TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

manustillflops Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by manustillflops on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Again, I'm not going to reply to any assumptions made or shots taken at my personal life. It contributes nothing and accomplishes nothing. There is no other way to say it other than to say you are just wrong. Consent is not implied. It is verbally given. It does not need to be a technical process that breaks intimacy, but it is a verbal requirement. If someone wants to escalate the situation with the person they are with, they need a verbal affirmation from the person there are with that they wa…
/r/seduction21/06/13 07:09 PM
7

This is a very good breakdown of how I feel. Consent cannot be assumed or implied. Consent is expressed explicitly after it has been asked for. My main issue lies in the first couple of quotes you gave. Before editing the post Tofu also seemed to suggest men grab a woman's hand and place it on your penis without asking, but that point has now been plucked from the context of continuing without consent placed in a context where sex is already happening, making the point seem rather benign. My con…
/r/seduction20/06/13 03:36 PM
11

I must be an idiot if I think one of 130,000 people could ever rape a woman? That is an incredibly naive statement which really does a lot to illustrate how big the problem of sexual assault is in this country and how oblivious so many people are to it. The odds of one person in 130,000 committing rape are not impossible, like you seem to think. They're depressingly likely odds. I am not an idiot for thinking it's possible that someone here could commit rape. The odds are actually pretty substan…
/r/seduction20/06/13 03:19 PM
0

mstrkrft said a lot of it very well. My main issue lies in the first two things he quoted. Consent is not taken by coercion or force and it is not implied. It is spoken after it is asked for. Forcing her to make you stop is sexual assault. Edit: The text of the post was taken down temporarily. It is back up now.
/r/seduction20/06/13 03:05 PM
10

I read OP's post (and admittedly, I initially responded to it somewhat irrationally due to emotional nature of the situation) and TofuTofu's post in full. I only read "Part 7", but I did read it in its entirety before he deleted it. His stance that permission is not needed to make the kinds of advances he suggests is what got to me. Consent is not taken through coercion or force.
/r/seduction20/06/13 08:23 AM
4

That first point may have been misguided and I apologize. This is an issue very close to my heart for a few different reasons and it is often a trigger for me. I did not mean to approach you with malice as I know you are not the one who wrote those words. I apologize for taking that out on you, it was not my intent. Still, I feel like it must be discussed and I feel that the epicenter of the event is appropriate enough. I feel that way, many of the people who were involved in those posts may be …
/r/seduction19/06/13 11:07 PM
43

I am not here with hate in my heart. I am here with what I feel is good sense and compassion. You are making yourself into an apologist for someone who has, in writing, backed the idea of nonconsensual sexual activity and made it quite clear his view is not that women are an equal member of society to be respected, but instead commodities for the purpose of consumption. Beyond that, with this post, you are saying you refuse to discuss the matter, thereby enabling him to continue this campaign he…
/r/seduction19/06/13 10:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter