TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

marcos_de_santos Archive

View 15 posts and 179 comments by marcos_de_santos on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
62

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights09/03/11 06:39 AM
48

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights12/04/11 01:06 AM
47

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:39 AM
33

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights17/04/11 11:14 PM
19

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights16/06/11 10:09 AM
16

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights17/05/11 03:19 PM
11

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights11/03/12 11:55 PM
11

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights05/04/11 11:54 PM
10

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights11/05/11 01:13 PM
10

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:14 PM
4

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights13/05/11 09:38 PM
3

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights29/05/11 11:42 AM
2

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights20/05/11 03:31 AM
1

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights22/05/11 03:30 PM
0

marcos_de_santos/r/MensRights19/07/11 09:09 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Absolutely right. and please put them in prison and onto death row, too. http://human-stupidity.com/science/evolution-psychology-darwin/male-reproductivelosers-overlooked-by-feminists Quotas lead to serious hardship for men and injustices http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/political-correctness-stupid-dogma/promotion-stop-for-men-at-siemens-to-achieve-voluntary-women-quota human-stupidity documented that women can not compete with men in tennis, chess, snooker and even cooking and advocates…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 09:23 AM
2

of course there could be a reason. (if the example is true) They know that women will work shorter hours, will be too emotional, will need paid pregnancy leave, will file harassment lawsuits, etc So maybe they have good reasons to prefer men ........
/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:43 PM
5

exactly. And the type of rape he is being accused is a female perversion of the law. Regretted sex because they found out he had other lovers. And maybe he did not use a condom but she could have stopped it.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 02:56 PM
2

The question about rape is very theoretical, about extreme situations of total lawlessness the fact that women, in our actual society, are willing to "forget" the pill to get a guy to pay for 20 years is more worrying. This is a real threat and happens every day. No breakdown of law and order, no catastrophe is needed.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:35 PM
1

Right. Lots of people would loot, especially when needy and hungry and when all order broke down. Lot of people would take money and gold that they found when there is no danger of taking it. Rape actually exists in lots of animals (check youtube for rape in ducks). In war and other extreme situation rape is quite frequent.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:33 PM
1

Sorry, it is all in German. Please try google translation. The new custody right law is necessary because of a decision of the constitutional court. That court, in 2010, stated that men clearly have major legal disadvantages, and that women not always have the best interest of the child in mind. Nobody ever questions if couples or women deserve to get custody. But unmarried fathers are always seen with suspicion.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 05:26 PM
16

Obama himself discriminates Based on these calculations, Obama’s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama’s average male employee earned $54,397. Obama’s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average. http://www.seattlepi.com/local/opinion/article/Obama-only-talks-good-game-on-gender-pay-equity-1284942.php
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:08 AM
4

Obama’s first cover-up: the gender wage gap myth
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:07 AM
6

EU plans tough quotas to put women in the boardroom. Are politicians too stupid to understand the wage gap lie statistics? Are politicians too stupid to understand Warren Farrell‘s debunking of the wage gap myth? Or are they misleading on purpose? See reddit about the wage gap quotas http://exposingfeminism.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/the-wage-gap-myth-harriet-harman-and-manipulation-of-statistics/
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:06 AM
4

They are useful idiots for the politicians who would love to see our legal protections eroded away. WOULD love to see? They have been eroded away, there is no due process for men accused of rape. Guilty unless they can prove they did not rape. And guilty of rape even if he can prove she consented (because consent can always be invalidated)
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:38 AM
13

A police spokesman said Sex Crimes Investigation Branch detectives had thoroughly investigated and were satisfied no sexual offence occurred. They are satisfied. Pussy pass for the teen. Police are satisfied. The case was so weak there was no doubt. Still no explanation why it was a false report. "Police want to assure residents who live in the Aldinga Beach area that there are no ongoing concerns for public safety in relation to this matter," he said. except concern for men's safety. And police…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:20 AM
1

Olympus has a tradition of making good recorders. But smartphones do it pretty well, too. You can even get external microphones, or use the microphone on your headset.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:07 PM
5

the article is ok. Very ok. The feminists described in the article are not ok and get people upset.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:05 PM
1

I mentioned that above. Men in martial arts choking women is not a feat. Nothing to brag about. Women tough enough to choke men is rare. And choking in MMA, Jiu Jitsu etc is nothing serious. You get choked, tap out and that is it. Unless it is a very serious fight, and even then not much happens with a choke.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 03:59 PM
3

really. Brilliant. All upvote. And read the article!!
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:19 AM
1

thanks for the links and the info. Fits with my comment above that choking someone till they tap is a normal feature of Judo, JiuJitsu and MMA.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:15 AM
6

Right. In martial arts you choke people. Till they tap out. Or till the judge stops the fight. This is totally normal, within the rules, and inoffensive. Not dangerous because any normal person taps out early, at least outside important fights. Much less dangerous then punches and kicks that can do uncontrollable damage. And a girl that fights men and chokes them is a rare accomplishment. So looking at the t shirt from this point of view, probably nobody intended it to be an offense to men's rig…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:14 AM
3

interesting info. thanks
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:02 AM
4

that is actually amazing and unexpected. Maybe it is because women think they can get away with it and men are scared shitless of sex accusations? It does not make sense that women rape a lot more then men. Or maybe when women have the absolute power, in prisons, that changes? Or it has to do with the definition of "rape". maybe consensual sex with staff is always rape?
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:59 AM
7

especially if the school had no clear guilt or omission in this issue. Or maybe they invented some omission in school policy that caused the rape to happen. Would be interesting to see the civil 1.5 mio verdict
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:57 AM
5

the accuser was black too, correct? The important thing here is that the accused is a MAN. They get white men just the same when accused by women of any race. Just compare Strauss Kahn
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:55 AM
0

6 years of his life, potentially ass raped. Or having sex with men voluntarily for lack of women.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:54 AM
4

Don't they give financial rewards for rape accusers in Britain? Isn't there something similar in India? Oh, and when it is proven wrong, they still don't need to return it?
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:53 AM
12

right. But kind of the opposite. When they murder and then come forward, then they should away unpunished or with some slap on the wrist. After all we want to encourage murderers to come forward and to confess. Punishing confessing murderers would dis-encourage others from coming forward. Thanks for inspiring me to post this.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:51 AM
4

Great article. All upvote. And find some ways to convince your senators to vote against it. Any chance the Paycheck Fairness Act will not happen? It is like VAWA. Feminist lies always pervade and win. Why?
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:58 PM
1

There are plenty of links to Brazilian law web sites, major Brazilian press organs. It is the Brazilian supreme court. It is Brazilian law. Further projects to worsen the law are in the senate. The only hope: there is some resistance in society. And there is a possible appeal, as Brazil has millions of legal appeals. But don't put much hope in it, the decision is not far fetched and in line with the law.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 02:54 PM
1

right. Ever seen boot camp? Males seem to be able to take abuse. Even appreciate that the abuse is for their own good. Take sports. Men get yelled at all the time to surpass their limits. In martial arts they get yelled at and beaten.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 09:51 AM
1

keep the life style even if she never had it because she had a few one night stances with him. ridiculous
/r/MensRights22/04/12 08:40 AM
1

I once saw a listing. Private school. 3 private drivers in 8 hour shifts to take them to the country club, shopping mall and private language and luxury sports classes and violin or piano classes. Of course, only designer clothes. It could be possible to spend this. Now I doubt mom will spend all this on the kid, and she herself live on McDonalds hamburgers and use the bus Now to be serious. If a rich guy bangs a relatively poor woman, who lives on 2 minimum wages, she should get by on one minim…
/r/MensRights22/04/12 08:38 AM
7

and he would arrest you for verbal abuse, I guess. If you either make her feel uncomfortable by calling her names, or god beware, even yell so she fears for her life. PC is so dangerous because it starts with a real problem (men seriously dominating, intimidating, beating forcing women) and then goes down the slippery slope to men verbally "abusing" women to men scaring women by inviting them for dinner repeatedly.
/r/MensRights22/04/12 08:24 AM
2

No proof needed. Gender is socially constructed and men and women are equal. All else is sexism /s Well, of course, this dogma is only enforced when it suits women. Like for quotas in top job positions. Somehow it is totally forgotten when it would be to women's detriment, like demanding quotas for women in jail, work deaths, homelessness.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 09:11 AM
4

Men have given their opinion for Millennia when the patriarchy was in full power repressing women's rights and women's voice and women's opinion. So it is more then fair to finally listen to women and to over-rule the voice of the privileged men. /s
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:43 AM
2

he has a point. Feminists have a history of fighting for what they think is right (even if it is blatantly sexist and biased) Men don't stand up for other men or men in general. So reddit is a good start, and it raises awareness. But women go out on the street and to Oprah, organize boycotts and demonstrations, call politicians and go to press organs. Mens rights has a long way to go
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:38 AM
0

If someone made 19 false rape claims, that does not mean the she can not be raped the 27th time /s Try to make 19 false claims of fire, or lf robbery and see what will happen to you and who will care about your 20th claim. Even if London is on fire, she wouldnot be believed
/r/MensRights16/04/12 03:44 AM
2

Unless you allege that 34 % of the nurses were actually raped, the study clearly shows that LOTS of women get bruises when having normal sex. And it does not need 34 %, because 1% would cast reasonable doubt on a rape conviction based on vaginal bruising. so there is a HUGE margin for errors that still would not invalidate the study.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:55 AM
54

This is a serious issue. Can't ACLU or similar institute take his case? Can someone publish this in politics, human rights and other reddits?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 01:03 PM
2

right. But in this series they really show vicious female serial killers of babies, elderly, relatives, etc It never ends, though they seem to be only trailers.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 11:57 PM
14

What about men being required to wear suits and ties even in tropical climate? And of course long pants and closed stuffy shoes. As a job requirement! any way to liberate men, too?
/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:10 PM
4

so he seems to have some moral flaws. Good to know But, feminists don't have problem with women who poke holes in condoms or forget the pill to get pregnant and stiffing an innocent guy out of $ 500 k. So, no excuse, but he is not alone.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 11:57 AM
-7

If this is true, this is extremely shocking and very very relevant. And, maybe as "normal" and "socially acceptable" as advice to "forget" birth control. A sign that mensrights is very very much needed to save men from unjustified prison and life long wage slavery for women's socially acceptable lies. BUT Please furnish the complete link & text to your statement. (see "permalink" under the comment) and copy the entire comment in case someone deletes or changes it.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 10:26 AM
3

First he needs to study state law if he can get punished for recording. If yes, he has a problem Second he needs to tape her conviction that she is blackmailing him with a false violence charge. This needs to be well planned to get her to confess. But it is easy as she will react to certain cues. Just say it is unjust, you know I never beat you. If she says "I know, but you deserve being arrested" you have it.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 02:33 AM
-1

a sonogram before abortion is a wise medical decision. Just as a good as doing an x ray before extracting a tooth Not totally necessary but any good physician will do it.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:47 PM
8

tell that to our politicians who care that women are under-represented in politics and high paying workplaces. And who want to ARTIFICIALLY change that, by shortchanging men.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:38 PM
3

and 1% midgets, and 0.2 % with Down syndrome.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:37 PM
3

Just mathematically, the cited article depends on the males and females being randomly selected from the population. If the females are the TOP best of all females in the country, and the MALES likewise, other statistics apply.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:36 PM
3

that article makes a good argument. Probably a desperate argument to defend feminist equality and discrimination claims. The article needs further research to prove or disprove it. Theoretically it depends on sampling. In practice, cooking, fashion etc already seem to disprove it. Only good unbiased (non-feminist) academics can shed further light.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:24 PM
2

that article makes a good argument. Probably a desperate argument to defend feminist equality and discrimination claims. The article needs further research to prove or disprove it. Theoretically it depends on sampling. In practice, cooking, fashion etc already seem to disprove it. Only good unbiased (non-feminist) academics can shed further light.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:24 PM
3

This is the DOGMA. That there is no gender difference. Ahem: except where it is totally obvious. Boxing, weight lifting, etc. And where the difference is obvious, but not blatant, then it is always discrimination and the evil patriarchy. No proof is needed for that. But even if there is moderate proof for gender difference, like in math, or in ambition and competitiveness, it gets denied, it must not be.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:17 PM
3

amazingly even cooking. Certainly not because there are not enough women learning to cook
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:06 PM
2

aren't most of them actually gay? At least gays are over-represented?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:05 PM
2

Thank you. This explains things. Very shocking, misleading, inflammatory article. But getting back to the point, someone with clout should re-try Wikipedia.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:42 AM
1

related: Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases birth rates
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:45 AM
3

Obviously, his wife did not want the information released. The same wife that was the cause of his self immolation. Did Thomas Ball forget to authorize the release of all photos and videos of his act? Or could a good lawyer show that he obviously did not wish for his wife to make such determination. Does he have parents that would speak for him?
/r/MensRights11/03/12 11:56 PM
5

Please cite SPLC's mentioning of Thomas Ball, link and text. Thank you
/r/MensRights11/03/12 11:09 PM
2

It has been said here that Southern Poverty is a powerful organisation that informs US law enforcement and government on terrorism and hate groups. It can lead to serious legal problems.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:38 PM
29

Foley now owes $17,301.30 monthly toward his two children, who are both now teenagers: the $10,700 in child support agreed to in 2001, now raised to $12,301.30 to reflect cost of living increases, plus $5,000 a month toward the overdue $589,000 he already owes. For a performer, that means that once taxes and a 20 per cent commission are factored in, he has to earn $40,000 per month, he figures, before he can see a dime. http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/television/article/952260--comedian-dav…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 11:07 AM
8

Government may even emit false ID, the man still is supposed to know. Strict liability was never meant to be applied when the man has been officially misled by government. Government-emitted ID proves she is 20. Men could not know she is 15, but will go to prison for underage sex, child porn
/r/MensRights10/03/12 11:02 AM
2

Nobody would punish women. Of course, it is the opposite Women Would Get 42% of Male Pension, if Unsubsidized! Brazilian Retirement Fund for Government Employees to Subsidize Women's Earlier Retirement
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:10 AM
10

Any link somewhere that tells the entire story? A twitter post is not very informative and does not even link to anything. found it http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/television/article/952260--comedian-dave-foley-fears-canadian-arrest-owes-500-000-in-child-support
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:07 AM
4

Angry Harry mentions that it is a financial drain to spend for women's college education if after all most will not practice that profession for a reasonable time with reasonable intensity. He says that it is a serious problem for British health services, that women take away University spots of men who would actually work full time life long as physicians. Extremely politically incorrect. That is why he calls himself www.angryharry.com
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:15 PM
7

feminism is based on being offended. Look at the entire sexual harassment industry
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:57 AM
1

very simple. r/mensrights has feminism in its title. So google correctly recognizes it as a sub-reddit relevant for feminism Very correct. And a result of the choice of title by the r/mensrights founders and moderators. And it correctly attracts people who want to know about feminism. Which is why feminists hate it.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:26 AM
2

it is very simple. The feminist formulation gets asked all the time, with very high frequency. So Google suggests the frequently asked question and suspects a typing error. After all, it still found good answers to the original question.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:24 AM
3

Great phrase! Who invented that?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:21 AM
3

I left already But it is getting like this everywhere. Australia, Canada. And the US is not far behind with so called anti-discrimination laws that discriminate
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:53 AM
7

According to Warren Farrell, male primary school teachers are almost unemployable. He cites anecdotal evidence that in one class cohort all women got hired and no man got a job. Now try to get grant money to research this concisely. Women get hired PREFERENTIALLY in male dominated jobs. Any rare qualified woman engineer or executive gets promoted too quickly in a desperate attempt to get token women in high positions to fight off discrimination law suits.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:28 AM
3

we are telling him the options. He does not know. We don't know. It is a possibility that she is outright lying, or just exaggerating, or just trying to keep the kid away from the man she ended up hating. If we did not consider that possibility, we would be ideologically blinded. You act as if we KNEW she lied. No, we don't. Also we simply have the problem that nowadays almost everything is rape, so we don't know what type of rape has allegedly happened.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:42 AM
0

I already posted this 3 times but it disappeared. Excuse the insensity,but "what kind of rape". 20 different types of rape! It would be helpful if you could tell the entire story. Even allowing for false accusations. Your father was convicted of forcible rape-rape? Or it was "statutory rape", consensual sex with a minor? Or date rape, where she consented but was legally too drunk? Ask some older relatives, your mother's father, mother, sister, best friends to shed light onto the story. If it is …
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:42 PM
1

maybe I try to repost? or will the other comments show up eventually?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:39 PM
1

what kind of censorship is going on here? My comment here has twice been removed instantly. It still can be seen at http://www.reddit.com/user/marcos_de_santos/ Very strange indeed. Many more of my comments have been removed at r/mensrights. any explanation for this?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:52 PM
1

is this getting censored? I posted this once and it disappeared It seems pretty clear that around 6-15% of rape accusations are proven to be blatantly false. 40-60% look false to the police inspectors. But there is no proof. If in doubt, move forward with the accusations. And if in doubt, do NOT charge the potentially false accuser. Way over 50% of rape accusations are false. 7.4% blatantly enough to prosecute (Bavarian Police research report) One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn,…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:47 PM
1

true. Except, women proudly proclaim themselves as sluts on slut walks
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:47 PM
1

It seems pretty clear that around 6-15% of rape accusations are proven to be blatantly false. 40-60% look false to the police inspectors. But there is no proof. If in doubt, move forward with the accusations. And if in doubt, do NOT charge the potentially false accuser. Way over 50% of rape accusations are false. 7.4% blatantly enough to prosecute (Bavarian Police research report) One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered without due process, escaped…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:40 PM
1

Excuse the insensity,but "what kind of rape". 20 different types of rape! It would be helpful if you could tell the entire story. Even allowing for false accusations. Your father was convicted of forcible rape-rape? Or it was "statutory rape", consensual sex with a minor? Or date rape, where she consented but was legally too drunk? Ask some older relatives, your mother's father, mother, sister, best friends to shed light onto the story. If it is very clear and proven that he was a brutal violent…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:51 PM
10

are you serious? Sex bots need to be protected from objectification. Only female sex-bots, of course. Or they need to be outlawed because they teach men that they can get sex without paying half their income for life /s Male dildos are part of the privileged patriarchy, and as such have no protection against objectification /s
/r/MensRights10/02/12 01:19 PM
7

This is different. Women are a disadvantaged minority. Thus objectification is traumatic to all women Men are part of the privileged patriarchy. Thus they are not protected /sarcasm
/r/MensRights10/02/12 01:16 PM
2

This is a joke. How to sign the Hague convention without ever needing to honor it: However, it also stipulates the court must not order the return of children if one of six criteria are met. The criteria are that the request for the return is filed more than a year after the abduction and the children are used to the current living environment; the plaintiff did not hold custody of the children at the time of the abduction; the plaintiff approved of the "abduction" before or after it happened; t…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:08 AM
4

QUOTES FROM ARTICLE One in four New Zealand women will experience sexual violence in her lifetime, according to the Ministry of Justice. Messages which blame victims of rape and sexual abuse for not taking precautions to prevent their assaults have attracted international criticism through last year’s global SlutWalk movement. “People are raising awareness that these messages are harmful to the survivors of rape and sexual abuse, and that they create myths which allow sexual violence to continue…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:24 AM
6

Any interpretation for the uninitiated? Who is Michael Kimmel? What did the guy write in Men's Rights? Where is the link to Men's Rights in wikipedia?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:21 AM
6

You think you can slap a women. You better have surveillance camera proof that before you slapped her she hit you with a baseball bat on the head. Otherwise it is violence against women, unbailable, unforgiveable.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 09:25 PM
18

They got rid of it already. They just try to further increase the burden of proof to prove one's innocence.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 08:43 PM
1

Sorry for the late reply. It is free market: If Mel Gibson comes to your restaurant and offers to do a speech, or a show, or even just to wait tables for half a day, believe me your boss will be happy as a clam if Mel wanted only $50 an hour. If he had a huge luxury restaurant, he glady would be paying $1000 an hour. Voluntarily. Now most likely you are working harder then Mel Gibson's wife who just took half of his money
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:20 PM
3

right. And it also gives some minority (black) athletes a chance to get a college education.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:42 AM
2

The press and public opinion discriminate against men. They give one line to the kiling of 200 men and 20 pages to the rape of 20 women. Furthermore, if you read the article, and see the movie, men are gang raped in massive numbers, over months on end. Anyone ever heard about it? So what does a libertarian say about totally biased one sided reporting in press, NGO's and finally United Nations help organisations?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:37 AM
1

women get ENCOURAGED. The entire sexual harassment industry convinced women that full consent when drunk followed by regret is rape. Or that almost any sex with later regret, or with some mild cajoling is rape. Women get brainwashed into this, for example in college
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:27 AM
1

Some military authority is quoted that there is no such thing as consent with alcohol. People here stated that the military rule is that one drink is too much. also you know that a woman's self reported drunkenness with slight corroboration that she had some drinks usually suffices to create misery for a man. No alcohol test needed. You are right in theory. In practice a rape accusations does not require hard proof of total drunkenness to the point of incapacitation. Not in the military, not in …
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:24 AM
4

Damn. High price for cheating. I think he should give ALL his money as punishment for cheating /sarcasm I thought we had no-fault divorce?
/r/MensRights25/12/11 09:58 AM
5

in a way you are right. But, people give the money to them voluntarily. The movie industry gives the money because they know that the celebrity makes them even more money. So they really deserve the money. A free market throws the money after them. Millions go to the movies, to a large part because of the celebrity and pay $10 each, out of which maybe $0.50 goes to the celebrity. (numbers are guessed)
/r/MensRights25/12/11 09:57 AM
1

you might be right, but links would be good. If you are right, then the hugs, of course, are a delicate balance act so they don't become harassment or sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 01:21 PM
-3

if it looks like a woman, you expect her to be a woman. Not a man in women's clothes, nor a trans. If a man in women's clothes deceived a Lesbian, he would be in jail instantly for rape. She did not consent to be with a man.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 09:43 PM
2

One is a pathological aberration of one's sexual identity. No need to discriminate, but it really is not natural, or normal. And operations and hormones were never available in the past. I call it pathological because it is not normal and creates huge suffering in the person with the mixed sexual identity. Ephebophile, liking 16 year old girls, is built into the human genome and has been normal for millions of years (yes, since chimpanzee times) Sexualization of 15 year old minors was totally no…
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:41 AM
3

right. Privilege creates entitlement attitudes. Nobody wants to give up unjust privileges
/r/MensRights21/09/11 07:36 AM
2

What middle man? Daddy can pay the bills. Bring a car-load of groceries. or demand itemized bills by mom. Mom (or dads, if that ever happens) spending a child's money on herself is nothing but fraud and should lead to felony convictions! Stealing a child's money! how low is this?
/r/MensRights06/09/11 11:52 PM
2

Sure. If you want MY money, maybe you behave. Or else you earn your own money, or decrease your life style. This is female entitlement. Get supported but still be the boss.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 11:42 PM
3

maybe mother should think before the divorce. If she divorces, she will have to adjust her life style. If she wants dad to pay, maybe she needs to convince him. Or give the kid to dad. Divorced woman are the only ones with guaranteed life style. Because married women might have the husband lose his job, or get sick. If you ever get married, let your kids and wife live in poverty, so they never get used to a good life style. Just gamble your money away, or stash it away in a bank. Also, often the…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 11:36 PM
1

upvote for you! This is an example of the perverted system. One party pays, the other one makes the decisions! To either throw out and wate the other's money. Or to save and spend it on her own shopping sprees. He who pays should decide exactly how it is being spent. And get full accounting.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 11:31 PM
9

well, the accuser has been proven to lie everywhere and about everything, including details of what happened right after the alleged rape. Usually about 3 versions of most things. then why should anyone believe that the only thing she did not lie was the time inside the room, where no surveillance video or key card can prove her wrong.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 03:12 AM
8

Great Idea, BUT in fact, all laws are one sided, no women has ever been accused of rape when both were drunk. So you are doing an uphill battle. The discrimination IS LEGALLY institutionalized. Violence against Women Act, Women's studies,, Title IX used to discriminate ......... Nice idea but probably will not work, a privileged class fighting a traditionally repressed class. The same about race: you can have black pride week or black beauty contest in college, but try white pride or Miss White …
/r/MensRights30/07/11 09:53 PM
3

yeah, like men's studies in college, men's health centers, men's shelters against violent spouses /sarcasm
/r/MensRights28/07/11 09:03 AM
9

right. Stick to grannies, or at least over 40 year old women and you can be fairly certain you don't get an under 18 year old.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:55 PM
1

Whenever you have an argument with your wife or girl friend, sleep alone in a well locked room. You will remember me if you don't heed this advice. People like these are the reason many women have to sleep alone because men are too scared to sleep with them. The only alternative would be sleeping with very very tight firm pants. But that does not protect if you are drugged.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:09 AM
2

This guy teaches a course on "Men and Masculinity". They finally make a course similar to "Women's Studies" and put a darn feminist to teach it! About Hugo Schwyzer Hugo Schwyzer has taught history and gender studies at Pasadena City College since 1993, where he developed the college's first courses on Men and Masculinity and Beauty and Body Image. He was for many years the leader of the high school youth program for the largest Episcopal parish in the Western United States. A writer and public …
/r/MensRights15/07/11 09:42 AM
1

feminism opposes equality almost everywhere. So this is equivalent to "oppose feminism"
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:21 AM
1

Links are sometimes needed so we can see the "crap" that is written elsewhere. There should be a way to link "nofollow", to link as a BAD EXAMPLE. Reddit should differentiate between "positive" links and "negative" links, between good examples and bad examples.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 12:18 AM
0

Incest is a major crime. It actually has biological reasons, a major chance of having genetic defects. So incest with a biological son is a major aggravation.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 07:20 PM
-2

oh, good. So rapists can not be forced to undertake a DNA test?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:50 AM
1

In Brazil a drunk driver who just killed a person in an accident can not be forced to undergo a alcohol test. That would be self incrimination.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:49 AM
1

even if they arrest you and/or your customers? If they make your life miserable by judging, condemning, or "saving" you?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:40 AM
1

and to prohibit prostitution without saying so.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:39 AM
0

What this really proves: women should not be in war zones. Imagine men in war zones having to worry about both land mines, bullets, etc and women ready for sexual harassment charges. Alternatively, people in war zones constantly concerned about politically correct language? Very problematic ......
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:05 AM
2

It is the same as Strauss-Kahn. The fact that she lied dozens of times, including about the details of the case, does not prove that she has not been raped. Just say you have been raped. Tell 100 details, 50 of which prove to be a lie. That does not mean you have not been raped. Of course, no other proof.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:00 AM
1

What would have happened to a man doing the same? Police would have been very understanding for the absurdity of an arrest for verbal abuse. And of course, there is a difference: whatever women do is excusable.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:56 AM
4

and d in an alleyway in the middle of the night men are more likely to be beaten up by thugs and injured then women are. Anyone has statistics to prove this?
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:13 AM
1

Right, I said it above and say it again Right. Read the darn article. The woman is extremely positive towards falsely accused men: Still, let me just say this to Mr. Strauss-Kahn or other horny men who think a quickie with someone they don't know at all seems like a good idea: Be careful who you have sex with. Be careful who you are with in a room, alone. Whatever the facts of this matter, having sex with someone you don't know, can't trust, and who may have motives you haven't even dreamt of, i…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 07:49 AM
1

Right. Read the darn article. The woman is extremely positive towards falsely accused men: Still, let me just say this to Mr. Strauss-Kahn or other horny men who think a quickie with someone they don't know at all seems like a good idea: Be careful who you have sex with. Be careful who you are with in a room, alone. Whatever the facts of this matter, having sex with someone you don't know, can't trust, and who may have motives you haven't even dreamt of, is extremely risky.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 07:47 AM
0

All is gender neutral. Boys and girls are the same. At some time they will pull down the briefs and panties and find out there IS a difference. At that time: when a boy pulls down his briefs, they will arrest the boy for indecent exposure. If a girl pulls down her panties, they will arrest the boys who look.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 07:05 AM
1

There are guys that get castrated, there are guys that get kicked in the groin with similar results, there are guys whose face gets so disfigured and whose income drops due to head trauma, that they will never get sex for the rest of their lives. And these are not psychological sensibilities, but real true unsurmountable physical problems.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 12:46 AM
6

even good, honest, just women will be tempted by the absolute power feminist laws give them, to accuse men of rape, abuse, etc. It needs enormous strength of power to never ever abuse this power, even when angered. People should not be given such absolute powers. The laws are wrong. And the laws are being pushed by feminists, though dumb males let themselves be seduced to collaborate.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 09:18 PM
1

male slut: womanizer, philanderer, etc. Strauss Kahn, ......
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:23 PM
1

That looks like a joke ............ belongs into political humor
/r/MensRights02/07/11 10:22 AM
2

being a woman trumps ultra rich. Men, rich or poor, are guilty until proven innocent, in cases regarding sexuality, abuse, against women. Ultra rich increases the chances to escape the feminist injustice system.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:11 AM
1

in sex abuse cases all odds are stacked against the man, even if innocent. So sometimes it is easier to plea bargain to get a low punishment then to fight and get 20 years in jail. See for example Ganarlow Wilson. Unfortunately, even if you did nothing wrong, you might go to jail for a long time. OJ Simpson got free even though there was plenty of evidence against him. All Blacks think he is innocent, whites think he did it.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 10:10 AM
3

That is clear proof of discrimination. Don't you know that males and females are equal in all respects? That is why we have quota for politicians and CEOs. So obviously, this is due to discrimination.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 08:52 AM
0

if you have sex with a piss drunk regular partner or a girl that clearly consented to sex before and during the party, then there is no rape whatsoever. If the girl clearly consents but is a bit too drunk, rape is also far fetched. Certainly not as bad as spiking the drink of an unwilling girl. After all, girls drink on purpose in order to lose inhibition for sex. The only clear case of rape is when a woman is clearly unconscious, and you know better that she would not consent if she was awake. …
/r/MensRights18/06/11 12:36 PM
-5

go to r/libertarian This is about being able to do what you want, even in unconventional ways, without government or authority interference. probably a borderline men's rights issue. Actually feminists are very sympathetic to gay, transgendered, and similar. How would he go to the school dance? as a girl, with a guy? in dress with another girl? There once was the naked guy, defending his right to go to college nude. He got in trouble even at Berkeley.
/r/MensRights18/06/11 11:56 AM
7

sadly, you are right. Still, I feel bad about following this suggestion. Maybe he should have set himself ablaze inside family services, or blown himself up in there? Violence is wrong, but if you are getting fucked over and raped by the system, maybe it is self defense.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 05:24 AM
-1

Men are increasingly avoiding marriage and even cohabitation, leaving women who desire a loving relationship with a man alone. Did anyone ever research as to how feminism and number of offspring correlate? could this be why Western Society is dying out? The lower class women and men that pump out babies by the dozen usually are not feminists! Just as as feminists treat men as potential abusers and rapists, men are treating women as potential plaintiffs and false accusers. This means that men are…
/r/MensRights16/06/11 10:16 AM
1

5 points (56% like it) 23 up votes 18 down votes This proves how many rabid feminists are here. Nobody else could read the Urban Dictionary links here and not agree that Urban Dictionary's definition of Masculinist (and MRA) is dismissive, derisive and overall insulting totally right. And it shows once more then women must not be offended in the slightest ways. But that it is legit to offend and hurt men. MRA 820 up, 506 down buy mra mugs, tshirts and magnets = Men Run Amok The most screaming an…
/r/MensRights16/06/11 09:31 AM
1

Well, people who walk their Rolexes and wads of cash in the ghetto are not really asking to be robbed. They just enjoy showing off It just so happens that these people get robbed more often then those that have cheap watches and hide their cash and use credit cards. It is actually amazing how well the waving cash analogy fits the slutty dress case.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 08:26 PM
-3

From the article: The Toronto policeman who in January told a "personal security class" at York University that "people should avoid showing off their money and carrying large amounts of cash in order not to be victimized" said nothing unusual. What made news was what happened 10 weeks later, when a thousand people hit the streets of East Los Angeles in a "money slut walk". These money-slut walkers are simple fighting for their right show off their money These 'slut walk' women are simply fighti…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:02 PM
0

It is a HUGE difference if a) you put a dangerous medicine into somebody's drink to commit premeditated rape, risking bodily harm or death if you dosage it wrong b) having sex with a drunk chick that later passes out and blames you. Can you not see the difference?
/r/MensRights13/06/11 08:55 PM
2

actually, thinking about, this facebook conversation would be only "hearsay" and not a proof in normal court of law. No grounds for a conviction but grounds for an investigation to see if there is corroborating evidence
/r/MensRights11/06/11 10:13 AM
2

actually, did she break any law? She might have truly believed that the husband's statements were true and thus would have a reason. The only sin was to have used dirty tricks to try to get information out of him. Not a crime. Don't downvote. Occasionally women's behavior is just sleazy and not criminal.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 10:12 AM
2

great. they exonerated many innocent men jailed for rape accusations. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/rapists-proven-innocent-are-majority-57-of-prisoners-released-by-innocence-project
/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:53 AM
3

so scared she asked her father to drive her to work?? To protect her against militarily organized machine gun toting mass murdering drug gangs? She risks her father being viciously tortured to death. She should be declared legally insane. She might as well get a chihuahua as a guard dog for the police station. "saying publicly she was not targeting the cartels". WTF is she doing then as a police chief? And then they say "a women who defied the cartel's assassins"? WTF
/r/MensRights08/06/11 08:29 AM
0

Posted it here! please help voting and commenting. http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/duplicates/hu8gy/bbc_news_mens_prisons_should_close_men_should_not/
/r/MensRights08/06/11 01:52 AM
1

Legalizing Child Pornography reduces child sex abuse crimes (Scientific study by Dr. Milton Diamond, U. Hawaii) Kendall (in press) conducted an in-depth analysis of possible relationships between society, pornography, rape and the Internet for the state of California. Kendall found that the arrival of the Internet, while not seeming to have an effect on other crimes, was associated with a reduction in rape incidence. After checking the results for the effects of the extent of porn use, user mari…
/r/MensRights06/06/11 06:39 AM
1

Can't you just pay a nearby certified day care center anyway and send the receipt. Of course, you should notify her by certified mail. But, I believe it is normal standard and tolerated by courts that women live off child support money.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 08:11 AM
1

she just honestly says what feminist women think. Feminism is crazy.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 02:52 AM
2

please furnish some links to see what really happens. Any mens rights site reporting about the case??
/r/MensRights29/05/11 08:47 PM
4

the boyfriends are taken away due to age of consent laws. Otherwise good honest law abiding men are not taken away from their loving girl friends and children by the arm of the law.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 07:34 PM
1

If you have several witnesses to attest a violent forcible rape has happened, then the case is clear cut. If you have only one witness and no corroborating evidence in a non-rape crime, then nobody would convict.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 11:50 AM
0

Where are the 30% female quotas for jails, homeless, workplace deaths, garbage collectors? This cherry picking would be funny, if it were not endorsed by the highest political and legal authorities.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 12:59 AM
2

in other crimes you can have several witnesses corroborating the story and thus get a conviction. In rape cases, there is ONE witness, the accuser, no other witness, no corroborating proof, and not even certainty that any crime was committed. That is the difference.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 09:06 PM
0

The average Joe could not afford a top lawyer, nor paying several armed guards for 24 hour surveillance. If it were us, we would remain in jail
/r/MensRights20/05/11 03:32 AM
0

well, women get encouraged to file false rape claims because a) the men gets punished instantly b) she is always believed c) if they find out she lied, she gets a little slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 12:39 AM
3

arrest millions of people. Definitely everyone who forwarded it Maybe also everyone who received it and did not report to police. 2 Million people for 4 years jail, that will be good for prison company stock investment.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:30 PM
3

Certainly, men don't unite and men don't demonstrate. Until it is too late. Where there ever demonstrations for John Wayne Bobbit? There certainly were lots of demonstrations in favor of slicing Lorena! What about a demonstration not to put famous men into jail based on unproven allegations of a chamber maid. Or not to convict anyone except on proof beyond reasonable doubt. And the right to cross-examine your accuser.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 05:25 PM
1

This title is misleading, after you cut out the ending. I thought she gave the money for a DNA test of another family. In Britain you can go to jail for taking a true DNA test of your own child (provided you are a man, of course)
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:55 AM
1

well then someone pick up some court cases and document them. http://human-stupidity.com/pt/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/men-pay-child-support-even-if-fraud-deceit-lie-rape
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:23 AM
3

Rapists are nuts and criminals But the following are men's rights issues redefining the word rape so that almost anything a man does with a woman is called rape violating human rights and constitution by suspending due process and presumption of innocence of men accused of rape a woman crying "rape" is enough to lock up a man for months. No proof whatsoever is needed. Special rights for women. Nobody gets locked up if someone cries "robbery", "theft", "murder" if there is no proof, if it is not …
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:00 AM
-1

Did you see at 2X? Really gender neutral! "Parent" Parent who burned baby daughter to death in the microwave finally convicted after THREE trials (f4e.com.au) submitted 1 hour ago by liztuu4 http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/hb9ct/parent_who_burned_baby_daughter_to_death_in_the/
/r/MensRights14/05/11 04:37 PM
3

You normally have well thought out comments. But here seems your emotions are blinding you. He does not just ejaculate and leave. All his kids and wives (except the divorced wives who were disobedient) live in his house. He probably works from his house. So true, he can not give hours per day individual attention to a single child. But he might give more attention then some working fathers in the US, and certainly more then fathers that the US or European mother got a restraining order against. …
/r/MensRights13/05/11 10:04 PM
2

Did you read the story? he feeds them all and all the wives are happy. When they arrested him his wives demonstrated in his favor, and they all defended him in court. He only demands obedience. He knows something we don't. He does not get a false rape accusation, nothing.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 09:44 PM
4

Only the man gets arrested. Draconian absurd punishment. No victims. On the opposite, impoverished women make money without touching a man or leaving the country or running any danger. Men in the US are even prevented from having contact with women through web cams.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 01:17 PM
1

rapes per capita: per year? per lifetime? Probably per year, but does it say so? Per capita of females? of males? of males plus females?
/r/MensRights07/05/11 07:02 PM
1

http://www.vdare.com/taylor/080814_military.htm this older article is much better and more detailed. Makes it quite clear. Mixing high testosterone dare devil soldiers with women does not work. And the argument, about men not being able to listen to injured women's screams, and about taking too much risk to save a woman. Very true. So even if they could pass at EXACTLY the same standards as men, they should not be allowed to mix. If anything, they can try to have a women only batallion. If they …
/r/MensRights05/05/11 09:17 AM
10

‘Under no circumstances shall the child support paid by Charlie for Bob and Max be less than the child support paid by Charlie to Denise Richards for Sam and Lola.’ Of course, all the money will be used exclusively for the kids, that is for sure. Pure jealousy. 2 women competing against each other who will take more money from poor Charlie. How much money does he make? How much money will he make in 10 years? Maybe we will see him in jail once he can not afford 2x 55 000 to his two ex wives. Of …
/r/MensRights03/05/11 07:17 AM
6

maybe the laws are wrong. Maybe women are less competitive and have less desire to train like maniacs to become champions. What do they get out of it? Great improvement of reproductive success? Nope. On the opposite, top athletes probably have too low a body fat percentage to be even fertile (which probably does not make them more attractive to the average male). Men should demand equal number of magazine cover photos as women. They don't do it because men themselves don't want to see men on mag…
/r/MensRights02/05/11 10:10 AM
1

I forgot: there are probably less women WANTING to box, play football etc. Should we compensate this with synchronized swimming? Is there research on how many women want to be championship athletes compared to how many men? Male champions get admired by women and are extremely attractive to women. They get lots of pussy. I doubt that women's world champion athletes can compete with a Playboy Centerfold in attractiveness to men. It is just less attractive to them. So it is natural for men to grav…
/r/MensRights02/05/11 10:03 AM
7

The problem is that women cannot compete against men in sports. Not a chance. The don't run as well as men, certainly can not box against them, a world champion women's soccer team would be defeated by 5th league men's team, etc. So almost nobody pays to see women play soccer. I haven't seen women command $ 30 million transfer fees in soccer or basketball. Anyone alleges discrimination here or just facts of free market? Maybe people need to be forced to watch equal amount of women's boxing and p…
/r/MensRights02/05/11 09:50 AM
1

see my comment below: if you approach her directly and talk about the situation, she will be calmer. Or if you somehow overtake her in a non-threatening way and then jokingly ask her why SHE is following you.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:14 PM
2

No pickup artists here? You could approach her and say you are sorry it looks like you are following, but it seems you just have the same destination. Or you can somehow overtake her (without being threatening, run on the other side) and then be AHEAD of you. After a while you stop and ask her "why are you following me?". Either way, it diffuses the situation. And you might get a date too. Even though I will get downvoted, I want to stressL Women's reaction is understandable. How would you react…
/r/MensRights24/04/11 06:13 PM
11

how come she does not go to jail for fraud before a court of law?
/r/MensRights17/04/11 09:31 PM
1

gets you in jail in Britain. In other countries it is just plain invalid. Not even reason enough to request a court ordered DNA test in Germany.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 05:09 AM
9

Minor buys a house or car: invalid Minor agrees to sex: invalid Minor agrees to 20 years of child support payments: VALID, Minor did not agree to 20 years of child support: has to pay anyway
/r/MensRights16/04/11 05:08 AM
3

and if it was not his semen and he failed to oppose immediately, he might have to pay for life, too. Men can't win.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 05:01 AM
3

Did she disinfect the toes first? On top of the sadistic sexual abuse, it is a infection health hazard, to lick toes with street dust and dirt.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 02:10 AM
2

Did you read the story? do you need more information? The headline here is not enough!
/r/MensRights12/04/11 02:08 AM
4

RawLikeCocaine: this is not the only crazy woman. For 100 years women have pushed legislation to give special rights to women and take away constitutional legal rights from men for That one woman is just an example
/r/MensRights09/04/11 03:46 PM
1

your link is great, thanks, but the title you gave is a bit unfortunate.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 08:22 AM
-1

great. One sensible voice who sees the spoiled brat who wants his convenience above security. Even if there were possible excesses in need to be addressed, safety is first.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 02:38 PM
1

Why is this a men's right issue? It is a politics issue, and has to do with safety. It is easy to complain, until the next plane gets blown up or kidnapped and flown into a terrorist target (white house, nuclear plant, ....) Everyone here has complaints. Nobody comes up with an alternative solution. Is the only alternative everyone has to suggest to reduce safety? or maybe do what is being done, but with highly qualified security personell that costs triple the salary? Who will pay? Or are you s…
/r/MensRights07/04/11 01:22 PM
1

why do the court ranscripts cost $3000? At 5 cents per copy, 2000 pages cost US$ 100! Are the making major profit from selling transcripts?
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:35 PM
2

Sounds right, BUT The woman can stop sex at any time The married man is forced to pay all the time, non stop And he is supposed not to seek sex elsewhere Sound unjust. One sided When the woman refuses sex on a regular basis the man should be free to seek it elsewhere, and take his money elsewhere
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:32 PM
1

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_n31_v10/ai_15674644/pg_3/?tag=content;col1 Here is a 10 part article about the same case. Extremely detailed!
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:26 PM
1

Women are solely responsible for the child Women can afford to support the child on their own ====> man has to pay This is a general tendency. If the woman fertilizes herself secretly, if she lies about birth control, etc., always the man has to pay. Even if his money is not needed. I would even understand that it is in the best interest of the child that the man pay up, if mother is broke and the child is starving. Would be unjust but could be called a necessity. But if mother can perfectly wel…
/r/MensRights06/03/11 10:34 AM
2

A woman with a motive to lie. She is getting evicted for non-payment. She has a low life boyfriend who is in jail. So she probably has character problems. The jury does not believe her. But, of course, women don't lie, so the jury is sending a wrong message.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 11:01 AM
2

This proves once more that women are dangerous and violent.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 11:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter