TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

marauderp Archive

View 0 posts and 583 comments by marauderp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

You are easily one of the misogynist people I've run into on Reddit. You give women no agency whatsoever and deny that they have any innate worth.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 10:55 PM
2

What equality are you talking about? /u/SuperNova618 is saying that they are one of the "good" feminists, and there's a tiny number of bad feminists out there. All you need to know about anybody adopting the feminist label is that they think feminism is good and that they are one of the good ones and that they are a good person for being a good feminist. Any time you read "I'm a feminist" or "as a feminist" just translate that to, "I'm a good person." It'll save you a lot of trouble.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 10:48 PM
2

I don’t think hostility is necessary. Says the person who opens the discussion with "y'all are gross." Be the change you want to see in the world, asshole.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 10:26 PM
1

You claim that it shouldn't be about who has it worse, and then follow that immediately with: If you look at the statistics for female genital mutilation, child-marriages, and rape, women are affected in much higher numbers. And you clearly don't even know what those numbers mean, and most of the ones you've probably seen are wrong anyway.
/r/MensRights08/02/21 05:41 PM
3

You're a 22 year old "expert" lecturing people who know far more than you about what the world is really like. Any responses you receive are far more than you deserve. Maybe if you're honestly interested in getting people's opinions, just read for a while instead of injecting your own ignorance into the discussion. Your entire post screams, "I know nothing."
/r/MensRights08/02/21 05:39 PM
2

This is the only correct stance, unless you're either MM, one of the accusers, one of the lawyers, or a direct witness to the events.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 11:52 PM
4

Projection. Pure projection. Understand one thing: men don't hate women like women hate men.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 03:58 AM
3

Use your own two eyes? Somehow several dozen to a few hundred unarmed people managed to "storm" the capital, after which they mostly milled around and/or took dumb selfies and then left voluntarily when asked. How the fuck do you explain that? Insurrection? You can't expect anybody to believe that. It's obvious bullshit. Should the people who did illegal things be punished? Obviously, and pretty much nobody credible has said otherwise. Were the people who organized the "security" who fucked this…
/r/MensRights03/02/21 10:10 PM
3

I was under the impression that individual variance was far more important than some silly “gendered brain” thing. You were listening to constructivists, who are simply wrong. Yes, there is some overlap between the sexes on a lot of attributes. But in a lot of cases, the "spectrum" is not a slight shift of the average. It's a bimodal distribution.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 11:17 PM
3

At my work we have men and women working together and there are no issues whatsoever. Well clearly then you are 100% correct and honest about your own situation and can extrapolate your personal situation to the whole rest of human experience.
/r/MensRights02/02/21 11:09 PM
3

The shooter specifically went in to kill women Do you know anything else about that shooter? Like his motivations or upbringing? I'll bet not. It's always people like you who love to bring up things that you know nothing about.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 02:40 AM
3

You don't even know the history of your own country, and you want us to believe that you understand the entire rest of the world?
/r/MensRights28/01/21 05:04 AM
7

You know how I know you aren't a software developer? You're asking for ASM code in situations where it makes zero sense to use it. Your first example isn't even coherent enough to know exactly what it is that you're asking for.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 04:38 AM
3

Software dev in general is filled with special snowflakes who forgot what a honest day's work is. I say that as a software dev. You're spot on here. Modern software development (and modern software developers) make me cry.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 04:35 AM
5

It boggles my mind how some men's advocates could be against it. Because it's 100% based on false pretenses and half-truths?
/r/MensRights28/01/21 04:31 AM
2

By your (stunted) logic, a woman wouldn't shoot a more equal scene, she'd just shoot in a way that appeals to women.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 08:10 AM
1

Or were you comparing only first world MGM to the absolute worst version of MGM. No, they were just repeating what they've heard because they don't actually know anything about the topic.
/r/MensRights25/01/21 03:12 AM
3

Well I have good news for you: it probably wasn't because they were worried about touching it. They probably just didn't care.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 07:09 PM
2

When all factors are accounted for It's funny that you think that this is true. Shows that you don't know anything about statistics. And even though that first assertion told me everything I need to know about what you were likely to say... many feminists Weasel words. Look it up if you don't know what that means. Secondly, everyone makes the argument that men just tend to gravitate towards fields that pay more More weasel words. Who is this "everyone" you speak of? Whenever men enter a female d…
/r/MensRights21/01/21 10:26 PM
7

was friends with the US's most prolific child sex trafficker You really need better sources for whatever news you're getting. This is a ridiculous take. Some other "friends" of said trafficker: Matt Groening. The Clintons. Bill Gates. Many university professors. And besides that, guilt by association is a terrible standard.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 06:40 PM
1

I know people are going to hate this comment. Well yeah, it's completely pointless, unfounded speculation. Also: First I want to say that feminism, in my view, is about seeing women as whole real people warts and all. Nobody cares what your definition of feminism is. The only really important thing about "feminism" is that everybody who claims to be one thinks it's a Good Thing and that they are a Good Person for adopting the label.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 03:03 AM
3

Your vitriol is quite profound. Your word salad isn't.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 09:26 AM
2

Just like the SJWs that accuse everyone of being Alt-right and conservatives that call all democrats socialists. You're the one that started off with this action that you claim to be against. You just accused someone of being an incel, you imbecile.
/r/MensRights14/01/21 09:01 AM
1

So you're against people owning themselves and being able to choose what to do with their lives? Why would you be anti-capitalist?
/r/MensRights13/01/21 06:24 PM
1

I'm now trying to find a way to see if I can unpick the supernatural and crazy bits from the moral stories Look at it as purely allegory. 100%. Even revelations starts to make a lot of sense as allegory. Particularly with what's going on in the world right now.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 06:16 PM
1

As in more women are being prompted to live independently ect, less likely to simply live to marry and have a family, mainly because of gender roles becoming less important They still have the option of marrying someone and being taken care of to some degree. Men have no such option.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 06:13 PM
8

Yes, as a female MRA (and feminist), I try not to be at the forefront of this discussion, so I hope this is okay Of course it's ok. We're not feminists here. We don't tell people they have to get in line and know their place.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 06:07 PM
3

I appreciate your passion but I strongly believe in progress for both genders and non-binary people. The message you're replying to is almost certainly an obvious sarcastic troll. The fact that you were unable to recognize it as such should prompt you to pause and do a bit of reflection on why that is the case.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 06:16 PM
2

I can only speak for the studies I have read (and even then, it's been a while) which I do not believe were conducted by a feminist group. There are no other groups that conduct these sorts of biased, useless studies.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 06:08 PM
0

No, you're not oppressed, and neither are women. There's some shit you'll have to deal with as a man that women don't, and some genuinely unjust laws that affect only men, but taken as a whole, you're not oppressed. Live your life to the best of your ability. You'll probably be fine. Just like women.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 05:52 AM
2

the only question is why it exists That's the only question that ever mattered, yet it is never framed in a way that is more subtle than, "women are paid less for the same work!" which is absolutely a lie.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 07:03 PM
-1

Like when a neck beard says they want an Asian wife Christ you're a sexist, racist asshole.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:56 PM
1

"Why would we rely on quantifiable metrics like grades earned, degrees completed, and hours worked, when we can throw up non-measurable speculative things like 'fetishization'?" You realize you're just spewing "tired old rhetoric" yourself, right? You're making arguments that are decades old. Without data, it's just rhetoric, and you provide none. Just speculation. I notice that you didn't include in your list of hypotheses, "maybe they're doing better because they've been the beneficiaries disc…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:54 PM
-1

Good on you. Hope you're not annexed by China in the next 5 years while Biden and the rest of the west looks the other way.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:51 PM
4

You're not wrong. People don't understand wealth, and their envy has been stoked by decades of "progressive" messaging. I don't have a yacht and probably never will, but I don't really care that there are people who do because I have a pretty decent life where I'm free to pursue my interests. It only becomes a problem when all the people who do have yachts sail them to the World Economic Forum and decide that everybody else needs to have their wealth redistributed, and then use their power and i…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:49 PM
2

In many patriarchal societies men in general tend to have more rights than women How many? How many societies? How many rights? Can you enumerate them or do you just mouth the words that you've been taught? How many rights do women have in those societies that men don't? Oh? You've never even heard of those rights? Color me unsurprised. Your posts come across as a young-ish person (probably female) with a chip on your shoulder who doesn't know their own half of the story, let alone the whole sto…
/r/MensRights25/12/20 06:37 PM
1

What you mean by "true feminist" is "good person like me, who is a very good person because I'm a good person who believes the right things." That's all it means. But we already know that you think you're the best person in the world and that everybody who thinks exactly as you do are similarly Good People.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 05:12 PM
1

I'm not insulting you, I'm just letting you know that you're a hypocrite, and that you don't know what you're talking about. I'm helping you. But I won't be coming back to waste any more time in this thread, so feel free to have the last word if it makes you feel better.
/r/MensRights15/12/20 06:55 AM
2

You are ignorant. That's not an opinion. You literally don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 07:14 PM
3

There is nothing wrong with admitting that women experience one problem more frequently than men. I DO agree that we shouldn’t wash over violence perpetrated by women, but most people agree with that already. Good thing you came here to make sure that everybody knows that women have it worse. That's really the most important thing.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 05:39 AM
-2

You're all fucking insufferable.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 05:35 AM
3

So you're both ignorant and a hypocrite. Unsurprising.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 07:29 PM
9

You got lucky. Some of us didn't.
/r/MensRights12/12/20 03:50 AM
3

Just jeez what she said is soo wrong and just hurts my soul to know that she’s putting that out into the world. What did she say that's wrong? If you're referring to Christina Hoff Sommers, a.k.a. the Factual Feminist, I'm not aware of any blatant misinformation that she's spread. It should really tell you something that you can't recommend a good "feminist" subreddit because they're all crazy but for some reason you think feminism is somehow still a good thing. There's a good chance that what y…
/r/MensRights11/12/20 07:19 PM
15

And here it is: This situation has parallels in history. In Britain, the Great War robbed two million women of the men they would have married, causing huge social change. Men die in war, women most affected. The women were robbed of the men they were owed. Not, "it was a national tragedy where many men lost their lives and, subsequently, women were unable to find a man to live with." And they call men entitled?
/r/MensRights10/12/20 06:49 PM
1

I was expecting machismo and whatever else bullshit I’d expect from the idea of “man” in this day and age. Would you say that was a sexist assumption on your part? What do you think might have contributed to that potential sexism? I have seen and experienced the power that some men have, and have been controlled by it. What about women's power? Ever seen a man controlled by it?
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:54 PM
2

Do you think the hatred towards single moms That's just ridiculous. Not wanting to date somebody is not hatred. Not to mention, single motherhood is also a choice, and a poor choice at that.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 04:29 AM
1

Women weren’t allowed to be educated or publish books, women were banned from all public life. In what country?
/r/MensRights04/12/20 04:56 AM
2

Only time I’ve heard republicans bring that up is in the “what about black on black crime???” You haven't been listening very much. I suggest you get your news from Republicans from actual Republicans instead of listening to sound bytes of people describing what Republicans are saying.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 02:46 AM
5

Why should anybody engage with you when you just want to twist words and argue with your idiotic interpretations of the things they say?
/r/MensRights03/12/20 02:43 AM
6

This has been obvious since Obama gave a speech talking about how great it was that women earn 60% of college degrees and that we still had more work to do.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 01:32 AM
6

Sadly, I witnessed many hateful/misogynistic statements in the ESPN comments section. Oh, the humanity. There's never been a single disparaging remark on a sports-related comments section before this Strong Wombyn made a shitty kick in a virtue signal of unprecedented magnitude. Her interview was the worst: she was saving the world by being an example to all the girls out there who desperately want to play football.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 01:18 AM
4

In my experience, it's only been taxes to help people. They seem pretty happy to get taxed if it's for buying bigger, shinier guns to shoot brown people with half a planet away. First: 10-15 years ago I was like you. Reality: you don't understand the people you disagree with. You're an embarrassingly bigoted idiot.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 06:03 PM
2

A bachelor is an unmarried man. It has nothing to do with seeking a relationship or not. From dictionary.com bachelor 1 - an unmarried man 2 - a person who has been awarded a bachelor's degree And other archaic definitions that have nothing to do with men in relationships.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:37 AM
1

Bachelor is the term for a man who doesn't seek out relationships with women. No it isn't.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:33 AM
1

Hence why I said speculating. Maybe, if you're interested in learning, just ask questions (or read!) instead of gifting everybody your idiotic, uninformed speculations. "Better to be silent and thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt." and all that.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 03:24 AM
18

Men’s rights, doesn’t that mean all men But the transgender person mentioned wasn't a man. She was a woman. So what man's rights do you think you're standing up for here? Or are you misgendering her due to your transphobia?
/r/MensRights04/11/20 05:35 PM
4

I am trying to see men's point of veiw. No you're not. You're trying to get some free therapy for your family issues and trying to explain things that you don't understand to people who know more than you do.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:52 AM
5

As well as when a man is sexually assulted it is more likely to be another man rather then a woman. You don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:49 AM
2

Yeah, but according to the critical theory that all of your opponents believe in, your fighting back is proof of your guilt.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:44 AM
1

that's not even true though. first of all, controlled burns are effective at stopping forest fires, and even preventing them - they burn up all the fuel. Pfft. Found the climate denier.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:38 AM
5

I'm not a white man, but this is nonsense. I feel sorry for you guys, people making you all out to be the villains these days. I know plenty of white guys who grew up with less than me I grew up on the free school lunch program and had to beg for 5-year-old used computer equipment that I tracked down in classified ads. Taught myself BASIC, Pascal, C, and x86 Assembly before finishing high school. Haven't stopped learning new technologies for about 30 years now. I have been granted two patents fo…
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:31 AM
2

dont tell me idk what i'm talking about because of my age You don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about. You're a 16 year old child, have some goddamn humility.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:23 PM
-3

My mom wasn't allowed a credit card in her name. Your dad was responsible for every penny your mom spent, and would go to jail if he couldn't pay her debts. You didn't know about that part, though. I went car shopping at 25 and told to come back with my husband or boyfriend or dad because the salesman said he couldn't take me seriously. Bullshit. If you went car shopping at 25 and the salesman wouldn't deal with you, you were either wasting his time or he was an idiot for not taking you for ever…
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:56 AM
0

Scandinavia? You mean all of those market economies that are not socialist? Can you even name a Scandinavian country?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:45 AM
1

american public education at work here Hmm... Wouldn't you call American public education a ... socialist organization?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 06:43 AM
1

i’m not angry it’s just scares me. i have really bad anxiety so even asking for food at the shop is scary to me. i don’t know how to deal with it. That's a you problem. Only you can put in the work to get over your irrational fears.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 06:51 PM
1

why does it bother me so much Because you've been brought up thinking that you're better than the people who dare to catcall you. Grow up and get over it and realize that you're not special. If someone lays their hands on you, then that's crossing the line. If they follow you or corner you, that's crossing the line. But someone just saying something as you pass by, just be glad for the attention because it will not last, and trust me, you don't want to know what that's like.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 06:48 PM
0

This distinction is only meaningful if you also know what percentage of the male population is actually fighting. Otherwise, it's just numbers pulled out of your ass. And on top of that, even with that percentage of the male population being non-civilian, the male civilian casualties still outnumber women and children.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 10:15 PM
12

the whole point of blm is that black people are being treated worse by authority than white people Except that the statistics all disagree with this statement.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 07:52 PM
17

Elaborate on what happened. White people as a whole don't experience it like POC. Well, one of the things that we have to deal with is racist assholes insisting that we don't experience racism.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:44 AM
4

Get out of here with your racist bullshit. Nobody cares about your personal neuroses, or that you ran into one jackass woman.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 04:44 AM
4

100% projection.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 05:10 AM
3

So you should a few percent more scared than men are ... as if such a thing were even quantifiable and as if we should care about your largely irrational fears.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:42 AM
2

For example, women are often trusted more when it comes to custody of a child. That’s because gender roles state women are the caretakers and the homemakers, which is something feminism wants to end No, feminists state that. Look up the Tender Years doctrine. You're railing against something that previous feminists fought for.
/r/MensRights01/07/20 12:37 AM
7

I have some bad news for you...
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:20 PM
1

Here, let me give you a response that speaks the language you're probably looking for: It's not his job to do the emotional labor of educating you.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 06:58 PM
4

I am a woman, and it was honestly an epiphany as an adult for me to realize that men had the same feelings as women. Hell, I'm a man and it wasn't until I was 35 that I had the realization, "why someone who like me as a human being instead of as a walking wallet?" I'd basically been brought up by feminists to think that men offered absolutely nothing to women except money.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 07:10 AM
16

Just to be clear she's not a feminist Tell her that. And tell all of the other feminists who hate men that are in positions of power that. Quit white knighting for a label that people choose to apply to themselves. Judge people based on their actions. Most people who call themselves feminists are just female chauvinists; it's not a label worth defending.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 03:36 AM
6

I discovered Jordan Peterson, because he was so hated. ... like this hatred towards Greta Thumberg made me take climate change more seriously now Not really a good comparison. The 'hatred' directed in Greta's direction is mostly in the direction of the utterly abusive handlers that she has. I'm sure there are plenty of randos attacking her personally on Twitter, but most of her detractors in the actual media just think she's an idiot that doesn't know anything and is being used by the "cause" th…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:13 AM
-4

most people who aren't think will read "348 adults arrested" as "348 men arrested." That just is what it is. If you say there were 348 murderers, 348 muggers, 348 rapists, 348 whatever negative, people are just going to kind of most likely by default picture 348 men. The flip side of that though is that if someone mentions doctor, lawyer, scientist, astronaut, or whatever prestigious position, they're also going to most likely by default picture a man.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:00 AM
2

Sounds like she's just a garden variety anti-capitalist that doesn't hate men and/or worship women.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 04:12 PM
25

Feminists: "Feminism isn't about man hating!" Random person: "Boy, I sure get tired of man haters." Feminists: "Quit talking about us!"
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:37 PM
1

Naw dog, I'm out. Good call, man. You wouldn't want to sully your reputation by associating with us lowlifes. You're a much better person than us, what with the not being a bigot and all. I'd feel really bad if you spent too much time here and we corrupted you, because if there's one thing the world needs, it's more not-bigots -- particularly ones as brave as you are who will tell us real bigots how bad we are. Thanks for letting us know that you're not a bigot before leaving though, because oth…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:35 PM
0

OHHHHH, I thought you were saying that u hated them... That's amusing, because there were exactly zero mentions of anybody hating trans people in the thread, so it's difficult to see where you're getting the idea that someone in the discussion said that. Oh wait, I know, you just saw an opportunity to display your moral superiority to everybody else in the conversation and don't care at all about what's actually being said.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:28 PM
5

You want to vote for someone who thinks injecting bleach is a GREAT idea. No, he doesn't. If you read that somewhere, find a better news source. If you honestly believe it, seek help.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 01:25 AM
8

I've read many articles that prove to me the wage gap is real. Jobs that used to be male, lowered their salaries when women took over the industry. Teaching, design, etc were higher paying when men had those jobs. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/upshot/as-women-take-over-a-male-dominated-field-the-pay-drops.html https://www.payscale.com/career-news/2016/03/when-an-occupation-becomes-female-dominated-pay-declines https://www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/2018/06/17/opinion-female-dominated-jobs…
/r/MensRights26/04/20 01:18 AM
3

you thinking 50% of the population joining the work force You thinking that 50% of the population wasn't already in the work force just shows your ignorance.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 06:54 AM
5

I definitely see where you’re coming from. Everyone who’s commented yet apparently thinks that I hate men I've read nearly the entire thread thus far and I haven't seen anyone accusing you of that. You just don't know what you're talking about and people are calling you out for it.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:27 AM
2

There was recently an article where the US soccer league said they paid women less than men because being a male soccer player took more skill. Well, it does. Women's world cup national teams practice against local 15-year old boys teams and lose. Badly.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:24 AM
9

You’re saying that all feminists are bad No he didn't. The label itself is bad. Quit using it. Take anything said by a self-identifying feminist in the name of feminism with a huge grain of salt. Assume that they don't know anything about the history of the label they've adopted.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:19 AM
12

Maybe we should just drop the label feminist. That'd be good. The only thing that I hear when someone says "I'm a feminist" is: "I think I'm a good person." Well, good for you. The term is utterly meaningless. We'll judge you by your actions, not by what label you choose to apply to yourself. Of course, claiming the label "feminist" and running defense for it is an action in itself...
/r/MensRights04/04/20 03:17 AM
38

Brock Turner didn't rape his victim under California law He didn't rape her at all. They were in the middle of a drunk hook-up, some simp idiots came and started yelling at him, and he ran off. The drunk chick that had been into him all night and left with him under her own power then decided that he raped her to save herself the embarrassment ... and also to absolve herself from the fact that she chose to go out, get wasted, and to cheat on her boyfriend. Brock Turner is guilty of nothing excep…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 01:22 AM
3

The person you're responding to is responding to the image, not to you. Calm the fuck down.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 08:06 AM
5

However it is difficult on this sub, in another comment I'm told I'm gatekeeping for just giving the definition of feminism, over here the people who are more balanced are silenced so we don't bother trying to contribute to the conversation because it's pointless. You aren't silenced, you're disagreed with. Try arguing against feminists on a feminist-run sub -- then you'll see what silencing actually is.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:48 AM
3

men who think that every woman should give them sex Can you name a single man who actually thinks this? I've never encountered one in my lifetime.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 08:32 PM
6

You probably have the luxury a mother who's never done anything to deserve a punch. If your mom regularly got violent with you, you might not have such solid feelings.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 08:30 PM
43

For most of human history and for a long part of US history women weren't allowed to vote Neither were men. own property Yes they were. You've been fed a half-truth. work Yes they were. file for divorce Yes they were. Divorces were more difficult to get. The same restrictions applied to both men and women. accuse their husband of rape Do you know what the definition of 'rape' was up until the 1990s? It'll surprise you! Also, are you aware of what the definition of 'rape' is now? It specifically …
/r/MensRights31/03/20 07:29 AM
4

as we have seen Barr will act in a hyper partisian manner, interfere in prosecutions and stop/block or alter investigations for political reasons. Projection. Utter projection.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:05 AM
3

Islam is shit for everybody.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 12:22 AM
27

The internet is very hateful towards feminists Says the self-declared feminist who enters the conversation calling someone a hateful moron. You get everything you deserve.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 12:04 AM
1

I'm trying to look at this from a different perspective No, you're looking at it from your perspective. It's funny that literally everybody else in this comment section says "we should give it to everybody, regardless of sex" and Ms. "I'm being open minded here" thinks that it would be best if people that look like her are prioritized. What a coincidence!
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:22 PM
5

You are literally the only person making arguments from assumptions in any of the threads that you've been shitting up for the past few hours. YOU are the one that's full of shit. There is no way to for you to know what you're claiming to know without some sort of proof, and you have provided none. The only things you've done is exhibit several very stereotypical behaviors: a) women most affected (9:1 male to female deaths but we should really care about the women and the men all deserved it) an…
/r/MensRights13/03/20 05:00 AM
6

And out of those 8 how many of them were cartel against cartel? 8. Do you have a source for this? How many of the women were gang bangers? Do you realize that, in fact, women are actually capable of being criminals?
/r/MensRights13/03/20 04:40 AM
8

again, proof of your claim No, you prove your claim. The only thing anybody knows for sure is that there are 9 men for every 1 woman killed. YOU are demanding that we assume that some number of non-drug-gang-related women are killed, and that it is greater than the number of non-drug-gang-related men that are killed. YOU bring the numbers. What percentage of the murdered women were related to gangs? What percentage of the murdered men were related to gangs? All I've seen from the "women most aff…
/r/MensRights13/03/20 04:35 AM
1

It's a rant, not a formal debate. Most reasonable people will take it as such.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 06:03 PM
1

Feminism has played the dominant role in getting women into office, allowing women to vote, giving women the right to learn, to work, and to own property. No it didn't. Women were already in office, women were already allowed to vote, they already had the "right to learn", they already worked, and they already owned property. The only thing Feminism has done is convince everybody that these things weren't already common before it came along.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 05:15 PM
2

Some of her policies are, some aren't. She's definitely not in lock-step with the regressive left, and apparently that's enough for you to cast her out of the "left" cult.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 07:56 PM
11

But not so for "the future is female". I actually saw a man my age wearing one of these the other day, out for breakfast with his daughters, both under 5. Those daughters are almost certainly doomed to grow up to be insufferable entitled grrrrrrl power princesses.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 07:48 PM
1

I am that Vaapaahera's daughter, I am his Suomi wife, I lived in that forest for 6.000 years No you aren't, and no you didn't. You're an unhinged lunatic.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 02:24 AM
1

In todays world one wage is not enough Bullshit. I've made as little as 15k per year at times in my adult life, and at no point was I unable to set aside money for savings. I made sacrifices to be able to afford it, obviously, but all I had to do was pay attention to how much I was spending vs. how much I was making. At no point in my 30s or beyond have I been unable to save 20% or more of my income, and that's after paying for insurance and making maximum contributions to retirement accounts. D…
/r/MensRights11/02/20 02:18 AM
1

The character she’s portraying is quite important, from a business perspective. One could also argue that, perhaps, Captain Jack Sparrow was somewhat important as well, for a business perspective.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 03:12 AM
1

Ahh yes, all those white people in those black majority cities with black majority police forces with black mayors and black city councils, in a time when the US attorney general and the US president were both black were totally just controlling the "real" data. Unless what you mean is that you're a racist that thinks only white people can count, in which case, well, I guess I'll have to disagree with you on those grounds as well.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 03:05 AM
1

Feminism is also more than just a group of people yelling about women. Yeah, it's a religion. Typical feminists care far more about whether one calls themselves a feminist than if one lives up to the "tenets" of feminism. That should tell you something.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 02:59 AM
4

People wouldn’t judge me when they saw me Do you seriously think that people don't judge men on sight either? Do you not judge men on sight? People wouldn’t call me a whore or a slut or a hoe or a thot or a bitch. Instead, they'd call you a loser or an incel or a womanizer or a dick. People would like me. <bender_serious.gif> You clearly haven't spent any time really thinking about this.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 07:50 PM
2

And i said he's a fucking bro because of it. A lot of people use 'bro' as an insult these days. It's easy to misread your comment.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 07:22 PM
0

it would force that child to grow up poor I grew up poor. It's not fatal.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 05:23 AM
1

The kind of guy who doesn't stop when a girl stiffens up and doesn't respond is the kind of guy who wouldn't stop anyway. What about guys who don't read body language very well? Or ones who grew up being assured that sex is mostly a chore for women, so they wouldn't see it as unusual/unexpected if they don't seem into it?
/r/MensRights15/01/20 05:35 AM
0

I understand many people may have never seen a guy wear that type of stuff in the media and places they’ve grown up in. It's more that you probably look like an attention-seeking jackass. It likely has fuck-all to do with how 'feminine' you think you are.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 08:58 AM
1

Until that situation reverses for centuries the patriarchy will endure. That situation will never reverse, because women will never put in the work to reverse it. Furthermore, you can't force them to.
/r/MensRights07/12/19 07:37 PM
2

Tell you what, go tell special needs folk that they are "retarded" but that it's all fine because you looked up definitions that fit your agenda. The only reason they'd think of it as anything more than a medical term is because you told them that it was hateful. You are the one who simultaneously made it harmful to them and pushed people down the euphamism treadmill.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 04:50 AM
3

Not really but okay lol but that is true sometime. Genetic can play a big role:) (living prood lol) There's also a strong correlation between height and intelligence, but clearly there are exceptions to that rule.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 09:19 AM
15

Also the fact that a lot of men are getting blamed for things their fathers or grandfathers did. More like getting blamed for things somebody else's fathers or grandfathers did.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 06:56 AM
3

They released her on bail.... That's not unusual. That's how bail works unless there's a very good reason to deny it.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 06:51 AM
3

They invented their own definition for racism because they realized they were being racist and sexist. It’s now power + prejudice for them. They also redefined "power" to something that means Barack Obama has strictly less power than Bubba the gas station attendant.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 02:19 AM
1

Right wing groups tend to compete with each other over how well they treat their women and there seems to be something of that in your comment here. Yeah, because those egalitarian left wing groups never congratulate themselves over how well they treat women. I mean, it's not like the Democrats in the US make that half their platform or anything. /rolls eyes
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:22 AM
3

Question/comment about circumscision- is it fully comparable to FGM? OP is still dealing with the guilt he's been instilled by feminism and doesn't want to directly compare FGM to MGM, so I will. They're both barbaric. In every society that performs FGM, MGM is also performed. If it is done with unclean tools on girls, it is also done with unclean tools on boys. The parts removed during male circumcision are also full of nerves, and can also have complications that can lead to amputations or dea…
/r/MensRights08/11/19 06:16 AM
-1

I had a women tell me with a straight face that as a women she can relate to my experiences as a black person. No joke. So you complain about one-upsmanship done by feminists, and then one-up them. Good job.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 05:25 AM
3

Sounds like you came from a family of idiots, and that your apple didn't fall far from the tree.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:53 AM
2

I feel if there is a demand then it should be provided. Would you feel the same way about a black only session? How about a white only session?
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:49 AM
2

Thanks for being clear for us mouth breathers who don't know this already. It's fortunate that we have the One Good Man in our midst to keep us from degenerating into a bunch of rape savages. Truly, you are a savior to peoplekind.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:43 AM
3

Ah yes. Let's ask the person with a knife to my throat to let go before doing something about it. Goalposts: successfully moved.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:31 AM
9

Get over yourself. He's saying that gay guys who act more stereotypically 'gay' are allowed more leeway with women, by the women themselves. And it's generally true. Nobody's attacking your sexuality. Lose the victim complex.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 03:24 AM
3

You know, I bet more women would be interested in STEM if they didn't have abusive assholes like you telling them how awful it will be.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 12:16 AM
3

It's no secret that generally the older people get the more they are stuck in their ways and views, their mind closes up and thus they get more conservative, it's not always a bad thing (they don't fall for the narratives given by blind ultraliberals or crazy people as I call them) but often it can be especially right now as their fears leave them very vulnerable to manipulation by evil dickheads and this is truly a global problem. This is one of those opinions that you had nicely formed for you…
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:52 PM
4

Nobody means harm You're much more optimistic than I am.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 11:44 PM
1

Yeah, women unfortunately get encouraged to be submissive and men get pressured to be competitive. When was this? I've been alive for over 40 years now and this has literally never been the case at any time or in any place in my life. In fact, if I were to look at only the propaganda that is routinely fed to kids, I'd say it's the exact opposite. It's been nothing but a steady diet of "grrrrl power!" since I entered kindergarten.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 06:00 PM
1

The real way to close the gender pay gap would be to encourage more women to go into higher paying careers, stop stigmatizing men who take care of the kids so that their wife/gf can work This "solution" requires that you change people. Any time your "solution" requires changing people's personal preferences, you're doomed to fail. In fact, if you have to change people's personal goals to implement it, you should seriously question whether your "solution" is even necessary or desirable.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 05:21 PM
2

Women in the past were certainly pushed away from that path for various reason (and not to say most men weren’t either). So was everybody else who wasn't from an extremely wealthy family, but nobody seems to remember that when we're talking about how people who didn't go to college were somehow "oppressed".
/r/MensRights30/08/19 11:27 PM
1

What was especially not-nice was the monumental amounts of busy work that I did. Then either you don't know the value of that "busy work" or you got a worthless degree. I also have a degree in computer science and all of that "busy work" was absolutely useful in my 20+ year career. I did hear a lot of people who had no real interest in computers or math but simply wanted a job whining about all of the subjects we were required to take. They're all probably still junior programmers somewhere chur…
/r/MensRights29/07/19 08:35 PM
3

Not a robot, she just sort of magically appeared after they scanned some pictures of magazines into their sweet Apple II and adjusted a boob slider. Then the computer did ... something. There was some lightning involved as well IIRC. And then she was there.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:46 PM
1

She can just charge them more, a premium for being a woman I guess. Double bonus: then they can complain about the "pink tax."
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:42 PM
2

And it is systematically easier for women. Yep, in a lot of ways it is, and that's literally never going to change. What are you going to do about it? Demand that all of society change in ways that are completely incompatible with biology? Good luck with that. Demanding for women to be attracted to something they're not attracted to is no different than the "fat is beautiful" idiots that demand for men to be attracted to grossly obese women.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:27 PM
1

Get a haircut, hit the gym, shower more often You're trolling right. Men can't find love, it is obviously their fault No, he's acknowledging harsh reality: you aren't going to find love if you don't take care of yourself first, because even somewhat undesirable women are presented with a smorgasbord of opportunity, and they aren't going to choose the lesser option. I've got no problem with people commiserating about their difficulties, but you're not fucking oppressed. Yeah, it's harsh. It sucks…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:22 PM
11

That's what I heard too.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 05:56 PM
2

Women are made to feel like they are "competing" with one another. They are competing with one another. So are men. You have to be delusional to not understand this.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 04:53 PM
1

Because the only way this works out is if there are women not in college who are fucking the shit out of the college men. Or there are far more women in college than men. Which there are. About 3:2. That said, it's still a bullshit statistic because the average is a useless number.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:52 PM
6

“shaming men for showing weakness” is exactly the sort of thing feminists would like to stop. Which is why they accuse anyone who disagrees with them of "fragile masculinity". Yeah. They're so intent on stopping shaming of weakness.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:38 AM
4

You think its impossible that a single right winger mocked the movement? That's absolutely not what the person you're responding to said, that's something only an utter idiot would say, and something that only an utter idiot would try to imply that someone else said.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:37 AM
7

Are you trying to exemplify the "strawman" right here? Because you did an excellent job of it.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:27 AM
1

Life tip: one side of an argument being idiotic doesn't automatically make the other side not idiotic.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:06 PM
1

Even if they don't think too hard about their ideology and learned it in college that is a lot more self-reflection than the average conservative who was literally raised into their ideology has. This right here? NPC drivel.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 07:55 PM
8

Saying that women can't drive because you've seen female drivers using their cell phones while driving is a logical fallacy A strawman, which you just created here, is also a logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 04:55 AM
2

Do you seriously think that this girl would have committed murder at 16 if she had been born without FAS, into a stable 2 parent household, without a meth addiction, and gone to high school instead of being pimped out by a rapist scumbag? Yeah, and if that butterfly hadn't flapped its wings in Peru, she would have never been born at all. It's clearly the butterfly's fault. So what? The reasons might be mitigating factors but the fact is she still shot the guy in the back of the head in cold bloo…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:30 PM
10

And this, everybody, is a textbook example of "projection."
/r/MensRights06/01/19 11:05 PM
3

They don't, but circumcision apologists act as if they believe that that is the case.
/r/MensRights06/01/19 10:57 PM
1

The KKK is statistical noise. Feminism is not.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 07:55 PM
5

why would they have such outdated thoughts that men cannot be raped. You already answered your own question: Britain and Europe in general are very progressive You just have to understand one thing: progressives are not liberal.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 08:26 AM
6

When convenient, it does. When convenient, it does not. Sometimes, two and two are five. Other times, two and two are three. Two and two are whatever the party needs them to be.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 08:21 AM
1

I believe the judge had sided with the lawyer who had said the girl deserved it because of how she was dressed I have no idea about this particular case, but you're almost certainly repeating misinformation. I have literally never heard this line voiced in the western world by anyone in any position of authority; the only time I hear it is when feminists claim that that's what everybody in any position of authority says.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 05:42 AM
4

Oh hey, look at the person spreading literally 2-year-old fake news. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsaB3ynIZH4 Seriously, you can't find something about Trump to complain about that isn't a bald-faced lie? Are you that lazy? Or are you just that dumb? And for the record, I've seen much longer super cuts from non-mainstream sources of Trump doing this exact hand motion; they're just impossible to find on Youtube because if you search for "Trump + anything" you'll get nothing but mainstream sour…
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:08 PM
8

I'm not a Republican, but I am an ex-Democrat, and this shit is exactly why.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 06:31 AM
1

And are you going to start advocating that other tournaments where women and men both play best-of-3 should start awarding equal prize money No, for the same reason: women's sports aren't as popular, which means they don't attract as many viewers, which means their sponsorship is less than men's sports. They don't earn the money, they don't deserve to be paid the same. End of story.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:10 AM
1

women's tennis has been far more interesting Only if you find inferior play to be interesting.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 04:08 AM
0

Trump is somehow a clueless dupe idiot that also managed to sneakily evade pervasive surveillance by the FBI while performing his clueless treasonous collusion. Do you even listen to yourself?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 10:05 PM
1

...No, it's just not about men. I have heard, repeatedly, for decades, from countless sources, that feminism is about men too. Now you're telling that it's not? How's about you refer back to the quoted Karen Straughn rebuttal again.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 12:51 AM
13

Feminism is an ideology. It comes with presuppositions. Being born a man is not analogous in any way. Generalizing about feminists is nothing like generalizing about men.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:59 AM
8

Pretending that women were not previously denied equal acknowledgement in the public sphere is one of the worst rhetorical mistakes that MRAs make. So name some women that deserve acknowledgement. Raise awareness (for anyone who cares... which is really going to be a vanishingly small number of people.) and then raise funds to build your statues. Or whine on the internet and expect someone else to do all the legwork for you. AKA feminism.
/r/MensRights30/07/18 09:10 AM
2

I'm a liberal. There are too many anti-Hillary or anti-Pelosi type of posts. No such thing. The world will be better when Hillary and Pelosi are no longer relevant public figures.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:17 PM
2

You let the psychos you HAVE the psychos. You silence the psychos, you risk accidentally silencing your allies. It's just precious that you think that most of the people running feminist-friendly subs aren't psychos.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 11:15 PM
1

And the day before that, he complained that he was tired of 'men'. So no, he hasn't learned shit.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 05:28 AM
3

When you are tricked by an outrageous lie Here's the thing, it's not that outrageous unless you've been living under a rock. Democratic leaders have already been beating the drum of "shutting white people down". Obama is giving talks where he complains about how tired he is of men. This really wouldn't be that out of character for some of them to say. To adopt as a party platform? Doubtful. As a NOW-sponsored campaign slogan? I'd totally believe it.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 03:55 PM
0

In other words, you have completely redefined the term "nice guy" when "entitled to sex" is far more descriptive, less confusing, and less all-around hateful. This is why people complain about redefinition of words; particularly when you redefine them to mean the opposite of what they are.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 02:06 AM
3

Gun control has nothing to do with right/left in the rest of the world. That's only because the rest of the world is so illiberal and totalitarian that they've already banned the guns.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:08 AM
1

"Yes, it can go both ways. Let me demonstrate by engaging in a comment thread where I exemplify the other way it can go."
/r/MensRights19/05/18 12:04 AM
12

I get his complaint about MRAs being strawmanned but let's acknowledge that's not a one-way street. Let's also acknowledge that feminism is institutionalized in academia, government, and the media, and that those institutions demonize anyone who has the temerity to disagree with them.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:50 PM
59

Ain't no rest for the triggered
/r/MensRights13/05/18 06:02 PM
9

Ok, so you're clearly not a linguist because you don't understand the etymology of the word "man". Don't feel bad, because pretty much every feminist has the same problem. Here's a quick lesson that I'm sure your feminist instructors never gave you: do you know what the word "boy" used to mean? Hint: slave. Does that mean that boys were historically oppressed?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:53 AM
1

The problem is that you're a racist with a guilty conscience, and you're projecting it onto everyone else. Don't feel too bad about it; a lot of people share your affliction.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:22 AM
2

You just keep telling black people that the system is out to get them, that they can't succeed, that they should live in fear of whitey, even though it's 100% lies. I'll keep calling you the controlling, abusive asshole that you are. You aren't some sort of martyr for a cause or messenger of truth: you're a run-of-the-mill racist with a guilty conscience.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:17 AM
1

I'll give you a personal anecdote: Previously, I wouldn't have treated Indian people any differently. Now, because of the Wormtongues like you that whisper into the ears of anyone who you can force to listen, I have to wonder if the particular Indian person I'm dealing with is a hypersensitive bigot who will assume the worst in everything I say and do in an effort to prove I'm a racist. Because I'm not particularly interested in having to prove my intentions to people, and because I find it ment…
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:07 PM
1

I'd hypothesize that people who are indoctrinated into it at an early age are generally no different than the general population in their inherent overall shittiness about gender relations and attitudes. But those who adopt it willingly later in life are far more likely to be doing so to atone for or cover up their own bad behavior.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 04:36 PM
1

Only the profits were privatized. This may be one of the dumbest insinuations I've ever read. You mean in the millions of high paying jobs that were created by utilizing the tech developed via public sector funding? That kind of privatization? Or from the billions (trillions?) of dollars of "private" wealth created that is publicly owned through the stock market by "private" citizens? Or are you whining about CEOs of Intel and nVidia and Facebook and other tech companies making tens of millions …
/r/MensRights19/04/18 05:01 PM
1

Interesting that you've focused on a couple of inaccurate details in the recounting of these stories, rather than acknowledge the more important points: Someone was JAILED for putting bacon outside a Mosque, and someone is in the SENTENCING process for training a pug to raise its paw as a joke. You're really not seeing the forest for the trees here.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:55 PM
0

It just so happens that its a list of online alt-right dogwhistles Supposedly a "dogwhistle" is something that only the "dogs" hear -- yet you're able to hear it. So doesn't that make you alt-right yourself? Or would you like to rethink that transparent, nonsense attempt to shame people without addressing their points? And for the record, I don't consider myself alt-right (I've voted Democrat in every election of my life up until 2016), but I'll happily claim the label any time some moron wants …
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:47 PM
0

Here's my questioning about that: Who decided what the "facts" were? Was it people who got their "facts" from NPR? Which "facts" did they poll about? How were the questions about the "facts" worded? There are any number of ways to bias a survey like that, even unintentionally. I'm sure I can find some actual facts that NPR listeners would be woefully uninformed about and that would show Fox or Brietbart as being the best at informing their audience.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:41 PM
2

I've always found that if clothes are how someone chooses to express their personality, they're very likely to be a profoundly uninteresting person.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 09:04 PM
3

minimizing the risk of any of the many hate groups getting one of their people into the position to cause harm Seriously? Paranoid much? That's an awfully long con.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:48 AM
11

The reason most women don’t work on cars is because there parents don’t teach them too not because they are biologically predispositioned not too. I suppose you have proof of this naked assertion? Just kidding. I know you have none, because none exists. This is one of the most easily observable, basic differences between men and women that is present in infants and even in other non human primates. Boys tend to prefer objects, girls tend to prefer people. This is why there are more men who work …
/r/MensRights24/03/18 01:26 AM
2

Thanks for correcting us that it's actually women that are the victim.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:20 PM
5

In that case, I'll bet you're ok with just saying all worldwide terrorism is committed by Muslims as well.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 11:11 PM
11

Just FYI -- that link likely has a bitcoin mining script embedded in it. The second I open it, I get a tab that maxes out all 12 cores on my CPU. I have plugins that are supposed to block that ... guess they aren't perfect.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 03:46 AM
1

You're surely aware by now that any criticism that she (or any other prominent feminist) receives is just filed away in her "men scared of a powerful woman" folder, right? And she'll just use it as evidence that there's so much misogyny in the world. It's best to just not interact with these people, at all.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:21 AM
1

I'm not asking you to reduce anyone to what's between their legs. Deal. In return, would you ask them to stop wearing it on their heads in these insipid women's marches?
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:38 AM
2

I'm a lifelong democrat (well, up until last year; the DNC proved to me that they aren't interested in my vote anymore). People question Hillary Clinton's ability to lead because she lacks any ability to accept responsibility. Everything is someone else's fault; all of her failures are actually because of something outside of her control (sexism, incidentally, is one of her go-to scapegoats.) On top of that, she's clearly a criminal. The illegal email server alone was enough that she should have…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:36 AM
2

Real feminists are the level headed bunch that have been silenced by the psychos running the current show. I think you misspelled "useful idiots." There was never any genuine understanding of reality by the feminist movement or its adherents.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:22 AM
3

That’s why I encouraged my guy friends to take gender classes and encouraged the guys looking for a diversity credit to actually participate. Guys don't have the luxury of taking useless gender classes. We actually need to learn things that will turn us into useful human beings, so that we won't be discarded by society.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 06:13 AM
2

One thing to keep in mind that to a fairly large group of people, everyone they disagree with for any reason is immediately assumed to be and labeled "alt-right". The number of people who actually consider themselves alt-right is pretty small, and the criteria for being alt-right (basically, desire for a white ethnostate) are pretty specific. The number of people who are accused of being alt-right and the criteria for the accusations range from black liberals to Jewish conservatives to basically…
/r/MensRights28/02/18 05:45 AM
2

No, he's clearly saying that we should organize our society like the lobsters.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 01:07 AM
1

It was porn Oh, so you were taught by porn? Does that mean you demand anal, facials, and choking, because you weren't able to distinguish porn from real life?
/r/MensRights09/02/18 04:40 AM
9

The woman is not being confrontational, she's not saying anything out of the ordinary or anything like that. She just found a way to know whether or not the other woman was okay and at the same time offering a smooth way out. See, and when I try do the same by helping white people get out of mundane but potentially uncomfortable situations where a non-white person speaks to them, I get called a racist!
/r/MensRights08/02/18 11:30 PM
3

Deplorable because you're OK with people dying because they don't have enough money. Haven't you figured out that this pathetic shaming doesn't work anymore? How much more evidence do you need? For the record, I also quit the democratic party, though it was before I cast a vote for anyone in the last general election. Go ahead and make assumptions about me and try to shame me back into ... whatever it is you think you're shaming me back into. I'm sure it will work, this time.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:43 AM
1

They really helped me further develop critical thinking abilities What, they developed so well that you can't discern "critical thinking" and "critical theory", which is what those classes actually teach?
/r/MensRights29/12/17 12:00 AM
1

how could you state if it's exponential or not Draggonzz said "it's certainly not literally exponential". There is virtually zero chance that even if there has been some rapid growth, as you claim (without data), that it has been "exponential growth". So technically correct. And your entire post is pure speculation as well. I would personally hypothesize that there hasn't been any change in frequency of anything except reporting. People have always been people, and people have always behaved rou…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 06:04 AM
4

I can’t wait until 3-D printing can print ediable things and when it’s cheaper! If Corperations aren’t too greedy, this might even end world hunger and world poverty! Just wanted to respond to this... Your enthusiasm is nice and all, but there's a flaw in your reasoning, and it's very common in the "science can do anything!" crowd. 3D printing will almost certainly never be able to create edible things out of raw materials that weren't edible to begin with. Which means it's not going to be able …
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:48 PM
15

Those dude-bros who talked about "nailing chicks" every day. Those were real misogynists Here's the thing: no they weren't. They just liked having sex with women and had no problem saying that they liked having sex with women. That doesn't make them misogynists. I find it distasteful, personally, but it took me a long time to understand that it's actually ok if this is how they want to behave as long as they aren't hurting anyone else. Be careful of harboring resentment of people who are able to…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 11:42 PM
11

Nothing dumbass. That's rich, coming from someone who spends the next 2 sentences demonstrating that they don't know anything about application of statistics or random selection.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:03 PM
-1

You know, I'm actually pro birth control and have no problem paying for it. I think it's an excellent investment for preventing unwanted children. But when people like you come along and demand that it's some sort of right, it makes me think, "nah, fuck you. I'll keep my money." Your entitlement and self-righteousness is just unbearable.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:30 AM
4

Yes... The weather never routinely kills or maims people. I like the post you're replying to starts with "imagine this situation" and you immediately respond with "but the situation isn't like that." Well, no shit. That's why you were supposed to imagine the other situation. Do you understand what an analogy is?
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:12 AM
1

How do you know this? Because of what they say, write, and do?
/r/MensRights24/10/17 07:09 AM
3

Ahh yes, the typical feminist contribution to the conversation: "my anecdote means something, listen to me!"
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:42 AM
2

I read through most of her diatribe. I love that she spends so much of it talking about how she didn't have the "Hollywood" look or and that she was typecast as the frumpy friend, and that women are held to these ridiculous standards for their appearance ... when the show she's currently on is about a group of guys who, specifically, are held up as examples of not meeting standards for appearance, social skills and social standing.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 05:18 AM
7

Let's be real. It's TSA. They aren't representing anything except a waste of tax dollars.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 12:13 AM
2

I believe that people sexually attracted to children are mentally ill and need help. It’s not a sexual attraction. "sexual attraction is not a sexual attraction." Got it. Also did you see the ask reddit about rapists? The one where they said why and how. It’s not about sexual attraction. They want to hurt people because that’s what turns them on. Ahh yes. The authoritative Reddit. Many a gender studies paper has come straight from the all-knowing and perfectly-reality-reflecting answers given in…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 07:13 PM
12

Because sometimes it's nice to have a place that is untainted by people competing for the attention of the opposite sex.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 06:56 PM
1

The clear implication of a message like this is that boys are not special. Well the truth is that they aren't special. And neither are the girls. Also, in a twisted way, the teacher is actually doing a good job preparing boys for the real world where they really are not special and nobody gives a shit about them.
/r/MensRights26/09/17 12:54 AM
2

And how does he know that there is no teacup orbiting the sun exactly opposite the Earth? Turns out when one person makes a claim regarding the supposed existence of something, it's their responsibility to prove it.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 11:37 PM
1

I don't disagree with anything you've said, but I have a feeling that nobody would be extending the benefit of the doubt if the sexes were reversed.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 05:13 AM
2

Huh, sounds like you might be a rapist. According to you, that's rape.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 08:05 AM
6

I guess a lot of guys in here haven't spent any time with a woman Heh, nice little dig there. But I'm going to assume that you haven't spent time with many women, because I've been with multiple women where we fell asleep together and woke up having sex; on more than one of those occasions it was the first time we'd had sex together. And many times it ended up being really damn good sex. And on zero of those occasions did either of us accuse each other of rape. So no, I'm going to have to assume…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 08:02 AM
1

The only methods of getting out of parenthood are preventative. Unless you are a woman. I'm all for women's reproductive rights. I don't want to restrict abortion to only cases of rape or incest; just leave it up to the woman. Girl says she doesn't like condoms? What if she pokes holes in them? What if you're in a committed relationship and she has been on birth control and decides to "forget" to take it? Guys, you are in control of where that semen goes. What if she gives a blow job and saves i…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:23 PM
3

I feel like this is very dismissive of the hundreds (thousands?) of female legislators, judges and political appointees who have pursued justice impartially in the years since females holding such offices became a thing. It's no less dismissive than how all the men who pursued justice impartially throughout history get accused of being chauvinists that perpetuated the "patriarchy" to oppress women.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 05:30 PM
6

You are way over thinking things. Says the person who has practically no chance of ever being thought of as "rapey" or threatening in any way, and hasn't undergone decades of conditioning to tell you all of the ways that your behavior can be rapey or threatening.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 11:20 PM
4

I like how the only metric that they give to support their story is that after 200 exercises, men's strength dropped 15% more than women's. Well ... without knowing the actual numbers involved, that means absolutely nothing. If men have 2x the strength of women to begin with (not an unreasonable assumption), at a greater relative loss of strength after exercise, they're still likely to be far stronger than women. It just reeks of "rah rah, you go girl" crap that will appeal to low-information, m…
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:43 AM
3

Well it's a good thing that the system isn't trying to "represent" them, then. It's just trying to classify them. And sometimes it's wrong. And whoever is trying to develop the system will surely try to train it better because they're trying to classify reality, not because of some stupid "representation" crap.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:16 AM
11

They're reporting on female suicides because that's risen by 50%... that's a lot! It only seems that way if you're mathematically illiterate. Here's an extremely simple example to illustrate: Year 1, 2 female suicides. Year 2, 3 female suicides. 50% increase. Year 1, 10 male suicides. Year 2, 12 male suicides. Only a 20% increase. So the 50% female increase in this example is actually less than the 20% male increase. 50% is utterly meaningless unless you know the absolute numbers that it's deriv…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 06:25 AM
5

Sounds like your principal was the shitty one. "Boys will be boys" is in no way expresses a desire to excuse shitty behavior.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:52 AM
3

Oh god, as a woman I'm sorry for this (and as a feminist, too). Don't apologize. She doesn't speak for you.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 02:42 AM
1

Remember the part where I said I was feminist.. Of course I can talk about things freely with other feminists! I thought I was sympathetic to feminists as well -- then I had some discussions with feminist friends about these very issues. We aren't friends any more.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:22 PM
2

People here like to argue that men commit suicide at 3-4 times the rate of women. I just gave you stats that said women are killed by their spouses at 4 times the rate of men. How is my argument different? Nobody here thinks that female suicides should be ignored. Feminists (the ones in power; the ones that make policy; the ones that actually have money to allocate to do something. Not the "I'm a feminist because I believe in equality!" useful idiots), however, not only think that male domestic …
/r/MensRights23/06/17 10:21 PM
1

Did you miss the part where that's all they did? You don't seem to have a very high opinion of the societal contributions mothers, and seem to be erasing all of the accomplishments of women throughout history besides "shitting out babies". Are you, perhaps, a misogynist?
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:07 AM
8

(1) I'll start with Peterson. The issue with Peterson isn't that he's refusing to use a gender pronoun, it is that he is pre-preemptively declaring that he will never accommodate a request from a trans person. I'm not going to bother reading the rest of your reply because you've failed so obviously and fundamentally in the very first sentence. He did not say that he would never accommodate the request of a trans person. He said that he would not be compelled by the state to accommodate a "trans …
/r/MensRights19/06/17 10:51 PM
1

I mean the whole point of a takehome exam is give more opportunities for everyone to prove themselves Except that wasn't the justification for this change. So that's not the point. Yet you're replying to nearly every comment in this thread as if you have some point.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:30 AM
1

Yet you brought up a whole host of other things that had nothing to do with divorce as if they were somehow relevant to the discussion.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:06 AM
1

Well, if the current lawmakers are writing legislation trying to restrict women's bodily autonomy, why don't you just become president to fix it? Good god you make some disingenuous arguments.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:11 AM
1

It's like of Christianity was entirely judged on the Westborough Baptist Church and Televangelists. The Westborough Baptist Church is a few idiots that are reviled by everybody. Feminism and its lobbying organizations like NOW are multi-billion dollar machines that are able to enact policy. It has presence in (every?) public university in the western world, and one of its core tenets is "patriarchy theory," which doesn't even begin to resemble "feminism is just about equality!" There's literally…
/r/MensRights18/04/17 02:49 AM
8

Correlation and causation and all that. It's entirely possible that the people with personality types that are likely to divorce are also likely to live together before marriage.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 01:54 AM
26

Business sources more often than not make the assumption the choices women make exist in a vacuum. Goalpost: moved. Now you're onto mind reading about why women make the choices they make.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 05:05 AM
3

should be debating Oh, you mean being called a sexist, racist, homophobic, transphobic, Islamophobic bigot, then having rumors spread about me among the (IRL) feminist circles that I used to brush shoulders with? Yeah, did that, no thanks.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 04:53 AM
1

Because neither the data nor conclusions are reliable. The methods of data collection are unknown and haven't gone through any peer review. The conclusions drawn from the data are not educated, scrutinized opinions. It's simply not scientific. Then we will never know these things to your satisfaction, because those things will never exist. No dating site will ever open up their data for someone to do a proper analysis of it, and nobody else in the world will ever have the data to analyze. So OKC…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 04:46 AM
1

Except in most cases when someone refers to women as "girls" it isn't meant in an explicitly demeaning manner.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 01:55 AM
3

I'm absolutely 100% pro-abortion but your argument is bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 04:08 PM
3

He was correct that there were dirty commies that needed to be persecuted? Of course he was right. The contention has never been that there were no communists for him to 'out' -- the contention is that they never should have been 'outed' at all.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:30 PM
2

You know, I've got to agree with you here. Now as a liberal I'm completely fed up with "the left" at this point, so I'm not defending the actions of either the morons in the black blocs or their enablers in the media and academia... But I was under the impression that "the left" was for big government. That, to me, seems obviously fundamentally incompatible with anarchism, yet I'm assured by many conservatives that they are in fact equivalent movements and groups of people. Furthermore, that ana…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 05:48 PM
2

Or a man may want his partner to have access to abortion if they do not want the child.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 01:50 AM
3

I hope you never leave the house when you have any sort of communicable illness. I also hope you don't live with anybody else, because you would be assaulting them if they caught whatever you have.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 03:34 AM
3

Some quick research finds that forced sexual copulation in animals is about reproduction Zero species outside of humans know that sex has anything to do with reproduction. There's no way you can make the statement that forced sex in any other species is "about" anything except satisfying a sex drive. And yes, while there are instances where rape is about control or power (redundant, IMO), the fact that the vast majority of rape outside of prison or war is heterosexual suggests that there's at le…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 03:22 AM
1

It came from Airport's law.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 01:39 AM
1

You may want to mentally replace 'patriarchy' with 'culture' Anybody with any amount of understanding already did that a long time ago. And then we mentioned that realization to feminists. And now, due to those interactions, we are anti-feminist. It's a religion. You cannot question the dogma.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:06 AM
1

If 70% of people who called themselves pacifists went on killing sprees, and wrote widely-published articles condoning killing sprees, and actively worked against people who were trying to stop killing sprees, then people who were aware of this correlation might start thinking that the label "pacifist" didn't really mean what the "good" pacifists claimed that it did.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 01:27 AM
1

where at the school I worked at we had separate math textbooks for the girls that taught their geometry through quilting patterns. Huh. So your school used topics that students are more likely to have a personal interest in to teach more complex material. So oppressive.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 07:49 PM
1

The problem with the people who say that is that they mean it in a pejorative way. You don't know this. You aren't a mind reader. They may just be direct.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 07:31 PM
1

The majority of shooting victims are male because the majority of shooters are male. If men stopped shooting, then men would stop being shooting victims. Hmm, let's try something... "The majority of rape victims are male because the majority of rapists are male. If men stopped raping, then men would stop being rape victims." Yeah, I don't think your logic works. (Also note that I don't agree with either the original or my altered statement; both are stupid.)
/r/MensRights11/12/16 02:28 AM
2

It looks more like hostility and assumptions aimed at "outsider" groups (i.e., minorities) when they want inclusion. That sounds a lot like projection coming from you. At the very least, you're arguing in bad faith.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:59 PM
2

Do you have a source that proves that there's no teapot orbiting the sun exactly opposite of Earth? No? Then clearly my teapot-in-space hypothesis must be given just as much weight as your no-teapot-in-space hypothesis. You are the one making a positive claim that something called "gender fluidity" exists, and is measurable and observable. Prove your claim. The burden of evidence is on YOU.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:52 PM
2

Gender dysphoria is not the same thing as gender fluid.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:49 PM
1

are possibly the most privileged people in Western society all of human history.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 03:57 AM
2

Absolutely! I just don't like that some people here act like the movement was never good. No movement that completely ignores half of the problem can possibly be 'good'.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 03:38 AM
2

I'd say it's even worse in these environments tbh Well sure; that environment is filled by upstanding individuals such as yourself who clearly love to listen to other people's concerns.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 05:30 AM
2

Actions define a group, not a dictionary.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 05:15 AM
7

Won't stop me from being one or believing in full equality There was a term for that long before feminism: egalitarian. Feminism is a sexist word anyway.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 12:17 AM
1

now not only is there her word against his there is actually a physical piece of paper with his signature on it admitting to the act. Not at all. There's the piece of paper. Either it exists or it doesn't. Now obviously the piece of paper can be forged, lost, destroyed, etc. but those are all a separate issue from the fact that this does give someone an actual, verifiable, physical piece of evidence. It's the exact opposite of just taking someone's word for it.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 12:05 AM
6

No character depth. This is such a weak and subjective distinction. Splitting hairs is an understatement.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 06:21 AM
1

Or, you can win the electoral college but lose the popular vote, as happened here. We don't have approval voting, so you can't assume that a vote for a 3rd party is automatically the same as "not wanting" a different candidate.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 03:59 AM
2

A few quick ones: Boys are severely falling behind in school; they have been behind for decades and all of the trend lines are only getting worse. Women earn roughly 60% of all bachelor's degrees (3/5) and are trending towards 2/3. They earn the majority of master's and doctoral degrees, and again, both numbers are trending upward. Men get 60% longer jail sentences after controlling for socio-economic status and other factors. No legal right to bodily integrity. Maybe do a little reading instead…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 03:13 AM
2

well thanks to the democrats for this mess Lifelong Democrat here. This mess is almost entirely on us.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:35 AM
3

I don't think its the whole reason she got no support from white males, just a part of the reason. So this is just your feelings. Got it. My feeling is that you don't have a clue about why she lost, and you're probably a simpleton who can only think in terms of "racism and sexism" as an explanation of everything.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:53 AM
2

The thing is, if this election cycle has taught us anything, it's that the mainstream news doesn't care about news: they care about narrative.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 09:24 PM
2

It's not a difficult concept, it's just a useless concept, because it assumes that you can make predictions about a specific person's life because of their race, sex, or sexual orientation. You can't.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 05:09 AM
3

Many here seem to believe I'm lying about this and that I have all his med info. Bullshit; I've read the entire thread and nobody has even implied this. You're throwing a fit about things nobody has said.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:12 AM
1

You know, I agree that in this day, access to medical records would be pretty important. But you seriously come across as one of the "crazies" you speak of that your donor father should be worried about.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 04:08 AM
2

You know, if the ad were actually poking fun at how the women were so careless (perhaps they were so excited about the sale that they weren't paying attention or something like that) then it wouldn't be so bad. But as it was, it was just completely pointless. The only thing it could be going for is "look how funny it is when a guy gets hit in the head with a purse!" It's just dumb. And I wouldn't even have a problem with it if it weren't so damn pervasive.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 03:37 AM
2

I was not equivocating. I was making an analogy. For an analogy, there has to be some equivalence between the examples. You chose an example that has zero equivalence. To paint a sympathetic portrait of the Nazis, you'd have to sort of leave out the whole Jew killing thing, which ended up being kind of a major part of Nazism. There is no such equivalent in the MRM. Yes, I understand that you were trying to make an analogy. It was a shitty analogy.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 08:11 PM
3

Just a pet peeve of mine. You're not the only one. It really confuses the issue when "surprise sex in a dark alley" and "consensual but inappropriate/unethical sex" are given the same name.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:33 PM
0

Trump will fuck this country up if he wins. I have bad news for you... The country is already pretty fucked up.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:44 PM
3

But they do have the right to be believed Not by the justice system. They have a right to a fair investigation and a fair trial, nothing more.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:42 PM
2

It doesn't matter how good of a piece of nazi propaganda you make, it won't land you work in a good place. Nice equivalence there.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 11:27 PM
1

This movement has its ugly sides though, and the film didn't really look to hard into any of that. Likewise, there wasn't a ton of time spent on feminist responses to MRA points. What ugly side? You mean some angry people? Every side has angry people. You mean sinister legislation people sympathetic to the MRM have passed? Uhh, nope. You mean events that MRM members protested and shut down? Uhh, nope. You mean mean things written on websites? Again, every side writes mean things on websites. If …
/r/MensRights03/11/16 05:24 PM
4

And it wasn't daytime network TV, and people did throw a fit about Howard Stern all the time.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 05:19 PM
1

http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2015/08/14/are-roosh-vs-bang-books-how-to-guides-for-date-rape/ Seriously?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 06:47 AM
2

It's a "pile of shit" because it contradicts or decontextualizes the actual facts. If your world view isn't based on, you know, facts, then I really don't know what to tell you.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:54 AM
3

Seriously? What do you think Paul Elam has to do with Google manipulating data on Erin Pizzey?
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:10 AM
1

Do not pretend to speak for all, or even most, "former boys". That's fine advice, as long as you follow it yourself. There are a number of teachers that I would have happily and willingly slept with at 14. No, I don't think that every boy (or girl) would necessarily be OK with it. However, I do know that it's not impossible that someone under 18 could enjoy it, and even (gasp!) have it be a positive experience for them. It really bugs me that statutory rape gets lumped in with straight ol' rape,…
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:06 AM
7

The news is that the suicide rate for young women is rising and we don't know why. This is not a random fluctuation, it happened in Australia last year too. One data point is not a trend. You can't say they are "rising", you can only say that they were higher in 2015 than 2014.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:30 AM
13

Someone has to flip burgers, cause people gotta eat. Well fuck, I guess I should just drop my high-stress technical position and flip burgers if we're going to make everything all equal-like. Because, you know, we're all so dependent on burger-flippers. But seriously, what incentive do you think I have to put in years and years of study and work long hours in a high-pressure environment if I could just get a job with no skill flipping burgers? If your answer is, "well, obviously we wouldn't pay …
/r/MensRights27/09/16 06:44 AM
-1

So? Why are you throwing out this red herring that nobody is arguing against?
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:38 PM
3

What percentage of people who were tickled ended up being physically abusive? Can you provide that? A quick skim of the article (which I am absolutely not going to read) didn't show any data. Do you have anything to base this on? If not, your opinion can be discarded as worthless.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 09:34 PM
3

I don't think female genital mutilation is comparable to circumcision. What you think has no bearing on reality.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:47 AM
1

Context matters - they are still entirely different levels of sexual contact, but there are varying levels of appropriateness depending on the situation. Kissing a stranger without any warning: bad. Kissing a girl you've just brought home from your first date: fine! Ripping the clothes off a girl you've just brought home, especially after she's said no: bad. Have you ever met a single person that disagrees with any of this? Why do you feel the need to type it out like you're spouting pearls of w…
/r/MensRights07/09/16 02:31 AM
1

I'd love to see that, actually. There's no way it could be accepted as anything but a farce, but there's also no way that anyone would actually call it out as such.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 08:36 PM
1

Not necessarily. And that is not the point. "Your alternate hypothesis undermines my predetermined conclusion."
/r/MensRights29/06/16 06:59 AM
1

It's like they're longing to commit incest by proxy. Projection much? Good god.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 07:01 AM
1

but you assume that us men that were in charge in the '20s - '80s You were in charge in the '20s -'80s? Damn. Who else is in your club of 'us'?
/r/MensRights20/06/16 06:01 AM
1

I'm pro single-payer healthcare but you're a terrible advocate for it.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 06:52 AM
1

It's impossible to know without semantic analysis of the tweets, but I think the null hypothesis in this case would be that the percentages are the same as what contexts men tweet them in.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 12:25 AM
2

I attended university in the mid-90s. I had only one interaction with feminists, and that was at a booth that they had set up for a talk given by the son of Martin Luther King. I walked to their booth and they literally opened up with, "if you say 'guys' to a group of people that includes women, you're erasing the existence of the women in the group." So yes, these bullshit word games are absolutely something that feminists whinge over.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 05:41 AM
4

Feminists say a lot of things about a lot of topics. Few of the things they say have any basis in reality.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 06:10 AM
1

You know what was lacking in that article? A single piece of data supporting her premise.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:32 AM
1

What about "dick"? Did the inventor of that pejorative think fondly of male opinions?
/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:16 AM
6

screwing over a child Gee, that sure is a neutral way to phrase that.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:13 AM
1

irst of all, this is ON TOP OF HER PAYING JOB. In your first post, you were talking about a stay-at-home mom. That means she has no other job.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 01:48 AM
1

Are you OK with restricting some rights from minors? By your logic, wouldn't that mean that you don't think that minors are human, given that you're willing to restrict their natural rights?
/r/MensRights09/05/16 12:34 AM
0

I don't despise people who live in irrational fear. I pity them. I do despise people who convince other people that they should live in irrational fear. Or people who enable and encourage irrational fears.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 03:53 AM
1

Not GP, but first, I disagree wholeheartedly that debtors prisons should exist. That said, he knew the system when he made the agreement; he knew the system when he chose to father the kids; he knew that this was a risk. The system is shit but that doesn't absolve him from responsibility. He made his own choices to put himself in this situation.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 04:07 AM
3

What would probably be best for your kids (and your own mental health) is to let the guy disappear from your life entirely, as it sounds like that's what he wants to do. It sounds like he was trying to do that a long time ago when he developed addiction problems in the first place -- what was he trying to escape from? Do you need the money? If not, why deal with the headache? All it does is gives him something to lord over you and allows him to make excuses for not contributing anything else. Be…
/r/MensRights04/05/16 03:56 AM
1

While Im not saying the comments arent innacurate, every time you say "men" or "women", you are implying that happens to the entire population. No, you're saying that when the population is considered as a whole, on average, "men" or "women" tend to exhibit a trait. There is absolutely no reason, aside from statistical illiteracy, to think that general trends apply to each individual within the population.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 02:56 AM
1

I love watching people like yourself defend their sacred cows. It's so obvious as an outside observer ... you're so trapped by your belief that you can't even consider the possibility that maybe the stupid shit you care so much about is really just stupid shit that you should let go of. Small hint: calling yourself a feminist doesn't make you a decent human being.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 06:22 AM
1

Having kids doesn't "use up" a person sexually. Far from it. And the whole concept of "hit the wall" as a way to describe aging in people of either sex is outright hateful. If you don't want to be mistaken for a terper, don't use their misogynistic language. And this was your only contribution to the discussion. Tone policing people over words you don't like. I'm not going to stalk your profile but I'll bet you're not the type that jumps on feminists for deriding neckbeards or "nice guys" or "du…
/r/MensRights21/04/16 07:06 AM
2

This author clearly does not believe that all men are shitty, or that all men are misogynists. Of course not. Men like him are clearly not shitty misogynists. He's the one shining beacon of morality among the shittiness that is the male half of the species.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 04:48 AM
4

When there's a good chance that being a "base-level good human being" is actually likely to cause ostracism and flames, then yeah, it's worth rewarding. Of course, doing a good thing and then running around telling everyone "hey, look at this good thing I did!" does kind of cheapen it.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 07:23 AM
2

I can't imagine what it would feel like to know that you are alone. Well, that's pretty much what you get used to as a guy. It's you vs. the world because aside from the people that care about you personally, there's nothing there to help.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 06:28 AM
1

While it is a spectrum, generally speaking, Republicans support less government spending while Democrats support more government funding. This really isn't even true in the slightest and I don't understand why people let them get away with this lie. Republicans have no problem spending loads of money when it's on things they like. For instance, on the military.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 06:09 AM
9

That's why there are movements to force other people to subsidize useless degrees pay to train the next generation of knowledge workers instead of making them buy their way into the labor force.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 02:47 AM
3

Erin did establish the first shelter, but i ask this, but for feminism would there have been such a large growth in shelters and domestic violence? i doubt it, as no other large group was willing to take on womens rights and fund such things or exert pressure on the government This is pure, worthless speculation. If I were inclined to pull something out of my ass I could just as easily argue that if feminists hadn't poisoned the DV conversation, we would probably have more, better, non-ideologic…
/r/MensRights09/04/16 02:31 AM
7

They weren't educated Neither were the vast majority of men.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 08:48 PM
7

For instance, going to college was rare for women until about 50-60 years ago. Going to college for anybody was rare until about 20-30 years ago.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 08:47 PM
1

You can't reason someone out of something that they didn't reason themselves into.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:49 AM
0

2000/1800 is an average. That's my point that you're missing. It's not a magic number. Um, no shit? So if you're trying a restricted calorie diet and still gaining weight ... maybe restrict your caloric intake just a bit more? It's still a numbers game regardless of whether you know the exact numbers or not.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 05:15 AM
1

If you just divide $20 trillion by $13 trillion you get $0.65 dollars earned per dollar spent.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:48 AM
1

I agree with you about the double standard but you're absolutely wrong about the burden of proof. It's likely that a man who ripped the shirt off of a 17-year-old girl on stage would be shredded in the press. I'd bet money on it. A lot of money. But until it happens it's just speculation.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 06:34 PM
3

Not working is a lifestyle choice. And they don't "give up" their parents. They just aren't expected to take care of them. Besides, it's racist to criticize or question other cultures. Why are you being racist?
/r/MensRights17/03/16 03:30 AM
22

Also, given the fact that women rate men so harshly in terms of attractiveness, that comparison really isn't very useful. What would be more useful is if an (average) 50th percentile man messages 67th percentile women, while a 50th percentile woman messages 60th percentile men. Not to mention the other comments about "most of the messages women get come from unappealing men." Well guess what honey: most of the messages I get come from unappealing women. I just get far fewer of them to be choosy …
/r/MensRights12/03/16 01:10 AM
1

Why would you be insulted? Would you be insulted if someone ran a study that found that men make more spectacular plays in basketball than women do? If there is some measurable standard and it turns out that men measure higher by that standard, why would you be insulted? I'm not insulted by the fact that women have better color and taste perception than men. It is what it is. It's not an indictment of any single individual.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 04:24 AM
1

Who said I have no empathy for others? I just don't have the energy to care about your irrational fears. And here's something you need to understand: neither I nor anyone else owes you a damn thing. Empathy or otherwise. You are not in danger. Anyone telling you otherwise is not your friend.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 09:00 AM
1

When did I blame the personnel for starting the wars? Can you point that out? I don't blame the members of the U.S. military for doing their jobs. But I don't overlook the fact that they are there voluntarily either. See? It's a nuanced position.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:59 AM
1

Vietnam was initiated over a half century ago. I stand by my statement that the draft has not been relevant for anyone in the U.S. for decades.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:50 AM
3

That really isn't the reason. And ignoring complications like economic opportunity, none of the current members of the U.S. military have to be there. Note: I think that the draft should be done away with. But the draft has absolutely not been relevant for anyone in decades, and has not been a deciding factor for any stupid wasteful wars that have been started.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 05:58 AM
1

Ahh yes. I just didn't notice it. In the nearly 40 years I've been on the planet, I've just somehow never noticed it. I don't doubt your story that someone honked at you or that someone said you had a nice ass. At some point in your life, someone did or said something you don't like. Good for you. I don't believe that it happens with any regularity. You know what? I've had women yell shit at me too. It's probably happened maybe a half-dozen times or so in my life. Should I get all bent out of sh…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:32 PM
2

If she seriously feels "unsafe" and starts looking for escape routes because someone waved at her: yes, she needs therapy. Not enablers like yourself telling her that her irrational fears are prudent and justified.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 04:20 AM
2

Getting waved at, shouted at, and worse, multiple times, every day, is what women get. No they don't. I'm out and about on a regular basis, and I literally never see this happening. It's impossible for it to be the case that every woman gets waved and shouted at every single day and for me to never see a single instance of it happening. I'm going to go with my "lived experience" in this case and say that you are full of shit.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 04:19 AM
5

How do you feel rape culture is different from its popular use? I think the definition has gotten distorted a great deal, but I think there's a pretty widespread issue of people feeling entitled to other people's bodies. The fact that you have to describe "what rape culture means to me" means that it's a meaningless, subjective term. Also, your wording is ambiguous: do you think someone who feels 'entitled to your body', even if they ever act on it, is a manifestation of rape culture? Do you bel…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:49 AM
16

The crime rate is already at its lowest in decades.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 07:49 AM
1

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 08:57 AM
2

I think the way the kids would say it is ... /r/thathappened
/r/MensRights16/02/16 08:40 AM
3

But "no sex until you get snipped" is not abuse. This is where we disagree.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:20 AM
7

Perhaps he was inexperienced and grew up with the idea that women don't actually enjoy sex, and don't do anything during sex?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 07:14 AM
1

http://freebeacon.com/issues/new-yorks-anti-manspreading-campaign-cost-76707/ No, millions of dollars weren't wasted combating manspreading alone. But GP said "these issues," which includes other stupid shit like ban bossy and a whole host of woozles. Also, it took me literally 5 seconds to open a new browser window, type "manspreading campaign", and see that link as the second hit.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 04:32 AM
1

Feminism is a very broad church At least you admit that it's a religion. That's a step.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 09:19 AM
2

I love this pathetic dodge. "This thing that you're challenging me on that is a result of feminism? Well I don't know anything about that but let me talk about something unrelated to tell you how you're wrong about feminism." Police at all levels, from what I have seen, are unlikely to be feminist and significantly likely to be MRA. From what you've seen? Seriously? Do you have a shred of data to support this? Didn't think so. You sure do type a whole hell of a lot for as little as you have to s…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 09:17 AM
9

I love how feminism is one big ball of "but think about the women!" But when someone else uses the excuse, "but think about the women!" to argue against something that feminists want, well that's part of the larger gender war and clearly bigoted.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:49 PM
5

It's both. You aren't enlightening anyone here, and nobody called anyone a wuss except you.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 06:33 PM
1

I didn't see any examples of targeted bullying there. Just a bunch of idiots posting their opinions.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:25 AM
1

No. Both Trump and the Twitter user are idiots, because they ignore the 90% of the military rape victims who are men.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:09 AM
1

Why do you think a famous person like Bill Cosby would need to drug and rape women when fame alone will generally have them lining up to jump on your dick?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:56 AM
1

Kind of goes off the rails there around the time it mentions the illuminati and satanists who control society to keep the black man down.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 07:51 AM
2

Can confirm. I don't have numbers, but a large percentage of my "best" matches list feminism and patriarchy in their profiles. =\
/r/MensRights26/01/16 05:39 AM
3

If you don't trust the anonymous, random stranger you just met at the bar Not everybody engages in the same reckless partner selection that you apparently do. Nice try at poisoning the well though and victim blaming though.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:20 AM
1

Your first line was good. Fell apart in the last 2 paragraphs though. If they're in an exclusive sexual relationship there's no reason they shouldn't be able to trust each other in regards to both VD and pregnancy. If they've both been checked out and choose to have sex without a condom, it's not out of laziness. It's because it's better.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:19 AM
3

Roles that naturally fall to men? What does that even mean? Like men having more raw physical strength? How do you know what is natural, and further, why should the natural dictate our lives? Men aren't hunting mammoths and women don't picky berries anymore. "Natural" might not be the best word, but "generally biologically predisposed" is more accurate and basically says the same thing in a lot more syllables. The typical man is just going to have different interests and abilities than the typic…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 07:13 AM
0

Are you trying to say that women are equal or better at chess, that they have better world records in the Olympics, or that they do better in math? You're the one that needs to provide proof. Where's your evidence? Every one of those things is utterly dominated by men. And I don't even really care about the "who's better at what" bullshit; it's uninteresting. The sexes are different and have different strengths and weaknesses. Only someone with no grip on reality would call acknowledging that fa…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 06:05 AM
1

We are seeing that with the behavior of muslim refugees in europe. If the refugee gangs were targeting men, men would be just as exposed as the women were. They were choosing targets that they could overwhelm; an individual man wouldn't have any better chance against a gang than a woman would. Also, from what I've read, they did attack some men, and those victims have been ignored just as much as the female victims were. Perhaps more.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 07:14 PM
10

Not really the same thing. The Kafkatrap is of the form, "if you don't admit that you're X, that proves that you're X." This is "if you don't believe X exists, it proves that you're X." I'd agree that the headline is overstating things, but it's not a Kafkatrap.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 09:05 AM
5

If those things are important to you, you do them. Why should he be responsible for it? And if you do insist that he help you with the things that are important to you but not to him -- what do you do in return?
/r/MensRights14/01/16 09:29 AM
4

You seem to have a misunderstanding of how "black-out drunk" works. A person can be completely lucid during a blackout. There is absolutely no way to know from looking at someone if they are blacked out. In short, just because you don't remember, doesn't make it rape is absolutely true.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:09 AM
1

So your hypothesis is that this guy's (admittedly anecdotal, but lining up with every other janitor's claims that I've ever seen) experience is due in some part to vagrants just happening to occasionally choose women's bathrooms to dirty up? Care to explain your reasoning?
/r/MensRights03/01/16 12:30 AM
2

Even if the majority of the men in the MRM aren't misogynists some most certainly are. And don't you also think I would imagine "I think" and "I feel" are not arguments, and that's all you've brought to the table. "Some" is a weasel word with zero meaning. Bring unbiased statistics or STFU. Seriously. Nobody is engaging you because you have brought literally nothing to the table worth engaging with. I don't give a shit about your feelings, and you've proven already that you're extremely biased.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 07:41 PM
1

There is no default biological setting. That's a myth.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 03:53 AM
12

Ugh. No. A pedophile is someone who is attracted to pre-pubescent children. 14 is not pre-pubescent.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 10:08 AM
1

Oh hey, did you used to write that ridiculous Single Asian Female webcomic?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:52 AM
3

Eh, I really think this is a different situation. If something is shoved in your face and you decide to make a point by burning it, that seems like a reasonable thing to do. If you're actively going out of your way to be offended by something and seeking out things to burn, that's a completely different mindset.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:42 AM
3

when they attack you it's on the basis of your resume Oh bullshit. They'll happily attack you for being un-American or for being too soft on X because you don't want to go all-in on eradicating whatever scourge it is that they want eliminated.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 03:27 AM
36

I've read a lot of "feminism is about" but I've never once heard someone say "fairness". So congratulations on coming up with an original idea, I suppose. But feminism isn't about fairness either, or you'd see more feminists in the media wanting to give people who disagree with them a fair opportunity to respond. Instead you get nothing but constant smearing of anyone who gives even the faintest hint that they're not 100% on board with everything 'feminism' has done.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 04:10 AM
3

I'm 100% pro choice. People fighting to close abortion clinics is not an example of sexism. People not voting for a woman because she is not strong enough is not sexism; people not voting for any women would be, but statistics show that women are more likely to win a race than a man, all other things being equal, which would suggest that there aren't a lot of people who do this.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:09 PM
1

Let's pretend that there were zero women in college until recently. I'll grant you that. Now let's also acknowledge that a tiny minority of men went to college until recently. Is this really the huge problem that you seem to think it is?
/r/MensRights13/09/15 08:32 PM
1

and most of the other things that women happen to use more than men mostly due to social pressures Due to social pressures? Bullshit. I know it's just anecdotal, but at my old office that was primarily staffed by women, every single one of childbearing age was absolutely thrilled to get pregnant and have a kid. Every single one was excited to get their maternity leave. One of them specifically planned to have her second kid, take her maternity leave, and then quit as soon as her leave ran out. N…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 08:17 PM
4

No they aren't. Radio waves and light waves are both electromagnetic waves, but they're on completely separate parts of the spectrum. The dumb questions were 11 and 12: inventor of a vaccine is a "history" question, not a "science" question. Astrology doesn't "study" how people are affected by the movement of the planets and the stars, it just makes bald-faced assertions that "this is how you will be affected."
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:54 PM
4

How does that make it better? Seriously? So you're free to discriminate as long as you charge people membership? Would it be ok to have a white-only gym as long as people pay for membership? Your argument is just special pleading. It's idiotic.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:44 PM
1

"Men are defective women. Men should be more like women. Men should not complain when they act more like women and are unattractive to women. Any expression of male sexuality is objectifying of and threatening to women. Men feel entitled to women's bodies and seeking any sexual activity with a woman in any way that some feminist somewhere disagrees with is wrong." Yeah, I can see that going really well.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 06:12 AM
0

Personally, I don't understand why people adopt non-descriptive labels at all. 'Feminist' is a horrible label because it basically has zero meaning. I'd guess that you're one of those types that wants to "reclaim" the word. You might get more accomplished to that end by talking with the shitty "feminists" that you disagree with, though. Good luck finding a feminist forum where you won't be immediately banned for dissent.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 06:07 AM
9

There are plenty of polyamorous people. (Incidentally, most of the ones I've met are incredibly pious, unbearably judgmental assholes) Cheating is not polyamory.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:54 PM
5

I also have a preference for men who don't refer to women as "things." I have a preference for women who don't have an arbitrary shit test that they expect men to perform to prove themselves worthy of her affection. But it's ok; our preferences won't conflict anyway. I don't ask women out because feminists have told me far too many times that they don't want me to and that it is a creepy thing to do.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:47 AM
5

Saying "all men are idiots" is not the opposite of saying "all feminists are stupid".
/r/MensRights18/08/15 04:29 AM
1

And even better yet, "no consequences" could also be interpreted as "no consequences for the victim". If there were absolutely no consequences for anyone, why would it matter?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:21 PM
2

real movement to kill all men Nobody worth listening to is stupid enough to think this.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:44 AM
5

Just because people want female superiority and CALL themselves feminists, does not make them feminists. I have an idea: why don't you go tell them that? Why don't you tell them that they're bigots? I doubt you'll get very far. And besides, it takes courage to stand up to people who you consider to be your "in-group." Instead you're in here lecturing us about NAFALT. Maybe if the real "feminists" had done a better job policing their movement, it wouldn't have been overrun by obvious anti-intelle…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:36 AM
5

The great this is that because there's this huge push in tech to hire more women, the biggest companies (Microsoft, Google, Apple, Amazon) snap up a higher percentage of women than the industry average, making every other company have an even worse percentage of female programmers and engineers. Then feminists can point to the no-name companies with next to no women in STEM positions and point to how hostile they clearly are.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:21 AM
8

From where I stand, feminism is either the source of or exacerbates most existing problems for men. Feminists have convinced me of this. All I had to do was start paying attention to what they were saying.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 04:49 AM
7

that once there is a fetus inside of her, it's not just her body A fetus is not a human being. Her body is still her body. She's under no obligation to lend it to anyone for any reason. Her not consulting you was a dick move, but that's her prerogative. Sorry you handled it in such an unhealthy way, but that's not her fault either. You gotta own your own shit.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 06:46 AM
6

You are conflating Feminist with woman As do most feminists.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 06:39 AM
1

No, men do not gravitate to the end of the spectrum on average. Men have a wider spectrum. That's it. As a result, there are more smart and dumb men, but the average man still has an IQ of 100.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 03:54 PM
1

In many households the woman ends up working full time and doing the food prep, planning, and all the majority of the housework. This is only true if you count "housework" the way feminists count housework: work that women typically do is "housework". Work that men typically do doesn't count towards anything. Also, the average female "full-time" job is 36 hours. The average male "full-time" job is 42 hours. So yes, women, ON AVERAGE, have more time to do things around the house. And they, ON AVE…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 04:27 AM
1

Or, for someone like me who could go above and beyond, but learned very quickly that it wouldn't actually help to distinguish me much from the other people getting participation awards, it completely kills any motivation to work hard.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:39 AM
3

Acknowledging reality is not "implying blame". I obviously don't know whether it is true or not, but it seems likely that there's something to the idea. Women choose who they like, and men are more than happy to keep other men who haven't been selected away from "their" women.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 06:35 AM
0

Umm, no, you can thank a statistician for them. There's some overlap, but economists are something entirely different.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:05 AM
7

it would be great to know that guys are growing up learning that rape isn't cool & we're all afraid of it. We do know. Now you know that we know and you can stop making these insulting, bigoted, propagandist videos!
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:16 AM
3

No, no I really wouldn't. That would be an absolutely disproportionate response to something that caused me no discernible harm or danger.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 12:35 AM
2

The only person who brought up Fox News is OP himself. He effectively derailed the conversation because 90% of the comments on the post are in this idiotic thread.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:41 AM
1

Yes they do and those outlets never get called out on Reddit. You dipshit, what do you think things like /r/KotakuInAction and half the stuff in this sub are? If you could get over your pathetic victim complex, most of the stuff you post when you're not whining about the evil moron lib'ruls is fairly decent. I even upvote you, believe it or not. Hell, in this case I upvoted your submission, and I'm happily giving you the downvotes you so crave in comments because this whining bullshit doesn't he…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:39 AM
2

That's a ridiculous view and a straw man. I've never heard anyone describe gender inequality in this way. Seriously? You haven't been listening much, apparently.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:53 AM
2

However, this is what I've got to know, guys. Why do very few men take me seriously when I say I'm a lesbian? Because what do they have to lose? I doubt if it has anything to do with them taking you seriously or not; it's more a matter of, "hey, I think she's attractive. Why not make a play for her?" Sure, it's annoying to you, but it's not like it hurts you or anything. Also, as a lesbian, do you initiate dating interaction? How many messages do you get from other women? For male/female dating,…
/r/MensRights21/03/15 02:43 AM
3

Questions: Are you a member of those boys clubs? Could you join them? Are they "boys clubs" because they are just for men exclusively, or are they "boys clubs" because they happen to be mostly men who know each other and look out for each other's interests?
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:39 PM
4

Creep shaming may be a less significant issue on an institutional level, but at a personal level it can be incredibly significant to individuals who have had it affect them in a negative way.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:36 PM
8

Because liberals don't give a shit about MSNBC, while as stated earlier, Fox has a larger audience than any other cable news network. False equivalence much? You're comparing the guy yelling on a soapbox on the corner that everybody mostly ignores to the one in a suit giving press releases in front of the courthouse.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:11 PM
1

If that's what she'd meant, then it would have been very easy to clarify in the surrounding context. Even something like, "women are the primary surviving victims of war" or "soldiers who have died are obviously beyond help" would be enough to at least acknowledge the sacrifices made. But she doesn't bother. It's basically, "it sucks for me that someone else died."
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:02 AM
1

Why would someone expressing interest in you, sexual or otherwise, in a completely non-hostile or threatening way, be "creepy" to you? The only explanation I can think of is that you (like Watson) are likely a sex-negative puritan.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 12:32 AM
1

Rush Limbaugh is an idiot. I'm not sure why you would not understand the comparison. And yes, I've listened to him. The guy thinks that the amount of sex a woman has is somehow proportional to the cost of her birth control. He is a moron that makes a living telling people what they want to hear. Just like Valenti.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 05:56 AM
1

Actually: in order to get positive reviews is wrong. She got positive press, but she got zero positive reviews. It's factually incorrect, and sadly, it's one of the things that anti-GG constantly points to, saying "hurr durr, she didn't get positive reviews, so obviously nothing you say is true." So yeah, this is exactly the kind of ignorant thing that makes GGers look bad.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:44 AM
2

Yeah, because RINO isn't actually a thing that Republicans say. Shit, do you even pay attention to what (presumably) your side does?
/r/MensRights04/03/15 04:31 AM
3

I thought feminists and liberals loved taxation? You clearly have a deep understanding of liberals.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 04:39 AM
1

I liked Karen's underlining. It showed a whole shitload of sources to back her statements. Unlike the other, nearly hyperlink-free essay which was a lot of word salad saying, "women are oppressed because I say so."
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:02 AM
10

But that logic fails anyway: if there are no men using either bathroom, then having both bathrooms be gender neutral would effectively be the same thing as having one gender neutral and one women's only.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:42 AM
1

How about ones that shut down a college campus for several hours? Do those usually hit the news? Or are you just pulling a false equivalence out of your ass here?
/r/MensRights15/02/15 03:02 AM
2

Are you implying that you think we'd be better off if government didn't have a monopoly on force? If not, what the fuck is your point of nitpicking semantics? "Statism," as you like to call it, is basically just the codified will of the people. Get rid of that, and suddenly it becomes mob rule and whoever has the biggest mob wins. Then whoever has the biggest mob will eventually codify their rules for an air of legitimacy and claim authority to use force. Then you're right back where you started…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:55 PM
2

I don't doubt that this has happened, but I certainly doubt the frequency for these reasons alone: That fraternity is a top tier meaning there are men who come from rich, influential families. It's weird that they would feel the need to spike drinks but they have. That fraternity got in trouble because a lot of guys drank from it and passed out with the ladies. 1) well-off guys tend to have women lining up to jump on their dicks. 2) if this happened with any appreciable frequency, you'd hear abo…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:52 AM
4

And you can't reason with the Republican Party or the modern American right. Their entire platform rests on the pillar of religion, and you can't reason with someone who believes they have 'God' on their side. (Substitute 'God' for 'Free Market' as necessary. It's all religion to the fanatics, and the fanatics largely drive both parties.)
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:16 AM
1

Find me an example of the MRM having a direct negative effect like this on either women or men out in the real world. I'll wait. Remember, Feminism hurts women too.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:12 PM
3

Number of survivors doesn't tell much of a story, and even the survival rate doesn't mean much on its own. In fact, one could argue that using the absolute number of survivors is a pants-on-fire lie with statistics. If you don't know the ratio of men to women on the ships, the statistic is utterly worthless. Looking through the paper, it seems that overall, men had a survival rate of nearly 40% vs. women's survival rate of nearly 30%. This really isn't much of a surprise. But it also appears tha…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:20 AM
4

Actually, that sounds pretty nice to me.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 08:28 AM
1

Are you seriously trying to tell me that a black man in America doesn't face a different set of obstacles and types of discrimination than a trans man or a white man? You could do yourself a big favor to quit strawmanning nearly everyone that disagrees with you.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:17 AM
0

It was an example of bad overreaching policy. Why the fuck do you think he would defend it? Then you go on and mischaracterize his entire argument. Can't tell if you're trolling or just genuinely stupid.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:51 PM
2

I think one of the biggest problems in this sub is it doesn't address how economics come into play with gender issues I think the biggest problem with feminism is that it pretends that gender/identity issues are bigger than socioeconomic issues.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 09:40 PM
3

Not really, because in the process it's doubled the workforce and driven down everybody's wages. It's a Red Queen scenario; everybody has to run twice as fast to stay in the same place.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:06 AM
2

I don't think it's terror that prevents the discussion you were hoping to have; it's a lack of interest. I think my thoughts on the subject can be summed up as, "yep, women can be pretty fucked up serial killers too, and it doesn't get acknowledged much." There just isn't a whole lot more to say.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 01:25 AM
5

I pretty much associate the left with the Democratic Party This is your first mistake. The Democrats aren't even remotely left.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 12:25 AM
6

There is no definition of patriarchy. It is a boogeyman that means whatever the speaker wants it to mean.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 09:57 PM
0

Holy strawman, Batman.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 07:53 PM
2

Republicans seem to be evil because the only thing that they promise is that they want people to work and fend for themselves. FYI, I don't think Republicans are evil, and the reasons that you've given for why they seem to be evil aren't the reasons that I won't vote for them. In short: you don't even understand the problems that many of us have with the Republican party.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:08 AM
2

There's no such thing as free healthcare. No shit, Sherlock. That was never the argument, no matter how desperately the Republican party wanted to paint it that way. The argument is that we're so poorly 'optimizing' how we spend our money on healthcare that it's way, way more expensive than it should be. Any cost saving measures that we could have had went out the window when Republicans made sure that single-payer would never be an option; instead we got the biggest bail-out for health insuranc…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:06 AM
2

Men should have the right to completely wash their hands of any responsibility? Yes. Just like women have that right and multiple avenues to pursue it.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:41 AM
2

The difference is that, well, not as many people insult men as women Do you have any data to support this? Recent polls by Pew would suggest otherwise; men receive more face-to-face namecalling and harassment. It seems unlikely that they would receive less indirect namecalling. Unless, maybe, people just tend to vent more about women behind their backs because they aren't allowed to insult them to their face. Hypothesis for someone to pursue?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 08:01 AM
-9

So?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:41 AM
6

http://www.firstpost.com/world/peshawar-live-132-children-9-school-staff-died-in-taliban-attack-says-pakistan-army-1852007.html Here's a link. It specifically says "one female teacher".
/r/MensRights16/12/14 09:10 PM
1

If you divorced the hatred of men, in particular Caucasian/Christian men, the left would cease to exist. You could have typed this more simply by saying, "I am completely ignorant of what the left stands for."
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:38 AM
0

I'm a liberal; I read the article. The article itself was pretty good. The comments were terrible, of the MattClark "Durr, liberals r dumb" variety. Just ignore him. He makes decent points when he's not whining about liberals.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:27 AM
5

Feminists are the left's version of religious authoritarians. Many of us on the left are tired of them and want them gone and discredited.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 07:47 PM
2

Christina Hoff Sommers is a registered democrat.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 09:17 AM
-4

Do you not understand that at least some context for this anecdote would be necessary before it could be evaluated? Was the guy your boyfriend? Was he a random guy on the street in the middle of a crowd? Was he your boss? And even with context for the anecdote, it is not data. I've had women do shitty things to me in public too. It's nearly impossible to make it through life without experiencing some negative things from a variety of people. Something relatively benign that happens once or twice…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 09:00 AM
0

If men lived 4-5 years longer, do you think that feminists would give men the benefit of the doubt and just chalk it up to biological factors?
/r/MensRights12/12/14 08:51 AM
4

That's like saying you're doing something wrong by being black, or straight Actually, no. You don't choose your race, you don't choose your sexual orientation, and you don't choose your sex. You do, however, choose which ideologies you support. (Ignoring the fact that many people's ideologies are more or less chosen for them by their parents; this applies far less to feminists however, because most of them pick it up later in life)
/r/MensRights12/12/14 08:47 AM
3

When someone begs for negative moderation, I always indulge their oppression complex.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:09 AM
0

And one could argue that the "philosophy" behind Christianity is that one should be humble and treat others with kindness and respect. Unfortunately, when that philosophy is practiced by people in positions of power, they fuck it up just as much as feminists have. And they do it with clear conscience because they believe they're doing it for the good of the people.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 01:03 AM
1

You're free to believe what you want. You aren't free to force your beliefs on others, or to force legislation or policy based on beliefs that aren't based on factual evidence. If you meet those criteria, cool.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 07:12 AM
1

You think it's so awful that women are shamed for having sex? Men are shamed for even desiring sex. And they're also shamed for not having sex. I honestly do not see much of what you call "slut shaming" happening in general society, and what does happen mostly comes from other women. However, shaming of male sexual desire is absolutely pervasive and it comes from everybody.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 06:27 AM
7

Pointing out a double-standard is not hypocritical.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:55 AM
2

So, in your Orwellian world, who would hire the guy? He's responsible for manslaughter whether he plays for the NFL or if he shovels shit for a living. If it's not ok for an NFL team to hire him for something he's good at, why is it ok for a stable to hire him for something he might be good at? Would it be ok for him to play football if, say, he had to pay 50% of his salary to taxes? 70%? 90%? 100%, and we let him live off of food stamps? Perhaps he gets to keep, say, $25k untaxed per year and a…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:33 PM
1

for us to ask men on dates This, I find hilarious. I recently moved to Seattle, with the thought that "it should be much easier to meet women out here, because there are so many liberal, empowered women!" Nope. It's absolutely no different than anywhere else I've lived. I get to make all the moves. Still have the dozens of "likes" on dating sites but zero messages. And your strawmanning of what MRAs want is hilarious.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:53 PM
1

And I also include the dislike of and prejudice against women. It's semantics, really, though I resent that I am apparently "just wrong." Different dictionaries, different uses in different contexts. Oh well see, my definition of misogyny includes words spoken or written by anyone who has double consonants in their name, and since we're just going to use arbitrary, subjective definitions, my definition is just as good as yours. Misogynist.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:38 PM
1

Yeah, that's going to work out well for you. I love reading these "I saved the day with a gun!" fantasies. So you hit a woman (in self defense, obviously) and then pull a gun (again in self defense) when a mob rushes you. Let's say that the gun scares everyone off and they leave you alone, as happens in your fantasy. Now you're going to have a room full of eye witnesses saying "he just attacked a woman, then started waving a gun around! He was crazy!" This is your best case scenario. Now let's c…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:00 PM
2

Just, listen. I have listened. And I have stopped caring. Because of idiotic shit like this.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 06:00 AM
2

I think the point he's getting at is that your delayed response may be because you were out raping someone. Can you prove that you weren't? What about last night? You might claim to have been sleeping, but I heard on good authority that you were actually raping someone. Can you show us evidence that you didn't? In fact, these accusations about you are getting so pervasive that I'm going to have to assume that for any moment in your life that you don't have an airtight alibi, you must have been r…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 03:44 AM
3

It's only OK to make gender-based put-downs if you're the first lady of the US.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:50 AM
2

Apparently you don't know about the Citizens United case. That lies squarely on your Republican shoulders.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:29 PM
3

Many rich people are Republicans and get government favors, too. Your two examples don't illustrate shit about what the Democrat's policies are. All they serve is an example of your own confirmation bias and availability heuristic.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:25 PM
-1

Yeah, the right never pushes War on (subject) propaganda. Ever. No annual war on Christmas. No war on Terror. No war on Drugs. Nah.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:15 PM
3

This is an over simplistic generalization of what the "left" believes. The large presence of progressives in this board itself should be an indicator of that.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:10 PM
5

Yes, it is incredible to see just how fucking warped your worldview is.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:13 AM
3

Congratulations on winning the "I don't understand statistics!" badge of the day. Turns out fatherless and/or poor kids are more inclined to commit violent crime than average kids are, and that black kids are far more likely to be fatherless and/or poor, and when you control for those things black kids aren't more likely than any other demographic to commit violent crime. But the way you say it is a thinly veiled justification for actual racism.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:17 AM
10

That's not "to be fair". It's elevating an irrelevant distraction to a point of discussion that then has to be addressed and dismissed.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 01:13 AM
1

There's a big difference between being a member of a religion and pandering to the loudest, most regressive members of that religion. Someone who goes to church every Sunday: no big deal. Someone who thinks that creationism should be taught alongside evolution: big deal. The two are not the same.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:54 AM
9

I'm sorry, but claims of female subjugation, especially in Western civilization, is absolutely idiotic.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 12:04 AM
1

The point, which you seem to have missed, is that even when phrased as "we should teach them to not make girls cry instead" is that it frames the discussion in a way that makes the interests of the boys matter because of how it affects girls. It is the same with nearly every one of these sexist, bigoted campaigns. Yes, I will agree that it is very slightly better than just blaming boys for their own conditioning, but it's still a sexist, bigoted, gynocentric message.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:44 PM
1

The thing is, it doesn't even matter when, exactly, the relationship started. Whether it's a case of her using sex to get positive press, or him using his position in the press to get sex, BOTH are a case of ethics violations. Whether the sex or the articles happened first is a complete red herring.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:34 PM
1

There's a world of difference between quotes from a random internet asshole and quotes from an influential figure in the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:58 AM
1

I realize you're playing devil's advocate, but I think your argument is still stupid. You could arguably say that there's a power imbalance if it happens in a situation where the subject (hey, how can the objectified one be the subject?!) of the catcalls is isolated from any possible protection. However, none of these stupid videos show that. They show situations where, should the guys try to assert their supposed "power" over the poor helpless ladies, there are any number of people around who w…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:24 AM
2

Well, initially, it was. The whole thing would have been a non-issue if there were any competence whatsoever at the media outlets and they'd just issued a mea culpa and started disclosing conflicts of interest. But the social justice warriors insisted that it was about them. So now it's about them too. They seem to think that they're social media savvy but clearly don't understand the Streisand effect. They picked the fight, they got it. It would give me an immense amount of personal satisfactio…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 10:04 AM
1

It's no different than how any other religious demographic indoctrinates children.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:22 AM
1

Do you similarly jump to the defense of people telling a "go make me a sammich" joke?
/r/MensRights10/10/14 10:13 PM
1

enough incidents like that occur in our society that the situation is almost a cliche. Availability heuristic. Confirmation bias. Learn them.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 09:29 PM
1

That must be where all of that Kickstarter money went; gotta pay for her Twitter monitorer.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:21 PM
2

I want to have a proper discussion about it No you don't, because any disagreement you encounter will just be met with your cries of "you don't know what you're talking about! Educate yourself!" as if you're the only special snowflake that has ever done any reading on the subject. You've already done so repeatedly in this thread.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 08:31 AM
1

I don't doubt anything you say, however you omit one thing that most other women who complain about this also do: what's the frequency? Daily? Weekly? Monthly? I've been cat called several times as a man; I've had unattractive, creepy women say stuff to me when I'm out and about. It's very infrequent, but it does happen. Do I get to complain about street harassment? Then you have women equating "a guy stared at me" and "a guy told me he'd like to fuck me raw". Then they equate a guy staring at t…
/r/MensRights03/10/14 07:59 PM
2

It's also sexist assuming that the dad needs to be encouraged to help mom.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 12:19 AM
1

Were the pants against the dress code? There's a big difference between being sent home for violating a dress code and being sent home for oppressive gender norms. I'd bet good money that any guy who chose to wear a skirt to your mom's school would have not only been sent home as well, but mocked to hell and back by his classmates.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:44 PM
3

Did it hurt anybody? No? GTFO. And no, you choosing to be offended doesn't meet the definition of "hurt anybody".
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:12 AM
1

Roughly 40%.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:09 AM
3

“I really believe in this war and I’m really keen to help.” She replies: “Rubbish, if you were really keen to help you would have killed yourself to raise morale.” No one can seriously believe this to be the right opinion. Sounds more like a parody of hyper-patriotic rhetoric to me. It depends. If, for example, a Homer Simpson-esque character is delivering that line, it's obviously not meant to be taken seriously. If Lisa or Marge deliver it, it becomes much less obvious how the authors meant it…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:00 PM
2

Here's the difference between AVfM-like satire and feminist "satire": I'm pretty sure Paul Elam actually cares for women. I'm also pretty sure that most feminists "care for" men in the same way bigoted Christians "care for" gay people. And yes, I'm sure if I listened to you speak for any length of time about gender issues, I'd hear the same bigotry out of your mouth that I hear from every other feminist -- even the ones who think they are incredibly reasonable and level-headed. It would be one t…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:24 AM
3

Holy shit. That page is a sight to see.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 08:57 AM
2

The argument you'll hear from feminists is that breasts are not a sexual organ. Also, stop staring at breasts. You're turning women into sex objects by doing that.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:51 AM
1

Not to defend the pay gap myth, but in this case presumably the threshold would have been crossed in the other direction. 100% -> 75% instead of 50% -> 85%.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 02:19 AM
2

Question: would you have the nerve to ask this question in regards to some of the 'lesser' forms of FGM?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:31 PM
1

I think, by and general, the MHRM is an apolitical movement and people who try to claim it as one do severe damage to it.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 06:10 AM
1

When I was in my all girls high school, our computer classes involved learning how to touch type. Computer science didn't exist as far as our school was concerned. So from my experience, computer science wasn't an option for females. Hey, there was no computer science in my high school either! Only touch typing! I guess we were both equally oppressed and discouraged from learning technical subjects.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 03:43 AM
1

Yet criticizing gender specific posters is a favorite past time here. No, criticizing gender-specific campaigns is a favorite pass time here. Do you understand the difference?
/r/MensRights12/08/14 06:35 PM
1

I am offended that you are presuming things without enough data to support your conclusion. Do you have any data? Because all you currently have is the bald-faced assertion that "men can fight, therefore they are all combatants."
/r/MensRights11/08/14 11:57 PM
1

Dude, acknowledging religious parallels with feminism is actually a pretty damn strong indicator that people should approach feminist claims with a healthy dose of skepticism. Sorry if that makes you uncomfortable. Comforting lies benefit nobody.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 07:53 AM
3

Even if I set aside my religious biases against abortion, the feminist obsession with the topic disturbs me. The problem is that it was introduced as a wedge issue to religious voters. If religious voters would shut the fuck up about abortion and quit trying to find ways to make it unavailable, people (not feminists -- people; a lot of us who support abortion are not feminists) would also shut the fuck up about it.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:29 AM
1

Number of patents filed? Seriously?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:02 PM
1

Supply and demand. Supply of labor goes up? Expect the value of labor to decrease. See also: tragedy of the commons. Dual-income households used to be very well off compared to the 'average' household. Well, now dual-income is the 'average' and you need to have two incomes just to stay out of poverty.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:49 AM
0

Your analogy fails because "reproduction" is an "issue". You've replaced "reproduction" with "kittens", but what you needed to do was replace "issue" with "kittens". Also, your sidestepping of "this isn't about reproduction" is completely disingenuous. Control of reproduction almost certainly falls under the category of reproduction.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:49 PM
1

Well, if you make the assumption that the man will always find the woman sexually attractive, then her 'logic' basically works.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:39 AM
1

Probably not, because Mr. Smith probably didn't ever have a widely-circulated video claiming that a large demographic of people are a bunch of misogynistic creeps.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 04:13 AM
4

Oh my god -- everybody check it out! This guy just found someone who was wrong on the internet! That has never happened before! Thanks so much, vicedets! This may be my only opportunity to witness such a rare occasion!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:32 AM
1

They claim to be sex-positive, sure. But they're just as sex-negative when it comes to male sexuality as the Bible-thumpingest fundie conservatives you can find.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:23 AM
2

(since the woman would have to deal with being slut shamed) I will worry about women being slut-shamed as soon as feminists start worrying about men being virgin-shamed. For the record, I used to care about slut-shaming, and also for the record, I really don't give a shit about how many dicks a woman has had inside of her, because it doesn't matter to me. But now? Liberal women living in liberal environments of non-judgement whining about being slut-shamed is just comedic to me.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 10:15 PM
1

If you think that Obama is far left, you are so far right that your perspective is probably as warped as the Westboro Baptist Church.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:55 PM
1

Well good news for you -- he's not going to ever, ever be up for election ever again, so you don't have to worry about people voting for him again! And for the record, I voted for him the first time. He's been a disaster, but almost certainly less of a disaster than McCain/Palin would have been.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:51 PM
1

I tried suggesting that to a feminist. They called me a white-male-privileged patriarchal oppressor. This was someone who was an intelligent friend that I thought was reasonable.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:11 AM
2

No, it's concern trolling. There's a difference. And yes, you're concern trolling.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:09 AM
6

Oh, wow -- thanks for pointing that out. I really didn't follow that. I mean, I was over here thinking that it's idiotic to blame patriarchy (a system that advantages men over women and says men are great and women are worthless) for disadvantaging men and saying that they are stupid, horny animals. Thanks for pointing that out. I guess I should stop looking for the deeper implications in stuff and just take the overly simplified, barely-scratches-the-surface explanation. I mean, it works for fe…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:24 AM
1

You chose to give birth three times, and you're demanding that the rest of society pay for your choices. I don't care how difficult it was for you. There are already plenty of shitty kids on this planet and your 3 probably aren't going to make it any better, so you can climb down off that cross and talk to us as equals or you can be ignored.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:19 AM
1

What an idiotic question. Nearly everyone is going to agree that a thong and shoes are inappropriate attire for school.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:33 AM
3

but so is society for telling them that they are entitled to women You, like almost every feminist, have absolutely no idea what society actually tells men. As a man you are entitled to nothing. You have to earn everything, and if you don't have everything, you're a failure.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:32 AM
5

but I'd argue it doesn't happen as often as older men praying on that vulnerability. You can argue 'til you're blue in the face but without data to back it, your arguments can all be dismissed without consideration. Also, it's "preying".
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:28 AM
4

Anybody who ignores half of the problem that they're purportedly trying to solve is stupid. Feminists ignore the problems faced by the male half of humanity. At best, they'll acknowledge that "men have problems; their maleness and other men."
/r/MensRights23/07/14 02:18 AM
1

And will probably always mostly be men. Even if it were 60/40 or 55/45, there would still be complaints.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 06:21 AM
1

Don't worry; none of them will be brave enough to admit that the emperor has no clothes, and anyone who claims that you're a fraud will be cast out on your behalf.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 06:11 AM
11

You'll notice one thing in all of these: They ignore female rapists. Until I start hearing feminists repeating the easily available statistics that address the large amounts of female-perpetrated rape in the world, I will assume that everything else they say in regards to rape is an outright lie. See also: domestic violence, sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:17 PM
14

FTFY. You don't know jack shit about what individual MRAs think. Quit projecting your own lack of empathy on others.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 08:13 PM
5

So which government position or senior position in a corporation or company do you hold? I don't hold any of them. I'm unlikely to ever hold them. I know from experience that men are happy to throw any other man under the bus as quickly as possible if it will make themselves look better, so all those dudes in power aren't likely to do jack shit for me.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:17 PM
0

I'm going to give you a suggestion: Next time you've typed up a comment that has the word "leftist" or "libtard" or "leftie" or any other variation thereof, just don't post it. They aren't constructive and just make you look like a moron. If you feel that you must post shit like this, consider this an automatic reply from this "leftist": go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:10 PM
0

Abortion is not a Mens issue. Quit repeating this nonsense. You sound like a feminist. Abortion is very much a men's issue. Say you and your girlfriend end up with an unwanted pregnancy, and can't get an abortion and you are forced into fatherhood (just like she's forced into motherhood). Just because men aren't the one carrying the fetus to term does not mean it has no effect on their lives.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:06 AM
3

Recent studies showed 80% of MRA's oppose gay marriage. If this is true, it's not a bragging point.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 09:03 AM
0

Here's the difference: liberals don't take MSNBC seriously. Conservatives take FOX News very seriously. Also, would you also like to see the poll results for how well informed viewers of various news stations are? FOX always comes in dead last.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 08:14 AM
1

Stranger-in-the-bushes rapists, or drugs-victims-to-unconsciousness rapists, sure. I'll grant that seeing them as worse than murderers is at least reasonable. They're also fairly rare. Took-advantage-of-her-drunken-buzz-to-get-some 'rapists', or wasn't-100%-sure-about-consent-and-went-ahead-anyway 'rapists', or asked-multiple-times-until-she-said-yes 'rapists'? Nope. Keep in mind, when we talk about 'rapists' in feminist's eyes, they want to invoke the boogeyman image of the former category whil…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 06:49 PM
2

I'm paying your game here. You should stop. You're not very good at it. You sound like a conservative Christian trying to describe how much liberals hate Christmas.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:48 AM
4

Patriarchy: men are the source of all problems. Intersectionality (aka Patriarchy 2.0): white, heterosexual, cissexual men are the source of all problems. And for the record, when I first heard about intersectionality, I was excited. I thought maybe feminism had finally learned something and just might add something about socioeconomic status in there. Nope! Every white, heterosexual, cissexual man is obviously at the top of the SES food chain!
/r/MensRights22/06/14 05:26 AM
1

I just don't have the energy tonight to keep fighting about abortion. That'll be a job for tomorrow. There's your problem: this isn't about abortion. Try to keep up.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:45 AM
3

What you just described -- the LGBTQ poly/kink sex-positive community -- is something that I just got somewhat exposed to through a friend who is thoroughly feminist, queer, kinky and poly. This is in the Seattle area, which is apparently poly/kink central. From being around these people, one thing I can say for absolute certain is that they are not male-sex-positive. They are traditionalists when it comes to male sexuality (icky/scary/predatory) but "you go girl" when it comes to female sexuali…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:58 AM
1

And Elam is completely opposed to violence. Calls to violence or threats are one of the few things that will get someone immediately banned from the AVfM message boards.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:58 AM
1

She maintains that they are "indirectly" your best friends, as their aims would ultimately help men in the same way the quote describes. I'd never really considered it before, but this line of reasoning sounds a lot like supply-side economics.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:45 AM
1

Special pleading. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:41 AM
3

As opposed to feminism, where every problem gets resolved in a week and you never hear about it again. Oh wait, no, I think they're still complaining about the same non-issues that they were back in the 90s. And 80s. And 70s. And 60s.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:28 AM
6

I have bad news for you: they've taught you that you're an eternal victim, and all of your replies in this thread make it very obvious. :( I hope you heal someday. I've been deeply hurt by women. I know that not all women hurt people, but it doesn't make it any easier to deal with them. But I also know that that's on me to fix. I don't project it onto all women and blame them and, even worse, make up shit to be mad at them about.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 04:06 AM
1

Oh good -- I'll remember this next time I feel like starting a fight. Walk up, punch someone, then immediately start walking away, and claim to be a victim when they retaliate. You'll be there to accuse my "attacker" of assault, right?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 09:29 PM
1

Did it teach the converse? It's amazing how easy it is for people to fail to see that their own arguments can be used against their own positions, and also how rarely people apply their own arguments to themselves.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 07:23 PM
1

Did you not see "tend to" in your quoted excerpt? Which basically renders your entire rant about your own -- individual -- situation completely moot?
/r/MensRights10/05/14 01:43 AM
1

Yes, we desperately need to continue to split ourselves into warring tribes.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:34 AM
3

With the incredible wealth of contraceptive options (many provided at no cost!) that women have under the current system, there is no way you can say that their pregnancies are anything but by choice or negligence. It's completely unfair to have a system where it's men's responsibility to take care of that choice or negligence.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:48 AM
2

The second and third both assume that abortion IS wrong (which can only be true if it is murder). The fact that you think this shows that you are blinded by dogma. There are plenty of reasons that both of those could be true that have nothing to do with murder.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:41 AM
2

What if she lied about being on birth control? What if she poked a hole in the condom? Does he still have to help her pay? And no, that's not the closes thing we can "agree" on. I don't agree that that's an acceptable solution at all.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:37 AM
1

She has options. He has none. Once she is pregnant, she chooses what happens. He has no say whatsoever. With agency comes responsibility. If he has no agency, he should have no responsibility. If she chooses to have the baby, she should get to deal with the responsibility, and part of that may be the responsibility to convince the father that it would be worth his while to stick around and help out. It's really that fucking simple. I don't understand why this is so difficult for you to process.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 06:35 AM
1

It has nothing to do with what's "better for the child". It isn't even a child. Why is that so damn difficult for you to understand?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:23 AM
1

Women can currently make unilateral decisions where children are concerned. Unfortunately, there are biological realities that make 100% fairness impossible. I agree completely that there should be an out for men. I have never heard a compelling argument that women should be forced to carry to term, and yours is just traditionalism wrapped up in a "fairness" bow.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:59 AM
-1

So it's better to kill the child even if the father wants to raise him? Yes. No further elaboration is necessary.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:56 AM
0

Begging the question is circular reasoning. You can't "beg the question" by asking a question. Or did you not see the question mark at the end of that paragraph?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 06:51 AM
1

You're missing the entire point. The point is that being hit on isn't automatically sexual harassment, that women who get hit on aren't delicate flowers who will wilt as soon as a man gets within 10 feet of them, and that men who hit on women aren't automatically some sort of pervert degenerate that should be shamed into never daring to speak to a woman again. You're still doing nothing but coming up with reasons why guys are automatically bad and projecting malicious motives on them, and making…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:29 PM
1

You don't get it. Historical oppression is only a factor if it's female historical oppression. Male historical oppression was just a minor inconvenience for a few unlucky individuals, it wasn't hegemonic systemic oppression, experienced by every woman everywhere in either equal or greater than equal amounts.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 06:18 PM
2

I like how in your mind, disagreement = lack of empathy.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:10 AM
3

It's funny how when you walk into a group of people you don't really know and say, "hey, you guys are all assholes!" they don't really respond well. You'd think feminists would know this by now.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 07:08 AM
5

But How I've always seen it is it's nice to help keep women from having to by something like that and reduce how much they spend on required(though not all of it is) feminine care products and birth related costs, but why should I have to pay more on insurance for coverages that don't apply to my gender when I'm single and living alone? This is exactly wrong. The reason to cover birth control options for women is not because it's a "nice" thing to do. The reason to cover it is because birth cont…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:59 AM
1

No, we are not saying the same thing. You think that "privilege" exists. I used to just accept that too, because I had been told so many times that it does exist. But when you think about it, at all, it's a stupid, meaningless idea. For the feminists/SJW definition, its only use is to shame, marginalize, and dehumanize specific groups of people.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:25 AM
2

Just lose the idea that white male privilege exists at all. It's not uniform and can't be applied to everybody. What use is the term at all other than to shame a specific group of people?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 06:22 AM
1

It's not really about that. It's reckless endangerment and corruption of a minor. I'd say that it's more a reflection of the absolutely ridiculously fearful, unhealthy, self-loathing way we view sex in western cultures.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 12:36 AM
2

Says the tool that spends every fucking post complaining about liberals. Do you see the hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights14/04/14 02:17 AM
23

It's also a fictional story, so there's that.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:07 AM
2

Hi Anecdote, nice to meet you. Do you happen to know "Data"? He's far more reliable for drawing conclusions.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 09:55 PM
0

And you're begging the question here by asserting that the supernatural being called the free market can solve everything.
/r/MensRights05/04/14 06:37 PM
1

Plenty of people on the right also see those on the left as malicious. Even among the less religious, boogeyman labels like "socialist", "communist", and "Marxist" are thrown around in abundance.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 03:12 AM
2

No, by "fluid knowledge" you're just making up phrases to try to sound smart. The problem with the phrase "rape culture" (and most of the rest of feminism's pet oppressions) is that there is no real definition; it means whatever the person arguing it wants it to mean at the time that they mean it. Don't even validate it by insinuating that it's possible to "understand".
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:01 AM
0

It's happening in this very thread. Both are happening in this very thread. I'm definitely anti-circumcision, and I'll happily call anybody who tries to suggest that it's no big deal an ignoramus, but "you should be madder about this than you are! You're a victim whether you like it or not!" and "I really like the way I am and wouldn't have it any other way, get over it" both get very tiresome.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:14 AM
13

Do you have anything to contribute to these discussions besides whining about liberals? My years of reading this sub would suggest no.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:19 AM
1

I try to believe that, and then I remember that there are still a large number of people who believe in creationism, which has equally absurd supporting evidence.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:00 AM
6

Also, staring down the barrel of a gun and then putting it away, or standing on a ledge and not jumping typically aren't counted as "attempts."
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:16 AM
1

<quote>Women have more options because biologically women have more consequences things happening to their body?</quote> That is not why women have more options. Women have more options because we, as a species and a society, have developed more options for them. Period. End of story.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:36 PM
0

Your naivete. It's cute.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:33 AM
1

Anyone claiming that a fallacious example can still be valid is too stupid to bother debating with. Seriously; that's just embarrassing. You also don't understand statistics. If I'm standing in a group with 10 people, 5 women and 5 men, and the 5 women all make $40k/year and 4 of the men make $40k/year and the other makes $100k/year, then you could say that statistically men do have more income than women, but it would be utterly meaningless to the 4 men that make the same that women do -- espec…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:28 PM
5

Upvoted for honesty.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:18 AM
12

There are plenty of male feminists. And I find that this is a mentality in a lot of cowardly people in general; I've had plenty of supposedly small-government "libertarians" tell me, without a trace of irony, that it's more important to make sure that people get punished than it is to make sure the innocent go free. I guess they just assume that nobody they care about will ever be the innocent one falsely accused.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 07:17 PM
0

And in your myopic view, what works for the BDSM community should work just peachily for the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 09:50 PM
6

Here's the thing, though -- you yourself said: Intellectually I knew that some women lied; however, I couldn’t really ever fathom why someone would, still can’t. You can't possibly believe this. You can't possibly have lived in a world where women never, ever lie or manipulate people. You can't possibly have lived in a world where nobody behaves selfishly or irrationally. I know this because this world doesn't exist. You would have to be either willfully blind or incredibly sheltered to not see …
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:40 AM
1

Dude, you're a racist. Just own it.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 01:54 AM
0

What you wrote is pointlessly offtopic. Despite your belief in your towering intellect, your point was very easily understood, and is also something that practically nobody disagrees with. And, as I said before, it's a strawman that adds precisely nothing to the conversation.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:16 AM
0

Congratulations! You missed the entire point of the article! The whole point is that they're both stinking drunk, yet all the blame always lies with the man. Neither one is capable of clarity of thought, yet the man is a rapist. Your scenarios are something that nobody is disagreeing are rape, but they're the exact same strawman argument put up by NOW.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:09 AM
1

And men didn't get educations for most of it, either.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:51 AM
2

Except that both of your other points are subjective. -"morally wrong." -"Despite what the study says, I'm going to insert my own nonexistent expertise and say that it is addictive anyway." Take your sky wizard justifications elsewhere.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 06:23 AM
7

What would be the point? Validation? The satisfaction of knowing that, if they wanted to, they could have any number of these guys that they've been stringing along? Just because you personally can't see anything worth getting out of it, doesn't mean that there aren't people who do.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:03 PM
0

No, it really isn't. Men have no option but to have a job (I'm ignoring the vanishingly small number of men who are allowed to be house husbands). If there are fewer of them in the workforce, it means that either a) they're being supported by welfare (from the state or parents or friends or whatever) or b) they're homeless. It's great that women can have stable employment and take care of themselves, but that doesn't change the fact that it's entirely optional for them.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:59 PM
0

If you're so concerned about accurate quoting, maybe you shouldn't use weasel words like "many" with the clear implication that this guy is one of them. The only way that implication would be reasonable if there was a high probability (note another weasel word there; 'high' could be 20%, or it could be 90%) that he was one. The only way that it would be reasonable to assume that he fell into this category is if you believed or would like the reader to believe that the the number was high enough …
/r/MensRights14/02/14 02:29 AM
1

Your partisan bullshit isn't helping. I find the anti-intellectualism present on the left FAR less damaging than the entirely anti-science, anti-reality idiocy coming from the right. I spend my time dealing with the morons in my party and trying to keep them in check when I can; I think that the feminists are currently doing to the democratic party what the religious nuts have already done to the republican party. You clean your own house first and then tell us how bad ours is. I see no allies f…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 03:42 AM
0

Do you not understand sarcasm?
/r/MensRights02/11/13 04:24 AM
7

It may be a fake, but I'll say that I've personally had a very similar experience with a woman on a dating site. While I never called her out for stalking specifically, she checked my profile multiple times per day until finally sending me a message after a few weeks, and then was completely unable to pick up on my not-so-subtle messages that I wasn't that interested.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 04:22 AM
8

Also: women (and men) without jobs shouldn't be able to get credit cards.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:35 AM
5

The only way this statistic means anything is if it also compares teams of all women and women + 1 man. Even then it's probably not going to mean anything without a fairly large sample size.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 06:07 PM
2

You know an even better way to have this conversation? Person 1: Why don't black people trust the police? Person 2: Because they have experienced historical discrimination by police against African Americans, corruption in cases involving African Americans, and illegal profiling which means they get hassled by the police despite doing nothing wrong which builds up a lot of resentment. Person 1: That makes sense. I'm not a completely unsympathetic moron so I can see how that would suck. There is …
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:56 AM
3

We'll answer this question right after we're done answering for when we finished beating our wives. Leading question much?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 09:58 PM
1

No, we're talking about internet trolls trying to get the writer's hackles up, and they are very successful at it, because feminists apparently just got on the internet yesterday and can't distinguish trolling from honest comments.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:52 AM
1

Seriously? So you're going to lecture people on Marxism and how bad it is without having even read it? I'm not saying Marxism is either good or bad; I just find it ridiculous that people such as your self see fit to describe someone else's ideas without even taking the time to inform yourself about them. And on top of that, that you don't see a problem with arguing from ignorance.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:43 AM
1

The only thing I derived from this report is that the incredibly simplistic "men abuse, women are abused" line that we hear all the time is clearly not telling the whole story. It doesn't matter if the numbers are exact, or what it is measuring; this report shows that there are plenty of woman abusers out there. Even if it turns out that men are ultimately responsible for 80% and women are responsible for only 20% (numbers pulled out of my ass) of IPV, that's a significant number of female abuse…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:20 AM
3

Don't wear x clothes I've been reading this sub for a while and I have literally never seen this suggestion given in either a non-sarcastic manner, or by some troll who wasn't immediately downvoted into oblivion.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:07 PM
1

Yet what happened was, you were emotionally brutalised into "manning up", pushing it down, "sucking it up" or you were no doubt mocked for it. If the dude doesn't feel like a victim, please don't try to convince him that he is.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:35 PM
1

So, Glenn Beck hasn't come out and denied raping and murdering that girl in 1990. Isn't that interesting? I mean, the lack of denial must mean something.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:44 PM
2

Finally making the link between "original sin" and "privilege" was what made me see the light. I'm sorry if you're a Christian and still believe in original sin and that this alienates you, but for someone who had already completely rejected that idea, this was a very powerful connection.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:29 AM
5

It wasn't Bill O'Reilly that convinced me that feminism had gone too far; it was feminists themselves. If you'd asked me even a year ago whether or not I'm a "feminist," I'd have said yes. I had an almost out-of-body experience watching a good friend of mine supplicate himself to a horde of feminist women (who, by the way, all considered themselves 'good feminists') on Facebook. Continually apologizing for all male behavior, attacking anybody who dared question the legitimacy of their arguments,…
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:39 PM
1

First of all, to a woman all men ARE potential rapists And to a man, all women are potential false-rape-accusers. See where that attitude gets us? And don't start quoting anything aboust statistics about how there's no reasonable fear of men being falsely accused. Statistics also show that there's no reasonable fear of women being raped by a stranger.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:50 PM
1

Your Wikipedia link basically spends the first 4 paragraphs describing how there's no consensus on what rape culture is, or where it even exists. And then you spend this entire thread telling skeptical that s/he doesn't know what rape culture is. This is why it's tough to take people like you seriously. "I have a perfect understanding of this nebulous concept. Your understanding, even though it's one that many other people have as well, is completely incorrect."
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:41 PM
1

I don't see where ejk314 said anything like that. It's just an acknowledgment of the reaction that you're likely to get for even suggesting that maybe rape and sexual assault don't have to be scarring events that are even worse than being murdered.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:48 PM
2

Or, even more likely, "You know, I can't feed my family for that pay, so I can't afford to take that job, even though it's less likely to injure me or leave me with a long-term disability."
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:34 PM
10

If the idea that women are as capable as men, but are socialized to remain immature and childlike in many ways is bigoted, then I am a bigot. And coddling people by censoring ideas that they won't understand is exactly the kind of socializing that allows individuals to remain children. If you never challenge someone, they will never have a chance to overcome the challenge.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:50 PM
1

You'd have a point if there were lots of scouting organizations, and the BSA were one of many who just chose to be heterosexual-only, and boys could choose one that met their needs/preferences. But there aren't lots of scouting organizations. If you insist on making the BSA a "safe space" then essentially you're excluding gays from every scouting organization. And, by far, the best way to overcome fear and bigotry is to expose people to what they're fearful and bigoted towards. You'll see that, …
/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:31 PM
1

This is a pretty terrible false-dichotomy you've presented here. Don't tell us how we should react. It's almost as if you're advocating perpetual angry victimhood instead of a rational, healthy decision to let it go and get on with life. Nothing says you can't be at peace with your own place in life while trying to prevent others from sharing your fate.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:11 PM
7

No, liberals acknowledge the fact that no matter how much you shield them, society does have a huge effect on a child's upbringing.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:20 PM
2

It's almost as if abortion is as much of a gray area as date rape is.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter