TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

maplehobo Archive

View 4 posts and 3,217 comments by maplehobo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,217 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

It leads to great results… for them. You just end up exploited.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/26 12:34 AM
1

So mainly cohabitation then? Making a great case for men to stop cohabiting with women
/r/MensRights13/08/26 11:59 PM
1

How do you find the state forcing you to a relationship arrangement you never agreed to justifiable? If you find this has any sort of justification then you have already gone down the slippery slope
/r/MensRights13/08/26 11:42 PM
2

That’s what Im saying. What happens after men stop having relationships with women? Make it illegal for men to pump and dump women. You had a date and you didn’t pursue further? Well you misogynistic pig now owe her a compensation for the emotional turmoil you put her through. Protect women and girls!
/r/MensRights13/08/26 11:20 PM
1

How do they determine when the relationship started? Is it after the first date? The first time you saw each other? Since the woman says it started? What happens if the guy didn’t think of it as a relationship while the woman did?
/r/MensRights13/08/26 11:05 PM
1

> The clear take-away is: the government is displeased that so many people are opting to raise families on their own terms, and feels it needs to step right in to their personal lives and start regulating. Exactly, just one minor but important correction. Not people, men. The government needs to extract resources and labor from men to keep sustaining itself. So men having the option to opt out of a bad deal for them is a no no. Same old, same old, put women at the center, then children and lastl…
/r/MensRights13/08/26 11:01 PM
1

And what happens next? Who’s to say they aren’t going to keep doubling down? Make it a criminal offense for men to pump n dump women on the grounds of protecting them from emotional harm or some other bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 10:47 PM
1

Why are men in the UK not protesting this?
/r/MensRights13/08/26 10:27 PM
3

The UK is a totalitarian state. Now you can’t even escape it in your own relationships. Men will be forced to enter implicit marriages simply by cohabiting with women. Absolute bullshit.
/r/MensRights13/08/26 10:23 PM
7

Who tf cares? If you want to approach women go approach them bro. Stop crying about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/26 06:18 AM
1

I was directly responding to your claim that the amount of women in the world means men don’t have to compete for mates. That wasn’t my point at all. You’re really dense aren’t you? And if porn solves the problem why even bring up the number of women? It’s not impacted by porn. It does impact porn in an indirect way because there’s more production of it. The point was that porn impacts the value of pussy. And that’s my point women can be single moms so men have it harder finding wives. And what’…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 08:38 AM
1

Yep, it’s what my man did and he’s married to me. No it doesn’t. Marriage is a scam anyways for men at least and is not a parameter of anything. Also I know married men and notice their wives are usually their looksmatch Good for them I guess. That’s not how it works because there are more men in the world that could reproduce with those women. That’s what creates competition not the mere quantity of women it’s about the ratio to men. Since men can reproduce in old age women of reproductive age …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 03:54 PM
1

I didn’t say my advice was good. I’m just saying you have no grounds on which to judge my advice because you are the single one and I am the married one. So being married makes you an authorized voice somehow on telling men what they should do? This is just blatantly false It isn't. I don’t know what you mean saying that context doesn’t exist now it’s literally the same as always It isn't. Eggs are far from scarce, there are 2 billion women in reproductive age in the world. Eggs where expensive …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 06:08 AM
–

Women’s income is largely a neutral factor for men. They’d much rather take a pleasant cashier than a bossgirl any day. I wasn’t talking about you specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 05:31 PM
1

Late 20s. 2 approaches. Dates, still in contact with one of them, no relationship. I don’t approach women unless there are clear signs of interest. My last two approaches one woman was eyeing me across the bar and I caught her stare several times before I made the move. Second one was at a festival and her with her group of friends came to dance near me an my group, she kept getting closer until we eventually ended dancing together, so Im not really sure if that even counts as me approaching her…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 04:35 PM
–

Men don’t care about women’s income and the average women is fat when she used to be slim. Women are not bringing extra. That’s such bullshit. They are demanding more and bringing less. Stay single, it will be for the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 03:57 PM
2

You said my advice was bad but you’re the single one. And? Me being single makes your advice good how exactly? I’m saying men don’t get rejected by average women and attractive women alike, unless they’re just offering sex. Offer more to your actual looksmatch and you’ll see more success. They get rejected whatever they offer. Offering “support” be it financial or otherwise is detrimental to men if women are not interested. You’re just advocating for prostitution with extra steps at no costs to …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 03:46 AM
2

https://preview.redd.it/zr2fjots0j9h1.png?width=678&format=png&auto=webp&s=7c0a127729b9984b5d70e2414b2ff091394502ad
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:03 AM
2

Because I was literally replying, and you kept acting like you missed the point? Not how I seen it but hey, that's your debate with her, doesn't mean I am going to join. What point?? You didn't make any point. You made a strawman in your head and then replied to that strawman. Do I need to bring the thread up? My issue is only when men say this, then when a woman either states what she wants, she's put down for her wants, instead of men just leaving her alone, or when a man states what he wants,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:46 AM
1

Why did you feel the need to debate me if we agreed so much? Also Yvey is not talking about her needs and preferences she's debating gender dynamics same as me. Because quite literally we both agree women and men alike had the right to want what they want and do what they want, and other than that move on? You just seem to have a problem only when men state this. If you agreed with me you didn't have to respond at all or you could've just left it at the first interaction, but you kept going on a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:32 AM
1

LMAO Im only like this online because idiots like you get triggered when someone dares criticize the sisterhood and then get mad without even thinking what they are arguing. You just fucking react. No thoughts behind. But its always outwards, you would never argue against the sisterhood, that must be protected at all costs. IRL Im actually pretty chill.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:24 AM
2

I was agree to disagreeing on men wanting king treatment, yes men do want this without doing the same for women, but it is a case by case basis, like I said. Obviously NOT ALL MEN. It is overwhelmingly women who want to be wooed and chased. It is overwhelmingly women who have YveyGrey mentality. This is not a tit for tat. This is not equal between the genders. Fuck outta here with your case by case basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:19 AM
1

Nah, not relationship material. Keep on topic next time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:17 AM
0

I don’t have to do shit. I don’t have problems. I have a booty call on wait. We are discussing GENDER RELATIONS here, keep up buttercup.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:12 AM
2

Agree to disagree on what? This is what YveyGrey wrote: You would think they would be aware by now, your female looksmatch has more SMV than you, to get her you have to put in work, if you can’t bring your end of the bargain—support and finances—you don’t get her because you are not offering anything more than the a much more attractive man would. That doesn’t seem like a reciprocal basis for a relationship to me, that just screams prostitution with extra steps. So tell me again WHY TF ARE YOU A…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:11 AM
1

Yes because asking for reciprocity is asking for woman to bow down and “lower their standards”. Its so funny how just fucking blind you are to the shit to write down.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:06 AM
0

Also men don’t expect king treatment, merely reciprocation. That’s not king treatment. You switching the genders doesn’t give your arguments validity. This isn’t equivalent. Stop being disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 12:04 AM
1

Then tell that to all the women commenting on my thread instead of telling me since we seem to be agreeing. You just get fucking triggered for no reason when someone dares to point anything to women and immediately jump in a knee jerk reaction to defend the sisterhood. JFC man its like you are all NPCs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 11:59 PM
1

Then why are you responding to me for? God damn you all get triggered over nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 11:43 PM
-1

LMAO at women viewing having to reciprocate effort and not being treated like royalty by default like something outrageous to ask for
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 10:07 PM
2

Gotta be better than yours Mr. I’m happy single. Except I didn't give any advice did I? Well first of all that makes no sense. If all men are going after the most attractive women then many more of them will fail than if they go for a larger portion of women or most women. Also that contradicts the whole theory. If men are going for the best they can get then the average woman wouldn’t have more options than the average man but she does so that’s not what’s happening.What I said is most men will…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 09:26 PM
7

> No, you don't have to work for a relationship you as a man obviously don't want, you have that option, just as women have the option to say no. That's the equality. Don't do something you don't want to, it's ok. The program being this. (?)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:18 PM
4

Words have meaning
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 08:16 PM
6

> Why should women change what they want to please you, though? Who’s saying that??!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:30 PM
8

Lets just redefine rejection to whatever we feel like then
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:29 PM
4

> Again this is for the people who want a relationship which many people do. It’s not about what you think. Well, your advice is garbage for people looking relationships. Especially for men. Im sure women love it. > What are you retorting? That a woman doesn’t have higher SMV than her male looksmatch? No, actually read the comment before responding as a knee jerk reaction for once. Im retorting that if SMV is the metric you’re going for then it makes sense that men will go for the best they can …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 07:03 PM
4

Uh huh
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:49 PM
6

Lol that’s not men
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:49 PM
4

> Women over reciprocate in relationships. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:25 PM
7

> Yes they do. That’s why single rates are high. You are arguing this like young men are doing well with women collectively. They aren’t many of them are single, many don’t have sex at all. And? This tradcon fearmongering is hilarious to watch. I say good keep going if that means men are finally growing a backbone. > Well if all he wants is sex sure. You’re the one who brought SMV as a metric, Im merely retorting to that. Now you’re switching gears, cool. > But many men complain about sex and ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:21 PM
13

LMAO at women viewing having to reciprocate effort and not being treated like royalty by default like something outrageous to ask for
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 06:07 PM
4

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:29 PM
8

Yes, that’s what Im saying. Women seem to have an issue getting with the program though. You should tell u/YveisGrey this
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:25 PM
14

Its not that we see them as low payoff its more that we see them as high risk. It can be high payoff if a relationship forms but that’s not exactly guaranteed. Women have this idea of romance in their heads that’s just not realistic. No knight in shining armor is gonna come and give his life for you because you’re such a unique and beautiful creature in this world. Its amazing women have advanced in almost every regard but when it comes to romance you hold on for dear life on ideas from the XIV …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:21 PM
9

> If you don’t think it’s worth the effort then don’t put in the work but then also don’t complain when you have little to no success with women. Who’s complaining? I just don’t approach women Im not attracted to. And I do just fine. > Like I said you have work for your looksmatch not a woman out of your league, not a baddie, not a hottie your looksmatch. It’s always been that way because women have higher SMV than men. So a man’s looksmatch has more options for sex than he does. That means if a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 05:12 PM
29

> Their issue is they think they shouldn’t have to work for their looksmatch. Many “modern” men believe they should only have put in effort to get a woman who is more attractive than they are. If the woman is actually his looksmatch then she should just jump at the opportunity to be with him. Nobody wants to work for something they are not even sure is worth the effort. Men don’t enjoy being a dancing monkey for a low payoff. This is such an alien concept to women its really baffling to see. Thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/26 04:37 PM
2

So, why is it the default for the woman to take on the lion’s share of the responsibility? Why can’t the woman work more and the dude stay home? Because women overwhelmingly choose men that make more money than them. You know all those “standards” you like to proclaim so much? Well guess what that entails? You all want a “driven, ambitious man” but don’t want any of the downsides that come with it. Maybe start choosing men who make less and have more time to stay in the house or shut the fuck up…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:40 AM
0

You’re the one neglecting the other side. If a guy is out working wtf do you expect him to be at home with the kids? Of course the woman is going to be the one “saddled” with home duties you retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 08:15 PM
0

LMAO you’re going to bitch whatever the case aren’t you? I feel sorry for the fella who has to put up with you
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 05:06 PM
1

Also when I meant work outside the house I meant like a job. Moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:22 AM
1

Maybe stop choosing bums and applying the results of your dogshit standards to the rest of the male population.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:20 AM
2

And you know damn well men do the lion share of the work outside the house.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 06:11 AM
2

And most men also earn a wage and raise their children. Women on average spend more time raising their children and men on average spend more time working. How is that more exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 10:40 PM
-1

I’ll give you pregnancy but lol breastfeeding. The point is you’re arguing shit that’s unquantifiable. For every hour the woman spends breastfeeding how many extra hours of work did the guy have to take? Arguing you’re “giving up more” without examining case by case basis is pretty disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 10:19 PM
1

Entirely different ballpark. For decades there have been campaigns to raise awareness and for women to come forward to tell share their experiences. There is none of that for men. Men are actively encouraged and socialized to completely ignore or outright welcome sexual harassment when it comes from women. Like there is a stigma going for and not against sexual harassment with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 10:10 PM
4

As opposed to men who don’t experience being a parent at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 09:57 PM
1

No it isn’t unless she’s working the same amount of hours he is which is hardly the case in most couples with children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 09:56 PM
0

Yeah well its hard to tell when men don’t even register being grabbed or catcalled as sexual assault to begin with. I do agree that women experience it more routinely than men, but if you ask if someone has ever been sexually assaulted at least once, then I think the vast majority of people have. Its just there is a stigma with men and many times they just don’t register as sexual harassment (I know I didn’t).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 09:54 PM
20

The difference being no one gives a shit about men’s fears or problems
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 07:54 PM
4

Oh really? Who are you to say it demands more? So being a mother and raising a family demands more than being a wageslave because women believe so?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 07:51 PM
2

Tbh if you count groping and/or being catcalled I think 80% of men have also been sexually assaulted once in their lives. I also had my ass grabbed by drunken women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 07:45 PM
5

Creating a spreadsheet is pretty much loser behavior. If he was unhappy he should’ve left her on the spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 07:39 PM
3

Then you should stop complaining about his gaming habits
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 07:37 PM
1

Well first of all, within the context of this thread, it’d be so you can get laid, since this is assuming a world where women wait till marriage for sex. So, that’d be off top. Well, we don't live in that world anymore and its not necessary to get marry to have sex Marriage is also good for building a family. Lots of benefits for being married that help with raising a family. Not nearly as high benefits to offset the huge drawbacks if things go south You’re acting like the worst outcomes are com…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 05:47 AM
1

You’re still not giving me a reason for why men should do it. You’re just keep giving me an option were men should avoid all these traps vs one were they don’t. Why the fuck should I choose the one were Im at risk? If someone came with an offer to take 100 dollars vs one were you get 100 dollars but have a 50% chance of getting punched in the face why the fuck would I take the former choice?? Like the shit youre arguing is retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 03:05 AM
1

Yeah well, it ending “amicably” is 100% reliant on one party isn’t it? There is an entire industry of lawyers bending over and screwing relationships to get a profit. You’re still not giving me a single reason why this is a good idea. Its amazing that people and men specifically keep falling for this dumb fucking trap.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 12:41 AM
1

Exactly. Why marry? Date someone you like if it works, great, stay together, if it doesn’t split up without getting bent over.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 10:58 PM
1

Again, why? Why put unnecessary strain on a relationship? What’s the point? Why not just BE in a relationship? You can just BE in a relationship without signing a goddamn contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 08:04 PM
4

This is the level of IQ of the average feminist btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 05:22 PM
-2

Why are tradcons so hellbent on marriage? Fuck that bro, marriage doesn’t benefit men in any way shape or form. Stop fucking pushing for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 05:15 PM
2

I think you’re confused as to what you’re arguing here. By definition if you’re in a relationship you have to concede on some things **that’s what relationships are** its a give and take. You have to make sacrifices even if you don’t view them as such or you want to use another term for it. It can be as small as leaving the toilet seat up, it doesn’t matter. You even admitted you buy your bf gifts, thats a “sacrifice” you’re making for him. You don’t have to frame as a bad thing, its just a way …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 02:05 AM
1

The GSS data is pretty recent about it. So no, you’re actually wrong. Even accounting for bad relationships women in relationships are on average happier than single women. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:54 AM
3

Nope, we live together. How tf do you live together with someone and not compromise on anything lmao?? Either this dude is a doormat and bends to your every will (which wouldn’t surprise me as you have a very selfish view of relationships) or you’re not telling the whole story. You are contradicting yourself. How am I contradicting myself? yes I stated what I want, it’s not a shameful secret. Yes I know, you expect everyone to accommodate for you while you are unwilling to compromise on anything…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:42 PM
1

I mean show me the stats then. This is from another comment I always bring up when this bullshit is inevitable brought back up again It seems to be widely accepted in this sub that women are generally more okay with being single than men, and single women are statistically happier and healthier on average than married women, when the opposite is true for men. For the 1000th fucking time. This is absolute bullshit. It is based on a bullshit study with bullshit sources propagated by mainstream med…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:35 PM
2

So what, you have like a bootycall relationship? You just guys get together to fuck and talk and then you or him leaves? > I know exactly what I want and I got it. Stop projecting. You really don’t. You think you do, but you don’t even know what a relationship entails. You’re in this cosplay thing you call a relationship. (Im guessing not really and he’s the one having to accommodate for you). > "What's your income then? You are still telling me nothing" Considering we are not dating, it’s irrel…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:33 PM
1

🙄 This shit again. Paul Dolan’s article has done more harm to women’s self perception than anything else and I find it hilarious how you all ate that up despite being disproven a thousand times already. No, wives are not more unhappy than single women, not by a long shot. Actually single women are 3x more likely to self delete themselves. Young single women use of drugs and antidepressants has skyrocketed as well and call me crazy but I don’t think that really scream “happiness” to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 05:23 PM
1

You did not understand what I meant. I meant I do not want to sacrifice myself for others àd therefore do not require it from them. If someone wants to sacrifice for me though I am not saying no. Yeah, and that's the problem. Relationships by their very essence means accommodating for another person. You have to concede and make sacrifices and viceversa, otherwise you don't have a relationship, just a hookup which most women seemingly hate. You painted the perfect picture of women's irrationali…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 02:33 AM
3

I am not someone who values sacrifices Maybe you are the special snowflake who doesn't. Lots of women do (I'd say most) and expect that from men. In the context of dating, men require you to diminish who you are and make them the center of their lives. It’s not worth it. LMAO you got that completely backwards. I do not know about the standards of women Clearly you don't. You should sit and listen to what men are telling you then. Most women I know want reasonably attractive, gainfully employed, …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:44 AM
3

Yes conceding to what other parties want requires sacrifice from you, and like every sacrifice, it’s annoying to do. I don’t think it requires nearly the amount of effort nor the returns are as low as what women grant men for clearing the bar. This is practically the whole point of modern dating woes. Women’s standards have become practically impossible to clear for regular men to the point its not even worth trying as the returns for such demands from women are laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 11:43 PM
8

Yeah but this hasn’t stopped men on other arenas before. I think Paul is right. This pits us directly against women and men are biologically and (by extension) socially conditioned to kowtow to women. The redpill and the manosphere (warts and all) is instrumental for this deprogramming to happen and women (and society al large) are hating it.
/r/MensRights07/06/26 03:46 PM
10

How is that contradictory lmao?? It means have enthusiastic sex with your partner in the bedroom and act like a respectable human being outside the bedroom. Apparently not acting like a whore in public is too high a bar nowadays for women to clear?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 03:24 PM
7

This has a pretty easy solution. Stop listening to them! Encourage men to stop listening to them. It is futile to pay attention to anything they say. They don’t want to help men. They don’t have our interests in mind. They are trying to mold us. Who gives a fuck who they date? The day men grow a fucking spine this shit circus ends.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 07:14 AM
25

“Be a girlboss” and “be a slut” is coming exclusively from women lmao. Men are not giving contradictory messages to women this is such bullshit lol. What men ask from women has pretty much stayed consistent this whole time. Whether women like that or are willing to provide that to men is an entirely different discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:39 AM
0

Yadda yadda same old spiel. Feminism is cancer ideology and I hope it dies a slow and painful death.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 11:12 PM
2

There is no such thing as a patriarchy in the west. Any man that supports feminism is a total moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 04:23 PM
3

Its amazing how blatant this is. They don’t even try to mask it anymore. And it’s always been like this but at least in ye olden days you got the promise of a reward for being a good little sheep sent to the slaughterhouse. Now they just try to shame you if you don’t comply.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 04:06 PM
8

How dare someone call your bullshit on a debate, preposterous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:07 PM
1

They are pretty universal yeah. Im willing to bet far more than half of the female population do it. Millions don’t wear make up. Billions are married to poor men who don’t have resources. Any stats on those? Im also willing to bet women wearing makeup is like men watching porn. There is just fraction of a percentile that has never and will not ever use it. And “me me me” is something both men and women do equally. No, not by a long shot. Not when it comes to dating at least. This isn’t about “d…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:02 PM
1

There is a clear sexual dynamic were women want to be chased and be the center of attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 03:54 PM
6

Never in my life have I heard this term and Im familiar with the whole feminist dictionary of bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 12:29 AM
2

I don’t think so, not really no. For how much people like to drag the manosphere through the mud and complain about how “they’re radicalizing young men” feminism has been far more radicalizing for young women, there’s stats on that. Women have been brought up for several decades now with an antagonistic message towards men and they literally hate our guts long before they get into any sort of relationship. The average young woman has her guard up with men as a general rule before she even has a …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/26 09:31 PM
1

<image> There's also tons of women who engage in sexual acts out of their comfort zones to please a hot guy. Tons of women enjoy it when the guy is hot and they don't even want to think about it when the guy isn't. Tons of women make less attractive guys jump through hoops they don't make other guys jump trough. This pretty much is a thing. So yeah, it is pretty damn realistic scenario. Why women still keep trying to gaslight men with this bullshit is beyond me, we live in the internet age, this…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:23 PM
2

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 02:17 PM
2

I wouldn’t say its “being expanded” that seems awfully disingenuous. Its “being strained” Id say is more accurate. Apart from the traditional benevolent side more and heavier expectations are being placed on masculinity while less is being offered in return. The opposite is happening for women as we have lifted almost every restriction they had, be it social, cultural or biological.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:35 AM
3

God this reads like AI slop fed on feminist slop
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:29 AM
3

Yeah the problem is we care too much lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 04:09 PM
26

But its not gender specific, girls are also brutal and persecuting only boys while prioritizing girls is just unadulterated injustice. It creates a system where boys are always presumed guilty before they are even aware of it and women are always presumed victims. A system ripe for the exploitation of one group over another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 05:13 PM
–

That’s why added the studies part in there. This is one where social media psicosis is kinda right.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 03:08 PM
–

If you go according to social media and studies its a dating apocalypse right now. If you go irl nobody really talks about it because I guess if you’re struggling with dating that’s a rather private issue you just don’t discuss with just anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 02:37 PM
1

Okay now it just sounds like you are larping and this whole post is just a fabrication
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 08:52 PM
1

Okay, if I take your word for it then your problem is not looks it must be either A) you’re coming of as really uptight and probably swinging out the gate with a list of demands for men before they get into a relationship with you which I don’t think is gonna work too well for you because the well has poisoned beyond repair at this point, the dating landscape nowadays is that you have to assume the other person is also seeing other people and not put all your eggs in one basket B) you’re aiming …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:48 PM
3

All his videos seem staged. Like overall I agree with the point he’s trying to convey, really attractive people have it easy yadda yadda but dude’s just straight up picking girls right in front of their boyfriends and making them look like cucks, not even one of them even attempted to confront him and the girls just seem overly infatuated like to the point they forget object permanence is a thing and their boyfriend is right there in front of them watching. It isn’t even good ragebait, it’s real…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 05:53 PM
1

You’re “all women are 10s” kinda hot or actually objectively hot in men’s eyes I guess is what Im asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 03:44 PM
1

You make no mention of how hot you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 12:24 PM
–

Oh shut the fuck up. Most men don’t “intoxicate” women to have sex with them, women do that all by themselves without any input from men, stop victimizing them about everything. Ive had drunken women that Ive never met before in my life throw themselves at me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 03:04 PM
–

Did you run out of arguments this fast? “Don’t mind it bro” doesn’t fucking fly anymore, that’s how we got to this situation in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 03:04 AM
1

Yes, whenever someone brings “X gender being the prize” (usually women) its always some ego-soothing cope to try to justify why people from the opposite gender should do free labour for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:40 PM
3

How do you even know a man is high value? Is it his income? His height? What makes him high value? Where do you even find a man like this? Whatever women deem as attractive and valuable attributes to them. Right now those entail height and high income amongst other attributes, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 02:58 AM
2

I never claimed women only fuck Chad. It’s really not that difficult, women prefer to fuck an attractive, dominant, successful man that is protective and caring to them —> that is the ideal man. This ideal is very elusive, like all ideals are and women like all people have to come to terms with reality and settle and bargain for the next best deal they can get. So they might start trading raw physical attraction for more stability and provision (usually this comes with age). Or they might choose…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 02:44 AM
1

Because for women its a tug of war between physical attractiveness and other attributes. Mainly AF v BB. They have to weigh in their options. That’s also in the hypothesis as well if you cared to read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:36 AM
26

Because “loving” and “romance” for men entails a big burden of performance and sacrifice and many times that’s just not worth the effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:15 AM
7

Women fuck all kinds of attractive sleazebags and lowlifes. They’re still being picky, if they can’t get the best genes for physical attributes then they start applying other layers of filtering. Its called the ‘beautiful son hypothesis’.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 01:10 AM
4

Reading the responses to that article gave me hopes for the future. The world is healing.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 01:44 AM
1

Same with cucking men as the example I gave down the thread. Yet it still happens. Cheating is never accidental nor justified. Yet people do it all the time. Doubting if its in your human nature to commit a heinous act is more honest than assuring you would never do it imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 01:10 AM
1

the same way answering “yes” to question 2 (and 1 to a lesser degree) from my hypothetical also seem unhinged That's why I clarified answering yes to scenario 1 isn't as bad as answering yes to scenario 2 or answering yes to raping someone
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 09:48 PM
1

Okay? Then what’s your point exactly? Are you advocating that Id be okay for women to cuck their husbands as long as they don’t find out?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 09:26 PM
2

It wouldn’t, but its still a highly immoral, evil act, and the worst kind of treason you could make. Just like if a guy could grape a girl and get away with it because she was sleeping, passed out or whatever and she never knew what happened. Both scenarios there is seemingly “no harm done” but its still an evil act to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 09:20 PM
1

In my hypothetical it’s scenario 2, because scenario 1 would first pose the question would you ever cheat? Which is another fair question to ask. But yes, without knowing the specifics of the question answering yes to “would you rape someone if you could get away with it” seems unhinged, the same way answering “yes” to question 2 (and 1 to a lesser degree) from my hypothetical also seem unhinged. But its what people do all the time. People that say they won’t cheat en up cheating, people that sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 09:12 PM
0

What questions were the surveyed men specifically asked? That’s a good question, we’d have to look into that I understand that people are capable of horrible things, but do you fear starving to death if you don’t rape someone? People do horrible things for millions of reasons or no reason at all. Those are humans for ya. I put the starving just as an example. For example to flip the hypothetical to women: women are capable of cheating getting pregnant from another man and hiding that fact from t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:49 PM
6

That’s because you think you have high moral values and that can be true or false but we can never know until you put them to the test. I like to think I’d never murder my neighbor for food in case of an apocalyptic scenario but I honestly wouldn’t know what I’d capable of. So if Im being completely honest with myself I wouldn’t assure 100% that I wouldn’t do it. You have plenty examples of human cruelty and debauchery happening in extreme cases of otherwise upstanding citizens. Hell, you don’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 06:10 PM
2

Yes, its even better if you can do it without porn
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 05:40 PM
1

What would be near impossible? We live in the time of constant gratification. This obsession some of you have with getting laid I will never understand it. Dudes get porn addiction while being in committed relationships so its not true that any sex is better than masturbating.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 03:44 PM
1

Beats me. Probably because they never had sex in the first place, because they don’t have any social circles or a combination of both most likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:35 PM
1

Porn is better than mediocre sex. Its also better than having to chase and dance like a monkey or having to posture as ‘alpha’ or having to change your whole personality for some random woman to like you. It is specially good advice for guys that don’t have the looks threshold to even be considered by women without putting in tremendous effort. Sex is not all that’s hyped to be honestly, but some guys never got anything so they have no point of reference. You’re just helping fuel the rat race an…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:30 PM
1

Everything I listed was done by feminists. You don’t get to throw away your most rotten apples simply because you don’t like that its a reflection of your movement. And explain to me, how a policy that treats men as the defacto guilty party in cases of domestic dispute and sends them to “re-education camps” is not an incredibly unfair and unjust policy to have, seeing as domestic abuse is pretty much equal between the genders. There was never a need to even create this kind of policy in the firs…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 03:00 PM
0

As opposed to your brilliant rebuttals lmao. If you have something to add or contest then say it. Otherwise keep on moving. Or keep whining about it. Your choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 02:24 PM
1

Feminism has opposed and boycotted men’s organizations and talks about men mental issues. They have opposed men having shelters or receiving help. They have impulsed harmful policies that discriminate against men, like the Duluth model or the fact that in many cases rape when done by women is not considered rape as stated as a law. Also the introduction of bullshit terminology like femicide into law that discriminates when a murder is done to a woman vs a man it gets harsher sentences effectivel…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 02:20 PM
0

I work in mental healthcare, and I have way more male clients than I would have had 50 years ago. I know men who were able to get no-fault divorces, and as women's pay goes up, men's alimony dues go down, and men can even get alimony now. To name a few things. Feminism has fought against men’s issues and applied policies that have harmed men more than the few residual benefits men have gained from feminism fighting for women. …Yeah? If a rule does nothing but hurt people, or causes more harm tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 01:34 PM
2

There is a difference between facing struggles, and being oppressed by your sex. No one argues that every man has an easy and grand old time. But when men have struggles, they are largely caused by either circumstance or by other men. Even when a man faces an issue from an individual woman (ex. woman rapes a man), his greater part of that issue is male-caused (ex. male judges and male-run police and male-run lawmakers don't believe that he was raped and don't punish his rapist). Ahh yes the good…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 01:18 PM
8

This is exactly why feminism isn't about "equality", it's about freedom of women from oppression based on their female sex. I actually agree with this take and its what Ive been saying all along but feminists are dead set on claiming feminism is about equality. Its not. Problem is, you are not the only ones oppressed by your sex. Being by natural or social oppression, men are “oppressed” too (I find the oppression argument stupid that’s why I put in quotes). And men and women are deeply intertwi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 05:06 AM
1

That’s easy peasy. Just masturbate, porn is free, readily available and ubiquitous. Gets your hit and many times its even better than having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 04:04 AM
7

I love how women use the most darwinian theories as backup when it suits them, but its all muh-equality and social stigmas/conditioning when it doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 04:02 AM
0

Because he’s not saying that. You just believe men not bowing down to women is “harming them”.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 03:56 PM
-1

Why do you assume harming women? How about just not giving a fuck? The fact men are realizing the game is rigged doesn’t necessarily mean we are going to start murdering women on the streets, we just stop giving a fuck to whatever you say or do. Your issues stop mattering to us, that’s all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 10:31 AM
1

You realize the same applies the other way around too right? Women’s way of showing empathy is not the standard to apply to everyone. And it shouldn’t be.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 09:46 AM
3

Same as the one you did. Id like to see “all this research” you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 09:43 AM
3

All research points the other way No it doesn’t
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 12:57 AM
1

And men have empathy. Again, because men don’t show empathy the way it’s socially acceptable by women doesn’t mean men lack empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 11:40 PM
1

No, men have different ways of showing empathy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 06:33 PM
1

Damn bro keeps coming back 😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:51 PM
1

Take a chill pill bro, its not that serious. Let it go.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:42 PM
1

Seems like you are really mad about orange man. Irrationally so. To the point you just can’t let it go. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:30 PM
1

Its also not an acceptance. Your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:24 PM
1

Damn bruv you really getting invested in this
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 08:14 PM
1

I think orange men funny because he make people mad
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 07:53 PM
1

Ok bruv
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:44 PM
1

The just‑world fallacy (also called the just‑world hypothesis) is a cognitive bias where people assume that good actions will be rewarded and bad actions punished You don’t like Trump and want to believe so bad he’s this miserable rich old man despite not having a single evidence beyond some conjectures you made. Maybe you’re right and he’s miserable, maybe he’s the happiest men in the world, most likely its somewhere in the middle. How hard is it to comprehend that people you don’t like are not…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:37 PM
3

Right, sorry, forgot we aren’t allowed to question anything that is on the site and take everything on the site as the absolute objective truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:23 PM
1

What points bruv, you’re just doing just world fallacy. Trump can be an asshole, doesn’t mean he’s an unhappy asshole. That’s you just making assumptions because you don’t like the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:19 PM
3

Be empathetic and be able to be open with their friends about their feelings. Sooo, socialize like women. Not just having shallow friendships. This is a slippery slope. “Talking about your feelings” doesn’t make your relationships any more or less shallow. This is what Im talking about. You’re applying your female lens on men’s relationships. Men are not broken women.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:15 PM
3

😂 So it was all in your head. This just reads like wishful thinking, bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:11 PM
4

How should men socialize in a way that you would deem not toxically masculine?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:09 PM
1

That’s the implication when you use bullshit terms like toxic masculinity
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:06 PM
3

He has the ability to transactionally get what he wants. But it never feels real. Which is why he keeps trying for “more!” Because the feeling of emptiness his dad’s apathy for him has never been validated. Did he say this?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:05 PM
4

It is. Men are not women. We don’t socialize like women do and trying to cram a round peg into a square hole its not going to work. Besides men already had groups and bonded just fine with other men and women barged in demanding to be let in, nevermind shutting any form of male spaces and then you come complaining about how “we don’t bond with other men”.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 06:00 PM
7

😂 Im sure telling this stories to yourself makes you sleep better at night. And Im not defending Trump here, Im absolutely neutral to US politics, but this was fun to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 05:49 PM
4

Or or or … hear me out. Toxic masculinity is complete utter bullshit, and men are not broken women … how about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 05:41 PM
1

You think these women don’t exist?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 06:09 PM
1

For sure they are caricatures, they aren’t fantasies though. And I don’t understand why we can’t complain about stuff now. I mean women complain about men all the time. Are we not allowed to?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:54 PM
1

You can’t comprehend simple text and Im the one who can’t reason lol
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:51 PM
1

My argument is coherent. You’re just seemingly too stupid to read and process a single paragraph without getting triggered beforehand.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 05:15 PM
-2

and she says thank you- that's it Please read the comment before responding out of a knee jerk reaction like a dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 04:19 PM
-5

Man you guys really give the most NPC responses imaginable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 04:14 PM
0

Ah yes, women are known for initiating and advancing relationships as well as paying for dates and men are deeply unappreciative of said women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 04:05 PM
-6

Gee, sure feels like a reward interacting with an ungrateful bitch that believes I should bankroll her life and dance like a monkey for her amusement simply because I was born with a penis. Oh no please, whatever are we going to do if you leave us alone??!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 03:43 PM
4

Men don’t mind doing things for women. We actually like doing things for women if it’s appreciated and reciprocated. What we do mind is the current sleuth of women that expect and feel entitled to men doing things for them and the only reciprocation and appreciation they are willing to give back is their presence and men are just seemingly expected to take it as if it were a gift from God. The absolute sheer narcissism of many women is what we complain about.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 09:22 AM
2

So make a reddit post whining about it? How is that going to stop men complaining about stuff? What’s happening is that you’re getting upset that men don’t have nor need to take your bs. They can have whatever standards that is not sleeping with ran thru hoes then there’s nothing much ran thru hoes can do about it. Same way women want 6’ guys and short men can do nothing but complain about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 12:56 AM
3

Ok. What if men don’t want to? What are you gonna do about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 08:39 PM
3

Sometimes i think that you men see women as a service distribution system Oh, the irony … and complain that "bee-mee you gave away quicker for him, why do i have to do more to get the same service". Why would men owe women to shut up and take whatever its given to them for women’s comfort??
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 08:10 PM
28

“The bar is in hell” is the most laughable catchphrase ever and its not men that came up with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 07:54 PM
1

I never assigned any moral value to it, YOU DID. My argument is that free will is free will and if you’re going to use that to justify not hiring someone as bad, then another person can justify not choosing ro date someone for being tall or skinny enough as something bad as well and thinking you get to decide which one is good or bad is plainly narcissistic. That’s it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 10:22 PM
0

I never said that. How about you actually address the argument being made instead of putting words in my mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 09:57 PM
0

What I personally think is irrelevant. The argument is about free choice. Hiring or not hiring someone based on their skin color holds the same validity as choosing to date or not to date someone because of their height, weight or whatever other physical attribute. Thinking you’re the ultimate moral authority regarding which one is good and which one isn’t seems incredibly narcissistic, egotistical and selfcentered to me, so idk what to tell you, sister.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 09:00 PM
1

This seems like the most convoluted rationalization ever lmao. Sorry but no, if one’s fair the other is as well. After all its all based on free will and the freedom to choose. If I have the freedom to serve, employ or have sex whit whomever I choose who gets to decide what is “good free choice” and what’s “bad free choice”? you? lmao give me a break. The guy above is absolutely right, if you’re going to give the “free will” spiel then at least be consistent about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/25 08:48 PM
1

I just didn't leave that one date immediately. Which means you entertained her. Did you pay for the date?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 05:02 PM
5

I had a woman come on a date and get on her tip-toes to check if I'm balding (I'm not, but I am tall) and said "sorry I have to make sure I'm not dating a loser" and tried to laugh it off. I laughed it off with a "is there going to be a cock inspection as well?" and we went on with the date flirting and having fun. Most men would implode for not having all the boxes that I have checked and I'm STILL being treated like trash. This woman was not that attractive. Chunky, unfunny, socially inept, et…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 03:54 PM
2

💯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/25 01:56 PM
3

I’ve been hearing him lately and he’s just a moron. He also seems pretty stern and sad that must be why he’s projecting onto every man his own issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/25 01:46 PM
0

including straight women Highly doubt they are 100% straight. Women are more likely to fall on the bisexual spectrum than men by a large margin. Also when talking about someone being aesthetically pleasing you have to take into account makeup and clothing which makes up like 80% of the aesthetic (the other 20% being physical fitness and a naturally attractive face).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 06:12 PM
3

That’s not what the manosphere says. The manosphere says ‘don’t be taken for a chump’ aka expect consistency from women’s morals/ethics, sexual or otherwise. There are no issues if a woman makes you wait for sex as long as you’re not the idiot she’s making him wait NOW when before she used to let everyone hit fast. Don’t be the chump, because that’s a recipe for disaster.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 06:04 AM
7

This. I think women have a hard time differentiating between the two because for them raw attraction is heavily intertwined with how much they respect/admire the man. Men tend to be able to compartmentalize the two more.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 05:52 AM
8

Funny thing is, those are some of my favorite characters listed there. Women constantly complain about the Bechdel test but it works exactly the same the other way too. A lot of male characters motivations are driven by romantic interest and their stories centered around a woman. The characters you listed are their own with their own motivations and their own core set of values the live by. They also subvert these romantic tropes of the white knight or hero coming to the m’lady’s rescue. Rorscha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/25 08:53 PM
1

Im not from US, Im asking out of curiosity since I have a very vague idea of what the political landscape looks from inside. I just had the impression that even before Trump won the elections, MAGA was a lot more mainstream and talked about than what it used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 07:53 PM
1

Isn’t MAGA mainstream?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 06:18 PM
33

He sounds like a pandering jackass. The left really does have a problem talking in a non condescending way to men. Edit: Also many of the claims he makes are false which quite frankly makes me doubt his intelectual background and honesty. For example, he claims boys need a male role model for better outcomes while girls don’t, and the latest feminist bandwagon that men “need” relationships while women don’t. Both statements easily refuted by a quick google search or a chatgpt query.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 02:26 PM
15

What is a place hot women go to as opposed to a place non-hot women go to? Personally when me and my guy friends went “on the prowl” we went to places were we knew there’d be women and you could interact with them. If there were hot women the better.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 10:55 PM
2

You’re attending an event that’s made for something that should ideally happen naturally, it’s specially egregious for women, seeing as they could potentially meet, pick and choose from thousands of matches on dating apps without having to leave their house. And then there’s the whole “I don’t need no man” spiel, but then you’re attending an event to try and meet one. At least men that attend these events are being honest about how desperate they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 12:57 PM
1

Except they don't if you read my 2nd point
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 09:07 AM
6

1) If men had chances, they’d be attending these events. There’s a reason men are not attending. Who’s paying to be rejected in person? 2) The dynamic seems to be the same as dating apps. Men show up, women scan them, and they still pick the top ones. Except now you have to pay for the privilege of experiencing that in person. If anything these venues should let men in free and offer them a courtesy drink or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 11:20 PM
4

Nah I couldn’t imagine my life revolving around getting a woman this much. You’re basically a glorified atm, your dignity out the window, it’s seriously a lot more dignified to just live the rest of your life masturbating. Your buddy would still get more action than the once in a year pity starfish sex his wife gives him anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:50 PM
1

Nah I couldn’t imagine my life revolving around getting a woman this much. You’re basically a glorified atm, your dignity out the window, it’s seriously a lot more dignified to just live the rest of your life masturbating. Your buddy would still get more action than the once in a year pity starfish sex his wife gives him.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:29 PM
0

Well they are not wrong. If you’re attending a speed dating event, by definition you’re desperate being man or woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:15 PM
3

This is just embarrassing. Imagine being that dude and still going after that woman. Porn is free bro, just jack it like a monkey and go out with your buddies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/25 10:10 PM
2

Except it does. Except it doesn't. What recourse do men have after impregnating a woman? And you still haven't answered: What happens with men who got baby trapped by women? What is their recourse? "Should have just kept it in your pants bro"? It did. You can't piss and moan about responsibility and authority going hand in hand and then say men should get authority with no responsibility. Im not saying that. Im saying responsibility and authority should be applied equally Men have no responsibil…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 03:33 AM
2

Neither parent gets to unilaterally discharge their responsibilities to a child. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe-haven_law It does? Except it doesn't. Women have a recourse even after screwing up. Men don't. For men its just "keep it in your pants". Asked and answered. Didn't answer shit. They have 100% authority over their bodies, I can agree on that. They shouldn't get to have 100% authority over men's bodies and men's lives. It works both ways. You seem to be making the claim that because …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 07:31 PM
4

Actually, you'll find that both parents have to pay for the child which also grants them authority over the child (unless removed via legal channels), but many men choose to abdicate that authority. Except women are the only ones who get to abdicate that responsibility if they choose to do so. They can unilaterally chose to abandon their child without any input from the men needed if they don't want to be financially responsible for their child. Men are stuck paying whatever they choose to do, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 06:08 PM
–

Ditto. You don’t speak for men, and saying men enjoy slaving away its about as wrong as you can get.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 03:23 PM
3

Fine by me. Except that’s not what’s going to happen, that’s just some female revenge fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 03:21 PM
5

What’s fair? I think financial abortion would be fair if given the option to men
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 03:05 PM
–

Love how you speak for all men without having the slightest awareness of the dumb shit that comes out of your mouth
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 03:00 PM
4

Well, time to get yourselves up by the bootstraps ladies.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 02:58 PM
9

Women have the responsibility for gestating the fetus and therefore have the authority to abort. Men do not, so they don't. And men have the responsibility to pay for the child. Women can abort or unilaterally decide to abandon the child if they wish to do so. Men don’t. Whatever men decide to do, they are always bound to the mother’s decision. So it looks to me like women have authority while men have responsibility when it comes to reproductive rights. But they don't, which is the entire crux …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 02:56 PM
9

So do women. Why do we need to implement DEI policies? Why do we need to implement maternal leave? Why do you still complain about the wage gap? Like we are always told “suck it up, buttercup”.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 02:44 PM
3

And why should they? Do you think men don’t face similar decisions in life? Slave yourself away or don’t earn as much but have more time for yourself and your loved ones. Why do women think they are so special in this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 02:41 PM
5

Just some arrogant soldier type, basically a man with boobs but better than all other men. Not even that. Male heroes generally go through some development in the process, you know the classic “hero’s journey”. They have to face adversities, some losses first, either a loved one or something that sends them on their path of growth and ultimately face their adversity and win. They show the process they go through, which shows dedication, discipline and resilience before they can ultimately win. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:24 AM
6

Yep pretty much. That’s character development and its the reason why female heroines of the last decade generally suck ass. Nobody can empathize with a smug bitch that got handed superpowers/abilities from up above and now she’s effortlessly so much better than anyone else around them (and when I mean anyone, its 99% of the time men). Even when it’s implied she suffered in the past, that does absolutely nothing, like in this pathetic scene, you can’t just cram character development in a 10 secon…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 01:10 AM
1

I don't think it's traditionalism more as it's about treating others with respect and how you want to be treated. People aren't experiences to collect they are someone . They are humans with thoughts feelings and emotions? So best to treat them like it. This says absolutely nothing. You can treat someone with respect and still the other person might not take it well. Nobody owes anyone romance or a relationship, if it happens good for them, but like I said, in modern dating nobody, men nor women…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 05:08 AM
–

Sadly I think the well has been poisoned beyond repair. That cat is not going back inside the bag anymore, it’s either adapt or die, maybe we’ll see a resurgence in traditionalism but I wouldn’t bet on it, not if we also brought traditionalism in other areas beyond dating as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 04:49 AM
–

Many men have been burned doing exactly what you propose, have been used for free drinks or a free meal without even a ‘thank you’ as a show of gratitude. The current environment is women’s doing as well. It is a much better return for men to invest as little as possible at the beginning and see where things develop from there. I agree, maybe a low stakes date like a coffee date or a walk is a good idea. But many women also don’t like that, they see it as the man not putting effort. For how much…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:26 AM
–

I don't know you, I don't know what you consider "high maintenance", that's highly subjective to each individual but there's a considerable amount of women that think "princess treatment" is "the bare minimum" to expect from men and I personally believe women in general still expect old school fashioned gestures of romance and chivalry from men without realizing the rules and the environment have changed. Look at other comments here and you'll see women saying how they find most men they date "m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 12:53 AM
–

There's always meaning behind the language used. You obviously think men aren't up to snuff for what it takes to "maintain" you aka you're high maintenance, which is common for pretty women who know they are pretty. That's the other half of the equation that is always omitted in these stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 09:28 PM
–

I would say you get treated like a luxury car people would love to have you for the status but don't have what it takes to keep up the maintenance This is the part it all falls apart. So its not that men see you as an object, its that you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 08:54 PM
1

I like your flair, can I get one too?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 07:39 PM
1

I mean, they are? You can and are allowed to not have kids if you don’t want to. Having kids is the ultimate goal if you only reduce everything to a biological discussion and operate looking at the world through those googles. Luckily humans, are able to go a little beyond that and find meaning and purpose in different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 01:02 PM
1

The reason why men "like sex" more than women is quite literally a matter of biology. There is a science to every human instinct and urge. Because reproduction is inexpensive for males, it is sometimes in the males favor to reproduce with many women. Also you must consider the 24-hour biological male hormone cycle versus the 28-day hormone cycle of a female, which heavily impacts sex drive ability. This doesn’t change the fact that women are just as concerned at an evolutionary level to spread t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 09:21 PM
1

Biologically, women tend to be not as concerned with spreading genes as men. What? Women are just as concerned as men with spreading their genes, they just differ in the strategy they use. But that aside, this is incorrectly framed because neither are concerned with “spreading their genes” at a conscious level, they just like sex. Proximate goal vs ultimate goal. And how are women "choosing not to be good enough" or "not good enough"? If men are considered worthless because they can’t provide fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 08:19 PM
8

But that cannot be categorized as rejection. If one party is completely unaware they are being proposed in the first place how does that count as rejection?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:21 PM
1

Fuck if I know. What is exactly the purpose of this thought experiment?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 05:02 PM
0

Yes, I understand, and it’s by this same pattern that women who choose to not reproduce will be eliminated from the gene pool. Which right now, it’s a really big chunk of women. So by this same token “women aren’t good enough” either or rather are “choosing not to be good enough” which is nothing more than shooting themselves in the foot really. In the end, life always finds a way.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 11:32 AM
1

So you’re advocating for women to go back to the kitchen and be incubators? Because if we go by your logic then what is the value women are actually adding when they are not reproducing? You know, for women to dangle the “I have inherent value because I can reproduce life” you actually have to be reproducing life otherwise, by the same token you’re just worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/25 11:06 AM
–

How am I making things personal? He’s literally blackpill, he’s part of another sub where they discuss these ideas
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 12:45 AM
–

He's not red pill, he's blackpill
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:30 PM
1

I'm not on the anarcho-capitalist camp, but overall less social help programs (only really necessary ones), less taxes, less gender quotas, DEI, etc. Less funneling of men taxes over to women's programs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 11:27 PM
4

Who gives a fuck, it’s already happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 10:44 PM
5

LOL fuck that. So men basically have to bankroll and break their backs to uphold women’s living standards. How about no. Libertarian all the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 10:20 PM
1

Lol no y'all famously suck at having intimate conversations with each other. Yes, no man ever has any friends or talk to other men, we just lie, cheat and eat hot chips. But that aside: you had in-depth conversations with the serious partners of your former FWBs in which they described significantly worse treatment while being honest and forthcoming about how their own behavior may have affected that? And you did this enough times to have a decent sample size? And your version of "worse treatmen…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 11:22 PM
–

This revolutionary idea might implode your brain but men talk to each other
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 10:46 PM
1

Various problems with this take. They are marrying men they wouldn’t hook up with. That’s part of the problem, many women are settling for men they don’t find attractive later in life and dooming the relationships to deadbedrooms. So its a little bit more than your patriarchal bullshit. They might have the option to choose, doesn’t mean they are being chosen back, because you see men also have the option to choose and the more women’s “choosing” tend to accumulate at the top of men, the more opt…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 05:43 PM
1

Ive also been sexually harassed by an old woman as a kid lmao, its a lot more common than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 12:48 PM
2

Ive had my ass grabbed by women while walking through night clubs, its just a fun anecdote and it felt good in the moment. Id gather the experience would be different the other way around. But I’ve also had my ex key my car and stalk me at work and on social media (her friend told me). That was not a fun experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 12:40 PM
5

It’s certainly a lot less than what women experience from men but it’s not negligible. It also doesn’t pose the same level of threat of a woman creeping or harassing a man so men just brush it off or don’t even register it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 11:56 AM
1

Like I said never seen it and I have seen some of the most outrageous shit being said by both men and women and I frequent a lot of “gender wars” subreddits. Never seen it. Please do share next time you see something of the sort if it is so common as you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 11:10 AM
3

I have never in all my years of Reddit seen someone say anything of the sort. The closest I’ve seen is men bringing up double standards and women’s hypocrisy but never seen any man demand women fight for something they want. Are you fighting a strawman you created in your own head?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 12:25 AM
2

Yep, but its funny seeing it thrown at totally anonymous people online whom you don’t know nothing about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 01:18 AM
10

Aw man I dont want a guy with high body count either. Now im stuck with weird furrys. Who’s gonna tell her?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 11:00 PM
4

Bruh …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 03:59 PM
11

Doesn’t matter if he is or not. Women use the lack of sex as an insult all the time, calling men directly or indirectly either virgins or incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 06:18 AM
1

https://preview.redd.it/0y0zvrf7q7nf1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=14ca3ea56dd8d803600d9e182ef49b481ecaa1dc
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 09:04 PM
1

Modern feminism as the movement we know it was born in 1848. There were many scholars that advocated for women’s rights long before the enlightenment era, you pointing that fact changes absolutely nothing. I already stated that feminism is a female liberation movement, which none of this proto feminists you’re giving as examples disprove.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:43 PM
1

By that logic you could argue Plato was a feminist since he advocated for women’s education. Feminism was born in 1848.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:21 PM
1

Yeah I know feminists have a hard time wrapping their heads around that one but its true
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 08:04 PM
1

No, feminism is just rebranded Marxism except its not a class struggle but a gender one
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:52 PM
1

Nope. Western liberal values predate feminism and have its origins in the enlightenment era.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:48 PM
1

Feminism has not been the largest vehicle for achieving egalitarianism. Technology and western liberal values were.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:43 PM
1

I have zero points of agreement with talibans. They should be wiped out from the face of the Earth if it were by me. ALL FEMINISTS agree on patriarchy theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:34 PM
1

And if you can judge the feminist movement by its worst elements, fair play dictates your views be judge accordingly to the same standard. Im not. That’s the thing, Im judging it by its median lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:26 PM
1

What do you think is my ideology to be exact?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:16 PM
1

Except “anti-feminism” doesn’t have an overarching ideology nor core set of ideas, its just critique and rejection of feminism. Some are tradcons, some are people driven by religion, some are liberals fallen out of love of feminism. So you can pretty much separate them. Im an anti-feminist, but that doesn’t mean I want Sharia-law nor to live under a muslim dictatorship. Can’t say the same for feminism when it comes to egalitarianism, liberal, terf or whatever other branch of feminism are part of…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:06 PM
0

Im taking the actions of the movement as a whole. Feminism doesn’t give a rats ass about men except to use them as pawns for their purposes. Even first wave suffragettes, you know “the good ones” fought for the right to vote but didn’t give a fuck about male conscription which was a necessary requirement for men to vote. Feminism is a female liberation movement, not an equality movement, never was, never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:16 PM
0

Yes you can. You don’t get to decide what reality is or isn’t lmao. And feminists don’t get to co-opt whatever terms they want. The mask has fallen anyways you’re not and never were for gender equality at least be honest about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:04 PM
2

Feminism =\= egalitarianism. You can be against women being second class citizens and also be against feminism. They are not exclusive despite how much feminists try to co-opt the term.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:42 PM
1

Was going so good and based until the last sentence. Personally I don’t think it’s entirely the mom’s fault. Usually it’s the dad’s job to instill discipline in their children. I do agree that slapping, spanking or disciplining your kids when they go completely out of line is something that should be brought back and is very much needed for their correct development. Kids need to understand when there is a limit that shouldn’t be crossed and a clear threat of controlled harm should be establishe…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:35 PM
11

You’re such a special cookie, but there exists more than two cookie molds irl
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 05:19 PM
1

Well, I wish you luck in your endeavors
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:45 AM
1

Well, good for you, but you're making a lot of assumptions here: The girls that men ACTUALLY want, the cool girls who “don’t nag,” who are confident, interesting and attractive are typically that way because they’re not going out of their way to deal with men This isn't going to be necessarily true. Women have this idea that romance and relationships "just happen" to them. That is not necessarily guaranteed, life is not a Dinsey movie. You have to be somewhat interested, open and looking for a r…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:32 AM
1

Problem with that is that you’re locked at an impasse. It only takes a few breaking the line for the strategy to fail. You might hold on for commitment, but chances are other women won’t if the guy is high value enough, and the higher the value, the fiercer the competition is going to be. Men at the top won’t really care if some women won’t put out, they will have plenty options to choose from. Men have the same problem with simps, if they didn’t exist, average men might get a better shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:00 AM
1

Perhaps. So then why do men get so upset when women more than dick in a man? When she was kindness and personality and financial stability in addition to him being attractive? And from your comment, it sounds like men want similar things from women beyond her just being attractive. The guy already has to bring that beforehand. You’re trying to equalize things if men do this, then women do it too.It doesn’t work like that. Women select men before having sex, men afterwards. Men already have to pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:32 AM
1

Great flair
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:25 PM
40

This is the actual problem right here. He can advocate for the eradication of the male species and present it as thesis of his scientific research all he wants but then let me contrast that with research from other scientists, after all, isn’t that what the scientific method is all about? Except I can’t because pretty much any researcher who has deemed explore these topics and came to conclusions that painted the female sex in a bad light has had their work removed and censored, many had their c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 10:48 PM
3

Women do that everyday though. Except she doesn’t? They are in college. They are not married. They live in different dorms.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 12:27 AM
4

Terrible example. Organizing my google drive folder has no bearing nor does it make my life better in any way. I already know what’s in there, at most if its more organized you’ve saved me a few clicks. You’re going to annoy me more than anything, why are you snooping in my google drive for? That’s very sus.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 12:21 AM
1

Oh but women seem to LOVE when men do it. Watch the videos of men opening car doors, fixing shit, buying flowers and gifts and women drooling in the comments section. But I guess only women are allowed to reinforce performative gender norms when they benefit from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 12:10 AM
1

Oh, but they go absolutely CRAZY with videos of men doing chivalrous shit and being gentleman, buying flowers, fixing shit, opening doors, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 12:06 AM
2

Huh I actually agree, which is why I think the bashing of gender roles is idiotic and its not going to lead anywhere but our extinction in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 07:30 PM
2

They are struggling to find it because there isn’t supposed to be one. Wasn’t that the whole point? To free us from gender roles?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 07:01 PM
2

What does "equal partners with better men" even mean? It's contradictory. I think that was the argument he was trying to make. That it’s contradictory. You also illustrated it in your main comment. “Men have not been able to adapt to their new gender role”. Which is what exactly? We have removed every (or most) barriers for women, yet women by an large still hold men to traditional gender roles, its not so much than “men have not been able to” but more “they have not been let”. Feminist theory s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 06:49 PM
2

This assigns a lot of the weight (if not all of it) to men. Its kinda tone deaf to declare “men have not been able to adapt to their new gender roles” when by an large, the vast majority of women also hold men to those traditional gender roles. The latest pew research throws that 72% of men and 71% of women still hold on to the idea that men should be providers.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 06:27 PM
1

This is a really lame cop out. And you keep doubling down. You’re not for logical debate, I’ve gone through your comment history just now, nothing indicates that. You just respond to men and you’re also low key a misandrist, you’re not actually fooling anybody, I hope you realize that, but you do you. Just exposing your bullshit. Which there is a ton off. Another confession. We have established that you're a hypocrite, but that doesn't mean I am. Lmao, this is the most lame attempt at a kafkatra…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 06:00 PM
1

Im not persecuted. I don’t want you to do anything. Just exposing your bullshit. Which there is a ton off. You don’t care about logical debate. You let misandrist rhetoric slide, while any mild questioning of women you jump at the chance to try to correct. Can’t have men questioning what women bring to the table now can we? And then you come up with the most bullshit rationalization that “no but its actually tiresome responding to every comment” yet here you are 50 comments down the line this th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 05:32 PM
1

This particular sub is dominated by men who say the most vile shit about women on a daily fucking basis reducing them to warm holes, but the vast majority of even "egalitarian" men here sit on their asses and say nothing. Which is exactly what my experience has been with many men IRL when their friends do vile as shit stuff. They look away and play clueless. But I have yet to have a meltdown against a particular user for them not doing what I want them to. Amazing that you then expect others who…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 05:16 PM
1

So the mask has come off finally. You were never trying to have a logical debate lmao, rebutting OP was never so intellectually taxing that required such a well crafted response. You were just playing tit for tat and that was obvious from the very beginning, Im glad now you’re at least consistent. You should keep this up instead of being a fucking hypocrite. Goodbye
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 04:44 PM
6

No its not. I swear I can’t relate with this at all, I know men are hornier but Im not attracted to most women I see on the street day to day, that doesn’t mean I find them disgusting, they are just neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 12:46 PM
1

The variable its controlling its what women are doing contrasted to what women are saying. And what do you consider feminist spaces other than what you are hand-fed by the manosphere? What feminist spaces have you been in? Twoxchromosomes, feminism, trollxchromosomes, askfeminists, 4wavefeminism, witchesvspatriarchy, pornismisogyny, radicalfeminism, againstmenrights Just to name a few off the top of my head. I have also been on feminist spaces on twitter and have seen what you all say about men,…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 12:27 PM
4

Not disgusted, just not attracted, its not the same dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 05:29 AM
1

And you're arguing that shows...? That the study doesn't contemplate ALL age brackets. Same amount of men and women are alive if you take into account all ages, including, infants, children and teens. If you only account the ages which the pew study analyzed there are roughly ~5 million more women than men, yet single rates of men and women are the same. Moreover if you take from 20-64 years, that is men's dating lifespan until they start dropping, then 65% of men are dating vs 73.5% of women. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 05:12 AM
1

Second of all, even though men die younger, there are roughly equal numbers of men and women. There are roughly equal numbers of single men and women, just in different age brackets. The numbers just don't add up for your contention that women are dating more than men, just that men and women are more likely to be single at different stages in their life. Men outnumber women at very young ages (0-20) which are not accounted for in the study for obvious reasons. They remain roughly the same from …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 04:08 AM
1

Dude, single men's options are generally not women already in a relationship. Their options are single women. Why you keep conflating single women with all women is just asinine. Yes, single men's options are single women > Which there are less of > Because there aren't as many single women > Because they date more men than men do women > Which makes the claim that men want women more asinine. Not to mention, there are close to the same amount of single men and women, albeit distributed in diffe…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 02:50 AM
1

That's obviously silly. I'm saying single men want women more than single women want men. Which indicates they--struggling men--view relationships as more beneficial than their options do And I'm saying that's a silly assertion when women are dating more than men. Hence why maybe they shouldn't get defensive and should actually listen to why their options - other single people - aren't as interested in dating I think men have listened for a long time. Demands just keep getting higher and higher …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:33 AM
1

But looking at people who are single, women under 39 who are single are still less likely to be looking for something than men in the same age bracket. They say they are not looking however they are dating more than men: 37% of men vs a whooping 66% of women <30 are dating 75% of men vs 83% of women between 30 to 49 72% of men vs 70% of women between 50 to 64 It only starts to flip at old age and women have +10 years life expectancy over men. This is why I say actions speak louder than words and…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 11:34 PM
1

Let's say only 10% of men were interested in dating, whereas 60% of women were. In that society, women and men would still be dating around the same rate as each other, but women would be a lot more unhappy with the status quo. In general broad strokes yes, however if you analize by age brackets things change a little. Among young people young women are overwhelmingly dating more than young men, it only flips at old age 65+ where male mortality plays a big role and I'm somewhat skeptical that wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 10:37 PM
1

But they are not telling with actions. It would be great if we actually started measuring things by actions rather than words. What actions tell you is that both sexes are dating despite women telling they prefer to be single and that both sexes are happier partnered despite women saying they’re happier single. Also the loneliness epidemic is starting to catch up to women fast.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 09:36 PM
1

So given many men are obsessed with figuring out how to get women - and indeed more single men than women are interested in dating - they perceive such relationships as beneficial. But that’s actually not true. Women are dating more than men, it’s roughly the same amount of people in both genders that are single, the disparity comes in different age brackets, so while women say they don’t want to date, they are in fact dating more than men. But even if it were true that women are less interested…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 09:14 PM
1

You didn’t respond to “flawed logic” you responded to a totally valid opinion questioning what do women bring to the table. You didn’t like that, so that elicited a response from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 08:56 PM
1

So how that wasn’t so hard to comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 08:31 PM
1

Yeah Im sure “men bad” requires a lot of thinking power to process for you, and if it really does Im kinda of sad for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 08:17 PM
1

Like I said nice cop out
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 08:12 PM
1

No I don’t think you’re being good faith at all. I think you’re concern trolling and get mad at every minor criticism of “team woman” and feel the need to come to the rescue to fight those evil menz and their wrongthink opinions. That’s why choose to reply a minor bland comment from a dude while letting the obvious misandrist post slide. Be for real.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 08:05 PM
1

LMAO nice weasel out. OP: “men are trash” Man: “hey maybe women aren’t so great either” You: “then why don’t you just leave women alone reeeee” Also you: “nono but Im totally against what OP is saying”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 07:54 PM
1

I'm not mad, that's projection my dude. And I don't fully agree with OP, no. Yet you only ever reply to men, never challenged OP, funny that
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 07:45 PM
0

You agree with OP but feel the need to respond to a man espousing similar things but reversed. You agree when a woman says it but get mad when a man says it about women(which btw wasn’t even as incendiary as this post, just a mild comment). Your hypocrisy and resentment is showing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 06:25 PM
0

Sure, like all the other videos, posts and articles made by women complaining about being unable to find a partner don’t reflect the sentiment of OP and the femcels agreeing with her. But whatever keep fueling animosity between the genders, Im sire that will work out great.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 06:11 PM
0

That’s all it is. A narrative. Stats show single childless women in their forties are the most unhappy demographic out of all. Including single men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 01:14 PM
1

Its my comment under the post
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 01:12 PM
1

I can show them to you, I can’t understand them for you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:42 PM
0

You’re welcome 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:36 PM
2

Yes. Partnered women are happier than single ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:34 PM
2

I already did, the comment is mine Here you go: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/inMGSP4P3s
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:30 PM
2

The part where stats contradict her claim that men don’t benefit women’s lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:29 PM
1

Here you go
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:20 PM
4

Yes Edit: for the people getting lost, its my comment under this old post, not the post itself
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:18 PM
1

I’ve already discussed this 1000 times on here. Where the claim “single women are happier than married men” comes from are articles from mainstream media derived from the “study” made by Paul Dolan, which has been debunked to hell and back. This isn’t the first time mainstream media has done this, they take some pretty dubious studies made from “feminist scholars” with a very clear agenda to push and then roll with it because its click baity, then women lap it up because it panders to their ego …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:15 PM
0

Interesting that i've seen completely different stats. Lemme guess, Dolan? Stats paint a better picture than personal anecdotes though, and when two conflicting messages are given it can help separate the wheat from the chaff
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 11:42 AM
0

Every stat says otherwise though. Partnered women are happier in general than non partnered. It’s like you all drink the kool aid and keep contradicting yourselves at every step of the way. Do what you want but then please for the love of god stfu about it. You have femcels like OP and everyone jumping in to support the claim men are trash, we are a net negative to women, you don’t need us yadda yadda. And then on the other hand you have women then complaining, making tiktoks, videos, writing ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 11:28 AM
1

Selection bias and marriage is not the same as relationships/sex. Men don’t seek marriage more, women do, if men could stay with women being perpetual gfs they would, it is women who push and pressure for marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 11:15 AM
4

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 11:07 AM
-1

Which is exactly what they’re doing. 50% of young men are not looking for a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 11:06 AM
9

Stats contradict your claim
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 11:02 AM
1

According to a lot of women that’s not the case. Ask a lot of women how they feel about their partners even in this very sub and they go like “I only have eyes for him” “if I were to divorce/separate don’t know what Id do, Id probably just remain single for the rest of my life”. A lot of women seem to have this contempt for men in general but funnily when talking about their partners they are “so not like the rest, they are so special, and they were so lucky to find them in the dating pool of me…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 08:48 AM
2

Think like what? Its not like a script or a questionnaire men put women through if that’s what you think Im saying. Men don’t go “how can I make her prove to me she’s valuable? what’s the next test I can set for her?”, like women a lot of times do to men. Its more like a natural process or flow that goes like “hey, I like spending time with this woman, she’s cool, she’s nice, she doesn’t make my life a living hell, she doesn’t bitch, she doesn’t nag, she’s sexy, she’s pleasant to be around, I wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 08:27 AM
1

i said from the beginning both genders want to feel special Not at the same level. Women’s way of wanting to “feel special” is unique to female sexuality. Men don’t have that, certainly not at that level. Men understand that there is a high probability they’re nothing out of the ordinary and they have to compete with other 4 billion men. Women on the contrary DO believe they are unique, their entire sexuality rests upon this, but in reality what happens is they are, in fact, also competing with …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:54 AM
1

No, they actually aren’t. You keep going in circles on you own logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:29 AM
2

K. I love how you just keep proving the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:23 AM
2

Because men DON’T FEEL special
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:13 AM
3

Women FEEL special. Doesn’t mean they are. Cmon keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:09 AM
2

Yes? Are you following the thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:04 AM
1

That’s kind of circular logic. The entire thread started with women getting mad at men being honest about the reasons for not committing after sex. Which is that many times women don’t have what it takes for the man to want to be in a relationship with them. That implies that women aren’t as special as they first thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 12:30 AM
1

Yes, everyone wants to feel special. However its not the same for men and women. Feeling like you’re the only woman in the world its like the entire basis of female sexuality in relation to men and heterosexual relationships. Women have responsive desire, this is very well documented, they need men to initiate, pursue/chase and woo them. This is every piece of erotic media and literature targeted at women. Its the “taming the beast” script that 99.9% romance novels for women use. Hell, you just …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 12:09 AM
4

Okay? What’s that got to do with what we’re discussing? Look Im not in the “marry a virgin” camp, I think that’s retarded. But when guys say don’t commit to high-n women, its not because they want to feel special, they know they aren’t, that’s the whole point actually, why are they being made to wait when everyone else got to hit it faster?? Its like you are trying to sell a thrift store jacket like its some brand new designer clothing and then act surprised when men don’t want to pay the price …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 10:52 PM
3

Nice strawman
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 10:30 PM
3

Im not dressing anything up as women's fault. You're taking it way too personal. Women select before having sex, men afterwards. Women trying to apply their selection criteria for men is just not going to work, same as the other way around. That's why incels/betabuxx get frustrated about women's dating behaviors and why women feel slighted and believe "that its just about sex". Truth is, women do have to prove themselves to be special to men for them to be chosen for a relationship, they don't a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:20 PM
11

A lot of times they can’t handle the truth which is they aren’t really that special because that is the cornerstone of women’s sexuality. They need to feel like they’re the only woman in the world for their man because that’s how women experience attraction. It doesn’t quite work like that with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 02:41 PM
2

Two completely different things, worlds apart. Lysistrata was done in another time in a completely different context. Back then the threat of women going on a sex strike might've been an actual threat, not only for men, but for the survival of the societies they were a part of. What is the threat today exactly? Women are already not fucking men, at least not your average-to-below cohort, so that ain't much of a threat, add to that the existence of readily available pornography and its not like m…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:05 AM
4

Men are already starting to organize and return the punches, and women are hating it. The cat’s out of the bag. Politically, socially and sexually the sexes are starting to diverge more and more and believe it or not, unhappiness and loneliness is not exclusively a male issue, increasingly so. Men just need to “hold the line” long enough to renegotiate the terms or walk off entirely and let the entire thing collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 11:17 PM
2

Yep, sounds about right
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:39 PM
2

In my country feminist men were responsible for assaulting, harassing and even beating women simply for the mere fact they were supporters of the political party they don’t like.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:34 PM
2

In my experience, you can tell the difference between a guy supporting women out of a genuine belief in feminism and a guy who's thoughts begin and end at "women right". I think there are a lot of men who fall into the latter camp and I think it detracts from the legitimacy of female empowerment and women's issues. I think the 2nd group outnumbers the 1st one 1000:1. There are a lot more boot licking feminists than misogynists, especially when the word misogyny is thrown around so much without a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 05:25 PM
1

I think when men say women are ‘boring’ is more so in response to women who claim men are boring or uninteresting because of some uneventful dates. What you have to understand is that men have a lot of pressure to perform on dates and be the entertainment and a lot of women sit there judgmentally and put men down the second sparks aren’t flying. So its more of a “well Im here busting my ass trying to keep the conversation going while you keep looking at your phone and Im the boring one, wtf are …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 08:19 PM
1

Bro, jfc Im tired of discussing this with. Not wearing underwear to show off their dick? Getting gynecomastia? Constantly posting half naked pictures on social media? Really? What percentage of men do you think engage in these things v the percentage of women. Sorry dude but the only who is living out of touch here is you https://preview.redd.it/5duys41naw6f1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d2a4443e5137e9f560f1e4de974b15f3a54bddae
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 01:31 PM
1

I don’t give a fuck what women want or don’t want. You’re just wrong. You want so badly to believe women don’t want men and are doing wonderful by themselves when everything is pointing to the opposite. You’re just projecting your own views on reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 02:11 AM
1

I provided multiple studies with sources and the corresponding links. You just copy pasted some paragraph taken from God’s know where and Im supposed to take your word for it. “Just google it bro”, GTFOH.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 05:45 PM
1

Post a link bro. It’s not that hard JFC
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 05:43 PM
1

You didn't provide shit, you just copy pasted a pharagraph that says absolutely nothing
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:20 PM
1

Most of them still give the same conclusions. Also why is the Paul Dolan study even debunked? You want other studies?? Because they're based on the same study, stupid. Read again my first comment to see why Paul Dolan study should be dismissed. You just posted a whole pharagraph with no source or link, where is this coming from?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:19 PM
1

The links are bullshit. Fucking read bro. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/NbRmkH8P9p
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:43 PM
1

⁠Those are tabloid/opinion articles pointing to “studies” not studies themselves. ⁠The “study” they all point is to the one made by Paul Dolan which has been debunked to hell and back. Are you even reading what you’re posting? This is getting lame
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:40 PM
1

Those are tabloid/opinion articles pointing to “studies” not studies themselves. The “study” they all point is to the one made by Paul Dolan which has been debunked to hell and back. Are you even reading what you’re posting? This is getting lame
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 03:40 PM
1

If that was the case then low child rates wouldn't happen and many studies show it's actually women wanting less kids and less mariages overall Wrong again. https://preview.redd.it/afdwn7bxy36f1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=25859933a915e917131937f9eb80b8b7327fd707 How did you debunk me? All I stated was facts. No you didn’t lol. And just google it ffs, you seriously think childless single women demographic study is wrong? You keep saying this, yet provide zero evidence. Im not going t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 02:19 PM
1

You keep arguing with me, but then contradicting yourself and actually proving my point. What did the avg man do? He spends money to look rich. Either buying a car he can't afford, or watch/jewelry or bottles. He again cannot compete physically, so he needs to appeal to women somehow. So in other words, men are using other means to get female attention other than displays of physical beauty. Fast forward to now, you say only a few select men go to the gym? No, where did you read I said that? It …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 02:16 AM
2

You’re using a small subset of men and extrapolating that to the vast majority of men. It doesn’t work like that. What percentage of the male population you think is traveling to Turkey for hair transplants? What percentage of men you think is on steroids? Men’s looksmaxxing mostly consists in staying in shape, going to the gym, dressing well and getting a good haircut. Compare that with women and the 1 million things they do, from wearing revealing clothing to makeup, which is btw like 99% of a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:41 AM
1

Why would women becime depressed simply because they don't have kids? They can literally adopt one, women are more open to adoption than men Just because women's clocks kicks in doesn't mean shit Believe it or not most women want to form families and they want to have children of their own sometime in their lives, jesus christ it’s like it’s like you people are fucking aliens or something. Just because you are a resentful 30yo virgin who hates men doesn’t mean all women are like you. But how did…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 06:46 AM
1

Being with a man actually makes women more depressed Are you able to read? That is actually what I'm disproving here. Yet countless studies show the EXACT opposite. Women in marriages tend to be more stressed and unhappy, that's why divorces are a thing. If that was the case most women wouldn't even divorce their husbands Show me those studies. And those better not be based on Dolan's "research". I provided ample evidence yet you have provided absolutely nothing but baseless assumptions. And whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 05:19 AM
1

Then single women are better at handling relationships without men. same thing You said women were happier single, that's not true, and that's not the same thing, this also might disprove that: "Data from two of the surveys show similar levels of reported marital happiness for husbands and wives, and they show a stronger relationship of marital happiness to global happiness for the wives. On the basis of this evidence, Bernard's thesis that marriage is more beneficial to husbands than to wives i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:31 AM
5

Not comparable sorry, some dudes looksmaxxing or broccoli dudes posturing is not remotely comparable to what women do. From makeup to clothes accentuating body figure, skin tight short skirts, stilettos to uplift butt cheeks, short dresses, you name it, we are not even in the same league.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:20 AM
3

I think its partly that, yes, but I don't think that paints the whole picture. Women aren't as visual as men, sorry but anyone who believes otherwise is in full blown denial. But that is not to say women aren't visual at all. Historically men's getting women's attention has had less to do with visual and more to do with actions. That much hasn't changed and while men might be adapting to new times and new game rules, visual stimuli is still female game, they are not even in the same league.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:16 AM
2

See my other comment: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1l6ijfu/comment/mwrvyxy/?context=3 But I think you make a good point, I believe historically men's way of getting the attention of women has not been the same way women get the attention of men, but with the red pill and female nature out in the open on the internet that might be changing and men might be adapting.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 04:03 AM
6

Umm no. Men's primary reason to go to the gym is to stay in shape and you could argue that they do it to attract women and you'd be right but that's not what I mean by this Men don’t try to get the attention of women by visual displays the way women do What I mean is men don't dress in tight revealing clothing nor do they wear leggings were you can see the outlining of their butt crack when they go to the gym. Men's way of getting the attention of women is not the same as that of women getting t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:57 AM
7

When I see someone saying the things you’re accusing them of saying and not a strawman you made in your head, sure why not
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:06 AM
5

That’s the thing. Men don’t go to the gym to get women’s attention. Men don’t try to get the attention of women by visual displays the way women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:02 AM
1

My bad, my comment still stands tho. Birds still tend to be exclusively monogamous while mammals is more of a wild card.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 10:07 PM
-1

Yes sexual selection by markers of sexual and health fitness still occur in every species, that’s kinda the definition of sexual selection. What I mean is that mammals somewhat differ in how they attract partners than birds. Males still tend to do performative acts and females tend to sexually select but they do it differently. In birds males will dance or flash their feathers to attract a female and in mammals they will fight with other males for territory, difference being in birds there doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:56 PM
1

https://preview.redd.it/lq01c06lvr5f1.png?width=1178&format=png&auto=webp&s=d7a0d645e7aa37ce0c519a6f596fdad6e502cc7d
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:36 PM
5

K?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:33 PM
11

Bruh, for all women talk about how they hate male attention, the male gaze and how they wish they’d be invisible, look for stories of women that are actually ugly and get zero male attention. Read through some of the stories of wives on r/deadbedrooms. Even here, you can see it on the staunchest anti-pornography defenders when they realize men watch other women naked and they realize they aren’t as special as they thought. Heck, just observe regular women and the way they dress, use makeup and p…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:26 PM
1

LOL she could have been an awful abusive parent for all we know
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:10 PM
-7

We’re not birds. Our strategies for attracting partners are not the same. Most bird species are strictly monogamous and once a couple has been paired it usually goes “until death do us apart”. We’re mammals, and in mammals it usually goes that males compete harshly for territory and females and a few winners emerge that then get to reproduce with all or most females of the group. So, at the top of the hierarchy in males the table flips around for mate competition.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 08:50 PM
2

But many if not most men will have sex with a woman they find unattractive or even repulsive Dumb take and an oxymoron. Men will not have sex with someone they find repulsive, maybe a few will but by and large the little guy wouldn’t work. Men just simply find more women sexually attractive and there aren’t as many risks so it’s not as big of an issue for men to have sex with strangers. Men have so little to lose by having sex with any willing hole, no matter how unattractive, inept, or incompet…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 08:38 PM
1

You keep commenting this and I responded with stats sometime ago. I remember your username and anime pfp. In case you need the stats to see how wrong your takes are: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/CmUGU1NjJu It is based on a bullshit study with bullshit sources propagated by mainstream media. It has been disproven a billion times. No, single women are not happier than married or partnered women. They do better than single men though, but every metric shows partnered people of both se…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/25 09:21 AM
1

Sorry for wanting a partner that actually desires us without needing to force themselves to sleep with us. Then I don’t understand what you’re complaining about here. Seems like the guy has reactive attraction which is like 90% of women as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 11:59 PM
1

Seems like a lame excuse and rationalization to me. Why when its a woman its "reactive attraction" so its okay but when it is men its "he's not really attracted to me at all"?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 11:38 PM
2

Chubby yes, old or ugly no.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 11:07 PM
3

Why is it only a problem when it happens to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 10:53 PM
2

We hit it off pretty much immediately and I was also instantly interested in her, but is she someone I would have noticed on the street? Almost certainly not. In that sense I guess it was lucky that we happened to meet in a situation that got us talking first. This is how 90% of women describe their man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 10:48 PM
3

We hit it off pretty much immediately and I was also instantly interested in her, but is she someone I would have noticed on the street? Almost certainly not. In that sense I guess it was lucky that we happened to meet in a situation that got us talking first. This is how 90% of women describe their man
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 10:45 PM
4

We hit it off pretty much immediately and I was also instantly interested in her, but is she someone I would have noticed on the street? Almost certainly not. In that sense I guess it was lucky that we happened to meet in a situation that got us talking first This is how most women describe their man and this is how I've seen many women on here describe their man, bur suddenly when men don't automatically go "she's the light of my eyes and the most beautiful, gorgeous and sexy woman to ever walk…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 10:45 PM
1

Older men are fine because they literally have wives and what not, women add more happiness to a guys life . There are studies showing guys in a relationship are more happy compared to being single and women's mental health getting worse in relationship and marriage than being single. Single childless womwn are by far the happiest This is not true. I already told you this but on another occasion but you refuse to listen because it doesn't align with the fairytale you're desperately trying to bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 09:53 PM
1

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 06:26 PM
3

and the reason they dont call themselves gamers or nerds is because they get constantly bullied and harassed by men The reason they don’t call themselves that is because for decades that had a negative connotation largely promoted by women as well. Men just didn’t give a fuck and kept doing these things and now it’s something “quirky” that a large number of women use to try to differentiate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 05:06 PM
10

You tell me. Because for women the problem always seems to be 'men' as a whole. Even you are treating every man who doesn’t go out as basement dwelling NEETs like there isn't a huge gap in between. You can't make this shit up man. Zero self awareness.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 03:56 AM
12

Bish you're in a post blaming men about literally leaving you alone. When men go out they get blamed of making it unsafe for women. When men stay inside they get blamed of being porn addicted losers. And on top of that we get blamed of "blaming women". Seriously men can't fucking win, no matter what we do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 02:53 AM
7

Do you have any data on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 02:43 AM
1

Keep moving the goalposts
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 11:48 PM
1

No, sorry I don’t save them
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 02:10 AM
1

I have also seen it discussed on forums subs, threads, reddit, twitter, you name it. This is a thing in trans and feminist communities whether you want to see it or not, you’re not gaslighting anyone, this isn’t the hill you want to die on.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 12:18 AM
4

I didn't use a bullshit argument You think "if you don't want to have sex with me you're a X-phobe" isn't an absolute garbage take? I'm simply pointing out that there's this fervent belief that trans folks are demanding everyone have sex with them or else that isn't supported by reality We know not every trans isn’t demanding that, every response from a man I've always seen on this matter is on some tiktok of some trans woman crying over being rejected or some other nutjob accusing men of transp…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 09:02 PM
1

Tell me again how men never had conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 08:01 PM
1

Women in the US got the right to vote in 1920, so you had 50 years of vote with no selective service attached. Tell me again how men never had conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:40 PM
6

Maybe next time don’t use bullshit arguments that people can easily pile on then. Also the ratio of men to trans women is like what 100000 to 1?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:36 PM
2

The only time I see this is men in a comment section of some tiktok video of some trans woman crying about how a guy rejected her for being trans. I have literally never once had a dude say unprompted in public he doesn’t date trans women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:31 PM
2

Wrong. He explicitly told you a condition men had. Majority of men didn’t have the right to vote and when they got it, it came with selective service attached, something women weren’t subjected to. This idea everything came free and in a silver platter for men is feminist revisionism.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:26 PM
4

Because feminism =/= gender equality
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:11 PM
16

Men are overwhelmingly more likely to be transphobic. I would like a source on that. Not wanting to sleep with trans women doesn’t make men transphobic. Also there is a significant chunk of trans women who are plain misandrists. Men seem to get along with trans men exceptionally well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:05 PM
1

Having money doesn’t make you shallow, being a gold digging whore does
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 01:35 AM
1

I would want nothing more for golddiggers than get what they deserve, sadly that’s not always what happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:25 PM
1

It also has other connotations like emotional or financial exploitation. Which is exactly what these women are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:04 PM
1

If the only reason was for sex and pump and dump, then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 11:02 PM
1

What men do is irrelevant. She’s being a predator. Full stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:43 PM
1

Predator behavior refers to a specific behavior people engage in. Namely stalking your prey, waiting for the opportunity and then pouncing on it. You know, like actual predators do in the wild. It also has other connotations like emotional or financial exploitation. Which is exactly what these women are doing. They ARE ACTIVELY LOOKING for rich men to exploit, whether they achieve it or not is an entirely different discussion and what men do in response is completely irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:41 PM
1

He’s not going after her you retard. She’s actively looking and approaching these dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:31 PM
1

Are you even following the thread? The response is to a dude saying thots slide in to their dms looking for a sugar daddy. As in they ACTIVELY go and look for someone for money and act upon it. That’s predator behavior. How you feel about the matter doesn’t change that fact. It doesn’t matter if she’s from Cambodia she is still a gold digger.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:27 PM
2

Wtf are you talking about? “Willing” is referred to the woman in this case. As she is willing to prey on dudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 10:23 PM
1

In a relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 09:31 PM
0

Damn, you’ve been cheated on a lot?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 09:30 PM
2

Lol. Someone being desperate doesn’t make them any less of a predator.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:46 PM
2

Many such cases
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:44 PM
2

Fr fr
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:42 PM
2

She tried to switch predator and victim 💀 Can’t take these people seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:41 PM
4

desperate and willing to go after predators for money I like how you removed any ounce of agency from the woman. That internalized misogyny is showing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:19 PM
0

Wont somebody think of the poor cucked billionaire?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:03 PM
1

What “true evil” have you experienced?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 06:50 PM
1

Not all women, but how are you supposed to know which is which? Id argue 90% of women today have some feminist messaging ingrained in them. Even if not all of them take it to the extreme there’s some degree of “men ain’t shit” in broad culture today.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 11:06 PM
1

I have approached women
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 05:11 PM
0

I thought I made it clear in my first comment I don’t approach women. Yet you felt the need to come whining about how I don’t center women because women can’t stand for a second not being the center of the universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 04:53 PM
1

Some women like being approached and some don't. No I don’t think you understand. I don’t give a fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 04:42 PM
1

Im perfectly aware that women aren’t a monolith. However there is a considerable chunk and -Id argue most of women today- have been reached by feminist messaging in some way shape or form. Turns out comparing men to vicious beasts, treating them like predators by default, asking if we are really useful to women today, blaming us for all of your problems while reducing us to inanimate objects to slave away for your comfort (what do you bring to the table) wasn’t such a great marketing strategy hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 04:06 PM
1

While hunting was often emphasized as a male activity in many prehistoric societies, men also participated in gathering, especially when hunting opportunities were scarce. Survival required flexibility, and food gathering wasn’t strictly divided by gender. Men likely helped collect tubers, fruits, and other plants, particularly when hunting was unsuccessful or during certain seasons when plant foods were more abundant. Additionally, cooperative strategies—such as trapping small animals, fishing,…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:32 AM
1

For most of human history, women provided the lion share of wealth to the community Lol the source (if there is one) is gonna be hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 11:50 PM
1

That’s the double standard I’m calling out. If a woman wanting reciprocity is entitlement, then what do we call a man expecting free access to a woman's time, body, or emotional labor? You’re not calling out any double standards. You just made up a narrative in your mind and taken that as fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 10:43 PM
1

I think men are really simple and upfront in expressing what they want. It’s women who are the mindfuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:26 PM
7

Im not afraid of approaching women, Im tired and kinda pissed at the games and the sheer hypocrisy in the public discourse. This is exactly what (they say) they wanted so I don’t see what’s the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 06:15 PM
18

The “I’ll get sued” sure is a pathetic excuse and anyone who uses it to rationalize men not approaching women is just lying to themselves. The animosity women have created towards men is not and men are actually kinda fed up with it. I know that’s actually my case. No more bullshit, no more playing games, no more “chase”, cat and mouse games. You either show “enthusiastic consent” as feminist would put it or Im not wasting my time. As a matter of fact I now wait for women to approach me, no more…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 02:50 PM
2

Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men written by Caroline Criado Perez Yeah Im gonna press X on that one chief
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:17 PM
2

My prediction for the future is that college as we traditionally think about it will become increasingly unnecessary. It already is sorta happening. A lot of people go to college to get bullshit degrees and come out of it with nothing but debt. I think AI and the technological revolution we’re going through will open new paths to get an education.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 07:02 PM
1

Wait, I don’t get, so you’re not actually sure he was watching you? You felt like he was staring? Why didn’t you try to check out if he was watching? That’s the first thing I would do if I felt like Im being watched.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 01:24 PM
2

Right, the more I think about it, the more a guy staring at you for 20 minutes straight without doing anything else at all seems a bit outlandish. Maybe OP is exaggerating the amount of time? I find it hard to believe that either party did absolutely anything else other than stare at each other for 20 minutes, that seems weird as fuck lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 04:27 AM
5

Yeah I find this a little odd. If it was this one instance we might have a predator on our hands. If this happens to her somewhat regularly she lives in creeptown or something isn’t adding up. Like I get some men will stare a bit too much but 20 minutes watching you eat whole burger stare?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 01:36 AM
6

Some time ago I saw a reel on tiktok or ig I don't remember using an audio of an interview of a serial killer where someone asked him how he chose his victims. Apparently he killed families, wives and children. He said he looked at the husband. If the husband seemed like a menace and seemed likely to fight back to protect his family he didn't choose them. It was actually quite chilling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 11:20 PM
5

Yes I read something about rape not being actually about sex but about power, so contrary to popular belief rapists don’t target hot women who tend to be more confident and outspoken and would be more difficult to subdue but rather more meek and introverted women who would make easier prey. For all men’s claims they are bad at reading body language and facial cues, they are very, very good at spotting insecurity and vulnerability, and very good at picking out naive or mousy women and teenagers t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 10:53 PM
0

No, I just have common sense
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 09:48 PM
0

Could have been a million things, most likely he was a creep. Next time tell him wtf are you looking at or something if it makes you uncomfortable and be as loud as you can. The fact he approached you alone in a parking lot is a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 09:31 PM
1

Yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 09:25 PM
2

Did it happen just this one time?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 09:24 PM
4

He was a creep. Is this a regular occurrence for you? You might be hot and be giving introvert vibes to the point only creep and/or awkward guys are trying to approach you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 09:15 PM
1

None of this would make women more attracted to men Maybe, maybe not. It would make men less miserable, though. And it's still somewhat far from reaching a critical mass but not for too long the way things are going. Gender relations are breaking, whether you want to believe or not, this 'touch grass' meme isn't cutting it when you look at the bigger picture and where the trend is going. More singles, less couples, less children (this is actually one of the major concerns for humanity in the com…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:40 AM
2

Strike. The answer is so obvious I don’t see how more men can’t see it. It is already happening at some level. Learn to live without women, stop centering them. Go to porn, prostitution, whatever. For how much women like to complain about the male ego, watch the meltdown that ensues when you stop centering women. They are the ones needing to be wooed, wined and dined, proposed and be treated like princesses. They are the ones still clinging for dear life for chivalry and romantic gestures from m…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 03:50 AM
7

Women are more depressed and atomized than ever. Believe it or not women also complain about dating and impossible beauty standards and how they are constantly comparing themselves to other women online. The idea that women are thriving is a fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 02:56 PM
5

You act like this isn’t affecting women as well. Social media acts like an addiction a lot of times you’re asking a bunch of alcoholics to “just drink socially”.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 02:29 PM
1

Honestly it could have done without like 90% of the article, I felt like I lost brain cells reading all that. Creepy men are creepy we know that, we know the archetype, a stranger picking up carcasses or whatever at the side of the road offering you to spend a night at his cabin in the woods is a nono, that could have gone horribly wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:59 AM
-3

Women ruin their own lives alone just fine, they don’t need men for that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:43 AM
1

Worst case scenario you’re not safer from a man than from another woman. Another woman is just as capable of doing the most sadistic shit imaginable as any man. So I pose this question to you then: Would you rather be alone in the woods with a man or a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:36 AM
3

My choosing the bear is because I know scientifically how long I’d last being mauled, and I’ve calculated that that is a far better outcome than being raped and tortured for some man’s sadistic pleasure. LOL. How exactly did you make this totally scientific calculation? LMAO the amount of shit and hamsterwheeling women do to try to rationalize the stupid shit they come up with is astonishing. And if we are gonna go with the worst possible scenario women are no different than men. A woman could d…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:30 AM
1

A man. Your article is garbage I don’t know why you thought it would make a solid case to try to change anyone’s mind, not that it’s already a moronic petty answer to choose bear.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:08 AM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:03 AM
4

The analysis is absolute garbage as anything that is analyzed through a feminist lens is.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 12:57 AM
2

Then do it and stop whining about it. It is what it is. Human sexuality at its core is a bitch, women’s sexuality is no better and no less fickle. People want the best bang for their buck and they will try to get the best they can by giving up the least they can. Only thing standing in the way is your moral compass.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 12:50 AM
15

This. Red pill is become more mainstream rather than the contrary if anything. It’s just that these spaces have always been niche so less activity here doesn’t necessarily indicate that as a whole the message is dying. I see people never in a million years I would hear talking about this stuff on more mainstream outlets, nevermind the media, we just got a Netflix series fear mongering about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 12:35 AM
4

Bait used to be believable
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 03:15 PM
1

Never was, never will be about equality. This is what people don’t understand. Feminism is not a movement for gender equality, it’s a women’s liberation movement, not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 01:34 PM
3

Yes that’s what Im saying. Men want to be desired, but it isn’t a core characteristic of male sexuality like it is with female sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:39 AM
-2

I assure you that men like admiration and lust directed their way just as much as women Not by a long shot. Men want enthusiastic partners during sex for sure, but the need of women to be the center of attention and male lust and admiration is unparalleled, its not even a contest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 02:12 AM
3

Mostly applicable for men who are not top of the hierarchy. Women spend a lot of time/energy trying to learn how to seduce highly attractive men into him choosing her over his other options. That’s the catch. You can’t. Top men are not more “complex” or “mysterious” as a general rule than most other men. You just make that shit up in your head because you actually like the guy. The only difference between a top guy and the rest when it comes to women’s chances of locking him is the availability …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 12:16 AM
1

Or maybe because they are more risk averse in general the jury’s out on that one
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 07:14 PM
1

I was giving you an example. Women use less lethal means of self deletion. Maybe because they are crying for help, maybe because they are more risk averse than men. That doesn’t take from the fact they tried to self delete.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 07:11 PM
1

Men and women are different. Men take more risks and die of random stupid shit all the time, why would it be different this time? For example women would try offing themselves using drugs and ODing for a painless death, which can be better treated if someone encounters them on time while men would just rather take a shotgun to the face. That doesn’t take from the fact that both tried to kill themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 07:07 PM
1

Women attempt suicide at the roughly the same rates than men. Men are just more effective at self deleting.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 06:48 PM
2

But generally speaking they tend to gravitate towards same sex groups. Even in mixed gatherings you see groups of men and women forming even if there is some inter mingling. Also even if you have a mixed friend group typically your closer inner circle are people of your same sex. I have female friends, they are just on the outer side of my social circle. This is basic human socialization, people of the same sex relate better with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 03:29 PM
1

Do you think your experience is the norm amongst men?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:33 PM
2

For you. You are not the last word on male/female friendships. All of my female friendships have been flaky as hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 01:26 PM
0

Then you’re an outlier and you prefer the company of women. Happens to both sexes as well. There are people who just are more comfortable having friends of the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:57 PM
0

Because you’re a woman. We call, text, check in and plan hangouts with my male friends all the time. Men and women usually form better friend groups amongst their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/25 12:49 PM
1

I can show you a dozen women killed for rejecting men. That’s not the majority. That’s a fringe overblown statistic you’re using in bad faith. See how that works? Can you show me any women who killed men for approaching? Why would I show you this?. This has never been a point I made. You’re battling imaginary windmills. I can show you the stories women have posted about their experiences Okay, good for you? Still not the majority the nice guy subreddit of men going off the handle for being told …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 03:52 AM
0

Yeah that’s not the majority. Again, being bad faith. Show me sources for your claims or stop talking bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 10:20 PM
0

There are a ton of women who turn men down badly and who turn up their nose at “men beneath their league” approaching them, or how they are “only approached by losers”. And you know it. You, in bad faith, tried to make a false assumption that we were talking about the assholes when that was clear that wasn’t the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 05:01 PM
1

You don’t want women who you are attracted to, to approach you? You don’t turn down women you aren’t attracted to? If obese women with pig noses were constantly trying to corner you, you’d be pretty sick of them complaining about “no one loving them” and want them to stop. I'd have no issue turning them down nicely. In fact I have done so. I have no problem with people shooting their shot, (respectfully and with grace of course) and I have nothing but respect for women who do so. Last thing I'd …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 08:57 PM
1

This is bs. Women care a fuckton what people think about them, moreso than men I'd argue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 08:45 PM
4

Lol Im not shamed whatsoever. If anything hearing you people cry about it makes me want to do it even more. Extra pleasure
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/25 02:36 PM
–

The idea that men get mad because women say mean things to them while women experience real shit is disingenuous whiteknight trash and needs to be buried in a ditch
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 03:46 AM
–

No, my logic is much more simple: Oppression argument is fucking retarded and men don’t owe women a perfect ideal universe free of pain, suffering and struggle. Women are the most entitled creatures in the universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 02:03 AM
–

No. Feminism radicalized women. Im sorry you’re too stupid you have to be spoon fed everything
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 01:51 AM
–

Okay I want you to give me a very simple answer My very simple answer is this: FUCKING GET OVER IT ALREADY You wanted to enter the workforce? You wanted high paying careers? You wanted to marry whoever the fuck you want? Maybe if those things were so important to women maybe women should have done what men did: fight for those ideals Die standing or live on your knees. That's been men's motto since the dawn of mankind. Women chose to live on their knees and take it in the ass instead. Then you w…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 01:38 AM
–

Funny how for supposedly all of history you were oppressed by men, but we managed to get along fine. Only now with the advent of feminism when other women started telling you “Noooo! you were scammeeed!!!” you started hating our guts even though most of you haven’t lived through a fraction of what your grandparents went through.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 01:23 AM
–

What you’re describing is a very specific pipeline. You’re not likely to get raped. Kids are assholes. Always will be. Girls are no better. The world is full of degenerate assholes. I have had my assed grabbed three times one by a man and two by women. One time on the bus a middle aged woman not so subtly started rubbing her crotch against my knee, I was a kid and didn’t know wtf was going on. I have been catcalled by gay men and women. This is not an experience unique to women. Men’s argument o…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 01:02 AM
1

I think the point was that women have it worse in marriage and relationships with men They don’t Dare I say I think most women would be happier having children and no man vs having a man and never having children. Dare all you might, single moms are right up there will childless women lol And they are still much lower than men’s in the same age range. Suicide rates get higher for men and women with age Except what changes are suicides numbers but not attempts. Whatever happened to “but women try…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:07 PM
1

It’s not super common I would say it’s just as common as the other way around. It’s just that women tend to overblow their side of the story and minimize men’s side so it’s always the stereotype of the lazy husband and the over active wife when I hardly see that very much. It tends to happen in couples where the man feels she’s “out of his league” Maybe. I just think it’s very ingrained in men that “happy wife, happy life” maxim.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 09:10 PM
1

Nah I know many men dumb enough to put a ring on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 08:56 PM
5

Whenever I hear women over generalizing how they do everything and men do nothing I can almost smell the bullshit from my phone screen. It’s a clear example of in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 08:54 PM
1

Yes. Although not at the level of being a potato couch. My own mother was kinda like that, still is but now she lives alone. I remember my step dad doing like 80% of everything besides working. He took us out to the park or club activities, he took us to school, made us breakfast, besides working like 8-10 and sometimes even 12 hours shifts since he was establishing his business. My mother stayed around the house and focused on her studies (didn’t even clean, we hired a cleaning lady) and would …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 08:19 PM
1

This seems like a contradiction. Surely smart, cunning people are self aware and know their strengths and weaknesses. They have to know their strengths to leverage them get what they want. I think you are putting too much agency on men to the verge of them being mind controllers and too little agency on women to the point of them being helpless victims which is nothing new from feminist line of thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:38 PM
1

Nah, we are not gonna see eye to eye on this. To even be anywhere near the spheres these guys operate in you have to be a cunning sunovabitch, nevermind actually getting in a relationship with them, we are not talking about Becky the librarian here.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:34 PM
1

Yeah I don’t buy that. Women that go after men like Musk or Trump are anything but gullible, naive or innocent. They are very self aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:01 PM
1

Since you seem to be unaware, Elon Musk is insane. He only pursues blondes, and is very aggressive and controlling with all of his partners. He pressures them to bleach their hair to match the color of his mother’s hair. He has many children by different women. He abandons these relationships when things get complicated. His first wife wrote an op-ed on their relationship. In all likelihood he has NPD. This is what domestic abuse looks like. If the allegations are true I feel sorry for his first…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:06 AM
1

So if I understand correctly, your argument is: Because women marry up it's okay that men abuse them and the men are not responsible for abusing their partners because their partners married them with the understanding that they might be exploited by unfair power dynamics? So far I have been arguing under the assumption that women are being abused. You haven't provided me what constitutes abuse to you. Because simply being in a traditional conservative household does not constitute abuse nor exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:11 PM
1

Where is the accountability for the role men play in these dynamics of commodifying, abusing, and exploiting women? I told you there are some men that might marry down with the sole intent of exploiting the women who they get with. I don't think that happens as much at the top of the hierarchy as you're implying though I think its much more pervasive in the middle to lower levels. But as whole it is women who marry across and up a social hierarchy. I'm sorry but this isn't up for debate, it is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 08:11 PM
1

Your theory that wealthy people have equal marital dynamics is insane That's not the fault of men. See, this is where I think feminism gets things fundamentally wrong. Men don't marry down with the intent of "exploiting women". I mean, some men might, sure, but as a whole it is women who marry up. Men like Trump or Musk don't force women to be with them. They are not making women marry them, nor they are even tricking women in who they are. They are high status enough they get to set the terms t…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 07:35 PM
1

Why would they have an equal relationship? They are partnering with some of the most powerful men on planet earth. Did you honestly expect them to have an equal relationship? Do you think they went into those relationships with absolute untainted pure intentions of loving men like Elon, Trump etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 05:10 PM
1

a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it It isn't 'men' as a group that hold the power. Its rich and powerful people, this was always a class struggle. And there were/are also women among the rich and powerful as well. I also put the addendum: "AFAIK 1 & 3 used to be the definition of patriarchy until feminism co-opted the term to mean 2 with the addendum that this resulted in women's oppression by men" Women as a group weren't oppresse…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 02:00 AM
1

Can you reconcile these two thoughts for me? I don’t understand why you think those two thoughts are connected and why you think they need to be reconciled. But to organize things: I reject the term patriarchy insofar as is a system set by men to exploit women. This is the feminist framework of patriarchy. I think men are better at organizing insofar there is a clear goal in sight. “Smash the matriarchy” or whatever the equivalent of a feminist movement for men would be wouldn’t cut it. If there…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 10:05 PM
1

I fail to understand how the old definition for the word patriarchy has anything to do with modern feminist theory. I think they just used this same word to describe the concept at hand. Well that's what im saying. Feminism coopted the term patriarchy. It used to mean a very specific thing now it has this whole ideology behind it. Can you describe your idea of religion? I took this from chatgpt because my brain is fried right now to try to come up with a detailed definition but this pretty much …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:50 PM
1

Can you please elaborate on your understanding of the history of feminist ideology, as well as why you disagree with definition #2? Patriarchy as a term long before feminism used to mean bloodline (family name, possessions, etc) was passed down through the male line. It didn't have the negative connotation it has today, it was just a description of the way things were done. Then along came feminism and morphed it into something with all the negative connotations it has associated today. You can …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 01:44 PM
2

I have no intention of imposing this onto other people. I am expressing my personal thoughts on human overpopulation to you, another person who is aware of human overpopulation. I think my life would be better spent helping the society around me rather than rearing children. Fair enough I did specify. I said I think this is a good goal for those who have attained greater self awareness. I wouldn't expect it of anyone, but it's a compelling argument. Consider these points: The average person does…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 01:27 AM
1

If you choose to value such a thing, I suppose this would make sense. There are 8 billion people on the planet today. I think the species would do well to reassess our priorities. But that's not how it works, I can't see how you can enforce this onto people. That's why I said going against our nature rarely goes well. Humans at the end of the day are animals and they are doing exactly what other animals do when they become a plague. Destroy the environment they live in. As such, I would make a n…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 08:13 PM
1

We all have self preservative instincts, but could you please explain how this is necessarily conducive to selfishness? No man is an island unto himself... First you have to understand that when I say selfishness Im not applying any moral value to it. I don’t think selfishness in and of itself is inherently right or wrong. We apply those values according to context and our own moral fiber. A mother that looks for her child and only her child’s well being is being selfish to give you an example. …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 06:18 PM
1

This maxim is the rule and thus exists for a reason The reason is that every living being is innately selfish and looks out for their own self-preservation. Humans don’t escape that maxim even if we can manage it to some extent compared to other animals. I would argue that those most prone to corruption are the ones who pursue wealth and power. In modern world unless you live in a hippie commune everyone is pursuing some level of wealth and power. And even in the hippie commune there can still a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 04:30 PM
1

You’re conflicting two different things. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. You see it everytime people start to accrue power and wealth. In politics, private sector, high profile athletes, movie stars, you name it. Men and women alike. It’s a feature of humans and most animals I would argue. The only difference is that men tend to accrue more wealth and power than women. But that has nothing to do with “patriarchy”, not in the way feminism defines it at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:20 PM
1

Have you heard of the 4B movement? What of it? You sound incredibly irritated lol. I hate having to deal with dumb people
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 01:05 PM
1

You said everything is subjective and women just have “feelings” while men are sacrificing the world. No I didn’t say that. This is like the 5th time women are completely misrepresenting what Im saying and putting words I didn’t say in my mouth. Do women have a reading comprehension problem? Am I the one who’s not expressing correctly? Are all women Cathy Newman? If everything is subjective then maybe men also just are “feeling” a certain way meanwhile it’s not true at all. Except men are not th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 04:53 AM
1

Men don’t benefit more overall, this has to be done on a case by case analysis.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 11:57 PM
5

The “study” on which mainstream media came to the conclusion that single women are the most happy demographic is the one made by Paul Dolan which has already been proven and even acknowledged by the very same Paul Dolan as being flawed. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/6/4/18650969/married-women-miserable-fake-paul-dolan-happiness https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/is_marriage_really_bad_for_womens_happiness Overall women are not doing so great either only marginally better tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 11:44 PM
1

Talk about being men pissed about being decentred while failing to realize not everyone lives in your small little bubble. I don’t have a fucking clue nor do I give two shits about whatever the fuck is radio 4, because guess what, Im not from the uk, genius. I already provided you ample evidence why you are wrong, if you have no substantial rebuttal then either take it or leave it for all I care, no skin off my back.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 11:28 PM
3

Im not invalidating women’s feelings. Im perfectly aware there are bad men in relationships. Men that don’t pull their weight. Abusive assholes. Men not fit to be in relationships. You name it. But this narrative that femcels have that the “good ones” are so few and far between its almost like finding a unicorn I find it to be absolute horseshit because it completely releases women from any semblance of accountability and puts all the blame on men (shocker). It rests in a deeply flawed assumptio…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 11:10 PM
1

This idea that there aren’t enough good “emotionally intelligent” or caring men is absolute garbage. Just tell it like it is. Either you’re not sexually attracted or you they can’t bankroll your lifestyle. Because that’s what women mean with net benefit. Partnered people of both sexes are happier and live more fulfilling lives than single people that’s what the numbers show. Stop gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 08:37 PM
0

I don’t suscribe to tradcon romanticism of the past although I do see the point you’re making. Id rather have a monogamous relationship (no marriage) borrowing things from the past but adapting it to modern times.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 07:02 PM
10

When something is entirely subjective in the realm of feelings anything can be possible. Men can sacrifice their lives and women can still feel that isn’t enough. That’s why all this reeks of bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 06:34 PM
1

Men always have options as well. We know what those options are though. Women having options doesn’t mean they get what they want, they might get thrown a lot of free cat chowder to eat but they get laughed out of that nice restaurant around the corner for not having the credentials to get in.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:23 PM
1

Sources: tabloid article and personal anecdotes
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:15 PM
1

Only stupid people can’t recognize when they are wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 05:00 PM
11

according to women There’s a WHOLE OTHER SIDE OF THE STORY you’re leaving out. Just because women feel it doesn’t make it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:48 PM
–

Yes you got absolutely put in your in place. Either fact-check your bullshit sources before making sweeping wrong statements or cry about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:37 PM
–

Nobody wants to be near you. Please for the love of God, do leave men alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:20 PM
1

“Voluntarily” “You can’t fire me, I quit”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:19 PM
4

Who cares wtf you do? We’re talking gender dynamics here. If you want to spread dumb sweeping and erroneous statements expect people to put you in your place.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:17 PM
4

For the 1000th fucking time. This is absolute bullshit. It is based on a bullshit study with bullshit sources propagated by mainstream media. It has been disproven a billion times. No, single women are not happier than married or partnered women. They do better than single men though, but every metric shows partnered people of both sexes are on average happier than single people. Please for the love of God stop spreading misinformation. Guess women really need that fairy tale for an ego boost hu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:12 PM
17

This idea that there aren’t enough good “emotionally intelligent” or caring men is absolute garbage. Just tell it like it is. Either you’re not sexually attracted or you they can’t bankroll your lifestyle. Because that’s what women mean with net benefit. Partnered people of both sexes are happier and live more fulfilling lives than single people that’s what the numbers show. Stop gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:05 PM
1

This shit again
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 04:01 PM
–

I couldn’t have a relationship without sex, I would rather shoot myself in the leg. Im the complete opposite of you, cuddling, hugging, kissing would completely lose meaning and I would find it incredibly annoying without sexual intimacy. Like get off me, lol. I can cuddle for like a minute before I need my personal space.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 02:16 PM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:05 PM
31

Not even AI, I think. They are pushing a fear campaign to increase government control and population surveillance, using Andrew Tate and MRAs and conflating the two is just their perfect scapegoat. Didn't they just recently passed a law in the UK over ending end-to-end encryption over private messages or something like that? UK is in a shitstorm right now. EDIT: don't know if it's been passed yet, but yeah this isn't looking good: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/07/uk-government-very-close-er…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 03:00 PM
1

Heterosexuality bad Men bad, must do better, don’t love women enough Lesbianism good, must imitate lesbians
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:23 AM
-1

This is why I can’t take anything feminists say seriously. Every excerpt you put here reads like embellished mumbo jumbo. One key point of EVERY feminist discourse I can gather from all this nonsense is this: THE ONUS IS ALWAYS PUT ON MEN TO DO BETTER FOR WOMEN’S BENEFIT However this critique on heterosexuality (and men) falls absolutely flat in its face when you consider how many issues lesbians also face in their relationships. Lesbianism is not the rosie colored happy tale feminists would lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:05 AM
–

Not to mention the way women like to frame their past “oppression” is a gross misrepresentation. Yes, women weren’t allowed to vote or open bank accounts. That doesn’t mean they were second-class citizens. I find it extremely distasteful how feminism tries to nudge some kind of parallelism between the plights of black people or other truly discriminated groups and women. Women throughout history were never “oppressed” in the sense we usually mean oppression. Women were INFANTILIZED sure, and you…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 12:34 PM
0

Because different things affect the genders in different ways, because get this: we’re not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 12:52 AM
-1

It’s called incentives and it’s how the entirety of society works. Like do you live in outer space or something? Do you believe this doesn’t apply to women as well? Do you think women are untainted angels with an absolute flawless moral compass? Do you WORK FOR FREE and only for the benefit of others??
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 12:46 AM
23

It’s the main one though. Everything comes on top of biology, this is no chicken and egg, biology and evolution take precedence.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 10:41 PM
9

100%
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 10:40 PM
3

Wut?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 10:33 PM
2

That’s what the data shows, yes. Single people of both sexes are unhappier than partnered people, men more so than women but data still shows women are unhappier single. And it’s even more stark at a later age, the unhappiest demographic is single childless unmarried women over forty.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 09:26 PM
2

Im not American. And initially many of the gfs didn’t like our friends hanging out, out of jealousy and the thought of us being a bad influence and encouraging them to cheat or whatever. Some gfs/wives in the group are particularly toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 06:03 PM
2

Im sure many do. Many more don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 06:01 PM
3

It’s appealing because there is a lot messaging behind and the true consequences are hidden behind a time lag. Im not saying women are better off in relationships with men. That’s debatable and idk which is worse if being single or in a mediocre relationship but if we go by actual metrics the numbers are not supporting your argument that single is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 06:00 PM
5

My friend group from HS have set every Wednesday to get together, have a barbecue and hang out. We might see each other during the rest of the week but Wednesdays are sacred. Wives/gfs cannot say one thing nor complain nor try to reschedule, they don’t have a say, they know Wednesdays nights are untouchable. Honestly this is one of the best decisions we have made.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 03:48 PM
0

They just don’t “bring enough to the table” to compete with the new challenger, which is being single. Being wanted is a lot harder than being needed. Except single is not cutting it if we go by actual metrics. More unhappiness, more loneliness, more isolation, more drug usage. Women are not getting beat up anymore but the “single lifestyle” isn’t suiting them as well as they claim online, its just a frog that is being slowly boiled in water rather than being thrown in a boiling pot, so they com…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 03:32 PM
–

The amount of hamstering and gymnastic olympics lol. Yeah 4B and all the feminists who try to make a movement out of not having sex with men for X reason whether that is not liking their political party, ideology, religion or sports team are absolutely using sex as a bargaining chip, that’s like the textbook definition lol, are you kidding. And they are absolutely orders of magnitude a bigger group than the handful of incels you read around here. Im not hysterical Im tired of talking with you. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 07:03 PM
1

The kind of "violence" that you talk about is not the kind of violence that makes people afraid and society difficult to live in Well I hardly disagree. Violence is violence and no violence is "better" than another or at least it's highly subjective. I know I would rather get my face beat up once than spend even a week being detained for being falsely accused.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 10:34 PM
1

And I'm saying there isn't just one type of violence. There is indirect violence (like my example) which women tend to gravitate more towards and let's not even talk about psychological violence. Men are more likely to smash your face and break your bones but women are more likely to smear your name and ruin your life if you take that into account I don't think women are necessarily committing less violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/25 08:53 AM
0

And Im saying it’s not comparable, so miss me with the whataboutism. A few incels here is nothing. Are we going to play dumb and pretend that women not sleeping with conservatives as a form of punishment or the 4B movement wasn’t a thing? MEN DONT USE SEX AS A POLITICAL BARGAINING CHIP THE WAY WOMEN DO. Just for once stop arguing the sky is green, JFC.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 11:21 PM
1

You're trying to whatabout my argument that women use sex as a political power play waaay more than men by saying a few fringe incels here claim trump voters is a comeuppance to women. I'm saying that's so not comparable it's laughable. Is your reading comprehension really this trash?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 03:25 PM
1

Aah yes ppd and fringe incels made Trump win the elections, whatever helps you sleep at night
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 07:35 AM
1

In my country a female judge just released 115 detained criminals that were captured in a political protest that led to violence. Who’s more violent here? One particular man from those 115 who commits the most violence or the one woman who allows for the collective violence of 115 men?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 03:01 AM
2

That’s why put selfless in quotes. Nobody is actually selfless of course everyone expects something in return for their time and efforts. What I mean by selfless is that men are expected to sacrifice more or put more on the line for the greater good. But then some of them go off thinking they're owed something specific, and get frustrated when they don't get it. That's where the entitled nice guy stuff comes in. It’s funny that you notice this only in men though. Might want to check your biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 06:00 PM
1

No women aren’t going to give men sex to get men to vote a certain way I don’t know why you frame this as men’s request, when it’s women who have used sex as a political bargaining chip time and time again.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:33 PM
3

This is such a simplistic reductionist view of the problem. “Pick yourselves up by your bootstraps” would’ve been a shorter way to summarize this thread. But overall I agree, I hope that men start solving their problems, I just don’t think that’s going to have the results you think it’s going to have. People don’t seem to understand how really dependent society is on men being “selfless” and being put through a meat grinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:14 PM
4

but something comes across in their frustration over working so hard and not being rewarded for it. So, like every other human? Wow guys slave themselves away and they expect that to be rewarded? Such entitlement. They should know they need to work their asses off without any expectation of a reward or recognition and don’t express any frustration whatsoever like good little dancing monkeys, you’re totally right.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 04:51 PM
8

Nobody actually says what you're telling here dude, I don't get where you are coming with this from but it is so made up to make the manosphere or whatever you don't like look bad. When men complain about dating is not because they can't get Scarlett Johansson to be their girlfriend. They are complaining about Becky who is a little overweight, average looking and works as a teacher, thinking she deserves a princess treatment from Christian Grey. When men complain about money is not because they …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 04:17 PM
3

LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 03:29 PM
1

I’m not the one who stormed his feet and screams “not fair!!! I don’t give anyone tinglessss!!!” ??? I know reading comprehension is difficult Yeah no shit, we’ve been on this thread for 20 comments and you still haven’t grasped what is being said. Im sure you’ll get there one day buddy, but I gotta go now, best of luck!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:42 AM
1

Ok, cool. Way to go a tangent there. You were you just aching to unload that rant there weren’t you? I still don’t care and it’s completely unrelated to the topic we are discussing. Keep up, or move on please.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:25 AM
1

No, that’s not the crux at all. And I guess if there’s absolutely no reason why women won’t sleep with anything other than a hot dude it proves the red pill completely right.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 04:13 AM
2

That didn’t answer the question. A question you’re pulling out of fucking nowhere because that’s not what Im arguing about What upside do I have for risking anything for the subpar man? I don’t know and I don’t care
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 02:10 AM
3

The fuck boy could very well be known only by a few pictures. The difference being that you like those pictures because they give you tingles. The “basement dweller” could very well be an accountant with his full profile on linkedin, facebook and instagram or whatever. The only difference is that you don’t like his pictures so he’s a “basement dweller”. It’s literally the “know the work rules” meme. Just fucking own up to it instead of keep doubling down on this idiocy for crying out loud.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 09:21 PM
2

Im not trying to change your mind dude, you can fuck whoever you want I couldn’t give two shits. Im just saying whatever reasons you give about a hot dude being safer for having instagram or whatever, are in fact, bullshit. Just admit that you prefer to fuck a hot guy and move on, jesus, I don’t even think we are disagreeing on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:38 PM
3

Wut? The reason you choose the hotter dude is because he’s hotter not because he’s safer. Im not disputing that, Im disputing the bullshit reasoning you’re doing about him having “5 star reviews” or whatever other bullshit you’re peddling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:18 PM
9

Did you mean choose the attractive option for casual sex? Why would I not? Yes, that’s exactly the point he’s making. You choose the more attractive option because he’s attractive not because he’s safer or whatever bullshit rationalizing you’re trying to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:14 PM
1

What facts? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 05:04 AM
2

“The probability is low because women are cautious, “neurotic”, and avoid situations where it can happen.” No, the probability is low because there aren’t many rapists and murderers, women’s precautions might make it lower but it is already a very low probability This has been my stance the entire time and you disagreed. So you’re already demonstrating that you jump to conclusion about what I and likely other women consider caution to be. Bringing up statistics of rape and murder makes you sound…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:50 AM
1

Don’t treat men you are meeting as potential predators, make some vetting beforehand, try to not have sex at least on the first date, go out to public places, common sense stuff. Give at least some benefit of the doubt, many women jump straight up to conclusions and get defensive the moment they sense some boundary is being crossed in their heads when that might not even be the intention or even a miscommunication. Let your guard down a little, that doesn’t mean be stupid and walk into a dark al…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 04:04 AM
1

No, Im saying women’s caution of men is blown way out of proportion borderlining paranoia and the whole use of rapists and murderers as a justification is incredibly disingenuous
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 03:38 AM
2

Out of arguments I see
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:23 AM
1

No, you just lack reasoning skills to understand what’s being argued, yet claim people don’t know statistics when clearly statistics are not backing up any of your claims. Women are not likely to meet murderers nor rapists in dating because there aren’t many murderers nor rapists to run into not because some sixth sense women think they have or whatever precautions women take which is probably statistically insignificant in stopping a rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:21 AM
1

We eat right and look both ways 40% of women are obese in america (more than men) and from 2011 to 2021 the rate of female pedestrian fatalities went up from 0.85 to 1.2 So no, no you don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 02:12 AM
13

What 5 star review?? The same “awkward dude” probably also has instagram and online accounts. Just tell it how it is that one makes your pussy wet and the other doesn’t instead of this weird rationalizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:38 AM
1

No, the probability is low because the amount of rapists and murderers in male population is relatively tiny. You have more chances of dying of diabetes than being murdered, or being hit by a car. Yet somehow women are not paranoid about going near a street for fear of being run over.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 01:28 AM
21

You know women watch porn too right? In rapidly increasing numbers and tbh hentai is PLAGUED by women were Im at the point of wondering if its 50-50 by now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 05:02 AM
59

He means when men complain about this stuff women usually mock them, downplay their frustrations, try to throw it back at them or one up them. Only when another woman with similar experiences as men tells this stuff she’s taken seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 11:24 PM
6

They can’t do that anymore. Demonizing men has become a core fundamental pillar of the left. Unfortunately the left has married with feminism to the point they are now almost synonyms. The first fundamental step the left needs to take is to divorce itself from feminism, but that we all know that isn’t going to happen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 07:04 PM
1

While I strongly disagree with some of this (egalitarian is all that works for me) Wdym?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 02:49 PM
1

Buying things is romance you? It is how a lot of women measure their man’s love for them, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 01:52 AM
1

I mean, that’s either a yes or a no statement and Im not sure which one is. If it’s a no then you never needed men you just chose to subjugate yourselves for convenience. If it’s a yes then you pretty much still need men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:36 PM
–

I hate this tradcon whining about how women are going to be sad because they didn’t have kids and raise a family for muh society. Some will, some won’t, who gives a fuck but this sort of whining I find absolutely pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:30 PM
–

Im not an incel. Larping? WTF are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:25 PM
–

Idk. I think this is all subjective as fuck “wants” vs “needs” who determines what is what. I think a lot of people are deluding themselves. Men are deluding themselves into thinking they need women and women are deluding themselves thinking they don’t need men. I think people will adapt themselves to whatever situation they are in and try to rationalize the choices they have made. That’s what we do after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:23 PM
–

A broken promise isn’t a failure. Yes it is lol. Female mindset in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 07:05 PM
–

Men don’t need women. If we are going to talk about personal anecdotes then I have mines as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:47 PM
–

Dude stop being such a fucking loser Jesus Christ who gives a fuck. Muh families muh lonely men muh childless women muh society collapse. Do you guys even hear how fucking cringe you sound?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:45 PM
1

She doesn’t have one because she knows she doesn’t have a leg to stand on when it comes to equality same as every other feminist so she’s just left to troll and call anyone who calls on her bullshit an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 05:53 AM
1

I never said all. You really need to learn to read.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 09:34 PM
1

Stop being obtuse, you’re playing dumb here. Yes I can assure you 100% put my hand on the fire might a lightning struck my dad if Im lying these are all things women do (or rather don’t do).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 09:01 PM
2

That’s not what I asked
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 08:43 PM
2

Really? You think most women are doing the things I listed
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 08:12 PM
2

Good for you but we are discussing gender dynamics here
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:33 PM
–

Yeah get back to me with that one when women are the ones asking men out, paying for dates, having a reasonable list of requirements, buying gifts, asking for marriage, splitting the bills, and not constantly asking for reassurance from their partner at least 50% of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:52 PM
–

Cue in “but women are waaay more oppressed than men, men’s oppression is nothing and they did it to themselves anyway”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:43 PM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:26 PM
1

Not an incel, trash
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:25 PM
1

Stop talking, trash
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:22 PM
–

That’s not the point being discussed here. You can treat your partner nice and still be egalitarian, but that’s not what women want. Women mistake being babied like an “equal relationship”, that’s the point being discussed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:18 PM
1

If you don’t actually believe the words you’re saying and just do it to get a reaction, you’re just a troll and your opinions are absolutely worthless. Guess I can disregard you now like the trash you are, move along.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:15 PM
1

Yes you are
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:04 PM
2

Yes you are
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:04 PM
–

I really hope “normal men” stop falling for the bear trap that are normal women. And for the most part they are, slowly.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:03 PM
1

You are showing that with your words, stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:01 PM
3

Something something hypergamy, 80/20, AFBB, something something
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 11:45 PM
2

Once again, a man trying to tell women what they do and don't want. I mean, we listened at first but then you kept contradicting yourselves at every step of the way (and even then we kept listening for a while more) but that will only go so far (it went far) until you realize you’re being bamboozled. Something something fool me once and don’t listen to what they say yadda yadda
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 07:52 PM
6

They are most definitely real. Google is your friend. Doing some research might enlighten you on how your ideology is utter bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:02 PM
6

The female privilege of not being obligated to die in a trench for example. The female privilege of leaving whenever the fuck they want from a war zone while all the men are forced to stay and die to protect your freedoms. The female privilege of having absolute power and the last say when it comes to reproductive rights. The female privilege of being always considered the victim and not the aggressor by default and BY PROTOCOL on cases of DV. The female privilege of having coded into law what r…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:56 PM
–

You seem to come from a sheltered upper middle class or high class background. Regular low to middle class blue collar workers don’t play by the same rules than you do. Some people get to play Disney princess most people don’t, that’s why FDS fails miserably, because most of its audience are average Jane’s trying to date upper class and they just don’t make the cut.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:28 PM
7

Female privilege and men paying the broken dishes, always.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 04:38 PM
1

Ok, so?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 05:29 PM
1

This isn’t a dating advice sub. This is a gender/social dynamics debate sub. You gotta keep up maam.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 05:24 PM
4

I hear wild salmon is expensive as shit
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 05:20 PM
4

LOL My man pulling the nukes to a gun fight
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 03:21 PM
1

Damn. Struck a chord eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 03:15 PM
2

You know it works the other way around yes? Guys will approach many women and sleep with the ones that say yes, nothing’s changed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 03:13 PM
3

That's like a singular bullet in MG42 belt feeling "it's the only one" despite being shot at 1000 rpm towards the beach. Female sexuality in a nutshell
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 03:09 PM
2

Sorry but Im not buying it. Your phrasing makes me doubt you really "suggest" women like that, otherwise you wouldn't have had the need to make it a gendered thing. And it's funny to me how women always claim they "advocate both sides" but somehow I never see them in the wild when women are shitting on men. Wanna lecture your sisters on how to "let go of the anger"?? Let me introduce you to r/TwoXChromosomes you will have a field day over there.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 06:43 PM
2

You DO REALIZE that you’re complaining about human behavior not specific to men right? I mean women do this shit too all the fucking time. Where do you think the phrase “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned” comes from? Women acting like they’re these perfect angels that do no harm while these filthy man beasts just can’t control their emotions when they’re rejected is beyond laughable. Ive witnessed IRL a woman smashing a guys windshield because the guy broke up with her, but women somehow fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:59 PM
0

You remove sex and you no longer have men nor women. But to answer your hypothetical, women would be 'liked' or 'disliked' solely on the merit of their relationship with men. With sex no longer being the carrot dangling over men's head women would be freed from sexual oppression from men but also stripped from every privilege that comes with female sexuality. Basically you just become another dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:03 AM
1

Shit half the AskMen sub is nothing but criticism of female fashion choices that none of those women give a flying fuck about Funny how they don't give a fuck yet THEY'RE ASKING FOR MEN'S OPINIONS ON r/ASKMEN and in 28 years I’ve never met a single woman who cares if a man is offended that she didn’t smile at him Maybe it's because you don't date women but I've met several women who got extremely offended when I completely and politely tried to ignore or downright reject their advances.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 02:55 AM
3

The fucking sheer entitlement of women who believe men owe them a better life will never cease to amaze me
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:18 PM
1

I don’t think so. There is a large enough number of women that make it everyone else’s problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 11:19 AM
–

More than the gender of the person the thing that would piss me off waay more now that I know how women operate in marriage and relationships is the way Im being dumped. If she was already planning on leaving and had another person on the sidelines without me even knowing, that betrayal would hurt a fuck ton worse than anything having to do with the person she's cheating me with.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 07:59 PM
16

Then stay single but stfu about it if that’s the choice they made. Don’t make it a men’s problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 04:18 PM
1

This is due to people taking relationships more seriously lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 03:55 PM
1

Umm no sorry Im not the basement dweller here. Never heard a guy say they could take someone with a gun, most crazy take I heard is a friend say he could take a small pitbull and he got laughed out of the room. Ive heard some pro and semi pro fighters say the moment someone pulls a weapon, -not even a gun mind you, just a regular knife will do- you just retreat and run for the hills. That’s the most common and most sensible take people have.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 11:10 PM
1

IDK if this is an American redneck thing but I have never heard a single guy say they could withstand a bullet or they could take on someone with a gun. Never in my whole life. Either you live in a really weird place or YOU don’t know many men, because thinking this is a common stance between men is insane to the point of caricature.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 04:56 PM
2

I know. Im agreeing with you
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 09:59 PM
2

As feminists would say “it’s intersectional”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 08:53 PM
54

The Schrödinger feminist, empowered boss babe can do everything men can and more and helpless victim of the patriarchy at once
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 08:37 PM
11

I don’t know what’s preventable about someone pulling an AK to your face and threatening to kill you if you don’t do what they say. There is no “masculine urge” there wtf are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 08:33 PM
1

I am a wonderful woman that men should be fighting for. I will not change anything about myself because it is men who must change what they’re looking for. They absolutely 100% say this. In fact you just described THE FEMALE COMPLAINT, not the male one. “No men are good enough for me”, “I won’t lower my standards”, “Men aint shit” “I don’t need no man” “Where are all the good/real men?”, “Why aren’t men approaching me?”, “The bar is in hell” etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 06:43 PM
4

Maybe it’s something like that who knows. This all smells like projection on her part.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 07:37 AM
3

you can’t handle the truth You’re not telling any truths, you just concocted this theory in your head that men are a certain way and no amount of proof otherwise is going to change your mind because you already established your bias as ‘truth’. Women are so much more logical and pragmatic, we learn quickly that some people cannot be trusted and most men cannot control their feelings. LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 07:29 AM
4

It’s not even that. I have Chad-lite friends. They would never try to fuck with another gf from the group. We just don’t do that, you have to be a horrible garbage human being to do something like that. You don’t backstab a bro like that. Ive known these guys from more than 8 years, some 15, we went to high-school together. A few of them are like literal brothers to me. She wants so desperately to believe men are these horny beasts that would throw away every ounce of rational thought and moral …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 07:22 AM
1

Weak and pathetic personal attack, you boys are so emotional. Is it your period? I seriously pity the guy Go to bed early a couple times and leave them to hang out with your appealing girlfriend and see what happens. Do I need to repeat myself that it never happened? Nor with my gf nor with any other gfs in the group. Your boyfriend’s friend group is not representative of male friendships whatsoever. Stop projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 07:01 AM
2

They weren’t my friends, do I need to repeat this again? Yeah seems like your boyfriend is a terrible judge of character, he picked you as well Yeah, typically developing men prioritize sex over almost everything else. You are right, not all, but men have far fewer inhibitions and will steal your girl. Random men sure, I trust my friends with my life though and so far I’ve not been disappointed.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 06:46 AM
3

They weren’t my friends. They were my boyfriend’s friends. Then you and your boyfriend are both terrible at picking friends. But men prioritize sex and access to women well above friendship. No they don’t. Not all and not even at a much larger amount than women. You just associate with shitty people. Gotta know and vet who you let in your inner circe.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 06:37 AM
5

I know you are a raging misandrist that thinks the absolute worst from men but you really REALLY need to touch some grass. If your story is true I'm sorry you're absolute garbage at judge of character and picking friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 06:20 AM
0

Umm nope, you are just projecting what women might do. There absolutely is a bro code, my friends would never and have never done anything of the sort. Don't know wtf kind of friends you have might wanna check on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 05:49 AM
3

100%. Unlike women we don’t YASSS QUEEN, pat ourselves on the back constantly. Male friendships are 10x more authentic than women’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:47 AM
6

But it is needed for survival. Maybe not at the individual level but as a species.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:38 AM
3

Is complete and utter bullshit lmao I can’t believe you said that with any seriousness
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 09:41 PM
2

This? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10298299/ Says nothing about lesbian dead beds
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 05:55 AM
5

So no
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 10:14 PM
12

Do you have data?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 08:33 PM
8

Do they? What about lesbian dead beds?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 08:21 PM
8

Link them then
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 10:14 PM
-5

So feminists are the victims now huh? Not unlike how they turned feminism on the average joe and are now complaining the average joe is pissed. Feminism made its own bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 09:44 PM
1

Bro you keep moving the goalposts and twisting into a pretzel trying to rationalize this. Average men approach average women. Average has a meaning and men as a whole have dictated what that average is. Your “no but if Chad approaches some average woman that means she is not average is a non sequitur”.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 05:33 PM
–

Well I disagree. It all depends on what her standards are and what she provides in relation to those standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 05:20 PM
1

Except “average” has a meaning and not whatever you want it to mean. Men’s ratings for female attractiveness follow a bell curve which is exactly what you’d expect for a given population. Few ugly people, few beautiful people and most just fall in the middle aka “average”. Women’s ratings do not follow that pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 05:17 PM
–

Women are deciding to be single We need stats on that because there are also a lot of women (and increasing) complaining about being single not by choice. That because bad relationships exist that women couldn’t possibly have realistic standards? Im saying women’s “standards” (same as men tbh) are complete garbage and completely subject to outside forces more than you are all willing to admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 05:11 PM
–

What? Bro you keep contradicting yourself at every step. Choose one. Average men don’t approach average women Even chads approach average women Both can’t be true at once
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 05:05 PM
–

Doesn’t matter in the end because it’s not sustainable. That free shit someone has to pay it and eventually the well runs dry. Women are just beginning to see their card statement arrive.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 05:00 PM
–

I don’t want them to ‘be humbled’. My problem with this line of thinking is another. I was just correcting you because you are wrong and it doesn’t matter if you say it 50 times over it doesn’t make it true. Average men approach average women, this fantasy that men only go for attractive women like women do is simply not true. You even contradicted yourself in the last sentence dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 04:51 PM
–

Yeah. I said it in another comment. I don’t hate the libertarian ‘free-market’ approach but apply it equally for everyone. Women want free-market law of the jungle when it suits them but are the most staunch defenders of regulations and protectionism when it doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 04:45 PM
–

There’s an imbalance, but red pilled men made it that way by choosing to pursue attractive women. Red pill men are a tiny minority to even make a dent on statistics. Men already approach all women from attractive to same level to below. In fact Id wager mid women are the ones who get APPROACHED THE MOST because they seem like the most attainable without foregoing too much physical attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 04:31 PM
–

A lot of women hold out for a really excellent kind of man and do eventually get him. Allow me to press X to doubt. Stats show that more and more people are single and the ones that get into relationships according to women (so this is coming straight from the horse’s mouth) are not that great.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 04:25 PM
–

Not only that but it’s always the most ruthless ‘free-market-law-of-the-jungle’ rules when it suits them but ‘buh-huh we have societal issues affecting whamen we need to address!!’ when it doesn’t. And then they have to gall to whine about red pill which is nothing more than men acknowledging these unwritten rules and adjusting accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 04:13 PM
2

Exactly. I wouldn't add nor take a single word to what you said. Its really ironic how the left that used to be the movement that fought for the little guy has been co-opted by radicals that completely transformed it into something so alien now the right is seen as the party of the people. Maybe they are just the two sides of the same coin and maybe the pendulum will swing back in time but right now the left owes itself a deep introspection and cleansing if they want to have any semblance of aut…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 07:54 PM
3

Not all women are like this and so the solution is to just find one who values you and prioritizes your life and wellbeing apart from your usefulness as a tool or “ally”. Then we are all fucked and finding women like these is like finding a needle in a haystack. If politics is anything to go by left leaning women have made it very clear that men are only a concern as long as they help promote their agenda, for anything else they must be quiet, listen to women and keep their mouths shut and their…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 05:57 PM
1

Yes, this is exactly the reason why. Don’t forget these are the same people that uphold an ideology that states that they are oppressed and that we benefit from that supposed oppression. They supposedly are in favor of dismantling gender norms …….. Only for women of course, and only until shit hits the fan.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 05:42 PM
7

I must have gotten too late then because the reasonable comments were drown by the usual nutjobs
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 05:32 PM
14

You don’t really see the “I hate men but still need to be with them” kind of people. I see them all the time. In fact Id wager that’s the vast majority of misandrists.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 05:25 PM
1

I said the word kindness and you replied to that comment. Furthermore, so many men on this sub are utterly shocked 😧 that women are perceived as relatively more “wonderful” (aka less inconsiderate or aggressive) than men This can be interpreted as being kinder but fair enough you didn't use the word 'kind'. So lets go with less inconsiderate and more agreeable. In this case we both know that women online are anything but considerate and/or agreeable. They are paying lip service because there is …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 07:33 PM
0

Those are actually good reasons but have nothing to do with the 'kindness' women are displaying here. Because its not kindness at all and kindness can be a double edged sword anyways. Women have a vested interested here that men keep taking risks in approaching and showing intent to them, paying lip service to some dude because he brought flowers amounts to the YASSS QUEEN pat on the shoulders you all give each other all the time. I'd much rather take the cautionary advice from the dudes here, t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:52 PM
-1

WAW is not because women are kinder than men (which isn't true btw because that "kindness" is in many cases just surface level makeup) its because men want to fuck women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:33 PM
3

They dgaf. They are champions applying the risk-assessment logic when it comes to women but when it comes down to men we must take all risks at all times. They are incapable of taking into account all the risk-reward calculations we do because they just get to sit down and choose and never go through the meat grinder we go through that is approaching women. So for them is just 'why don't you just do this? it would be soooo cuuutee!' ignoring all the times this went bad for us. They remind me of …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 06:13 PM
-1

This is a great crazy test. The ones who cut off friends/partners simply because they just found out their partners don’t think like them is better to let themselves take out, otherwise they are going to try to police every little thing you think/believe. These are the same wackos who have meltdowns when things don’t go their way (ahem Trump).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 03:03 PM
1

Okey dokey
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:49 PM
1

I didn’t answer your question because it’s not worth answering. Just an unrelated tangent you went on when you realized you were getting steamrolled. Hope that helps. Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:45 PM
1

Just take the L with dignity
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:40 PM
1

LOOOL Its from a government agency. THEY ARE LITERALLY STUDIES NOT ARTICLES YOU CLOWN 🤡🤡🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:35 PM
1

There’s no big difference. One comprehensive peer reviewed study showed that 50% of violent relationships are reciprocal, meaning both partners are initiating violence, and neither are doing so in a defensive manner. Beyond that, when there is violence that in non-reciprocal, meaning only one partner is using violence, 70% of the time is is the woman who is physical abusing the man. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1854883/ In the CDC’s 2017 report on Intimate Partner Violence, it sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:19 PM
1

Okay, even if men still commit more violence it’s not as clear cut as it once was thought. Furthermore violence on men is very obscured because of shame and stigma so we don’t really have very reliable data. DV is much more close than we thought so separating victims on different levels as we currently do is not doing justice.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 02:08 PM
1

Firstly it’s not. Child abusers are mostly women for example and the data on intra relationship violence shows women can be just as violent as men and in fact incite violence way more often. Lesbians relationships are the most violent ones. Secondly separating between genders creates two levels of victims. One that gets all the attention and one that gets made invisible as it shows with all the attention VAWG gets vs violence against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:47 PM
1

A lot of things that shouldn’t be are, doesn’t make them right.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 04:27 PM
4

Nope. VAWG is BS. Violence is violence and should not be distinguished by gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:04 PM
3

Well yes, everyone has a responsibility towards not harming other people but that’s not specifically to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 02:33 PM
1

That’s only because of the different messaging men and women get. Men are being told constantly that they need to chase women and their worth is measured by how many women they can get. Women are being told men are going to chase them and their worth is measured by the caliber of men they can attract. The groups of people you’re reading are usually unsuccessful and vent their frustrations accordingly. Men vent they can’t get women and blame their pickiness to save face. Women vent men are trash …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 06:15 AM
-3

Aaand there’s the double standard. No its not. And men as whole have absolutely no responsibility or duty towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 05:50 AM
–

Nah he’s right. If you dare criticize even just a little bit women or feminism or go against the grain on TwoX you are instabanned.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 05:28 PM
1

“As it used to be” lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 01:20 AM
1

That would be patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 07:25 PM
1

This doesn’t answer the question tho. It does. You didn’t read the thread. How 👏 is 👏 feminism 👏harming 👏 men 👏 Cringe. Feminism only exists because of abusive, neglectful and over powering men. Nope, I already told you feminism exists as a byproduct of the excesses of riches and resources brought by the advancement in modern technology. There are no feminists living in shitholes. Yea because they’re smart enough to evacuate the damn house. I know. You’ll just flee like rats abandoning a boat an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 07:01 PM
1

So how is feminism harming men???? This thread might be enlightening to you: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1gtsr6g/comment/lxpzx7s/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button So the boogeyman i made up was who wouldn't let women vote back then. Who wouldn't let women work. Who made it so women had to get married if they wanted a decent life. You think the boogeyman i made up is what allowed women to be domestically abused, or not h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 06:00 PM
2

It has never demanded anything from average everyday men Wrong Feminism doesn’t harm men Wrong You only see things in terms of how you can personally benefit. I would like it to be equally beneficial since you know .. feminist is supposedly about “equality” (complete bullshit btw). I won’t be part of a movement that expects my support while actively despising me, that just makes me an idiot. It doesnt matter if you don’t think you get anything in return, feminism isnt about YOU I know its about …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 04:49 PM
1

Okay? Im not an incel if you’re trying to make me upset or smt this doesn’t affect me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 03:06 PM
1

I don’t hate women. I hate feminism. And I get a really good laugh watching you all lose your collective shit imagining a hand maid’s tale scenario just because orange man won.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 02:53 PM
1

I think you have the concept of free speech completely wrong. Man Im so glad Trump won, well deserved I hope he gives you a taste of your own medicine.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 02:42 PM
1

LOL comparing nazis with Farrell is quite a fucking stretch. Can’t imagine the mental gymnastics you had to do to come up with that, but Im not surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 02:33 PM
1

You might not like his take. That does not give you the right to boycott and shut down a talk on a completely unrelated topic and harass any bystander that was just trying to get in just because you didn’t like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 02:26 PM
1

Not beyond acquaintances I guess. Like I get some of my coworkers or women I know might be feminists but we just chat a bit and keep it professional. In my family the only one who calls herself a feminist is my sister and mostly out of obligation Id guess she isn’t interested much in politics or with the movement she is what you’d call a ‘casual feminist’ she just likes the equality slogan. Friends I don’t have many close female friends and the ones I have are most definitely not feminist lol. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 02:18 PM
2

Maria David-Evans, the exasperated deputy minister of Alberta Children’s Services wrote in a formal response to one of his suits. “This is clearly not because of discrimination or gender bias … but is based on the illogical, unjustifiable and unreasonable ideology needed to communicate his views about misandry conspiracies that he has come to believe.” Mmmh Maria David-Evans yeah she doesn’t seem like she would have any prior bias that would have swayed her decision in any way nono she seems abs…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 01:48 PM
1

I always said feminism true purpose is female liberation and that “for equality” is just a slogan used to reel suckers (men) in. Those are two completely different objectives. What exactly does feminism demand from men???? Feminism demands full political action, support and loyalty from men while giving absolutely nothing back at best and actively harming them at worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 01:18 PM
2

Yeah that’s what I said because I don’t associate with feminists on a personal level. That doesn’t change the fact that feminism as a movement demands and feels entitled to everything from men and gives absolutely nothing in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 01:10 PM
6

Was gonna say the first thing that stood out to me was the metric ton of paint and plastic on display and the ultra feminized pinkpill-esque persona trying their hardest to analyze men and the manosphere. It’s like watching a donkey trying to mount a giraffe … it just seems way off.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 08:36 AM
2

While I agree her arguments are incredibly disingenuous I think guys here tend to over focus too much on the dating and sex aspects when discussing men’s issues. Trust me feminists do shit WAY WORSE than not date you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 08:22 AM
5

How about Erin Pizzey who opened the first shelter for domestic violence for women but when she saw that men were just as battered and tried to extend the same kindness suddenly all feminists turned against her and even manage to kick her out of her own shelter? Here she talks about her experience: https://youtu.be/irVB8b0zhQI?feature=shared Or Earl Silverman who couldn’t afford to keep his shelter for men open in Canada due to lack of funding because you guessed it .. feminists protested it. Oh…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 07:48 AM
4

Yes they are and feminist organizations keep blocking them at every step of the road
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 07:05 AM
-3

A harmful dogmatic ideology that spreads misandry and actively harms men through politics and gaslights men’s issues through the use of the mainstream media apparatus.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 06:59 AM
-2

How am I supposed to answer this retarded question? Okay lets give it a shot: Me personally, never because the second I hear someone spouting feminist bs I don’t associate beyond an acquaintance with that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 06:53 AM
2

Did I say anything about dating or sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 06:39 AM
-9

Women aren’t doing much better and men have been going down the shitter for a while now. Men tried to warn you. Red pill tried to warn you. Feminism has been shitting and exploiting men uncontested for far too long. There’s so much lending the other cheek before the dude being slapped gets angry and slaps you right back.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 06:28 AM
5

Why would men be part of a movement that demands everything from them and gives absolutely nothing in return? That sounds like slavery to me
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 06:14 AM
–

This isn’t feminism, because it has nothing to do with equality. Neither does feminism. And men appear to think it is something, the complaints from men have reached millions across social media, when women aren’t doing anything to men other than choosing not to date or have sex with the worst of them. No they are complaining a whole lot too and blaming us for everything, you’re not being quite gtfoh with that lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 04:15 AM
–

Oh yeah forgot about libfags
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 04:12 AM
0

That’s women not men. Men couldn’t give less of a fuck unless you’re insufferable with politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 07:08 AM
1

So … this is a nothing burger basically. This is what feminism has been doing for the past 30 years
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 07:03 AM
4

True. The only reason I keep hearing about 4B is because it keeps being brought up in this sub and on twoX.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 06:56 AM
1

Nor Trump is going to oppress women. This is just your schizophrenia kicking in.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 06:41 PM
3

Good. Keep it up 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:21 PM
2

Got any kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 07:47 PM
3

i find it perfectly reasonable when women push for women’s rights in places like afghanistan - i actually respect the women who do things like that but that’s not exactly the biggest part of modern feminism. when women from the most egalitarian and privileged societies in the world talk into their phone about how the patriarchy keeps them down, i just can’t take it too serious. Not even that, they actually SUPPORT IT. It’s mind boggling to me. On the one hand they complain about patriarchy from …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 06:50 PM
1

Apart from pregnancy, I don’t think periods nor horniness should be excuses for anybody to be an asshole, but I don’t see men using horniness as an excuse the way you’re portraying.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 05:00 AM
1

Hot
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/24 10:45 PM
2

As long as I don’t have to put up with their whining I don’t care what they do. I mean you don’t. Nobody’s putting a gun to your head to browse ppd lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 06:55 PM
1

“Happy wife, happy life” has always been the maxim of marriages. I say fuck that. Red pill it is. Men need to start being selfish and put their needs first. Pussy has never been cheaper if you know how to play your cards right.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 04:32 PM
2

Who cares what women get out of it? It’s a bad deal for men. All you get is more chores and responsibilities on top of a nagging bitch complaining about you not doing enough chores while she keeps greeting her teeth at the mere prospect of touching you. Yay. Honestly I don’t even know why both men and women keep doing this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 04:17 PM
3

Women want men to pursue them but if they aren’t handsome, rich and well connected/ liked in society by the right social circles then what good are they? So are those the only possibilities? Either you are a hot, social rich guy or bust? It’s funny in one sentence you mock red pill as a mental disorder and in the other you literally prove them everything they say is true. It’s also funny because hot social rich guys are the only guys that don’t pursue. Also I wouldn’t call it controlling men wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 01:45 PM
1

Did I say it was?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 12:22 AM
1

Okay?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 02:47 PM
1

Men becoming less horny. Humanity will carry on.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 02:40 PM
4

It’s already happening
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 09:41 PM
1

Eww no
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 03:50 AM
1

It’s not “for men too” that’s the problem. But feminists keep telling it is. Id have no problems with feminism if they didn’t reel in men by saying it’s for equality which is complete and utter bullshit and just be honest and said feminism is a female liberation movement (which they used to say at the beginning until they changed the slogan to garner more male followers).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 02:56 AM
3

Yeeeah we know you’re full of shit
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 11:20 PM
2

You’d just rationalize and deflect the hell out of it and it would be a 50 comment thread long drag that I don’t have the energy nor the willingness to engage in.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 11:08 PM
1

I mean the exact same can be said for women. In all of the years Ive been at ppd I have encountered a handful of actual egalitarian women. Most just spout the most misandristic bs imaginable you included and they never get called out or corrected by other women least of all feminist women (funny enough these egalitarian women weren’t feminists). You have to give and take if you want your claims to not fall on deaf ears but the well has been poisoned beyond repair at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 09:21 PM
2

The hypothetical is pretty bad bro But here’s my summary then: Gay/bi men would probably take over and women and straight men would become extinct. IDK this could be a species ending event that would ultimately develop in an all out war between the hermaphrodites and women and the rest of hermaphrodite men that would ally with them. That sounds like a really good or really shit Hollywood movie though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 06:00 PM
0

🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:47 PM
3

The hypothetical is really vague for me to try to picture it. Are men still attracted to women in this hypothetical? Are they attracted also to men now? Do they know about this shift? Honestly I think if men became able to carry children out of nowhere abortion or any other superfluous discussion would be at the bottom of the priority list.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:45 PM
1

From 14 to 22 deaths at 100000 births? I know feminists and statistics don’t get along well and tend to overblow things to hell and back, but JFC.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:27 PM
2

If men could get pregnant tomorrow we would become an entirely different thing. You don’t seem to understand that ALL of the differences between men and women, our psychology, our physiology, our brains, our socialization, all stem from the fact that women are the ones who bear children. You take that away and you have no more “men and women”. You have something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:23 PM
1

Maternal mortality is at 56% in Texas You can’t actually believe this
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:12 PM
0

soaring maternal mortality wtf are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:08 PM
2

Women telling men they can’t handle rejection. The joke tells itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:01 PM
6

It’s a nonsensical hypothetical because you’re taking away the differentiating thing that makes men, men and women, women. You’re basically asking what would happen if men became women. Well, they’d be women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:57 PM
1

Interesting. So you need to see the woman feeling pleasure to put yourself on her spot?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:34 PM
1

As an aside note, do women really like watching cunnilingus that much? Because it seems almost universal when discussing porn consumption. I can say that as a dude blowjobs are the worst part of any porn vid and an insta-skip for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:35 PM
1

As an aside note, do women really like watching cunnilingus that much? Because it seems almost universal when discussing porn consumption. I can say that as a dude blowjobs are the worst part of any porn vid and an insta-skip for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:35 PM
2

No its not relevant because I never brought men into this you did. It was never a comparison men v women. We already know men are doing bad, the tale you have been fed and keep regurgitating is that women are doing well. Women today are more sad and depressed than women of the past besides the abundance of choice you say have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 02:38 PM
10

You do realize more men use drugs and alcohol in women right? You’re hilarious. So? How is that relevant? We’re talking about women here. And if you don’t know who the running mate for the person that you’re voting for boy that says a lot about you. This just in. Scientists have discovered that there are other countries besides the US, imagine that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 11:31 AM
2

LOL K bubs
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 06:36 AM
3

Out of arguments? Thought you were leaving
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 06:34 AM
7

generalizing women as a homogenous entity LOOOOL. Isn't that what you always do with men??? Apparently you can dish it but you can't take it. Might I remind you this thread started with some dumbass claiming MEN (as a whole) oppressed WOMEN (as whole). But to be honest I'm not surprised, this is 101 feminist debating tactics, when its convenient to your argument you talk in absolutes but when its not then you pull the wOmEn ArE nOt A mOnOLitH diDN't Ya KnoW?? You're not worth the time to engage …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 06:29 AM
10

Humans have dehumanized themselves since the beginning of time. Women dehumanize men all the fucking time, get off that pony please. You have demonstrated time and time again that your "superior morality" is absolute garbage. "The empathetic gender" lmao gtfo here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 06:16 AM
11

Cute story but no, data shows unhappiness in women specially younger women is rising and specially amongst singles. So the data directly contradicts your claim. Opiods and drugs and medication usage also rising. I think the tale you have been sold is not the one you think. Also I have no fucking clue who JD Vance is and I have no interest in american politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 06:08 AM
6

Maybe you should've fought for your freedoms? Y'know like men have done since time immemorial. Like I said, pretty fucking ironic you kept your mouths shut all this time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 06:00 AM
15

Women didn’t want to stay home. They didn’t wanna have babies. They didn’t have a choice. Yes, that seems to be the narrative Now that we have choices we are working, outnumber men in medicine and law, are increasingly going into stem. All those choices and depression and unhappiness still soaring huh. In the words of Ruth Bader Ginsburg we simply needed men to “get off our necks". Yes, you just needed men to build everything for you and hand the world to you on a silver platter so now we can he…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 05:53 AM
3

Lol humans have not decoupled from nature AT ALL. We’re just smart monkeys that’s all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 09:08 PM
11

You were not “oppressed” in the sense that children are not “oppressed” by their parents by establishing restrictions on them. I find it really funny how women are just now coming out of the woodworks in the cushy modern times we live in (and it’s even more ironic if we take into account that is western women who are complaining) about a so called “oppression” they suffered at the hands of men for millenia. Where was this same vehemence when it actually mattered? You seemed pretty content back t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 08:48 PM
1

Do something about what? The fact that women don’t give a shit about men? What am I supposed to do about it? They can do whatever they want, they don’t have to give a shit but Im gonna call them out on their bullshit whenever they try to impose their ‘morality’ on us.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/24 12:26 AM
2

So because some feminists say “y’know it would be kinda cool if we abolished the draft?” are we supposed to take you seriously lol. This is just lip service and to save face, what else are they going to say? Where are the marches and protests? Abolishing the draft lol are you fucking serious? Might as well wish for ending world poverty. But I agree that tradcons are just as bad as feminists, they both don’t give a shit about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:08 PM
-2

Yeah your sisters. Until I see ‘good feminists’ call the bullshit of ‘bad feminists’ instead of getting upset at men for pointing out you are all full of shit, I’ll treat you like you are all part of the same beehive mentality (because you are).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 01:55 PM
1

Then maybe you should lecture your sisters instead of lecturing men. The vitriol comes from feminists demonstrating time and time and time again that their words and grandstanding when it comes to equality mean absolutely jack shit. You even fucking joke about returning to the kitchen to make sandwiches at the mere prospect of a war. But somehow I never see “real feminists” lecture these “false feminists”, you always seem to get upset whenever men point out the sheer hypocrisy on your own moveme…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 03:27 AM
5

Wars have never been “the domain of men” to the extent that men don’t fight wars because they like it or are bored or whatever. This is one of the most stupid arguments people keep making. There are many examples of women in power who have been worse than many male rulers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 02:02 AM
1

I mean … https://nypost.com/2022/08/23/women-are-more-likely-to-cheat-than-men-heres-why/ But somehow we need to constantly placate women’s feeling of being raped or murdered, but that’s not neuroticism nono, that’s perfectly valid. Only men’s feelings are allowed to be invalidated.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 11:10 AM
1

Sure whatever, Id gather DNA is stored in a database anyway. This whataboutism is really fucking stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 04:38 PM
4

This is a dumb comparison they are not even in the same ballpark. DNA testing will 100% get rid of paternity fraud. It will save innocent men from getting royally screwed over. DNA testing will not 100% solve rape because you still have to prove there was rape in the first place and if we base our sentence solely on matching DNA it WILL open the door to another way innocent men get royally screwed over via false rape accusations.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 11:30 AM
1

Thanks, was too lazy to Google it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 11:12 AM
5

I can 100000% assure you this WILL NEVER HAPPEN because if there was even an itsy bitsy hint this was even being discussed into law or smt we would be able to hear all the feminists screeching from the moon. So might as well wish for a pink unicorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 03:34 AM
1

Don’t waste your breath bro they will never ever give an inch and admit they’re wrong. They can’t. They won’t. There are countless studies. Unlike men, women have a really strong ingroup bias and they will defend any shit they do and try to uphold any privileges they have with tooth and nail. That’s why they think it’s totally logically and morally consistent to be distrustful of men as a whole (aka bear v men debacle) because of what a small minority do but suddenly lose their shit when men are…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 02:48 AM
10

Honestly fuck your honor bro. #Notallwomen but #AlwaysAwoman when it comes to paternity frauds DNA tests should be mandatory
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/24 02:21 AM
2

Women don’t (generally, or at least never happened to me) just come up to a guy and say “hey wan sum fuck?” That much I agree, however when I say “women who approached me” Im talking about woman game. All women approach with IOIs (again, vast majority of cases) but the ones that really want you are really obvious about it. All women that “approached me” aka made it really really obvious they were into me were for the most part not that attractive or I wasn’t really into them. Attractive women wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 03:47 AM
2

All men have to do is stop asking out random women, and only go for the women that you know are into you. You aren't usually getting rejected if she wants you. Speaking from experience this wouldn't work because the women who approached me I have generally not been into them and if I was it was only horniness blurring my judgement at the moment. I'd much rather look for IOIs from women I'm attracted to and do the approaching myself than have to deal with advances from women I'm not attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 12:33 AM
1

That’s the thing, it’s biological because men will never give a shit about being called a fuckboi. There is absolutely no downside for being a fuckboi. For men it’s a worse insult to be called “husband material” than a fuckboi. The hypothetical scenario where society shames men for being a fuckboi and men “feel shame” for it can’t ever happen because for men there is virtually any downside for being a fuckboi. For women it’s different. There are a lot of downsides to being a slut beyond “muh-soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/24 06:53 PM
1

You do realize that most women are complaining about lack of commitment or fidelity, right? Yes If a woman just wants to get laid, it’s easy Getting laid sure. Getting laid good which is another big complaint of women is another thing entirely. The vast majority of women are not looking for casual sex and the ones who are want to get dicked down good, so they are still aiming for a minority of the men on these apps. You say women are not monolithic, sure but the complaints are pretty monolithic …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 05:55 PM
1

It’s a gold mine if you want hot pre-vetted dick to pump and dump. It’s also pretty great if you want a relationship so long as you dig through the sexual harassment and red flags, but you can also fish around locally in person for something more organic too. Okay then. I’ll take your word for it and save this comment for whenever I see the countless accounts of women complaining about the dating landscape. We’re also not killing ourselves and other people in droves over sexlessness. Our life ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 03:32 PM
1

I’m not sure if you think “quality dick” is a relationship material dick or dick that can make us orgasm. Both. If it’s the latter there are apps with the pick of the litter laid out like a catalogue for us to choose from. According to women, that catalogue is 90% trash lol If it’s the former then we are pretty content to bide our time and pick the market over, or even be alone. The longer women “bide their time” the harder it gets and women being happier alone is straight up cope according to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 02:57 PM
1

Yeah but there is scarcity of quality dick lol. That’s in pretty high demand and high value. That’s the reason you slut it out in the first place and that’s the reason women who can’t compete police each other. Like I said nothing to do with historic oppression or whatever other bullshit you rationalize it as, it’s just female intrasexual competition
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 02:37 PM
1

Now that women have flipped the script and are pumping and dumping men with leagues more success those morés might shift in the future but it will never have the history of oppression behind it What script lol? Women will never not care about being slut shamed. In fact you slut shame each other far more than men. Women police each other because sluts are a threat to the value of women’s sexuality. It has nothing to do with “historic oppression” or whatever other bullshit you are trying to peddle…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:57 AM
2

It has nothing to do with societal pressures/expectations, this is completely biological. The “shame” is completely subjective to each person, difference being men as a general rule actually don’t give a fuck about being slut shamed because the reward is greater than being called mean things and its plainly obvious the insults come from a place of impotence (women not being able to lock down the guy) than from a place of actual disgust.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/24 11:37 AM
5

So you condonde slavery as long as you can have your shiny new iphone but suddenly get your panties in a bunch when people watch porn? How very morally consistent of you ..
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 01:11 AM
3

You can also not wear shoes or not have a smartphone or not eat steak
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 12:53 AM
4

Maybe the real problem here is women having an irrational, primal fear of sexual competition from videos and then all this is post-hoc rationalisation? Pretty much, yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/24 12:41 AM
1

Nope. Cuckold fetish is a hard pass.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 11:13 AM
1

That’s a dubious claim. LOL I can’t … Who else would they need protection from? How about the whole fucking universe?? ARE YOU SERIOUSLY THIS STUPID?? You realize your whole existence you are battling death right??? The moment you are born you are battling every little thing that is trying to kill you!! From bacteria and viruses to lions and big animals. Men invented medicine, technology, they built your fucking house and put a roof over your head they are largely responsible for all the technol…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 10:57 PM
1

Given a long enough distance women can come out ahead or the gap closes completely which is what you see in these ultra endurance events They still don't outpace men even in ultra endurance. Women possess certain attributes that level the playing field with men, but they still don't outperform men even in ultra-endurance. At the very best they come equal. Still calling women better hunters because they match men at endurance is iffy at best. It’s not a toss up. They could survive. Period. They j…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 07:46 PM
1

No because children actually need their parents to survive so they are generally safer with their parents than not. And women are safer with men than not. Are seriously arguing that men are predators of women because you think women are LESS SAFE with men around? Are you seriously that delusional? Men are “predators” of women the same way women are “predators” of children. Also men don’t protect women from sharks and bears lol they mainly protect them from OTHER MEN. Because we made is so safe t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 07:18 PM
1

Women do have better endurance that is why the gap narrows. They have better endurance relative to other advantages, but not overall. That is the gap with men when it comes to endurance reduces but does not disappear. There is still a gap. You seem hell bent on this idea that women couldn’t possibly hunt Nope. I already said this. Women can hunt. They are worse equipped than men. or that everyone would die of starvation if women had to hunt but you actually don’t know that much about how early h…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 06:01 AM
1

You said men protect women from predators I reminded you that the main “predator” of women are men and that’s actually who men currently protect women from mostly, other men. And I contested that absurd take. Men are “predators” of women the same way women “predators” of children. I used the examples of sharks and you went on a completely unrelated thing of men killing sharks or whatever. Basic math so you can understand what Im saying. Let’s say women have on average 100 shark encounters in a y…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 05:32 AM
1

WTF am I reading here? Sorry I’ve completely lost track of what you’re arguing here. The predators of humans are what? Snakes, mosquitoes? Ticks? Spiders? Women aren’t strong enough to kill those? Lol What? Where did this come from? What are you trying to say here lol. Humans currently have no predators. You said men were the predators of women I was disputing that absolutely bonkers take? Most carnivorous animals do not hunt humans as a main source of meat, also men aren’t even that strong. Com…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 02:31 AM
1

This is an interesting read but the article is a little bit click baity. Women might be better at some stuff that might increase their endurance relatively compared to men (like better fat management, estrogen or longer strides) but there is no evidence that women have more endurance overall than men. Sure the gaps narrows on endurance on longer distances but they still don’t outperform men, so saying that “women might’ve been better suited for hunting because they have better endurance” is a bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 02:28 AM
1

But you are arguing that women couldn’t do this and would just die on the spot or something lol. Im not saying they would die on the spot, maybe they can last some time. But you have provided 0 evidence if women could survive this hypothetical other than wishful thinking. And honestly stop bringing up “protection” the main predator of women is MEN not wild animals (which men aren’t even stronger than anyways). If there were no men who would women need protection from? LOL this is such a bullshit…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/24 03:29 PM
1

Ok so because men are better at something than women that means women cannot do it and would not survive without men doing it? You need to stay on track. The question was never are men better hunters or better at xyz task. This was a discussion about contributions and survival. Can women survive without men? YES. Do women contribute as much as men in a society? Also YES. I even argued they contributed more because men actually cannot give birth, it’s not simply a fact that they “aren’t as good a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 08:40 PM
1

It’s a division of labor it has nothing to do with ability. Just like the fact that men don’t do as much childcare, gathering or weaving as women doesn’t mean they can’t do it. Yes it does. Men are more apt for hunting. Women are more apt for child rearing. We even evolved different edges for such cases like spatial awareness: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6591491/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260490267_Correlations_between_spatial_skills_A_test_of_the_hunter-gatherer_…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 04:30 PM
1

That isn’t true at all. Women can and do hunt really they just don’t have to because men do it for them in order to mate with them. Women hunted small game primarily. 33% percent of those societies women helped hunt big game. “The type of game women hunted was variable based on the society. Of the 50 foraging societies that have documentation on women hunting, 45 (90%) societies had data on the size of game that women hunted. Of these, 21 (46%) hunt small game, 7 (15%) hunt medium game, 15 (33%)…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 02:41 AM
1

Idk what you mean don’t birds just lay more eggs and raise em? Same with humans. So what does it matter per child? It’s to illustrate the point that per pregnancy humans are the the species which infants require more care and are vulnerable and dependent on their mothers for longer. And you are splitting hairs here. Who is currently dedicating more of their life span to childcare? Women. So even by your own metrics women are “contributing more”. If you only count childcare as tending to kids. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 10:22 PM
1

I edited my original comment to add stuff because reddit app on ios is garbage and using it is painful. Sure some animals invest a lot in their young. Not like humans though. Birds spend approximately on average 2.5% of their lifespan caring for kids. Early humans were considered to spend like 40% of their lifespan, modern humans since our life expectancy has increased is closer to 25% if you take it to 18 years old. We also aren’t monogamous (not strictly) much less in prehistoric times. Monoga…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 07:41 PM
1

Okay so you actually have no clue what you’re talking about. That explains a lot. Not true at all see most bird species for reference. And most birds are monogamous like humans. Birds need from about 2-8 weeks to be independent from their mothers. A 5 year old toddler is dead without adult supervision wtf are you even arguing here? Also humans are not monogamous. Ok one humans are apex predators idk where people get this idea that everyone was trying to eat and hunt humans. That’s not really a t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 05:52 PM
1

Nah I applied it all consistently you just don’t like the truth of the matter. No you didn't. They don’t need to be as good as men. That’s what you’re not getting. Men aren’t strong so they can build things they are strong because they need to compete with one another for access to mates. It’s nice that y’all use the strength to build as well but this was never truly necessary for human survival. Women’s baseline strength is sufficient men are extra strong as a result of competition. Yes they ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 03:06 AM
1

Who the hell raised you? Were you not born of a woman? Did women not care for you as baby? My parents, my mom and dad. Actually my step-dad. He pulled us out from poverty and a shitty life. My dad wanted to help raise me but my mom took me away when I was a kid. Puts a big fucking hole in the "women take care of children, but men don't help as much" argument for me. Again why are men getting more credit for anything? Who's taking more credit? You seem to have chugged down a whole fucking bottle …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 11:29 PM
1

Um yea. What good is a bunch of technology if everyone went extinct? I’m saying men’s contributions are great but not really necessary they only matter in so far as they help keep women and children alive. LOL sooo, exactly like we have been doing? not only helping women and children just being alive but also thrive? But men cannot have children without women so what’s the difference? And you are the one belittling the contribution of women. I never belittled the contribution of women. I even sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 02:41 PM
2

So your entire premise is that without women's childbearing we would be extinct but without men's provisioning we would not be extinct but .. our lifes would be miserable, just a bunch of monkey tribes barely surviving and scraping by? I agree with the first, not so much the second. First of all, women can't have children without men, so the idea that ONLY women's labor is required is plain fucking stupid. Second, one of the things that differentiates us from other mammals and brought us from mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:53 PM
2

Insane take. You did bring a really good point about women’s child-rearing and raising being a fundamental key value to societies which is deeply undervalued and a point that a lot of women gloss over easily because they want to prove they bring as much contribution as men on men’s turf. But then you had to go the deep end and undervalue men’s contributions, which is honestly laughable you think we could have survived as a species with only women giving birth. Both roles are equally valuable to …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:23 PM
1

https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-management/ While women have been making strides in managerial positions they are still surpassed by men and that's without taking into account the fact that the bigger the company, the less probability it has a woman CEO. https://www.forbes.com/lists/global2000/ If we go into politics the landscape is even starker. Very few women in the upper echelons of government, again not even mentioning countries with actual power. The big boys competing nowadays …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 11:53 AM
1

Thats not what Im talking about. Im talking about the highest spheres of power. Women haven’t nearly moved the needle there. Nevertheless its a tricky question to answer. For women as a whole one can argue that yes, women’s “power” and “self direction” has improved, I personally think that, in the grand scheme of things no, it hasn’t changed much.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 11:08 PM
2

We’ve been waiting and seeing for the past 60 years and nothings changed
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 04:08 AM
1

No, you are just to dummy dumb to understand what’s being said
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 03:05 AM
4

Why would it change from how it is now? All higher levels effect lower ones to some extent. Right now there is some level of autonomy at the middle. AI is going to change that. Tell how you can before you brag. Men operate at the extremes. This is well known. Most brilliant geniuses are men but so are most dumbasses. Men are also more driven and risk taking which are also important factors. Men still comprise heavy majority of the world’s elite class.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 03:00 AM
6

Well of course. But the 6/6/6 meme is an exaggeration, and primarily on social media. Well yes, it’s a meme, of course it’s an exaggeration. But like every meme it goes viral because it has some element of truth to it and resonates with people. What you see on social media is not an accurate depiction of what most women actually want or require in a partner. Is it? Is it not? Who’s to say? All I know is this handwaving of social media as this wacky place where wacky people say wacky things is re…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:53 AM
–

No you fucking idiot. How do you think people survived in the olden days when there wasn’t a strong social security? How do you think social security came to be in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:15 AM
-1

I mean that’s what a “free market” would be. I never exposed any judgement if it is a good or a bad thing. Just that the premise of OP that we are in a free dating market is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:10 AM
6

I’m curious what you think would change men’s outcomes at large in a way that doesn’t involve actually appealing to what women want? Because “what women want” is not set in stone. Women are not entities living in a vacuum, they are shaped by the environment and culture they are immersed in. And our cultural zeitgeist is feeding women increasingly harder to achieve standards for men. The 666 meme became popular for a reason. That’s the reason of the whining, a lot of men are getting crushed under…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:03 AM
7

Nope. It’s intellect and information and women are just as equal to the task. Except they aren’t. Not at the highest level at least. Which is the only level that’s going to matter in the future. Let’s face it AI is gonna rule us all like the monkeys we are, men and women alike. There will only be a few people pulling the strings behind these AIs and I can almost guarantee that group will be comprised of majority men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:43 AM
-2

Yeah and? They probably end up dead before their 30s so natural selection did its thing which was exactly the point
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:14 AM
4

Or you would be part of a strong community like people did to survive back then
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:10 AM
8

Is it on you as a responsible person to not kill and instead save? Yes. But it’s an ethical obligation, not a matter of credit and blame. Umm nope. It is not my obligation to save. Woefully entitled of you to place that burden on others. And you’re the one who brought the blame game into the discussion. Well let’s be fair, you’ll see a lot more men killing women than the inverse. Cannot even follow your own logic now?
/r/MensRights20/08/24 07:05 AM
8

LOLOL "Hey you wanna be part of our church? It's super exclusive and has a lot of benefits but only for certain people. Other people namely you, have to pay a very high membership price. The membership fee is repentance, and you have to pay that price your whole life -as you are tainted being- child of the patriarch. You'll always come second to the divine -the feminine- such is the way of the feminism. Only the femme can determine if you are worthy of groveling at her feet. So, are you interest…
/r/MensRights20/08/24 04:32 AM
10

That’s a pretty retarded logic you have there buddy, but I can’t expect more coming from regurgitated feminist rhetoric. Okay men kill more women than the inverse and? Whats the point here champ walk me through your thought process. So are we all men responsible for the actions of a few? Do you apply this same logic to every other group of people? Men also save more women than the inverse, can I get credit for all the women and all the lives I helped improve simply by the fact that I share a com…
/r/MensRights19/08/24 10:29 PM
2

It used to let me watch it on the website, now it doesn’t anymore neither on my iphone or on my PC without downloading the app
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 07:38 PM
2

Yes. But they also get overblown for comedic effect. No guy lives like that, that is the house of someone either moving or kicked out of his house or whatever. This is more akin to the average guy’s house. https://np.reddit.com/r/malelivingspace/s/ZyXC3K545x
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 06:25 AM
2

That’s just a meme. No dude actually lives like this this is just an over exaggerated way to say men are more minimalist.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 06:17 AM
0

Can’t watch the video because I refuse to download that chinese spyware app, but you didn’t specify at all she’s the only caretaker of the kids. This seems like a hell of a relationship to be in but if she’s gonna treat it like a business relationship then business relationship it is and she’s just the live in nanny for the kids and she better not say a word when he doesn’t lift a finger to help around the house. Also it better be spotless.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 06:03 AM
3

This is an insanely delusional take. I’m a dude and I constantly daydream about love stories I’ve seen on tv shows or movies. Is it? Im also a dude and I can say never in my life Ive daydreamed about fictional love stories. Ive daydreamed about sex scenes I watched particularly when I was younger and discovering porn but I don’t think that qualifies in the “romantic” sense. Same thing goes for most people. Got any stats on that? As far as we now romantic novels/literature/cinematography are prim…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 09:08 PM
-2

Okey dokey
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:59 PM
-10

Good to see you’re consistent then. You just struck me as the whiteknightey type .. for some reason
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:49 PM
0

Well by the same token it isn’t misogyny either
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 11:33 PM
5

There are a lot of “incels” that were the beta buxxers to begin with. The meme didn’t just grow out of thin air.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 04:28 PM
2

1) Because women are not a monolith and a lot of women say a lot of different things And Actual data/studies (which help cut through the bullshit of 1.) say that people are happier partnered than being single, including women. Also I didn’t insult anybody and I have no problem getting dates Im apparently one of the rare men that are happy being single
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:33 PM
3

I think women being happy single They’re not. comes from the fact they no longer need men They do. and men are unkind and unhelpful enough to keep them from wanting men wtf does this even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 04:12 PM
–

Nursing is hard man. Who tf is saying otherwise?? But between having to clean old people shit or possibly dying or being crippled Id clean shit all day long. And honestly nursing is kinda the only job sector I can concede that is actually shit that women outnumber men, but lawyers and teachers, really?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 05:37 AM
–

Never said that. I guess drug is a hell of a drug.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 02:10 AM
–

My brother in law is a doctor. My half-sister is a lawyer, same as my dad. My sister and BIL are also parents to three kids; a baby, a toddler and a little girl. Their lives are stressful as fuck, on top of raising three little children they have very demanding jobs. My BIL works 8-10 hours a day sometimes more and while my sister has a lot more leeway with her job, she’s the primary caretaker of the kids. But they both work in big offices with air conditioning and drive big SUVs to work and to …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 01:58 AM
–

Every job can be stressful, even being a secretary. Im not saying being a doctor or a lawyer is easy, but it is a lot more cushy than being an oil rig worker where a screw up might cost your life. The “cushiness” is relative to other jobs genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:59 AM
–

Oh Im sure you know many people who say that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:47 AM
–

Those too Teaching LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:16 AM
–

Yes. Your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/24 12:13 AM
–

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 11:14 PM
–

Always the cushy jobs
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 10:39 PM
1

No, he’s 100% correct. Nihilism is the logical conclusion to the argument you presented. Let’s say someone follows your train of thought unfortunately in this game of survival we call life, nature doesn’t give a fuck if you find girlfriend ,wife , get cucked whatever. Life is inherently competitive, and women want to be with the men they want and shaking your fist at the state of things doesnt help you. I didnt say shit doesnt suck , but as a man myself I don’t operate under the assumption that …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 05:57 PM
12

You are 100% correct. However this is useless because I can guarantee you wouldn’t like where this train of thought can lead if we take it at mass scale. Never go full darwinist. Also you list all the downsides this does to men, but I’d gather going full darwinist ends up worse for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 05:31 PM
–

Women: “Men’s loneliness and lack of sex is their making they should fix it themselves, men are not owed sex from women” Men turn to porn Also women: “Noooooo not like that”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 03:43 PM
5

I don’t “think” this, it’s what data says. In relationships they’re about the same in terms of being violent and/or abusive, actually women might be more abusive than men, go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 11:48 AM
5

there is literal data about rape and murder. And there it is. The most batshit insane takes from apresonly. Pulling the nuke when talking about skirmishes. Also data about relationship rape and abuse is heavily skewed and its about 50-50. So no, mistreatment in relationships is not gendered. i don’t think its men’s job to mindread and just assume women are gonna mistreat them. if a woman mistreats a man, that’s on her and she sucks. its not the man’s fault for “being dumb enough to believe her”.…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:36 PM
3

Mistreatment is not tied to gender. Some people men and women mistreat their partners for several reasons, one of them is feeling they settled for someone, this isn’t unique to men, but I’d like to believe most people don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:12 PM
1

Competition of resources does not beget patriarchy. Yes it does
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 10:25 PM
3

This. OPs making it out to be as if the roles can be easily switched between the genders simply because other species adapted differently. This is also the base of the feminist argument that men can take the role of women and women the role of men. In reality it’s not that simple. Female mammals WILL ALWAYS have more parental investment by default because they carry their offspring inside them and are responsible for their feeding and survival for their first moments in this world. There’s also …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 10:14 PM
–

I have never heard any of the extreme shit I read online on real life (except by some feminists) because internet anonymity brings out the worst in people. If you say some of the things people say online you most likely get ridiculed, ignored out of the room or decked in the face. However I disagree with the notion that people online are an entirely different group from “normal” people. I find it hard to believe that many people are just neckbeards/legbeards that would be easily spotted on the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 02:35 PM
14

What a crock of shit. I thought it was going to be a good debate but I couldn’t stand past the first 20 minutes. It’s always so fun seeing these feminist intellectuals banging their heads against the wall trying to figure out “patriarchy” and its origins. The answer is so goddamn simple, but no, they theorize eloquently, missing the mark every single time because they can’t think outside the little box they set themselves in called ‘the feminist theory’. It’s like watching two flat earthers deba…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 02:52 AM
2

Definitely
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 02:20 AM
56

Ive watched some of his videos. He really comes off as a smug prick. All these pseudo intellectuals youtubers do. What does BMS stand for?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 03:05 AM
7

Just “discontinuing” us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/24 09:30 PM
5

I don’t see how it is a problem for young women. Older women generally can’t compete unless they have kept in great shape.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:27 PM
4

Older guys are more attracted to young women too
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/24 09:23 PM
1

Oh I believe the data that says that 60% of women are dating because I can contrast that with what men show. I don't trust self reported data about what women (or anyone for that matter) say. I prefer to trust objective data about what people actually do. Don't listen to what they say, watch what they do. So yeah your cherry picked data doesn't mean jack shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 03:52 AM
1

The one who is set in defending her preconceived notions is you. Women change their minds all the time, women say they don’t want to date until they do, women say they like a man’s personality, they don’t care about looks as much until they get dickmatized by some hot asshole, women say they rather find a bear in the woods right until the moment they fucking do and then go running and screaming to the first guy they see to save them, women say all men are trash except for her man, her man is per…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 02:00 AM
1

Self-report studies have many advantages, but they also suffer from specific disadvantages due to the way that subjects generally behave.[6] Self-reported answers may be exaggerated;[7] respondents may be too embarrassed to reveal private details; various biases may affect the results, like social desirability bias. There are also cases when respondents guess the hypothesis of the study and provide biased responses that 1) confirm the researcher's conjecture; 2) make them look good; or, 3) make …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 02:44 PM
1

Except more than 60% of them do. Women don’t primarily date from dating apps you’re grasping at straws now, just take the L and move on this trolling is getting old.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 06:40 PM
1

Thats what they say 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 02:13 PM
1

YOUNGER women are
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:22 PM
1

Not offended. I feel awkward because I don’t know how to reject women upfront and I don’t want to make them feel bad, so I usually act dumb and try to get away from the situation, it’s my “I have a boyfriend” exit strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:21 PM
1

Here we go again. It doesn’t matter what they say .. it matters what they do
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:01 PM
1

Ok then If the same amount of women and men are in relationships Overall. I was talking exclusively about young (gen z and millennials) people.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:53 PM
1

Its called cross checking data. Same amount of men and women are in relationships it just differs by age group. It’s in the same study you linked. I know you were just trolling a while ago but some effort into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:56 PM
1

No? They are in relationships with older men, you said it yourself. If you look at different age groups younger women tend to be in relationships while older women are single, the opposite happens with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 01:40 PM
1

Because my point is that more single women are currently not open to dating than single men. What you don’t seem to understand is you can’t take women’s words at face value. I already established women say one thing and do another. Women SAY they are not open, women still DATE more.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 01:12 AM
1

Source source source?? You need to back up your claim that they are entirely two different groups of women with no commonality (other than their relationship status) otherwise you’re just making assumptions and pulling things of your ass. For all we know the partnered women could have said exactly the same thing when they were single. Not like people change their minds, not like women constantly say one thing and do another in other realms too. Nonono that is not happening here according to you …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 02:19 PM
5

Fr? Obsessions? Do you mean like celebrities that happen to be married or just regular women you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:29 PM
3

Do you hit on married women?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 08:41 PM
1

The fact that women have at some point in their life been interested in dating is irrelevant to the fact that in the current day, less single women are open to dating than men. It’s not irrelevant at all. The point is that women say a lot of shit but act completely different to what they say. Which has been my point of this entire thread. Women SAY they aren’t looking to date. Women DO date more. I firmly believe that when it comes to their public perception, women are completely and utterly inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 04:58 PM
1

I’m not sure how many times I have to explain this but no, women are not dating more than men. I’m not sure why you keep insisting this when it’s not backed up by anything you’ve claimed. The only way this would be true is if we were to assume that all of the men who claim to be single are not dating at all and have no interest Do you even read what the fuck you are writing. WOMEN ARE DATING MORE THAN MEN. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 03:42 PM
1

Women aren't less open to dating. They are dating MORE than men. The women who are not single are not an active part of the dating market LMAOOO. "Women are less open to dating because there are less women on the dating market ... because they are dating" That's some sound logic you got there. You can make accusations and deflect all you want but you still don’t have actual evidence for the claim you made. Making things up is not an argument. Jesus. Literally this meme.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 06:13 AM
1

Yes I lumped them together because my claim was that men have more to lose if less women are on the dating market than men. But there aren't less women on the dating market. That's the point. There are a lot more (young) women entering relationships than men. The only thing men lose out on by dropping out compared to women is just sex. Which is rapidly being replaced by porn which also explains why men dropping out of the dating market is accelerating. You making it out to be like men lose more …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 02:51 PM
1

Men want sex more, you are lumping dating and relationships there which is kinda disingenuous. Women are not entering relationships at double the rate Millenial and gen z are dropping out entirely from relationships. More than 50% aren’t even looking for one, 60% of them are single while 30% of young (millennial and gen z) women are single. That is hard, cold data. No virtue signaling, no nothing. Don’t listen to what people say, watch what they do. Women are entering relationships far far more …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 01:36 PM
1

Men like sex more and might date in order to get, that’s no secret. It’s also no secret that they swipe right on anything to get laid. That doesn’t necessarily translate on men wanting a relationship. I’ll tell you an objective hard fact though: while women say they don’t want a relationship they are entering one at double the rate of men. Im sorry if facts hurt your feelings. Now let’s see the source for your statement that a lot of women end up as bitter cat ladies. It’s called having eyes and…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:00 PM
1

Tbf it’s true that a lot of women end up as bitter cat ladies. Men don’t have more to lose than women. Men don’t want relationships more than women, in fact millennials and gen z men are dropping entirely from relationships. 60% of young men vs 30% of young women aren’t in relationships, so tell me again which side doesn’t want relationships as much?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:40 AM
1

But I don’t see how it’s a revenge fantasy or a power play against men. They love to point out that women are happier single while men are happier in a relationship. The implication and subtext is always “women don’t need men but men need women so men better watch out because we hold all the cards” It’s more of a response to men saying that women will die alone with cats than a power trip. A lot of times this comes completely unprompted especially in female subreddits. There are not men telling …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 02:17 AM
1

Then you’re not paying attention or clearly biased because I see it brought up everywhere especially in female centered subreddits. They always LOVE to point out how women are happier single while men are happier partnered completely unprompted.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:24 PM
0

Yeah but there’s also the female revenge fantasy and I see that just as much as I see dudes relishing on the idea of the cat lady. Women seem to love rubbing it in men’s faces how they (allegedly) don’t need men and how they thrive alone while men do need women. Like they have this sort of a power trip. Difference is men’s revenge fantasy has some element of truth in it while women’s is just pure delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 09:05 PM
2

So… much less than men Aren’t women the ones who always bring up how women attempt suicide more than men? You didn’t answer my question at all. Who do you want to kill themselves more instead? I want no one to kill themselves, what a strange question.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:19 AM
1

Women over forty have the highest suicide rates among women Single women are three times as likely to kill themselves than married women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:52 PM
1

😂
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 06:50 PM
1

I love how sub par dudes be like "without men in the oil fields or paving roads society will collapse" It would. But sit at home unemployed while their elderly mother does his laundry lol Is that supposed to be a dig at me? Quite the picture you painted of me inside your head. Does it help make you feel better thinking of people you don’t agree as neckbeards? I'm a guy for what it's worth It’s worth less than nothing actually
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:35 PM
1

Do you think the modern average women has your skills?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:27 PM
1

No, you live in a bubble. People can cook. People don’t know how to feed a whole family out of chicken broth and whatever the hell you listed up there. That’s not some skill people learn outside necessity.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:21 PM
1

Also I feel personally insulted you said I would eat a bagged salad. Wtf is a bagged salad? That some shit only Americans would eat.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:15 PM
1

Then you’re an exception or you’re old, because that skillset is almost non existent in modern women outside traditional communities or third world countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:09 PM
1

You think modern women know how to do that??. You’re beyond delusional. You’re talking traditional women from 50 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:58 PM
1

Lol try again. Cooking. Is. Not. Difficult. Once you learn the basics that’s it. Then you can start making more complicated dishes of course, but the basics are not complicated, like at all. I can make a mean steak with salad, pasta, different types of rice, chicken breasts, boiled vegetables. It’s not hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:28 PM
1

Bruh cooking is not difficult, just apply seasoning and heat to food, boom. Done. Nobody is gonna be eating gourmet dishes in times of crisis, so yeah, delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:23 PM
1

Whatever needs to be done. And men are far more capable and far more willing to do it. You named plumbing, carpentry, auto repair, electrical wiring. Those are far more essential than cooking. Physical labor and fighting skills are also important skills in times of crisis. Jobs that tend to put you in danger? Men far more likely to do those as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:14 PM
1

Do you? I have a little bit of electrical skills but I don’t see what the fuck that has to do with your statement. If you think women are more skilled at things that are important during times of crisis you’re simply delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:00 PM
6

Lmaooo. This is 100% accurate IME. You’re arguing with women who haven’t set foot on a gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:42 PM
1

Lol delusional
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:37 PM
2

100% agree with the first paragraph. Not so much the second one. I don't think that's the reason women don't like to admit they need men. I already reply what I think in another comment so I'm just going to copy it here: I think because the way we as society see romance, sex and relationships women have a really hard time acknowledging they need men. They simply aren’t used to being the “active” part in the dynamic. Everything about women’s sexuality revolves around the idea of them being pursue…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:06 AM
2

Maybe. But single women are three times more likely to kill themselves. That sure doesn’t bode well for those other dozen reasons. https://www.standard.co.uk/hp/front/being-unmarried-makes-a-woman-a-higher-suicide-risk-6678947.html
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:00 AM
–

I think because the way we as society see romance, sex and relationships women have a really hard time acknowledging they need men. They simply aren’t used to being the “active” part in the dynamic. Everything about women’s sexuality revolves around the idea of them being pursued, of them being objects of desire instead of active participants and as such they feel something is truly wrong or “broken” if they admit they want men because that upsets the order. Men should want them, men should seek…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:52 AM
2

Why do you think it is?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:27 AM
0

Single women over forty have the highest rates of suicide
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:14 AM
1

the "gene pool" is an almost exclusively male concern Well duh, of course it is
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:09 AM
–

Hard to say what women really want. For every woman I hear saying “I don’t give a shit about men I’d rather be alone” I hear another complaining about loneliness and not being able to find a partner. I don’t know which group is bigger but according to stats women aren’t doing much better than men in terms of loneliness and unhappiness. Sometimes I feel like women admitting they need a relationship is sacrilege nowadays as the implication they might want/need a man is some sort of admission of de…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:53 AM
1

I was trying to point out to you that even though I had a similar experience, I didn't let It stopped me from developing healthy platonic relationships with men No you just think less of those relationships . After all friendships with women are selfless and effortless and supportive and friendships with men are … kind of a hassle but cool I guess? Totally not biased at all. Nope. No bias around here. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 01:04 AM
-2

Making friends with a woman is generally going to be a supportive selfless engagement and there is no obstacle to it It's real easy to disdain a group of people when it's only the bad actors who have ever reached out to you Yeah, you have to watch your biases, It takes actual reflection and effort. Give it a go 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 12:50 AM
1

It's real easy to disdain a group of people when it's only the bad actors who have ever reached out to you LOL the self awareness of this comment I hope you get some experiences like that where you're valued for who you are and taken advantage of. I have. My guy friends. I have a close group of friends all the way from highschool. After reading what so many men go through with loneliness and having experienced it to some degree when I was in college and was really homesick Im ever so grateful fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 12:12 AM
1

Sadly it has been an all to common dynamic throughout my life to call any friendship with women worthwhile. Im in my late twenties
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 10:39 PM
1

I have the opposite reaction. I find them so utterly pathetic that their opinions absolutely lose any value to me. The moment I find out they’re simps and/or male feminists I have an automatic disgust reflex and just keep scrolling they’re not even worth my anger.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 10:01 PM
0

Making friends with a woman is generally going to be a supportive selfless engagement and there is no obstacle to it. Making friends with a man is not guaranteed to be a relaxing experience and when it happens naturally, great! No problem! As a woman maybe. As a man Id rather crawl through broken glass than make friends with women. IME there is absolutely nothing to be gained and a fucking bunch of expectations placed upon you because many think like you do that men only want to fuck them which …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 09:43 PM
5

Wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 06:15 PM
2

Keep moving the goalposts buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 05:56 PM
20

heres another post: "Why do heroes always need to be described as the largest men in the whole world" in which the OP claims that a book "had the lead described as “at least a head taller than the largest of the men around him”, when the men around him are huge barbarians. It feels like every book I read nowadays features an absolute beast of a man. " LOL r/womenwritingmen This reads as the female version of “she breasted boobily down the stairs” meme
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 03:28 PM
5

Yes I believed things people told me when I was a child. Then I grew up and realized a lot of what I was being told was a lie, y’know, like stop being a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 04:50 PM
4

Everyday you guys keep proving the redpill when it says women are like children. I really want to give you guys the benefit of the doubt but when it comes straight out of the horses mouth its kinda hard to.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 03:24 PM
4

Both parties lose out and women lose more. Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 03:20 PM
0

Its not because it “offends us” this is just women cope because their egos took a hit. It’s because there are tangible downsides for men who were settled for. Countless of stories about men getting shafted by women in relationships where they are putting a ton of effort being the perfect guy only to end in a db scratching their heads not understanding how him doing all the chores plus funding her lifestyle doesn’t get him laid with is own wife. Countless of stories about men getting fucked over …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:14 PM
4

No I don’t believe women have to cook for me, however if she happens to invite me to some homemade dinner on the first date Im not going to say no to that and if the dinner is good those are some serious brownie points on her favor.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:30 PM
6

Because maybe he doesn’t expect it, just would be a nice gesture.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 11:26 PM
1

No. Anyone with reading skills and comprehension can see you are too stupid and/or batshit insane to be in a discussion. You’re throwing baseless assumptions and words like ‘misogyny’ and ‘entitlement’ without any fucking clue whatsoever what they mean, you just don’t like when men hold women to any standard whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 11:35 PM
–

Besides her past is none of your business If she wants to be with me her past is pretty much my business. You should prove to her that you are in fact worthy Goes both ways. Wtf is this “sit down shut up and do as I say, no questions asked”?. GTFOH with that shit Im not your dancing monkey.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 07:48 PM
–

Man it’s like their brain short circuit trying to understand this basic concept. Apply it to literally anything else and watch how a light bulb turns on over their heads. Would someone be okay having to pass more requirements for obtaining something other people got way easier and with less effort? Jobs, money, gifts, skills you name it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 07:16 PM
17

I could see myself down that career path Celibacy coaching: Close your legs Where’s my $1000??
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 08:32 PM
-5

Women are not getting killed or raped on OLD, not in any considerable amount. Shouting “RAPE” every goddamn time women complain about any issue where that isn’t even a substantial factor has gotten really fucking old at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 08:26 PM
22

Now she's become a celibacy coach, offering courses and guidance to women who've begun their own celibacy journeys. For $1,000, clients can register for eight weeks of private, one-on-one sessions. Interest has been so high that Jeppe's been able to make coaching her full-time job, alongside content creation. Jesus Christ, and people complaining about redpill grifters
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 07:49 PM
23

Every time I read one of these fem articles I feel like throwing up rainbows and pink glitter. They have to sugarcoat and paint everything women do in blinding pink pastel colors. Men not having sex: look at these incel losers who can’t get laid!! 😡😡 Women not having sex: ohmagerd! she’s finding her femininity and tenderness and self care and establishing boundaries for her body and blahblablherg 🤮🌈🦄🦄💅🏻💅🏻💖💖🌸🌸
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 07:25 PM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 09:56 PM
1

I have no idea. I haven’t visited that sub since it was quarantined.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 08:44 PM
1

Well idk man, Im getting a lot of conflicting messages here. All I have to say is things don’t just magically happen, if you want something to change you have to do something about it, but it starts and ends with you, nobody else can force you or do it for you. And that goes for everything not just the romantic aspect. Best of luck to you, being on the spectrum must be a bitch when it comes to socializing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 08:36 PM
2

How would you start from basicaly zero? I mean no friends to introduce you, you don't enjoy any social hobbies, you don't drink, don't enjoy parties, don't like loud enviroment like parties. Where would you even start really from zero? Well this is way above my pay grade. In all honesty you should seek professional help, I don't think any reddit advice is truly going to really help you. First of all I'd be curious to know how you reached this point in your life, usually being a shut in the way y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 06:12 PM
2

Do you think that the purpose of the sub is to hate all men and not to ever find a good relationship? Yes. FDS was just femcel central with the guise of relationship advice subreddit. At their peak their only purpose was to shit on men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:42 PM
4

Sounds like you resigned yourself to be alone then. That’s fine but in your original comment you said you wanted to meet someone by simply existing. That’s not going to happen if you stay inside a room your whole life. People need to be at least able to see you to approach you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 05:06 PM
8

Talk to guys you like. That's it. It doesn't even have to be flirtatious just try and make small talk if you are not comfortable being flirty, they'll probably take it from there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:55 AM
1

I think you’re just having a mental breakdown trying to downplay women’s hatred of men as men having their feefees hurt while at the same time overblowing every instance of women having their feefees hurt as harassment, rape and murder which is a very commonly used feminist strategy. “mIsAnDrY iS mEn BeInG aFrAiD wHaMeN woN’t DaTe tHeM, mUhSoggYkNeEs iS wHaMEn bEiNg AfRaiD MeN wILl kiLL tHeM” Yeah okay Becky 👍 we heard you the first fourth trillion times
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 10:43 PM
0

I still remember the day I was called a "fat ass bitch" randomly just walking home from the cafeteria bc I didn't respond to a guys "I'm trying to fuck ayo what's your at". “Nooooo misogyny is everywhere men insult wahmem all the time” 3 doritos later … Touch the fucking grass. Misandry is women hurting your feelings where misogyny is women dying because they rejected them..it's so fucking fragile that means words are tantamount to violence except the actual physical, sexual and societal violenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 10:28 PM
0

Lol PPD is a pimple on TwoX massive asscheeks Are you seriously comparing a sub with 15M subs to a sub with 100K??
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 05:48 PM
1

Everyone spews their worthless opinions on the internet, men and women. Shocker. If you don’t care then wtf you are even complaining about?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 01:33 PM
–

When have women EVER listened to or even needed for that matter male dating advice? Gender flipping everything redpill says doesn’t make it a thing
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 05:08 AM
–

What? It doesn’t have to be about themselves specifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 01:03 AM
1

I find it telling that women who follow this cunt are probably the ones reeeing at dudes like Andrew Tate and the like.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 01:01 AM
–

A bunch of female posters here have the need to always paint women as victims. Even if the scenario is completely detached from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 11:11 PM
2

Aren’t they? How do you know women are interested in him? My guess is he’s just not that interested in dating. Outside multimillionaires and celebrities the red pill fantasy that women are throwing themselves at Chad isn’t true. Even Chad has to put in some effort, if he does truly want to get women he needs to put himself out there, if by all accounts what you’re saying is true then I bet he could pull women just fine but women aren’t gonna magically fall from the sky and land pussy first on hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/24 09:26 PM
–

The article you linked in no way shape or form disproves or even counters what I'm saying. Learn to read ffs. You still have provided no evidence. Scenario 2) is lacking a few things. You're laser focusing on scat for whatever reason. The women in those scenarios did a lot more than just getting shit on. They were beaten, gangraped, had various objects hands and fists shoved into them, they were thrown of boats and submerged in water against their will. Also made to consume shit and piss iirc. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 09:01 PM
1

I'm the dark knight biatch
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:43 PM
–

Someone who develops a shit fetish (literally) likely has less self respect than someone getting paid the average person’s yearly salary (or more). You have no basis to make this claim because 1) You don’t know that. Fetish and or kinks don’t necessarily develop from trauma, but Im not an expert so if you have actual info and not your preconceived notions Im all ears. 2) They can be richer than Bill Gates and it still won’t buy their self worth back. They literally leave traumatized because if m…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:03 PM
3

Honestly I haven’t really jerked to or watched AI porn yet and Im kinda scared to. I have jerked to hentai in the past so I kinda feel AI would just be a step up from that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 03:43 PM
–

To me they are both disgusting. But if the one doing it because she has a fetish and likes it I can kinda respect that, so yeah she would have more self worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 03:36 PM
1

The only seething femcel here is you even if you try to larp as a stacy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:52 PM
3

I mean I don’t think you wanna go that route. Plenty of ancient civilizations regarded men as the more aesthetic gender. It certainly doesn’t back up your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:51 PM
–

It’s an expression, jesus christ it just means men do it because they like it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 01:31 PM
–

Missed the point entirely
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:15 PM
–

Men like fucking. Even if the girl isn’t the most attractive lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:08 PM
–

Yes please go your own way
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 06:19 AM
1

What is women’s number 1 priority?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 06:12 AM
–

There was an article published recently I think he’s referring to that. Apparently it’s come to light many cases of instagram influencers being flown to Dubai by filthy rich men/sheikhs for prostitution. What they thought would be a “standard” evening turns out to be a nightmare of the most degrading shit imaginable. They are heavily compensated but plenty come out traumatized.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:59 AM
–

That’s even worse lol. At least men do it for the “love of the art”. Women are just being filthy whores and not even the good kind, its the disgusting no self worth kind lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:47 AM
–

Man for being a lesbian you sure like to womansplain how men should act to us
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:40 AM
2

Man, wish I hadn’t go searching for her. She’s annoying af and her takes are shit-tier femcel material.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 10:16 PM
1

https://youtu.be/dWNvlyycWzQ?feature=shared
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 09:16 PM
1

Not a boomer, boomer
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 08:48 PM
1

Okay boomer
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 08:29 PM
–

So oppressed you poor thing 🥺😢🎻
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 05:51 PM
–

As a Gen Z woman in America let me explain our tendency to use dark humor to come to terms with our grim reality. 🙄 Here let me play the world’s tiniest violin for you 🎻
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:37 PM
–

It does matter. The main factor of the hypothetical is the danger each subject poses for women man vs bear. Baring the obvious answer that bear is more dangerous and everyone with the tinniest bit of rational thought can see that, the option “man” is so very obviously done with the intent of making a “men suck” political statement, because shitting on men as a whole is a-okay. Adding race it’s just expanding on that premise (the danger posed to women). But women won’t touch that with a 10ft pole…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:22 PM
–

The hypothetical is a "solo" man, who, in most women's experience, is likely to initiate some awkward and desperate interaction with a lone woman. And men have no problem admitting they prefer pursuing lone women in non-social spaces, it's the last resort for awkward and unpredictable men. No, that’s just your twisted warped view of the world because you’re a schizo. 99% of dudes in the woods would be just as scared as the women of being alone in the woods with a stranger. About 0.01 would be a …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 04:04 PM
–

It absolutely is relevant. Who do you think would be more likely to be violent a white, black or palestinian dude? Because there are stats on that. The hypothetical is absolute dogshit from the get go and OP is right, its only purpose is to make a political statement. The only one being a bad faith hypocrite is you buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/24 03:48 PM
2

Right. Apparently women shitting on men online is not real but red pill and the manosphere is a real and actual threat deserving of funding and CIA intervention.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 04:20 PM
1

Im not talking you specifically, Im saying women/feminists in general
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:07 AM
2

Im just gonna copypaste my other comment: The purpose of answering "Bear" was to convey just how terrifying it is to be a woman in today's world. It was to say, "Hey, shit is bad out here, fix your shit men!". No one knew it would blow up like it did, and now it's too late - we have to own this position. If this was your purpose then no wonder you failed spectacularly. Like it really boggles my mind how women actually believe this. “In today’s world” bitch have you any fucking clue what the worl…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:17 PM
–

That didn’t happen 50 years ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 10:53 PM
–

Then maybe you should stop
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 10:15 PM
–

Good ol kafkatrap
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 09:57 PM
–

The purpose of answering "Bear" was to convey just how terrifying it is to be a woman in today's world. It was to say, "Hey, shit is bad out here, fix your shit men!". No one knew it would blow up like it did, and now it's too late - we have to own this position. If this was your purpose then no wonder you failed spectacularly. Like it really boggles my mind how women actually believe this. “In today’s world” bitch have you any fucking clue what the world was like 50 years ago?. You failed to co…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 09:35 PM
2

Nietchze’s take is actually based. Schopenhauer’s take is dogshit. Aristotle was just gae.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:27 PM
2

The stats directly contradict your claim. If women are not interested in relationships then why are more than half of them in one? Among singles, single men were more likely to desire a relationship than single women As the saying goes “don’t listen to what they say, watch what they do”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 05:09 PM
–

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/3868557-most-young-men-are-single-most-young-women-are-not/amp/ Literally 2 seconds of google
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:42 PM
1

Damn straight
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 07:19 AM
2

Incorrect. 60% of men aged 18-29 are single compared to 30% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 06:41 AM
3

Simply put women aren't worth it. I much prefer my freedom. Also I don't plan on marrying. Ever. Marriage as an institution is broken and has just become a business to fuck people (particularly men) over.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 04:16 AM
2

😘
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:42 AM
2

Oh shit, you’re not playing dumb. You’re actually dumb. My bad. But I don’t feel like dealing with this. Carry on then
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:33 AM
2

Ohh come on bb, we both know it’s not just a “harmless joke”, there’s a lot of subtext under it let’s not play dumb here
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 01:14 AM
2

I don’t know what I just read All I know is that “watch me fuck this stranger because he agrees with my ideology” is as pathetic as it can get
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 12:23 AM
2

Good thing I didn’t have the need to bring up having sex up as the sole unit of value I have then
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 11:14 PM
2

Nah. I didn’t need the mental image of a female dweller of this sub having sex. Thanks for that btw
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 10:51 PM
1

🤮🤮
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 10:28 PM
–

Yeah, while I agree with the overall message this comes off as an upper class white woman pissing on people beneath her. Reality: the wealthiest and most successful men are almost exclusively married to well-educated high-achieving women within 5 years of their age, first of all. Reality: most people are neither wealthy nor successful Men in serious lines of work What does this even mean? I can only assume when you guys talk about this being the preference for “successful” men, you mean “owns hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 04:38 AM
1

Both. They agree with a lot of foundational stuff when it comes to gender dynamics but red pill is male centric and doesn’t cater to or makes an effort to accommodate women and the reverse can be said for pink pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 01:13 AM
1

I already explained this, remember? Women who are harassed and pestered want that attention to go away. Women who are ignored and never have a shot don't want to be ostracized entirely. The two statements should not be contradictory in your head unless you foolishly expect all women to behave the same and to treat all interactions with all men exactly the same. You realize your view that "women", a group that constitutes literally billions of people, should behave as a unified collective is comp…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 07:35 PM
1

Is being ignored not finishing last? Not according to women. Maybe you should get your speech straight. Are men such hindrances to women they hare happier alone or not? Pick a lane already. You’re the one who went off on a tangent about how women get insulted for being ugly, I merely responded to that. As for the OP I agree, at least in part. I don’t think generally speaking “nice” women always finish last however I do believe “nice” women do undoubtedly better than “nice” men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:45 PM
1

Of *course* you're making it personal. I wasn't bullied. But I have eyes and ears. I can see that women who are not regarded as attractive are not treated so well. And even if they are not actively bullied, being ignored and alone is something lonely men claim is cruel and unfair torture-- so why do you dismiss it as unimportant when it happens to a woman? I have eyes and ears as well. You're greatly overestimating how people mistreat ugly women. 99/100 they just leave them alone. Now you can ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 02:37 PM
1

Great, you’ve solved bullying entirely— as long as most people aren’t bullies, bullying doesn’t exist and doesn’t matter! /s, if it wasn’t obvious. Never claimed that. But this is PPD an we discuss generalities and trends and you are trying to pass some fringe cases as if it is the norm in everyday life of unattractive women. It’s not. Sorry you were bullied when you were a kid but you have to let it go now. Women who get ignored or treated horribly, would probably like to get some interest beyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 01:37 PM
1

I did not claim all men call ugly women mean names, only that unattractive women get called mean names Everyone gets called names at least once in their lifetime. Big shock there. We’re talking about generalities and trends here. Men by and large don’t bully women like you’re describing. A problem I also referenced in my original comment when I said “if they notice them at all”. And according to the men who complains about “nice guys” finishing last, being left alone entirely is exactly what fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 01:41 AM
2

So most men I presume. This is not something I have witnessed beyond highschool bullying. And when I witnessed it was mostly done by other girls. People aren't assholes unprompted to nice but unattractive women like that. They just leave them alone (which is another problem unto itself and not what you initially claimed).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 07:26 PM
5

if you ask me, probably just that women aren't delusional, shitty and dumb enough to attribute their failures and trials to being "too nice". that is a transparent justification for not being nice, and such a complete misunderstanding of niceness that it raises questions about whether the person is even theoretically capable of being nice at all. Lol you have actual NiceGirlsTM doing this in this same post. Give me a break women try to sanctify themselves as being "too nice", "too caring", "putt…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:56 PM
3

Ugly nice girls are called dogs and cows and all sorts of hateful things. Men generally assume ugly girls are not nice, if they ever notice such women at all. That sounds incredibly mean an not something men at large do, just some very few assholes. Like it sounds more like highschool bully stuff than an every day occurrence.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 05:13 PM
1

Pink pill is just female red pill. They are mirror images of each other and have a lot of overlapping in their gender views so you are actually still agreeing with redpill. your right this behavior was around long before the red pill became a thing, we just called it different things like PUA for example. Even before that lol. Men have been doing this since time immemorial.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 03:48 AM
0

You don’t have to go to radfems. Plain ol regular feminists will do
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 03:36 AM
0

Lol what a delusional take. You don’t even have to be redpill/chad/alpha/whatever to do any of those things. Men have been doing those things since before redpill was a thing. You don’t even have a clue what redpill even is seeing as your flair is “purplepill” that means that you at least partially agree with some redpill takes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 02:53 AM
2

You’re glossing over the fuck ton of women where that is the expected dynamic. I don’t agree with the extreme take that men solely spend on women but there is some level of truth to whats being said.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 10:12 PM
16

Some people don't understand the women's reasons for the choices, apparently. We do. They’re stupid as fuck. Like actually braindead. But they serve the purpose I guess which is rage bait. “Hey would you rather get hit in the face with a boxing glove or have your skull bashed in by a metal baseball bat?” “tHe wOrSt a BaSebAlL bAt cAn Do iS kILL YoU”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:25 AM
2

Hell make it 100%. You’re bound to get catcalled at least once in your lifetime unless you never leave your house.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:42 PM
2

Feminism never was about equality, not even from the beginning, its just that at their conception they couldn’t adopt the anti male rhetoric they have now. If they had gone out full guns blazing like that they wouldn’t have gain much following, especially from men as they needed men to also be onboard. So they sugarcoated their raison d’etre behind a more humane message that everyone could get on board with: equality. But that’s not what the movement is or was ever intended to be. The real objec…
/r/MensRights01/05/24 02:23 PM
1

I know in your head it doesn’t, but trust me it does. Why do women have the NEED to debate on the most basic inane shit no one else in their right minds would think would be controversial takes? You are a lesbian that dresses masc and get objectified? Guess what, try on some booty shorts and a low cut top or a tight dress and go out on the streets. I can assure you mUh oBjEcTiFicAtIoN is going to be x100 worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 10:13 PM
–

Yeh that’s what I thought about coming to this post at first. PPD being a sub where generalizations and discussions about current trends are the norm. When you read a post like this, you read “women” as “a number of women where its enough to be a thing” not “every goddamn woman on planet Earth”.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 09:43 PM
–

I see nothing about OPs post being in bad faith when there are red pilled posters who come here and say that women should be held accountable daily with some even going as far as hoping bad things happen to women as a consequence for their actions Maybe its because we are all not red pillers who come here and say that women should be held accountable daily with some even going as far as hoping bad things happen to women as a consequence for their actions
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 04:08 PM
1

The reason I asked about it all is because a person cannot objectify themselves. It's literally something that another person does to others. It's not influenced by clothes, location, age, anything. If a person chooses to objectify another person, that's on them. Well, see objectification happens ALL THE TIME. And done by women the same as men. I know women tend to believe their love is pure and they love their partner for “who they are”. It’s all bullshit. Everyone objectifies at some degree. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 04:01 PM
–

OP was referring to women as a whole not some extremely niche segment or women like you’re trying to do. Which is why this whole post is dogshit and just bad faith arguing. You can’t hold an entire group of people accountable for the actions of a few. That was the whole point of bringing up rape and SA from men. Women as a gender cannot be held accountable same as men as a gender cannot be held accountable, but that was before I realized OP was just setting a trap so I thought he meant “enough w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:42 PM
1

So now you moved from jeans and t shirts to more generic top and trousers. I think women tend to wear a much more broader array of clothing than men. There’s a line where some piece of clothing goes from being okay/normal to having the obvious objective of grabbing attention. Which isn’t bad per se, I never claimed it was, but if it is then just fucking own it and don’t play victim afterwards (Im talking about objectification, not rape, rape is never justified).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:19 PM
1

Jeans and T shirt isn't what men wear? No, it isn’t all men wear and I highly doubt that’s what most women are wearing. Stop worrying about what women are wearing and stop harassing them. You are the one who asked me what should women who don’t want to be objectified do you weirdo
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:08 PM
–

Most women are dressed like men Highly doubt it Stop looking to blame women for men’s behavior ??
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:04 PM
1

The vast majority of men don’t commit rape or SA either. The analogy is equivalent for both sides I don’t see how thats not apt for you, retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 03:02 PM
–

1.Dress modestly. 2.Don’t upload pictures of your ass for the internet to see. 3.Profit
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:58 PM
–

Enlighten me genius one
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:52 PM
–

Sigh .. if that’s what you take from it
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:46 PM
–

I already replied this is just bad faith lazy arguing
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:33 PM
–

I now see this is just a bad faith argument. You’re referring to “women” as the entire gender. It’s impossible to hold an entire gender accountable for the actions of some of its members, we are not feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:31 PM
–

Conduct yourself in a way that doesn’t lead you to be objectified by the masses if that isn’t what you want, it’s not that hard. I know where you are going with this “but women are objectified wearing burkas”. Yes and that’s a problem, but objectification is never going to completely disappear, some men are just going to do it and they should 100% also be held accountable for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:20 PM
–

Billions of men don’t commit rape or sexually harass women. How do those men hold themselves accountable? Im obviously not talking about the entire gender here dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 02:13 PM
–

For me it comes down to the hypocrisy I see from (a lot of) women everywhere. It boils down to pick a lane. Be consistent in your morals and ideals. Women one hand will complain about being objectified by men and how life is so difficult because of that, then on the other hand will post a picture of her ass front and center on social media. And before people come telling me "those are different women", no they're not, A LOT of times they are the very same women. This is just one example off the …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 01:56 PM
1

I’ve always been a solid 6 I believe, but now that Ive started taking my training and gym seriously Id say I have gone up one point at least. I notice people looking at me more, sometimes it makes me a little self conscious because Ive never experienced it at this level. Also people seem more chatty and friendly but because Im more on the introverted side a lot of times I can’t take full advantage of that. Id say for people who can take full advantage of it and exploit it well, pretty privilege …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 11:49 PM
6

Meh. I don’t think it’s important at all. Maybe it could be a good thing, maybe it could be beneficial, but not important. I think it’s very important for men to have (good) male friends. Same applies for women and female friends tbh, but I think women get more benefits from male friendships than viceversa.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:09 AM
9

Not that women are great with consent either https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sexual-victimization-by-women-is-more-common-than-previously-known/ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374715014_Rates_of_Male_Sexual_Coercion_Comparison_with_Female_Rates_and_Comparison_Between_Sexual_Orientations
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:17 PM
1

Right. This isn’t about any individual problem but the principle that is at stake. But also if you look at stats women in relationships coerce men into sex almost as much as men coerce women, it just isn’t accounted as sexual harrasment/rape because I guess societal views and in some countries that is hardcoded into law (women are almost virtually incapable of committing rape unless they shove something up a man’s ass).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 04:09 PM
13

Holy shit. How is this even allowed?? LMAO what a shitshow
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 06:51 AM
7

Doesn’t surprise me at all. Women were quick to point out, mock and ridicule the rising stats of male loneliness and pass it off as “men need to level up”. Media has sold them the (false) message that women are thriving by themselves and the new liberated women of [current year] need no man. Meanwhile the actual stats tell a completely different story. Truth is men have always been the canary in the coalmine of large societal shifts. The wave of change is only just now starting to hit women, and…
/r/MensRights22/04/24 06:39 AM
–

She just needed the world to know she has so many options but none are worthy of her 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 06:14 AM
3

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:12 AM
6

So your comment is completely irrelevant then as this doesn’t even apply to you in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:02 AM
9

Why does it ALWAYS ends with the same bullshit with you people? You’re telling me out of thousands of guys there isn’t even three, four, ten, that could meet your requirements for dating? No, they must be all autistic neckbeards with no hygiene. Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 02:32 AM
3

Women’s go to insult when they don’t like what some man is saying/doing is incel, virgin, neckbeard. Wtf are you talking about. Did you expect the insults to be the same word for word?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 08:25 PM
3

I have one set of eyes, thanks. If you have two that may be the source of your problems with women. English is not my first language, sometimes those kind of mistakes slip by me. I’ve read the comments. There is no equivalency between (1) women calling men incels or whatever when they post their misogynistic screeds online about how women are all sluts who get used by chad and (2) men taking out their anger at being unsuccessful in sex and love on a woman whose post doesn’t even mention men. Ple…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 08:20 PM
3

What do you want me to enlighten you on? You have two set of eyes rights? Start fucking reading comments, posts and articles and shit women say
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:54 PM
1

No, the principle is the same. These attempts to justify one and condemn the other are pretty lame. Both are just people living their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter