TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

markus_hates_reddit Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by markus_hates_reddit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

come on buddy. you know the answer. you purchase them.
/r/seduction01/02/26 01:55 AM
1

just because you want a word to mean something to make your bullshit pseudo-psychological post mean something, that doesnt mean you get to do that. your ego is yourself. tarnishing your ego to get you a lick of mid pussy is why youre pathethic and people dont respect you
/r/seduction31/01/26 01:18 PM
0

Do you happen to be short and ugly? Women cant stand that apparently
/r/seduction31/01/26 12:55 AM
1

the very act of judging your worth by how much pussy you get is ego in on itself.
/r/seduction31/01/26 12:54 AM
1

yeah we all know the word for ego in latin means uhm uhhhh uhhhuuhmmmm
/r/seduction31/01/26 12:53 AM
2

Means they see you as safe and sweet, but not much more.
/r/seduction21/01/26 09:12 PM
30

dont poop where u eat
/r/seduction18/01/26 10:35 AM
5

If you're being tested, it's a no brainer, just leave. This sets a bad precedent and won't get better in the future. You should be in a position that you have options either way.
/r/seduction13/01/26 12:55 PM
3

Just wanted to be the one that rejects you.
/r/seduction18/12/25 10:13 PM
1

What? I have no trouble relating to women. What are you even talking about? > That doesn't mean she wants any of them that she can entice. So what they have a lot of options that they don't want? What good is that? She gets the impression she's of extremely high value to men of the opposite sex (which she is right about), which then goes to follow that the men NOT instantly drooling on her are men with value, something rare, or desired enough to not be desperate. It's a challenge - everyone like…
/r/seduction15/12/25 12:08 PM
1

What weird messages were you getting?
/r/seduction14/12/25 05:56 PM
2

"Have anyone", as in, can sleep with anyone, or can get anyone's dick hard if you twirl in front of them enough - this is the reality of being in your 20s, haha. An average twenty year old girl can absolutely entice many single men for a short term fling, and the average twenty year old man, in comparison, has to put in so much more work to make it happen that it's become an entire 'dating guru' industry and culture.
/r/seduction14/12/25 05:12 PM
2

Try being tall and handsome and saying "hello"
/r/seduction13/12/25 04:50 PM
1

When you can have almost anyone, you're only intrigued by that which you can't have.
/r/seduction13/12/25 02:47 PM
1

Divorce rates is a good start, but even that is ambitious nowadays considering marriage rates are at an all time low and situationships are the only thing 80% of people do from 16 to 45.
/r/seduction12/12/25 01:57 PM
1

Jarvis pull up the stats
/r/seduction11/12/25 06:37 PM
1

No, we don't need to start shaming these men. You're allowed to like someone of the opposite gender platonically. You're allowed to hesitate on whether you want someone romantically or not. Love and attraction can be complicated things. It doesn't make you evil, beta, or mediocre. "Men wasting women's time with this type of rhethoric" as if women also don't sling orbiters around ad infinitum, to the point we even came up with the term 'friendzone'. This is just part of romance and love. Do you c…
/r/seduction11/12/25 01:58 PM
1

Many women are guarded, and rightfully so. Don't take it to heart.
/r/seduction11/12/25 04:09 AM
3

Don't think of it in terms of 'making him feel that spark'. Either someone likes you, or they don't. You can't trick him into liking you, unless you want something very short term. If you've been on two dates, and he's already hesitating, then he's just not that into you. Sorry. Better to take it in stride and understand not everything is in your control - most importantly, don't let him waste your time and put you on a 'roster'.
/r/seduction11/12/25 01:53 AM
10

This is moronic. You're not 'extremely beta' or 'cooked' for not liking a girl. You're allowed to not like a girl the same way a girl is allowed to not like you. Incredibly weird thinking.
/r/seduction11/12/25 01:52 AM
1

Youre joking but if she finds you cute and you do it right, and youre both like 20, this genuinely has a 65% chance of working
/r/seduction10/12/25 10:31 PM
1

You're getting aura farmed bud.
/r/seduction10/12/25 12:22 PM
2

I've already looked into all of this and can tell you it's a bunch of moronic feel-good mumbo jumbo. Worse yet, it's capitalistic rhethoric aimed at making humans interchangable cogs. Humans are different. Men and women are different. That's good. And it should be recognized to gain a better, deeper understanding of ourselves and one another. To know how to challenge and hold each other accountable, to empathize better with each other. Get your head out of the sand. Please.
/r/seduction09/12/25 05:53 PM
1

I highly suggest you apply critical thinking to concepts like 'gender constructivism' and instead rely more on science and observable reality. I'm still waiting for you to produce a single gap or fault in my logic - I've listed a very simple reasoning process that you claim is illegitimate. Go ahead and poke a finger in it. You surely can, easily at that, right?
/r/seduction09/12/25 05:39 PM
1

No counter argument. Cognitive dissonance won't even let you engage with what's being discussed here. Womp womp :(
/r/seduction09/12/25 05:36 PM
2

Uhm, what? Neurology literally shows that not only are male and female brains STRUCTURALLY different, they're also WIRED different. There's so much research done on this field showcasing exactly where, how, and why we - on a baseline - differ... I don't understand why you're getting this worked up over... pointing out women and men are different? There's no moral painting or any framing like that - literally just pointing out differences. Don't victim men deserve to comprehend and understand whe…
/r/seduction09/12/25 05:33 PM
2

Male and female demands from one another are polar opposites in a relationship. (Even if on the surface level it's claimed to be an inexhaustive list of 'loyal and kind :)') Because there's radically different demands and expectations posed on each gender, the way they operate is by necessity different. Will a man ever say "You're controlling me by not letting me wear what I want?" Will a woman ever say "Stop getting mad at me for not planning dates?" Of course not. Because we expect different t…
/r/seduction09/12/25 05:27 PM
-1

"Blatant misogyny" and it's just basic gender dimorphism. Humans are sexually dimorphic in every single study ever done. A lot of feminism's legitimate complaints is that this dimorphism has been ignored to favor men as the 'default' - or do you suddenly also call them misogynists because they're doing 'muh gender essentialism'? Come on buddy. Let's put on our thinking hats here. Do you think emphasizing women's social prowess is a dig at them? Is it mysoginistic to point out women dominate in t…
/r/seduction09/12/25 05:20 PM
2

They're not the same. Sorry. I don't agree. It's practically impossible for them to be the same. Women and men are simply too different in how they process love, power, control, and influence to borrow template tactics without modification - they apply variations of the same core but in unique ways. Nobody is saying, not even the sloppy AI OP's post, that these are UNIQUELY female patterns - just that this is how they manifest in women. When men exhibit patterns, everyone's quick to pathologize …
/r/seduction09/12/25 03:10 PM
-1

??? Of course males have statistically an easier use of physical violence because males have evolved superior physical strength for overt competition. Let's take this logic to its natural conclusion. How does evolution equip women to survive and defend themselves in this environment? Covert competition, psychological violence - women are, in all neurologically conducted tests, significantly more socially active than men with more socialization neurons firing. They are shown, in tests, to pick up…
/r/seduction09/12/25 02:39 PM
4

Do we not live in the same universe where girls on social media regularly gender human traits as uniquely male faults? Lying, manipulating, cheating, aggression, 'the male audacity', 'the male ego', etc, etc, all ascribed as uniquely evil male features and traits? When people point that out, the response is "Well, just make your own post about it, then!" Are you from bizarro world or something? Is it opposite wednesday? the fuck
/r/seduction09/12/25 02:34 PM
0

This is just not true. Male and female patterns of aggression are obviously different, rooted in the phsyical differences - evolution sharpened and honed different tools for domination and competition and control in both genders. Every psychological test ever done on something like this speaks to this obvious truth.
/r/seduction09/12/25 01:45 PM
-3

What are you talking about? We unanimously agree that men have special ways of being evil that come from being male? Whhy wouldn't the opposite apply, too?
/r/seduction09/12/25 01:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter