TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

marchingrunjump Archive

View 18 posts and 593 comments by marchingrunjump on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
395

Activism/Supportmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights13/07/20 07:06 AM
239

Progressmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights03/11/24 12:40 PM
90

Discriminationmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights01/11/24 07:25 AM
87

Generalmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights15/06/20 07:44 PM
54

Social Issuesmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights23/03/25 09:25 AM
41

Activism/Supportmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:23 PM
41

Activism/Supportmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights13/07/20 10:43 PM
35

Social Issuesmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights23/03/25 09:55 AM
16

Feminismmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights15/06/20 05:07 PM
16

Anti-MRMmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights18/07/20 07:24 AM
16

Progressmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights03/10/20 03:35 PM
14

False Accusationmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights07/06/20 07:01 AM
14

Generalmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights21/08/20 07:45 AM
12

Activism/Supportmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights15/07/20 07:01 AM
4

Feminismmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights07/10/20 07:00 PM
2

Marriage/Childrenmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights03/06/20 06:47 AM
1

marchingrunjump/r/MGTOW201/06/20 09:28 AM
1

Marriage/Childrenmarchingrunjump/r/MensRights30/07/20 08:56 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

If you’re ahead and winning, why would you consider any other’s needs and viewpoints? Currently feminism has a worldwide monopoly on what we think about gender.
/r/MensRights12/07/26 05:06 PM
-2

Women ought to start their own corporations. If Mackenzie Scott can give 26.3Bn$ for charities, surely she can also start just one female corporations. But this doesn’t seem to be a priority. https://www.instagram.com/p/DXwX8v3gBRH/?igsh=bXNjN2IyNHNoNW83
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 02:39 AM
–

The OP is arguing that if men don’t have wives and children, they’ll I don’t know go rogue and destroy society or something? If you’re oblivious to how much effort it takes to keep a successful society running, I can understand how you get to that conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 03:32 PM
18

You could get a good primer by taking a look at Cassie Jaye’s documentary “The Red Pill”. There’s also a lot of backstory material available on yt.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 08:58 AM
0

A gun is a tool violence. But the gun doesn’t do it by itself. It’s whoever that wields the gun you should be scared of. Or whoever tells the gun-wielder where the gun points. So be scared al Capone’s cronies but be more scared of al Capone. Women do not need to be violent by themselves as long as they can direct others to do their violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:46 AM
-2

Women are huge supporters of Somebody else providing universal health care, access to mental health services, unions and living wage policies, labor laws, medical leave, reevaluating over policing, identifying problems with the carceral state, all of which help men immensely. But quite against offering affections and vaginas as part of our care toward society does In return for the There. Fixed it for you. No problem buying lots and lots of stuff if you’re never gonna pay. Or only pay a small pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 02:44 AM
1

https://www.statbank.dk This is the main page. Afaik it should be open to the world. You should look into “social conditions”->”crime an justice” … etc
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:48 PM
1

You can’t really get that from the data. If only the most egregious cases are investigated and ends up in court, i.e. the most clear cut ones, the conviction rate would higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 01:58 PM
1

I do have for Denmark. The snip shows data for 2019 to 2025. As you see 803 men were charged and 120 were imprisoned whereas 10 women were charged and 1 imprisoned. You can search for yourself on https://m.statbank.dk/Data?lang=en
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 10:05 AM
1

<image>
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 10:01 AM
1

But its a rare exception that a woman gets punished for having sex with an intoxicated man.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 05:40 AM
4

It is a quasi-religion. The missing deity is just a minor detail.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 10:24 PM
8

That’s probably because it’s predominantly to be seen as good and virtuous rather than creating good and virtuous results in the world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 10:21 PM
2

What's wrong with expecting that bringing a child into the world should require consent? It's not much different than tea: Ask for it: If you offer someone tea, you know they want it only if they say a clear "yes". Never force it: If someone is unsure or says "no," you don't give them tea, and you don't get angry at them for changing their mind. It cannot be taken back: Just because they wanted tea yesterday doesn't mean they want it today. Unaware states: You cannot serve tea to someone who is …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:59 PM
13

The study originated from the New Stateman and the women behind discuss their study here: https://youtu.be/dQRKL4BxrEM?si=8e3NoFhCvrnxiAh3 The New Statesman or New Statesman and Nation is left leaning. It absorbed Marxism Today back in 1991 so there’s that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/26 12:01 PM
22

It annoys me a bit that people seem to insist that the male loneliness epidemic has only to do with pair-bonding. Originally it was about men having shrinking social circles overall.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 04:53 PM
28

There’s good reason for the Wikipedia article on the manosphere article being locked. Likewise for related subjects.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 08:05 PM
5

I really like the values of the left wing. However, I’ve come to realize that much of left wing policies rely on bureaucratic management of society. And bureaucratic management is extremely inefficient. And the inefficiencies scale with size. Capitalism otoh with all its flaws rely on self-organization according to some key rules. Surely there must be a way that socialism can exist without the bureaucracy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/26 09:36 PM
2

So, when you realize this today, you also realize that the goalposts have been hearded as cat ladies her øs cats. Stable. Ever stable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 09:36 PM
7

Well, it makes you wonder, how did the patriarchy actually survive historically? Has the support of women and women’s cause changed so much within the last 100-200y? One should think at least a few countries would be pro-women…?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 07:03 PM
5

Let’s not incentive even more dead beat dads ya know? Won’t LPS ensure all dads having chosen their fatherhood? I.e. decrease the number of deadbeat dads? That’s what was seen when women got access to methods of seperating consent to sex with consent to parenthood.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 12:29 PM
6

Your enemy’s enemy is not necessarily your friend.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 12:16 PM
4

- Conservatism is what restricted men into gender roles(unhealthy roles) Be careful about drinking feminist kool-aid. Gender roles emerge from the requirements of the various stakeholders and interconnected interests and ties. The’re not arbitrary or conjured up from bad people “just because”. It is possible to deviate from gender-roles but it may be perilous as the underlying reasons for these gender roles persist. An analogy: Of course you can claim teeth brushing is an evil plot to poison you…
/r/MensRights19/01/26 10:01 AM
4

A societally regulated and enforced marriage contract as it is now is …. Problematic. The concept of marriage is a good thing but it’s really supposed to regulate the rights and obligations of the different stakeholders: Children first and foremost, society and lastly husband and wife. When a man and a woman decides to make a family its quite reasonable to agree on rights and obligations beforehand. Eventually they will have children and those children will become somebody else’s problem if the …
/r/MensRights08/01/26 10:14 PM
3

Because the problem is not discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 10:22 PM
1

Don’t cuck yourself. Yes contemporary relations between men and women might such but that’s no reason to cucking youself. Come to think of it, that might be what the feminist Karens wants you to do.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 08:53 AM
50

MeToo basically ensures all sexual relations between a man where it can be argued that he’s higher ranking than her, she can claim foul play and reparations if she’s dissatisfied with something and has the willingness to use the system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/25 03:54 PM
7

Interesting how they sum up that suicide hits hardest among 45-55y old men but the program os targeted young men up to 25 and +65 guys.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 02:14 PM
2

A short video of misogyny in full display back in the olden days before consent and reeducation https://youtu.be/SrDFGa0juCM?si=TovmiKf7Lw4mivOI (Aka: Nudge nudge)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/12/25 02:51 PM
1

This is hilarious 😂 You prove the point by pointing out that harm (abusive ess) trumps any possible veracity. The paper really is about scholars in psychology. It's abusive to generalise to women from it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/25 01:44 PM
1

This is a longer podcast. It’s also quite cute how she soo taken in by Chad Williamson. https://youtu.be/GKJ5wqKjous?si=pvL-uL-rS1pdKArj
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 12:54 PM
1

This is her main papr on the subject: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17456916241252085 You can also take a look at this short from when she was interviewed by Chris Williamson. https://youtube.com/shorts/E1jPOIkOx0g?si=X9EbbNdkVvwrw0_V To me she seems like a proper geek-girl.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 12:50 PM
0

I suppose so. However, objectively true isn’t always attainable, so I suppose I mean as objectively true as possible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/25 09:42 AM
3

As Cory Clark has shown, women value what’s subjectively good above what’s subjectively true. Hence - protecting women - which is good - trumps the truth of the matter. If policies and initiatives don’t work or even backfires because we got it wrong gets glossed over.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 08:44 PM
11

It’s almost like the one saying the world suddenly flipped around and crashed onto the top of the car.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/25 07:31 PM
10

…some say bad publicity is better than no publicity. So, perhaps we should start giving bad actors no publicity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 07:44 PM
3

Well isn’t this a reddit representation of a surprised pikachu face over the cultural scaffolding of dating and courtship being torn down and torched.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 07:57 AM
1

I think your problem stares back at when you’re in front of a mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 09:56 PM
1

It’s easy to say “just leave”. As if a relationship was only about sex. There’s a lot of other reasons and benefits of being in a relationship. Leaving also means forfeiting these.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 10:48 PM
1

Feminists rarely say men have it easy. They always say everyone has it hard. So let’s focus on the non-privileged and opressed groups, elegantly dodging the question. Quite clearly men’s health a lot less funded that women’s health. Even to the degree that we’re not even aware of the extent of the problem.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 11:28 AM
6

compliant wage slaves for women… …and the Scott Galloways of the world. The neo-nobility of course require the serfs to keep at it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 09:23 PM
3

Yet, many women can no longer have abortions in the many states in the USA even when their life is at risk. Neither can men fwiw. AFAIK, the pro-choice vs pro-life balance would be the same if all male votes were null and void. I wonder which is more threatening to women’s rights: Taking the individual pro-choice off the table or the collective pro-choice (ie deciding politically what society will allow).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:49 PM
14

Don’t try to find logic. It’s merely a rhetorical trick to deflect anyone pointing at male suffering.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 10:16 PM
–

You said the better candidate lost. That happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:39 PM
–

You do realize that the situation won’t change just because you fail to be convinced? If you really want to change the situation for the future, you ought to get the best fix on yhe problem and then proceed to work. I have go to bed now. It’s 1:37 am here and theres work tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:37 PM
–

And if you compare Bush, Gore and Kerry, thevtwo latter were the most experienced yet Bush won.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:34 PM
–

Yeah and betamax won against vhs did it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:25 PM
–

As mentioned, you’re most welcome to get a shot of penecillin against your flu.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:24 PM
–

This is from another post here: Republicans: pump as much content propagandizing men to believe Democrats insult men, blame men for all the world’s problems, make misandry mainstream, shame men for things they cannot control/are born with. Well I’ve been following r/AskFeminists for years and I don’t think there’s a group loving democrats more than feminists. And it’s obviously mutual. Now from following the dialogue in such forum it quite obvious that men are feminists’ designated prügeknabe. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:22 PM
–

It often alleged. However I haven’t seen any data or surveys proving this is a factor. Currently the are 12 us states are run by women: Rep.: Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, New Hampshire Dem: Arizona, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Mexico, New York, Oregon Among candidates 26.8% of all political candidates are women. If us voters had such a problem with women running for office one should think less than 25% would end up as head of state quite closely matching the gender ratio of politica…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 11:02 PM
–

Well sort of - it wasn’t the goodies Harris put in the bag for men but the charcoal men had gotten from the establishment- herewithin democrats - for years and years without anyone being the least embarrassed. Such experience might lead to an expectation of more charcoal regardless of how many goodies are promised.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 09:25 PM
–

That’s easy. Trump offered some “not democrat”.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 09:12 PM
–

If you say so…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 01:03 PM
–

I there might also be a group of men assuming that a woman being attracted is a rare exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 11:05 AM
5

Ok, lets imagine female attraction was such that only X (%) of men passed well enough for ppl to have kids. Say X=1%, forced pregnancy (ie successive) would be the norm for all societies and all times. Else people would die out. If X=90% all women would be able to find a mate. But no selection pressure would be present. Most probably X varies from woman to woman and it’s a question of which strategy is better: Being picky at risk of going hungry or being non-picky at the risk og getting a sub-op…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 09:10 AM
5

It’s not a question of “doesn’t like” but a question about a more attractive person.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 08:06 AM
6

Well is it bad? Anything goes in war and love. You should expect that. I’ve been way more gaslit from women than from men considering relationships. Men can end up in terrible relationships and have all the women around them saying that its perfectly normal. Though that happens way less to the assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 06:22 AM
10

Men settling for women is just as common as women settling for men. The parameters might just be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 06:12 AM
20

When the average man is no match for the average woman, it obvious someone’s tipping the scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 11:37 PM
–

The origins might be that men used to being the protectors of society herewithin culture and values. If “society” has decided that monogamy is the way to go, men are the ones feeling the obligation to enforce such decision. With “society” I mean the male-female multi-generational consensus. Now that “society” has decided that monogamy is no longer within the common consensus - only serial monogamy, i.e. boyfriend/girlfriend type relationships, there is no longer any need to enforce a certain mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 04:15 PM
26

She concludes that: The performed analyses reveal that no systematic differences can be devised across the misogynistic and misandric communities. This suggests that, in addressing the phenomenon of online gendered hate speech, both male-to-female and female-to-male perspectives should be taken into account, thus recognizing equal importance to both misandry and misogyny. I suppose its a step forward that misandry is recognized.
/r/MensRights20/09/25 12:59 PM
3

The Duluth model - with all its problems - influenced the Istanbul convention which is actively being pushed in Europe. Istanbul is not as lopsided as the Duluth model but is 50-60% similar in view of the subject.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 07:29 AM
1

Thanks for the response, however it doesn’t really answer whether someone intentionally tried to get women to hate men. Perhaps I didn’t explain myself well. If they did they certainly succeeded. This said, you speak about muslim community as if there’s only one. Surely there’s a big difference between a Bosnian, a Turkish, a Moroccan, a Palestinian, an Iranian, a Pakistani, a Somalian and an Indonesian community. Just to mention such from the top of my head. I’ve bumped into ppl from all of the…
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:15 AM
1

Looked at a bit from afar, one might wonder why so many women almost reflexively seek to create distrust between the genders. Is it social contagion? Do the really hate men? How common is it for women to wish other women to hate men?
/r/MensRights12/09/25 09:54 PM
1

What I can or cannot is besides the point. Anecdotally, I had my teen years in the 80-ies and had exactly the same position as you have: Listen to women and everything will be ok. So I read everything I could about men from women’s perspective. I was head over heels in women at that time. What I did learn was that men had been terrible to women for millennia and women clearly preferred to be left alone. In the rare case they didn’t want to be left alone they’d say so. I got that message in the 8…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:10 AM
6

Women can’t or won’t accept that they reward men according to their ability to provide. Men otoh knows that they either have to be good at creating the stuff women want but even better take stuff other men create and give it to women. This leads to an unhealthy dynamic where men both collaborate to create stuff but also fight each other in order to get a larger chunk of the stuff created in collaboration. Should men start to find a fair an equitable system you can be sure such system would be in…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 10:49 PM
1

Slowly we’re reversing to homo-sapien’s default pairing-up model: predominantly polygyny where a minority of males sire a majority of children. The majority of males are more or less sidelined. The model will be executed as serial monogamy where the wife is exchanged for a younger model after a couple of kids. If it is so, will society be able to run without the effor of the sidelined men? Family fathers are known for working their asses off whereas bachelors take it easy. The good news is that …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 05:32 PM
-4

The mindset that children are "women's business" and have nothing to do with men is very harmful to everyone. That mindset is a typical female mindset. Surprisingly enough. Doesn’t it say: my body, my choice…. Eventually complemented with our responsibility as I see fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 03:32 PM
1

https://hbr.org/2011/09/embracing-complexity Personally I been raised quite liberally with a heavy dose of feminism in Denmark in the seventies. I’ve always been taught that women are better people than men and that you just should do what you “feel like”. The unspoken detail was that you shouldn’t do like was done traditionally because that was bad. Personally it left me confused and paralyzed. And longing. Not surprisingly numerous men have been punished for believing this. Believing men and w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:49 PM
1

I think gender roles emerge spontaneously from the interaction of men and women. Eventually the get reinforced via feedback loops; people with a “good configuration” thrive and people with a not so good falter. Eventually a blueprint of what works well shows up: Voila gender roles. One must understand complex adaptive systems to grasp the extent and significance of such mechanisms. To think culture is arbitrary and we can thrive equally well regardless of cultural configuration is IMHO silly. Mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:37 PM
1

Perhaps I should have written either difficult, unpleasant or dangerous. It certainly matches difficult.
/r/MensRights21/08/25 06:10 AM
0

The absence of gender norms have made my life infinitely more difficult. Just like throwing away all maps when going from NY to LA. You might get there eventually but the map makes it much easier. EDIT >>> How have traditional gender norms made your life easier? They haven’t as everyone around said they were obsolete. However with time I realized that that wasn’t true and women still expect men to conform. How have traditional gender norms made your life harder? They haven’t. Whenever you see a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:28 AM
32

Men dominate everywhere where it’s difficult, unpleasant or dangerous.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 07:19 AM
2

People saying “men just parent less” are usually looking at early childhood—diapers, feeding, bedtime routines. And sure, if that’s your whole definition of parenting, it’ll look like dads matter less. Not that men shouldn’t participate. But here’s the thing: human development doesn’t stop at age 3. In fact, most of what makes us functioning adults—impulse control, long-term thinking, emotional regulation—develops much later. Evolution made our brains huge, so babies had to be born early. Which …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 08:56 AM
1

Well it takes time to note down all deeds and misdeeds in the little black book for future fights. Have you thought about that? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 11:56 AM
1

I’d say it’s a risk. Not a chance.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 08:36 PM
14

I’d guess a significant proportion of downloads are due to ppl wanting to see what it’s all about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 05:30 PM
1

If you average over all males, you’d come to the conclusion that it’s a net negative. If you’re only looking at the “smart ones”, probably the ones not giving a fuck about anyone but themselves, you’re probably 100% correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:10 PM
1

It’s not a war against male sexuality as such. It’s simply women using all means possible to assert absolute dominance over human reproduction and sexuality. As you know “Everything in the world is about sex except sex. Sex is about power.”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:04 PM
16

It’s a bit like a vegetarian eating steak bcs to begin with cows eat grass.
/r/MensRights21/07/25 08:53 PM
–

Women underestimate how badly the average young woman wants to call the relationship shots. May well be there’s not supposed to be any commitment, but that’s her decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 11:24 PM
3

I once had an acquaintance talking about his disdain for c-suite men with a high sexual appetite because they focused on the “lowest of the low human urges”. Dirty bastards. He did start to think when I pointed out that somewhere below men’s drive for sex is an underlying drive for having offspring. Why would that be the lowest of the low of human urges? What is broodyness in women must be concentrated into sex focus for men. Men can’t do much else.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 06:43 AM
5

I started being interested in gender issues late 70’ies early 80’ies. Feminism formed who I am way more than other faiths. I suppose feminism took the role of religion, so, even growing up in a (culture-) Christian community. Feminism influenced way more than Christianity. Feminism and a hodgepodge of new age philosophy that was so prevalent at that time. Mid to late 80’ies I started to get more interested in the male perspective and differences between masculine and feminine. I read all I could…
/r/MensRights12/07/25 12:56 PM
2

It’s often seen that reactive violence from men is seen as primary violence. And thus punished as such. In your case it isn’t violence as such but the principle remains: your secondary misdeed erases her primary.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 04:25 PM
6

Growing up raised in the feminist faith, I resonate with this. I set out as an adolescent boy nobly trying to right millennia of wrongs. Undo the patriarchy so to say. Eventually I learned that all the theories, the entire worldview, just don’t add up. Or … at least … add up to something different than advertised. One of the promises was a happier and more fair life. Now it’s “fair” the same way a narcissist would define fair.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 06:49 AM
1

Where in the world is this?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 07:22 PM
4

…and where it failed was to convince people that this is the least bad model.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 05:19 PM
14

You missed a couple of zeros The “everyone gets a wife” experiment lasted about 5000 years and failed. Now it’s back to normalcy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 05:18 PM
4

So often we hear, boo hoo men have all the power. Yet when it gets down to the details it often ends with the 80/20 rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 09:08 PM
1

So the terrible men you’re talking about are not men in your life but all the other men…? Gauging from what you write it seems like the terrible men are a large majority, yet you managed to have good ones in your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 05:21 PM
9

Conversely looking from the perspective of the voter and the consumer, women constitute a majority of both voters and makes a large majority of consumer decisions keeping said corporations in power.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 03:58 PM
1

I’m so sad to hear that your dad, your brothers and your uncles were terrible people.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 03:52 PM
3

Unpaid would only be correct of no money, goods/assets or services were transferred from man to woman.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 09:35 PM
16

Women and gender studies academics are unapologetically gender uniform: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_women%27s_and_gender_studies_academics So, with women and women’s perspective absolutely dominating everything gender, the male perspective on gender is missing.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 09:01 AM
3

Surprise surprise, feminism got one thing wrong. /s
/r/MensRights07/06/25 02:09 PM
1

It seems to me that a lot of discussions must have a solid foundation in philosophy. Without a philosophical base of principles of right and wrong, it soon becomes impossible to establish a yardstick by which one can measure what is equal. E.g. is bodily integrity and risk more important than the obligation to support children? Is violation of a woman’s reproductive autonomy a bigger thing than entirely robbing a man of his by deceit? Those questions can only be answered by philosophy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/25 08:03 PM
5

She trying jedi mind tricks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:15 PM
36

It's socially appropriate to not be heightist, yet women will answer 6ft with no problem. Women do what they can to argue that heightism is an exception or that it’s just an innocent preference or some other way of dodging the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 09:37 PM
2

Manslaughter is not the same as murder. Doesn’t help anyone that you conflate terms.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/25 04:33 PM
1

More women in soft harems with the decreasing number of wealthy men Won’t the social acceptance of soft harems incentivize such wealthy men towards antisocial behavior towards other men? They are - after all - threatening these soft harems. And with more ressources such men may succeed to dominate the discourse. Perhaps even try to character assassin the unsuccessful to limit the threat.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 04:03 PM
2

5y is the minimum sentence in Denmark. ~5% gets less that 8y and ~50% gets 8 to 12y the and ~20% gets more than 12y while 5% gets life. So 5y is not correct. https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/150-aars-domme-se-hvor-haardt-vi-straffer-drab
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/25 03:46 PM
9

For every man “in power” there’s often a man “in responsibility” as well. Feminists only look at male power and rarely - if ever - at male responsibility. Conversely, the mental load comes from power. Women’s mental load is contingent upon women insistence of being in power.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 08:55 PM
1

Of course they’re not going to accept him cheating. But then he’s not going to commit to anything but casual hooking up. Ie a situationship. Good luck getting a fwb to accept that non exclusivity is cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 12:22 PM
7

Indeed they are https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000560 Interestingly enough, the article even comments on people misjudging the prevalent bias. However, both scientists and laypeople overestimated the continuation of bias against female candidates. Instead, selection bias in favor of male over female candidates was eliminated and, if anything, slightly reversed in sign starting in 2009 for mixed-gender and male-stereotypical jobs in our sample. Forecasters further fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 11:51 AM
8

Not at all. You can verify how the laws defined women’s rights (ie, voting vs nonvoting, inheritance, property ownership, etc) and how many women got educations, jobs, property, lines of credit, etc, before and after non-discrimination laws were passed If asking feminists, they would claim that we still live a patriarchy. This though women have been voting for more than a century and probably have cast more democratic votes than men in aggregate. Inherentance is gender neutral. Women are ahead i…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 10:31 AM
1

No it doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:11 AM
6

He’s not cheating. He’s saying: “you’ll have to accept that we’re not exclusive” and she’ll accept. Or not. Cheating is only if both agree on exclusivity. It’s not even cheating these days if he switch girlfriend every 3y leaving a trail og baby-mamas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 09:40 PM
5

This is infuriating. Just defining so called essential traits aways does not remove consequences of trait differences. E.g. one could define differences in physical strength away and the postulate that fair physical fight would be a just way of settling differences in a marriage. Here, ingnoring gender differences would allow men to dominate way beyond fair. This is clear for everyone. What’s way more difficult to see, is that women have an edge in non-physical aggression and fight, i.e. social …
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:02 AM
21

It’s so very convenient in such discussions to be able to point at women’s historical oppression. Always stated as undisputable facts. Yet anyone challenged to imagine a functioning non-oppressive society year 1500, can’t point out what would be different. History is written by the victors. Indeed it is.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 07:08 AM
-6

Is it never the case that the net flow of money in and after divorce is predominantly from men to women? And that men in many cases are ordered to continue paying to their ex even after divorce? And that payment is enforced by the full force of the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 12:46 PM
-3

if men are contributing 60/40 external/domestic work and women are contributing 40/60 ditto and the divorce courts ensures that both are equally well off post divorce for the external work only, no wonder life gets a lot easier. It is so by design and quite a motivator for divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 10:34 AM
115

all men have to pay for the sins of a select handful of shitty men While still getting no appreciation for the contributions of the majority of good men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 10:22 AM
1

Following r/Feminism or r/AskFeminists imho
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:14 PM
18

Sexuality isn’t offensive, period. Unwanted sexual behaviors to a non-consenting participant is offensive. That’s it! Male sexuality is predominantly unwanted by women whereas female sexuality is highly appreciated by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 05:35 AM
–

Sound pretty much like a サラリーマン with the added detail that he’s doing the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/25 05:01 PM
7

I don’t experience that they stutter. But almost always they double down in agressiveness and vitriol.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 09:20 PM
8

Apparently
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 06:57 AM
13

They get the male chunk of the funding in exchange for service rendered - lip service that is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 06:56 AM
2

Yes. I think so. You might start with the TED talk
/r/MensRights20/04/25 04:28 PM
3

https://youtu.be/Q7MkSpJk5tM?si=9xEmD9PDKrPHAnGH
/r/MensRights20/04/25 07:28 AM
5

You might see the red pill movie with her and the videos about how it was received. Especially Australia is interesting. Stats won’t convince as much. The point is: There’s active suppression of male issues. But if there is, you have to be critical about the story of the genders. But you won’t start looking until you’re motivated to be critical.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 07:27 AM
17

It’s a symptom of widespread misandry. It may be censored away but the underlying misandry remains.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 07:15 AM
-3

Well, would you mind if your boyfriend or husband used the services of a sex-worker? What about your son or your brother?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 05:51 AM
2

Same here. Though the guy on the right, William Costello, seems to have a decent grasp of the subject and not afraid of going against pre-conceived notions. I’ve heard him being interviewed by Chris Williamson. The guy in the middle seems like much more prone to follow the current discourse. Guy at left don’t know.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 08:46 AM
3

It can be quite powerful to try to tune into how other people feel about something. If there’s a connection to the feelings, it becomes obvious why they cling to certain beliefs. And how they would hurt by abandoning their position, regardless of how illogical. And sometimes you just realize that it’s the man in the mirror stuck in a feeling.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:40 PM
0

Is just testament to arguments alone not being very useful in changing ppls opinions. Study of rhetoric says that we should speak to the rational mind (logos) feelings (patos) from a position of “authority” (ethos) … and at the rigth time (kairos) You’re lacking speaking to her feelings and disregard who she sees as authorities. So, its just the way people work.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:28 PM
3

You’d probably need to talk to a couple of hundred to get a proper feel for it. And then there’s no guarantee that you’d pick up on the relevant details in the first place. E.g. Laura Bates allegedly spent a substantial amout of time on incel forums and didn’t get any wiser. BTW, did you actually hear the full session?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 08:55 PM
27

Whether you’re able to see it, depends on your understanding of power. There’s of course different definitions of what power is, but I think the definition that makes most sense is: Power is the ability to get your needs and objectives prioritized in comparison to competing needs and objectives The CEO may have a lot of power but that power is not necessarily power for personal gain. The CEO’s objectives are the objectives of the shareholders and only to a lesser degree power for personal object…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 11:29 AM
66

I think there’s an overlooked aspect underpinning this issue: It’s asserted that men as a group has more “power” than women. This stems from a quite narrow definition and methodology of figuring out who’s having power. Power is present in all spheres of society. There’s power dynamics in the dating market, in schools, in families, in social groups, at work. Merely pointing at a majority of CEO’s being male doesn’t really address power in all these other contexts. Just the fact that it legitimate…
/r/MensRights31/03/25 10:02 AM
7

Excellent write-up. Though one thing to consider about male violence: There’s two strategies to deal with (male) aggression. 1) Suppression I.e. don’t. Just don’t! 2) Mastery Know how to dose it and use it or aviod using it as the situation warrants. Many people liives lives where the necessity for violence/physical aggression is quite small. With the societal dominance of female moral values, we lear that we should aim for method #1. The problem about that is that if a man ends up in a sharp si…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 12:49 AM
8

If anyone wants to get their facts right I can recommend this conversation from the Select Committee- Women and equalities - Incel culture from May 15th 2025 (UK parliament committee). https://youtu.be/c8bZ7up1BRg?si=cGPGMDsmp6xVc9vL The experts are three university scholars doing research on Incel culture. Obviously this committee was arranged following the series Adolesence. One thing I do note, is how strikingly little concern is shown from the committee e.g. when it’s mentioned that 30% has …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:42 PM
3

If Trump and Vance are champions of MensRights I’ll have to become a feminist. And that’s just a terrible thing but IMHO the lesser evil. Trump is for Americans and Americans only and has absolutely no limits on which expenses he will impose on non-Americans. He also seems to be a believer in might is right. This is a fair political position to have. But must be taken ad notam and taken into consideration in dealings with American officials. He’s definitely not on “my side” by any stretch of the…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 09:04 AM
9

Not necessarily. It really depends on whether either’s view is reprensentative of feminism. Is it possible to make the case that Tate is representative of the wider manosphere? Is it possible to make the case that Gearhart is representative of feminism? And what about Butler? Is either of them revered or denounced by a substantial part of their group? Do they even belong to the same group? Are similarities coincidental or substantial. Are all vegetarians baddies because Adolf was vegetarian?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/25 08:39 AM
36

I think many people see Tate as very useful. It’s really easy to convince people that he’s 1) a terrible person and 2) speak from the male positon 3) has a predominantly male following Conversely, moderate voices speaking on behalf of men may be much harder to combat. A soft spoken man like Warren Farrel is much more difficult to combat. But putting Tate and Farrell in the same bin and sticking on a “far right manosphere” label makes it possible to use Tate’s toxicity against others. After all t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 10:57 PM
2

Well if society or others guarantees your provision regardless of your circumstances, you might not be so dependent on having a job. That’s probably how female privilege works.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 09:00 PM
9

It’s quite telling that the conversation was three powerful women asking (relatively) young men questions about a group of marginalized men. I don’t think any of the men in the committee asked a single question. The issue is so deeply embedded in the culture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 06:33 PM
–

Such a stupid study. <image> Eurostat has compiled this report of quality of life. It measures life satisfaction through a number of parameters: Age (both age and age2) Sex Income (log income) Educational attainment Household type Labour market status Citizenship Degree of urbanisation Severe material deprivation Unexpected expenses Physical insecurity Air / water pollution Supportive relationships Self-perceived health status Trust in institutions Trust in others SF36 Mental well-being These se…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 07:35 AM
19

That was quite an amazing discussion. One thing though, there was never asked any questions about whether there is anything in particular in society at large, causing young men ending up in such a bad place. Often when men have issues men must change. It’s seen before that when women have issues, society must change. Towards the end it seemed genuine that the committee leaned towards doing something different than just advising incels to lift themselves by their shoelaces. The motive for doing s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 01:44 AM
41

I’m puzzled about where the stories about men’s experience of living in the current world is. Some years ago, Christian Tafdrup stumbled into making the film A Terrible Woman about a guy ending up with a subtly dominating and controlling woman. The budget was only 3mio $ but was an instant hit showing the world from an uncommon perspective. Of course it was hated by women and raised a lot of controversy. There must be other such films book or whatever. Fiction and the stories we tell each other …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/25 06:10 PM
1

The question is more: Would you marry a divorced may paying alimony and child support to his ex? I.e. in practice be his second wife. Or: How many ex’es is acceptable for a man to have for you to go into a committed relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 08:21 AM
2

Isn’t this just a “if everyone was like me, they wouldn’t have any problems, because I haven’t such problems, so the problem must be that people aren’t like me” type of post?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 01:53 PM
2

NEET’s are per definition not classified as students
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:41 PM
3

Did you notice that this statistic is for students only? Thus nurses are not part of the stats. Most student workers works in low end jobs not requiring any particular skill. Some gets student jobs at a substantially lower rate than fully educated professional. E.g. a law firm may get a law student to do office work while studying. Sometimes such student job experience useful for building network and getting the first job after graduation. I’ve employed engineering students doing menial technica…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 04:05 PM
10

It’s a quite fascinating mechanism how men are set up to distance themselves from the false image of all men being terrible. The narrative erodes men’s trust in men and self confidence. With the lack in self-confidence men have to make amends and do something extra to signal they are good. One way to do so, is to reinforce the narrative of men being inherently bad. And so a feedback loop is created constantly putting men down.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 01:24 AM
2

Well then people don’t really discuss the male loneliness epidemic - whatever that is - but something else they find more meaningful and important than the rise of male social isolation. It’s quite common for married men not to have friends. So, getting a woman in your life, might make you more “lonely”.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 11:54 PM
2

AFAIK male loneliness epidemic was the empirical observation that the number of men having at least 6 close friends was 55% 30year ago whereas today this has fallen to 27% Study here. The Study also saw a much steeper decline in men’s connectedness than women’s. 15% of men reports having no close friends at all. How come the male loneliness epidemic almost always gets mixed up with some men struggling with pair bonding? Do people really think female attention is the most important in men’s lives…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 10:32 PM
–

In reality, women in this age group just have a much larger available dating market available to them than men of the same age. Conversely older men have a much larger dating market than their equally aged women. …which might explain why women try to shame older men from dating younger - but still adult - women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 12:52 AM
–

Women are constantly looking for good men, women go on dating apps to find men. Women go to bars and clubs to find men, seek marriage brokers etc. etc. etc. Men’s problem is that women won’t accept shit treatment from men. Women’s problem is that they think they can nag reality into compliance to their whims. That may work with men. Reality won’t budge. The asymmetry of male attractiveness leads to shitty behavior from the attractive men exactly until their shitty behavior is in balance with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 12:45 AM
–

thereby creating an endless toxic loop of unsatisfied women and men. The top-tier guys are winning tho.Women are soo lucky to be in a harem. You were the one arguing that women were winning. To me it seems like everybody’s loosing but said top tier guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 12:24 AM
–

#1 doesn’t make sense. How can women find men, if men do not find women? That’s quite a paradox.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 09:49 PM
46

A subtle mate-guarding technique is to nudge your partner to be less attractive to others. Ensure there’s always enough calories around might help in that direction.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 06:03 PM
10

Except when using the “victim blaming” defense. Though, that - quite neatly - presupposes the unfortunate person actually being a victim. And that job is taken.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 06:34 AM
24

Very often feminism is at least two things: motte-feminism and bailey-feminism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 08:49 PM
0

Sort of. Adding nuance is also a part of debating. Though domestic abuse might be a bigger problem for men even though “more men” are NPD or “abusive”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 06:08 PM
4

Men are more likely to be abusive in relationships than women and men are more likely to have personality disorders like NPD. Men are probably more likely to stay in abusive relationships as society predominantly offers help for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 11:44 AM
6

Manosphere is a neat way to invoke a guilt by association.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 12:11 AM
2

And Karen S
/r/MensRights10/03/25 03:29 PM
1

Then why not the fiamengo files?
/r/MensRights10/03/25 03:27 PM
3

I think this to some degree comes down to a distorted view of reality. It’s really striking that one gender has de-facto monopoly on defining what’s equal totally stripped of any objective criteria or methodology. Gender equality should be measured as a gendered and individualized version of a suitable Quality of Life index, e.g. an adaptation of OECD’s better life index https://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11111111111 The topics are given below: Housing: housing conditions and spendings (e.g. …
/r/MensRights10/03/25 10:18 AM
29

Feminism is about equal rights. Equal rights for women. But never seems to have much of opinion of who’s obligated to back such rights. E.g. the pay gap: women should be paid the same as men. Theoretically the same for work of equal value. Fair enough. But if women were to pay women more in women’s companies, who’s stopping them? How come feminists cannot convince women to pay women “fairly” thus out-balancing the paygap? It always ends up with men being obligated to back women’s rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 08:27 AM
11

There might be a manipulative undertone of guliting men into being responsible for solving women’s problems. It’s done elegantly with probable deniability. So, challenging the guilting can be denied at any time.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 10:46 PM
4

It’s a good mix of a luxury belief and gaslighting. Luxury belief because it’s makes the ones stating such belief virtuous and good but at the expense of others. Gaslighting because it tries to convince men that their feelings and experiences are not real. Crying is normal but can be “problematic”. Herd animals instinctively hide their weakness. Not to say that men are herd animals. But showing hurt and weakness is not always safe.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:42 PM
1

It’s a neat way of moving the “problem” to a believable place where it cannot be tested or even refuted. How would you ever disprove systemic privilege? Most often you’d say: What is asserted without evidence can be refuted without evidence. The beauty is though can it can be proven that some men have a disproportionate advantage. Then this is used to say all men have a disproportionate advantage. All in all it end up being unfalsifyable and thus left to what we feel. Or belief. And whoever we f…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 08:14 AM
12

The same report was asked about in AskFeminists But alas, now it’s gone.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 11:28 AM
8

Full article via archive This should do it https://archive.ph/KFHD9
/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:56 AM
2

Is she really a single mother? A mother sharing children in a 7/7 arrangement is not a single mother. If you yourself is 7/7 parent, such a woman would be ok to pair up with. You would be equals. If she’s in a 12/2 or 14/0 arrangement you should probably pass. You would get some degree of a husband’s obligations with no rights.
/r/MensRights02/03/25 11:27 AM
24

The much larger gap in life expectancy for the less wealthy is clear evidence of misandry killing. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Life-expectancy-at-age-40-associated-with-household-income-at-age-40-Chetty-et-al_fig1_335366263
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:37 AM
1

The paper on tandfonline
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/25 07:17 AM
6

It close to claiming that women couldn’t get a driver’s license prior to year 1900 or so. Objectively true but very misleading. Same thing with the vote. Women didn’t get the vote until start of the previous century. Objectively true but very misleading. Democracy as a system of governance wasn’t really a thing until the mid 18xx. The common person here In Denmark got the vote approximately at the same time as women. One could say that it’s close to lies by omission. The thing with the bank acco…
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:09 PM
3

What almost no people realize, is that the main problem is the hierarchy of power. A hierarchy of power is not unique to communism but absent of any other mechanism of balancing different stakeholders’ interests against each other, the power hierarchy become exponentially worse. As long as there’s a free market and a fair system guaranteeing people to truly being able to exchange good and services, capitalism at least has one mechanism whereby power can be distributed and balanced. One main prob…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:57 AM
43

You should read the article. It’s quite critical about this mainstream opinion. Puts some data on things we have as hunches The drop in the time that married men spend in bars is part of an overall trend toward doing less of all sorts of other enjoyable activities after marrying, such as playing informal sports and pursuing personal hobbies (from pp. 95-96 of Nock’s book). Time spent bowling, however, does not decrease when men marry. Insert your own conclusions here. Feminists always claim that…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 12:51 AM
1

See https://www.reddit.com/r/raerth/s/RRMHF2nngR
/r/MensRights22/02/25 01:03 PM
2

4. What is everyone else entitled to? Men reformed themselves and created societies with laws and codes of conduct because it benefited the collective, especially the collective male populace, this was the function of “patriarchal societies”. To manage a safe and fair distribution of resources, and that includes sexual and reproductive resources. What was an older society’s view on sex for women? Well for them virginity was a prerequisite for a woman to be “marriage material” because men wanted …
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:15 AM
1

3. Disenfranchised Males = Self Destructive Males There’s this african proverb that I think perfectly describes whats taking place between modern society and average males. “If the young are not initiated in the tribe, they will burn down the village just to feel its warmth.” Modern society is extremely sexualized, there is no escape from sex as a man in these times, which is why it feels like you’re being trolled whenever people say the all too cliche phrase “sex isn’t the most important thing …
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:13 AM
1

2. Men don’t feel entitled to sex, they simply WANT sex I keep seeing the “entitlement” argument repeated everywhere and it is literally just a strawman argument, propping up a stance so absurd that you can’t help but be right being against it, heck even I agree with being against it, because its egotistical and illogical for anyone to think they literally DESERVE anything, a persons reasoning for being against it would likely be more emotionally based though, more like - “women are people too, …
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:11 AM
1

Does this read better? What’s a guy entitled to these days? In regards to sex and life Nobody is entitled to anything Entitlements are a figment of imagination, they exist only in the minds of humans, and function only within societies where they are allowed to function, and are facilitated (usually through tax collection to fund said “entitlement programmes”) Pension, welfare, clean water, education, nobody is really entitled to any of it if were being objective and honest.
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:10 AM
4

https://youtu.be/Q7MkSpJk5tM?si=fOfk0odc3pqTdwmB This one?
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:49 PM
–

Then give just a few…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 11:58 AM
–

How can you expect examples of removed content? Isn’t this just like expecting proof of murder by asking murder victims: ‘who did this’?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 07:52 AM
2

It always rubs me the wrong way when masculinity is attributed with being a leader. Masculinity is the just as much the ability to take charge when necessary and fall in line when necessary. And furthermore having integrity enough to know when tondo what. No leaders without followers. No followers without leaders. Masculinity is about de-centering and purpose. Leadership for its own purpose is not leadership. He who seeks power for the sake of power is no leader.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 12:34 AM
6

Never took my time to read it. I haven’t got very strong instincts or automatic/knee-jerk reactions. Thus less prone to “common sense” or “everbody knows” logic. Is suppose those are the source of such Mental Seal. The world is a complex place and most have to resort to some kind of heuristic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 09:53 PM
32

It is indeed quite extreme. But it is quite interesting how and why feminism gained such a position. In the heydays of christianity, heresy was a big thing. Could get you burned at the stake. Nowadays herecy against any religious faith is way less frowned upon than heresy against feminism. Though nobody’s burning anyone at stakes luckily. Feminism has substituted at least one function of a faith: Given a prescription of how to be a morally good person. So, if you speak against feminism, you’re s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 07:48 PM
71

Haven’t you realized? It’s the rare exception that feminism can be criticized anywhere in society. Let alone r/men .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/25 07:02 PM
7

Civilian men have been able to vote in almost any society since democracy has existed. Definitely not correct. Voting rights probably grew out of war councils and typically required ownership of an estate i.e. skin in the game. This power came with responsibility, however; men who could vote could also generally be drafted in these societies Britith men drafted for WW1 did not have voting rights. WW1 draft actually paved the way for universal suffrage. On the contrary, women were not deemed resp…
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:39 PM
2

It might be like bear grylls season 2
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:41 PM
16

Well, wouldn’t it be more realistic to have society setting up a women-only Island, city or state or whatever where she and her peers could do whatever they wanted in safety from men? There’s really not much stopping her and her peers from doing so. I’m pretty sure overall society would back such an initiative as an experiment.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 11:41 AM
–

This one is German/Austrian with a total of 1158 https://english.katholisch.de/artikel/50948-monastery-study-shows-higher-life-expectancy-among-religious-men I wouldn’t say that 2024 is quite old. The there one from Belgium https://paa2012.populationassociation.org/papers/122836 This one is from Netherlands https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7709920/ … I haven’t looked very thoroughly at these papers but it seems like it’s more than one study.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 04:54 PM
0

Trying to find the fittest mate. And what that is, is 3D chess…
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:19 AM
-1

so the more physically attractive the woman -> the more they’re selecting for higher status men Won’t that also require men to select for women being highly physically attractive? What does a highly physically attractive woman bring of value to a man when it comes to life goals overall? Will she give you a better life? Will family life be happier? Will it be more meaningful? Will you get kids of your own? Is the purpose bedtime fun? Is sex with highly physically attractive women better than sex …
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:45 AM
1

Many of these big business have been around for decades. Longer than women have been in the workforce. So the big gap between male and female CEOs aren’t because men are the “work horses of society” it’s just because only men were allowed to participate in society for so long. This is the problem with today’s world. They ignore history. They want to erase it. Well you can’t and you shouldn’t. Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it. You’re very welcome to counter my points: - …
/r/MensRights11/02/25 08:15 PM
5

Much of male aggression is about dominance. As soon as dominance is achieved there’s no reason for further aggression. Some of female aggression is about destroying anything seen as a “threat” thus creating a “safe environment”. The question is then: is it more dangerous to be dominated or to be destroyed? Which is better and which is worse. This said: Men can for sure also be utterly destructive as well as women may fight for dominance.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 11:48 AM
7

I don’t think we can. But, we might succeed in getting people to care about society. Contrary to common belief, society’s well being is highly dependent on a majority of men thriving. Men have always been the work-horses of society. Among 8billion humans, the number of female founded and predominantly female manged corporations is as scarce as matriarchal cultures. Why isn’t there just a single large successful corporation run by women? It’s staggering but there isn’t. It’s not until it is reali…
/r/MensRights10/02/25 10:18 AM
2

May well be. Sometimes a feminist is just someone that believes in gender equality. Other times it’s also a prerequisite to believe in the patriarchy, the pay gap and women’s historical oppression for milennia. Some even require belief in a happy gender-equal or matriarchal distant past as well as that gender is entirely a social construct for everything that matters. Who knows.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 06:54 AM
5

Louise Perry claims she’s a feminist. I think she also acknowledges that men and women’s sexuality is different. https://youtu.be/DAhHoMVPie0?si=J5ZqkhrJIS5RE57x Mary Harrington has also grown out of feminist spaces but I’m not sure she calls herself feminist. Or that other feminists would say she is so. https://www.maryharrington.co.uk/about
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 04:22 PM
8

Feminism probably have to be “conquered” by Darwinian mechanisms.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 04:06 PM
6

Certainly depends on which part of the world. Here, everyone’s working hard to fill the ranks of mangers with women.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 12:17 AM
14

Some of my acquaintances are a couple of pharmacists. They both worked at Novo Nordisk but she got fed up with the corporate life and started a shoppe with alternative medicine and health products. The shop doesn’t make much but the guy now has to stay in the corporate treadmill to allow her to pursue her hippie dreams. She probably says: Money isn’t important. No wonder when she can get others to pay the bills.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 09:51 PM
7

Because the theory about gender norms and why and how they occur in the first place is flawed.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 06:37 PM
9

Feminists get more positives than negatives out of feminism. You could equally well ask: Why do people keep stuck in a certain faith? Feminism has some commonality with religious beliefs and probably substitute some aspects that would otherwise be fulfilled with a faith. Ex.: How to be a good and just person. This can be answered within frameworks of - feminism - christianity - islam - judaism
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/25 12:45 PM
146

It’s a way bigger issue that men receive no appreciation or authority but are still held to the obligation of protecting.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 11:04 AM
2

I can follow that. I’ve ended up always preferring towards an approach based on principles than on subjective sympathies or in-group out-group dynamics. Perhaps this is a side-effect of having some autistic traits and preferences. My but-everybody-knows-circuits are somewhat weaker than the average person’s. Taking prevalent moral codes at face value seems to be a huge error. Just because people say they’re for equality, doesn’t mean they’re for equality. It’s Kafkaesque at times. people just wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/25 08:23 AM
3

As said by the typical MD. Aa the article outlines, there’s six off factors There are six pillars of a healthy lifestyle:1. Eat a healthy diet. 2. Increase your physical activity. 3. Manage stress. 4. Maintain healthy relationships. 5. Improve your sleep. 6. Avoid substances. But exactly why are middle and upper clas men better able to adhere to these six healthy lifestyle choices that the lower class? Why do people end up using drugs? Why do the succumb to stress and have poor sleep? Why don’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 12:41 AM
0

You’re the one putting a balanced diet and doctor’s visits forward. I did not. So why exactly do you think I am obliged to defend a position you put forward without even making the case that these are the most central factors?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:52 PM
2

this Poppy Sowerby - afaik a feminist - categorizes Bjørn Andreas Bull Hansen as part of the manosphere and warns against his radicalizing influence. To my knowledge he’s not particularly antifeminist but otoh does not shy away from sending criticism that way. Mostly PS seems angry about BABH speaking what he thinks and enjoying the outdoors. How dare you! https://unherd.com/2024/09/meet-the-wild-men-of-youtube/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 09:25 PM
1

You’re assuming that home cooked meals and doctor visits are the main difference. They may be differences but are they differences that matter in the big picture? What you’re suggesting is indrectly victim blaming. What you allude to is that men and only men are responsible for their loss in longevity. Men is the only demographic group where this is acceptable to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:31 PM
7

Highschool cured me from reading ordinary literature. Since the I’ve on been reading sf/fantasy and non-fiction. Recent years even sf/fantasy seems to be diluted with crap. I struggled to get through the first Honor Harrington book. It ended up being way too girl-bossy. Similarly Niven’s Ring World is too guy-bossy. I have also been wondering about where men look for art and fiction treating their subjective life experiences. Where are men’s hopes and dreams? Where are the fiction about how they…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 03:06 PM
1

The problem discussing with feminists is often the alignment of objectives. If starting with the conclusion that women are frail oppressed subjects with no influence over society and that women actions has no consequence for society, the discussion is going to be a shouting contest.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 01:33 PM
1

Good point. But I’m not sure a comeback makes a difference. Bo Seo has some good points about how to debate effectively Is it real? Make sure the topic you’re about to argue is real and not just a misunderstanding. Consider whether the disagreement is worth addressing or if it’s better to avoid it altogether. Is it important? Ask yourself if it’s necessary to disagree with someone on this topic. Consider why it’s important to make your point and what you hope to achieve by doing so. Is it specif…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 01:23 PM
2

This might be where it starts: Who decides which people gets political mandate and power. Who decides which things must be politically prioritized?
/r/MensRights06/02/25 01:03 PM
22

You can’t win a discussion with someone arguing from a narcissistic position.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 12:59 PM
2

in hunting parties, and to protect the tribe from threats. I think if you observe contemporary Australian indigenous tribes, South African bushmen or South American tribes you’d get a good idea about how stuff was in the past. When people talk about our ancestors, they sometimes fail to consider contemporary evidence. It would be so cool to do ethnography in these original people with a non-feminist lens.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 12:48 PM
9

Men’s ability to find common ground and cooperate towards a common goal seem to go under the radar. Conversely, it’s quite controversial that women struggle way more in this regard. Women are not the superpowers of collaboration. They may create safe and inclusive environments (mostly) but at the expense of traction towards the common purpose. I think this comes from most womens inability to “suck it up”. Sometimes you just have to suck it up and cut your losses and get on with the job.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 11:43 AM
5

Whaaat? You couldn’t make up this shit.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 11:31 AM
1

It was actually the conservatives / right wing scrapping quotas. It’s quite fascinating how it goes: The left fights for quotas when women are below 50% and stops when women get above. The right dismantles quotas if they can. They want things to be merit / credential based. So, the net effect is that we end with quotas when women are below and merit when women are above parity. At the same time the left can claim that they fight for equality and the right that they fight for merit based.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:34 AM
2

Yeah, makes you wonder why it is so in a society allegedly built by men for men, where women allegedly always get the raw end of the deal. …yet this pretty obvious fact is never discussed in a society obsessing over gender equality for more than a century. If such obvious facts are overlooked, what else might we miss?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 01:03 AM
0

Bugger… I’ll leave it though. Was worth a try.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 12:58 AM
6

Google translate
/r/MensRights06/02/25 12:23 AM
5

Nuns have only a slightly higher life expectancy than the general female population. Munks otoh have considerably higher life expectancy than the general male population. The largest difference is between non-married men and monks whereas the difference between married men and monks is smaller. Monks do not have wives to urge them to go to the doctor or anything similar. Certainly not from anything resembling a wife. So the real difference must be that single men lives shorter. Men just loose wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:00 PM
6

Studies of monasteries have shown that under ideal conditions, men live a little less than a year shorter than women. If so, it’s really not married men benefiting from marriage but non-married men paying a penalty for not being married. Considering how little society cares about men, let alone single men, no wonder.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 02:24 PM
1

Don’t shoot the messenger. The study is especially interesting because it’s very recent. The increase in ratio of both male and female virgins may look small but considering the stability of the numbers over more than a decade and suddenly this peak upwards is a dramatic shift in the pair-bonding of young people. Whether it be social dynamics changing e.g. due to covid will be seen a couple of years down the road. A parallel development is the radicalization of young women towards left. At the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 01:19 PM
2

Bcs they say so. Quoted verbatim from the page. The fact that sexlessness is rising faster for men than for women could seem to imply that a small group of men are having sex with many women. This isn’t the case. The figure below compares men in 2013-15 to 2022-23. The text continues below the figure There was a rise in the share of heterosexual males with no female sexual partners in the last year—but it was driven mostly by a decline in the number of males with one female partner, and secondar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 06:42 AM
5

It’s seen elsewhere: Sweden set to scrap university gender quotas
/r/MensRights04/02/25 10:22 PM
2

Bugger. Though, even with my tongue-in-cheek “dare” it could’ve been an interesting subject. Their ability to argue is quite remarkable. But, I suppose, they’re not very appreciative of questions and dilemmas that aren’t easily handled within their worldview. Somewhat stuck in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:09 PM
1

Is the flair wrong? To me it says “Blue Pill Woman”. …and you’re entirely ruining a potential opportunity for some popcorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:59 PM
2

I think that’s a quite precise analysis. Bu I suppose women haven’t filled the approaching gap as predicted as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:50 PM
3

This study claims no to the harem model. It’s the monogamous ones dropping away.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:29 PM
20

Perhaps you could ask r/AskFeminists … they should be experts on everything gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:28 PM
1

SPLC is also listed in the same block as skibidi toilet. That’s for sure not within the manosphere. But certainly a related subject. If manosphere is to be defined in a meaningful way, one has to look at what is typically asserted to be part of said manosphere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 06:59 PM
5

The manosphere as a term places emphasis on it being a male-exclusive space. I think this is your personal opinion. Wikipedia is extremely biased on the subject. However it does state what is (at least) lumped in under the term. Manosphere : MRA MGTOW PUA incels Father’s rights groups I’d say that this reddit forum is a part of the manosphere as it advocates for men and thus falls under the Mens Rights Advocate label. It doesn’t really matter that the shoe doesn’t fit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 06:29 PM
3

I’d say MRA is also considered manosphere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 04:04 PM
14

I’d say manosphere is used to target any male centered circles going against feminist interests or dogma. You can easily be denoted manosphere without being anti-feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 04:02 PM
18

I think there’s a massive element of learned helplessness. If a proportion of boys systematically get’s a feedback of “meh” or “pooh” throughout a decade pf primary achool, there’s a good probability that it’ll show up statistically. It seems like men gravitate towards subjects where evaluation criteria are more objective - ie hard subjects - and away from subject where evaluations are subjective - ie soft subjects. Perhaps because evaluation bias plays a lesser role in hard subjects.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 04:46 PM
43

Also confirmed by OECD but met with a shrug.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 04:33 PM
7

The question is whose interests are served by the people in power. If men only serve men’s interests, having men only in power is a problem. If women only serve women’s interests, having women only in power is equally problematic. If people in power are 50/50 gender balanced and men see to everyone’s need and women only to women’s needs, we have a problem.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 08:15 PM
32

Thank you for this analysis. One interesting detail throughout the piece, is that politics is something done to young men. Not with young men. How come the voices of such men aren’t already a part of the political dialogue? Why are they excluded from participation? The author doesn’t even realize this.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 04:39 PM
1

It’s actually the gain/loss ratio that determines whether it’s a good idea Here it’s 15%/12.5% = 1.2 ie a net gain. This assuming equal value of “gain” and “loss” If the gain of a positive contact is small and the loss is large, the ratio can easily be a net loss. It also depends on whether the guy is able to afford the losses. The last 10$ on your account is more valuable than 10$ on top on 1mio. Men in medium to low social standing has something to loose and may not be able or willing to affor…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 12:18 PM
11

Come to think of it, divide and conquer is a well established principle. If men are divided, who conquered? Is there another way to a good future than stopping the dividedness of men?
/r/MensRights31/01/25 11:23 PM
18

Sure it is. But then again, why does gamma bias begin in the first place? Is it purely genetical? Seems to me that men are more willing to be disagreeable. Women otoh always strive to appear “sugar and spice”. Sugar-and-spice’ies are less at risk. Women love disagreeable men for their ability to dominate other men and women. They outsource the dirty work and can keep their hands clean. Better let the man take the risk. And get the spoils of their asshole partner’s deeds. Scale to society and thi…
/r/MensRights31/01/25 11:14 PM
78

Women seems often to be worse than their reputation. Men often better. Not to say which gender is the better or worse but it’s probably closer that what contemporary culture tells us it is. The bell-curve of each gender’s virtues and vices are more overlapping than we typically believe.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 10:49 PM
7

I can recommend to listen to John Barry from The Centre for Male Psychology. The Palgrave Handbook of Male Psychology qnd Mental Health should be a main resource for professionals. At 187USD it’s not one you buy just for fun, so I haven’t read it. With John Barry as author I expect it to be both science based and bit more free of feminist influence.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 11:49 AM
2

That one man had kids with two women for so long stretches of human history, that it has left evidence in our genes. Obviously, there’s similarly one that ended up with no kids and in an evolutionary dead end. Eradicated from the future. And that the typical way homo sapiens arranged their gender relations is to be one man with more women and some men with none. Monogamy with one man to one woman throughout life is historically an exception. Of course only if the science holds.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 05:25 PM
1

I don’t think I’m the only one doing so: Wikipedia- Average The type of average taken as most typically representative of a list of numbers is the arithmetic mean – the sum of the numbers divided by how many numbers are in the list. But I suppose colloquially “average” is often used according to varying definitions. Wikipedia also states that: In ordinary language, an average is a single number or value that best represents a set of data. Which leads to confusion about what is exactly being disc…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 03:20 PM
0

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. – George Santayana, The Life of Reason, 1905. From the series Great Ideas of Western Man. I’d probably extend that to “Those who cannot understand the learnings of the past are condemned to repeat it.”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:56 AM
6

You probably mean that it’s the median. But if so, yes. This said, there is a skew. How big it is and how big it’s going to be I don’t know. Historically there has been at least a 2:1 skew This observation differs significantly from neutral expectations based on a one-to-one breeding ratio but is extremely close to the expected results given a breeding ratio of two females per male (Hedrick 2000). Thus, a simple skew in the human breeding ratio may be sufficient to explain the low levels of vari…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 11:27 AM
6

If you look closely, they’re talking about the median which is an entirely different matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:50 AM
12

How to tell you don’t know what an average is without telling you don’t know what an average is. The average body count of women must per mathematical definition be exactly the body count of men. Else the math doesn’t math. This of course assuming only looking at heterosexual body count.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 10:28 AM
4

The folks in r/datingoverfifty are going to be a bit sad about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 07:31 AM
14

The tragedy is that it seems lile men are only able to defend themselves in fields where it is possible to establish some degree of objective criteria. When everything’s subjective women seem to win out. Perhaps that’s why women seems to push for less objective criteria and more subjective criteria.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 06:40 PM
7

The best lies have an element of truth. The lie consisting in the exaggeration of facts. If not by omitting some. There’s no doubt that there was patriarchal practices and may well be that some remains. The lie is that patriarchy is so dominant that each time a group of men may show up having a slightly more positive outcome than a comparable group of women it’s because of men having patriarchal privilege. Thus, disregarding all other factors. In my culture, feminism is more influential than bot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/25 01:15 PM
21

It oscillates. Sometimes it’s the rich and powerful men. Sometimes it’s the marginalized incels. But most frequently it’s “the culture” and millennia of habits and practices. Ubiquitous and impossible to do away with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 02:01 PM
6

Yeah and the corporate elite is the “Enemy above”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 01:57 PM
42

Patriarchy and associated has strong similarities with conspiracy theories. Walker’s five kinds Jesse Walker (2013) has identified five kinds of conspiracy theories:[77] The “Enemy Outside” refers to theories based on figures alleged to be scheming against a community from without. The “Enemy Within” finds the conspirators lurking inside the nation, indistinguishable from ordinary citizens. The “Enemy Above” involves powerful people manipulating events for their own gain. The “Enemy Below” featu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/25 01:03 PM
8

This one is quite fascinating: EU’s gender equality strategy 2020-2025: Factsheet - Championing Gender Equality, 7 March 2024 Main bullets in this document are: GENDER EQUALITY STRATEGY ACTION PLAN ON GENDER EQUALITY AND WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT IN EXTERNAL ACTION (GAP III) COMBATING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE EMPOWERING WOMEN IN THEE LABOR MARKET PROMOTING WOMEN IN DECISION MAKING INVESTING IN WOMEN AND GIRLS IN THE EU AND AROUND THE WORLD As is seen, all points focus on women’s is…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 08:17 AM
10

Law is a complex area. If you expect references to law texts, you’ll miss a big part of the picture. There’s a reason why matters of law are handled by legal professionals. In England, the archetypal common law country, there is a hierarchy of sources, as follows: Legislation (primary and secondary) The case law rules of common law and equity Parliamentary conventions General customs Books of authority The rub is that the written law is interpreted by judges establishing case law which is just a…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 12:04 AM
1

Who says the loneliness epidemic has to do with romantic partners or lack of same? What used to be called the loneliness epidemic was stats showing men’s social connections dropping away. This regardless of whether they have an intimate partner or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 10:13 PM
16

You make a good case for blaming (and shaming) men more.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 10:15 AM
1

I think it makes sense to think about feminism as a faith or a belief system. So, how to deal with a hardcore Christian or Hindu believer? Does it make sense to argue that it’s silly to belive in the world being created 7000y ago by a supernatural being? Probably not. Does it make sense to argue that there is no evidence of a spiritual afterlife? You either believe or you don’t. Same thing with feminism. No sense in trying to dispute the presence of patriarchy to a feminist believer.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:53 AM
15

because the answers were objective, and you could not be marked down for being a boy. The girls including those who were great at mathematics and science had all chosen languages and humanities. That’s an interesting observation. Men’s gravitation towards education with objective measures of performance may be caused by discrimination in areas using more subjective assessments.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 11:27 AM
4

That’s a really interesting take on the issue. Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/25 11:48 AM
1

You tell me.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:17 PM
1

Depends on the country. And depending on how much he can and will spend on pushing the issue. Here where I’m living there’s no possibility of challenging paterity after it has been settled.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:02 PM
1

It’s at most only a matter of getting child support back due to misattribution of fatherhood. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternity_fraud This guys finds out after 51 years. He’ll never have kids of his own due to being deceived by the one person that both made a wov to put him first in his life and was supposed to have his back. Absolutely no consequences for that. He can of course divorce her and they’ll split their assets and then he can sue to get child support back. https://youtu.be/z56…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 03:48 PM
2

Yeah, gamma bias 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 06:57 PM
15

Yea it’s funny. So much for dismantling the patriarchy. When issues arise, it’s not like an alternative steps in to replace said patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:30 PM
3

It’s quite obvious that it’s a bullshit argument. Yet the argument that violence against women and girls is a much larger problem than violence against people remains.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:40 AM
24

One argument often used in such situations, is that the enslavers are men. If the enslavers and the enslaved share gender, it’s seen as something men must deal with themselves. This is the argument used when discussing violence. Men’s violence against men is entirely for men to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 10:47 AM
1

Think Before you Sleep - Survival: Men vs women.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 06:11 PM
1

No hate at all. It’s just a puzzling gender difference with emphasis on collaboration. If you ever tried to participate in AskWomen or any feminist forum, you’ll see that you’ll be silenced or banned for even the smallest thing. Dissent is not tolerated. Currently, there’s a discussion in AskMen whether women should be able to make top level comments and the conclusion seem to be that we’ll manage. Women can comment and men expect people to be able to cope. Same shit here in MensRights. Feminist…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 06:05 PM
1

And… surprisingly enough, men also seem to excel in collaborating productively with men they dislike or even hate but have common interests with, which is benefits large scale cooperation.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 12:57 AM
33

Aah but that’s exactly where you’re wrong. Banks cheat and steal and con and … But they do not rob and they certainly do not end up in robbery crime stats. (Rapists violate women’s reproductive rights and men are 98% of the perpetrators… but violation of men’s reproductive rights such as paternity fraud is not even illegal… then no wonder there’s no cases).
/r/MensRights07/01/25 10:26 PM
61

It made me wonder about why it’s almost always poor people robbing banks? It’s never banks robbing poor people. It’s at least in 98% of all cases a poor person robbing a bank. That’s what crime stats show. Not all poor persons but always a poor person. Banks are oppressed. /s
/r/MensRights07/01/25 09:28 PM
2

Is it reasonable to control your partner’s sexuality in excess of infidelity?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/25 08:02 PM
19

The billboard issue also happened in Canada https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.2989105
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:30 AM
1

Isn’t it peculiar that usually the more powerful can get thw less powerful to contribute more for less. Yet, in these conversations this flips. The privileged is seen as the one working more and paying more to the family. The question drills down whose’s gets their preference met. Is family time more important than career aspirations. Depends on the individual. If work iife is a drudgery, family time might be preferred. If work is fulfilling and a realization of personal ambitions, family time m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 05:11 PM
-1

u/julymoonrise Would anybody ever expect you to defend anyone physically? Would you step in yourself to defend someone being physically assaulted? Did you take any classes such as to be able to physically defend yourself and others? Have you ever stepped in to protect anyone in trouble? Would anyone come to your defense if you were assaulted and if being present?
/r/MensRights05/01/25 01:20 PM
2

I’ve been puzzled about why there’s no indie market for books and films or even cartoons pointing out the contemporary state of affairs. Change often starts with he changing our common narratives.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 11:42 AM
30

Incel is just the slur-du-jour.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 09:56 PM
2

It would be interesting to see the same experiment run anno 1750 and anno 1500. Albeit we can’t of course. But it interesting if this is the contemporary culture or just the way humans feel about men and women. Given how often this bias shows up, the narrative of women’s oppression for centuries seems more and more like a conspiracy theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 05:37 PM
1

Take for instance woman not having the vote. What the feminists do not tell any one is that most women never wanted the vote. Feminists just decided it was oppressive to women. It is also never considered that having something to vote for, is a rather recent societal development. In Denmark, the majority of men got the vote at the same time as women. A minority of men got the vote approximately 50-75 years earlier. Prior to that, the king had absolute rule.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 01:15 PM
11

My experience is that most people will work if their work makes sense. That’s where we came from If I cook a meal or mow the yard, it’s not passion driving me to do so but meaning. Much labor in the labor market is meaningless. Consequently when most jobs are so, people hate work.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 08:27 PM
9

I don’t buy this analysis. Men still contribute 2/3 of the valie creation in the public sphere. The individual woman may well be able to earn her own living, but this only in a society predominantly sustained by men’s collective effort. It will be tough times when the majority of men cannot see any point in contributing to society via their skills and labor. Everything just becomes easier when men and women collaborate. And tough when they don’t.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 08:21 PM
2

Or even sPending it
/r/MensRights02/01/25 06:33 PM
2

Could you elaborate on how men seems to be offended? Stating a perspective countering yhe presented doesn’t necessarily mean that anyone’s offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:02 AM
3

The core problem is that you assume a functioning society without the contribution of men. Remove men from the equation, women may well work but there would be no gas in the car, no food in the shops, no water and no electricity. No heating, no plumbing. No police and certainly no borders. No houses, no roads, no airplanes. The list goes on and on. All these things and many more are predominantly provided by the collective of men. Most of them men with families providing for their families and i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 12:19 AM
3

Perhaps ask them (in good faith) what isn’t the patriarchy. If “patriarchy” is to be dismantled it is necessary to identify the beast. This starts with figuring out what is and what isn’t patriarchy.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 08:53 AM
14

At this stage, I’m reasonably convinced that the only way this will change is when people - en masse - join a new religion that favors men and boys over women and girls. Perhaps - a little counterintuitive - this is why the major religions favor men. Because the religious favoring of men, then makes a counterbalance to human’s gynocentrism. I.e. makes society more balanced and equal. Edit: Fixed typos
/r/MensRights21/12/24 05:37 PM
0

I don’t think it’ll have much success unless a reasonably correct understanding of gender dynamics is achieved. Many things can be postulated but only reasonably correct models linkng cause and effect will be able to guide succesful initiatives better than random actions. Claiming men just needs to open up and share their feelings will only work if lack of sharing was the problem in the first place. Everything else equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:26 AM
25

You’re missing the obvious: She doesn’t give a fuck about him. Which is emphasized in all of you 9 points. He doesn’t deliver to her wishes. Ad 1.: He doesn’t deliver the sex she needs. Ad 2.: He should accept her lower libido Ad 3.: He’s not giving her the right emotional connection Ad 4.: He’s not pulling his weight Ad 5.: He’s just bad at sex Ad 6.: He’s not wooing her Ad 7.: He has let himself go’ Ad 8.: He’ pressuring her for sex Ad 9.: He’s expecting her to be erhusiasic about sex I.e. Eve…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 11:30 AM
1

And that agreement is called “marriage”. No, because people who aren’t married still have kids and can be even better parents than married people 🤦 Of course they can. Why would people being married or not have anything to do with whether they’re good or bad parents? It is not. I know, hence the title of the post. Just show up at work and hope your boss will pay you at the end of the month. Work and intimate relationships are obviously different 🤦 Two people comitting to each other for long term…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 02:42 PM
1

are they not to make any prior agreements to each other? They can make agreements between themselves like adults. And that agreement is called “marriage”. Are they to fight it out as they go along? Marriage doesn’t stop people from fighting 🤦 Same could be said about anything. No need for any contract. Just show up at work and hope your boss will pay you at the end of the month. Just hand over xx$ and hope the car dealer will give you a car eventually. if they can’t get along If they can’t get a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 01:48 PM
1

May well be that marriage is a trap. However, when two persons agree to have children and start a family, are they not to make any prior agreements to each other? Are they to fight it out as they go along? Must the surrounding community pick up the fall-out if they can’t get along and either party runs from their obligations? What else besides marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 11:59 AM
-4

Reproductive rights and healthcare are very real issues for women Funnily enough, reproductive rights are rights only when discussed in terms of women. When discussed generally it’s all about bodily autonomy and the health during pregnancy. Reproductive rights drill down to the right to - abstain from sex if you’re not willing to be a parent - having your reproductive potential surgically removed …that’s it. These are the lowest common denominator of reproductive rights afforded most people in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 02:51 PM
5

im against the return to ‘traditional’ gender roles. i dont even think they are ‘traditional’. i think those people are profoundly confused and conflate americana 1950s hot wife cuck husband with ‘tradition’. no historical analysis bears those gender roles out beyond a slow build up to it via industrialization. most everyone was farmers historically. men, women, and children all farmed, they all made their own stuff, they traded in small communities, etc.... thats actual history. Hear, hear! (So…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/24 08:24 AM
6

Feminism is very much about power. However feminism’s view of power is shallow, biased and doesn’t stand much scientific rigor. Typically, femism assumes that position power) is the only type of power worth looking at. This is then used in a plethora of “gender equality” measures with a gendered lens proving that “there’s still a long way to equality”. Fortune 500 CEO’s are predominantly men and it is assumed that these men privilege men over women or thatt it is so because “structure” privilege…
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:38 AM
6

…yet they strongly speak agaist gender essentialism while stil uphold same essentialist views with the tiny modification that “it’s socialized into boys by evil cultural norms”.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:11 AM
9

One notable paper is Rudman and Goodwin, 2004 also referred to in wikipedia’s article on in-group favoritism.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 12:03 AM
0

This question is often countered with a looong list of what women want from a relationship. Then postulating that women deliver above and beyond. The more interesting question is: Among the things men would like from a relationship, what can men genuinely expect?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/24 11:56 AM
–

What would liberals do without mr. Tate? He’s just so wonderfully good at being pulled forward for showcasing how toxic and radicalized men and boys have become. Liberals should be grateful for mr. Tate’s efforts to showcase how toxic men have become. That just saves them from having to build their own strawmen. Much better solution to just point at mr. Tate. No need to build the case that he’s listened to by enough to actually move the needle. Those dots are filled in automatically… and believe…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 08:34 PM
8

A minority group or women I would say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/24 06:45 AM
1

Cool nick btw :-)
/r/MensRights06/12/24 12:02 AM
1

subjects like gender studies very corrupted by idealogy, in fact it is basically idealogy. Perhaps even an religion-like belief system albeit with no deities but fulfilling the same need as a religion and working according to the same principles.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 12:01 AM
18

Patriarchy seems to be a desription of how a subset of women - typically of feminist observation - would rule society if they had power. They can’t imagine men not doing so. By assuming the presence or history of a patriarchy, matriarchal rule legetimized by postulsting: You started, now we’re balancing out. It’s women’s turn. (The future is female.) I remember listening to a radio program from a female parliment member explaining how she suppressed men’s voices and amplified women’s. With absol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/24 11:51 PM
5

There is shared goals and better conversations to be had. I suppose a starting point is to figure out the status of the current situation. It seems to me that the most difficult is always to agree on how the world operates. How we see the world affects the analysis of cause and effect. One person may argue that men get the worse deal because they loose 5-6y of their potential lifespan due to how society structured. In comparison to women only loosing 1-2y. Another person will argue that as long …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 08:50 PM
8

This looks a bit like the agument to moderation fallacy. We all just have to meet at the middle ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 07:26 PM
8

This really requires some deep discussions about how relationships are supposed to work. The expansion of what is defined as abuse has expanded widely over the last 50 year. Likewise, the cultural fabric outlining roles and responsibilities and what the partners can expect of each other has been altered immensely. It’s a tough job to negociate everything from scratch and with no reasonably consolidated models it may become a battle between the parties. If society always backs one of the partners…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 10:44 PM
6

Personally my dad had two terrible wives. From a relationship point of view. My brother’s marriage is not one I envy. My father in law’s neither. The only one I can think of having a decent marriage is my brother in law. Perhaps also one of four uncles. So, perhaps men look at other men’s marriages and relationships and conclude: I wouldn’t like to be in his shoes. Or his, or his… Eventually they conclude that this is just the way it’s supposed to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:15 AM
2

Many women are taught how to avoid awful men (which they still should be) but men are often not taught how to avoid awful women. When we as a society can recognize women can be abusive and hurt a man in many ways, then we’ll see changes. Not to mention the widespread gaslighting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 04:03 AM
3

The average child support payment is less than $300 USD and the majority of men don’t pay it, Where does that number come from? According to pew reasearch the average i $721 monthly but varies from state to state. This of course doesn’t account for non-registered money transfers e.g. when the supporting parent pays for things that was supposed to be covered by the custodial parent. The child support may be used fully at the discretion of the custodial parent.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:59 AM
5

Driving is a neccessity. I get it. Way more necessary than having children. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 02:14 AM
1

On a side note: I don’t think schools were much of a thing at that time. The bulk of learning was done theough apprenticeship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 09:33 AM
1

Wikipedia states that In the rural society of Hildegard’s time, much of the medical care was provided by women, along with their other domestic duties. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_medicine_of_Western_Europe So which “medical schools” were women barred from in 1650? Apparently Hildegard of Bingen wasn’t very barred.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 08:28 AM
1

Well it was OP claiming that we move towards a world of sexual promiscuity and debauchery without any consideration to other factors. There is evidence for lower sexual activity among men. Rates of sexual inactivity among men have been constant across the time series, but those born between 2000 and 2004 had significantly higher rates of sexual inactivity than previous birth cohorts did at the same age. Additionally, men who are unemployed and/or living at home with their parents are more likely…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 08:09 AM
1

Perhaps women WERE oppressed hostorically. However, thinking of Europe anno 1650, what would be different, if women weren’t oppressed? How would a historical society be different absent of female oppression? Europe because this is where the West has it’s main roots.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 11:22 PM
0

No what? It does indeed converge towards polygyny. Which means a higher burden on women to raise children as the majority of males are stuck in the basement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 10:29 PM
4

It’s intersting to observe how the argument is crafted for a boys-school goingg co-ed. The argument: This is what I as a parent choose seems to have no value. Considering how objectively weak the argumentation, it seems to work by manipulating the values leading to the decsion. So, it is a study of how feminism won the hearts and minds of the public. https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/feb/07/sydney-boys-school-protest-gender-equality
/r/MensRights28/11/24 06:27 PM
1

Now imagine said woman gets 2.1 child and the next bullet on the wish-list is 4.2 grand-children. Her 1.05 female offspring decides to have a highly active social life filled with countless adventures / fun experiences, Daughter grows up in complete sexual and romantic abundance. But the tall and attractive men showering daughter in abundant attention also shower such attention to other women. Not at all easy to lock down. Eventually daughter might decide to be strong and independent and get 1.0…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/24 12:21 PM
8

Hurt people hurt people. Perhaps you might have suffered pain. Without facing subconcious pain resentment might be projected outward. People can be cruel and selfish on their own whim but often there’s underlying feelings driving behaviour. Envy, anger, hurt, etc. can be destructive if not handled and directed properly.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 10:16 PM
14

Ps. No room for rape culture, violence and disrespect of women. Eg, “if she cheats on me, she deserves a belt treatment” or “she wear clothes like a slut, what did she expect from me, protection?” Discaimer: I’m not a MRA per se as “equality” seems to miss the mark. Many MRA’s are for equality of the sexes. I think women and men have different strenghts and weaknesses rendering equality to the letter useless. But I suppose the predjudice is something men face again and again. Are men really that…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:33 PM
3

Interesting. I’m middle aged and I’m constantly puzzled about seeing RP stuffe with very visually appealing women, since my experience with such women is that they’re typically very entitled, crazy or both. High maintenance so to say. I guss I learned this the more or less subconciously.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 09:41 PM
–

I was asked to put my comment under automod… It’s just gaslighting There’s a surprisingly amount of gaslighting going on in gender space. The assertion that women are not dating men because they’re “shitty” is an excellent way of DARVO’ing the problem. The culprit might (in part) be the push for “gender equality”. One aspect of “gender equality” is narcissism on group scale. When “gender equality” only considers the problems of one gender while disregarding or even dismissing the problems of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/24 01:19 PM
1

The more high profile spaces for women only, the easier it will be to defend having male spaces.
/r/MensRights24/11/24 07:47 AM
4

That one way to deal with the cognitive dissonance. In the next setence you’ll probably also claim that psysical fights between men and women are equally good or equally bad because … same rules for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 10:05 PM
4

The law is gender neutral. Men and women have the exact same rights to abortion and to legal parental surrender. So many words basically stating: “No arms, no cookies”. My point is not about the cookies but the point of basing rights on the presence or absence of arms and then claiming: Hey, it’s equal for everybody. Why not just state the obvious: Women are granted rights men aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 07:18 PM
5

I do actually have a IRL female friend paying a butt load in alimony to her ex husband. Anecdotes are plenty. There are no biologically male people who will ever be pregnant. Which is exactly why the right to abortion hinges on the woman’s bodily autonomy and not her right to autonomously decide when and how many children she’d like. That particular right is seldom claimed. The only exception is when ppl fuck the argumentation up such as in reproductive rights. rest on the recognition of the bas…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 06:02 PM
10

Yea, just like the right to abortion is gender neutral.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 03:27 PM
-2

Depends on what you value. Would I trade my kids in for any any amount of money? Hell no. There will be no pockets in my last suit. What I leave behind will be carried on by my children. Whatever the risks, having a stable partner is still the best way to optimize. No amount of ice-cream will be able to compensate that.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 04:58 PM
-4

To me marriage is still the best bet for having a stable family with children.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 04:39 PM
1

Do you have any training in statistics, data handling? Economics? Beyond the basics? The “everything-else-equal” does not necessesarily mean that everything is equal but that a data-point is analyzed as if it were. Partial derivation is a similar “mathy” way of doing the same. You’re correct that when the distribution is skewed upwards fewer ppl would be parents at any given age. If the median age is increasing with 1y (the numbers show 25.5->26.4), the parent-group previously having kids at 40 …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 07:50 AM
3

You’re American, right? So you haven’t really learned anything but US history? Ordinary men and women got the vote at the same time in Denmark. That was 1917. A little less than hundred years prior, Denmark was a feudal society with absolute rule by the king. The French revolution happened 1848 where the French revolted against the nobility. That was the year the Danish king yielded absolute rule and from 1848 to 1917 more and more societal groups were allowed to have a say in the rule of the na…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 12:28 AM
1

Nah, I’m just using an “everything-else-equal” way of analysing the data. 6pct-point change over 5y is quite a lot. According to this Stanford article 9% of us births are to 40y old fathers. Then a lower percentage must be firstborn to 40y or older fathers. Not enough to move the needle 6%-point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 12:10 AM
3

Well, I live in Scandinavia and was brought up on a diet of second wave feminism. Everything “gender” is told through the lens of femnism. Just recently, there was a top level comment in AskFeminists pretty much stating the same fact. i had quite old parents. They’ve both passed years ago. My mother was born in 1927 and my father in 1929. So I know a bit about gender roles both from my direct family and from the contemporaray narratives about how women were oppressed in the past. Those two versi…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 11:58 PM
3

Seriously? ….feminism started as a reaction to being denied the same rights that men had. Feminism is a reaction to oppression History is always told by the victors. Feminsm has won the last 60-70 years and we now live with the consequences.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 11:20 PM
1

What was the answer from the feminist side?
/r/MensRights20/11/24 11:16 PM
16

Well, what were you wearing 😂 For men the question is usually: You must’ve done something…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/24 04:04 PM
1

Thanks for the feedback. Solid data is hard to come by. Did you note that the report gives numbers for 40-49y old sampled in the 2015-2019 period? I.e. People born between 1966 to 1975 Same report states that the likelihood of fathering a child by age 40 dropped from 78% to 72% whereas mothering a child only dropped from 83% to 81%. It is futhermore expected that by 1950, a majority of women will be childfree. So the 80% is in for a massive drop when we go to younger cohorts. Nobody’s paying muc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 10:00 PM
2

I think there a subtle gender difference we haven’t acknowledged. Everybody knows men are stronger physically. Men acknowledge this. However, women are way more socially adept. So, in any given 50/50 mixed social group, women will dominate the discourse unless other factors are at play. Women has the ability to dominate the will of the collective through stronger social muscles. This is not something women typically will acknowledge. It is easy as a women to postulate that men makes the rules an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 09:43 PM
2

May well be that they are underreporting. But then what is the distribution among the non-reported? Everything else equal, it’s at least as probable that the man with 5 children fails to report child no 6 as it is that the man with 0 children fails to report #1. It is probably most reasonable to think that the un-reported has the same distribution as the reported. This makes the picture even more controversial. Btw could you give me the source of your table? One thing that is yet in a blind spot…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 01:35 PM
7

May well be. However, among black Americans, there’s distinct skew between childless men and childless women. The mating pattern of black americans might be how other ethnic groups play out now. 54% of black men are without children whereas it’s 39% for black women. Actually, a majority of black men do not have kids. The same pattern shows for the general population but to a lesser degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 12:37 AM
16

Well you’re the same. You judge women according to hotness just as the hot women judge you according to hotness.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 12:26 PM
1

Very good points. Everybody seems to loose.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 08:14 AM
5

Alas the feminist crusade against sex work is not based on anything rational. Au contraire, my friend. I think it’s rational but nor anything any woman ever would admit. It’s about women having control over sexuality. Everything in the world is about sex, except sex. Sex is about power. This is of course painted with a broad brush but women are not oblivious to the value of sex and the power that comes from having something of worth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/24 11:59 PM
5

It might not even be attractiveness. Whomever dates a lot becomes good at dating. As with most things, training improves skills. Of course the more attractive people might have it easier to build skills. But if they are timid they may build routine slower than a less timid person. Too bad for the “chad-types” is that chasing the dragon ruins their ability to build a stable relations. Never committing and being stuck in adolescent behaviour. The winners will be the men and women actually dating w…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 11:40 PM
20

It’s not the media. It’s academia. Cargo cult academia IMHO.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 06:10 PM
20

And that’s most probably what’s going to happen. Fragile crumbling society. And people will wonder, where did the good times go? Women will be pissed at the burden of both having to run the economy and the families. Some may realise that they will have to yield some ground. Men hold up half of the sky.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 10:08 PM
–

I don’t know. Why do you think so? Obviously, a measured gender difference could be caused by gender specific traits as well as cultural traits but could also (just) be correlation. Small/physically weak men would be as nervous as similar women. The harassment/rape hypothesis can be checked by doing the same study across environments and cultures. The prevalence of rape/sexual assult where I live is quite low. Then, are women more as anxious as they are in places where prevalence is much higher?…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 05:19 PM
1

Are you just doing the classic old school women are too emotional and dramatic? Nope. I’m doing the very contemporary reference to psychological research: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7294929/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 03:36 PM
2

What? Dudes aren’t walking around terrified of women. Prevalence of women being killed in traffic is 100per year here in Demark and people just shrugs. Women being killed by a partner i 6 per year and women are terrified. Why? Cause’ emotions depends on how we see the world. It also depends on gender. Women are more sensitive to threat. Just like men are stronger. Gender differences. This is purely an online narrative made up for insecure boys. Depp wasn’t some innocent dude in that situation. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 11:31 PM
-1

Oh. But it is. 500y ago everbody just knew the world was flat. And earth was the centre of the universe. Men are indeed more agressive but are from childhood condtioned socially to control that potential. Women otoh are not. We even have all kinds of mechanism to control men’s violent potential. Whatever aggression women have - there’s very few restraints. Or even consequences. Take Amber Heard, she could do as much DV as she pretty much wanted. She lost the libel case but was scott-free in any …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 09:49 PM
0

Physical violence kills people So does indirect forms of violence e.g. relational violence with aim of ostrasizing the target. It’s no coincidence that divorced men have ~10x higher suicide rate than other men. Divorced women do not increase in suicidality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 09:23 PM
1

Men are bigger. Men are stronger. Men tend to be a little more on the aggressive side. It’s just true. But stronge in all aspects? Women tend to be more socially adept than men. Better to sway the social consensus.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 09:09 PM
4

Conservatives accept men as violent as the status quo, liberals try to change them. The liberal solution is to suppress the male potential for violence. Other than that both agree that violence is a male characteristic and women will not be violent save for exceptions mostly for good cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 09:05 PM
13

But but … patriarchy hurts men too.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/24 08:38 PM
-4

The only thing stupider is to find a counter to the 4B movement. Sheesh.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:55 PM
3

Important to be on the right side of history?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/24 11:36 AM
29

One thing is what men voted for. Another is all the grass root people running the campaign for their team. I wonder whether there was an absence of younger men among the blue team grassroots. Was there ever an “where are all the men” realization moment? Or did the blue team young men consist of people ready to check their privilege anytime challenged? How come they didn’t notice?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/24 03:05 PM
1

I wonder how the Handmaid’s Take would play out, if the fertile women were the wives each religiously choosing to have a dozen babies and the “handmaids” were given 2-3 children to care for backed by the force of the state. Handmaids freely able to choose a life partner or not. “Handmaids” might be made barren to avoid unregulated procreation. We all must give our bit to protect the planet. I suppose such a scenario would be a female equivalent to paternal fraud.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:06 PM
5

Arh it’s just copy paste…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 01:07 AM
15

A few definitions might be appropriate Reproductive health is defined in paragraph 7.2 of the Programme of Action as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being ... in all matters related to the reproductive system”, which “implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life and that they have the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when and how often to do so.” Reproductive rights, according to the ICPD, “rest on the recognition of the basic rig…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 12:08 AM
1

You missed the point. It’s not about you. It’s about you doing the minimal to reflect on power aggression
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:52 PM
1

The controlling wife https://www.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/s/S4RwQixzIv
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:38 PM
2

I think women should grow up. Stop giving a pass to peers when things do not add up. I know women are perfectly capable of understanding the world without resorting to conspiracy theories about “men have all the power”. Looking at the genitalia of people with stars on their shoulders is not a proper analysis of power. And subsequently responsibility. Also do get a better grip on the concept of aggression and violence. There’s subtle and hidden ways of hurting an opponent and crude and overt. The…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:31 PM
3

You can’t affect dogmatic thinking with facts. No person would loose faith just because of mere information Feminism is a quasi-religion. It establish a value system allowing ppl to reduce the complexity of the world into a simplified world view. As with any religion - quasi or not - whether it will do good or bad for its belivers, depends on whether it increase or decrease the overall viability and success of its believers. Currently it looks like proponents of feminism will die out in 3-4 gene…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 09:25 PM
2

I suppose what you’re suggesting is the same strategy as the blue team. Only allow the chosen into the circle of power.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 12:39 PM
6

You ought to get your historical facts right. Common people were given the vote including women.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:22 AM
12

I’ve pondered a bit about this. What do men want? I think a fair shot. A level playing field. I think many men are seeing red team as better at setting the frame for having a fair chance in a fair society without anyone being quotaed in. Whether they’re right I don’t know. I’m European.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 11:53 PM
14

What to expect with a female CEO. You should think it wouldn’t matter. But apparently it does.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 10:19 PM
5

This is silly to spend energy on.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:07 PM
1

I suppose you could crowdfund a documentary then. Or make a startup where you set things right.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:22 PM
24

Great work.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 07:25 AM
2

Interesting that it’s the trust aspect that’s affected.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 07:30 PM
2

I’ll be damned! You’re telling me that the upper echelons are not taking the DEI medicine they’re prescribing for everybody else? Who would’ve guessed?
/r/MensRights04/11/24 02:39 PM
2

You really should contact the crew
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:52 AM
1

I’m not the one to ask. I’m just passing the message. You have to contact the person in the webpage in the link. Obviously nobody makes a documentary on the basis of a reddit thread.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:37 AM
3

Wild-cards are where a position is offered to someone that doesn’t fit the stereotypical requirements but you might have a hunch that the person might be something to try out. It could be a young promising candidate rather than the safe card of a more experienced type. If it doesn’t work out as well as hoped for, there’s still resilience enough to cope.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 07:33 PM
27

The issue might be: We know how to deal with male assholes. We don’t know for female ditto.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 01:51 PM
4

I’ve never experienced this directly. But then again, I work in a US corporation in Scandinavia. Have you experienced something yourself?
/r/MensRights03/11/24 12:54 PM
8

One thing I’ve noted, is that the number of wild-cards available are way fewer for men. There will always be the “alpha” types (for lack of a better word) with slick hair and a huge self confidence. They loove to be the chivalrous men helping promising women ahead. So, the wild cards are offered for these pet-employees.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 12:51 PM
2

I think sex work is preying on men’s urge for reproduction. Quite unapologetically. This urge has also been exapted to work as glue in the bond with the mother of their children. This makes misuse even more sinister as it redirects ressources away from “wife” and children.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 09:04 PM
3

Well not only the apex fallacy. Then you missed the point. Was Jeff Bezos really much more powerfull than Mckenzie Scott?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 07:45 PM
2

Well that argument is problematic, when you realize that 75% of men incarcerated in UK would be free if they were punished as women. US is probably have similar numbers.
/r/MensRights02/11/24 11:40 AM
1

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2014/06/28/first-international-conference-men’s-issues-day-1
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 09:50 AM
6

I mean there were plenty Men initially fighting for women’s suffrage so I don’t really understand why men can’t do the same. You can’t understand because your understanding of the world is distorted or incomplete. Things are not the way you think they are. The most important thing is to understand power. Looking at a Rolls Royce where a man is driving miss Daisy in the same way as we look at power between the genders in society, would reveal that the chauffeur is the powerful. Driving an expensi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 08:43 AM
5

Wait I’m sorry why do women have to help men? Why can’t they just help themselves? I suppose women should help men to same degree men are helping women. At least if you’re pro equality of the sexes. Fair enough if you aren’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 08:32 AM
2

Obviously only after having worked hard for supporting women and being good allies.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 08:20 AM
8

I think there’s a truth hidden in plain sight. One that George doesn’t get. Richard Reeves have to use 30min of his podcast to pay homage to women’s rights. Movember, a charity for men, pass off a considerable amount of money to benefit women. The opposite would be unheard of though charities for women are at least 10x more affluent than charities for men. The fact hidden in plain sight is power . Which gender has power and which gender has not. If power is seen as the ability to get ones intere…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 08:19 AM
3

as long as they have there current agenda men’s issues must take second place, if even that. Anything that would oblige any woman or affect any woman negatively is out of bounds. It’s widely accepted or even lauded that women priortize own gender but a huge nono if men (are seen to) priortize men. Whatever men can fix without affecting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 08:01 AM
10

I’m not an American so I can’t vote in US anyways. But I suppose other could ponder a bit over the gender dimension. Thanks. The inspiration for this post was actually a news article in the Danish newspaper Politiken. It very Guardian like but it reported a middleaged Texan that was convicted to 30y in his young years for trying to drive from the police. He only served 5y but was barred from his civil rights in the 25y parole period.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 01:55 PM
18

Let me google… According to statista 93.2% of incarcerated people in US are men. One thing is the current state of politics. Another is how it was 10y ago or 20. Or even 20y from now. Whichever team men should vote for I don’t know. However, logically policy will form around voter preferences. If men were to be 45% of the voter base, policy must focus on the wishes of the 55% majority of women. Regardless of what feminists say: Trump cannot win without the backing of a non-trivial amount of fema…
/r/MensRights01/11/24 01:32 PM
12

If you ever experiences a narcissist you’d recognize the pattern.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/24 11:23 PM
10

I think one of the most important issue to address is people’s understanding of power. Men do not shy away from disoplaying power overtly whereas women hide their power. I thknk power is best understood as the ability to get ones interests served. Tyrannical power is getting ones interests served by force, manipulation or deceit at the expense of others. Feminism has succeede greatly in dominating the gender narrative. I think it must be generally understood that it is of less importance whether…
/r/MensRights31/10/24 08:52 PM
4

Why engage at all? After all, it’s a loaded statement. The underlying truth is that men are born and evolutionarily selected for having “sharp claws”. An unstable and unregulated man is thus more dangerous than an unstable and unregulated woman. In a comfy and safe society, the “sharp claws” might not be necessary. But they were througout the last quarter of a million years of human evolution. And if we fuck up they will come in fashion again when the zombies rise. Or something… The most dangero…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 12:03 AM
2

Good for some types of music. Not much for other things.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 11:53 AM
11

Option 5 Allow evolution to do it’s magic. Let the too picky women die out. Whatever too picky is.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 10:25 PM
9

I think for the majority it’s caused by abandoning truth seeking for what is perceived “good”. This what Cory Clark found. Bless her. It’s like they say: “who cares if the numbers are (a little) unprecise” if the numbers pull society in a “good” direction. The moral compass is extremely biased pro women. I’ve met feminists that truly belived that putting ten innocent men to prison would be a moral and good thing if this could prevent one case of IPV. This regardless of circumstances i.e. Duluth …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/24 09:06 PM
6

My ideals are not the MRA position, egalitarian or feminist. I think the (abstract) ideal should be human flourishing. This in a pareto-optimal way. Pareto because there might be many optimal or near optimal solutions. As men and women are different and has different strong and weak traits, egalitarian does not make sense to me. Currently we’re going away from pareto-optimal as women seem to get men’s benefits without men’s obligations. Telling someone they are responsible for putting in nails a…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:40 PM
12

This can also be seen by looking at society’s out-group and in-group split. The out-group is the ones always getting the blame for everything bad whereas the in-group is able to claim to represent the good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/24 09:40 PM
3

So lucky that the university can get away with swift action against a stupid blabbermouth. I bet that for every Lowcock speaking the unspeakable there’s hundreds smart enough to only show this in actions and decisions.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 07:53 PM
5

On that note, it seems like women instinctively know to downplay their power whereas men’s instincts are to showcase theirs. Men showcase hyperagency. Women showcase hypoagency. Figureheads showcasing power also showcase a target on their back. Power for the sake of power is best done in the shadows. Better to be the excellence in the shadows pulling the strings than the president being shot at. One hypothesis of why it is so, is that women choose a man of as high a status as possible. Thus men …
/r/MensRights13/10/24 10:55 AM
8

I don’t know the history behind wikipedia on everything related to gender, but everything is locked. Allegedly against “vandalism”. However it’s has the typical character assassination when MRA is viewed theough a feminist lens. Not much to do about that. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement
/r/MensRights09/10/24 03:04 PM
3

I think they figure out that random walk is not leading to a good place. Then they think: “now what”?!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/24 09:21 PM
2

Good comment. I have to think about this a bit and hopefully I can add a proper reply. On thing though, when the point “rhaa, men need sex” comes up, it can’t help but think of how women again and agin use anything related to sex to control men. Either by reward or by the whip of claiming “sexual foul”. How come men so willingly put the shackles on? If not a yoke? Sex can be beneficial and mutually bonding but quite often it’s comes with whip, shackles and yoke.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 02:52 PM
3

Very accurate. Though, how do we shed some light on miss Daisy? Miss Daisy does not want to be seen and would bend over backwards to avoid responsibility.
/r/MensRights07/10/24 01:37 PM
13

It’s fascinating (and scary) how well feminists have been able to control the narrative about men and women and how well this influence has worked in affecting policy. Feminists are keenly focused on power. However their view on power is narrowly focused on looking at positional power and downplaying the soft power of culture. As they say, culture eats strategy for breakfast. Contemporary society is a bit like “driving miss Daisy”. Feminists constantly point out that the chauffeur “is in control…
/r/MensRights07/10/24 12:07 PM
9

Deluding someone on purpose is called gaslighting
/r/EverydayMisandry06/10/24 09:48 PM
3

In general. Though the dog always want to be cuddled. The cat won’t mostly which is sad since I’m predominantly a cat person. Wife and daughters … no. Though my wife is ok with me giving her a hug now and then.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 11:21 PM
7

Personally I don’t feel much frustration about lack of sex. Luckily I’m middle aged and does not have the burden of a teenage libido. Good riddance. I do feel touch starvation though. Very much. Probably to a degree where it makes me sad. Not depressed as such … just a bit grey inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 10:42 PM
2

Over the last half century, there has been a push for empowering women. But with great power comes great responsibility. Or, at least, that’s what Yoda claims. Perhaps power dynamics are in play as well? So how does this work: 1. Do the powerful typically approach the less powerful? 2. Do the less powerful typically approach the powerfull? 3. Do people of equal power approach each other? I would probably say that the one being approached has the upper hand. This is also law #8 in Robert Greenes …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 04:48 PM
–

Why do you think that men preferring low bc women are uptight, insecure and controlling? We can have all kinds of theories about why people do what they do. In the end, the proof will be in the pudding. Men ought to have an interest in women being as sexually free as they like, and then choose the ones with lowest bc. Then the problem becomes, how to know? For some reason women won’t very willingly disclose that information.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 12:12 PM
–

There’s probably a lot of reasons. But some of those reasons are related to - mate guarding - probability of a having a stable partnership If a man is to invest in a family, it is important for him that the kids he invests in are his biological offspring. If a woman has a low bc, there’s a better chance that any kids the woman gets will indeed be his biological kids. This has via evolutionary selection been entrenched to male preferences. Secondly, if a woman has a low bc, there’s a lower probab…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/24 10:56 AM
1

I never had one ever here in Denmark. Always only ordinary ic. My wife won’t let me go down on her as well. Never ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 07:57 PM
3

Sex without reciprocity and some degree of enthusiasm is not enjoyable to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 07:50 PM
19

Patriarchy hurts men too /s
/r/MensRights02/10/24 05:31 PM
2

It won’t until the world burns. Sadly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/24 08:56 PM
1

Gimme a break. Y’all always complain about no shelters for abused men. There’s plenty. They’re just called prisons. /s
/r/MensRights01/10/24 08:48 PM
2

The opposite of lies is not other lies but truth.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 08:35 PM
–

Would should they try in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 06:53 PM
–

Maybe it’s not anx If women and men are close to equal, a man should be able to gauge how intersting he is for women by how often he’s been approached. Women ought to be as intersted in men as men are in women. If approaching only has a minuscule chance of a positive outcome and a high risk of a negative, why bother? Intersted women ought to approach anyways. And if they don’t… it’s probably because they’re not that interested anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/24 06:40 PM
1

Typically feminists point at stats such as Males constituted 77.8% of those arrested for aggravated assault[63] Males were convicted of the vast majority of homicides in the United States, representing 89.5% of the total number of offenders. [60] Homicide trends 60 fbi stats 63 Some of this is due to bias against males in the judicial and law enforcement systems. However, the over representation of males cannot entirely be explained to this. Expectations of men This comment thread on X clearly s…
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:42 AM
1

If you read carefully, I never state that men are inherently violent. I never say that masculinity is violent and women are not. What I say is that men are metaphorically speaking born with large sharp claws whereas women are not born with similar large sharp claws. Better learn to use these claws well.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 07:55 AM
2

https://www.instagram.com/p/DAQgwzrt9VF/?igsh=MmN1NXVrdzg0M2ps See also https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/s/gMVzkniVsw r/TheTinMen
/r/MensRights30/09/24 09:32 PM
6

I think Evans made this semi-sarcastically. To prove a point. Her point being: Men are the problem. What really pisses me off is how callously women throw men under the bus. It’s soo easy for women to point their fingers at men’s violence. However men’s violence is a side effect of men’s obligation and abilty to protect. Men are evolved over milennia to be able to muster aggression enough to protect women, children and their tribe. Women select intuitively men with the “best” traits for this bru…
/r/MensRights30/09/24 08:52 PM
10

This movie can go both ways. It may either conclude that curfew is a good or a bad thing. It would be interesting if the perpetrator is indeed a woman. Thus pointing out that removing men is no solution. As we say in danish: when the family moves the gremlins follow.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 06:45 PM
2

This. I’d say the key difference is that feminists don’t believe misandry exists It might not be a question of belief. More a way to define it away. Gaslighting so to say.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 10:30 PM
2

Here in Denmark, higher pay wasn’t alotted men per se, but husbands. Since almost all men were married it ended up pretty much the same.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 05:15 PM
3

I think the most pressing issue is to break down the gender narrative. Contemporary view of the genders and gender relations has almost entirely been defined by feminism. It’s pervasive and ubiquituous. It’s easy to win a battle if you get to define the battleground. Any game can be easily won if you get to make the rules. Currently feminism has been able to be absolutely dominant in everything related to gender.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 12:28 PM
5

At 21? How much education can be accomplished at 21? Gets weirder and weirder. I work in Europe in a smaller US corporation that used to be big. Working with energy. Since I work with sales of large infrastructure projects I know typical calc rates for “ordinary employees”. The highest rate is for structural mechanics where rates correspond to 200k/y gross. From this the average net might be 100k/y. I would guess the most senior people average 150k at most. Typically at least 15-20y of experienc…
/r/RedPillWomen28/09/24 09:21 PM
5

We I suppose that’s one way of becoming quasi-celeb But then such income probably won’t last a lifetime… 150k/y in a decent career might end up with more in the aggregate.
/r/RedPillWomen28/09/24 08:47 PM
10

Only 5% of US population earn in excess of 200k Looking at 21-28 year old it’s 1% or less. Those 1% are most probably people born with a silver spoon in their mouth given a lucrative job in the family business or the few people ending up with celebrity status. Perhaps the occasional lucky one. All other jobs with high pay require education and some years of hard work thus only present in the 30-ies. How did you end up at 200k this young? No wonder you can’t find any.
/r/RedPillWomen28/09/24 07:39 PM
6

What is similar income?
/r/RedPillWomen28/09/24 12:27 PM
12

The tin men just published how male support groups have been shut down systematically. Most often these groups are backed by ordinary people. But typically theee ordinary people are afraid to voice their opinion publically. On could say: What are they scared of? Why don’t they just do it? I’m not sure they realize, but typically they have this perception that it would give trouble. They might end up being hurt. I think they’re right. They perceive the threat correctly. They’re afraid of is being…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 08:59 PM
6

Won’t work to keep men in cages for sperm. Women have a strong interest in men keeping on working.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 01:28 PM
3

The sexual participation and attention of women, is valued higher than man. So whatever man is getting this participation and attention is of course looked upon with respect.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/22 10:15 PM
4

Guess why? (It’s never been about equality. It has always being excerting soft power. It’s a power grab.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/22 07:22 AM
12

It is not my impression that the average woman is invisible on a societal level. At least not in the mothering and birth giving years. Women do complain about becoming invisible when they get middle aged. They don’t realize that this is the where men start.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/22 10:48 PM
38

Sometime it seems to me that half of the male population is invisible. I.e. the least successfull half. From the homeless in the street to the the janitor or the early retired (aka unemployed) blue collar worker. Then, because that half is invisible, obviously all the visible men seems like they’re way better off than the average woman. Obviously that must be privilege.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/22 10:13 PM
1

Apparently not: https://www.livescience.com/25386-fertility-decline-surprises-women.html
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 07:57 PM
-1

I’d probably say that they should get informed about their fertility and how it develops with time. Yes, there are women able to conceive at 40 but the odds are way lower than at 25. There is a relation between fertility and attractiveness to men. It’s not 1:1 but it has to be taken into account.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 09:54 AM
1

The article is a decade old. I wonder what the situation is now.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 06:45 AM
1

Are we talking about Mahatma Gandhi and not his lesser known cousin Gopi Ghandi, which is correctly spelled Ghandi?
/r/MensRights16/01/21 07:11 AM
1

Just like society can have pockets where the far left controls the narrative doesn’t mean that overall society is far-left leaning. The majority of wikipedia is not particularly controversial. Going into areas where values and polical observations are important, there is a severe risk of dramatic bias. What direction that bias takes cannot be said a priori. I think my views on democracy are probably a bit more bleak than the average person. People in aggregate masses are notoriously stupid and w…
/r/MensRights11/01/21 10:19 AM
11

Wikipedia is a democratic collective effort so it just mirrors society. I do agree MGTOW is misreprented but I think that is because MGTOW’s don’t really give a damn. Nevetheless Wikipedia isn’t the only place where MGTOW is lumped with misogynistic and radical hate-groups. Exactly this ‘lumping’ is IMHO systematic relational agression just like cancel-culture.
/r/MensRights10/01/21 07:17 PM
188

What we lack to understand is that manipulation of social networks values and culture - i.e. relational agression actually constitutes violence just as much as direct agression. What Doris Lessing observes is the fallout from such social manipulation over many years. It’s not well understood that female violence is different than male violence. If looking at the definition of violence on e.g. Wikipedia relational violence is not even mentioned. Note in Liz Bates presentation how easy it is for w…
/r/MensRights10/01/21 10:26 AM
1

Just remembered Seven Samurais by Akira Kurosawa. I think this is an archetypical film about masculinity. Seven Samurais are mobilized for the good cause of protecting a defenceless village against bandits. The succed but at the cost of four of them. And when the danger is over, the villagers shy away from rewarding and acknowleding their contribution. What’s missing are angry japanese women blaming the three survivors for their violent behavior and unfair patriarchal rewards. It’s easy for femi…
/r/MensRights17/12/20 08:26 PM
1

Why my problem? What’s that got to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 08:01 PM
2

Well if the source of your attractiveness is being a provider/protector, then conscripting a person by force to protect is a type of coercing the source of attractiveness (ability to fulfill the protector role) away. Ofcourse society could compensate by providing another source of attractiveness - say money instead. But then we get to the tax and alimony problem. If we make rules in society forcing persons with many ressources to give up these ressources for nothing in return, then this source o…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 08:19 AM
1

It could also be because the ‘source’ of your attractiveness is taken from you by ‘force’ or coercion.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/20 07:44 AM
1

https://mandecentret.dk just made an expo with stories from 16 abused men. If you mail they’ll reply in english.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:04 PM
2

http://chng.it/vGJ6PnZQC8 http://chng.it/rjKkmnqtvM
/r/MensRights07/11/20 08:01 AM
2

I think the subject title is cherrypicked. The author thinks men should be erased from women’s minds. That’s IMHO perfectly fine as long as she doesn’t interefere with mens right to be a part of the world.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 10:08 AM
1

Well maybe... however we have only heard it from one side and we have no clue about the context. Did he say it jokingly or as a reply to a sour face...? Did he indeed try to coerce her so blatantly? If this was his regular mode of operation there must have been other. I think everbody agrees that if he was indeed trying to coerce her to sex, this should be punished severely. But now this is lumped with all minor transgressions from the mere trivial of making a pass to the severe, using positiona…
/r/MensRights08/10/20 04:53 PM
10

Is that where society’s heading? Men are having less and less reason for keeping society running which leaves that to women. Why educate yourself and jump into the corporate hamsterwheel if not to provide for your family? A man can provide for himself just as well on way less effort. EDiT: typo
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/20 07:29 PM
6

He can dare his teacher to put his money where his mouth is. ( broke woke)
/r/MensRights28/09/20 07:58 PM
3

Very influenced by feminism throughout childhood and teens. Though never actually identified as one but did buy in to the notion: A woman without a man is like fish without a bicycle. Quite some self esteem issues from that. I read somewhere that the phrase is a satirical reply to a equally offensive phrase from men. That would have made it more reasonable. Decoupled from it’s origins it seems quite misandric.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 11:00 PM
12

I think the missing link is relational agression. So it’s illegal if you hit someone. however no consequece (or less consequence) if you slander someone to the degree that you get someone to hit your target. Women predominantly displays violence in the second form. Slander and libel men untill police, courts and institutions do your dirty bidding. See e.g. Spain’s DV laws. Harmange’s writeup no different.
/r/MensRights13/09/20 11:08 AM
3

‘Patriarchy’ is a consequence of women’s monopoly of reproduction. Men has to bring value to the union of man and woman of equal value to women’s reproductive capacity. So men compete for being best at providing as this is increasing the odds for getting attractive women. Women’s participation in wider society only a matter of providing for her kids and herself and whatever self-actualization she feels like pursuing. Men otoh participate for the same reasons plus the additional constraints that …
/r/MensRights12/09/20 06:29 AM
2

I’ve also wondered about why the archetypical villain is predominantly male. There are of course female villains as the wicked step-mom or Cruella de Ville but most are male.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 09:59 PM
3

... like living the South and saying ... ooh i have only met nice people around here so if there are any white supremacists here that’s not a problem bc obviously they’re really nice people.
/r/MensRights29/08/20 04:40 PM
1

Seulement un petit peux.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 07:11 PM
1

Au contraire my friend. Sadly enough they’re far too common these days :-( Female supremacist notions are far too normalized and accepted these days.
/r/MensRights28/08/20 05:37 PM
2

Women by and large frequently exhibit agressive traits by manipulating the social networks. The ‘female only’ banning policy or ‘support the dominant narrative’ or else and for that matter cancel culture are examples of how women perpetrate violence by ostracizing persons they can’t coerce into a desired direction. The feelings of being shut out you might be having can be quite painful. Scaled up it can be quite severe Ostracism This is also how some women intentionally hurt men in divorce cases…
/r/MensRights28/08/20 04:34 PM
2

How come BB is always about women? ... not to say it’s wrong. Feminism has always been very much about men.
/r/MGTOW228/08/20 06:55 AM
6

I guess that’s the way it used to be. However I don’t think that’s a viable solution in today’s society.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 10:49 AM
12

I guess the question is: What privilege should men enjoy in return for this burden.
/r/MensRights25/08/20 05:16 AM
4

To me relational agression is violence. Slandering a person such that society retaliates against that person is just as much violence as when doing it directly. No difference when one group slanders or libels another group and the other group gets damaged. The Duluth model is a prime example of how the villification of men orchestrates systemic violence against men: Only men can be perpetrators and only women can be victims. Women has for some reason a knack for relational aggression. However su…
/r/MensRights23/08/20 08:10 PM
2

I think this is an interesting comment on the patriarchy theory. Men do not seem to react to patriarchal or male entitlement. Howevever women apparently would react to matriarchal or female entitlement. As society entitles women more and more it seems like women have fewer second thoughts than men to use this entitlement in self serving manner. It would be interesting to know if this reaction is cultural or biological. I suppose repeating the experiment across different cultures could shed some …
/r/MensRights21/08/20 08:09 AM
3

One thing is interest another thing is motivation.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 06:39 AM
3

IMHO it’s not only whether a person is able to do the job but also if they’re willing and lastly whether they’re actually doing the job. It’s both about competence and production.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 06:37 AM
8

Do you have an ombudsman function? ombudsman
/r/MensRights13/08/20 09:50 AM
1

Statistics on this would be super interesting. But quite disconcerting. Thanks for the reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 10:31 PM
1

Also, older married men tend to have less of a social network because a woman's primary marital job is alienating him from any of his actual support network, as they may be negative thoughts in his head about her, and he can only have support from other "married" people who will tow the party line about pussy worshipping. I’ve wondered about how common this is. Reminds me of how precisely a jewel wasp imobilizes a cockroach. Do women have a tendency to attack the man’s support base to ensure he’…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 09:18 PM
1

certainly there will
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/20 08:57 PM
4

Just as much as the typical feminist is a totally sweet and understanding person who totally repect men. What the incels reports is akin to feelings of being ostracised. Damaging effects of ostracism If one sub-group actively marginalize a sub-group of the population, by means of manipulating the common narrative through cherrypicking facts and presenting biased statistics I would think this classifies as violence. It is surprising that young men are having less and less sex rising from 19% in ~…
/r/MensRights11/08/20 01:34 PM
7

Then how come the same argument does not apply for incels? When Alex Minassian lashed out suddenly all incels became dangerous. For any sufficiently large group there’s bound to be some crackpots.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 10:47 AM
1

... a woman can cheat on a man, go though a no fault divorce, take half his stuff, accuse him of abuse, prevent him from seeing the children and force him to pay half of his future earnings. The cherry on the cake is that he’s then labelled a “deadbeat dad”. Gold comment! Saved for the future...
/r/MensRights09/08/20 09:39 AM
3

I certainly also read other spheres of thought. Confining yourself to your own school of thought is limiting and just weakens your ability to defend your position.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 09:10 AM
1

In this context, myself. But if it’s only your opninion you can’t really claim any universality. You’ll end up in: ‘That which can be asserted without evidence can be dimissed without evidence’. Yes, and this is why you can employ critical thinking. As a lay person yes. But as a society no. It’s really rooted in what scientific paradigm your knowledge is rooted in. Social sciences are rooted in postmodern constructivism Here there’s no objective truth but basically just a bunch of claims highly …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 12:26 PM
1

If it is properly done, then yes. But who’s to judge? It would be impossible to rule out selection bias in data and hypotheses being tested and what’s being modeled for one thing. Anything can be 100% correct and still lead to flawed policies because of what it necessarily leaves out. Knowledge is connected to power. It’s the oldest trick in the book of people in power to leave out the facts not supporting their agenda and emphasize whatever supports their rulings and policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 11:18 AM
1

The above article? Anyways on the subject of the origins of the ‘nuclear family’ I bumped into this reference of viking family arragements. I guess this shows nuclear family arrangement and practice in Scandinavia prior to christianity. But also wider societal involvement in taking care of kids. I guess it’s way more difficult to prove that the nuclear familiy was only used in the last 200y than to disprove the ansence of the nuclear family model beyond 200y ago. I guess it depends on definition…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 11:02 AM
1

Not really comparable. Imagine taking 100 male upper class libertarian scholars and have them work for 20 years producing papers, statistics and books cross referencing each other in the field of political science and economics. Would you believe this bulk of academic work to be un-biased and be authoritative information about how the world works and how to build a good society? I wouldn’t. At will change libertarian for socialist, conservative, communist and male for female, etc. Then imagine t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/20 10:16 AM
2

Yeah but based on what? Gender studies have been monopolized by feminist beliefs for decades leading to a highly biased view of what are facts and what is fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 02:06 PM
1

The further one gets aways from ‘objective’ studies (e.g. math and physics) where facts can be verified by controlled experiments. the more belief systems play a role. So if all the published knowledge in a given area is rooted in a certain belief system only comprising a minority of the belief systems in society, it is to be regarded as biased to the level of being worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 01:58 PM
1

Well his thoughts are behind all the talk about diversity, isn’t he?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 01:51 PM
1

So how’s the diversity in this study? You know all knowledge has in-built power differentials (acc. To Lacan IIRC). So if your author has a strong affiliation with a certain belief system we cannot really use it without ensuring adequate diversity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 01:44 PM
1

But then I guess historical records from 1300 and back shedding light on family models could become a bit thin. (At least to say that the nuclear family model did not occur.)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 01:21 PM
3

History of the nuclear familiy According to above reference, the nuclear family goes back to the 13th century. I guess one couldn’t talk about the West at that time.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/20 01:12 PM
18

Cassie Jaye is awesome.
/r/MensRights07/08/20 07:28 AM
15

Interesting. Especially since the two largest lobbying group are: the military industrial complex feminist / women’s rights organizations EDIT: Fixed a typo
/r/MensRights07/08/20 06:46 AM
39

I think it is interesting that women expects men to favor men whereas men do not expect women to favor women. Isn't this feminism in a nutshell? The patriarchy theory assumes men to have power due to male in-group bias. However the study shows there's no male in-group bias. Imagine all of the leaders of the world were female. Then this female in-group bias would play out very badly for men. Men at least have some sympathy for other men whereas women has none. Or said in another way, a patriarchy…
/r/MensRights07/08/20 01:22 AM
3

I think the YTA was referring to the guy keeping the kid’s toys. So IMHO: He’s an A for keeping the toys He’s not an A for kicking wifey out
/r/MensRights03/08/20 11:00 AM
2

Missing links.
/r/PussyPass29/07/20 06:05 PM
3

I think it actually starts at the funding level. The study was made by an organization exclusively focusing at girl’s needs. I guess thats in principle ok. It could be interesting to ask all these donors whether they would controbute on a similar initiative for boys. And document the reply. Funding of Rox
/r/MensRights29/07/20 06:01 PM
3

Below the surface I think there’s s lot of hurt in the FDS community. I think the reason why they’re bashing men so much is bc of poor self esteem an bad experiences with men. TTBT all men are not saints. Hopefully they’ll heal and be able to relate positively to the other gender. Kind of like the male ‘red pill rage’. Burn it out and get on.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:42 PM
2

The most surprising thing is that it never occurs to the journalist that there might be other men that weren’t that lucky.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 05:35 PM
1

Is ‘rape’ actually worse than this? The traditional notion of rape where a man attacks a woman and forces himself on her, Maybe. But the ‘rape’ where an American college kid fingered a drunk girl for 60s? The day after she couldn’t remember and denounced any consent - type of rape. I think not. Rape’s a lot of things these days.
/r/PussyPass29/07/20 05:34 PM
7

There’s a big risk of thinking correlation is causation here. With the rather small number of coutries in the world and the huuge number of variables going into how such a crisis pans out it’s meaningless to conclude anything from gender. It’s basically just indication of how prvalent Women are Wonderful notions are.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 10:04 AM
2

Oh but men do have a civil rights movement... NCFM
/r/MensRights19/07/20 08:49 PM
4

It’s freakin Jordan Peterson! r/JordanPeterson
/r/MensRights17/07/20 07:15 AM
1

I think there’s a big difference in saying: ‘Women are higher beings’ ‘Women show more altruistic behavior than men’ One is loaded with anti-egalitarian values, the other is empirical data. I second OP. Anti-egalitarian, female supremacist view should IMHO not be accepted.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 08:55 AM
11

UK reporting in Daily Mail
/r/MensRights13/07/20 10:49 PM
11

If we’ll ever get to know the full facts.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 07:32 PM
6

Comment on Marc Angelucci’s death from Cassie Jaye .
/r/MensRights13/07/20 04:37 PM
2

Google translate of link to EN
/r/MensRights13/07/20 02:08 PM
57

Who the f*** is downvoting such an article? Briganding?
/r/MensRights13/07/20 10:25 AM
2

San Bernardino news coverage Also a comment from congress person DeAnna Lorraine
/r/MensRights13/07/20 07:12 AM
14

Well it’s for sure not speculation that it’s a loss for men’s cause. It’s also going to be interesting to observe the coverage of the murder of mainstream media. The murder of a prominent feminist would cause quite a wave regardless of reason.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 11:11 PM
6

Official info
/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:25 PM
2

The user’s name is one I took inspired from from an internet aquintance from North Carolina back around 1998-99
/r/MensRights12/07/20 07:08 PM
3

Fabulous post. Thank. If I wasn’t so stingy I’d buy you an award.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 04:55 PM
23

Good term: Patriarchal feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/20 04:24 PM
4

I think it follows from the patriarchy dogma, Men have all the power and if men have problems they have way better possibilities to solve it than feminists. Like one feminist said: The ‘international women’s day’ the 5th of march does not to have a male counterpart as the other 364 f*******g days are ‘international men days’. Quite oblivious to the fact that men are the ‘invisible sex’. Feminists have always seen mankind as excluding women and raising men to being the norm. However another way t…
/r/MensRights11/07/20 10:05 AM
1

Try this with your girlfriend on the pill. Quite an awkward conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/20 09:47 PM
3

Men do not have the same rights as women reproductive rights . When and where you want to reproduce is a reproductive right. Currently in Denmark men have few rights except from condoms (if possible), sterilization and celibacy. After conception, the man has no rights. Only obligations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/20 04:09 PM
10

I would appreciate if you would write back what you learned about men’s views on men’s and women’s issues and your position on gender equality after you’ve done some studying. What made an impression and what not so much. Give a little back so to say.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 03:43 PM
3

Bringing a child into the world it not only a matter of conception and the 9 months of pregnancy. It is also the matter of the 18y9m a parent has obligations to a child. In former days, there wasn’t a way out for a woman getting pregnant. No anti-contraceptives. It was reasonable that men were as obliged by conception as women. Today, due to technological development, women now have way more control over conception. However the consequences may of that freedom has not yet been extended to men. M…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/20 09:18 AM
26

Dammit. It sounds like men now are treated the same way feminists picture women being treated under the vile patriarchy... only the vile patriarchy of feminists never existed. Haven’t experienced it here in Denmark directly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/20 02:09 AM
4

One could say that women succed in dividing men into white knights/simps and the rest. As the simps are grouping with women the remainder of men arguing for men’s rights actually becomes a minority.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 03:10 PM
9

It emphasizes how difficult it can be to find a partner without a backdrop of norms and culture to aid regulating do’s and don’t’s.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 09:21 AM
2

And for society. Having a bunch of single moms with random dads is not good for society. The burden of the dad’s role is shifted to society with too many single moms. When that burden becomes uncomfortable, society then think people should get their shit together and stop having babies without two parents. Hence marriage. Men need to start insisting not paying for random douchebags’ kids with random you-go-girl single moms. This probably goes via insisting on gender equality on tax payments. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/20 08:48 AM
3

I also wonder when we’ll see a shift in fiction. The danish instructor Christian Tafdrup made a movie called A Terrible Woman Extremely small budget (a little less than 1million $) ... certainly not US. He expected it to be an artsy niche film as his previous movie only sold 1603 tickets. But alas much to his surprise it sold over 100.000 tickets within the first month. There is a huge un-served market. So much misandric shit around. ...
/r/MensRights02/07/20 08:33 PM
1

Ever any explanations why a given sub is banned?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 08:39 PM
54

There’s a misconception here. Women are the gatekeepers of sex. Men are the gatekeepers of long term relations. If women want to fuck around and haven’t grown an interest in long term relationships, the 20% chads are plenty to keep the women busy. But with lots of ‘free’ sex the chads won’t commit. So women get the impression that men won’t commit. The sexless sods gets the impression that women are out of reach and stops trying. Time pass and everybody ends up alone. Chads because it’s better w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/20 11:00 PM
9

I think it’s extremely seldom to see an MRA hating women. Perhaps feminist ideology but rarely women. Perhaps false accusers and misandrists Has MRA/manosphere a rad-fem equivalent?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 10:42 PM
2

Sorry if this first argument seems bollocks. It works for me and I haven’t figured out a better way to think about it... If you’ve ever studied differential equations, you would have realized that different sets of boundary conditions in exactly the same differential equation may trigger entirely different results. Gender roles are somewhat culturally determined. However there are some biological unavoidable facts that works as boundary conditions. The feminist role theory of gender entirely or …
/r/MensRights30/06/20 10:15 PM
1

It’s really unfortunate that the balance between the genders have been mangled so much over the last fifty years. May well be that women’s suffrage was a necessity. With the increased wealth of society, effective birth control, I guess the balance from 500 years ago needed re-thinking. Women have a lot more to offer society than staying home and raising kids. But from a men’s rights perspective, the ideological homogeneity and uniformity of gender issues studies, makes the perception of reality …
/r/MensRights30/06/20 09:09 PM
11

I wonder if a girl going missing cause a report more frequently than a boy going missing. Society unfortunately has a bias of caring more about females than males.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 08:46 PM
3

And why the lack of diversity in gender studies is so problematic . We can’t be any wiser if stats and science is entirely politically motivated with one ideology allowed.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 03:41 PM
2

Insane This is full-blow rape!
/r/MensRights30/06/20 03:37 PM
2

The guy’s story may be anecdotal. However with enough cases, a pattern start to form. So it has some relevance as a part of the pattern. It’s usually argued from anecdotal evidence that men are more self-serving than women. I.e. the females are more empathic. However that strikes me as odd. Women has a strong in-group bias where men has a strong out-group bias towards women. If men were selfish, how come they side with women all the time?
/r/MensRights30/06/20 03:31 PM
5

Super interesting article. Thanks for posting this.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 12:09 PM
1

r/thefairersex is unavailable now
/r/MensRights29/06/20 10:42 AM
3

It’s also notable that every time a man is giving the slightest hint of deep rooted hurt or need, there’s 1.7k women telling him that he’s a wuss. Isn’t that toxic masculinity? I thought that was perpetuated by the patriarchy. Apparently it’s perpetuated by FDS women.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 01:32 PM
46

Funny thing the FDS’ers don’t realize that the reason why he’s not looking forward to go home is because he has FDS wife at home...
/r/MensRights27/06/20 09:56 PM
1

Only if you set the value of military service to zero. In Denmark Jens Bonke has been following the number of hours worked in the household and outside for men and women since the 60-ies. Without exception men used more time on work on average. I’m not sure whether that considered necessary time spent on being able to do the work. I.e. time commuting or doing grocery shopping.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/20 07:46 AM
1

Well it’s certainly going to be interesting to see what happens when the average woman figures out she’s is going to pull all of the weight of society. Won’t it start to be a feminist theme that men should contribute? And back comes the wage gap... (If you note, it’s usually more fun spending money than earning money. And in spending women already have the edge .)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 10:45 AM
1

Take a look at the gender wage gap across the world. Men consistently earn more. They have a higher labor force participation. Higher pension age.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 08:55 AM
3

Have women ever been net contributors as regards economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 07:24 AM
5

The problem is not the ability to have kids but the economy. Both on the micro and macro scale. BTW not getting laid is imho a side effect. It’s the decrease of the birth rate as well as the increase in single parent families that may cause worry. Not necessarily for the sake of getting kids but because men are shifted from net contributors to neutral or even net consumers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/20 06:59 AM
21

And outsourcing. First outsourcing the simple stuff. Then outsource the complex stuff. Then outsource the earning.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 08:11 PM
2

The point is not mating. The point is creation of resources for the offspring and society in general. Having society running on all females and 20% of the men is going to hurt. Especially since the 80% disconected represents 40-50% of the economy. If they decrease their production to half, society is going to loose 20-25% of GDP. This not even considering cascading effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 08:09 PM
38

Well the effects are shown in Japanese economy Herbivore men Birthrate 1.42 Japanese economy getting weaker and weaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/20 07:40 PM
5

I think OP is forgetting that the average man has to approach a lot of women. With 25% of women taking offense even for a guy to ask her for her phone number and egregious measures due to mee too, it’s too dangerous to take the chance. Approaching a girl in the first place is difficult enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 08:42 PM
2

The tragedy of it is that you never know if the one you’re approaching is among the 25% who takes offense. EDIT: Looking at the graph it’s actually ‘only’ 12.5%
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/20 08:38 PM
6

Any links? It’s difficult to follow without references. EDIT: Added Google translate of added link from GR to EN
/r/MensRights20/06/20 09:18 AM
3

Well the point is that feminists claim women are treated unfairly because they are able to choose to get the money from their spouse. Statistically you and your wife are lumped in different groups and the ‘patriarchy’ is ‘proven’ by showing the difference in income between the groups. However that’s cherry picking as this method- as you rightfully mention - ingnores the transfer between the genders.
/r/MensRights18/06/20 04:16 PM
13

So with the wage gap debunked, we’ll have to start putting the spotlight on the productivity gap. Is it fair that women only contribute with 30% of gdp while still getting the lion’s share of the educational investments? Should each gender not contribute with equal amounts of tax . You know women and men being equal? EDIT: And don’t get me started on the consumption gap BTW : Anyone know how larger the transfer of money is between men and women in relationships?
/r/MensRights17/06/20 11:04 PM
0

Power is always based on need. If A needs B to a high degree and B only needs A to a low degree, A has power over B. The more skewed the needs are, the more unbalanced the power becomes. Traditionally men came with the necessary additional resources needed for bringing up kids to full adulthood and women came with the biological ‘apparatus’ to create a child. Today resources are not a huge problem in comparison to 150y ago and older. Especially since the state funds single moms and laws ensures …
/r/MGTOW217/06/20 10:34 PM
1

Is there someting I’m missing? Is it ok to coerce your partner into something by whatever means? Economical Physical Sexual ...? Are some means of coercion ok and other not? I would think a sound partnership is based on equality, collaboration and respect for each other.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 04:14 PM
3

It was a user posting about the sudden loss of the dad. The post has been removed. Nevertheless, I lost my dad years ago. I was fortunate enough to be at his side when he drew his last breath. Though I still miss him, I never felt he was very much there for me. I think he saw too much of himself in me and he never thought very much of himself. He just cracked on. I used to work with him for four years when going to high school. We relied on each other and both had our routines keeping the farm r…
/r/MensRights15/06/20 09:46 PM
1

😃
/r/MensRights15/06/20 08:17 PM
1

I’ve often wondered about what’s behind the social norm of fidelity. It’s enforced vigorously by men an women. Especially women. Anything can of course be negotiated and some couples lives polyamorously. But unless specifically agreed, sexual fidelity is a requirement.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 08:11 PM
1

Adding spice to the soup...
/r/MensRights15/06/20 07:32 PM
5

I have a problem with the dominant ways men are ‘violent’ to women is forbidden by law whereas the dominant ways women are ‘violent’ to men has no social sanctions whatsoever. Even when the consequences are the same. Even more it annoys me that men and society are blind to Relational Agression and the consequences thereof as this is most women’s preferred way of coercing their foes into compliance.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 05:34 PM
5

Men Women and emotional intelligence . According to this study women are on average more receiving to mirror emotional cues wheras men are more prone to act on emotional cues. Whether one is better than the depends on the circumstances. No doubt men will be more helpful for a person in distress whereas, if emotional support is called for, women man have the edge. Both genders has a great deal of flexibility so individual differences may have a lot to say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/20 07:44 PM
1

You just have to click on private.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/06/20 03:13 PM
4

Hey... don’t shoot the messenger. All he’s saying is that perhaps men and women have different interests. It really doesn’t matter whether quotas are in favor of men or women. Interest and qualifications is what should matter... given equal support, conditions and opportunity to develop the talent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/20 09:42 AM
4

This guy ? I guess he was very much convicted.
/r/PussyPass10/06/20 04:56 PM
2

Perhaps she’ll inherit him like the hammer lady.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 10:20 PM
1

He/she didn’t. Feminism is radicalism is what I read.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 09:47 PM
1

And to add insult injury. If he caves in and agree to date her and if she wishes so, and eventually marry him, statistics will in 10y time show that India was under the evil patriarchal rule forcing women to marry their rapists thus leading to more egregious measures against the vile men of India.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 09:40 PM
8

Probably the mean both.
/r/MensRights07/06/20 08:41 PM
1

That would be an intersting concept as well. Like an alien ethnographers’ field work as participant observers trying to figure out how human societies work. I think a radical feminist ‘utopia’ would have severe problems with keeping the production up leading to poverty and pushing some women into tough and undesirable jobs. Perhaps that would address the gamma bias issues. Men are responsible for 60-70% of GDP so decimating that to one tenth would leave the remaining GDP at index 37-46 for a pop…
/r/MensRights07/06/20 09:26 AM
1

Right. That one as welll most often. if the woman is on the pill and e.g. a steady girlfriend or wife using a condom could be really awkward. There’s also vasectomy. I’ve heard that this requires a wife’s written permission in US. Sterilization for women as well. EDIT: Added a few missing words
/r/MensRights07/06/20 05:55 AM
6

Where in the western world are women forced to have children? If so, how big a part of the population are under such rules? I certainly think women indeed do have a right to choose if she wants to: A) Want to have sex if they can find a suitable partner B) Want to use contraceptives C) Want take a ‘day after’ pill to avoid unwanted pregnancy D) Have an abortion E) Give up the child for abortion In Denmark they can as well F) Choose to be fertilized by a donor Men otoh can - as regard to reproduc…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 10:53 PM
5

I think the rationale for not incliding misandry comes from #2. According to feminist theory, women have been oppressed for millennia. By changing society to a society where men and women are equal, everyone would be better off. Hence theory of toxic masculinity where men are made to suffer because of the patriarchal system. So how do we know we’re still in a patriarchal system? Men are still the majority in the positions of power in the society (politicians/ceos). What is never discussed is the…
/r/MensRights06/06/20 08:35 PM
1

Better not to let such matters leech off your energy though you might be frustrated about the state of affairs.
/r/MGTOW206/06/20 05:20 PM
1

Drop latching onto negative people. It’ll just drain your and notably this forum’s energy.
/r/MGTOW206/06/20 01:30 PM
4

Let FDS be. They have enough to struggle with. Better keep your energy to yourself.
/r/MGTOW205/06/20 08:28 PM
7

I think it’s sexists. If they dug into the numbers, there would probably be more men where drug addiction poverty and social de-route has led to crime. Especially since 90–95% people incarcerated are men. The ideas suggested in the article do work but it’s totally unnecessary to gender it.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 09:27 PM
10

I wonder how the paper would have been received if it supported that women in some aspect had an advantage over men. This would still challenge the social constructivist paradigm, but not the female superiority paradigm. It seems like men and women are equal unless women are better.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 12:01 PM
1

I suppose you could say: Maybe I have a long distance girlfriend, maybe I’m gay... in all circumstances it’s personal. Not a lie but perhaps it’ll do the trick.
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 05:11 PM
1

Agreed. Howey paying attention to what’s out there is imho quite sane even if for those who decide to do their own stuff.
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 04:11 PM
3

I really like the oompf of your comment. (meant positively) Thanks.
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 03:50 PM
1

Maybe I wrongfully understand the word ‘toxic’ as having negative connotations indicating some kind of resentment. As I’m a non native English speaker I hope you can forgive me.
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 12:33 PM
1

Don’t shoot the messenger. I’m not saying there’s any misogyny. Quite the contrary. I’m saying it’s all too frequent that MGTOW are blamed for misogyny. It may have to do with female vs male modes of aggression and violence: Men’s violence may predominantly take the form of physical and perhaps verbal violence Women’s violence are predominantly relational and perhaps verbal. All to often men are quite conciously attacked out by women’s relational aggression. It’s rather effective and unfortunate…
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 11:02 AM
2

So there’s for sure hate at feminism and the ‘system’ and the women reinforcing this system as well as taking advantage of the benefits of a stacked game and for that matter the white knights likewise defending the stacked game, but is that on feminity in general?
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 10:11 AM
-1

Men have to tell some women, that they’re terrible’ It may have severe consequences if men are not allowed to voice their frustrations, says Sofie Jama In the article it is claimed that men’s resentment may become dangerous to women and that the MGTOW community is misogynist. From what I know of the MGTOW community is that resentment towards women as such is not the dominant sentiment but (at most) that the rules of the game are stacked against men in such a degree that a fair and equal relation…
/r/MGTOW201/06/20 09:30 AM
1

I have a substantial amount of funding available at universities able to generate academic ‘proof’ of women being oppressed and men being privileged and I thus have unsurpassed ability to influence policy to my ends whereas the opposite sex has none
/r/MensRights31/05/20 10:46 AM
7

If it hasn’t been posted it could be a nice separate post in itself.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 10:33 AM
1

It might be intersting to look at diversity in gender studies at differet universities. What’s the ratio of male vs female faculty and staff. Are men equally represented? If diversity is a necessity for corporations it must also be a necessity for gender study faculties. It might get you in trouble but if you build on data I would hope you would be able to pull it off. I’d for sure like to see the result.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 10:11 AM
2

So sad.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 09:40 PM
3

Nah, Don’t you think it’s because the Karens have gotten hold of the managers?
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:32 PM
10

Dammit. The original post has been banned. I wonder how far the right to free speech goes. If a government was censoring in this way it would be a human’s rights violation. However a private company can of course make their own rules. But when they make their own rules, are they allowed to treat their customers differently?
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:20 PM
14

I suppose the removal of the post more than adequately answers the question in the title.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 08:03 PM
13

It is really important that MRA get an academical branch. Possibly also someplace where relevant stats can be generated. Finally a political leg would also be needed. I’ve wondered why there’s almost no fiction taking the point of men. Here in DK we had Christian Tafdrup’s En Frygtelig Kvinde but I think it’s rare to focus on gender without taking the ubiquitous feminist perspective, Take StarTrek Voyager having a strong willed female captain. Why? Cause the future is female... at least until th…
/r/MensRights29/05/20 07:03 PM
1

Certainly agree. However that the wage gap is due to so called ‘systemic oppression’ is a myth that just won’t die.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 07:46 PM
1

How do you discern between A) Systemic oppression and B) Systemic laziness and C) Systemic priortization of all other sorts of things above your day job and D) Systemic priortization of all other sorts of things above your day job and systemic priortization of your SO’s day job above everything else. The feminist explanation model only thinks A is a possibility. There’s a huge hidden priortization gap. Before MRA’s start to priortize getting statistics and data for the situation, nothing will ch…
/r/MensRights28/05/20 04:04 PM
2

Correlation does not imply causation. Edit: if it ideed was the male factor, why is it only less than one percent doing mass shootings.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 09:15 PM
4

Not the least female nurses are high in demand from male doctors. And male doctors are high in demand from female nurses. Likewise female doctors are high in demand from male nurses. Howver male nurses are low in demand from female doctors. Everything else equal.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 03:40 PM
7

Obviously the’s a lot of great women out there. It’s nevertheless a really interesting question: How do men and women figure out a good way to complement each other and keep the playing field fair and equal. How do we teach other virtue in relationships? What legal and cultural back drop supports good relations? How do we balance power in relationships and how in the overall society. So far feminists have been bickering about unfairness of the female roles historically and blamed men on patriarc…
/r/MensRights24/05/20 06:58 PM
3

Smokin prevalece in DK https://www.cancer.dk/forebyg/undga-roeg-og-rygning/fakta-om-rygning/voksnes-rygevaner/
/r/MensRights24/05/20 11:15 AM
10

In Denmark male and females smokes equally much. However still 2/3 of deaths are men. https://sundhedspolitisktidsskrift.dk/grafik/3242-corona-alders-og-konsfordeling-pa-dode-i-dk.html
/r/MensRights24/05/20 11:14 AM
1

I haven’t seen actual rigorous statistical analyses with a decent methodology in place. There are of course popular articles such as: https://girlpowermarketing.com/statistics-purchasing-power-women/ I don’t this can stand for scientific scrutiny. Even though women spend the money to how large a degree are they the decision maker? It’s really drills down to the power balance in male-female couples’ relations. Feminists have always argued that men unfairly have more influence and power in society…
/r/MensRights23/05/20 08:43 AM
2

This is already in effect. There has been numerous studies of the pay gap and most - if not all - conclude that men earn more because of their choices. A man will have a stronger tendency to make choices that result in higher salary compared to a woman. Men also deliver more hours for their job than comparable women. Why are men striving for economic success? Women prefer economically well off men. Why? A man with sufficient ressources available will be better for their common offspring. In a re…
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter