TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

markov_antoni Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by markov_antoni on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Actually this is not that insane. In fact you seem to be sticking to a structural explanation instead of any kind of conspiratorial narrative, and you do accurately weild NYT's known incentives and market constraints with appropriate disclaimers of your doubts. Given the tone of 'the dialogue' at the time, and the rise of Covid, the BLM protests, etc. it is actually very likely that NYT was doing this out of a sense of optimizing their brand for maximum market capture of anyone who leans more le…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 11:00 PM
2

Sharing is caring!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 04:32 AM
3

Idk, the wording seems like they are trying to frame the shooting as some kind of diconnected counter example that proves she brought positive value to feminism. "She may have shot Warhol, but don't let her attempted murder overshadow how she wrote 50-100 pages about eliminating men from existence." type of framing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 04:32 AM
8

Valerie Solanas is a better example imho, I agree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 03:27 PM
1

Being romantically attached to an abuser is not exactly "doing nothing".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/25 12:51 PM
11

Just think about the Duluth Model as an example. If the cops are called over domestic violence and decide to make an arrest, they will arrest the man. It does not matter if he is the abuse victim, if he is the one covered in defensive wounds and bruising while she's totally fine, it doesn't even matter if he is unconscious and bleeding out when they put the cuffs on. That should be more than enough to show: if men's right's advocates allow advocacy to be read as open conflict or use conflict as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 06:15 PM
4

It's more than brain size differences dude. No the human brain is not truly sexually dimorphic, but there are empirically proven distinctions between the two that involve more than the physical scale of the organ. "The amygdala, hippocampus, planum temporale and insula display sex differences." "The prevalence, age of onset, and symptomatology of many neuropsychiatric conditions differ between males and females." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3969295/ Despite how sex explains only abo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 04:16 PM
2

You can downvote me all you like but your position is still self evidently absurd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 03:51 PM
6

Yeah totally, the 10-15% greater volume the male brain grows into is just the misogyny/misandry lobes reaching full maturity. 🙄
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 03:49 PM
3

I don't think anyone here is in favor of twisting our own arms into confronting misandry directly every time we encounter it. We are a minority position of a minority position, it doesn't benefit us to try to confront our way to our goals. In fact I think there is real merit in the ability to recognize these sleights of rhetorical/moral hand in real time, without needing to make a scene about it. Structural misandry is predicated on framing confrontational men as dangerous and those they confron…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 03:46 PM
6

When I was a feminist it was the singular mindset of every male feminist I knew, so I'm speaking from direct experience. Not a generalization. Being a feminist requires the demonization of men, to do that as a man they have to externalize that demonization as abstract generalizations about 'other' or 'bad' men. Never found one exception who didn't end up leaving the movement explicitly. Can't help but notice you replied to this and not my comment about the Duluth Model.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 02:46 PM
3

Literally every single feminist man qualifies as this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 01:24 PM
3

It's just honesty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 01:24 PM
12

Well, we don't expect a feminist to understand. You still think the Duluth Model has merit ffs, so yes you are screwing over men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 01:23 PM
5

Contra is pretty gross on Israel so... pass.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 01:21 PM
10

Vaush and his community have always been a pack of useless douches, so this is no surprise
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 01:17 PM
1

I'm talking about parental surrender, or just rights to our own bodies. Women don't get drafted, your consent for what happens to your body matters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/25 01:56 PM
1

As in my principles don't revolve around vaginas or people who have them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/25 01:54 PM
2

You can't just handwave this away as 'diversity and complexity', that is an oversimplistic misportrayal. It is not diverse or complex for a movement to give platforms, support, and credibility for both trans activists and TERFs - that is just incoherent hypocrisy at best. It also carries the non-zero chance of being malicious, since TERFs are inarguably a hate group even by feminism's own biased standards. The only 'strength' that provides is the capacity to launder fear hate and ignorance as li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 06:21 PM
2

So what tf are you doing here aside from trying to invalidate our grievances, insult our intelligence, and repeat empty threats about how much more ostracized and unpopular we could become if we don't march in lockstep with your self defeating bs?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 06:10 PM
1

What reproductive rights do men have?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 05:24 PM
14

Are you for fucking real? Chopping male baby's dicks has nothing to do with hatred towards and dehumanization of men? Mass conscription of men that forces them to die and kill other men for the benefit of people nowhere near the front lines has nothing to do with hatred towards and dehumanization of men? Teaching men that they need to submit to the will of an invisible imaginary being or else they get ostracized or abused by the faithful has nothing to do with hatred towards and dehumanization o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 02:44 PM
8

Men can be misandrists too dude.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 02:08 PM
8

I don't have any principles preventing me from criticizing feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 01:23 PM
14

It's so very clear what I am saying. Only to you. Do you want to be part of a hate movement? So unless we repress our emotions we automatically become a hate movement? You really don't think there is ANY room for expressing how those who harm us make us feel without collapsing into a nebulous organization dedicated to the destruction of others? How about one that doesn't end up making things better for anyone because it alienates potential allies? If they cannot bear to tolerate our full emotion…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 08:17 PM
10

Why? What is the purpose for repressing our own emotions? Is the reaction of anger and contempt against those who harm us invalid to you, or just the expression of it? What are you so afraid of, discovering that other men share those feelings too?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 07:59 PM
19

That... They allow all sorts of hate in their midst without policing it, as long as it hate that they deem ok. ... is tone policing. Curating what groups are and are not ok to criticize and hate is a form of tone policing. 🤷‍♂️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 07:55 PM
28

They're some of the most censorious and vindictive subs on the whole site, what do you mean they don't tone police? They often ban us from their subs just for joining this sub, how is that not tone policing? Feminism as a whole is very active in curating its talking heads and talking points for very strict ideological conformity against men or men's interests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 07:48 PM
28

I've noticed this sub has seen a huge uptick in extreme negativity towards feminism and even leftism as a whole lately. Got any examples? No? Of course they deserve to be called out. So are you upset about this sub critiquing feminism or leftism, or not? But we need to realize this: leftists and feminists aren't the only ones who deserve to be called out. Has anyone in this sub claimed otherwise? For some reason, this sub is conveniently ignoring the elephant in the room that's currently trampli…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 07:44 PM
1

That's the age old question of governance itself, remaining unanswered for the totality of written and oral history of our species. "Who will watch the watchers?" My point is that removing transaction from politics is so out of reach that it can only be achieved after first achieving the almost mythic ideal of institutionalized egalitarianism. Only from a basis of absolute equality can political action be taken for the direct positive outcomes the action yields for the public good, instead of fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 02:18 PM
10

The ratio is itself a result of how women treat men. If men were not demonized for approaching women in public to try to make connections in person, the dating apps would not have become popular to begin with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 08:04 PM
16

What is there to address though? The utter lack of up to date regulation for social media companies, and the need to classify the services of such companies as a type of addictive drug. That doesn't seem like something that can be changed unless you made women more open to using dating apps. The dating apps arose because of the rising stigma against men approaching women in practically every irl space where people meet each other. Because men are not allowed to show desire for women in public wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 06:45 PM
20

Um... did you read the post? The complaint was not "women on dating apps won't date me". The complaint was that dating apps and social media are fundamentally toxic due to asymmetries and inequities in the attention economy, and yet men's rights advocates face a lot of resistance against addressing this from feminist voices because a lot of women get an addictive ego boost from the same toxic attention economy that severely damages men emotionally. So it serves as an example of how feminism clai…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 06:28 PM
17

This is the top post in this sub right now: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/nVEiUivT0q
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 06:14 PM
27

Let's start with the Duluth Model. Ever heard of it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 05:47 PM
31

I don't recognize any of these claims as active movements I've seen. Are you sure you're not conflating actual male advocacy with the greivance culture war grifters?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 05:46 PM
5

Politics is transactional. Let's focus on one mess at a time, we're not going to excise transaction from politics any time soon. Arguably that task is impossible before egalitarianism is institutionalized anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 03:34 PM
15

One of the biggest problems feminism has is that there are no coherent standards for what is and is not feminism. So whenever a feminist for example creates a model of domestic abuse that literally defines male victims of abuse out of existence, gets that model proliferated across law enforcement and social work institutions on the international scale, and is celebrated as a feminist hero the entire time for doing so - feminist cheerleaders can claim that person is not a feminist and thus the ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 03:32 PM
20

Where do you think rights come from? The flowery fields of your imagination? Rights are social constructs, defined actualized and enforced by social contracts. The very least women could have done was thank men by fighting for our rights too. Instead you got the rights you wanted, refused to hold the Democrat party accountable to the task of institutionalizing RoeVWade as law instead of just judicial precedent for 50 years, and blame men alone for the GOP when the GOP depends on women to survive…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 03:23 PM
4

Yeah I don't see any problem with this. Hell, I know half a dozen men who would literally march to war for this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 03:11 PM
8

If whites and Christians get their version of the Duluth Model they would finally have a point. But because institutions measurably do not operate under prejudices that harm whites or Christians, they do not have any evidence they are being persecuted by any structure of hostility against them. They are facing a lot of social hostility these days, but that's not a real substrate a serious liberation movement can grow out of, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of that hostility was essentially …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 03:09 PM
9

I can get behind universal policies without a second thought. It's the "rights for me but not for thee" stuff that gets me to abandon ship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 01:59 PM
5

Don't worry, I don't judge. I used to think similarly, not that I am claiming to be more mature. Just, worn out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 01:52 PM
21

Feminists themselves are some of the most homophobic people I know. They're the ones going around claiming gay men hate women. They're the ones who haven't ejected TERFs from their movement. Most men fall within typical parameters for masculinity. Gay rights =/= male rights, this is an absurd example of special pleading for the lack of support for men to count as support. Nobody is buying it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 01:05 PM
27

First article is literally about mobilizing men for women's benefit. The second one is less offensive but is still talking about how hard it is to sympathize with men, how feminist's hatred towards men is just a byproduct of our misogyny, ect. It's a start only in that it is marginally better than the typical raw contempt we usually get, but I don't think I'd be able to stay in a room with anyone claiming "free market solutions" are the way forward to gain better rights for either gender. She's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 01:02 PM
19

My principles are egalitarian, not gynocentric. Women have more reproductive rights than men. Helping them instead of demanding more for men is against my principles, and without leverage we cannot expect feminists to care. They never have before after all. I refuse to support those who only harm me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 12:52 PM
28

Feminists were often the strongest allies to the gay liberation movement Not even close to a plurality of men are gay. plenty of feminists have fought for men’s domestic violence and abuse shelters and raised awareness about the rape of boys and men as well as their mental health struggles Who? And how does their work outweigh the work of Mary Koss in the opposite direction? A couple of fringe medium.com articles is a paltry grain of sand compared to the harm feminism has done to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 12:48 PM
26

Contributions like what? The Duluth Model?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 12:46 PM
28

Ask feminists. Doing good for their sake just means aiding their contempt for us. So, why should we help those who only harm us?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 12:45 PM
14

I already say this. Have for quite a while.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 12:43 PM
16

Doin the lord's work here
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 07:32 PM
5

It's given as much leniancy as it has received in part because slavery and indigenous genocide deservingly stole the attrocity stage for American history. But the honeymoon phase cannot last forever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:25 PM
5

Oh I am never frustrated by others' denial. Might as well get frustrated about any other delusion at that point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 11:10 PM
15

I do not believe even plurality of men think women enjoy giving birth. Wtf.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 07:22 PM
34

Widespread and worsening misandry, to summarize. The belief that men are born oppressors, the belief that men prioritize sex above all other interests, the belief that men are natural sexual predators, etc. What else would it be? Over the last few decades women as a collective have become more hostile and dehumanizing towards men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/25 07:19 PM
-12

Oh yeah, act like a baby in front of women to show your confidence. They love men who act like children.
/r/seduction02/10/25 10:32 AM
1

Are these essays a cry for help?
/r/seduction01/10/25 09:13 PM
6

Said it better than I did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 08:34 PM
2

The manosphere is a reaction to a brutal and contradictory system It still participates in and exploits that same system. except that it points the contradictions out, Not the ones that serve its dogma, just like feminists. and advises men on how to navigate them instead of pretending that they don't exist. Except for the contradictions it does pretend do not exist, especially its own contradictions. With some accuracy, it points out how men are affected by the society's pathologizing of masculi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 08:32 PM
1

Nobody but the manosphere can be the source of its own constraints and contradictions. It tells men that they are victims of maleness being pathologized, while pathologizing femaleness. It encourages men to tie their self worth to women's approval, trust, and intimacy, while telling men to never trust women. It is a hate movement for the same reasons radical feminism is a hate movement. The solutions to our problems will not be found in their movement, nor in tolerance for their movement. All th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 05:37 PM
24

If no models are needed, then why is representation necessary in media? Like it or not, human beings learn very efficiently from example. Until we are mature enough to set our own standards for ourselves, the vast majority of people rely on others to exemplify all sorts of roles in life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 05:16 PM
1

why would you be dating them? Because they are insecure. 🥳
/r/seduction29/09/25 08:16 PM
11

You think capitalist societies get more social with time, despite ~200 years of hard evidence that they don't. If you can make yourself believe that you may be able to, one day, make yourself believe you're not a virgin.
/r/seduction29/09/25 08:01 PM
17

Everyone is dirt poor, and getting poorer per capita each year, because of late stage capitalism. Needing to work multiple jobs just to pay the bills doesn't make anyone feel sexier, more confident, or more experienced at the skills needed to attract. It also cuts into the time people could otherwise use to make connections. It's pretty self evident that capitalism is slowly but steadily deteriorating every social skill humans have for most people, which includes seduction.
/r/seduction29/09/25 07:43 PM
5

Post the sources please?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/25 03:43 PM
8

Don't chase in the first place, instead simply pursue. A "chase" is a pursuit where the pursued is moving away from the pursuer as the pursuit progresses. Only make an effort for the people who don't make more distance as you try to get closer. Pro level is when you only make effort for those who are actively moving towards you.
/r/seduction25/09/25 10:33 PM
13

We can hope, but OP hasn't commented on any of the replies as far as I can see
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 09:22 PM
20

Wait, OP already was given an answer by you on this question? Are they asking in bad faith now or...?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 09:05 PM
2

Lol nah, I got better things to do. I don't owe anyone a connection they neglect.
/r/seduction18/09/25 07:07 PM
1

Oh, it's not worse. I just get the impression British folk enjoy the antagonism, so I give it freely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 06:15 PM
4

I mean he's british so he's automatically disqualified imho But more seriously, you want to vent about him?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 07:49 AM
0

Hey - no the fuck I will not. How many of my friends have to die because of the agendas of right wing grifters like JP before you decide that the people who despise him have plenty of good reason to do so? Why don't you take a "give a shit about human lives and dignity pill"? Why does everyone else have to cater to your reflexive defense of hate fueled, active political agents of right wing authoritarianism? The entire right wing and most of the center stands united on the mass murder of Palesti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 02:07 PM
2

I tell her if she wants me she's got to take the initiative, since I'm focusing on women who don't flake.
/r/seduction05/09/25 11:56 AM
1

Rarely is anyone all good or all bad. He's a drug addicted bigot. Where exactly is the 'good', his con to feign value by telling grown men to pick up their rooms? He is a smart and thoughtful dude, No, he's a hack and a fraud. Just a run of the mill hate filled carnival barker. Binary thinking like that is what keeps the world divided and prevents progress and people from working together for a better world The only 'better world' Jordan Peterson can offer is one with one less Jordan Peterson in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 03:50 PM
4

Most of the people who call themselves feminists, in my experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 01:19 PM
4

He was always a bigot, and he still is. Stop making excuses for a narcissistic hateful con artist. The man has produced nothing of real value.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 01:18 PM
3

Amazing counter argument, it's like my years of feeling degraded and objectified by other leftists never happened! 🙄
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/08/25 08:45 PM
2

This is such a bad situation in so many ways it feels like ragebait.
/r/seduction29/08/25 05:08 PM
1

I don't know about 'stud' lol, I leave that to them to judge. I just put in the work and try my best to keep myself open and honest. To be fair, ladies were most prone to do that when I was traveling or in venues that are explicitly about sex/kink and hookups are encouraged. If you're trying to get picked up by women, it's probably not going to happen in places or circumstances where they will see you on a routine basis afterwards. When One Night Stands work for both parties, it's because there …
/r/seduction27/08/25 09:04 PM
0

Partnership is about listening to the person you want to partner with.
/r/seduction27/08/25 01:24 PM
1

Yeah, I wonder what he'd tell the ladies who 'pumped and dumped' me! It's especially funny to me since that kind of logic (that women need to be protected from men who are capable of having sex one night and keeping it professional the next morning) doesn't get a guy very far with a lot of women. It's one thing if he personally wants emotional connection with every partner. That's his choice. Not everyone does though, and so long as people are up front about that then what's the harm?
/r/seduction27/08/25 06:38 AM
21

Um, women like casual sex too lol Like, I've been 'pumped and dumped' by women. Sex is fun. 🤷‍♂️ At least it is if you're good at it anyway.
/r/seduction27/08/25 01:51 AM
4

Isn't that the point of getting 'picked up'?
/r/seduction27/08/25 01:20 AM
0

Society is fucking stupid. It wasn't until the 1990s that society realized black mold is potentially lethal to human beings. Besides, weird people have better sex in my experience.
/r/seduction27/08/25 01:19 AM
1

So... the very people that those women who want a man they are attracted to should listen to the least. Lol
/r/seduction27/08/25 01:15 AM
0

I imagine approaching as a woman and being rejected hurts more than as a man. Doing anything once and failing is always more painful than failing at it a bunch of times. That's why women should do it more. It is humbling, grounding experience.
/r/seduction27/08/25 01:14 AM
2

Fair enoigh, though the US is far from the only pseudodemocracy. Most US de facto client states are in the same situation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/25 03:01 PM
7

They're the best we have, at the very least. I disagree. Captured electoral processes are the best too many people choose to limit themselves to, there is a century of data showing they alone do not function as a vehicle for popular interests, only corporate interests. Without organized extra-electoral action, elections serve little purpose beyond manufacturing false consent of the governed. If you're voting Republican because rawr I perceive Democrats as being mean to me, that's something else.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/25 02:43 PM
17

You still think elections are an effective vehicle for political change in favor of popular interests?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/25 01:21 PM
23

Well, until that changes men have about as much reason to support the left as the right. We're cannon fodder and weaponizable tools to both.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/25 01:19 PM
18

This is basically nothing. The explicit language of the order is to "develop recommendations", "identify opportunities", and fundraise for generalized social programs. They're just putting a glaze of men's interests ontop of an executive order Newsom was going to issue anyway. This is only a new skin, not a new approach. They even disclaim multiple times that the pursuit of men's welfare is not mutually exclusive with supporting women within the same executive order. They're starting the convers…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 02:21 PM
7

Where is this "need" coming from? Men with self respect don't WANT to perform like a dancing monkey for random strangers just for the 'chance' at sexual interest. Go for the ladies who express interest in you, the rest are a waste of time.
/r/seduction21/08/25 08:01 PM
1

Idc about her standards lol, I care about how quality of a partner she is. Sometimes her standards contribute to that quality, a lot of the time they detract.
/r/seduction21/08/25 07:58 PM
5

Three at the moment. They are all aware of each other, and they are all aware I am not looking for anything exclusive for a very long time. Two of them are actually trying to organize a ffm for me. But our situation is kind of unique. We're all survivors of abusive relationships who escaped in the last year. This is less about variety and pleasure, and more about support and healing. It's actually really nice. Nobody is under any pressure to perform, so whenever I try to do anything to make a go…
/r/seduction17/08/25 04:14 PM
19

It's not crazy, it's conditioning. And for the record: anyone who makes their living off being a curator and communicator of information in this day and age has a nonzero chance of being a rent seeking grifter. Seeing so many creators rise and fall by chasing the dragon of 'men are people too' only to reveal that they only performed their belief in that principle - that is going to leave a mark. The mark manifests as reflexive distrust of similar creators, because your brain is a harm avoidance …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/25 05:47 PM
25

The Dadvocate is way better imo
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/25 12:00 PM
-2

Women get praised for holding down a job and paying rent on time by themselves, for men it's expected. Male promiscuity is actually difficult to achieve, for women it's just shooting fish in a barrel.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 05:39 PM
0

Nah, he's from the exact same bucket of white-savior-secret-prejudice-holder V is in. https://www.reddit.com/r/seculartalk/s/mpWVfTggsV
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 05:14 PM
0

Secular Talk has always been a trashy Young Turks spinoff. Kyle is basically another version of Vaush who thinks it's ok he used to say the n word. If you want to be dehumanized for being a man or a serious leftist, ask Kyle for his opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/25 12:59 PM
1

Because the parties are more united on the pedo issue than they are divided, obviously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 03:32 PM
3

Why do you think it still exists? Do you think Democrats aren't on it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 11:59 AM
6

I'll take accountability: I refuse to be in any movement that hates me for what I was born as. I laughed when Kamala and Hillary lost because I predicted both 11 and 8 months ahead of schedule, respectively. When are the Dems and Feminists going to take any accountability for driving men away? When are you going to take any accountability for carrying water for their hate?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 03:39 PM
8

"belief in and advocacy of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes expressed especially through organized activity on behalf of women's rights and interests" That's just egalitarianism until the last comma. I'd prefer they were egalitarians, not feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 01:50 PM
5

This is fucking disgusting. Worse he is upset by this and causes a argument. The argument is resolved by Roy accepting it, and ques up the video for her, hands her the phone, and gives her head while she watches it again. What the absolute fuck. The people who made that scene deserve to lose their jobs. I feel shocked and appalled just reading it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 01:27 PM
1

Good post, followed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/25 01:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter