a thought.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:42 PM
1

FOLLOW UP VIDEO: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4bbffh/story_time_with_cenk_humor
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:47 PM
1

Oh, okay. You have nothing to say about the actual video, then.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:46 PM
-1

Who pissed in your Wheaties? ;-) Seriously, not to knock anything you've said, but it doesn't seem to have a lot to do with the video.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:47 AM
1

Excellent sources on this topic & thank-you.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:06 PM
1

It is an actual issue as long as: Women get shorter sentences for the same crimes as men Mothers are more likely to be awarded custody Men are demonized as the "abusers" Until then, highlight the horrible violence and abusive crimes committed by women all the way.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 06:49 PM
-1

Are you new?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 03:58 AM
2

Ok well if I accuse someone of falsely accusing someone of rape, then you can't challenge me. I get POI and don't you dare question my story no matter how half-baked it is. Hey, I like this! But of course, everyone knows that only works if you have a vagina ;-)
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:23 AM
2

Your fantasy that an accuser should be afforded the protections & benefits of POI.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:55 AM
2

No, that's an invention in your own mind. The accuser does not get the benefit of POI in no situation whatsoever. As long as they remain the accuser. If they become the accused, they get the benefit if POI.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:28 AM
1

James Deen was never charged with a crime and mras advocated for poi there. Holy shit, do you actually bother reading anything I post? I literally just explained it to you in ridiculous detail If someone is going to throw accusations around and not file charges against the alleged perpetrator and let the system do it's investigative work, they don't deserve the benefit of POI. But another aspect of this is Feminist insistence "Believe the victim!" - Bassically assuming the accusation is the evid…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:02 AM
2

When speaking of accusations of false rape accusations, however, they do not advocate presumption of innocence and Yep. Because unless she was charged with a crime, POI doesn't apply here.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:56 AM
1

Tru 'dat. Probably best termed "Revenge out of control."
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:19 AM
1

I'm thinking it's not a double-standard, until she is charged with a crime. I know you want it to be, but that's not what Presumption of Innocence amounts to.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:18 AM
0

No one claimed there was, and that "asshole" isn't saying anything most MRA's haven't been.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:43 AM
2

I see 5 individuals insisting on Presumption of Innocence as a standard. So?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:42 AM
2

Nope. Only in your imagination :)
/r/MensRights09/03/16 04:41 AM
4

Innocent until proven guilty applies to any crime, including false accusations Nope. It only applies if she's been accused of it.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 03:15 AM
3

Yeah, and...?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 03:12 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/RTJIDOM.png
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:59 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/RTJIDOM.png
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:57 AM
1

OTOH, Drumpf may be a shill for Hillary.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 06:07 AM
1

Oliver’s actually going to take the unbelievably stupid and borderline racist argument that the man’s migrant ancestors anglicised their German name when they arrived in the US? IF you listened to the video, that's not the logic behind what he's doing.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 01:19 AM
1

Bloomfield is more on the bleeding edge of Trump-like Xenophobia than Elam. Easily.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 01:03 AM
1

this sounds to me like someone who is completely lacking in self awareness yet still has a very high opinion of themselves and their "ability"... I believe the word for that is "Prima Donna."
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:28 AM
3

My instincts hearing facts like that are that the woman is low intelligence - likely intellectually disabled. She's being abused by her father, and then a group of boys show up, and take advantage of the situation You're a pig.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:19 AM
1

I could support most of those :) With the qualifier re #2 that if we're going to give women that right, then men should have it also.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:37 PM
1

It strikes me more as a modern movement idolizing a past nobody ever lived in. Actually, that describes demigogs like Razor Blade Kandy, who keep insisting that the 1950's is the model for Trad Marriage according to Traditionalists. None of the Anti-Trads seem to have any history to offer. Throwing socialization out the window is stupid. I believe both nature and nurture affect us to some extent. But unless you care to throw in with the Feminists and Cultural Marxists, you have to own up to the …
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:16 AM
1

I'll see if I can get the commentator to come in & talk for himself.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:04 AM
1

I'll admit that a pacifist traditionalist takes away one of my objections When you're so clearly ill-informed about that, what else do you think you might be missing, here? I don't identify as a traditionalist for the same reason I don't identify as a feminist, I disagree with the ideology. Traditionalism is why the family structure has held society in place and on good footing for centuries. Opposing it is contradictory to the screaming about "Cultural Marxism," that you often hear repeated abo…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:55 AM
0

Try listening to the video.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:24 AM
1

As far as I know, going by the text of a verdict IS being objective.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:49 PM
2

Actually, Rachel went public with her leaving HBR before they did.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:48 PM
1

"I don't want a war" does not exclude "I think men should be on the front lines in case of a war." I'm sitting here trying to determine if you're actually serious with this statement. You clearly do not understand pacifism if you think this. Stating that death is bad is not putting deaths on an equal level regardless of gender. Equally silly. This distracts from the argument though, yes it's possible to be a traditionalist and a pacifist. That being a fact doesn't make it inherently compatible w…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 09:57 AM
1

Interesting, but you're all over the place and it's difficult to ascertain where you're coming from and what position you're taking on all of this?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 09:53 AM
1

You don't see how War resistance relates to this very statement you made??? Traditionalism is the view that only men can sacrifice their lives for their country. Funny, but I would have thought being against war and/or conscription would take care of that rather nicely.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 09:41 AM
1

I don't. I support him because he is a father and he's not guilty of theft :)
/r/MensRights25/02/16 02:40 AM
1

A person who is a traditionalist can be a war resister. Ask the Mennonites... Quakers... Amish...
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:45 PM
1

As is pointed out in the video, it is possible to be a traditionalist and a pacifist.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 08:27 PM
1

Excuse me for pointing out that he was not guilty.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:01 PM
1

Okay, so the fact that they changed the charges against him is irrelevant, because now you have two charges against him that didn't prevail. And the fact of the teenager not being able to own property doesn't prove that the mother is the rightful owner. The girl was in the physical custody and care of the father at the time, and in such a case it could be that he had veto power over anything illegal that might be going on in his house, or anything that could cause legal or social ramifications h…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:50 AM
1

Maybe you should read the article I did. Maybe you should learn to read: A Texas father has been found not guilty of theft after he took his 12-year-old daughter's phone away as punishment. Ronald Jackson, 36, had been charged with theft of property of at least $50 but under $500 after taking his daughter's iPhone 4 when he found an inappropriate text in September 2013, WFAA reported. A judge ordered for Jackson to be found not guilty on Tuesday citing insufficient evidence to continue the case.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:26 PM
1

Since she is a minor her property belongs to the person who has primary custody By what law? And do consider that this is Texas. And btw, who is physically supporting this child? Incorrect. The court decided it wasn't the higher charge of theft of property which value of $2000 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/01/31/i-was-being-a-parent-father-found-not-guilty-after-taking-away-daughters-iphone Following a long legal battle, a Dallas County Criminal Court judge ruled last w…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 12:19 PM
1

1) Technically the phone was a gift. Ordinarily, one would say it's the recipient's property, but for the fact that the girl is a minor. 2) The mother could have stopped the Cell Phone plan, and reported it stolen in order to get compensation and prevent further loss of fees. 3) Since what happened took place on the father's property, his right to prevent possible juvenile delinquent behaviour comes into play. 4) The court decided it was not theft, in the father's favor.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:32 AM
0

I was trying to determine who's custody she was in at the time, also. I doubt if the mother wasn't married to a cop...
/r/MensRights20/02/16 10:28 AM
0

True, but I'm talking about what kind of court order/mediation could come out of this.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 09:55 AM
3

The phone should be returned to the mother as the rightful owner, and he shouldn't be arrested or charged.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 09:41 AM
1

*YAWN* Nobody's read that before.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 12:37 AM
1

Why in the world was that downvoted???
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:08 AM
-1

To be fair, the same quote from the German Prosecutor is also used on a later piece by the Independent.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:38 AM
0

I see them on Chrome.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:34 AM
0

and do everything they can to make sure the comments pages are disabled Can't be the Independent you are referring to. They have their comments up.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:22 AM
-2

http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2013/03/this-was-posted-on-breitbart-com-people-are-outraged-by-the-lack-of-integrity-editors-of-breitbart-became-as-corrupt-as-the-rest-of-the-puppet-media-and-the-regime-2458020.html
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:18 AM
-2

And only 3 rapes were verified. Such a deal.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:11 AM
0

The admin person who made the one Facebook comment if you scroll down, that was chilling!
/r/MensRights17/02/16 01:55 AM
0

You have your head up your ass. I can tell you straight up on my own account ;-)
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:39 AM
2

Unless they want to ask "What about the Men & Boys," I'm going to take it with a grain of salt. Just another gynocentric group looking for funding as far as I'm concerned.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:31 AM
4

The article is not pro-polygamy.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:32 PM
2

Because it's informed and from someone who should know what he's talking about. How about the article at the top posted by 4418?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:14 PM
4

You appear to not even be interacting with the article. Could you please go an read it and get back to us?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:37 PM
1

Is this some kind of campaign? A get your head out of your ass and stop spreading rumors of a Rape Culture campaign, yes.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:48 PM
1

or women who have lived in middle eastern countries Well, there's one here: https://youtu.be/YO1wO2NL2Pw https://youtu.be/9NyK_JRzEjA We have a girl who's from Germany and lived in Pakistan, plus other 2nd hand reports were included: https://youtu.be/R0VuJE_ssKg Some other anecdotes from those living in the Middle East mentioned here: https://youtu.be/5eqYEVYZgdo Here's the Man's perspective from someone who lives in Iran: http://www.avoiceformen.com/gynocentrism/the-myth-of-patriarchal-oppressi…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:25 AM
2

Tom James is a family law attorney who has done research in the area of custody law: http://www.amazon.com/The-History-Custody-Law-James/dp/1499182031
/r/MensRights05/02/16 12:54 AM
2

Tom James is a family law attorney who has done research in the area of custody law: http://www.amazon.com/The-History-Custody-Law-James/dp/1499182031
/r/MensRights05/02/16 12:54 AM
2

I think you raise some very good points. I would put those on her comments section. ETA: Do you have any sources for how men's lives were prior to the Industrial Revolution?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:35 AM
1

You err in thinking slavery had ended with the passage of the 13th amendment: http://www.slaverybyanothername.com/reviews/tales-show-how-slavery-lingered-after-civil-war-atlanta-journal-constitution http://www.cracked.com/article_19223_6-civil-war-myths-everyone-believes-that-are-total-b.s..html
/r/MensRights01/02/16 02:22 AM
1

What about the Georgia Tech thing?
/r/MensRights29/01/16 08:44 PM
1

Of course. We should vote for Chump the Rape Hysteria bullhorn. That's Men's Rights right there! ETA: I have no intention of voting for Hillary either way.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 03:31 AM
2

Learn what "apologist" means.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:55 AM
1

What kind of a tool would DV this?
/r/MensRights22/01/16 04:27 PM
5

Or maybe the marriage rates? :D
/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:03 AM
4

Wanted to check before I unjustly downvoted you :))
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:20 PM
6

You're being sarcastic, right?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:17 PM
2

Do you really expect people here to invest 65 minutes into it? If you want to hear from someone who's lived in the region and/or an Iraq veteran because they likely know better than you would, yes.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:08 PM
0

So here's some reality for you: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-islamic-state-isis-is-made-in-america-the-pentagon-had-planned-the-fall-of-mosul-and-ramadi-in-2012/5451363 http://www.globalresearch.ca/newly-declassified-u-s-government-documents-the-west-supported-the-creation-of-isis/5451640 http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/secret-pentagon-report-how-washington-fostered-isis-to-topple-assadshiite-alliance/?utm_source=wysija&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Mailing+List+PM+Monday http://www.gl…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 09:46 PM
0

Jihad. The striving and fighting in the way of Allah didn't clue you in to that? So Muslims are "fighting in the way of Allah" every minute of every day, in every situation. All the time. Can't put down that Uzi right now, gotta shoot some Jews. Sure thing. Just like there are Muslims who aren't engaging in Jihad, there are those who don't murder apostates. It's still their religion. No, it isn't. Their "religion" is their interpretation - or how they choose to carry it out in their daily lives.…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 09:42 PM
0

Do you read the title of your own links? I do better than that, I read the text. For instance, here's the date of that piece you just quoted: 1:00PM EDT 9/10/2015 That means that it's talking about the current political situation caused by outside interference on foreign soil, nothing to do with religious persecution. How about reading this one, 2nd link: From what I’ve seen, many evangelical Christians live in what I call “Christian bubbles” instead of living life with those who are not covered…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 09:07 PM
0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_converts_to_Christianity_from_Islam http://www.boundless.org/blog/five-questions-with-a-former-muslim-who-converted-to-christianity http://www.charismanews.com/world/51920-hundreds-of-muslims-convert-to-christianity-amid-violent-persecution http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3225014/How-Muslim-migrants-converting-Christianity-Germany-hundreds-boost-chances-winning-asylum.html Nobody's killing all these people that I can see.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:45 AM
0

"Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame That still doesn't give context. WHAT is is addressing? A book of the Bible has an audience and an occasion for it's writing - usually some issue that is being addressed. You don't give any of this. Enlarging your cherry-picked quotes won't help you. The insults are unnecessary. If you believe that, the insult is accurate. I wonder what Muslims are supposed to do to those who le…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:35 AM
0

So you don't care that there is no evidence. Why is that?
/r/MensRights16/01/16 11:25 AM
-1

I might also add that US capitulation to Zionist/Neocon destabilization in the middle east is more important for our consideration than worrying about at what point do we call end of game on "tolerance." I'd like to know how much more tolerance we can expect for American interference and wasting trillions of dollars on wars that never get anywhere.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:06 PM
1

Since there hasn't been any real problems other than this rape thing in Cologne that has nothing so much as a video clip somewhere as evidence, I'd say the sky's the limit. Male Disposability or demonization of men as rapists should be what we focus on here.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:01 PM
0

Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home Once again, you are ignoring the fact that each Muslim sect takes the importance of each passage differently, just as Christians or Jews do. Plus you didn't even give context. That's kind of what happens when you force people to convert at swordpoint You are a complete moron. They aren't growing at "swordpoint," they are growing because they, like the Catholic Church and many others "fuck like rabbits." http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/20…
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:46 PM
1

if they were true believers So you're prepared to say anyone who is a Muslim who isn't out slaughtering heretics isn't a true believer. Wow. I certainly don't feel qualified to talk for someone else's religion to that degree. Do you realize that one day, Muslims will be the majority population worldwide? You need to take some skeptical pills: https://youtu.be/DArTKr8ggdU
/r/MensRights15/01/16 02:40 AM
1

And so all Muslims everywhere are turning converts at the threat of a machete'. Why, you can't go out your front door without a bloodbath.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 01:58 AM
1

There is a verse in the Bible that says Homosexuals should be executed if caught in the act. But not every Christian follows that verse. Why? Answer: "Everyone interprets it differently" Some folks go by the Old Testament war verses heavily. Others focus on Jesus' injunction to "turn the other cheek." Within Islam, there are such continuums as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifism_in_Islam http://www.wandoujia.com/items/5619948946664804741
/r/MensRights14/01/16 10:36 PM
1

Oh. You clearly have no clue what you're talking about, then.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 11:46 AM
1

That has what to do with the facts on the ground in Cologne?
/r/MensRights14/01/16 06:38 AM
1

Keep your comments to yourself about the colors of the formatting or that it's allegedly "blog spam" to link to something you wrote.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 04:28 AM
-1

There is no victim blaming in this video, Respondent you utter Sheeple ;-)
/r/MensRights13/01/16 09:18 AM
0

Dunno what to tell ya.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 10:03 PM
1

Actually no. I think Karen would be making the case that messing around in other people's shit is a waste of time. That's just a guess on my part, but her being a Libertarian, I'd say that's highly likely.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:01 PM
3

This has nothing to do with Islamophobia It has everything to do with Islamophobia, because hyping women's woes is a way of stoking the war machine which results in Male Disposability.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:08 PM
2

She does say that Source?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:37 PM
1

Read this - Facts shoot down the anecdotes, every time: http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showthread.php?17151-Australia-it-s-legal-to-rape-so-long-as-you-re-Muslim
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:53 PM
1

Try looking at the big picture instead of focusing on anecdotes: http://forums.avoiceformen.com/showthread.php?17151-Australia-it-s-legal-to-rape-so-long-as-you-re-Muslim
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:44 PM
1

you should at least acknowledge that a "stable and peaceful" middle east would most likely deny you that same freedom of expression A stable and peaceful region would be oppression. You just said that, and I'm the one who's warped? Feel free to show up for our podcast this Friday: https://youtu.be/kJ-3DIrYGZ8 We will be featuring a student from Germany who's spent time in Pakistan and she will refute the notion that Muslims are some kind of uncontrollable animals who oppress women. Just one of m…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 08:07 PM
1

Then I have no idea what your complaint is, other then I just don't explain things "your" way.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 06:59 AM
1

I'm simply not pretending that the ME would be stable and peaceful if the west wasn't involving itself Of course, nobody has made that claim, but it would undoubtedly be better off. Your repeated return to that point as if it were actually an issue speaks more of your own attempt at derailing.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:29 AM
1

I think we now know what your "agenda" is by that statement ;-)
/r/MensRights11/01/16 12:27 AM
1

The Root of said Problem: https://youtu.be/CvOGUsMzeAg
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:25 PM
1

My political agenda = Getting to the root of the problem. I think you're avoiding the main issues and wildly grasping at straws everywhere but failing to look at where the blame mainly lies.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:20 PM

but your analysis appears to be a mile wide and an inch deep. I think one could easily say the same for yours :) In fact I think it's safe to say you have no real clue as to why there's anything that's taking place right now has occured: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/refugee-crisis-where-are-all-these-people-coming-from-and-why-10490425.html "Some 2.6 million Iraqis have been displaced by Islamic State – Isis – offensives in the last year and squat in tents or half-finished buildings. …
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:04 AM
1

I should add that in terms of stability, which the OE seems to have had, Saddam Hussein had things more stable than the current situation in Iraq. He fought off terrorists. Since them Iraq has become a breeding ground. Al-Queda was not in Iraq prior to American interference. Most Syrians would rather have Assad in power, realizing the fact that if he is forced out like the US seems bent on doing, the resultant chaos will be much worse. US interference in foreign affairs has it's greasy pawprints…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 10:11 PM
1

For example, did foreign interference cause a multi year drought that wiped out the agricultural segment of the economy resulting in food shortages and migration to Syrian urban centers? Not really relevant AFAICS. I'm in my mid 40s and the Middle East has not known peace in my lifetime. I remember learning about the Israeli / Palestinian conflict when I was 11. I guess if you want to go back to the Ottoman Empire or earlier you might point to a time where is is less chaotic *ding *ding *ding *d…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:59 PM
1

What's going on in Syria isn't remotely as simple as "the US bombed Iraq then started bombing ISIS" I never said that. What's going on right now is the topic of the article: A refugee crisis. That didn't happen until recently, and as a result of foreign interference. Same thing with the US Policy in Libya causing refugees to flee across the Mediterranean. If you don't see the connection, you must be as blind as a bat. Furthermore, the Middle East has not always been a hotspot for conflict everyw…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 05:59 PM
2

So who's going to help you with stupid generalizations like "since the beginning of time?" Especially since anyone who knows history will tell you the Middle East is the Cradle of Civilization.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 10:09 AM
0

So from your link: The first wave (late 1800s to mid-1920s) overwhelmingly consisted of Arab Christians from the Ottoman province of Syria But you said: People have been trying to leave that shithole since the beginning of time
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:59 AM
2

Well no, any idiot might at any time for any reason might start Rape Hysteria.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:48 AM
0

People have been trying to leave that shithole since the beginning of time Who are these "people?"
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:47 AM
0

Oh, you have none? Thanks for admitting...
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:13 AM
1

Got examples? :]
/r/MensRights09/01/16 07:03 AM
1

The problem I see with this, is that inevitably, it will be the feminists to draw up such a section, and they will use that responsibility to further their own agenda. So i'm at a loss for how to respond to this problem, prior to the feminist problem being resolved. I know how to respond: Stop bombing other people's homeland. No refugee crisis, no problem.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 06:13 AM
1

What's the obsession with Archive?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:40 AM
1

Tried, this is what I got: https://web.archive.org/web/20160104202506/http://www.forbes.com/home_usa
/r/MensRights09/01/16 03:31 AM
1

That stinks. I have an alternate browser that I use in occasions like this.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 07:16 PM
4

Hit it out of the park again, Karen. Will share this around.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 04:44 AM
1

More so that men who do that are predatorial.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 11:12 AM
8

Feminists generally seem to think dating way out of your age range - particularly if that includes young females - runs into "power dynamics" and increases the potential for abuse.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 10:47 AM
1

But surely if they were talking drugs consensually, the legal brief wouldnt have stopped cosby saying it. That's an assumption you're making that you cannot possibly know. A when multiple people have similar claims Actually some have been proven false, and some have serious credibility issues of their own and have histories of making similar accusations: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/01/examining_bill_cosbys_accusers.html as it does matress girl Strained comparison at best, straw-…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 03:29 PM
3

There is no evidence of that being said. LMAO Just like there is no evidence of anyone ever being raped. :) He settled out of court and admitted getting drugs to have sex. He also filed several lawsuits, so what? What you are doing is exactly what feminists do "believe" even when the accuser looks dodgy as hell. Nope. It's called Due Process. Which you seem damn determined to circumvent. Get off this site if you have no better interest in the well-being of men. When asked if the women knew about…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:20 AM
1

But that doesn't necessarily mean it was done without a priori knowledge or consent.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:14 AM
1

Could you please share a source? Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 05:09 AM
1

The issue is refugees, not soldiers having to go fight terrorists. Don't bring in irrelevant information to bolster your pathetic excuse of an argument. As if the west never supplied arms to Syrian rebels, many of whom turned to ISIS in the long run. And as if the conflict is not why they're leaving: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/oct/25/six-reasons-why-syrians-are-fleeing-to-europe-in-increasing-numbers If you don't like Australia, I hope you never come…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 12:45 PM
3

This is not a men's rights issue Excuse me? Who is most likely going to be sent overseas to fight these so-called hobgoblins, but men? Australia Another neocon Zionist stronghold toddling along in the US's wake, just like Canada & Britain. if single muslim men from Syria do not want to be assumed to be terrorists, they should not become terrorists Better yet: The West gets the fuck out of the middle east and we won't have these problems. The current refugee crisis is a result of more misguided N…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 05:36 AM
3

cowards stay home and fight for their country Male disposability and gynocentrism at it's finest.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:20 PM
0

I don't see what your problem is with me posting something I wrote. COTWA does that all the time, and far more so. Get on his case about it, 1st.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:27 PM
0

Did you wake up this a.m. & decide "I'm going to write a shit opinion that's wrong on every single count?" You can always fuck off and not read my blog. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:06 AM
3

As long as a particular candidate doesn't propose anything too drastic, the wage gap is just hot air AFAICS.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:32 PM
2

When you get that argument, tell them to check the number of years between the 1st & 2nd time the draft was used in the US. Then compare that to how many years it is between now & 1973.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:39 AM
1

I didn't sign up for the draft, either. Carter asked for everyone born after Jan 1 of 1960 and I was less than 3 weeks too old. But most of my classmates did have to register. I'm not going to wave that in their faces.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:37 AM
2

Check the number of years between the 1st & 2nd time the draft was used in the US. Now compare that to how many years it is between now & 1973 #OOPS
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:35 AM
0

The "1 in 4" resonates with women too. Non-sequitur. 1 in 4 is a bogus statistic, and not based on real life experience. PE's video is a reflection of the real-world experiences of men. Point refuted.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 07:43 AM
1

AVfM and the MHRM were built on videos such as this, ones that resonate with a lot of men's experiences. This was typical fare in the early days.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:40 AM
0

this is "1 in 4 college students will be raped" for a male audience That's a ridiculous assertion. Elam built AVfM and the MHRM on videos such as this, ones that resonate with a lot of men's experiences. This was typical fare in the early days.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:39 AM
0

I can't make heads or tails out of that garbage. And Idgaf, either.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:23 PM
0

What is up your butt about that?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 11:51 PM
3

Idk... I'd rather hear the words "due process" come out of the mouth of a trained attorney. Even if she is politicking.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 07:42 AM
-1

Who's making the claim that violence IS gendered Every Feminist who bothers to offer their unwanted opinion on the matter. And a few White Knights as well.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 05:18 AM
-1

Because it highlights that violence is not gendered. GTFO.
/r/MensRights01/12/15 12:05 AM
1

http://mankindglobalmedia.blogspot.com/p/you-hear-it-all-time-mras-arent-really.html
/r/MensRights28/11/15 06:25 AM
1

Still remains that feminism arose out of Marxism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_in_the_Nineteenth_Century That's considered the first major work of Feminism on US soil. Who were her supporters? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_in_the_Nineteenth_Century#Criticism_and_legacy Henry David Thoreau thought highly of the book, suggesting that its strength came in part from Fuller's conversational ability. As he called it, it was "rich extempore writing, talking with pen in hand". In the Evening…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:59 PM
1

I think dagthegnome did the best job of articulating what I'm getting at. Check his post.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:41 PM
1

The scary part of all of this is that you're serious ;-) You think cherry-picking sources like that makes any more difference than my posting E Belfort Bax? Here's the difference. Bax was an expert on Marxist thought. Please show me an actual collectivist (Islam or Eastern Orthodox Church as a couple of examples,) who would take such a claim by feminists seriously. From your first link: The problem with collectivism is that it assumes a simple, definable group identity. Collectivism quickly beco…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:38 PM
0

That's how they self-describe. You still don't have any real evidence, sorry.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:44 AM
1

even though that can be found in more feminist textbooks than you can shake a stick at Feminism also claims affinity with Christianity. Whether it's legit or not is another matter. Feminism claims a lot of things that are in fact, ahistorical.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:40 AM
1

Okay well be that as it may, I've yet to see any real justification for calling Feminism "collectivist" other than it's a political shibboleth that's waved around for the purpose of ahem group identification among those who don't like Feminists or Collectivists ;-)
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:35 AM
0

Women are all part of a hive mind to band together against THE EEEEVIL PATRIARCHIES That's defining something by it's prejudices, which is an epistemological mistake. A lot of people feel for Ron Paul's "Libertarians aren't racists because we aren't collectivists" canard. Actually, an individualist can be quite a bigoted person.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:32 AM
1

I think dagthegnome did the best job of articulating what I'm getting at. Check his post.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:23 PM
1

I think dagthegnome did the best job of articulating what I'm getting at. Check his post.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:21 PM
1

Freedom of speech empowers minorities by giving them a voice that would otherwise have been shouted down or censored. That's why the gay rights movement and the feminist movement (and the animal rights movement) are products of the West and not products of other civilizations That would be why I see it as Western at it's core. If you see something wrong with the Putin quote I don't. But Putin isn't being in the least bit collectivist; he is pronouncing the nationalist creed par excellence Becaus…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:19 PM
1

Thanks a ton for typing this out. Good assessment of the way Feminism badly tried to hermit-crab it's way into a paradigm as long as it's useful to it's own purposes.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:16 PM
1

E. Belfort Bax is wrong. Who the fuck is E. Belfort Bax. Only a Marxist journalist from the early 1900's who can be found in the archives of most Marxist libraries. But I'm sure you would know more since you've studied Marxism top to bottom.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:08 PM
1

feminism is collectivist in the sense that is anti-individualistic (see the first paragraph in wikipedia). There still seems to be to be a nuance here, in that Collectivism emphasizes the group over the individual, but not necessarily against all individual rights. See Putin. Group traits take precedence over indivdual traits when evaluating social conditions and recommending policy. Thus, in feminism, the fact that a particular man is poor is not enough to overcome his membership in the "men" c…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:05 PM
0

Oh, wow, you found ONE Marxist who is anti-Feminist. Oh wow, you found ONE Socialist website that is also Feminist ;-) See if you can wrap your head around this: I didn't say Marxists were Feminists. I said Feminism was built on Marxism See if you can wrap your head around this: You still haven't proven Feminism is at it's core, a collectivist ideology.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:00 PM
1

Feminism is "anti-western" in favor of some half cocked utopian idealized matriarchy. That's probably true, but they aren't about to implement what I see as Collectivist cultures. Examples of those are the Eastern Orthodox Church or Islam. They're all about appropriating all kinds of paradigms to suit their purposes. Hell, they'd appropriate Men's Rights if they could and still support their own hardcore minority rights agenda (you could argue they've already tried that - half-heartedly, though.…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 03:44 AM
2

Such principles would be freedom of speech or innocent until proven guilty They're all for it. As long as they can hold that in tension with their feminist ideals and the contradiction is never exposed.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 03:38 AM
1

Okay, so you want to cherry-pick sources. Here's a Marxist who is Anti-Feminist: http://ernestbelfortbax.com Fyi, I've read The Communist Manifesto and it doesn't say all that much about women. Really! It does call for destruction of the Family, though. That's not a collectivist notion, either. ETA: Wrong link. My bad.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 03:35 AM
1

The idea of a class based system, where one class is the oppressor and the other class is the perpetually oppressed, originates from the socialist ideas coined by Marx The problem with that is you're assuming Feminism is faithful to the Marxist paradigm. E. Belfort Bax would like a word with you on that. The assumption that Women are an oppressed minority in the same way African Slaves & their descendents have been understood is probably a large part of the problem. These ideas are staunchly in …
/r/MensRights15/11/15 03:31 AM
1

It's collectivist, AND anti-Western. [citation needed]
/r/MensRights15/11/15 03:15 AM
1

Feminist theory is literally Marxism repurposed; substitute "women" for the proletariate, and "men" for the bourgeoisie So they appropriated part of a paradigm and re-tooled it to fit theirs. That doesn't make them faithful to it. In fact, they appropriate Christianity, as well. Western society has always been about individual rights, individual responsibility; feminism sees history dialectically, as a struggle between men and women for power Western society has largely been about hardcore minor…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 03:11 AM
1

So was this post.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 10:05 AM
2

Most employers these days feel they have the right to fire you for swearing under your breath. If she doesn't get axed, likely it's the you-know-what pass.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 11:38 PM
1

elected leaders (who happen to be men) have had too great an influence on women's lives' eg. abortion (which does have some merit). It has no merit. Plenty of women vote pro-life, however Roe v Wade was decided by an all-male supreme court.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 01:37 PM
1

Unfortunately, we still have no alimony reform by the GOP governor of Florida, bad adoption laws put up by religious conservatives in Utah that the Republican AG ignores, Republican congressmen lying about sex trafficking stats, and John McCain wanting to start wars in every nook and cranny on the globe he possibly can. And occasionally, Democrats do get it right and do something nice for fathers.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:15 AM
1

Just so everyone is aware, I am not affiliated with the Mankind Initiative. We just happen to share the 1st word in our name! lol
/r/MensRights05/11/15 02:37 PM
2

There are more people who agree with you then you think. Caution is really important here Oh, I'm sure there are. I know there are. It's the jackass OP that I'm addressing. You can go through my archives and see part of an exchange he and I had where he just insisted I came at the movie with a bias and a set of fear-based assumptions that were unfair. Then there's an exchange that followed that in PM that I'd happily share with anyone interested. He kept saying shit like "I corrected you" (LOL!)…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 06:55 AM
1

Indeed. It didn't escape my notice ;-) https://youtu.be/lObjbm9GYvI
/r/MensRights24/10/15 09:54 PM
1

the one with the horrible lip stick Which one is that - nobody had great lipstick afaics LOL
/r/MensRights18/10/15 10:28 AM
0

And...?
/r/MensRights18/10/15 09:59 AM
1

This is you arguing that its biased against the mrm. You don't even get a "nice try" for that one. Here's the full context of the convo: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3oho69/the_red_pill_a_documentary_film/cvxs4u8?context=3 Stating that the movie "is not made by 'each other' is pointing out that it primarily is not a MRM-initiated project. Stating it is "made by the other side" is an honest admission that the filmmaker starts with a point of reference. No comment was made whatsoev…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 10:56 PM
0

Which Strawman is that? You have expressed your unhappiness with the title [citation needed] or are you worried you'll lose against a Girl LOL! What exactly is it that I'm supposed to "lose," here? I didn't know this was a boxing match. Clearly it must be so from your angle.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 08:51 PM
1

So clearly some anti feminists are aping feminists. Clearly they are not. In fact, they most likely never connected it up with Feminism. Since I've never heard it from anywhere else but you, I'd say it's a slam dunk. You declared what its about without finding out. Nope. Only in your masturbatory fantasy. You were corrected LOL Exactly like a Feminist. Declaring that they enacted a "sick burn" when it was nothing of the case. Or "You lost the argument," or any one of a number of sillynesses. *(c…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 08:47 PM
1

https etc etc No, that is not anything but an honest reaction to your trying to salvage something out of this that won't make you look like egg is on your face. I dont respond to feminists that say (citation needed) Funny, but at least 2 different Anti-feminists were who I got that from. Your trying to insist that that is a feminist response just underscores your butthurtedness. I provide citations to people that aren't aggressive, sarcastic and childish about it That's actually more of a femini…
/r/MensRights15/10/15 01:10 AM
1

mocking teen text There is none. Rather than admit the info you wanted was and is already on the thread No, actually I never denied that it was. I have no idea, because of your poor citations skills, that amount to pointing me at a haystack and telling me to find the needle myself, and then getting annoyed at me for finding you annoying for doing that. "butthurt" The only place that can be found is in your mirror.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:39 AM
0

Wow... I am impressed... At the way you center on trivialities and then claim victory à la your straw man. :))
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:31 AM
1

Just because you say something "is" something for the purpose of salving your butthurtedness, does not in fact mean it is that something. It just means you're butthurt.
/r/MensRights15/10/15 12:28 AM
1

LMAO ;-)
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:29 PM
0

Anyone who knows me knows how wrong that claim actually is. It just so happens that some chick and her movie are quite beneath False Rape Accusations, our broken Criminal Justice System, VAWA and "No-Drop," discrimination against men in boys in education etc, etc, etc.- that duty logically calls elsewhere. A movie we haven't seen yet deserves only the speculation that can be (only) assessed from what we're shown. And again, you really didn't do anything to negate those legit expressed concerns. …
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:28 PM
1

Keep thinking that if it makes you feel better.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:42 AM
1

No, my blog has been around for 1 year. I've been around for going on 55 ;-) And it has nothing to do with lacking information. I just expect better citation skills. Sorry to trouble you.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:51 AM
1

Again with that lingo of Groups, Of Mass Nouns. The correct word is "My" not "Our". You have an odd need to be more than just yourself. Very odd that. No, there's no misuse here at all. In fact "our" was quite appropriate given the context of what I was addressing. But since you talk a lot and listen next to none, it doesn't surprise me that the context was something that went completely over your head. I notice that you have provided zero context or extra information to assist others. I have. E…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:54 AM
1

You are absolutely not listening to anyone, and not anything really - except the "Echo-Chamber" in your head.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:35 AM
1

You aren't polite lol Said the dude who just called me an idiot for no real reason. you know you put a large passive aggressive [citation needed] in there Is this like the Feminist "Micro-Aggression" thing? When you were told where the information was But really, you didn't. I know I cite better info for people when I'm trying to help them out. If you post on mra related sites so much, you know the story behind the documentary you are choosing to talk about. Its been out there for over a year It…
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:33 AM
2

You know, I cite information for people on MRM-related sites all the time. Usually I'm polite and helpful enough to give them precise information. The only time I don't is when I could give fuck-all about whether that other person learns anything or not, I just want them out of my face.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:40 PM
2

Thanks for admitting you have no citation.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:36 PM
1

Darling Right off with the patronizing and belittling nomenclature. Cinematic Projection is so last century So is being other people's "mom" If all I'm doing is responding and pointing out contrary views to yours, that is not tone policing Examples of where you shamed/gaslighted others for expressing their feelings: "fearful and negative" "glowering skies" "the Paranoid" [Followed by a link to a video that confirms most reasonable people's suspicions.] "your own Fixations" "personal bias, which …
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:34 PM
1

And who is the one asking for money? Therefore, the "askee" has every right to check the territory out thoroughly.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:20 PM
3

There was no place on the video where that was expressed. So again: [citation needed]
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:12 PM
3

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights13/10/15 06:06 PM
2

If all your going to do is tone police and wag your finger at expressed concerns, why don't you get the fuck off this subreddit. You show absolutely no love for these men or concern for what concerns them at all. You're just being pedantic and you're haranguing people.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:53 AM
1

As if someone trying to pitch this project would show what they do in anything less than a glowing light.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:50 AM
2

her Directors Reel And this is supposed to convince us of ...what, exactly?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:47 AM
3

Enjoy Your Echo Chamber Does that mean you'll go away?
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:43 AM
3

Wow this film is not even out yet and already we're seeing evidence of pedantic female tone-policing.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:42 AM
3

But this movie isn't being made by "each other," it's made by the other side.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:40 AM
2

Too much of the "other side," which already has more than enough of a voice.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:36 AM
1

Why are these generalization okay here, but the second a woman says "All men are evil," we quickly jump to saying how it's wrong to generalize all for the actions of few Because it wasn't a "few" feminists who have been trying to obstruct every peaceful assembly that CAFE has tried to put on. It isn't a "few" feminists who believe in Patriarchy Theory." Conversely, it's almost zero feminists who call others out on their bad behaviour. And your comparison is ludicrous if you stop and think about …
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:00 AM
1

And while were at it, how about some disclosure on your part? What school do you attend, and do they have a Women's/Gender Studies segment - even one course, doesn't have to be a whole major or minor. I'd genuinely like to know. That will bring the "good feminists" you claim you know to the sunlight, since we will know more about their education. ETA: Eliminate anyone from school you know who got there because of Gender-based Affirmative Action.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:22 PM
1

I genuinely find it hilarious that whenever I come to this sub and suggest that feminism isn't the spawn of Satan I get accused of "running my mouth" or other analogous terms. If anybody's getting brainwashed, it's the people that read one article about a thing said by one person and ascribe that view to a movement with tens of millions of followers. Has it ever occurred to you that you are talking to a group of people who have spent copious hours looking at several sources and have come to the …
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:17 PM
2

https://youtu.be/if4_bq0lMJc At the 3:00 mark: "2 per cent" Then... 2 - 8%... Then... "2 out of every 100"
/r/MensRights10/10/15 11:00 PM
1

Funny, I present you evidence. You have none. Yet you feel free to ho hum this. Tell you what, has it occurred to you that you are better off not frequenting this subreddit?
/r/MensRights10/10/15 10:52 PM
1

http://40.media.tumblr.com/cc10b16d334f267dc9d67c5105101630/tumblr_inline_nvs4e2nTAw1sos8f4_500.jpg
/r/MensRights09/10/15 09:31 PM
2

Most if not all Feminists buy into at least one, of not several, of the following: The so-called “gender-wage-gap” The existence of a so-called “rape culture” So-called “male privilege” So-called “Patriarchy Theory.” Gender as a so-called “Social Construct” That Male Disposability is a myth That the problem should be given a male-centric name (“Patriarchy”) and the solution is given a female-centric name: “Feminism” “1 in 5 women are raped,” “97% of all rapists are never convicted,” * “2% of all…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 09:27 PM
0

Are you suggesting that all the feminists who misrepresent rape statistics or use out of date statistics are doing so intentionally and with malice? I'd be very very surprised if it wasn't just ignorance for the most part You're an idiot. When someone 1st says "2- 8%," and thereafter says "2%," that was not done in ignorance. Wise up.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:41 PM
0

I can only assume from being at -8 that this sub believes feminists think false rape accusations are good things. That's more than a little terrifying. Those that don't downplay it's significance, or try to play with the stats to make it seem like it doesn't happen very often. For example: 2 - 8% of rape claims are deemed false, according to DOJ stats. You can bet a feminist won't stick to the higher number. And I can show you video evidence of them doing that. The other thing that is ignored is…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 08:37 PM
1

That's Ms, to you :))
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:45 PM
1

I think we'll do/are doing quite fine without your advice.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 06:21 AM
2

You appear to be in the minority.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:09 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights30/09/15 11:01 PM
1

Guess the system failed to tell me.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 08:50 AM
0

Laws that invade people's privacy should not be written. It's not a difficult concept.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 09:25 AM
-1

he has pleaded guilty and received 12 months probation And it will stay on his record.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 03:41 AM
0

He didn't plead guilty, but presumably would have gotten the same as her if he took the deal Not much of a choice. That would have stayed on his record.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 03:38 AM
6

It clearly says "threatened," not that he was jailed.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:51 AM
3

You should probably comment on the blog post itself if you want your concerns to be heard.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 08:58 PM
1

You missed Paul Elam's essay where he said that they were going to be focusing on activists more and not so much raw numbers in terms of ratings.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:29 PM
1

This is not advertising my religion, Moron. I'm not Muslim and my posting it is not meant to be supportive of Islam.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 03:47 AM
2

In the abortion debate both sides demonize men. I doubt it. Sure that may come up, but most people are going to talk about the unborn fetus and/or the woman making the choice - whether they are for or against it.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:03 PM
2

I gave ya a counter-balance ;-)
/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:07 AM
3

So what's the problem? How would the reaction be if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:21 PM
1

Can't help it if the system doesn't tell me.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:03 AM
1

I think you are assuming "women" = "feminists." In fact, you've been doing it the whole conversation, from you're opening statement. Also, you are NAFALting. The problem with that is that the few things I just listed are indicative of most of feminism. Apparently I need to repeat myself, at length: I'll believe that Feminists are not supremacists when they: Start demanding Women's Responsibility in tandem with Women's Rights (example: along with voting should have been conscription.) Stop speaki…
/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:40 AM
1

The 1 in 5 stat sure as hell ain't intending to be about female rapists. The gender wage gap is assuming men deliberately want to pay women less than what they deserve. Both assume women = good/men= bad. Both are sexist. Therefore both are signposts of female supremacy.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:58 AM
1

"Justice" means so many things in the mouths of so many people, but that doesn't mean it is a pointless word or a pointless pursuit. Oh please. Justice has an agreed upon locus of understanding in the documents a nation, society, or culture adhere's to. OTOH, how many times do you hear someone go "I'm not that kind of believer in justice?" If this critique holds for feminism, then it holds for any and all ideology or social movement. Nope. The Black Civil rights movement knew exactly what they w…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:26 AM
1

Do they believe in "Teach Men Not To Rape?" "Men can stop rape?" That violence is gendered? That 1 in 5 stat? The Gender Wage gap? Changing the requirements of military, police and firefighter entry to suit women? That women are basically good? If they believe even one of those things, then they are supremacist.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:04 AM
1

Thanks for that~!
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:56 AM
1

If the system doesn't tell me that the item has already been posted, nothing I can do.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:15 AM
1

Who bears the burden of proof in an accusation?
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:18 PM
0

Too bad for you, The Constitution was upheld: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/judge-rules-university-cant-shift-burden-of-proof-onto-the-accused/article/2569953
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:33 AM
1

Because a percentage take out of the number of bride-to-be parties that hire Male Strippers has to be a good bell·weth·er for the way all marriages are going to go.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:05 AM
1

I couldn't give a fuck about your constitution red herring, and this has nothing to do with due process. It has 100% to do with it. It's all in how society will look at someone who's been accused but never proven guilty. With the benefit of the doubt? Or with hatred. The people who went off the deep end in the stories I just shared with you chose the latter. How can you not see that? Unproven means unproven. We don't know if it's true. We don't know if it's false. It's an unknown. An unproven ra…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 03:27 PM
0

Learn what constitutional protection and due process means.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:58 PM
0

Learn what laws are for, and the freedoms they afford us. And stop White Knighting on this group for Men's Rights. Do I have to fucking spell it out for you: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/03/horrendous-news-of-innocent-man-beaten.html THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 2010 Horrendous news of innocent man beaten, sodomized over lover's rape lie What can I possibly say about the following news story -- a story that details a terrible assault on an innocent man, all because his lover was mad at him? …
/r/MensRights08/08/15 10:00 PM
2

I think you're trafficking in urban legends.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 09:15 PM
0

Completely blinkered. Completely kissing up and trying to be PC. Presumption of innocence also applies regarding accusing someone of a false accusation. No that is false. Presumption of innocence is just a fancy way of saying "innocent until proven guilty." It's a law regarding the accused. The accuser has no such protections afforded him/her. And that's the way it should be. If a false accusation is unproven does this mean that the false accusation is therefore made up? Do you even have any fuc…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:43 PM
2

Have you ever spoken with a rape victim? Yep. Your point?
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:30 PM
0

Garbage. And the US isn't the only country in the world where rape is an issue, so you're being doubly blinkered. Completely irrelevant. If we're going to start claiming that all unproven rape cases are false then we can have no issue with Feminists claiming that all unproven rape cases are true. Nope. They do not have due process and presumption of innocence on their side. So fuck them and fuck anyone who will try to deny a man his rights under the law.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 01:06 PM
2

someone who is shocked and afraid Feminist injustice against men are built on those very words.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:35 AM
1

There is a pretty big diference between treating an allegation as false and treating it as a claim made with mallicious intent. We need to clearly separate the two Not if the outcome is the same. Lots of men sent up the river for a few years based on what could be nothing more than a mistake on her part. In the end, I don't give a fuck. False is false.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:32 AM
0

We look at anything unproven as unproven. Nope. That is what our Constitution guarantees us.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:30 AM
1

Doubt it. Legal stats or Psych could probably do just as good or better.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 07:03 PM
0

An unprovable report is not a false rape report any more than an unprovable theft report is a form of slander. In fact, Presumption of Innocence mandates we do look at anything unproven as false. being too eager to label an unprovable report as false hurts everyone because it will just cause false accusers to step up their game and make more believable claims How long did it take you to make that one up?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 06:45 PM
1

Because that right wing website wants young men to die chasing ghosts in the Iraq desert.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:07 AM
2

Hey Pierce: Good work, man! Would be a lot easier to share your articles on Twitter if the titles were more concise, like this one! ;-)
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:49 AM
2

No. You can't read videos :p
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:18 AM
1

I side with men being able to make their own choices like adults.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:06 AM
0

I think you listened with a jaded perspective and didn't really hear.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:01 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3ex54t/sociopsychopaths_a_study_in_evil_introduction/ctjqfoy?context=3
/r/MensRights29/07/15 02:10 AM
2

Curious... where did you get your education and in what field that gave you this view of men. If you don't mind?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:12 AM
1

Still dodging.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 05:13 PM
0

I have no connection to the network in an organizational sense. Let me walk this out in baby steps for you: A Video was posted with a negative opinion about treatment of men in the MH Profession. You objected based on the following 2 reasons, in your opinion: 1) Copious lit exists to the contrary 2) Because of this, men don't experience discriminatory attitudes in the MH profession. Point one was never disagreed with by all sides, and has been affirmed by all sides (Example: I told you I was fam…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 07:27 AM
0

Of the links you just shared with me: The APA one appears to be making a news distinction between maltreatment and violence, but I cannot tell what that says to me as a man. It doesn't make clear in the abstract whether or not the approach taken is gendered. It does say that life and stress are important factors and doesn't seem to be about "patriarchy" or "control" or anything of that nature. But it could still be gender biased in terms of painting men as aggressors and women as victims of circ…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 09:18 PM
0

I'm not even going to bother debunking it formally. You said that, I didn't. In several ways. So again, the claim you are making is what needs to be justified. You keep harping on the same line—"it's the most commonly used model in batterer intervention programs"—but I've already said several times that there is a bias against men in law enforcement. Batterer intervention programs are a branch of the justice department, not the mental health system. Again, WHERE are most men going to encounter t…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:50 AM
0

I'm still waiting for you to defend your own claims here. Editing comments may be bad form on Reddit, but "I could refute you but I don't want to waste my time," is a dodge ANYWHERE. Full stop.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:37 AM
2

it's not going to be made illegal to disagree with feminists It's looking more and more that way.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 01:35 AM
0

Psychology being dominated by Patriarchy Theory? Psychologists believe men are emotional stunted and deficient? These 'symptoms' don't exist Every evidence I've been able to unearth has indicated that the Duluth model is widely used.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:43 PM
0

You appear to have ignored stuff right on the links you provided as evidence. I can only go by what you show me.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:39 PM
0

Plus, if you check the Wikipedia page for domestic violence, you'll find the Duluth model is referenced...twice. In fact there is a whole section on "Power and Control" and the Duluth Wheel is prominently displayed. For some reason it's not linked in the outline, I assume that has to be a typo. Check also the bibliography and see how many times "power," "power and control," and "power dynamics" shoes up in the works referenced. So far I haven't been too impressed with the case you're trying to p…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:25 PM
0

Sorry, but the only person I can see that's butthurt is the person that is doing all the complaining that the assessment of his profession is unfair. And then pulls the "it would take too long to prove it" copout. That would be you.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 10:06 PM
0

As I said before, I encourage you to do your own research and come to your own conclusions. No, that ain't how it works. The person making the accusation has the burden of proof. All I see is you flipping out because somebody said something about the profession you hold dear, and then providing links to things that actually don't back up the claim (argument by omission.) What I don't see evidence of is a positive disclaimer of using Patriarchy Theory as a model. Without a policy statement as suc…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:57 PM
0

@7:14 "According to the vast majority of studies..." then goes on to discuss how men process emotions differently than women. @8:19 "Countless studies however, show this to be a false conclusion." Seems to me that he says the same things you are saying, if you listened to the whole thing for the context.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 09:33 AM
0

Okay well again, there appear to be Doctored MH Pro's and others with years in the field who would beg to differ with you. Again, Idk that either side is so much "misinformed," as the experiences are different depending on who's talking. ETA: And the sources I cited that specifically talk about Duluth would seem to beg to differ with you as well.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 09:07 AM
0

My background is in mental health counseling. I could potentially believe that the Duluth model gets more representation in schools of social work (which have an entire "social justice" component to them), but it certainly doesn't in doctorate-level programs for general psychology. I think the problem here is that you're looking at all the stuff that's inside the journals written by PhD's, whereas those you are arguing against is looking at what men are likely to encounter when shoeleather hits …
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:33 AM
0

It hasn't gone public yet. That's why you should've finished the video ;-) All I know is, Paul Elam is a mental health professional himself and he works with others in the field such as Dr. Tara Palmatier (A Shrink4Men,) Tom Golden (MenAreGood,) etc. You can search for both of those. So although your experience may not perceive that there is a strong feminist bias in Psychology per se, perhaps there are other parts of the world that are? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model Says it's "the …
/r/MensRights24/07/15 04:22 AM
0

So what did you think of his proposal for a Men's Mental Health Network?
/r/MensRights24/07/15 01:58 AM
0

So soon after the last debacle that got her kicked out of here Wasn't around for it, so I have no idea.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:53 AM
1

The original built-exclusively-by-men justice system back in the 18th and 19th centuries wasn't so nice Beg to differ. Any system built on Blackwell is better than anything any woman can do in any era.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:18 PM
1

It was called "The Dear Colleague Letter."
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:09 PM
2

Is this a fair trade? Is state protection as good? It's like I repeatedly said when discussing why children need Mothers and fathers: The best case scenario is what you have to shoot for. 2nd best is never best if the best is readily available.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 04:46 AM
2

I would love to see the reaction to an article in a mainstream magazine that started off with "Even mothers with average parenting skills can make a real impact on their children's lives". Won't happen ;-) But I'm wondering if the intent there is to encourage fathers by making it clear you don't have to be "super-dad" to be effective?
/r/MensRights02/07/15 04:44 AM
1

Where's Unclestinkbug to shame us all for assuming things when we don't know the college's side? /s
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:37 PM
1

meaning your interpretation, and pulled straight from your rectum. Your ipse dixit. you mean your interpretation Your ipse dixit. No you can't so you still are pulling all this out your ass. Your ipse dixit. Yes because bringing up a customer service issue in a gender based sub because the "alleged victim" is a male and the "alleged aggressor" is a female is not gender baiting. Wow. Persecution complex, much? Are you dropping the whole pretense that this is an issue with how we treat men and boy…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 04:23 PM
0

if you recall (which I know you won't) my major position was that we don't know the context of the video, and should withhold judgment of whether she was a cunt or not until all the facts are in Yeah I tended to forget that in light of all the "turds" you've been throwing around. The reality is you should be outraged by their decision not to take any real action against her Nope. I know that school institutions move primarily to protect their own interests. It could be that firing her at this po…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:57 PM
1

Please tell me ONE specific thing that places the video in real context I just shared several with you that are good strong indicators. You still haven't answered my question is it possible in the moments leading up to him recording the video could he possibly have been being a dick Eliminated, based on the facts gleaned from the conversation that we can see. Or do you think those statements happened in a vacuum? Why didn't Ms Dawson come down on him for other behaviour he allegedly displayed, i…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 09:49 PM
0

LOL Still fighting to cling to your pearls, though the outcome proved you were wrong from the start. How droll ;-)
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:51 PM
0

Your SJW comparison was destroyed, when I pointed out to you why your comparison to Mattress Girl was ill-founded.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:50 PM
1

context for the video It was plain as the boils on your ass: A) Mr Bruce said he wasn't harassing anyone, indicating his belief that his behaviour was normal and congenial. B) Ms. Dawson explained her rationale as "sitting here waiting for someone to become available is harassing them," indicating that her interpretation was unique enough that she had to provide an explanation, one that would not occur to most people. 1) Such interpretations that are constricting to normal human behaviour, are p…
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:49 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights09/06/15 12:44 PM
0

Sort of amounts to the same thing, though.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 11:27 PM
0

Watch the video and find out! ;-)
/r/MensRights04/06/15 05:41 PM
1

Read the comments: Wow, they really do blame men for everything. Imagine a man said that, "Her pussy was so good, I had to slap the bitch". He'd be carted off to either jail or an insane asylum.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:29 PM
1

You are kidding, right?
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:27 PM
0

The system didn't say anything...
/r/MensRights01/06/15 12:33 AM
2

Also, if someone cares to explain to me what the "problem" some allegedly have with r/TheRedPill, that'd be great. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:36 PM
1

Wasn't even claiming victory snicker ;-)
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:38 AM
1

Earth to unclestinky: What I was referring to was the comments of yours on the 1st page of my original posts. And all I said was that no one can look into give an opinion on our long-winded convo because you got yourself hidden by being downvoted. Great listening skills, should help you really well in your line of work.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:29 AM
1

Of course you can't acknowledge it, because that possibility doesn't fit into the narrative you decided about this story Not "cannot," don't see the need to. At least they can sometimes admit other possibilities outside their own narrative exist. All the while clinging to the general narrative that women have it worse than men. I even dealt with a Lesbian Feminist recently that admitted to men being cannon fodder, raped, etc. and yet STILL felt her experiences of sexism were worse because sob "M…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:09 AM
1

Concession is what you mean to say.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:06 AM
1

Only in your mind. And in the mind of anyone who objectively would look in on this convo. Except you've been downvoted into being hidden again.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:05 AM
1

Texas Sharpshooter (committed when differences in data are ignored, but similarities are stressed. From this reasoning a false conclusion is inferred). https://youtu.be/_tcBsryYd6s The fact is I never ignored any outlying data. I merely used Sage & the lawsuits as a strong indicator that there is bias against Kevin Bruce. I have also admitted throughout the conversation, that it could be exactly what the girl in the USA TODAY video said: Abby is just a shit administrator. I think you're committi…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:49 AM
1

there you go spinning your lies again. In the actual context of the conversation, this cannot be deemed a "lie," since you stated that not all of the facts are outed yet, and I agreed. In fact, in agreeing with the more thorough investigation called for by Sage Gerard, I've completely left you in the dust as far as that's concerned. You only want an investigation insofar as it serves your purposes. I on the other hand, even said Abby Dawson herself may want to have all her records extricated as …
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:11 AM
1

Thanks for that non-answer, and clear admission that you cannot defend your claim.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:47 PM
1

One other thing: Let's see you demonstrate my alleged use of fallacies. You keep up on the Texas Sharpshooter thing, so let's see you walk it out. I doubt you can. Might as well include Fallacy Of Division for good measure.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:04 PM
1

Also, still waiting for your example of a "Real MRA." I hope you didn't think you were going to tip-toe away from that without being called out. Also, what was your reason for the sly intro of Race as an issue into the mix?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:04 PM
1

that I don't instantly knee jerk react to defend the man Just knee-jerk react to declare him an "entitled turd," that's all. choosing to hold conviction until all facts are released is the fallacy of moderation then totally guilty If only you really did that... My position is that the facts are not yet released Same here! That's why I support a public records inquiry. Any smart individual would do so. If Kevin Bruce has or had an attorney on this, that's probably one of the top 5 things he'd be …
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:43 PM
1

At most it's evidence that the department is understaffed LOLOLOLOL!!! Unclestinky when insisting that we're all jumping the gun: "Wait until the video has been put in context" Unclestinky when belittling the pro-male side: "At the most, it's evidence of..." How droll! I only have disdain for people (social justice warriors)like you who act no different than bitter feminists. Oh yes, play the "I'm above it all card." The fallacy of moderation I believe is what that is called. you've tried to spi…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 04:37 AM
1

It should also be noted, that Sage Gerard didn't advise Kevin Bruce "If it doesn't go your way, call for all your records to be coughed up." He told him to go ahead with it in advance. That shows he's on top of things and let's the school know exactly what the stakes are. VERY smart thing to do.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:33 AM
1

You'll have to forgive me for not really believing you Mr. Integrity "Not" believe me all you want. He never produced a shred of evidence. Would you like to see a screenshot of the convo I just had with him? I wonder if you'll feel the same way should the investigation determine that she was completely in the wrong? If the school determines KB was an innocent victim will you still question how they conducted their investigation? Or will you accept that verdict as completely and 100% factual sinc…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:43 AM
1

ignoring that half the story that pits the interaction into a proper context has not been released. And it could very well not be. I'm betting the school won't show anymore context at all. Or at least, not what is necessary to understand what actually happened. That's why it's good advice to ask for all communications that used his name.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:16 AM
1

Thanks for clearing that up. You ignore so much that doesn't suit your purposes that it's hard to keep it all straight.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:18 AM
1

Bahahahahaha, I'm sooooooo sure for no reason whatsoever he made that up. I see how much "integrity" you truly do have Like I said, produce the evidence. I have no idea how being a Reddit mod works, but it's possible that he could be completely mistaken. Either way, that stands as what it is: A lie. You've already started questioning the investigative methods even though you have no knowledge of the investigation. Which is what anyone with a working brain would do: Question Authority. Too many i…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:16 AM
1

I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony I am rejecting his testimony Quoth you, showing why you have been driving an agenda here from the beginning. Presumption of innocence for thee, but not for me. Clear-cut that this is what you are doing.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:02 AM
1

Now you go cry to the mods again Except that that was a bold-face lie. I told Mr Silymod to produce evidence that I had typed out a personal letter to complain about you - or anything for that matter. Haven't seen it, yet. But I think it's funny that you think I find your comments something to go to a 3rd party about. ;-) We like ourselves, don't we? You're a joke mate, you didn't rip anything to shreds. You didn't win anything, you didn't prove anything, you haven't convinced anyone of anything…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 08:49 AM
1

you sound just like a feminist quoting patriarchy with this garbage Except the Feminists have pulled a construct out of their rears that they cannot back up with hard data. I on the other hand, can so do - as well as most "MRA's." so like I said you're quoting a facebook comment as fact More hand-waving when it doesn't support your purposes. You do such a good job of misrepresenting your opinion as having 99.99% certainty it's a fact Okay, so your struggle to make something out of this has faile…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 09:18 AM

Dude you seriously are full of shit. He said while he flung scatological references far and wide. All this schlock you just wrote you're pulling out your ass. That has nothing to do with this situation. Excuse me for looking at the entire sociological backdrop of how society views men as one very valid piece of the puzzle. So now you quote Facebook as fact Nope. I quote the statement of someone who researched the issue and counted eighteen complaints against Ms Dawson. Here's where you'l go "but…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:18 AM

Well there you go making those assumptions again. No, I don't think so. Most of the gender dynamics in social situations in North America runs pretty much along the same lines. If I was somewhere like a store trying to get the manager to let me in the bathroom, I would tell him if there were also ladies waiting to get in. He'd move much faster. In the news, we always hear about Boko Haram capturing those girls, never about them murdering those boys. Or the fact that boys make up 60 - 90% of abdu…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:19 PM
1

Not really. I just give weight in situations that you are quick to write off.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:01 PM
0

Mine are based on the testimonies of copious individuals.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 03:29 PM
1

I'm not closed minded so that may challenge your views. We like ourselves, don't we? :)
/r/MensRights25/05/15 03:28 PM

Can you find in The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Only an SJW would cite a UN document as evidence of anything. I am talking about the 14th amendment, which guarantees him equality under the law. If she wouldn't do that to a female student, guess what? There's a violation. What you really meant were there were 18 twitter complaints Nope. I believe there was other sources besides Twitter for these. You don't know how many are factual, how many are fake outrage, and how many are bandwaggon…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 03:26 PM
0

That's not an argument. That's an opinion.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 02:25 PM

I never claimed to be a hero. I asked you what have you done that we should be listening to you? You're the one pontificating at us.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 02:25 PM

Tee-hee-hee. I've only spent copious time on Tumblr or various comments boards that feminists are drawn to. Their arguments are easily torn to shreds. Like yours.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:09 PM
1

Have you seen a shrink about those scatological references?
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:08 PM

So... what exactly gives you the license to come in here and try to "straighten us all out." if I may ask? What shoeleather-to-pavement work have you done on behalf of Men & Boys to make life better? Have you advocated for fathers who are being falsely accused by an ex? Have you done anything to raise awareness of how the government is spending millions on women's health & DV issues, and next to none on men? Have you worked to change any laws at the local level such as shared parenting? Have you…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:07 PM

And I would also have the intelligence to know not to bother with them, since I clearly do not belong in that subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:59 AM

You know more about KSU than students who are there experiencing it. Admit it.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:58 AM

and you excused yourself from any and all pretense of neutrality and open-mindedness when you admitted you chose to defend him only because of the fact that he is a male. (which you admitted to). Hahahaha except I never did. Only in your imagination :) Maybe, nobody was going to be in the waiting area to monitor the office. Wow. Let's just make things up that aren't there to fit our narrative o.0 You don't know what the form was so get your head out your ass. We don't have to. We know he was ask…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:56 AM

Looks like the downvotes are in and you're the official turd of the sub, homie! ;-)
/r/MensRights25/05/15 11:39 AM

Because acknowledging that there are two sides to this story (and we only see one) is white knighting. You excused yourself from any and all pretense of neutrality and open-mindedness when you called him an "entitled turd." Now run along and go find a threat more suited to your tone policing, Little Boy. Assuming you are male, that is. ETA: The part of the story that is glossed over. Maybe just maybe there was a reason they asked him to come back in an hour What you are missing is that "come bac…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:25 AM

Could you scroll down and offer this to Uncle Stanky? I think he (?) could use your enlightenment. I'm not meaning to be facetious or anyting.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:23 AM
0

Isn't it funny how I never mentioned anyone by name, and yet someone has to pipe up and out himself? ;-)
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:20 AM
1

Thanks Girlwriteswhat for this submission! :)
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:32 PM
3

Thanks, just now saw that! :)
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:21 PM
0

So stop replying. I know it's hard for a brave White Knight of the Tone Policing Division to move on. :)
/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:47 AM
0

It probably will make MRA's look bad more from you highlighting it.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:46 AM
0

because the "evidence" is one persons perspective Nope. The evidence is eighteen complaints that have been logged against Ms. Dawson. Once again, that is: eighteen complaints that have been logged against Ms. Dawson. IMO you're an idiot and the worst kind of SJW. You're no better than a male feminists Said the tone-policing, White Knighting gynocentrist who thinks it's his business to make everyone else's conversation fit some nebulous PC model of perfection.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:34 AM

You seem to be the only one here who thinks he was "supporting" murder. Because it was about a woman. White Knighting again.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:03 AM
0

That "MRA" is a human being with the right to freedom of speech. I know, that comes as a shock to you, that men are human beings and that men's rights are human rights. But it's the truth. See a shrink about your scatological fixation.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:00 AM
0

Pretty much your entire argument summed up. He is male, her side does not matter for reasons of penis. LMAO you moronic little feminist shill. In what rule-book is it that because there are two sides to anything, that both sides are equal? Those KKK guys who hung blacks in the south - gosh, don't they have their own version of events? The slave owners: C'mon, some of them genuinely felt they could own a human being as property! Are these the same thing? No, but the serve to illustrate that so-ca…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:57 AM
0

Fuck you, Liar. He did not say she should be murdered. You obvioulsy have no grip on reality.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 01:26 AM

PS: A "tone police-r" that uses terms like "entitled turd" is a hypocrite. An (uncle) stinkin' hypocrite.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 04:16 PM
0

Oh, so you're our self-appointed "tone police?" Knock yourself out, Bro.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:50 PM
0

MRA's are viewed as a "hate group" only by ideologues with an axe to grind and entitlements to defend. The whole "hate" group thing started with the SPLC, who never actually said that. The words "hate group" do not appear on the page where the different entities are listed.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:45 PM
0

You just like a feminist choose to ignore that there are two sides to the story Who cares about "2 sides." The fact of there being 2 sides does not mean both of them are right. Plus without seeing all that happened, you chose to call him an "entitled turd." Entitlement is a classic charge Feminists lodge against men who want fair treatment. OTOH, I actually choose to point out that there's more to this story, such as the eighteen complaints that have been logged against Ms. Dawson. (blogs lol) C…
/r/MensRights19/05/15 03:36 PM
0

Pretty much sums up your entire argument. Ditto. without proper context you don't know if his actions are harrassment. Exactly what I've been telling you about the "entitled turd" - as you call him. Yet, you speak as if she has every right to treat him as such. assumption Facts. I am sure you could find students that have has problems with every advisor at one point. Not true. Only the little Hitlers get eighteen complaints logged against them at one time. Again you are assuming she is a bad adv…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:15 PM
1

SI notation You're not paying attention to the facts is not mine.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:06 PM
0

Get over yourself. You didn't "change" my opinion. I didn't say I did. I said I changed your "tune," which I've always heard it to refer to how one talks about a situation. And you did - for awhile anyway. He is still an entitled turd who was being a dick and not following the simple request to wait elsewhere. Now we're back to you're old closed-minded curmudgeonly self. Welcome back, we've missed your ugliness dearly. You assume because he is a man and she is a woman she is completely in the wr…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 08:32 AM
0

Ask them.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:13 AM
0

The difference between our opinions is I am open to the possibility that maybe this story is not as black and white as you want it to be. You went from: entitled turd to: I'm open to the possibility that Your original comments were soaking in vitriol, dehumanizing, and very black & white. Finally after I pounded on you, you changed your tune. Now you want to front that you're above that. Nice try. Plus you still haven't acknowledged those eighteen complaints that were filed against her. but you …
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:12 AM
1

You walked 75 miles to the grocery store...
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:59 AM
1

It's just a bit silly to make comparisons, especially given the fact that DP did his strike after a 75m walk.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:38 AM
1

So go measure Gandhi's dick on your own :D
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:19 AM
0

You keep bringing her gender up. It's kind of telling about your position. Yes, it tells you I have the class not to use dehumanizing terminology like "turd."
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:19 AM
0

Hey dumbass, you still don't know if she had a reason for being frustrated, or how long this had gone on, or how he was speaking to her off camera. Right. The fact that she just then had walked up to him means absolutely nothing. The fact that she spoke as if she was defending another person (butting in?) means nothing. Except when you want to act all macho and impress the ladies. You go, boy! (As in whistle "here, boy!") This entire story is based off the video. You dim sad man of course it's o…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 03:15 AM
1

Prove evidence of that, asshole. I never typed out any such message.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:44 AM
1

Excuse me? It was about 8 days.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:20 PM
1

Did it ever occur to you that it was an accident? And did it ever occurred to you to be a lot less rude as a mod? No on both counts.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 11:20 PM
0

Once again: The evidence is in the video, he was asked to leave and refused. He was asked to leave by who? The woman, therefor you are believing "her word" that he was in the wrong. But keep squirming.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:03 PM
0

hey ding dong, you can google search when they have open advising sessions. This didn't occur during one of those times. It occurred during a time when advising is done by appointment. Hey dumbass, you still don't know if it was so bad that she needed to speak to him in that way, or that it was considered "harrassment." And if you're soooo good at searching for things, then you know 18 complaints have been logged against her, mostly women. The evidence is in the video, he was asked to leave and …
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:57 PM
1

Nobody here reported anyone's post.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:36 PM
-1

or the school had to go into damage control mode because the SJW's like you got your pitchforks out. No need to worry about that one. The SJW's are in power there. ETA: You sure do got a thing for her, eh? Find her Twitter & ask her for a date. I'm sure when she hears how well you White-Knight for her about those horrible pitchfork bearers, she'll agree to seeing you on the sly :p You dumb ass SHE HAS NOT SAID ONE WORD ABOUT THIS!!!! Get that through your dense skull. She has not said one word a…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 06:50 AM
1

I might feel the same way if I dealt with some of the shit he has on that campus.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 04:13 AM
-1

Nice attempt to put spin on her being placed on administrative leave. what does that really mean? Probably means that complaints have come out of the brush like a hornets nest now that her profile has been raised. I posted this story on Facebook and one of my commenters said he found EIGHTEEN complaints so far. Surprise, surprise: Most of them were women. Two things wrong here, first what specific right is she violating of his? That's just it - you have no clue. You assumed that just because she…
/r/MensRights17/05/15 04:10 AM
-1

And what does that blog post tell us? Nothing? Just some other person posting their feelz about this...., another factless pointless post. Excuse me? That's a student at the campus who's dealt with the Feminazi atmosphere there at the ground level. I think he may have an insight into how students are treated. How about the fact that she's been temporarily kicked out: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/05/15/video-of-university-adviser-accusing-student-of-harassment-touches-a-…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 09:06 PM
0

http://zenmen.org/abby-dawson-needs-to-eat-her-words
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:34 PM
1

Indeed, you are~! :)
/r/MensRights16/05/15 08:34 PM
2

We do not know: *If she's telling the truth about the procedures *If the other advisor would have seen him willingly *If waiting for someone is generally considered "harrassment" by the school... There's lots of things we can't verify.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:56 AM
1

Factoring in all he has said about the events that led up to it, I think she was upset that he might get to see a different advisor, and was worried it would reflect bad on her job.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:53 AM
1

No, because you don't know if Mrs. Tilley had a problem with him being there or not, only her word.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 11:48 AM
2

Bruce later shared screen shots of emails dated in Aug. 2014 in which he was corresponding with Dawson about course requirements in the exercise science department. Bruce also posted screen shots of emails dated recently explaining the trouble he has experienced with Dawson to an unknown recipient. In those emails Bruce says Dawson displayed a pattern of cancelling scheduled meetings, while also indicating he prefers in-person dialogue to email correspondence. Bruce also said he spoke to the dep…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:47 AM
1

Since he is trying to demand an appointment with an advisor who is not assigned to him Still assuming without full access to the facts.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:42 AM
2

Nope. Hers. You know, the person you're White Knighting for?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:40 AM
0

I believe he says "Mrs. So-and-so, you're my advisor?"
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:36 AM
2

How do you know he was being rude, based on the video? You believe the woman automatically?
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:35 AM
6

I call that standing up for your rights.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:48 AM
3

Actually, there isn't enough info for even that. We only have her word on the matter.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:47 AM
2

I do believe she was his advisor. He had tried to get an appointment on a couple of occasions to no avail. Fyi this is Kennesaw, which should tell you something.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:46 AM
6

I don't know how truly bad it is in the US, or if it's more hype or not http://www.avoiceformalestudents.com/list-of-lawsuits-against-colleges-and-universities-alleging-due-process-violations-in-adjudicating-sexual-assault
/r/MensRights11/05/15 12:44 PM
1

Welcome. This list the same stories, plus a lot, lot more: http://mankindglobalmedia.blogspot.com/p/you-hear-it-all-time-mras-arent-really.html
/r/MensRights08/05/15 08:02 PM
4

this scenario also describes a large number of false rape accusations FIFY.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:08 PM
3

I think she also copped to the reality that there may be more male victims than the stats sometimes tell us because 1) under-reporting (imagine that!) and 2) the language of DV politics hasn't grasped the notion of anything else but female victims at the present time. This article is a couple of years old. So there's been little change by feminism proper as a whole, obviously.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:49 PM
2

that very easy point that most of us agree on anyway Except not all of us agree. a tour of suffragette history which literally interests none of us Doesn't interest YOU, perhaps, but it did interest most of those listening to her. And if you had listened to the video I linked you to, you would have heard her say that even one of Cenk's regular viewers criticized him on that very thing: Cutting her off when she had some not as well-known aspects of history to discuss.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:17 PM
2

Try about the 1:40 mark or so.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:39 AM
1

1) It is a discussion, in that the inclusion of it is intended to spark discussion among adherents to this forum. 2) It in fact has been published on Men's Issues Weekly, HBR Facebook, and has generated discussion by those interested in men's issues, including here - if you looked at the comments being made as a whole. Just what gives you the right to unilaterally decide what is & isn't "Men's Issues" for the rest of us?
/r/MensRights31/01/15 04:38 PM
1

I just don't buy the pro-life argument that an unborn fetus is alive The argument has never been over whether or not a fetus is "alive," but over status of personhood, pain capability, viability, etc. If it's not alive, you have a stillborn birth.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:16 AM
1

Since the "P" stands for "Paternal," that seems to be rather impossible.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 02:59 AM
1

My Wife: *Saw a teenage girl - tiny thing - hitting a boy on the bus and wanted to alert the driver. *Was shocked and appalled over the boy who was suspended for playing "pow pow" shooting games @school *When I told her about the Pee sitting down thing in Europe & Manspreading, said "They're trying to take away your uniqueness!" I think I came out alright marrying this one, myself!
/r/MensRights28/01/15 02:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter