TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

masculistfeminist Archive

View 35 posts and 114 comments by masculistfeminist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
129

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:41 AM
74

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights09/08/13 11:05 AM
49

Social Issuesmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights16/01/16 09:51 AM
44

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights27/01/14 10:10 AM
39

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:36 AM
32

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights05/12/14 01:24 PM
32

Feminismmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights04/10/15 08:25 AM
32

Feminismmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights27/08/15 12:29 PM
31

Feminismmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:53 PM
26

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:39 AM
22

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights16/07/13 04:58 AM
22

Discriminationmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights23/04/15 02:56 PM
22

Analysismasculistfeminist/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:20 PM
19

MR Blogs/Vlogsmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:11 PM
19

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights20/01/14 01:46 AM
17

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:42 AM
16

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:58 PM
15

Outragemasculistfeminist/r/MensRights01/02/15 01:44 PM
14

Social Issuesmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:48 AM
13

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights30/11/13 10:45 AM
12

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights03/04/14 04:28 AM
12

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights22/11/13 07:06 AM
11

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:14 PM
11

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:38 AM
9

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights10/03/14 08:25 AM
8

Discriminationmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:49 AM
8

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:45 AM
7

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights15/02/14 10:32 AM
6

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:47 PM
5

Raising Awarenessmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:44 PM
4

Opinionmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights14/02/15 09:31 AM
2

Raising Awarenessmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:37 AM
1

masculistfeminist/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:20 AM
0

MR Blogs/Vlogsmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:50 AM
0

MR Blogs/Vlogsmasculistfeminist/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:45 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yep lol I agree. It would be even more amusing to watch it slowly dawn on them how completely and utterly useless their ideology is in the real world. Ahhhhhh responsibility, get it off me, get it off me....Lol. No more freeloading off men. I have heard some individuals in the manosphere suggest we send SJWs into space to cure them. I reckon boot camp Full Metal Jacket style would be a better remedy. We would probably have too many section 8s though unfortunately. Of course that is assuming they…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:42 AM
1

Firstly nice post. Comprehensive. The way I like them! We can can reduce everything to relative terms. A boiling cup of water is relatively cold to the surface of the sun. That does not make it safe to drink. If we examine human history as a whole, then this period is relatively the most peaceful period ever. There is definitely less war than say a couple of thousand years ago. Four things to consider. We have far more devastating weaponary than before. War between nations now can extend far bey…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 06:10 AM
0

Yep okay then. I could waste my time entertaining this exchange further, but why bother.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:49 AM
1

Too an incredible degree indeed. For the record I am apolitical. I do not consider myself a conservative, liberal, libertarian or anything else. I go where the facts take me and I alter my position accordingly. As for the "evil wymins" it certainly ain't coming from me. I referred to radical feminists, sjws and man-hating women. I don't hold the notion that represents all women. But that does not seem to matter to some people. Any criticism of such individuals makes one a toxic misogynist appare…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:44 AM
0

Yeehaw! Not sure whether to take that seriously or whether it is good trolling. Regardless the ad honimem made me laugh. I don't live in Texas and I don't own a gun or care for one. It is inevitable that some individuals will be hell bent on painting me as a wacko conspiracy theorist lune for telling it like it is. People want to do that fine. No problem. The economy is fine, the geopolitical situation is fine and there is nothing to worry about in the world. I am just fear mongering and am not …
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:34 AM
1

"I don't see a conflict of nations at any time in the near future." I could spend hours with you debating that. All I will say is I disagree. The geopolitical situation is the worst it has been in a long time and quite a few prominent comentators far more knowledgeable than I, are warning that a major war is where we are headed. I don't have a crystal ball, you don't have a crystal ball. You could be right, I could wrong, the experts could be wrong. I hope we don't have crash, a depression or a …
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:24 AM
1

No argument with you about needing an army or only needing one party willing to fight. My sentiment is simply that men need to: 1. Be wary and resistant of being called to fight another war for some supposed "worthy" cause and the use of fear to motivate them into action. Given history and present circumstances, it is a good possibility both with be pulled out of the hat in the coming future (Problem, reaction, solution). 2. They need to actively support a path that de-escalates further build up…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 05:02 AM
9

People are free to disagree with me about the merits of this message. The simple fact is that getting men to fight a war for a civilisation that actively marginalises them is pointless in the long run. That should be on every man's mind in the coming future. I have nothing further I wish to add. People can comment as they wish.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:55 PM
7

Men fighting other men is as old as history. We can either go down a war path or we can have a peaceful social revolution. That is a decision men need to make before there is total war and no choice.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:41 PM
6

A draft does not really involve people asking if they want to fight or not. "Would" is not really relevant in that instance. I was attempting to make a point of just how irrelevant these people are going to be when the collective "shi*t" hits the fan. It would be good to see them swallow their own hypocrisy and be marched off. Do I really think it will happen? No. But I would like to see someone give these feminist and sjw idiots a good reminder of what they had to say about men, if men are sent…
/r/MensRights16/01/16 01:33 PM
2

Just one last thought on the comment from 192873982 in this thread about feminism and male suicide. It reminded me of a quote from Andyman in the comment section of one of his videos I embedded in my article-"I think the most radical idea ever is for men to begin to value their own lives." My entire article focused on providing the scientific basis for why men are valuable. Even after all that writing, I still could not cover everything. My hope is that the next guy whom gets told he has a defec…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:05 AM
2

That is a sobering question. Tens of thousands at a minimum over the last 50 years. More likely millions. When you consider all of the cultural, social and institutional affects of feminism over the last 50 years that is not a hyperbolic response. I will leave people to discuss this thread and my article further on their own. I am a bit tired and spent from all of the writing and research for this massive article I wrote.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:04 AM
1

Could not help but add some more content in my article about Bronwyn Bishop and her travel expenses (I am kicking myself I forgot). Why add it? Because this BS about female leaders being somehow better than male leaders is a demonstrably false myth.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:06 AM
3

"Meanwhile, the males bound about like clueless idiots, being deluded into thinking they are the ones who are in "power" (ego)." Dr. Warren Farrell spelled it all out in The Myth of Male Power didn't he. Men have been conned by our culture, into thinking power roles approved by women for the benefit of women at the expense of men, is power. Men need to be deprogrammed and taught that real power comes from self-determination and personal freedom of choice to live your own life as you see fit. The…
/r/MensRights24/08/15 03:03 AM
3

Fascism is fascism even when it wears a dress.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:59 AM
6

Invisible indeed and that attitude is what disgusts me the most. Their snide moral arrogance while they ignore the thousands of men living on the streets, committing suicide, coming back from war and so on and so on. I would like to see them walk a mile in men's shoes, they would not last a block.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 02:56 AM
1

I have added some more content from Alison Tieman examining the dynamics of female manipulation and how perceived vulnerability can be turned into strength and perceived strength can be turned into vulnerability. Excellent material.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 11:59 AM
2

Just discovered one of my top five content producers has gone missing. The only clue I can point people toward is a new website apparently under construction with his name ManWomanMyth. That does not explain the sudden removal of all of his content without warning, but perhaps it might be a clue. I have asked AVFM to shed some light on it. I am sure they are looking into it as we blog.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:18 PM
1

I was not aware there was an existing discussion, serves me right for being out of the loop for a month.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:08 PM
1

That will certainly be a big part of it. There is an old saying-"Don't bite the hand that feeds you". That hand is a male hand and the food is money.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 11:31 AM
0

20% of Americans might identify with the "word" "feminism" and the idea of gender equality, that does not mean 20% of Americans subscribe to feminist ideology, patriarchy theory etc and are active members of the cult. I think if we could tease out the real feminists in the surveys and polls ie the ones that do actually subscribe to feminist ideology, patriarchy theory and so on, we would be looking at a much smaller percentage of the general population, probably in the single digits. I also find…
/r/MensRights17/02/15 11:30 AM
1

I absolutely love your suggestion. I am smiling from ear to ear. Feminists talk about equality so much, so how about we make sure each one of them gets enlisted into frontline combat to fight ISIS. We could deal with two birds with one stone. It is about time feminists were forced to confront the realities of what is really like to be male in this world. I am sure their eagerness for "equality" will disappear like magic. Let us make sure feminists are held accountable.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:24 AM
0

Feminism is in decline right now. Feminism will experience demise in the sense that the political, legal, educational, media and social influence they currently enjoy is unlikely to exist in any significant and substantial way in the near future beyond 2040 (I predict the Fempocalypse around 2030-2040), if current trends continue as they are. Again I have to point out as I did to another commentator, that comparing feminism to a mainstream religion is not a proper comparison of scale. Feminism i…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:15 AM
1

As one KBG agent remarked once the state has full control, they will eliminate the useful feminist idiots that helped give them power in the first place (for the idiots out there I am NOT calling for feminists to be killed). I don't think feminists understand how they are being used and I don't think they want to. See this link for more info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLqHv0xgOlc Having said that, I am not entirely convinced that the ruling elite will be successful in completly forming a p…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:46 AM
1

To Wolfofthewest-Plenty of prehistoric tribes and early civilisations had religions and belief systems that don't exist in any meaningul way today. Saying there are one or two people that still practice them today, is not the same as saying that they still have a significant and substantial following and influence on society as they did back in their "hey day" thousands of years ago. Lumping those two realities into the same category is not really relevant to the context of the basis of my artic…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 07:24 AM
1

Religions do come and go, just as cultural myths do and so many other aspects of culture, knowledge and customs. Granted religions are more stubborn than most aspects of society, but they do have a finite lifespan. Feminism is no different. Something tells me though that we will not agree on this point. So let time be the judge.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 02:05 PM
2

I always struggle with the flair. So many motives behind me writing what I write, I could choose several. Opinion it is then.
/r/MensRights14/02/15 02:02 PM
1

Could not agree more. The contrast between how the two fathers were treated in that article just highlights how quickly the government, the justice system and wider society is prepared to throw men under the bus and how reluctant they are to stand up for men when they are the victims and women are the perpetrators. I am of course referring to the article I linked in response to cassius999's comment above (all criticism is good criticism by the way, I use the feedback to improve)-The title of the…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 11:58 PM
1

Read the rest of my article, that was just the beginning. I go on to other examples and cases. With respect to the first case, it may very well have blown up in their faces, but that was not before the father had been dragged through hell and my government aided in the abduction of four children in breach of international law. It should not have even happened in the first place and I don't blame the father for not forgiving my government. I would not either. Now imagine if we reversed the sexes.…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:31 PM
1

I would agree with most of that. John Hembling has said as much. Making women feel vulnerable and helpless as feminism helps to promote, does indeed have that affect. I am not sure I can agree feminism is a minority movement though. Feminism has a heck of a lot of power and reach in society. Is it dying? Difficult to say. It certainly is being challenged more now than what it was 30 years ago. We should be wary of the prospect of feminism simply changing it's spots and keeping it's core doctrine…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 01:37 AM
0

Feminism being a grand conspiracy? Interesting idea…Feminism is something tangible, we can see and experience it. I never said it was a grand conspiracy. I did raise the possibility it is merely a front for state and corporate interests. I think that is a possibility not a certainty, with or without involvement from certain foundations or agencies. A glance at the multibillion dollar divorce and family law industry which I did mention earlier in my article (please watch Divorce Corp embedded in …
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:07 AM
1

I think by this time the comment thread should illustrate what the article is about. I agree with your point though and will make changes. Thanks for the feedback.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:06 AM
1

Just had a funny thought. The idea that the feminist movement might actually be an extension of the state and corporate power structure feminists erroneously perceive as the "patriarchy", might just make their heads explode! So even if it all does turn out to be BS, which it may, some good might still come of it. Lol.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:28 AM
1

Look it all may be bullshit. I don't know. But I think it would naive to believe feminism has the power it does without strong support from state and private groups that either directly or indirectly benefit from the movement. As for specifics, I agree it is pure speculation and I have said as much. So you might be right, it might just be BS. You can't test ideas without sharing them. So I thought I would share it, despite it being admittedly fairly radical.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 07:04 AM
1

I am not particularly fond of NWO crap either. But to say our governments are not strongly influenced by the banking industry and corporate interests, particularly in the US, I think is bordering on wishful thinking. Of course I take the material in this article myself, with a grain of salt. It would be wise though to consider that there are state and private interests that do benefit financially off feminism, gender warfare and family breakdown. They do strengthen and reinforce the hold of femi…
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:58 AM
-1

I would prefer people to read the article rather than make snap judgements.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:49 AM
1

Who said it has to be patriarchy? Who said it had anything to do with masculinity? Who said women in the upper echelons are not involved with their male counterparts? It may indeed be bullshit, I don't know, but frankly it is not too far fetched to say that certain groups have a particular financial incentive to profit off a gender war, break-up the family and so forth and that they may have a hand in the feminist movment directly or indirectly. I don't know either way. Just putting it out there…
/r/MensRights20/05/14 06:48 AM
1

Could not agree more. Thanks for sharing. I feel likewise. I remember first having my doubts in my early teens. I remember wondering to myself how on Earth in a society where men and women are supposedly "equal", could women getting the house, most of the assets and the kids be fair, while the man is left with nothing except the bills he has to pay to someone that hates him. It did not make sense then and the older I get the more ludicrous it appears. Frankly the people that blame men for not ma…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:02 AM
2

I have made a few changes to my article. I have added in some excellent material from Tom Golden and a few other bits and pieces. Marriage itself represents different things for men and women and that does play a role in the much higher rate of suicide for men in divorce. As does the abuse or rather neglect of a fathers visitation rights.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:16 AM
2

That is terrible.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:13 AM
1

Thank you. It was the least I could do.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:05 AM
1

Thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:02 AM
1

Yep, I am Australian.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:58 AM
1

Thanks for the response. I will need to clarify a few things and I agree with you by the way. Women can and should get involved now and so should men. No need to wait for a big change. Even if it is just talking, writing about things and exchanging ideas, or engaging in an intersexual dialogue as Prof. Nathanson and Young proposed and Dr. Warren Farrell has discussed. What I meant by that statement of cultural double standards and systemic biased attitudes, was that before people can help, they …
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:09 AM
1

Just one comment on this. I am not going to debate feminists on what feminism is, or any other subject matter. That especially goes for the men's rights reddit! I mean wtf seriously? The time for debate on feminism ended long ago. I learnt years back, that it is not worth my time or energy talking to an ideologue. I share my views on feminism and call them out on their bullshit for the sane and rational majority to see, nothing more. Feminism is whatever feminists claim it is at any particular m…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 08:59 AM
1

Yes. But I find it truly amusing that they are now beginning to understand the unsustainable nature of their hateful ideology and are now scrambling like headless chooks to save face.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:15 AM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:10 AM
1

The fact the presenter has no idea how insulting that is to men speaks volumes about how well ingrained misandry has now become in our culture and how blind feminists are to their own bigotry. Lets reverse the statement. "Men civilise women, it's what we're supposed to do." or how about, "Whites civilise blacks, it what we're supposed to do".-If that was on YouTube it would probably make the news and this woman would most likely have lost her job. Men are human beings, we have a conscience, we h…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:06 AM
2

Breathtaking sense of entitlement.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:51 AM
1

If people decide to get rid of males it will literally be over my dead body and anyone else standing in my way. I am not the type of individual that will go down without one hell of a fight! As for living in a male free world. Good luck to all the hateful bigots left over in doing all the hazardous work, dying on the job, working 50 plus hours a week, doing all the physical labor, replacing all the technical ingenuity of the male gender in designing, building and maintaining all the technology a…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 09:30 AM
1

Thank you all for the commentary you have provided. I have taken it into consideration.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:58 AM
1

Now to steer this discussion back onto men's rights, let me write this for people to consider. One has to seriously question how helpful gloating about "The End of Men", discussing the extermination of men and promoting man-hating bigotry from ideological feminists is, when we are faced with such grave challenges. Frankly I find the stupidity and short sightedness of idiots like Hanna Rosin, Maureen Dowd and other gender ideologues as a threat to our society. Words cannot describe the stupidity …
/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:41 AM
1

Nice to see someone else gives a dam about these problems ;). I don't want to segway further from the point of this article (the importance of men's rights to survival) so this will be my last post on this subtopic. The main criticism that has been levelled at the nuclear option is the lag between starting construction and reducing the carbon footprint. We cannot reduce carbon emissions for decades after they are constructed. So reducing carbon emissions in the near future (i.e by 2030) with nuc…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 04:35 AM
2

Thank you. Although I cannot agree with your last remarks. I will assume you are being figurative and won't take it literally. However for those idiots that actually do see validity in the obviously non-serious final statement about Femitheism made by the commentator above, I will leave them to contemplate this. If one were to not care about human rights and commit mass genocide on a global scale, it would inevitably result in a nuclear war and global conflict that would bring about the end of t…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:32 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:14 AM
1

Nuclear power plants are not carbon neutral and require a lot of carbon energy to assemble and even run. It takes about 20 years of nuclear power to pay off the carbon debt. As you also mentioned if there are meltdowns then the fallout can irradiate large areas of land, contaminate the local food and water supply and kill millions of people over the following decades. AGW has the potential to not just dislocate billions of people, but to induce a mass extinction event and with it the highly prob…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:58 AM
1

Unfortunately we don't live in a world where it is "common" sense or "common" knowledge that screwing over half the population will have consequences on society. We can see numerous indications of that from the behaviour of our media, politicians, law enforcement, judiciary and state institutions in addition to the feminist movement toward men and boys and men's issues. So strange as it may seem to the sane amoung us that have not drunk the feminist kool-aid to write such a thorough article on i…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:46 AM
1

This will be my last post on this subreddit. I am not engaging in a pointless flame war. I want to make a few things clear, as there seems to be an apparent attempt to distort what I have said or engage in disinformation by some individuals. People should read the article I posted at the top of this subreddit before they comment on it, rather than rely on other peoples comments. Make up your own mind, do not let someone else make it up for you. Which some people have clearly not. I don't hate wo…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:42 AM
1

It would be far less poisonous if people actually read my article and stopped presenting what I said as something entirely different. I never said anything about hating women. Making snap judgements is easily dismissed when people can go and fact check and look over what I have written in my linked article at the top of this subreddit and my other articles on Hub Pages. People can make up their own minds about what I wrote, without other people coming in and conflating what I said with something…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:35 AM
1

"People come in all shades and stripes." They certainly do. Which is why men (and women for that matter) in one-sided dysfunctional relationships, should not feel as if there is no alternative. Putting up with a woman you are with that thinks the world revolves around them and letting them emotionally abuse you by threatening to terminate the relationship if you don't pay up, is not the way to go when there are plenty of women you could be with that respect you for who you are. A point I made in…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:30 AM
1

I would say that if the woman you are with accepts you for who you are, then she is the "catch". I understand what you are saying though. But as you clearly already know, looks are not everything, just as man's wallet is not everything. Sounds like you had a mutually enjoyable V day. That is good to hear.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:18 AM
0

"Oh please. Pulling out the "oh because I'm a man I can't complain?!" card" Yeah I guess men should just shut up and take psychological abuse and accept that from time to time they will be threatened with a break up if they don't pay up. I guess we should remain silent when a feminist claims she wants chivalry and equality. Sorry I don't live in that camp of men. "as the women you apparently hate". Don't know where you got that from but hey, you can strawman as you wish. People can check my writ…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:11 AM
1

"No offense, but it's a holiday." -The day itself was not the focus of the article, the attitude of the feminist from the news segment in the article was, as was our cultural attitude to put women on a pedestal and giving a reality check to the subset of self-entitled women among the female population and the subset of white knight men among the male population. "No one's getting hurt, it's just people buying things for people. Yeah, the convention is that men buy more gifts for their women, but…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:04 AM
0

"I will say though that on average, V-day is pretty bullshit, but not in every case." That's right. There are good women out there, men just have to be prepared to cut ties with those who would exploit them and go after the right one. "I got pretty damn lucky with someone" Very lucky.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 12:37 AM
2

AVFM seems to agree with me, she is a feminist. I guarantee you-You cannot promise me anything when it comes to a movement as amorphous as feminism. Actual feminists_Again subjective. What is an actual feminist? Depends on who you ask, what dogma you cling too. She is just some talk show guest.-Not according to her, not according to AVFM. Both describe her as a feminist. Bye
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:31 PM
1

ROFL.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:30 PM
5

Which is the typical response I would get from a feminist. She is not a "real" feminist, she is not "really" one of us. She identified as a feminist on national TV in front of a wide audience. AVFM identifies her as a feminist. "no feminist that actually knows something about feminism is going to agree with her." An extremely subjective statement. Who is an expert feminist? Depends on who you ask. That agree with her? Depends on who you ask. Frankly from what I have read of feminist opinions on …
/r/MensRights15/02/14 01:12 PM
5

What do you say Tanya Acker is a feminist? She said she was a feminist on national TV in front of a wide audience. Being for valentines day gender role playing would be anti feminist, to a feminist? That clearly depends on what feminist you speak too and I would add on what day you ask them. There is no consistency with feminists they just move goal posts, same BS.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 12:40 PM
1

Sounds like you are in a healthy mutually respectful relationship with a nice girl. That is how it should be.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 12:34 PM
1

Watch the video on a feminists take on Valentine's day embedded in the article and then read the article. I did not conflate anything, she did that all by herself.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 12:23 PM
1

Yep exactly.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 11:34 AM
3

No one is forcing anyone, just emotionally manipulating them. "Stay true to yourself"-Bingo. Agree completely. Expectations? Well if you say your a feminist as the woman did in the news segment and feminists say they are for equality and then go on national TV and promote chivalry, then someone is being dishonest about their expectations aren't they? Expectations are fine provided people are honest and forthright with each other. To pretend to love someone for who they are, when you really value…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 11:23 AM
-1

Men complaining. How dare they. Lolz. I should shut up and man up.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 11:11 AM
2

Feminists did not invent the word equality either and look what they have done with it. Nothing nuanced about the cries of rape apology at U of T. The protestors were pretty hyperbolic and detached from reality in conveying their insults and rhetoric.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 06:19 PM
1

If I take that statement as gospel, then I would regard this so-called academic meaning of normalise as intentionally misleading and rationally inconsistent with the manner in which feminists apply their paradigm of rape culture to society in practice. It seems clear to me from the examples they cite, that they seem more interested in conveying that rape is normalised in the sense that we start seeing it as healthy, a common part of everyday life and a socially acceptable norm. I am more concern…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:52 PM
2

Well if they were not delusional sure. Unfortunately many of them appear to be so.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:32 PM
3

Well that is the problem isn't it? When they use deliberately vague language to convey some ethereal and nebulous concept. We can say anything is "normal" if we stretch the meaning out far enough. Kind of like what feminists do with so many other words. A deliberate attempt by them to mission creep their agenda right under the public's noses. Probably why they are so paranoid of men's rights. Projecting their own behaviour onto us.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:28 PM
1

I agree. I don't think there is one right way at this point. Diversity of ideas and approaches seems to be key. In some ways we get a synergy from our different approaches.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:40 PM
1

Exactly. Asking me to get married, is like asking me to volunteer to become a debt slave for someone else's benefit. I think I will pass on that one. It is real interesting to see that awkward form of cognitive dissonance on peoples faces when they talk to me about marriage and I remind them of reality. People seem to be more prepared to live in an illusion that everything is fair and just, rather than exert any effort to address grave injustice or even just voice outrage. I don't have any respe…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:44 AM
1

The thing is, that politicians, media and so forth generally do not pay attention or give time of day to only softly spoken reason. I wish they did! Generally some degree of outrage or anger is required to get their attention, as was the case with AVFM and 20/20. Indeed it is the mass apathy of society that has allowed our governments and media to deteriorate to the level of ineptitude they have. These people don't work in business or with hedge funds, they work to gain the popularity of the vot…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:09 AM
1

I would certainly say I am uncompromising when it comes to holding people accountable who talk about the end of my gender or take away my rights. Perhaps if the Jews were uncompromising and less accommodating to the Nazi's they would not have been exterminated. When people publicly proclaim that I have no place in future society because I am male, suggest I am obsolete like a product and attack my human dignity, I will be uncompromising in my position to defend myself and hold them accountable. …
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:50 PM
1

I am with you. Fuck them. Why care about them? They don't care about us and that this the problem. Being nice and polite to those that see us as machines or utilities will get us nowhere.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:39 PM
1

Thanks mate.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:36 PM
1

Criticism is fine by me. No hard feelings. Who the hell knows which approach will work best and which one will not. I do not know, all I know is I am done playing nice.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:35 PM
1

Exactly. Paul Elam and others are right about this one. Anger is needed, but anger with intent behind it.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:33 PM
1

I agree. It often takes outrage and public condemnation to shame those who act as bigots to instigate social change. We are not going to politely reason with people that see men more as products becoming obsolete than as human beings.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:31 PM
1

Fristly my apologies for being off reddit for so long, been busy. Now let me say this. I am angry and most men should be as well. Indeed a lot of young men are. When men cannot marry without the threat of having their life destroyed, when they can't count on the legal system to protect them but instead to harm them and when our societal institutions give no room for men and boys, then I would call anger a pretty measured response. It is not like we talking about minor injustices here, basic cons…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 12:18 PM
2

I have added a YouTube link to my profile. I comment (no vids sorry) under the name "men's rights are human rights". Link is: "http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrGimZDjn8jQSaAv6VBDWlQ" Masculistfeminist is merely a wordplay for me to use against feminists and ideologues on HubPages. Why not use their own arguments about the dictionary against them? It seems to be causing them the cognitive dissonance I intended.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:39 PM
2

Thanks, it is usually the first thing to come out of these peoples mouths. Change the subject, draw attention away from men's issues, start talking about women, get them to disagree, call them a misogynist and then rely on social conformity and the sheep mentality to social ostracise the men's human rights activist. Don't play their game. Keep them right where you want them, ON topic. Or at least that is how I go about it.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:36 PM
1

That was most amusing to read. Where do I start rebutting them....I am beyond the point of being tired of this simpleton feminist nonsense. Apparently it is too much to ask these people to try and think for themselves in place of an ideology for just a minute or two. I have tried, oh how I have tried.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 12:33 PM
1

Lolz, sorry. That is cool with me though. Thanks.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:48 PM
2

I am not sure I can do that without violating HubPages terms of service. However you can copy and paste the text of the entire article yourself direct from the HubPage link into a word document. Sorry, that is the best I can do. My only request is you mention I am the author to avoid identity issues. I don't really care for copyright, I want things shared and for this movement to grow.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:15 PM
2

Yes we are seeing this now. They are calling it the demographic winter and the state is becoming very worried. But they won't talk about the elephant in the room, men's rights. The cognitive dissonance is most amusing.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:10 PM
3

Thanks for the feedback and sorry for the length. I wanted to give young men and boys the 5 star treatment, so I made it long and comprehensive. They deserve it. But yes a condensed version would be useful. Here goes with a condensed version. Decide who you are for yourself. You determine who you are, not women or society. Focus on building a future to cater to your interests and aspirations and not that of women or for meeting antiquated social norms of society. Be very cautious and selective a…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:44 PM
2

What you have described will occur in our lifetimes. I just hope the current politicians, lobbyists and columnists responsible for this mess are held to account in the decades to come as this all unfolds. History will record their actions, as they did with white supremacists, nazi's and other bigots.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:37 PM
0

Oh please please do. ;)
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:34 PM
3

Haha you got me. I never was if we talk of feminism as a movement compared to the idealised version one finds in a dictionary. But I like to use their strategy of pretending to be about equality against them. Divide the enemy against itself and destroy the center. With modern feminism that is not hard. Hell even their own leaders are calling it a dead movement (Camille Paglia). I can't change the name (HubPages does not allow me do that), but I hope it really grates on feminists that I can use t…
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:29 PM
1

Dowd does provide a perfect example of exactly what is wrong with modern societies general attitude towards men.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 09:04 AM
1

Most welcome. I thought her piece was very thorough. Good to know this type of man-bashing crap is not going unanswered by either gender.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 08:52 AM
1

I am not giving up hope and packing it in. My future, your future and the future of society is at stake. Things might seem bleak and insurmountable now, but all movements for change started out that way at some point in time. This may indeed or at least in my opinion should be the long term "end game" or goal. However talking about it now, does provide a beacon for people to check their actions and the direction we are moving in. Sharing such a future goal or vision also helps remove the venom f…
/r/MensRights25/11/13 02:34 AM
2

I have discussed humanism in this article. Without going into detail, humanism is the gender transition movement. I agree with your sentiments.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:04 AM
1

Upon reflection I have chosen to re-activate my commentary for most of my Hubs (some topics remain closed given their subject matter and the incessant need of nutters on HubPages to post vulgar nonsense on those topics, i.e gendercide, treating men as subhuman). I have felt as if I cannot have an open forum on that website due to the hostility directed toward masculinity from authors and commentators there. However it is becoming clear to me, that I was mistaken in thinking I was alone with no s…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 04:07 AM
1

Thanks guys for the helpful replies and feedback, including the negative feedback. Much appreciated. Cheers and have a good weekend. Ryan (Masculistfeminist)
/r/MensRights13/09/13 07:34 AM
1

Sorry about that. I made an a difficult decision a while back to remove the comments threads. A couple of reasons: There are unfortunately a lot of sick and delusional nutters that frequent HubPages because of the disgusting material sometimes on it about men and other things (published disturbingly sometimes by people in fairly senior positions in society, including one I came across who was an administrator in education). There is only so much of that crap I can read, moderate and respond to o…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 07:30 AM
2

I agree. I do mention in my Hub Profile I am a humanist before anything. However I realise that although men and women face many similar challenges, some are unique. Hence the reason for a separate movement for each gender but a need for a partnership between the two movements (as the welfare of the two genders are to a substantial extent interdependent). A men's human rights movement and a women's human rights movement as part of a wider human rights movement is what is needed. Warren Farrell h…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:48 AM
1

"in addition to a legitimate women’s rights movement"-Highlighted that mainly to ram home the insinuation feminism is not a legitimate women's rights movement. However on reflection I do dislike the bolding. I'll change that. Clearly as can be seen from your fair response, it can be interpreted as giving preference or importance to one set of peoples rights over the other. As for political correctness, using feminism against feminists is my way of fucking their shit up. I understand many will di…
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:36 AM
0

By taking their name from them, I am fucking their shit up. As for opening peoples eyes to reality, I have spent quite a few articles comparing reality to feminist fiction. "The transformation of feminism into a hate movement and their censorship of free-speech" and "Patriarchy theory and other feminist half truths" are the two big articles I wrote on that. http://masculistfeminist.hubpages.com/hub/The-Patriarchy-Myth-And-Other-Feminist-Half-Truths http://masculistfeminist.hubpages.com/hub/The-T…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:51 AM
1

My primary aim for doing that is to deprive the bigots and hypocrites of using the word feminist to disguise themselves as advocates for equality. The public perception=equality for women=feminism, the reality=female supremacy=feminism. They are using the word feminism to disguise themselves from public scrutiny like wolves in sheeps clothing. I want to take that away from them. Yes I will get flak from some people in the manosphere and that is understandable. I hate what feminism stands for as …
/r/MensRights24/07/13 03:04 AM
2

No problems. Not sure why this link and text is not safe for working (nsfw). I am not exactly condoning this misandric message. Unless of course I have mistaken the label below my text (see above). Still new to reddit.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:24 AM
1

I understand that. See above comment to Pecanpig. The name is more for the misinformed public than the manosphere which actually knows what is REALLY going on.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:32 AM
1

If I could go back in time I would change my name to Masculisthumanist. HubPages does not allow a name change, so I am stuck with Masculistfeminist. In the manosphere the name Masculistfeminist can pose a problem. I can initially appear as an enemy. However there is an advantage to the name. The public still is under the false impression feminism means equality for women. Putting it in my name allows me to talk about men's rights without coming across as a misogynist. Better still I can critique…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:29 AM
2

I won't get everything right all the time. However if I get 95% of it right and give the public a window to explore men's issues in greater depth by linking A Voice For Men, Girlwriteswhat, Paul Elam etc, then I am achieving my goals.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:25 AM
1

I am aware of this. I post my material only HubPages, if you see it elsewhere that person is not me (I mention this on my HubProfile). Personally I don't have a problem with people sharing my stuff, just as long as they make it clear that I wrote it and they did not. The primary reason for this is because of my concern someone could pose as me and then begin to write material that I never wrote and that I might strongly disagree with or find offensive. I have mentioned on my HubPage that I only …
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:24 AM
2

Firstly to be clear, I am on HubPages to support men's rights and help raise awareness of men's issues. I have written 12 Hubs thus far on various topics relevant to men. A sincere thank you for your criticism. The problem with calling myself a feminist is it automatically associates my belief system with that of feminist theory and feminist idealists. This is wrong. I don't believe in feminist theory and I do not follow feminist ideology. I called myself a feminist in an attempt to reclaim the …
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter