TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

marlospkm Archive

View 1 post and 37 comments by marlospkm on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
102

marlospkm/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:21 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

We're not doing so great at keeping anyone employed nowadays, unless you consider fast-food, some sort of real meaningful work. The fundamental problem is there's not enough "profitable" work for everyone anymore. Without enough work, some people end up without the ability to make money because there's someone else already doing their job. Poverty creates more criminals than any other condition. Ultimately it'd be cheaper to pay for a room and some food for a person than spending the average of …
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:35 AM
1

The American legal system is designed to target and exploit those who are the least desirable in society. This means poor lower class males. Masculine expression is criminal for these men, as they often grew up without the privilege to learn how to navigate the ever-changing "acceptable" behaviours list from the PC-feminazis. Just like how "street harassment" is really just a way of criminalizing the men of minority neighbourhoods, so the system of oppression can continue getting it's cheap slav…
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:25 AM
7

This is even funnier when I remember what GWW said on TYT regarding Suffragists and suffragettes. The suffragists fought for everyone's rights. While the suffragettes that later went on to form feminism only fought for women's rights. Satire is reality.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 02:10 AM
1

I'm only lying about my age. I keep +- a few years so no one can ever be certain because I'm paranoid. I don't really think my number of female partners is going to give me away. If you add trans-women to that my number is 104.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 03:12 AM
1

I've saved it as .ods. I red pilled at 22. I've been at it for 10 years. It's not really a great count to be honest, after all this time I'm actually pretty sad it's not higher. I wish I could care less about that, and I recognize it'd probably help me in the long run to stop caring about it. But I'mma keep improving, so I'm hoping for the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 03:09 AM
1

32, Male, 101 counting female vaginal penetration only.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/15 10:46 AM
9

The truth is, there's infinitely more of us than there are of them. The problem is that all of us haven't realized it yet. This is why it's important to remember that neutrals are just people who haven't realized how dangerous and toxic modern day feminism has become. Once they suffer the bullying, shame, and stigma that comes from being targeted for disagreeing with feminist ideology, they stop listening to the feminist bullshit being peddled by these sorts of women. They don't really become "M…
/r/MensRights19/01/15 07:27 PM
2

One young boy, César Vargas, came up to your correspondent and told him with no prompting that men are “very rough” and should learn to respect women. Older children are enticed into counselling with incentives like football coaching. Grown men are generally considered lost causes. So the best way to deal with a whole class of people is consider them "lost" if they don't agree with your brand of feminism? You know, maybe instead of shitting all over men and subjecting to them to the worst abuses…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 06:00 PM
1

If a man said this, the feminists would decry him as a manbaby and proclaim how this article was full of male tears that they were drinking.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 08:24 AM
15

I think what we're beginning to see is the fall of elitist white pop-feminism as it's being challenged by a whole range of feminists from different backgrounds. As muslim, black, and other minority women begin questioning feminism's hypocrisies, the more obvious that feminism as it's currently promoting itself is looking out for the self-interest of the elite white female who wants to have it all, as she hires minority men and women to raise her children, take care of her property, and work her …
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:36 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenape
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:40 AM
7

It looks like "feminism" is starting to really shed it's equality spiel, and do what it was originally intended for. Oppress minority and poor men. Feminism is the new way the rich white elite get to oppress people. It's acceptable racism. Gentrification is the new colonization. Hipsters are like Columbus finding the New World, and have gone to work destroying all around them in the name of "cool" and profit. The guilt they feel about it, they blame Men's Rights and conservatives for so they can…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:10 AM
2

Patriarchy? Rule by fathers? I stopped be ruled by my dad when I became a man. Down with the patriarchy. :p
/r/MensRights12/10/14 06:21 AM
0

Added some text http://imgur.com/n0RjkHW
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:06 PM
1

I guess the difference in my mind is that yeah, a bunch of men just got killed over there, but hey, look! there's a complex, developed male character standing right over there. with women, sexualization is the norm, even for lead characters, so there's little to no escape from the ways in which women are slighted on film. For men, it's a constant reminder if you're not that complex developed male in real life, you're as good as dead. There's no escaping that. Even in real life, this is a standar…
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:59 AM
1

Modern organized feminism, by those who organize it.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 01:33 AM
6

The freed slave with little property of his own has more rights than all females. You should tell that to the descendants of those free slaves. Something tells me those white females were able to sit in a lot more restaurants and establishments than those black men. Jim Crow was pretty terrible in terms of rights. Generally, segregation and discrimination were outlawed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Women got the vote when the Nineteenth Amendment became part of the U.S. Constitution on August…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:42 PM
5

Just a reminder that feminism was started by racists to empower white women. So yes, of course a movement that began from racists is going to create a huge amount of inequality. There are more black men in prison today in the USA than there were slaves in the Confederate South. This is what social justice means to feminists.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:24 PM
1

That's true--but female characters are also disposable. Yeah, that's like saying 1 is better than 0. ;) Men make a massive majority of disposable characters. Here, in this famous movie scene 88 men are killed without being given any characterization. However all the women killed are given way more characterization. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3aFv8IQb4s however, someone somewhere decided that Kate Winslet should be topless for part of Titanic, and I'll guarantee that that person wasn't thin…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:15 PM
1

Mostly no. There were a few girls though that honestly did.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:14 AM
1

I don't know. Consent actually gets pretty complicated. But like, actually discussing that consent can be complicated apparently means you hate women.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:13 AM
1

there are so, so many male characters in so, so many movies that are important, interesting (and exist) for reasons other than their potential sex appeal or value as a romantic interest. And for every one of those, there's a hundred or so men who's sole purpose is to die in the film. This is a case of apex fallacy. You're paying attention to the men with the spotlight and ignoring all the multitude of men who are disposable. the world values them for what, though? Their existence. See: Because I…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:12 AM
1

but it's still way less than 50. Why is 50 so important though? The amount of dynamic men in film compared to non-dynamic isn't that far off from the dynamic women part. it's just the fact that women are stuck in one end, the sexualized end, that makes it seem as if the world does not value them in more dynamic roles. Except they're not stuck, the world values them constantly, and this is not actually a fact but a result of how you're subjectively viewing the content. Try paying more attention t…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:59 PM
2

Hipster heavy areas in all actuality. Hipster coffee shops, hipster music shops, etc...
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:48 PM
2

I guess I've only really starting seeing dudes wear them around a year ago in my particular city, but it's definitely not a taboo anymore.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 01:40 PM
5

But males do have the right to wear that outfit already... Tights and shorts are in fashion for men if you're wearing them as street fashion. I wear something similar to her bottoms every now and then.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 12:08 PM
31

This is a great point. So many women never asked for my consent. I've been getting raped, but I just haven't been aware of it.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 12:03 PM
2

Dynamic and less sexualized representation of women already exist in modern film and television. There's also non-dynamic and super sexualized representations of women. Both exist. Both make money when done well. Both can be celebrated. Celebrating women in all roles.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 11:42 AM
2

not making any grand claims about why that is. order to expose potential problems I feel like the word "problem" here implies that the cause is problematic as opposed to just a cause without having unnecessary subjectivity ascribed to it. But true, it is social commentary. Everyone should be allowed to make comments about reality.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:10 AM
15

Feminists have this problem where they forget that Bechdel test is meant as a thought experiment. It brings up some very interesting issues TO DISCUSS. Unfortunately they skipped the discussion part, and went straight up into social control. Perhaps feminists should actually let everyone voice their opinions on why things are the way they are. There's things called "MULTIPLE INTERPRETATIONS". From that you get a THEORY. After that you TEST your theory. (Because you know, if something is true you…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:45 PM
4

The person in office is just the figurehead for the administration. Obama has pandered the same way Sarah Palin would have pandered for McCain. Ignoring the control academia has over discourse pretty much ignores how much control PR and bad academia can do. Feminism has power despite whoever is in office.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 07:07 AM
1

And again where's the funding for socialism and communism? China
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:21 PM
1

As a human liberation movement gets more popular, it gets bought out by the status-quo. Democracy in the Middle East and Racial Equality have been funded billions, but ultimately created or co-opted by the powers that be to be used against those they claim to protect.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:05 PM
1

Right now feminism is getting all the funding. In years gone by it was other movements. Such has been the struggle for equality of all individual human beings.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:52 PM
1

Most human liberation movements were conceived by elites to be honest. Most the founding fathers of America were wealthy slave owning landholders afterall. ;)
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:50 PM
2

Every human liberation movement ever conceived has been co-opted by the elites. Feminism has been the same.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:41 PM
3

Given that those with Dark Triad are often more successful, have more sexual partners, and wield more power in the world than those who do not, Dark Triad is a response to adapt to a world in which those with Dark Triad are rewarded more heavily than those who do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/14 05:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter