TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

marauding-lunatic Archive

View 28 posts and 348 comments by marauding-lunatic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1164

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights16/08/13 09:53 PM
768

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights09/06/14 03:57 PM
670

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:09 PM
615

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:01 PM
194

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights14/09/13 08:53 PM
182

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights01/04/13 03:04 PM
161

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights16/08/14 06:40 PM
141

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:10 PM
68

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights08/06/13 12:28 AM
55

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:38 PM
45

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:49 PM
32

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:57 AM
21

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:02 PM
21

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights16/02/13 12:48 PM
17

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights03/09/13 04:28 PM
14

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights01/09/13 10:46 PM
13

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:23 PM
12

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights16/09/13 06:45 PM
10

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:15 PM
8

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights05/07/13 09:18 PM
6

r/MensRantsmarauding-lunatic/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:49 PM
6

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:23 PM
4

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:11 PM
4

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:31 PM
3

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights02/09/13 06:30 PM
2

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:17 PM
1

marauding-lunatic/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:12 PM
0

Blogs/Videomarauding-lunatic/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:09 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

When they say "We're not all like that," it's like saying "We're ok with what they did, but we don't really want their jackassery to make us look bad in the process."
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:36 AM
1

Other subs like /r/KotakuInAction use archive.today for most of their links, and they don't encounter much of that problem. Without using page copying sites, we're just contributing to the click-bait business model that many sites use.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:47 PM
1

It would have been better to put that one in the main link and the link to the actual article in the comments. That way, anybody who clicks on the title link can read the archives copy without contributing to the site's revenue, while anyone who wants to leave a comment on that site can visit the original link in the comments.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 06:54 PM
24

Wait a minute, I was told by multiple people that "radfems" don't actually exist in real life, You're correct. These women in the video are what we refer to as "strawfeminists," which are completely imaginary and are only made up to make feminists look bad. I believe that there's a witty comic about it somewhere on the internet. It should answer all of your questions on the issue so that us MRA's can focus on real gender problems, such as making sure that all men accused of rape are prosecuted a…
/r/MensRights13/02/15 09:03 PM
5

http://i.imgur.com/PNj3vME.gif
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:05 AM
24

I didn't fully realize how corrupt and completely full of shit the media was until I started paying attention to gamergate. I can't believe how much journalists lie and abuse their position in order to promote their beliefs (as well as attract readers).
/r/MensRights17/01/15 12:14 AM
6

Guys, this is an example of misogyny though. She was the real victim in all of this.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:36 AM
5

What they're doing is equivalent to raising funds for those in poverty, but only using those funds to help white people. Yes, there is something wrong with that they're doing.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:06 AM
3

The internet is much larger now, which is great because unlike radio and television, it is a medium that allows everyone to participate without worrying about censorship (although many politicians and SJW's are trying to change that). Also, we have much larger anti-feminist and anti-SJW groups than in the 90's, such as AVFM and their annual International Conference for Men's Issues.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:59 AM
1

Shameless plug for the GamerGate subreddit /r/KotakuInAction.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 03:55 AM
9

blocklist: crowd sourcing a block list of people who's views oppose your own is hardly an act of hate. Not everybody wants to interact with people across the aisle from them. People like her want that blacklist to be used against those who are listed in order to hurt their professional relationships and employment. doxxing: it wasn't "just for disagreeing with her". She apologized. She hasn't done it since. What proof do you have that the person did anything other than telling that moron that sh…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:15 AM
13

I'm sure that she wouldn't find it anywhere near as funny if somebody put "kill all women" as their username.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:10 AM
12

Whatever you want to call her words, that "kill all men" screen name says a lot about how she feels about men.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:46 AM
9

I suspect it's satire, actually. She's actually an extremely hateful person. She made an enormous blacklist of people who are fighting against SJW corruption in the video game industry (that's the ggautoblocker that is being referred to in the post). Also, she publicly doxxed someone on twitter just for disagreeing with her.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:43 AM
23

(4) She presumes to be able to judge men to her arbitrary standard of a real man. There's nothing arbitrary about it. Those "real man" definitions usually involve doing something that benefits women or others.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 05:57 PM
4

For those of you who don't know, concern trolling is when somebody pretends to want what's best for a group while purposely giving out advice that's intended to weaken that group's stance or goal. The only way I can think of a comment such as that one receiving 40 points is from a vote brigade. People who are anti-MRA will try to attack or compromise this sub in whatever way possible.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:17 PM
1

Engaging in debate with them while making them look stupid (which is what usually happens) helps to spread awareness to readers who might be on the fence about such issues. I'm surprised that your comment even got upvoted. Being silent about men's issues isn't what this sub is about.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 05:26 PM
3

I disagree. Spreading awareness of men's rights issues is extremely important. Not commenting at all is being self-defeatist.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 03:44 AM
27

No, this is why we need to use page copying sites such as archive.today to prevent our posts from giving them page views at all. If someone wants to leave a comment on that page, then it's worth going to the site because readers of the piece will be able to read our perspective on the issue.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:09 PM
12

So a feminist thinks that an awareness of the challenges that men face and an understanding of the vindictive nature of feminism towards men are to be considered "venomous and hateful." What a surprise.....
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:45 PM
14

We don't have to agree with every single thing that every MRA says. You're afraid of what MRA's have to say because you know that people are beginning to see your shitty feminist cult as the hate group that it really is.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 07:20 PM
107

"Men's weakness is their facade of strength; women's strength is their facade of weakness" - Warren Farell Why do you think Anita Sarkeesian (if you know who she is) puts so much emphasis on the alleged threats against her? She, like all feminists, knows that acting like a victim is an extremely effective way for a women to get her way.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:56 PM
32

So when they discuss feminism with a non-feminist, it's like discussing physics with someone who refuses to believe in gravity. It's infuriating. It's more like discussing dianetics with someone who doesn't believe in Scientology. Feminism isn't based on any reality like physics is. Everything about it is like an extremist religious sect, especially the way the followers adhere to the ideas, as well as their rejection of any actual evidence that disproves what they believe in. There's also the w…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 05:04 PM
1

She she has a history of using any anonymous threat against her to order to gain sympathy (including threats that are obviously fake). Also, nothing from that letter sounds like the users here, but the whole thing does sound like the kind of person that feminists want everyone to think MRA's are like. I'm surprised they didn't throw Elliot Rodgers in there as well.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 08:18 PM
1

Yes, either gender probably suffers from acid attacks for different reasons on average. Is that any excuse to prioritize one over the other? No, it sure as hell isn't. I understand the (very weak) reasoning that feminists use for putting women first. I think I understand the underlying motives as well, but either way it's obvious that they just want to prioritize the well-being of women to the exclusion of men, and they will usually rationalize it in some way to convince others that what they're…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:56 AM
7

That note reads in much the same way that a feminist would want MRA's to be viewed. They've been trying to associate MRA's with Marc Lepine and Elliot Rodgers for a long time now. It should definitely be taken seriously from a law enforcement standpoint, but I don't think that it's anything other than a false flag. Even if it were, it would not change the way I view the men's rights community in any way, although feminists are definitely trying to use this to change how the general public see MR…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:47 AM
4

patriarchal societies women and girls just suffer more Women and girls get acid when they're doing things AS or because they ARE female So you seem to be very deep in the feminist mentality yourself. It definitely looks like your reasoning is that women must be put first. And since you're probably already pretty deep in the feminist hate, this is a freebie: When women are throwing acid on everyone's faces on the same frequency as men, and men stop discriminating on the motivations behind all the…
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:23 PM
2

Is it really that common to attack multiple people at once with acid? Yes, apparently it happens more than one would think. An article from the same website covers a story about a woman who threw acid on eight people in Kermanshah, Iran.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:12 PM
1

It means that women make up slightly more than half of the total victims, as opposed to the almost exclusively man-on-woman crime that it is typically portrayed as.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:10 PM
2

Whatever the reason for their being attacked, does that mean that the suffering of male victims is less important or should be put as second priority? What you're saying sounds like typical feminist reasoning to put women first.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 04:06 PM
13

You cited an organization that is not only based on a single country (Bangladesh), but also has an obvious pro-female bias. I myself find it disturbing that feminists would even leave men out of the picture in the first place regarding awareness on acid attacks.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 05:43 AM
1

I'd like to hear what feminists have to say in response to OP's question. If they can justify the discrimination of men in order to help women, then surely they should be all over this comments section....... yep, any minute now.......
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:20 AM
5

It's worth pointing out for several reasons: Feminists are always telling everyone that feminism fights for men's rights too, when that obviously isn't the case. Feminists will often attack and try to silence any group that speaks in favor of men. Feminists will even protest upon experiencing a backlash after bashing men. Most of them want to be able to dehumanize and degrade men as much as they want to while making sure that criticizing women is discouraged.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 03:32 AM
5

Did taking testosterone change the way you view others sexually? Did it make your sexual attraction to others more physical rather than emotional? I vaguely remember reading about a woman experiencing this with testosterone injections.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 12:38 AM
25

Donotlink still gives them page views. The best site to use is http://archive.today/
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:48 AM
0

How did it backfire on him? Because of his satire, AVFM received press coverage from journalists who wrote hit pieces on him only to find that many would point out that his most controversial article was actually a parody of a jezebel article.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 11:51 PM
1

Women, as citizens, are born with the right to work for the government. Men are barred from doing so unless they sign up for the selective service.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:41 PM
36

She needs to be locked up for other people's safety.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 02:21 AM
20

If a KKK member were to post something racist, with thousands of people praising him for it, and he was still able to keep his job in the media(!), you'd have a problem with it too.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:33 AM
6

So anything negative that feminists say about men can be dismissed as a joke or satire? Don't be so gullible. Saying something in order hurt/humiliate/dehumanize somebody and then, in the face of retaliation, saying that it was just a joke is something people have been doing since grade school.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 10:51 PM
6

I think that you're overthinking those comments. More often than not, there isn't much more to what they're saying other than what they obviously mean. They don't enjoy making those comments because it's ironic or whatever. They enjoy it because it's a way for them to express their spite, hatred, and sexism. It might have started out as satire for all I know, but that's definitely not the reason they keep saying it. They embrace that shit, and the reason they love it is immediately clear.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 10:21 PM
6

killallmen was the same thing, its supposed to be a joke on us. It was supposedly started to see if feminists would join in, and sure enough, loads of them took the bait.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:23 PM
6

Its not an excuse. It is, and it's a bullshit one at that.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:17 PM
14

No MRA would buy a shirt or mug that says "woman beater" or "misogynist." That irony/satire excuse is one of the weakest I have ever heard, and I don't think that most people are convinced by it. There are people who have tattooed the word "misandry" on themselves for God's sake. Those male tears comments are normally said for the same reasons feminists will make comments about castrating/killing men or the various ways in which men are useless/inferior/rapists etc. It's a show of hatred.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 09:11 PM
2

Also, please make sure to use archive.is to submit links such as this. We don't want to be giving traffic to outlets such as rawstory.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:52 PM
3

Here's a proposal. We might stop calling feminists a bunch of man-hating sexists if they would only stop doing these things: blaming men for women's problems treating men as a scapegoat trying to induce guilt in men, making them think that they owe something to women or that they must make up for past gender roles leaving men out of the picture with issues that affect men and women equally working against men's interests if they only benefit men denying men's struggles, as well as female privile…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:49 PM
8

They've taken down pro men's rights posts before, so I reported this one.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:50 PM
1

That may be true (IDK if she's backpedaling and lying about it in your link), but either way her main points are so utterly horrible and sociopathic that it really makes no difference to me.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:27 PM
1

One can't just post comments and videos about killing/castrating 90% of men and then defend it with statements like "it was just a joke" or "let me explain." That is concern trolling. I read the article that you linked to, and it was just several paragraphs of bullshit basically saying "Well, I did say these horrible things, but they aren't as bad as you might think...... but, actually, they are." Coincidentally, I was originally nothing but a poster in the MR subreddit What's your point? People…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:24 PM
4

You're a poster in AMR and you're a fan of David Futrelle and the Femitheist? You're more the resident concern troll than anything.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 01:35 PM
13

For sites that are obvious clickbait, please use donotlink.com or a page copying site like archive.is
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:15 PM
41

For sites that are obvious clickbait, please use donotlink.com or a page copying site like http://archive.today/.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:14 PM
6

Has she ever responded to Thunderf00t? He has proven her arguments wrong so thoroughly (and humorously) that I would love to hear what she has to say about his critiques.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:15 AM
1

Nope, male-only spaces are sexist and oppressive. Do you think that feminists would be happy with just women-only places? It's no fun unless they can actively prevent men from enjoying the same thing.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 07:20 PM
3

Yes, if/when most feminists stop blaming men for women's problems and leaving them out of the picture when addressing social problems that affect everyone, then MRA's would most likely want to work with them. Demanding special treatment from men is another problematic behavior that will surely antagonize MRA's for a long time to come.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:13 AM
85

Shouldn't both feminists and MRA's exist to fight for equality together? They should be, but good luck getting feminists to cooperate with MRA's. That's why MRA's criticize feminists and how they apply feminist ideas. So yes, feminism, right now, isn't our friend and should be criticized for how it treats and portrays men. Blaming men for women's problems and leaving them out of the picture when addressing social problems that affect everyone isn't fighting for equality.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:16 PM
-3

The girls are the protagonists, and this is true in many of the films, however there are also a whole lot of male protagonists. Hercules, Aladdin, Pinocchio, Simba, Robin hood, Mowgli, Arthur. And they have their own journeys and fleshed out characters. But the female characters in those films weren't portrayed in a negative light in order to put the female characters on a pedestal. This isn't about making movies with female protagonists, it's about movies where men are demonized in order to sho…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:23 AM
0

It's good for boys to get a different perspective about how the male and female characters are portrayed. I haven't seen Frozen or Maleficent, but I did watch Brave (it was being shown in the flight I was in). The anti-male bias was blatant in that movie, and I wouldn't be surprised if it were the same in the other two films, given what I've heard about them. Disney wouldn't, at this point and time, come out with such a kid's movie with the genders reversed due to feminist backlash. So why shoul…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:20 AM
-1

STOP, IT IS FUCKING RIDICULOUS! IF I HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHY, YOU ARE IN SERIOUS NEED OF SELF-REFLECTION. Just say it. The other comments were constructive, but SJW-type responses don't really tell me anything.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 01:10 AM
4

This is like a neo-nazi posting bullshit statistics to try to convince people that white people get longer prison sentences than black people. The hate is strong with a lot of feminists.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 03:49 PM

It's because their comfort and convenience is more important than yours. Now man up and deal with it you privileged misogynist.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:53 PM
1

It's unbelievable that people can behave that way without repercussions, but then again that's one of the reasons that MRA's exist. Some day, hopefully, people like the hateful, violent feminists whom you're describing will be recognized for what they are and will be relegated to random sites like Stormfront.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 10:17 PM
6

It's a shame that they got kicked out, but at the same time it's a perfect example of why CAFE exists and a reminder of why groups like them are important.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:00 PM
1

This is something that I realized some time ago, and you have no idea how much weight it took off my shoulders. I feel that I should be good to those around me, but I don't owe anything to women just because of I'm male and they're female. This is why I can't stand feminism. It's a movement of women who feel entitled to special treatment and protection from men all while pretending that they're just asking for equality. I really do not like somebody pushing me into these white knight, paternalis…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:42 AM
1

Yeah, I'm sure that you're going there in good faith./s
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:52 PM
12

It seems that most of them know exactly what MRA's are, but they simply feel threatened by anyone who doesn't put women first. I don't think that they have those misconceptions so much as they want the general public to have those misconceptions about us. "MRA's won't put women first and they believe that men also suffer from sexism? Let's tell everyone that they're an ultraconservative group of woman beaters and rape apologists."
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:31 PM
6

Yeah, I just noticed it now when I came back to the post.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:07 PM
24

Damn, I hate it when I leave a dumb typo in the title! Oh well, I can't change it now.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:05 PM

Paul Elam and the AVFM staff have been doing a superb job of spreading the message of men's rights and helping the movement to move forward. Several years ago, I would not have thought that the MRM would now have several groups throughout North America (including universities), showing up in the mainstream media, and having a conference. We need people like Elam a lot more than somebody who only uses toned down arguments and watered-down rhetoric. His controversial nature has helped to make our …
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:47 AM
15

Awesome! I made a donation.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:01 PM

Although the man in the comic is obviously a caricature of Warren Farrell, the story is based on one of Paul Elam's experiences in the mental health field.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 09:51 PM
1

I've heard that at first they mostly came from the Something Awful forums. The site supposedly has a strong feminist slant and has a group of extremists who really, really hate Reddit.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:42 AM
1

Contact a local news organization. Do any of your local news organizations have a lawyer who does pieces on legal situations? It's worth a try.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 03:38 AM
2

She has been stealing other people's work for a long time now, such as with the video game footage in her videos. She will keep on doing it too, as the only consequence that she has had to endure so far is removing artwork that she stole.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:40 PM
1

I will never buy another samsung product after seeing this.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:23 AM
29

Their current cast is the saddest that I've ever seen. This is the same show that, throughout the years, has had cast members like Bill Murray, Will Ferrell, Chris Rock, Phil Hartman, and many other people who made it big. And now, it's... well....
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:22 PM
10

Many women already do this. It comes in the form of slut-shaming other women and opposition to prostitution. Anything that gives men more options for sex lowers the sexual power that these women have, so many of them respond negatively to seeing men getting easy sex. This was discussed in /r/todayilearned a few months ago.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 03:55 AM
307

insults males expects help from them because she's a woman Welcome to feminism!
/r/MensRights24/02/14 03:46 AM
1

I blog about that stuff all the time. Isn't equality supposed to mean that we can have all the good things about being white but also be served by slaves? If we can't have it all then they're obviously not doing this equality thing right.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:22 PM
21

It doesn't matter if it isn't true. He could know that it's bullshit for all we know, but as a politician he's going to pander to his supporters (and there are large groups of people who still buy into the wage gap thing).
/r/MensRights29/01/14 06:35 AM
12

There was a post here a month ago about a study indicating that men can be seen as being misogynist simply for not showing benevolent sexism. Basically, not giving women a pussy pass or any form of preferential treatment is enough to brand you as a sexist.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 02:22 AM
9

I cannot get over how peaceful feminists are and just how much they love and value men.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:22 AM
4

People like the SJW's who participate in SRS are an absolute embarrasment to society. How someone can post or upvote something like that and not feel like jackass is beyond me. The reason that they're even able to say the shit that they do is because those men (whom they apparently don't give 3 shits about) went out and risked death to defend what they so affectionately refer to as "freeze peaches." I think that the Westboro church is the last group of people that I thought were as much of a can…
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:30 PM
26

On the bright side, this event has surely helped to spread awareness of the MRM. I don't doubt that MRA's will soon be successful in establishing men's rights in academia. A lot of it will be 1 step back and 2 steps forward though.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 06:41 PM
2

The KKK has Jews and non-whites to go after, and Westboro has gays to pick on. If we make it wrong to discriminate and scapegoat men, then what will most feminists do with their time?
/r/MensRights12/01/14 03:05 PM

Feminists' appropriation of the struggles and hardship faced by blacks is one of the sickest and underhanded things that I've seen in their movement.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 01:18 PM
21

What I would love to witness, is what would the feminists say if the men were to do that and the country would collapse? They're already masters of bullshitting and mental gymnastics. Surely they'd find a way to blame it on the men somehow.
/r/MensRights04/01/14 11:02 AM
9

There's already Men's studies, but it's nothing more than feminism for men.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 11:13 PM
3

So you're not going to actually address his point because you didn't find their comment to be grammatically sufficient, desperately finding some way to discredit their argument, even going so far as to trawl through their comment history to find something compromising. His point was addressed. Also, he frequently posts in subs where an MRA would get banned on the spot. So I'd feel no obligation to address anything that his sorry ass says anyway.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:38 PM
-1

Go back to your safe space, little one. It isn't safe here for you.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 11:28 PM
4

Just be careful how you go about it. Keep in mind that, depending on what you tell him, how you say it, and how far you push it, he might resent you more than he does his wife. Cognitive dissonance is a powerful thing. Or, he might admit that you're right and that he just needed to hear it from someone. You really don't know how he's going to react.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:06 AM
2

So I went to go look at the mod list for that sub, and one of the mods does indeed stand out among the others...... just..... wow. I can't believe that they would let that person mod a subreddit.......
/r/MensRights19/12/13 12:36 AM
2

I was going to say the same thing. This comment provides a detailed explanation.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:50 AM
1

/r/amrthrowaway is the user who submitted it. The sub is r/againsmensrights.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 11:15 AM
2

It doesn't surprise me that radical feminists would want to grab a hold of a subreddit about anarchism. I've been reading complaints about the feminist element in that sub for a long time now.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:47 AM
6

I was about to quote that same sentence. That us vs. them mentality isn't helping their movement....... at all.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:43 AM
1

This post has 2007 karma at the time that I'm writing this. Now, if the entire feminist movement policed itself half as well as this sub does, they might not be losing so much credibility.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 06:04 AM
2

The point is that it shows that society still has much more sympathy for males than for females. It means that problems that affect men won't receive significant attention until (or if) a few women are affected as well.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:26 PM
3

They linked to this post on againstmensrights. The concern trolling comes as no surprise to me.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 09:21 PM
1

-The patriarchy-deniers are as bad as holocaust deniers. You can bring attention to matriarchal double standards without denying that patriarchy exists. All right, you're an idiot. This isn't a women's studies class, and there's nothing taboo about questioning one's interpretation of (or even the existence) of patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:52 AM
3

Sometimes they brigade from subs like againstmensrights (I can't link to them or else the post is removed). There have definitely been cases where they brigade from other subreddits or external websites that we don't know about.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:47 AM
0

I feel the same way. Yes, this is an uncomfortable truth. But no amount of concern trolling is going to convince me that it isn't true (for the most part).
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:42 AM
3

I don't think it can be said that men created everything that we see, but the vast majority of our knowledge and civilization was indeed built by men. Except for the absolute manner in which they try to make their point, I really don't disagree with this quote.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:08 AM
2

The link will probably be downvote-brigaded just like the links to some of her other videos were.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:26 AM
2

There are so many people who say that the MRM isn't needed, and that feminists are already doing everything that the MRM is trying to accomplish. Well, can someone link to an article in a feminist site defending Nicholas Alahverdian? There should be plenty of them, seeing that feminism is already working on these problems. /s
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:23 AM
4

They must have at least one or more preteens modding that sub. I got banned from /r/Feminism and /r/AskFeminists for this post (which was in /r/MensRights)!
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:53 PM
8

This post should be stickied.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 10:33 PM
-3

I completely agree. If it were me, I would have screencapped the article.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:38 PM
4

Well, they're both the same type of sexist, neurotic feminist scum. So you might be right ;)
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:25 PM
17

IMO, what they're saying is that every hobby or form of entertainment must either be specifically for women or neutral. It's typical control freak behavior. There's also the fact that hobbies and entertainment that are geared towards men tend to become really damn popular and successful. Anything from comic book conventions to Reddit itself are forms of entertainment that were created by men and brought up by an almost completely male fanbase/userbase. Instead of creating their own space, femini…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:19 PM
12

I don't think that women are thinking straight when they laugh and celebrate this type of sexist humor. It's things like this that contribute to men and women becoming MRA's. These women and feminists don't realize that they themselves create the backlash to feminism that they now have to deal with.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:27 PM
1

Yeah, I've noticed it too. That's why I never visit their site anymore.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:19 PM
6

Yes, they did. I don't know how crazy or misandric you have to be to write something like this, but the fact that it was actually published is the most unsettling thing about it.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:18 PM
3

This reminds me of a video from Paul Elam that I submitted a couple of weeks ago. In his experience, even mental health care workers view women in a much more positive light than they do with men.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 03:16 PM
1

One difference between the sexes is that women have a greater in-group bias. Individuals of both genders are often more biased towards women, so this is something that works against men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:06 AM
23

There’s the puny 4.2% of female Fortune 500 CEO’s, the mere 23.7% of women state legislators the paltry 19% of women in Congress. It's hard to care any more about percentages like that, considering that feminists celebrate when women become the majority somewhere and men become the minority. 40 to 50 years ago colleges had a roughly 60% male and 40% female population and feminists saw it as a problem that had to be fixed. Now, it's the other way around and feminists only respond with "Yeah, girl…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 12:23 AM
2

Yeah, it's about sexism, hating men, castration, etc. I don't know what the whole video shows as I only watched some of it (I have yet to listen to the original in its entirety either). There's another equally bizzarre parody that actually does reverse the genders. It manages to get a point across without showing an obvious hatred of men IMO, (even though I could not care less, I think that "objectification" is part of life and something that human beings do every single day). These are the lyri…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 11:32 PM
9

The more moderate feminists will, at the most, mention the more aggressive feminists with the typical NAFALT excuses. But they'll rarely actually denounce them. This is because they benefit from having a bad cop, someone who does the dirty work for them. They distance themselves a bit from the more blatantly hateful feminists so that the backlash won't be against the entire feminist movement, but they have no problem with what these hateful feminists do.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 10:20 PM
7

Did Sweden ever develop a men's rights movement in response to its hateful feminism?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:00 PM
17

I can't understand how adult feminists say these things and expect not to be laughed at. A child saying this kind of stuff? Sure, they don't realize that people can see how absurd their statement is and what they're trying to accomplish by saying it. When you consider their desire for censorship, their evasiveness when they get cornered, their use of the term "mansplaining," their echo-chambered safe spaces, and then this BS that they try to pull, I wonder if the users in these feminists subredd…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:42 PM
2

I was thinking about that same scene from the simpsons. I'm sure they're going to try their best to edit the interview to make Paul look like a monster.
/r/MensRights28/08/13 04:29 AM
29

Women with a controlling nature feel threatened by male only spaces because the bonding and support that men offer each other in such a space is a threat to men's emotional dependence on women. These are the toxic women who think that it has to be about them all of the time. They also don't like the thought of men expressing and supporting opinions that support men. It's much harder to feel like you have power over certain people when those people aren't emotionally isolated and are allowed a sp…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:22 AM
1

That breaks the general mentality that feminists have, in which men (ahem, or the "patriarchy") are responsible for the oppression of women. It goes against feminist mentality to criticize women, unless those women acting like what they call a "special snowflake" (aka non-feminist women, female MRA's, etc). The whole "men are the bad, women are good" dynamic is what drives many of them emotionally. If you go around and start holding women accountable for their actions, then it breaks their simpl…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:17 AM
10

I still get impressed by the mental gymnastics that they pull when asked about their beliefs. That's what happens when one forms an ideology that is based excessively on emotion without enough logic to back it up. They know that they're wrong, but they just want to believe.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:27 PM
3

You've just learned what most of us here know already: Feminist subreddits are quick to delete comments and censor people who don't agree with them. Their points of arguments wouldn't be able to survive otherwise. "You can't be wrong if there's no one in the room to prove you wrong!" - r/feminism, r/shitredditsays, r/againstmensrights
/r/MensRights19/08/13 08:12 PM
1

from an interview he gave in a smut magazine during the late 70s: First, because millions of people who are now refraining from touching, holding, and genitally caressing their children, when that is really a part of a caring, loving expression, are repressing the sexuality of a lot of children and themselves. He also says: "I’m not recommending incest between parent and child, and especially not between father and daughter." His research involved questioning societal mores. He never advocated i…
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:22 PM
3

They're very disturbed that there's a subreddit that's pro-male and that criticizes feminism. The reddit enhancement suite is an extension that you add to your browser. It provides several features, such as letting you write a tag on other users and showing how much karma you've given (or taken from) them. It's free, you don't have to pay for it like with reddit gold.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 10:17 PM
5

I recommend visiting their sub and tagging those who are posting there (get the reddit enhancement suite if you don't have it yet). That way you'll know when they're brigading a thread here.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:43 PM
5

This thread is being brigaded by againstmensrights. The whole purpose of their sub is to brigade mensrights.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:25 PM
1

you mean the doxxing of feminist bloggers and canadian feminists protesting the appearance of a man notorious for endorsing acquaintance rape and child sexual assault? When has he ever promoted rape or child sexual assault? I guess you're talking about his incest research, in which he never endorsed anything which he was studying. Feminists like to point out his neutrality in his research to mean that he was promoting child incest, which is absurd. He addresses those accusation here in his AMA. …
/r/MensRights18/08/13 07:20 PM
2

no... i mean acceptance and advocacy of misogynist language and behaviour. for example: the widespread use of misogynist slurs, tolerance of misogynist hate sites like register-her and AVfM, victim blaming, and ubiquitous calls to normalize violence against women. Have you seen the people who are featured on register-her? Haven't you seen that about half of the writers for AVFM are women? Let me guess, those women are traitors to the sisterhood? By ubiquitous calls to normalize violence against …
/r/MensRights18/08/13 04:58 PM
2

By misogyny, you mean talking about men's issues instead of women's issues? I have a hard time imagining someone like you being ok with any forum that focuses on helping men specifically. You seem like someone who would only be ok with this sort of thing if it had a feminist twist, telling men how horrible they are and how they can learn to not rape and abuse everything they see.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:33 AM
2

how can you be sure it isn't "shocking and disgusting" because of what the girls did? That would be cancelled out by the fact that he decided to defend himself, which is the whole point of the video.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:35 PM
44

I'm sure it got reported like crazy, as well as flagged on youtube. Still, it was a mod(s) who agreed to go ahead and remove it. They have the final say, and this was their decision. It's obvious when people try to mass flag something out of some sort of prejudice.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 11:34 PM
101

Yeah, I should have specified that it's the mods/admins of both sites that censor stuff like this. The Reddit userbase, at least, was ok with it.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 10:53 PM
6

Does it surprise you? This is their typical response towards discussion on men's issues. Women's victimhood must always be the topic at hand, and it has to be about the women, always. They hear people talking about problems that affect men, and they try to push their own issues in front. It's really a very selfish and toxic behavior.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:51 PM
20

It's no surprise that boys aren't doing as well in school and college as girls are. People are making academia such a toxic environment for boys that it's almost expected for boys to drop out of high school at higher rates and attend college at lower numbers than girls. I feel bad for the shit that you have to put up with, and I cringe when I recall that article in which a brain-dead woman claims that "men are raised to hate women," rather than pointing out the divisiveness of feminism and misan…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:36 PM
8

/u/NoseFetish is a huge feminist (think SRS or radical feminist). One of the few posts of his that I read was so full of female victimhood and blaming of men that I couldn't stand to finish it. The MRM has only gained traction within the last few years. Also, I think that people underestimate the power of spreading awareness, as well as the necessity of said awareness in order to accomplish the goals mentioned in the pic.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:38 PM
3

Societies often need a group of people to blame all of their problems on. So, they've bestowed that honor onto (straight) (white) males. Being a scapegoat is just another privilege to add to our list!
/r/MensRights29/07/13 09:08 AM
1

Funny enough, I was watching something on youtube a few days ago that applies to your situation. What are you gay?
/r/MensRights28/07/13 09:36 AM
3

Every hate group has to have a scapegoat.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:57 AM
3

/r/TumblrInAction
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:54 AM
2

Summary: "I'm a man-hating control freak and I feel envious and threatened by male-only spaces. I feel that women-only spaces are acceptable, however, because I'm a misandric, sexist piece of shit."
/r/MensRights20/07/13 12:30 AM
5

The stats in the first two sentences in the first post of the image are dead wrong. Men who are convicted actually receive longer sentences than women. False statistics like these that are spread by feminists (including those related to the gender wage gap and rape incidents) are one of the main reasons I have a hard time respecting feminism. Even the moderate feminists repeat the false statistics in an attempt to justify preferential treatment for women. It probably also has to do with creating…
/r/MensRights19/07/13 08:44 PM
6

It's the typical reaction of misandric control freaks. They're threatened by male-only spaces, but will do their best to defend any female-only spaces. I love how people are even trying to defend women-only golf clubs while still attacking men's golf clubs, saying that the men's clubs have all of the prestige. Well, why don't the women's clubs work to attain the same level instead of trying to eliminate the ones reserved for men only?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 06:36 PM
9

"Patriarchy" is a euphemism used to replace "men" whenever feminists want to talk about who is to blame for the world's problems. It's the one thing that most of them have in common. There has to be a scapegoat, and that scapegoat is always men. Of course, they want support from minorities and the gay community (as many people as possible really). So they focus their attention on straight white men in order to gain cooperation from these other movements. I honestly doubt that most feminists woul…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 04:19 PM
1

How is he creating an issue? The article is obviously assigning all of the blame and accountability on the father when in fact both parents lost custody of the children. Both parents have played a significant role in the situation, yet it's the father who's being blamed. It's definitely an issue.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:17 PM
1

Speaking of Breaking Bad, there's also that scene in which one of the men spares a woman who tried to have him killed (and succeeded in having several other men killed). He later admits that it was sexist of him to let her live when he would have killed her if she was a man.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 03:59 PM
-1

Look, guys..... this means nothing! Women and feminists love men! There is no such thing as misandry! /s
/r/MensRights30/06/13 02:19 AM
2

I've heard it said several times that, in order for feminism to be successful, the participation of men is required. Why then, do they downplay the issues that affect men? Why do they mock men who care about problems that affect themselves, or men who are sympathetic to the men's rights movement? I have a hard time holding my laughter when I hear people saying that feminism is for everyone, and that it cares about men's issues. Modern feminism is not about equality and it isn't inclusive to men.…
/r/MensRights29/06/13 01:48 AM
26

I've noticed that we've had a significant increase in subscribers whenever attention had been brought to /r/MensRights in popular subs lately. Those posts were obviously meant to belittle MRA's, but what they're not counting on is that our message is stronger than shaming, ridiculing, and belittling. They're trying to slow down our progress, but they're really just helping us to reach more people. They can't grasp the idea that "any press is good press" applies to this sub.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:37 AM
-1

Can you explain your analogy then? I'm just dying to hear this whiny "because the privileged men oppress the poor wimminz" explanation.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:27 PM
-1

Isn't part of the show that people criticize them for stealing? She said it herself, that people would judge her if she stole the money.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:24 PM
0

Yes, because women everywhere are just as oppressed as black people.... ...just...wow...
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:23 PM
11

Victimless crime? What about all of the women who lose sexual leverage and power over men. If men have other alternatives for intimacy besides dating and marriage, then what will the average woman do? Male sexuality needs to be controlled for the benefit of women. /s
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:58 PM
7

I hope you don't go away for good. You're a valuable and very productive MRA (to me, at least, you're an MRA). Your name is instantly recognizable, not to mention the green tag next to your username that says [+132] from my PC. Sometimes you just need to take a break and get away from the drama. It can be emotionally draining at times. I don't think that anyone can do this constantly without getting away from it for periods at a time.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 02:13 AM
4

The idea itself doesn't sound bad at all. Some of us (including me) do criticize feminists for wanting to enforce gender quotas in the cushy, higher paying jobs and not the more dangerous, dirty occupations. However, I can easily imagine this leading to the male boat workers having to work harder to compensate for what the female workers can't (or won't) do, all while the female employees get paid for doing "dangerous work."
/r/MensRights22/06/13 08:49 PM
14

I agree. Feminists rely on the weaker enforcement of personal accountability that traditional gender roles have for women. Otherwise, they wouldn't have so much lee way to lie, manipulate, shame, claim victim status, engage in rampant hypocrisy, and enforce such double standards.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:20 PM
1

/r/nottheonion
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:02 AM
2

Humans beings show a tendency to engage in tribalism and "other" those who they perceive to be different from them. Othering men is a form of discrimination that is still considered acceptable. Just like with other forms of discrimination, people who hold prejudice against men will fight tooth and claw to justify their bigotry and preserve their right to continue assigning blame and scorn onto their chosen group.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 11:50 PM
25

Don't drop out because of that. College professors are notorious for using (or abusing, to put it more accurately) their position for pushing their own agendas onto students. Dropping out only contributes to their goal of influencing the new generation.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 10:15 PM
33

If there was ever a great example of an us vs. them mentality in feminism, it's this.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:50 PM
4

It's free of any feminist bias IMO. I have yet to see any character being demonized or shamed in any way for being male. The show presents characters of both genders in a way that's free of any messed up gender ideology. It's one of the few shows that doesn't seem to pander to the feminist mindset. Also, it does a great job of presenting the male characters as human beings, having a wide variety of different kinds of men without them all being measured by their gender roles and gender expectatio…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:03 PM
6

I've found that at this point if a show becomes openly misandrist I basically shut it off immediately. This is one of the reasons I rarely watch TV anymore.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:28 PM
3

The Wire is also an excellent show if you're interested in Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:27 PM
4

They're mostly hateful feminists who claim that their circlejerking is just "satire." They're serious, but they pretend not to be.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 02:07 PM
2

When I first saw that a few days ago, it had several comments. It looks like they've all been removed.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:53 PM
3

Whatever happened to "feminism is for everyone," or "feminism helps men too?"
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:22 AM
1

They only care about patriarchy theory regarding how they believe it affects women, not men.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 08:21 AM
2

A lot of people are very angry at us.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 12:53 AM
1

In regards to the women’s attempted suicide rate, he said that “part of the reason why the successful suicide rate for women is lower is that they are more willing to come forward and ask for help.” Which, if I might editorialize, makes no sense. If it were socially acceptable for women to come forward and ask for help, wouldn’t it follow that there would be fewer suicide attempts? Many suicide attempts done by women does involve them seeking help, which is made possible by the fact that they te…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 11:43 AM
2

The girl with the scarf looks like the girl standing near Old Red in this video.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 11:15 AM
3

I couldn't believe how biased and unprofessional that writer was. When I started reading that sentence, I was expecting to read about how the protesters did their job by making commotion and attracting media attention to the lecture (which they did).
/r/MensRights19/04/13 11:11 AM
5

I don't get it. Didn't the nasty soy milk help him dodge a bullet in this case?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:16 AM
2

White feminists' response: "But... but.... blame men! They're the enemy! They're the ones who are oppressing all of us!"
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:14 PM
0

Feminists are similar to racists and anti-semites in that they must have a scapegoat, someone to blame their problems on or find a way to feel superior to. The straight white male is an excellent choice because it allows feminists to co-op (or at least pretend to co-op) their movement with those of minorities and homosexuals. They want to be in the same club as these other groups, and they want a piece of that victimhood (badly). From my perspective, this is why I think they target certain men, …
/r/MensRights10/04/13 10:02 PM
6

They called you a misogynist because you're expected to tell them what they want to hear, not what's actually true. It's like a religious person getting offended that you agree with evidence-backed knowledge instead of their own beliefs.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 09:47 PM
44

Great!, I didn't know this. I guess that's why they have mostly women working in coal mines, oil rigs, factories, garages, and many more industries that rely on heavy labor. /s
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:47 PM
10

She calls it sexism when she loses much of her female privilege.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:45 PM
1

It looks this person doesn't care about the victims as much as she cares about what "group" they belong to. I can't believe how incredibly ignorant and childish some people are.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:43 PM
17

The main reason that feminists are normally against prostitution is that it allows any man to have easy access to sex. Thus, it reduces men's sexual dependence on women overall.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:06 AM
3

Who the fuck do you think sent them to fucking war you piece of trash? It was a bunch of white men sitting around a table, while the poor were shuffled off to be killed for their countries. Men are definitely a huge contributor to issues that men face. Talking about rights isn't so much about who to blame as it is about who suffers from this disregard for human rights. Even today, most countries with enforced conscription only draft men. While their poor husbands were being shipped off to war an…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:05 AM
9

Discussing how men's gender roles and place in society affects them is hateful? I guess you think that a good man always makes himself useful for others, even at his own expense, without ever being self-aware of his role.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:28 PM
4

I was just about to say, "who cares, just look at what you people help to create!"
/r/TheRedPill01/04/13 03:12 PM
2

It's unavoidable. Feminists are often at odds with men's rights, usually because they want discussion on gender issues to focus on women. Thus, they feel threatened by others focusing on mens issues. Victimhood is a major element in the feminist mentality, and it's difficult for them to have that if it's not all about the wemminz.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 03:01 PM
18

She's more of a con artist pretending to be a low-rate whore. At least real prostitutes hold up their end of the bargain.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:12 AM
7

This is one good reason why it's never a good idea to pay for the first date. The first date is just to start getting to know the person. There is no reason at all for one person to have to pay for a stranger's meal just because of their gender.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:11 AM
2

This is just another tactic employed by the government to ensure the transfer of wealth from men to women. Fewer men are getting married because of how raw a deal it is for them in a legal sense. So the government is now stepping up it's game.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:20 AM
12

What the difference between the example on men and rape and minorities and stealing? Both involve smearing everyone in those two groups as potential criminals, even though most of the people in either of those groups aren't guilty of the crime that they have been associated with.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 03:00 AM
9

The sign is spot on. Why do you think it's worded poorly?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:14 AM
30

Describing a group of people as being potential criminals and trying to teach them all on how not to do wrong is ignorant and moronic. No movement that scapegoats an entire group (or an entire gender, for that matter) can be described as benevolent.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 10:49 PM
2

Yes, feminists would like to reduce or eliminate any privileges enjoyed by men, while ignoring or flat out denying women's privileges. So their goal isn't even to "level the playing field." It's to give women as many advantages and benefits as possible by attacking men's privilege while keeping women's privilege. In regard to men's rights, I only hear feminists talk about issues such as men wanting to wear feminine clothes and enjoy feminine hobbies. I hardly ever hear them talk about issues lik…
/r/MensRights11/03/13 07:52 AM
1

It's be great to know what questions that study really asked so that we can see how they interpreted the men's real answers to make them look like rapists.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 01:33 AM
1

Yet Sandberg has been an unwavering supporter of women, imploring them to “take a seat at the table,” negotiate salaries, and not leave the workplace before they have to. Feminists ought to embrace her message of strength and independence, in which she gives women the “agency” women’s history professors could only dream of. It sounds like she has some very rational, down-to-earth advice for women who want to work their way up. Sadly (but expectedly), feminists resent her advice because she promo…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 08:04 AM
5

They can't help it. Though I wouldn't wish problems on either of the speakers at these two events, antics like these only help to spread awareness and expedite the progress of the movement.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:07 AM
1

Good point, I didn't think of that. Based on the approach most countries have towards prostitution, it's obvious that they're more concerned about suppressing the trade than they are about the health and safety of the prostitutes and clients.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 08:07 PM
3

There are plenty of feminists on reddit who hate us, especially those who post on SRS. One thing that must be kept in mind is that, as reddit grows, popular opinion will become increasingly present (and feminism very mainstream). Having said that, I don't think that the majority of reddit hates /r/MensRights especially since this sub is growing rather quickly.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 08:04 PM
4

That thread is about beinging fairness to men. What does it even have to do with "lowering the status of women?" They're talking about men's right to make sure that their son is genetically theirs. I don't know how you went from that to trying to bring women down.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:19 AM
2

Everyone has their own views on how /r/mr should be run. But I think a lot of these posters are just concern trolls, trying to neutralize this place in the most inconspicuous and underhanded way possible.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:12 AM
18

I think only good things can come from teaching people about violence against men. This is why misandric feminists hinder progress. Violence is still ok only as long as the victim isn't female.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:11 AM
10

but there is already an equalities officer Despite the language that feminists use, it's not about equality. It's about expanding on benefits and privileges for women. Why do you think they get angry at anything that can honestly be proposed as true equality? It's just not their goal.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:58 PM
3

False accusers like these make it harder for actual rapists to be prosecuted. So why don't feminists ever call out and criticize these individuals?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:54 PM
5

How virulent is their sexism that they're threatened by a penis made out of snow?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:47 PM
1

Men are not denied custody of their children because a sexist society and family law system deem child-rearing a woman’s domain. It’s feminists trying to make sure women take all the kids!!! Actually, feminists did their best to make sure that women would get custody as often as possible. When divorce rates really started to rise, women were concerned about losing custody of their kids, and feminists groups like the NOW didn't want to lose the support of women. So, rather than letting women deal…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:00 PM
0

Sadly there is some truth to this. They probably are more threatened by someone like Warren Farrell, who gets to the heart of the matter as he spreads awareness of issues affecting males specifically. They're more afraid of having to make room in discussion of gender issues than they are of someone criticizing them. People paying attention to men's problems too, rather than only women's problems, is what really rustles their jimmies.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 03:03 AM
25

They can't feel like victims unless they have someone to blame. They feel the need to invent problems and imaginary struggles for themselves, as well as having a made-up oppressor to overthrow. It's particularly insulting when they try to co-opt their movement with groups that actually do have to deal with discrimination. It's like they want to feel oppressed as well. I find it to be pathetic, and it really takes away from my faith in humanity that we have adults who think and operate this way.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:21 PM
7

A defensive anxiety about the ascendant power of women It seems that the writer herself is suffering from such an anxiety towards the opposite sex. No wonder Seth McFarlane’s worried. We’re one reproductive-technology breakthrough away from not needing men at the Oscars at all. I rest my case.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:11 PM
14

I'm guessing that she was able to find your info by looking through your comments? Always have an extra account just for your MRA stuff. MR haters will look through your comment history to try to get as much info on you as they can.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:09 PM
2

This is still better than most other states, or better than most of the developed world for that matter. Normally a man has to keep on paying even after finding out he's not the biological father. In some states a man be be forced into providing child support even if he's been the stepfather for a few years.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 07:05 PM
3

If you have the time, you can try to start a men's group in your campus. Putting up posters where people can see them can help spread awareness. AVFM, for example, will send you stickers for free.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:52 AM
2

“We are shocked to learn that the ordinance introduces a gender neutral perpetrator for sexual assault, suggesting that both women and men could potentially be charged with the offence. Rape, as we know, is a crime largely defined as male violence against women, with absolutely no evidence of women as perpetrators. This is in disregard to the Justice Verma recommendations and totally unacceptable,” said leading women rights lawyer Madhu Mehra. Oh no, they don't want to enforce our sexist double-…
/r/MensRights19/02/13 04:03 PM
4

But feminists say that their movement speaks for men too. I guess it doesn't. So you can become ans MRA, but then you'll have to deal with people telling you that you're a misogynist because it has to be all about the wimminz.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 06:44 AM
2

It's interesting to see how feminism is promoted by attacking the self-esteem of male children. It's best to get them young. Yeah, it's not a cowardly ideology whatsoever.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 11:37 AM
0

Nah, I just wrote the title to describe Paul Elam's opinion on Dr. Phil. I didn't mean to mislead anyone.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 05:54 AM
9

So they're protesting patriarchy (which is made up by feminists), domestic violence (which is perpetrated almost equally by both genders), and rape (which society already condemns, not to mention the fact that it affects both men and women equally). All in all, it looks like it was a massive orgy of victimhood with a bunch of made up problems to serve as an excuse.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 06:16 AM
15

She said people might think whoever is putting up the signs just wants to have a discussion. “They can discuss all they want, but not based on lies,” she said. Those darn mansplainers and their statistics! So if a statistic doesn't support feminism, then it's not true. I guess they forgot to mention that most of the numbers pushed by feminists are inflated, distorted, or flat out lies.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:56 PM
101

He's pandering to a very large voting bloc. It's why more men need to vote and make men's issues a factor in who gets elected.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 04:12 AM
20

Exactly. When you remove all the BS about victimization and objectification, it becomes obvious that the real reason for this law is to control men's sexuality and sexual independence. It's a great example of feminism working to benefit women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 11:11 PM
1

This should be crossposted to /r/todayilearned.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:13 PM
10

This is one of the main reasons I don't take modern feminism seriously. Women must have the center stage in discussions about gender issues, and feminists don't want to set aside any space for issues that affect men. What makes them think that they understand what it's like to be a man any better than we understand their lives? As it is, their victimhood relies mostly on manipulated and inflated statistics.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:12 AM
4

The first 5 statements on the left side are valid points. Notice how the right column has words in it, but fails to say anything at all. "I don't like x ideology because of [insert valid reason]." "Well, you obviously know nothing of said ideology." Can anyone give a more empty, BS response than that?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:43 PM
3

Men have been made into scapegoats by feminist activism. Look up any feminist campaigns or messages to the public, and the one thing you find that most of the have in common is that men are the problem.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:37 PM
1

If they discussed things honestly and objectively, then what would they have left to talk about? The debunked wage gap, inflated rape statistics, or the symmetry of gender ratios regarding domestic violence?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:31 PM
2

I can't say that I'm surprised. Those subreddits can only survive as echo chambers, protected from dissenting opinions which they cannot argue against.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:57 PM
2

There's always /r/AskFeminists, if you want to openly ask them something.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:45 PM
7

Enforcing this ban is a way of maximizing the utilization of men as providers at their expense. It's another method of ensuring the flow of money from men to women. Men having the ability to confirm their paternity takes power away from women who cuckold men, so obviously it must be made illegal.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:38 AM
5

For whatever reason, it shows the mobile layout by default. I just click "Turn off Mobile" on the bottom right hand corner.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:36 AM
5

Feminists use some very effective methods for promoting their agenda...... you know, the usual: victimhood, inflating statistics, shaming and attacking dissenters. Our culture also doesn't encourage female accountability and responsibility like we do with men, so feminist women (and their male lapdogs) are allowed to behave in this whiny, dishonest, and immature manner without repercussions from society at large.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:49 PM
6

Rebecca Watson and those who follow her don't even belong in the atheist movement. The atheist community is about objectivity and evidence-backed knowledge. The Atheism+ people obviously do not think in this rational way and they've only replaced religion with another dogma, which is feminism.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:16 PM
7

"Men's weakness is their facade of strength; women's strength is their facade of weakness." -Warren Farrell
/r/MensRights10/02/13 10:03 AM
3

Many people will be curious enough to look us up and see what we're discussing. The more you talk about something, the more people will want to know about it. Reading articles like this shows me that more people are paying attention to the MRM. Feminists and misandrists will continue to criticize, mock and misrepresent us. It's unavoidable. What else are they going to do? Their position can't be defended in any rational or honest way.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 01:48 AM
9

What the guy doesn't realize is that he's helping us by putting our name in the mainstream. Comparing us to religious fundamentalists, neo-nazis, and the KKK doesn't hold water when people actually visit /r/menrights or AVFM and see what we're actually about. Calling us names isn't going to nullify the free publicity that he's giving us. I would like to thank our opposition so far for making efforts to put our name out there!
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:46 PM
2

Unless this happened on a slave plantation in the 1800's, those people who told you that "ladies first" crap need to get a grip.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:32 PM
16

So, if you show awareness of issues that can affect you, then you're a pussy....... Those are the kinds of statements that someone would make out of resentment towards awareness and concern about men's issues. So, you're a pussy if you don't ignore problems that might apply to you, while showing nothing but complete concern for women's issues. That sounds like a great way of making insecure men into useful idiots.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:22 PM
2

You're expecting reason from an overgrown child. This is what most feminists do when confronted with their beliefs. They try to taunt you, insult you, and act passive-aggressively. What else are they going to do when they want to defend an idea that they know is wrong?
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:52 PM
57

You say that men deserve all of those things too. She deletes your comment. That's the majority of feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 01:23 AM
29

Yes, as the MRM becomes more popular, they will use more extreme measures to try to censor us. AVFM has also been blocked in a restaurant chain that provides wi-fi.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:20 PM
4

So they see her as one of the guys? For all we know it could mean that they already respect her and accept her as one of their own. How is this a bad thing?
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:07 PM
2

I hope he divorces her, get's custody of his child (at twice her salary, he's clearly a better provider), and distributes the video of his wife's infidelity to her entire family. If the kid is his, I do hope that he gets custody (though it probably won't happen).
/r/MensRights05/02/13 04:30 AM
6

This is the man's first child (if it's even his). He's lucky that there aren't any other children in this mess.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:45 AM
3

It was very clever of the OP to set up a camera. Honestly, he's in a better situation than other men who find out years down the road, after paying tens of thousands in child support.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:42 AM
1

Men have enforced patriarchy to benefit themselves for all of human history. Women must fight against this oppression! Nurture your victimhood and blame all of your current problems on men. Don't worry, we're constantly making up problems that affect you, and plenty of excuses to scapegoat the male gender!
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:45 PM
1

Men's rights supports equality between both genders. Feminism, in practice, does infringe upon men's rights quite often. So it would be very difficult to talk about issues that affect men's rights, seeing that many of those issues come from feminism's influence on politics, media, and academia.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 07:21 PM
1

As far as those posts go, I think that the main issue with those is that they're the typical low quality junk that pops up in larger subs. Men's rights include social and personal issues as well, though obviously articles are a much better option for those than the facebook junk that get's posted here sometimes. I have no problem with linking to a blogpost, though that comes with the chance that the writer could be a troll.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 12:38 AM
65

Many of these posts about women behaving badly are submitted and upvoted because the criminal only got a slap on the wrist. Only MRA sites will call out and criticize this infantilization of women. Part of men's rights is promoting the idea that we should improve society by holding women accountable for their actions, just as we do with men.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 11:01 PM
3

Anytime.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:54 AM
2

I agree. I've recommended her channel several times here as well.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:40 PM
12

A few other great channels: Manwomanmyth barbarossaaa Andy Man Chapin's Inferno Edit: I like girlwriteswhat just as much as anyone else here. I'm just plugging in a few other great channels for the large number of newcomers.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:16 PM
1

I'm definitely in favor of federally funded birth control. With a population of over 7 billion people in the world, more women taking birth control is a great thing! Our overpopulation is a huge problem that needs to be addressed globally.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:44 PM
14

The only thing I've heard feminists say about that protest is the usual "not all feminists are like that." Of course, I still haven't heard any of them denounce it. I guess some of them like the fact that there are extremists in their movement to do the dirty work.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:30 PM
4

Same thing. Two different users already tried to dox me after the post I made in askreddit. Sorry to hear that. It doesn't surprise me though.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:21 PM
0

I'm not even talking about online threats. I'm talking about real life occurrences. Edit: My original post was about online harassment. But, with regard to Erin Pizzey and the Warren Farrell protest, I'm talking about real life.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:07 PM
4

There are real life feminists who are violent and confrontational. Not all of them, and probably not most of them are this way. But some of them definitely do behave in this manner, and they're more vocal and influential than most people realize. Haven't you heard of Erin Pizzey or seen the Warren Farrell protest on youtube? Also, I'm glad that mens rights was able to help you with problems that you've had.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:23 PM
40

An MRA comic on strawfeminists. Source.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:18 PM
3

Manwomanmyth made a documentary that can be downloaded here. I think that all of his videos on youtube are clips from that documantary. Steve Brule, who also filmed the Warren Farrell protest, made a teaser for a series he's working on about divorced men.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:32 PM
16

There are too many posts here talking about drama, death threats, and a shitstorm coming. I know that a lot of these feminists aren't the most civil of people. But seriously, lighten up people. It's a great day for this subreddit. Fucking enjoy it!
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:41 PM
2

Most likely they'll give you some BS technicality, even though the post didn't violate any rules.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:52 AM
3

The post has already been removed from /r/bestof.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:03 PM
37

It's a sad combination of a need for victimhood as well as for attention. Oh, there's an annual event geared mainly towards men? Let's see how we can make it about demonizing men and portraying women as their helpless victims at the same time. Even if it's mostly for men, it has to be about women somehow. It's just sick.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:39 PM
0

It's not a big deal, seeing that I was responding to another user who was doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:51 PM
0

I admitted that I should have referred to what others said about the book, rather than making my own statement. So, where is the problem? What I didn't like was that you were making a big deal about that when you weren't expressing your true disagreement. It's like trying to pin me down with a technicality when the more important issue was that men should know about these things. Dodging my questions and talking as if men's rights is only about matters relating to the law is dishonest and doesn'…
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:44 PM
0

You could have just asked me that in the first place, instead of pretending that the main issue was that I hadn't read the book. See? You can actually get somewhere by being straightforward. Yeah, I think some PUA tactics are deceitful and abusive.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 03:36 PM
0

The avoiceformen article on this book was very informative about manipulative and deceitful tactics that some men are targeted for. Why would you have a problem with men or even women gaining insight into problems in the dating world? Also, you still haven't answered my question, which tells me that you probably haven't read the book either.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:38 PM
0

Why not answer my question? My post was intended to inform and help out whoever might come across this link, not "whining," as you call it. Maybe I'm wrong, but you seem to have much more of a problem with my point of view than whether I read the book or not.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:20 PM
11

When I think about it now, I may have over-reacted in anger,I may not be setting a positive societal role model. No, you did the right thing. Halfway through this story I was thinking that you were just going to get up and sit somewhere else. Good for you for standing up for yourself!
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:36 PM
0

So you agree with Vyvanne (who probably didn't read the book either, yet nobody said anything their statement) that the book is about letting men take the lead, rather than manipulating them into doing it?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:16 PM
0

Yes, it would be better. I'll refer to the reviews of others next time. Although, I was replying to a comment written by someone who doesn't seem to have read it either.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:50 AM
0

This isn't a book report (well, not my book report anyway). I realize I should have said that I was basing my statement on what others have said. But, I don't doubt a large number of people who have all given similar criticisms on it.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:06 AM
0

I'm basing that on multiple reviews that I've read on the book, as well as several articles (including the one I linked to).
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:52 AM
1

not initiating, letting the man lead things The book is obviously about manipulating the man into doing these things, not simply letting him.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:34 PM
2

I don't read magazines, but if that one does cover that type of stuff then you got me there.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:15 PM
6

MRM is not about policing personal behavior of woman. The point of this post is to inform men and bring awareness about underhanded and manipulative tactics employed by some women. It's not about policing the behavior of others. Sure, we have woman here behaving in a manipulative manner, but so what? Like just ignore them. That's why I posted this. There are plenty of men who fall for this kind of crap and don't know any better, or don't have the self-esteem to distance themselves from women who…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:55 PM
3

Bringing awareness to issues that affect men in much greater numbers, such as: Suicide Homelessness Drug addiction Alcoholism Dropping out of high school and college Reminding people why the wage gap isn't due to discrimination is also important. Another important thing is to remember that, as men, we have value. Men in western society had tough gender roles that came at their expense. Both genders have always had certain privileges, and Western men weren't and still aren't oppressors. Youtube u…
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:14 PM
8

Not only do "positive discrimination" policies fail to stop when they've achieved their goal (ie programs directed at women enrolling in universities even though they're already the majority), but they also work by pushing aside qualified individuals and prodding in others who may be less interested or less qualified. Programs like these compromise talent and excellence all in the name of a one sided, anti-male gender ideology.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:16 PM
1

We need a real life Dexter for people like this.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:06 PM
12

Pretty much. One major difference is that PUA reading material isn't included in national magazines to be put on display in supermarket lines, like this stuff is.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:48 PM
1

I wish I had good advice for you. All I can say is you couldn't have picked a worse username to post this under.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 05:58 PM
1

Better people would instead support something more honest, rational, and egalitarian.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 12:58 PM
6

That pm is nothing less than cringe-worthy. I mean, talk about sexist victim-blaming. What kind of degenerate thinks that way?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 11:45 AM
3

Other men are just as much of a problem for men's rights as some women are.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 06:46 AM
2

I guess my response was a bit vague. My point is that they only want to support a message that promotes a feminist agenda, one that falls in line with empowering feminist women, as well as the mentality that their male counterparts can all agree on. It doesn't empower any men, but feminist men apparently get off on this stuff.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:19 AM
1

Good point. I added an edit based on what I should have said.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:07 AM
2

True. I said women specifically because feminists does include men, though male feminists do probably get off on promoting feminist agendas just the same. So you have a good point there.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:06 AM
5

I guess sexual stimulation would be a better way to phrase it.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 07:39 PM
3

I wasn't sure if you were being sarcastic, but I didn't pick up anything indicating that they're a religious group.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:51 PM
3

In the video on this, they never mentioned anything about God or sinners. They seem to be a bunch of gender ideologues to me. Over on the original post in /r/vancouver, someone does mention that the professor is rather zealous about social justice.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:49 PM
28

Gender equality and a sex positive society means stripping (and prostitution is fine). Deal with it. Didn't you get the memo? A positive attitude towards sex is only acceptable when it empowers women. /s Edit: Feminists would be a more specific and accurate word to use here, rather than women in general.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:24 PM
18

The target audience for most strip clubs, porn, and prostitution is obviously men, so of course feminists denounce the sex industry to limit men's access alternative outlets for sexual release. A thousand times this. It's why I said men's rights as well as women's rights. Strip clubs are an environment that allows for men to experience sexual release, like you said. This results in men feeling a bit more satisfied and gives them a degree of sexual independence. Feminists obviously aren't ok with…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:21 PM
179

This is what happens when feminism goes far enough that it starts infringing on not only men's rights but women's rights too.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:48 PM
1

The post was linked to in r/againstmensrights.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 02:17 PM
1

I think that more and more women are becoming cynical towards feminism for other reasons. Maybe I'm being naive here, but I think (and hope) that with the public's increasing awareness of the more hateful elements of feminism, most women will take on the responsibilities associated with equality without major problems.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:18 PM
10

Funny enough, that study was only conducted on men (or only the results on men were published). So we really don't know if women's brains would react differently. Though, even if they did, it would not reflect badly on men. It reminds me of an informative post about how feminists mess with research in order to promote their agenda.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:07 PM
1

I think they may have removed that user's comment from the thread. Their comment is no where to be seen when I look through the full comments.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:29 AM
2

A couple of youtube channels to check out are Girl Writes What and Manwomanmyth. They both make some great videos that offer some in depth perspective on the role of men in society, as well as how those roles come at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:10 AM
6

I really respect women who want to share the burden of male responsibility along with men. In Israel, there is mandatory military service for both men and women. If they can pull it off, so can we.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:59 AM
3

Men's rights include boy's rights.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:52 AM
-1

There's also the fact that women needed men, and society needed women in a certain place, just like it did with the men. It wasn't until men invented things like the washing machine, dishwasher, etc that women finally gained some freedom from their household duties. Men still support women today, though now it's more indirect and less acknowledged. Women still depend on men for the roads, buildings, houses, cars, gadgets, and almost everything else they use. That includes the tax money paid by m…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:53 PM
8

I very much enjoy these x-posts. Whenever somebody links to these, it's like they open a gate to let the MRA's run out and play with the feminists. On a serious note though, it's great to engage with others about our ideas. Otherwise, this place would be an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:40 PM
4

I'm guessing the person who posted the comment got the information from Warren Farrell. He talked about it in his lecture in Toronto (the one for which there is a youtube video of the protest). He mentions it on one of his other (shorter) videos on youtube, and I'll edit this post if I find out which one it was. In the meantime, he does mention it here.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:07 PM
6

This user made a great post about problems that men face, yet sadly has more downvotes than upvotes.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:34 PM
0

For anyone who's offended about the message from the video, what the narrator is saying is that the importance and history of male accomplishment is enormous. It's about male pride and knowing that our importance as men far outweighs any attempt at making us out to be a bunch of oppressors and whatnot. Unfortunately, when the media does focus on men, it's usually in a negative way. People like to use the male gender as a scapegoat for their problems. Men have built civilization, and we're extrem…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 01:50 AM
2

The link doesn't work.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 05:54 AM
2

I re-posted this over at /r/OneY. http://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/16zigu/sign_an_executive_order_establishing_a_white/
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:25 PM
10

"How dare those other men not care about gaining sexual affection from women by being little sycophants like me?" stamps foot
/r/MensRights21/01/13 10:04 AM
28

The guy speaking 36 seconds into the video is a great example of a feminist lapdog. Apparently, he doesn't think that it's ok for men to have easy and consensual access to sexual gratification. On the contrary, being able to do something like going to a strip club on occasion is a very healthy way for a single man to receive sexual interaction. It's much healthier than being at the mercy of women's preferences and sexual control all of the time. Many feminists resent men doing such a thing becau…
/r/MensRights21/01/13 09:15 AM
1

Being, silenced, shamed, and not being taken seriously or allowed to express yourself are understandable reasons for exploding on occasion, as you say you do.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:54 AM
7

At the end of the day I'm a man, I just like dudes instead of girls. Exactly. Your sexual orientation is just one sphere of your life, and only part of your identity. Being a man is another. Welcome to the MRM.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:42 AM
1

They'd surely remove them just as quickly, if not sooner.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:36 AM
4

They should have had women do the kind of heavy, dirty, and dangerous labor that men do, just to see how long they last. Also, I doubt that women would have lasted any longer with electrodes attached to their abdomens, given that they have the choice to remove them.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:48 PM
5

Feminist arguments can't be defended very well in an open and honest debate. But, if they want their echo chamber, let them have it.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 11:43 PM
9

If women want stories that they can better relate to, they should write these stories and get them made. Look, creating and building is hard work. It's easier to take something great that's made and dominated by men and put pressure on those men so that women can be accommodated.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:45 AM
4

It depends, are you asking about men or women? Men are held responsible, but women are often not.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:40 AM
8

Exactly. With the exception of family (and even then it's often true), relationships tend to form on the basis that the person has something to offer. Men are also "objectified" for the list of reasons that you mentioned, and people hardly ever talk about it.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:01 AM
8

I do think that our society's idea of masculinity is a problem for males, and in turn, for society. In American culture, males aren't allowed to have pride and self-love in the simple fact that they're male, unlike with women. Again, unlike with women, males are judged by how willing they are to make themselves disposable, as workhorses, and how aggressive they are towards each other. Just being themselves isn't good enough, so they're pressured to act in order to be considered worthy. If not, t…
/r/MensRights19/01/13 12:17 AM
28

objectification There goes another word that's been so overused that most people probably don't care about it anymore. To be fair though, that term has never really meant anything to me.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 12:04 AM
2

I think you should stick to a more straightforward approach with this one. The gender flip idea works with some infographs better than others. With this one, people aren't going to think twice about which one represents females and which ones represents males. Thus, most of them aren't going to look at the key, or if they do many of them will think it's a mistake. You can also make it obvious that you intentionally used the wrong figures.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:26 PM
2

She's very well known here. A couple of other great MRA youtubers ones are manwomanmyth and barbarosssa.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:23 AM
3

Whenever I talk about men's issues, I never label my points as those of an MRA or any movement for that matter. I express these views from the perspective that this is what I think and why I think it's right (just like with any other point of view). Though I'm proud to be an MRA, there's no need to put a label on my points of debate. Like Barbarossa said in one of his videos, it's better to spread one's ideas like they're simply your own (which they are) rather than making people think that you'…
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:32 PM
2

That's too funny. The user who created that sub is the same person who got linked to in a comment in this post (the post itself is to a screenshot of that convo though). The butthurt is strong with this one.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:58 PM
1

40 signatures in 5 days.... /r/mensrights has gained more users than that in the last 5 days. We normally gain twice that or more in one day.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:52 PM
1

We can have her sent to a special room, one in which the padded walls are custom patterned with phallic images and the male symbol.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 07:47 PM
1

If by science you mean psychopathology, then yes you will be in for a treat.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:56 PM
1

A comment link to an againstmensrights post that links to this very post, and it gets downvoted to oblivion. It's like we reverse brigaded them. I like.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 12:52 PM
2

There's nothing wrong with passing an offer to dance with a girl. I think it's great of her to show sympathy and empathy for others like she was doing. But, I can see why it would bother you if she was specifically asking for dances with people generally considered to be rejects.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:06 AM
74

Feminism has been permeating our culture for decades. For the most part, it's gone unchallenged except by the religious right, tradcons and so on. But now, they have to deal with a movement with which they can't argue against. So they resort to attempts at shaming us, smearing us as hate groups, as misogynists, etc.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:03 AM
2

You have a point there. I shouldn't have called it a false accusation. Still, it was nothing more than an accusation.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:13 AM
10

The reasoning behind the choice of that ugliest word of the year? It degrades the real victims of rape. He isn't the one degrading the real victims of rape. The ones guilty of that are false accusers like his ex and everyone else who jumped on him without knowing what really happened.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:59 PM
0

Society has been having this same problem with prostitution for a very long time. How do they deal with it? Make it illegal (though it's been legalized in several countries by now). Anything that takes away from women's sexual power over men is considered a threat. This fear of men gaining even a small amount of sexual independence is probably what feminists refer to when they talk about "women being objectified." So a man is happy forking over money for a short encounter with guaranteed sex, ra…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:44 PM
6

I wouldn't call it a narrow or a necessarily right wing view. Women do have certain advantages that are allowing them to attend school in greater numbers, while men fall behind.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:35 PM
1

Some women have an exaggerated sense of entitlement, and quite a few of them purposely show zero respect for male spaces.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:22 PM
1

There's an obvious difference. One is kept empty on purpose. The other is a ghost town due to lack of participation.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:21 PM
4

I guess you're being downvoted because of the statement on abortion. I agree with you on everything else though. The men's locker room is a male only space, and women should stay the hell out. Either that, or allow male sportswriters into women's locker rooms.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 10:42 AM
4

There's always /r/trueblackfathers.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:38 AM
1

Yes, but in this thread, it isn't us who are getting laughed at.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:34 AM
18

SRSers have an odd way of courting.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:23 PM
3

True. Though, who needs facts and logic when you can sensationalize something to get people's attention? It's a typical tactic for dishonest and persistent ideologues.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:13 PM
11

They might be basing that on our opposition to paternity fraud. I've heard that adoption argument being used before in defence of it, even though there's a world of a difference between willingly adopting a child and unknowingly raising a child that is the product of infidelity. It's a huge stretch, but it wouldn't surprise me if it's coming from a feminist.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:13 PM
2

Manwomanmyth makes some awesome videos.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:04 PM
10

Some women and feminists are threatened by male spaces. This applies to really anything that can potentially empower men (like a male only club, or an "old boy's club," as they like to call it) or offers them an emotional or sexual independence from women (porn [link is sfw], promiscuous women, prostitution).
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:49 AM
1

Sorry, I should have been more clear. I agree that it's gotten weaker, though I don't know if it's because of its overuse (as I thought you were stating) or if it's simply because we tend to do this with most shocking terminology.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 06:05 AM
8

As it is, we're a society that incorporates killing and disfigurement into jokes. "I'm going to murder you" or "he's going to tear him a new one." Younger people will always use more shocking terms and hyperboles towards each other.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:25 AM
22

Feminists will keep on using that word because because of it's supposed shock value. I feel that by overusing it, they are weakening that term. It will still have the same meaning of course, but its connotations and shock value will change with its excessive use.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 11:16 PM
2

It bothers me too. As a society, it doesn't make sense for one gender to have certain obligations to the other (such as paying for dates), while the other is able to do whatever it wants. Men need to be freed from their gender obligations to women in the same way that women have done so for themselves.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:23 AM
-7

It wasn't just a job. The US was in total war at the time and people back home were expected to contribute to the war efforts as well. I'm sure most of the men overseas would have preferred a factory job over death, dismemberment, and disease.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:44 PM
1

I just did.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:56 PM
2

There's so much butthurt on youtube about this. Search for "thunderfoot feminism" on youtube for a good laugh.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:07 AM
2

This is feminist hysteria and professional victimhood at its finest. I wonder how an Indian woman would feel reading someone's claim that American women actually have it worse.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 04:51 PM
4

I fully agree with the quote. The hypermasculine gender roles that men are often pressured into are more harmful than empowering. "Manning up" makes men passive about their problems, making them bottle up their emotions and is arguably a great contributor to the seriously high percentage of suicide victims being male. Less than moral women are able to accomplish a lot by playing the victim (as can be seen by much of the feminist dogma, hysteria, and propaganda). It's a frighteningly effective to…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter