TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

masgrada Archive

View 0 posts and 308 comments by masgrada on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

2/3 of college debt is from gender who makes up 2/3 of college? Math checks out.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 01:03 AM
-3

Close, but there’s still exponential fuel consumption per weight of flight. Sailboat is a little different story. I see you’re set on making some sort of point, so I’ll concede she perhaps ate more food on a week’s sail vs half day of flight travel.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 08:01 PM
-1

Wut? The girl hitched a ride with a couple who were already crossing. Or were you being sarcastic?
/r/MensRights11/08/20 04:48 PM
–

How tall are you?
/r/seduction01/06/20 02:42 PM
1

Already there man.
/r/seduction07/04/20 10:51 PM
–

How about you try it for a few weeks and just see who replies.
/r/seduction07/04/20 08:21 PM
–

🙄 Born on 2nd and thinks it’s just as easy for everyone.
/r/seduction07/04/20 08:18 PM
7

Femcels. Feminist incel.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 09:20 PM
1

How about this; let’s settle this debate for you. Tell us the majors or degrees that have been compared. Don’t tell us which one is yours. We’ll give honest answers for what ones are hard and if they’re fluff or easy. This way there’s no gender bias.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 07:20 PM
8

Perhaps they were being logical, not competitive or purposefully denigrating. Some degrees are really freaking hard compared to others. Say, compare nursing to graphic design. One is way harder, but the graphic designer might be butt hurt if anyone said it. While they might have the same title at the end of their educational career, some degrees also make less. So if you have a “pointless” specific social science and can’t get a job, and worked relatively less to get that degree... yeah. Some de…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 01:20 PM
0

Just curious because there’s a heavy paid anti-musk brigade, so it’s hard to know what’s real with the guy.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 11:01 PM
0

You’ve seen the video? Or is it just “out there”.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 08:16 PM
0

“son of Mrs. Keyser and her ex-husband, former Fox News personality” Unbiased I’m sure.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:39 PM
8

Guarantee her dude had a remote controller for a wearable pleasure device.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 06:29 PM
14

Well... there aren’t actually witches.
/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:21 PM
-5

You come off as kinda dumb and pretty rude. Lay off the FOX and talk radio.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 03:37 AM
-9

Have you ever looked at the entirety of the right?
/r/MensRights14/08/19 03:14 PM
1

Pretty sure the target you speak of doesn’t shave anyway.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 01:45 PM
3

Exactly, people here are claiming perjury because a couple minor details aren't continually 100% the same. I'm saying that's how our memories work, it's consistent with recalling an old memory.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:33 AM
9

That’s a thing a well trained prosecutor would use to try and convince a jury a witness is lying, irrelevant of the truth. Memories are faulty all the time, and we continually slightly change them. Traumatic memories generally retain their core actions, but minute ‘hazy’ details are somewhat fluid. Sadly, the behavior of our own memory is rarely or if ever considered during trials, and the minute errors are used as false ‘proof’ those recounting events are lying.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:17 PM
5

His good friend Judge wrote a book called “Wasted” and all about their times in high school. Even though he renamed the characters, the oddly familiar O’Kavenaugh is a heavy drinking cohort.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:39 AM
1

A single 'legit' article does not make the whole place legit.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 12:15 AM
1

That's why you go get a haircut.
/r/seduction30/11/17 02:52 AM
1

You're going to find that even 'liberals' are split on this topic.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:43 AM
1

My comment was more geared toward those who're using it as some sort of celebratory motto or pushing it onto others regarding relationships. Obviously your situation didn't apply, but making it into a prideful statement disregarding situational differences is concerning as the other commenter had done.
/r/seduction30/05/17 05:25 AM
–

I didn't change anything about myself for [my S.O.], I did it for myself. I've been quite irritated at this comment from those who push it without caveat. It makes for a very selfish base of actions. To disregard your partner in all aspects of your own being makes for bad partnership. I understand the sentiment, but the manner in which generally presented is not wholesome advice. If taken literally and wholly, it's quite bad advise.
/r/seduction30/05/17 03:58 AM
1

Hahahah... at least you're good looking. My, god.
/r/seduction06/03/17 08:52 PM
–

Crying? I'm stating the obvious. You look at any average looking 6 foot something and their girlfriend is at least 4 points better looking than them.
/r/seduction05/03/17 03:44 AM
–

But why male models?
/r/seduction01/03/17 05:05 PM
–

That's the attitude! Stay optimistic ;)
/r/seduction27/02/17 08:16 PM
–

Tall makes a 5 guy into a 9.
/r/seduction27/02/17 07:08 PM
1

Except here we have 120 peaches and 80 eggplants to start with, the whole point being we're not starting equal. Women make up the majority of higher education. The original post is saying that 7.9% of women are in higher education STEM, but did NOT mention that there's way more women in higher education. So, we have a situation that's not quite as dire as it seems and likely stated in that manner to be misleading.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:28 PM
6

You forget there's a roughly 60/40 split of women/men in higher education. That'll nudge the absolute values in each field. So, 10.8% of higher edu is men in STEM and 6.3% is women. Not quite the stark contrast, but still little over half as many women at a roughly 38% total.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:20 AM
18

I bet it was those reddit jerks!
/r/seduction17/11/16 05:23 PM
28

The person she crashes into will be charged. And the passengers, because they're also willing participants.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 01:18 AM
1

Before jumping down my throat, go check it out yourself. The inconsistencies are there.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:52 PM
1

I know exactly what I'm talking about and that is exactly what I'm implying. The theory is that they started under a false pretense of PC/SJW whatever and now mix in stories that aren't of the same narrative. Basically, controlled opposition. Once they nailed the user base they could start injecting narrative pushing in a desired direction. Quite brilliant, really. Keep your enemies closer.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 08:49 PM
1

There seems to be some coordinated attacks on Musk lately. He's got some sort of target on him now. Not surprising this is from Vice, a publication that's been recently twisted into some subtlety neoconservative backing rag after they've long earned the trust the counter-culture. Interesting choice of attack indeed, rather telling of what they've become.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:55 AM
1

The alcohol.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 04:56 AM
7

You always say that.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:45 PM
–

Man, some people are born with unfortunate facial structures that will never be in style. There's no 'getting there'.
/r/seduction14/09/16 06:25 AM
1

Never try to understand the stupid things teenagers do. They could have any reasoning in the world from a dare to something as random as putting French fries in their nose, "hey watch this!"
/r/seduction29/07/16 10:45 PM
-4

Given all the years of evidence and circumstances, I'd be extremely surprised if he isn't guilty.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 03:32 AM
5

That's how we end up with problems like these, nobody sticks up for the sane.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 12:20 AM
2

It's usually not included on a routine panel because the majority of people already have genital and 90% have been exposed to oral.
/r/seduction09/03/16 01:04 AM
42

I'm going out on a limb here and say rolling stone is in for a world of legal hurt soon.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 05:41 PM
0

I've known a few people who would probably be a good percentage of that crew if genetically tested.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 02:15 PM
3

You said you still have both your kidneys, right?
/r/seduction11/11/15 04:21 PM
6

Unless you're Canadian.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:23 PM
0

That's because in America they're told to do whatever makes them happy. It doesn't matter the problems it causes everyone else, just do what makes them happy.
/r/seduction27/09/15 11:50 PM
2

A t-shirt is a bad idea. Could make you a target.
/r/seduction25/07/15 10:25 PM
1

We're talking courts, not common sense. The two often don't align.
/r/seduction12/07/15 02:32 PM
9

Bullying her. That's a perfect way for someone to respect your opinion.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 07:06 PM
1

He's not 'ugly'. That guy looks manly. I suppose I should have said unfortunate looking rather than ugly. There's people who under no circumstances can be considered physically attractive. It's just the simple truth.
/r/seduction10/06/15 06:14 PM
0

Naw man, there's a truth that some people are just ugly and have to overcome that.
/r/seduction10/06/15 05:32 PM
3

The whole thing read like bad Cosmo advice put into action.
/r/seduction19/05/15 06:38 AM
2

When you get up there with the really high scoring males, girls definitely go batty. I've had a few solid almost 10 friends. There's some carnal switch at that level for women that make them act like a cat in heat. But for the other 99% of guys it's a different game.
/r/seduction18/05/15 03:00 PM
2

The call is the probable cause.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:51 PM
1

There were plenty of "don't go to work today" messages for those they were concerned with.
/r/seduction06/05/15 02:28 PM
1

You see, there's people who read all the details and then there's people who think the details are a bunch of bull and can't handle the possibility of anything being that horrid. Neither group much likes the other. Then there's the people who just don't want to know and hates both groups. Either way. Shut your mouth on this topic because it's a mood killer.
/r/seduction06/05/15 07:44 AM
3

Uh. You know how many metric shit-tons of money is made off selling and financing war? That's a huge incentive.
/r/seduction06/05/15 07:39 AM
3

It's the multiplier effect.
/r/seduction21/04/15 09:52 PM
0

Did you switch color representation in the title vs body on purpose?
/r/MensRights19/04/15 05:43 PM
4

It was a compromise, but better than nothing.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:01 PM
-4

No. That's not at all the case. There's 30 years of accusations. Not just people talking about 30 years ago. Janice Dickinson did an interview on Howard stern something like 6 years ago and couldn't comment to the specifics of why he was so creepy because her lawyer told her not to say anything. This was way before it came out. Even Richard prior did a skit on how rape-y he was in the 70s. Hell. Even Cosby himself did a skit on drugging and raping women when he was starting as a stand up actor. …
/r/MensRights08/04/15 07:31 AM
-11

Are you kidding me? He's been doing it forever.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:41 AM
-17

Uh. No. That's not what happened to Cosby. That dude is a serial rapist.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:53 AM
2

Some people have sensory needs that are more evident when they're comfortable in their surroundings. So, unfortunately that means it could go either way for you. Good luck!
/r/seduction04/04/15 07:26 PM
0

Gut? Diet soda has recently been proven to give people three times the belly fat of a normal person.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:32 AM
11

Never underestimate the power of stupid people. Who do you think are having most the kids?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:48 PM
1

Agree to disagree.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 06:39 PM
2

Just like how the right isn't all war mongering neoconservatives and religious radicals. It goes both ways and better not to group inappropriately.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:08 PM
5

Left wing Feminist activists. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 03:12 PM
10

In some countries and a few states.
/r/seduction21/03/15 04:38 PM
1

Also, make sure she doesn't try to surpass your preventative measures.
/r/seduction07/03/15 12:39 AM
9

Don't wait to exercise. From improved physical and mental health to the probability of having a better looking SO, there's all benefit and no downside when done right. Just don't wait, because before you know it you'll wake up fat and old wondering where the hell your chance at a good life went.
/r/seduction07/03/15 12:35 AM
5

It's not a 'left' thing.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 01:55 AM
1

For probability's sake, she'll have to go hunting without her friends.
/r/seduction24/02/15 07:13 PM
5

Problem is, so many go into it with a bitter axe to grind. It's their little way at blaming another group for their problems.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 05:02 AM
6

You sir, have mastered the pigeon chess.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:15 AM
5

Clearly I haven't watched enough fox or Rush Limbaugh to get the real story!
/r/MensRights24/01/15 05:14 AM
9

The left gives different shits about liberty.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:13 AM
3

Just because feminists are capitalizing on something doesn't magically make it a 'left' ideal.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:12 AM
2

It's a gender issue at that point. Not left vs right.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:09 AM
9

Conservatism has nothing to do with cheating nor honesty about who's kid is who's. That's really a bunch of baloney if you insist it does.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 04:01 AM
11

You're just making things up now.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 12:25 AM
–

This isn't left wing. It's actually a 'conservative' ideal, keeping a woman with the children and man the money provider. Feminists have taken advantage of it as one of their pick-n-choose items that benefit them. That doesn't magically make it a 'left' ideal.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 11:43 PM
17

I got the sense she wanted to date a decisive woman.
/r/seduction21/01/15 05:27 AM
4

That's a really dumb stretch of the imagination, but that's what they do best!
/r/seduction21/01/15 05:21 AM
10

They never claimed lack of demand. They claimed there is a demand, but lack of women willing to take the job.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 09:00 PM
1

Tag her.
/r/seduction26/12/14 06:29 AM
4

Wish they'd get that memo. We wouldn't be here otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:47 AM
22

You forgot 'screw another guy behind your back' first.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:22 PM
1

Do you the standard Fox News viewer is seen like a religious nut-case who's scared of Kenyan Obama because someone made a joke and it stuck? No Made a joke? Is that what the months-long media crusade was? Very subtle long-running joke indeed.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 07:38 PM
2

To be fair, that's what happens when the other side flips the bird at women interested in keeping their own reproductive and medical rights in their own control.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 04:17 AM
5

I do. Quite closely. I also follow the underhanded tactics employed by the right to associate every asinine thing with 'liberals'.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:04 AM
6

As is cultural understanding.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:22 PM
6

I've seen it a pervasive tactic to associate the two on talk radio and the like, but that doesn't make it true.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:16 PM
1

Herp derp! Sure are, Cletus!
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:32 PM
13

Pervasive ignorant insults force weak minds to incorrectly correlate stupid shit with liberalism. To be honest, it's been a brilliant tactic by right wing strategists. Drives me nuts hearing them do it constantly in talk radio and on FOX though. "Heh Heh. Derp, stupid liberals...!"
/r/MensRights04/11/14 09:39 PM
4

Still has nothing to do with liberalism or liberals, unless we're going with the ignorant insult tract.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 09:35 PM
15

Being culturally unaware is actually quite contrary to a liberal belief system. A major factor in highlighting this issue as not being of liberal origin. OP is simply making an ignorant knock at 'liberals' as is so common in the current political atmosphere.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 09:28 PM
100

Quit saying liberal as a synonym for feminist. It's just like people don't say republican or conservative in place for creationists or West borough baptist church. It's not a liberal thing.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:28 PM
5

I can't believe people got trolled into buying into this.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 05:50 PM
3

Rum and coke, thanks.
/r/seduction19/10/14 07:53 AM
1

Yeah. You did. Get on it bud, all is not lost just means more work on your end.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 06:22 PM
2

File first and file big! Go for emergency custody because she fled.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:49 PM
11

It's not a business. It's a government job.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:00 PM
4

One solution is under the table jobs.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 03:48 AM
3

You might want to check your settings. It might be that you're set as a girl on the app.
/r/seduction07/08/14 09:44 PM
7

Woooosh
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:28 PM
1

Except all the times it doesn't work... yea, It's perfect!
/r/MensRights15/07/14 07:54 PM
1

An awfully simplistic and ultimately incorrect formula for predicting obesity. Unfortunately, the metabolic pathway is completely ignored which is how any energy gain or loss occurs.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 07:22 PM
1

WOW You should be on the news and head of all health science! Such knowledge! Oh, you've been shown to be wrong by Stanford recently. Sorry man, from hero to zero. http://www.philly.com/philly/health/HealthDay689547_20140708_Inactivity_May_Be_Main_Culprit_in_Obesity_Epidemic__Study.html So; No, nope, nuh huh and no. But really I could go on and on.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:53 PM
1

Genetics is also a contributing factor to obesity.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:25 PM
4

20x more likely, or 2,000% more likely. What you said would be; of all occurrences of kidnappings, die by family, or die by auto accident, 99.5% would be the latter two and only .5% would be kidnapping.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 06:17 PM
5

Woah there. He didn't call women 'skirts', it was used to indicate it's the same thing but 'dressed' differently. It's the same style of illustrative phrasing 'lipstick on a pig' would be. You can put the lipstick on the pig, but it's still a pig. You can put a skirt on chauvinism, but it's still the equivalent of chauvinism.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:48 AM
10

Not to ruffle any feathers, but this sub would be 'liberal' by definition.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:15 AM
0

They went back to court and he couldn't get it reduced. He pays more than he makes.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:18 PM
0

He had a semi-successful business that is going under and isn't able to reduce his support payments because his business is still 'worth money'.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 03:09 PM
-1

One of the dad's in my kids' class has this exact arrangement. It's really not uncommon.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:17 AM
5

The new 17 is to be treated like 13, yet inundated with mature subjects and material as well as having unprecedented amounts of information immediately available.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 09:49 PM
3

That could be illegal.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 07:43 PM
3

Glad that one weeded herself out.
/r/seduction22/04/14 02:58 AM
1

Shift the age range by like 4 years and you're on point. Gotta be 18 to use it.
/r/seduction22/04/14 02:57 AM
0

You've never typo'd? Well now, cast the first stone my friend.
/r/seduction22/04/14 02:53 AM
1

That depends...
/r/seduction22/04/14 02:51 AM
0

1. Be attractive. 2. Don't be unattractive.
/r/seduction03/04/14 10:49 PM
0

He's possibly successful with rule one and two. Hence her possible willingness to look beyond the other crap.
/r/seduction03/04/14 08:58 PM
7

... Exactly.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 03:27 PM
1

I'm saying the situation didn't meet 'self defense' requirements. The self defense angle seems to be an after-the-fact attempt to get out of trouble.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 05:34 PM
1

It varies from city to city.
/r/seduction15/03/14 07:59 PM
1

Right.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:40 AM
16

They're saying that to try and justify the murder as a home invasion, else he's going away for a long time.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 07:06 PM
1

The boy was invited into the domicile by the daughter, subsequently the father killed the boy. That's already enough to convict the father on. He's already guilty of murder or homicide if this is true. The only question here is whether the father's supposed ignorance of this circumstance enough to redeem his guilt by a jury. But, per the law he would be 'guilty' and can't claim the boy was an intruder due to his daughter's actions.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:58 PM
2

Ha. Nope! Lots of reasons why. Stuff like this is on the list.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:06 PM
3

That's a hard sell in this circumstance.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:58 PM
4

I think that's the dad's cover up story, because they both know he'll go to jail for a long time if they don't have a legit reason to kill him.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:49 PM
132

I really think the case is that: Dad killed the kid after becoming enraged. Dad knows laws, knows he just killed some fucking kid who was invited in their house. Dad told daughter to lie so he doesn't go to jail for killing the kid. Daughter is told to say she didn't know him. Dad now has chance at not being charged with manslaughter or murder.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:46 PM
-2

The law often has a twisted way of convicting people.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:41 PM
2

Can't upvote this one enough.
/r/seduction13/03/14 03:37 PM
1

That's basically the only demographic that doesn't get shit handed to them for nothing.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:33 AM
1

That's highly dependent on the organization. Most don't have "deep pockets."
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:33 AM
2

Fail? You just started school. You're not going to be a doctor with your first lesson.
/r/seduction25/01/14 09:55 PM
3

Support is based on theoretical days with the kid as written in a plan. Shared means he has some days, threshold variable in some states, with the kid. He could have 50 days in the plan, be given total of 350 by the mother, be paying 100% of child support because he doesn't meet the minimum in the support calculation and pay for all child care, education and medical care as ordered by the judge. It all sounds pretty reasonable and similar to what I had, but I had 2x that.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 11:50 PM
1

It ruins your battery life either way.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:01 PM
1

Correct.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 03:20 PM
1

If they're using DOS, they're in trouble.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 07:37 AM
1

Ever read the bible?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 04:20 PM
–

Guess I didn't catch the hypothetical context in which you were speaking.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:32 PM
–

People don't simply "not pay" child support. It will happen. The state will get their money.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:25 PM
–

if the man isn't paying for the child How adorable.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:19 PM
1

Tinder (smartphone app) is perfect for practice as well.
/r/seduction21/11/13 03:24 PM
5

A stupid, foolish mistake should not haunt some one for the rest of their lives and prevent their future prospects in 20 years time. It could easily be argued that tricking someone into conception and having a child falls under that category.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 04:40 PM
1

If it isn't a ruling, there's nothing to appeal?
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:09 PM
1

That's simply a form of projection.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 04:59 PM
7

Forced penetration is rape. Tie a guy down and give him viagra. 100% no debating that would be rape. It's possible, yet the current definition would exclude this scenario.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 10:07 PM
2

If we're talking about a house full of cats. Less.
/r/seduction06/10/13 05:31 PM
1

Might work if you were married to that one.
/r/seduction06/10/13 05:30 PM
2

This is how I survived going out in college college with little money.
/r/seduction27/09/13 02:24 AM
0

Says the guy who states "children" as a response.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 12:24 AM
-1

36% of families are under single parents. 19% of married couples have children. But, we're comparing single vs non-single. Not families vs single people. It's not a proper analysis if you're changing more variables.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 10:06 PM
-2

Being a single parent (with or without custody) is way more expensive than being a married parent. How is "children" even close to an argument?
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:06 PM
-4

Married men have a much greater need for a higher income than do single men How on earth is that true? Married people split costs for many items, especially large ticket items such as housing. Single people don't have that luxury.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:00 PM
13

Just remember, chances are this one wont work... Or the next one. Take them as it is, until it does, and don't let any of them get you down.
/r/seduction09/09/13 01:44 PM
5

He's not trivializing, but rather sarcastically restating the feminist response to this epidemic which trivializes the man's place as a victim in this circumstance.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 03:27 PM
5

Were all in this together!
/r/seduction05/08/13 02:35 AM
-2

Not some of the girls I've seen...
/r/seduction30/06/13 04:23 AM
–

So we have a plausible scenario. Is that what she's claiming? Or does it differ from her statements? I'm suspecting there's semantics at play and both sides are riled up regarding their own opinions regarding the definitions.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:50 AM
1

Because that's super easy to do!
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:55 AM
5

For permanent change, one does not simply "edit" wikipedia anymore.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:00 AM
2

Nice try Dorothy, this isn't OZ.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 01:05 AM
1

Crazy people. Yes, they're out there, and many don't have psychological triggers to blame it on.
/r/seduction23/03/13 04:34 PM
2

If you really want to know, get a pair of those tall shoes that Tom Cruise has; I'll wager things won't be that different for you.
/r/seduction04/03/13 03:05 AM
7

You're citing US laws and interpretations.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 04:29 AM
5

I think you're really failing to grasp how logic works in arguments...
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:42 AM
3

That's a national syndicate article, could have happened anywhere.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:37 AM
-1

What does that have to do with anything? Democrats don't control any legislative branch at the moment, so the fact they 70 whatever % favor it is moot.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:10 AM
4

When claiming support from the state they have to name a father. Doesn't mater if you are or not, they'll pursue you for CS.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:23 AM
1

Detroit, Flint or Saginaw.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:55 PM
6

Literary.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 04:44 PM
1

And honestly, the biggest thing is practice talking to people. Everyone. It's takes actual work and experience to get good at it. Practice being positive and confident, they'll both increase with experience. You'll get used to how to deal with people responding shitty, that happens. As you improve yourself, you'll notice improving their view and attitude toward you. Just takes time and experience, work your way from the bottom to the top. It will take a while.
/r/seduction20/01/13 06:40 PM
1

The great thing about getting fit is you don't need to join a gym. You can start with simple things like pullups and pushups.
/r/seduction20/01/13 06:28 PM
1

I'm sure you know, but medical MJ is really the best method to encourage eating for chemo patients. No other drug comes close to the efficency and lack of side effects.
/r/seduction20/01/13 05:12 PM
2

Biggest "player" I know is asian. He was a chump in highschool and decided to screw it, start working out and began talking to everyone for whatever reason. He said he just started with a smile and a confident random compliment with random people and that'd usually break into a short conversation, for practice. He's doing awesome now.
/r/seduction20/01/13 05:00 PM
2

"That law" is defined differently in each state. Most states have their own wording and clauses not exactly similar to the next.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 06:32 PM
10

"Well you see, I first complement her on her beauty, relative to the others in the room"
/r/seduction27/10/12 10:43 PM
1

... and then wait the 9months to years before anything gets settled.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 12:26 AM
–

That's an assumption that wasn't stated nor can be conclusively supported by the given data.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 07:38 AM
4

So by your logic, 84% of females shouldn't be wed because they aspire to stay at home?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:40 PM
1

Easily? Ha! Not in the US.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 05:35 PM
8

Sounds like he's doing all the chasing and they're catching on. Good opens but slowly crashes after... yep, sounds about right. He need to give more shit tests and have 'em validate themselves more.
/r/seduction16/09/12 05:04 PM
1

Yep. Just can't be used in court if you recorded your conversation. Check two party vs one party states.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 12:14 AM
1

Forcing someone to work for the sole benefit of the other party or risk punishment; that comes pretty damn close to slavery.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 01:56 AM
5

They give mothers a million chances or parents as a collective a million chances.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 08:45 PM
1

He tied manipulated and coerce you into sex. Still bad.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:11 AM
19

Problem is; the pre-college education is now geared toward methods that girls benefit from more than their male counterparts. This causes an unrepresentative ratio of females over males whom are best qualified to be accepted or continue into higher education. Also, this then renders the notion of "best qualified" to be subjective because it is based on a gender biased system.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:18 PM
4

And it works for that! Sometimes too well...
/r/seduction18/08/12 04:27 PM
2

You're tall. Easily gives you a million bonus points.
/r/seduction05/08/12 03:42 AM
2

Portland Oregon is good too if you're clean-cut non-hipster. Because there's so many of them here it really cuts down on the competition for other guys.
/r/seduction05/08/12 03:27 AM
2

Most successful 'player' I know is Asian. You shut your mouth, change yourself and your game.
/r/seduction04/08/12 04:14 AM
1

There's a whole world out there junior! You just got to pull ourself up by the bootstraps and experience it.
/r/seduction22/07/12 05:55 AM
1

This is more for r/Atheism or r/liberal than men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 02:27 AM
3

Personally I get REALLY insulted by the posts in here about men who have been fucked over by an ex, and use that behaviour as the standard for all women. It's not a standard for all women to behave this way and is never really described as being such; however, it's standard for women who behave this way to be supported by others and most importantly the legal system. The support by the legal system has the largest and most damaging effect on men. There is an extreme which they have to take it to…
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:07 AM
5

"The point I'm trying to make is that MOST of the issues that MRAs face are caused by shitty societal practices, and that those same ideas/practices also affect girls." The largest issues MRAs fight are not those of which would benefit females if they succeed, thus has not been in the interest of the larger feminist community to support these changes. Do they have an affect on women? Yes, but they also benefit women and thus no real incentive for non-egalitarian feminists to support the intended…
/r/MensRights30/06/12 12:56 AM
4

But not the waterpark.
/r/seduction28/06/12 03:28 AM
80

Seddit or PUA aren't the majority of people in real life.
/r/seduction20/05/12 02:31 AM
1

See, the classic definition of feminism is the umbrella that all feminists find protection, regardless of their true intents. It's a huge movement with a gigantic array of initiates but no real way to sort out which parts are which. There is no officially stated differentiable identifiers regarding the egalitarian feminists vs pure female betterment at any cost feminists (often the cost of degrading men). More significantly, there has been little within the greater movement to discourage the 'be…
/r/MensRights04/05/12 10:51 AM
1

Also, don't comments in people's feeds show as a portion of the entire comment? So your first sentence might have been the only portion that people were reading. Without the rest of your paragraph, it sounds pretty bad.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 05:18 AM
1

So, I think you might have a real problem with semantics. Your phrase "I refuse to respect you because you have a vagina," has an entirely different meaning than what you intended to write. You should have said some thing like "I refuse to give respect based on gender" or similar. Instead your sentence read; "I don't respect you because you're a woman" and are now confused why people de-friended you. Most people realize that the context would alter the meaning for the most part. TLDR; what you s…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 04:45 AM
18

This is the "No True Scotsman" fallacy.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 08:32 AM
13

You must be from Denver.
/r/seduction13/04/12 01:11 AM
3

And to be fair, they are probably not hanging about in this sub-reddit. You wouldn't believe the trolls that come here! It's a real magnet for people who want to see it go down in flames.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 06:11 AM
1

Re-locate into a state that does work better. Do some research.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 12:40 AM
1

That's not possible unless she has your apple ID and Password.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 12:38 AM
5

Passing kidney stones is worse than childbirth; that's what women who've done both say. It's likely worse for men because there is 4x the travel in the male urethra.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:23 PM
1

Don't live in Colorado, she can divorce you even if you never get married.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 05:06 AM
0

Cool story.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 04:38 AM
3

Yep!
/r/seduction27/03/12 03:29 AM
4

You know.. and he's actually not bad looking. Passes rule #1 and #2.
/r/seduction26/03/12 10:32 PM
2

Bread on the other hand...
/r/MensRights26/03/12 09:45 AM
1

Sure would!
/r/seduction18/03/12 10:51 PM
1

Of course Tyler did better! He looks a million times better than the other guys. You have to tailor your game to who you are, not him. For a lot of us, we probably identify more with the other guys. All techniques don't work equally for everyone. A lesser attractive person can't just open with sign octant touching like Tyler can.
/r/seduction17/03/12 09:57 AM
1

Hahhaha, like that will do a single thing.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:03 AM
2

Honestly, this is another example of why we need national healthcare like the rest of the developed world. But alas, there are so many out there who are disillusioned that it might cost more money than the absurd system we currently have.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 01:33 PM
1

Huh?
/r/MensRights09/03/12 10:02 AM
4

What state can you request receipts?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 05:34 AM
1

Isn't this basically 'The Graduate', but with in-laws and not family friends?
/r/MensRights24/02/12 10:09 AM
2

This scenario doesn't sound plausible in the least.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 09:47 AM
2

Sounds like the same despicable reasoning behind rape.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 01:53 AM
2

Either extreme immaturity or a saboteur. I'm leaning toward the latter, especially with the frequency it happens in this subreddit vs general. Actually, I'm sure those from the SRS group could easily fall into both categories.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:02 AM
3

I'm not a big fan of the guy, but if you follow closely, he's getting screwed from the party and media pretty overtly. There a lot of shady and down right wrong things happening to try and keep him out. You really can't argue that it's remotely subjective or not occurring with the frequency of blatant negative unfounded bias thrown at him, misleading editing, leading questions, off-color commentary, camera tricks, ignoring him, ect... and all purporrated by the larger media groups. Even in the p…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:59 AM
11

Whooooo let the trolls out!? WHO, WHO, WHO-WHO?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:04 AM
1

-Earl the Crackhead
/r/seduction09/02/12 10:49 AM
1

That is the tip of the ice burg as to how fucked up the laws are here.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:24 AM
2

Both fucks.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 10:09 PM
2

Circular reasoning here. Women have greater commitment to children because they win in court. They win in court because they have greater commitment. It's difficult to take an article seriously with faulty reasoning. The rest of the assertions are all speculative with no evidence.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 07:51 PM
1

Johnny Ives turned the company around with the i products. Ives created them all.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 10:07 PM
5

One idiot sent a incredibly stupid email, thus they condoned it? Isn't that a bit of an assumption? "Had he been part of an honorable fraternity he would have known that wouldn't fly in the first place." Again, aren't you assuming that there isn't a single bad apple of any reputable bunch?
/r/MensRights19/12/11 09:26 PM
8

Good luck in jail after they tried you as an adult for attacking them.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 12:39 AM
2

It's not a lifetime earning potential thats being argued. If you look at earnings for comparable jobs (same hours, commitment, position, etc... ) women are earning more than their male counterparts. A study was done in the US where it showed that young women earn 15% more. Also, even if women do better than men at school now, it is because schools are more accommodating to methods that favor female learning abilities. It used to be that schools leaned toward methods that favored males.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 10:01 AM
2

He flat out told her. Dishonest? Because she didn't probe further when he told her it wasn't possible? Now it's his fault?
/r/MensRights30/11/11 07:44 AM
31

"But later it was discovered she wasn't happy in her relationship, so charges were dropped."
/r/MensRights30/11/11 02:47 AM
1

The force of reading comprehension is not strong with some it appears.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:01 AM
1

The baby looks like the doctor, weird.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 06:58 PM
1

Luck.
/r/seduction17/09/11 06:51 PM
1

Being part of your family or not, you're still their caretaker. You might not like the sound of the word, but the reality is it would be neglect if you didn't provide the necessary care as their caretaker. They're not contributing the same as if it were another person living in your household. Thus, you cannot use the same calculations to determine the cost of children vs household members in another situation. Yes, they cost money, but the calculations used give costs that are far and beyond th…
/r/MensRights10/04/11 04:20 AM
1

Their fair share isn't the same as additional costs of 'ownership'. That's where your math is falling apart. Kids aren't roommates, you're their caretaker. Big difference. Say you live in a million dollar house, they didn't cost you $600,000 to live there. That's a big mathematical flaw. The unfortunate thing is; whoever calculated CS payment rates can't tell the difference either. If you are spending $50k of $100k a year on your kids, you're completely horrible at personal finance. Then we're t…
/r/MensRights09/04/11 06:58 AM
3

$32,000 a year? So, your children must cost you around $47,000 per year... right? I call bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 05:34 AM
18

The problem is: children don't cost that much money. The numbers for calculations used are way beyond the actual cost of maintaining children. Can you honestly say that a responsible family would spend $2.6 thousand dollars per month on their children?
/r/MensRights07/04/11 09:39 PM
2

So what are the best body language books / learning materials?
/r/seduction31/03/11 01:59 PM
-1

It seems this is a hypothet-o-troll. Claiming a hypothetical situation as reality to see how MR reacts.
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:37 AM
3

Sense, this post makes none. It's like talking to a mean cleverbot.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 10:04 AM
4

Troll post smells of troll.
/r/MensRights27/03/11 09:57 AM
1

Just dont get her knocked up, and dont get her pregnant Am I missing an other part to the birds and bees story?
/r/MensRights20/03/11 10:37 PM
1

Napoleon, you're just jealous because I've been talking to hot babes all day.
/r/MensRights20/03/11 10:36 PM
2

You don't have hands!
/r/seduction04/03/11 02:41 PM
3

Just remove it. Automatically saved passwords on a computer is not implied consent. Accessing someone else's private email or electronic messages without explicit consent is a class 3 felony under wiretapping laws. You "saw facebook replies" would be ambiguously legal and acceptable. How about: just don't say nobody warned you.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 11:52 PM
2

HIGHLY unlikely. As he stated: it was automatically saved on the computer which is not implied consent. Thus wiretapping laws have been broken.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 11:52 PM
-4

Yea, delete the facebook part. Felony.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 12:06 PM
7

I'm in nearly exactly the same situation as you. I'm required to make that exact same trip 11 times a year, per the court. My support is $1,100 and I make about the exact same amount of money as you. I was determined to be the more stable parent and recommended to keep the children per the family investigator; the judge basically said 'screw that.' And since my twins have been in and out of other families homes because the mother can't keep a job or act financially responsible.
/r/MensRights15/02/11 07:43 PM
2

Agreed. Slashdot.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 04:04 PM
2

Now that's true love.
/r/seduction02/02/11 03:12 PM
1

To call a 17 year old a 'child' is misleading.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 05:30 PM
1

The "inherent nature of a relationship" is the whole point of my posting, something that an age can't quantify. I'm saying a 16 year old and a 19 year old is a normal natural relationship, or a 15 and a 17. There are people going to jail over these very situations and I think that isn't right. There isn't a magical line at 18 or 16 were everything is ok, that's my point. And we shouldn't destroy the lives of those who are otherwise capable of normal bonding.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 04:55 PM
1

/s
/r/MensRights01/02/11 04:21 PM
1

It can also be said that women on men violence is significantly underreported because of sex roles.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 04:15 PM
2

That's why education, parenting and community are important. Youth are much more capable of reasoning than many people give them credit for. To simply discredit someone because of their age/race/gender/orientation is close minded and unnecessarily limiting.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 04:12 PM
1

Turning harm or battery into "natural male aggression" can easily be considered to be a sexist remark, women are just as capable to be the purveyors of bodily injury. I realize you weren't thinking you were sexist in the least when you said it.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 03:58 PM
0

I'm saying your point of over limiting others, while under-considering their own abilities to learn what is appropriate, is inappropriate.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 03:48 PM
1

Current American taboos are too strong to answer this without having a seemingly negative connotation it appears. I think the over-hyped fear of predation overshadows the ability for consent and mutual love which leads us to over persecute or limit what would otherwise be natural. I'm saying the natural born laws of attraction are adequate for someone to know what they think is appropriate. The 65 year old with the 30 year old doesn't always appear to be normal, but occasionally there is a natur…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 03:22 PM
0

Now, you're moving on to the most important side of the coin. Education.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 03:10 PM
3

When it becomes unnatural. When the lovers aren't obviously reciprocating a mutual love an affection, instead have a one sided obsession. Basic attraction and neurologically based biological limitations are naturally occurring phenomenon within the human. Too often societies overlook this and redefine their own arbitrary limitations, such as the American 18 because that's when the average student finishes high school. People are capable of defining what they want and almost every person you enco…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:43 PM
1

Sex happens when you're developed and have hormones. Well, maybe not for you, but it doesn't give you any right to tell the rest of the world how they're doing something wrong because it doesn't fit what you think is right. And it's not a stain, it's called human nature. You can get all red in the face about it, but nothing you're saying or doing will change human nature.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:31 PM
2

"precocious sexuality is one of the scourges of Western civilisation" And right there is when you lost all credibility. On the other hand, women who show their ankles is the other scourge.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:04 PM
2

And female.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:03 PM
4

To be honest. It's pretty normal as far as the entire human race and history is concerned. That's why it's pretty disheartening when people make comments of this nature.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:01 PM
1

But that takes... well, style. You're not born with style. Some guys are born fabulous, but they're playing a different game.
/r/seduction28/01/11 04:19 PM
2

6'+
/r/seduction27/01/11 09:45 AM
10

Women more likely than men to fake lots of shit.
/r/MensRights23/01/11 02:04 PM
1

No, statistics can appear to imply different things based on how the metrics are compared, calculated or displayed.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 05:22 AM
2

... And one with a horrible personality at that. Looks like you've saved 'em some time.
/r/seduction02/01/11 12:02 PM
2

So how is Oregon different? I may be headed to family court there.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 11:30 AM
1

DOCUMENT EVERYTHING. DOCUMENT DOCUMENT DOCUMENT!!! Get video, audio. Writing. Find out explicitly what the law allows you to do in your area to gather any evidence on her. Have him keep an explicit journal. DO ALL OF THIS. It will be EXTREMELY useful in court. (where it is undoubtedly heading) I went through damn near this exact senario. I didn't document enough, and the judge felt that the mother deserved a second chance. And once the primary parent was set, the court is extremely difficult to …
/r/MensRights25/12/10 09:17 AM
0

C'mon now. This isn't XX.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 09:11 PM
11

Or dressed in all black with the little white neck tie thing.
/r/MensRights18/11/10 07:06 PM
4

I think he's talking IRL social life. I know, I was confused too.
/r/seduction13/11/10 11:47 PM
1

Driving: men pay more. Health: women pay more.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 02:30 PM
5

Congress park area. Nice.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 02:14 PM
3

Oh, and this has all taken place in a little over two years. But hey, if you're anywhere near Denver we should get a beer sometime.
/r/MensRights06/09/10 02:10 PM
6

Man, I'm only 28 and going through almost all this in Colorado. Luckily I realized what she was like and didn't end up marring her after we had twins by accident. No alimony here, just everything beyond rent and food goes to support. I've been fighting tooth and nail, all my money I had ever saved gone fighting for my kids. Even though the court ordered family investigator found me to be the most stable parent (by far), they gave her the kids and let her move to Oregon with a per-diem job which …
/r/MensRights06/09/10 01:43 PM
5

Japan doesn't!
/r/MensRights06/09/10 01:24 PM
3

And if 1% of the population had STDs, people would start wearing condoms during sex...
/r/MensRights27/08/10 08:59 AM
2

Rule one for getting laid. Do not hang out on IRC.
/r/seduction10/08/10 01:02 AM
-7

Because: "Niiiiiice!" *Apparently nobody got the southpark reference... sigh.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 11:44 PM
3

It puts the lotion on before it gets off the bus!
/r/seduction02/08/10 09:32 PM
2

We should all hang out.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 10:05 PM
4

Sad that she doesn't know the statistics of pornography usage resulting in sexual offenders is quite contrary to her beliefs.
/r/MensRights29/06/10 10:04 PM
12

"If you don't want to risk having a child, don't have sex." That is an overly simplistic view on a complex issue. You're (theHM) completely ignoring the existence and need of desire in relationships and the variations on self control. We all know how well abstinence education works.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 05:34 PM
1

The text before this puts her "But if it involves beer and relaxing I'm down" into context.
/r/seduction22/04/10 11:12 PM
14

28
/r/MensRights05/04/10 03:43 PM
2

Resources? Like: A high school, a convertible, nice cloths and money?
/r/seduction05/03/10 09:50 PM
2

Ugg.. that's the effects of Ritalin when used on the wrong people. It has the opposite effect as if it were on a truly ADD person.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 10:27 PM
3

So by that math, when you're 2 you can date someone who's 8... Big pimpin'!
/r/seduction20/01/10 05:41 AM
12

Poor choice of graphs.... C'mon now!
/r/MensRights20/12/09 04:58 AM
9

Leaving him $58/week to live on is still crazy. Although I guess it's not much different than my situation leaving $87/week after living expenses (rent and util) and a $900 CS payment. To top it off I've been fighting to just see my kids from the beginning. That's not including how I'm supposed to maintain a fully stocked home for them when they come.
/r/MensRights03/12/09 06:56 AM
1

Record the conversation.
/r/MensRights14/11/09 08:06 PM
1

If she's ugly then it's an attack. Niiiice.
/r/MensRights09/11/09 05:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter