| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Attorney destroys the false rape graphicSo you think the woman isn't responsible for choosing a partner who doesn't accept her lifestyle? Manhater. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/13 02:03 AM |
| 1 | Attorney destroys the false rape graphicA small correction: in most states, there is no right to a grand-jury indictment, and the US Constitution's guarantee of that right (in the Fifth Amendment) has not been held to apply to state prosecutions. So a case may be brought to court by a prosecutor, rather than by a grand jury. Even when there is a grand jury involved, the grand jury does not necessarily hear any evidence, and the evidence has never been tested; ordinarily the prosecutor tells the grand jury, "here's what we have" and th… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/13 11:34 PM |
| 6 | Attorney destroys the false rape graphicNo. Way to be inappropriately offended. [Edit: Would you be equally offended by "plutocrats" or "kleptocrats"?] | /r/MensRights | 10/01/13 11:25 PM |
| 2 | Attorney destroys the false rape graphicMore on victimocrats: http://blog.bennettandbennett.com/2010/03/go-go-godzilla.html (Is that appropriate here?) | /r/MensRights | 10/01/13 11:24 PM |
| 2 | Attorney destroys the false rape graphicNot exactly. I missed the links because of the way they are formatted. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/13 11:23 PM |
| 2 | Attorney destroys the false rape graphicI appreciate the comment. I put that section in brackets at the end for a reason; I could (and perhaps should) have left it out. I'm writing a followup post in which I discuss some empirical evidence in support of the proposition, rather than just asking my readers to rely on their own experience of the world. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/13 11:20 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter